Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Biscuit Baron


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Biscuit Baron

 * Nomination by: 20:00, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Dinner and a movie!

(5 Inqs/0 users/5 total)
Support
 * 1) —Tommy9281 [[Image:Dark Side Master TotG.jpg|17px]] ( Peace is a lie ) 22:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Trendsetting? Nah. Cull Tremayne 07:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer 03:13, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) BB Me ASAP!  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 23:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:29, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Eyrezer:
 * 2) * Can you reword this: "the building which housed the business possessed a cylinder-type shape to its form with a large dome atop." The building description seems a little awkward.
 * 3) **Yeah, I figured it would. Reworded to "On Sullust, the Biscuit Baron building was cylindrical in shape and possessed a large large dome atop..." and combined the sentence immediately following.
 * 4) * In thhe Bantha Biscuit paragraph, it sounds like the creature eats the actual planet. Is this the case or is it more a case of eating all vegetation on the planet? Also the sentence about it changing is a bit awkward. --Eyrezer 17:43, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) **I'm not sure if it's figurative, but page 5 of the comic (conveniently seen here) shows a planet essentially disintegrating. Also, changed slightly; hopefully it reads better.
 * 6) ***It still needs to be sourced :p
 * 7) **Thanks for the read :D 17:58, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) "The restaurant's repute among the galaxy was so large that, in communiqués to Imperial officials such as Darth Vader, a mention of Biscuit Baron was made in order to easily prove a point, and was recognizable as such.[7]" This could be clarified a little, if possible. I'm not really sure what it means. An example of it would be good too, either here or in the history section. Other than that, excellent. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:20, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) *Well... I tried to work something out. Nothing seemed to fit nicely, so I asked the IRC guys; they told me the one-off mention really doesn't warrant inclusion, and, since I can't figure out a clean way to get it in, I'm inclined to agree. I've removed it. 07:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Good article nominations/Biscuit Baron. 20:00, 29 November 2008 (UTC)