Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Interstellar Parcel Service

 * Nominated by: Fe Nite (talk) 17:40, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Everybody has to start somewhere.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Burned at the stake
 * 2) *Nice to see you here, Fe Nite. First off, "scenes" in "Behind the scenes" is not capitalized. Same goes for "Notes and references".
 * 3) **Ah man! I think I have done the same thing on all the pages I have created. I fixed it on IPS and I will look into it on the other pages. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Please provide context on what "Mos Eisley" and "Tatooine" are. For Tatooine, include the galactic region (and maybe the sector if you feel like it) that it's located in and remember to source it.
 * 5) **Not 100% sure what you meant but I think I got it. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Almost. For the Essential Atlas ref, place it straightaway after the word Outer Rim. The way it is now makes it seem like the Essential Atlas is also a source for all the information in that paragraph. I would suggest the following scheme: .   Stake black   msg 17:33, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Done.
 * 8) * There's no need to use the same ref twice in a row. It's automatically implied that the ref sources everything that precedes it.
 * 9) ** Someone else fixed it for me but I think I just messed it up again. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) * Appearances needs a 1st.
 * 11) **Done. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) * "Over-sized" package redistribution center? Sounds like POV.
 * 13) **No. Best Birthday Ever specifically calls it the over-sized package redistribution center. You could even make the argument that it needs its own page. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) *For now that'll do.  Stake black   msg 17:50, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) *Bonus round
 * 16) ** Please use Company infobox, add the revelant fields and source them.
 * 17) ***Done.
 * 18) ****I think you forgot to source the fields filled.  Stake black   msg 22:10, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 19) *****Yep. Fe Nite (talk) 22:27, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 20) *****Done.
 * 21) ** Add more context to Best Birthday Ever. What is it? A comic book? A graphic novel? Also, like 501st said, the release date should be there too.  Stake black   msg 17:33, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 22) ***Done. Fe Nite (talk) 22:06, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 23) Nice to see you writing
 * 24) *I think you could mention Bib in the article, and how he goes to pick up the parcel.
 * 25) **Done. Fe Nite (talk) 21:26, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) * A date released would be nice in the BTS, and you could put a note about how it's ambiguously canon.
 * 27) **Read my comment in the comments. Fe Nite (talk) 17:08, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 28) ***I have no idea either, so we'll see what others have to say....  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:10, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 29) ****Done. Fe Nite (talk) 22:06, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 30) * If this article is about the company, I don't think you can have a category for Mos Eisley locations, as that is the category for buildings and such, not companies.
 * 31) **You know, when I rewrote the article I did not even look at the categories. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 32) *Don't freak out because there's so many objections. Everybody has this many on their first nom or two. Good job. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:06, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 33) **Shoot. This nom has more objections than a FA! No I am just kidding. I kinda expected this. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * I thought Best Birthday Ever was non-canon. The nature of the comic sounds non-canon, and also the FA Bidlo Kwerve states that comic to be non-canon, and strangely the comic's article itself is categorized as both ambiguously canon and Infinities. Of course I know the information could be in error, but perhaps something to look into. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 18:39, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * This one is tricky. If you read Tales from Jabba's Palace there is no specific mention of how the rancor got to the palace. It simply says that it was transported there. This would make the Best Birthday Ever/IPS seem ambiguously canon. However, at the end of Best Birthday Ever Bib, Bidlo, and Tessek all take a plunge into the rancor pit. This of course would make Best Birthday Ever noncanon. However, if you really want to make some speculation that they didn't die when they fell down this story would be back to ambig canon. Therefore, I am going to let someone smarter than me make the call. If it is noncanon I'll fix IPS. If it is ambig someone will have to fix Bidlo Kwerve. Fe Nite (talk) 17:08, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * You should talk to others about this. An FA saying something doesn't automatically mean it's the case, but the nature of this comic would make me think it's non-canon. I think I'll ask Leland Chee this. If he doesn't respond, hopefully this site can come to a consensus. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:45, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * While we wait, I don't think we should kick the nom off the page for unanswered objections, as we are waiting for a response. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:06, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * I think I have answered everything now. So are we going to wait to see how the whole noncanon/ambiguous thing turns out? Fe Nite (talk) 21:42, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * If we're waiting for Leland's answer, we may as well sit here forever...  Stake black   msg 21:52, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Or do a consensus. Fe Nite (talk) 01:58, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Marsune and Gallo

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 05:56, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Haven't done many CANs recently.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:13, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Stake black   msg 11:31, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Slow-roasted at the stake
 * 2) * Context on Naboo
 * 3) **I've said its a planet, what other context is needed?
 * 4) ***Is it a Core World, a Mid Rim planet, or what? Don't forget to adequately source it.
 * 5) ****Done then.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:05, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * Perhaps you could explain a little more about the unification of the Gungan tribes (why were they split? how did that achieve peace for Naboo?)
 * 7) **No info is given on why the tribes were split other than that they were fighting each other, so I can't put that in, put does saying that they ended a war help with the other one?
 * 8) * You could probably mention that the game was played (but not necessarily exclusively) in the swamps and forests of Naboo
 * 9) **Done
 * 10) * You can beef up that BtS, for sure. Tell us very briefly what SW:GB is about, and, more importantly state the name of the expansion pack.
 * 11) **What Stake said here. Pipelinking should be avoided in most cases, especially when the pipelinked articles have official names and are of significant relevance to the article at hand, like in this case. Winterz (talk) 23:23, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) ***Damn, I've been doing this in all my other GB noms... Well, I have some work to do.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 07:02, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) ****A lot better. But I'm a little confused, what story are you referring to in the BtS?  Stake black   msg 14:08, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) *****Changed story to missions, that help?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:05, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) *I think that's it, but good job overall.  Stake black   msg 21:40, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Say you, say me
 * 2) * The "Mentioned in databank" should have an additional "only" to clarify that it only appeared there.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) ***Also remember the "first mentioned".
 * 5) *You must get rid of the quote, as it isn't quoted from in-universe material.
 * 6) **It's in the Bts, so it's okay.
 * 7) ***Alrighty, let's just start small to solve this then. The rules are explicit about not allowing (most of the times) OOU quotes, however there are exceptions. Can you tell me how the databank presents itself? Is it ingame? Is it IU?
 * 8) ****The databank is definitely in-universe.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:05, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) *Also, careful with the verb conjugation in the Bts, it still should be past tense. Winterz (talk) 23:23, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) **I thought we were allowed to right Bts's in present tense, could you point me to where this rule is written?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 07:02, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) ***It's logical. The subject was mentioned, it is not being mentioned as the entry is not ongoing work anymore is it, sir? Published work is past. ;) Winterz (talk) 12:24, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) ****Ah, gotcha. Done.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:05, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Not sure if the quote marks in the Bts should be there or not, but the GB databank only writes this with the quotation marks, so I've wound up putting them there.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 05:56, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * That sounds okay and fine. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:13, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Imperial outpost (prison camp)

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:25, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:23, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 13:06, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) *Reckon you could say in the body that Rusk later mentioned the outpost to the Hero?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 06:20, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:48, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Lionel Richie will keep singing
 * 5) * Avoid pipelinking the Surgeons, sir, their name seems pretty significant in that subject.
 * 6) **No, they weren't called the Surgeons at that point. It's a link to the article on a squad that was later known as the Surgeons.
 * 7) * You should clarify that Rusk didn't enlist with false credentials (different wording ofc) in the second reference, considering you make the assessment of the legal minimum to enlist yet you just explain with "Therefore, Sergeant Rusk must have been older than 15", be more clear.
 * 8) **Done.
 * 9) * "They escaped the base with no fatalities," are you implying that there were no fatalities to neither sides? If not, then you should clarify "with no fatalities to their side" or something like that. Winterz (talk) 00:01, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 04:30, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Berrun warden

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:38, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:38, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 21:32, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) *Shouldn't the detention center be in the affiliations?
 * 3) **Not in my opinion.
 * 4) ***I have to second Cade here, CC-8. Locations should rarely be (I believe Universities are one of such exceptions) in the affiliations section. In this case, the prison is operated by GR members so what you propose is utterly unnecessary here, same goes for the other situation. Only when there's a more specified organization operating the place, and even in those cases, the latter must receive an article and that would be the one being inserted in the affilitation, not the location. ;) Winterz (talk) 00:14, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Actually, we have precedent that contradicts that, Winterz.  Stake black   msg 00:18, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *Similar case with the Imperial outpost nom.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 06:28, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **I can understand that for the outpost, but this one really doesn't seem necessary to me. It's mentioned in the BTS, and I really don't see why the fact that the warden is mentioned obliquely by Rusk has to be stated in the biography.
 * 8) *Another one, since some of the squad members are named they could probably be named in this article.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 06:31, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Again, I'm not really sure this one is necessary. Maybe for the detention center itself, but adding their names seems rather superfluous. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:35, February 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Again, I request you to avoid pipelinking relevant articles like the Surgeons. You have commas and emdashes to use freely, after all.
 * 3) **Here, yes. Done.
 * 4) * Note that I've capitalized "(the) warden" for you, as it's solely referring to the individual. Winterz (talk) 00:43, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 04:35, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Actually, undone. Warden isn't a proper title that should be capitalized, as exemplified by the multiple uses of the word in the conversation files. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:07, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Per our discussion in the IRC, I've altered my stance and recapitalized. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:29, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) * In the last sentence of the intro, you should use emdashes, it is..a lot of context for just two little commas.
 * 9) **Reworked the sentences to make them less run-on.
 * 10) * You use the word "warden" many times over, you should at least once, replace it with a synonym. Winterz (talk) 13:01, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:07, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * To avoid extending the conversation in the Objections section, I'll just reply to you here, Stake. That's a whole different case because the prison had no specific organization operating it. In this situation however, you have Sith Empire and Galactic Republic. Winterz (talk) 00:23, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Berrun detention center

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:38, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 06:34, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:27, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Yde system

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 18:04, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:AST

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:28, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 21:36, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *Apparently Desultri's a planet. This should be said in the article.
 * 3) **It's never explicitly called a planet in the source. That would be speculation on our part.
 * 4) ***According to its article it is, and its sourced to the Atlas and a Twitter thing. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:06, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****The article is wrong, I'll have to change that. You can check the source, the only mentioning of Yde is: "AANXI RAANXI LAANXI of Desultori, Yde, chairs four subcommittees...". The Twitter ref doesn't say anything whether it's a planet, a moon, a star, an asteroid or anything else.  Stake black   msg 01:16, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * I think you should add Desultri to the infobox as one of the planet's in the system, even though its not canon.
 * 7) **I disagree on that... If I put it there people will mistake that for canon information. I don't recall any examples of cases like this. It's my understanding that non-canon information should be in the in-universe sections as long as they are appropriately sandwiched between noncanonstart and noncanonend.
 * 8) *Otherwise, it looks good. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:35, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Thanks for the review, dogma!  Stake black   msg 21:49, February 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Template:Nc should be in front of the non-canonical appearance (after '1stm' of course), don't you agree?
 * 3) **Wow, you're right, I missed that one.
 * 4) * You don't require the last sentence of the Bts at all, it's just saying what is already in the article. But I'll let you the decide the fate of this objection and will sratch it regardless. Winterz (talk) 00:57, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Well, I think I'll keep that one :P  Stake black   msg 01:16, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Still, per a recent CT, Atlas' coordinates can't be in the article's body, so you'll have to get rid, at least, of that part. Winterz (talk) 01:20, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Done.  Stake black   msg 13:54, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * Bizarre, but also kind of hilarious. &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:28, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Madonna

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 18:27, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For the lulz of having this randomly generated in the Main Page.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 16:35, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 14:21, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) * Small stuff &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:32, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) **Grammar: " "Sightings by Twang", " appears twice in this article. Proper grammar places punctuation inside the quotation marks.
 * 3) **Style: I could go either way on this one, but there's a couple of words in there which would be linked to other articles but currently do not. Specifically, I note that "gender" and "species" are unlinked when we have articles for those. Not a serious complaint by any means, and I debated even mentioning it at all, but meh.
 * 4) ***Both done. Thanks for the review!  Stake black   msg 15:48, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Winterz
 * 6) * She chronicled the events in a "social gossip column" of what exactly? Specify in the article.
 * 7) **Reworded.
 * 8) * Again, the template should be applied here. Winterz (talk) 01:10, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Nc is only used when the article is canon but appears in a non-canon publication. This one, unlike Yde, is non-canon, so it's already implied the source is a non-canon appearance.  Stake black   msg 14:00, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) ***Yeah you're right, I wasn't sure about this so I asked in the IRC, but didn't get any answer. Winterz (talk) 14:21, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Pig-lizard Flu

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:58, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 17:28, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Blahblahblah &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:39, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Grammar
 * 3) ** Capitalization: The article title and bolded text capitalize this as "Pig-Lizard flu," while the Doc quote indicates it's capitalized as "Pig-lizard Flu." Whichever of these is correct, it should be consistently one or the other.
 * 4) ***Ewha? I could have sworn that it wasn't capitalized when I copied it from the conversation files. This shall be remedied.
 * 5) **** Title and bold both now capitalize as "Pig-Lizard Flu," but the quote doesn't cap the L in Lizard. Same flag as before&mdash;all should be the same, one way or another ;)
 * 6) *****See, this is why you shouldn't edit when you're sick. Ugh. Fixed. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:00, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ** Spelling: The BTS mis-spells the ailment as "Pig-Lizard flue."
 * 8) ***Done.
 * 9) * Style: I see this is already under the Category:Diseases and maladies. maybe it should also be under Category:Viruses?
 * 10) **Nah, all we know is it's a disease or malady. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:26, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Alright. I wasn't married to this issue anyway.

Comments

Gamorrean Mumps

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:01, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero. The less exciting sequel to Zabrak Scalp Necrosis and Bothan Nether Rot. *shudders*

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:40, February 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Fosh Jedi

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 05:01, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Exploits of the Chicken & the Goat, Part 1.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 17:37, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * A question (which doubles for the nom below this one as well): I'm not familiar with the RPGs so I'm completely ignorant here, but is there an in-universe 'mission' (named or otherwise) for what this Fosh and Gotal were doing on Felucia? &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 17:32, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * No, the caption for the actual pic mentions that the action they are undertaking is related to a RPG skill.&mdash; 17:35, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. I only asked because I pondered if maybe there ought to have been an article for that, linked in these two noms. Since that's not the case, never mind! &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 17:37, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Here's the exact caption under the image. "An overland travel skill challenge on Felucia".&mdash; 17:38, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified Gotal traveler

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 05:01, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Exploits of the Chicken & the Goat, Part 2.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 17:44, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Sinton species

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer (talk) 12:59, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Derp. &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:49, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *I see that "was explored by the wider galaxy" links to the generic galaxy. Since the phrase is specifically referring to our favourite FFA galaxy, rather than a generalized use of the word, I would think that link should point to the galaxy.
 * 3) **Sure. --Eyrezer (talk) 15:38, March 1, 2013 (UTC)

Comments