Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Vil (Coruscant Security Force)

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:59, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project CSF

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:09, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Did a copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:24, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 14:03, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Context on the CSF ("planetary law enforcement agency" or something similar should be enough).
 * 3) **No one has ever asked for extra context as Security Force is context within itself and I also have "police officer" in the sentence. Coruscantfan (Talk) 13:37, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***"Security Force" does not mean that they enforce the law, it just means that they protect something. But okay. Winterz (talk) 14:03, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) *Besides that, good work. Winterz (talk) 17:14, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * Please note that the NOTOC should be on the top of the article (between the infobox and the Eras template) ;) Winterz (talk) 17:14, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Whoops. :) Coruscantfan (Talk) 13:37, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

Incident Commander

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 06:52, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project CSF

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Did a copy-edit. Mainly, I tackled the passage noted below.  Rather than having it be a part of the previous sentence, I divided it off into its own sentence for better flow.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:35, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:19, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  02:05, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *".. all negotiations and as well as final say on tactical options..." This doesn;t sound right.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Compltetly source the BtS, as you sourced the rest. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:39, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 02:51, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Exiled Jedi
 * 7) * Please use the InsiderCite template for the appearances section and for the references. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:16, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **Do I still need to do that since it was also printed in Republic Commando: Triple Zero? Coruscantfan (Talk) 13:40, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) ***No, but I think you should mention that the story was reprinted in the book in the BTS.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:55, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) ****Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 06:10, February 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Cassa Hun

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:10, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:10, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 06:26, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Missing P&T.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 22:06, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 00:45, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***The section's good but does the game say he's devoted? Sounds POVish to me.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 01:11, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Removed. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:25, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Just a heads-up, CC (and Cade). Cade could have dismissed this objection because when articles are this small, that sort of sectionizing is absolutely unnecessary and the writer can mention those physical attributes well in the Biography.
 * 7) ******Guys, I did not write the above comment.  Stake black   msg 16:28, February 7, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Winterz goes shopping
 * 2) *The Hero of Tython isn't linked in the article, sir.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) *I'm not entirely sure about this, but you should probably move the "(...) the Jedi Master gave the Jedi armor or an additional lightsaber depending on the Knight's choice" to the Bts section, and correct the Jedi armor part as it's confusing. Did he give the Jedi, an armor or did he give The Jedi armor to the Jedi? Winterz (talk) 14:45, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Fixed. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:56, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Is there a reason why one of the quotes is repeated? (last sentence of quote in bio and P&T's one) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:52, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Because he has like three lines. Fixed. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 00:57, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 244 words. Are you sure you don't want to go on a little bit longer and nominate for a GA?  Stake black   msg 15:48, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Not particularly. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:09, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Cazzush

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:44, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero. Ah, what the conversation files can show you.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 18:37, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Nice.&mdash;  15:50, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Article for Cazzush's gang.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Reload the infobox.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * You mention that he was set to appear in that scene, yet you don't really specify that he was ultimately cut from the game. Regardless of the tag on the top, you should be that specific in the Bts. :p Winterz (talk) 17:28, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:24, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 501
 * 1) *Context on Alderaan. :)
 * 2) **Done.
 * 3) *A time period might be nice as well, such as the Cold War if it happened at the same time. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:45, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:11, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Human Emperor's Voice (3,678 BBY)

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 19:28, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero. A Voice of the Emperor who has strangely feminine fingers.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice.&mdash;  21:32, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Is not "emotionless" POV? Other than that, awesome.&mdash;  20:17, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Nah, the Codex itself uses that exact word. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:02, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Cool.&mdash; 21:32, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Could you explain the double meaning you mention in the quote attribution? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:25, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) *Actually, I removed that, since it's pretty much speculation. I had some weird idea that his using the word "voice" was important, but the quote itself can stay. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 05:46, February 2, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) You should probably add in the first sentence of the Bts something like "The Human thought to be the Sith Emperor's real face/body" or within those lines, as the remark you make on the section never specified it, only that the Human and (in different lines) the Emperor's face first appeared in the comic and that the novel then contradicted the Emperor's appearance. Winterz (talk) 14:57, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:06, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified male Dark Jedi

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 21:27, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Give in to your anger&hellip;"

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) A Jedi serving the Empire? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:26, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:28, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) There's an empty Eras template on the article, so you should probably fill it in, considering my comment below. Also if he isn't given any relevant info, that should warrant a tag ;).Winterz (talk) 15:18, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *The book does not specify which era the Dark Jedi or the trooper belonged to, whether it was the Rise of the Empire era or the Rebellion era.&mdash; 17:43, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Then you should probably remove the Eras template, at least until this receives the status. How about my second point? Winterz (talk) 18:21, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Both taken care of.&mdash; 20:41, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **** isn't required when is already used, the same as  not being required when  is used. "Picture only" is implied by "First pictured." Menkooroo (talk) 01:10, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Thanks for clearing that up, Jeff.&mdash; 03:21, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * Same question as the one below: is the stormtrooper confirmed dead?  Stake black   msg 14:19, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see the answer below.&mdash; 00:33, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you confirm that he served Palpatine's Galactic Empire? Or is there a chance that it isn't Palpy's? Winterz (talk) 15:18, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see the comment above.&mdash; 17:43, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified stormtrooper (Victim of a male Dark Jedi)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 23:22, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Ouch.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:54, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:26, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * Might be a sofixit, but please fix the categories. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:23, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * For WP:AMB.&mdash; 05:40, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Are not all stormtroopers part of the Stormtrooper Corps? Perhaps that should be added? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:26, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * I have absolutely no idea.&mdash; 01:04, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Does the source explicitly say the trooper died? If not, that's OR.  Stake black   msg 14:18, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * The caption for the image says this: "A Dark Jedi gives in to his anger, cutting down a subordinate."&mdash; 17:22, February 3, 2013 (UTC)

Ceremony, Gala, and Ritual droid

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:49, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero embarks on another journey into the conversation files for Doc.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:36, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

CGR-80

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:49, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:42, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Did a copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:40, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Rodian harvest festival

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:49, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:03, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Looks good to me.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:59, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Terms of Bonding

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:49, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:20, February 3, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

DRN-592

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 09:49, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Since 38 went to the GAN...

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Everything in the infobox needs to be in the body. You're missing the height, and you might as well link to battle droid and B series as well. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:01, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *I've put the height in, still not sure how to handle the other ones.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 21:19, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Put the B-series and battle droid parts in, is it too awkward?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:56, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Chiss Dark Jedi

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 14:22, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My guess is that he's Nuru Kungurama sometime during the Imperial era, but that's just my opinion.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 17:35, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:53, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Did a copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:38, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * "who was sensitive to the Force, having fallen to the dark side." This sounds like he was sensitive because he fell to the dark side.
 * 3) **Reworded.&mdash; 17:20, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Is the lightsaber shown in the picture? I can't see it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:24, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **If you take a close look at the picture, it is on the right side of his waist.&mdash; 17:20, February 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Atomic blast on Raspar-6

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 17:37, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: That's all there is to it, really.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Did a copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:35, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *Would a conjecture tag be in order?
 * 3) **Trak handled that for me, thanks.
 * 4) *How about saying that the blast happened in the Outer Rim, because that's were the sector it's in is located. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:04, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **I said it happened in the Tragan Cluster, which is in the Outer Rim. Would you rather have me replace Tragan Cluster with Outer Rim?  Stake black   msg 14:55, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * I cannot give further context on "Stolivea" or "talking fogs" because the author never really says what those things are.  Stake black   msg 14:53, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Darth Guile

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 05:46, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Extremely obscure dude.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:27, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Did a copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:32, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 06:22, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Until it says he was a DLOTS, the article doesn't mention the Sith.
 * 3) * Can you say the bit about Palpatine and Plagueis's conversation in the body rather than the Bts?
 * 4) * Year for Plagueis's release date needed.
 * 5) *Remember to add notoc to articles with only an into and Bts. I did it here but keep it in mind.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 09:04, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **All taken care of. And thanks, I will.&mdash; 15:05, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * After reading the book, he is only mentioned once, and the conversation in which he is mentioned does not imply Guile belonged to the Order of the Sith Lords, nor does it specify what era he was a part of.&mdash; 05:46, February 4, 2013 (UTC)

Tactical and Operational

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 15:48, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project CSF

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) As long as you fix Fe Nite's comment.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:29, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Did a copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:57, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Are you sure that it should be: "the The Elite hotel..."? In other words the back to back 'the?' I can see how that could be correct but it just does not sound correct. Fe Nite (talk) 17:14, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Come now, you can't expect me to check for something as simple as grammar mistakes in an article that is all of 4 sentences! ;) I'm kidding, this was just a simple typo on my part. Coruscantfan (Talk) 05:57, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. Phew. I did not want to come out and say it was wrong because I was not completely sure. Fe Nite (talk) 20:12, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) Coruscantfan (Talk) 02:07, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified trafficker

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo (talk) 15:58, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: One of the many owners of C-3PO and R2-D2.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Interesting.&mdash;  17:39, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Did a copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:30, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:11, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Duros Jedi artisan

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 06:39, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "No, the button goes over there!"

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Did a copy-edit. I think it's safe to say that with that Duros's lack of breasts and how female Duros are usually depicted as having breasts, than this Duros artisan is most likely a male.  Part of me would want to leave it ambiguous, unless it was otherwise mentioned, but as I said... he's most likely male.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 07:52, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:19, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) There is no need for the unidentified gender category here now. You should switch it for the Male category.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:57, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done.&mdash; 17:33, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) *The Unidentified gender cat is still there.... 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:07, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **Sorry about that, accidently removed the Unidentified Jedi category.&mdash; 21:14, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * That's what I was thinking, as well, Trak. :)&mdash; 07:55, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified Gran Jedi (Crossguard lightsaber)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 07:31, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Silly troopers&hellip;

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) I removed any mention of the Gran's gender from the biography while I was copy-editing.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 07:48, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:11, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Since the Gran is unidentified, are you positive it was part of the Jedi Order and not an early member of the New Jedi Order?
 * Reworded to accommodate for the lack of era.&mdash; 21:17, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Perhaps articles for the stormtrooper and scout trooper? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:35, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Done and done.&mdash; 15:11, February 7, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified stormtrooper (Victim of a Gran Jedi)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 16:26, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Might as well&hellip;

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified scout trooper (Gran Jedi)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 16:26, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Silly trooper.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments