User talk:Trip391

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Trip391!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash; Trak Nar  Ramble on 07:27, May 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * }

Talk pages
Hey, just a heads up when leaving messages on talk pages, please note the timestamp on the comment you're replying to. The comment you replied to on Tie/LN starfighter was from 2005. Thanks, Supreme Emperor (talk) 11:36, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
Hey, thanks for helping me out by correcting my mistakes in The Lawless. Cheers, -- XXLVenom998 ''' (Surprise me!) 18:28, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

If you are worried about lack of references in my additions to the Jar'Kai article (which I did put in), please consider either leaving a note about the article needing references or putting them in yourself. --Milar Kayne (talk) 18:58, March 13, 2013 (UTC)Milar Kayne, 1:57 PM CST, 03-13-2013

Revert on Anakin Page
Ever read The Rise and Fall of Darth Vader? It's not Fanon.Garrett Atkins (talk) 00:37, March 21, 2013 (UTC)


 * I have not read The Rise and Fall of Darth Vader, but seeing as how there was no source or link for Mochot Steep I thought it was fanon. Also, Darth Maul was confirmed to be alive (whether you agree or not) in canon, making that part fanon. Trip391 (talk) 01:10, March 21, 2013 (UTC)

Redirects
Hey, if you're going on a redirect-fixing spree, please try and mark your edits as minor, as they clog up the Recent Changes feed. Also, you don't have to post the edit summary every time. Thanks, Cade    Calrayn  00:49, April 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay, sorry about that. Trip391 (talk) 01:17, April 15, 2013 (UTC)

Novels
Hey Trip, just wanted to say welcome to Project Novels. Supreme Emperor (talk) 13:55, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Doghouse
But that doesn't explain why you moved it down a line.&mdash; Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 22:04, May 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * I must have slipped and hit the enter key when adding the indent, since they're right next to each other. Whoops. Trip391 (talk) 22:18, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Anon
Ah, okay. Thanks for the heads-up!  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:52, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Mission to Tatooine disambig
The disambig page has been moved. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 22:32, May 21, 2013 (UTC)

Project Novels
Hey Trip just a heads up when you remove/create a redlink here please move it to the novels archive here or notify someone to have them do it. Thanks. DarthRevan1173 (Long live Lord Revan) 23:34, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay. I wasn't 100% sure, but now I know. Trip391 (talk) 00:29, May 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * It's no problem just figured I'd give you a heads up. DarthRevan1173 RevanTOR001.jpg (Long live Lord Revan) 00:35, May 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm guessing you just archived the list, so should I just make new scroll boxes for my info? Trip391 (talk) 00:43, May 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * I archived some of the newly created articles. There's no need to make new scrollboxes though, just add whatever needs archived under the correct section. DarthRevan1173 RevanTOR001.jpg (Long live Lord Revan) 23:55, May 23, 2013 (UTC)

Message to Trip
I didn't know that. I looked at the category and it said Category:Dantooinians on that page. I wasn't the one who added that category. This is seems to be mistake.--151.75.31.121 20:23, May 31, 2013 (UTC)

Re:
In that case, I'd recommend moving it to the bottom of the page and giving it a new heading. Removing it altogether is counterproductive to the point of a talk page, especially when it actually does suggest a change to the article. Menkooroo (talk) 05:05, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

The New Guy
Hey Trip391, I am Legoguy1, I am comparatively new to Wookieepedia editing, wondering if you could help me out a bit. I have been a fan of Star Wars for about seven years, and a Wookieepedia reader for two. Thanks. --Legoguy1 (talk) 06:17, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Duranium
It is not vandalism if it is correcting a problem. The behind the scenes section of Duranium is false. Even if the name was used in another scifi universe that does not mean that it had any bearing on its usage in this one. It is also impossible for anyone to claim that the substance came into existence in this universe because of star trek. So to say that it was first used in an episode of Star Trek that aired 11 years before Star Wars is inane because it is a fictional substance and its use in the Star Wars scene was not dependent on its "discovery" or invention in the Star Trek universe. To aimlessly remove my edit for this material without considering the logical reason for its removal is sloppy and inconsiderate to say the least. I hope you make future changes with a little more forethought.
 * You were asked not to do it, then you did it again. 1 1/2 years ago you were also asked not to do it, also. The content was just not placed there randomly, (ie. not irrelevant), removing it actually is considered considered vandalism because you are lowering the quality of the article. Trip391 (talk) 17:55, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Duranium
Just because something was not placed there randomly does not mean that it is not irrelevant. It cannot be lowering the quality, if material removed has no bearing on its use or introduction into the Star Wars expanded universe. I always imagined that the point of the Wiki was one of information of the material presented in the given universe. How can something be background information if the information being used is disassociated from the substance used this universe. In other words what Im trying to say is that just because they share a common name does not mean that either universe was influenced by the other. They could have been just as easily concieved of it independant of one another. To use statements like it was first mentioned in the Original Series episode "The Menagerie," predating Star Wars itself by nearly eleven years is more akin to trying to claim some sort of bragging rights. A look at me kind of statement. Had they left it at it was first mentioned in the Original Series episode "The Menagerie." I would not necesarrily have cause for complant. Also I was unaware that any request was made 1 1/2 years ago for me to not delete anything. It was not my intent for Vandalism mearly to try to keep the atmosphere clear of comments which could be construed as someone trying to claim supremacy of one fictional universe over another by claiming that they came up with a supposed material first when the idea could have easily been an independant one. After all isn't Duranium simply the word durable with a -ium thrown at the end? Yes I know that this one small area isn't sufficiant enough to cause any harm but I also know that enthusiasts (me included) can be rather fanatical about these things and if you give them a foot in the door they tend to try and take for all its worth.
 * As Jang said. Trip391 (talk) 20:02, June 9, 2013 (UTC)

Re: IRC
Hey Trip; sorry, but I currently have no access to IRC. I'm actually on vacation and using a tablet to browse. If this is regarding the recent reverts to the anon editor, then you should know that he is serial fanoneer (if that's even a word) and my restricted editing capability meant that I was more concerned with removing his erroneous information than anything else. - Sir Cavalier of One ( Squadron channel ) 09:11, June 13, 2013 (UTC)

jabba's unnamed jawa slave
hey why do have my page on Jabba's unnamed Jawa slave(a real star wars character) on the The speedy deletion list. I've seen him in the movie return of the Jedi if you don't believe me watch the movie.--Jedi ginga (talk) 17:23, June 15, 2013 (UTC)the angry Jedi Ginga

nether did freaking attark and how do you know the gammorean guards names

Fan-fiction?
Ok! I understand, but I didn't know what I did wrong. I think this is a misunderstanding. The editor that created Alim'Gen. I thought that individual affiliated with the Galactic Republic. So I only fixed the infobox. That was only it.--99.56.53.134 22:16, June 16, 2013 (UTC)

AT-ST
You really should stop going behind my back and editing in Bill George's name as crediting him with the design of the scout walker.

A little history, Bill George did not even work at ILM as a model maker until Return of the Jedi. The scout walker was first introduced in Empire. It was Joe Johnston, the art director who created a plastic model of the first 2-legged walker which George liked so much he decided to have it thrown in at the last minute, requiring a hastily made stop-motion armature to be made for it by Jon Berg and Tom St. Amand. He told me personally it was the only model in the Star Wars universe that was made in 3d first, using off the shelf model kit parts and it preceded any concept art of a 2-legged design.

Even my ILM book states Joe created the first scout walker. So please, don't take my word for it - research this yourself so people aren't misinformed and give Joe the proper credit for creating this design, which was his way of creating a vehicle that varied, but was inspired by the 4 legged walkers.


 * MORE*

Ok so correcting your false info is now vandalism, eh? I'm not being threatening, I'm just frustrated this is the second time I've had to correct you and I won't stop until you get your head out of your butt and acknowledge your mistake. This site is set up to provide accurate information to the public, you don't have any ownership over the page so please remove your ego from the equation.

You just admitted that Lorne Peterson's Sculpting a Galaxy book is your only source for this erroneous Bill George credit. You should possibly consider due to the man's age that he made a mistake recalling things from 30+ years ago. There's another source of info you may like to consult, young man, it's called Cinefex, issue #3. This is the most respected sci-fi magazine publication in history and they interviewed the very people involved with the making of Empire Strikes Back, SHORTLY AFTER FILMING. In it, they describe in great detail the creation of the AT-AT scenes and it's mentioned the original AT-ST walker Joe created only made a brief cameo in the background on Hoth because the main shot they were planning got ruined due to a backdrop shifting. And yes, in this issue Joe is credited with the design, Dennis Muren can be seen standing next to it. Now tell me, how could Bill George, who George Lucas did not even know of at the time create the first AT-ST walker model? If you knew anything about Bill George, which I doubt, you'd learn about how he got hired at ILM in 1981, AFTER the first scout walker was already seen on Hoth in Empire. Look at his IMDB page, he was not working for ILM during Empire at all in '78 and '79 when the first scout walker prototype and AT-AT's were made.

Disastrous Campaign (Kazdan Paratus)
Hello. I have declined your speedy deletion tag on this article because I cannot recall any precedent of a battle, campaign, or similar conflict being judged as non-notable by the community. As the first such case, I feel that it needs to be discussed by the community at large since there is no precedent. I have therefore started a TC thread at Trash compactor/Disastrous Campaign (Kazdan Paratus), in which you are welcome to argue your case for deletion. Thanks. &mdash;MJ&mdash; Jedi Council Chambers 17:13, June 19, 2013 (UTC)


 * Also, Great battle (Kazdan Paratus) has also been declined and has been combined into the same TC. &mdash;MJ&mdash; Training Room 17:34, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

NPOV
Of course its NPOV. "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter", and from another point of view the Sith were liberators---even Zenith felt used by Tai Cordan who found the first excuse to send him offworld rather than give him a place in the government. This is your first warning. 24.52.194.108 09:05, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

My page
Why was Club Penguin Star Wars Takeover deleted? I'm curious to know why. Did I break an editing policy? --Knc1w2h3n4c5t (talk) 21:04, June 22, 2013 (UTC)

Categories
Hey, Trip. I see you're adding the Gallofree products category to all GR-75 medium transport articles. It would actually be more practical and less redundant to subcategorize the GR-75 medium transports category under the Gallofree products category, to avoid adding both categories to all individual GR-75 articles. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:21, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

CEC
Any reason why you keep reverting my edit, and without giving a reason? I clearly stated why I think the list should stay but if you're just going to edit it back without giving a reason...... Alpha-1437 (talk) 22:04, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Imperial Department of Military Research
Please do not remove material that is in the article body if it is listed in the infobox. All infobox material must be repeated in article body. Thanks. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 00:34, June 25, 2013 (UTC) All infobox material must be detailed in the article proper, with the following exceptions: The out-of-universe "era" field The "prev," "conc," and "next" fields of event infoboxes, which are not necessarily relevant to the article →See Wookieepedia:Mofferences/November 11, 2012 &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 00:44, June 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * Since there has been some misunderstanding regarding this: