Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Bill 1979

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 00:54, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:16, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:49, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) It's a wrap!
 * 2) * You're going to need the template 1st in the Appearances section.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * You should take the descriptive part of the image in the infobox out. It's not visible in the article anyway.
 * 5) **Okay.
 * 6) * The Galactic Empire should be mentioned in the body.
 * 7) **Is that better?
 * 8) *Good work on a random Detours nom. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:53, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Thanks! Stake black   msg 02:33, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Kel Dor Sith Lord

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 06:24, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Powah!

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:27, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 19:39, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:27, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) DarthRevan1173
 * 2) *The article could use a personality and traits section.
 * 3) *Also a powers and ability section wouldn't be a bad idea. DarthRevan1173 RevanTOR001.jpg (Long live Lord Revan) 06:28, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **Taken care of both.&mdash; 06:43, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Just a note from me: comprehensive articles that are short enough to not require an intro (less than 200 words) don't require subsectioning. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:27, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Winterz goes to Hollywood
 * 7) * The last sentence of the P&a should go. They are already mentioned in the previous section and the appearance is irrelevant to the P&a section. Winterz (talk) 08:53, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **Done.&mdash; 17:09, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) Exiled Jedi
 * 10) *If you section the article, I believe you need a biography section. The bio should give more information about the fight between the Sith and the officers.
 * 11) *His robes look more like a dark brown to me. He also seems to wearing some kind of chest armor.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  05:46, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) **Taken care of both, I took Menk's suggestion.&mdash; 14:58, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) Another opinion on the subsectioning!
 * 14) *The article is short enough that subsectioning isn't needed --- since there are only 108 in-universe words, subsectioning is actually a detriment to the article rather than a benefit. So many short sections in a row are a big eyesore. Menkooroo (talk) 06:45, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) **Took your suggestion, Menk.&mdash; 14:58, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) *The Jedi Academy Training Manual was unclear as to what era the character falls under, so.&mdash; 06:26, January 14, 2013 (UTC)

Gungan dunk tank

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 12:38, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Your silly nom o'the day! Whosa wants ta dunken Boss Nass?

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:24, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Meesa gon' taka de shot.&mdash; 02:26, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) I dare you to put that image in Nass's article :P  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 02:23, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:30, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5)  Stake black   msg 21:31, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Is it confirmed in the game that someone falling in the tank was supposed to be comical?
 * 3) **Not really. But Nass does make funny faces when he falls in the water, though. Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 11:11, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) *Could you describe the seat that the person sits on in the article? You mention that the person is suspended and that there is a seat, but you do not connect the two.
 * 5) **Sure. --LelalMekha (talk) 11:11, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *Please create an article for the celebration.
 * 7) **I created a redlink, but I'd better not create an article right now, because I'm currently working on the series of celebration that took place on Naboo following the victory in 32 BBY. See my third sandbox&mdash;it currently encompasses only the victory parade, but I'll soon integrate the Gungan funfair, the Gungan Sling Brigade performance in the Theed Coliseum and so forth. --LelalMekha (talk) 11:11, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) *Please mention that the tank was clear.
 * 9) **Added. --LelalMekha (talk) 11:11, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) *Do we know from the game that people were delighted. Unless it was clearly stated, I believe it would be best to merely describe how the Gungans reacted to it.
 * 11) **Removed. --LelalMekha (talk) 11:11, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) *Could you mention the dunk tank in the BTS?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  05:40, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) **Done, but I couldn't find a non-commercial reference for that... --LelalMekha (talk) 11:11, January 15, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Redlink alert! Redlink alert!
 * 3) **Sigh. I don't think the article is ready as it is, but since there two of you who want to see it, there you are: Naboo celebrations --LelalMekha (talk) 12:09, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * I'd remove the source in the Bts, since there's not really any way you can source the other statement. Good work other than that.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 11:21, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 12:09, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Luona

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:40, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: creepy gal....

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) You got that right. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:21, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *"Due to this, the individual left and joined the crew of the EF76 Nebulon-B escort frigate Far Orbit, a privateering vessel working for the Alliance to Restore the Republic after it mutinied from under the Galactic Empire's control, when the ship docked at the station looking for crew." Please reword this sentence; it seems to say that the Alliance mutinied.
 * 3) *The BTS makes it sound like Pirates & Privateers followed the crew of the Far Orbit.
 * 4) *"She was mentioned under the "Avoiding a social misunderstanding" part of a section that..." I think there's an extra word or a missing word in there somewhere. Could you rework the sentence for better flow?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  05:25, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **All taken care of. Thanks for looking it over. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:35, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ooroo's homeworld

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 15:27, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ... or can you prove it's Celegia?

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) You just gave me an idea for my first FAN. Thanks eheh. Winterz (talk) 20:20, January 15, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) AST rocks
 * 2) * As he lay dying, and expressed his wishes, you should mention to whom he was talking. Winterz (talk) 19:34, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done.  Imperators II (Talk) 19:56, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) 501st
 * 5) *You don't need to link in the quote attribution.
 * 6) **Fixed.
 * 7) *I think you should cut a bit out that pertains to Ooroo, as it does not really expand the reader's knowledge of the planet itself. The third sentence particularly is not quite needed. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:42, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **Removed.  Imperators II (Talk) 09:23, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Coruscant Spaceport Docking Bay 74

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:23, January 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The sequel (or is it a prequel?) to Docking Bay 84!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:04, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Context on Ord Mantell!
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Link to Coruscant Spaceport Authority in the main text. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:46, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:54, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Keshk

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:09, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:10, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 17:42, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * This army you mention seems relevant enough to warrant its own article. Winterz (talk) 01:48, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:55, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Gerrard

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:25, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:28, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Context on Taris!  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:25, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *RAAARGGHHH Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:26, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Souske

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:38, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 501st dogma ( talk ) 01:42, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Sith Empire and Imperial Military are not mentioned in the main text. Also, you may want to add mention of the Cold War.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:27, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Blarg. Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:32, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Wookiee passenger

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 13:37, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A quick Star Tours nom.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Stake black   msg 22:11, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 22:30, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Are you sure that he isn't Chewbacca? Winterz (talk) 22:15, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * I haven't read anywhere that he is Chewbacca. I suspect the hair suit is that of Chewbacca, but that doesn't mean anything, I guess, since Yarua was also a slightly modified Chewie costume. --LelalMekha (talk) 22:20, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Still the Wookiee there is a lot more similar to Chewie than Yarua, in fact the two former look exactly alike. But you are right, since there's no confirmation of such, everything else would be just speculation. Winterz (talk) 22:30, January 16, 2013 (UTC)

Attack on Kalikori Village

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:41, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero's Prologue section is at 90% thanks to this little bugger. Plus, I want to boost that 22.272% to 25% completion by February.

(0 ECs/1 User/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Stake black   msg 17:19, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified planet (Theron Shan)

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:02, January 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) *You should add info about the planet's breathable atmosphere.  Imperators II (Talk) 14:45, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) *If you name the author of Annihilation, I think you should name the author of the comic, as well.  Imperators II (Talk) 18:43, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Dex's Double

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 02:17, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) *Context on Dex's Diner ( try not to be short ;) ). Winterz (talk) 17:43, January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Socorro Freight

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:10, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In the semi-immortal words of Floyd.... I CANNOT BE STOPPED

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Pythar-class shuttle

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:41, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Ugroth's sector

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:06, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More? MORE!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments