Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for In-Universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good Article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Vert-mite

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 01:54, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A mite from the Cassandran Worlds

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 12:58, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2)  Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 09:27, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Clean. And I didn't even have to spray it. Menkooroo 13:45, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Karika
 * 2) * Context needed for Chik Apla and Chala Venan.
 * 3) **Context is provided for them in the next line. --Eyrezer 09:25, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) * Mite-dust could probably use a stub article.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 22:15, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) **I don't really think that is necessary. It's like creating an article on shedded Thisspiasian skin, or molted Nosaurian feathers, or perhaps bantha poodoo (except that one is used as a phrase). I have created a redirect to vert-mite, though. --Eyrezer 09:25, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Drexl-class starfighter

 * Nominated by:Omicron 17:18, September 20, 2010 (UTC):
 * Nomination comments:Interesting article about a previously unknown starship

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
 * Omicron 17:18, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Soresu: A few basics
 * 2) * Remember to capitalize in the infobox.
 * 3) * Some spacing problems in the infobox.
 * 4) * Check for linking.
 * 5) ** This remains to a large degree. For example, in the infobox, the manufacturer should be SoroSuub Corporation, starfighter should be linked, credits has been unnecessarily linked twice, kg could be linked, and days could be linked to Galactic Standard Calendar. Please go through the entire article to fix these sorts of things up.
 * 6) *** Still not fixed. Please make an attempt to address this. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 04:52, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) * Quite a lot of infobox stuff that has no mention in the body.
 * 8) ** Not fixed. The description should contain info on the crew, consumables, etc. You might even be able to push the word count over 250.
 * 9) *There are a number of other problems I'll put up once these are addressed. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 02:01, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) **Ok, I've tried to address your objections, let me know what else needs to be done.<-Omicron 14:31, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) Makashi
 * 12) * Linking problems remain. I put some stuff on your talk page.
 * 13) **Fixed what you suggested.
 * 14) * Cost, at least for a new fighter, should be mentioned.
 * 15) **added.
 * 16) * It was named for the predatory bird native to the moon of Dxun. Can this be confirmed? If not, it should be in the bts.
 * 17) **source specifically states this.
 * 18) *** Link to Drexl. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 02:25, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * 19) ****Done.Omicron 17:22, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * 20) * Its use by customs agencies should be in History, not Characteristics.
 * 21) **moved
 * 22) * Why no mention of SoroSuub in the body?
 * 23) **state in History that SoroSuub engineers revisited their design, not sure what else to mention.
 * 24) *** You haven't even established what it is when you say that. You should say something like The Drexl-class was originally conceived by SoroSuub Corporation as a prototype, otherwise, it sounds thrown in. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 02:25, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * 25) ****added.Omicron 17:26, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * 26) * Introduction could be expanded a bit.
 * 27) **not sure what more I could add, the source is only 3 paragraphs.
 * 28) * It appears that the difference It appears that? Wookieepedia deals with facts, and only facts.
 * 29) *Retcon is defined as "changing" previous canon. This has not been done, I think. There was simply an depiction contradiction in canon, and The Unknown Regions stepped in, stating that the Drexl was a prototype.
 * 30) **rewrote BTS to remove speculation
 * 31) ***Much better, but what you've said is that "There was a visual discrepancy between two sources. A third source stepped in and said that a prototype existed". This itself doesn't solve the discrepancy, unless the image was retconned to a Drexl. If there was, then it should be stated. If there was no retcon to say that the Gamer issue was a Drexl, then it should say something like "Regions addressed this by depicting a starfighter similar in appearance to the Gamer image and naming it the Drexl, without specifically retconning the old image." SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 02:25, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * 32) * Remember to italisize class names and sources.
 * 33) **done
 * 34) * Specify which Gamer issue you're talking about.
 * 35) **done
 * 36) *Watch your spacing. I'm seeing two, three, and even four spaces between sentences. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 05:03, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 37) **This remains. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 02:25, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Ok I've rewrote the article a bit to address some concerns. Please let me know if there are any other suggestions/objections. Thanks. <-Omicron 17:45, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Plasma miner

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 23:17, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: These things can burrow underground!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) I think we need some context as to why the plasma miners have to be destroyed, both in the article body and the BTS. - Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 10:09, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Too much? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:15, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Just to let you know - if the name of an article is conjectural, that article name isn't bolded, as you have done here. I would suggest bolding "mining vehicle" or something similar. Cylka  -talk- 10:55, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) *Can we meet halfway? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:15, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * In the PC version of the game, they are only referred to as 'transports'. 'collected plasma by burrowing underground and lifting the plasma out.' - never mentioned or seen in-game. Also, there's no need to destroy the mine. So, is the destruction of the mine canonical outcome? Octurion 12:20, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * This is a little off-topic, but I have had a similar discussion with User:QuiGonJinn over the Unidentified mine operator. I have the N64 version, and three of the transports are seen in the game. It is necessary to destroy them to proceed during the mission, as the mining camp opens fire on Sykes during the Search for Captain Kael. And just out of curiosity, where did you get your information? From the manual? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:15, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Borvo the Hutt's starfighter

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 23:17, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Cannon fodder

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) NAYA   YEN   18:59, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) * Just one: "...and starfighters had a small cross-section" Eh? Even if you put "the" in there, it still sounds odd. Reword? NAYA   YEN   23:27, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) **I put "profile" instead. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Disabled Trade Federation base

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 23:17, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's a trap!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Caf bean

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 13:37, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Reviewing this will keep you awake all night

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * I think that reference #6 should be broken up into three references --- multiple refs are surely better form than one big super ref. Menkooroo 15:57, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Andrevea River

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A really long river

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Prepare to be savaged...
 * Please at least stub the swamp.
 * In my opinion, there is too little information even to stub the swamp. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:04, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, well, if the Grey Cadre overrule my objection, that's cool, but I think even a stub is better than nothing. It's a canonical subject that we know exists, even if we don't know much about it. ~ SavageBob 00:28, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * The swamp isn't even referenced in the game, just in the CSWE. And that doesn't provide anything to put in an article, just that "a swamp existed." Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:26, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Needs a BTS section. Tis all. ~ SavageBob 20:05, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestions. BTS added. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:04, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Ferentina

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Kindly ignore the fact it was once named "Unidentified Naboo town"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Porso Hill

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Place of a Hutt's comeuppance

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
 * Prepare to be savaged...
 * Yeah, I'm not sure why the game template is there. Is there a possibility that if the player takes other actions that the hill won't be surrounded by islands? That there were no missile launchers on them? That the vehicular upgrade wasn't there? It seems odd that any of this stuff might not be there based merely on player actions. ~ SavageBob 20:02, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, all of it is there no matter what; the mechanics is the player's choice to pick up the upgrade. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:06, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, in that case, I think the template can be removed. You're not stating anything that varies based on player characater actions; you don't even mention that anyone ever picked up the upgrade. ~ SavageBob 01:34, October 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * I added info about Sykes picking up the upgrade. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:26, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Is the "gamemechanics template" too much? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:30, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Widow's Valley

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: So named for the unstable spires.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 20:09, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Karika
 * 2) * The body could be split up into three sentences.
 * 3) ** Needs a BtS.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 16:26, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Done. Thanks for the suggestion. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 20:01, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Xd1358
 * 6) * "...near the south ridge of the city of Theed." Reads awkwardly. Perhaps the capital city Theed instead?
 * 7) *"Sykes was a pilot of the Royal Naboo Security Forces and flew through the Valley during a battle against the Trade Federation Droid Army at the end of the Invasion of Naboo in 32 BBY." Okay, this is a weird sentence. You must get this and the earlier sentence to run smoother. Please see what phrasing adjustments you can make. 1358  (Talk) 21:47, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) **How does it read now? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:48, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) ***It's still pretty choppy. It's like, which is not good.  1358  (Talk) 19:30, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * I could find a quote if necessary. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Um...where's the page? =/ --''' Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 21:44, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know; it won't show up when running a search for it. The only way to go to it is through a page which links to it (BFN appearances or Battle of the south ridge). Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:50, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * The apostrophe was different. --Eyrezer 23:10, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Unidentified minelayer

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ~One second of screentime.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) I suggest you merge the intro and the history. There's no point of having them both in a super short article like this. 1358  (Talk) 11:45, September 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, so moved. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:26, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * Who wants to place bets on whether I have to move the page? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, it needs to be moved to Unidentified minelayer. :P 1358  (Talk) 12:10, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just UnID minelalyer, and not UnID minelayer (TF)? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 20:01, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, if there are no other unidentified minelayers, no (TF) is needed. 1358  (Talk) 13:49, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Page moved

Corellian flame miniatures

 * Nominated by: — Hunter Kahn  15:31, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: If it's good enough for Thrawn, it's good enough for me...

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 15:13, September 29, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) * I googled "Goorlish", and it looks like it's a uniquely SW-word --- any idea what it means? Is some sort of article in order?
 * 2) **I'm not entirely sure what it means. The source only refers to "Goorlish light sources" in the same context as the article now does. I had thought perhaps it was a reference to the planet Goorla, but didn't link to it because I can't be sure... — Hunter Kahn  15:06, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Probably best to create a stub for "Goorlish light sources", then, that references the flame miniatures. Menkooroo 03:46, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ****Done. — Hunter Kahn  13:53, September 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) * Super nitpicky, but: "Those fibers were then shaped into extremely delicate sculptures in the shape of an luminescent blaze" makes it sound like all of the sculptures together make up a single luminescent blaze.
 * 6) **I think I clarified it. Let me know. — Hunter <font color="#595454">Kahn  15:06, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Looks good but you changed the tense again! :^P Don't worry I fixed it.
 * 8) * "Although many have tried to do so" --- how dare you switch up the tense!!!!!!!!!!!!
 * 9) **lol Whoops. Fixed. — <font color="#C0C0C0">Hunter <font color="#595454">Kahn  15:06, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) * Yo, specify which issue of the DFR comic they appeared in in bts, appearances, and notes and references. S'all, baby doll! Menkooroo 13:59, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) **Ok. — <font color="#C0C0C0">Hunter <font color="#595454">Kahn  15:06, September 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) **Ok. — <font color="#C0C0C0">Hunter <font color="#595454">Kahn  15:06, September 28, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Mantooine Minuet

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 00:34, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Palpatine liked dance?

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) What?&mdash;  07:05, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you perhaps reorganize your sentences to make them a bit more chronological? Right now the information about Mara being captured seems superfluous. I'm certain it's not, but it doesn't fit in with the rest of the article as of now. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 09:10, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * Thanks Cylka, for the CSWE entry. --Eyrezer 00:43, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Kalasaad Woztu

 * Nominated by:  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 13:55, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 2

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Trading village (Naboo swamps)

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 15:04, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Who wants to go live in a swamp?

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Prepare to be savaged...
 * "destroys every target." What are the targets? ~ SavageBob 16:00, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Reworded. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:17, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's better, but the wording still assumes knowledge of how the game works. What are the "military targets?" Are they buildings? People? Weapons? ~ SavageBob 00:30, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * Is it for sure that the village featured in the bonus level is the same village? It looks totally different. Any sources? Octurion 16:36, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Absolutely. Its several sections of the village and the countrysde from the second level. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 20:55, September 24, 2010 (UTC)

Blackwater Systems

 * Nominated by: <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 05:22, September 25, 2010 (UTC):
 * Nomination comments: This place was pretty much a drug factory. Enjoy.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Karika
 * 2) * Context needed for Granta Omega, Falleen, Jenna Zan Arbor, Roy Teda, Anakin Skywalker, and Obi-Wan Kenobi.
 * 3) * Unless you can provide a source for the BtS note, it has to go.
 * 4) * refs are needed since there is more than one source.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 12:05, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) **I believe I fixed these problems, the BtS note has been removed, refs were added and context was added. You had better check it though. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 13:25, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) *** Refs are also needed in the infobox.
 * 7) *** The article needs a short BtS, something along the lines of any other comprehensive article.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 22:12, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) **** I added refs to the infobox. The BtS was based off of the one from this article. Also, I'm not going to have internet access until the 30/9 (9/30), so if more changes are needed I'll do them then. Don't think I've abandoned it. <font color="#208090"> Holocron  Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 23:40, September 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * 1) Karika part 2
 * 2) *Blackwater's appearance in the CSWE should be mentioned in the BtS.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 12:29, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 05:54, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) *Since I went ahead and made the changes, I will list them here for when you get back. Make sure you link to everything possible in the article (Jude Watson was not linked).
 * 2) **I fixed the refs. If there is more than one, you do not need to keep adding the long version. There is a shorter reference note you can use, and you can implement it yourself in the rest of the article. Also, I recently learned this myself, if you have a ref in the infobox, you need to encase it in the "Reference" template. And one final thing, I think you need to source the era as well in the infobox. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 03:04, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Thanks for the help. I changed the rest of the refs, though it didn't make all that much of a difference. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 05:54, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) *Might do to add a brief comparison in the BTS section with the real Blackwater company. The novel was written and published around the time that Blackwater was in the media. While they may differ in their trade, both are secretive and have controversy. What do you think? Andykatib 03:24, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) **Unless there is a source for the connection, then no.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 12:29, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Tanis (Jedi)

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:23, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Does not even deserve a nomination comment :P

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 02:30, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Feel free to tweak the source link if you don't like the current format. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:23, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

Flybane

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:41, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Same as above

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 02:35, October 1, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Desolation Station's commander

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 20:05, September 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: UGHH!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments