Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Lesser Galam

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 14:37, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Just 2 more!

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:45, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:00, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:50, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Warm climate seems a little misleading, since the infobox says searing rock.
 * 3) **eheh it's still recommendable for those looking for sun baths :p. Corrected.
 * 4) * "...started exploring the mines" Were there mines there before the Humans bought the mining rights? Then someone would have had to build them. Please clarify whether there was mining activity on the planet before the Humans arrived. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:51, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Corrected! Winterz (talk) 21:46, December 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Why is the galactic empire in the affiliation? You say in the article it had no presence there.
 * 3) **Scratch that. It makes sense. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:45, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *Otherwise it looks good. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:26, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * These last three of my nominations may look similar but that's because nearly all information there is the same, in case you sirs, were about to ask it, although I've tweaked several sentences. Winterz (talk) 21:46, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Lan Fellov

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 20:03, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:53, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:04, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:53, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * "Lesser Galam was extremely ore-rich..." I think you meant to say Lan Fellov.
 * 3) * "...began exploring the mines" Were there mines there before the Humans bought the mining rights? Then someone would have had to build them. Please clarify whether there was mining activity on the planet before the Humans arrived. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:57, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Both objections addressed and here, a gift, for you sir! (See below) Winterz (talk) 22:10, December 28, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Lan Tundi

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 22:40, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: This should be my last nomination of 2012. Cheerful year "finale" and a good entry in 2013, to everyone!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * 1) Lan Tundi and Lan Fellov have almost the exact same wording, but for a few words. Could you change it up? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:04, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Muheeda

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 00:58, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: May I present... the Mysterious Man-Rodian! No one knows why he changed... maybe he's a Shi'ido.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *Is the capitalization correct here? - "The Arm That Holds The Saber"
 * 3) **Meh. Changed the other one. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 04:02, December 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *Otherwise, fine by me. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:33, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * BTS is a significant portion of the article, which I believe exempts it from Rule #14 - no intro. Currently approx. 220 words. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:00, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, he has a sweet sweet side-stache. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:00, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * If I'm not mistaken, that applies when the Bts is the majority of the text. In this one, the body has a few more words than the Bts section. Unlucky! :p Winterz (talk) 01:03, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Give us an intro! 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:05, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Bam! 199 words. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:10, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Nathema's sun

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:48, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:07, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:57, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tenebrae's adoptive father

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 04:32, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: After a page-move debacle, I decided to knock this one out.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:34, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:59, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * Uh, the Notes and references section is empty.
 * 1) **Left over from when it had references. Now it does.
 * 2) *Did the novel mention the dates, or does some reasoning need to be done. If any calculations need to be performed, please insert some references and source the article.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:12, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Blarg. Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:17, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Holodarts

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:03, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For the people who don't actualy want to throw darts to play darts

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *The BTS does not mention the holodarts at all.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:07, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Ouch. Fixed. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:36, December 29, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Raid on a Republic Military warehouse

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 04:32, December 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: 199 words. Let's keep it down below 200, okay?

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *Its 200 words right now actualy.... 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:08, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Pletik soup

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  05:21, December 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Nights!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:12, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Spinstick

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  05:42, December 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's a weapon...

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Good, except that the first and thrid sentences start with "Spinsticks were a type of weapon". Additionaly, my browser puts them right overtop of one another. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:15, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments