Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Abbaji

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 17:10, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:29, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) How bout adding it's atmosphere type to the body?
 * 2) *Argh, done.
 * 3) **Still remains. Are you sure you saved the page?
 * 4) ***Now. Winterz (talk) 19:27, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) I've done it here, but in the future add near the top of the article to get rid of the table of contents when we have this short of an article.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:38, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *Well I tried to find that code to remove the content table, but apparently it vanishes after being inserted. Winterz (talk) 19:00, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **The table of contents only pops up for some noms, so you were probally looking at those who did not have the template. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***TOC's appear when there are three or more section headings of any level. - i.e. a Behind the scenes, an Appearances section, and a Notes and references. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:42, October 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) Same question as Lankashire: Even if this planet isn't mentioned in the Atlas, can we say anything about the territory in which it fell throughout history, based on it system or its sector? Menkooroo (talk) 03:23, November 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) Also, the BTS is pretty confusing. Can you re-word it to make it clear as to just what the OOU history is between Abbaji and Abbaji Minor? Some of it looks like it was copied and pasted over from Abbaji Minor's BTS, which has resulted in unnecessary repetition like "but the planet called Abbaji was first mentioned in Shadows of the Empire." I think both articles could use a BTS rewrite. Menkooroo (talk) 01:52, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) *Any progress on these two? Menkooroo (talk) 10:04, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) **Sorry it took me some time, having to go through Atlas maps a 1000th time always makes me lazy. It's done now. By the way I've also updated the refs and Sources with the CSWE template. Winterz (talk) 17:06, December 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Lankashiir

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 16:13, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:35, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Authors for the Atlas?
 * 2) * Main terrain needs to be mentioned in main article.
 * 3) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done. Winterz (talk) 21:58, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) 502
 * 6) * "Outside the Star Wars universe, the name of the planet may be a reference to Lancashire, a county in England." It's always tempting to guess like that, but this kind of speculation falls under our No original research policy and is a big no-no if there's nothing to back it up. Menkooroo (talk) 12:28, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Good, it looks prettier without it. Still, considering that it wasn't me who added it, I thought the info could be relevant in some ways. Winterz (talk) 13:47, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * One more question: Anything from the Atlas on parts of space under which it later fell? Any Imperial warlord territories, New Republic, Krayt's Empire...? Menkooroo (talk) 09:59, November 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Info added, sir. Winterz (talk) 21:48, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) ***Great. However, "until its fragmenation one year later" can't be sourced to the Atlas. I don't think it can even be sourced to the last issue of Legacy War, which only tells us that the Alliance conquers Coruscant and that the Sith go into hiding. No indication of what happens to Krayt's Empire. Probably best just to leave that sentence out. Menkooroo (talk) 01:55, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) ****Actually, yes the Empire collapses and the Triumvirate takes over. It is the remnants of the One Sith that go into hiding, Krayt's Empire was no more after his death. I'm sure I can get you a reference. Winterz (talk) 20:43, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) *****There's not a lot we can say about the Triumvirate based on the single panel in which they appear in Legacy War 6 --- we can speculate on what Hogrum Chalk means when he says that the galaxy has been unified, but it would be just that: speculation. Sure, the Sith go into hiding, but we can't make any assertions about what actually happens to Krayt's Empire; we can only guess. Menkooroo (talk) 03:21, November 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) ******If it is speculation then someone should really take care of the false information that is referenced in Darth Krayt's Galactic Empire. Winterz (talk) 14:10, November 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) *******Done, but this objection still needs to be addressed... Menkooroo (talk) 00:47, November 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) ********Done. Winterz (talk) 18:53, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) *Sorry for the delay; one more: "Galactic Basic Standard" is currently exclusive to the infobox and should be in the article proper. Menkooroo (talk) 10:18, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) **That was sort of an assumption since I considered it because a Human (Imperial) family resided there and were obviously standard Imperial language speakers. Anyway, it's gone now. Winterz (talk) 16:27, December 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abregado-san

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Cade, Winterz is winning this contest!  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:44, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:13, November 29, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Could you provide approximate dates for when the planet fell inside each government? Please address this objection on the other Abregado nominations as well.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  00:39, December 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) ***"fell within the territories of several galactic powers, including the Galactic Republic sometime between 20,000 and 17,000 BBY." This makes it sound like it was only in Republic space at some point during this timeframe. Please correct this on all of the Abregado articles.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:48, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) * Also, in each Abregado article, you source the coordinates in the body to Coruscant and the Core Worlds. Shouln't this be sourced to the Atlas? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  00:41, December 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) **Argh, that was accidental, it was when I (recently) added the coordinates to the body, fixed. Winterz (talk) 00:25, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) *The wording seems almost identical for the part of the articles dealing with its history. Could you try and vary the wording up a little bit?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:51, December 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abregado-dai

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Three in a row...fus-san-dai!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I need EC back up here... Too many noms to deal with alone.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:47, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) *Since you mention that the New Republic became the GFFA you should probably say that the Republic became the Empire.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 02:10, December 8, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abregado-taki

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 23:04, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Sorry EduCorps!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:38, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Your ref in the main body of the article is formatted wrong. Use in the infobox only. You should be using  in the body. Please look over your other noms and see if they are formatted correctly.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:15, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) **Wow, I really wasn't aware of that. What is the difference? Anyways, corrected it in all my 17 noms, thanks for the heads-up! Winterz (talk) 15:44, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Truthfuly, I have no idea what the difference is, but that's how we properly reff an article. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:38, October 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) *Same objection as in the other Abregado nom.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 02:12, December 8, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abrion Major

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 23:43, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work on all these noms.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:41, October 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) You should nom the senator of this planet for the barn burner.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 06:55, November 28, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Same reffing problems as before.
 * 2) * You should mention that it seceded to the CIS.
 * 3) * Humans as the immigrated species needs to be mentioned in the main body.
 * 4) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:20, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. I decided to remove the immigrated species and language from the Infobox as I couldn't find any source that confirmed it. Winterz (talk) 15:48, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * You might not consider this important, but I think at some point in the body you should refer to the Seps as the Confederacy of Independant Systems, since they're called that in the infobox and if a user who knew nothing about Star Wars saw that they could get confused. That's all.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 09:58, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **I consider all objections important ;), corrected. Winterz (talk) 18:56, November 27, 2012 (UTC)

Rage (Lancer-class frigate)

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:59, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:More Far Orbit!

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 08:19, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 01:24, December 7, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) This isn't a real objection, per se, though just a few more words of context in the Ringali Nebula would be great! By the way, project Far Orbit is boring :p Winterz (talk) 03:06, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *There's not much more to be said. It's a nebula. In the Core Worlds. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:13, December 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Green/Aura

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Aurabesh

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Apparently there isn't a code for that, yet. :/ Winterz (talk) 18:56, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:41, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Is there any way to remove the "< Green"? Considering that the Green article isn't related to these ones.
 * 3) **I have no idea how to remove it. I noticed it when I first created the article, but did not know how to eliminate it.
 * 4) ***I'll leave the question at Darth Culator's talkpage, will sign my support once I have a reply. ;)
 * 5) * Context on Sienar Fleet Systems.
 * 6) **Contextified.
 * 7) *** Lol, I was expecting some more specific context like "a subsidiary of the massive company X", not just two obvious words. Winterz (talk) 18:48, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ****Does that satisfy your objection? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:31, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *****Meh, I guess so. Winterz (talk) 13:09, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * (objections apply to both 'Aurabesh') Winterz (talk) 14:43, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Both articles have been upadated according to your objections. Thanks for the review(s). 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:17, October 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Green/Besh

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Aurabesh

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 20:52, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:37, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Hey! Far-Orbit! Far out!
 * 2) * TFOP was a direct supplement to Pirates and Privateers. The way you've written it here, it's like TFOP was just riffing off the theme.
 * 3) **It was a supplement to the RPG just by existing. It was also a direct supplement to Privates and Privateers, like a sequel to it but not. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:25, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***That any better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:38, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Yep. Just needed another tweak. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:37, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * The scenario hooks have names. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:44, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Both fixed. Thanks for looking it over. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:53, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Don't forget to apply these changes to Aura. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:25, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Pich

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:46, November 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:BB5

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  19:57, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Please add the appropriate categories for unidentified gender and unidentified species. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  14:29, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:22, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Could you make it clearer why the last sentence of the BTS is true? Is it due to player choice? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:31, November 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:05, November 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *I think "The Capture of Coh Veshiv" should be an RPG adventure in the "Appearances" section. Menkooroo (talk) 10:34, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **You sure? I've been handling the adventures as though they were a part of the source. I'll go around and change them all if you want. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:23, December 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***There seems to be a lot of precedent for it. Cav treats all of the Darkstryder RPG adventures as Appearances, and they're the same thing as these ones. The Layout Guide names "roleplaying adventures" as Appearances rather than sources. Menkooroo (talk) 01:25, December 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Guess I'll change it tomorrow then. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:31, December 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) *****There you go. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:13, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) ******Probably should fix this myself, but since you have a few articles that use it and will probably have many more in the future: The name of the RPG adventure should come first and the sourcebook second, like here. Menkooroo (talk) 10:09, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) *******Didn't even see this objection, and coincidentally fixed them all! There you go. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:42, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) *******Didn't even see this objection, and coincidentally fixed them all! There you go. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:42, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Vestig

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:42, November 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Pich's pal

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:48, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  15:19, December 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Sorry to be picky, but the ship can't volunteer to do anything. You should probably just mention the captain like in the other article. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:59, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Aggh. There you go. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:21, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

All Planets Relief Fund

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:32, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) *Hey, Holocron. Really, really, really good to see you back. I have a couple of things here:
 * 2) * "Galactic Republic" isn't mentioned or linked in the article outside of the infobox. It should be somewhere in there, and it would additionally be good context for Palpatine (of what is he the Supreme Chancellor?).
 * 3) **Done
 * 4) * On that note, Palpatine's title should probably be included in the "Proposed by" field of the infobox.
 * 5) **Done
 * 6) * The infobox says that he proposed it in c. 24 BBY, but the article itself outright says "in 24 BBY." Which one is correct?
 * 7) **My bad. The book doesn't actually state when it was proposed. Removed the infobox year.
 * 8) * The description of the bill in the first paragraph almost copies the quote from the novel verbatim. Can you put it in your own words?
 * 9) *Can you give context for Tyro in the quote attribution? A title, a rank, or something?
 * 10) **Done
 * 11) * The article could use a little more info on the ceremony --- namely, where it takes place. Also any other details that are available, such as who hosts it, etc.
 * 12) **The ceremony is a bit sparse on details even in the novel. But I did add where it takes place.
 * 13) * Is it worth mentioning the response to the bill? ie, Tyro thinks it's a good one.
 * 14) **Other than Tyro and Palpatine, nobody else really comments on the bill.
 * 15) ***That's fine. Tyro's thoughts on it probably wouldn't be out of place in the article itself, though; they're currently only in the quote. Also, I combined two sentences to avoid some repetition; see what you think. Menkooroo (talk) 14:31, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) ****Added a sentence about its reception.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:13, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) *****Great. I removed the links to Tyro and Senatorial aide in the quote attribution; now that they're in the article itself, they don't need to be there. Menkooroo (talk) 02:11, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) * And, one more: Can you add release dates for the novel and the CSWE in "Behind the scenes" ?
 * 19) **Done
 * 20) *Again, I'm very glad to see you here! Here's hoping you can stay a while, and get reacquainted with the FAN page, too. Menkooroo (talk) 08:26, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 21) **That's the plan. I've had a really bad year, and this is kind of therapeutic. Although I'm obviously a bit rusty.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 09:02, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 22) ***Not going to object over this, but it might be worth making the "result" field of the infobox say "Passed in 24 BBY" just so that the infobox can give some idea of the timeframe.
 * 23) *OK. I have some bad news. The article is 239 words, which, according to the rules at the top of this page, means that an intro needs to be added. That will take the article over 250 words, meaning that it will have to go to the GAN page. Should be an easy GAN, though; you can do it! Menkooroo (talk) 02:11, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) *OK. I have some bad news. The article is 239 words, which, according to the rules at the top of this page, means that an intro needs to be added. That will take the article over 250 words, meaning that it will have to go to the GAN page. Should be an easy GAN, though; you can do it! Menkooroo (talk) 02:11, November 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Argos

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:01, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero returns to the CAN page.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:29, December 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Could you mention his mask in the article?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:51, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Immolanoid

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:32, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Just something silly I came across from Dining at Dex's

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:31, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 01:19, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * In the first sentence "known for combusting", sounds weird. I'd change it to "Known to combust", but I might just be crazy :P  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 02:17, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Changed.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  03:53, December 8, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Devaronian's food cake

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:23, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Pretty obvious what real-life food this is based on, but I don't have anything to back it up...

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Devil food cake.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:48, December 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * 1) I'm not sure how the last BtS sentence about the Devaronians is relevent to the article. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:26, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Removed.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:56, December 8, 2012 (UTC)

Berrun

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:49, December 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Hmm... this is kind of breaking my rule. I try not to go more than two articles away from the Hero.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 501
 * 1) *There's some linking in the lead quote. Please remove it.
 * 2) *How bout not linking Rusk's name in the quote attribution, and instead link to it in the BtS?
 * 3) *In the BtS you say the planets in the grid square M-8, but the infobox has it has M-10.
 * 4) *Info on the Atlas?
 * 5) * 501st dogma ( talk ) 13:20, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Hero of Tython → Fideltin Rusk → Berrun detention center → Berrun... but the Berrun system calls to me.... Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:49, December 8, 2012 (UTC)

Berrun system

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:09, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I really need to remember to post my nominations on the pages.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) How bout some info for the Atlas in the BtS? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:34, December 11, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Ghibli fruit

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:54, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Nights!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:24, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Lizard dance

 * Nominated by:  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:03, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Meant to nominate this one a while ago, but it slipped my mind. Thanks Karo Naru for reminding me! I need to stop nominating articles while distracted...  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:03, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) I'm Karo now? &hellip;Um. Abacus. Historical factoid. PANDAS! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 06:07, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * Bah. So much for my new glasses. :P  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:11, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:37, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Could you provide some context for the festivities and why they are being held in the body of the article?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:40, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Context added.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 03:21, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Could add a date for when the events mentioned occur?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:20, December 12, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Although I've supported, I'm not sure if it's okay to mention the page number the dance is mentioned on. Page numbers differ from printing to printing, so it could be the wrong page number for some books. The Polish and Russian books have a different number of pages, though I'm not sure if that's relevent to the Wook. I'm no expert on this, so its up to you if you want to keep it or not. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:37, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Ooh, good point. It was mainly there for my reference, but I removed it from the article.  It's still in the citation, though I may remove that, too, and stick it in some hidden note in the Appearances.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 03:21, December 11, 2012 (UTC)

Malarian laser pistol

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:16, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Just something I came across while I was reading...

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Tut, tut. You linked year twice. :)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:39, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Hoxie

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 07:37, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Last of the four Gungan Bosses from GB, although the rest went on the GA page.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 501
 * 1) *Link to the Gungan Grand Army in the body.
 * 2) *What is a repeater militiagung?
 * 3) *Otherwise, great work on all these GB noms. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:22, December 12, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Vel Terno

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:03, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments