User talk:Ralok

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #FEFFCF; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Ralok!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Internal pages:
 * Senate Hall
 * Wookieepedia FAQ
 * Manual of Style
 * Reliable sources
 * Guide to image use
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Wookieepedia policies:
 * What Wookieepedia is not
 * User page, user image, and user signature policies

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash;SFH 16:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
 * }

Warning
Do not remove posts from talk pages, whether they belong to you or not. Likewise, your original user name has been banned from editing. You only get one username. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:13, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

wait that hardly seems fair Ralok 15:05, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Your forum post
Your forum post, being a question about this wiki rather than a question on Star Wars, has been moved to Forum:Senate Hall under Forum:SH:why are these here. Cheers, &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:11, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk pages
Thanks for contributing to Wookieepedia! Before posting talk page comments, please familiarize yourself with the disclaimer at the top of talk pages, Talkheader. Talk pages are for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Thank you. [[w:c:starwars:User:CC7567| CC756

7 ]] (talk) 08:06, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * sorry, my bad which talk page did i screw up on exactly? or has it been all of them. ralok 08:10, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Talk:New Mandalorians and the now-deleted talk page for "Sphere of Influence"&mdash;while the comments should not be deleted now, as they are part of the public record, please try to avoid similar violations of policy in the future. Thank you.  CC7567  (talk) 08:12, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

i got it, i will try and keep myself from making those mistakes in the future. ralok 08:14, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Please note that your comment on Talk:The Clone Wars: Season Three was also in violation of Talkheader and has been removed. Talk pages are to be used for discussion on changes to articles, not for discussion about articles' subjects. Please take the time to review the policy before continuing to contribute. Thank you.  CC7567  (talk) 08:24, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

one person says there is a contradiction in canon, and i say there is not. . . that is a violation? ralok 08:28, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

im gonna review this policy now ralok 08:28, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * There is nothing to discuss if a potential change to the article is not being discussed. Any discussion about an article's subject instead of the article itself qualifies as a violation of the policy.  CC7567  (talk) 08:33, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Can't escape from me Ralok ha ha. I've gone to this wiki tons of times before but never really started editing this is only my 5th ah well I'll catch up.Sniperteam82308 13:03, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

RE:back off
I didn't edit the content of your comments. I left in the ellipses. I simply changed the ". . ." to "& hellip;". This is the wikicode for an ellipsis and is what you're supposed to use for those. NaruHina Talk  02:11, August 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm sorry. I looked it up again and saw I changed it to "& mdash;" by mistake. I use that one far more frequently. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:19, August 18, 2012 (UTC)

Sith
I have the book as well, and you're still editing through an in-use template. Beyond that, you're removing sourced information, writing in present tense, and adding information about other species in the slave caste that does not belong in an article on the Sith species. Herglics, Humans, and Mrlssi are not members of the Sith species, so they do not belong in that article. The Grotthu caste is a division of the species itself, though members of conquered species were later referred to as Grotthu because they were also slaves. Cade  Calrayn   04:29, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * No it is not, Grotthu specifically refers to the mixed-species of slaves in the sith empire!!! you have no proof that it started as a name for a sith biological caste, the term has only been used to refer to all sith slaves collectively with no regard to species, and never specifically for red sith. Also the book definitly states that the native sith have skin ranging from crimson to obsidian. ralok (talk) 04:32, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * also the idea that "it has a number at the end, therefore it is canon" is stupid. I have checked the sources and they do not support the information that was placed on the page. ralok (talk) 04:33, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Let me break it down, none of those "sources" used the word Grotthu, they only showed red sith slaves. Nor were thoses red sith slaves specified as an independent caste (they could have been slaves from members of the other castes). Everything you are saying, and that I removed was rampant speculation. As Grotthu is never demonstrated in any context as being used to refer to red sith of any kind. ralok (talk) 04:38, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Administrative warning: Talk pages
Ralok, you've been warned time and time again to only post appropriate discussion items on talk pages. Now, I am giving you one more chance. Follow the Talkheader template, or you will be blocked for disruption and failure to follow the rules. Consider this your final warning.&mdash; Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 15:21, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * woah dude, sorry about that it is easy to forget, that last instance i just needed to know something (the shown details of it shows that it probably isnt canon BTW). ralok (talk) 15:35, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * and often the line between discussing the content and the page is blurry, people tend to think I am discussing the content though for some reason. Assume I am doing wrong when there is no proof i am doing right I guess??? And it is kind of a jerk move to block osmeone who has no malicious intent dont oyu think? I am not here to cause trouble, or to insult, or to edit other peoples comments (or jump on them because they were warned about something a long time ago). I am just here to make this place . . . better, like it or not. ralok (talk) 15:42, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * We block someone if they go against the rules, malicious or not. If you want to make this place better, fine. But you have to do it by the rules, not by whatever way you think you can do it by yourself. If you can make things better, great. But realize that if you don't follow the rules and admins' warnings, you will be blocked.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 15:51, August 30, 2012 (UTC)