User talk:Trip391

Archive 1 {| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Trip391!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash; Trak Nar  Ramble on 07:27, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * }

Unsourced Human fanaticism
Ok let's settle this, how about we carry out a duck test?2.218.38.253 06:04, April 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * As you've already been told numerous times, do not assume and say that facial covered characters are Human without confirmation from an official source. You cannot apply the duck test to those characters and you cannot go around and guess. If you continue to do so, you will continue to be blocked. Trip391 (talk) 06:12, April 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * Trip, I don't think that rebel commando (no hat) should be humanoid as...
 * 1,he looks human
 * 2,there is no source to say he is humanoid 2.218.38.253 09:33, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Then what is your point for him being Human again? Trip391 (talk) 16:18, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Trip, in the star wars the clone wars episode the shades of reason, i caught a glimpse of the mandalorian police captain's nose and it was a human nose.Is it evidence for the captain being human?2.218.38.253 15:01, April 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Humanoid nose =/= Human Trip391 (talk) 16:18, April 5, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry the rules are close to but not the same as some other wikias i use. Zenkid (talk) 17:28, April 2, 2014 (UTC)

Information
I've expanded the information on Trade Federation Patrol Boat and History of it, why were you deleted it?Ben800013 (talk) 21:15, April 2, 2014 (UTC)
 * As the edit summary had said, the information is unsourced, or not relevant to the article, and does not belong. Trip391 (talk) 22:12, April 2, 2014 (UTC)

2.218.38.253 08:48, April 6, 2014 (UTC)Could we do a duck test on ven zallow?2.218.38.253 08:48, April 6, 2014 (UTC)

Jedi Exile
No, there is no character in KotORII by the name of Meetra Surik. Period. The rest of the article maintains the canonical nature of the character, but in the context of the game, it's irrelevant. Give me a break. 72.200.151.13 03:11, April 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, the canonical name IS Meetra Surik... Trip391 (talk) 03:18, April 7, 2014 (UTC)

2.218.38.253 06:17, April 7, 2014 (UTC)As uthar Wynn is an individual of an unspecified species, could we do a duck test on him?2.218.38.253 06:17, April 7, 2014 (UTC)

wioslea
hi the wioslea page does not need black on the template?-- Emperor Jarjarkine   Senate Hall  04:29, April 9, 2014 (UTC) I think that it what i added... I see that you not revert my edits :D For me thats fine ! So the most part of em were good ?
 * Black is actually there as eye color...? Trip391 (talk) 04:32, April 9, 2014 (UTC)

Trip, is it normall that the orange links ( for redirect ) does not work for me ?-- Emperor Jarjarkine   Senate Hall  20:07, April 9, 2014 (UTC)

Alice in Wonderland reference
I was wondering why my link for a "non-canon" reference for the Sarlaac was deleted.Ktorg117 (talk) 06:20, April 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * As a rule we don't list non-Star Wars appearances in appearance sections of articles; they would be way too massive otherwise. Trip391 (talk) 06:28, April 13, 2014 (UTC)