Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Plo Koon's Delta-7 Aethersprite-class starfighter

Plo Koon's Delta-7 Aethersprite-class starfighter
Completely pointless. One user, User:Geekmasterflash, protests that it should stay, saying that it was different from other Aethersprites, yet he has given no source for his claims. Also, he says it should stay just because of its different paint job. So, I say delete. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:10, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep', as for the source: The episode III movie, as we all saw it. If nothing else it represents a factoid about Star Wars. Geekmasterflash 22:12, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * What about your claims that it was modified? Where's that source? Plus, what you have is only an appearance. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:14, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * The movie itself, would need to be blind to say that it is the same as any Aethersprite, as it is clearly at least a different color scheme. I dont even care if the article stays, so long as it gets mentioned somewhere in conjuction with Koon. Also, I never claimed it was modified past having a different appearance. Please look at the article history before saying something like that.Geekmasterflash 22:15, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * http://starwars.wikicities.com/wiki/R5-A2 This also is only an appearance, with little other actual fact/information on. Shall we delete this also? Geekmasterflash 22:18, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Droids, for all intents and purposes, are individual characters. A better comparison is calling Obi-Wan's Eta-2 "modified" because it had the Open Circle logo painted on it. CooperTFN 22:32, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * That isn't quite right, because they all had that logo, from what I've seen.Geekmasterflash 22:33, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Not all, but you're right that it was on more ships than it's supposed to be. They retconned it as originating with Open Circle, but becoming popular among other units throughout the army, probably due to Anakin's and Obi-wan's notoriety. CooperTFN 22:43, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Anyway, I added a note about the fighter to Plo's page in Behind the Scenes. That work for you? CooperTFN 22:43, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Works just fine, no need for redundancy, 'delete. Geekmasterflash 22:46, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * It's pretty good acually. Maybe changing the customized part about it and saying other things. I say it should stay, with some editing of course. A Lightsaber 24:15, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)