Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer.


 * /History
 * /2005 History
 * /Queue
 * Community vote on the renomination of previous FAs

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must...


 * 1) ...be well written and detailed
 * 2) ...be unbiased, non-point of view
 * 3) ...be sourced with all available sources and appearances
 * 4) ...follow the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide
 * 5) ...not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 * 6) ...not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
 * 7) ...have a succint proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
 * 8) ...have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
 * 9) ...have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Anakin Skywalker

 * 1) Impassioned Jedi 04:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Anakin Thomas 16:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Cariel 05:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Shon Kon Ray 17:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Ugluk 00:57, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Jaina Solo 21:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Jedi Anakin Solo 23:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) LandoSystem1138 17:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] 15:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * ?I count four redlinks in the article. They're nothing too important, but they should probably be cleared up first . --LandoSystem1138 17:38, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Come on people. This was nominated just a month or so ago and little has changed since then. The major objection then was that there is little to no information included from the Jedi Quest novel series, Outbound Flight, and a variety of other EU sources. - Breathesgelatin
 * Also, a bunch of unsourced images. -LtNOWIS 20:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * For the same reasons as above, I object. Adamwankenobi 23:01, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Per Breathesgelatin and LtNOWIS. &mdash;Mir  len  00:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree with Adamwankenobi and Breathesgelatin, too many unsourced images and needs more on EU stuff. I object. Roron Corobb 13:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I also agree with Adamwankenobi and Breathesgelatin. Taktwo 22:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I dont know what you are talking about there are no unsourced images and only two redlinks. PLEASE SPECIFY! Ugluk 23:48, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It needs more on the Jedi Quest series, EU comics, Outbound Flight, and other EU stuff. Roron Corobb 01:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * I think its sad that the article for Star Wars' central character still isn't a featured article. We all need to band together to make it worthy. Impassioned Jedi 20:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Lots of great text and pics, worthy of the title Anakin Thomas 16:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree with Impassed Jedi, the article for Star Wars' central character should be featured. Jedi Anakin Solo 23:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Should we nominate it for the improvement drive and try to rush it to "featured article" worthiness? Jwebb13 14:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't think that's necessary. I think the article is very good. It would seem new info was added today as well. I think what would really help is if someone who's read Outbound Flight, add some info about Anakin's involvement during those events. I would add details, but unfortunately I haven't read it. - Impassioned Jedi 04:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It's more than just Outbound Flight, though. It's missing information on almost every EU source in which Anakin appears. In my opinion, this has a long, long way to go to FA. Putting it up for Improvement Drive might get it there... I don't know. - Breathesgelatin 04:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Almost all the images are unsourced. Just because you know that it's from Revenge of the Sith or The Phantom Menace doesn't mean everyone does. That should be specified in every image. Only a few of the EU pics are sourced with a few comic panels and Clone Wars scenes telling where they are from. The rest aren't. There's no need to specify when almost all the photos don't say where they are from. Cull Tremayne 05:03, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, for all those people who wanted sourcing for the images, I did my best to add some info on that in all the images that I was knowledegable of. I started with the main bio image and worked my way down. Make revisions if you feel fit, but I hope this pleases everyone. If this settles the sourcing debate, please cross your name off the objection list. That would leave just adding some more EU material. - Impassioned Jedi 01:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Lightsaber
Objections
 * 1) --Roron Corobb 11:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Brisky 07:44 4 June 2006
 * 3) SkywalkerPL 11:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Darth Kevinmhk 04:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Cutch 19:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) LandoSystem1138 05:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Nighthawk leader 07:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Anakin Thomas 16:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Superior 22:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Red Head Rider 7:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 11)  Son of Nils Talk[[Image:Sabre_hilt.jpg|50px]] 15:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Nom Callide 22:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) --Ugluk 02:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] 15:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Impassioned Jedi 05:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * no way, this article needs so much word, its being changed all the time, facts aren't certain on it and its just...not FA material which is a shame since it is so vital..Jedi Dude
 * There is something funny going on with the image distribution throughout this article. - Breathesgelatin 14:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Definitely needs some reworking of the whole image thing, but also I'd like to see a better intro, and something nicer in the Appearances, section. "Almost all works of the Star Wars saga"? Then I'd really like to know where no lightsaber's appeared. --UVnet 08:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * FIXED - This phrase has been deleted and a list of appearances has been added.  Son of Nils Talk 19:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Not only is it poor quality but everyone knows what a lightsaber is. --Dumac 00:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That has no relevance to whether or not it deserves to be featured. Most everyone knows who Yoda and Padme are, and they are both featured articles. - Breathesgelatin 03:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * "Plus many more colors." Come on. I think this is a good article that should be featured someday, but it still needs considerable cleanup. CaptainPellaeon1138 19:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * FIXED - This sentence has been deleted, and the color section has been refined to exclude any ambiguity.  Son of Nils Talk 19:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think this would be a very good choice, since it's always changing and such  Orange_lightsaber  Villip 21:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * When this article becomes stable, and of higher quality, I will support. As it is a highly documented topic, it still needs a lot of work. Adamwankenobi 23:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Very important topic. If it hasn't been one already, it should be one imediatly
 * Great, good article, and very, very important. SkywalkerPL 11:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Contrary to what some of us who can't spell say... I think this is a great article. Cutch 19:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Corrections and mods to style and content have been made. Images are more uniform and less "clustered" now. -  Son of Nils Talk[[Image:Sabre_hilt.jpg|50px]] 15:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a lot more cleaner now than when it was nominated, and if people are complaining about it changing all the time, just revert them back. LandoSystem1138 21:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Outbound Flight

 * 1) Inbl 12:21, 21 July 2006
 * 2) worthy of recognition Ugluk 00:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Objections (UTC) Comments
 * It could stand to be more in-depth.--LandoSystem1138 19:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Object, per above. Adamwankenobi 16:46, 22 August 2006
 * Per above. - Breathesgelatin 20:37, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Expand. Atarumaster88 04:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * per above&lt;font color=&quot;black&quot;&gt;Sith&lt;/font&gt; [[user talk:Emperor of the Milky Way|&lt;font color=&quot;red 00:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Qui-Gon Jinn
Objections
 * 1) A major character, whose article hasn't been featured yet. It's well-written, perfectly fits into the Wookieepedia guidelines, has useful BtS section, factually accurate, contains everything that should be known about him, and has neutral point of view. - TopAce 11:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Nom Callide 22:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Ugluk 01:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) LandoSystem1138 17:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] 15:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Taktwo 22:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I think a quote from the movies (ie, from TPM) would be probably better as lead in. The "Blockade of Naboo" section is also a little image heavy. Apart from that, the article seems fine. QuentinGeorge 11:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * In fact, I suggest it could have many more quotes period. I'm sure there must be a relevant quote for most of the page sections there. --Eyrezer 23:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * An importent chracter, a good amount of images, but a lack of quotes brings the article down Jedi Dude 17:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Per above, but I think the bullet text in the Behind the Scenes section is rather unprofessional. Otherwise, the article is good to go. &mdash;Mir  len  01:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments


 * I just recently put some new quotes in it. Still looking for one about Jenna Zan Arbor and Forbidden love though, and I may change the quote for Xanatos, Taktwo 22:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The Haunted Village

 * 1) This is our best TV episode article so far. It seems comprehensive and as best as an article on a TV episode can be. Adamwankenobi 20:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) I like ewoks Ugluk 02:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Cutch 03:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * The synopsis is huge! Crikey! That is not the objection, but rather, that being the case I think it needs a number of pictures added to that section. --Eyrezer 01:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I plan to add more images to it soon. Adamwankenobi 01:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * once thats done i think it'l be worth nominating for. Jedi Dude 17:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with Jedi Dude Roron Corobb 19:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I counted 4 redlinks and many new things that we could try to expand on  Orange_lightsaber  Villip 21:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Jabba the Hutt
style="color:orange;">Roron Corobb ]]  12:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) I beleive it's a very popular article. I loved reading it and adding stuff of my own. Though it does have a few red links, but I will more than willingly clear them up. Plus it's a huge artical and tons of people add on to it almost every day. --Jabbathehuttgartogg
 * 2) ok i am replacing my vote again on the grounds that i assume it wont be changed too much anymore Ugluk 23:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Very near to a featured article though images do need to be cleared up. MyNz 00:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) I fixed a ton of the stylistic, grammar, spelling, etc. issues. I think it's worthy of a nomination now. Plus, there's stuff from the Han Solo Trilogy in there now. Cutch 04:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) The "Beauty and the Beast" section still reads a little roughly, but the article's great; it's very informative and entirely worthy of nomination. Hell, it even made me like Jabba more.  Jwebb13 15:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) [[User:Roron Corobb|<span

Objections --- Ummmmmm ..... It's Jabbathehuttgartogg. Thank you very much. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg   22:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) I still think it needs alot of work before its FA material, maybe with less redlinks, plus theres still alot better FA worthy articles. Jedi Dude 16:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Agreed. Needs to be rearranged, fixed up a littlebit, expanded and checked over and over for proper grammar. -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 05:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) I agree i'll go through and fix up the grammar and spelling, i have a pretty good eye for that (please disregard lower case "I"s throughout response ;)) Ugluk 03:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC) ***Update*** I went through and fixed all the spelling or grammar errors i could find. Ugluk 04:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Needs more info on the Jabba the Hutt: The Art of the Deal comics 21:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) What more info.? I put everything from the book onto the page into my own words.It's covered.  --Jabbathehuttgartogg 21:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC) [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]]
 * 6) Info is good, images are good, grammar, syntax, etc. need serious work from someone who knows what it is supposed to say. I would do it, but I think something would get lost in translation. Almost worthy of a cleanup tag. Atarumaster88 02:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) I take it back. While I have fixed the grammar issues, there is almost NOTHING in there from the Han Solo trilogy. Cutch 04:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Looks good overall, but it needs a longer intro. You also might consider cutting some of the fair use images. Adamwankenobi 23:48, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) i am also revoking my vote, i went through and fixed all the grammar and spelling twice but some doofus (Jabbathehuttgortag or cutch) either goes back and reverts it or adds more with terrible grammar/spelling. before this is FA material somebody needs to learn the english language. Ugluk 22:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

-- Jabbathehuttgartogg   23:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC) Comments
 * On second thought .... Yo, that was harsh man. If I'm such a "Dufis" Howcome I know so much about jabba ..... Hmmmmm? It's Jabbathehuttgartogg pally and I'm ussally a nice guy. Cutch is nice too, we just get so caught up in the work, we forget grammer. I can belive a lot of users dissagree with you, if you knew who i was and what i (Tried) to do for Jack Nebulax ; created a very usfull template ; Protected jabba (Sort of) from Vandels ; Used my time and energy to make a wonderfull userpage ; Made freinds ; accually found someone who would work on Jabba and so on. That remark was unfair at best dude, and that's in it's technical term...
 * Oh come on leave it the pair of you, this is not the place go to each others users page, don't be so rude Uklug some people aren't as good typers or have diffuculties with grammer and to be honest you havn't been here long enough to start throwing comments like that around, and Jabba you shoudln't bother responding and presume to speak for other users at the same time, end of this discussion take it further on your user pages as you have already made this look unprofiessional with your argument Jedi Dude 23:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll be a peace-maker. I'm not going to argue. This is rediculous. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 23:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, there's now only 3 redlinks, and one is in BtS. -LtNOWIS 23:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * If your going to support it Ugluk, then you should strike out your pervious objection, this can be done by typing stike and then slash/strike at the beginning of your comment, objection, etc. I already did it for you. Roron Corobb 23:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Information wise. It's fine. Though I suggest someone check it for grammar. And also, please, get rid of some of the images. More images is not good. I know some people's monitors aren't large enough so that it actually looks the way you see it and the images will look clustered. I could name a couple that are unneccesary...-- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 15:47, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know who striked out what said, im still not convinced this can reach FA status yet Jedi Dude 23:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't take it I did, because I didn't strike your name. Though it was likely because there are almost no red links anymore. Though I don't know how much more WE can add. All I know who's even contributing to the article are VERY FEW people (mabey 2 or 3 users}. everyone else is either correcting it or deleting stuff. For 2 or 3 people working on it daily and accually contributing, for how far it's come since I started on it, it's worthy of the title and I stand to that my freinds. --Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 23:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

R2-D2

 * 1) Ugluk 02:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Shon Kon Ray 21:43, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Objections It shouldnt have a template, it covers everything, that is new from after i nominated it i believe. Ugluk 22:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Good article but I know R2-D2 is in almost all of the Marvel Star Wars comics and there are none listed in the Appearances section but once you add those then i will support it. Roron Corobb 23:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) It shouldn't FAed if has an expansion template. LandoSystem1138 03:43, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Needs expansion in several areas. Adamwankenobi 20:47, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Needs expansion, particularly in the Post-Galactic Civil War era. I mean, one paragraph for NJO, Dark Nest, and Legacy? Also, needs more expansion of the Droids TV series. Rather than a listing of various owners, the actual adventures should be described. - Breathesgelatin 21:10, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Instead of just saying it needs work why not do it?

Comments

everything about this little guy and his article are worthy of being recognized as an FA. Ugluk 02:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Millennium Falcon
Objections
 * 1) LandoSystem1138 03:49, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Roron Corobb 22:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Ugluk 22:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) somebody needs to go through and search for grammar/spelling errors for me to vote. Ugluk 22:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) I took care of most of the spelling/grammar, but there is very little mention of it after Return of the Jedi. Unacceptable. Atarumaster88 03:26, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) I agree with Atarumaster88. Adamwankenobi 20:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Definitely needs post-ROTJ expansion, for example the continued dispute and changing of hands of the Falcon between Lando and Han in the Jedi Academy trilogy. - Breathesgelatin 21:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Pretty impressive, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't ever think a ship has ever been featured. LandoSystem1138 03:49, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Imperial I star destroyer was featured in january. Ugluk 17:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Wedge Antilles

 * 1) I am amazed that this has never been featured before. Atarumaster88 02:36, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) So am I Ugluk 22:24, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * I think that this could stand to be fleshed out some more. Most everything I can think of is mentioned in some level of detail, but could use some more elaboration. Specifically, and off the top of my head, pretty much everything from the X-Wing comics could be fleshed out, and and Wedge's relationship with Iella could be much better described. They flirted/dated for a while, both before and after Qwi Xux... - Breathesgelatin 16:39, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Breathesgelatin, by this time tomorrow, that should all be updated. Atarumaster88 04:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, how about now? I don't have the comics, but I think the X-wing series and the romances are much better explained. Atarumaster88 03:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The romance issue is definitely better now. Thanks Atarumaster 88, it looks good. I do have the X-Wing comics (at least those that have been released in the first omnibus). I'll try to update the page with at least that much info this weekend, and then Wedge will get me my vote. - Breathesgelatin 20:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Why, you are most welcome. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments

Rogue Squadron

 * 1) Your Benevolent Overlord 02:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Cutch 02:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. Atarumaster88 04:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * I think the NJO section needs to be expanded before this article is ready. Also a couple more pics in the "Later action" would be good. I added one from the cover of SoA. I also think quotes for each section would be good, and shouldn't be too hard to find. Would anyone object to putting the roster in columns? --Eyrezer 06:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * If NJO section has been expanded then I would vote my support at once. Darth Kevinmhk 10:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The Yuuzhan Vong War section needs more detail and elaboration. Perhaps one should expand on the battles and how the characters affected the war and the squadron itself.  Also, this a minor thing, but the image in the Other pilots section needs a caption. &mdash;Mir  len  20:25, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * i am not too knowledgeable about the NJO series or the Yuuzhan vong war so if you think it needs to be added you should probably just add it. ill fix the caption also. Ugluk 23:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree that the Yuuzhan vong war section must be expanded, but the squadrons actions during the Thrawn crisis aren't even mentioned. Wswordsmen 1:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Ebenn Q3 Baobab

 * 1) Nominated by Cutch 01:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 02:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC).
 * 3) Good work Cutch! Adamwankenobi 23:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Darth Kevinmhk 09:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Cull Tremayne 06:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) QuentinGeorge 06:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) I say, yes. For one man working on it it sure looks and sounds great. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 10:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Good article.  Jaina Solo  Goddess Stuff [[Image:Jbig3.JPG |20px]] 22:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Support. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * OK, it really could use a longer intro summary for the main page. Also, I have a question, how does one utilize a nascent talent for poetry to write five volumes of prose? If it's sourced, that's fine, but I am curious.Could also benefit from a personality section, if enough info is available. Atarumaster88 02:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, my bad. Suprised no one else had caught that&mdash;fixed now. Cutch 02:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Second the longer intro. Also, the article is well written and has all the information I could care to know, but it's just too short for me. Cull Tremayne 03:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Give it a longer intro, and a source for that birthdate, and I'll support. QuentinGeorge 10:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * What can I say? This article is my baby. I authored the whole thing, and have since made all entries exclusive to the Galactic Phrase Book and Travel Guide my forte around here. Trust me, the article is thorough; everything ever written about good ol' EQ3 is in here. Briefer than most featured articles? Yes. But I feel it's worthy nonetheless. Cutch 01:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I supported it, but if it fails here, perhaps because it is seen as too short, it should be made a Wookieepedia:Good article. --Eyrezer 02:28, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * When I get home later I'll get a better screenshot of him from Star Wars Galaxies. --Azizlight 03:33, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Done, see article for new image. --Azizlight 15:19, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * If Galactic Republic Chancery election, 32 BBY is long enought to be a featured article, this is definitely good enough. Ah variety of characters, that's what makes Star Wars great. Oh, but the intro still needs to be lengthened a bit. Cull Tremayne 03:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The introduction has been lengthened, and the birthdate (which I could not find in the GPB&TG&mdash;I believe someone else here had told that erroneous date) has been removed. Please support the article if you feel it necessary. Thanks,Cutch 02:11, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Over all it looks good to me, but I believe it needs a personality section. Most of our FAs about characters have them. No objection, but no vote yet either. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hard to make one for this character - he appeared for 2 seconds in TPM, and all the other info comes from his own autobiography, where he's hardly likely to write about any negative traits he may possess. QuentinGeorge 06:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Galactic Civil War

 * 1) Darth Red Head 23:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Ugluk 23:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * 1) Needs more like sources, like the template says, and coverage of pre-Death Star Battles. LandoSystem1138 21:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Carnor Jax

 * 1) Cull Tremayne 03:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Ugluk 23:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Adamwankenobi 23:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Roron Corobb [[Image:Black Sun.jpg|20px]] 10:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) EAGLES610 02:49, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) QuentinGeorge 11:01, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Objections

Comments
 * The first piece of EU art I saw was the cover of Crimson Empire 6, and I remember thinking, "That is the coolest thing I have ever seen". Who doesn't want to see that wicked picture on the front page? Also all the new info from the Dynasties article makes him even more interesting. Cull Tremayne 03:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Aayla Secura

 * 1) Darth Hideous 03:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * 1) Redlinks, and a personality and/or abilities/traits section would be nice. LandoSystem1138 21:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) I counted only 3 redlinks; and, yes, a section of personality traits and her abilities would be nice. ~ Darth Hideous 16:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

IG-88A
style="color:orange;">Roron Corobb ]]   11:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) [[User:Roron Corobb|<span

Objections

Comments It was redondent information at the beginning of the artical (it says what company created it twice). Fix that and you have my vote. Darth Red Head 15:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed that. Roron Corobb 23:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)