Talk:Sequel trilogy

Original Wikipedia History
This article was originally taken from Sequel trilogy (Star Wars). Much credit goes to User:Adamwankenobi, one of the major contributors to that article (as "The Wookieepedian").

History

 * (cur) (last) 21:56, October 19, 2005 12.40.180.17 (→The sequel trilogy - spellink)
 * (cur) (last) 00:13, October 16, 2005 24.57.18.237 (Spelling)
 * (cur) (last) 16:41, October 15, 2005 The Wookieepedian (rv. The list specifies what is explained above it.)
 * (cur) (last) 16:35, October 15, 2005 A Man In Black m (Reverted edits by The Wookieepedian to last version by Marskell)
 * (cur) (last) 13:07, October 15, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 06:27, October 15, 2005 Marskell (rename "plot summary" --> "initial details. rm "entries"--unneeded list. move dates from intro to initial details and qualify properly.)
 * (cur) (last) 21:08, October 14, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 21:06, October 14, 2005 The Wookieepedian m
 * (cur) (last) 16:17, October 14, 2005 Katefan0 (rm afd tag)
 * (cur) (last) 18:38, October 12, 2005 The Wookieepedian (removed redundant wording)
 * (cur) (last) 01:01, October 12, 2005 24.90.9.199 (Corrected spelling)
 * (cur) (last) 11:02, October 10, 2005 Painbearer (→Official claims)
 * (cur) (last) 14:48, October 9, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 14:47, October 9, 2005 The Wookieepedian (cleanup)
 * (cur) (last) 14:24, October 9, 2005 Marudubshinki (→References)
 * (cur) (last) 13:12, October 9, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 13:12, October 9, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 13:10, October 9, 2005 The Wookieepedian (added the horrible claims of supershadow)
 * (cur) (last) 13:03, October 9, 2005 195.214.255.253 (→Current possibility)
 * (cur) (last) 08:18, October 9, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 07:16, October 9, 2005 Kewp m (fixed sentence fragment)
 * (cur) (last) 07:14, October 9, 2005 Kewp (wfy)
 * (cur) (last) 07:06, October 9, 2005 Marskell (Removing section generally. See talk)
 * (cur) (last) 04:14, October 9, 2005 The Wookieepedian (moved up plot summary)
 * (cur) (last) 03:55, October 9, 2005 Cryptic m (fix afd link)
 * (cur) (last) 02:02, October 9, 2005 69.194.193.147
 * (cur) (last) 01:47, October 9, 2005 69.194.193.147
 * (cur) (last) 23:47, October 8, 2005 69.194.193.147
 * (cur) (last) 18:53, October 8, 2005 The Wookieepedian m (Sp.)
 * (cur) (last) 18:49, October 8, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 18:48, October 8, 2005 The Wookieepedian m
 * (cur) (last) 18:48, October 8, 2005 The Wookieepedian (added "see also" section)
 * (cur) (last) 18:44, October 8, 2005 The Wookieepedian m (The Star Wars Sequel Trilogy moved to Sequel trilogy (Star Wars))
 * (cur) (last) 10:16, October 7, 2005 The Wookieepedian (added image)
 * (cur) (last) 17:49, October 5, 2005 Marudubshinki
 * (cur) (last) 14:11, October 5, 2005 The Wookieepedian (added vague references, will expand on when I find exact details)
 * (cur) (last) 09:27, October 5, 2005 A Man In Black (→Events - Removing this section; no evidence exists that the "backstory" for the Star Wars Encyclopedia would have had anything to do with these movies)
 * (cur) (last) 21:50, October 3, 2005 The Wookieepedian (cleaned up)
 * (cur) (last) 17:35, October 3, 2005 Marskell (rm spoiler tag. Nothing can be spoilers because none of these movies exist.)
 * (cur) (last) 07:34, October 3, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 07:33, October 3, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 07:07, October 3, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 07:06, October 3, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 07:06, October 3, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 06:55, October 3, 2005 A Man In Black (→Plot summary - removed as copyvio)
 * (cur) (last) 06:51, October 3, 2005 A Man In Black (added a note about sub-only)
 * (cur) (last) 06:32, October 3, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 06:27, October 3, 2005 The Wookieepedian (added new reference)
 * (cur) (last) 01:25, October 3, 2005 A Man In Black (Ey Eff Dee)
 * (cur) (last) 00:20, October 3, 2005 Marudubshinki (cat)
 * (cur) (last) 08:13, October 2, 2005 CheekyMonkey m (+ Cat Star Wars)
 * (cur) (last) 08:10, October 2, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 08:10, October 2, 2005 The Wookieepedian
 * (cur) (last) 08:08, October 2, 2005 The Wookieepedian m (Sequel trilogy moved to The Star Wars Sequel Trilogy)
 * (cur) (last) 08:08, October 2, 2005 The Wookieepedian (established page; needs much work)

Also..
I would like to give credit to Nathan Butler for providing the information for the article. Adamwankenobi 23:59, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)

hmmm...
If The Thrawn Trilogy could be said as 7-9, and the Dark Empire Trilogy is 10-12, what would be 13-15? Dark Nest? Jedi Academy?-user:remoh

Other trilogy
I always wanted another SW trilogy and i strongly agree with the other SW fans that the movie project should handed to another person if George Lucas don't want to do it. Because the last 2 trilogies is so good! And beside CG (computer generated) and special affects technology has grown very advanced since 1977 and so this Sequel trilogy would just as or maybe even better looking than Episode III.

-Darth Tader

Zahn's
Heir to the Empire was the first SW EU book I was aware of, and I saw it owned by a classmate. Surprised, I asked her what is it about, and she told me 'it's the sequel trilogy to the movies, because the sequel movies were cancelled'. Now on Wookieepedia I read such a claim in the trilogy's article. Always in my comprehension, Thrawn Trilogy was the 'Sequel Trilogy', and not just 'a post-ROTJ EU novel', and that's why Jedi Prince series is not an 'official sequel' MoffRebus 22:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC) i don't know about 10-15...but Lucas (or his kids) will definatley do 7-9 regardless of what he says now ---Gran Moff Lando
 * But the Thrawn Trilogy's mention in the article implies that it has a higher status than other post-EU material (from Marvel Star Wars 81 down to the latest Legacy era stuff), and/or was based on the plans for the sequel movies which were never filmed. It shouldn't be singled out in this article as the replacement for the sequel movies. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:47, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a popular myth with no basis in fact. The Thrawn Trilogy holds no special status in regards to the movies. - Lord Hydronium 22:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It's the only direct sequel trilogy, and also the earliest published one, having the movies in mind. All other trilogies are subsequent (post 9 ABY) and later. I think it deserves at least a reference, even for pointing out the 'mistake'. Don't forget to fix the Thrawn Trilogy article as well MoffRebus 22:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I've rephrased your addition. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 14:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Possibly, but this article shouldn't spend a lot of time on speculation, unsourced rumours, and wishful thinking. 8) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I hate to do this, but....(removing link to fan blog)
I removed the following information: mostly because since it's a planned fanfilm, we have no proof it's going to be notable. However, it might be interesting to discuss fan efforts to produce a sequel trilogy or substitute thereof. I don't have the expertise on it, though. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

It looks pretty notable to me, and at the very least it's a notable undertaking. I think we should put the link back up.Darth Ceratis 19:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Over on Wikipedia, they have a rule: "Wikipedia is not a crystal ball." Maybe I'm being overzealous in applying a rule from another wiki over here, but as of yet, they haven't begun filming.  I'm leery about adding information about fan films which may or may not be completed. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 23:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I see your point, but they do seem pretty legitimate. I've actually contacted them about possibly becoming a concept artist for them, and they appear to mean business. I think they at least deserve some kind of mention.Darth Ceratis 03:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Unofficial Production
Recently in the fan film community, it has been announced that independent films are being produced to further the Star Wars saga, in what has been dubbed The Star Wars Sequel Trilogy Project. The official blog for the project briefly explains the films and provides an F.A.Q. section that answers some of the questions surrounding the project. The films have no affiliation with Lucasfilm LTD, and are being produced entirely by fans as a non-profit, volunteer source of entertainment.
 * Production blog for the Independently Produced Star Wars Sequel Trilogy