Wookieepedia:Improvement drive

The improvement drive is a collaboration to improve existing articles to Featured article status.


 * /History – For past winners.
 * /Failed – For failed nominations.

Nomination and Voting
Articles to be improved can be nominated by registered users in the "nominations" section below, with an explanation of what work is needed. Please do not nominate articles involved in edit wars. Also, when nominating an article, please put IDRIVE on that article's page so as to inform any visitors of the page of its nomination.

Each Sunday, the article with the most support votes is chosen. Opposing votes are not counted. You can vote for as many articles as you like. Articles need two votes per week to stay on the list.

Note: It is considered somewhat rude not to help improving articles you've voted for.

Collaboration
Here are some best practices to use while working on an article selected for the improvement drive:
 * 1. Plan your contribution. After an article has been chosen, it is a good idea to post your ideas for additions, changes and corrections for the topic on the article's talk page. You can then choose some of the listed contributions to avoid overlapping work.
 * 2. Be quick. Use . Once you have planned your work, make your edits quickly, but carefully. Articles chosen for the drive are the likely subjects of many rapid edits. By entering and exiting EDIT mode quickly, you can avoid another user saving a new edit before you have completed your work. If your edit will be more lengthy, place the  tag at the top of the article, save the edit to make the tag appear, and then begin your work.

Nominations

 * The next project article is to be selected on Sunday February 19.

Please add new nominations at the bottom of the page.

Mallatobuck

 * Nominated January 14, 2006, needs 10 votes by February 18, 2006

Support Comments
 * 1) SFH 22:11, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Adamwankenobi 22:23, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Skywalka 22:31, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Mirlen 04:08, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) KEJ 15:59, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Chrisyu357 14:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Stake black 19:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Ozzel 20:26, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Cato Neimoidia 15:42, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Vermilion 01:36, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Chewbacca's wife deserves better than this. Come on people. SFH 22:24, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * I concur. Adamwankenobi 22:31, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * One of the saddest articles/pages I've ever seen. No offense meant. Mirlen 04:08, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * In terms of the subject or the content? ;) Adamwankenobi 04:20, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Must you ask, you? :P, :D Definately terms of the content! &mdash;Mirlen 03:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Given that there's lots of info on her in the Chewbacca comics, this article can and must be expanded KEJ 15:59, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This is a MISERABLE article! Cato Neimoidia 15:42, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

List of companies and corporations

 * Nominated January 31, 2006; needs 6 votes by February 21, 2006

Support
 * 1) CooperTFN 06:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Imp 07:42, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) RMF 23:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Danik Kreldin 22:41, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * This probably isn't appealing enough to have a shot, but I thought I'd give it the ol' college try. Here's the trick: the article itself is fine&mdash;it's just a list, after all. The problem is that it's about 70% redlinks. Aziz and I have chipped away at it a little so far, but if we got several people on board and maybe assigned letter ranges or something, it could actually be feasible to finish it. And just think of the boost to our article count. Anyone up to the challenge? CooperTFN 06:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This is the sort of work I absolutely love doing. Strong support. --Imp 07:42, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I like this idea, but I don't really have that many SW books/comics/etc, which could limit my usefulness. If there are sources online that I could use, I would definitely help. Letter ranges is a great idea, especially if we get a decent number of people. RMF 23:05, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
 * CUSWE is pretty sure-fire for something like this, especially since that's where the list came from. CooperTFN 00:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I've started writing articles for all the red links. I'll be finished in a few days. Hopefully! -Danik Kreldin 08:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Galactic Federation of Free Alliances

 * Nominated February 2, 2006, needs 4 votes by February 16, 2006

Support
 * 1) MyNz 19:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) AngelQueen 15:37, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) AdmiralNick22

Comments This article is rather stubby and can be expanded further. MyNz 19:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Sith

 * Nominated February 3, 2006; needs 8 votes by March 4, 2006

Support
 * 1) Imp 23:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Clonesoldier91
 * 3) SFH 00:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) AdmiralKadann 07:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Mirlen 00:06, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) MoffRebus 11:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * I mean, come on. --Imp 23:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * This article could definitely use a facelift, especially for one of the most important antagonistic groups in the Star Wars galaxy -- Clonesoldier91
 * More like the most important. -- SFH 00:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright, I know we all can do better than that. &mdash;Mirlen 00:06, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Black Fleet Crisis

 * Nominated February 4, 2006; needs 4 votes by February 18, 2006

Support
 * 1) SFH 02:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Kwenn 21:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * It's been a stub for way too long, at it needs more facts as well. I just came from it, and it said that Borsk Fey'lya was Chief of State instead of Leia. -- SFH 02:00, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Definately needs more; a single paragraph for an event spanning three books? - Kwenn 21:05, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Delta Squad

 * Nominated February 5, 2006; needs 6 votes by February 26, 2006

Support Comments Phillowe88 19:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Revan 2:22,5 Febuary 2006
 * 2) User:Smickin Awesome 6:21, 7 February 2006
 * 3) Cato Neimoidia 15:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Phillowe88 19:20, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * One of the greatest military units and its still a stub
 * What is this? There are articles about background characters that 75%+ of Wookieepedians don't know about that are better than this! And this is a video game! Cato Neimoidia 15:49, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * This article doesn't do the Delta's justice. It needs much more expansion on the missions they undertook.

Lightsaber

 * Nominated February 11, 2006; needs 4 votes by February 25, 2006

Support
 * 1) Mike Kazz 1:36, 11 February 2006
 * 2) MoffRebus 12:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Mirlen 19:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * It's had that 'Doom' tag way too long. &mdash;Mirlen 19:47, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Star Wars Trilogy (Special Edition)

 * Nominated February 12, 2006; needs 4 votes by February 26, 2006

Support
 * 1) MoffRebus 19:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) CooperTFN 19:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Nobody ever bothered about this aticle, although we all bothered about the movies 9 years ago :) MoffRebus 19:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Speak for yourself. http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/14.gif Article does need work, though. CooperTFN 19:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I mean we were 'bothered' to go and see them, as in 'interested', not that we were bothered in the negative way. Thanks for the vote MoffRebus 19:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Blaster

 * Nominated February 14, 2006; needs 2 votes by February 28, 2006

Support
 * 1) Mike Kazz 1:36, 14 February 2006

Comments