User talk:SavageBob

 '''I really dislike fragmented discussions, so if you post something here, I will reply here. Likewise, if I post something to your talk page, please reply there; I will be watching.''' SavageBob welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * Internal pages:
 * Community Portal
 * Manual of Style
 * Online sources
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~. Four tildes produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Community Portal talk page or ask me on my Talk page. May the Force be with you! - MyNz 20:29, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Hi.
I just wanted to give you my welcome. And I just wanted to say that, from the quality of your edits, I can tell that you will be a great addition to our fair wiki. :) Adamwankenobi 22:51, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Adam! I appreciate your kind words. I've noticed your name in the edit histories of many of the articles I'm interested in, so I'm sure we'll run into each other again! — SavageBob 22:53, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Indeed we will. And, IMHO, Wookieepedia needs more pedants like yourself. ;) Adamwankenobi 23:00, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Alien Anthology -- thanks
Thanks for adding the contents to Alien Anthology! &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * My pleasure! I've got a ton of old WEG stuff that I hope to be able to contribute from, too. — SavageBob 22:59, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Who/Whom
Hi, though it's not a big thing really, I just thought I'd note that so far, every time I've seen you change whom to who it's actually using improper English, and should in fact have stayed at whom. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 16:39, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No, I don't think so. "The Bloggo is a sapient creature whom lived on the Forest Moon of Endor" is flat out wrong. Keep in mind that who is the subject pronoun, and whom is the object pronoun. Treat the clause as its own sentence and decide if the pronoun is replacing a subject or an object: "He lived on the Forest Moon of Endor" and "Him lived on the Forest Moon of Endor". Which is correct? Who is analogous to he, and whom is analogous to him. It's obviously he/who in this case. — SavageBob 16:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * It is Bob who is right ;-) KEJ 16:49, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * And it is I who am thanking you! (Or should that be "who is thanking you" . . .? :)) — SavageBob 16:53, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The world would be a much better place without hypercorrection ;-) KEJ 16:59, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

External links/sources
Hey, Dan. I noticed your edit on Nimbanel changing an "External link" to a "source". I thought that "external links" were assumed to always be sources, just that they were separated out per the Appearances/Sources/External link trichotomy. This not so? — SavageBob 11:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, we decided by a narrow margin when constructing the layout guide back in November to treat articles on official websites (databank entries, WOTC web enhancements, etc.) under "sources," and reserve "External links" for Wikipedia articles, fansites, weblogs, etc., which may give useful information but are not necessarily canonical. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 12:00, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Pages of interest
I've seen your excellent work in improving the Ewok-related articles, and thought you might be interested in some of the children's books articles linked to at Ewok. A few days ago, I created place-holder articles for them. Keep up the good work! :) Adamwankenobi 23:14, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Adam! I'm currently working on filling in the blanks for The Adventures of Teebo: A Tale of Magic and Suspense. The others would be nice to help with too, but I don't own any of those books. But who knows? Teebo was really cheap second-hand, so I'll keep an eye out for the others. — SavageBob 23:34, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Contact Details
Greetings...would it be possible to have some sort of contact details for you, besides this talk page? I've something to let you see, but I'm not legally allowed to post it here. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 13:31, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I just put in an email address, but I won't be able to confirm it until later today. — SavageBob 13:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Well if you have any way to contact me through other means than the Wookieepedia, I've left all my contact details on my own user page and I'd love to be able to send you the file, as it explains a lot of stuff you'll be interested in. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 13:51, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Characters > Dramatis personae
Many of the more recent Star Wars novels have began to use a "dramatis personae" list for the participants in the story. I've noticed that on Wookieepedia this has been applied to other types of media as well, so I thought it would be OK to apply it to the TV episodes so that everything would be uniform. I know that you were concerned that we may be "talking over" our readers, but because of the very fact that they come to this site in the first place, I doubt we're talking over them. ;) Adamwankenobi Talk to me! My home. 18:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm firmly against the idea (it's pedantic and elitist), but I'm willing to call a consensus track on it, if you want. — SavageBob 18:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, fine with me. :) Adamwankenobi Talk to me! My home. 18:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. See Forum:"Characters" or "Dramatis personae"?. — SavageBob 19:03, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Dried wank's hide
Hi Bob :-) I noticed you added "Dried wank's hide" to the Star Wars: Ewoks article a while back, and a few of us are curious as to whether this is for real or not. Could you shed some light on this? Thanks. --Azizlight 13:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Pacithhip
Great expansion of Pacithhip. Just a couple of things for the article. Can you source the infobox as well? (We generally require this) Secondly, did you come across any appropriate in-universe quotes that could be added to the article, particularly as a lead quote? --Eyrezer 15:44, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No prob. Souring the infobox also includes individuals, but I was able to do that myself for this article. I've also added a few more sources. Both the Insider ones are only in relation to the SE changes so no new info there. You may like to have a look at the Jedi Force Files pages which can be found here. I think the only new piece of info was the ability to resist stun bolts which I've subsequently added. I haven't checked The Art of Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, but I'll see if someone else here has access to it. Finally, I doubt the Ep 1 game has anything unique in it. I'll keep an eye out for quotes, myself. --Eyrezer 02:03, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, apparently the Art of Book only has images, such as this one. You may prefer it to one already in the article. --Eyrezer 02:21, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you know which Claws of the Dragon they appear in? --Eyrezer 02:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey SavageBob. I recommend you nominate Pacithhip as a Featured article. We need more Species FAN. For what it's worth, you might also like to join this WookieeProject. We're not organized like some other projects but you're welcome. --Eyrezer 06:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I see on the Pa'lowick article that The Vaynai Archipelago is no referenced at all, presumably because it only depicts a Pa'lowick in the background. You may like to include a line such as can be found on the Alzoc III article (Talz also traveled to worlds such as Phaeda,[37] Vaynai,[38] and Lok.[39]) as a way of including that info. --Eyrezer 23:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * With regard to images, Wookieepedia tries for alternating left and right alignment. This means that even if you want to keep the Lutrillians looking inward, you need to follow this pattern. I just thought I explain that. --Eyrezer 16:38, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That's a silly rule, especially when it violates core concepts of layout design. But I guess a rule's a rule, as daft as it may be . . . . SavageBob 00:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Lutrillia image
Hey, SavageBob; I fixed the image on the Lutrillia article. You just forgot to put the  brackets around it. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 13:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks! SavageBob 13:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Ecclessis Figg
I appreciate the quotes in Figg, but after mulling them a bit I decided to take them out; I don't think they really add anything to the article, just sort of repeat what it already says. Hope you don't mind. - Lord Hydronium 11:10, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Upon further discussion, removing it was a little premature; it wasn't doing any harm, so sorry if it seemed like I was just blanket-reverting all changes. Anyway, I went with another quote that I thought was a little more interesting. - Lord Hydronium 11:30, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, quotes are as much about adding color as they are about adding new information, so I hope you keep at least a quote or two in the article, regardless of whether they're ones I added or not! :) SavageBob 12:36, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Lutrillian
Hey, Bob. I meant to point out a few things per those ambig/non-canon appearances. I think it would be best if you could add whatever information you can take from them to the History section; i.e., "A Lutrillian appeared at Horn Station, etc." Both of these appearances fall within Tales 1-20, which we treat as ambiguous, but still add to the article proper, rather than just ignoring them outright. If you look at the early History section of the Luke Skywalker article, you'll see the "Tales 1-20" tag, which can be applied to the Lutrillian article for this specific information. But if you truly feel the Emperor's Court thing should be treated as non-canon, and I'll admit it sounds pretty ridiculous, I think it would be best to add a sentence or two to the BTS explaining that a Lutrillian appears in the crowd at the trial of Solo, etc., but that the article treats it as non-canon because of its silliness, etc. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Apparently, you're also missing info from the Millennium Falcon novel. A Lutrillian(s) does have a role in the story, I noticed, while flipping through the book today. I've removed the Mentioned only tag from the Appearances list. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:11, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, really? I don't have access to that book. Would you mind adding any pertinent info to the article? --SavageBob 05:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, never mind. The book is searchable on Amazon, so I was able to read the part where the Lutrillian character appears. Too bad there are no quotes that could be used! SavageBob 08:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)