User talk:CC7567

Message
It's nice meeting a fellow Wookieepedian. --Alexyodaross 01:46, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Question about message i got....
Well i got message that warned me about adding fanon to this site- but i definitely haven't done it- I'm quite a new user so i don't really understand all these things here but if you sent the message why you did it?--Swashbuckler1138 11:27, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Was it the edit i did for the 501st page? But isn't Rex part of the 501st- so when he appears 501st appears- it is not mentioned in every episode or it's online guide -that Ahsoka is togruta or Anakin human -but still no one considers that fanon if someone use that as a reason why "Togruta" appears in "Defenders of Peace" for example- so didn't 501st appear in all episodes with Rex? Explain this and I stop asking about it....--Swashbuckler1138 09:38, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Maybe the species parable- was bad -but still isn't it obvious that Rex -if he is member of the 501st- is simply member of the 501st if there is no source that his legion would have been changed? So 501st appear in all episodes with Rex- isn't it obvious?--Swashbuckler1138 17:55, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

This may sound like harping but - how many members of the legios should appear then? There is at least five in many episodes- entire legion (every single member of 501st) doesn't appear anywhere- not even in Revenge of the Sith- so how many members of the legion there should be that 501st appearance would be "canonical" then?- i don't get at all this "logic"- and sounds like you don't get it either since you haven't give any real reason why 501st appears in "Jedi Crash" but not in "Defender's of peace" or "Landing at Point Rain"- or "Mystery of thousand moons" at least in that last episode Rex says that "my men" clearly referring 501st- so shouldn't we add "possible appearance" or "indirect mention" at least- if this logic of yours actually makes sense you must have clear evidence- and you can stop this talking about these appearances of 501st... --Swashbuckler1138 09:41, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Excuse my butting in here, CC, but I have to agree with Swashbuckler on this. Using Brothers in Arms as an example, only two Jedi appear in it (Anakin and Kenobi) but "Jedi Order" is still listed in the appearances. This is because at least one member of the Jedi Order appeared in it. If at least one member of the 501st appears in an episode then the 501st appeared in the episode in some part. Either the clone is or isn't in the 501st and they either appear or don't appear in the source. Rex is in the 501st and appears in Defenders of Peace so, by extension, the 501st appears at least in part.  Nayayen &mdash; TALK  11:09, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for standing with me Nayayen- i cannot understand why this seems to be so hard for some- Rex is 501st and that's it if there is mention of him changing the legion i would understand- but since there is not he is 501st and every single episode with Rex also have appearance of 501st so simple as that... if we are going to speculate that he changed legion and have we don't have any sources we can also claim that there is no proof that jedi din't left the order and rejoined later, that is insane to speculate like that. So if there is no sources of Rex being other than 501st -he simply is in 501st....--Swashbuckler1138 10:18, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Antares Draco
Hey CC,

Thank you for the friendly reminder. I completely forgot about that. —Tommy 9281 14:46, March 8, 2010 (UTC)

Homeworld?
If I might inquire, what does "homeworld" mean beyond the planet where a person was born (or hatched or whatever)? Unfortunately I seem to do not understand the nuances. Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:17, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your pronto answer. I'll bear that in mind for future articles. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 08:23, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

Message
Please write back.--76.121.196.81 03:06, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

Taquito
I understand what you want to say, although I find the way you did it not correct. I asked Jonathan about the Encyclopedia and if there is no new info about him in the Visual Guide, I won't need it (now). -- Clone Commander Lee  Talk 19:31, March 10, 2010 (UTC)

shielding
ok thanks for your awnser, i am aware talk pages are no forum. but i would like to know about the shielding? NH-obi 10:37, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Bogga GAN
The whole point of my stepping in is that the objection is baseless. Especially because, as I stated, you yourself have supported articles (Tott Doneeta) where such an objection was never made and was therefore never an issue. What you are objecting to is rather trivial, and takes nothing away from the quality of the article. At the very most, if it's a   objection then leave it in the "comments" section, not as an actual objection. If you feel that consistency among Inqs and AgriCorps members is not an issue worth addressing then I cannot help you there. In that case, you personally need to figure out how to stick to a script that works for you so that nominators do not question your judgment in the future, because I can guarantee that it will happen. —Tommy 9281 22:23, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Katuunko
Katuunko is seen in the Senate when Padmé Amidala proposes to stop the production of more Clone Troopers.
 * I can assure you, I am watching it on my TV right now. How did you see it?
 * I was watching it on HD! I just don't make things up!
 * He is seen behind Padme when she appeals to the Senate.
 * Maybe if you trusted me in the first place we wouldn't of been in that situation.
 * Don't worry.

Visit my YouTube account at: http://www.youtube.com/user/CloneWarsFan96?feature=mhw5

Cad Banes cloaking device...
Well it seems that you was the one who claims that Bane's ship don't have a cloaking device- yes there is no proofs of that -but i added mention of "cloaking device" in the holocron heist episode- it IS MENTIONED no matter what you say- so don't try to say i'm adding fanon -it is not fanon- or should there be more than one cloaking device like your 501st reasoning went (one trooper is not enough) well at least it is said that Denal and Rex are from the 501st so is two troopers enough to add appearance of 501st in "Cargo of Doom" and "Duel of Droids".... well enough of this for now -but i can't stand bad arguments....--Swashbuckler1138 10:12, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Question
What's your favorite Star Wars movie?--Alexyodaross 17:08, March 14, 2010

Re:Katuunko
Hmm, interesting. Yeah, I rewatched the iTunes version this morning and was looking for a Toydarian. Once the episode airs on Cartoon Network in a week, maybe I'll be able to spot him.  JangFett  (Talk) 21:53, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Listen
On The Palpatine Page i was just saying that what someone wrote was wrong, that's all, please don't give me a wraning i wasn't doing anything. please?--Masterclanner 05:36, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * but isn't that what i did? I wrote on the discussion what the problem was?
 * okay sorry i'll make it clear next time.

"Appearance section is correct"
About the text you wrote while voting for Sapphire (smuggler) in the GAN page. What did you mean with "Assuming, of course, that the Appearances section is correct"? The article doesn't even have an Appearances section. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 13:07, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Talk page comments
Hey CC,

Just an FYI, talk page posts are permanent record and shouldn't be reverted unless vandalism is the case. —Tommy 9281 18:51, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's funny, because I've seen several admins do the exact opposite. I guess it's just a matter of the individual. —Tommy 9281 18:59, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Lunker
Just one thing: Is Lunkers homeworld stated to be Naboo in Children of the Force ? It is in the German version and I want to get sure. -- Clone Commander Lee  Talk 19:03, March 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. -- Clone Commander Lee  Talk 19:09, March 16, 2010 (UTC)

Hey!
The Battle of Christophsis. You keep deleting the Hunter and putting it under it's own "category". The Hunter was a Venator-class Star Destroyer. Look it up! --Alexyodaross 03:19, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Nala Se
Hey CC, I know you haven't read or own Stealth, but I was wondering if you knew any other user who did, or if you have any way of finding a detailed summary/plot syonpsis. I checked with the user who did most of the update's for the book's article, but he's been unresponsive as of yet. I plan on getting the book myself eventually, but I'd like to know if Nala Se has a major or minor appearance before paying 15 dollars for it. Thanks, and enjoy your spring break. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 05:52, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I've contacted him, but didn't have much luck. Thanks for the info, regardless. And have fun in D.C.. I love it there. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 22:04, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey CC, in regards to Se, I've gotten the info from Chack, but I need your insight as to its placement in her biography. Also, in the novel she's only referred to as "Nala Shan"&mdash; a Kaminoan administrator of Kaliida Shoals. You think this is enough to assume it's a typo or perhaps a totally different character? At the moment I'm leaning towards either assuming it as a typo or giving it a possible appearance notation and a BTS note. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 01:18, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * I figured that would be the best course of action. Thank you for the input, and the link. I take a look at your efforts on that page from time to time. Really impressive. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 21:59, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

R2-KT
I just read the edit summary, sorry my mistake. I was trying to link it to the databank. All the information I provided was on her page there. Dr. Kermit ( Complain. ) 23:49, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Will do. =] -- Dr. Kermit ( Complain. ) 23:51, March 18, 2010 (UTC)

Separatist Dreadnaught Issue
I am trying to resolve what may be an inaccurate identification of the ship class to which the designation "Separatist dreadnaught" belongs. I have started a discussion about it by presenting my own reasoned out argument against the current article and proposing a change based upon my conclusions. I would like to open up the discussion to members of the TCW project to get their knowledge to resolve the issue expediently. Since you are the head of the TCW project, I figured you would be the best person to approach about this as I am unsure who among the project members could best help me in finding a resolution. Thank you. --R.Werner 12:11, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

Request
Hi CC,

As the resident authority for all things WP:TCW, can you give me a thorough copy-edit/pre-nom review of Tera Sinube please? I'm sure that you'd be able to catch anything that I may have missed, and if so, you can leave them in the form of objections on my talkpage. Thanks, —Tommy 9281 18:35, March 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Greatly appreciated. And there is no rush, so take your time :) —Tommy 9281 18:37, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Neebo
Can we say that Neebo was killed by Grievous. WP:ATT "Editors may make straightforward logical deductions based on fully attributed data that neither change the significance of the data nor require additional assumptions beyond what is in the source. It should be possible for any reader without specialist knowledge to understand the deductions."  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 09:07, March 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks I already thought that.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 19:36, March 30, 2010 (UTC)

Mission to Vs Skirmish on Felucia
Chack let me know that you were the one that talked with him and asked that Skirmish on Felucia be moved to Mission to Felucia. I just wanted to explain why I don't think Mission to Felucia is accurate for the article. The "mission to Felucia" was to check on the status of the Felucia Medical Center. Once they saw the station was destroyed and got shot down by Vulture droids, the mission was over. The article is about the skirmish between the Hondo Ohnaka's gang and the Jedi/Bounty Hunters/Nicillin farmers. The Jedi stumbled into the skirmish, but it really had nothing to do with their "mission." I'd like for Chack to delete Skirmish on Felucia so that Mission to Felucia can be moved back to that namespace. But I wanted to discuss my reasons with you and hear your side as to why you think "Mission to" is more accurate. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 19:39, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just want to make sure your interests are met here. You are OK to have Mission to Felucia moved back to Skirmish on Felucia, but you want to make sure that in a "prelude" section that a "mission to Felucia" happened, or do you also want to keep the Mission to Felucia article separate knowing it would only be a few sentences long? -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 00:44, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Season 3 episode articles
Could you delete them? It's obviously a joke. Alexrd 10:07, April 1, 2010 (UTC)(UTC)

I got the thing about not deleting things
I actually was the one who put them there, and I deleted them because someone told me they didn't belong. 75.150.65.76 02:52, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Senate Commando
I thought Senate Commandos were in Senate Murders. Correct me if I'm wrong, I just thought there were. --Master Gevallen 10:04, April 2, 2010
 * I simply thought in one scene they were shown standing with a Senate Guard. I'm probably wrong though.

Draco
Hey Rex,

I've updated Draco's article with the latest Legacy issue. Solicitations are out for the next arc of the series, and it seems that new big info will be revealed about the dude in Issue 49. Accordingly, I was considering removing the nom, but I ultimately decided to leave it. Leaving it on the FAN page assures article quality, as it forces me to keep it up-to-date and invites objections to anything that could be improved. The only party who receives any detriments is me, really, as it prevents me from adding any additional noms. So, even if you and other inquisitors can't lend your support for another three or four months, I'm totally OK with that. Or, if the article were promoted to FA status prior to Issue 49's release, you have my guarantee that I would continue to keep it updated, just as similar FA'd Legacy articles like Treis Sinde are.

In the meantime, I doubt that Ganner and Sigel will play a role in the next Legacy arc, so feel free to review them. :D

Let me know what you think, re: leaving the nom up. Cheers! Menkooroo 03:48, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response! Regarding the Legacy articles that were never updated --- I have a question about that. When the inq's place an article on the chopping block, do you notify the user who originally FA'd it? I ask because Admiral Nick didn't know that Gar Stazi was due to be terminated until it was too late, and ended up updating the article a day after it lost its FA status. If notifying the original nominator isn't a policy, maybe you could suggest it at the next inq meeting? With that said, I'll reiterate that I wouldn't wait until an article was on the chopping block before updating it. :^) And yeah, no worries about inq's being hesitant to review articles on major Legacy characters. Like I said, I'm willing to wait. Menkooroo 04:06, April 4, 2010 (UTC)