User talk:JangFett

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent;"
 * valign="top" width="71%" style="background: #FFFFFF; border: 0px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em;"|

RE: Vindican
I am so sorry Jang, I forgot it was status and should have sourced it myself. It's from TOR the game.  —Tommy  9281  Saturday, January 14, 2012, 22:02 UTC 

CC-1993
Hi, Jang. I tend not to remind you of outstanding objections, but the last one about CC-1993 is standing there for nearly one month. Is there still anything wrong with it? Thanks for your time.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:25, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Rako Hardeen
Ummm...just wondering why my edit was reverted on Rako Hardeen? Thanks. -- Anju Vena  ( Nihilus Speak ) 01:51, January 21, 2012 (UTC)

bioelectricity
JangFett, I cant put Derrwown as a source from the star wars websie, because the thing wont let me. Just go to the star wars encyclopedia,they mention bio-electricity.

Hardcase
Seeing CC's suggestion for a P&T on your Hardcase FAN, I thought I'd offer this image for your consideration. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 03:18, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

Vindican
Hey Jang, I just wanted to draw your attention to the note I left on Tommy's talk page regarding TOR reference notes (here, precisely). If you have a way of getting the name of the mission or the location where the information on Darth Ikoral is found in-game, please add it with the TORCite template. If not, try checking with Tommy to get the information&mdash;it's a gigantic game, so we need to be as detailed as we can be in the ref notes. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 05:13, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

Near Indosa
Would you mind reading over the Near Indosa article and voicing you opinion. Thanks. ~ 501st Tup Tcgaotc_symbol.jpg( Communications ) 23:06, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

Past Tense
JangFett, i thought that the sections that had information on the "Slaves of the Republic" would have been moved down eventually. I thought i was doing Wookieepedia a favor by doing it already.--CC-1990 20:25, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

Hi
Hi jang fett. I want a favor to ask you. Please visit my wiki at http://clonewarsarchives.wikia.com

Favor
Hi jang fett. I want a favor to ask you. Please visit my wiki at http://clonewarsarchives.wikia.com

unknown articles
JangFett, i was just adding more information to the articles because of the episodes and i thought they needed to be upgrade more since as next week there will only be 4 episodes left. thank you for your concern.--CC-1990 16:09, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * I do not see how it is speculation when i just new information from the current Clone Wars TV show. Unless you think i should until do another overahul again to some of the articles after the 4th season of the clone wars is over.--CC-1990 16:26, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * I know I need to work on grammar a bit, JangFett, but I just thought someone a bit more... knowledgable would come along make it sound a bit better than me. I mean i know I probably over did it when I added sections about the Slaves of the Republic story arc that people watched a few weeks ago. I just thought that people would come edit. I mean is that not the point of Wookieepedia, to edit and information to the Star wars Universe.--CC-1990 16:45, February 4, 2012 (UTC)

Hardcase
Ola, Señor. I'm just writing to ask if you've been able to address CC's objection on the Hardcase FAN, which is four weeks old today. If not, hopefully you can get to it soon. Adios! Menkooroo 00:11, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Talk Page
Sorry, i just forgot. it has been a couple months since i've been Wookieepedia, since i was blocked.--CC-1990 02:51, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Ric
I noticed you placed a "mess" banner on the article for Ric Olié, but left no comments as to specifics... Since I just spent the last hour editing the entire page for grammar and choppy sentences, would you please let me know what specifically you find to be "messy?" I'm curious, because found the article to be in bad shape before, and I'd like to know how to get this one back in the spotlight page, since I've just invested a great amount of time fixing it up. I'm honestly not trying to be sarcastic, though I fear through text this may sound that way... I'd really like to know what you think would make the article better.
 * If you'll take a moment to note the edit history, before you reverted the caption edit, you'll notice that I just completed an extensive edit of the article, which is why I'm curious as to your reasoning for the tag. I just spent an hour using my Master's degree in English to re-write the prose into proper grammar. I'd like to know your specific reasons for feeling that more editing is required, or I'd like to request that you please remove the tag, as it actually makes the article look messier than it must.
 * Okay. Thank you for clarifying that. I'm not prone to editing wikis. Thank you for your professional tone, as well. :) (Cheesetater 08:26, February 5, 2012 (UTC))
 * I'll do that. Thank you for your suggestions, and again, my apologies if my tone sounded rude at all... I never know if my internet voice is sounding professional or not. Cheers, --Cheesetater 08:34, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Reference list
Hi Jang I noticed you removed the reference list on two articles I recently created. I realise that they only referenced one source but still am not sure why they needed removal as they would make any future editing which added more reference sources easier? A number of comprehensive articles contain reference lists with only a single source and I can't find anything suggesting they shouldn't. I may of missed something here and your edit is probably following correct format but I just wondered if you could explain why? Ayrehead02 22:26, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ah ok thanks for pointing out where I was going wrong. I'll make sure to apply it to future articles I write 82.22.36.163 19:02, February 7, 2012 (UTC)

Second Battle of Theed
Hi there, I saw you added a cleanup tag to the Second Battle of Theed. What kinds of thinks need to be done to the article? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 03:40, February 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Bueller, Bueller? Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 23:50, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

Nc
Ok, I just thought it looks better to have canon appearances and non-canon appearances seperated. Thanks for the heads up. Ressor 15:55, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * I see now. I aplogise for all the reverse editing that will have to be made. Ressor 16:02, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

So
So, which info was unverified? --XXLVenom998 17:09, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * If you mean Lee-Char, he is confirmed to be Mon Calamari. Just look him up on the Encyklopedia. --XXLVenom998 17:44, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * You mean he's not famous? His father was the king of Dac, he was the one to kill Riff Tamson and his aides, and he was the one to reunite Mon Calamaris and Quarrens, and become the ruler of Dac! He is more famous than most members, he was in 3 episodes! With respect, he is famous!! --XXLVenom998 17:51, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * So, you didn't watch the first 3 episodes of season 4, right? This whole speculation and sourcing thing is just silly, everyone knows he is famous! Just visit the Encyklopedia, again. --XXLVenom998 17:54, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * I familiarized myself with them. And Lee-Char is a famous member, a king is always that. For example, Darth Maul is not stated as a famous member anywhere, but he is, isn't he? But all right. Everyone knows he is a famous member. Anyone will find him. I hope there is no offence. --XXLVenom998 18:01, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

Search icons
I love the John Williams search icon. However, per Guideline 3, the image can only be cropped on the bottom. It can't be cropped from the side like that. Can you recrop/edit it so that only the bottom is cropped? -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 05:33, February 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * There was a method to my madness. ;) I don't figure all of them getting approved. So I'm just hoping for some of the better ones, like Rex, Ahsoka, and some others. I'm also working on some more non-TCW ones as well. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 05:47, February 12, 2012 (UTC)

Battle of Bothawui (Great Galactic War)
Hey Jang. Just wanted to check&mdash;how exactly did the Battle of Bothawui (Second; Great Galactic War) get probed at the last AC moot? I know the first one got probed, but the second one is an FA. :P Just checking; not sure if there was just an error in paperwork.  CC7567  (talk) 05:28, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Granted that they were wearing similar armor, it looks like they would be at least be a unit. Fil has been the only depicted commanding officer in this unit so far, though I do agree it's not confirmed that it's "his" unit. Even if it's not under the current title, the unit does look like it would warrant an article.  CC7567  (talk) 18:37, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

Linking
Well, thanks, I keep it in mind. But it doesn't really affect the text, the outcome is the same, not? --XXLVenom998 22:05, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * OK then. Thanks a lot. --XXLVenom998 22:19, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

TF-1726
I was recently browsing through pages and found the article TF-1726. It looks like it's good article status has been removed because nobody updated the article, an edit that would have taken 2 minutes. Is this the only thing keeping it from beeing re-nominated to GA status? Thanks,-- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 00:53, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for answering my question.-- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 01:06, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

Jet
Hey, Jang thanks a lot for your patience when reviewing Jet. It's been a long process due to several problems, but now it seems to be done. I know, my problem with some objections were quite large, but I hope that this will be better in the future. Once again, thank you.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:22, February 18, 2012 (UTC)

Comet
I know that I am not supposed to post Gan objective comments on your talkpage, but I think I have a rather major question about Comet. Since Comet wears Devil Dogs armor during the Khorm assalt, that would technically make him part of the 44th Special Operations Division. Also, Wolfpack was down to 3 troopers during that battle due to the previous battle of Abregado, meaning Comet could not have been part of Wolfpack. However, we later see Comet as part of Wolfpack in TCW. Does this mean Comet changes companies to be in the 104th after the battle due to Wolffe's neede for more clone troopers in Wolfpack? Can I change the article to say this or would that be speculation becasue no source I know supports this? Thanks for putting up with my less than stellar nomination. 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 01:04, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. That saves me a lot of time becaue I don't need to reword the intro to make comet a devil dog. 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 23:16, February 21, 2012 (UTC)

Lars
Hello Jang Fett. I'm a new user and an article I made a small expansion to was flagged clean up. I looked through the link regarding clean ups and it's still unclear to me as to why it was flagged. If you could clarify I'd be appreciative. Thank you.

Request
Hey, Jang. I was wondering if I could ask a favour. Could I get you to archive Mofference as a failed nomination? I want to take some time to hunt for a couple more reliable sources and rewrite much of the BTS. Thanks. Menkooroo 15:19, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

Request
Hey, Jang. I was wondering if I could ask a favour. Could I get you to archive Mofference as a failed nomination? I want to take some time to hunt for a couple more reliable sources and rewrite much of the BTS. Thanks. Menkooroo 15:20, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

CT-5597
Sorry for bothering you, but why did you remove CT-5597's photo, and then but it back exactly the same? 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 17:22, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll avoid promotional pictures from now on. 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 18:47, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Removing Content
Well, will all due respect, I feel that I was just highlighting the major events. I realize that it may seem inccorect to remove source information, but a lot of the information in the article, sourced or unsourced did not add to the article. One of my mainproblems with the article before (this is just my opinion) is that it was too long and unweidly. Could you please reconsider you revert? Although it seems like I'm just removing content, making something short is a lot harder than making something long. Best, -- Kangaroopowah  ( Talk ) 05:08, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok thanks, but can I condense the content while keeping the reference at meaning. Like if there is a paragrapgh about a magna guard attack mace windu, can I make it a sentence or two? -- Kangaroopowah  ( Talk ) 05:29, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Balith Civil War
Hi, Jang. May I request your help in updating the article about the Balith Civil War? Is there any new info about it in Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Incredible Vehicles? Thanks for your time.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 15:11, February 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks a lot.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 12:53, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Onca
Mind looking at Onca and giving me some tips on getting rid of "sorry about the mess"? Thanks. ~ 501st Tup Tcgaotc_symbol.jpg( Communications ) 16:12, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Tup (clone trooper)
Hi, mind reading over Tup and giving me some tips on getting rid of "sorry about the mess"? Thanks. ~ 501st Tup Tcgaotc_symbol.jpg( Communications ) 16:24, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Hey
Hey JangFett. I'm JediMaster22, a newer member of Wookieepedia. I can't figure out how to get a picture for my avatar. If you know a way (other than that Facebook link) please tell me. []User:JediMaster22|JediMaster22]] 01:54, March 5, 2012 (UTC)JediMaster22

Section
I was going to add more information to them. I thought that some other user would fill in the blanks before me. will my behind the scene's section stay?--CC-1990 14:03, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

TCW
Hi. So which day it is scheduled to air? Maybe I am the one who is illierate, but I would bet it reads "March 9, 2012". My computer and calendar says this date. So something is not correct here! It is quite funny how you argue about those couple of hours... Anyways, i don't want offense. Do as you wish, you are the moderator.--XXLVenom998 14:53, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * But it will in several hours, if it didn't yet. How do you know it didn't air? In some countries, it may be weeks until it airs. Just because you haven't seen it, it doesn't mean it didn't air. if it is confirmed that it airs on 9th, than it aired today. So the main point is that it AIRED. There's no need to argue on 2-3 hours, in myí opinion.--XXLVenom998 15:15, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Unverified Information
Hi, I saw your message. When you say I added unverified information, I'm assuming you mean the stuff I added to the Karis and Naa'leth articles, correct? Both were referred to by Talzin in Nightsisters as the "greatest warriors of our coven", and Naa'leth was present on Serenno along with Talzin and Talia in Monster. So why exactly were those edits reverted? If it all comes down to sourcing, why were those two particular edits reverted while there's still boatloads of edits out there without citations attached? Thanks.--The Shadow Emperor 18:05, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 'Kay then, I took a look over the sourcing page and think I've got the hang of it now. The info to the articles was added again and sourced. Thanks!--The Shadow Emperor 21:29, March 13, 2012 (UTC)

Dyer in Behind the Magic
Hello JangFett, I see that your GA Dyer is listed as being pictured only in BTM. Does that mean his line "Freeze!" is not included in the script? Another possibility (most likely) is it is merged into one Commander saying "Freeze! You Rebel scum," in which case I wouldn't know if that should count as a mention or not. Hanzo Hasashi 20:38, March 14, 2012 (UTC)

Savage
Hi! About Savage Opress, that template has been there for ages, I noticed it even back in 2011. For me it means it is not in progress, if it was in progress, it won't be there for more than a couple of days. Otherwise, the title of Wikia is an Encyclopedia that anyone can edit. It is not possible to block an article so only one user can edit it. If he does not work on it, than others may do so. Otherwise, I only made minor edits, I did not edit main sections, and I did not add a lot of information. I don't understand how can this causae conflicts. Please do not block pages from editing if they are not edited. Thank you. --XXLVenom998 13:38, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * As I told you, the template has been there for ages. It is not possible to block a page from editing for other users for months. Otherwise, I only added an image, and made some minor edits. Why shouldn't I work on a page if he does not work on it? Maybe he should carry on "refreshing" the page after someone's edit, not reverting the edits. I don't want a war, I support you administrators, but I have to say that you sometimes act like the whole Wookieepedia was only yours. If I find problems, spelling mistakes or other things in the article, I would still edit them. I don't know how can this cause conflicts... Furthermore, as I mentioned, you can't make an article a property of one user for a long time. If CC really wanted to make changes on the page, than he would have made it on a single day. I don't understand what edits can he make which take months. If he really worked on it for that long time, the article now should be longer now than Anakin Skywalker's article! I am a faithful Wookieepedian, and I edit anything that has a problem, or is out of date. Please do not revert my edits just because someone namely edits it, while he is not working on it. Otherwise, if that page belongs to CC, please rename it "Savage Opress - CC7657's property". I don't put WIP tags to certain pages I follow, please don't you do that either, until you really, constantly work on it. Thank you.--XXLVenom998 13:57, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * I understand what you are talking about, I partly agree with it, but it is not the question of a few days, it has been there for months. It is quite annoying that you can't edit a page for half a year, and there is no real clue that there was editing. If he is that slow, than others should edit it. And the template hasn't disappeared yet, so it means that it may not be edited for years! Please talk with him about it, that article needs editing!--XXLVenom998 14:32, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

RE
I'm familiar with said policy, thanks. According to which the removal of the image was perfectly legitimate, as it is contradicted by a higher canon source; George Lucas having personally approved Maul's resurrection and new backstory, and the official Encyclopedia stating that his tattoos are of Nightbrother, not Sith origin. In the future, please use the "show preview" function, so as to avoid bombarding me with "you have new message" notifications. Thank you. Jayden Matthews 13:18, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * "As long as a piece of information comes from a canon source and is not contradicted by a higher source, it is accepted as canon." In this case, the image was contradicted by a higher source, ergo, I removed it. I never attempted to decide myself what is canon. The Encyclopedia does that, as does George Lucas, I was simply following the current policy. I'm curious as to what which part of my previous post you interpreted as "rudness", as I'm pretty sure I said thank you. Really, I made a simple request, intended to spare myself further inconvenience. If you are unable to accept polite advice then perhaps you should refrain from dispensing it to others. Jayden Matthews 13:44, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * "Personal attacks do not include civil language used to describe an editor's actions, and when made without involving their personal character, should not be construed as personal attacks". Please be very carefull before making such an accusation again, as I do not take such aspersions lightly. Thank you. Jayden Matthews 14:01, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * As demonstrated by the above policy excerpt nothing I have said even borders on a personal attack. Indeed, I have been nothing but civil to you throught our interactions. If, however, you feel I have offended you, I apologize. Please feel free to take the appropriate action. In the meantime I wholeheartedly agree that we should cease this discussion, as it is distracting me from a whole host of other things that I would rather be doing. I'm sure you feel the same. Thank you for your time. Jayden Matthews 14:37, March 21, 2012 (UTC)

Heads!
Hey, Jang. Just a heads-up that some objections to Hardcase have passed the three-week mark. Hopefully you can get to them soon. Cheers. Menkooroo 14:02, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries. Also, I saw the "Please do not leave me a message regarding FAN objections" message only after pressing save. So, sorry. :P Menkooroo 14:08, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Warning?
Really? May I ask why? I think it would be considered standard practice for most major encyclopedias.
 * Also, I think you meant to send me a message earlier. I had to reboot my homehub, becasue I lost my internet connection. Many apologies. James Gates
 * A thousand apologies.

Van Warning?
I beg your pardon sir, but you sent me a Warning. I would wish you would be a little more clear over which part of my edits were in valilation of rule, so I do not make the same mistake. It whould well liked if would. thank you sir.--Darthahsokaboyfrenidfett 22:30, March 27, 2012 (UTC) --Darthahsokaboyfrenidfett 22:37, March 27, 2012 (UTC)

Thank You...
Thank you for clearifing, but really "vandalisim". That part about "Nal Hutta not showning any hutts" is totally lagit. I do not wish start a confrontasion you JangFett, but the tone in your massages seem quite hostile, I just wanted to help Wookiepedia and be with other fans of starwars. sorry, I will try to look deeper into the rules.--Darthahsokaboyfrenidfett 23:12, March 27, 2012 (UTC) --Darthahsokaboyfrenidfett 23:14, March 27, 2012 (UTC)

Corellia shipyard edit
My edit to Corellia, concerning the size of the shipyards, can be verified from the shipyard and Fondor pages. Both say that the largest shipyards in the Star Wars universe are at: Corellia, Kuat, and Fondor. Syalantillesfel 17:05, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

New policy
Hey there, I have read your 'new policy', which is a nonsense thing. Don't even try making this up, everyone realised this is an april fools joke, which is not a good joke anymore. Replacing valid pictures with picture that do not belong there, is not fanon, but vandalism. You are an administrator, so don't keep on saying this valid thing nonsense, this does not belong here. You can see everyone had enough of it. I don't know what's good in replacing the Apocalypse's cover with Dave Filoni's picture. If you keep on doing this, it would take a lot of time to revert these things tomorrow. But do as you wish. Makea fool of yourself. --XXLVenom998 15:44, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Please stop doing that, because we all now it's just an APRIL FOOLS JOKE, okey? So please do what you must do as a staff member. Okey, you all laughed a lot seeing us really worried, but it's over, it was just an enormous joke, we all now that.Skenar Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk ) 18:50, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it is disgusting now. I got the three-revert stupidity just because being a faithful Wookieepedian? Come on, your are getting really silly! --XXLVenom998 18:58, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

Maul
Can you please stop vandalizing the pages please. You may not like what they have done with bringing Darth Maul back and neither do I, in fact it's idiotic. There was logic behind how he survived, the only thing you are doing is being childish and completely disrespectful. - HeadyBoy
 * Reply to XXLVenom998: I think the admins have each edit stored somewhere, it probably won't take long for them, it just makes the guy look like a kiddie. - HeadyBoy
 * Can you at least answer us and tell us why you are doing this?
 * I take that as a no?--HeadyBoy 17:10, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

Can you PLEASE change the Darth Maul page back to normal? I don't know why you did that; it was stupid. Please change it back to what it was, because that is vandalism.

72.137.70.236 18:52, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

OK
Ok, so everyone who is a faithful Wookieepedian is blocked. So this is becoming Babypedia?--XXLVenom998 18:59, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

Can you please stop vandalizing the articles? Thanks.

Infamousstarwarsfan 19:04, April 1, 2012 (UTC)


 * I am expecting to receive a "sorry-template" tomorrow morning from all of you administrators. Thanks in advance. --XXLVenom998 19:05, April 1, 2012 (UTC)

Posting in JangFett's talk page
MY BAD, I didn't mean it to you. I meant to mssg JangFett, the real vandalizer. I didn't realize I accidentally msged you. (I'm new here). Sorry.