Talk:LEGO

The official company name is not Lego, but LEGO. Should we change the title of the page to reflect that? -Gorblax, 5:29 August 24 2006 (EST)
 * Wikipedia also has it as "Lego." - TopAce 09:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is wrong then. Check the official LEGO site for confirmation. It is LEGO not Lego. Sulgran 10:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I checked wiktionary and found this. Moving it to LEGO.

New sections added
Hi. The new sections added in the past week (crafts, locations etc.) were done by me (not a Wookieepedian...yet).I hope you like them. hopefully some pictures will be added. 05:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Wookipediaosity
Why do we really need a list of Star Wars LEGO (or Lego) sets? Couldn't that be considered advertising?Geekboy42 21:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC) \\Captain Kwenn// &mdash; Ahoy! 16:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Would having a list of Star Wars movies be considered advertising? —Xwing328 (Talk) 23:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but this isn't LEGO(or Lego)pedia. It's WOOKIEpedia-star wars, not LEGO (or Lego). See the difference? Geekboy42 15:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope, because, by the same token, "it's WOOKIEEpedia-star wars, not MOVIES. See the difference?" It's Star Wars, ergo it's relevant. We also have lists of Star Wars books, games and trading cards, so why not LEGO? -
 * That was meant to be a completely rhetorical question. Anyways, it was decided before that a list of, say action figures, was okay, but individual articles for each figure usually isn't appropriate. —Xwing328 (Talk) 04:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It's probably alright to have a list of LEGO sets as long as you don't list the suggested retail price and where to find the set next to it... And I for one use this list occasionally. -- Darth Phonebook  22:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)