User talk:I need a name/Archive5



This page is an archive of the discussions from my talk page. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on my current talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.

Vongspawn
Why revert it to an incorrect title? http://www.darkhorse.com/Comics/16-142/Star-Wars-Legacy-43Vongspawn Dangerdan97 18:59, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * ,, , . The story arc was apparently originally named Vongspawn, then renamed to Monster with the announcement of subsequent issues. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 19:03, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

Great Page!!
Hey I saw your Dinner at the Lars homestead battle on your homepage. I started laughing when I looked at the casualties. DarthGuy 00:46, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Articles
Hey I need a name, I need some articles that need fixing, do you know any?

--Lot Krotan 15:30, January 3, 2010 (UTC)Lot Krotan
 * Category:Cleanup, Category:Articles with wrong tense, Category:Articles with proseline, Category:We're Doomed!, Category:Articles that need plot summary. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 15:37, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * You might have just point to WP:TODO. =)  Mauser  Comlink

Eeth Koth/Agen Kolar
Why do you and others insist that the Zabrak Jedi on the bubble wort projector planet is Agen Kolar when the Zabrak Jedi on the Council from Chapter 22 has been confirmed as Eeth Koth? The disputed Zabrak Jedi is the same Jedi.
 * Because there's no source that says that's Eeth Koth in Chapter 22, whereas the credits for Chapter 22 clearly identify the character as Agen Kolar. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 19:04, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Eeth Koth/Agen Kolar (Sorry don't know how to continue conversation)
How come no one is changing any of the articles related to Eeth Koth's appearance in Chapter 21? Wookieepedia states that that is Eeth Koth yet it states that it is Agen Kolar in Chapter 22. I doubt it is credited differently.
 * Those articles have been changed, by users incorrectly changing the previous Kolar mentions to Koth ones. The ones I've seen have been reverted now. To continue a particular discussion, click the edit key to the right of the section header. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 12:17, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

hey
lets talk
 * Might be a bit late for that. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 22:37, January 7, 2010 (UTC)

Barriss Offee
Please explain to me why you keep removing the TCWRetcon tag from the Barriss Offee article? Any newly TCW information conflicts with existing canon, regardless if it doesn't show it. We don't know what year or when that new Barriss information occurred, due to the unestablished timelime. I would recommend that you leave the tag on the page.  JangFett  (Talk) 15:04, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * The template is for actual, verifiable contradictions, not super secret ones which are hiding under the surface but are totally definitely maybe there. TCW =/= automatic contradiction with previously established canon. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 15:14, January 9, 2010 (UTC)

Yoda's species
Yoda's species is the Whills
 * No, it isn't.  OLIOSTER  (talk) Imperial Emblem.svg 01:06, January 10, 2010 (UTC)

Omnibus: Shadows of the Empire
I may have done this outside of protocol, so I'm sorry if that's the case, but I reverted your edit to the Omnibus: Shadows of the Empire page. According to the Dark Horse website, it comes out January 27th. If you already have it, then it's a fluke. The release date hasn't changed. Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith  -Just shy, not antisocial: You can talk to me!- 15:21, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Diamond, a far more reliable source for comic release dates and which is recommended by Randy Stradley here says the 13th. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 18:11, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I stand corrected. Isn't that pretty dumb though?  You'd think that the DH website would be the be-all-and-end-all.  Then again, I did also check my comic vendor's website, and he gets it next week (20th.)  So Diamond it is.  My apologies.  Also, I'm going to start a discussion on the Senate Hall, that perhaps we should start sourcing release dates (so that this sort of thing doesn't happen anymore). Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith  -Just shy, not antisocial: You can talk to me!- 18:50, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

calling me a lier
fuck off
 * 'K. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 00:34, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

stop editing my edet's


 * I see you had a little visit from Giacco too. It's ok to delete those comments from one's talkpage right?--Tellanroaeg 00:46, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Lego Star Wars
Didn't even think about a redirect. Thanks.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 19:47, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Darksaber (lightsaber) canon-level
What exactly are you trying to point me toward with your ambiguous edit description of "Try reading the article". Are you saying something in the Darksaber (lightsaber) article shows that GL did not design the weapon? Or are you saying that the canon article says something other than "Elements originating with Lucas"? Both of the above are statements I disagree with. The Darksaber is G-canon. &mdash;fodigg (talk) | 15:48, February 22, 2010 (UTC)

Satele Shan
Where has it been confirmed that Satele Shan is Bastila's descendant? As far as I've heard she has only been confirmed as a descendant of "pne of the KotORI party members". NaruHina Talk  06:43, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Order 66 commando edit
Why'd you revert my edits to Order 66 page? It's established in Order 66: A Republic Commando Novel that the commandos and Nulls disobeyed the order in higher numbers than elsewhere in the GAR. The impression that section gives about how much the order was obeyed is a little disingenuous. Rackham 20:59, February 28, 2010 (UTC) So if I do it again, with proper sourcing, it'll stay? Pinky swear?Rackham 21:09, February 28, 2010 (UTC) Not really, since the Dark Lord source says there were no other recorded instances of the order being disobeyed. Officially, Delta and Omega complied. That loophole opens the door for all the other squads O66:RCM implies didn't follow it. Rackham 22:06, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Replacing sourced information with unsourced, contradictory information is an automatic revert as far as I'm concerned. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 21:06, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Depends, since there's evidently a contradiction between Dark Lord and Order 66. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 21:41, February 28, 2010 (UTC)

ref-tags
Thanks for the ref tags cleanup on Gray Jedi. Those were mostly my bad, as I didn't realize you could do that. &mdash;fodigg (talk) | 17:19, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Tan Divo's insignia
Hey there, what exactly is the problem you're having with File:TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders.svg? Is it that the logo in the commentary is mis-proportioned or was it when you joined the two? If you want, I can redraw the whole thing from the logo in the video for you. Let me know if I can be of any help. Cheers,  Nayayen &mdash; TALK  20:34, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not entirely sure if the dimensions are accurate compared with the documentary logo, so it might need tweaking in the future. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 20:38, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll see if I can make any kind of improvement redrawing it directly. If that doesn't turn out to be any better then we may as well keep it as is.  Nayayen &mdash; TALK  20:42, March 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Bah, I compared the two versions and the current one looks best. I've checked that one against the documentary logo and, as far as I can tell, the dimensions are all okay provided you don't zoom in to several thousand times which, for something which is going to be shown in the article at less than 100% is negligible. I leave the final decision of whether to include it or not, up to you.  Nayayen &mdash; TALK  13:22, March 21, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thanks for uploading the better version of this image. Much appreciated! Menkooroo 05:52, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you also
- Esjs (Talk) 22:29, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Citadel Station
You reverted my edit to Citadel Station about the alternative ending and I was wondering why, as Wookieepedia states that letting the Ravager crash was a cut ending and it is well known that the developers left in some cut content like sound files and movies. Thanks for your time, Hamishmackellar 10:36, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Replacing sourced content with unsourced speculation is a big no. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 16:15, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whilst I would agree with you, Cut content from Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords states that abandoning the Ravager was a cut ending and my search of the Obsidian forums (the only area I can find left there about KotOR II: TSL) has turned up no theories as to why it was there as to a possibility of joining Darth Nihlus. If you wish I will say that that cutscene could have been caused by abandoning without replacing the core or joining Nihlus, but either way I think that it is definately worth a mention: after all, whilst it is not known for certain what caused this cutscene I can only see two possiblities. So the source provided really contradicts what's in the article, as it says on the forums that it might be from joining Nihlus, and we have an internal source, shown above, to put forwards another theory, and another editor that came before me on the talk page of the article seems to agree. Hamishmackellar 19:13, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wookieepedia articles and talk pages aren't valid sources, nor are forum fan theories. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 19:52, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Either way I wasn't replacing sourced data: the source actually *contradicts* what the article says, and what it currently says is wrong: there are ideas of what choices caused that cutscene. And as I said earlier someone also tried to do the same a while ago and was supported by another editor. Hamishmackellar 08:37, April 12, 2010 (UTC)

technicality
technically it was not a vandalism, granted it was under construction buty Everything that I put on the page was fact... 66.172.185.2 13:13, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * The vandalism warning is from February 2009, for this edit (I doubt sources identify the Shifty Prince as being "the fag of space"), not the Sarlacc Enforcer stuff from yesterday. You'll want to talk to about that. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 13:18, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

Oh I see. Sorry about that, I wasn't logged on and I am at an open server, a school no less. So I apologize for anything students at this school may have written. -- Anju Vena  ( Nihilus Speak ) 21:49, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

"Don't edit other people's comments"
Just wondering what that edit comment referred to on The Unknown Regions Talk page. I want to make sure I didn't do something wrong, but I'm not seeing that I did. Dangerdan97 21:42, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Changing the spelling and/or grammar in people's comments is editing them. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 21:45, April 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, oops. I used the spellchecker, which dutifully corrected everything, I never even noticed. Dangerdan97 21:48, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

1381 in "Zillo Beast Strikes Back"
I don't want this to turn into an edit war, so I'm taking it to a talk page. Below I have listed multiple instances of 1138's usage in which the number is not complete. All are from the article 1138 (number).

Under other movies:
 * Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull:
 * The house Indy enters in "Doom Town" is marked "138".

Under video games:
 * Star Wars Battlefront: Elite Squadron:
 * In campaign mode, on Endor, you need to destroy an AT-AT.The pilots name is TH 113. If you add an 'x' and '8' to it, it would spell THX-1138.

Under books:
 * Star Wars: Death Star introduces a storage room aboard Death Star I with the designation 3181.
 * Luke Skywalker finds himself trapped in section "TH-11" while infltrating the Tarkin superweapon in Star Wars 52: To Take The Tarkin, a more obscure reference to THX 1138.

If you accept my point, could you revert your last edit on the article? Thanks. Darth Shohet 21:46, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Most of those are ones I considered removing when I checked the article earlier, especially 3181 and TH-11. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 22:12, April 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, since we've kept those, shouldn't we also keep the 1138 reference in this episode? Darth Shohet 00:09, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

Pure Fannon
Listen pal, maybe you would be better at home at the Star Wars Fanon Wiki, as most of your contribions and reverts seem to display the same views to star wars continuity and the universe.

Chiss
sorry for putting in so many duplicate refs in Chiss. thanks for fixing them ASDF1239  -DISCUSSION- 20:26, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Spongebob Fanon Wiki
Hey, someone is impersonating you on Spongebob Fanon Wiki. We banned the vandal so it's taken care of. Squid the Baptist 21:24, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Award
I, Xd hereby award you, I need a name the Anti-Vandal Medal for spending countless hours reverting vandalism. Keep up the good work! -- 1358  (Talk) 18:51, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for helping us out over at the Battlepedia, the Battlefield Heroes Wiki. We don't want this guy coming back, and having someone from the Wookieepedia helping us makes it an inter-wiki effort.

I hope it is unneeded that I repay the effort, but I will. RedShocktrooper 21:30, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

Vector graphic request
Hey there INAN. I've got an SVG request for you, as one of our active SVG people. Can you take this symbol for the Wolfpack and make it into an vector graphic of the symbol? I've also asked to give it a try as well. Thanks in advance. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 16:32, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's probably beyond my abilities. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 17:12, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for letting me know. I'll see what Nayayen says and then try Trip as a last resort. Thanks again. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 17:15, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Clone Galen Marek
If you watch The Force Unleashed 2 Betrayal trailer, at the end there are many clones so it proves that it is not Galen in a different body so Wookeepedia should have a Clone Galen Marek page.--SUP3RCHUBBY 17:02, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

Darth Revan
He I Need A Name, I recognize Darth Revan in the cinematic (battle for Alderaan) by the mask that he is wearing
 * All the non-Malgus Sith wear that mask in the trailer. There is no evidence that any of them are Revan, especially considering The Old Republic is set 300 years after the KoTOR games. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 15:12, June 18, 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Hi, can you fix my user page? Well it just makes everything all wacky, you'll notice the side bar jumped up. Looks like Mode. Thanks! -'CloneSaber ' Room |undefined  23:10, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

you are lame
you are lame
 * I probably wouldn't have known was evading a block and continuing the very thing he got blocked for if you hadn't have given me a heads up. Thanks for that, I'll go inform an admin now. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 19:45, June 29, 2010 (UTC)

Hey I dont like
my edits being reverted. Do you have a reason? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJqWIjOow6Q watch this!

Why???
Why did you revert my edit on Mara's page? I only added one single image, who had free copyright use. Te Shukalaryc Mand'alor 21:46, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fanart isn't allowed in mainspace articles. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 12:14, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah I get it, sorry, but it was such a good image. Te Shukalaryc Mand'alor 23:55, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Image tag
Hello there, you may not be the person to ask, but how would I crop the image you tagged or otherwise turn it into a better photo? Its a screenshot directly from the game. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 19:29, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Bozzie Baranta
Hi there we should do some work on Bozzie Baranta together.Arjun Sharma 21:49, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

Sebulba
I corrected Sebulba's biography, because the race did happen, but the results were never recorded

Xenomorph
Hey, I noticed you reverted my edits on the "Xenomorph" page. I have no problem with it, as I might have done something wrong (I don't edit here much.) However, may I ask why they were removed? I'll keep it in mind if I ever do edit again. Thanks! 71.190.6.5 22:07, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * How much of that information was from Aliens sources and how much was from Star Wars ones? --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 13:30, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

M M
Thank you very much for your help on Russian Wookieepedia! I'm sure you can block that User:Hjkhkhkh! Максим 05:55, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

uh can you delete a page?
can you delete holoprojector stand? its not real relevant.
 * Only admins can delete pages. If there's a page you want deleting, adding the delete template with a reason is usually enough to get an admin's attention. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 19:19, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

3.3 Removed personal attack
Okay, so my edits on the Star Wars: Galactic Battlegrounds vehicles made a few more assumptions than was probably necessary. However, I wouldn't classify them as fanon. Most — if not all — of the edits concerned technical information that neither conflicted with existing canon nor made any statements that placed the subject vehicles in a position of any more prominence than has already been established. All I attempted to do with those edits was to add a bit more detail than "The was a vehicle used by the for the purpose of around the time of ," which is about as descriptive as saying "Darth Vader was a human Sith Lord who held a leading position in the Galactic Empire until his death during the Battle of Endor." Now, I know that none of the vehicles I fiddled with are anywhere near as important to Star Wars as Darth Vader, but you see my point.

The technical details I add to obscure vehicles are always based on the same seven things:

1. Visual inspection of the vehicle's shape and visible components 2. Notation of components with obvious uses (for example, laser cannons, air intakes, engines, etc) 3. Orientation of visible exterior vehicle components 4. Differences in visible component configuration between subject vehicle and other models, prior or successive 5. Actual canon records of operational history (The N1-L was not seen in space, therefore as far as we know only saw atmospheric action) 6. References to canonical sources regarding placement of internal components in later models when stating a lack of shield/hyperdrive/weapon in an earlier model that is present in a later model 7. Performance statistics (speed, maneuverability, weapon damage/fire rate, etc) based on canonical sources. In the case of maneuverability, SWGB does not provide adequate information, as all units are able to essentially turn on a dime. In these instances, aircraft shape in relation to air resistance (drag) is taken into account, and notation is made specifying manueverability in atmosphere.

If you would be so kind as to respond on my Talk page? --Triloh1138 00:02, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Oh, and definitely didn't mean to put the "Removed Personal Attack" title there... accidentally clicked the wrong thing. (doh!) -Triloh

Video games usage
Hello. I noticed you had quite a few PC games. Is there any way you could check some of them to see if they contain the Main Title? I don't have any more games than what are already listed on the article, and I don't know of a way to find that info on the web, so.... Master Fredcerique Begun the Clone Wars has † 13:18, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the intrusion, but if I might suggest, Monsieur, there are lots of walkthroughs of various SW games on YouTube and other video sights. Many of these will include the introduction sequences, so you can check there in the meantime while you wait for INAN's response. ~ SavageBob 15:22, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice. I'll have to wait until school's out cuz I'm using the school's computers, and YouTube is blocked. Master Fredcerique  Begun the Clone Wars has † 15:38, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * The ones I can remember off the top of my head are already in the article. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 18:52, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Themes
Ummm...When you added the "don't edit the HTML" thing on Themes, were you refering to me? If so, I'm not sure what to do. Master Fredcerique Begun the Clone Wars has † 18:27, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's my default edit summary whenever someone doesn't update the template source code (the stuff near the bottom of the page). --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 12:14, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh wow. I have no idea how to update the source. Please tell. Master Fredcerique  Begun the Clone Wars has † 12:51, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Fi-Ek
Hey, I was wondering if you could let me edit Fi-Ek Sirch. The true figure was "Nikto Jedi Knight" and He did not die.

WHAT!!!!
I did not what did i do man!!! you are stupid
 * This, this and this are all you adding fanon to the Riyo Chuchi article. Don't do it again. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 23:18, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

Please help
What does this Cite error: Invalid tag; no text was provided for refs named Star_Wars:_The_Old_Republic_Holonet:_Quesh mean and how do i fix it?
 * You need to define the reference first (see here for help with adding references). --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 20:00, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

Well then
Should I go through and change the race for the rest of the Neo-Crusaders in KotOR and TSL? Ruthless Xero(Comment) 22:17, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, unless they're specifically referred to as humans in those sources. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 22:25, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

Padmé's Theme
Hey there. What was the reason for moving Padmé's Theme? The new article has the exact same title. MasterFred (Whatever) 19:47, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's hard to see due to the ClearType on Windows Vista/7 and Internet Explorer 7+, but I changed it from a  apostrophe to a   one. Otherwise, it's impossible to move an article without changing the name in some way, like how saving an article without making a change doesn't show an edit in the history. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 20:56, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

Alderaan Jedi
Hey INAN, I'm just wondering what source you have confirming that Satele Shan is not the Jedi from the Hope trailer? I haven't been following TOR too closely, but this seems to confirm it: "Satele is, of course, featured as well in the cinematic trailer." &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:28, March 7, 2011 (UTC)