Wookieepedia:AC/Log/2012 July 7

[16:04]	Jujiggum	lol Okay, first off, let's take care of TOR [16:04]	Jang|Away	I'm ready to go :P [16:04]	Jang|Away	haha [16:05]	Jujiggum	The Senate Session one with way too long of a name for me to post here: [16:05]	Jujiggum	Seems to be keepable to me per Trayus' post [16:05]	Jujiggum	Per my notes in the edit summaries one these, the Senate session had no new information. I threw the tag on there when the Journal of Gnost-Dural came out because it was pictured, but there was no new information. I'd forgotten that I left the update tag on there, so it looked like there was still stuff that needed to be added, but it wasn't anything specifically new. So that one's good now. [16:05]	Jujiggum	Er... that^ was meant to be in quotes. Trayus said that [16:05]	Toprawa	Keep [16:06]	Jujiggum	Keep [16:06]	CavalierOne	keep [16:06]	Cal_Jedi	Keep [16:06]	Jang|Away	Yeah keep [16:06]	Jujiggum	Okay, Session kept [16:06]	Jujiggum	Now, the Treaty [16:06]	Jujiggum	Trayus said we can just outright kill [16:06]	Jujiggum	And I'm good with that [16:06]	CavalierOne	Kill per Trayus [16:06]	Toprawa	Kill [16:06]	Jang|Away	True, kill [16:06]	Cal_Jedi	Kill [16:06]	Jujiggum	Alright, Treaty killed [16:07]	Jujiggum	Moving on... to the Maintenance Page! [16:07]	Jujiggum	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Vindican?t=20120701230056 [16:07]	Jujiggum	Update tag [16:07]	Toprawa	Wait. [16:07]	Jujiggum	Waiting [16:07]	Toprawa	oh, nvm [16:07]	Toprawa	go ahead [16:07]	Jujiggum	Okay [16:07]	Jang|Away	Just to let you know, Trayus and I discussed Vindican. He said he could take care of him. :P [16:07]	Jujiggum	Okay [16:07]	Jang|Away	It's only a brief mention iirc [16:07]	Jujiggum	So no probe for now [16:07]	Jujiggum	? [16:08]	CavalierOne	I'm good with that [16:08]	Jang|Away	Sure, that's fine with me [16:08]	Toprawa	sure [16:08]	Cal_Jedi	yup [16:08]	Jujiggum	Cool. Vindician spared for now [16:08]	Jujiggum	Anybody have anything else? [16:08]	Cal_Jedi	XD [16:08]	CavalierOne	Nope. [16:08]	Jang|Away	Track 30 :DD [16:08]	Toprawa	Just a discussion item [16:08]	Cal_Jedi	Quickest meeting for the win. :P [16:08]	Jujiggum	LOL [16:08]	Jujiggum	Discussion! [16:08]	Jujiggum	From Meeting 47: the possibility of adding to the Bylaws a section about how many votes (or members) are needed at AC meetings will be discussed [16:08]	Cal_Jedi	Yes [16:08]	Toprawa	Ok, if I may... [16:09]	Jujiggum	You have the floor, Tope [16:09]	Toprawa	Thank you [16:09]	Toprawa	This came up two meetings ago, I believe it was, when it looked like no one was going to show up, and there were only two people here or something and there was some confusion over whether they could legitimately hold a meeting. [16:09]	CavalierOne	Aye [16:09]	Jang|Away	Yeah I remember [16:09]	Toprawa	Very simply, I offer the following proposal: [16:09]	CavalierOne	There wre no proxy votes, either [16:10]	Toprawa	a) As long as one person is present on IRC, a meeting can be held with only that individual and proxy votes [16:10]	Toprawa	It is recommended, however, that you invite a responsible non-AC member to witness the meeting for honesty's sake. [16:10]	Toprawa	I almost did this once with GT. [16:10]	Toprawa	Then another AC showed up at the last second [16:11]	Jujiggum	That sounds good to me [16:11]	Cal_Jedi	We should add a blurb, though, on how /many/ votes are needed. [16:11]	Jang|Away	What if there's no proxy votes? Do we just go by the only present AC? [16:11]	Toprawa	b) Between present members on IRC and absentee votes, there should be at least three participating members. [16:11]	Cal_Jedi	I believe we've done three in the past, right? [16:11]	Cal_Jedi	ok good [16:11]	Jujiggum	That works for me too [16:11]	Toprawa	If there aren't three members providing input, the meeting should be postponed until a later date. [16:12]	Toprawa	That's about it. [16:12]	Jujiggum	Cool [16:12]	Toprawa	Any other suggestions are welcome [16:12]	Jujiggum	Anybody have more suggestions? [16:12]	Cal_Jedi	All sounds good. That's what I had in mind, too. So, sounds excellent... :P [16:12]	CavalierOne	I think that covers everything [16:12]	Jang|Away	That does sound good, Tope. [16:12]	Jujiggum	Alright [16:12]	Toprawa	Cool [16:12]	Jang|Away	I was just confused but then nps after a second thought :P [16:12]	Jujiggum	So all three parts to that are passed [16:12]	Toprawa	Oh, also [16:13]	Cal_Jedi	And added into the Bylaws, correct? [16:13]	Toprawa	And to add this to the Bylaws page, in case that wasn't clear [16:13]	Toprawa	yes :P [16:13]	Jujiggum	Correct [16:13]	Cal_Jedi	good. :P [16:13]	Jang|Away	Sounds good :P [16:13]	CavalierOne	Indeed [16:13]	Jujiggum	Okay, anything else from anyone? [16:14]	Jang|Away	I'm all good :P [16:14]	Toprawa	Just meeting duties [16:14]	Toprawa	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/AC_Bylaws [16:14]	Cal_Jedi	and I hope someone logged this? [16:14]	Jujiggum	Alright [16:14]	Toprawa	We actually need to update this. [16:14]	Toprawa	Xd is scheduling next meeting. [16:14]	Toprawa	Tranner was on paperwork..but he died. :P [16:14]	Jang|Away	D: [16:14]	Cal_Jedi	:( [16:14]	Toprawa	Any objections to just moving ahead to Floyd, who is next in line? [16:14]	Jujiggum	Hah yeah I just saw that [16:14]	CavalierOne	:( [16:15]	Jujiggum	No objections [16:15]	CavalierOne	Not at all [16:15]	Jang|Away	We need to introduce Weatherscan to Tranner :P [16:15]	Cal_Jedi	Sure. sounds fine. [16:15]	Toprawa	Ok, I'll update that chart [16:15]	CavalierOne	Floyd may objectm but here's not here [16:15]	Jujiggum	Jang - indeed [16:15]	Toprawa	right :P [16:15]	Jujiggum	Cool [16:15]	Jujiggum	Okay [16:15]	Jang|Away	and then CT, who is missing :P [16:15]	Jujiggum	Meeting 48 is hereby adjourned!