Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights

This page is for requests for user rights.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Requests for rollback
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * 4) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * 5) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Questions

 * 1) Why should you be granted rollback rights?

Support

 * 1) Guy sits around in IRC all the time telling the admins when to delete things and ban people. Watches the recent changes, reverting and warning where necessary, for a solid percentage of his editing time. This is one of those "it's good for the site, so shaddup and let him have the tools" situations. Graestan ( Talk ) 04:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Absolutely, a great RC patroller.  Grunny  ( Talk ) 04:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Graestan. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 04:35, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Like falafel-flavored candy. jSarek 04:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Per above; Floyd deserves them.  CC7567  (talk) 05:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) About time. Per above. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 11:49, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) I'm not around as regularly as I used to be, but even I can see IFYLOFD is a deserving user. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 12:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 8)  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 12:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) This should have already happened a few months ago.  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk  13:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 13:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Good user, though I find his lack of faith disturbing. :-P Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 15:12, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Ataru. —Tommy9281 Dark side Master SWGTCG.jpg ( No quarter given, all exits sealed ) 15:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) —Xwing328 (Talk) 15:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Floyd is a fine choice. Cylka  -talk- 16:10, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) FLOYD!  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 18:42, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) Havac 18:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) I have full confidence in Floydaloyd. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  19:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 9)  OLIOSTER  Sith_Emblem.svg 19:28, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 22:42, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Per our newest bureaucrat. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jujiggum ) 02:26, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Per our newest Bureaucrat. Good going, Floyd. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:29, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Kosher candy! -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 03:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 05:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 07:58, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 6)  &mdash;Lucius malfoy7  Love  Life  Liberty   00:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) Blah blah candy blah.--Darth Oblivion 03:33, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) Because everyone loves candy.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 03:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) Master Gump(The name's Forrest) 21:38, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 10)  Mauser  Comlink 19:26, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) LtNOWIS 20:52, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 12) Per Grae. GroceryBag Grocery Store 22:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) Ozzel 23:36, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments

 * Accepted nomination on IRC. Graestan ( Talk ) 04:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Mauser (8 admins + 10 users/0/0)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends 30 May 2009.

Support

 * 1) Active user. WotM. Been around since 2007. Contribs full of "undo" entries that could be rollbacks. Does operational grunt work that few users do (that few admins do, really). Doesn't get into needless conflicts. Basically just an all-around un-objectionable candidate for additional user rights. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 17:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Culator. Especially the yada yada candy bit. Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:50, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Yup.  CC7567  (talk) 18:08, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Onwards and upwards. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Per Green Tentacle. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 18:48, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) Per Green Tentacle. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 19:09, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) Absolutely.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 8)  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk  20:43, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) LtNOWIS 20:52, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 10)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 21:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) Of course. This guy puts in the hours, big time. Never afraid to take bold action in the site's interest. Graestan ( Talk ) 21:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 12)  Grunny  ( Talk ) 22:48, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) I generally try to stay away from these things, but Mauser gets the Four Dot Stamp of Approvalment. Thefourdotelipsis 23:11, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 23:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 15) Ozzel 23:36, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jujiggum ) 23:38, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 18) Per....everyone else, really.  OLIOSTER  Sith_Emblem.svg 01:37, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments

 * Accepted nomination yada talk page yada. Yada yada candy. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 17:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Requests for adminship
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have two years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * 4) They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * 5) They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * 6) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 7) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 8) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
 * 9) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * 10) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

Questions
Here are some general adminship questions. They are 100% optional, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them. :)

Requests for bureaucratship
Rules:
 * Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.


 * 1) They are an administrator.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * 3) They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 6) Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month&mdash;from the day the nomination is put forth&mdash;are counted).
 * 7) Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 8) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.