Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights

This page is for requests for user rights.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Requests for rollback
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * 4) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * 5) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Questions

 * 1) Why should you be granted rollback rights?

(2 admin + 4 users/0/0)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends on March 31, 2012.

Support
 * 1) Omicron has been a member of the wiki since 2006. A hard-working editor, Omicron is a common sight in the RCs, spending much of his time doing various maintenance tasks. He also does a huge load of anti-vandalism work; reverting vandalism, removing speculation, as well as tagging articles for deletion. Giving Omicron rollback would make his anti-vandal crusades smoother and faster &mdash; something that we all benefit of. 1358  (Talk)  00:24, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Xd. I was in fact preparing to nominate Omicron myself. Many-a-time I've seen Omicron monitoring the RC, reverting vandalism and tagging articles with proper tags, as Xd said. In fact, many times I have gone to revert vandalism, only to get an "edit-conflict" message because Omicron has already taken care of it. He does a terrific job with this, and Rollback would help him do this even quicker and better.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 00:42, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Full support.  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 02:27, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Why not? &mdash;MJ&mdash; Council Chambers Saturday, March 17, 2012, 02:31 UTC
 * 5) MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 02:59, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  03:33, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Optional candidate Q&A
 * 1) Why should you be granted rollback rights?
 * I just want to help make this wikia the best source of Star Wars knowledge on the web. I spend a lot of time here, and this will help me do that. <- Omicron (Leave a message at the BEEP! ) 03:00, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Nomination accepted via IRC. 1358  (Talk)  00:24, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Requests for adminship
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * 4) They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * 5) They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * 6) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 7) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 8) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
 * 9) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * 10) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

Questions
Here are some general adminship questions. They are 100% optional, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them.

Requests for bureaucratship
Rules:
 * Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.


 * 1) They are an administrator.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * 3) They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 6) Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month&mdash;from the day the nomination is put forth&mdash;are counted).
 * 7) Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 8) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.