User talk:Grand Moff Tranner/archive5

Scroll boxes
Hey, GMT. Would you mind if I borrowed the code for the GA/FA scrollboxes from your user page? I'm trying to find a better way to display my own contributions on my user page, and I think your solution is both elegant and good-looking. Thanks, ~ SavageBob 20:35, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome; thanks (even if it's a copy of a copy...) :) ~ SavageBob 05:13, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Hello GFT, a few minutes ago you changed the page Mission to Coruscant(Boba Fett) from my last edit, can i ask why you changed the next section in the infobox, because that is a proven fact. Thanks, Arthur232, 22:52, December 21, 2009(UTC)

Anon vandal
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page!  Darth Karika Answering Machine 18:57, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

Observation
Hi Grand Moff Tranner, I don’t know if you’ve seen this but on the template page of that ‘’clever template ‘’ of yours it says: Misuse of it (including, but not limited to, adding " is stupid is stupid" to pages) may result in a ban. If you want to see for your self you can type ‘’Template:username’’ into the ‘’search Wookieepedia’’ field. Also as you probably allredy know on the civility policy page has the following message: Proposed   I don't want to restart an old conflict I'm just pointing out an important fact.  Galen Merik Talk page 03:48, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Civility policy
Hi Grand Moff Trainer (Gee I hope I spelled that right) I just read the civility policy and I noticed you use it allot in arguements, I am not sure if you knew before this but the civility policy is a unoficial guideline for Wookieepedia so it may not look good to use this. (sorry if I seem rude at all) try using real guidelines. Hey, Im just telling you what I know.

--Lot Krotan 15:18, January 3, 2010 (UTC)Lot KrotanLot Krotan 15:18, January 3, 2010 (UTC)--

What the heck!!!
What is going on? I am not Galen Marik!!! and why did you unedit my user page!!! I just read the civility policy and you just come along and ruin my page!!!

--Lot Krotan 15:41, January 3, 2010 (UTC)Lot KrotanLot Krotan 15:41, January 3, 2010 (UTC)--

My apologies
I'm sorry about my comment on Talk:Unidentified Sith Lord (Sacking of Coruscant), apparently I missed the policy template at the top. Quite different from the Star Wars Fanon and Wikipedia discussion pages that I'm used to. It's just that so many people were making a fuss on the same page, so I wanted to put a thought or two that would hopefully quench the tension. But I will be more careful to read any other policies (if any) at the top of talk pages from now on. -Ano-User 12:30, January 7, 2010 (UTC)

Mar Tuuk
Just so you know, Tranner, the featurette for "Storm Over Ryloth," which has some info on Mar Tuuk (including what appears to be the first confirmed pronunciation of his name, at least as defined by the production team) is conveniently on YouTube. Hope that'll help.  CC7567  (talk) 19:47, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * The only other possibilities are a few extra lines in the extended version of "Storm Over Ryloth," but I don't think that will be an issue; if there was any extra dialogue that I failed to notice, it wasn't anything notable. There might also be some extra stuff in the Blu-ray "Jedi Archives" feature, which I don't have access to, but most of that is concept art stuff.  CC7567  (talk) 23:32, January 9, 2010 (UTC)

Intimidator
From AGSWU 3rd: "An Imperial Super Star Destroyer, its crew was killed and the vessel was captured by Nil Spaar during the Yevethan attack on the N'zoth shipyards. It was renamed Pride of Yevetha and made part of the Black Fifteen Fleet." Other entry forthcoming. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:04, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

From SWE: "An Imperial Super Star Destroyer, its crew was killed and the ship captured by strongman Nil Spaar during the Yevethan attack on the shipyard at N'zoth. Renamed Pride of Yevetha, it was made part of Black Fifteen Fleet and participated in the Yevethan mobilization at Doornik-319. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:08, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * The ship is also mentioned under the N'zoth entry: "Yevethan leader Nil Spaar and his commando team used the confusion of the moment (during the shipyard attack) to capture the Super Star Destroyer Intimidator and murder 20,000 Imperial citizens by firing the Intimidator tubolasers on the evacuation transports." Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:13, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * And there's even a Pride of Yevetha entry: "Formerly the Imperial Super Star Destroyer Intimidator, it was seized by the forces of strongman Nil Spaar during a raid on the Imperial shipyard at N'zoth. The Pride of Yevetha was placed in Spaar's Black Fifteen Fleet and was spotted in the Yevethan mobilization at Doornik-319. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:16, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Tell me how to be a wookiepedian like you!

Argyus
With all due respect to your work on that article, you do not own the article. It is not my responsibility to look at any articles I edit to see if someone else made contributions to them, and ask them permission to make edits, especially if it is to correct an inaccuracy in the article. It is also not proper grounds for you to revert my edit simply because I didn't ask you for permission or notify you of the changes before I made them. You do not own the article, the Wookieepedia community owns the article. --OuroborosCobra 01:36, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

Again, I am under no obligation to contact you or any other editor to ask permission to make edits to articles. I brought up the problem on Talk:Senate Commando months ago, waited months for that discussion to continue, and nothing else happened on that. I was bold and made the change. Hell, I don't think it could even be described as bold, seeing as I'd waited months for the discussion front to work, and had been largely ignored except by a single editor who never presented any evidence that these captains were the leaders of the entire branch. You want to know why I am being hostile? Because I made an edit and had it reverted apparently not because of the content of my edit or the facts involved, which I put out in my edit summary and linked to the discussion regarding, but because you personally didn't like that I touched an article without talking to you first. I will continue to be clear, this is not your article. I am under no obligation to contact you before making an edit to it. Reverting my edit simply for not contacting you is not a proper reason for reverting. Now, do you have a problem with the actual content of my edit, either its style or whether it is factual? If not, I do not think there is anything else for us to discuss, as those are the only two grounds for you to revert my edits, as I am not being vandalistic. --OuroborosCobra 01:48, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

WHAT???
I just helped your montross thing ,by giving a picture FROM the video game and you ,MISTER JAELOUS ,keeps deleting it ,MAN people WANNA SEE THIS DAMN PICTURE WILL YOU GET THAT SOMEDAY???????

hey pal ,can you tell me why you keep deleting my montross picture??? It's improving the file ,but you keep deleting it ,why? anyway ,you seems not to realize ,anyway ,i'll keep uploading it ,until you'll give up ,this picture is NEEDED in the file

Wullf Yularen
On that photo of two ISB officers walking through the Death Star's corridors, neither of them look like Colonel Yularen. The older one does look similar, but to me it appears that it's a different actor. Hanzo Hasashi 17:38, January 31, 2010 (UTC)

Little poisoner
Hey GMT,

Thanks for that bit of info. His edit was sourced incorrectly, which prompted me to revert it. I've since cleaned it up properly in anticipation for whatever else we might learn upon the actual release of the comic. Thanks again. —Tommy 9281  ( Mechno-chair ) 21:33, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Mistakes
Listen i am sorry if i have made a mistake with my articles Wild Karrde/tri fighter i still dont quite have the hang of this. If you could get back to me, that would be great. My email is Bazza890@gmail.com cheers Bazza891 01:00, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

thanks
Thank you for clarifying that issue. you seem like a nice bloke thanks (Would you like me to edit the action vi page??) Bazza891 01:11, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Its JJ21
Whenever I edit that Denal appears on the cover of Star Wars: Battlefront: Mobile Squadrons, WILL YOU STOP CHANGING IT! HE APPEARS ON THE COVER! CAN'T YOU SEE THE WALLPAPER COVER on the PAGE OF STAR WARS: Battlefront: Mobile Squadrons!

Redlinks
Sorry for that. I thought it was better if they were removed. Sorry, my apogilies (I hope it's good written).--Station7 15:46, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Pammant in Official Episode Guide
I'll try to get the info from the book to you ASAP over IRC or email. If I don't get it to you within the next four days, assume that I've forgotten and please remind me. (I'm on the verge of recommending that you buy the book yourself, if only because you choose to nominate the few unlucky subjects that Fry chose to expand upon in the "Galactic Dispatches" section for each episode. :P)  CC7567  (talk) 06:50, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Hello
I am not a fish! Also, your hobby is awesome.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 17:32, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Templates
Why are you reverting all the templates I updated. Is it not better to have uniformity among the templates.

Please give me a reason. Sithjedi 13:33, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

You were kind of funny! >___<

about Bodo baas
Hey GM Tranner, thanks for the link, I didnt know that there was a Fanon site. I've deleted from the "idea" down and put it on the fancon site instead. I felt I needed to vent my idea somewhere and I also wanted to show off what he looked like lol but in future I will keep it to just references in this site.

Unidentified Sith
Just wanted to mention that after watching the TOR Deceived trailer again, looking at every screenshot of this Sith throughout the trailer and comparing it to this image, they are identical in every possible way&mdash;from gauntlet configuration, to mouthpiece, to belt, to armor, to lightsaber. If it looks like a wampa, smells like a wampa, walks like a wampa, it is a wampa. That would mean he is a Sith Warrior, not a Sith Lord. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 21:21, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

lego council
Sorry for that. Most of the Wiki's want Lego with a big L instead of a little l. That was my reason.--Station7 21:35, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

That's not smart of me, I thought that was an L. That's really not smart. My apoligize.--Station7 21:39, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Kagi
Do you plan to further work at Kagi ? After a little work he would be ready for a GA. I would do it, but it's majorly your work. -- Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:56, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

He was
Oh come on CC75....whatever....was being a complete jerk to that guy. And he WAS being a by the book kiss ass.

Hey buddy
Hey, just so you know, I have two other computers, plus a cell phone to edit on. :p

Re: Fan Art
My apologies, I found this image on the web, and I thought it was real. Once again I am sorry, I will have to double check the next time I upload a file. :) Bonbondoodle 06:29, 04 March 2010 (UTC)

Yo
Hey bro, I was just giving my oppinion. All, i've ever seen him do is bitch and moan.

Sith
Why? There's no evidence to prove it. -- Boba Vett  19:11, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Good articles and Featured articles
If I want to give something a good article. How do I that? How do I make them good articles or featured articles? It's just a question, that I have to understand.--Station7 20:47, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

WHy do you delete everything of mine

Svivreni objection
Before I do something I will regret ("Chronologically before", I think, and not "Instead of"), and if you do not mind, I would like to explain you my point of view in further detail. As per "Have significant information from all sources and appearances", IMHO, the article must include all the available canon information on the subject. "On the subject": Sometimes that line might be blurry and, in this case, you and I obviously do not see the line in the same point. To me, the article must include the information in the three offending paragraphs or else it would be clearly incomplete; to you, these paragraphs are less than tangentially related to the subject and should go as they do not involve the Svivreni enough. Unfortunately, to me, should the article not include that information, then it would be not exhaustive and thus unworthy of being Featured.

This leads us to what I call a deadlock: As long as the objection is standing, the article cannot pass. If the objection is solved, then I cannot keep my support to the nomination, and as such the article cannot pass. We have already tried negotiation explaining our reasons; mine do not convince you, and yours do not convince me. This is a statu quo of unaddressed objections that can only be kept for three weeks before the nomination is asked to be removed but, as the FAN page is already crowded, even that can be quickened: The next logical step, once this little conversation is over, will be the so-called "requestal to remove nomination", by nominator's request (I have experience at that). Here is a situation I would like to avoid if possible, as I think the article could be a good FA, but I cannot do so by solving the objection. Thus, I can ask an Inquisitor (that's you) for help to see if we can find any other solution. Thank you,

-- Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:38, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Onaconda Farr
Please stop reverting my edits to the Onaconda Farr article. I added information from the latest episode.--Jen&#39;ari Xer&#39;lyx 00:38, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

"Imperial troop transport" edits
I just checked my email and discovered you reverted edits I made to "Imperial troop transport" on February 21. Why did you revert? How can I view my reverted edits? 99.186.120.66 07:35, March 22, 2010 (UTC)Spectralancer

Kendal Ozzel
Would you mind if I changed the quote for the "Ascent" section in his article to be one from the new card set of the SWGTCG which is him saying, "Need I remind you that I was awarded this commission by Emperor Palpatine himself?" It seems to be very fitting for that particular section, maybe even a little more so than the one currently there. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 04:51, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * You are absolutely right. Would be completely redundant in light of that Clone Wars quote, which I completely overlooked. Good deal. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 12:07, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

sorry
sorry if i left something not conforming to the talkheader. i was simply commenting on the talk page. :( i wont leave a comment again.76.102.73.250 01:26, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

sorry cont...
and i wasnt aware of the policy. whoops. i will try to understand it better. i feel bad, and im sorry. wont comment again.76.102.73.250 01:32, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

hey
by the way, your occupation is AWESOME! 76.102.73.250 01:37, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Sure
Yes, an info box would be nice.--Alexyodaross 00:02, March 26, 2010 (UTC)Alexyodaross--Alexyodaross 00:02, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

sorry
soo sorry for vandalisim to mace windu just a bit of humor but im sorry

Argyus
I added something little but essential to your Faro Argyus article from Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Ambush. Just to let you know. -- Clone Commander Lee  Talk 19:38, March 26, 2010 (UTC)