Talk:Lucrehulk-class battleship

Shouldn't this be moved to Lucrehulk-class battleship? Cmdr. J. Nebulax 00:50, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 21:07, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Weapons count

 * The published weapons count is in error. If you watch the Queens escape closely, there are more guns atop the engine housing part that are not counted in original 42.  Really the count should be at least 18 higher, maybe more since weapons fire is observed coming from the bottom of the ship.  In addition, the novelization mentions hundreds of smaller emplacements for its secondary armerment.  The problem gets even worse by the time of ROTS, where there are literally dozens of heavy emplacements newly added to the ships atop the coreships and on top of and below the arms.  Fortunatley, a rationalization is possible - the AOTC novel describes a diference between these being battleships and troop transports.  Thus the 42 heavy quad turbolasers is probably the primary armerment of the troop transport, the battleship mk I (and really its more of a Star Cruiser]] has an armerment of at least 60 (84 if bilateral symmetry is part of the design like it is in the other craft bigger then Imperators) heavy quadlasers, and the mk II is what is seen at the BoC.  Comments before editing?  --Lowkey
 * As far as I have seen, there are no "Mark I"s or "Mark II"s for the Lucrehulk. If the weapons are modified, the ships themselves are not considered "Mark I"s or "Mark II"s. Admiral J. Nebulax 14:14, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, the extra guns are highly visible on the ROTS versions, they're placed all over the ship, both the ring and the sphere, so that would constitute a different, heavily armed subclass. VT-16 14:00, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Or, it shows that the ships became more heavily armed due to the war. I'd say that "more heavily armed due to the war" seems to be the most likely situation. I doubt that there are subclasses of this vessel. Admiral J. Nebulax 15:48, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, that's true. VT-16 17:22, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Of course, the only "source" we have it what we saw. Admiral J. Nebulax 19:42, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * True, but if what we saw in ROTS is what most Lucrehulks turned into, there wouldn't be any Mk. Is, only original Lucrehulk models with more guns. VT-16 22:13, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Admiral J. Nebulax 00:41, 24 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I've found a schematic made by ILM for ROTS showing the spread of long guns, quad guns and heavy guns on the CW era Lucrehulk. Will count the dots at a later time. VT-16 17:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Admiral J. Nebulax 20:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * A lot of dots on that schematic. A lot. Plus I can't tell the red and green ones apart cause they're so small and I'm colourblind. The problem with the schematic is that it's HS only, and I'm not sure if using information on it is illegal or not.YIIMM 21:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Could this schematic be posted here? I'll see what I find. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 22:54, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Link to requested schematic: Archon 23:30, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow... Thank you. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 00:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Could there possibly have been ventral guns?

What refits did it get?
From analysis of the Lucrehulk-class Battleship's weaponry, it seemed more adapt at anti-starfighter warfare than ship-to-ship warfare. In the article, it was said that heavier guns were placed on it, does that mean it actually got turbolasers for the Clone Wars? ...like what exactly? What types of Turbolasers? Where the Quad-lasers removed?
 * Yes. It had a very large upgrade for the Clone Wars. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 16:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * There's a chart up above that shows dots representing what weapons it had. And no, from what I can tell, the quad-lasers weren't removed. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:14, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I want to know the source of the refit. It seems improbable. Cheers,  Relentless Recusant [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] 21:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Why is it improbable to you? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 02:46, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Source? ILM on the Hyperspace feature. VT-16 10:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Were the Quad-Lasers Actualy Quad-Turbolasers?
They seem to huge to be laser cannons.
 * Well, I'm positive that sources call them quad laser cannons. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)