User talk:AV-6R7/Archive 1

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, AV-6R7!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash;Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:06, May 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * }

Comments
Please remember to always sign your comments with 4 tildes ~. Supreme Emperor (talk) 23:15, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Again, remember to sign your comments with ~ . Trip391 (talk) 05:36, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Is that not the Sig button?AV-6R7 19:29, July 29, 2014 (UTC)

Your signature
Your current signature is violating the third item Wookieepedia's signature policy: You must include your actual username. Trip391 (talk) 06:00, July 23, 2014 (UTC)

Re:2-1B
Unless there is a source that states what something is specifically, it should not be added. Espcially if there is any room for doubt, like whether a droid is a [2-1B or the similar looking 2-ZH, we cannot state it is one or the other without more information. Just because something may seem "obvious" does not actually mean it is true; that is speculation, and is not allowed. If there is a source that states specifically what droid model was in the episode, then it could be stated to be that model, but since that may not be the case, it cannot. [[User:Trip391|Trip391]] (talk) 05:36, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * If there is no source to verify it (or a blog article, etc.), and there could be a reason for doubt, then yea, it shouldn't really be in the articles. Trip391 (talk) 05:44, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd say nah. While it might not be obviously a 2-1B or 2-ZH, it might be one of them, and making an "unidentified  xxx" for it wouldn't really be necessary. Trip391 (talk) 05:51, July 28, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. Its from the two Jedi Academy Books--Wookieedude12 (talk) 02:26, November 3, 2014 (UTC)

Finis Valorum/Canon nomination
Hi. I just finished updating Finis Valorum/Canon, which you voted for on its ongoing Featured Article nomination, with new information from the book Tarkin. Since you voted for it, this is an FYI so that you're aware of the changes in the event you would like to review them to ensure that you still support the nomination. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 21:20, November 30, 2014 (UTC)

"Royal House of Naboo" in SW Journeys
Hello, AV-6R7. Since you seem to play Star Wars Journeys: The Phantom Menace, could you tell me whether the name "Royal House of Naboo" is actually used in it, and in which context? Thanks in advance. -- Lelal Mekha  (Audience Room) 10:38, December 17, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Theelin
Restored. Please update the article with the appropriate sources. Cade   Calrayn  04:21, December 19, 2014 (UTC)

Image sourcing
If appears in Ultimate Factivity Collection: Star Wars, why isn't the source listed under "other sources"? Trip391 (talk) 05:43, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * I am not familiar with the ins and outs of working with the images themselves. I can add it if you would tell me how. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 05:45, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, figured it out. Done. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 05:48, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Chopper droid
Let me make sure I understand this correctly: You want Chopper medical droid moved to Chopper droid and 2-1B medical droid/Canon moved to 2-1B medical droid? I just want to make sure I handle things correctly.-- Exiled Jedi   (Greetings)  15:07, December 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * All taken care of.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:53, December 27, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Clearing pages
So, DC-15A blaster is where the canon version of the DC-15S blaster needs to go? They changed it from A to S in the canon switch?-- Exiled Jedi   (Greetings)  21:38, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * All right, the pages are ready for the canon articles.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:34, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Storm Commando has been cleared for use.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  07:13, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Change to voting option on WP:TC Sepper

 * As you voted simultaneously with me changing the vote option, I am now required to inform you that I have changed the redirect option on the Sepper TC to link to Confederacy of Independent Systems instead of List of phrases and slang. The relevant edit is here. Please review the TC page and change your vote if so inclined. If you review the change and are still in favor of redirection to the different article, you don't have to do anything. JorrelWiki-shrinkable.pngFraajic 04:34, January 11, 2015 (UTC)

Canon article improvement
Hi! Since you expressed an interest, I wanted to let you know that I've started a thread regarding selecting our first project to begin working on improving canon articles. The first task is to identify which article to work on first. You can find the thread here. ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:53, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Eopie image
thx for adding the image on Eopie/Canon. I didn't know how :( I really appreciate it. --RROGON (talk) 01:20, January 14, 2015 (UTC)

here is a "superior" pic:

Zuckuss/4-LOM error
Hi, since I saw you working on the Zuckuss/canon page a lot I wanted to let you know that the switching of the those two bounty hunters their names only happened because of a mistake and I have proof of the writer of the book himself. Concretely, this would mean that it's 4-LOM who's present in Star Wars 1 and bot Zuckuss http://boards.theforce.net/threads/the-official-jason-fry-discussion-thread.50004273/page-34 --178.117.184.14 23:20, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * This I know, but until we get an official source saying otherwise, we stick with the Kenner naming scheme. Also, please sign your post. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 23:03, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * I honestly do not know what isn't official about it, the writer of the book in whoch both were identified hilself states it was a mistaken, than why would we stick with information we know is wrong. --178.117.184.14 23:20, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm really not the person you should be discussing this with. Maybe put your objections on the Zuckuss/Canon talkpage. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 23:21, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree that we should change it. Jason has acknowledged that it was a mistake. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:21, January 14, 2015 (UTC)