Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Interstellar Parcel Service

 * Nominated by: Fe Nite (talk) 17:40, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Everybody has to start somewhere.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:57, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  17:27, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Burned at the stake
 * 2) *Nice to see you here, Fe Nite. First off, "scenes" in "Behind the scenes" is not capitalized. Same goes for "Notes and references".
 * 3) **Ah man! I think I have done the same thing on all the pages I have created. I fixed it on IPS and I will look into it on the other pages. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Please provide context on what "Mos Eisley" and "Tatooine" are. For Tatooine, include the galactic region (and maybe the sector if you feel like it) that it's located in and remember to source it.
 * 5) **Not 100% sure what you meant but I think I got it. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Almost. For the Essential Atlas ref, place it straightaway after the word Outer Rim. The way it is now makes it seem like the Essential Atlas is also a source for all the information in that paragraph. I would suggest the following scheme: .   Stake black   msg 17:33, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Done.
 * 8) * There's no need to use the same ref twice in a row. It's automatically implied that the ref sources everything that precedes it.
 * 9) ** Someone else fixed it for me but I think I just messed it up again. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) * Appearances needs a 1st.
 * 11) **Done. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) * "Over-sized" package redistribution center? Sounds like POV.
 * 13) **No. Best Birthday Ever specifically calls it the over-sized package redistribution center. You could even make the argument that it needs its own page. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) *For now that'll do.  Stake black   msg 17:50, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) *Bonus round
 * 16) ** Please use Company infobox, add the revelant fields and source them.
 * 17) ***Done.
 * 18) ****I think you forgot to source the fields filled.  Stake black   msg 22:10, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 19) *****Yep. Fe Nite (talk) 22:27, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 20) *****Done.
 * 21) ** Add more context to Best Birthday Ever. What is it? A comic book? A graphic novel? Also, like 501st said, the release date should be there too.  Stake black   msg 17:33, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 22) ***Done. Fe Nite (talk) 22:06, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 23) Nice to see you writing
 * 24) * I think you could mention Bib in the article, and how he goes to pick up the parcel.
 * 25) **Done. Fe Nite (talk) 21:26, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) ***How bout giving us some context as to who these characters are. Only minor though, like "the Hutt crime lord" Jabba for example. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 27) ****How about that?
 * 28) *****Could you add that crumb was a monkey lizard? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:53, March 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 29) ******Ok. Sorry it is taking me so long. I've been swamped. I'll probably fix it tomorrow. Fe Nite (talk) 23:12, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 30) *******There you go. Fe Nite (talk) 20:55, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 31) * A date released would be nice in the BTS, and you could put a note about how it's ambiguously canon.
 * 32) **Read my comment in the comments. Fe Nite (talk) 17:08, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 33) ***I have no idea either, so we'll see what others have to say....  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:10, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 34) ****Done. Fe Nite (talk) 22:06, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 35) * If this article is about the company, I don't think you can have a category for Mos Eisley locations, as that is the category for buildings and such, not companies.
 * 36) **You know, when I rewrote the article I did not even look at the categories. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 37) *Don't freak out because there's so many objections. Everybody has this many on their first nom or two. Good job. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:06, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 38) **Shoot. This nom has more objections than a FA! No I am just kidding. I kinda expected this. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 39) Emperor Supreme
 * One minor question, do you know what year Bib and Crumb went to the IPS? Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:46, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well that is the problem this nom has stalled on. If Best Birthday Ever is non-canon it falls under the Infinities and has no real date. However if it is ambiguously canon then the date would probably be between 0 BBY and 4 ABY. Now of course I obviously think the nomination should go on (because I nominated it) but I think everyone is waiting on a confirmation. I have been planning to do some research into it but I haven't the time yet. All I know is that according to Wikipedia it is considered non-canon. But where did they get that information is the problem. Fe Nite (talk) 17:08, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, i'll strike my objection, other than that, nicely done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:36, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, hey, hey. You want to support it? ; ) Fe Nite (talk) 19:50, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Please create an article for the over-sized package redistribution center on Dune Street.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Since you refer to Salacious Crumb and Jabba by their species, please do the same for Bib Fortuna. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:54, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **I kinda butchered that sentence. Please tell me if I messed it up. Fe Nite (talk) 20:03, March 11, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * I thought Best Birthday Ever was non-canon. The nature of the comic sounds non-canon, and also the FA Bidlo Kwerve states that comic to be non-canon, and strangely the comic's article itself is categorized as both ambiguously canon and Infinities. Of course I know the information could be in error, but perhaps something to look into. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 18:39, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * This one is tricky. If you read Tales from Jabba's Palace there is no specific mention of how the rancor got to the palace. It simply says that it was transported there. This would make the Best Birthday Ever/IPS seem ambiguously canon. However, at the end of Best Birthday Ever Bib, Bidlo, and Tessek all take a plunge into the rancor pit. This of course would make Best Birthday Ever noncanon. However, if you really want to make some speculation that they didn't die when they fell down this story would be back to ambig canon. Therefore, I am going to let someone smarter than me make the call. If it is noncanon I'll fix IPS. If it is ambig someone will have to fix Bidlo Kwerve. Fe Nite (talk) 17:08, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * You should talk to others about this. An FA saying something doesn't automatically mean it's the case, but the nature of this comic would make me think it's non-canon. I think I'll ask Leland Chee this. If he doesn't respond, hopefully this site can come to a consensus. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:45, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * While we wait, I don't think we should kick the nom off the page for unanswered objections, as we are waiting for a response. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:06, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * I think I have answered everything now. So are we going to wait to see how the whole noncanon/ambiguous thing turns out? Fe Nite (talk) 21:42, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * If we're waiting for Leland's answer, we may as well sit here forever...  Stake black   msg 21:52, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Or do a consensus. Fe Nite (talk) 01:58, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * This archived post gives Leland Chee's position on the matter (It's in the middle of the page.) That's probably as good as we're going to get.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  00:05, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * I guess Best Birthday Ever would be "outrageous" or whatever he said. Which means it is non-canon. Fe Nite (talk) 14:04, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Not having read the comic, I cannot say for certain, but that would be my best guess from what I know of it.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:37, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. I non-canonized everything in the article. I think I have done everything now. I noticed that some of the objections have not been struck yet; but they haven't told me anything more to do. Fe Nite (talk) 18:46, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Klee-klee nut

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:06, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Sometimes you feel like a nut...

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Now I've got this old recorder song from primary school stuck in my head...  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 21:16, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:29, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 14:18, March 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Can I claim this for project novels? :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:52, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Offee is used twice in one sentence, change one of them to avoid repetition.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 21:11, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Thanks for the catch, fixed.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:13, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***That was quick :P  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 21:16, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) One thing: "during a battle between the..." It sounds like she was fighting, and then smelled the nuts. Could you change this so it explains that she was not fighting at the time.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:37, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *Any better? The battle was taking place, but she was just in her quarters.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:29, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) Winterz
 * 8) * You should probably mention the larger conflict between the CIS and Republic (could be done in that start). Winterz (talk) 17:43, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Oops, added.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:49, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 19:26, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) * I know it's nice to have a BTS section and all, but in this case it seems completely redundant.
 * 12) **It isn't redundant, as it tells us when the thing was mentioned. Additionally, all CANs require a BTS. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:09, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) ***Struck because it's a requirement for CAN, but I still think it's stupid to include a BTS that says exactly the same thing as the Appearances directly below. &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:26, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Citypath 515

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:40, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My first nomination for the new voting amount

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; 05:15, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 18:00, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  17:31, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:18, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) * Minor grammatical quirk... This article starts out "A transit route, Citypath 515 was located in Cityblock Kesk-319 ...." To me, that flows rather awkwardly and might read better if it was tweaked to the more simple "Citypath 515 was a transit route located in Cityblock..." However, this is not an objection I feel especially strong about, so I won't mind terribly if you disagree and want it struck. I just think it would read better that way.
 * 3) **Fixed. Thanks for looking it over. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:42, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Mind eel

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 16:25, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:31, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) [cough] Goa'uld! [cough].&mdash;  05:12, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Kasra :D &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:59, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Only one thing: The first sentence has two many "located"s. Delocate one please.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:18, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done.  Stake black   msg 18:23, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Style &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:27, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Aside from conjectural article titles, the article title and the first instance of bolding should read the same. In this case, the article is singular where the bold is plural. I think "Mind eels were a species..." ought to be replaced by "A mind eel was a species..."
 * 5) **Done.  Stake black   msg 13:32, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Block 135

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:27, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:36, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; 16:01, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Block 135 was a cityblock on located in the Kesk Cityblock on the planet Brentaal IV. Could you correct this? &mdash;  05:09, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Sorry about that. It's been remedied. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:49, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Nuyu

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:51, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I wonder what a major body alteration is....

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hate tattoos, but the article's solid.&mdash;  05:06, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:37, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Cei Vookto's first Padawan

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 04:53, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Yet another anonymous Jedi.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:16, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 18:01, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could we have the quote that mentions him? I remember reading one when I was read the comic.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:51, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done.&mdash; 16:05, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * This is pretty trivial so I won't bother making an objection out of it, but is the (Jedi Master) after Vookto's name in the infobox's Master field really needed? Since the Padawan has no other known affiliations besides the Jedi, it's kind of a given that Vookto was his/her Jedi Master (and not a Sith Master for example). Tinwe (comlink) 12:06, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'd rather not, but if you insist, I'll remove it.&mdash; 16:05, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Withholding Support vote per Dogma's objection; but just placing that as a Comment rather than Object in case I forget. (I do support this article otherwise, though) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:48, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Hortentious Clee

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 12:29, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Xim Wannabe

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:55, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:46, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; 16:06, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you compltely source the BtS? Otherwise, looks good.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:50, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done.  Stake black   msg 12:51, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Melancholia agressiva

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 12:35, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Italicized on the source

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:56, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; 16:12, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:14, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Megalomaniac Wars

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 12:51, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Great war name

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 13:57, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) What?&mdash;  16:21, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Sergeant-at-claws?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:44, March 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Zrak system

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 18:38, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:AST for infinite victory

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:41, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:39, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Adamar Kirb

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:20, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project begins... !crazylaugh

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:19, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *I've never been able to find the Chevin or Duros codex entry in the game. If you were able to find them, you can leave it how it is, but otherwise it seems to me that we can't say that the information is canon. It may just be bugged entry, but if you can't obtain the entry in game its canonicity is unknown. This applies to all three of your codex nominations.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:48, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Ugh. Tagged with a Cut and expanded BTS accordingly. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:26, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) I know I've supported, but could you give context on the Cold War, as you did so in the cartel article.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:20, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:57, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Adamar Kirb's cartel

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:20, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:21, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sol Vara

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:20, March 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Fe Nite (talk) 23:54, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:19, March 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) "Famous" seems like POV. Fe Nite (talk) 16:01, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *... Really? That objection is getting thrown around a lot lately, and it's getting rather ridiculous. The actual definition of famous is "widely known" - which is entirely accurate. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:42, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Alright. Since "famous" means "widely know" you are correct. I was simply thinking that someone could be famous from one viewpoint but infamous from another. But that is not the case. Someone can be infamous and famous at the same time. My mistake. Fe Nite (talk) 23:54, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Should Duros be linked twice in the body? It would be okay if the main part is considered the intro, but if it's considered the body of the article, than we can only have one linking. Thoughts?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:26, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) *Fixed. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:59, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Wurrooba

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:51, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Don't try to steal from this guy.....

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:40, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * I'll be gone from the 16th of March to the 23th, so unaddressed objections will be dealt with when I get back. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:51, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Mioe

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:51, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My 200th article created deserves to be a CAN

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:41, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * I'll be gone from the 16th of March to the 23th, so unaddressed objections will be dealt with when I get back. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:51, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Labio

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:51, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Here's another nom. Have fun

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:42, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * I'll be gone from the 16th of March to the 23th, so unaddressed objections will be dealt with when I get back. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:51, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Morol

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:17, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I hereby swamp you with noms. Take that Cade.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Should probably link armor at least once. &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:46, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Fixed. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:18, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'll be gone from the 16th of March to the 23th, so unaddressed objections will be dealt with when I get back. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:17, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Gjaddia

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:17, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Should probably link armor at least once. &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:47, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:19, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'll be gone from the 16th of March to the 23th, so unaddressed objections will be dealt with when I get back. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:17, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Bron Burs's species

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:24, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:ALIENS and more Chronicles maquettes

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * White and blue are disambig pages. You should probally link to color instead.
 * 3) **I thought that is traditionally a matter of personal choice, as long as it's consistent throughout the article. In any case, have pipelinked to color now.
 * 4) * Shouldn't it be added to the infobox that the species was sentient? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:30, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Added. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:44, March 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Savaged&hellip;
 * 2) *A great deal more should be said about the physical appearance. That head is quite unlike any other alien we have, and it needs to be described. Talk about where the spines are, how many of them there are, where the eyes are located, where the nostrils are located and what their shape is, the shape of the mouth and where it's located, the overall orientation of the head as flatter than it is tall, the way it goes back into concentric semi-circles toward the back, the fact that we can distinguish a head and torso at least from the pictures in Chronicles.
 * 3) **So this will probably be above 200 words, then the intro would be needed, which would most certainly bring it up to 250 words. May I also request an image from Chronicles? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:24, March 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) *You should also mention that Burs wore clothing and say what that was.
 * 5) *In all, I think there's enough visual information here to break out a lead section and then have a proper "Biology and appearance," "Society and culture," and "History" section, even if the latter is only to talk about Burs. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 20:44, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Nemrileo irm-Drocubac

 * Nominated by: Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:14, March 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Another for project novels

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments -->