User talk:JMAS

{| width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #b2cc99; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

 Find archived discussions here: I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII | IX



'All questions/comments posted  here  will be replied to  here ''. If I posted on your talk page, please reply on your talk page, not here.'''
 * Welcome to my talkpage, ! Here is what you need to know:
 * Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started. (see the big, bold, red text above)
 * Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
 * Indent your comment by using an appropriate number of asterisks '*'. Please do not use ':'.
 * Start a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
 * To begin a new topic [ click this link].
 * Always sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~ ).

Audiophiles
Hey J,

Are you still able to upload audio from Tales of the Jedi: Dark Lords of the Sith? If so, I have a few I need please, when you have time.
 * 11:46 to 11:48&mdash;sound of lanvarok disc being hurled.
 * 11:48 to 11:41&mdash;Primitive weaponry&hellip;but accurate, said by Exar Kun.

That's based on a total play time of 1:08:34. Thanks either way.  —Tommy  9281  Friday, November 25, 2011, 18:02 UTC 
 * should be able to manage that for ya. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 18:29, November 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, how're those audio clips coming?  —Tommy  9281  Friday, December 2, 2011, 00:25 UTC 
 * *face palm* completely spaced on it. I'll get them done by this weekend. Thank YOU for giving me the timestamps which will make it MUCH easier for me to do. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 00:32, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries :P And that's based off of a 2nd disc with no track breaks. I have both, just the single hour & change long version on the pc only. Thanks again.  —Tommy  9281  Friday, December 2, 2011, 01:00 UTC 

"Primitive weaponry...but accurate!"

- Exar Kun

Here I was all ready to upload and add them to the article, and MJ slapped the inuse tag on it. LOL Anyway, here are the files, ready to copy and paste when MJ is done. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 02:59, December 2, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Fives
Yeah, I'm aware of the change. :P  JangFett  (Talk) 04:34, November 28, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Sniper droid
Done and done. :)  Trak Nar  Ramble on 01:01, November 29, 2011 (UTC)

Kiros
So, another request. Could you upload several pictures from Kidnapped? Basically, what I want to do is replace all the comic images in the article with images of the same scenes from the episode. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 11:44, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done, regarding all the images in the Kiros article. Did you also want everything found here also to be converted, as much as is possible give the changes to the storyline? -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 23:58, November 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * D'oh! Stupid me. I was talking about the Battle of Kiros, but I got distracted and didn't make it clear. I'm really sorry. Yeah, if it's not too much, the request stands. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 12:06, November 30, 2011 (UTC)

Delete
All set.  —Tommy  9281  Friday, December 2, 2011, 00:18 UTC 

Images of the Sith Emperor
http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/File:Sith_Emperor_1.png

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/File:Sith_Emperor_2.png

since when is youtube not a good source? i seen images on a lot on wikis from it.


 * Wookieepedia is not other wikis, it is not wikipedia. If your picture didn't come from an officially licensed source, then is is not welcome here. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 01:35, December 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough.

Re: Qui-Gon
Yeah, the Zygerrian thing is going to keep me occupied for a while, but as soon as I resume my work on Qui-Gon and find myself in need of images, I'll certainly drop you a note. Preserving the images from deletion won't be a problem, I think. We can always find some relevant mainspace article to add them to. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 10:40, December 5, 2011 (UTC)

Overwritten Edits?
I'm sorry, I'm a little confused/concerned by a comment you made (apple fly) about my recent edits to the article CT-7567. You seem to imply that my edits will be overwritten by "CC's work". Is that actually the case? I'm new here, and I joined in part because pages like that one where both poorly written and factually inaccurate. I welcome criticism and I understand that anything I post here is subject to revision, but it's a little disconcerting to hear that my work is going to be overwritten "anyway".

If to could clarify what you meant by that comment, I'd appreciate it. For now I'm assuming that my contributions are not welcome on that article, which is disappointing to say the least.--Sachariah 04:06, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * There is a WookieeProject The Clone Wars on which the founder, has marked Rex as a long term project he is working on, on one of his user subpages. So, while any quality edits you make to improve the current article are welcomed, and may be incorporated by CC's work on his subpage, when he is finished writing the article, he will likely replace the entire article as it sits now with that he has written and been working on a very long time. So any work you do may get overwritten, not because it is poorly written or anything like that, but simply because someone is working on it currently in the plans to make the Rex article a featured article here. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 04:13, December 8, 2011 (UTC)

TEA image reply/question
Hey, JMAS. Thanks for all your help with those TEA images. I don't mean to be a bother, but is there any chance that you can get a clearer image of this pic? By your response, I wasn't a hundred percent sure whether you could or not. Thanks again for your help.-- Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 20:42, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * That one wasn't on Chris Trevas's FB profile, but I think I can get an improved version of that. Do you have an article to put it in though? If not, "I'm afraid she's scheduled to be terminated." -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 20:46, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I should be able to find a place. Thanks. :) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:55, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. If you place it in an article, please be sure to remove it from here. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 20:57, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Will do. Thanks for your help. :) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 21:00, December 10, 2011 (UTC)

Re: WTCWtalk
Sure thing. Thanks as always. :)  CC7567  (talk) 06:23, December 11, 2011 (UTC)

Ringo Request
Hi, JMAS. Could you upload [|these][|two] from the Dutch starwars.wikia for the Ringo and Oz articles?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 12:53, December 16, 2011 (UTC)

More Mos Eisley Madness
Hey, JMAS,I had a question/request for you. Would it be possible to upload the image from the article to the Wook? Ideally without the lines and text, but if that's impossible, that's impossible. I don't think that image has appeared anywhere else previously (though File:Mos Eisley BTS group shot.jpg is close), and the identifications made by Chee are throwing a bunch of previous cantina IDs into doubt (see Forum:SH:More_Mos_Eisley_Madness). Also, the image would be good raw material to get good infobox images of the two Lutrillians, since neither of them is Solomahal, the only OT Lutrillian for whom we have a decent headshot. If you're too busy or unable to help, no problem at all. I thought if anyone could do it, though, it'd be you! Thanks. ~ Savage  16:20, December 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * I can probably edit down to get any headshots you need from it, and on those headshots, edit out lines. However, the full image, the most I'll be able to do is blank out the text in the bubbles. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 23:25, December 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, both of those sound helpful. The full image would at least be useful for us to debate how to treat the new information, and for some BTS sections. The headshots that would be useful at this point are the two Lutrillians and the white-haired Nimbanel. I really appreciate it, man. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 15:38, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Candidate
Uh, hello. I have watched Palpatine looks for a job many times on youtube. It's funny and professionally made, it deserves entry here.24.193.147.106 04:01, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * It was unsourced, and did not meet our Notability Requirements. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 04:37, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * What about the Curry PC and World Commercials and the Spike TV commercials.R they okay?24.193.147.106 05:01, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Frog-lady
I think that'd be a bit of a stretch. :P He does say that, but the name itself is too ridiculous to sound official, and even if it were official, we should wait for printed confirmation given the ambiguity of the name. It sounds like he used "frog-lady" for lack of a better term.  CC7567  (talk) 03:14, December 18, 2011 (UTC)

Contrail
Hey JMAS. Would it be possible to upload the full image of CT-4981 and Vader from Vader Adrift as CC has requested here? QuiGonJinn (Talk) 13:09, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the version I have puts a gap between the two pages, but if I'm able, I'll do it. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 23:20, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks great. Thanks a lot. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 12:54, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

Ask lobot
Yeah,its driving me crazy. Why arent all the Ask Lobot question and answers up on the internet. Do u know where they are listed, they might have unknown info that couldcontribute to this wiki.24.193.145.164 01:39, December 29, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Image usage
I was planning to use it for the Prelude section of the Battle of Kamino (Tipoca City assault), but I'm not sure if it would be entirely appropriate just because it might be too distracting (:P) from the purpose, which is just to show Grievous and Ventress as rivals. It sounds worth looking at, though, so yeah, could you upload it for comparison?  CC7567  (talk) 03:21, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * I like the image, but to be honest, I think it's too distracting and not directly relevant to the Battle of Kamino's prelude, which would be my use of it. It might work for Grievous, though&mdash;there's an imageless section on the Battle of Kamino there.  CC7567  (talk)

Suicide
Hey man, I saw nothing wrong with that image in the Suicide article. Because the intro states it, as well as it's mentioned in the image itself, it pretty much fits.  JangFett  (Talk) 03:28, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * And you clearly didn't see that I reverted my own edit before you posted this. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 03:42, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * This?  JangFett  (Talk) 03:43, December 31, 2011 (UTC)

Info/Image request
Hey, I'm wondering if you can please assist me with images and information from Star Wars: Republic 28: The Hunt for Aurra Sing, Part 1 specifically in regards to the Republic Peace Officers. Images of them, if there are any, would be great but I'm also needing as much information as possible including quotes. I'm hoping you still have access to the comic. Thanks! Coruscantfan (Talk) 05:03, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Ackbar
There seems to be a misunderstanding. When I said to leave the SWE infobox image out of the Ackbar article until it's been discussed in the talk page, I did not expect for you to put it back in the article. Normally if an infobox image is taken to the talk page, there's a gallery with the original Ackbar infobox image and yours, and it's put to a vote. This time, it was not present, and I reverted your edit of putting back the SWE image and commented on it, although I received a comment that wasn't my intention. No, I do not own the article, but I'm sure you know what I meant when I said "take it to the talk page." Ackbar, and his image, is one of those characters that should be discussed first.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:59, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Keeper Agruss
Thanks, JMAS. Those will work perfectly. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 20:37, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Indigo Studios
I have trouble accepting that Indigo Studios is the actual author of Hasbro images. First, they misspelled their client's name on their site&mdash;Harbro instead of Hasbro&mdash;and, second, they have Darth Vader's ship, Anakin Skywalker's Jedi Starfighter, and a TIE Interceptor labeled as a "V-wing" on the box image. If they truly were the authors, they would have the final proper images. Can we get a verification of the claim to authorship by Indigo Studios from Hasbro? Because I have worked in the industry long enough to know that fraudulent websites will make sensational claims to get business. Otherwise, the art taken from the actual box should remain the canon image, shouldn't it?  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:03, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Additionally, is there any supporting source to the claim that they are the authors of Hasbro's Star Wars merchandise?  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:15, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think they necessarily designed every box art in the Hasbro line, but did for the V-wing and the other ones. As far as the V-wing on the boxes, I would guess that is an early production design where they digitally placed their artwork on a pre-existing packaging box for the V-wing to submit for proofing purposes. So they misspelled Hasbro. It's a typo. I've seen plenty of other professional websites with typos, not to mention they correctly spell Hasbro for other product lines they developed packaging art for. Trust me, they would not put that there if they hadn't actually been hired by Hasbro to create that artwork. Otherwise they'd have Hasbro and LucasFilm on them faster than you can blink. I can confirm the Sith Infiltrator box artis the same box art as the final Hasbro product, so they are the designers for that. Based on that, I trust the others to be accurate as well. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 23:35, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I have seen before where a certain website claimed that a software company called Cyan was their client, except that they actually didn't yet they even produced images they claimed to have done for them. So, just because someone states that they are working for a company does not make it so and it isn't unheard of&mdash;it's called resume padding. A company operating unethically can and will do that sort of thing. If we can get a confirmation from Hasbro that they are the designers of those images, then I personally would feel better. However, you do make a good point about the veracity of Lucas Licensing. Then again, in searching for the Indigo Studios site, instances of the results&mdash;some that mention their founder by name&mdash;pulls up flagged warnings of untrustworthy activity from watchdog applications like WOT. If they are the real thing, then great because the image is better. However, I am concerned of the authenticity of canon because they are the only source of verification here. I will call Hasbro and ask, though, and get it straight from them. Everyone should be back to work by now.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 14:58, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * You will not get any sort of confirmation from Hasbro on who does the artwork for any of their present or past Star Wars toy lines. I've asked them before, who the artist was that designed the box artwork for their Unleashed line figures. They refused stating it was proprietary information. And after a fair amount of searching, I discovered it to be Clark Mitchell. I'm not saying that a company won't pad their resume like you're saying. What I'm saying is, LucasFilm watches for that kind of thing very closely, and would have shot them down by now, if it wasn't legitimate. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 01:15, January 11, 2012 (UTC)