Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Mission to Skytop Station


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Mission to Skytop Station

 * Nominated by:  CC7567  (talk) 18:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another TCW story arc lays siege to the FAN page! Technically the finale of CloneProject Droid Retrieval, but had to work backward without current possession of Wild Space.

(5 Inqs/2 Users/7 Total/INQCON 5)
Support > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 19:49, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Nice article, although a bit too play-by-play. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) Great Work again CC7567! Xd1358 14:38, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  00:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 13:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4)  Graestan ( Talk ) 19:15, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Outstanding! Obilivion  Too many lab rats&hellip; 00:21, September 4 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) After a copyedit, we are fine. &mdash;  Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 23:08, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 18:24, October 4, 2009 (UTC)

Object > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 18:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Since I was the one who worked on Denal, here's an objection related to him. How do we know that he is a sergeant? Nothing in the episode establishes that, and the episode guide calls him just Trooper Denal. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) *Oops. I just checked the sources, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe it was an established fact that he held any rank by the time of the episode.  CC7567  (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Small thing for ya:
 * 3) * "The mission featured the series' introduction of the Confederate listening post Skytop Station, previously introduced in The Clone Wars web comic Prelude." I'm assuming you're saying that it was introduced in the TV series, although this is a touch confusing. You state that it was introduced in the series, and then say that it had already been introduced. I get it, but it is a little bit confusing. If you change this around somehow, that'd be great. Good work, though.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 13:39, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) **Addressed, and thanks for the review.  CC7567  (talk) 20:40, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Comments