Forum:SH Archive/Barn-burner number 3, perhaps?

Well, this is actually the month of the barn-burner if we go by the same timespan as we did for the last two. I guess that makes this a little late, but I'm pretty sure December is just as good a month as November. :P Anyway, we should probably come up with a topic soon. Any ideas? MasterFred (Whatever) 20:16, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * That time already, eh? I think December would be better so we have time to plan it out. As for topics, I'm always partial to Battle of Naboo-stuff. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 21:42, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Like I've suggested before: Everything related to Coruscant. That's a really big topic with many different types of articles that however are related to each other. To be honest, reviewing similar (i.e. Wookiees and weapons) articles multiple times is boring, but with a large topic like my suggestion it could be interesting. :P 1358  (Talk)  21:57, November 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I was coming here to say that someone suggested Coruscant, which I thought was a great idea. Looks like that person was Xd! --Eyrezer 09:43, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Per Riffsyphon1024, I was wondering if doing a push for Star Wars Galaxies related content might be worthwhile, since we're losing that resource next month. jSarek 10:45, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that doing a Galaxies barn burner would be the best idea, but a Coruscant one sounds pretty good as well.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:27, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm leaning toward Coruscant, but we do need to do something about SWG. But, since we're gonna lose that source during the month of the barn burner, I don't know if it's a good choice for this effort. Maybe that should be left for personal projects. I say we go with Ecks. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 12:48, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Personally, I don't think that a Galaxies-themed barn-burner would be a good idea. The majority of Wookieepedia editors are not Galaxies players and furthermore, Galaxies shuts is scheduled to shut down on December 15, which would sever our access to Galaxies material half-way through the proposed barn-burner period. While we could rely on third-party websites like SWG Wiki for Galaxies-related information, such websites are not always reliable and this could be problematic. The Coruscant idea is more feasible. --Jinzler 12:59, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hooray! Another Barn-burner! Well, I've been thinking about Barn-burner 3 for a while now, and my first thought would be a TOR burner, since there are so many sources we could use and it's coming out soon. But, I really don't know if that would work. In the past, we've done item burners rather than source burners. For example, rather than doing a RotS burner, since that has many Wookiees in it, we did a Wookiee burner in general. On that note, I, too, don't think that a Galaxies burner would work. Not everyone has the sources needed and many people don't even like SWG. I like the idea of Coruscant since it appears in many sources and I think pretty much everyone has at least one source that Coruscant appears in. So, unless someone else comes up with a better idea, my vote is for Coruscant for now. One question remains for me, however. Would we do a barn-burner about anything that has anything to do with Coruscant? For example: The Jedi, the buildings, the organizations, the citizens, the droids, etc. And where would the line be drawn? Would we do the Yuuzhan Vong, for example, since they conquered Coruscant? Thoughts on all of this?-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 15:11, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think one can use common sense here. Stuff like buildings, battles, organizations and individuals strongly affiliated to Coruscant in some way are obviously within the scope. Yuuzhan Vong probably wouldn't be within the scope, considering they didn't really have any major affiliation with Coruscant other than their conquering... but the battles of Coruscant during the YVW would count. 1358  (Talk)  15:24, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's what I figured. Thanks for clarifying, Xd. I'm ready for the barn-burner, then. :D -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 15:26, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm going to be obviously biased and support the Galaxies barn burner idea.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 21:33, November 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * No reason not to encourage Chack Jadson to finish Yuuzhan Vong! ;) --Eyrezer 09:51, November 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * A TOR burner would be a bad idea at this point in time, because every TOR article will need drastic updates/rewrites when the game is released. I support the SWG idea. It's a terrible game and a chore to play through for information, but it's gone soon. This is the last chance we are going to get. Besides, the trial is only a few gigs large, and there's plenty of subjects left to cover just from the tutorial portion of the game. --Imperialles 03:39, November 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * If everyone is for it, I wouldn't mind doing a SWG burner. It would also be great for both WP:SWG and WP:VG, too. :D Some people might need to ask for info from people that have Galaxies, however. If others will be willing to share info, I'd be willing to pitch in and bring up some of these boring articles. :P -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 14:17, November 9, 2011 (UTC)