Forum:CT Archive/Merge Peer Review & Good Articles

I was just scanning Peer Review, and I was surprised to see that someone had recently put up Gorm, just as I had done after a big rewrite 15 months ago. Needless to say, that was still my own entry. In fact, there have been less than five additions to the page in the last year. In the interest of simplification, and since everything beneficial that could be done there is already happening on the Good Articles page anyway - though with a much more substantial audience - I propose merging the two concepts and thus promoting GA as the means by which to have one's articles reviewed. Even if some of you don't feel this is necessary, you have to admit that as a practical matter it'd barely change anything, except for clearing out a barely-used PR page. CooperTFN 19:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) CooperTFN 19:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * I'm gonna go have lunch now. CooperTFN 19:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)