Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/D5-Mantis Patrol Craft


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

D5-Mantis Patrol Craft
Ok, maybe i've got one this time
 * Nominated by: GTQ 23:48, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Like your last nomination, it is currently impossible for this article to reach comprehensive status because it will appear in a upcoming canon release.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 04:32, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Is there a rule against that? I think it's probably wise not to nominate it, but the sheer fact that something is going to appear in the future shouldn't be reason not to CA something. In other words, what's the harm CA'ing the article now but then revisiting if and when more information comes available? ~ SavageBob 07:08, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **According to Toprawa during a discussion in IRC, this is the intention of rule 5. Besides, it can hardly be called comprehensive when new information is so obviously on the horizon.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 08:03, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Yes. It seems almost like lying; "We know everything already" is the message the reader will get from seeing the 'comprehensive' box. Didn't think that IRC discussion would ever come up again.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 04:57, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Trayus
 * 6) *I can say with certainty that this article is not comprehensive in its coverage of the subject. There is much information missing, and if it were truly comprehensive then it would easily be in GA territory. Like, Quesh, the EC will allow you a day or two to get this article in proper running shape before starting a vote to remove the nomination. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 22:37, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I made a number of edits to this article.  As a reminder, for future articles, when using the possessive form of "it," it is "its," without the apostrophe.  The addition of the apostrophe contracts "it is" to "it's."  After the formatting and grammar edits, I would have considered supporting this article, but for the reasons that Olioster has mentioned, I cannot.  So, I am simply going to inform you of the changes made.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:55, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Removing per EC consensus. 1358  (Talk)  06:16, March 14, 2011 (UTC)