User talk:Corellian Premier

{| width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #FEFFCF; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome Corellian Premier!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * Internal pages:
 * Senate Hall
 * Wookieepedia FAQ
 * Manual of Style
 * Online sources
 * Guide to image use
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * What Wookieepedia is not
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * How to write a great article

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash; MyNz 21:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * }

Disruption of Comm 4
Hey Corellian Premier, I saw the article you created for the Disruption of Comm 4, and there are a few things that you should add to it to make it more encyclopedic. In the main article (not just in the infobox) you need to put the battle into context - when was it fought, who were the combatants, why did it occur, what was Comm 4, etc. Otherwise, the article really only means anything to somebody who already knows all about it. Also, you should put links to things in the main article (like the pilot that you name, and for that matter you should link to the source). Doluk 15:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nice work on improving the article - it reads much better to me now. Doluk 23:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Battle of Ryloth losses
While yes, there are merits in specifying exactly how many starship casualties there were, it tends to be a bit moot if we don't know exactly how many were destroyed and if there were probably a lot more than those we know. Thank you for your contributions to the article.  CC7567  (talk) 20:04, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Venator Turbolaser
It's not confirmed. Unless you can find a source that specifically says those are the correct Turbolasers, then you can add them in. That list is also incomplete.  JangFett  (Talk) 21:08, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

164.107.226.134
That's not exactly vandalism.&mdash; BobaFett1 Bounties collected  21:38, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay...&mdash; BobaFett1 Bounties collected Jaster's Feather.svg 19:26, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Recent Vandalism
Any time.  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 21:46, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Falcon
Please clean up your recent edits to Millennium Falcon. We write in present tense, for one thing.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:32, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * It is past tense. I'm sorry about that, I have no clue what I was thinking. Anyway, thanks for your hard work, and I'm just gonna sign off now...  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:43, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Mos Eisley
In all the ten years I've been playing the game, every single time I've played the level the guy gets shot down and says "I'm clear but my fire is down", always in the same part too. Either I suck at the game or its scripted. DjMack 00:11, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Christian
Can I use your Christian Userbox.  Darth Rage Leave a message after the beep 00:24, July 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re: FAN nomination process

 * Heavily dependent on the quality of your article, the length of your article, the appeal of the article to the Inquisitorius. Could range anywhere from a week from the best, most popular, shortest articles, to a couple of months for something longer. If your article has numerous objections pile up quickly, expect to be there awhile. I'm not really an expert on this matter any more, but I'd say a good median time is anywhere from two weeks to a month. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 17:22, July 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Palmer CAN
Simply contact any member of the EC, and they will start an EC vote to remove the nomination. Since it is a nominator request, the vote should pass with no problems. Just remember to put it up for GAN when you feel up to the challenge. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie the truth  ) 01:17, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Battle for Naboo
Hey. If I've understood the mission correctly, during the disruption of Comm 4, Sykes, Kael, Adela Tyché, and Vedd Deviss flew N-1 starfighters, and Kol Kotha flew Borvo the Hutt's starfighter. As for your second question, I've just started replaying the game, so I have not reached the final level yet. I'll let you know when I do, though. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 14:56, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

No HUD
Does Battle for Naboo have an option to remove the HUD and UI, like a cheat or menu option? If so, please make sure all future uploads are taken with the UI turned off, in order to better keep with Wookieepeedia's image guidelines. SinisterSamurai 15:55, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Uhm, no, I can't say there is. Sorry.

Torkil Mux
It was kinda sloppy, but looking at it again, I'd say it can be re-added, just touched up. I made some changes and put the section back.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 16:15, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Replies
Hey there. I think I'll just reply to all of your messages here. First of all, I've reached the final level, but I'm still not sure whether Hollis or Deviss participated in the battle. It is quite hard to tell by the voice acting alone, especially to a non-native English speaker like me. It'd help if there were subtitles, but there aren't any. However, I'm more inclined to say that they did not participate based on what I could hear. Second, yes I would like to take over Adela, but only if you are not interested in her anymore. All that her article needs is a bit of detail, and then you can safely take her to the GA nomination page. Lastly, yes, I do have the PC version. I believe this explains some minor differences that we've encountered in our playthroughs. I plan to GA Kael, and I am going to add the picture of his downed starfighter later. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 11:13, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Your nom for Barren planetoid
Do you want me to remove the nom from the CAN page?&mdash; 03:33, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I did already ask Grand Moff Tranner to remove it. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 22:21, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: South ridge
The LucasArts watermark should be removed. Apart from that, it looks fine to me. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 16:04, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just save the current image to your hard drive, crop it with JPEGcrop, and re-upload the new picture under the same filename. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:35, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

You've played a lot of Battle for Naboo, right?
Is the resistance movement ever referred to as the Naboo Underground? Or just the Naboo Resistance? SinisterSamurai 07:18, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, neither. Sykes just goes on and on about the 'fight against the TF.' Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 15:58, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * But the OOU briefing for several missions refer to "the resistance." Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:12, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. Thanks. I had previously merged Naboo Underground and Naboo Resistance based on existing BFN info on Wookieepedia. However, I will probably split them back up again, now. SinisterSamurai 04:04, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

Trade Federation escort cruiser
Hey! Thanx for the clarification! I rewrote the Trade Federation escort cruiser article. Tell me what you think! J.C'Boath III 02:20, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Borvo the Hutt's starfighter
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I removed that article from the CAN since it was over 250 words. You can now nominate it to become a GA. Also, remember to not capitalize "I" in —if you do it, the era icon does not show up. Cheers. 1358 (Talk) 10:22, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Re: CANS
Are you sure you want those two removed? I'm actually halfway through striking my objections for Feretina right now, and the base article is almost done (only 1 or 2 outstanding objections). SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie the truth  ) 02:05, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, whenever you are done with Ferentina is fine. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:07, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is there a particular reason why? SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 02:12, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure. They are ready to be removed, and I can concentrate on my remaining noms. And I was going to wait to move the Base page until it was removed so I didn't have to deal with changing all the links yet. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:27, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

CAN Objection
I'm sorry I delayed the minelayer's CAN passing. I didn't get 13's message until today. Aside, congratulations. NaruHina Talk  22:32, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Redirects
As far as I know, it's Special:MyPage/Wikia.css. 1358 (Talk) 07:38, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Nod Kartha FAN
Hey Corellian Premier,

I just wanted to contact you regarding the Battle of Nod Kartha nomination. There currently are objections that have been left outstanding for approximately fifteen days. I want to stress that if there is no activity on the nom within the next seven days, then the Inquisitorius will remove it from the nomination page. If situations have arisen that have hindered your ability to maintain the nomination, please let one of us know so that we can take the appropriate course of action. If the nomination does end up being removed by the Inq, you can renominate it at a later date so long as you intend to see it fully through the process. Please advise either way, and thanks for your contributions to Wookieepedia. —Tommy 9281 19:38, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, i've been really busy lately. These five page papers start to add up. Anyway, I am still planning on working on it. Thanks for enquiring. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:49, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey no problem, I completely understand. I would suggest though that you leave a note on the pages comments section so that other Inqs don't prepare themselves to remove the nom. —Tommy 9281 22:50, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just want to let you know that you still have a single outstanding objection for this nom. You might want to hurry up and address it before another Inq feels inclined to begin the removal process. Thanks, —Tommy 9281 15:29, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

Vacation
Given your recent vacation notice, please be aware that your nominations on the GAN page will removed within the next few days unless you demonstrate a continued dedication to working on them. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:51, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * This goes for your lone FAN page nomination as well. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:54, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * As I will be away from the computer for well over a week, that is unfortunate, but hey, if thats the policy... Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:12, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Carida as a Good Article
Do you mean every thing needs to be linked once on the whole page of just each section? User:Grand Moff Hopkins
 * After the intro and infobox, it is just one link throughout the entire page. You don't have to re-link something in each section.

WP:RWM and LMW
Hello there. :) I just wanted to invite you to WP:RWM. If you're not interested, no biggy. Also, as you're a Christian, I wanted to let you know of LifeMusic Wiki, and Protestant Christian music wiki. I'd love to have you on both RWM and LMW. Anyway, nice talking to ya! :) MasterFred (Whatever) 15:12, February 18, 2011 (UTC)