User talk:AV-6R7/Archive 1

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, AV-6R7!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash;Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:06, May 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * }

Comments
Please remember to always sign your comments with 4 tildes ~. Supreme Emperor (talk) 23:15, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
 * Again, remember to sign your comments with ~ . Trip391 (talk) 05:36, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Is that not the Sig button?AV-6R7 19:29, July 29, 2014 (UTC)

Your signature
Your current signature is violating the third item Wookieepedia's signature policy: You must include your actual username. Trip391 (talk) 06:00, July 23, 2014 (UTC)

Re:2-1B
Unless there is a source that states what something is specifically, it should not be added. Espcially if there is any room for doubt, like whether a droid is a [2-1B or the similar looking 2-ZH, we cannot state it is one or the other without more information. Just because something may seem "obvious" does not actually mean it is true; that is speculation, and is not allowed. If there is a source that states specifically what droid model was in the episode, then it could be stated to be that model, but since that may not be the case, it cannot. [[User:Trip391|Trip391]] (talk) 05:36, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * If there is no source to verify it (or a blog article, etc.), and there could be a reason for doubt, then yea, it shouldn't really be in the articles. Trip391 (talk) 05:44, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd say nah. While it might not be obviously a 2-1B or 2-ZH, it might be one of them, and making an "unidentified  xxx" for it wouldn't really be necessary. Trip391 (talk) 05:51, July 28, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry. Its from the two Jedi Academy Books--Wookieedude12 (talk) 02:26, November 3, 2014 (UTC)

Finis Valorum/Canon nomination
Hi. I just finished updating Finis Valorum/Canon, which you voted for on its ongoing Featured Article nomination, with new information from the book Tarkin. Since you voted for it, this is an FYI so that you're aware of the changes in the event you would like to review them to ensure that you still support the nomination. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 21:20, November 30, 2014 (UTC)

"Royal House of Naboo" in SW Journeys
Hello, AV-6R7. Since you seem to play Star Wars Journeys: The Phantom Menace, could you tell me whether the name "Royal House of Naboo" is actually used in it, and in which context? Thanks in advance. -- Lelal Mekha  (Audience Room) 10:38, December 17, 2014 (UTC)

Re:Theelin
Restored. Please update the article with the appropriate sources. Cade   Calrayn  04:21, December 19, 2014 (UTC)

Image sourcing
If appears in Ultimate Factivity Collection: Star Wars, why isn't the source listed under "other sources"? Trip391 (talk) 05:43, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * I am not familiar with the ins and outs of working with the images themselves. I can add it if you would tell me how. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 05:45, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, figured it out. Done. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 05:48, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Chopper droid
Let me make sure I understand this correctly: You want Chopper medical droid moved to Chopper droid and 2-1B medical droid/Canon moved to 2-1B medical droid? I just want to make sure I handle things correctly.-- Exiled Jedi   (Greetings)  15:07, December 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * All taken care of.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:53, December 27, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Clearing pages
So, DC-15A blaster is where the canon version of the DC-15S needs to go? They changed it from A to S in the canon switch?-- Exiled Jedi   (Greetings)  21:38, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * All right, the pages are ready for the canon articles.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:34, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Storm Commando has been cleared for use.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  07:13, January 3, 2015 (UTC)

Change to voting option on WP:TC Sepper

 * As you voted simultaneously with me changing the vote option, I am now required to inform you that I have changed the redirect option on the Sepper TC to link to Confederacy of Independent Systems instead of List of phrases and slang. The relevant edit is here. Please review the TC page and change your vote if so inclined. If you review the change and are still in favor of redirection to the different article, you don't have to do anything. JorrelWiki-shrinkable.pngFraajic 04:34, January 11, 2015 (UTC)

Canon article improvement
Hi! Since you expressed an interest, I wanted to let you know that I've started a thread regarding selecting our first project to begin working on improving canon articles. The first task is to identify which article to work on first. You can find the thread here. ProfessorTofty (talk) 01:53, January 12, 2015 (UTC)

Eopie image
thx for adding the image on Eopie/Canon. I didn't know how :( I really appreciate it. --RROGON (talk) 01:20, January 14, 2015 (UTC)

here is a "superior" pic: thumb

Zuckuss/4-LOM error
Hi, since I saw you working on the Zuckuss/canon page a lot I wanted to let you know that the switching of the those two bounty hunters their names only happened because of a mistake and I have proof of the writer of the book himself. Concretely, this would mean that it's 4-LOM who's present in Star Wars 1 and bot Zuckuss http://boards.theforce.net/threads/the-official-jason-fry-discussion-thread.50004273/page-34 --178.117.184.14 23:20, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * This I know, but until we get an official source saying otherwise, we stick with the Kenner naming scheme. Also, please sign your post. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 23:03, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * I honestly do not know what isn't official about it, the writer of the book in whoch both were identified hilself states it was a mistaken, than why would we stick with information we know is wrong. --178.117.184.14 23:20, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm really not the person you should be discussing this with. Maybe put your objections on the Zuckuss/Canon talkpage. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 23:21, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree that we should change it. Jason has acknowledged that it was a mistake. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:21, January 14, 2015 (UTC)
 * I think we should wait until his name is acknowledged in an appearance or source. If 4-LOM, the names are swapped. If Zuckuss, think are kept as they are. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 23:25, January 14, 2015 (UTC)

Star Wars Journeys question
I suppose you have the star wars journeys app, as you have recentky added a lot of info coming from it. I have at this point unlocked all profiles, but two (in both AotC and RotS): one which I cannot find in the story, and Amidala in Rots and anakin in aotc of which I both have the profile but not the full info. Could you perhaps help me with this? --Hafje (talk) 12:35, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Have you played the Minigame for AotC and RotS? I was able to unlock Skywalker's full profile by playing the AotC activity, and Amidala's by playing the RotS activity. The missing profiles at the end are a mystery to me too. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 20:28, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * I seemd to have missed though, thanks and btw you get the missing profiles at the end when you have all other full profiles. --Hafje (talk) 20:42, January 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * K, thanks -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 20:43, January 18, 2015 (UTC)

Star Wars Celebration
Hey AV. Are you still planning on going to Celebration and being part of Wookieepedia's fan area? Wikia is currently working on its presence, which Wookieepedia is part of, and we need to know who&mdash;as of right now&mdash;is going. If you are going, can you email me at brandon@wikia-inc.com? Please include your full name (hence the email, instead of just asking you to say it here). Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:23, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * I have sent my response. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 23:29, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:33, January 29, 2015 (UTC)

Canon articles
If there's not an article at a pagename, don't add /Canon. Just overwrite the page. Elite Corps is a redirect. Cade   Calrayn  00:28, January 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * K, I just used the existing redlink on Gree's page to create it. Sorry. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 00:32, January 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * You're still doing this, a week later. I've fixed two articles for you already, and you just created another one at "AT-ST driver/Canon." Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:35, February 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * I leave them intact because some legends sources use names like Elite Corps as it's title like the Encyclopedia. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 21:57, February 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm sure I don't know what you're talking about, but it doesn't matter. You'll need to start doing it correctly. Please revise any and all recent creations of yours that are not at correctly named titles. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:10, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * I revised AT-ST driver a dew hours ago, and my other recent contributions were either new namespaces entirely or were redlinks. In CC Gree's Encyclopedia page, the 41st is called simply the Elite Corps. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 04:13, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Is what you're saying that there is no Legends article, but the reason you created it at "/Canon" is because there could be? Like when I was creating Treason and Treason/Canon - neither article existed, but I went ahead and created them both. I'm not sure if there's a rule that if the Legends page hasn't been created and we want to create the Canon page, that we're required to create the Legends page also. ProfessorTofty (talk) 05:09, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * No, I created Elite Corps/Canon because the 41st was referred to as the Elite Corps in a Legends resource. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 18:10, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * You've just filled the Kel Dor/Canon page with red links, presumably because their canon page has not been created yet. While I get this, is it necessary to do this for such articles as helium and Dorin gas? It's not like they change from canon to non-canon. CC3636 (talk) 16:36, February 23, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, those Legends links do not belong on a Canon page, even as a placeholder. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 15:39, February 23, 2015 (UTC)

Filling in canon redlinks
Hi. As someone who has been involved in recent Senate Hall discussions about a Canon/Legends default change, I wanted to draw your attention to this thread and invite you to participate in our efforts to fill in as many /Canon redlinks as possible. Hope to see you join in! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 20:52, March 1, 2015 (UTC)

Model 47
Hi AV-6R7; while your enthusiasm to correct the information on the Model 47 Spitrolighter page are appreciated, I was in the middle of an edit to correct and expand the information, and your changes edit conflicted me. As you added the image I uploaded in one of your edits, you could clearly see I was working on the article. Please be more careful in the future; editors moving pages are generally in the process of editing them to reflect new information, and edit conflicts cause unnecessary problems. Cheers, - Sir Cavalier of One ( Squadron channel ) 01:10, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

Servants of the Empire: Rebel in the Ranks
Hi! I noticed that you've been editing the Appearances section of Servants of the Empire: Rebel in the Ranks, but I currently have the article checked out as Inuse. Could you leave off for now? I'll take care of the Appearances and then if you notice anything I might have missed when I'm done, you're welcome to go back in and take care of it, though I'm trying to be pretty thorough. ProfessorTofty (talk) 17:26, March 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, I completely agree-- it's an excellent series and it's already introduced so much stuff back into canon just in these first two books. Fancy a nerf steak? ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:21, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

Boles Roor/Canon
Hiya AV. I was doing some snooping when I remembered that you placed a tag on Boles Roor/Canon, and then I realized I never left you a message here like I thought I did (Though the talk page also has a similar message). Anyways, I was just wondering what it was for in terms of the article, and what needs to be removed. As far as know, the body and whatnot should all be sourced directly to Roor's film appearances. I figured maybe I had too much unneeded Legends material in the BtS, and so I removed some. I was wondering if you had anything specific in mind. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:18, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the Legend materials gone now. You can get rid of it. It was probaly a knee-jerk reaction when I saw the old DB entries in the N&R sec. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 23:24, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, alright. Yah, that's all the BtS section really, as all of the dev background is found in otherwise Legends stuff. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:30, March 17, 2015 (UTC)

Update
Please make sure to add the Update tag to articles that need them from newly added Appearances. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 00:53, March 19, 2015 (UTC)

DK Readers
Hey AV. I would encourage you to not add the DK Reader reissues into canon pages right now. ProfessorTofty correctly posted this thread asking for opinions about how to treat them, because they were originally books that would now be considered Legends. Let's wait to add them until the community has had the discussion on that thread. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:54, March 19, 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, I've actually started doing so myself, at least for material that only appears in the new edition of What is a Wookiee? As I noted in the thread, the material is clearly canon as it was reviewed by the Lucasfilm Story Group. So I don't really think the canonicity of the material is debatable, it's just a question of how we ultimately section off the pages. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:01, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think ProfToft is debating the canonicity of the reissued books, which have went through the Story Group. It's merely how we categorize the pages for the books themselves. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 00:03, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * I wasn't referring to the canonicity. But you're adding links that will very likely have to be changed moving forward and will very likely be the Legends page, thus creating more work, so it's easier to just hold off and add them once we have a plan. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 00:13, March 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok then. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 00:14, March 20, 2015 (UTC)

Ask Aak
Hi. Do you know where Ask Aak appears in Episode III (per your recent edit)? I know that the Legends page says that, but he does not appear in the credits and I don't know where he appears in the film. I checked the likeliest scenes, namely when Palpatine returns to Coruscant after the kidnapping and the night at the opera, but he was not there. Can you clarify? Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 21:17, March 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * I really don't know. I only added it according to his Legends page, which I assumed was accurate. If he were in the movie, I would assume it would be a scene featuring the Senate Rotunda or the Opera house. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 21:18, March 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * I also saw it on the Legends page but, because I couldn't verify it, I left it off the Canon page. I'm going to revert it for now, and then ask on the talk page. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 21:30, March 22, 2015 (UTC)

Two versions of Empire's AAT tanks
Hi! Thanks for adding link to Imperial Assault Tank on AAT tank page. But i noticed that there is two versions of AAT tanks in that comic issue. Imperial, and, i think, lightly armored AAT, federation-like. I cant upload images on wikia, so... http://i.imgur.com/NEwg5Hs.png At left, there is definitely light armored tank with launchers in the base. Heavily armored Imperial does not have them. Can you add the frame onto page? Lone Guardian (talk) 04:41, March 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * It appears they are supposed to be the same thing. Strange. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 06:03, March 26, 2015 (UTC)

Writing tip
Hey AV. Wanted to give you a quick writing tip, from something I've noticed in some of your contributions. For an example, check out the edits I made here. You'll notice that I changed all of the instances where you used the word "would." For example, your text will often say things like "A would corner B" or "Y would fight Z." Instead of doing that, you should say "A cornered B" or "Y fought Z." There's no reason to say "would," which is a word that suggests the future. It has a better flow and a better tense. That make sense? Let me know if you have any questions about that. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 00:16, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tip. ;) -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 00:17, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem. On another note, are you still planning on working at the Wookieepedia table at Celebration? If so, we'll have t-shirts for everyone there. Can you tell me your size? - Brandon Rhea (talk) 00:51, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't really thinks so. I may be attending Celebration with some family members of mine that live out in Cali. EDIT: I also doubt I am qualified, or old enough for such a responsibility within our community. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 01:47, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 01:56, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your understanding. I hope you guys put on a great show at the booth(not a literal show of course, but you know what I mean). -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 01:57, March 27, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Coruscant Guard
No problem, I'll take care of it. Coruscantfan (Talk) 08:51, March 30, 2015 (UTC)

Rebels Utai
Hey there AV. I was just curious where you saw an Utai in the new season 2 Rebels trailer. Cevan (talk) 23:17, April 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Near the landed orange B-wing. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 23:20, April 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you talking about the person showing the B-wing to the Rebels? Cevan (talk) 23:34, April 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, his height, skin color, and facial features are consistent of those of an Utai, not a Mon Calamari. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 01:42, April 19, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd have to disagree there. The sharp point on the back of his head is something all Mon Calamari have; Utai don't have that at all. You also don't see his eyes bulging out at all like an Utai's. Cevan (talk) 01:51, April 19, 2015 (UTC)

Ultimate
How in the name of the Force did you get an advanced copy of Ultimate Star Wars!? Nivlacanator (talk) 04:06, April 21, 2015 (UTC)


 * ... I hate your face... :P Nivlacanator (talk)  04:09, April 21, 2015 (UTC)


 * Nah, nothing I can't wait 7 and a half days for. Nivlacanator (talk)  04:24, April 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually, I still haven't gotten my copy (my Barnes & Noble sold out before I got there) could you look up what Lando's farm is identified as and whatever other relevant info for that? Thanks AV! Nivlacanator (talk)  04:50, May 6, 2015 (UTC)

Quotes
AV, you don't need to vote for quotes that have already been placed on the queue. Vote for quotes that are still on the nomination pages.  IFYLOFD  ( Talk ) 03:59, April 22, 2015 (UTC)
 * Derp. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 04:00, April 22, 2015 (UTC)

Missing canon pages
Since you've been so active with it, I thought I'd let you know that the missing canon pages list has now been completed. Nice work on the ones that you did! I've opened discussion on where we go from here. ProfessorTofty (talk) 17:00, April 25, 2015 (UTC)

Databank
Please remember that StarWars.com Databank entries are to remain the last item in Sources lists, per the Wookieepedia Layout Guide. This is one example of the offending contribution. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 04:08, April 27, 2015 (UTC)

BX-series droid commando
Hey AV. I was just wondering, where in Ultimate Star Wars does it say commando droids are called BX-series droid commandos? I just got the book yesterday and don't see them called that anywhere. Thanks! Cevan (talk) 21:15, April 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Cevan (talk) 21:22, April 29, 2015 (UTC)

Are you still working on the Blockade article?
Are you still working on the Blockade article? It's tagged with a (Work-in-progress template)-- Richterbelmont10  ( come in R2! ) 17:21, May 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * No, I forgot to remove the tag. Sorry. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 17:23, May 21, 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries. Actually it's the Canon article that's got the tag.-- Richterbelmont10  R2 sig.jpg( come in R2! ) 17:25, May 21, 2015 (UTC)

CT
Would you mind providing us with the reason why you're opposing the Canon Human CT? If you have some piece of source evidence suggesting this isn't the course to follow or something like that, sharing it with us would be helpful. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:30, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

Warning
This is an official administrative warning regarding the creation of categories. Unless you're going to provide the proper categorization for the categories themselves, making the new category a subcategory of the appropriate categories, do not make them. Cade    Calrayn  17:44, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * For future reference, would Star Wars Rebels: Rebel Journal by Ezra Bridger and Sabine My Rebel Sketchbook be reference books, and if so, would they belong to the category C|Category:Images from Studio Fun International reference books? -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 17:56, June 7, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Sarrish
Yeah, my mistake. Please keep in mind, however, that "Missing in Action" only refers to Foxtrot Group as an "elite squad." it doesn't explicitly state that it was a squad of commandos, so we can't assume that.  CC7567  (talk) 23:24, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * In their current form, no. All episode guides for the first three seasons are Legends sources using SWArchive, with URLs similar to "http://www.starwars.com/theclonewars/guide/episode001.html," which existed up until the September 13, 2011 redesign of the official site. Guides for the first six seasons are valid Legends sources, with similar content to the current guides but different designs, with URLs similar to "http://www.starwars.com/explore/the-clone-wars/ep512/#!/about" and existed up until the site's second revamp on July 1, 2014.  CC7567  (talk) 23:35, June 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's fine.  CC7567  (talk) 23:38, June 7, 2015 (UTC)

Clone commandos
I realize the benefit of having the canon clone commando page at a location without the "/Canon" marker, but that doesn't change the fact that the majority of canon sources refer to them simply as "clone commandos." That's where the article needs to be&mdash;or rather, at Clone commando/Canon. Furthermore, the source that you provided (the "Witches of the Mist" episode featurette) only refers to "Clone Republic Commando" in a single piece of concept art, and that definitely should not have preference over all of the Databank entries and the episodes which directly refer to them as "clone commandos." That's not to say that "Clone Republic Commando" isn't a valid alternative name&mdash;it apparently is&mdash;but nevertheless, I'd strongly advise you to move the page back to Clone commando/Canon.  CC7567  (talk) 04:00, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but if it's just a concept art that calls it that, there's absolutely no reason to move the article, regardless of how "official" the name sounds. Please move it back. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  04:10, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Regarding this message, CC and Cade are not saying that concept art is an invalid source. They're saying that when there are multiple sources that refer to something one way, the fact that one or two pieces of concept art refers to it a different way does not necessarily suggest that the name in the concept art is the official name. I hope that clears things up. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 04:24, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I guess i'm just off today. I understand what they are saying, I just personally prefer the longer name and was pressing my opinion on everyone else. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 04:37, June 8, 2015 (UTC)

In regards to your image query, I'd advise asking someone more experienced like to assist you. Also, in the future, if you have something to add to a previous talk page message, it would be prudent to just make a new message (under a separate bullet point) to avoid confusion, especially if the second message isn't particularly relevant to the first one. Otherwise, it can get a bit confusing. Hope that helps.  CC7567  (talk) 13:21, June 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, it's important to note that we don't know whether that symbol on Gregor's armor actually belongs to Foxtrot Group. To my knowledge, no official source has explicitly made that connection. If there were multiple instances of the symbol being on the armor of different Foxtrot Group members, then it might be prudent to deduce that it's the unit's emblem&mdash;but as it stands, the only current canonical instance is on Gregor's armor, and that isn't enough to attribute the symbol to the unit.  CC7567  (talk) 15:21, June 8, 2015 (UTC)

Recent Changes
Hey AV-6R7. I'd recommend using the "Preview" button more to preview your edits, in order to reduce the amount of small edits that you make to a single page. This is particularly important in regards to the Recent Changes page, which is used to combat vandalism; as you can see, a high amount of edits to the same article in a small amount of time can clog up the Recent Changes. Please keep this in mind in the future. Thanks.  CC7567  (talk) 04:32, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

Evazan GAN
Hey AV-6R7. While this is by no means official policy, I'd like to encourage you to prioritize your current status article nominations, e.g. the Evazan GAN, over other projects on the site. Responding promptly to reviews and making it a priority to address objections&mdash;before writing other articles&mdash;shows reviewers that you're putting your best foot forward for your current nominations. I'm not trying to discourage you from working on other projects at the same time; how you spend your time on the site is, of course, completely up to you. Just something to keep in mind. Thanks!  CC7567  (talk) 03:07, June 25, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Vector graphics
Sort of. I got reference images to use for its creation, however I had someone else create it. Cevan (talk) 21:33, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll see what I can do! Do you think you could try to get some good pictures of it for me to use as references? Cevan (talk) 21:38, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks! Also, in case you weren't aware, the same symbol can be seen on the wall of the bottom floor of the Grand Republic Medical Facility in "Orders," as Fives is trying to escape the facility before the blast doors are all the way closed. Seems it's the galactic symbol for anything medical-related, at least for the Galactic Republic. Cevan (talk) 22:20, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Does this look alright, or would you like any changes? Cevan (talk) 23:30, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, it looks like it cuts off part of the circle, but I assure you it does not. I've tried several other circular emblems that look like it's partially cut off but once it's uploaded and in use it looks absolutely fine. If you have no other requested changes, I'll download it and get it uploaded. Cevan (talk) 23:35, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah yeah, I see what you mean. I'll get that squared away and then we should be good to go. Cevan (talk) 23:42, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, here it is in a brighter form, however apparently the first image is the same color as the one on his armor, which I can see in at least one of the pictures. Personally, I believe the first, darker one would be better, as now that I look back at images of Kix's armor it does seem to be the true color of it. What do you think? Cevan (talk) 23:55, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sounds good! I see you've already located the file on here so you can add it in to whichever page you had planned on adding it to whenever you'd like. Cevan (talk) 00:04, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, I use reddit quite often and they have a subreddit there designed for pic requests, so what I do is get some good pictures of the emblem, crop them down to just the emblem, put them in an imgur album, and make a thread there to see if anyone's willing to recreate the emblem as a vectorized .svg. I've been able to get a lot of great emblem pictures this way, such as for the Imperial Press Corps, the Imperial Information Office, Jedi younglings, and more. I plan to try and get the emblem for the Mandalorian Guard very soon as well, and I'd like to get the Shadow Collective emblem too (the black hand seen in the concept art gallery for "The Lawless" and on the helmets of the Shadow Collective soldiers). Cevan (talk) 00:08, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * Maybe so! The only thing is the other Techno Union logo, the more banner-like one from Legends, is in the concept art as well. Personally, I prefer the circular one though that's exclusive to canon. I'll definitely try to get that made as an .svg sometime soon though, as it may not be a bad idea using that one instead of the other way to better differentiate the two pages (plus I doubt the Techno Union would use a larger banner/emblem a great deal when they have a more compact, circular one). Cevan (talk) 00:16, June 30, 2015 (UTC)

Category categorization
Hey AV. Please remember to categorize the categories that you create. The three you just created were not categorized. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 05:11, July 2, 2015 (UTC)
 * At this point, considering how much text is there, I think it should more closely follow the Layout Guide and include relevant sections, rather than having all of the in-universe email in a single intro-style paragraph. Then it'll look great! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 05:20, July 2, 2015 (UTC)

Darth Maul
Hi AV. In regards to this edit, can you please specify what content you think is missing from Darth Maul/Canon. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 06:41, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. In the future, I don't think that warrants a template. It doesn't take much longer to add in the text than it does to add the template to the page, and often times that template doesn't really provide enough information about what contributors should be adding. In this instance, I've added the text and removed the tag. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 06:51, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * No problem! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 06:55, July 10, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Colony world
I really have no strong opinion on the subject. I created a redlink just in case, but I wouldn't mind if you deleted it. --LelalMekha (talk) 14:16, July 21, 2015 (UTC)