Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
 * 15) &hellip;if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place your signature in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Attack on the Vandyne system

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:38, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Hmm feels like time I made a few more CAnoms

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:43, October 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:29, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:07, October 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Technically, the Vong Empire did not exist until 27 ABY, so they did not actually invade the galaxy in 25. The species itself was the thing that invaded, and they formed the Empire after the fall of Coruscant I believe.
 * 3) **Ah ok changed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:44, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Do not use Vong to refer to the invaders. Instead, use the full name Yuuzhan Vong.
 * 5) **Ok fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:44, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * "The book gives no information on the outcome of the attack, but a separate map shows the Vandyne system was under Vong control by 26 ABY." In this case, it probably can be assumed that the attack was victorious.
 * 7) **Ok there are some CAs at the moment in a very similar style to this from the last burner in which victory wasn't assumed in the same circumstance. I can change it so that this and all the others make that assumption if you'd like or should I maintain the standard used in the older articles? Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:44, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) ***I seem to remember some articles asserting that the battle was won by the Vong due to the other map. However, you can leave it as is, as it seems both ways of doing it have been done, provided that I am remembering correctly. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:43, October 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) *If these objections are also relevant in your other two noms, fix them as well. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:07, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) **Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:44, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * SE
 * 1) * Can you reword the first line a bit? I was thinking something like "During the intergalactic Yuuzhan Vong's invasion of the galaxy between 25 and 29 ABY, they attacked the Vandyne system." Or something like that. What do you think? Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:38, October 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) **Reworded as per your suggestion. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:20, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Exiled Jedi
 * 4) * I noticed you used the word "attack" a lot in the body. Could you vary up the word choice a bit? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:04, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Changed out two of them. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:20, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) A Force user
 * 7) *Please find a way to adjust the wording so it doesn't indicate that the battle took place over an entire year.
 * 8) **Changed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:46, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) *Also, it could use some context on hyperlanes. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 02:28, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) **Context as in what a hyperlane is or where those lanes go? Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:46, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Sorry, I mean where the lanes go. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 02:47, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) ****Added some context. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:09, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

A Speeder Bike Built for Two

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:41, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I feel like I should know what this is referencing...

(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) He's a droid of much talent. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 18:16, October 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:05, October 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  13:57, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:35, November 7, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * The stuff added about the "Daisy Bell" song needs to have a valid source. I know you didn't add it, but it needs to be taken care of.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:55, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * How could I source it? I'm assuming a link to the song wouldn't be enough. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:54, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * You would need to find a source that says the name was based off the song. If no source says this, you provide a source using Template:Cite web for the real-life song and mention that part of the song is similar to "A Speeder Bike Built for Two." That way, the similarity is mentioned, but the article doesn't claim anything either way.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:35, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Freight Queen

 * Nominated by: Trip391 (talk) 04:01, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For the Novels

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:02, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:19, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  02:56, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * Context on Han, Jania, Zekk and Lando.
 * 3) **Done?
 * 4) * Don't you need "the" before each of the factions in the war, e.g the Chiss Ascendancy?
 * 5) *Done
 * 6) * Can you add what planet the hive is on and also make an article for the hive itself. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:41, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **It was an asteroid and called the same name, but done. Trip391 (talk) 13:30, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) 501st
 * 9) * "In their guises as Rysto and Syrule, Han Solo and his wife, Leia Organa Solo, were attempting to track down the Jedi Knights turned Joiners Jaina Solo and Zekk, and bring them back from the front lines of the war, Leia spotted the Freight Queen taking off." This sentence isn't quite working, so please fix it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:18, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) **Whoa, yea, I fixed it. Trip391 (talk) 15:14, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) Supreme
 * 12) *I was flipping through my copy, and I noticed that it refers to it as "That Freight Queen". Are you sure it wasn't referring to a class of ship, rather than an individual one?
 * 13) **OMG! Yea, I just checked the hard copy, it isn't a ship but a class! So fixed that.
 * 14) *Can we get a quote for it? Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:08, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) **Added. Trip391 (talk) 19:14, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Blasted Asteroid

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:42, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I always felt like there never any commercial chains in Star Wars it's nice to see some added.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:22, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:15, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  16:49, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Pirgi

 * Nominated by: Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:48, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another for the novels.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:31, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:58, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:17, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) All good, but this:"During a memorial held on the Reprieve, an EF76 Nebulon-B escort frigate, shortly after the raid, Wedge Antilles, commander of Rogue Squadron, gave a speech in memory of those killed in the raid." Way too many commas. Kill some pretty please. :)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:26, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:57, November 5, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Smoking PSA

 * Nominated by: Thunderforge (talk) 06:13, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I don't think we have any real-world comprehensive articles, but I don't see any reason why we couldn't.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * First of all, I think you need a Development section. This should contain its run time, when it was released, and its distributor. Currently, those are all intro or infobox exclusive. Additionally, I think it should be mentioned in this section that it had two different run times: the 1 min, and the 30 seconds.
 * Done. Let me know if you have ideas to further improve it. -Thunderforge (talk) 05:14, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * It would be better if Development came in between appearances and the synopsis.
 * "...humans do and so they should set a good example." Sounds like humans should be setting an example, while it is the droids that are actually supposed to be doing so. Also, you should probably capitalize Human.
 * I've rephrased that sentence and capitalized Human throughout. -Thunderforge (talk) 05:14, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * I believe context is needed for C-3PO and R2. Nowhere does it say they are droids.
 * The article now mentions that they are droids. Let me know if further context is needed. -Thunderforge (talk) 05:14, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * I think it necessary to give them context as droids in the synopsis as well as the intro.
 * You list a spacestation as appearing in the commercial in the appearances section, but the Synopsis says nothing about this.
 * The synopsis now mentions the space station. For what it's worth, I didn't create that article and if someone thinks the location is something other than a spaceship (or wants to remove the article and link in the Appearances due to ambiguity), feel free to change it. -Thunderforge (talk) 05:14, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * On second thought, is there any proof that I'm missing that it is a spacestation? Because it could have happened anywhere really.
 * The infobox should be completely sourced. Ref 1 will probably work just fine there.
 * This I'm a little more confused about. Ref 1 only includes the year, it doesn't mention the distributor, runtime, or language. Surprisingly, I can't even find a third party source to say that it was distributed by the US Department of Health and Human Services, despite the unambiguous logo at the end (with text in the 30 second version). It seems to me like all of these things are sourced by the video itself. Am I misunderstanding your request? -Thunderforge (talk) 05:14, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * The infobox should be sourced, but not to 1 I guess. Instead, source it to itself, like here. The synopsis and the development should be sourced as well, with most likely all of it being sourced to itself again.
 * Do you know if it ran throughout the 1980s? If so, that should be said somewhere.
 * I haven't been able to find anywhere when the commercial actually aired (and I never saw it myself). The only definitive thing I've found was the statement from TheStarWarsTrilogy.com saying it was in 1983. -Thunderforge (talk) 05:14, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * It looks like it will survive the TC. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:09, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * It's over the limit word wise, so I'll continue my review until you have satisfied everything, then we can move it to the GAN page, and I'll support there. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:53, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Good work on the nomination. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:30, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Searching to see if there's anything about this, and apparently this image from the PSA: EW Robots article Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 02:53, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Are you sure this is from the PSA? The console doesn't look much like the one C-3PO is at at the beginning or the one where the two droids meet at. -Thunderforge (talk) 05:14, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) This already has a considerable size. You should consider taking it to the GANs board ;). Winterz (talk) 14:36, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

Carter

 * Nominated by: Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:13, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Sentry number 2. For the novels, as usual.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) I added the guards category, which I think you might need to do for the other sentries as well Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:30, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Nice catch, and added to the other as well. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:28, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:15, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:38, November 9, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified blue-skinned exhibitor

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 13:21, November 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:07, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 02:44, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:42, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:18, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you alphabetize your categories? Otherwise, good work.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:49, November 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Certainly. --LelalMekha (talk) 16:44, November 11, 2 013 (UTC)
 * 3) If you're saying he's not Pantoran, you may want to remove that from the infobox. ;) Per a Mofference last year, conjectural titles must match the page name in the infobox. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 03:11, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) *Woops. Hadn't realized he was still called a Pantoran in the infobox. Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 16:44, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Cy Yunga's podracer

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:53, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The podracer of the Dianoga-guy underdog, Cy Yunga. Also, due to the nature of being a cheat code, part of this article is treated as ambig.  I actually don't know the official ruling on cheat codes, and didn't see anything in the FAQ, though I probably missed it.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:52, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:13, November 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * I'm not sure how you want to treat this because its a cheat code. However, you might want to add a bit of a description of the podracer to the body. Describe its overall appearance, mentioning the shape of the engines.
 * 3) **How does the description read now? More?
 * 4) * Context on Aquilaris? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:29, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **How does that look?
 * 6) * On second thought, use this for the cheat code: . Just put it at the top of the article I believe.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:31, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Alright, but should I leave the   in or no?  The engines do appear in the normal sense of the game, but only in Watto's Junkyard.  The description could probably fit outside the tags as well, but the usage would be part of the easter egg/cheat code.--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 14:21, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Actually, it would be better the way you had it before I think, since the engines being in Watto's yard are canon. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 17:14, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Returned the ambig tags, and offered some extra BtS per below. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:47, November 11, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * Now that you've removed the ambig templates you should mention in the bts that the engines appear in the junkyard without the cheat code being entered and on all systems.
 * 3) **I can mention such in the BtS, but, I think I should go back to the ambig tags per above. It'd just seem a bit more proper as opposed to leaving everything in the BtS, I would think.
 * 4) ***Ah fair enough my objection was only relevant for if you did removed them, but I haven't got a problem with the templates themselves. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:52, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) * Can you mention some type of time frame for its use in the body? Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:39, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **Alright, 32 BBY per the game.--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:47, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Jinn Reeso

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:59, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Podracing, Podracing Everywhere. Another Easter Egg/Cheat elements from EIR.  This character does not appear in any way on the PC/Dreamcast versions, however.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * Does the source actually call his helmet extravagant? If not then that's an opinion which you should remove. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:54, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Opinion removed.
 * 4) *Could you give context to the pod's statistics? Or reword that part somehow it feels awfully like game mechanics at the moment. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:54, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Added some info. It was basically the same as Guo's podracer, except worse steering.--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:39, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Decent set of specs sounds a little too informal. Could you reword it slightly? Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:16, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified green-skinned podracer pilot

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 16:56, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Podracing is as fun as always, eh? Even for greeny here.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) *Could you mention the clothing they wear while racing?
 * 3) **Of course
 * 4) * The podracer will need its own article as well.
 * 5) **Alright
 * 6) ***Comprehensive articles can't have any redlinks in I'm afraid so you'll need to create the podracer article. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:19, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) * The article should be in the unidentified gender, unspecified species and unidentified individuals categories.
 * 8) **Okay
 * 9) * Can you tell anything about their placement in the race from the source? Not necessarily where they finished but who came first (I'm assuming its Anakin or someone). Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:45, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) **No, he's only seen on the starting grid, and even there it's not easy to tell where he's situated. In addition, we only really see his cockpit and don't really see him during the race.  San Maxus wins though, so that can be mentioned.  The only other two named competitors are Raido and Ahsoka Tano.  Anakin never even races, only Tano, and she never even finished a race in the entire book, heh.  I guess the joke was that in major event the qualifier was for is that Ben Quadinaros wins.  Poor guy, always the butt of podracing jokes. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:11, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Ah ok fair enough I thought I remembered a Clone Wars comic where Anakin podraced again but I remember the Ahsoka one as well. All you need to mention is that Maxus won then, you don't need to mention the other two although you can if you like. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:19, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) ****Heh, already did in the last edit, unless you think I should reword it (Maybe that's what you were asking?). Hm, I wonder if there was another CW comic with him racing.  Gotta find it if so, though if not, I'm surprised this is the first time it appeared in a Clone Wars related comic as far as I can recall. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:33, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments