Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Anti-Alien League

 * Nominated by:  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Something different for a change.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support GTQ3:09, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 21:32, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 10:24, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Gorton Colu has a CSWE entry and is mentioned in the KOTOR Strategy Guide --- do you know if either of those sources mention the Anti-alien league?
 * Nope, no mention in the CSWE.
 * Strategy Guide? SoresuMakashi might be able to help you out; he GA'd Colu.
 * I'll see if he can help.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Let me know when you find out whether or not the league is mentioned (directly or indirectly) in the strategy guide.Menkooroo 04:45, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * No mention in the guide.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 17:02, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking that out. I saw some of the inquiries you made on various talk pages --- good hustle! Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * "The Anti-Alien League was a Humanocentrist group formed by Gorton Colu" is currently sourced to The Essential Atlas.
 * Resourced.
 * I could and should fix this one myself, but it'll be handy for you to know if you don't already: Only use punctuation in image captions if it's a complete sentence. Menkooroo 02:43, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:06, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Rubefacient
 * Context of Taris's multiple cities should be added.
 * Done.
 * Mention that aliens were prohibited from UpCity under normal conditions. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * There needs to be a year in the intro
 * Try now.
 * I'm sorry, I was confused by the banner. Because of that banner, I think this should be made with a History section to avoid the dissonance caused by it. I'll not force you to, but it would probably be beneficial. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved the image over. Does this help?
 * Greatly. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * You say the league was mentioned in the game in the body but say it appeared in the BTS.
 * Corrected.
 * Because the article assumes 100% completion, you do not need the clause saying he could be avoided. That is, unless you include the alternate dialogue tracks (which you should).
 * Alternate dialogue tracks? There are no others that mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Revan can ignore the man, can agree with his speciesism, or tell him to screw off. Which of these elicits the mention? If it is the lattermost, remove the portion saying that Colu mentioned it to Revan and say that he could mention it to Revan given the proper dialogue in the BTS. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe he mentions it the first time Revan talks to him (and before any dialogue choices come up).  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:26, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Then say that Revan can choose not to speak to him. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 13:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the runaround. I couldn't wrap my head around it the right way. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Speciesism FTW NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:17, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the article should go into more detail about the player's potential conversations with Colu, The player can agree with him or refute him, if I remember correctly, and the reactions of the side characters (the Wookiee and the Twi'lek) change as well. This should probably all be mentioned in BTS. ~ SavageBob 06:24, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * While that might work in Colu's article, in no other place in Colu's dialogue does it even remotely mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 01:12, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Isn't it still pertinent, though, since Colu is out touting the league? ~ SavageBob 16:21, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, try now.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 19:21, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that should be in the BTS; the party doesn't have to include Zaalbar or Mission at that point. Instead, I think you should mention that "If the party includes Mission or Zaalbar, they react to his anti-alien rant by blah blah blah" and/or "Colu reacts to the Wookiee and Twi'lek by saying blah blah blah." ~ SavageBob 19:40, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Try now.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 20:00, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry to keep harping on this, but it goes beyond even that. If either the Wookiee or the Twi'lek is in the party, Colu does chide Revan. But there are further levels of interaction depending on whether Revan agrees or disagrees with Colu's rant. If you have the game saved near hear, play through with the two in your party and you'll see what I mean. If not, try to find the dialogue files or a video walkthrough. ~ SavageBob 20:27, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Also, guest nom for WP:KOTOR.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:58, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Obitoki

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:37, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now Podracing: there's a sport. At least when it's real podracing, where as long as you take off your helmet and shed your gloves no one can say a damn thing until someone's knees touch the ice.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support


 * 1) Jinzler 10:57, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) If you ask me, this article is obi-toki, er, okey-dokey! ~ SavageBob 16:16, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Are you sure this guy actually exist in canon? The Complete Cross-sections states that 18 racer qualified to the Boonta, and Obitoki is not one of them. Furthermore, the novel incorrectly identifies the racers in the scene where Obitoki is first mentioned. It mentions Obitoki, Elan Mak, and Habba Kee passing Anakin in the second lap, but in the film they are Ark Roose, Gasgano and Teemto. Obitoki's scenes doesn't fit well with the film, but the two could be "merged" by stating that Obitoki, Elan Mak and Habba Kee and Ark Roose, Gasgano and Teemto all surpassed Anakin. Darth Morrt 22:46, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * How about I just update it with an Ambig tag and beef up the Bts with the explaination? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:49, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * It'd be OK. Darth Morrt 08:56, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Episode I: Incredible Cross-Sections This is the CS book you were referring to? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:01, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is. The book says: "Eighteen Podracers, many well known at Mos Espa, qualify for the great Boonta Eve Race, in which nine-year old Anakin..." And there are listed the names of 18 racer and pictures of their podracers. Obitoki, Habba Kee and Xelbree, the three racers unique to the novelization are not among the 18 listed in the cross-sections book. Additionally, Obitoki is mentioned in the script of TPM. Darth Morrt 21:43, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Updated for these sources. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:58, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it would be useful if you created a Podracer (profession) article to link to. The current podracer article seems to double for both podracer pods and the individuals that flew them, but I think we can justify a separate article. --Jinzler 11:27, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:51, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Isn't there a source to state that Anakin is the only Human who can podrace? If so, it's probably worth noting that Obitoki was a non-Human. (Also, not required, but a link to his CUSWE page would be nice as an external link.) ~ SavageBob 02:11, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind; CSWE says "very few Humans could do it." He does have a CSWE entry, though, which has some info that needs incorporating (such as the fact that he's non-Human, and that he is a canonical podracer from the Boonta Eve Classic ). ~ SavageBob 02:14, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the entry is ambiguous over whether he raced in the Boonta. But he did race against Sebulba and experience the mishaps explained in TPM novel, just maybe not when TPM novel says. ~ SavageBob 18:12, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Does the entry confirm he is male? Otherwise updated. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:58, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Here's the full entry: "Obitoki An alien Podracer who competed against Sebulba during the final years of the Galactic Republic. Sebulba used the heat vents on his Podracer to cut through Obitoki's engines, knocking Obitoki out of the race. Another Podracer, Habba, was also knocked out by flying into Obitoki's debris." . So, no gender specified. If I were you, though I'd consider the CSWE stuff canon, but not the stuff from the novel, since that seems to contradict most other sources. In other words, can we assume his race was on Tatooine or in the Boonta Eve Classic? ~ SavageBob 23:29, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * We can't assume it was on Tatooine (I got it in my head that Sebulba only raced there. :P), but I think the generic scenario of the book's story should be fine to include, which gives extra detail on why his pod crashed. Updated again, and thanks for taking the time to transcribe that. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:24, March 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * You'll need to source the bit about him being mentioned in the script, as the script isn't a commercially available product like the novelization is. A google search for "The Phantom Menace script" oughtta gitcha whatcha need. Menkooroo 06:58, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:29, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Is he/she mentioned in Star Wars Episode I The Phantom Menace: Illustrated Screenplay? ~ SavageBob 22:44, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Airten

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Alliance Sympathizer.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Menkooroo 15:08, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 23:42, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * According to card statistics, supports Luke on Bespin? Should that be added to his BTS, and if so, should it be proof he was on Bespin during its takeover in 3 ABY? Same applies for already-comprehensive article Kuep. Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Card seems to indicate that he may support Luke on Bespin --- if the player wants him to. I don't think that means he necessarily does. I think the article's fine not mentioning it. Menkooroo 15:08, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the input. Hanzo Hasashi 00:19, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Hakin

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Former Skiff Racer.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 06:33, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * The sentence beginning with "In 0 BBY" is very long and winding with a lot of commas. Can you break it up into multiple sentences?
 * Done.
 * Can you give a more specific reference for Ref #5 (ie, a specific card)? Menkooroo 01:34, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Overlooked the fact that what I was citing did not have any url :/. Now taken care of. Hanzo Hasashi 05:09, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Maer

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Tauntaun Handler.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 18:51, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * As his sex is known, can you start some of the sentences with "He" rather than using "Maer" every time?
 * Have started every other sentence with "He" instead of Maer.
 * Like above, can you source 3 ABY to something?
 * Would ESB count? Hanzo Hasashi 18:30, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * The New Essential Chronology is usually the safest bet. Technically, ESB itself doesn't say anything about it being at 3 ABY. Menkooroo 18:34, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks. Hanzo Hasashi 18:42, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * The last sentence of the bio kinda reads like he remained on Hoth and continued to handle Tauntauns after the defeat. As Under the Ice just states that he became well-known afterward, can you tweak the sentence to reflect that? Menkooroo 16:54, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Wasn't sure how to be honest, but have now reworded his legacy to the way Corman Quien's was worded. Hanzo Hasashi 18:30, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Like with Airten, Maer's statistics say he supports Luke on Hoth. Worth noting? Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Guess not. Hanzo Hasashi 00:19, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Fun World Founder's Day

 * Nominated by: Another holiday, another PAR-TAY! Just don't try to get married. ~ SavageBob 03:12, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 07:32, March 3, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Fizz-Pop Cap (with foil cluster)

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 03:33, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: You know you wish you had one.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 08:16, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * It just occurred to me that "Fizz-Pop Cap" could refer to some sort of pop-top from a soda can instead of the actual hat/cap Spilfer is shown to be wearing. Am I right to assume that "Cap" here is the hat? What do others think? ~ SavageBob 03:02, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Upon further reflection, it's too ambiguous; infobox duly gutted. ~ SavageBob 06:50, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Balderdash

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:53, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I have two. Number One: Win on the parts of Mr. Hidalgo and Mr. Ens. *applause* Number Two: A prime example of why Wookieepedia is so addicting. You never know what you might turn up just before you sign off.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) From the Council Chambers:
 * 2) *Otherwise, looks good.  Master Jonathan  (Council Chambers)  Saturday, March 5, 2011, 01:10 UTC
 * 1) *Otherwise, looks good.  Master Jonathan  (Council Chambers)  Saturday, March 5, 2011, 01:10 UTC

Comments

Terrafin

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:11, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I'd like to officially motion we begin referring to the "duck test" as the "terrafin test" so it is more alliterative and "Star Warsy."

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi 05:13, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  OLIOSTER   (talk) 12:52, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm never quite sure what qualifies as a sofixit or not, but could you possible add "dish" or something similar to "had a serving of this for breakfast the day"?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 17:02, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:09, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * As Battle of the Corellian Queen is a conjectural title, you must link it in a different way "&hellip;took part in the Battle of the Corellian Queen." as that implies it is a canonical title. 1358  (Talk)  15:24, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Fighter (painting)

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:54, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I will keep nomming paintings until there are no more to nom! MUAHAHAHAHAHA!  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:54, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  1358  (Talk)  19:32, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Again, me fail at precise description, so any help is appreciated.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:59, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Galactic Solutions Industries

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 14:09, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Not a very large company...

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Sith trooper (catacombs)

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 15:40, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Ouch.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Warrior's Honor

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:45, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Painting painting painting painting painting

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Getting better at the whole "describing it" thing, but if you see ways to improve it, go ahead.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:45, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Mol Ni'mai's hut

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 17:49, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: With this, the RIS project will be finished!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Kaul

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 19:18, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another poor soul trapped in the Refugee Sector.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Palso Thern

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 19:29, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Hmm. I'm not sure an image of an action figure can be considered canonical. I think the design of the action figure is fair game and canon, but the image that's being used in this infobox is basically making the statement, "Palso Thern stood in this exact pose at some point in galactic history." Since it's essentially an image of a representation of him, I think it can only go in BTS.
 * So should the photo from the movie be considered the canon one? And what about Oxixo's photo, as AFAIK he only appears as an action figure, unless some later source confirms he is also in the movie.
 * Uploaded a cropped photo. Hanzo Hasashi 23:16, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, I replied to your query on my talk page; yes, he does seems to appear in the PhotoComic, but only from the neck down thanks to some wonky panel cropping. ~ SavageBob 20:54, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi 22:37, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Oxixo

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 19:29, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments