User talk:Imperialles

Cookie 4 U
I can't wait to see what it'll look like when it's finished. KEJ 18:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! At the moment I'm pretty much transwiki-ing Wikipedia's tutorial, but I'll start customizing shortly. --Imp 18:09, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Shielded image
Can you unprotect Image:Thoseabouttojediwesaluteyou.JPG so that I can upload a high definition screenshot to replace it? - JMAS 20:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Tis done. --Imp 20:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * New image has replaced it now, if you want to delete the old revision and re-shield it. Thanks, Imp. - JMAS 21:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Discuss before putting verification tag
You should put something on the discussion page about WHY you consider an article unverified. As for the Latin alphabet page, look at the See Also section for sources.  Expansionary Fleet Commander Mitth'raw'nuruodo  Discuss 12:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I consider an article unverified because it doesn't cite any sources. Other Wookieepedia articles are not legitimate sources. --Imp 12:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Revert
Hey there, Imp. Just wondering as to the logic in the revert you did on the C-3PO page. Was it because the way it was written it looked stupid (which I agree with) or simply because the Latin alphabet page is up for VfD right now or for some other reason? Just wanted to know before I go piping any more links. In other cases where that same information was added (check out EFCM's recent contributions) I removed the word "Latin" from displaying in IU places since that part at least is definitely conjecture. But the rest of the information... well, if we do keep the article, it might as well not be an orphan. Thoughts? Wildyoda 14:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I reverted it because the article is up for VFD, but also because the "Description" section was somewhat awkwardly positioned at the top of the article. --Imp 14:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Compulsive edit
LOL* That cracked me up. If it is preferable, I'll make sure to include all the fields in the image information template, even the unused ones, from now on. I mean, I don't want to be the cause of a nervous tik or anything. ;) - JMAS 21:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it, I enjoy fixing little things like that. ;) -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Should I just not bother putting the ((Imr)) tag on the high def images I'm uploading since you seem to be on top of it and deleted the old ones before I can even update the infobox? ;) - JMAS 22:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I go through all your uploads anyway. =) -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 22:22, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

WookieeProject Galaxy Maps
I thought you might be interested in checking this out: WookieeProject Galaxy Maps ~ Jaywin

Problem new user
I put a warning up on the talk page for A-17 about uploading images that overwrite currently in use images. Ya might need to take it to the next step if he keeps it up. Just giving you a heads up. - JMAS 23:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for alerting me (and I apologize for taking this long to reply). I see the matter has been dealt with. =) -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 01:15, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Pictures on homepage
When I was putting images on my homepage I put over 10, and I also didn't check my messages. I Recently looked at my messages saying I can no longer edit and I lose the pictures on my home page. I'm sorry, can I have those privileges back?
 * Your privileges were never removed, it was just a warning. Feel free to re-upload 3 images. =) -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 01:32, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Star Wars Fanon
Hi, a precautionary measure. Did you recently create an account over at the Star Wars Fanon wiki? Because an account under your name just cropped up, and i'm dubious as to whether it's actualy you, or an imposter. Sith Council Sith Campaign 20:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would be me. Thanks for your vigilance. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 20:38, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Ban
Please ban 67.86.138.50 for continued vandalism. Nice sig BTW. Chack Jadson 21:43, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * He's been banned, and thank you. =) -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

A favor.
Could you tell Thefourdotelipsis to stop acting the way he was on Talk:Palpatine? More importantly, could you do something about his Inquisitor status? Having someone like him in that group is very bad. He's already tagged at least a dozen articles to be removed from FA status, yet he hasn't done a single damn thing to improve them (and he says that I don't contribute; I do have the second most amount of edits on this site). The fact that he doesn't do anything to fulfill his role of Inquisitor is enough to remove him from that group. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 22:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I have already talked to Thefourdotelipsis on IRC. I have no power over the Inquisitorius, so no, I can't remove him from that group. Keep in mind that the Inquisitorius is primarily an article review project, not an article improvement project. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 22:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * But do you agree that they should be allowed to remove articles from FA status? &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 22:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)