Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Anti-Alien League

 * Nominated by:  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Something different for a change.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 21:32, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 10:24, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) GTQ3:09, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) GTQ3:09, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Menkooroo
 * 2) * Gorton Colu has a CSWE entry and is mentioned in the KOTOR Strategy Guide --- do you know if either of those sources mention the Anti-alien league?
 * 3) **Nope, no mention in the CSWE.
 * 4) ***Strategy Guide? SoresuMakashi might be able to help you out; he GA'd Colu.
 * 5) ****I'll see if he can help.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Awesome! Let me know when you find out whether or not the league is mentioned (directly or indirectly) in the strategy guide.Menkooroo 04:45, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ******No mention in the guide.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 17:02, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) *******Thanks for checking that out. I saw some of the inquiries you made on various talk pages --- good hustle! Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) * "The Anti-Alien League was a Humanocentrist group formed by Gorton Colu" is currently sourced to The Essential Atlas.
 * 10) **Resourced.
 * 11) * I could and should fix this one myself, but it'll be handy for you to know if you don't already: Only use punctuation in image captions if it's a complete sentence. Menkooroo 02:43, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) **Fixed.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:06, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) Rubefacient
 * 14) * Context of Taris's multiple cities should be added.
 * 15) **Done.
 * 16) ***Mention that aliens were prohibited from UpCity under normal conditions. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) ****Done.
 * 18) * There needs to be a year in the intro
 * 19) **Try now.
 * 20) ***I'm sorry, I was confused by the banner. Because of that banner, I think this should be made with a History section to avoid the dissonance caused by it. I'll not force you to, but it would probably be beneficial. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) ****I've moved the image over. Does this help?
 * 22) *****Greatly. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 23) * You say the league was mentioned in the game in the body but say it appeared in the BTS.
 * 24) **Corrected.
 * 25) * Because the article assumes 100% completion, you do not need the clause saying he could be avoided. That is, unless you include the alternate dialogue tracks (which you should).
 * 26) **Alternate dialogue tracks? There are no others that mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 27) ***Revan can ignore the man, can agree with his speciesism, or tell him to screw off. Which of these elicits the mention? If it is the lattermost, remove the portion saying that Colu mentioned it to Revan and say that he could mention it to Revan given the proper dialogue in the BTS. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 28) ****I believe he mentions it the first time Revan talks to him (and before any dialogue choices come up).  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:26, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 29) *****Then say that Revan can choose not to speak to him. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 30) ******Done.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 13:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 31) *******Sorry for the runaround. I couldn't wrap my head around it the right way. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 32) *Speciesism FTW NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:17, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 33) SavageBob
 * 34) *I think the article should go into more detail about the player's potential conversations with Colu, The player can agree with him or refute him, if I remember correctly, and the reactions of the side characters (the Wookiee and the Twi'lek) change as well. This should probably all be mentioned in BTS. ~ SavageBob 06:24, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 35) **While that might work in Colu's article, in no other place in Colu's dialogue does it even remotely mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 01:12, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 36) ***Isn't it still pertinent, though, since Colu is out touting the league? ~ SavageBob 16:21, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 37) ****Okay, try now.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 19:21, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 38) *****I think that should be in the BTS; the party doesn't have to include Zaalbar or Mission at that point. Instead, I think you should mention that "If the party includes Mission or Zaalbar, they react to his anti-alien rant by blah blah blah" and/or "Colu reacts to the Wookiee and Twi'lek by saying blah blah blah." ~ SavageBob 19:40, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 39) ******Try now.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 20:00, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 40) *******Sorry to keep harping on this, but it goes beyond even that. If either the Wookiee or the Twi'lek is in the party, Colu does chide Revan. But there are further levels of interaction depending on whether Revan agrees or disagrees with Colu's rant. If you have the game saved near hear, play through with the two in your party and you'll see what I mean. If not, try to find the dialogue files or a video walkthrough. ~ SavageBob 20:27, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 41) Sanjuro
 * 42) *Please add Ref tags to the Bts. will work fine . SinisterSamurai 21:51, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 43) *"Colu will chide Revan because of neither Zaalbar nor Vao being human," seems weird to me. Maybe change it to "Colu will chide Revan because neither Zaalbar nor Vao are human." (It's OK for the Bts to be present tense, but you can use "were" instead of "are".) SinisterSamurai 21:51, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 44) ** Actually, neither is a singular pronoun, so either was or is would be appropriate. :) ~ SavageBob 22:16, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 45) ***Even better. SinisterSamurai 22:50, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 46) Jujiggum
 * 47) *Just from having read the Gorton Colu article, I see some information missing here. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:56, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Also, guest nom for WP:KOTOR.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:58, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Fizz-Pop Cap (with foil cluster)

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 03:33, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: You know you wish you had one.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 08:16, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I suppose it isn't necessary, but could you include either Spilfer's infobox image, or a cropped version that focuses on the cap? SinisterSamurai 22:59, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *I would like to, but there are a couple of problems. The image would look best in the infobox, but I don't want to give the impression that Spilfer's hat is the Fizz-Pop Cap in question; it could also be a bottle cap that isn't depicted in the image, say. Second, if I put his image anywhere else, it has to be left-justified in the BTS section, but this breaks the page, causing the image to cut through the next two headers below it and into the notes on my screen. So I made the decision not to include the image after all. If you have any suggestions for how to make it work, though, please let me know! ~ SavageBob 18:20, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * It just occurred to me that "Fizz-Pop Cap" could refer to some sort of pop-top from a soda can instead of the actual hat/cap Spilfer is shown to be wearing. Am I right to assume that "Cap" here is the hat? What do others think? ~ SavageBob 03:02, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Upon further reflection, it's too ambiguous; infobox duly gutted. ~ SavageBob 06:50, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Oxixo

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 19:29, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Capstick:
 * 2) *Jedi-Business.com Provides Oxixo's homeworld as Kamino. Are you able to tell if that information is on the packaging? SinisterSamurai 16:49, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * No it isn't. Is that website a canon source, or just a fan site? Hanzo Hasashi 20:31, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Jedi-Business.com has some nice shots of Oxixo, but mentions that the mold is identical to Mianda's. Mianda's review mentions that he is in turn a re-release of The Legacy Collection's TIE fighter pilot. that figure's review has a really nice face shot, wherein their logo can be easily cropped to make a very decent info-box proportioned image. Jedi-Business mentions that there are some minor facial color differences between Mianda and the LC's Pilot, but I can't see any difference. It's up to you if you want to swap out images. SinisterSamurai 16:49, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * If we start accepting any fan-made shot of the action figures as canon, I think it'll signal that we've crossed a line. Just saying, Hanzo, do as you wish, but I think this is something the community should address. ~ SavageBob 23:47, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Rebelscum doesn't have this figure profiled yet, so it's tricky. As soon as they do, the article will have to be updated to include Template:HasbroCite. Pictures of the action figure from rebelscum have traditionally been OK to use in articles, but I think that rebelscum is the exception rather than the rule. I'd recommend waiting until rebelscum does have a profile on this guy in their action figure photo archives before nominating him for a status article, personally. The article will have to make some changes to its template and likely its lead image at that time, and I think it would be best to wait until we can say for sure that the article is complete before calling it "comprehensive." Just a recommendation. Menkooroo 03:37, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Personally, I'd recommend the box image if any toy image is used. I don't think waiting is necessary per se, just caution on what image to use. :O ~ SavageBob 05:20, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Will change the image some time later today or tomorrow. Hanzo Hasashi 20:31, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

D5-Mantis Patrol Craft
Ok, maybe i've got one this time
 * Nominated by: GTQ 23:48, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Like your last nomination, it is currently impossible for this article to reach comprehensive status because it will appear in a upcoming canon release.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 04:32, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Is there a rule against that? I think it's probably wise not to nominate it, but the sheer fact that something is going to appear in the future shouldn't be reason not to CA something. In other words, what's the harm CA'ing the article now but then revisiting if and when more information comes available? ~ SavageBob 07:08, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **According to Toprawa during a discussion in IRC, this is the intention of rule 5. Besides, it can hardly be called comprehensive when new information is so obviously on the horizon.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 08:03, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Yes. It seems almost like lying; "We know everything already" is the message the reader will get from seeing the 'comprehensive' box. Didn't think that IRC discussion would ever come up again.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 04:57, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Trayus
 * 6) *I can say with certainty that this article is not comprehensive in its coverage of the subject. There is much information missing, and if it were truly comprehensive then it would easily be in GA territory. Like, Quesh, the EC will allow you a day or two to get this article in proper running shape before starting a vote to remove the nomination. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 22:37, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I made a number of edits to this article.  As a reminder, for future articles, when using the possessive form of "it," it is "its," without the apostrophe.  The addition of the apostrophe contracts "it is" to "it's."  After the formatting and grammar edits, I would have considered supporting this article, but for the reasons that Olioster has mentioned, I cannot.  So, I am simply going to inform you of the changes made.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:55, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Reridan Reksiss

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:20, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: This person needs to be used in something.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I was wondering if "actor" was enough indication that the character is male... I eventually decided that the answer was: "Yes." Menkooroo 02:17, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Shimazu
 * 2) * I'm guessing that you don't like ref tags on single-source articles. SinisterSamurai 22:08, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **As stated above: per Sourcing Rule #5, ref tags on single-source articles are not required. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:16, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Gaeriala Boosin

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:20, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A musician to go with these song noms.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Boo! Sin! Menkooroo 02:14, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ishida
 * 2) * No ref tags? SinisterSamurai 22:07, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **And once again: ref tags are not necessary on single-source articles per WP:S rule 5. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:19, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

South Quarter Mining Refinery

 * Nominated by: NAYAYEN &mdash;it appears to be a frammistat 15:56, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It explodes.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
 * 1) Star Wars: Dark of Dxun NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:30, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) This needs a Location infobox.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:44, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *A bit token, but added. NAYAYEN &mdash;it appears to be a frammistat 18:02, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Template:Structure infobox might be better. Menkooroo 18:06, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Switched, for all the difference it made :P NAYAYEN &mdash;it appears to be a frammistat 18:19, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) * This also needs a quote from the broadcast. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:22, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) **Added, the refinery's mention consists of this single sentence so that's all you can get. NAYAYEN &mdash;it appears to be a frammistat 18:27, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

RB-551

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 20:59, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: This place's getting quiet.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Actually write out a short intro in order to tell whether or not the 28 words would feel too fluffy. For example, my intro to Obitoki would qualify this article for GA and it is only two sentences long. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:27, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Gelesi's wife

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:43, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My FAN's pulchritudinous sweetheart.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Gelesi's daughter

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:43, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Contrary to popular belief, my FAN and previous CAN were not polyphiloprogenitive.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments