Talk:Fenn Shysa

Heh, I remember in the early comics his spoke like a pirate. "I don't care for causes no more. These days I fight only fer me planet, me people... an' me friends." --SparqMan 13:27, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Last line
No one needs to know that Boba Fett became Mandalore after Fenn in a Fenn Shysa Article. The article is about a him and only him. It doesn't need to have anything about Boba fett becoming Mandalore. If someone wants to know that all they had to do is look below the article to see who came after Fenn.--Darth Nuke 15:49, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * And why do we need "the man responsible for the new rise of the Mandalorians" on the page? If anything, that should go to Spar's article, he rebuilt the Mandalorians more than Shysa did. And "Fett succeeded him as Mandalore" should really be there just as a little footnote, since Shysa sacrificed himself for Fett and the notice would just wrap off the article nicely. Demented Smiloid 21:40, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Sorry son, but Fenn Shysa being the man who gave rise to the new Mandalorian era should be in there. Fenn rebuilt the Mando Army, freed Mandalor, freed the Mando Sector, gave rise to a new Mandalorian economy. So I'd say he's done way more than Spar. So since your the one who's been EDITING MY ARTICLE. The Article I WROTE, then you can bet your ass any changes you make I'll change em back. Fett as Mandalore does not need to be in there, and it won't be. If they want to know who came after Fenn they can either look at the bottom of the page or look up Boba Fett. This is my arcticle and it's fine the way it is.--Darth Nuke 23:18, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)


 * Your article? You didn't create the article, QuentinGeorge did. And he was the one primarily editing the line out. If I can properly recall, he is something called an  admin , who has stated this constant edit is becoming close to vandalism. Besides, Spar is the one who actually rebuilt the Mandalorians from scratch, after they were completely wiped out (with the exception of Jango) which is quite an achievement in my book.

And I fail to see how you'll change it back if one of the admins gets really ticked off about it and locks down the article... Demented Smiloid 23:28, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I wrote this Article Not George. What George had done was only a few lines saying that Fenn faught during the Clone War with Spar. I wrote what you see now in the article. What George wrote was a snub.

When I finished the Article it was as it always was. Your the one who's in the wrong, and commiting Vandalism. Because the Article was fine the way it was, and you keep changing it. So I hope it is locked so you can't touch it anymore.

Also Spar did rebuild the commando's but his try ended with only 3 surviving Slim. Fenn went on to create a much grander army, and took back the Mandalorian Empire. Ten times what Spar did. So leave my contribution alone.--Darth Nuke 23:33, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Also GEORGE, please respect my contribution and please leave it alone. I've had two contributions, the other being the Master Jaing article. The line about Fenn bringing forth a new era for the Mandalorian is very True. And Boba Fett doesn't need to be added, for all anyone reading has to do is look at the bottom and see who succeeded who. The article is fine the way it is.--Darth Nuke 23:41, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)


 * Nuke, you don't seem to understand the concept of a Wiki; nobody has ownership of any article, and you don't have the right to tell people not to edit a particular article simply because you've added to it a great deal. MarcK 23:51, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Which is why this edit war is still going on... Demented Smiloid 23:53, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * The article is fine the way it is. It doesn't need to be edited. Whoever is editing it isn't adding any of interest nor is George or whoever doing anything to help the article. The article is fine the way it is. I want it locked so it can't be touched. And I didn't add to anything I practically wrote the thing.--Darth Nuke 23:54, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Even then, it doesn't matter what you did, no article belongs to you. That's the whole idea of a Wiki. And locking it isn't going to solve anything in the long run; what we need to do is settle on a compromise, put that in the article, and let us all go on our merry ways. MarcK 23:59, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I will accept no compromise the Article is fine the way it is. The line about Fenn being the on who gave the Mandalorians a new rise is correct, and the Boba Fett line isn't needed. If they want to know if Fett became Mandalore they can look right to the little box which says who succeeded who.

So there is no compromise, because there is nothing to compromise the Article is fine the way it is.--Darth Nuke 00:02, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Even Insider 80 doesn't have anythign about Boba Fett taking Fenn's place in his little piece in the Article. It ends ALMOST Like the way I have it.--Darth Nuke 00:04, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Let me clear a few things up for you, Nuke. 1) No one owns any article. If you don't want people editing something you've written, go start your own website. 2) We have this thing called the three-revert rule. You've gone way past this&mdash;and don't say that QuentinGeorge did, too; he was supported by at least one other user, while you were acting alone and in your own stubborness. I'm reverting this to Quentin's version now, and if you mess with this one more time, you're out for twenty-four. By the way, QuentinGeorge isn't actually an admin, although he is a respected Wookieepedian. – Aidje talk 00:06, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Nuke, seriously, give in, because you're the only one who wants the "man responsible" line in there. Even the admins disagree with you, and if you keep editing it you might get suspended or even banned. Just forget the page, it's only a block of text! Demented Smiloid 00:12, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, bit too late now I guess...Demented Smiloid 00:13, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Only twenty-four hours; he'll be back&mdash;hopefully with some new ideas about how to interact with other users. – Aidje talk 01:15, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * A compromise then. At least lets have a compromise?--Darth Nuke 01:41, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Lets at least agree on thsi,


 * "After almost 20 years of rule, Fenn Shysa, the Man responsible for the new rise of the Mandalorians, died on the planet of Shogun saving Boba Fett from death. Boba Fett would become the next Mandalore."


 * I believe that's what I was saying from the beginning. MarcK 01:50, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Well then lets make it so. It's wrong that way, but I'll take it. And at least we can compromise.--Darth Nuke 01:52, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

That is not acceptable because Fenn did more than that. He freed Mandalore, rebuilt the Mandalore army, took back the Mandalore Sector, and gave the Mandalorian a better future. He's more than just a man who created another incarnation of the Mandalorians.--Darth Nuke 02:07, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I have just given my compromise. Please accept it the way is. I have added my piece plus that of you and George's. At least give me that much.--Darth Nuke 02:12, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

If you want to know why I kept reverting this, it was because Darth Nuke kept trying to insert admiring POV regarding Shysa. I eventually gave up, since I didn't see fighting about this article worth my time. It's fine how it is now, though, since most of the POV seems to have been removed. QuentinGeorge 07:04, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * PS "I wrote this Article Not George." - not that you can "own" an article on Wiki, but if you look in the edit history, you'll find that I created this one and cleaned up most of the subsequent contributions. But as others have said, that is irrelevant - no one owns an article here. QuentinGeorge 07:04, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Well that admiring POV about Shysa is truthful, and it was I who wrote the actual article. Which before hand was just your snub. But who cares, it's over and the article is fine the way it is.--Darth Nuke 15:43, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

"Fenn Shysa was a Mandalorian who fought under Mandalore the Resurrector and eventually became Mandalore himself."

That is what you wrote George. What you wrote was a snub, for a article. I wrote what you see on July 22, which has my IP number as th arthur of it. Therefore It was I who actually wrote the article of Fenn Shysa. You may have cleaned it up, and added some pretty pictures, but it was I who actually wrote the article.--Darth Nuke 16:58, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Regardless, the point is moot. Move on to other things please. -- Riffsyphon1024 18:13, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I have. The article is NOW fine the way it is. The boba fett line still shouldn't be in a Fenn Shysa article, but whatever. The compromise is good, and shouldn't be changed.--Darth Nuke 18:21, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * As long as you're still talking about it, then, uh, you're still talking about. As Riff said, please no more last words or final arguments. Just move on. – Aidje talk 05:09, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC)