User talk:Cade Calrayn

 Find archived discussions here: I | II | III | IV

Separatist Droid Army
Ground Vehicles and Droid Infantry are 2 different things.

Caridan system
Hi, I'd counter your arguments with the fact that "Caridan system" was how the original author, Kevin J. Anderson, intended it to be named as the creator of the system. As you've all already pointed out, Carida system is it's ALTERNATE name. This has already been established with regards to naming conventions for system names in the Essential Atlas/Online Companion appendix. Therefore the most canon name IS "Caridan system". May I ask what heading it is listed under in TCSWE? Rokkur Shen (talk) 23:11, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Also Cade, I never accused you of reverting "Hk's edit out of spite or to argue the point". Please refrain from implying that I did. Archiving your talk page does not wash your hands clean of past incidents. Rokkur Shen (talk) 23:11, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * And also, as you've already been advised, the correct course of action would have been to notify Hk 47 on his talk page that his move/edit was incorrect and suggested the correct action so that in future he does not make a similar mistake. Thankyou! Rokkur Shen (talk) 03:20, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * *double sigh* As I've already mentioned in other threads, unless you can provide an overwhelming number of "in-universe" sources for it being named "Carida system" then it should remain "Caridan system". The Essential Reader's Companion, Atlas Online Companion etc are "out-of-universe" sources and do not override "in-universe" naming conventions. Rokkur Shen (talk) 23:24, February 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Obviously OOU articles can override IU articles in the case of a retcon. This was not the case here. It was more to do with the fact that initially the system was named IU, and that subsequent incorrect naming has most likely spun out of the obvious typo that Culator has identified, as well as the small probability of authors seeing it listed here on Wookieepedia as well as other sites for so long, listed as Carida system, that it has now become common place, instead of its originally intended name. Besides this argument is over for now. I've accepted Jedi Marty's reasoning. However, in my opinion, as we write articles in past tense from an IU perspective, IU references should take precedence over OOU references. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:47, February 2, 2013 (UTC)

Umm.. NOT FANON
Hey um u left a message on my talk page saying i added something fanon. It was about Bo-Katan being Satine's sister. Umm.. yeah i saw the new episode. THEY SAID SHE WAS! Wasn't fanon, its fact.

Re: Kryze
Yeah, it was slightly fishy to me too at first, but the "Trivia" section in the episode guide verified her surname.  CC7567  (talk) 17:28, February 3, 2013 (UTC)

3RR
I'm sorry Cade, but please do not engage Wadem18 in an edit revert war. Just tell him via his talk page about the issue. Also, it's already confirmed by Filoni on Saturday. He and his followers/buddies confirmed it on Google hangout.  JangFett  (Talk) 20:38, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Again, do not engage Wadem18 in an edit war. You need to talk to him in his talk page, and if he contiunes, then an administrator could step in and take care of him. It's common sense man,  JangFett  (Talk) 20:17, February 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, but please be more careful in the future. You had engaged this guy in the past.  JangFett  (Talk) 20:53, February 8, 2013 (UTC)

Not this again
Seriously, you either need to double check these pages and rewrite the explanation or move it to the behind the scenes. As it stands, the explanations do not make sense. A couple of pages I have left cited the way you cited them. However, the ones I've reverted yet again do not make sense. They may to you but not to others. Rokkur Shen (talk) 05:33, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Finally, you hear the voice of reason. Rokkur Shen (talk) 05:36, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Ivor Drake
Hi Cade

I believe the ivor drake page is a joke at my expense as it is my name but I am not a woman...

Please can you remove the page

Thanks for fixing my page I just made.Wolf Screech (talk) 22:59, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Question
Hi Cade. Despite your explanation, I do not understand why you have deleted the picture I've posted on the page of Oppo Rancisis. Please, can you explain why? It doesn't crowded the page yet... Maguinic (talk) 14:50, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Tor
Cade I am not copying directly from the encyclopedia. I am saying the same thing with different words!Wolf Screech (talk) 16:59, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

STOP
Seriously stop butting into our conversations! It is none of your business what we talk about.Wolf Screech (talk) 18:39, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

RE:Myneyrshi
No, I didn't know that. The colony is still a continuity error (in fact, it's a pretty bad one), but it's an error that could be a step toward some resolution, at least. Thanks for the tip. NaruHina Talk  04:16, February 8, 2013 (UTC)

Hello
Why can't there be discussions on talk pages any more. Remember Nebulax and those guys always had discussions on talk pages.Garrett Atkins (talk) 22:22, February 8, 2013 (UTC)

Why did Nebulax get banned in the first place then. This wiki should not become boring, sterile information. The best days of Wookieepedia was from 2005-2007, before all this "Talkheader" or "Knowledge Bank" started appearing. Just saying.Garrett Atkins (talk) 22:32, February 8, 2013 (UTC)

Thuku
Thanks again for proving you've got nothing better to do than revert other user's edits. I'll take it up with the admin then. Rokkur Shen (talk) 05:38, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

FAN page reviewing
Hey, Cade,

I'm writing this to you on behalf of the entire Inquisitorius. At our recent meeting, we discussed the current lack of non-INQs who are actively involved in reviewing on the FAN page, and we decided that the best solution was to simply appeal to people to review more. This first paragraph is being sent verbatim to a whole bunch of people, but the following one is being written specifically for you.

Sure, we're both on IRC right now, but f that noise! OK. You're actually one of the site's most active FAN reviewers, but I want to send this message to everyone. Your reviewing skills keep improving as the months pass, and we'd love to see you continue to hone them on the FAN page. If you up your reviewing productivity even more, who knows? Maybe it'll encourage people to review beasts like the Sith Emperor and the Hero. ;) But yeah, given the amount of FANs you pump out --- even though you are already one of the most active reviewers --- reciprocating by reviewing a few more now and then wouldn't be amiss. So, in other words, join the reviewing revolution! Cheers, and have a great day. Menkooroo (talk) 07:34, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Admin
Hello, I request that I be given the level of Admin, as I have done plenty on improving this wonderfull wiki. Thanks.Garrett Atkins (talk) 13:48, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Making a better "Timeline of media" revisited
Hi Cade Calrayn, I recently picked up where Morbus Iff left off a while ago on a Timeline of media revamp discussed here. As a recent editor of the Timeline of media, your opinion on the near-finished project would be appreciated: User:Tainb'ocu'chulainn/Sandbox Timeline. The forum for the discussion is Forum:SH:Making a better Timeline of media: revisited. Thanks. Tainb&#39;ocu&#39;chulainn (talk) 20:52, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Revan's codex entries
Hey Cade, I seem to have lost the link you gave me earlier which detailed the codex entries regarding Revan. Could you help me out with that once more, please?&mdash; 22:56, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Cade, I appreciate that. I remember that, now.&mdash; 23:04, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Taking over Begeren?
Hey Cade. As you did for the Tingel Arm campaign, I was wondering if you could take a look at the current objections to the Battle of Begeren FAN and possibly take over addressing objections in the interim, since I don't know when Trayus is going to be back. It's fine if you don't have the time, but I thought it was worth asking since you're heavily involved with TOR. Plus, the article is just a vote or two away from passing, but it's going to have to be removed otherwise due to the inactivity (technically it should have been closed a week ago). Thanks!  CC7567  (talk) 20:01, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Just wanted to make sure you saw them&mdash;I have two outstanding objections as well, but they're admittedly easy to miss because they're in the upper section. Thanks.  CC7567  (talk) 21:34, February 12, 2013 (UTC)

CA page
Hi Cade. I'm not sure if you've been busy or not, but it'd be nice if you could remove your successful noms from the CA page. That thing is getting crowded. Cheers.  Stake black   msg 13:14, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. I've just seen they have objections to them.  Stake black   msg 14:52, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Old Republic App
Under the appearances on Star Wars: The Old Republic there is a link to Hal. It needs to be changed to Hal (sniper). I would have done it but you have the old inuse up there. Fe Nite (talk) 17:52, February 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * I know you have probably already made a not of this and will change it in the future but I thought I would remind you again. Fe Nite (talk) 22:59, February 23, 2013 (UTC)

Sith Emperor new info?
I was reading the character list of Revan in TERC and it lists the Emperor as being human in the novel. Shouldn't this be mentioned in his article or is this an error? DarthRevan1173 (Long live Lord Revan) 00:00, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

TOR Darths
Are you absolutely sure that these aren't real. I don't have the game and their are an awful amount of Darths under NPC's on torhead.com. What's going on? DarthvaderX12 (talk) 21:08, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

War on Cannon? Nope just a fan trying to keep star wars great
Their is no edit war its just a fact han shot alone there. lucas over the last 15 years has been betraying the star wars cannon. It's just his retouches to the original trilogy that are non-cannon. If you can't accept that you and lucas are wrong then why do you call yourself a star wars fan. lucas removed value and credit from the actors that made him big. such as changing Boba fetts voice, Adding episode 3 anakin instead of episode 6 anakin which luke wouldn't recognize in the 1st place. so lucas ruining the original trilogy, us loyal star wars fan are supposed to be silent while lucas wrecks what he made for millions of fans.

a True and loyal Star Wars fan Sparduck117 

Darth Nox and Star Wars: The Old Republic Encyclopedia
Hi Cade! Since you own Star Wars: The Old Republic Encyclopedia, I wanted to ask you whether there's anything interesting or not about the one we call Darth Nox. Could you please have a look whenever you have time? Regards. --LelalMekha (talk) 12:21, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Too bad. Thanks anyway for your answer. On a completely unrelated note, anything of interest on House Organa? --LelalMekha (talk) 00:44, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

Jabba's Palace
Cade, if you take a closer look he's replaced Human with Savage Opressrophy (whatever that is) when it clearly is referring to Han Solo in carbonite. Definitely needs reversion. Rokkur Shen (talk) 22:39, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Looked more like intentional vandalism if you ask me. In such a case how are we to know what else the user added wasn't accurate. Anyway, problem sorted. "Move along". Rokkur Shen (talk) 00:57, February 19, 2013 (UTC)

My edit from before
I'm embarassed. I don't know what happened before on Slythmonger. I guess I was looking at the previous edit, and it copied it when I fixed the red links that were in it? Thanks for fixing that though, if I hadn't had to rush out before, I probably would've reverted it as well. Trip391 (talk) 02:16, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

The Lawless
Hi! Please, do not remove the mandalorian super commandos from The Lawless until the end of this week, as I'm planning to make them in up to 3 days. If it doesn't happen until Sunday, you can delete them, but please be patient on it. Thank you. :) -- XXLVenom998 ''' (Surprise me!) 18:53, February 20, 2013 (UTC)