Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
 * 15) &hellip;if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place your signature in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

CZ-332

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:20, November 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  05:48, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:43, November 23, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * "The droid worked with the shop's owner, a Human named Nols, in selling a wide range of first and second-hand equipment, with the pair being able to find items that were requested, but which they didn't have for sale, elsewhere on the Wheel." Could you split this sentence? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  01:00, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Split. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:32, November 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme
 * 5) *Would you mind rewording the third sentence a bit? Reads a bit awkward to me. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:31, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Attack on Fury Station

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  17:13, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Dawn of the Jedi enters the Force War!

(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:45, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) They followed proper military tactics. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 00:53, November 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:08, November 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  21:28, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * Could you split the first sentence it's a bit long.
 * 3) * You don't mention the settled worlds anywhere in the body as the opposing force. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:48, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **Both done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:25, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Preem
 * 6) * Can we get a bit of context on the settled worlds?
 * 7) **Done.
 * 8) * Can you reword the last sentence a bit? When you say "From there" do you mean they captured the two gas giants from that station, or they moved on to capture the gas giants after capturing the station? Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:40, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  21:27, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

One-Eye

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 04:17, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: First in a string of Dark Forces II multiplayer characters. Ambig due to multiplayer only appearances.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:10, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:14, November 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  20:39, December 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * I think we could probably add a nickname tag? Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:18, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **While it does seem obvious, I'm still not entirely sure if it should be. Clearly the name derives from his Cyber-Eye. But, for all we know, he was born as such, given a cruel name, and later got a cyber-eye. Sure that's completely speculative, but not anymore than assuming "One-Eye" is a nickname as opposed to a legal name (Granted, I have no idea how "legal" names work in SW).  I kind of avoided such for all of the multiplayer characters, because honestly who knows.
 * 4) ***I guess if it's the official name the game gives him then you right I am making assumptions. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:08, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) * Is there not any kind of time period the multiplayer is associated with? I would just put it as the same time period as the main game. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:18, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **Mmm, makes sense I suppose. Done. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:39, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) *** You still need to add the time period to the body somewhere and the infobox. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:08, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) ****Whoops! How about that? The dates are the dates of the two games. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:13, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) ***** To be honest I'm not sure you need the precise dates, just saying during the reign of the New Republic is enough. The dates currently make it sound like he only was active in those five years but we don't know that. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:03, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) ******How's that then? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:04, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) Preem
 * 12) * Can you change the end of the first sentence a bit? Something like "during the time of the New Republic"?
 * 13) **How does it sound now?
 * 14) * At the end of the Bts, can you change the word disputed to not known or some variation? I wouldn't really call his status disputed, more unknown.
 * 15) **True, so I guess I was thinking like 'Some say he's Canon' some say 'He's not Canon', so I dunno. Unknown then. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 17:50, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 16) *Nice work. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:48, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 17) Exiled Jedi
 * 18) * You need to source the eras field in the infobox.
 * 19) **Ok
 * 20) * You need to include all the information from the infobox in the main article. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  01:19, November 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 21) **Whoops, consider it done! --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 04:31, December 1, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Borra Chambo

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:18, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: One of probably several blog inspired noms.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:44, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 01:43, November 26, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I would give a timeframe for the Zabrak surgeon right off the bat, not in the second sentence he is mentioned.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:45, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Swapped. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:06, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Preem
 * 4) *Can we get a little more context on the Republic Mobile Surgical Unit? A mention that it's a base would work. Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:23, November 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Dobi Deene

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:02, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another musical nom

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:45, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) So is that the SW version of Michael Jackson?  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 01:46, November 26, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) You switch between referring to Dobi as they, and her. Keep it consistent, probably by just using they.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:47, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Damn thought I changed all of references to gender neutral, must of missed one. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:05, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * SE
 * 1) *Can you find a way to add some context on sound slugs? Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:30, November 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Yyeger sugar

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:54, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A food redlink from one of my favourite books? Too good an opportunity to miss.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 01:48, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:04, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * SE
 * 1) *Any quotes available?
 * 2) *Can you reword the last sentence a bit? As it is, it reads a bit odd to me. Thanks, Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:36, November 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Please check the spelling in the book, as we actually have two articles for this: Yyeger sugar, and Yyegar sugar. 501st  dogma ( talk )
 * 2) *It's spelt yyeger in the book same as my nom'd article. Should I make the other page into a redirect? Or should it just be deleted. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:42, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **A redirect would be appropriate. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:15, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:02, November 26, 2013 (UTC)

Ribba

 * Nominated by: Demos Traxen (talk) 05:36, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Hutt, Hutt, Hutt.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) *Could we get articles for the employee and the bar that he dies in please? Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:53, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **I'm absolutely willing to make the employee article, I don't want to clutter the wiki; the bar is mentioned in a single sentence without a name. Should I still make that one as well?
 * 4) ***Yup, although it may seem obscure there's no need to worry about cluttering the wiki, we have plenty of room! :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:05, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) * With articles this short you can add __ NOTOC __ (without the spaces around NOTOC) above the infobox and it will remove the contents sections. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:53, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **Done. Thanks for the tip.
 * 7) * You link to a redirect of Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game in the behind the scenes, could you change it? Also a tip, if you go to the my preferences page and go to gadgets, you can set your account to highlight redirects in yellow. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:53, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **Done, thanks for catching that.
 * 9) *Could you mention in the bts the date that the sourcebooks were published, and mention the New Essential Guide. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:53, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) **Done as well.--Demos Traxen (talk) 18:37, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Ah, I think you might of got sources and references mixed up. I'm assuming Ribba isn't actually mentioned in the New Essential guide and you've added it as a source for their gender. On the Wiki the Sources list contains all non-story mentions of the subject of the article, these include books like the New Essential guides or the Essential Atlas. If you use information from a book but the subject of the article doesn't appear in that book then it should only be included in the references not the sources. Don't worry it's a very easy mistake to make, all you need to do is remove the sources section of the article and the mention in the bts. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:05, November 26, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Capture of Obri

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:30, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Dawn of the Jedi

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) *Could you mentioned the settled worlds in the body. This applies to the nom below as well. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:55, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  21:32, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Capture of Mawr

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:30, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Dawn of the Jedi

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:56, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:13, November 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  06:10, November 30, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Wouldn't a concurrent field in the infobox be appropriate? You mention that the attack on Obri happens around the same time.
 * 3) **Nope. The wording just refers to the Giants together, but doesn't specifically say that they're concurrent&mdash;only that Fury Station was before them and Tython afterwards.
 * 4) * The Settled worlds need to be linked to in the body. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:08, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  21:31, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

First battle of Tython

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:30, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Dawn of the Jedi. It's labeled First because the solicitations for the rest of Force War indicate that the Rakata will invade again. (spoilers :P)

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:04, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:57, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  06:15, November 30, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Ref for the attack on Orbit in the infobox?
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Skal'nas should be in the leaders section of the infobox for the Rakata. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:11, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Nope. No evidence that Skal'nas participated, it's just revealed why he's attacking the system. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  21:34, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Fall of Ska Gora

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:30, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Dawn of the Jedi

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:03, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:58, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * "The battle had been predicted many years in advance.." Are we talking about the attack on Shikaakwa, or Ska Gora? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:14, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  21:34, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Swiff

 * Nominated by: Trip391 (talk) 21:37, November 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For the Novels

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *The landing vidcam must be mentioned in body.
 * 3) *Could you add references to the article? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:48, December 1, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Veamon

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:33, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More Dark Forces II mp stuff.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments