Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Anti-Alien League

 * Nominated by:  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Something different for a change.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 21:32, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 10:24, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Gorton Colu has a CSWE entry and is mentioned in the KOTOR Strategy Guide --- do you know if either of those sources mention the Anti-alien league?
 * Nope, no mention in the CSWE.
 * Strategy Guide? SoresuMakashi might be able to help you out; he GA'd Colu.
 * I'll see if he can help.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Let me know when you find out whether or not the league is mentioned (directly or indirectly) in the strategy guide.Menkooroo 04:45, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * No mention in the guide.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 17:02, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking that out. I saw some of the inquiries you made on various talk pages --- good hustle! Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * "The Anti-Alien League was a Humanocentrist group formed by Gorton Colu" is currently sourced to The Essential Atlas.
 * Resourced.
 * I could and should fix this one myself, but it'll be handy for you to know if you don't already: Only use punctuation in image captions if it's a complete sentence. Menkooroo 02:43, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:06, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Rubefacient
 * Context of Taris's multiple cities should be added.
 * Done.
 * Mention that aliens were prohibited from UpCity under normal conditions. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * There needs to be a year in the intro
 * Try now.
 * I'm sorry, I was confused by the banner. Because of that banner, I think this should be made with a History section to avoid the dissonance caused by it. I'll not force you to, but it would probably be beneficial. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved the image over. Does this help?
 * Greatly. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * You say the league was mentioned in the game in the body but say it appeared in the BTS.
 * Corrected.
 * Because the article assumes 100% completion, you do not need the clause saying he could be avoided. That is, unless you include the alternate dialogue tracks (which you should).
 * Alternate dialogue tracks? There are no others that mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Revan can ignore the man, can agree with his speciesism, or tell him to screw off. Which of these elicits the mention? If it is the lattermost, remove the portion saying that Colu mentioned it to Revan and say that he could mention it to Revan given the proper dialogue in the BTS. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe he mentions it the first time Revan talks to him (and before any dialogue choices come up).  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:26, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Then say that Revan can choose not to speak to him. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 13:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the runaround. I couldn't wrap my head around it the right way. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Speciesism FTW NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:17, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the article should go into more detail about the player's potential conversations with Colu, The player can agree with him or refute him, if I remember correctly, and the reactions of the side characters (the Wookiee and the Twi'lek) change as well. This should probably all be mentioned in BTS. ~ SavageBob 06:24, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * While that might work in Colu's article, in no other place in Colu's dialogue does it even remotely mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 01:12, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Isn't it still pertinent, though, since Colu is out touting the league? ~ SavageBob 16:21, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, try now.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 19:21, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that should be in the BTS; the party doesn't have to include Zaalbar or Mission at that point. Instead, I think you should mention that "If the party includes Mission or Zaalbar, they react to his anti-alien rant by blah blah blah" and/or "Colu reacts to the Wookiee and Twi'lek by saying blah blah blah." ~ SavageBob 19:40, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Try now.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 20:00, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry to keep harping on this, but it goes beyond even that. If either the Wookiee or the Twi'lek is in the party, Colu does chide Revan. But there are further levels of interaction depending on whether Revan agrees or disagrees with Colu's rant. If you have the game saved near hear, play through with the two in your party and you'll see what I mean. If not, try to find the dialogue files or a video walkthrough. ~ SavageBob 20:27, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Also, guest nom for WP:KOTOR.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:58, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Obitoki

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:37, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now Podracing: there's a sport. At least when it's real podracing, where as long as you take off your helmet and shed your gloves no one can say a damn thing until someone's knees touch the ice.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support


 * 1) Jinzler 10:57, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Are you sure this guy actually exist in canon? The Complete Cross-sections states that 18 racer qualified to the Boonta, and Obitoki is not one of them. Furthermore, the novel incorrectly identifies the racers in the scene where Obitoki is first mentioned. It mentions Obitoki, Elan Mak, and Habba Kee passing Anakin in the second lap, but in the film they are Ark Roose, Gasgano and Teemto. Obitoki's scenes doesn't fit well with the film, but the two could be "merged" by stating that Obitoki, Elan Mak and Habba Kee and Ark Roose, Gasgano and Teemto all surpassed Anakin. Darth Morrt 22:46, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * How about I just update it with an Ambig tag and beef up the Bts with the explaination? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:49, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * It'd be OK. Darth Morrt 08:56, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Episode I: Incredible Cross-Sections This is the CS book you were referring to? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:01, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is. The book says: "Eighteen Podracers, many well known at Mos Espa, qualify for the great Boonta Eve Race, in which nine-year old Anakin..." And there are listed the names of 18 racer and pictures of their podracers. Obitoki, Habba Kee and Xelbree, the three racers unique to the novelization are not among the 18 listed in the cross-sections book. Additionally, Obitoki is mentioned in the script of TPM. Darth Morrt 21:43, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it would be useful if you created a Podracer (profession) article to link to. The current podracer article seems to double for both podracer pods and the individuals that flew them, but I think we can justify a separate article. --Jinzler 11:27, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:51, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Isn't there a source to state that Anakin is the only Human who can podrace? If so, it's probably worth noting that Obitoki was a non-Human. (Also, not required, but a link to his CUSWE page would be nice as an external link.) ~ SavageBob 02:11, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind; CSWE says "very few Humans could do it." He does have a CSWE entry, though, which has some info that needs incorporating (such as the fact that he's non-Human, and that he is a canonical podracer from the Boonta Eve Classic ). ~ SavageBob 02:14, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the entry is ambiguous over whether he raced in the Boonta. But he did race against Sebulba and experience the mishaps explained in TPM novel, just maybe not when TPM novel says. ~ SavageBob 18:12, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Darth Desolous's martial art

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 13:47, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I promised you more.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support


 * 1)  I love it when people write up and CAN tiny articles that are related to their current FAN project. Menkooroo 14:03, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * One thing: Could you add a bit of context on the Jedi Trials? ~ SavageBob 02:20, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Shodon Ko

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 14:38, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Guest nom for WP:TOTJ, I guess?

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 14:05, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * One small thing: Bureaucrat seems to redirect to a Wookieepedia page about administrators for the site. If there's a better link, use that, or ditch the link altogether. ~ SavageBob 02:26, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Or turn the redirect into an actual article. :D 1358  (Talk)  14:13, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Vanus Cruor

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:08, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Could The Holonet be a new, untapped vein?!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Context on the Exchange? Tis all. ~ SavageBob 02:28, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Guest nom for WP:TOR. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:17, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

The Will of Exar Kun

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 21:02, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: What do you wanna bet that this painting was available in the galaxy?

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:52, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Made a go at a bit more description. ~ SavageBob 02:36, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * If anyone can think of some ways to more precisely describe the painting, feel free to suggest them.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 21:04, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Err... abstract might work, I guess. It's a fairly unusual looking painting.
 * Looks good Bob, thanks!  OLIOSTER  (talk) 10:58, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

High Squibbian Law

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 06:12, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Possession is nine-hundred-and-ninety-nine one-thousandths of the law.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Defending Your Freedom

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:55, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Combo x4

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support Object
 * 1)  OLIOSTER   (talk) 13:32, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * No information on when it was released?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 03:39, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nope. Artistic Integrity was their latest release, and Totally Patriotic came before that. However, we don't know when specifically Totally Patriotic was released. Could be in the same 0 ABY-4 ABY timeframe, could be earlier. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 13:21, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Food for thought: Should songs have the in-universe media infobox? mediatype=song. It seems like it applies. Menkooroo 09:56, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Probably. I just have one question regarding the era field. I don't think that eras apply here, because, unlike a painting which can be lost or destroyed, a song will potentially exist forever once it's been written. Any thoughts? QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 18:08, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * How about something like... "Rebellion era and later" ? Menkooroo 14:08, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Should this use the in-universe media infobox? ~ SavageBob 18:14, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Star Destroyer (song)

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:55, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Combo x5

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support Object
 * 1)  OLIOSTER   (talk) 10:25, February 25, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Supremacy

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:55, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Combo x6

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support Object
 * 1)  OLIOSTER   (talk) 06:00, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

The New Order (song)

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 20:00, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Combo x7

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Artistic Integrity (song)

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 20:00, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Combo x8

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Totally Patriotic (The Emperor's New Clothes song)

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 20:44, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Combo x9

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Keshiri bartender

 * Nominated by: Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:03, February 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:From Lost Tribe of the Sith: Sentinel

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Emerging star painting

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 10:21, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Infoboxes suck.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Jinzler 10:57, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) I think you should give some context for Bestine, to clarify that you're referring to the city, and not the planet Bestine. --Jinzler 20:21, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 03:34, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Airten

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Alliance Sympathizer.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * According to card statistics, supports Luke on Bespin? Should that be added to his BTS, and if so, should it be proof he was on Bespin during its takeover in 3 ABY? Same applies for already-comprehensive article Kuep. Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Hakin

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Former Skiff Racer.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Yount

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Obscure Imperial governor.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Maer

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Tauntaun Handler.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Like with Airten, Maer's statistics say he supports Luke on Hoth. Worth noting? Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Civé Rashon

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Leader of Obsidian Squadron.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Rubedo thinks he's started a trend
 * 2) *"In 3 ABY, Civé Rashon and her squadron participated in the Imperial occupation of Cloud City on the gas giant Bespin[1] in pursuit of the Rebel starship the Millennium Falcon." Missing word?
 * 3) **I don't think so, should I add another word? Hanzo Hasashi 19:45, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Bts needs to say she was mentioned on her wingman's card.
 * 5) **Will do.
 * 6) *Since you source her doing things to ESB, shouldn't it sayshe appeared in ESB.
 * 7) **An explaination of this retcon would be called for in the Bts. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:28, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ***She is not in ESB, her fighter is though. At first I had that in the info, but I then looked at the good articles Starck and Nevar, whose AT-AT's were destroyed in ESB, and neither of their behind the scenes mention ESB at all. Hanzo Hasashi 18:46, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ****She is flying the fighter per your article. All three of these articles are textbook cases of with a Ret tag. Furthermore, neither of those articles sources the characters' actions to the movie: they source them to the books in which Blizzard # was probably mentioned as blowing up. In Cive's case, there is no such confirmation that Obsidian flew after the Falcon in ESB to my recollection.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:26, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) *****The Obisidian 1 card shows image of one of the fighters pursuing the Falcon in ESB. And The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia confirms this was the TIE squadron pursuing the Falcon out of Bespin, I'm going to source the CSWE entry instead of ESB then. Hanzo Hasashi 19:39, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ******Now that I've accordingly changed the sourcing, I feel like, as with Starck and Nevar, I will just not mention any appearances, unless you really believe otherwise. Hanzo Hasashi 19:59, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) *******I really believe otherwise. She is confirmed as piloting one of the TIEs seen in ESB so it should be marked as a Retcon. Not even as an indirect appearance. Frankly, if that image is really based on a still from the movie, the ESB still should be used in the infobox if the pilot can be vaguely seen. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:48, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) ********We do not get to see her, just offscreen pilot. Should I also re-add the BTS stuff about her fighter in ESB? Hanzo Hasashi 22:47, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Fun World Founder's Day

 * Nominated by: Another holiday, another PAR-TAY! Just don't try to get married. ~ SavageBob 03:12, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments