Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

 The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.


 * History
 * Queue

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
 * 5) &hellip;not be the object of any ongoing edit wars.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box.
 * 8) &hellip;have no more than 3 redlinks.
 * 9) &hellip;have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
 * 10) &hellip;not have been previously featured on the Main Page. Otherwise, it can only be restored to featured status.
 * 11) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 12) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 13) &hellip;provide at least one quote on the article. A leading quote at the beginning of the article will be required only if there is quotable dialogue by or about the subject. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
 * 14) &hellip;include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles.
 * 15) &hellip;include a "powers and abilities" section on all relevant character articles, especially for Force-sensitive characters where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
 * 16) &hellip;include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available.
 * 17) &hellip;pass review by the Inquisitorius review panel.
 * 18) &hellip;counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 1000 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc).

For more information on what makes a featured article, see What is a featured article?

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above. Note that a previously featured article cannot be featured on the Main Page again; however, it can be restored to featured status.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 Inquisitor supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under! Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has five supporting Inquisitor votes and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add Nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the Featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the Featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

(5 Inqs/5 Users/10 total)
Support
 * I nominated this article because it seemed very good, and hope you like it!StarWarsDude 21:56, 20 October 2007 (UTC) (You didn't nominated the article. Also, single issue voter, struck per policy.  Greyman ( Paratus ) 04:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC))


 * 1) Sikon 17:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 11:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Sikon, this is bloody good. I demand more FAs out of you, sonny! Thefourdotelipsis 02:38, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Per 4dot. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 02:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Lord Hydronium 12:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  Greyman ( Paratus ) 15:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Slash Z 19:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC) (single issue voter, struck per policy.  Greyman ( Paratus ))
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 01:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Dark Lord Xander  ( Embrace The Dark Side! )[[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|20px]] 03:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Very nice. -- Ozzel 16:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Per Ozzel.  Victor  ( talk ) 00:30, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) A few things:
 * 2) * The infobox image (Image:Kotor.jpg) has a Dark Horse watermark is generally low quality. Replace this.
 * 3) ** Replaced. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) * The introduction needs a good rewrite. Things such as Dark Horse's other current Star Wars comics and the chronology of the series are best discussed in other sections.
 * 5) ** Addressed the issues you mentioned - tell me if something is still wrong. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) * There's a few punctuation errors throughout the article: several instances of punctuation being placed outside quotation marks, and em dashes are erroneously surrounded by spaces.
 * 7) ** Corrected em dashes. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) * The "2007: Days/Knights" subsection of "Production" has several two-sentence paragraphs. Rewrite if possible. Why is the section given the affix of "Days/Knights," when the 2006 section has no affix at all?
 * 9) ** Explained on IRC, also see below. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) * The section "Core characters" should either cover only the core characters, or be renamed to "Major characters" or something similar.
 * 11) ** Renamed to just "Characters". - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) * The thin paragraph issue applies to most of the "Plot" section as well, particularly the subsections "Commencement" and "Days of Fear, Nights of Anger."
 * 13) ** Expanded small paragraphs. - Sikon 14:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) * There's no reception section, and no mention of sales figures.
 * --Imperialles 17:50, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) ** Added. - Sikon 14:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) The core characters section needs to be wookified. At the very least, it needs a grammar cleanup.  Chack Jadson  Talk  20:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Kotorteam.jpg needs to be properly sourced with the Information template. --Eyrezer 23:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) * Done. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) From the Grey of Man:
 * 3) * Image:Kotor.jpg is currently tagged with . Please rectify if this is going to be used.
 * 4) ** Deleted. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) * The infobox picture isn't really the best one that is out there, though I can understand why it was chosen. Maybe the following one, which I've linked to, would be better enjoyed by the community? Especially since it has full color. Image:Kotorhandbookcoverandtitle.jpg, just a suggestion.
 * 6) ** Done. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) * None of the character information in the "Core character" section has any reference tags. Please source info from the necessary appearances/sources.
 * 8) * What's the source for "&hellip;abbreviated as KotOR&hellip;"? I know it is often referred to as that around here, but is there a source for it being used in the comics/interviews/media etc.?
 * 9) ** Sourced. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) * The caption ("Dark Horse promotional image and preliminary issue 0 cover") is not needed below the picture in the infobox.
 * 11) ** Removed. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) * Each entry in the Core Characters section needs to be expanded, IMO; and as already pointed out, needs to be cleaned up.
 * 13) ** See below about expansion. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) * It may have been intentional, but Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic 0: Crossroads is not listed, along with the other comics, in the "Media" section. All of the other comics which were collected into the TPB Commencement are listed, and Crossroads was collected in it as well&mdash;please include.
 * 15) ** It's there, see below. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) * Please completely source the "Continuity" section&mdash;only a few paragraphs and/or pieces of information are currently sourced. Even though some of the information may be obvious, it should still be sourced to comply with FAN standards.
 * 17) ** Sourced. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) *** Better, but the first two paragraphs still need ref tags. The first paragraph needs at least one, if not more, ref tags of where the KotOR comics reference the TOTJ comics and the KOTOR games. The second paragraph simply needs a ref tag from either the Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic video game or even the Strategy Guide since it details some of the information listed. Using both wouldn't be opposed to either. Greyman ( Paratus ) 15:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) ****Reworded the first paragraph and restructured the section, so that the paragraph wouldn't require a reference (hopefully). As for the second, it openly says "in the game" and provides a link to said game, so I don't think it needs a reference - the game is established as the source for this information in the text itself, and I'm not a fan of having footnotes for the sake of them. - Sikon 12:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) *****Neither am I a fan of having footnotes for the sake of having them, if it can be avoided&mdash;and your re-wording of that specific part clears up my objection, thanks. Greyman ( Paratus ) 15:24, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) * Formatting for the "Notes and references" section should be a scroll box at the very least.
 * 22) ** Done. - Sikon 08:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) * Once the writing objections listed by Imp, Chack, and myself have been looked after, I'll go through the actual writing of the article. I don't see any point in doing it before hand.
 * 24) * In the "Continuity" section, the first sentence says "Set in the years 3,964 BBY and 3,963 BBY, at a midpoint between Tales of the Jedi and the video games&hellip;". It needs to be made clear that that the video games are Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic and Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords, as right now a wayward reader could mistake it for all the video games.  Greyman ( Paratus ) 15:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) ** Addressed. - Sikon 12:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) * I feel that introduction should make some mention about the fan reception of the series as well as any other relevant Real World impacts it has had&mdash;especially since it's an article about the overall series. Greyman ( Paratus ) 15:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 27) ** There haven't been any significant real-world impacts, to my knowledge, besides Vector &mdash; which I have now mentioned in the intro. - Sikon 12:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) **An interesting FAN which I could see becoming the template for future projects like it. Greyman ( Paratus ) 00:57, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 29) From the beaker of Lord Hydronium:
 * 30) * Expand on a few things in "Plot Summary", particularly the second paragraph of "Commencement". First, some explanation of the knighting ceremony, and second, a few more details on the vision, like the figure you mention later.
 * 31) ** Expanded the Commencement section to clarify this. - Sikon 12:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 32) * Nothing about Vector.
 * 33) ** Added a section about Vector and mentioned it in the intro. - Sikon 12:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 34) *No other complaints here. - Lord Hydronium 09:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 35) From the desk of Atarumaster88
 * 36) * Source handbook release.
 * 37) ** Done. - Sikon 12:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 38) *Copyedit plot summary
 * 39) *This is not the easiest of objections to resolve, but I'd like the prose in the plot summaries to be a little better. Some of the word choices don't seem to quite line up- I think a "misled" in there is kind of awkward. Another example is the way the last sentence of Flashpoint reads- it doesn't seem to flow. Also, a bit more detail in some parts, e.g. "After Zayne learned this." What did he learn- that the banker was his father? That the banker had been captured? Both?
 * 40) * Maybe it's because it has been freshly released/not fully released, but the Daze of Hate section is abominably small and hard to read/follow.
 * 41) ** Expanded with #20 events and restructured. - Sikon 12:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 42) *This is definitely not a hard and fast rule, but what about having an authors/pencillers/creators section on the page? Ozzel's SOTE soundtrack FA has a paragraph about McNeely and some of his background work, and I think that an entire series merits a section on the creators and their background, at least briefly.
 * 43) * Disambig link to other KotOR products needed.
 * 44) **Added. - Sikon 12:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 45) *Have a Super Terrific Friendly Un-frustrating Day. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 18:24, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 46) From the lair of Hobbes15
 * 47) *"Vision on the rogue moon"? What is this (the Lucien Draay section) ? As it isn't mentioned before, some mention should go in Draay's bio.
 * 48) *Does Characters need to be referenced? At the very least, the final paragraph of each character should be referenced, if not the main information area, IMO.
 * 49) *Per Ataru on the Plot Summary prose. ..."standing right there with lightsabers drawn", "misled"... the prose could most definitely be improved.
 * 50) *"the operation that eventually results in Arven being freed"? What operation? Some detail about it should be added.
 * 51) * Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 04:17, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 52) The infobox needs to be sourced. --Imperialles 15:59, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Nominated on Sikon's behalf per request on IRC. -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 17:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Confirming the request on IRC. :) Plus some responses:
 * Sourced the "KotOR" abbreviation.
 * Replaced infobox picture per Greyman's suggestion, deleted Image:Kotor.jpg. Removed caption.
 * Removed references to other DH titles and specific years from the intro. Tell me if anything else needs to be done about it.
 * As I told Imp on IRC, 2007 has the "Days/Knights" subtitle because that's how Dark Horse refers to that meta-arc. There was no codename for 2006, hence no subtitle.
 * Renamed "Core characters" to just "Characters". But what is meant by "wookifying" this section? I'm not sure it needs to be expanded, either - it's an article about the overall series, so I tried to be as brief and concise as possible when describing the individual plot summaries and characters. Entries on individual arcs may have longer descriptions.
 * I still feel that the character entries should be longer, but I understand your reasoning and struck that particular objection. Greyman ( Paratus ) 15:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Removed spaces around mdashes.
 * Reception section: I'll add it soon.
 * Thin paragraphs: I'll expand them.
 * Sourced the unsourced part of the "Continuity" section. Things without a reference footnote are sourced in-text - for example, "Alek references the Great Sith War in Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic 0: Crossroads."
 * Issue 0: Crossroads is already in the Media section, just out-of-order. Fourdot suggested listing everything by release date, and #0 was released after #1 and #2.
 * Put "Notes and references" in a scroll box, although I'm personally not a big fan of them.
 * Templatized the description for Image:Kotorteam.jpg.
 * - Sikon 07:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Could someone strike Slash Z's vote, as he has no edits on the main namespace? Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 00:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a opposed vote here, but I tried previewing the article with all the character images on the right instead of on the left, and I think the article looks better that way. Anybody else want to take look at it that way and see if they agree? - JMAS 18:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

(1 Inq/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) I put a lot of work into this one; I think it's accurate, interesting, concise and complete. I would definitely welcome any criticisms or suggestions, but I definitely think it is worthy of being a featured article. &mdash; Colinmcev Talk 03:00, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Thefourdotelipsis 04:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  19:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Just glanced at it, but the Personality and Traits should be at the end of the article, you know. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 04:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Fixed that.--Colinmcev 18:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Would be nice to have a BTS (Behind the scenes) section, covering stuff like who created the character, where he first appeared, any continuity errors, etc. Also, this would be a good place to include one of those wacky Galaxies pics. -- Ozzel 02:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) *Added both. Thanks for the great suggestions!--Colinmcev 01:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) From the Thoroughly Pounded Desk of Four Dot:
 * 6) * There's a little bit of POV in the intro, and "He betrayed Rogue Squadron during a covert mission and attempted to kill Corran Horn, but he was shot and killed by his lover, Inyri Forge." could probably be rephrased.
 * 7) **I reworked it a litlte bit and removed what I thought was the POV. If there is any left, or if you think it needs further rephrasing, please let me know or feel free to tweak it.--Colinmcev 01:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) * "Zekka Thyne served on Black Sun" - Sounds dangerous. I think he just "served Black Sun", but I think "joined the Black Sun syndicate" would be better.
 * 9) **I agree! Fixed that.--Colinmcev 01:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) * Just a general observation: There are a lot of unsightly "thin" paragraphs. Of course, you can "cheat" on this one and just merge a couple of the offending paragraphs together.
 * 11) **This is a bad habit of mine; in real life, I'm a reporter, and in newspaper articles small paragraphs are required. lol. I tightened them up a bit, but if you still think there are paragraphs that are too thin, please point out which ones and I'll make further fixes.--Colinmcev 01:38, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) * Another observation: The end of every paragraph containing In-universe information should have a relevant citation.
 * 13) **Fixed that.--Colinmcev 01:41, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) * "eliminate single targets and slaughtering informers and even their families." - This could be worded better.
 * 15) **Tightened the sentence altogether, I think it's better now.--Colinmcev 01:42, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) * "In 7 BBY, Fliry Vorru, then a Moff in charge of the Corellian Sector, was sent to Kessel after being framed by Prince Xizor. This allowed Xizor to establish Zekka Thyne as his chief associate in Corellia." - How so? This might need more clarification.
 * 17) **Done.--Colinmcev 01:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) * "However, he was well protected by his heavily protected fortress" - One of the "protected"'s needs to be replaced, methinks.
 * 19) **Yeesh, what a lame mistake. Fixed that.--Colinmcev 01:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) * Even though you link to cutter, you might want to briefly explain what it is.
 * 21) **Done.--Colinmcev 01:44, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) * Take the image of the Bothan Thyne out of the bio and put it in the BtS. Also, assume that they're separate characters. I cite Chertyl Ruluwoor as a precedent.
 * 23) **I don't necessarily agree that the SWG Thyne should be a seperate character since both are affiliated with Black Sun and are clearly meant to be one and the same; maybe it's just me, but I think just noting the Bothan discrepency is enough. But I did move the pic.--Colinmcev 01:49, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) * "Although Loor attended the meeting during which the plan was formed, he started a confrontation with Corran Horn that resulted in Fliry Vorru punching him in his abdomen injury and smashing his head against the table." - Eh? You might have gotten you characters a bit mixed up there.
 * 25) **Yeah, that "Loor" should be a "Thyne." Fixed it.--Colinmcev 01:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) * The preceding sentence also starts with "Although", which doesn't flow well.
 * 27) **Fixed that and redid much of the sentence altogether.--Colinmcev 01:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) * "With this, Zekka Thyne died." - Too short a sentence, but I could be wrong. You'll want to integrate it into the preceding paragraph, though.
 * 29) **I think the short sentence works for effect, but I agree that it is WAY too short as an individual paragraph. Merged it with the previous one.--Colinmcev 01:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 30) * Mention who the other spy was in the Post-death section.
 * 31) **Done.--Colinmcev 01:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 32) *Best of luck with all that. It might take a bit of work, but I think there's some good foundation here. Thefourdotelipsis 09:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 33) **If there's anything else, please don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks for the thorough look!--Colinmcev 01:56, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, first things first: Don't strike other people's objections. It's frowned upon. However, you got most of them. I still have an issue with the paragraph spacing. Basically, in the first half of the article, merge every pair of paragraphs. It just looks a lot neater and, well, meatier. Thefourdotelipsis 23:27, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) **I'm really sorry about that, I've never nominated an article before so I didn't really know the proper procedure. I tightened the paragraphs a bit, let me know if you think that looks better.--Colinmcev 23:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) ***That's OK, you know now. Good work with this though. It looks fine to me now. Thefourdotelipsis 04:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Got some things here:
 * 4) * In the Appointment to Corellia section, it first says the Moff was framed by Xizor. Then it later syas it is widely believed he was framed. That sounds reptitive and contradicts the above info somewhat.
 * 5) **Actually, Moff Fliry Vorru was definitely framed, and accordingly that is definitively stated. But the person who is noted as "widely believed" to have been framed is the previous owner of the fortress. That isn't Vorru, it's someone else who is never identified in any of the source material. So the two references are not related, and I don't think there's an error there.--Colinmcev 01:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) * Also, the protected fortress thing that Fourdot mentioned earlier needs fixing.
 * 7) **Right you are. Fixed that.--Colinmcev 01:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) * In the Spy for Lorr section, the last paragraph needs to be ref'ed.
 * 9) **Done.--Colinmcev 01:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) * In the Imperial scheme section, the second-to-last paragraph needs to be rephrased. It's too repetitive.
 * 11) **Good call. I think I fixed it, but if you still think it needs work, let me know or go ahead and rephrase it.--Colinmcev 02:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) * The last paragraph int hat section needs to be sourced.
 * 13) **Done.--Colinmcev 02:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) * In the Imprisonment paragraph, the "Maw" needs to be unlinked.
 * 15) **OK..--Colinmcev 02:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) * The first paragraph needs to be sourced too.
 * 17) **Fixed it.--Colinmcev 02:02, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) * In Presence on Coruscant, the first paragraph needs to be rephraes as it sounds repetitive.
 * 19) **I agree, big time. Fixed it.--Colinmcev 02:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) * Also, change execute to shoot.
 * 21) **To be honest, I don't think this change is entirely necessary, but I made it anyway.--Colinmcev 02:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) * In the Death section, "this new" should be "this news".
 * 23) **Another dumb mistake. Fixed.--Colinmcev 02:05, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) * In P&T, the word "Wookiee" needs to be unlinked. Also, rearrange it so it flows, going from his perosnality to his appearance than his tastes, not jumping around.
 * 25) **I think it already is that way; the first paragraph is personality, then we have three paragraphs of appearance, and the last one about his art taste. If this isn't acceptable, can you give me some further clarification on how it could be rearranged?--Colinmcev 02:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) * And everything from Release from Kessel to Post-death needs sourcing.
 * 27) **Done.--Colinmcev 02:08, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) *Good luck.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 19:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 29) **Thanks again, I really appreciate the thoroughness!--Colinmcev 02:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 30) And now for something completely similar:
 * 31) * Source the rest of the infobox.
 * 32) **Is it OK the way it is now?--Colinmcev 00:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 33) * There's a few instances of redundant ref tags. If the whole paragraph is from the same source it only needs one ref at the end.
 * 34) **Removed those. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 01:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 35) *Include information about his quest in Galaxies.
 * 36) **This is the only one I really can't fix myself. I don't have Galaxies, and I've scoured the Net for info on his quests, but I can't find any. Maybe someone else can help me out here? I'd hate to see the whole article snagged just because of this...--Colinmcev 00:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 37) * Intro: "Although rumored to be the heir-apparent to Xizor's criminal organization..." Rumoured by who? This needs to be mentioned later in the article and sourced.
 * 38) **Done--Colinmcev 00:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 39) * Imperial scheme and capture: Source the first paragraph.
 * 40) **Done--Colinmcev 00:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 41) * Imprisonment on Kessel: "a spicer term used to describe close enough to a person that they could be trusted with cutting their spice" Can this be reworded?
 * 42) **Done--Colinmcev 00:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 43) * Presence on Coruscant: Needs something to lead into second paragraph, even if it's just "Some time later..." As it is, it feels disjointed.
 * 44) **Done--Colinmcev 00:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 45) * Presence on Coruscant: Second paragraph has a sentence starting with "but". Kill it if possible.
 * 46) **Would changing it to However be cheating? If so, I'll reword.--Colinmcev 00:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 47) * Presence on Coruscant: A brief mention of how the Rogues got involved in the Imperial raid would not go amiss.
 * 48) **Done--Colinmcev 00:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 49) * Personality and traits: "one massive black eye that was slowly fading" is a quote from the narrative, not something in-universe. Lose the quotes and make it something like "Corran Horn thought that it gave the impression..." Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 50) **Done--Colinmcev 00:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 51) From the lair of Hobbes15
 * 52) * Per GT on the infobox.
 * 53) **Is it good the way it is now?--Colinmcev 00:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 54) ***All the data must be ref'd, not just selective bits.
 * 55) ****Ok, didn't realize how much has to be referenced. I did that.--Colinmcev
 * 56) *Mention somewhere in the bio that he was born on Corellia, if this can be referenced.
 * 57) **It never says in either source material whether he was born there or not, so I can't really put it in.--Colinmcev 00:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 58) ***Than where do we get that in the infobox? If it isn't referenced, it shouldn't be in his article at all. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 00:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 59) ****Well, the Corellia reference in the infobox was here before I ever touched the article. Even though it's never stated that he was born in Corellia, I always just thought it would be OK there since his earliest appearance (Side Trip) have him in Corellia, and that was where he was thriving at the high point of his career and lived most of his life. But what do you think, should we take that out altogether or leave it? --Colinmcev
 * 60) *****I'm all right with it staying, but make a note in the article or a footnote that it isn't necessarily Thyne's place of birth, but it is where he spends most of his life. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 06:11, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 61) ******I put this in the end of the first section. Thanks for the guidance.--Colinmcev 00:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 62) * Needs a mention of how Black Sun met its downfall.
 * 63) **Did that, and cited Shadow of the Empire for it.--Colinmcev 00:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 64) * The last sentence of Spy for Kirtan Loor seems a little out of place. Perhaps place it after the segment about the destruction (sort of) of Black Sun.
 * 65) **I just dropped it altogether; I guess it wasn't really necessary.--Colinmcev 00:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 66) * Ref the end of the first paragraph of 1.4.
 * 67) **Done--Colinmcev 00:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 68) * The last bit of 1.4 that says Thrawn captured Thyne is a bit unclear. I thought it said the Horns captured him earlier; in addition, a little mention on what happened after Hal shot him would be nice.
 * 69) **Done--Colinmcev 00:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 70) ***I don't see any difference. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 00:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 71) ****Oops, my mistake. I made some changes, how does it look now? --Colinmcev
 * 72) * "to describe close enough to a person that they could be trusted with cutting their spice"? This is unclear.
 * 73) **Reworded it.--Colinmcev 00:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 74) * "Myda wanted to take the offer, Kassar insisted that Inyri must make her own decision, and even expressed hope that Inyri might be able to change Thyne for the better." Who the heck are are Myda and Kassar?
 * 75) **I double checked, but there was already a first reference to them in there.--Colinmcev 00:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 76) ***My mistake. Struck. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 00:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 77) * The first sentence of Presence on Coruscant makes no sense. When is Thyne talking to Horn? It is unclear what's happening there. All it says is that Thyne was about to be released, then next thing you know, he's psychologically attacking Horn.
 * 78) **Fixed this up.--Colinmcev 00:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 79) * "to look back and check on Inyri"? This could be reworded and made much clearer and more interesting than it is at the moment.
 * 80) **Reworded.--Colinmcev 00:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 81) * Mention why Loor feared Horn would try to kill him in 1.8.
 * 82) **Done.--Colinmcev 00:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 83) * Rogue Squadron Betrayal and Death is an unclear headline. Who's doing the betraying&mdash; Thyne or the Rogues?
 * 84) **Just changed it to Death. Seems easier and it still works.--Colinmcev 00:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 85) * First paragraph of this section is unclear and should be slightly reworded.
 * 86) **Done.--Colinmcev 00:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 87) * "Thyne instead told him there was at least one other spy in Rogue Squadron, although Thyne did not know that Rogue Squadron pilot Erisi Dlarit was the spy." This doesn't make sense, and Rogue Squadron is over-used in the sentence.
 * 88) **Clarified a bit.--Colinmcev 00:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 89) * In Post-death, the article makes it seem like Horn died in his confrontation with Celchu, not in the battle following it.
 * 90) **Fixed.--Colinmcev 00:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 91) * In the P&T, could the three paragraphs regarding his appearance be merged into one?
 * 92) **Done.--Colinmcev 00:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 93) * Is it specifically said in Side Trip that Thyne's taste in art was considered questionable by most? If not, it needs a seperate reference.
 * 94) **Clarified this.--Colinmcev 00:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 95) *Do you have a reference for the fact that Thyne was only referenced in the parts of the story written by Stackpole (BTS)?
 * 96) **No, it's a fact but I don't have a source, he's just the only author to have written him. How should I handle this? Drop the fact altogether? I think it's an interesting note so it would be a shame, but if that's how it would have to go I'd be fine with it.--Colinmcev 00:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 97) ***I checked this in Side Trip&mdash; it's divided into four parts, which I didn't know, and Thyne is only in Stackpole's parts. It's fine. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 00:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * If, as GT says, he has a specific role in Galaxies beyond a mere appearance, it does need to be mentioned.
 * 1) **See above. I need help with this one because I don't have SWG.--Colinmcev 00:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) ***I'm afraid I don't either, so I can't do much about it. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 00:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) *And that's all. Good luck with those. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 01:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I finally got to read Side Trip and I expanded the section with a whole lot of info from that. As that was the final major source for Zekka, I think this article is pretty much as complete as possible.--Colinmcev 01:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Colinmcev, I uncrossed Chack's objections, because, after checking the history, I realized that he didn't cross them out, you did. For future reference, the way these things work is that you make a comment when you've addressed an objection, the objecting user looks at the article, checks to see if the objection is fixed to his/her satisfaction, and then crosses it off. If they still see a problem, they'll point it out. Thank you, and good work with the objections ;). Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 02:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm sorry about that; as I said about, I've never nominated an article before so I didn't really know the proper procedure. I was basically crossing them off as I fixed them, but I'll make sure that doesn't happen again.--Colinmcev 23:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * It's fine. I'll try to look at the article later today.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 10:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * As I noted about, I need some help with Thyne's SWG quest. I don't have Galaxies and I can't find it anywhere online. Can someone else add this info for me? I think it would be a true shame if this couldn't become featured just because this is missing.--Colinmcev 00:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Would be nice if you could work in this image somewhere. Aside from the Galaxies thing, it looks good. -- Ozzel 07:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I added that picture; it was good to get another pic in there! As for the Galaxies thing, I'm still stuck on that for right now. Can anyone help? I hate to see it stuck because of this...--Colinmcev 00:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

(4 Inqs/3 Users/7 Total)
Support
 * 1) --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 20:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Thefourdotelipsis 01:33, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Janeway 14:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  &mdash;Graestan  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( This party's over ) 05:50, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) JMAS 02:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  Greyman ( Paratus ) 22:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 21:28, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Image:Oodbnar.jpg needs sourcing. --Eyrezer 00:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * This is one of those rare TOTJ nominations :P --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 20:27, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

(0 Inq/2 User/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) As nominator.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 19:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Support, after a quick spell-check and edit Enochf 20:18, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) There's gotta be a better infobox image out there. And...have all the sourcebooks been scoured? I'm surprised that no new information on the character was provided in the Thrawn Trilogy Sourcebook for example. Thefourdotelipsis 05:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Gave it a tighter crop. How's that look? -- Ozzel 06:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Very image-light for a character in a comic trilogy. Could definitely use a couple more images. -- Ozzel 06:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) * Comics not even listed in his appearances, I might add. -- Ozzel 21:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) BTS could be bigger, including expanding on DB info . --Eyrezer 07:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) *Why is the information on Ukio placed before the information on Jomark? As I recall, Ukio is the opening chapters of TLC whereas Jomark is DFR if not HTTE. If it's about not wishing to do a blow-by-blow biography then let me know and I'll withdraw the objection, but it feels a little anachronistic. Harrar 18:00, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) From the transient desk of Atarumaster88
 * 8) *I believe Outbound Flight in the context of a ship, should be italicized.
 * 9) *1st 2 sentences of third paragraph of "Creation" are speculative.
 * 10) *De-capitalize non-proper uses of "Guardian".
 * 11) *"Discovery and entrance into Imperial service" is an unwieldy and slightly inaccurate title; he was serving Palpatine previously, no?
 * 12) *"He discovered that Joruus C'baoth was completely insane." This short sentence ruins the flow of the paragraph and should be moved and rewritten.
 * 13) *"He also revealed to Pellaeon that the Dark Jedi was not Jorus C'baoth, as he the captain believed." There's a word missing here or something, and I'm not quite sure what it is.
 * 14) *"A group of Star Destroyers waited outside the shield, one of them, with C'baoth on it." Poor wording. Rephrase.
 * 15) *" At the Battle of Nkllon, which C'baoth was coordinating, his mind felt Skywalker's presence, and he told him that he knew he would come to him.". Confusing antecedents in the end part, and a lack of context on this particular paragraph in general.
 * 16) *Needs the AWB treatment.
 * 17) *"Their plan succeeded, though they were forced to leave Leia at home with the children, protected by the Noghri, whose loyalty had recently changed from the Empire to the New Republic." Awkward and run-on sentence. Please split this up.
 * 18) *Missing context on the whole Noghri thing. That whole paragraph needs either expanded or cut as irrelevant, but the half-done job that currently exists doesn't cut it.
 * 19) *"He was there and ready for them." Reword this; it disrupts the flow.
 * 20) *Ugh. The whole Showdown on Wayland section reads like a summary of the final third of The Last Command with an emphasis on C'baoth. It should focus on C'baoth's actions, with only enough information on the other characters and events to provide sufficient context.
 * 21) *"ultimate treasure" is both speculative and POV. (Showdown on Wayland)
 * 22) *"However, the simple fact that Luke's clone was near in proximity caused a strange buzzing in his head, distracting him, and making him struggle in their duel." Context and antecedents are unclear. Please reword.
 * 23) *The whole actual two paragraphs of the showdown are disordered and poorly written. Seriously.
 * 24) *Go look at, say, Xaverri, and check the reference syntax. The current syntax is unnecessarily long.
 * 25) *Reference the BTS. Completely.
 * 26) *Never described as a Dark Side Adept in any source. Remove or source.
 * 27) **Have a Super Terrific Friendly Un-frustrating day. Ataru the friendly apparition 01:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) Joruus has an entry in the Essential Guide to Characters which might provide some info. If you don't have it Chack, I can show you how to get it on IRC. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 11:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * This article looks way different than it did 2 weeks ago. I did a major expansion on it.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 19:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This article still has a long way to go. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 01:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

(4 Inqs/3 Users/7 Total)
Support
 * 1) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 22:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) An interesting Watson character? I am shocked and chagrined! Thefourdotelipsis 23:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) POWER!!! Unlimited POWER!  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 11:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Lovely. Now FINISH WARU! --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 03:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Wait a second...this ISN'T Waru!?  Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) A few really minor things:
 * 2) * Perhaps a bit of explanation as to who Xanatos is before he is introduced.
 * 3) **You mean a eerily similar individual who is, surprise surprise, somewhat Dookuish? And that both dealt with Qui-Gon? Oh, by the way, expanded.
 * 4) * In Ending the games, two sentences in a row start with As Xanatos... Perhaps one could be rephrased.
 * 5) **Rephrased.
 * 6) * I noticed two instances of numbers being written in digits (3, 100), as opposed to spelled out. There may not be more, but I'd like all these turned to three, one hundred etc.
 * 7) **Numeral designations removed.
 * 8) **That's all. Good article, easy to read; I demand you keep up this FA writing. Well done. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 16:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) ***As if it's that easy... but there will be more incoming. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 03:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) ****Excellent. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 11:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) From the desk of Dr. Fred Edison Green Tentacle:
 * 12) * Intro: "There, he worked for various companies, including UniFy, each hiring and subsequently firing him because of his abilities." Could do with being reworded slightly so it doesn't imply his abilities get him fired.
 * 13) **Reworded.
 * 14) * Telosian Security Forces or Telosian security forces? There's one of each. If it's actually a name, it should be linked too.
 * 15) **Lowercase.
 * 16) * The POWER Party: "Den showed that he was capable of insightful insight." Insightful insight eh? That's pretty insightful. :P
 * 17) **I did that on purpose. I can't believe it survived this far.
 * 18) * Clarify what was actually happening on Telos and UniFy's involvement a little.
 * 19) **Clarified.
 * 20) * Infiltrating UniFy: Xanatos's introduction in the second paragraph could do with being a little clearer.
 * 21) **Expanded/clarified.
 * 22) * Bringing down Xanatos, UniFy, and Katharsis: "His celebration was cut short, however, as Xanatos had entered the arena to give his customary speech which concluded the event and precluded the awarding ceremonies." Should that be precluded or preceded?
 * 23) **Preceded.
 * 24) * Ending the games: What exactly had Obi-Wan recorded?
 * 25) **Explained.
 * 26) * Reunion with Obi-Wan Kenobi: "After accomplishing that task with a lock-pick device he fashioned, the three decided that an investigation of Vox Chun's room." That sentence doesn't seem to have an ending.
 * 27) **Ended.
 * 28) * Saving the BioCruiser: "Vox eventually told the four gathered with him the plan." Which was?
 * 29) **To destroy the ship and steal the treasury. What else?
 * 30) * Saving the BioCruiser: "Den stayed behind as the three Jedi made their way to Uni." Obi-Wan, Anakin and who?
 * 31) **While it was explained the in the last paragraph's last sentence, I clarified here, too.
 * 32) * Saving the BioCruiser: I assume the mention of Qui-Gon should be Obi-Wan?
 * 33) **You assume correctly.
 * 34) *Green Tentacle (Talk) 23:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 35) **Objections addressed. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 16:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) History. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 22:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

(2 Inq/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Best. Villain. Ever. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 13:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Thefourdotelipsis 23:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Yay Troff! Boo Fake Kadann! --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 00:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Guiltiest, heh.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 22:12, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Dark votings Enochf 07:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * I don't think you can be Grand Moff of a single planet. He's likely the Grand Moff of the sector that contains Kessel. Thefourdotelipsis 06:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 11:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You introduce Trioculus twice. Thefourdotelipsis 07:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Whoops. Fixed --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 11:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Would it be possible to work in a mention of his relationship with Quorl Matrin? I'd think it at least slightly noteworthy that this Imperial slimeball has a buddy who does impersonations for his amusement and calls him "Troff." (Gamer 1, page 59) -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 04:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Added. "Troff." Wow. If only someone called him "Berty." --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 20:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * How this relationship ultimately played out is unknown, though Matrin kept Hissa informed throughout the expedition to Stenos. Um, what? How about, "Quorl was ultimately ripped to shreds by the Stenax, so the relationship abruptly ended". Cull Tremayne 23:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Heh, I asked if he died in IRC but nobody answered (I haven't read much Marvel...yet). Addressed, anywho. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 23:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments

(3 Inqs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 14:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Green Tentacle (Talk) 01:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 01:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Thefourdotelipsis 23:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Per rule 9 &mdash; there are some appearances that are not listed in the references. Either they need to be included with the information they contain, or the proper citation tags (for example,  ) need to be affixed to the appearances which require them.  Greyman ( Paratus ) 15:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've added where applicable. Other than the Roque Squadron handbook, which I am in the process of acquiring, and possibly Who's Who in Jabba's Palace, the remaining non  sources/appearances contain no refable information whatsoever. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 16:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) *(Clarified objection via IRC). Greyman ( Paratus ) 16:09, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) **Every non appearance currently referenced.--  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 20:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ***It looks like you got them all except And Then There Were Some: The Gamorrean Guard's Tale &mdash; that is, unless that story is supposed to have a tag attached.  Greyman ( Paratus ) 21:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ****Whoops, missed that one. Reference's been added though. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 22:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Needs a BTS, per Rule 4 --Eyrezer 23:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) *Addressed. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 20:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) From the motel of Green Tentacle:
 * 8) * "Palace" or "palace". I'd say "palace" unless you're using the full name but I could be wrong. Either way, it needs to be consistent.
 * 9) * Same goes for "Citadel" and "citadel".
 * 10) * It also might be better to call it the monastery or something until you get to the point where it actually becomes Jabba's Palace. No biggie though.
 * 11) * Practices and beliefs: "The Order originally consisted only of Humans, though in time it encompassed a great many species." Consider moving to the appropriate place in history instead.
 * 12) * B'omarr Registry should be linked shouldn't it?
 * 13) * Do these images have to be so huge?
 * 14) * Behind the scenes could do with a bit more. Specifically, since they were just brains in jars in ROTJ, which source first identified the Order? Green Tentacle (Talk) 00:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) **I think they've all been addressed. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 23:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) It says they were founded in 700 BBY, but would ponder for millennia...is this right? Thefourdotelipsis 07:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) *Addressed. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 23:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) The article claims that Eron Stonefield entered K'vin's Outpost. This is false. The player character in Missions enters the outpost. Thefourdotelipsis 08:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) *Addressed. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 23:19, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Not a character, ship or location, and not TOTJ. :) --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 14:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
 * According to Who's Who in Jabba's Palace, the B'omarr Monks are listed under "The Bad" section...maybe that, or Insider's writing of the B'omarr Monks, deserves some mention in the BtS. Just a suggestion since I haven't been able to read Who's Who in Jabba's Palace myself. Greyman ( Paratus ) 21:37, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I've been having trouble getting my hands on that myself. I'll see what I can do. Any assistance from anyone is welcome. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 22:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I still haven't gotten access to Insider 60, but I've added a brief mention of it in the BtS. Is that what you had in mind? If not, I'll continue trying to find Insider 60. Thanks, --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 23:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

(4 Inqs/1 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Greyman ( Paratus ) 23:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Good work, even if it is Legacy. Thefourdotelipsis 08:36, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 21:32, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Greyman+trooper=FA.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 23:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Images should be re-uploaded with unblanked speech bubbles. Stuff like "Harkas expressing his anger at Maleval." where he's not saying a word looks terrible. - Lord Hydronium 09:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *That's not a rule base objection, and more of a personal opinion ;) Per this CT archive it was decided by the community, "Comic speech bubbles may be blanked or completely removed. This remains optional." As such, I chose the option of blanking the speech bubbles, just as I do in all articles I write :) Greyman ( Paratus ) 13:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Rule 16. The blanking detracts from the quality of the images here. - Lord Hydronium 21:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Like I said in IRC, not in my opinion it doesn't. And that's really stretching rule 16 to suit your side of the argument, especially since Imp's objection below is what rule 16 is really all about. If you need to reupload those images with the speech just so the "quality" of the image is better, in your opinion, then go for it. I don't want to see this nomination die over something as petty as this, especially since the whiting out of the speech bubbles doesn't break policy. Anyways, like I said in IRC, do what you gotta do. Greyman ( Paratus ) 21:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Per IRC agreement, I'll upload rescanned versions soon, fixing Imp's objection too. - Lord Hydronium 21:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) *Now I don't feel so bad about my previous FA stunts. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 22:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Harkas.JPG and Image:Harkas3.jpg need to be rescanned (they're awfully distorted). I can forgive Image:Harkas2.jpg and Image:Harkas and Trask on Ossus.JPG, but these too should ideally be rescanned. --Imperialles 16:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * And, of course, if Harkas appears further in the Legacy series, I'll add the appropriate information in as needed :) Greyman ( Paratus ) 23:33, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I think the article as at its best, there isnt a lot of new info that will be flowing in any time soon, and it is all around a good article! P.L. 05:02, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Well, unfortunately, it isn't about liking the article. Please read the rules at the top of this page.  &mdash;Graestan ( This party's over ) 05:05, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) From the Grey of Man:
 * 3) *It's not sourced, at all, and needs to be fully sourced per rule 3 and 11.
 * 4) *From taking a look at the article, I can almost guarantee that not all relevant appearances and information from sources are covered.
 * 5) *Intro needs to be quite longer for an FA, per rule 7.
 * 6) *There...are...bullets...in the main article of the body.
 * This image needs to be sourced properly per rule 12.
 * 1) *Appearances list is not complete. (Example: it says "Jedi Apprentice series")
 * 2) **This is all just from a cursory glance...
 * Greyman ( Paratus ) 05:11, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Needs sourcing. Please Inqs, remove this.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 23:15, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments

(5 Inqs/2 Users/7 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nominated.  Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 18:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 21:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Thefourdotelipsis 23:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Tocneppil 09:59, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  23:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Any character that a sourcebook describes as "&hellip;cold, calculating, and vicious in the extreme." deserves to be on the front page one day ;) Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

(1 Inq/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) As nominator. &mdash;Graestan ( This party's over ) 21:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * My first conclave FAN. &mdash;Graestan ( This party's over ) 21:28, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

(2 Inqs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Greyman ( Paratus ) 22:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  &mdash;Graestan ( This party's over ) 22:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 22:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * A co-nomination with AdmirableAckbar and Graestan. Greyman ( Paratus ) 22:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)