User talk:Exiledjedi/Archive 5

EduCorps meeting
Hey Exile, I see you've put yourself as attending for the next meeting. I was just wondering if you think I've put it too soon? We seem to have been having them about once a month recently, but normally they're meant to be every three. If you think it's good I'll send out a message to everyone letting them know it's been scheduled. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:24, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

Chopper droid
Is there any way you could make the name space Chopper droid available for the Canon page of the DD-13 medical assistant droid? I've had to use Chopper medical droid instead, which is not accurate to its source, Star Wars in 100 Scenes. 2-1B droid is needed too. Thanks. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 06:56, December 26, 2014 (UTC)
 * Chopper medical droid to Chopper droid and 2-1B medical droid/Canon to 2-1B droid. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 01:36, December 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Good job. It may not be pretty, but that's what the book called them. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 02:55, December 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm going to need 2 more namespaces cleared. DC-15 blaster rifle and DC-15A blaster, the Canon pages for the DC-15A blaster rifle and DC-15S blaster respectivley. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 20:57, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Remember that little continuity error in Death Trap? It's not an error anymore. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 21:40, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 22:37, December 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm going to need Storm Commando for the Canon Storm commandos page. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 06:39, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 07:17, January 3, 2015 (UTC)
 * For some reason, the namespace Electrostaff/Canon namespace is taken. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 03:21, January 5, 2015 (UTC)

WOTM 2015
I'm not really one to do these things but since no one else did it yet... hey, congratulations! 2015 opens up with you as the Wookieepedian of January. Winterz (talk) 15:20, January 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * Congratulations :) Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:28, January 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * These are probably too many awards in a short amount of time but.. wutever:

Infobox edits
Hey mate, I had not idea sorry, I'll go back and have a look. I thought it was ok since when I looked at the source (of the infobox) it seemed to be fine and it was removing the pages from the "Infoboxes with missing parameters" category... Manoof (talk) 06:21, January 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, is it supposed to be "Character" or "Character_infobox"? Both those and "Character infobox" don't seem to give redirects or anything so I'm just accepting what you said without understanding. Manoof (talk) 06:33, January 11, 2015 (UTC)
 * I was wondering about that! Thanks for the info! :) Manoof (talk) 07:31, January 11, 2015 (UTC)

KOTOR question
Hello ExiledJedi. I asked you a while ago about an issue I had with my KOTOR Collection. Well here's the thing, the entire lower command panel for the game, including the dialoge section is gone, and that's why I can't get anywhere from the first dialoge scene. So I'd like to ask you if you don't perhaps know about a game mod that can fix this? Or do I just have to get another copy of the game?

P.S. Happy 10th anniversary by the way. MadMarek -  Talk  -  Contribs
 * It's okay, I'll see what else I can dig up. But thank you anyway!Redstarbird.svg MadMarek -  Talk  -  Contribs  10:10, January 18, 2015 (UTC)

Award
Thanks, EJ. It's nice to know you're always happy and willing to do boring, monotonous bot work whenever something needs to be done. I appreciate your efforts. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:11, January 20, 2015 (UTC)

Rebellion Era Sourcebook
Hello EJ, I saw that a couple years ago you added Rebellion Era Sourcebook as a source for Vizam. If you have that book, can you tell me if Rennek has any relevant info, or is also just ? I'm guessing the latter, but want to verify it. Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 18:07, January 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * So the image used for Rennek isn't even of the character? I think then I have to change his infobox picture. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:24, January 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Would you also have the relevant Rennek info from Who's Who In Jabba's Palace? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:27, January 24, 2015 (UTC)

RepCom Guide - AC Detonator
Hey EJ, the entry is as follows: Electrostatic Charge Detonator Manufacturer: Blastech Industries Ammunition type: Electrostatic charge Ammo count: 5 Fuse timer: 1 second after impact The EC detonator is effective against technology-based targets, such as battle droids, as well as organics. The EC Detonator emits an electrostatic charge that renders electronic circuits useless and electrocutes organic targets. Use with caution because it has a large radius. These detonators will reduce even the super battle droids to quivering chunks of metal for a short time, allowing you to attack them in safety. EC detonators have a wide blast radius, making them good for halting a large group of droids. The blast will cause nearby commandos to suffer adverse affects, because their equipment such as visors are effected by the electrostatic charge.

There's mentions in the battle tactics sections of the enemies chapter, which only add the following (paraphrased):
 * Thermal detonators > EC against B1 since the EC stuns whilst the Dets destroy
 * Recommended stun/sonic detonator combo against B2s
 * Droideka's shields disabled by the stun charge
 * Using ECs against magnaguards to stun them and keep them still

Let me know there's anything else I can help with. Manoof (talk) 10:56, February 8, 2015 (UTC)

Meeting 19
Hello, EduCorps meeting 19 will occur on March 7, 2015 at 7 PM ET, in the #EduCorps IRC channel. In the case that you are not attending, please leave notes in advance. 501st dogma ( talk ) 01:01, February 12, 2015 (UTC)

Armor regiment
Look, I'd move the article, but thanks to the rather sloppy method of implementing legends and canon subheaders in various articles, trying to do that would be a huge mistake because the article would be forced to block out the redirect area, which actually might be necessary.

I wanted to make it a disambig article so it wouldn't need to undergo a redirect as a result of a move. And if we delete it, we'd run the risk of it being a redlink as well. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 15:57, February 18, 2015 (UTC)

New Essential Chronology question
Hey EJ, just wondered if you could check something for me? I know the book places the Occupation of Bespin in 3 ABY, but does it also place the subsequent events of Aargau: For All Your Banking Needs and Star Wars 48: The Third Law in either 3 or 4 ABY? The best I have is that the events in question happen "not long" after cloud city... Thanks mate! Manoof (talk) 01:41, February 26, 2015 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... that might have to do, not sure they are chronological though. Some more digging will be had, thanks for that though! Manoof (talk) 09:55, February 26, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Legends articles that only exist in canon sources
Hey EJ, sorry about that, I wasn't aware of the distinction and figured that, since they'd only appeared in the clone wars tv series, they'd be canon. I'll refrain from changing things to canon in future, and will go change those others back. Manoof (talk) 13:42, February 27, 2015 (UTC)

Canon sources
Hello, I am a star wars fan and am looking forward to episode 7, I would like to brush up on my star wars knowledge and I'd like to ask, where on here or what site lists all the star wars tv shows, books and games that are canon? Cause I want to touch up on it and look into all of what I've missed on. M. Warlow 08:23, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. M. Warlow 00:12, March 5, 2015 (UTC)

RE: EduCorps
Fair enough, if that's the decision that's been made I won't complain. Just out of interest is there record of the discussion about it, it doesn't seem to be in the log and I'm curious as to exactly what criticisms were made so I can work on improving my flaws. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:25, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

Sandtrooper
Hello EJ, there are still many pages that link to the sandtrooper redirect instead of desert stormtrooper. Is it possible to run a bot to fix this? Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:33, March 12, 2015 (UTC)

Need help
Hello. Can you show me where the JS for template App, please? HellK9t (talk) 12:07, March 13, 2015 (UTC)

Meeting 20
Hello, EduCorps meeting 20 will occur on March 22, 2015 at 7 PM ET, in the #EduCorps IRC channel. If you are unable to attend, please leave notes in advance. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:19, March 14, 2015 (UTC)

Another New Essential Chronology question
Hi EJ, I was hoping you'd be able to help check something for the Nightscreamer article. The Mandalorian Armor places cradossk's death shortly after the battle of yavin, I was wondering if the essential chronology specified if it was 0 or 1 ABY, if at all? Various articles seem to use both, or even circa either year. This is for the reference which I've just added, I want to make sure it's correct (It'll also go on the BAX-7 article). Thanks again! Manoof (talk) 01:41, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * It appears at the end of the bounty hunter wars, so I'll just use c. 0 ABY? Manoof (talk) 01:52, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * The best I have is your 0-0.5 ABY, coupled with the Mandalorian Armor's "Just after the events of A New Hope"... Looking at other articles, the only other source may be the essential reader's companion, so I've sent a message to CP. Manoof (talk) 02:06, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll change the mention of the date, but doesn't that mean it's speculation to have one, the other or even both? Manoof (talk) 02:29, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * So I removed the eras in the infobox and eras tag, and made a few changes, is that better? Also wouldn't that BTS mention be counted as trivia on this page, though it would belong on Chek's BTS? Manoof (talk) 02:38, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Made the changes as suggested. Manoof (talk) 07:03, March 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries, I'll make those changes, section them and prepare them for GAnoming :) Thanks heaps EJ for your help! Manoof (talk) 07:16, March 20, 2015 (UTC)

Inqmoot 70
Inqmoot 70 is on Saturday, April 4 at 7 PM EDT or 11 PM UTC. Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:27, March 26, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks man
thank you for moving that page i made to a better titleAngrydroideka10 (talk) 00:26, March 27, 2015 (UTC)

Vendaran
Excuse me but Vendaran was fixed before the last EC meeting, so why was its status removed? Did no one actually check the article? --Eyrezer (talk) 05:54, March 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Grr, no only after the meeting but before the paperwork was done... Is there a solution? --Eyrezer (talk) 05:57, March 27, 2015 (UTC)

Josh Question
Hi my name is josh and I am doing a project on star wars. I was wondering if you could help me with this since you are knowledgeable about the topic. -josh

Imperial Handbook question
Hello EJ, does Imperial Handbook: A Commander's Guide properly confirm the Tyrant as Imperial I-class, or is that still something that can only be ducktested? I saw you updated Xamuel Lennox with info from that source, so was wondering if you would know. Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:13, April 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. Was wondering if we can use any proper source instead of that ducktest explanation, but as is it's fine. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:17, April 12, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Paperwork
Yeah, going to do those all at once once I finish the talk page stuff for the failed ones. 501st dogma ( talk ) 19:29, April 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that, should be good now. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:07, April 12, 2015 (UTC)

EC Meeting 22
Hello EJ, [EduCorps Meeting 22] has been scheduled for Sunday, April 26 at 7 pm in our usual IRC room. Make a note on the calendar app of your choice! Corellian Premier The Force will be with you always 18:19, April 14, 2015 (UTC)

AC Meeting 78
AC Meeting 78 is scheduled for April 25. Please leave notes if you cannot attend. c ya Winterz (talk) 02:37, April 19, 2015 (UTC)

DL-18 blaster pistol move
Hey Exiledjedi. First off, I wanted to say thanks for all of those articles you've been deleting for me who have /Canon at the end of their names, but don't need it. I've been making sure to change all the links right after they're moved as well. I found the same problem with the DL-18 blaster pistol/Canon the other day ago, and tried to have the page DL-18 blaster pistol deleted so it could be moved there. I just checked today and Master Jonathan removed my request, saying he wouldn't "indulge laziness." Could you try to look into this or just move it yourself? I don't know why he said that, as I can't change the pages to link to DL-18 blaster pistol before it's even moved as it'll just be linking to an empty page. Thanks. Cevan (talk) 11:11, April 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks Exiled! Cevan (talk) 23:11, April 20, 2015 (UTC)

Meeting 23
Hello, EduCorps meeting 23 will occur on May 9th, 2015 at 7 PM ET, in the #EduCorps IRC channel. See you there hopefully. 501st dogma ( talk ) 02:03, April 29, 2015 (UTC)

Just out of curiousity, how do we know which of the star wars tv shows, video games and books are canon? Cause my friend told me that george lucas said only the films are canon and everything else is non canon.

M. Warlow 05:18, April 30, 2015 (UTC)

Galaxies TCG placeholders TC
Hi EJ, since you voted on the Galaxies TCG placeholders TC, I just wanted you to know the vote on the TC has been split with a vote option for each article. Manoof (talk) 05:10, May 1, 2015 (UTC)

CA problem list
Hey EJ, I was wondering if you could post the full list of CAs with issues as a tab on your userpage or something. It would mean that I could try to fix all of my articles sooner, hopefully reducing the Educorps workload since if they've been fixed to your satisfaction they won't need to be looked over in a meeting. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:16, May 1, 2015 (UTC)
 * You're clearly very thorough in reviewing the CAs. Given as articles don't 'belong' to any particular author but to the Wook, have you ever pondered whether it might involve less time and effort all round to just fix directly some of the minor points you raise? (With more substantial concerns it's obviously not the case.) As a small example, I refer to the Ubasameir article. It appears you've actually checked page 18 of that book, but your objection is not that the Kuari Princess is *not* a luxury liner or that the event occurs before the GCW, but just with the sourcing - ie the content of the article is not wrong... With the book in front of you, I suspect it would have taken 2 minutes to fix. Instead noting the error, taking it to the EC, waiting for someone (hopefully the original author, who may or may not still be present on the Wook) to fix it, then probably stripping/ or approving in anther EC meeting, all seems a rather inefficient way of doing service to the Wook. I'm sorry to raise this with you in particular seeing as it appears to me to be a broader pattern within the EG/AC/INQ community - more of a focus on stripping articles of status rather than a broader concern about *maintaining* quality articles on the Wook. It strikes me as a real shame and a change from a more collaborative time that I remember. However, given that this was one of the reasons I left the INQ and associated groups and am now absent from the Wook, maybe I don't have a leg to stand on with the observation. --Eyrezer (talk) 09:41, May 13, 2015 (UTC)

Works deletion
Hey Exiled. I was wondering if you could delete the Works page. In canon, the Works does not have "The" as a part of its name, and is just "Works." If you could delete that page so I could move The Works/Canon over to it I'd appreciate it. Thanks! Cevan (talk) 15:09, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Cevan (talk) 15:15, May 10, 2015 (UTC)

SWG TCG card images
Hi EJ, I was just wondering where you've been checking the card texts, I can't seem to find any sites that are hosting the images to check if the text is general, or specific to the characters in the image. The only one's I nom'd (and were able to check) were through the SWG wiki. Thanks! Manoof (talk) 08:26, May 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah ok, no worries! I was just wondering about the Sullustan and Twi'lek card, as the article seems to have some specific information. If you've seen it then I trust your judgement :) Manoof (talk) 05:11, May 21, 2015 (UTC)

RPGseed usage
Hi EJ, just wondered what the usage of RPGseed means precisely? I was assuming it was similar to gamemechanics in that the players can change the outcome. My objection was thus the fact that the BTS only mentioned the excorting of the wookiee and not the investigation, which if it is in the template could be affected by player choices. However on further thought, it occurred to me that it could just be the background story of the scenario, not affected by any choice a player makes. This alternative has me confused however, as it seems that the information wouldn't require a template at all. If I'm mistaken on the usage of the template, I'll just strike the objection. Thanks again! Manoof (talk) 09:00, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah ok, I get it, thanks! Manoof (talk) 19:41, May 25, 2015 (UTC)

AC Meeting 79
Meeting 79 of the Agricorps has been scheduled for 6th of June at the normal time. Please leave notes if unable to attend. - Sir Cavalier of One ( Squadron channel ) 11:33, May 27, 2015 (UTC)

Kiffu/Canon
Since you supported my Comprehensive article nomination for Kiffu, this is to let you know that the article is updated with new information from the recent Databank update. Also, I believe this newest update satisfies your previous objection regarding nothing specifically stating that it's a homeworld of the Kiffar species. ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:58, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

Kaliida Shoals station canon article
Hi Exiledjedi, I saw that you recently deleted "Kaliida Shoals Medical Center/Canon", the canon version of Kaliida Shoals Medical Center for being unverified. I don't know how that article was written before, but I wanted to make sure it be okay to recreate it, as it is named in canon on the Clone Wars episode guide here:. However, it is named Kaliida Shoals medical station or Kaliida Shoals station for short in the guide. Should it instead be created as "Kaliida Shoals medical station" and then link with the template? Squishy Vic | message 05:38, June 14, 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the help. Squishy Vic | message 23:45, June 14, 2015 (UTC)

Aloysius Kallig's lightsaber image
Hello. I see that you are the one who deleted the image of Kallig's lightsaber and stated your reason was that it was an unused image. I can state with full confidence that it was in use as of February 5th, until someone deleted the image from the page due to it being but one variant. The saber is from Star Wars: The Old Republic, and can either be a single or double-blade. However, there nonetheless was art drawn by Bioware of the saber, and it was the official image of the saber in question. As such, I must ask: why not simply put it back on the page it was meant to be rather than delete it? :( --Lestroisrois (talk) 04:43, June 15, 2015 (UTC)

Inq Meeting 72
Inquisitorius Meeting 72 has been scheduled for Saturday 18th July at the usual time, one an obscure body in the S-K system. Attendance under Ming's laws is required, or appropriate tribute should be offered. - Sir Cavalier of One ( Squadron channel ) 23:15, June 22, 2015 (UTC)

Educorps 26
Hello, Educorps Meeting 26, aka ode to the Phantoms, will be in our usual lounge space on Saturday, June 27 at 7 pm. Corellian Premier The Force will be with you always 00:30, June 23, 2015 (UTC)

Meeting 27
Hello, Educorps Meeting 27, Revenge of the Wookiee Zombie Chef, will occur on Saturday, July 11th at 7 pm. See you there. 501st dogma ( talk ) 00:25, June 29, 2015 (UTC)

Comic strip template
Hi there Exiled. I was wondering if you (or I, with your permission) could make a small change to the comic strip template. Currently the template is setup where the infobox title is automatically italicized. However, not every comic strip has an italicized title, and there's no way to undo this without altering the template itself. If someone wants their title italicized they can change it as such, but as it's currently set up it's not possible to un-italicize it. If it's all right, I'd like to have this removed from the template. Thanks. Cevan (talk) 22:31, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * All right, I've gone ahead and italicized all the titles that needed it. Cevan (talk) 00:35, July 7, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Cevan (talk) 01:25, July 7, 2015 (UTC)

New
Hi iam new to this wiki. --Wikiaguy2015 (talk) 22:41, July 12, 2015 (UTC)

Help with another wiki
I want to know if you or another Admin could help with another wiki. The Terminator Wiki http://terminator.wikia.com/wiki/Terminator_Wiki. It would help us a great deal. We need someone who can help improve the main page and the layout of the wiki itself. Can you or anyone else help wit that? Skywalker2255 (talk) 15:13, July 19, 2015 (UTC)

Ilos Minor
Thanks for the help!  Imperators II (Talk) 22:38, July 20, 2015 (UTC)

Atlas Online Companion systems
Hi Exiledjedi! I was wondering: since you mentioned that the Atlas Online Companion mentions only systems, does that apply to all the entries, not just the planets, but nebulas, etc.? Was there ever some sort of consensus on this? Thanks!  Imperators II (Talk) 13:52, July 24, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clearing that up for me!  Imperators II (Talk) 08:25, July 25, 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Meat/Canon
I noticed that you deleted the article Meat/Canon under the dictionary rule. I found this interesting because I believe this is the first time that an article for a canon subject that already has a Legends article has been deleted under that rule. The rules regarding canon subjects state that "Once a subject's name is established in a new canon source, whether that be new material or old material that has been designated as canon, it can receive an article detailing its existence in the canon continuity." Are we to assume then that if the subject appears in both Legends and canon, but the details of the canon subject don't meet the criteria under the dictionary rule, then only the Legends version gets an article? ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:34, August 15, 2015 (UTC)
 * P.S.: I see that the Legends version is now also nominated for deletion. I guess that's cool, though personally in terms of precedent I wonder if the other deletion should have waited until after the outcome of the Legends vote. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:36, August 15, 2015 (UTC)

Card game citations
Hi EJ, I was wondering if you had a chance to look at my reply in the Card Game Citations thread. Basically I was thinking we use the new template for any expansion packs that contain more than 1 card. This way, all expansion packs would take up a single bullet point in the Sources list regardless of how many cards are in the pack. If an expansion pack has only one card, it would be listed with the current template, which lists the card right next to the expansion pack name. If an expansion pack has 2 or more cards, it would have the "Show/hide" next to the expansion pack name using the new template. This would make all card game expansion packs uniform across all Sources lists in all articles, each taking up a single bullet point. I think that's better than picking a random number of cards before using the new template. I would like your thoughts if you can post in the thread. It would be nice to get this proposal implemented by the time it gets to the CT, and your support would go a long way towards that.-- Richterbelmont10  ( come in R2! ) 18:09, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Manaan/Canon
Thanks for taking care of the GA business for me. Also, your objections on Comprehensive article nominations/Manaan/Canon have been taken care of for nearly a month, so I would appreciate it if you would check it out. -  AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 04:51, August 22, 2015 (UTC)

Kiffu/Canon
I noticed that you struck your remaining objections to nomination for Comprehensive on Kiffu, but for some reason, I didn't get your vote. Therefore, if there is nothing else, could I please have your vote, as I believe it's all that's needed for the nomination to be successful. If there's something that still needs to be done, please let me know so that I can address it. ProfessorTofty (talk) 04:49, September 12, 2015 (UTC)

Mandalorian Neo-Crusaders/Canon
Hi Exiled. I was just curious as to why you removed the deletion tag from the canon Mandalorian Neo-Crusaders page. A source for the name was never added to the page, so, per policy, the page has to be deleted. Cevan (talk) 00:13, September 29, 2015 (UTC)

Next AC meeting
Hello EJ, I saw you wrote this on the Cannok GA's talk page back in 2012, and a quick skim of the article alone makes it appear that some, if not all, of your issues have never been addressed. Just posting to see if you believe those issues are worth bringing up on the next AC meeting page. It appears that the article should have been addressed in an AC meeting a while ago. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:14, October 5, 2015 (UTC)

Meeting 82
A reminder that AC Meeting 82 is tomorrow, Saturday the 24th at 4 p.m.  IFYLOFD  ( Talk ) 06:02, October 24, 2015 (UTC)

IRC
Hey EJ, if you have a minute, would you mind quickly popping by the IRC? Thanks, Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:28, November 7, 2015 (UTC)

Inqmoot 75
Meeting 75 will happen on November 28 at 8 PM. See you there. Cade   Calrayn  05:12, November 20, 2015 (UTC)

Edit question
What do you keep editing on each page every 10 seconds?
 * If you are referring to AL-BRT, I am fixing redirects to policy pages on user talk pages.-- Exiled Jedi  ( talk ) 21:01, November 28, 2015 (UTC)

Celestials
Forgive me for butting in, but I just wanted to say that Galactic Architecture 101 and the History of Centerpoint Station on the Star Wars Blog does, in fact, explicitly state that Force wielders are Celestials! Rod (talk) 17:41, December 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that out. There wasn't any reference to it on the page, so I was unaware of that information. I have re-added the merge tag.-- Exiled Jedi  ( talk ) 18:52, December 6, 2015 (UTC)