Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights

This page is for requests for user rights.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Requests for rollback
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * 4) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * 5) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Questions

 * 1) Why should you be granted rollback rights?

(7 Users + 4 Admins/0/0)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends May 27th.

Support

 * 1) Basically, Farl's a good egg. The guy's been a mainstay for longer than than you or I, and in my experience he's always been a very civil, very courteous user who is more than willing to help out. He's also working up a bit of frequency as a writer in the WP: Aliens cult, which is something I like to see, and he's also clearly got the best interests of the Wook at heart. I'm confident that he would use the fancy extra button as any other honourable rollbacker would, to combat evil and such. Also, why not? Thefourdotelipsis 01:34, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Of course. --Imperialles 01:36, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Skip to my Farlstendoiro. —Tommy 9281 01:37, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 01:38, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Good dude.  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 01:39, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) Had it coming for a long time. Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 01:41, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) "Why not?" is my guiding philosophy for granting rollback. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 01:58, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) Per Culator. Grunny  ( talk ) 02:36, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9)  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 02:47, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) I have no objections. Havac 02:56, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) I'm actually surprised that he doesn't have such rights yet.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 03:38, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 12) Wait, Farl doesn't have rollback? How did that oversight happen?! Needs immediate correction. UPDATE: And Trak edit conflicts me with the exact same sentiment. More proof it needs to be fixed! jSarek 03:39, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

 * Accepted via good old-fashioned talk page correspondence. Thefourdotelipsis 01:34, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Requests for adminship
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have two years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * 4) They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * 5) They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * 6) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 7) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 8) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
 * 9) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * 10) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

Questions
Here are some general adminship questions. They are 100% optional, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them.

Requests for bureaucratship
Rules:
 * Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.


 * 1) They are an administrator.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * 3) They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 6) Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month&mdash;from the day the nomination is put forth&mdash;are counted).
 * 7) Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 8) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.