Wookieepedia:Userbox proposal

This page is for the nomination of new userboxes.

Before you create
Before you propose a userbox, read the following:


 * 1) No nonsense or joke templates. What you think may be funny may not be to everyone else, so it's best to just keep it on your userpage.
 * 2) If you are creating a Star Wars themed userbox, try and keep it OOU (i.e. "This user is a fan of Jedi" is good, but "This user is a member of the New Jedi Order" is not).
 * 3) Any offensive/racist/provocative userbox proposals will be deleted on sight, and the user warned. If the user persists, he will be banned.
 * 4) Due to being inflammatory, any religious and political userboxes that are nominated here will be automatically rejected, so don't bother.
 * 5) When nominating a template, keep in mind that the template will be for community use, not just your exclusive use. As a rule of thumb, if you think at least 10 people will use your idea, nominate it. If not, it's best left as code on your userpage.

To use this page:


 * 1) Use the current date as a header, and add the code of the proposed userbox underneath (use the following syntax:  ).
 * 2) Multiple userbox proposals should be presented separately so that the community can vote on each userbox based on its individual merit. Up to three userboxes may be presented for approval under one vote, if and only if, they are closely related in theme or are proposed as alternatives.
 * 3) Add sections underneath for "Support", "Object", and "Comments". Your fellow Wookieepedians will use these sections to support, oppose, or comment on your design.
 * 4) Once a majority has been reached, and two weeks have passed, the userbox will be created as a template for use in the community. If the nomination fails, the template must not be created regardless. If it is, then it will be deleted on sight, and the offender warned.

Support

 * 1) Brain40 (Sarlacc victim chat) [[Image:sarld.JPG|29px]] 21:20, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Object

 * 1) We already have versions of these.  - breathesgelatin Talk 04:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) We have something similar to these.--Ranat 23 16:06, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) As above. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Slightly redundant, and I'm not too fond of those colours. Cortle Steeze 10:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Been there, done that.– 21:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Exactly. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Cutch 22:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) I love Star Wars costumes! --Brain40 (Sarlacc victim chat) [[Image:sarld.JPG|29px]] 19:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) These guys are awesome. Commander Darc  (GAR) [[Image:Galactic_Republic.JPG|20px]] 21:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Nighthawk leader 23:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5)  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 00:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) --Ranat 23 16:10, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 7)  Angel Blue  (Holonet)

Comments

 * Thought I'd put this up because of their charity work.Tocneppil 23:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Might want to change it to say "This user is a member of the..." Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 23:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * And the description might be unnecessary, since their article already details the information. Do we actually have 501st members on this wiki? I don't want to vote for it just because it's cool, if no one will use the template. -BaronGrackle 03:02, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well 'supports' was intended as shorter than saying 'is a member of', and I thought there would be members here (you know, fan crossover and all) but so far . . .Tocneppil 06:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

For

 * 1) Nighthawk leader 23:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Brain40 (Sarlacc victim chat) [[Image:sarld.JPG|29px]] 21:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --Ranat 23 16:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Against

 * 1) Please see User:Atarumaster88/Lightsaber userboxes.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 02:50, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Cutch 14:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Imp 15:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) No. I'm all for using Ataru's until sheer force of will makes them templates in spite of going against the established rules (ala the Star Wars innuendos "article"). -BaronGrackle 22:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Sorry, but I prefer AtaruMaster's, too. Jwebb13 [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 23:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) I'm not sure you can really be said to "support" a lightsaber form. Support is for factions and people. Cortle Steeze 21:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 21:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments

 * I have a question. Are the people voting against just voting against having any lightsaber boxes, or against these proposed boxes and for Atarumaster's? I think that needs to be clarified.  - breathesgelatin Talk 15:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I think we definately need to get some lighsaber userboxes passed, no matter whose they are -Nighthawk leader
 * Very true; I prefer AtaruMaster's color schemes, but these boxes are at least as necessary as any of the others used. Jwebb13 [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 02:45, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

For

 * 1) Only the top one. Brain40 (Holonet News) [[Image:Yuuzhan_Vong_Logo.jpg|19px]] 22:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Makes sense to vote for my own, top one. Reignfire 02:18, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Number Three only. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 21:40, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Nighthawk leader 03:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) --Ranat 23 16:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Against
If you make each picture different, than I will support.-- Brain40 (Holonet News) 11:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Havac 00:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) "This user thinks Kyle Katarn is the only one who REALLY stole the Death Star plans." "This user thinks HK-47 and IG-88 are the baddest motherboards in the galaxy." "This user thinks Dash Rendar should get to be a Jedi, too." Sorry, but there's no way we want to open Pandora's box to this kind of template. -BaronGrackle 22:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 22:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Have to agree with Grackle.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 00:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) I do too. It is fine to make and share such boxes individually if you like, but they do not need to be official userbox templates.  - breathesgelatin Talk 04:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) True. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 21:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
I know I should only put one up, but I wanted to see which one you guys liked the most and then that would be the one voted for. Also, I wasn't sure if this is allowed since it's based on one character rather than an affiliation. Reignfire 05:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If it must be one of these, the last one should be selected. Lorth Needa 10:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * What is it with you guys and Chiss? -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 04:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I removed the first two userboxes. I think the third one (current one) follows more along the lines of other userboxes already approved.  Reignfire  ( Holocron ) [[Image:Sithempire2.png|20px]] 03:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, as nearly as I know there's one "this user thinks" (clones) and over two dozen "this user supports". If you want to follow the already approved style, that's the way to go. Cortle Steeze 21:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

For

 * 1) Jwebb13 [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 03:00, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Breathesgelatin 03:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Although perhaps it needs a square picture? Cortle Steeze 17:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg|25px]] 17:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Havac 00:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) --Ranat 23 16:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 22:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Agin'

 * 1) It REALLY hurts me to vote against this, but show me that at least five people can put themselves in the category we had for this last time it existed, and I'll reinstall the template.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 00:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments

 * We used to have this anyway, it just got removed when fewer than five people were using it. Maybe it has a critical mass now? I know I have a version on my page. - Breathesgelatin 03:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It just struck me as odd that a major galactic power would not have an affiliatory userbox; even the Chiss have one, and the Yuuzhan Vong are nominated for their own. Jwebb13 [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 00:40, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the template will be restored when more than five people link to the category.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 21:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You know, I thought I was in that but I wasn't. Well, at least there are two of us now.  - breathesgelatin Talk 05:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, since people seem to want this, I have restored it temporarily. If the template (and category) get five users by the time this vote is over, the template can stay. If not, then it will be deleted again. (For those wanting to use it, the link is located at User Hapes  StarNeptune Talk to me! 01:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't the Hapes Consortium have a decent article before it becomes a template? -Nighthawk leader
 * That's irrelevant. And there are now 5 users in the category.  - breathesgelatin Talk 14:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

For

 * 1) Brain40 (Holonet News) [[Image:Yuuzhan_Vong_Logo.jpg|19px]] 00:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2)  Angel Blue 451 [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]](Holonet) 02:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Havac 00:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4)  StarNeptune Talk to me! 00:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Nighthawk leader 08:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6)  - breathesgelatin Talk 04:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) --Ranat 23 16:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Against

 * 1) Against - I don't like the picture... Relentless  Recusant [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] 19:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) They got their butts whooped. Commander Darc  (GAR) [[Image:Galactic_Republic.JPG|20px]] 02:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) I don't like the picture either. Lorth Needa 10:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
Take out the "mighty", then I don't have a problem with it. -  Angel Blue 451 (Holonet) 03:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * How does this look? Brain40 (Holonet News) [[Image:Yuuzhan_Vong_Logo.jpg|19px]] 17:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe use the Yuuzhan Vong Empire logo instead of the picture of the Vong warrior?  StarNeptune Talk to me! 00:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Already tried it, no one liked it. Brain40 (Sarlacc victim chat) [[Image:sarld.JPG|29px]] 10:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, personally I feel that since all the other faction userboxes use their logo, this box should too. Just for consistency's sake.  - breathesgelatin Talk 16:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree- It should be their logo, not a picture of a warrior -Nighthawk leader 07:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * How does this look? Brain40 (Sarlacc victim chat) [[Image:sarld.JPG|29px]] 00:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Tocneppil 06:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Support -  Relentless Recusant [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] 18:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Jwebb13 [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 03:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Nighthawk leader 10:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) --Ranat 23 16:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 10:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
Jwebb13 03:47, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I re-worded this one so that it shows support for smugglers and other fringe elements and will no longer be mistaken for a nomination template for Wookieepedia accolades. Sorry to all for the previous confusion.  (P.S., thanks to Tocneppil for the advice)
 * Glad I could help:)Tocneppil 06:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

For
Dude. All the way. All the way. Though instead of linking to LEGO Star Wars, I suggest you link to simply LEGO.-BaronGrackle 20:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks for pointing that out.Tocneppil 21:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Absolutely yes (there's a freakin' Star Destroyer set, for cryin' out loud!) Jwebb13 [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 21:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) This user's LSW sets have grown so numerous that he thinks they've started breeding (although he still can't afford an ISD). He supports it wholeheartedly. Cortle Steeze 13:55, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) *The ISD set comes with a Grand Moff Tarkin figure, no less. Jwebb13 [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 21:47, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Sounds cool to me. Brain40 (Holonet News) [[Image:Yuuzhan_Vong_Logo.jpg|19px]]
 * 5) *LEGO makes awsome Star Wars sets ! While I don't have any games,...Oh wait! Let me get on topic...As I am going to say,"While I don't see the point of making this a userbox,I do like this box. Not a bad idea at all !" — SWME
 * 6) Nighthawk leader 10:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Even though I created the thing, I didn't want to vote (just not that self-aggrandizing, I guess) -but if it gets it accepted for other users.Tocneppil 21:29, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) --Ranat 23 16:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Against

 * 1) While I do like LEGO games and figures, I feel that it's unnecessary. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 13:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Agree with Nebulax, it's kinda unnecessary. Lorth Needa 12:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) No.  Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 03:44, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Cute, but not needed. You're welcome to use it on your own page. - Breathesgelatin 20:54, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 5)  StarNeptune Talk to me! 00:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments

 * Well, if ANY of the collectibles templates are necessary, the LEGOs are. LEGO and Star Wars have produced unique combinations long before the games came out; there are LEGO figures for nearly every vehicle and major character. There have even been arguments on this very wiki over whether LEGO images should be used within specific articles. -BaronGrackle 17:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
 * "I feel that it's unnecessary." And how many of these userboxes really are necessary?--Darth OblivionComlink[[Image:Oldsith.png|30px]] 02:14, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Would the copyright hounds be on us if we used the Lego logo for the box, do you think? Cortle Steeze 17:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * We already have the LEGO logo on the wiki, at its page ("Lego-logo-179.gif", if someone wants to mess with the template). It saddens and confuses me, though, that this proposal seems to be failing. Consider: 1) LEGO has more right to a template than any of the action figure sets below (under September 7, 2006), all four of which are on the path to ready acceptance. 2) LEGO Star Wars is massive, reaching to physical figures and sets, internet movies, and a couple of the most successful Star Wars games today. 3) It even carries a small bit of controversy, as some on this site are in favor of using LEGO images of major events within main articles. -BaronGrackle 09:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * This is the alternate I came up with...

Cortle Steeze 10:55, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

For

 * 20:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 19:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Nighthawk leader 08:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) I hope you aren't offended, Tocneppil, but I have to go with the fun LEGO logo. -BaronGrackle 10:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) *I believe the appropriate word is, 'meh' :) I went with the Star Wars pic over the logo because it was Legos in a Star Wars pose. But no offense -I just hope this doesn't prevent a Lego userbox from getting accepted.Tocneppil 18:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) This wasn't meant to become a proposal yet, just an idea to bounce around, but seeing as people like it I'll stick my own vote in. Cortle Steeze 19:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) *For what its worth, your wording hits the nail on the head better than what I had -'though I still prefer the pic.Tocneppil 22:27, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

For

 * 1) Cutch 00:16, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Bub 00:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 11:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks 21:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Jwebb13 [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:11, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Brain40 10:48, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) (Only the blaster one; blasters rule and stand opposite to the Jedi) -BaronGrackle 15:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) SecondSight 17:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Mmm, nice. Cortle Steeze 13:55, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Well, I don't got anything against them, just that the Jawa box is more "on the subject" than the blaster. Lorth Needa 12:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Support Both -  Relentless Recusant [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] 19:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) I don't care for the second, but the Jawa one is good and regardless of it not being official I am going to put it on my page.--CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 11:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Nighthawk leader 10:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) --Ranat 23 16:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Against

 * 1) Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 04:43, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) (Only the Jawa one; Jawas rule, but lots of species do) -BaronGrackle 15:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) No blasters, no blasters!Havac 00:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
Well, I know the sarlacc userbox was a bust, but I know these won't be. Brain40 11:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Why oppose them, Neb? They have just as much a reason to exist as "This user supports Ewoks". Cutch 21:58, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Would anyone be opposed to swapping the DH-17 image in the blaster fan's userbox for one of a DL-44? It's a minor issue, unless you are a blaster fan. Jwebb13 03:10, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I've changed it. Brain40 10:42, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

September 7, 2006

 * Added

You know what&mdash;I'm Supporting it for once!

 * 1) O.K. It's been 3 weeks. I've waited long enough. Hope this one clicks everyone who lays an eye on it. Jabbathehuttgartogg  [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 23:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Cutch 23:34, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 23:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) I'm in; it helps to categorize a user's inner fanboy and show which aspects of this whole wonderful Wookiee world they're into. Jwebb13 [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 00:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Me too:) -but oh, those colors.Tocneppil 02:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) I'm in if you ditch that horrible pink and yellow. Havac 21:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) BaronGrackle 22:33, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 5)  Snoop  Talk to me [[Image:5n00p2.jpg |20px]] 18:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Yeah, but with the games, books and comics ones from below. Green tentacle 10:38, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Support all except the one with the user having no SW collection. Being a Star Wars fan does not imply you have to be a collector!!!!! KEJ 11:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) I agree with KEJ, but all the others are great! Could you perhaps add this userbox?

Taktwo 04:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) --Ranat 23 16:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Again I will object to it!

 * 1) Change the colors and size of the images and we'll talk. -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 02:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 18:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 04:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Per Sentry. - Breathesgelatin 17:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Nighthawk leader 23:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments to my creation

 * 1) Colors changed ; Pics. sizes fixed....... -- Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 03:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Ditched pink and yellow -- Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 21:21, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Forgot to make a no collection userbox. I that unfortunate case. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 22:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * My problem with this proposal is that there are simply too many userboxes being proposed at once. Please add your comments about a possible change in policy on the talk page.– 19:57, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Ummm... ROTS and Galactic Heroes in the same box? I'm somewhat insulted... It's like comparing a cap gun to a .45... Commander Darc (GAR) [[Image:Galactic_Republic.JPG|20px]] 02:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * OK. We now have versions of the comics, books, and games userboxes created. Here is my suggestion: why don't we just have ONE user box for all Hasbro collectors, symbolized by the Hasbro logo? Could someone make one?  - breathesgelatin Talk 05:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, some of us only collect vintage figures (made by Kenner), or the miniatures, or the larger, 12-inch figures. . . Tocneppil 05:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * My thinking exactly Breathesgelatin. I was actually going to create a 'Kenner' template last night, but I was having some computer trouble. I will see what I can do&hellip; – 06:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I figured out how to make them; please tweak if you can improve them any. To respond to Tocneppil, I really don't think we need such a huge diversity of userboxes. Hasbro is enough. For example, I only collect the Gentle Giant animated maquettes and no other of their lines, but I'd only support a userbox that was for Gentle Giant collectors generally... can't be overly specific in my opinion.  - breathesgelatin Talk 06:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, there are those who like being specific in their allegiances (supporters of Revan-era Sith, for example), and we are talking about 'user'boxes here; people want to personalize their userpages (which is why we have the astrology userboxes). And in some cases that can be helpful, say if someone wants to know if a Kenner Boba Fett figure was ever released with a missile-firing backpack, they'd want to go to someone who had knowledge specific to that area.Tocneppil 19:16, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Two Alternatives
Instead of the remaining unapproved collection userboxes, I propose only two, one for classic figures and one for contemporary figures. Please feel free to tweak if you can make them look better, I'm new to this.  - breathesgelatin Talk 06:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  - breathesgelatin Talk 06:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 08:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Further Discussion
What do you think of these tweaked versions?

– 08:29, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Better. Feel free to replace mine with those.  - breathesgelatin Talk 17:29, 21 October 2006 (UTC)