User talk:Toprawa and Ralltiir

Archived talk: 1 2 3 4 5

Gorgon
Yeah, I guess I'll deal with the objections.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 12:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

SWE
Got something for ya. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 13:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Oops
Ah, sorry. I've never used the random page before, and I just forgot about the history page. I'll get it next time.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 21:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Scarl system
I have responded to your inquiry on the Scarl System and the Executor on my page. Briefly, the page originally said it was constructed at Fondor (unsure of the source...it was already on the page for a while). I tried to combine the two seemingly contradictory statements. See my talk page for further details. I will go and look at my wording to insure no "personal research"/fanfic hanky panky. IthinkIwannaLeia 21:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Light and Shadow
Hey, T&R. After finding several articles linking to the previously non-existant Jedi Nova, I instinctively created her article. However, after reading the source material, I fear the story she originates from -- as well as all the other articles based on the story -- are pure fanon (the site can be found here; I'm sure the "Fanboy Association" in the title pretty much confirms its fanon...icity? I doubt that's a word.). I'm not sure if we allow fanon articles on Wookieepedia, so do you mind taking a look into the situation during your free time? Thanks in advance, and happy editing. // ~mikah~  02:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bringing this to my attention. It seems that the article is not fanon, but instead comes from a licensed story that was canceled and never released. I've added the appropriate tag signifying this at the top of the Nova article. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Your GAN activity
Sorry, I didn't know. I'm new to the whole GAN thing. Do I need to add a short summary or something of my changes into comments as a record? Thx for the tip. Soresumakashi 02:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You don't need to specify what changes you make to an article on the GAN page. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Bring Back... Star Wars

 * On 17th September, you deleted the page Bring Back... Star Wars, which I created, citing that it was "nonsense". This was a real episode that aired in the UK, as you can check for yourself here. I was just wondering if you could explain to me why you felt it was appropriate to delete the page --Jinzler 08:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, cheers for explaining that to me. I'm guessing that it is alright for me to put something on it in List of references to Star Wars in television instead. Although, if it had aired in the US, i'm sure that it would have got enough viewers to be worthy of it's own article --Jinzler 21:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Executor
Hey there T&R. I saw your recently uploaded Executor image Image:ExecutorShuttle.jpg and thought I'd let you know there is already a larger/more complete version of that image in use on the site, Image:Theexecutorsheiswhite.JPG, in case you wanted to use that instead. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know. I'm not a big fan of that picture, though. Too dark. There is a much cleaner version in the SOTG 2007 book I'm trying to get to replace it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * In that case, I'll try to scan it. :) VT-16 19:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, cool :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, this didn't turn out quite the way I thought it would. You be the judge. =/ VT-16 19:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Delete and block
WHY THE FUCK DID YOU DELETE MY PAGE ? 92.10.124.244 20:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Pepper's Pax
It's mentioned under Nogo Sistek's entry, and the info is in the second paragraph under Darlyn Boda on pages 9/10. Nesis Vod 16:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Gorgon
You sure love that SWE don't you? :P Anyway, (and you're probably tired of this by now), do you think you could be a little more specific as to what you would like to see there, or if possible, provide the entry? Thanks a ton.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 23:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Maul Stanley
Hello. I'm new at this so it's quite possible I made a mistake, but could you please explain to me why you deleted my Maul Stanley article just 5 minutes after I created it? I made the effort to substantiate the piece with no less than 10 reference links, so I can't imagine what about the entry you considered "nonsense." I would appreciate a clarification, thank you.

Cybercomic 16:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Not knowing what your objection is to my contribution, I have just re-posted the article. Before doing so, I gave it a subsequent review to ensure that proper guidelines have been followed. If you have further issues with this entry, I would appreciate you making them known through proper channels, rather than pulling the article outright. Thank you.

Cybercomic 18:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Though I appreciate you taking the time to indicate that you consider this entry "not notable" (while deleting the entire article for a second time), this is not solely for you to decide. In cases like this, the subject is to be brought up for review by other contributors and not arbitrarily pulled because one individual objects to its inclusion. As for the character being "not notable," he is easily as notable as other "notable fans" included in Wookieepedia, such as Thomas J. Spanos and The Elvis Trooper. His contributions to Star Wars fandom are tangible and of merit, otherwise they would not have been reported on by such sources as TheForce.net and the blog at StarWars.com. Maul Stanley's activities have also been reported on by such notable non-Star Wars sites as Blabbermouth.net, MetalSludge.tv, KissOnline.com and KissAsylum.com, all of which were linked in the body of the article. Clearly, these established sites consider this subject notable so I'm rather surprised that you feel the need to discount them.

I am trying to give you due consideration here, which is more than you have thus far shown me by deleting my entry twice. If you personally do not feel that the entry has merit (despite all the evidence provided), you are entitled to put the topic up for discussion. However, you are overstepping accepted boundaries and being unfair to both me and the subject by repeatedly acting as judge, jury and executioner with regard to this matter.

Cybercomic 19:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)