User talk:Jonjedigrandmaster

'''Welcome, ! Please feel free to leave me a message, and I'll respond on your talk page. Archives: 1'''

CT-26-1409
Hey, Jonny. If you have time, can you look over your objections for CT-26-1409? I addressed them a few weeks ago, and was wondering if you not have noticed. :P  JangFett  (Talk) 12:30, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Does freenode work? :P I still have a few more questions.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:55, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Email sent. :)  JangFett  (Talk) 18:08, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Hey Jon,

Any chance you can meet me in IRC sometime? —Tommy9281  ( Mechno-chair ) 03:10, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey Jon, you still having IRC connection issues? —Tommy 9281 Mechnochair negwt.jpg ( Mechno-chair ) 17:16, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

Battle of the Rishi moon
Hello Jon. I just wanted to give you a heads-up that I left a small objection at your and JangFett's Battle of the Rishi Moon FAN over two weeks ago :) Xd1358  Talk 19:45, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * I took care of the quote, Jonny. :) Now, if you have time, I'd like to talk to you about your remaining objections for CT-26-1409 on IRC.  JangFett  (Talk) 00:41, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Tahv
Hey there Jon. As all the other Lost Tribe of the Sith books have show the landscape of Kesh and the new cover on Paragon appears no different. I believe, based the the if it looks like a duck, smells like a duck, it is a duck precedent that seems to be coalescing, that this image must be Tahv. The Kesh article states that Tahv is the only large city on Kesh, and this fits the discription. If you agree, I'll leave it to you to place in your FA article. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 21:42, February 2, 2010 (UTC)

GAN objections
I'm sorry, but I cannot pinpoint the points that lead to your objections either in Nashiak Llalik or in Sapphire (smuggler), even after repeated re-reading. I see no pending grammar issues, probably because as the writer I notice nothing wrong with the prose; and I can't see anything important in the body that should be repeated in the intro. Could you please be more specific about whatever you dislike? Skippy Farlstendoiro 08:20, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Bait
Hello, Jon. Could you take a look at The Clone Wars: Bait ? I believe your objections from his first nomination are fixed, but I want to go sure. -- Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:44, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe that they are no fixed. If you say that the article is all clear, I'll possible re-nominate it. -- Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:50, February 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah and in the future, would it be possible for you to look at the other noms from me which didn't make it. I believe you were the one with the unfixed objections and I would like to now if these problems are fixed before I nominate them again. -- Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:22, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

IRC
Hey, if you have time, can you come into IRC? I like to discuss certain issues dealing with CT-26-1409 and the Battle of the Rishi Moon.  JangFett  (Talk) 22:08, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Hey Jon,

Two things. First, the thing that I've been trying to contact you about recently has to do with WP:NSW. If perhaps you could make your way to IRC sometime later this evening we can discuss further. Second, do you have CSWE? Let me know, thanks. —Tommy 9281 02:03, March 5, 2010 (UTC)

Celchu Trial
Master Jonathan gave Celchu Trial nice, good copyedit and fixed my mistakes (mostly lack of articles). Care to take another look?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 21:37, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot. But if I leave a message to your talk page, you can answer it here. I keep in mind who I have been talking to and see if they have answered on their own page.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 22:23, March 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * It is not the alert or anything, but I prefer to read a complete conversation instead of jumping from one talk page to another. It makes the conversation difficult to follow.--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 23:17, March 7, 2010 (UTC)

Gas gaint (unidentified system)

 * If you could move the page because the title is spelled wrong. It says Gas Gaint not Giant. thanks Fett the 13th 01:02, March 9, 2010 (UTC)

ITS JEDI JETTSON
I HAVE THE COMIC OF BEING BOBA FETT! HE DOES APPEAR HELMETLESS IN IT!

My Question
Hi i have just joined wookieepedia & whould like to know what is wrong with the question i posted on the knowlage board - Which is better the Ebon Hawk, the Millennium Falcon or The Death Star?

Yours Sincerly Zeke Skywalker.

Hello
What's up. --Alexyodaross 02:05, March 11, 2010 (UTC)Alexyodaross--Alexyodaross 02:05, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re: FOTJ
Thanks for the clarification on the title template --- I wasn't really sure, so I figured it was better to be safe than sorry. But it's very handy to know what it's actually for, so thank you for that. Menkooroo 14:05, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, OK, I think I got it now. I didn't realize that a source wasn't necessary if there was no article body. Sorry for the slip-up. But I guess that sourcing everything you write isn't that bad of a habit to have, is it? :^) Cheers! And thanks again. Menkooroo 15:10, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

Gwarrk
If you find a minute, could you take a look at Gwarrk ? I think his grammar errors from his first nom are gone. -- Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:54, March 14, 2010 (UTC)

That long titled book
Hey Jon, saw you edit out the Into the Maw: Black holes, Egos and Other Forces that Devour Lives from the appearances list. I've read the part again and I feel that even though at some parts Dovan was joking, there was no indication that he was joking when he mentioned the memoir. If it was a joke, it would have been really out of place and crass of him. And thanks for the edits you've been making on the articles I make. Cheers! ToRsO bOy 02:50, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I just saw you put it back. lol ToRsO bOy 02:51, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

GAN objections
Just to be sure: You do not have any pending objection for the GAN on Saadoon-Kauldi, true? I've triple-checked the GAN page and found none but I'm afraid there might be something I've missed. Apparently I missed a lot with that article. Skippy Farlstendoiro 08:41, March 17, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Tribeless Sha
Hey Jon,

My mistake about the first mention. However, as with characters like Palpatine, Dooku, Darth Caedus, Kreia, etc., we tend to name articles based on what the individual is more/most often called/known as by others. —Tommy 9281 23:20, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

Lens Reekeene
I am sorry, but I cannot find either the offending grammar or the missing links. I have checked it time and again, trying to rewrite anything that doesn't sound absolutely right to me, and adding links whenever I felt it was useful. Apparently, I cannot find the instances by myself. Can you please pinpoint the precise problem? Skippy Farlstendoiro 10:01, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

copy-edit on Gray Jedi
Just saw it, good show! Thanks! I'll tackle the concerns of your new review some time this weekend. &mdash;fodigg  (talk) | 14:09, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Flanker
I must honestly say that I don't find any grammar erros in Flanker. If you would point them out I can fix them. If not I will change most of the article so that they (hopefully) be eliminated.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:32, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Well but if there are some other errors they are specified too. I understand your point if it are many errors, but it's just two errors, who keep Flanker from going on.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:28, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Ah that was from Cylka, so sorry for this statement, but it would still be better. Do you plan another review on Cooker ? Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:35, April 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **Do you still see grammar errors in this article ?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:56, April 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Well then it would be better if you remove the nom. He's under the word requirement for a GA and if you se "many" errors which I could not find. Possible some rewriting and I nom him again in the future (not before I get green light from you).  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:55, April 21, 2010 (UTC)

Kelbis Nu
Let me know if you are happy with Kelbis Nu staying a GA. I'm glad to see you cut back a lot of that PT/PS that was added. Thee is actually very little indication given relevant to those sections, which is why they were short in the first place. --Eyrezer 06:08, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Gray Jedi: advice?
What do you think I should do? Stick with the GAN for Gray Jedi even though there doesn't seem to be too much enthusiasm for it, or resubmit it as a FAN? The standards are the same for GAs and FAs, right? It's just a difference of article length? I figured that I should ask you as you've been the most helpful with my GAN so far (which I am very grateful for btw). &mdash;fodigg  (talk) | 22:16, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Really? I was just about to cut more. You don't feel the text was off-topic for the article? &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 23:17, April 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, I rolled back most of the changes. I left out the academies list, the Krayt stuff, and fixed some minor issues. I'm still not sure if I'd want to switch it from a GAN to a FAN. Would it get more reviews as a FAN? &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 00:30, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, well if it's more appropriate as FAN then I would want to go with that even if there's no real difference in process. I mean, I don't really have a preference either way; I figure the work required to get it approved would be equal. &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 00:39, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, that'd be great. I assume the old objections would move over as well? &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 01:45, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, cool. I'll nom it for FA now. Thanks, and looking forward to the review! &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 01:57, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

2242
Just that I know. Do you plan another review on 2242 ?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:39, April 18, 2010 (UTC)

Celchu Trial, vol. 2
Cylka made me do some rather radical changes to Celchu Trial (for the better, I would say). Care to take another look at it?--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 21:56, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Will do. I was wondering that. She hasn't been around for a few days. But I just got an interesting objection from Menkooroo for my choise of picture...--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 17:58, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

thanks for the review
Thanks for reviewing my noms! I will get to those as soon as the weekend calms down. If it doesn't calm down, then Monday at the latest. &mdash;fodigg  (talk) | 20:52, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Archiving
When removing a GAN, no matter how ill-conceived, make sure you archive the nomination for posterity. --Imperialles 22:40, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Proposal
Hey Jonny,

I've got a proposition for you. Care to help me out with this? When it's all said and done, it will be a joint effort between us, if you accept. Let me know. —Tommy 9281 23:35, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * That is exactly where I need your assistance. I've got the rest of it under control, but for the DOE sections (intro included), I'd need to reread the whole thing, which will drag this out much longer than I want to. The material seems to be still fresh in your mind, so I feel that you'd be the ideal person to make sure everything is up to par. Add your name to the inuse tag, and have at her! Thanks again. —Tommy 9281 23:49, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * The Bane image is fine. I wanted to also add Valorum, Cognus, Set Harth perhaps, and maybe one or two others from JvS. We'll see. Good job so far. —Tommy 9281 01:07, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Gwarrk
If you find time, could you take a look if your objections on Gwarrk from his first GAnom are gone ?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:35, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Some improvement ?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:15, April 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Award
Tremendous thanks for the award, Jugs! :) I appreciate it more than I can probably express in this message, and I'll be proud to display it on my userpage. But it's even more gratifying to know that I'm able to pass along to you the wisdom and knowledge that other Wookieepedians before our time have graciously bestowed upon me to help me become a quality editor, as you are, here on the Wook. Now you are the latest gifted recipient, and, rest assured, it's because you've earned this right. You're a wonderful writer, a solid editor, and a pleasure to work with in every facet of Wookieepedia, and I'm happy to help your progress and growth in any way I can. As proud as I am to receive this award from you, I hope you feel just as proud that your talents, above all else, are what facilitated all of this to begin with. So congratulations to you as well. :)