Forum:SH:Single-sourced article tagging

In an effort to improve numerous battle and event articles I've recently begun adding the { { Confirm-battletitle} } tag. My edits to the pages Nishr Suppression, Nishr Campaign & Battle of Tiems have been reverted but I disagree with the logic of this as per User talk:Rokkur Shen & User talk:Cavalier One. As I have previously mentioned it is unclear whether the title of these articles are canon in their present state. I do not dispute that Cav has checked the source to confirm the canonicity of the respective pages only that it should be necessary to place a (First identified) tag as per the { {Confirm-battletitle} }. In their present state, without clarification in the source list, it is not explicit that the source Rules of Engagement: The Rebel SpecForce Handbook explicitly lists the events as "Nishr Campaign" and "Nishr Suppression" and to the casual user the actual canon name of event is left ambiguous. For example the source may have listed the event as the "suppression of Nishr" and the creator of the page named the page "Nishr Suppression" for simplicity but without the appropriate tag it is left to interpretation. My argument is that single-sourced articles should not be exempt from proper sourcing or left primarily up to user interpretation. Any thoughts? Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:02, January 15, 2013 (UTC)