Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Anti-Alien League

 * Nominated by:  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Something different for a change.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support GTQ3:09, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 21:32, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 10:24, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Gorton Colu has a CSWE entry and is mentioned in the KOTOR Strategy Guide --- do you know if either of those sources mention the Anti-alien league?
 * Nope, no mention in the CSWE.
 * Strategy Guide? SoresuMakashi might be able to help you out; he GA'd Colu.
 * I'll see if he can help.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Let me know when you find out whether or not the league is mentioned (directly or indirectly) in the strategy guide.Menkooroo 04:45, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * No mention in the guide.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 17:02, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking that out. I saw some of the inquiries you made on various talk pages --- good hustle! Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * "The Anti-Alien League was a Humanocentrist group formed by Gorton Colu" is currently sourced to The Essential Atlas.
 * Resourced.
 * I could and should fix this one myself, but it'll be handy for you to know if you don't already: Only use punctuation in image captions if it's a complete sentence. Menkooroo 02:43, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:06, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Rubefacient
 * Context of Taris's multiple cities should be added.
 * Done.
 * Mention that aliens were prohibited from UpCity under normal conditions. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * There needs to be a year in the intro
 * Try now.
 * I'm sorry, I was confused by the banner. Because of that banner, I think this should be made with a History section to avoid the dissonance caused by it. I'll not force you to, but it would probably be beneficial. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved the image over. Does this help?
 * Greatly. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * You say the league was mentioned in the game in the body but say it appeared in the BTS.
 * Corrected.
 * Because the article assumes 100% completion, you do not need the clause saying he could be avoided. That is, unless you include the alternate dialogue tracks (which you should).
 * Alternate dialogue tracks? There are no others that mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Revan can ignore the man, can agree with his speciesism, or tell him to screw off. Which of these elicits the mention? If it is the lattermost, remove the portion saying that Colu mentioned it to Revan and say that he could mention it to Revan given the proper dialogue in the BTS. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe he mentions it the first time Revan talks to him (and before any dialogue choices come up).  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:26, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Then say that Revan can choose not to speak to him. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 13:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the runaround. I couldn't wrap my head around it the right way. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Speciesism FTW NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:17, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the article should go into more detail about the player's potential conversations with Colu, The player can agree with him or refute him, if I remember correctly, and the reactions of the side characters (the Wookiee and the Twi'lek) change as well. This should probably all be mentioned in BTS. ~ SavageBob 06:24, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * While that might work in Colu's article, in no other place in Colu's dialogue does it even remotely mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 01:12, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Isn't it still pertinent, though, since Colu is out touting the league? ~ SavageBob 16:21, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, try now.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 19:21, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that should be in the BTS; the party doesn't have to include Zaalbar or Mission at that point. Instead, I think you should mention that "If the party includes Mission or Zaalbar, they react to his anti-alien rant by blah blah blah" and/or "Colu reacts to the Wookiee and Twi'lek by saying blah blah blah." ~ SavageBob 19:40, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Try now.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 20:00, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry to keep harping on this, but it goes beyond even that. If either the Wookiee or the Twi'lek is in the party, Colu does chide Revan. But there are further levels of interaction depending on whether Revan agrees or disagrees with Colu's rant. If you have the game saved near hear, play through with the two in your party and you'll see what I mean. If not, try to find the dialogue files or a video walkthrough. ~ SavageBob 20:27, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Also, guest nom for WP:KOTOR.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:58, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Fizz-Pop Cap (with foil cluster)

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 03:33, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: You know you wish you had one.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 08:16, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * It just occurred to me that "Fizz-Pop Cap" could refer to some sort of pop-top from a soda can instead of the actual hat/cap Spilfer is shown to be wearing. Am I right to assume that "Cap" here is the hat? What do others think? ~ SavageBob 03:02, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Upon further reflection, it's too ambiguous; infobox duly gutted. ~ SavageBob 06:50, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Balderdash

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:53, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I have two. Number One: Win on the parts of Mr. Hidalgo and Mr. Ens. *applause* Number Two: A prime example of why Wookieepedia is so addicting. You never know what you might turn up just before you sign off.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Master Jonathan  (Council Chambers)  Wednesday, March 9, 2011, 20:42 UTC
 * 2) Menkooroo 07:01, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) From the Council Chambers:
 * 2) * "being made by Myris Pictures in 23 BBY.": The date here is wrong, as 23 BBY would be the year before the HNN story was published (IU, that is). However, I'm not sure what to change it to. The story says "next summer", which depending on interpretation, could refer to the immediately following summer (22 BBY) or the summer of the following year (21 BBY). Unless we can be sure which one they're referring to, we should probably reword it to leave it ambiguous.
 * 3) **Either way, the article establishes that it was in production at the article's publishing date, meaning it was being made in 23 BBY. Whether or not it would be released in 23 or 22 per your logic is irrelevant to this article though that deserves a mention in the main QFQ article. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:05, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I see your point, but the article's IU date (13:4:11) is 22 BBY, so saying it was in production the year before is OR. Change it to 22 BBY and I'll strike and support.  Master Jonathan  (Council Chambers)  Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 21:30 UTC
 * 5) ****Whoops. IU dates screw me up. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:55, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *Otherwise, looks good.  Master Jonathan  (Council Chambers)  Saturday, March 5, 2011, 01:10 UTC
 * Can you mention that the HNN article originates from Balderdash, rather than just saying "it was related" ? If the reader doesn't have to go check out the original source in order to figure out something that the article says, that's definitely bettah. Menkooroo 04:14, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:55, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Terrafin

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:11, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I'd like to officially motion we begin referring to the "duck test" as the "terrafin test" so it is more alliterative and "Star Warsy."

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi 05:13, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  OLIOSTER   (talk) 12:52, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  1358  (Talk)  13:44, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * I'm never quite sure what qualifies as a sofixit or not, but could you possible add "dish" or something similar to "had a serving of this for breakfast the day"?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 17:02, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:09, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * As Battle of the Corellian Queen is a conjectural title, you must link it in a different way "&hellip;took part in the Battle of the Corellian Queen." as that implies it is a canonical title. 1358  (Talk)  15:24, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:01, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Warrior's Honor

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:45, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Painting painting painting painting painting

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Gave it a look, didn't find anything to object to. I'm not entirely sure what I would object to, anyway. Well, I don't like the way Trandoshans look in Galaxies, but I can't fault the article for that.   Trak Nar  Ramble on 07:17, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Getting better at the whole "describing it" thing, but if you see ways to improve it, go ahead.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:45, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Kaul

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 19:18, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another poor soul trapped in the Refugee Sector.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) You can Kaul me any time, baby. Menkooroo 04:16, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Linking to colors is fine; just make sure you do it in both the infobox and the bio.
 * Done.
 * Context on the Exchange, baby! Even just a coupla words.
 * Done.
 * Ref [3] appears twice in a row near the beginning --- is one of them meant to be something else?
 * Just referencing too much. Removed one of them.
 * Can you cut down on the description of his conversation with the Exile? It's always better to try to get the key points of a convo across rather than offering a recount of every line spoken. As a suggestion, "to which the Exile asked why Kaul didn't just grab the goods himself." could probably be jettisoned entirely. Menkooroo 00:37, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:51, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * You should mention that he refuses to get the loot: "If I had the skills needed for the task, I wouldn't be stuck here on Nar Shaddaa, now would I?"
 * I already did mention this but Menk suggested to excise that part. See his fourth objection.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 21:46, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * I saw that, but he's pretty much saying here that he wouldn't be on Nar Shaddaa if he had such skills, nothing to do with the conversation really. NAYAYEN &mdash;it appears to be a frammistat 21:54, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Will that suffice?  OLIOSTER  (talk)
 * His conversation file in 302NAR_dlg.erf is named "kehvhen.dlg" [Kevin?]. I don't know if that is Bts worthy but it's the first time I've seen someone have a specific yet totally different name to their actual one. NAYAYEN &mdash;it appears to be a frammistat 21:31, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Eh, seems too speculative to me.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 21:46, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Oxixo

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 19:29, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

D5-Mantis Patrol Craft
Ok, maybe i've got one this time
 * Nominated by: GTQ 23:48, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 1) Like your last nomination, it is currently impossible for this article to reach comprehensive status because it will appear in a upcoming canon release.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 04:32, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Is there a rule against that? I think it's probably wise not to nominate it, but the sheer fact that something is going to appear in the future shouldn't be reason not to CA something. In other words, what's the harm CA'ing the article now but then revisiting if and when more information comes available? ~ SavageBob 07:08, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **According to Toprawa during a discussion in IRC, this is the intention of rule 5. Besides, it can hardly be called comprehensive when new information is so obviously on the horizon.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 08:03, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Yes. It seems almost like lying; "We know everything already" is the message the reader will get from seeing the 'comprehensive' box. Didn't think that IRC discussion would ever come up again.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 04:57, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I made a number of edits to this article.  As a reminder, for future articles, when using the possessive form of "it," it is "its," without the apostrophe.  The addition of the apostrophe contracts "it is" to "it's."  After the formatting and grammar edits, I would have considered supporting this article, but for the reasons that Olioster has mentioned, I cannot.  So, I am simply going to inform you of the changes made.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:55, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Reridan Reksiss

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:20, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: This person needs to be used in something.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Gaeriala Boosin

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:20, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A musician to go with these song noms.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments