Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



THIS IS A TRIAL RUN.

'''Comprehensive articles are not in effect&mdash;this is merely a trial run to determine whether or not the system can actually work. As such, certain rules may change over the course of the trial run, as we sample different possibilities and variations. If you would like to see any tweaks or amendments or even any additions sampled during the trial run, please make a note of them on the talk page, and we will attempt to work them into the itinerary. This trial is scheduled to conclude on July 1, 2010, after which the entire process will be taken to the Consensus track for either approval or rejection. For further reading, please consult the original Senate Hall thread suggesting this initiative.'''

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles. (Will not be created until trial period is over.)

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "Gray Cadre," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, the heads of the prominent WookieeProjects, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. (Note: This is not applicable during the trial period.) Members of the Gray Cadre will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can been improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for In-Universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good Article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add at the top of the article you are nominating. (This will not be done during the trial period.)
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only Gray Cadre votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the Gray Cadre support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and by tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. (This will not be done during the trial period.) When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If no Gray Cadre members have voted for an article, a total of six votes from regular users will be required. If one Gray Cadre member has voted for an article, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two Gray Cadre votes.
 * 6) *Additionally, members of the Gray Cadre can bypass the nomination process. Not including the writer of the article, two Gray Cadre members can sign off on an article's talk page in unison, and those articles will also be instantaneously promoted. This action can only be initiated by someone on the approved Gray Cadre list, and is performed internally. Regular users must go through the nomination process. (This will not be done during the trial period.)
 * 7) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. During the trial period, however, all nominations will be archived on this subpage, and will be divided up into successful and unsuccessful nominations. If the process proves successful, these will retroactively be granted true Comprehensive article status, and the nominations will be more properly archived. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two GC votes, and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by Gray Cadre members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Topas dosLa

 * Nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis 11:53, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Interesting stuff!

(0 GCs/5 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) --Skippy Farlstendoiro 12:11, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 14:07, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) -- TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 07:43, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:06, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5)  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 13:23, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:01, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Farl: Can you specify in the intro what an Overliege is? A planetary leader or something... --Skippy Farlstendoiro 12:08, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Tweaked. Thefourdotelipsis 12:10, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Should the d in "dosLa" be capitalized at the beginning of a sentence?  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:51, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) *Ehh... good question. I'm not sure how this is normally handled... anyone else can feel free to butt in, because I genuinely have no idea. Thefourdotelipsis 13:06, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) **I have no clue what would be proper here either. If it's alright, I just changed it to "Overliege dosLa" to solve the issue. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 13:09, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Good thinking. Thanks. :) Thefourdotelipsis 13:12, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) Does the OS capitalize "Overliege" in all instances? Typically, we should only capitalize titles when used in front of a name, so "the king ate custard" but "King George ate custard." Of course, SW does lots of stuff weird, so what's the OS do? ~ SavageBob 15:58, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) *It doesn't say, but I agree with you that we should not capitalize those titles. It's just that I've seen the incorrect capitalization enforced wholesale elsewhere, and was loathe to rock the boat. However, I'll gladly change it here. Thefourdotelipsis 00:45, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

DX-300 traffic package

 * Nominated by:  NAYAYEN : TALK 12:08, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now this is interesting stuff.

(1 GCs/6 Users/7 Total)
Support
 * 1) You don't say... Thefourdotelipsis 12:11, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) --Skippy Farlstendoiro 12:29, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Imperialles 14:44, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Still ify on the intro-body. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:00, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) -- TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 07:48, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) Yay 6 user votes! SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:05, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7)  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 00:12, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * Oh, can't you really add a quote? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 12:11, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) *Added one. It's a bit meh but it should do.  NAYAYEN : TALK 12:21, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * If CAs become real then this would be the first for WP:KOTOR.  NAYAYEN : TALK 12:08, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Sin Suub

 * Nominated by: Skippy Farlstendoiro 13:44, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Okey, this one wouldn't reach 250 words easily...

(1 GCs/5 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) -- 1358  (Talk) 14:05, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Suubperb. --Imperialles 14:13, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Start using "Alliance to Restore the Republic" if you want a word boost, though. :P Thefourdotelipsis 14:31, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4)  Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 20:44, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) -- TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 08:48, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) ~ SavageBob 03:28, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Appearance/reference not properly formatted! "Stuff, Second Edition", not "Stuff (Second Edition)". --  1358  (Talk) 13:51, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 13:53, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **No, I mean like "Star Wars Sourcebook, Second Edition" -- 1358  (Talk) 13:55, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Oh! Done. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 13:57, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Soresu
 * 6) * His first appearance could be mentioned in the BTS. Release years/months would further boost the word count.
 * 7) * Neither of the P&T paras are particularly relevant to his personality as it stands, and could really be moved into the Bio. If you want anything to stay, you must make a judgement on his personality based on those facts. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:01, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) **OK --Skippy Farlstendoiro 11:07, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Two suggestions here:
 * 2) *Why have you chosen to use one i instead of two in his name? Is the other source more reputable? A small BTS note about the usage in the article could help.
 * 3) **I didn't. I wrote "Siin" but someone else changed it 4 years ago and he must have had his reasons. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 11:26, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Must have had his reasons? JSarek changed it because he thought it was the correct spelling. It's quite likely he didn't know about the other sources at the time. I'd advise talking to him for the reason, because I personally would have chosen to accept the OOU source spelling than the IU source one. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 23:43, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) *This looks like it'll hit 250, so as a suggestion for the P&T, you can write that he was not averse to using industrial spies. This is an actual conclusion about his personality. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:18, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Relus

 * Nominated by: Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 21:04, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Way to go, Artoo.

(0 GCs/5 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1)  NAYAYEN : TALK 22:20, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 06:49, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) -- TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 08:54, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 23:47, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Nice --Jinzler 14:31, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I think the details of the infobox should all really be mentioned somewhere in the prose section of articles, in the same way that intros cannot contain unique information.  SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:47, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *I already mentioned everything except its sun and grid coordinate. Since I already mentioned the system, naming the sun seems sort of redundant and unnecessary. As for the grid coordinate, we don't typically use those in article bodies, at least from the articles I've seen. They're just more for reference. Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 16:41, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * P. 120 of TEA gives us an approximate date for its discovery. Might be worth mentioning. --Imperialles 06:49, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * That maps seems sort of contradictory. It lists 1000-25 BBY as the settlement dates of the Deep Core, but page 10 of the Atlas says Palpatine didn't begin sending probots to search for viable routes into the Deep Core until the Clone Wars. I think I'll just leave it out for now. Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 16:41, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Mimban

 * Nominated by:  JangFett  (Talk) 22:29, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Giving this a go. :P

(1 GCs/7 Users/8 Total)
Support
 * 1) Looks good after 3 attempts at a copy-edit and an edit conflict headache. :P &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 22:38, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 23:48, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:31, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Imperialles 07:05, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) -- TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 09:19, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:10, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7)  NAYAYEN : TALK 11:24, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:38, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Just a couple things
 * 2) * Kill that OOU "unidentified" in the infobox; even something as simple as like "Opposition to the Republic" might work better there
 * 3) **Addressed
 * 4) * How important is it to mention who heard the shout-out? Not really a request that you remove that bit; more of a suggestion. I won't obsess over it if you wanna keep it there. :P
 * 5) **The clones heard the shout-out, and it was mentioned onscreen, not off. :P If you want, I could remove it.  JangFett  (Talk) 23:45, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) ***No problem, like I said, I'm not gonna obsess over that one. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 23:48, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) * Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 23:36, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) Even if it's barely anything, there still needs to be some kind of body. As it stands, the article is just a Bts.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:26, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) * Oh, I agree with you. But sadly, those are the rules. Even if I can follow the LG, and I would, there's very limited amount of information in the article that cannot adhere to the GAN requirements.  JangFett  (Talk) 02:10, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) **For this process, one should follow the LG if possible, but it is not a requirement due to the limited content of these articles. In this case, the "intro" really is the body, which is why it's sourced. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 02:17, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Ehhh, that don't sit right with me. If you open that door to not writing up any body, you open the door to people doing that for articles that can have a body (Which is any article, really, but I digress). NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:31, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 12) ****Read rule 4 above. If it's within reason, then yes, there should be a body. But this is treated case-by-case, because a lot of these articles are just too small for that to be practical. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 02:40, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 13) Can you state in the body/intro/intrody thing who gave the shout-out? Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 07:06, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 14) *Addressed; hope that takes care of it, Trayus.  JangFett  (Talk) 21:51, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Borna

 * Nominated by: -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 22:33, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Let's give this a try.

(0 GCs/4 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  NAYAYEN : TALK 23:13, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Thefourdotelipsis 00:02, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Imperialles 12:07, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 23:49, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Nayayen has an objection AND A HALF!
 * 2) * "Borna was a composer who lived during the Imperial Period. Borna was a member of the Alliance to Restore the Republic..." Could this be reworded so it doesn't sound like two intros bolted together?
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * "However, the Empire did not take kindly to such activism, and Borna died while still very young..." The way you word this implies that the Empire killed him. Can you clarify as to whether they did or not?
 * 5) **Well, the wording in the source isn't clear on this, but the implication is very clear, so I've tried to reflect that in the article.
 * 6) *CANs are fun aren't they?  NAYAYEN : TALK 22:55, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) **Most certainly. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:11, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) "Borna died while still very young at some point between 2 BBY and 5 ABY." What are these dates based on? --Imperialles 06:51, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) *Added an explanatory footnote, should be good now. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 12:06, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) Savage
 * 11) *"However, as he was a member of the Rebel Alliance—founded in 2 BBY according to The New Essential Chronology—his date of death must be between the Alliance's conception and when Dark Forces: Jedi Knight is set, in 5 ABY." The change in tense here is a bit jarring; change the "must be" to "must have been"?
 * 12) *The first three sentences could be joined into a single paragraph and it wouldn't seem so choppy. Otherwise, solid work! ~ SavageBob 00:40, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

The Agony of Tarkin

 * Nominated by: -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:11, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: One more...

(1 GCs/6 Users/7 Total)
Support
 * 1) Kewl. Thefourdotelipsis 23:59, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 06:54, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) -- TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 07:30, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Provided Xicer's objection is addressed.  Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 08:02, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 16:21, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 23:55, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) LtNOWIS 01:19, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Any applicable quotes? I believe Mara narrates the whole comic so there should be something.  Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 23:55, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 12:10, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Isn't it speculation to call Mara Jade's seat "expensive?" It probably was expensive and she paid through her expense account, but it's equally possible that the good seats were simply reserved for VIPs without payment. Changing it to "balcony seats" or "theater boxes"  would probably be better. -LtNOWIS 09:22, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) *Good point, changed. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 12:10, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Pelemaxian

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 00:33, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Let's give this a shot. ~ SavageBob 00:33, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

(0 GCs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Loving the sheer amount of references. --Imperialles 07:02, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 07:59, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

224th

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:33, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: 222 words. I'd like it to go to GA if anyone has an idea on what I could add.

(0 GCs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Imperialles 07:09, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Fett
 * 2) * Seeing a couple of sourcing issues. Make sure you source "around 22 BBY" and "Rise of the Empire" to the TCW novel. As for Echo and Hevy's clone numbers, they weren't mentioned in the episode, but rather introduced in the TCW Ultimate Battles visual guide. You can pipe link to show their nicknames only, however.
 * 3) **The numbers themselves don't have to be sourced, the person is the same and we use the numbers if we have them per precedent. As for the "Around 22 BBY" and such, sourced. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:27, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I suggest that you pipe link their articles to their nicknames then. It would be more accurate, since you don't want to source them. There clone numbers weren't mentioned in the episode.
 * 5) * In the intro, what do you mean "that included Mud-Jumpers"? The 224th? the Grand Army of the Republic? That line seems out of place, as it doesn't have the necessary context. Perhaps you can create a new sentence explaining who they are.
 * 6) **Fixed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:27, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) *"The shout-out, dedicating the following song to the group, was heard by their fellow clone troopers" Whose "fellow" clone troopers?
 * 8) **Addressed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:27, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) ***Now it sounds like Fives, Echo, Hevy, Cutup, and other clones listed were part of the 224th. Please fix this.
 * 10) * Do we know for sure that patrolling the listening post was the rookie troops first assignment?
 * 11) **I believe they said that in the episode but I removed it. That didn't have to be mentioned. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:27, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 12) *Other than that, the bts could use some shaping up. You can take a look at other TCW-related articles to see what's usually done.  JangFett  (Talk) 03:18, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 13) **How's this? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:27, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 14) ***Better, but do you need to mention the sentence about the comic book mentioning the battle? In the comic itself, it doesn't mention anything about the 224th.  JangFett  (Talk) 03:00, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 15) L'Imperialles
 * 16) * Intro: "fighting to defend the Republic" Do we know that they were defending the planet, not attacking it? If not, best drop that line.
 * 17) **Removed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:40, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 18) * BTS: "It was in that issue that the 44th was introduced to Star Wars continuity." How is the 44th relevant to this BTS?
 * 19) **Removed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:40, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * --Imperialles 07:14, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * It seemed one of your Notes and references was broken, so I feekstit. :D  TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 10:57, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:40, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Nolarian 6000 drill

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 03:32, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: (insert nonsense here)

(1 GCs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Lots of tool CANs... new WookieeProject? --Imperialles 06:56, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Man it takes me this long just to review a single paragraph of Darth Caedus. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 07:58, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3)  Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 17:48, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) You know the drill. ~ SavageBob 03:22, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I would suggest adding a sentence regarding and linking to the mining safety committee.  Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 09:34, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done, and because I had nothing better to do, I turned it into a full CAN of its own. &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 15:39, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * 85 words at time of nomination. &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 03:32, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Unidentified machinery dealer

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 03:32, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Look at the edit history!

(0 GCs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Imperialles 06:58, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I like these CA's. 1 minute reviews FTW! SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 07:56, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Thefourdotelipsis 09:04, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * 112 words at time of nomination. &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 03:32, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Unidentified Dark Jedi (Endar Spire)

 * Nominated by: SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 07:29, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 GCs/4 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) -- TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 11:20, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 11:52, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 00:10, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) -- 1358  (Talk) 04:51, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Is that image of him? If so, put it in the infobox. How do you know his opponent was a Jedi Master? --Imperialles 07:58, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Are you sure we're meant to put battle scenes into infoboxes? I could crop the image a bit, but it might look ugly due to pixelation. I've reffed the Jedi Master bit to the Prima guide. Thanks for the review :D SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 08:07, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **Well, it is the only image we have of the guy, regardless of quality. --Imperialles 08:08, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Done. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:26, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) I'm taking Xd's question below and making it a full objection. I'm pretty certain the "Dark" in "Dark Jedi" is always capitalized, so please correct that unless you can point to a source where it is not. &mdash; Master Jonathan  New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 16:45, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) *Well, I took the name from the quote, in which dark is not capitalised. However, I've changed it and moved the article, since it is capped in the Prima Guide and in a GA. Thanks. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 23:32, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * Can an admin delete the redirect here? Thanks. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 07:29, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Imp took care of it. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 07:54, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why isn't "dark" capitalized? In this article, nommed for FA, it is capitalized. -- 1358  (Talk) 12:38, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * See my response to Jonathan above. Thanks, SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 23:32, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Nigel III

 * Nominated by: Imperialles 07:49, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Followup to Nigel VI

(0 GCs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 07:53, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) -- TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 11:14, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3)  NAYAYEN : TALK 12:28, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) In the Bts, can't you just say that it isn't explicitly stated whether it is in the Nigel system rather than smack of speculation and say "could very well"?  NAYAYEN : TALK  11:23, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Better? --Imperialles 11:42, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **Much ^_^  NAYAYEN : TALK 12:28, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Double stripe

 * Nominated by: Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 09:18, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Testing this out with a haircut.

(1 GCs/5 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) You can get pretty much anything with CAs.  NAYAYEN : TALK 11:13, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) -- TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 11:16, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Imperialles 11:53, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Consider creating an imagecat. XD -- 1358  (Talk) 18:33, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Hehe...I can get behind this. Bella&#39;Mia 00:59, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6)  JangFett  (Talk) 01:39, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) This CA thing is proving immensely popular. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 03:57, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Just take out the double usage of "many" in the BTS and it's all good.  SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:40, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done, thanks for the read. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 17:49, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'm willing to separate a sentence out into an intro, if that is so desired. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 09:18, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Imperial Knights quarters

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 11:39, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I want in on this.

(1 GCs/5 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) Imperialles 11:55, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Thefourdotelipsis 13:13, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) LtNOWIS 01:25, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  )4
 * 5)  Grunny  ( talk ) 04:09, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) ~ SavageBob 16:20, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Does the OS capitalize "Order" in all instances? Typically, it should be capitalized only when used as part of the full title, but SW is weird, so I ask. ~ SavageBob 03:58, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Yeah, you're right; I guess it's like how we do titles. De-capitalized. Menkooroo 04:50, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Featured on a single page in the issue. No confirmation that the IK's live, eat, or do anything other than spar there. Menkooroo 11:42, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Mining safety committee

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 15:39, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Wow. Three articles with the same lead quote.

(1 GCs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) You're thorough, I'll give you that. --Imperialles 15:41, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Love to see all these noms on Jedi Apprentice. It was the series that got me into Star Wars in the first place as a kid. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 04:10, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Hmm, 75 words. :P  JangFett  (Talk) 17:05, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * 75 words at time of nomination. &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 15:39, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Ku Chusar

 * Nominated by: Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 02:48, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Testing, testing&hellip;

(1 GCs/5 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) This is the shortest article I have ever seen. :P  JangFett  (Talk) 03:06, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) ~ SavageBob 03:59, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Provided the Legacy era thing is sorted. --Imperialles 07:34, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 21:56, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 23:15, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) Well, he might get some kind of era icon if this all works out. :P Thefourdotelipsis 23:17, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Are you sure he lived during the Legacy era? You make no note of it in the body but you list Legacy era in the infobox.  Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 03:13, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *The eras icon info pertain just to when the character lived, but also to the era of the source in which the character appears. For example, take Tokra Hazz&mdash;he lived in the Rise of the Empire era, but appeared in a Legacy era source, and so received a leg and imp in the eras icon. We don't know when Chusar lived, but he appears in a leg source, so he gets a leg icon. (This is another reason I supported getting rid of the eras info from the infobox in that CT a while back&mdash;it creates confusion, because it shows OOU info rather than IU info.) Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 03:19, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **Actually, according to the LG, era tags are only for eras in which a topic actually exists, which is also why they aren't featured on species and planets and the like, since they would be in all of them (usually). Thefourdotelipsis 03:32, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) **But Chusar is only mentioned in Allies, like you said we have no idea when he actually lived. Hazz makes sense since he appears in Outcast and is known to have lived during the Rise of the Empire era. But I've never seen eras icons used when a character is only mentioned in a source from some specific time period. Otherwise, characters like Anakin Skywalker would be listed under all eras. Looks like 4dot edit-conflicted me. =P Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 03:35, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) ***No, actually, Hazz does not appear in Outcast. And in response to 4dot, I had assumed for articles like this one or like Hazz&mdash;since all information on them is presented during a certain era and/or it shows them affecting someone/something in that era&mdash;that we placed the tag for the era in which the information about the subject exists. Since the only information about Hazz and Chusar comes from Legacy era sources, I assumed that's how it was presented; otherwise they'd have no era tags at all. If this is the wrong interpretation, I'll remove it, but I'd like to note that I've had another nom, Thallis Khai, with the same eras layout, and I've never run into objections to this before. If this is an issue, I suggest we make this clearer (i.e. say specifically in the LG that if the character's placement in time is unknown, then they do not receive any era tag) and then weed through any past "mentioned only" noms and make sure there aren't any more. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 17:10, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) ****My mistake on Hazz, but yes, characters should only receive an era icon for a certain era if they are known to have existed in that era. I only raised this objection because I've never seen era icons used in this way. The LG does seem to indicate they only be used for eras where the subject exists, but I suppose it would be a good idea to mention that characters of unknown placement should not receive an era tag. Although I thought this was already the precedent. Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 21:21, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) *****Eh, alright, removed. I have to admit that I haven't seen any kind of precedent, because I haven't seen examples for either way, other than those two GAs I already mentioned. And the eras on those were just something I did way back during my noob-stage, and since no one objected to it in those previous two noms, I just assumed that was how we did it. :P Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 21:50, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Canary

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 04:00, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Tweet.

(0 GCs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 16:15, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 16:17, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 23:16, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * Hmm, how do we know that they're birds? Thefourdotelipsis 04:28, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I see your point, but I'd say it's a case of the duck test (canary test?). So, the same way we call someone who looks human but isn't explicitly called a Human a Human. In other words, we have no reason to believe Smith meant something other than tweety-bird canaries. ~ SavageBob 04:39, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know that the duck test is really applicable, since we don't know what a Star Wars canary looks like, and it's probably more something that falls under authorial intent, which we can't always use. I know this sounds pedantic, but... I'd probably say yeah if they were said to look like Quorsavs, but they aren't, as far as I'm aware. Thefourdotelipsis 04:49, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I understand your argument, and it's sensible. The thing is, though, I see this as falling into the "English" assumption we all make all the time. If we see a standard English word used in a source with no further context, we just assume that that word means the same thing in Star Wars as it does in the real world. We don't second-guess words like "blanket" or "window" or "heart attack"; we take them to mean what they mean in the real world (these are made-up examples, mind you, although I can dig up specific examples if folks want). In other words, barring any reason to think otherwise, canaries in Star Wars should probably just be taken to be canaries like ours. If this is beyond the scope of the CA page, though, I'll rescind the nomination, because SH or CT might be more appropriate. Tweet. ~ SavageBob 16:10, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * No no, that's sound enough logic for me. :) Thefourdotelipsis 16:15, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Aggoron

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 10:45, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Let's see how this works...

(1 GCs/4 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 10:53, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 10:55, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) ~ SavageBob 16:14, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Quick n' easy.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 17:33, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 02:43, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Agorffi

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 10:45, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 GCs/4 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 10:55, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 10:56, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) ~ SavageBob 16:15, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 02:45, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Far Pando

 * Nominated by: Imperialles 10:52, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Hutt Space planet of the day.

(2 GCs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 11:42, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) ~ SavageBob 17:25, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Strange name for a planet.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 17:29, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) I was hoping for sentient pandas. Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 21:59, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Is there no other information that can be inferred from the Atlas maps? Whose territory it was in at what times of the galaxy's history, for instance? Even if it's always been the same as the rest of Hutt Space, at least a note to that effect would be good. ~ SavageBob 16:16, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Good call. I was able to dig up a few tidbits. --Imperialles 16:39, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Aldereenian

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 11:53, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My third A species

(0 GCs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Killiks? Thefourdotelipsis 13:44, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 14:33, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) ~ SavageBob 22:19, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * I know inferred Atlas info is less applicable for species than it is for planets, but is there nothing? ~ SavageBob 16:18, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I perfer to only infer it if it actually appears on a map, which is obviously a different approach to that taken with Perlemaxian... --Eyrezer 21:46, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Noted. I, of course, think it's pertinent to note that such-and-such a species's homeworld was in territory considered Fubar Space in the Imbricated Period or whatever, but it's cool without as well. ~ SavageBob 22:19, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Aplocaph

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 11:53, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My fourth A species

(0 GCs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Imperialles 14:37, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) ~ SavageBob 16:19, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Sith Knight

 * Nominated by: Jinzler 13:50, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Basically, I want to check out this new process

(0 GCs/5 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 13:51, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 14:38, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Boring sigs above this vote. :P -- 1358  (Talk) 16:18, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ~ SavageBob 17:26, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 22:02, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Can we get a date of publication for his one and only appearance in BTS? Perhaps some context for how and why he is mentioned in the OS? ~ SavageBob 16:25, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Added --Jinzler 16:34, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Sernpidal Enforcer

 * Nominated by: Jinzler 18:05, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I might as well nom this

(0 GCs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 23:13, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 16:16, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Is this really ambiguously canon? Wouldn't RPG or something be more accurate? --Imperialles 07:28, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Ah yes, cheers for noticing that, I used the wrong template. I've fixed it now --Jinzler 14:33, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

The History and Development of the Human Languages, Volume I

 * Nominated by: Tm T 14:34, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Time to learn some language

(0 GCs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 14:35, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) ~ SavageBob 16:12, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Nice. --Jinzler 16:57, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments