User talk:Riffsyphon1024

 See Archive1 | Archive2 | Archive3 | Archive4 | Archive5 | Archive6 

Date categorization
I noticed you've been doing a lot of date articles, and I have a suggestion: how about, when doing individual dates, we categorize them by number, like May 19 would be. As it is now, they're alphabetical. - Lord Hydronium 22:13, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I was thinking of doing that. If you look at Wikipedia's, their's is still in alphabetical. Sad isn't it? -- Riffsyphon1024 22:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * However now that I did that, it places the article under 0 or 1. Is that any better to look at? -- Riffsyphon1024 22:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, it's not as pretty, but it's probably more useful. Just one digit would look nicer, so all Mays would be under "5", but it wouldn't work for October-December. - Lord Hydronium 22:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Although, if we wanted to get more complicated, we could use 1-9 and do something like make October "A", November "B", and December "C", so every date would be in order and sorted by month. It might be confusing, though. - Lord Hydronium 22:22, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * How about a list? See here List of Dates--Erl 22:35, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Problem solved Erl. See the category. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:41, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah good. I'll get rid of the List of Dates then, and check the category to make sure its all back to normal. Thanks again!--Erl 22:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Improvement Drive
Hi Riffsyphon, Thanks for your note. The improvement drive refers to the List of Companies and Corporations, which suffers from an excess of red links. My adding stub pages for companies without pages (the new pages to which you refer) is meant to address this particular problem. I could leave the comment line blank when I add a new page, or simply say "new page" if that would prevent confusion, but barring this it seems clear enough otherwise. Ulic 04:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Bored article thing
Whoops, sorry about that. I went to put up the deletion notice and you had already deleted it. My fault! --Danik Kreldin 22:14, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * It happens. ;) -- Riffsyphon1024 22:14, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Banning user 67.139.52.226
I believe you banned 67.139.52.226. He is a friend of mine. He called me before, and said when he went to edit, it said he was blocked by riffsyphon1024. The vandalism that he made were only minor pranks played on me by him, he just removed "want" in the Star Wars dreams section of the community portal jokingly because when i first wrote the section, It said, "I more" (I forgot to put "want".) I believe he was booted because of the User:Bly1993/Amazing page. It was just a joke I played on him, and I was gonna have the page and smile image deleted. He didn't start that. It wasn't supposed to be vandalism. Could you bring him back? Lt. 1993 22:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Right. -- Riffsyphon1024 23:00, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Questions

 * Hey, Riff can you please answer some of my questions over at the ComPortal? Thanks --Razzy1319 20:16, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Link to us!
Okay, I was kinda bored so I made some stuff&mdash;some "link to us" images. I'm not a graphic artist, so don't expect brilliance, but I wanted to know what you think (and didn't know where to put 'em anyway, I'm tired).


 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 

Shadowtrooper talk 03:45, 19 March 2006 (UTC) I've made a crummy little mock up on my temp page, if you would, please lemme know what "administrative touches" it needs so it will fit with everything else around here. Shadowtrooper talk 15:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Good job Shadowtrooper. I personally like 3 and 5, large enough that you can see what it links to. -- Riffsyphon1024 21:21, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, so now the only question is...where should I put these? [[Image:Tbhelm.gif|30px]] Shadowtrooper talk 15:18, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I like 5 and 6. Adamwankenobi 15:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't say crummy but after cafeful consideration, I like the Wookiee attack logo the best, showing the mass of Wookiee(pedians) that have been created. :) Not sure what other administrative touches it might need, though I'm not sure if the text is needed or not. -- Riffsyphon1024 19:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

The Legacy Era
It Says and I quote, "All New Sith! All New Empire! All New Skywalker!". We already have Legacy Era Sith and Cade Skywalker, What about the Empire?? - SGCommand
 * I wouldn't know how they're going to present this. Probably something similar to the Old Sith Empire. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Dates
Yeah, you're right. As an admin, could you revert all of my date changes (they were all in a row, it should be a piece of cake), and I'll make a List of Dates, so that it can be ordered effortlessly.--Erl 22:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I have a better idea. If you look on my user page, you will find a already assembled table from Wikipedia with all the dates on there. I could place this on the category page at the top. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * That would work. Oy, I keep coming across like an idiot. Thanks very much. So is there anything I should do?--Erl 22:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for trying but it didn't work out. I'll revert the rest of these dates. Btw, you don't have to be an admin to rollback articles. ;) -- Riffsyphon1024 22:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
 * But if not an admin you can get repetitive motion injury doing so. I didn't want to do them manually (laziness I guess), and since I was talking to you, I took the path of least resistance . . . ;)--Erl 00:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC)