User talk:Jack Nebulax

Hello,. Welcome to my talk page.

NOTE: Due to recent personal attacks, my talk page can only be edited by registered users. Sorry for any inconvenience.

Archived talk: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13

Blocked, again

 * You know, I'd get into the whole quality thing, because I don't think you have a leg to stand on there, but that's not even the question anymore. That's just what got me fed up enough with your nonsense to take action. Your sense of complete ownership of this wiki and blanket reversions of any changes to your edits without even looking at them are juvenile and unacceptable. You pick almost exclusively on anons or lesser-established users to revert, and when anyone puts up a fight you keep pushing, thinking that you'll keep going when they give up. You're not interested in being right, but in having the last word. If anyone does call you on it and put up serious resistance, you run off crying harassment and namecalling and poor poor picked-on me or you throw a hissyfit and leave . . . for a week. It's classic bullying behavior. I've had enough. The Jack Nebulax drama show is over. It's not about Parck. It's about your complete inability to get along with others and behave in a mature manner. It's about your using this wiki as a stage for your ego. It's about the fact that you're a chronic edit-warrer who has been called on it time and time again and each time you promise you'll change and you come back saying you changed and you'll try and you haven't changed a damn bit except for one day of contrite behavior, and then back into the swing of things. Enough. Enough. I told you to stop the edit-warring. You didn't. You've been blocked eight times, seven of them for edit warring and five of those within the last six months. You're not learning. Apparently, you can't learn. You're done. Crying and moaning looking after some sort of compromise won't help you. Your history has demonstrated that it's just enabling you. Havac 00:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

This is not personal. You save us a lot of work patrolling the RCs, and we seem to have compatible views on a number of issues, so I certainly don't have an overwhelming desire to kick you out. You may have forgotten that I was happy to vote for you for WotM back in 2006, and I have been in your camp on a number of consensus tracks and talk page discussions, and I do not regret that. But Havac's points are hard to argue against. I've watched the cycle in action for too long. You need to cease your constant efforts to have the last word or the top edit. You need to give anons the benefit of the doubt more often. And most of all, you need to understand that you are neither greater nor lower than any other user in the eyes of the community and its laws. Your tenure does not give you any special privilege. I have no particular desire to see that tenure end, so I have agreed with my fellow administrators on this compromise. Take this week to consider your position, and do not force us to take action again. The next time we do will be the last. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 18:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Because some people believe a permanent ban is not yet warranted, your block has been shortened from infinity to one week. This, I fear, is merely delaying the inevitable. When you return, which I know you will, your actions will be watched more closely. The very next edit war you get into, the very next personal attack you post, will be the end of your time here.

I thinnk all of you are crazy! Jack never did anything wrong!ruusan 02:36, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It's in the past now, Ruusan. I did do many things wrong, and I got what I deserved. I appreciate your concern, though. And thanks for the Wookiee Cookie. ;) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 14:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

hello
hi im new.wookiepedia is great!!! Imperialwalker 23:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Welcome back, Jack
Hey, Jack, just wanted to say welcome back after that long ban.--Darthtyler (talk) (HSM RKY) 01:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I second that motion. Welcome back, Jack. Erik Pflueger [[Image:Republican Emblem.png|20px]] 01:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Hopefully, the forum discussion will end soon. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 13:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You do understand, though, Jack, that even if the discussion turns out to be in your favor, they'll be watching you like a hawk now. As your friend, who genuinely likes you, who stood up for you in a crunch as best as I could given the circumstances, and who owes you the honest truth as I see it, I'm telling you this: the long knives will be out for you if you make the slightest misstep after this. Whatever it is they think you keep doing - and I've never experienced it because you and I treat each other on a different and more cordial level - you MUST stop it. Whatever new leaf they want you to turn, you MUST turn it. I won't be able to defend you if it should happen again, and it was a real challenge THIS time. And regardless, they'll be tightening the punishments for things like this; whatever happens, if you're not walking on eggshells with these people, you'll be getting bans of weeks or months. Or maybe the most outraged of them will finally get what they want and perma-ban you. They'll do it. I don't doubt that others, such as administrators or even your enemies, would have said the same thing in time, but I felt you needed to hear from your friend first. I DO have your best interest at heart here, and it's in your best interest to be allowed to stay. Therefore, it's in your best interest to fundamentally change your approach. Whatever this "always has to have the last word" things is about, it has to end. Whatever this "3RR repetition" thing is, it needs to stop. Because if not, they WILL NOT stay their hand again. You WILL be finished. Please consider that, if only for my sake. I've lost enough friends in my life recently, for various reasons; I don't want to lose you too. Erik Pflueger [[Image:Republican Emblem.png|20px]] 16:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, Erik. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 17:19, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * what the heck did you do to get blocked for so long???? Imperialwalker 19:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I did too many wrong things. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 21:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Welcome back as well, Jack. I hope that you do change your ways, because I value you for your persistance in answering to talk pages and cleaning up articles. Unit 8311 10:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 16:30, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Grand Admiral Article
I noticed the addition of references to the Grand Admiral article and I think that puts it into GA territory. I'd be happy to support a nom for it if you'd like to offer it up for a vote. --School of Thrawn 101 05:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd definitely vote for it. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 13:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Jack

 * Hey jack I know this might be late but I dont really come here anymore but welcome back. Also I havent seen you at SW fanon but your article is now on the main page and thing are going well, but sadly Ive been blocked at SW fanon which will end at 5:27 am today. Well see ya just wanted to pop in and say hi, also I'm a admin and buericrate at the new transfanon wiki too just to let you know. well see ya. (Please leave responce on my SW fanon talk page since I'm way to lazy to check back here).Troyb(CIS ShadowFeed) contribs[[Image:Troyb2.jpg|20px]] 02:01, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Good to here from you, Troyb. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 00:01, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Its nice to hear from you to admiral. You know we should create an article together a SW fanon, something like an imperial or sith lord. We are such good friends yet weve done nothing together. Also I remember user:Rune Haako on my first day here, where is he anyway?Troyb(CIS ShadowFeed) contribs[[Image:Troyb2.jpg|20px]] 01:14, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * An article sounds good. We'll have to work on the details, though. As for User:Rune Haako, I haven't seen him around. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 12:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Voss Parck

 * May I remind you that this article is what got you in trouble in the first place? You've already been told to stay away from that article by an admin, and as far as I'm concerned it's for the best. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 20:18, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Ataru, I did nothing wrong; therefore, I cannot be banned for my edits. In addition, this is a website that "anyone can edit"; therefore, being told by an admin to stay away from an article when I'm not doing anything wrong is against the principle about wikicities. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 21:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, in all fairness, I didn't actually look at the revisions, I was informed that it was the same kind of controversial edit that had gotten you into this mess in the first place, and I was merely trying to forestall an edit war. Second, not everyone has the same view about following policy or interpreting policy as I do. Third, um, there have been numerous cases where admins have asked users to stay off talk pages and articles because of edit warring. Just ask Silly Dan. Or, for the flip side, Tnu. Anyone can edit anything, but the stability and civility of the community must be maintained. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 16:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Ataru, do you really think I'd suddenly go back to my old self now? &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 23:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Jack, I've already spoken to Ataru on your behalf regarding this matter, explaining the nature of the edits, and that they were good ones. As a result, he looked over the edits and concluded you did nothing wrong. He's already said he was reacting on impulse, both to me and to you. That's a noble and honest concession coming from an admin. Give something back to him now, and at least concede that you understand where he was coming from when he did it. It's not a question of whether he thinks you'd backslide or not; there have been any number of others who have backslid and given him good reason to be cautious with everyone, not just you. It's not his job to measure anyone's intent; it's to maintain order. And you'd have to admit, going right back to the same page that got the whole fracas started can be seen by others as provocative, whether it's meant to be or not. That's not smart to do when feelings are still sore. My advice as a friend: call it a lesson learned and just let the matter drop. Erik Pflueger [[Image:Republican Emblem.png|20px]] 00:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not trying to be rude, but Ataru should have checked my edits before he started this topic here. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 14:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Ataru's only human, Jack. And after what the Pedia's been going through for more than a week now, you're not in a position to take the moral high ground. Let it go. No more comments, no more "last words." Just please be humble and drop it. Erik Pflueger [[Image:Republican Emblem.png|20px]] 14:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Erik, I'm not creating a conflict here. I was simply stating that I did nothing wrong on the Parck article. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 14:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I know you're not, and I know you didn't do anything wrong with your edits. I'm just saying that it was just poor judgment to go to the Parck page even if you ARE blameless, especially after what's bveen happening, and you really need to just put it to bed. That's all. Between the two of us, for the first time, I'm actually seeing this thing that others have complained about, this so-called "need to have the last word." And I have to say, it's not the Jack I know and love. There's no need to defend yourself every time I say something. As I've said before, just be gracious to Ataru and call the matter over. And then we'll all move on. Happy-happy, joy-joy. :P Erik Pflueger [[Image:Republican Emblem.png|20px]] 15:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Erik, you have to understand this: I settled this with Ataru on IRC, and I have to say that you seem to be taking this a bit too seriously. Keep in mind that I'm not trying to be mean; we're friends, Erik, and I appreciate that. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 19:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Jack, considering that I've been on the front lines for a week or more, defending you with what little ammunition I had against a far louder and stronger number that wanted your head, can you blame me for being serious? I meant everything I said when I welcomed you back: they WILL take you out permanently if there's one nmore problem. I'm being serious now because we ARE friends, and I appreciate THAT. I want you to be able to stay. Better me being a pain in the butt than you being permabanned, because those seem to be the only options. Erik Pflueger [[Image:Republican Emblem.png|20px]] 20:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, I never said you were a pain in the butt. ;) And Erik, you can relax, because I'm not going to screw up. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 23:13, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

GA Core Forces Edit
Thanks for editing that anon bit in the Core Forces article. I saw that this morning on my way to work and hoped that someone would fix it before I got off. Kudos! AdmiralNick22 01:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. And if he puts it back in without providing a source, I'll remove it again. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 01:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, it seemed kind of a silly edit. The only compromise I can think of it to change it from saying "Defense Fleet" to "Defense Force". That way the more encompasing "Defense Force" leaves no doubt that starfighters and possibly some army units also joined the Core Forces. It may not be a important distinction (given the fact that authors seem to use both interchangably), but it may prevent the anon from doing it in the future. AdmiralNick22
 * I suppose that would work. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 01:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, I meant that the anon edit was silly, not your revert. I don't knwo if the wording was clear. AdmiralNick22 02:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't worry. I knew what you meant. ;) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 14:50, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Vengeance (Jerec's Super Star Destroyer)
Sure thing. When it is changed to the effect is to hide the actual location of the page. When linking to the page, people are more likely to link simply to Vengeance leading to the disambig page. The other alternative to using PAGENAME is to use. --Eyrezer 03:22, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Problem is, though, it makes it seem like that whole thing is the actual name of the ship, rather than just "Vengeance". &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 14:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd tend to think people are smart enough to work out that's not the case, especially when the text of the article only uses Vengeance etc. --Eyrezer 01:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Still, I don't like the idea of italicizing all of it. Would work, as you suggested? &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 01:23, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure. --Eyrezer 03:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Excellent. We'll need to do that for every ship article with the name followed by extra information. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 14:22, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Howeye.
Em, I was gonna tell/ask you this on swfanon but I saw a link to your page to thought, why not ask you here. yeah, so; I had this idea for a good fanon story a couple of days ago but wasn't really bothered writing it until today when i was inspired (yeah inspired) by jacks story so started it. long story short, a few pages in, i needed to come up with an admiral who was clever, cunning, feared, respected, ambitious, etc. but could not think of anyone because everything i came up with was GA J Nebulax, GA J Nebulax, GA J Nebulax. he was so perfect for the part (it was set in 3ABY) so i decided to stick him in and ask you later - but thats not what this is. anyways, HUGE story short, out of desire to write fanon that was not at the expense of canon, i changed the story so it was 3121BBY and had to change suprisingly little. GA jack nebulax changed to supreme admiral of the GSA (great sith armada) Gydon Nebulax and i might even give him a proper role as a sith lord. basically im asking could i give jack an anscestor on swfanon? or even reference him but not give him a part? the "book's" called Harbingers of the Force. Tutos Lumenarious 22:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It's actually funny that you should mention an ancestor of Jack. Having recently beaten KotoR, in which I used the name "Drak Nebulax", I thought about giving Jack an ancestor. Gydon Nebulax would be perfect, and that would give Jack two ancestors (I'm working on a separate Drak Nebulax character right now). After I'm done working on Drak Nebulax, we can try to come up with a way to relate Drak and Gydon, in addition to Jack. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 15:46, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * AND, funnily enough, the main character in this "book" is to be a descendant of the guy i origionally made up for kotor. Do you think a nickname 13 words long would piss off too many contributors? 20:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Will you be posting this "book" on the Fanon wiki? &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 21:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That was the plan but i think it might be irregular to have IT rather than a summary, which will be done at least by the time i finish the book. i dunno what to do with the actual book. any ideas? Tutos Lumenarious 02:19, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Gossam
why did you remove the paragraph about the clone wars in the Gossam page? I'm trying to get it ready for GA, and due to limited sources, I think it should include as much detail and information as possible. thanks for the cleanup work,  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 22:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The paragraph you are referring to isn't relevant to Gossams, only the Commerce Guild. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 22:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * you're right. Do you mind if I add in a line or two about how the Commerce Guild, and thus the Gossam, joined the CIS. Once again, thanks for the cleanup work, [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 22:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know if that's a good idea. Just because a group led by a Gossam joined the CIS doesn't mean the entire species did as well. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 22:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * you're probably right. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 22:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm just informing you that, after getting a second and third opinion on the IRC, i re-added the Commerce Guild/CIS/clone wars info into the history section on the Gossam article. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 22:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It has nothing to do with Gossams; therefore, I'm going to remove it again. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 01:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Jack, it does not have nothing to do with Gossams. It was an organisation led by Gossam which, if you've read the article, nearly every Gossam worked for for about 10 years of their lives. Gossams were not allowed on Coruscant. They were persecuted by the empire after the Clone Wars. It should stay. And other users have agreed with me on this. Please do not remove it. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 12:26, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I take it you haven't read the talk page for the article, then. If you had, you would have seen that I realized that it was necessary when Jorrel explained it to me. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 19:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * sorry I hadn't read the talk page. My apologies. Thanks, [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 21:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry as well. I was too harsh in my last statement. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 21:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * seeing as though you've taken interest in this article, I thought I' let you know that I've nominated it for GA. Thanks, [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 23:36, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * careful jacky. getting close to that perma ban that everybody wants for you so badly.
 * "Everybody" is an exageration. And who might you be anyway? &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 11:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Re:Grievous Quote
I removed it because I thought it's not really necessary, but I guess it could stay. It is a decent quote. I'll re-add it if no one else has already.  Chack Jadson  Talk 17:50, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. It's good to see that it's able to stay, without us having an argument over it. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 18:16, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Re:Admin
Thanks Jack :) Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 18:22, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

My edits

 * All I edited on your userpage was a rollback of another user, who has since been warned. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 00:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No need to explain, Ataru. ;) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 00:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Youre rankless

 * [personal attack removed]. 172.189.8.238 18:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * See WP:NPA. But I agree about the admin part. Thanks, [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 18:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * [personal attack removed]. 172.189.8.238 18:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

I agree there. De facto admins should be banned infinitely.  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 18:16, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * [personal attack removed]. 172.189.8.238 18:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * And with that, I will intervene and block the anon for personal attacks and vandalism of other articles. JK19BBY, leave Jack alone. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 18:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Here's the thing about this that I don't get: I removed the de facto admin box a while ago. Well, just as long as the anon is blocked and Jediknight19bby has been warned, I'm glad. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 19:31, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem- you're quite welcome. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 19:51, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

No problem
Fuggettabowdit! --School of Thrawn 101 14:11, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

R-Series
The reason I'm leaving the letter R off (for example: Category:R-series|2(S5)-series) is so they will be divided up by their number rather than having them all under the letter R. -- Reignfire 14:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, sorry about that. Go ahead and revert my edits on those articles. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 14:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Your request
Hey Jack, your request has been dealt with. Feel free to review it and forward any questions or concerns to my talk page, or via IRC. Cheers, Greyman ( Paratus ) 14:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey again, just letting you know that that anon thought he could continue with the conversation after the warning I left. He's been blocked for 1 month because of it. Thanks again for bringing this to my attention. Greyman ( Paratus ) 23:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * And thank you for blocking him. Now I can relax knowing that he's not going to be editting that talk page for a month. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 23:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. Greyman ( Paratus ) 23:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to the 181st
Hey Jack, I just wanted to let you know that the 181st is on my list of article to promote to GA and, eventually, to FA&mdash;since I'm pretty sure it's one of the articles you watch. I also just wanted to let you know that the edits you made, with regards to adding links to the references were unneeded in this instance. Although it is "undecided" here as per the exact policy, the references that you linked are already linked in the appearances and sources sections. As such, having the ref tags linked is kinda redundant. I don't mind ref tags having links, but only when they link to an appearance or source that is not listed in the article already. As such, I think I'll be working on this article on my subpage&mdash;and don't be surprised if I ask you for some factual help along the way :) Cheers, Greyman ( Paratus ) 15:33, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry; I was just editting them to make them like the references on numerous other articles. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 21:01, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, no problem at all Jack :) Also, if you know of any...hm, quality pictures of the 181st, they would be appreciated. I've never actually written about the "other" guys before, so any help would be welcomed. Cheers, Greyman ( Paratus ) 21:11, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't know of any good pictures. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 21:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: User:Cowcamp
Thanks for bringing that to my attention. The user in question has been given his last warning and been advised that any further fanon nonsense will be dealt with a lengthy block. Cheers, Greyman ( Paratus ) 14:37, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Palpatine
Is it SithLord990205 that keeps changing it? Greyman ( Paratus ) 14:17, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes. He's been doing it for quite a while now. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 14:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Sockpuppet
Jack, some People think I am a sockpuppet of yours. Could you please sort this out?ruusan 22:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Who thinks that? &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 22:38, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Jediknight19bby. To save us both from this, I am leaving wookiepedia. PS. It's on the admin forums as COPPA VIOLATION.ruusan 22:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Jediknight19bby apparently has a personal vendetta against me. See the above section titled "Youre rankless". And don't leave Wookieepedia because of this. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 22:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Specifically, the thread in question is here. jSarek 22:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I see. Well, since no one believes Jediknight19bby, I'm not going to post on it. No need to. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 22:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

TIE Interceptor
What didn't you like about the latest version?--MIS Tau 1 04:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't take this the wrong way, but it was kind of a mess. I'll admit that it wasn't the best idea for me to revert it, but I had some trouble in trying to incorporate both versions. I'll try again today. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 11:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
 * A bunch of us in IRC are discussing the article, instead of reverting it back every time it's edited. Perhaps you'd like to join us? Tread lightly. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:References

 * There is no policy one way or another, but I prefer un-linked references and I had the entire article (I think) referenced that way so I saw no need to link them. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 04:50, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Personally, I think the references should be linked, so people can just click on them there instead of scrolling up and looking for the link in the "Appearances" or "Sources" sections. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 12:26, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Sith Lords of Krayt's Order
My good admiral, there is no evidence that any of the "Unknown Sith" is Sith Lord. Therefore the category they are currently in is inappropriate. Would you kindly stop reverting my edits? Perhaps we should rename the category, but I thought it best to move them to the Sith acolytes and apprentices category, which currently holds such Sith from Darth Revan's times. Gorthuar 23:08, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No, because they are more accurately Sith Lords than Sith apprentices or acolytes. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 23:09, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I beg your pardon? Judging from their performance, they're half-trained minions. One thing we're sure of is that they are Sith. Unless they are explicitly named Sith Lords, we can't put them in such category. Gorthuar 23:15, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * And neither could we put them in a category for Sith acolytes and apprentices. If you must, make a "Category:Unnamed Sith of Krayt's Order" to put them in. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 23:17, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That will do. Thanks for your time. Gorthuar 23:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Hi

 * Hey Jack hows it going? I see you were not blocked for good, thats...good :P I was just here and wanted to say Hi to a friend. All of us miss you at SW fanon, hope you return soon.Troyb(CIS ShadowFeed) contribs[[Image:Troyb2.jpg|20px]] 23:58, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Good to hear from you, Troyb. I'm trying to fit in some time at the fanon wiki, but so far I can't. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 00:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Good to hear from you old friend. So you see I have now left wookieepedia (Check my user page) and I will only pop in once and awhile now. But hopefully you will find time soon. Also I have been named admin and admin appointer at Transformers fanon.Troyb(CIS ShadowFeed) contribs[[Image:Troyb2.jpg|20px]] 00:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Before I go for today (Possibly) I want to say that mayjor thing have been going on at SW fanon, we have a new voting system, clans are gone. Also C3POtheD has just got surgery. bye.Troyb(CIS ShadowFeed) contribs[[Image:Troyb2.jpg|20px]] 00:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Putting links in references
I'm not going to bother reverting it, but I think we've decided it's not really necessary to put links in the footnotes (as you did with your recent edit to Digger) unless you want to make a link to the article for a source which doesn't already appear in the "Sources" or "Appearances" section. Cheers, &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 01:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know who was in on that decision, but I certainly wasn't, and I'm pretty sure it was never a CT or anything. Footnotes should all be thoroughly linked. jSarek 01:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sure there's a discussion somewhere, but all I can find is Sourcing, which currently lists that question as "undecided". &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 01:27, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I actually don't think we have had a discussion on it all in one place, other than scattered bits in pieces across a number of talk and user talk pages. It's probably time we had something formal on the matter. jSarek 02:41, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Personally, I think they should all be linked. IMO, it looks more encyclopedic. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 12:20, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * This issue is finally being dealt with here. jSarek 00:32, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 00:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Skirting 3RR
Next time Goodwood tries adding the cleanup tag, let me remove it. I don't want to see you get banned when you're not in the wrong. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 22:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Will do. And thanks. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 00:19, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Good! Gooood!
Excellent, Jack! You found the stub tag on Palpatine! You are indeed among the most attentive Wookieepedians active. Bravo! (I won't do it again. Curiosity is satisfied.) Karohalva
 * I'm confused. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 11:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh well. No heed. Karohalva
 * Seriously, though, what was that about? &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 00:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I put a "stub" template on the Palpatine article just to see how alert we Wookieepedians are. One hour later you had found it and removed it. You get the Most Attentive Wookieepedian Award. Zaludt! Karohalva
 * Ah, I see. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 11:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

TIV
I disagree and would prefer to leave it written with "operations". I am not seeking to start a flame war about the semantics of the context of the use of the word, it is enough that it is mentioned in the actual reference source. Is this really a big deal to you?

Also, I don't see that you have any right to order me not to change it again... I mean seriously… what was that meant to be? (Some form of anonymous online bullying). Shiaic 14:53, 22 August 2007 (UTC)