Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Darth Zannah

Darth Zannah

 * Nominated by: —Tommy  9281 and  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 00:35, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A Jedi Master and a Sith Lord working toward a common goal? Surely you jest.

Support

 * 1) Excellent work, Tommy and Jon.--&mdash; 04:53, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) The P&T image isn't the most relevant one but there isn't much freedom of choice so I'm not bothered. Good work.  NAYAYEN : TALK 22:42, July 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Great job. Lots of good detail.  Darth Rage Leave a message after the beep 00:52, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Outstanding.--Lord David 17:27, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Attack of the Clone

 * Only one so far: can her birth date be mentioned in the Bio somewhere, possibly along with the general time period that it falls into?
 * I have to stop there to make sure that I can properly read through the rest of this comprehensive and quite well-written article when I'm more awake. I'll continue with "Saving Darth Bane" once the above objection has been addressed or when I'm a bit more awake&mdash;whichever happens to come first. :P  CC7567  (talk) 05:39, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Addressed. —Tommy 9281 06:36, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * "Zannah defeated Harth with ease, using her Sith sorcery to incapacitate him; deciding that if he was strong enough to recover, then she would take him as her apprentice." Something's wrong with that last clause; it's dangling and doesn't seem to have anything to link to because of the semi-colon. Please try to reword for clarity.
 * How's that? Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 20:23, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you check the semi-colon modifications I did to the second paragraph of the Bts? I just want to make sure that that's what you meant; the clauses were a little unclear to me when I was organizing them with semi-colons.
 * The changes look fine to me. Tommy? Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 20:26, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Cool breeze. —Tommy 9281 21:36, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * A quick question here: when you refer to "the online supplement for Insider 88," are you talking about Evil Never Dies: The Sith Dynasties, which you then mention after that? I have a feeling that Evil Never Dies is the supplement you're trying to cite, yet the connection isn't clear. If Evil Never Dies isn't the online supplement for Insider 88 that you're mentioning, then the actual one needs to be properly linked and mentioned. Please clarify in any case.  CC7567  (talk) 22:54, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Slight mistake, now addressed. —Tommy 9281 19:02, September 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think some punctuation or something else is missing from this succession box entry: "Kaan the Brotherhood of Darkness". Other than that, everything's looking good&mdash;great work, guys.  CC7567  (talk) 20:19, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Tweaked. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 20:26, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * And thanks very much for the review and kind words. :) Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 20:27, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Last one: can you fill in the "before-years" and the "after-years" fields for both succession boxes where possible? They're required per the layout guide.  CC7567  (talk) 22:54, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Mostly done; but I'm not sure what Kaan's tenure as Dark Lord beginning in circa 1,006 BBY can be attributed to. Tommy? Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 15:05, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whoever added that did so in error. It has since been corrected. Thank you very much for the review, CC. Please advise if anything further is required. —Tommy 9281 19:02, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

 * I replaced the dialogue templates with quote ones, feel free to revert if you find this unecessary.-- 00:50, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I just changed back one, since it had three speakers. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 00:51, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, OK. Didn't realize three or more needed a dialogue template. Thanks!-- 00:56, July 22, 2010 (UTC)