Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for In-Universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Widow's Valley

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: So named for the unstable spires.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 20:09, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2)  1358  (Talk) 16:33, October 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) ''' Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 00:50, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Whoops; thought I had already supported this. ~ SavageBob 02:02, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Karika
 * 2) * The body could be split up into three sentences.
 * 3) ** Needs a BtS.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 16:26, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Done. Thanks for the suggestion. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 20:01, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Xd1358
 * 6) * "...near the south ridge of the city of Theed." Reads awkwardly. Perhaps the capital city Theed instead?
 * 7) * "Sykes was a pilot of the Royal Naboo Security Forces and flew through the Valley during a battle against the Trade Federation Droid Army at the end of the Invasion of Naboo in 32 BBY." Okay, this is a weird sentence. You must get this and the earlier sentence to run smoother. Please see what phrasing adjustments you can make. 1358  (Talk) 21:47, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) **How does it read now? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:48, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) ***It's still pretty choppy. It's like, which is not good.  1358  (Talk) 19:30, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) ****Is there an improvement now? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:33, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) The Wizard did it
 * 12) * There needs to be some resolution to the battle. Did the Security Forces win, or the Federation? --''' Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 15:32, October 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 13) **Details once thought irrelevant are now added. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 01:55, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * 14) Soresu
 * 15) * If knocking over the pillars are not necessary, shouldn't Gamemechanics be used?
 * 16) **Should it be? Probably. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:27, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 17) *** Make sure that only optional things are included in the template. I think the proton bombs are required for mission completion, and there may be others. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 03:05, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 18) * any surviving convoy vehicles on the bridge were destroyed. How? By whom? SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 01:17, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 19) **By the exploding thermal detonators. Is it not clear enough? If not let me know. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:27, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 20) *** It isn't because you haven't said anything about them being destroyed prior to the proton bombs. This makes it seem as if some of the convoy vehicles survived the bomb detonation, and were then destroyed in some other way. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 03:05, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 21) *It is not necessary to destroy the pillars during the mission to delay the convoy. This makes it sound like it was intentionally destroyed by Sykes. In the body, however, you just say that they were knocked down. Please clarify. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 03:05, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 22) **Here's how the mission ends. By blowing the detonators with your bombs, or lasers, or destroying the MTTs (difficult to do without knocking down the pillars to delay them). Take your pick. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 04:42, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 23) ***This should be elaborated upon in the BTS. Alternate stories are noted in the "Behind the scenes" section. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 22:12, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 24) ****The point I am trying to make is that there is more than one distinct way to end the mission, and I need advice on how to express this. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 23:30, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 25) *****Something like: this battle appears in the nth mission of BFN. Then talk about how the player plays as Sykes. Then, address the requirements/optionals of the mission. Something to the tune of: "stopping the convoy by destroying the bridge is the only requirement for mission completion, with X serving as an optional action that delays the convoy." SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 00:23, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * 26) *In fact, it isn't even necessary to destroy the convoy, just the bridge. The mission objective says to "stop the convoy."

Comments
 * I could find a quote if necessary. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Um...where's the page? =/ --''' Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 21:44, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know; it won't show up when running a search for it. The only way to go to it is through a page which links to it (BFN appearances or Battle of the south ridge). Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:50, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * The apostrophe was different. --Eyrezer 23:10, September 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * I went back and made it super-comprehensive. You may want to verify everything is correct. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:48, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry to sound like a broken record, but I think the Unidentified Naboo canyon mentioned in the article needs to be linked and created. ~ SavageBob 17:15, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Eekar Oki

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:31, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ~220 words

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 03:51, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Xd1358
 * "Around 21 BBY, he attended a meeting in the Jedi Temple communication center in which General Grievous informed the Jedi High Council of his capture of Jedi Master Eeth Koth." Grievous informed the Jedi of his capture while in the tower.
 * Fixed.
 * I was referring to the intro. 1358  (Talk) 18:06, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed,
 * I took care of this one; see what I did. 1358  (Talk) 18:55, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Please go through the article and copy-edit it.
 * Copy-edited.
 * I still see a typos and a missing apostrophe (that's in the Bts). 1358  (Talk) 18:06, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Now?
 * Punctuation error in the beginning of the bio.
 * Fixed.
 * Ranks should be capitalized if they are referring to an individual.
 * Fixed.
 * Remains. 1358  (Talk) 18:06, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:11, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll read through it later. 1358  (Talk) 18:36, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Awaiting your objections.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:01, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Any reason why hologram is capitalized?
 * Nope.
 * How do you know Oki was present it the temple when Grievous captured Koth?
 * Fixed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:44, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1358 (Talk) 18:55, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't review on the CAN, but after a passing look at the article, I see a lot of unnecessary redirects. This has been a problem for you in the past, Lee. Also certain grammatical errors.  JangFett  (Talk) 03:20, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Should be gone.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:29, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey Lee, if you'd like an easy way to see which links lead to redirects, copy  to either User:Clone Commander Lee/monobook.css or User:Clone Commander Lee/monaco.css (or [[User:Clone Commander Lee/Wikia.css, if you use the new Wikia skin), depending on which skin you use. After you have added it, purge your cache and all links to redirects should be orange. Cheers.  1358  (Talk) 17:38, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks Xd.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:51, October 19, 2010 (UTC)

'''Prepare to be savaged... but not by Bob!'''
 * 'Oki was discovered to be Force-sensitive and taken by the Jedi Order for training" is sourced to Grievous Intrigue. This may sound nitpicky, but... that's conjecture. He appears as a background character in the episode, and the episode guide identifies him as a Jedi, and that's all we know about him. We can't infer anything about his early life, or about anything other than when he was standing there in the room, even something as basic as what you've stated. Especially considering that it's sourced to Grievous Intrigue. As unlikely as it seems, he could be one of Djinn Altis's Jedi, or his training could have happened outside of the Jedi Order, or any number of other possibilities --- we just don't know anything at all about his past. I really don't feel like a fleeting background appearance is enough of a basis to infer "was discovered to be Force-sensitive and taken by the Jedi Order for training". I think the article should stick with what we do know and let the reader connect the dots, and all that we do know is that he was a Jedi who lived during the Republic's waning years and that he was standing there in that room. See, for example, Unidentified Jedi (Battle of Alderaan). A great example of a Jedi article that makes no assumptions beyond what's seen on the screen. Sorry if this was long-winded. :^P
 * Killed this info.
 * Thanks for being so cool about it, despite my long-winded explanation. :^D But it actually still remains in personality and traits... which is a section that I think should be merged with the rest of the article, seeing as how it'll probably end up being a single sentence about him carrying a lightsaber.
 * Killed.
 * I feel like the article would be better off without an intro. It's definitely short enough that it doesn't need to be summarized in an intro, ya know? ie, the intro doesn't add anything to the article and just kind of seems like baggage. Thoughts? Menkooroo 07:11, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Killed the intro.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:35, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just remember to add NOTOC to CAN's that have no intro. Took care of it this time, but make a note of it. Also, the Biography heading is unnecessary when there's no intro.
 * Thank you. Killed the headings.
 * A few more: The article should identify him as a Jedi (can be sourced to the episode guide).
 * Fixed, but I believe we can say that he was was a Jedi by the episode.
 * Can you mention that Grievous's capture of Koth was during the Clone Wars?
 * Added.
 * Remember to link things on their first mention (Jedi Temple). Menkooroo 01:49, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Linked. Thank you.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:00, October 28, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Shagrad Loset

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 07:03, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Gotal week is anything but weak!

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 07:58, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I gave the BTS another look. If you prefer, I won't get upset or oppose if you want to change it back. ~ SavageBob 17:10, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * Prepare to be savaged...
 * From the lead quote: "We specifically asked the Jedi stay out of this." Is there a missing "to" here? If not, I suggest adding a [sic], since the quote reads oddly. ~ SavageBob 21:13, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is that what [sic] is for? I actually had no idea. Let me know if I did it right. :^)
 * Yup! For fixing errors in the OS. ~ SavageBob 03:56, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I changed the bts back to past tense, as present tense read a little awkward with the "published in 2002" at the end. I hope that's OK. Menkooroo 03:51, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think it's better in present tense in this case. The subject of the verb is Loset, not the author or creator of the source, and Loset appears in that source to this date (you can even click the link and check!)
 * Just checking to see if you want to keep discussing this. Menkooroo 13:15, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I'm not sure why it's necessary to include lines that give no real information, such as, "It is Loset's only appearance to date." This type of sentence (along with "He has not appeared in any other sources", etc. seem superfluous to me. I admit this last objection may be something that needs CTing, but I thought I'd mention it. ~ SavageBob 03:56, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think it really needs CT'ing --- I've always seen it as a harmless sentence that an article-writer can add to the end of a bts if they want in order to avoid one-sentence paragraphs (which is something I always try to avoid). I've always thought that it was the choice of the writer, and I would hate to see a rule implemented that said "You MUST add it!" or "You CAN'T add it!" :^P Ditto with past vs. present tense --- if there's only been one source/appearance, I always gathered that past or present tense were equally OK? Menkooroo 04:07, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Not to butt in, but such a line does give information&mdash;it's just letting the reader know when, where, and how often the subject has appeared, so it's no different than listing off what sources the subject has appeared in. This fits fine in the BTS. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 04:24, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * It still rankles (what does it add that can't be gleaned from glancing at the list right below it?), but I won't object over it. ~ SavageBob 05:18, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * If there's any way you think it can be reworded and improved, definitely let me know. The problem with comprehensive article bts's is that most of them are just a rehash of the source list that can be viewed below. "So and so appeared in blah blah blah novel" is an example of that, too. I just like to make every paragraph more than one sentence, ya know? Menkooroo 13:15, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified female (Anchorhead)

 * Nominated by: Darth Morrt 15:21, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * How do you feel about jettisoning the intro? The article is so short that an additional summary of it isn't really needed. Most CA's don't have 'em 'cause they don't need 'em. Menkooroo 07:17, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Cut. Darth Morrt 08:17, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Some minor grammar issues throughout --- I'm looking for "at" top speed, "ran" instead of "run", an apostropher in "Skywalkers" --- I could sofixit, but I'm hoping you can give the entire article a cleanup and copy-edit.
 * The bts mention of her appearance in the revised fourth draft should be sourced to where the revised fourth draft is available online (it's not self-sourcing since we have no article on it).
 * Can you give some context on Luke Skywalker? Even something as simple as farmboy. Menkooroo 01:58, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * I fixed all above.

Comments

Green-eyed wadie-platt

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 04:58, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: None.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Provided Soresu's objection is addressed, of course. ~ SavageBob 21:09, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2)  SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 12:26, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Check out the context I added. Menkooroo 07:20, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Soresu
 * 2) * Could you give a date for the droids' arrival on the planet, just to give an idea of the timeframe in which they existed. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 12:40, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. --Eyrezer 01:54, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) No infobox available? 1358  (Talk) 18:13, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Maysano

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 05:31, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: He finally has a name!

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) This guy's cool. Almost as cool as a Gotal. Menkooroo 13:27, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:TCW.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:23, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Gotal gambler

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 08:02, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Is that a bandwagon I see?

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) I love you guys. Menkooroo 13:21, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Time to nom Ssty, Ey! ~ SavageBob 17:07, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Gotal patron

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 08:02, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Why, yes it is!

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) This Gotal was in the casino winning money because Gotals WIN AT EVERYTHING Menkooroo 13:25, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) An Eyrezer article from TNR that's not an obscure sentient species! ;P ~ SavageBob 17:03, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Crystal Jewel patron

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 08:02, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I needed to create this article for the above Gotal, so here it is.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Is he a man? Or is he an astro-man? Menkooroo 13:30, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Gotals and men, Gotals and men, they go together like a horse and carriage... Or not. ~ SavageBob 17:05, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Siro

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 15:04, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My penultimate nom for Gotal week.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Even without an intro, you are currently at 252 words, making this ineligible for CA. Give it a mini-intro and take it to the GAN!  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 15:05, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Count again! :^P I removed some extraneous stuff, and not just for the sake of the word count (for truth! I did it before I read your comment). Yay salience! Menkooroo 15:12, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **Haha, well you're now at 247 words. I still think it would be most beneficial to give this a short intro and put it up to GAN, seeing as it is just three words short and the whole purpose of the CAN was to make it so articles that phsyically couldn't get up to 250 words could still have some sort of status, but I suppose that's up to you. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 15:25, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I actually feel pretty bad about the amount of context that's in the article already. I cut out a lot during my first draft in order to keep the article as focused on Siro as it could possibly be, and even so, not very much of it is about the Goat. An intro here would be difficult to do without a lot of context itself, and the repeated detailing of context would, IMO, make the article seem like it was more about the events surrounding Siro's death than about Siro. Keeping it short and sweet gives it the focus that it needs when it's so context-heavy. And I mean, if a character only appears in like, two lines out of the entire book, do we really need to make him a GA when we can just as easily make him a CA? Menkooroo 15:58, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Fair enough; like I said, it's up to you. :) Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 16:12, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Ossluk's gloves

 * Nominated by: Tm_T(Talk) 14:54, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Small gloves doesn't fit.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support Object
 * 1)  OLIOSTER  (talk) 15:01, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Gotal Rebel guard

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 10:20, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: One more Gotal for good luck

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 11:18, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I feel like Paul Harvey should be reading these CAs about Gotals. ~ SavageBob 15:05, October 27, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Solanus

 * Nominated by: Xicer9 atgar.svg( Combadge) 21:59, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A result of boredom. Just a bit under the GA word limit.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * :^P Menkooroo 05:11, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified female duelist

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 16:00, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Lassin

 * Nominated by: Grunny  ( talk ) 07:19, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another random Jedi.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments