Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Abbaji

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 17:10, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:29, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) How bout adding it's atmosphere type to the body?
 * 2) *Argh, done.
 * 3) **Still remains. Are you sure you saved the page?
 * 4) ***Now. Winterz (talk) 19:27, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) I've done it here, but in the future add near the top of the article to get rid of the table of contents when we have this short of an article.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:38, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *Well I tried to find that code to remove the content table, but apparently it vanishes after being inserted. Winterz (talk) 19:00, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **The table of contents only pops up for some noms, so you were probally looking at those who did not have the template. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***TOC's appear when there are three or more section headings of any level. - i.e. a Behind the scenes, an Appearances section, and a Notes and references. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:42, October 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) Same question as Lankashire: Even if this planet isn't mentioned in the Atlas, can we say anything about the territory in which it fell throughout history, based on it system or its sector? Menkooroo (talk) 03:23, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) Also, the BTS is pretty confusing. Can you re-word it to make it clear as to just what the OOU history is between Abbaji and Abbaji Minor? Some of it looks like it was copied and pasted over from Abbaji Minor's BTS, which has resulted in unnecessary repetition like "but the planet called Abbaji was first mentioned in Shadows of the Empire." I think both articles could use a BTS rewrite. Menkooroo (talk) 01:52, November 21, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abbaji (minor)

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 20:26, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Cade, I think Winterz is challenging you for the maximum number of noms on this page.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:19, October 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Sky's the limit! :p Winterz (talk) 14:49, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **If war is what you want, my young friend, then war is what you will get! !crazylaugh Now, to find some CANoms... Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:43, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER   (talk) 18:51, November 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 501
 * 1) * Could you add the Carrion sector to the main article?
 * 2) * 501st dogma ( talk ) 20:59, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Winterz (talk) 21:30, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Authors for Atlas? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:25, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **I just can't get enooooough. Done. Winterz (talk) 22:28, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) 502
 * 7) * In the BTS: "First appeared" isn't accurate for something in the "Soures" section; "was first mentioned" would be more accurate.
 * 8) **Corrected.
 * 9) * Some overlinking in the BTS; The Unknown Soldier is linked twice.
 * 10) **Argh, corrected.
 * 11) *I'm a little confused --- the BTS reads as if this planet was called "Abbaji" in both Unknown Soldier and the Atlas, with the name "Abbaji Minor" coming from a Jason Fry post at the JC forums. Is that true? If so, has the name "Abbaji Minor" ever appeared in canon? If not, the BTS will need some re-wording to be clear as to what the story is. Menkooroo (talk) 01:50, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) **Is it less confusing now? Winterz (talk) 20:49, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) ***Definitely. Is there any indication that the name "Abbaji Minor" is canonical, though? ie, can you link me to Jason Fry's post (the current URL is dead). Menkooroo (talk) 03:18, November 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) ****Couldn't find anything about the name Abbaji Minor though I couldn't really ignore the facts. I, personally, never saw the forum's post but I'm sure that when the link was live, someone on Wookieepedia checked and confirmed it, otherwise the name wouldn't have stayed that way for so long. Either way, I thought it was relevant enough to leave it be. So now I'm on a standstill, what should my approach be in this matter? Erase, modify or let it be? As I await for your reply I've added a "conjecture tag" considering no source, besides supposedly the author, confirmed the name's authenticity. :s Winterz (talk) 19:18, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) *****I've updated the link for you&mdash;the cartography thread is still alive at the Jedi Council Forums, though the URL (obviously) changed when the forums moved. But when you know where (and how) to look, the post isn't all that hard to find. Just type "abbaji minor" site:boards.theforce.net to Google and it turns up right away. :) Tinwe (comlink) 11:23, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) ******Thanks a lot, Tinwe! ;) Winterz (talk) 11:52, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) *******OK... I don't think the conjecture tag is necessary; I think we need to call the world "Abbaji" based on what's in canon. The authorial intent can definitely be mentioned in "Behind the scenes," but until it makes its way into an official product, we'll need to stick with the facts. Moving the article to "Abbaji (minor)" and just calling it "Abbaji" throughout the article would probably be the best route. Does that sound good? Menkooroo (talk) 12:21, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) ********This is becoming too confusing, done. Winterz (talk) 22:42, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Lankashiir

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 16:13, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:35, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Authors for the Atlas?
 * 2) * Main terrain needs to be mentioned in main article.
 * 3) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done. Winterz (talk) 21:58, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) 502
 * 6) * "Outside the Star Wars universe, the name of the planet may be a reference to Lancashire, a county in England." It's always tempting to guess like that, but this kind of speculation falls under our No original research policy and is a big no-no if there's nothing to back it up. Menkooroo (talk) 12:28, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Good, it looks prettier without it. Still, considering that it wasn't me who added it, I thought the info could be relevant in some ways. Winterz (talk) 13:47, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) *One more question: Anything from the Atlas on parts of space under which it later fell? Any Imperial warlord territories, New Republic, Krayt's Empire...? Menkooroo (talk) 09:59, November 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Info added, sir. Winterz (talk) 21:48, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) ***Great. However, "until its fragmenation one year later" can't be sourced to the Atlas. I don't think it can even be sourced to the last issue of Legacy War, which only tells us that the Alliance conquers Coruscant and that the Sith go into hiding. No indication of what happens to Krayt's Empire. Probably best just to leave that sentence out. Menkooroo (talk) 01:55, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) ****Actually, yes the Empire collapses and the Triumvirate takes over. It is the remnants of the One Sith that go into hiding, Krayt's Empire was no more after his death. I'm sure I can get you a reference. Winterz (talk) 20:43, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) *****There's not a lot we can say about the Triumvirate based on the single panel in which they appear in Legacy War 6 --- we can speculate on what Hogrum Chalk means when he says that the galaxy has been unified, but it would be just that: speculation. Sure, the Sith go into hiding, but we can't make any assertions about what actually happens to Krayt's Empire; we can only guess. Menkooroo (talk) 03:21, November 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) ******If it is speculation then someone should really take care of the false information that is referenced in Darth Krayt's Galactic Empire. Winterz (talk) 14:10, November 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) *******Done, but this objection still needs to be addressed... Menkooroo (talk) 00:47, November 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) ********Done. Winterz (talk) 18:53, November 27, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abregado-san

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Cade, Winterz is winning this contest!  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:44, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:13, November 29, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Could you provide approximate dates for when the planet fell inside each government? Please address this objection on the other Abregado nominations as well.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  00:39, December 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) *Also, in each Abregado article, you source the coordinates in the body to Coruscant and the Core Worlds. Shouln't this be sourced to the Atlas?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  00:41, December 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Argh, that was accidental, it was when I (recently) added the coordinates to the body, fixed. Winterz (talk) 00:25, December 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abregado-dai

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Three in a row...fus-san-dai!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I need EC back up here... Too many noms to deal with alone.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:47, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Abregado-taki

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 23:04, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Sorry EduCorps!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:38, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Your ref in the main body of the article is formatted wrong. Use in the infobox only. You should be using  in the body. Please look over your other noms and see if they are formatted correctly.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:15, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) **Wow, I really wasn't aware of that. What is the difference? Anyways, corrected it in all my 17 noms, thanks for the heads-up! Winterz (talk) 15:44, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Truthfuly, I have no idea what the difference is, but that's how we properly reff an article. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:38, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abrion Major

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 23:43, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work on all these noms.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:41, October 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) You should nom the senator of this planet for the barn burner.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 06:55, November 28, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Same reffing problems as before.
 * 2) * You should mention that it seceded to the CIS.
 * 3) * Humans as the immigrated species needs to be mentioned in the main body.
 * 4) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:20, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. I decided to remove the immigrated species and language from the Infobox as I couldn't find any source that confirmed it. Winterz (talk) 15:48, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * You might not consider this important, but I think at some point in the body you should refer to the Seps as the Confederacy of Independant Systems, since they're called that in the infobox and if a user who knew nothing about Star Wars saw that they could get confused. That's all.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 09:58, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **I consider all objections important ;), corrected. Winterz (talk) 18:56, November 27, 2012 (UTC)

Rage (Lancer-class frigate)

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:59, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:More Far Orbit!

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 08:19, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) This isn't a real objection, per se, though just a few more words of context in the Ringali Nebula would be great! By the way, project Far Orbit is boring :p Winterz (talk) 03:06, December 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Green/Aura

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Aurabesh

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Apparently there isn't a code for that, yet. :/ Winterz (talk) 18:56, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:41, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Is there any way to remove the "< Green"? Considering that the Green article isn't related to these ones.
 * 3) **I have no idea how to remove it. I noticed it when I first created the article, but did not know how to eliminate it.
 * 4) ***I'll leave the question at Darth Culator's talkpage, will sign my support once I have a reply. ;)
 * 5) * Context on Sienar Fleet Systems.
 * 6) **Contextified.
 * 7) *** Lol, I was expecting some more specific context like "a subsidiary of the massive company X", not just two obvious words. Winterz (talk) 18:48, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ****Does that satisfy your objection? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:31, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *****Meh, I guess so. Winterz (talk) 13:09, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * (objections apply to both 'Aurabesh') Winterz (talk) 14:43, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Both articles have been upadated according to your objections. Thanks for the review(s). 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:17, October 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Green/Besh

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Aurabesh

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 20:52, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:37, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Hey! Far-Orbit! Far out!
 * 2) * TFOP was a direct supplement to Pirates and Privateers. The way you've written it here, it's like TFOP was just riffing off the theme.
 * 3) **It was a supplement to the RPG just by existing. It was also a direct supplement to Privates and Privateers, like a sequel to it but not. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:25, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***That any better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:38, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Yep. Just needed another tweak. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:37, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * The scenario hooks have names. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:44, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Both fixed. Thanks for looking it over. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:53, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Don't forget to apply these changes to Aura. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:25, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Scimitar 2

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:01, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Hanzo

 * Intro needs to be expanded to be a summary of everything known about the article, including the history and whatnot.
 * Please check it. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:00, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it's a bit too little context. The idea with Wookieepedia is to be able to tell about any individual article to somebody who has no Star Wars knowledge. Also no sourcing the intro. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:11, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Please check to see if the context is better arranged. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:28, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Article needs to be told in chronological order instead of starting at 4 ABY, and then going back to 3 ABY.
 * Oops, fixed. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:00, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * The body seems to say Scimitar 2 was actually flown during the Battle of Endor, but clearly that was not the case as Jonus can be clearly seen trying to evacuate the Death Star before its destruction, and thus very clearly saw no action. I don't think we can see it in Return of the Jedi either.
 * Ah, good catch. Fixed. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:00, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Missing a behind the scenes section.
 * Done. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:28, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Most importantly, this article is definitely eligible for at least GA status, not CA. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:20, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Not quite 200 words, but even without a bts (which I will add later today) I will see what I can do to expand it to GA length. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:00, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * At 234 words now, but there's some info missing: Sienar Fleet Systems, Death Squadron, and TIE series are all exclusive to the infobox and need to be mentioned in the article proper. The BTS should also mention the Pocketmodel TCG. Seems like it'll be over 250.
 * Put SWPM in bts, hope that works. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:59, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Context applied to above mentions. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 02:04, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, Rebellion era is an out-of-universe descriptor and can't be used outside of the infobox.
 * Removed. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 02:04, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * should appear somewhere in the "Sources" section.
 * Added. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 02:04, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Aaaaaaand the second Death Star could use some context. Menkooroo (talk) 08:34, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 02:04, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it might be better to just archive this thing rather than post any objections, given that this is clearly at least a GA at best. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:12, November 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * I am trying to address any issues before I put it there, but if it's archived I won't mind. Just trying to get it up to par. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:59, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Please give it one more once over to see if I answered the above objections. Adding more objections is not necessary, because I am going to move it to GA. However, I want to make sure that anything here has been satisfied up to this point. Thanks. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 02:04, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Mine are taken care of. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:39, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * GAN this baby. Menkooroo (talk) 03:00, December 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Also as I believe this TIE bomber was in Empire Strikes Back, have you checked for it in the adaptations, as well as any sources that mention the scene in question? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:20, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hanzo added this into the hidden blank CANom below, so I'm assuming this is the one he meant. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:12, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually about the Empire Strikes Back appearance: can it be proven that this was one of the TIE Bombers from the film? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:11, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I reviewed the ESB asteroid footage and the only TIE bombers I could find were not shown at the angle depicted in the image. So, it can't even be speculated that way, and looks more like Decipher's usual use/manipulation of ESB production stills than a capture from the film. I've removed the reference. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:03, November 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Exams and finals are taking a lot of my time, so I am working on this when I can. Thanks. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:59, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

Umberbool City

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 07:08, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I think I have this whole CA wrtiting thingy down pat. More Operation Battlegrounds.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:08, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:36, November 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Could you change the text up a bit? Right now, you are using practically the same text for both this and your other city nom. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:28, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **There's other CAs that have very similar dialogue, such as Wanted Poster: Han Solo and Wanted Poster: Luke Skywalker.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 02:34, November 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***It depends on the reviewer, and it's off and on usualy. However, I still think you should change it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:18, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ****I've changed some words and reworded the odd sentence. Hope that works.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:04, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Exiled Jedi
 * 7) * You need to link to Gungan society somewhere in the article body. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  14:42, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) **I've linked it to the second mention of Gungans since I couldn't find anywhere else.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 21:29, November 19, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Sacred Feast

 * Nominated by: MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 17:21, November 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: And the GB greatness continues!

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:23, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Since my objection did get taken care of. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 01:20, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) A Gungan Thanksgiving!-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  14:11, November 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) I can't think of gungans without thinking about the "Aniiii, oh Aniiii, Anii, Ani-ani-ani, Ani mysa look at you!" from Jar Jar in Robot Chicken special Star Wars episode ;) Winterz (talk) 01:52, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) I can still remember a French-speaking Gallo referring to it as "Maxi Casse-croûte" or something like that. :) --LelalMekha (talk) 10:48, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Contxt on bursas. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  14:35, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added. Thanks for the review. :P MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 23:28, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Herpes
 * 5) * Not sure about this but wouldn't some context on the title Boss look better? I mean some may think that he is just someone's superior and not that certain Gungan community's leader. Winterz (talk) 22:39, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) **Added. Thanks for the review! MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 01:43, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Pich

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:46, November 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:BB5

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  19:57, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Please add the appropriate categories for unidentified gender and unidentified species. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  14:29, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:22, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Could you make it clearer why the last sentence of the BTS is true? Is it due to player choice? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:31, November 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:05, November 23, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Vestig

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:42, November 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Pich's pal

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:48, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  15:19, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Sorry to be picky, but the ship can't volunteer to do anything. You should probably just mention the captain like in the other article. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:59, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Aggh. There you go. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:21, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

All Planets Relief Fund

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:32, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) *Hey, Holocron. Really, really, really good to see you back. I have a couple of things here:
 * 2) * "Galactic Republic" isn't mentioned or linked in the article outside of the infobox. It should be somewhere in there, and it would additionally be good context for Palpatine (of what is he the Supreme Chancellor?).
 * 3) **Done
 * 4) * On that note, Palpatine's title should probably be included in the "Proposed by" field of the infobox.
 * 5) **Done
 * 6) * The infobox says that he proposed it in c. 24 BBY, but the article itself outright says "in 24 BBY." Which one is correct?
 * 7) **My bad. The book doesn't actually state when it was proposed. Removed the infobox year.
 * 8) * The description of the bill in the first paragraph almost copies the quote from the novel verbatim. Can you put it in your own words?
 * 9) *Can you give context for Tyro in the quote attribution? A title, a rank, or something?
 * 10) **Done
 * 11) * The article could use a little more info on the ceremony --- namely, where it takes place. Also any other details that are available, such as who hosts it, etc.
 * 12) **The ceremony is a bit sparse on details even in the novel. But I did add where it takes place.
 * 13) * Is it worth mentioning the response to the bill? ie, Tyro thinks it's a good one.
 * 14) **Other than Tyro and Palpatine, nobody else really comments on the bill.
 * 15) ***That's fine. Tyro's thoughts on it probably wouldn't be out of place in the article itself, though; they're currently only in the quote. Also, I combined two sentences to avoid some repetition; see what you think. Menkooroo (talk) 14:31, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) ****Added a sentence about its reception.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:13, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) *****Great. I removed the links to Tyro and Senatorial aide in the quote attribution; now that they're in the article itself, they don't need to be there. Menkooroo (talk) 02:11, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) * And, one more: Can you add release dates for the novel and the CSWE in "Behind the scenes" ?
 * 19) **Done
 * 20) *Again, I'm very glad to see you here! Here's hoping you can stay a while, and get reacquainted with the FAN page, too. Menkooroo (talk) 08:26, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 21) **That's the plan. I've had a really bad year, and this is kind of therapeutic. Although I'm obviously a bit rusty.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 09:02, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 22) ***Not going to object over this, but it might be worth making the "result" field of the infobox say "Passed in 24 BBY" just so that the infobox can give some idea of the timeframe.
 * 23) *OK. I have some bad news. The article is 239 words, which, according to the rules at the top of this page, means that an intro needs to be added. That will take the article over 250 words, meaning that it will have to go to the GAN page. Should be an easy GAN, though; you can do it! Menkooroo (talk) 02:11, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) *OK. I have some bad news. The article is 239 words, which, according to the rules at the top of this page, means that an intro needs to be added. That will take the article over 250 words, meaning that it will have to go to the GAN page. Should be an easy GAN, though; you can do it! Menkooroo (talk) 02:11, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Rule 729900 of the Galactic Senate

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 06:10, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good work.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:26, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) --LelalMekha (talk) 10:46, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Burn that Barn
 * 2) * You will need to source the body, and fully source the infobox.
 * 3) * You need to mention the Galactic Republic in the body.
 * 4) * For the quote, could we have a little rank for Bog, like Senator?
 * 5) * The Senate should probally be added as the legeslative body for that section in the infobox.
 * 6) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:15, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **All of those should be fixed.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:00, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * One last thing: It says in the infobox that it was proposed around 24 BBY. Technicaly it should be prior to 24 BBY. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:17, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Done.<font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 01:22, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

Rights of Sentience League

 * Nominated by: <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 04:24, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Perhaps you could add some context on the trade summit.
 * 3) * Could you explain what structure the east entrance is a part of?
 * 4) *I think that you can give this article an organization infobox.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  04:52, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done, but the infobox is a bit sparse. That's all the provided information, however. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 06:22, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ***You could add that the organization was affiliated with the Galactic Republic and that it was founded by the year 33 BBY.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:38, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Done. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 04:56, December 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Greenbeak

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 02:04, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Wanted it to be GAN, but I don't think that even I could drain 250 words out of this one.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Yes, I think you maxed it out.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  19:40, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) A wild duck appears. Winterz (talk) 22:31, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:56, December 1, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Iain

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 13:27, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Iain, a.k.a "that-guy-who-has-a-red-helmet-I-stumbled-upon-yesterday"

(5 ECs/1 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) Looks good.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:28, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  17:34, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) I wouldn't have thought creating a character from a prop would even be possible. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 18:38, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Wow talk about obscure. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:12, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Good work! ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:49, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Menkooroo (talk) 11:24, December 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * I'm confused about what you are referring to we you say their name in the article body and the image caption. I assume the their refers to the royal security forces, but could you make it clearer.
 * 3) **Not at all. I'm using "they" as a gender-neutral pronoun. "His"' in the BtS was a mistake. I could have used "he or she", but I think it's too cumbersome. --LelalMekha (talk) 16:02, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Okay, that makes sense.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:34, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) * Is Iain's gender ever revealed? You mention "his name" in the BTS, but you do not identify him as a male. If Iain's gender was not identified, please place him in the unidentified gender category. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:17, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) **Fixed, but I'm unsure this is proper English grammar, so you might want to check and perhaps correct it. --LelalMekha (talk) 16:02, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Looks fine to me.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:34, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) A Force user
 * 9) * The Category: Naboo. Is that supposed to be his species? If so, it needs added to the article. If not, he needs the unidentified species category. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 18:21, December 2, 2012 (UTC
 * 10) **Although Iain is most probably Human&mdash;I don't think there are other species in the Naboo Security Forces&mdash;we cannot speculate. That means you're right indeed. Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 18:27, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) Savaged&hellip;
 * 12) * Do we know that the custom for Naboo pilots was to write their names on their helmets? If not, that assumption is probably too speculative. I mean, perhaps "Iain" was the manufacturer of the helmets, or the name of the squadron, or a personal decal put there by the pilot in reference to his pet mooka. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 19:32, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) **We have at least one confirmed example of such customization, which is that of Simon Jabesq (with "Simon" in futhork written on the helmet). I also found out about that guy, whose helmet reads "Bernie." Granted, the second example isn't a confirmed one, but since Simon, Iain and Bernie are proper names, it seems like a reasonable assumption to make in my eyes. One may disagree, of course. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:38, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) *** OK, in that case, it should be spelled out somewhere that we are making the assumption that the helmets correspond to the pilots' names and why. This could be done in the BTS, or in a footnote; your choice. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 21:03, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) ****Done in BtS. See if you like it that way. --LelalMekha (talk) 21:16, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) *****Works for me! ~ Savage BOB sig.png 21:49, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) Iain!
 * 18) * Although it's used very commonly in everyday speech, "they" or "their" isn't considered formally grammatically correct in the case of an unknown gender --- "his or her" is the formal correct usage; alternatively, creative wording to avoid using a gender pronoun altogether would work.
 * 19) **Tweaked. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:17, December 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 20) * A little nitpicky, but when using two reference notes together, be sure that they proceed in chronological order --- eg, [3][4] instead of [4][3]. Menkooroo (talk) 03:06, December 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 21) **Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:17, December 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 22) Starpower
 * 23) * I admit that I have been absent for some time, but if I'm reading the sources and Bts correctly: Iain does not actually appear in the movie to our knowledge? Would that mean the character is treated as ambig canon or cut content? Or do we believe it was certainly used on an extra who appeared onscreen? SinisterSamurai (talk) 04:38, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 24) **The source is a canon source, so just the fact the helmet itself never appeared in the film doesn't stop Iain from being canon. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:43, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 25) ***Ok. SinisterSamurai (talk) 04:45, December 4, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Not an objection, just out of curiosity is there any evidence if Iain is the given or the surname? IIRC Simon Jabesq's surname was written on his helmet. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:12, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * No evidence at all. But this helmet and also the one worn by Bernie proves that the futhork mapping shown in The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia hasn't been randomly invented by LucasArt for Star Wars: Battle for Naboo. It was clearly created during the production of Episode I. I'm currently inquiring the helmets of other extras from the movie. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:18, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

Argos

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:01, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero returns to the CAN page.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments