Forum:CT Archive/Multiple 3RR's

I think the problem that has come to a head with Jack Nebulax has pointed out a weakness in our 3RR policy, so I'd like to suggest we improve it.

As a reminder, we currently have these guidelines for blocking:

With the exceptions noted above, blocks should usually progress according to the following table. Final discretion is left to  the blocking administrator on a case-by-case basis.

When blocking a user or IP for anything less than infinite, blocked should be subst'ed on talk pages with the appropriate length. Banned should be left on userpages only following an indefinite block.

These are for things such as vandalism, spam, disruption, copyright violations, etc. However, I think most people would agree that breaking the 3RR rule is not as egregious as vandalism and the like. So what I suggest is something like three violations of a 3RR would be considered equal to a "disruption." One thing I do think would be different would be, as is common now, a 24 hour ban on the first offense. So we could add something like this to the 3RR page:

Again, I'm just throwing numbers out there to get the discussion going. :) What do you think?  WhiteBoy 00:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)