User talk:Mith'raw'nuruodo

''' Ah, do come in, I've been expecting you. ''' {| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #FEFFCF; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Mith&#39;raw&#39;nuruodo!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Internal pages:
 * Senate Hall
 * Wookieepedia FAQ
 * Manual of Style
 * Reliable sources
 * Guide to image use
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Wookieepedia policies:
 * What Wookieepedia is not
 * User page, user image, and user signature policies

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash;SFH 17:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * }

Thrawn's personal armada

 * Greetings, Mith'raw'nurudo. I've been reviewing your edits to Thrawn's personal armada and I'm a bit curious as to the source for your additions and creations of Thrawn's fleet. It seems to me that Thrawn's vessels consisted of considerably more than just those few Star Destroyers and that the category of Thrawn's vessels might be a bit more encompassing than that. Anyway, if you could just clarify that, it would be appreciated. Wookieepedia does not allow original research, which means that even logical deductions are almost always frowned up when it comes to classifications. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. Given that the list isn't sourced, and a couple other admins in our IRC channel suspect that it's not factual, that template might not be a good idea. Categorizing the ships inside Thrawn's fleet is good, IMO, but we're not sure that the sources can legitimately place those ships as "Thrawn's personal armada", given that it's never called that. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:50, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'll go ahead and delete the Thrawn's armada template, if you wouldn't mind removing it from the pages you placed it on. As far as major campaigns are concerned, which ones did you have in mind? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, that's fine. Make sure that it is just the major ones, but there's no problem with that. Thank you for contributing and being understanding on this matter. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 18:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I looked at other war articles and they don't seem to embed the category in the template. At this rate, I'm not sure a new category is merited if they're already categorized within Galactic Civil War. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Seeking to know what you could do to help Wookieepedia

 * This Admiral jolyon to Mith'raw'nuruodo, do you read me? (Admiral jolyon 19:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC))

Hair colors
Neither Martio Batch's nor Josef Grunger's hair appear black to me; both appear to be brunet. It seems AdmirableAckbar also does not see the colors the same way you do. jSarek 02:00, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

FYI
Hey, just letting you know that you didn't need to create a whole new infobox for a WookieeProject, like you did here ;) I noticed that you copied my code from User:Greyman/Template:WPinfobox. If there's a WookieeProject you're thinking of starting, or adding the infobox too, feel free to use the one I created (Like many other projects have done). There's no need for double templates :) So, feel free to use the template I made if you so chose, and let me know if you don't need the new one anymore and I'll take care of it. Cheers, Greyman  @wikia ( Talk ) 23:43, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem at all :) I'm glad to see that you'll be using WookieeProject Tales of the Jedi as a guide. Good luck, Greyman  @wikia ( Talk ) 00:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Project Ambition
Hey, Thrawn, I saw you add the Project: Ambition template to the Executor article, so I'd thought I'd let you know that I'm currently actively working on bring the Executor to FA status. I'd be glad to help with your project in that regard. :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:48, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the updae. Daala looks pretty good; just needs Revelation info, which I can do. However, it won't be added for a week or two, so someone else can do it if they would like to.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 21:12, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I would like to help on your project. I can contribute with mostly Remnant-related content. Thanks! Car-em Hawhi 21:25, 5 June 2008 (UTC) Thank you!
 * I'll use it.

Project Ambition userbox
Here's the source for the deleted userbox. On the userbox proposal page itself you just need the part within the tags.

Usage
To use this template, paste the following code into your user page: &lt;pre>&lt;nowiki>&lt;/nowiki>&lt;/pre>

Categorization

 * Category:WookieeProject Ambition members

- Lord Hydronium 21:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Project Ambition
Great, I'll get started tonight. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 21:55, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Carvin
It's only safe to say it's legit if you can provide a canonical source to back up that claim. Just because it's on other articles, don't make the potentially dangerous assumption that it's true. It's likely fanon, or conjecture. Hell, it could be true, but until you can provide a source, it is not going in that article. Thefourdotelipsis 11:17, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Saying someone "controlled" the military isn't quite the same as them having the rank of Supreme Commander...pretty much what's needed here is a source to directly say "Paltr Carvin was the Supreme Commander," or words to that effect. Thefourdotelipsis 11:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, but on the other hand you could easily say that Palpatine "controlled" the military during the GCW, even though Vader held the SC post. It's too vague in its wording to be concrete. Thefourdotelipsis 11:43, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * But Cracken identifies Carvin as the head of the Tribunal, so he's in essentially the same political position as Palpatine, as effective ruler of the Empire. So of course he controls the military as well. The NEC establishes that the Tribunal, or Council, was in control of the Empire at that time, so...I'm not quite seeing where you're coming from. Thefourdotelipsis 11:55, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * No, Cracken clearly states that Carvin is head of the Tribunal. "A Tribunal headed by General Paltr Carvin has put itself in charge of the Empire." To call Carvin Supreme Commander is, at the moment, conjecture. Thefourdotelipsis 12:04, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You're using a piece of tangentially related info from Crimson Empire and a highly ambiguous quote...and calling it hard evidence? Well, I'm sorry, but it just won't do. It's nowhere near concrete enough. Give me facts and clear, blunt statements, and I'll put the information in the article. Until then, no sale. Thefourdotelipsis 12:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review, and by all means, if you see something objectively wrong with the article, feel free to change it. However, if it's subjective, it's best to discuss it first. Also, since you apparently won't be able to review your objections for some time, the article can't actually go through. So, rest assured it'll still be there when you come back. Thefourdotelipsis 13:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Ambition

 * Hey, man, sorry about my inactivity in the project; I've been very busy lately. However, you can direct any articles in need of referencing to me, and I'll do the job. Cheers, -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 15:13, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:Sev'rance Tann
Because it was worded like OR, and most of it was OR. If you want to comment on how her name differs from the Chiss norm, and if you want to mention Ar'alani and all that, by all means do so, in a way that is not essay-style OR and does not include fanon names, hypothetical or not. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 15:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Btw, I wrote that before I read your second message. Please try and have a bit of patience; it's only been less than an hour, and I can't be at my computer non-stop. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 15:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, for starters, the reason I didn't include a reason in my edit summary was because I used the rollback feature (which is not available to all users) and it does not give me the option to do so. I did discuss them, in IRC, and the general consensus (though, admittedly, there weren't many people active at the time) was to either revert or add fact tags or somesuch (and anyway, one doesn't need to discuss every little thing on a wiki before doing it, thankfully). Yes, how I spend my time is irrelevant, I was merely informing you why I hadn't replied immediately. The Chiss article, while well put together, is not a shining example of how articles should look. And while essay-style additions may not been revertable on their own, when coupled with OR it is. As I said above, I encourage you to add a mention of it to the article, but in a way that doesn't make assumptions and is merely stating known fact. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 15:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)