User talk:JMAS

{| width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #b2cc99; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

 Find archived discussions here: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

***ALL QUERIES/COMMENTS POSTED HERE, REPLIED TO ON THIS TALK PAGE, WILL BE*** If posted something on your talk page, I did, then on your talk page, reply to it, I will.

TFU
Hey, do you have TFU image capabilities? Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Define capabilities. LOL I do have the game on Xbox360 but have not yet had the time to sit down and play it. Also, I'm sure there is a way to capture screenshots of the game, but I've never done it before. Though I'm sure I can figure it out. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 11:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I was hoping you would be able to capture a specific screenshot for me. Toprawa and Ralltiir 15:38, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I will certainly do what I can to help ya. I've got a friend that's had his Xbox for much longer than I have, so I'm sure he knows how to grab screenshots and save them. I imaging they can be saved to a flash drive since there are USB ports on the console. What screenshot, of what scene? -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 15:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll have to get back to you on exactly what shot I'm thinking of. I need to look at the cutscenes on YouTube. I'm not sure if this is compatible with the 360 version, but it's a picture of the Executor shortly before this scene. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:00, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, nevermind my last comment. If you watch the YouTube video here and fast-forward to roughly 7:32, you'll see the shot where the Executor is surrounded by the Emperor's fleet. That would be a perfect screengrab if obtainable. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:33, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Force Unleashed image
Is it just my Internet provider, or did you upload a color-inverted image of Image:SWTFU PS3boxart 160w.jpg? // ~mikah~  13:56, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It must be your computer settings. The image is definitely not inverted. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 14:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I tried using Internet Explorer as well -- I was on Safari when I posted the comment earlier -- and the image didn't show at all. if it's just my computer settings like you suggest, then I won't sweat it. I'll just have to look into those later, I suppose. Thanks. // ~mikah~  16:31, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Doesn't work for me in Firefox, either: 'The image “http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/8/85/SWTFU_PS3boxart_160w.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.' -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:00, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't understand what's wrong when you are trying to view it. It displays just fine for me in both Firefox and IE. *shrug* -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:51, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Breha of Alderaan
Hello! Question, where do I recommend correcting the formatting of royal and dynastic characters to comply with Wikipedia? I dont plan on reverting your revert, until after it has been considered by due process. It is simply far more professioal looking to keep with standard English language convention in this regard. Drachenfyre 06:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You can start a Consensus Track (CT) about it. Though I can assure you it would be pointless. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 06:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Why are you contentious against a professional polish and correct naming convention for nobility and royalty in line with well established precedent? I do not understand.Drachenfyre 06:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, where do I find the naming convention guidelines and policies? It is not annotated.Drachenfyre 06:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Here's one place Manual_of_Style and Naming_conventions. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 06:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * With respect JMAS, these are basic Wikipedia naming conventions. Here is the Wiki link for Nobility and Royalty naming conventions.Drachenfyre 07:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * As previously stated, Wookieepedia is not Wikipedia. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 07:22, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, we seem to be going in circles. I have already placed a proposal in the Consensus Track. I am sorry you feel standard English language international practice on naming conventions for nobility and royalty is inappropriate for Wookiepedia. Drachenfyre 07:29, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

RE: REC
Hey JMAS,

Really? Who else have you seen doing that? REC means "restricted editing capacity" and I coined the acronym after I decided that I needed to differentiate between the edits I make from my cellphone, and those I make from an actual pc. It really is just to help me keep track of what I'm doing, and when. —Tommy9281 ( Peace is a lie ) 16:59, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, well maybe it's only you I've seen use it then. I just see it fairly often on the RC page. Not surprising, you are a frequent and excellent editor. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:48, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Dark jedi robes
Hey JMAS. I wanted to ask you if you think pages Dark Jedi robe, Dark Jedi Master robe and Dark Jedi Knight robe should be merged into Jedi apparel too. Thanks. * Cylka * 00:52, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I think that would be advisable, yes. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 03:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok then. Thanks for letting me know. I'll work on it. * Cylka *  12:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Should'nt they be merged into Sith apparel? Jayce Carver 13:09, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Good point. But Dark Jedi are not Sith ... maybe merge them into a subsection of the Dark Jedi article. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 13:12, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The thing I'm wondering about is that these robes are really game mechanics. You don't have to be dark aligned to wear them. Dark is just a name for them. Maybe put them in Bts of Jedi apparel? * Cylka *  13:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

There just black versions of the Jedi robes that were worn by Darth Revans Jedi converts. Which is why I thought Sith apparel would be more appropriate. Because during the Jedi Civil war Sith and Dark Jedi were largely the same thing. Jayce Carver 13:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Image
Thanks for Uploading that image for me. I really appreciate it. Jayce Carver 10:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Happy to help out. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 11:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Unlock
Hey, JMAS. As you requested on the article's talk page of me, the article is unlocked now -- I also left a msg on that talk page that you should see if you run into a similar problem in the future. Cheers, Greyman ( Talk ) 22:15, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks G-man. :) -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 22:22, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Re GAN
Ok, no worries. To give you one piece of advice, just because it is indeed such a broad topic, I would say just keep trying to add to the history and Apps/Source lists if you still have an interest in the article. I'm sure there is much, much more that could be included into it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh yeah, I'm not giving up on the article. :) Just on the GAN. I'll certainly keep adding to it as examples and appearances as they come to mind. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 00:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Image Phase I Cody
What's wrong with the new image? It's allot clearer, the old one has got all those limbs sticking around. With this weird lighting. I really think we should use this image. The same has been done on CC-1004. Good evening (Hitchcock style) - PaleoJazz Dopo Mee Gusha, Peedunky? 16:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Firstly, you don't upload over the top of an image unless the new image is an improved version of the same, or virtually identical image. Yours was not. And the example you cited about CC-1004, the image I uploaded over was identical, just larger and better quality. Yours didn't meet either criteria. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 14:24, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. But why can't we use this picture? It's seems the more logic choice to me. PaleoJazz Dopo Mee Gusha, Peedunky?[[Image:Foil Fencing.png|50px]]--PaleoJazz 20:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The unofficial policy and practice around here is to not use action figure images unless no other image is available. And honestly, that action figure image is not an improvement over the existing image, even with the limbs and lighting. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 21:31, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Thanks for listening though. PaleoJazz Dopo Mee Gusha, Peedunky?[[Image:Foil Fencing.png|50px]]

Re: Heads up
Hey, JMAS. Thanks for catching that. The similarities in the usernames was also what caught my attention in the first place and made me pursue a CheckUser on Greenwoman and Greywoman -- they are not the same person, but the CU gave me what I needed to block Greenwoman since that user was a cross-wikia troll. If you come across any others you're unsure of, please let me know :) Cheers, Greyman ( Talk ) 13:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:Alliance disruptor SWGTCG.jpg
Can you tell me where you found the high-res if this images plz? Mauser 18:50, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't have the link here with me, but it was from the artist website. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That was enough, thanks - I googled it from there: . Mauser 19:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Gallery
Oh ok thanks for the heads-up. But why cant I have a gallery on my user page??? Greekpimp - Talk 19:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It was decided some time ago that galleries violate the copyright terms of Fair use images. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 19:50, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

ESB Sketchbook
Hey, do you have the ESB Sketchbook? Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I've got a PDF scanned version of it. What image do you need? Oh wait, let me guess. The Executor? ;) -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:57, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You got it! :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Those look great. Thanks! Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:35, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Revert
What was wrong with my edit on Rianna Saren? The only thing I made was correcting the refs and the links, or did I do something wrong?  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk  17:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I misread what you had done. At first glance, I thought you had simply removed references. I've reverted it. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Question
Thank you for adding my Matchstick picture.I am going to take screen shots for new clones that deserve it.lol

Just a question, how big should they be?I made the ones of Denal and Matchstick smaller but they had very good quality.So how big should they be?250 px?ThanksRevan Malak 17:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * For the infobox, it should try to be 250px wide whenever possible. But don't stretch an image in an photo editing software to make it big enough. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 17:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

No I won't, I just use Photoshop to shrink it.Trust me I know when something doesn't look right.Revan Malak 17:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, then don't shrink anything. No need for that. Just keep it as its normal size. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 17:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

R2-KT
I really think we should not add her to the appearances section, even with possible appearance tag. We cannot mark every red-and pink-colored R2-unit as R2-KT, right? Besides, she should be on Resolute at that time, not on Coruscant underlevel. Mauser 17:09, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * To date, she is the only pink astromech to exist. Hence why I felt the possible appearance should be allowed in the Departure article. The Resolute may have been stationed at Coruscant at the time of this comic for all we know. Also. I don't think that was the underlevels. Notice the bubble-domed speeder/bus behind the Senate Commandos. That's the same type of vehicle that transported Anakin and Padmé to their transport to Naboo in Episode II. The gradual lightening in the background as the comic progresses leads me to believe it was dawn. Hence the darker environment to begin with that may have made it look like the underlevels. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 17:19, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Unlock request
Hey, JMAS. It was actually a larger problem on Wookieepedia, but I fixed it locally with our database and prodded Wikia staff to fix it on their end (which they now have done). Any more problems, let me know. Greyman ( Talk ) 21:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

MAJOR CONTRIBUTION
I have found a very good source of CW pics: http://s148.photobucket.com/albums/s29/caleb93andrew/cartoons/star%20wars/star%20wars%20clone%20wars/

Many blurry pics could use an update, and this user has got very high quality pictures.You should check them out:D
 * Yeah, thanks for the link. I have all those already. Any of the blurry pics you refer to are ones that have been scanned from books or taken from DVD screencaps from TCW film release. Always remember to sign your posts with four tildes ( ~ . -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 13:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry but I'm very sorry.I am so stupid.I didn't know you had them already...Revan Malak 17:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't sweat it. Providing me the link was very considerate. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 17:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Millenium Falcon Locations
I didnt mean to vandalize. I considered alot of those locations irrelevant to the story as well as many of them were red-linked. I still believe they should be cleaned up some but if you prefer to leave them its fine. Would you rather I just removed the links on them so it at least looks better? Rayn3000 20:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)User:Rayn3000
 * It's not a matter of what I prefer. It's how the Wookieepedia community does things. The red links help show what articles need to be created at some point, and if the location/person/thing is mentioned or alluded to in the book, no matter how seemingly insignificant, then it goes in the appearances list for the book article. I was just letting you know so you wouldn't continue with the removal of information and find yourself blocked by an admin. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 20:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright thanks. Rayn3000 20:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)User:Rayn3000

Lando
Hey, JMAS. Just letting you know that Ataru and I had discussed the scroll box for the references in Lando's article before we nominated it for FAN, and we decided that it was easier to search for references if there was no scroll box. Normally scroll boxes are preferable, but for articles with literally hundreds of ref tags, like Lando and Tales of the Jedi, a scroll box can sometimes hinder looking for a specific ref mention or whatnot. Just wanted to let you know why I reverted your edits. Greyman ( Talk ) 16:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks for the heads up. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 16:55, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Japanese cover arts
Hello, JMAS. On my computer I have not only the high-res scans of Japanese bookcovers, but also original cover artworks for some of them, which can be used to crop more accurate images without hieroglyphics, as well as for cover gallery. Unfortunately I cannot remember where I found them and therefore cannot provide any source other than the books themselves. Since you were the original uploader for most of the japanese covers, I thought I should ask before uploading: do we need more images like ? Mauser 16:21, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Tough call. I'll see if I can search around to find where they are from. In the meantime, unless you get told otherwise by an admin, the way you have it might be just fine. Now I have question. How many of the cover arts do you have? All of them? Would you be willing to share them via email? *big grin* I'm always interested in expanding my SW image collection. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 16:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I have about 15 of them, mostly NJO. Don't try to google it, because they're all extracted from .swf files. The problem is, the site the swf's were from doesn't exist anymore, and I don't even remember the exact adress. But if adding them to the cover galleries is fine, I could simply upload them over the next few hours. Mauser 16:46, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It would help if you had the site address to put in the source field, even if it is no longer a live site (you could say that in parethesis in the source field), but if not, then I'd just upload them as you did that first one. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 16:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll go ahead then. Mauser 17:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Similar usernames
Should User:Darth Plagueis the Wise be told to change his username? It closely (very closely) resembles User:Darth Plagueis The Wise. This may confuse other users about who's really who. -- Michaeldsuarez  ( Activate Holocron ) 17:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I would bring it to the attention of a site administrator. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 17:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Whoops, I accidentally thought that you were an administrator. -- Michaeldsuarez  [[Image:Infinite_Empire.svg|10px]] ( Activate Holocron ) 18:00, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Re:
I can't return back because I am banned infinitely. Darth Vukure Darth Vukure 20:35, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Argyus
I'm trying to get Argyus to FA status, and the quote you added includes a description in it that was brought up in an objection. Please don't add it again. And for future references, I'd appreciate it if you'd let me know if you plan on changing something in an article that I'm trying to get to FA or GA status. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 01:48, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * There was no FA/GA nom template at the top of the page when I made my edits. If there had been, I of course would have discussed it with the nominator first. I honestly cannot see how either of those quotes would be objectionable, but all right. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 01:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The template is indeed there - right at the top of the page, in fact. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 01:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, that's bizarre. According to the edit history, it was there. But I kid you not, there must have been caching issue, because it was not showing up on the article when I made my edits. It never appeared until your reversion. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 01:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I really should apologize for just removing the quotes without giving an explanation first. After thinking about it, I will use the quote you provided in the P&T section. Thanks for your help. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 01:58, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries. :) I can be a bit stubborn. But I'd never intentionally do anything to detract from a FA or GA nomination. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 02:02, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Kit Fisto
Watch this video. You can see that this Delta 7b Is clearly Kit's..
 * I've seen the video. And yes, Kit is flying a Delta 7-B. That image is not "clearly Kit's". Especially considering the fact that the image in question was a render on on the official site for The Clone Wars film, which did not show Kit Fisto in a Delta-7B fighter. Not to mention the render was up long before anyone knew anything about the "Lair of Grievous" episode. I'm sure it was the basic render used in designing all the Delta-7Bs used in the series, but that does NOT make that image Kit Fisto's fighter. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, and P.s. you always need to sign every comment with four tildes. ( ~ ) -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * But look at it when its landing! It looks just like the Starfighter in the picture--Butters4115 22:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)--Butters4115 22:37, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * To repeat myself: I'm sure it was the template render used in designing all the Delta-7Bs used in the series, but that does NOT make that image Kit Fisto's fighter. It just means Kit is flying a factory model, no modifications, KSE Delta-7B. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 01:27, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * But the droid is obviously Kits droid! Just cause he didn't modify the strafighter doesn't mean the droid always looks like that. I bet they used Kits picture because the paint design is very simple and wouln't take away from the ship design.--Butters4115 02:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It's pure speculation, and we do not use speculation in Wookieepedia articles. Period. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 03:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I guarantee that only Kits fighter will look like that in the series.--Butters4115 03:11, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No offense, but you can't make that guarantee. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 05:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok well agree to disagree sorry for wasting your time.--Butters4115 14:10, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * If your not suppose to speculate on wookieepedia then why are you speculating that the fighter isnt only Kits. Because it is Kits fighter. No one else's. That is Kit Fisto's Delta-7B Jedi Starfihgter with R6-H5 in the hull. Period.--Butters4115 00:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Fine. You show me the source the explicitly states the the image in question is Kit Fisto's Delta-7B Aethersprite-class light interceptor and the image can go back in the article. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 00:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Well for first off in the clone wars pocketmodel game they say that its his fighter and we've already seen it in the series. Plus im sure Lucasfilm isn't so lazy that they wouldn't make each fighter different.
 * Ps. thanks for the heads up about the pictures i wanted to crop them but i don't know what program to use on my Mac.--Butters4115 02:40, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Kit Fisto's Delta-7B image
Hey JMAS, The reason I used "Image:Delta-7B TCW.jpg" for Kit Fisto's Delta-7B was because, according to the Star Wars PocketModel Clone Wars Tactics expansion, Kit Fisto's Delta-7B is painted with the exact same markings. SWPM units are approved by Lucasfilm before they go into production and distribution, so this may be the only canonical reference to his ship until it shows up on the Cartoon Network show.Gethralkin 21:12, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks like the TCW episode I missed (last week), had the images needed. Thanks for supplying them!Gethralkin 12:40, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, that was from the preview of this weeks episode. :) -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 12:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Galactic Empire
Thanks for sending me that note. But, I don't like it when people delete my additions. Youngla0450 17:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * What the heck are you talking about? -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 17:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Galactic Empire
Thanks for sending me that note. But, I don't like it when people delete my additions. Youngla0450 17:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * What the heck are you talking about? -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 17:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

I mean, about the Galactic Empire article.--Youngla0450 17:46, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Here we go:
 * 1) Do not create a new heading with each post. You post under this same heading.
 * 2) I have never sent you any note.
 * 3) I haven't touched the Galactic Empire article since October 4.
 * 4) If I ever remove any information you add to an article, it will be because it:
 * 5) *It is poorly written
 * 6) *It is inaccurate information
 * 7) *It is not formatted correctly according to Wookieepedia standards
 * If any of those reasons apply, then it is a valid reversion regardless of whether you like it or not. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 17:56, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

I resepect your rules. --Youngla0450 18:02, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Re:Argyus
StarWars.com is not exactly living up to its expectations. Anyway, I talked to AdmirableAckbar, and provided I can make room for the image, I'll add it back in. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 01:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

A-4D
A-4D was decapitated not cut in two, so i just wanted to know why u state why it was cut in two? I suggest you take another look if you taped or Tivo-ed it. If not wait for the episode to come on again on Star Wars.com, Happy camping--Twi&#39; Lek 18:48, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It was a long cut they showed in the episode. So either he had a freaking huge neck joint, or he was sliced in two through the torso. We'll find out when the full episode comes to SW.com or CN, but until then, it can remain as is. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:54, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok, thanks just wanted to clear that up--Twi&#39; Lek 18:57, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Champions of the Force
I think instead of Champions of the Force redirecting to Champions of the Force (disambiguation) it would be better to simply move disambiguation page to the actual title. But someone needs to delete the redirect to make way for the move first. Could you do it please? Mauser 21:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I've asked an Admin to delete it. Once he does, I'll move it. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 21:38, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Tope's deleted the page but ask that we work it out amongst ourselves as to what gets moved there. If you have anything to say about my reasoning, please let me know. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:53, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, I see that. We can agree to disagree on this. :) I think letting the community decide would be best, that way you or I are not making the decision. I'll start a discussion/vote about it on the current disambig page. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 21:55, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm happy for you to start a vote if you'll consent to me moving it back to the status quo (i.e. the way it was/the way I want it) for the duration of the vote. If people agree with your reasoning then it will be moved around accordingly. That work? Also, I'm not physic, but I do know of something called common sense, which tells me that a very well-known EU novel written by a prominent author and which was probably a best-seller of some sort is going to be more well-known than a miniatures set and a trading card game. Edit: edit-conflicted. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That'll be fine. That way the page isn't empty. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 22:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)