Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

 The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.


 * /History
 * /2005 History
 * /2006 History
 * /Queue

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written and detailed
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide
 * 5) &hellip;not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
 * 7) &hellip;have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box
 * 8) &hellip;have no more than 3 redlinks
 * 9) &hellip;have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles
 * 10) &hellip;not have been previously featured
 * 11) &hellip;be completely referenced with tags for all available material and sources.
 * 12) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced
 * 13) &hellip;provide at least one quote on the article; a leading quote at the beginning is required. Only one quote would be allowed at the beginning of each section at max, although quotes may be placed in the middle of the article.
 * 14) &hellip;include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles.
 * 15) &hellip;include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available.
 * 16) &hellip;pass review by the Inquisitorius review panel.

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under! Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Luke Skywalker
Support style="color:darkgreen;">Atarumaster88 ]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Objections
 * 1) [[User:Atarumaster88|<span
 * 1) Red Head Rider 17:35, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
 * 2) Herbsewell 20:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Just wish we had the ROTJ pic .  .  .  .  05:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) The vote is 5 to 2. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg |25px]] 21:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) --Eyrezer 06:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Despite the fact that I hate this paticular meatbag emmensely, I have concluded that his article is one of the best I have ever read.-- IG-Prime (Sentience Core)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Garrett Skymaster 00:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Wstonefi 14:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Cato Neimoidia 22:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) --Humantoo 23:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Ursan Rafin 02:15, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Nighthawk leader 22:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Impassioned Jedi 23:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Rezendi 14:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 15)  Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 03:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) I can't believe this hasn't been a featured article before, but it should be now Jorrel Fraajic 15:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) -- Darth Phonebook  20:47, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) --Caddaric 01:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) --Palpy 01:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 01:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) Fatguy2006 00:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 22)  Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 23:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) SkywalkerPL 11:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) Like Jorrel said, how has this not been featured yet?   Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 00:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) I definitely agree. Luke is one of the original characters, so the most is know about him, and more people would want to edit his page, making it increasingly better. Jedi master Rimsek 17:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) Luke is THE hero of the galaxy. He is one of the original characters (the main original character), and, it's a great article! Darth Maddolis 09:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 27) Yes. Nejee16 02:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) Luke Skywalker rules and the article is excellent!! DARTH SIDIOUS2 16:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 29) Awesome Article.
 * 30) No mistakes in this page. Very good!! TMOFFT 19:21 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) No mistakes in this page. Very good!! TMOFFT 19:21 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think it's still too early. It's a good article, but not featured.  At times it is rambling, at times it leaves information out, and throughout the writing is a bit unpolished or unencyclopedic.  Patience, young Jedi!  --GenkiNeko 01:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Part of me hates to do this, but...
 * I don't think the subdivisions make a lot of sense. Why is the Yuuzhan Vong War categorized under "Establishing a New Jedi Order" but the Second Correlian Insurrection its own heading entirely? The subdivisions need to be worked on considerably and made more logical.
 * Certain areas don't make sense if you don't know the sources. For example, in the discussion of Kadann, the text jumps from Kadann to the false Kadann without giving an explanation for that.
 * I think the main picture should be a head shot, not full-length.
 * I haven't read the article extremely carefully, but my sense is that it probably needs a very careful grammar and spell check. Just skimming through I found several issues (primarily with diction), and more worryingly, an OOU statement.

Overall, I think the issues that I have can be cleared up very quickly; this is much stronger than it has been before and it's almost there.  - breathesgelatin Talk 01:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Better sectioning needed .  .  .  .  07:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'd say my previous objections are resolved. Now that I've done a very careful read-through, I have a few more minor things: the section Trials of the Jedi Master is still sort of weak. The writing is far more choppy than in other sections, and it's divided up into short, nonintuitive passages. It sometimes lapses into a play-by-play. For example, could any of the subsections here be either condensed, shortened, or integrated into one another? It seems that different subsections probably need different remedies. I've done the most general sorts of diction improvements, but I don't know these sources well enough to make a huge difference in terms of organization. Specifically, the sections on Kueller and Waru need improvement (and better titles--but maybe the best way to solve that is combination). And isn't the Waru incident technically part of the Empire Reborn movement via retcon now anyway? Also, having read the Dark Nest sections, in certain places they seem to be less about Luke and his actions then they are about the Dark Nest crisis generally. This should be improved. Finally, if we can't get the portrait-style infobox picture approved, the picture in the Talents section should be changed.  - breathesgelatin Talk 05:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry to sound like a broken record here, but can we get some more Marvel info integrated? I tried to include the post-RotJ info, but Luke's adventure during and between the films are lacking. I mean the whole Tagge subplot seems relevant and important enough to not be excluded. Cull Tremayne 00:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * This should be easy. We need some more images in about the middle of the bio article- Trials of a Jedi Master and Thrawn could both use a pic or two. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 18:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I think there used to be some more pictures there... Perhaps they could be reinserted.  - breathesgelatin Talk 17:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I worked to try and address breathesgeletin's objections, especially the grammar and Empire Reborn sections, but because I know next to nothing about Marvel and the Dark Nest, I can't really help out there. I count two redlinks in the 'in search for a legacy' section, but I have no knowledge of either of them, so I cannot correct it. I looked around for a pic Luke during the Thrawn crisis, but all I could find was on the Heir to the Empire comic book cover, but it is of a very poor quality. I don't own the comics so I cannot scan a pic in. -Solus 19:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Some of the Marvel info has been added. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * How many of these objections have or have not been addressed? -Solus 14:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * My objection regarding Dark Nest still stands; I still think it's covered way out of proportion to its importance in Luke's life. I recently got the 1st and 2nd Dark Nest books and am just about finished with reading them (I already had the 3rd). I will try to see what I can do with it once I finish that. Also, as far as I know, there is still some Marvel information left to put in the article.  - breathesgelatin Talk 00:05, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please examine the relevant section; I've cleared out a lot of the extra material in there. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 18:30, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I still I feel like the Dark Nest section is still pretty long and out of proportion, but I'm willing to live with that at this point. I went through and made some more cuts and factual corrections and in particular diction fixes. I guess I'll go on and strike my objection now. I just hope in the future that other sections of Luke's article are expanded so that the proportions are more realistic.  - breathesgelatin Talk 19:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Many of the quotes need sources. --Tinwe 15:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sourced several quotes, only one unsourced quote that I know if is the one under the Caamas Document Crisis. I'll try to look it up. EDIT: Found it. All quotes sourced. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  19:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * So all that's left now is the Marvel stuff? Or is it finished also?  - breathesgelatin Talk 02:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Marvel still needs work. There's a huge amount of it, and it's hard for me to do. I've done some, but it could use work. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 05:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Many of the pictures are lacking proper source info. Also has a quote from George Lucas which is still marked as needing confirmation. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 23:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Currently, the "Luke Skywalker as the Monomyth Hero" section reads like original research. The statement in this section saying Lucas referenced The Hero with a Thousand Faces is unsourced. - Sikon 05:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I nominated this before, but it was put on IDrive instead. After a week of IDrive along a considerable expansion by me, the page is much larger than it was and is now worthy of being a FA. Not as long as Palpatine, but it is over 120 kb long. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I just did some adjustments to the subdivisions- see if they make more sense now. I'm not sure what you mean on the sources, although I wrote the Kadann section and I don't have either of the sources, so I had to use our articles/the databank. Yeah. That could probably use some work from someone who has the sources. As for the pic- all the other major characters use full body shots- see Palpatine, Anakin Skywalker, Leia Organa Solo, Darth Vader, Han Solo, and many, many more. I'll work on the spelling- where is the OOU? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Good job on the subdivisions generally, though 1.3 still seems that it needs another subheading--it looks bizarre with only one. You could probably smack something above the first text section just for consistency's sake. What I mean on the Kadann section part is that it skips back and forth between discussing the real Kadann and false Kadann without even explaining that there is a false Kadann... which could be confusing. I know about the full body shots but recently there's been a move to shift to headshots. Let's see if anyone else agrees with me; that one is really a minor thing that may just come down to my personal preference. I wouldn't hold the whole nomination up over that if everything else gets fixed. I vaped the OOU that I saw; it was in the Talents section. Just had me worried that there might be more. I'll try to get a copyedit of my own done soon.  - breathesgelatin Talk 02:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Glad to see my lobbying get a mention ;). I too would like a head shot, and one from ROTJ, since it was when he was in his "prime". Head shots are simply more encylopedic, whereas the body shot should go down in the personality section .  .  .  .  04:11, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Like this one? Or is it to close. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg |25px]] 00:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That's perfect! And move the current one down to the Traits and Personality, or Abilities section, and then we'll have something that looks encyclopedic. .  .  .  .  01:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, I went back and fixed the subdivisions- moved one and added three more subsections. I tried to clarify the Kadann section, so I hope that helps. I don't care about the image, and I'll copyedit it eventually. I've already done some. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 17:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The pic looks great in the infobox but that's my opinion. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg |25px]] 23:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Still too many problems for my support. This article reads like a blow-by-blow account "Luke was stopped by Fortuna, then he used a mind trick on him, then he tried to talk to Jabba, then Jabba refused, then Luke used the force to grab a gun from a nearby guard but Jabba used a trap door to send him down to the rancor with one of his guards who got eaten..." It should just be something like: "Luke infiltrated Jabba's palace and tried to convince the crime lord to hand over Han. When Jabba refused, Luke attempted to kill him, only to be sent down into Jabba's secret Rancor pit." Well, that's not great, but still, the article needs condesing. We are an encyclopedia, not an info repository. .  .  .  .  23:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I know the section you are talking about and I've been meaning to smack and rewrite it for some time. Certain users are a tad overzealous in adding details, but this isn't Wikipedia and greater license is allowed with minutiae, 4dotE. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 00:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I understand that, but that much detail detracts from the article, and the overall flow of the prose, making it less enjoyable to read. .  .  .  .  01:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Definitely a copyedit should be able to clear that up though. I'm lovin' the new pic.  - breathesgelatin Talk 01:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I've copyedited much of it- including condensing the Endor section and expanding the Thrawn section. I've done up to the Yuuzhan Vong War, but as most of the prose was written by me anyways, someone else should probably look over it. Let me know if anything else needs fixed. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Either a bit more sectioning or condensing is needed from the "Jedi Master" section down. .  .  .  .  07:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Added two more sections. I'm strongly opposed to condensing too much of the prose- look at Palpatine- though I have consolidated some sections. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I finished a fairly thorough copyedit of the whole thing. I've added a bunch of sections, but Dark Nest could maybe be split up. What do you guys think? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 17:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Condense or section the YV war and the Dark Nest stuff, and we're there. .  .  .  .  23:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Much work on Luke have I done. Complete, the sectioning is. Affected my speech all this work has. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 00:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Good work on this Ataru. However I think there could be some info from Jedi OPutcast and Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy. Luke was involved in both the sets of events there. The Empire Reborn could be fleshed out in the Waru section, and the Disciples of Ragnos could also get a mention. --Eyrezer 01:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Gaaaaahhh. You ask for something I will be hard-pressed to deliver on: I've never encountered either of those games. I'll see what I can do. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll try and add the Jedi Outcast and Academy content...but let's not go overboard, Palpatine style. .  .  .  .  01:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Come to think of it, we don't really need the JA stuff...he doesn't really do anything in that. .  .  .  .  03:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Good work on the JO addition. --Eyrezer 03:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. .  .  .  .  06:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I've done some adjustments on it, but I keep looking over it and I'm having a hard time addressing Breathesgelatin's objections. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 00:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey... just a note. Someone struck out parts of my objection for me. While I actually consider the issues they struck out resolved, in the future I'd appreciate it if you let me strike out my own objections... I'm pretty good about checking up on the status of articles and such. No hard feelings; just FYI.  - breathesgelatin Talk 06:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I did it. I didn't know I wasn't supposed to, I'm kinda new. I apologize. It won't happen again. -Solus 14:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It's all good.  - breathesgelatin Talk 17:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -Solus 19:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Ysanne Isard
Support
 * 1) Red Head Rider 20:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) .  .  .  .  05:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Roron Corobb 21:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) I'm up for giving this article FA status, with the quotes now sourced. Jorrel Fraajic 19:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Redjetta 20:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 01:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) -- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Fynbos 21:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Great article. Besides, who could say no to this face? Rodtheanimegod4ever 00:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Great article. Besides, who could say no to this face? Rodtheanimegod4ever 00:28, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * Needs personality/traits section. .  .  .  .  00:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Added personality and traits section. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * "While she was officially (in an in-universe sense) killed by Iella, it was theorized and possibly implied in X-wing: Isard's Revenge that she actually survived, and was imprisoned for life in the bow of Lusankya. This is not verified by any canon source." What the? --Imp 19:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * removed. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Head quote needs source. Is it possible to get quotes for the different sections? Image:Ysanne-isard.jpg, Image:20040312175310ysanne isard.jpg lack sources. --Imp 19:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Images are now sourced. -LtNOWIS 00:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This quote, "Tall and slender, she wore her black hair long, and the white streaks descending from her temples made her seem more exotic than middle-aged", still needs a source though. :P &mdash;Mir  len  22:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That quote is from either Rogue Squadron, Bacta War, or Isard's Revenge. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I believe it's in Rogue Squadron, when Sate Pestage Kirtan Loor walks into Isard's command room for the first time. I could check if you would like; I have the book at hand. Jorrel Fraajic 16:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright, found it. Page 122 of X-Wing: Rogue Squadron, when Kirtan Loor meets Isard for the first time on Coruscant. Also found some other quotes that could possibly be used. --Jorrel Fraajic 19:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * She appears in Mara Jade: By the Emperor's Hand yet Mara Jade is only mentioned in the intro quote. Is all information from this series included in the article? The header "The fall of Isard's Empire" looks awkward as it is directly beneath the header "Isard's Empire." The "Ships Under her Command" section is clunky, it could be rewritten into an interesting section. --Imp 21:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Isard does appear in MJ:BtEH, but it's almost a cameo. Isard arrests her after the Emperor's death, and then Mara escapes. While she's in prison, she reminisces about her relationship with Isard. I admit that some mention of that could be included, though it will be about a two sentence addition. I agree with all of the other objections. Cull Tremayne 22:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Added as much as I could from MJ:BtEH. Hopefully it's satisfactory now. Cull Tremayne 09:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Has diction issues (Rule 1).  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Imp, it was much worse in prior revisions. See the talk page. I changed it and put it in a BTS section. It could be removed, but eventually the original author will most likely come and want it changed back. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It's just speculative crap. Away with it! =) --Imp 19:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I sourced Image:20040312175310, but I'm not sure where the other one is even from. It's possible that it's from the X-wing comics, but that pose seems like it's from a sourcebook. Riff uploaded it, so I'll ask him. Cull Tremayne 16:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Could someone confirm that Image:Ysanne-isard.jpg is from Handbook 1: X-wing Rogue Squadron? Cull Tremayne 16:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, it is. Cull Tremayne 16:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Anybody else think it might could use one more image? -- Ozzel 06:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm still not comfortable with some of the phrasing, but it's not a specific enough problem to actually object. I also think it could use more quotes, but I might just be looking for an excuse to re-re-re-re-re-re-re-read the X-wing series. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 01:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I added another pic now. And I agree that it could use some section headers and some more quotes. -- Ozzel 22:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Tott Doneeta
Support Objections Comments
 * 1) Jagged Fel,  (Yo!)[[Image:JagFel.jpg|20px]]
 * 2) Well written, informative, not a stub, my vote. 23:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) .  .  .  .  08:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image: Sithlogo.jpg|25px]] Admiral Arm-Ja Scobal, Dark Lord of the Sith (Guestbook) 22:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Very well written and well maintained. It's got my vote. Greyman 22:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 02:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC) - First, clear out the redlinks. We've been pretty good about having almost all of the new FAs having no redlinks, no reason this shouldn't get the same treatment. Secondly, expand the intro. It's far too short. With the info in the article it should be easy to write a good leader into the main article. Thirdly, least important but I think still warranted, it needs some quotes. A leader quote is essential, and quotes for the different sections if at all possible.
 * Redlinks were my fault. When I copied the article into Word for proofreading, I forgot all of the links. They are all fixed now. 06:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I added a leader quote and added to the intro. But Tott Doneeta really has practically nothing to say. The Leader quote was the best I could find and its still a little rubbish... Jagged Fel,  (Yo!)[[Image:JagFel.jpg|20px]]
 * Nice job on the quotes. I knew you weren't going to get many, but even one helps the article. As for the intro, still way too small. Three sentences just doesn't cut it. Cull Tremayne 01:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice job on expanding, but the intro now reads like a play-by-play. "On this date he went here. On this other date he learned how to do something. On another date he helped someone. On this final date he also learned something new." It needs to read more like an overview of the upcoming article than a point by point summary of his actions. Cull Tremayne
 * Rewrote intro, so it doesn't act as play-by-play. Expanded and removed some unimportant info. 19:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Cull; generalized prose issues (Rule 1). Please reference my comments on the Inquistorious page.  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Is there a way you can clean up some of the pictures? Perhaps edit out the speech boxes or crop them better? They look woefully terrible as it is. Cull Tremayne 01:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Which one(s)? I mean I think most of them look ok. Hows the introduction now? If its still not long enough or is wrong in some way, you'll have to be more specific... Jagged Fel,  (Yo!)[[Image:JagFel.jpg|20px]]
 * It's definitely better, still needs some work. The images I am referring to are here, here, here, and here. The second image just needs the dialogue box just cut off the top. I can live with the second one, though the huge white space on his forehead makes it pretty ugly to look at. The third one just needs some hole patching or a side-crop. The white space draws our attention away from the pic. The last one just looks ugly. It's not good quality, doesn't show Tott that well, and is a compilation of shots. I think either a new version needs to be uploaded, or the dialogue put back in. Wasn't there a discussion about keeping the dialogue and not editing it out? Cull Tremayne 21:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

HK-47
Support Object
 * 1) Tyg13 00:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Ceratis 23:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) -- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) RC 2413 15:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Question-in the quote source under 'Personality and Traits', is 'squishy' supposed to be italicised?Grand Moff Rhell 17:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) .  .  .  .  23:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) SkywalkerPL 11:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) --CommanderGree117 17:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Starwarsrulez 18:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Statement: I support this. KEJ 18:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Jedi master Rimsek   [[Image:Chiss Insignia.jpg|20px]] My rantings 19:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) DAWUSS 18:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Nejee16 23:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It has two red links. Fix those and I'll vote.-- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 12:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Main image is unsourced. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I got rid of the red links. I am currently working on finding the main image's source info.Darth Ceratis 20:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd really like that image sourced and all of the images to use the Information template. Besides that, this seems pretty good. 05:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * All images are sourced now, according to the Information template.Darth Ceratis 21:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro seems a little short. 14:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro made longer. 15:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The new rules don't apply here, per Ataru's comments at the bottom section.-- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 12:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Uhhh, well QuentinGeorge disagrees, and it is his right to object to it. You could perhaps ask the Inquisitorius to strike it. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Too long of an intro (Rule 7) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed (sort of). The intro's still long, but I tinkered with the opening paragraph, and it should be concise, yet informative enough to get the necessary points across.  Or maybe I'm so totally wrong that there isn't even a word for it.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 03:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It's still too long. Condense it to about half of that size! Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The opening paragraph or the entire opening section? Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 06:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This is a little strange: It was too short, so we lengthen it, then new rules come in and it's too long...can we just use the intro as it was originally?Darth Ceratis 02:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The intro is the first section of prose immediately before the main body, and it should be about 6-9 decent sized sentences, IMO. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. never mind what I said earlier, the original intro has nothing with Trials of Obi Wan.Darth Ceratis 23:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Bad introduction (rule 7). --Imp 20:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've tried to cut back on the information, but it is extremely hard. Anyone have any suggestions? 02:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't cut back just organize it so it is more coherent.-- Dooku (Solar Sailer)[[Image:Huppla Pasa Tisc.jpg|17px]] 05:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I trimmed it a bit more; see if it's acceptable now. jSarek 05:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Could use both image and prose cleanup (Rule 1), particularly in the "From Master to Master" section.  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Question-in the quote source under 'Personality and Traits', is 'squishy' supposed to be italicised?
 * Yes. It's italicized in the subtitles when he says it in the game.Darth Ceratis 21:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. There's three new redlinks concerning bits associated with Trials of Obi Wan. I'm really not too knowlegable about that part of this, so I'm not sure if there even need to be links there or if articles should be created. If someone could take a look at them and fix them, I'd be grateful.Darth Ceratis 01:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I removed the links. I see no standing objections, can this go on the queue?Darth Ceratis 02:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There are some new rules which are in place, one of which is approval by the Inquisitorius. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Form V: Shien / Djem So
Support
 * 1)  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 02:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Vatrir 16:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * Needs sourced, (Rule 11) fix all the present tense, (Rule 4). Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I think I've taken care of all usages of the present tense, but let me know if I missed any. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 23:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I still see several mentions of "is" and "are." Most of those happen when something is written OOU- which is also a violation of Rule 4. Example: "It is known that Anakin Skywalker mastered. . . " It would be better to re-write this as "Anakin Skywalker mastered . . . ", IMO. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 00:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Right, I'll go over it again later when I get a minute. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No sourcing, small introduction, first two images are terrible screenshots. .  .  .  .  08:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Unencyclopedic tone (Rule 1).  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I just recently overhauled this article, so if anyone sees any problems that I missed, I'd appreciate your input. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 02:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * KotOR II quotes would be nice. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

The Haunted Village
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 02:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Same problem I had with it last time: The plot "summary" is a play-by-play. .  .  .  .  08:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Except that you never made that objection last time! "I think it's fine now". :p --Eyrezer 09:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I lied. .  .  .  .  09:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been up for FA before, but it failed because it didn't have enough pictures. I have since added more pics to it and made a couple of changes. The discussion on the old FA nom can be seen here (for convienience), or the original page here . As to the objection about redlinks that is bound to come, there is 3 redlinks in the article: 2 are there twice so it looks like 5, but isn't. --Eyrezer 02:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Darth Krayt
Support Oppose
 * 1) Bly1993 21:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Not properly sourced. And while you're at it, could you do a Personality and traits? If you just do the first, I'll strike this, but the second would be nice. .  .  .  .  21:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:SwLegacy6.jpg needs to be properly sourced (rule 12), intro could be longer (rule 7), needs a personalty & traits section (rule 14), needs to be sourced overall (rule 11).  StarNeptune Talk to me! 21:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It's too early. --Darthchristian 21:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I don't oppose this article enough to object, but I have offered some suggestions for improvement on its Inquisitorius page.  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Anakin Skywalker
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) It is extremely well written, has great photos, good quotes, definitly deserving to be a featured article. --Darthchristian 11:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 06:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Awesome article. 21:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs to cite sources. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 17:11, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs sources, copyediting. .  .  .  .  20:42, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, not all images are sourced. -LtNOWIS 01:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Per above (sourcing is a must). Could also use better sectioning.  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. --Darthchristian 20:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Ebon Hawk
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) I haven't been able to get much response elsewhere, so here it is. Critique away.  Sarendipity  ( Talk to me ) 18:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  21:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Lord Hydronium 23:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) -- Shaelas (Ahto City)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 00:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Xepeyon 01:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Couple of unsourced images. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sourced.  Sarendipity  ( Talk to me ) 22:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs a longer introduction. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * How's it look now?  Sarendipity  ( Talk to me ) 05:26, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Better, although I'm not sure if the Exile's quest was to find the "lost Jedi"&hellip; -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 22:34, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks like someone fixed that already.  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 02:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Great job, one minor thing: BtS needs to be sourced.  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Done (assuming the Alternate Choices section doesn't need it).  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 02:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Trioculus
Support
 * 1) If I do say so myself. - Lord Hydronium 22:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Yes! We must have more stupid stuff on the main page! .  .  .  .  06:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Adamwankenobi 06:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Well, I'd rather accept this than any other Ewok cartoon thing. - Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Ozzel 05:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments '''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Trioculus 07:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how much this violates MoS or other rules, so I won't officially object to it, but I prefer the relationships section be reserved for romances, not for general relationships, in keeping with standard practice. I think the info could be better integrated into the actual article. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If it was given a name like "Personal relationships", would that be better (it might just be me, but that phrasing suggests more things like friendships than the admittedly ambiguous "Relationships")? Truthfully, I see no reason why a section like that can only be used for romances, and in this case I felt that stuff like MD-5 wouldn't flow in the Bio section. - Lord Hydronium 04:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I have to agree, the information on Hissa works better in a separate section, and this article works great with this section separated from the main bio. Cull Tremayne 05:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * "Personal relationships" sounds better to me.

Padmé Amidala's wardrobe
Support Oppose Comments
 * Heh, heh. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) --Amthyst fire 07:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Amazing work, Solus.  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 17:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  - breathesgelatin Talk 21:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) It's fine now. I was just being stingy. .  .  .  .  21:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 03:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) One of the best articles I have ever seen.-Jacen 15:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Several of the images cite fan sites as their source. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 00:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, Imp, A good deal of the images are from "Dressing a Galaxy," but all of the Images are sourced with ligitamate sources now. Can we get a green light? --Amthyst fire 23:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I hate to do this, since this is such excellent work, but, here goes: Galleries. The image should just be in the article...normally. We don't like galleries. There's no info from the comics, though that shouldn't be too hard. I don't know if you can really do anything from the books, since you dont' really know what she's wearing in them. It's not a lot of work, but it needs to be done before I support. .  .  .  .  01:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This is what it would look like with thumbnails instead of the Galeries. How does that suit?--Amthyst fire 07:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Rule 1: Irrelevant material on each segment. I don't want an in-depth explanation on what Padme did while she was wearing the outfit. We have her article for that. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * All right, I'll take it out. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Gone. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Critique away. I think you'll find it pretty much in order. I know it's an odd choice, but it's a pet project of mine, and, what can I say? The front page needs more weird stuff. Don't be worried about the IDrive template, when it was nominated, it looked like this. That was before. It doesn't need it now. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You'll likely see a few objections, but I'd just like to say that you've done an amazing job on this somewhat unconventional subject. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 00:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. For Imp's objection, I wasn't aware that fan sites didn't count as image sources. I'll get to work on that tomorrow. For 4dot's objection... I don't know what to do. LtNOWIS has offered to help me with finding pics of Padmé from the comics, as I only own the Commencement TPB. However, I can't do anything about the galleries. This is a very visual subject, and putting the pictures under each of their headings would look absolutely atrocious. So I don't know what to do about that one. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  03:20, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You might like to use this image also. --Eyrezer 03:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I wonder if something like this could work. I've only done one section so far. --Eyrezer 04:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I tried this once before |here but I think something similar would work now, with the expanded text. Maybe?--Amthyst fire 06:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This might not be popular, but I would suggest trimming several images. .  .  .  .  06:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm working on that now...here...And with the complaining, can I get a better res image of the "Peasant attire"???--Amthyst fire 06:32, 18 March 2007 (UTC)EDIT: I'm not sure what to do with some of the Images, because, while they enhance the understanding of some of the outfits, is there really room for two pictures of basically the same thing?EDIT:The picture for "Gift Dress" hardly shows it at all. While I realize it is a cartoon, and the picture of what is discribed will not do justice to the words, could we at least have said picture?
 * Better, but it's still such an amount for it to disrupt the prose. If the gallerys are fair use, I'll allow them, and then give support when the comic dresses are up. .  .  .  .  07:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, .  .  .  .  but this is going to be an image intensive article no mater what we do with it. There's no way around it, but we might be able to get the text to flow well around the pictures, well enough anyway. I personally would like to see more text, but I really don't know how much more waxing poetic about the clothes that she wore I could take. I redid the pics again, now all of the "tall" ones are at 100px. Is that less distracting? --Amthyst fire 09:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * In a minute I'll start working on image sourcing and expanding several comic appearances, but I just want you to know that whatever you guys agree on, I'll go with. Personally I prefer galleries, but if that can't be worked with, then oh, well. I know you'll end up agreeing on something, and I know that, whatever the decision, it will have taste, due to several of you (that have a big stick) having a sense of taste. I know you won't go along with something that looks like garbage. PS. As for a better picture of the Peasant disguise, I've looked and can't find anything. I know it stinks but it's the only (full body) pic we got. - Solus  (Bird of Prey)  16:51, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * My personal preference would be to get rid of the galleries. I think that they are ugly, and they detract from the flow of the article. I also would like to be able to see what the discription is talking about, right there instead of having to go hunt for it in a gallery. I don't think I'm as peavy about it as fourdot, but I don't think the galleries are entirely necessary. View proposed changes here--Amthyst fire 18:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Eyrezer but it really just looks like a gallery without the box. --Amthyst fire 18:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * In all actuality, if I had to choose between Eyrezer's version or Amthyst's, I'd choose Eyrezer's. Less distracting, and the images are right there next to it. Just my preference. Oh, and I think I've taken care of the fan-sited images, if you'll just take a look, Imp. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  19:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * EDIT: I've added pics and descriptions of the comic appearances known to me, and the dress on the tapestry in The Last Command. Until a format is decided upon or I'm given more pics, I can't really do much anything more. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I love this article, but I do think the intro could be better-written.  - breathesgelatin Talk 21:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Better-written as in length or grammar-wise? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  21:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * EDIT: I response to your comment, breathes, I just did an intro overhaul. Can you see if it's any better? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe you could break the bigger sections up by content. Specifically, I think the Senator section could be broken into three sections(EP II, CW, and EP III) and then maybe the travel atire into 2: Naboo and not Naboo, although I'd try to think of something else to call it(Ep II and Ep III, maybe too?) That's probably too OOU though. Maybe before and after her marriage? I think that would make the galleries shorter, since everyone seems to have agreed to use them, anyway. I dunno. I can do it if someone else thinks it's a good idea. Amthyst fire 02:31, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * While I agree that Senator attire is getting long, dividing it up according to episode and blatantly saying so is too OOU. I'd divide it up, but a 'before and after marriage' kind of division would leave three before marriage and the rest after marriage, a very uneven arrangement, in my opinion. I'm not sure what would go best, I'll let the Inqs figure it out. That's they're job anyhoo. :) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  02:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh, no big. I'm sure that we could find a good IU explaination for the way that they get split--Maybe before and after she gets pregnant?--Amthyst fire 06:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That would be fairly good. I'll see about that. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  13:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Because it did not divide it about in half and we don' know for sure when she conceived anyway, I divided it in a before/after Second Battle of Coruscant. If this is not satisfactory, it can be easily changed or reverted. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  16:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It is better, and works IU. The sections all seem to be about the same length, sort of. Now the only remaining thing is to source the images properly?--Amthyst fire 16:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Image sourcing. A list of Image issues has been compiled, mostly just verify issues. --Amthyst fire 18:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, thank you so much! Um, after just a quick skim, I noticed that you believed Image:NightgownRobe.jpg to be a screenshot. I'm not sure if it is or not, but I've looked over Dressing a Galaxy a lot and I know that that picture is in there. I wasn't doing a catch-all, I promise. Thanks again. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Your welcome. I think I've seen the book once or twice, but I may be thinking of the visual dictionary of episode 1, which I have seen numerous times. I don't have any idea what it contains, other than the general premise of the book. --Amthyst fire 18:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No prob. When you say that an image has 'fill-in-the-blank.com' in the text, that's a history thing saying what it used to say. It's unchangeable. Also, I'm working on finding a better pic of Image:Padmefull2GVelvet.jpg, per your understandable complaint. I think I've addressed all of the others... - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * There, that should do it. I also added a better pic I found of the peasant disguise, and several others. All sourced, of course. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  19:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * So, now I'm having issues with Image:PadmeCW4.jpg, and other than fixing the box on Image:Imppal.jpg I think we're done. I'm going to go do that now, it's easy enough. --Amthyst fire 20:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay. Turns out CW4 was actually fan art... I'll go replace it with a screenshot. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I went and looked on Padawan's Guide, and, it's actually very good fan art. The full image did, acording to the site, only appear on a veggie label. But that's not the image that you have, it's been touched up.--Amthyst fire 20:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It actually is the same fan art, I put it on a gray background because white IMHO causes too much contrast. Anyhoo, I replaced it with a legitimate one. Not full-body, but oh, well. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You've done a great job with this article Solus. I hope that I've been helpful, in my small ways, and not too much of a bother. I think we are done for the most part, whoo-hoo. On to bigger and badder projects. Maybe the Padmé Amidala Page, which they are threatining to remove FA status from?-Amthyst fire 23:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)-
 * Thank you, you've been a huge help. I wouldn't mind tackling Amidala, except I know clothes better than I know people. I'm an Erik Pflueger-esque prose + detail person. However, just cause I've been dared to try...  let's do it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  01:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Voren Na'al
Support Objections Comments
 * 1) jSarek 04:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 04:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Ozzel 05:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) .  .  .  .  06:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Lord Hydronium 07:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  - breathesgelatin Talk 21:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs a main image better proportioned for the FA box on the main page. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 22:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Now has a square bust shot for infobox, with old full image moved to bottom of article. jSarek 06:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Voren Na'al 21:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think I've got everyone's favorite history major up to snuff, or at least up to snuff enough that objections will be manageable. jSarek 04:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Snow King
Support
 * 1) .  .  .  .  21:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 22:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Adamwankenobi 02:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Time to get picky. Get rid of "and all was good again" from the intro. Also, I can't believe I'm saying this but, I demand a source for their "sexual affair". Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It is strongly implied...mentioned, even, that Orga, or whatever her name is, was the Snow King's lover. Or something. .  .  .  .  22:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Yuuzhan Vong War
Support
 * 1) Very "to the point"-Jacen 15:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) No references, some images unsourced. -LtNOWIS 21:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Some parts seem a bit anti-Vong POV-ish. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:30, 21 March 2007 (UTC)