User talk:Wildyoda

Toprava
I'd ask one of the admins about possibly merging the articles, because I don't remeber if it was a typo or not.RushinSundaws 03:21, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Wiki versus Wookiee
I'm glad you find us friggin amazing. :) -- Riffsyphon1024 18:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm glad someone reads userpages. And by the way, you are one of the most consistently helpful people around here. You add to the "friggin amazingness." Wildyoda 04:11, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. -- Riffsyphon1024 18:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Template:User rc patrol
Hi. I just wanted to remind you that new userbox templates must be approved before creation over at: Userbox proposal.– 05:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Whoops, my apologies. That being my first template on Wookieepedia, I didn't know there was a policy for it. In the process of complying. Thanks. Wildyoda 05:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Albhabetizing
Hey Wildyoda, about your recent edit on Tatooine Ghost. We have decided on Wookieepedia to alphabetize characters by their last name. It is true that some "Dramatis Personae" have them alphabetized by first name, but we only go by that when the book has a "Dramatis Personae" section. If you feel like bringing this issue up, go ahead and post it in the Senate Hall. For now though, I've reverted that edit. Thanks for your contributions to Wookieepedia! —Xwing328 (Talk) 14:17, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. Looks a little gross, but whatever, so long as we're consistent. Wildyoda 14:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you very much for the newbie page!--Wildfire 18:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Sig Pic Size
style="color:#FFA502;">Roron Corobb ]] Talk 18:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Its recommended that picture sizes for sigs not be over 20px. Just a word of advice. Bye. [[User:Roron Corobb|<span

Signature
I just wanted to notify you that we now have an user signature policy which will require you to retool your sig. Please see: Forum:User sig policy. Thanks.– 05:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Just So You Know
Considering my "Sakul Ondondanax" page--It is nothing even close to an in-universe biography of myself. He is indeed mentioned in KOTOR whether you're light or dark side, so he is verifiable. I find it slightly annoying that I am blasted so quickly before anyone takes the time to check that the info is verifiable, i guess. However, I respect the decision. Just for the record, I wanted to let you know that it is verifiable and that it is in no way intended as an in-universe biography of me. Brad2 03:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Clarification?
I see you've added a tag to the senior officer page I just created&mdash;nothing wrong with that, but can you tell me precisely what you think needs done? I intended the page to refer to the specific use of "senior officer" as a designation in the Imperial military, which I only know from the two sources referred to, not a general page for all high-ranking soldiers (for which see Admiral and General). So I'm not quite sure what else to add&mdash;except maybe a tag? --McEwok 15:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply here!
 * To explain the way my mind was working: Galaxy Guide 1: A New Hope refers to the stormtrooper in question as "Desert Sands senior officer DSS-0956" in the text and in the heading for his character template, and in the dramatis personae list for Allegiance, Vak Somoril is called "senior officer, Imperial Security Bureau", rather than by his rank of colonel, where other characters are given specific titles like "captain", "general", "director of planning" and "Supreme Commander".
 * I felt that was enough to warrant the page, but that said, I can see that perhaps it might benefit from a little more ambiguity. I'll edit it a bit and&mdash;if you don't mind&mdash;remove the tag? --McEwok 16:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Replying to this again. Good call on the "Behind the scenes" suggestion. Thanks for taking the time to help me improve the article! --McEwok 16:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Replying once again, and thanks. I know what you mean about finding out new information, too: there's some interesting stuff I didn't know about in your list of contributions. --McEwok 16:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Your new template
I responded on my talk page: ordinarily I'd leave it there, but I felt bad for not responding earlier, so I'll copy/paste the comment on your "inaccurate sources" template. ''This is what Verify is supposed to be for, actually: we may want another CT thread or something to clarify the issue for all editors. Certainly, if it's meant to do something different from Sources, the two of them should be obviously different. Plus, we could use a template for articles which are unquestionably canonical, but have added information from a source which may not exist/may have been misinterpreted or misquoted/etc. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 00:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)''
 * Hey Wildyoda, please see my vote at Forum:Source tempaltes revisions?. If you look at all of the templates I listed, we already have more than enough to say what you want for them. 00:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Reply located here --Wildyoda 01:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Copied reply for my own laziness: Yeah, there are a lot that don't get used, but what do you expect on a wiki this size? :P 03:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

SOTE
Why do we have a KOTOR Wiki? SOTE has more products than that. 67.72.98.103 04:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't say that I agreed with KOTOR wiki, simply that I disagree with SOTE wiki. Stop vote farming. Wildyoda 04:11, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Casualties

 * I was watching, thanks. Vryce 04:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Sexual stereotyping
Sorry about removing the article improvement signs on Sexual Stereotyping. I am quite new to Wookiepedia and thought they were mistakes I kept putting in myself. Soory, I have stopped now.
 * No problem, I understand. Wildyoda 19:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi, my Friend...
Hello, my friend, sight I want to make SubPages because there is much space in my UserPage, and want to do them for better visualization of her… MTFBWUA. Starkiller1996 Adidas F50+ 27 Febraury 2007, 17: 08 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, I have absolutely no idea what that meant and what the point of that was, but for future archival purposes, I'm sure it was related to this. Wildyoda 01:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Concerning the date of the Battle of Hoth
The actual calendar date for the engagement is from the Star Wars Adventure Journal #7 (p. 285), which was actually published in August 1997; we've had this information at hand for nearly a decade. The date specifically applies to the date on the NewsNet report, but the Empire has full control of the HoloNet at this point, and would want news of a victory reported immediately; the defeats, they would wait on until they were whitewashed not to look so bad. It also fits in nicely with the revelation in the Empire novelization (p. 2, hardcover) that Luke had just celebrated his birthday by saying he was "barely" twenty-three (neither the author, Donald Glut, nor anyone else would have known in 1979-1980 that Luke, born in 19 BBY, would actually have turned twenty-two, but the rest fits). Luke's birthday would have fallen on 28:5:27, roughly two weeks before the story can be presumed to begin on roughly 28:6:07. In short, there is significant direct and circumstancial evidence to support this date, and since there is nothing to indicate that the battle took longer than one day, there need be no other date beside the first one. Erik Pflueger  03:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for helping me out, but you could have started at Z and proceed backward. It would have avoided those lots of edit conflicts we had. - TopAce 20:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank You
thanks for the tips on editing and your help. Bandaloon 21:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, my Friend...
Hi, i´m Starkiller1996 and I want to ask if you want to be it? MTFBWUA. Starkiller1996 Adidas F50+ 13 March 2007, 16:36 (UTC)

Apology
WildYoda,

I apologize, I was selfish, I asked for a "welcome" post, and you gave it to me. I apologise for that act, i already had a perfectly good teacher, and it was a spur-of-the-moment kinda thing. I hope you forgive me for my selfish act, and i will help you in any way that is possible, except if it is impossible.

I apologize, again, Wildfire 23:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Corvis
You're right, it is Corvis, I just miss read my sloppy, sloppy handwriting. Thanks for pointing it out.RushinSundaws 04:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

RE: Random acts of editing
Thanks for the help. I didn't notice, but I'm all in favor of making this site as useful and professional-looking as possible (my own smart-assed user page notwithstanding). ;) Jwebb13 HoloNet 03:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

About your edit
It's alright, everything for the wikias best!  N@M3Le$ {Need Ideas For Image!}Please, can someone talk to me?! 14:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

"The" with ships
You can check in the Consensus track archive for details, but Manual of Style says that using "the" is ok. There's no need to change it in articles which use it. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 01:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Just a quick thanks
About you editing the WOTM nominations page. Thanks for catching that for me. Didn't realise I'd screwed up until I went back to it. :P Thanks again!
 * Welcome. Wildyoda 23:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Title template
Hi there. Just wanted to let you know that whenever you put a line break after the title template, that break shows up in the article (like this, vs. this). So you might want to avoid the extra line break. -- Ozzel 04:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'd actually never noticed that before. Wildyoda 15:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing it.

User Template
Hi. This is Jaywin. Thank-you for expressing your opinion at the administrator's forum. (Interestingly, you might like to check out Wookieepedian of the Month.) Also, the user template issue is being discussed at Forum:User template, if you'd like to weigh in. Have a good one :) Jaywin 22:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Is that a Fender Precision Bass?
...is it? KEJ 22:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It's a no-name brand knock-off actually, but yeah, it's pretty much equivalent to one, just the body is a little heavier. Got it to learn on when I started playing after our bassist at church went away to college. I'm more of a guitarist most of the time. I like sticking to my Seagull. Are you a bassist? Wildyoda 22:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No, mainly a guitarist. I do own a Fender Jazz bass though. Anyway, Fender precision basses are reputed to be really heavy, so if this one's even heavier, I can imagin you'll need to see a physiotherapist quite often ;-) KEJ 10:27, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I guess it's less that it's heavy and more that it's unbalanced that is the disadvantage. You just can't totally let your strap hold it or the headstock will smash into small things like... the floor. Next investment will probably be a Godin Freeway 5. Wildyoda 22:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The Jazz bass model is pretty well balanced, so if you like the Fender configuration, that's also a possible way to go. KEJ 09:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)