User talk:XXLVenom998

Re: New Year
Thanks, you also. :) &mdash; Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 04:39, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you as well. You too!  CC7567  (talk) 04:40, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

And a happy New Year to you, too! :D  Trak Nar  Ramble on 07:06, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Happy New Year, Venom! Thanks for the wishes. Also, a heads-up that you should remove the category from the bottom of your body armor workbench, as currently, the workbench is showing up in the actual Trash compactor. Cheers. Menkooroo (talk) 11:40, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Xd got it. You can check the page history to see what he did. Menkooroo (talk) 15:32, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Also a happy new year to you Greg! ' ℬiggestℒeo ' (ℳeeting ℛoom) 19:24, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

Categories
Your category for individuals killed by Darth Maul has been deleted. We do not, and will not, have categories like that. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 22:00, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Because, quite frankly, it's pointless and a waste of space. Such categories have been proposed in the past, but never implemented. A system like that would inevitably lead to the creation of single-member categories that would serve no purpose whatsoever. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 22:07, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Your objection is noted, but I will not be restoring the category per my statements above. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 22:14, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Be aware that recreating the category on your own, after its deletion and in direct defiance of an administrator, will be considered disruption and will result in a block from editing. If you wish to receive input from others on this topic, bring it up in the Senate Hall. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 22:27, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Since I found this conversation on my watchlist, allow me to offer another administrative opinion: we don't need it. Categorizing characters by who killed them is completely unnecessary, overcategorization, and a violation of the precept that Wookieepedia is not an all-inclusive trivia site. You're welcome to argue your case in the Senate Hall if you still want to, but the chances of getting anywhere with it are virtually zero. I would advise you to simply drop it. &mdash;MJ&mdash; War Room 23:11, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Venom, your opinion of administrators like Master Jonathan and myself is disturbing. Frankly, it is childish of you to accuse the both of us of being, in your own words, "'delete-everything-that-non-administrators-created' admins" simply because we don't agree with you. Furthermore, it is the job of an administrator to give an opinion on any issue that may arise and develop Wookieepedia in accordance with established policies. Being combative will get you and your idea nowhere. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 17:00, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Re: User page
In most cases, as long as subpages follow the user page policy, they should not be subject to deletion.  CC7567  (talk) 20:18, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * See here.  CC7567  (talk) 20:27, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Moving
Yeah, as Winterz said, the Mission to Mustafar from Episode III is the most-looked for article with that name, so it needs to be kept where it is now.  CC7567  (talk) 21:32, January 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * We still can't assume airdates, but I think it would be reasonable to assume that "Shades of Reason" and "The Lawless" are the fifteenth and sixteenth episodes, respectively, given that they're the rest of the story arc.  CC7567  (talk) 09:05, January 5, 2013 (UTC)

Can you post on the pageo f "Missing in Action" that the episode's production number is labeled 506? thank u. Unsigned comment by User:173.63.68.122 (talk)

Can you post on the page of "Missing in Action" that the episode was written by Brent Friedman and directed by Steward Lee, please? Thank u.

Re: Blocking
According to the block log, you have not been blocked recently, and I have not blocked anyone recently except Detreko. I'm not sure what log you were checking, but no, I did not block you. Cheers.&mdash; Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 14:15, January 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * You might have been caught in an IP block, but without a block ID, it's impossible to know which block affected you. 1358  (Talk)  14:43, January 9, 2013 (UTC)