Talk:Zekk

Can someone give a rundown of what Zekk did during the Black Sun crisis? I don't have access to those books. StarNeptune 10:00, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Un-joining
Jaina and Zekk were un-joined

Source, please? I don't remember this in TSW... Thanos6 18:56, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The source is Betrayal --Jacen Solo 18:45, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Affliliations
I find stating that he was a member of the Shadow Academy and a Dark Jedi a bit redundant, as the Shadow Academy trained Dark Jedi. I find it to be akin to listing Jedi Praxeum and New Jedi Order as an affiliation. I personally feel it would be less redundant to remove Dark Jedi as an affiliation if Shadow Academy is already stated.

As for Joiner being an affiliation, I disagree. Joiners are affiliated with The Colony (IIRC), so listing him as a Joiner is also redundant if it is stated he is affiliated with The Colony. StarNeptune 16:03, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Age
Betrayal lists Jaina as being older than Zekk, yet in the YJK, he's definitely older than the twins. I think a retcon might be soon needed. Doran 19:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I think you mean Betrayal has him listed as younger than Jaina. Anyway, we don't know yet if this is a continuity flub or a retcon, so maybe a note in the BTS section is needed.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 19:44, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

The Bi-sexual part
He may not be because that is during a time when he is linked mentally with Jaina And Jaina may have those feelings about Jag So he is thinking with Jaina

15:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree and plus before joining Zekk had feelings for Jaina. This joining thing is really freaky. JainaSolo32
 * As the saying goes, there's no fire without a spark. Thanos6 19:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Can someone give me a excerpt that gives an example of the sex thing please.Purpilia 03:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't have the book with me right now, but it's true that he does have a level of affection for Jag, but it does not constitute as bisexuality since he and Jaina were more like one person than two at the moments. --Sauron18 09:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I vote we leave it as it is; a "possibility." Thanos6 00:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I dunno, we'd otherwise have to consider everyone who ever joined to have been bisexual (or tri or who knows how many genders were joined)--Sauron18 03:25, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * To the best of my knowledge, I never saw any of the other Joiners develop those kind of feelings; didn't Jaina and Zekk join closer to each other than to anyone else? Sort of like how Han and Luke had a very mild joining... Thanos6 04:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Han and Luke were resistant to the joining process and Zekk and Jaina stayed in the nest longer than any of the other Joiners. As a result they became one person. I also think that it was Jaina who fantasized having sex with Jagged Fel and Zekk just happened to feel the same thing. Before the whole joining thing Jaina and Zekk had feelings for each other since the Young Jedi Knights series but never did admit it. I don't think it is a possibility. JainaSolo32 18:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This kind of thing makes me glad we never got to see things from Unuthul's point of view :P --Sauron18 20:30, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Can I still get an excerpt so I know what was thought.Purpilia 03:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * So Zekk is bisexual???OxfordScholar09 15:56, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
 * No. Zekk is not bisexual, the feelings that he had for Jag were a result of joining with Jaina. He has feelings for Jaina but Jaina thinks of him as a brother. Too bad, I would like for them to get together. Jaina Solo 00:27, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think that the "possibly" addendum should even be included. This is an encyclopedia, not a speculation website.  At most, it belongs here, in the talk page.  Unless Lucas or Pena or Chee "canofies" this, and given Lucas' propensity to keep Star Wars family friendly that is very unlikely, I don't think it should be in the article.  And user jaina, no, she shouldn't marry Zekk.  Jag's the man!  Besides, we need to do away with the millions of Jedi running around.  It's about time for a non-sensitive Skywalker and Jag would be a perfect candidate to help create a main character that relies on skill instead of the force.  This is after all, Star Wars, not Jedi Wars, like Lucas made the prequels.--PhilCarr 14:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Jaina+Jag = Emperor Fel in legacy time, populer thought line. Jaina's kids would be force sensitive despite the father, Leia/Han for instance. And theres been bi chracters before, Juhani for instance, but no Zekk is not gay, it was part of the Kilik effect and its getting riduculus even for people to assume that he is due to such a small line. Jedi Dude 14:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks "Dude". I forgot to mention that he feels Jaina's feelings for Jag, he doesn't develop his own feelings, as the article states.  As for Juhani, when did this happen?  I've played through KotOR as light female, and never got that impression.--PhilCarr 14:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't get me wrong I like Jag alot but after he tried to shoot her down I lost much respect for him. Besides Zekk and Jaina seem to have reached couple status in Betrayal so there's hope for them yet. Lieutenant Colonel Solo (Rogue Squardon Personnel) [[Image:Rouge Squadron.jpg|20px]] 01:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Wildyoda 04:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm removing the whole thing because this is what we'd call "original research" on wikipedia. I think it's best if it is published somewhere else and we make a brief mention of it (i.e. "Some fans have stated theories that Zekk is bisexual... see reference") and link there. The "possibly" in there doesn't make it any more valid and phrases like "The character's bisexuality is questioned" is POV. It is questioned by whom? I opine that the whole thing needs to be backed up with text or another source and written NPOV if it is to be a part of the article.
 * We ain't Wikipedia, we're better in basically every way. I'm oh-so-tempted to revert this, but that would likely spark off another damn edit war.  I'm going to let an admin decide. Thanos6 12:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * We may not be wikipedia, but if we don't have some level of consistency we won't be able to distinguish between verifiable information and fanon before long. Besides, when you click the edit button, look at the directions immediately below the text box: "Submitted content must be from a canon source and verifiable" If you put an intelligent source up next to it, nobody has any reason to delete it. Wildyoda 22:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)