Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Warrior's Honor


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Warrior's Honor

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:45, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Painting painting painting painting painting

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Gave it a look, didn't find anything to object to. I'm not entirely sure what I would object to, anyway. Well, I don't like the way Trandoshans look in Galaxies, but I can't fault the article for that.   Trak Nar  Ramble on 07:17, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) It was minor enough that I sofixited it, but watch your grammar in the future, please.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:14, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Menkooroo 05:44, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Musashi
 * 2) * Why no ref tags? SinisterSamurai 21:52, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Cause it has only one source? If you mean the infobox, can you please direct me to the policy where it says you have to reference it, because I've been getting mixed messages on this.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 21:58, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***References are optional&mdash;not required&mdash;for articles with only one source/appearance per Sourcing Rule 5. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:14, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****I suppose CAN Rule 9 does say that you don't have to, although it encourages it. Not sure there where a precise policy on Infobox sourcing would be. This will eventually get enough votes to make CA either way, but I won't vote for any CAN without ref tags. I feel like the next time a SW Encyclopedia is made, LFL will cull from our CAs, just like they did with the GAs and FAs. If that happens, then it won't be a single-source article, and the nominator might not be around/give a enough of a crap to sort it out. SinisterSamurai 22:19, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Alright, done.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 22:34, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Getting better at the whole "describing it" thing, but if you see ways to improve it, go ahead.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:45, March 5, 2011 (UTC)