Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Alain (Human)


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Alain (Human)

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 20:49, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Unit Scrounge

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 15:40, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 09:58, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Imperators II (Talk) 21:46, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Menkooroo 04:51, May 31, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi
 * 2) * I believe there is no evidence that he necessarily fought the 501st during the events of ANH, as the card never explicitly states it, nor does his CSWE entry. Does anybody else believe otherwise? Hanzo Hasashi 20:49, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) *Text from his Quick Draw card: fighting against oppression can be dangerous business. Oppressors carry blasters, and so does Alain. I do not believe any of this is necessarily from his POV, and chose not to include it as any new info in his bio. As with above, if somebody else believes otherwise, please respond. Hanzo Hasashi 21:07, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Axinal
 * 5) * In the Personality and Traits, you mention a Hakin. Who is Hakin? I figure this is supposed to be Alian and would therefore qualify as a Sofixit, but I want to be sure Hakin's name isn't there for some other purpose.
 * 6) **Right, that was just a careless mistake on my part, Hakin was another Rebel trooper I brought to comprehensive status. Hanzo Hasashi 14:28, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) * Could you tell us what a scrounge is?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:09, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) **A scavenger, will write. Hanzo Hasashi 14:28, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ***Nice work!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 15:40, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) Imperators II
 * 11) * Is there any indication that Alain still served by 0 BBY? He could have served aboard Tantive IV at any point between 2 BBY (the formation of the Rebel Alliance) and 0 BBY, and, imho, it would be more accurately stated that way. Or does "by 0 BBY" really cover it?  Imperators II (Talk) 09:47, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) **To be honest, I'm not sure. For Precht's nomination below, the user Menkooroo felt that what I had was fine. All I was saying was Alain's service could have been no later than 0 BBY. Hanzo Hasashi 14:29, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) ***Imperators see if you like the change I have just made. Hanzo Hasashi 16:06, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) **** This probably could be solved by adding something like "at some point before its destruction in 0 BBY" at the end of the second sentence.  Imperators II (Talk) 18:31, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) *****Added. Hanzo Hasashi 20:21, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) ****** The date has to be sourced, though.  Imperators II (Talk) 20:24, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) *******Added. Hanzo Hasashi 21:33, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) Can you find a source that explicitly states that the Tantive IV is destroyed? ANH only shows it being captured. Menkooroo 15:52, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) *The Databank. Will edit accordingly. Hanzo Hasashi 16:14, May 30, 2011 (UTC)