Wookieepedia:Inq/Meeting Twenty

Wookieepedia &gt; Inquisitorius &gt; 

"Most intransigent of them all were the officers of the Inquisitorius. Charged with rooting out all that smacked of the old ways during the Great Purge, they had long since outlived any usefulness&hellip;they were unaware of their unpopularity."

- Mr. Voren Na'al

There will be an Inq meeting on Sunday, 7th September at midnight UTC.

Articles which are lacking in some way

 * Winter Celchu&mdash;unsourced infobox and unsourced info in "Early life." Presentation issues with lots of massive images. No mention of her working with Dendo frequently around the time of Endor, and no mention of Dendo in the Tatooine section. Some issues with "The Tatooine affair" - parts of it read as a summary of the comic itself, not of Winter's role in it. "Masquerade" part could be expanded and there is apparently some issues with clarity. "Dark Empire" info needs to be expanded majorly - the text doesn't even mention the Dark Jedi attack pictured. "Destiny's Way" info needs an expansion, and possibly "The Unifying Force" too.
 * Sabé&mdash;bunch of appearances not referenced, and I'm fairly sure at least one contains new info.
 * Gaeriel Captison&mdash;needs expansion, and may lack info from Truce at Bakura Sourcebook.
 * Atha Prime&mdash;still no P&T. The whole reason it wasn't probed was because it was expected to be fixed in a matter of days, but obviously that hasn't happened.
 * Ephant Mon&mdash;this was my first FA, and while there isn't anything horribly wrong with it, the level of detail and quality of writing leaves something to be desired. I plan to redo it in the coming months, and it would be better if I could go through the usual review process.

Other items of discussion

 * Not reading the full article&mdash;during a recent Inq discussion about something different, I mentioned that I had once neglected to read a Legacy section due to spoilers but supported the article, and this wasn't met with much enthusiasm by some Inqs. At the time I voted I didn't give it much thought, but we should decide if that sort of thing is kosher. Note: this isn't about dividing up a long article between Inqs or anything of the sort. This would only be three paragraphs or so maximum.
 * Our old FAs&mdash;encouraging 'FA machines' to go back and fix up their old FAs, sourcing infoboxes and succession boxes and the like. Most Inqs and prolific FA writers who've been around a while will have a couple of older FAs that, while they might qualify for probation, have a few minor issues that could easily be taken care of.
 * Inactive Inqs&mdash;I propose that emails be sent to inactive Inqs (from carefully selected people in the Inq) asking them about their continued involvement and if it's a priority to them, and if they want to keep their posts. This isn't about kicking anyone out, merely talking to people.

Will claim to intend on attending

 * 1) Barring unforeseen circumstances. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 00:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)