Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for In-Universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Widow's Valley

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: So named for the unstable spires.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 20:09, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2)  1358  (Talk) 16:33, October 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) ''' Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 00:50, October 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Whoops; thought I had already supported this. ~ SavageBob 02:02, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Karika
 * 2) * The body could be split up into three sentences.
 * 3) ** Needs a BtS.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 16:26, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Done. Thanks for the suggestion. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 20:01, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Xd1358
 * 6) * "...near the south ridge of the city of Theed." Reads awkwardly. Perhaps the capital city Theed instead?
 * 7) * "Sykes was a pilot of the Royal Naboo Security Forces and flew through the Valley during a battle against the Trade Federation Droid Army at the end of the Invasion of Naboo in 32 BBY." Okay, this is a weird sentence. You must get this and the earlier sentence to run smoother. Please see what phrasing adjustments you can make. 1358  (Talk) 21:47, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) **How does it read now? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:48, September 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) ***It's still pretty choppy. It's like, which is not good.  1358  (Talk) 19:30, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) ****Is there an improvement now? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:33, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) The Wizard did it
 * 12) * There needs to be some resolution to the battle. Did the Security Forces win, or the Federation? --''' Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 15:32, October 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 13) **Details once thought irrelevant are now added. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 01:55, October 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * 14) Soresu
 * 15) * If knocking over the pillars are not necessary, shouldn't Gamemechanics be used?
 * 16) **Should it be? Probably. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:27, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 17) *** Make sure that only optional things are included in the template. I think the proton bombs are required for mission completion, and there may be others. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 03:05, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 18) * any surviving convoy vehicles on the bridge were destroyed. How? By whom? SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 01:17, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 19) **By the exploding thermal detonators. Is it not clear enough? If not let me know. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:27, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 20) *** It isn't because you haven't said anything about them being destroyed prior to the proton bombs. This makes it seem as if some of the convoy vehicles survived the bomb detonation, and were then destroyed in some other way. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 03:05, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 21) *It is not necessary to destroy the pillars during the mission to delay the convoy. This makes it sound like it was intentionally destroyed by Sykes. In the body, however, you just say that they were knocked down. Please clarify. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 03:05, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 22) **Here's how the mission ends. By blowing the detonators with your bombs, or lasers, or destroying the MTTs (difficult to do without knocking down the pillars to delay them). Take your pick. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 04:42, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
 * 23) ***This should be elaborated upon in the BTS. Alternate stories are noted in the "Behind the scenes" section. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 22:12, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 24) ****The point I am trying to make is that there is more than one distinct way to end the mission, and I need advice on how to express this. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 23:30, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 25) *****Something like: this battle appears in the nth mission of BFN. Then talk about how the player plays as Sykes. Then, address the requirements/optionals of the mission. Something to the tune of: "stopping the convoy by destroying the bridge is the only requirement for mission completion, with X serving as an optional action that delays the convoy." SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 00:23, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * 26) *In fact, it isn't even necessary to destroy the convoy, just the bridge. The mission objective says to "stop the convoy."

Comments
 * I could find a quote if necessary. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Um...where's the page? =/ --''' Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 21:44, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know; it won't show up when running a search for it. The only way to go to it is through a page which links to it (BFN appearances or Battle of the south ridge). Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:50, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * The apostrophe was different. --Eyrezer 23:10, September 22, 2010 (UTC)


 * I went back and made it super-comprehensive. You may want to verify everything is correct. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:48, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry to sound like a broken record, but I think the Unidentified Naboo canyon mentioned in the article needs to be linked and created. ~ SavageBob 17:15, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Unidentified female (Anchorhead)

 * Nominated by: Darth Morrt 15:21, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) More ANH novel goodness! Menkooroo 22:23, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) You kids, get off my lawn! ~ SavageBob 23:33, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Classic! --Eyrezer 09:49, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * How do you feel about jettisoning the intro? The article is so short that an additional summary of it isn't really needed. Most CA's don't have 'em 'cause they don't need 'em. Menkooroo 07:17, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Cut. Darth Morrt 08:17, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Some minor grammar issues throughout --- I'm looking for "at" top speed, "ran" instead of "run", an apostropher in "Skywalkers" --- I could sofixit, but I'm hoping you can give the entire article a cleanup and copy-edit.
 * The bts mention of her appearance in the revised fourth draft should be sourced to where the revised fourth draft is available online (it's not self-sourcing since we have no article on it).
 * Can you give some context on Luke Skywalker? Even something as simple as farmboy. Menkooroo 01:58, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * I fixed all above.
 * Prepare to be savaged...
 * Just one thing: Can you stub sun shawl? Seems like something we should have an article for. ~ SavageBob 17:22, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Page created. Thanks for the copy-edit. Just one thing, I have no proof that the woman's scene was ever filmed. Can the article say that the scene was cut? Maybe it was dropped before the filming. (Or maybe I misunderstand the meaning of 'cut' :D ) Darth Morrt 19:29, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, it's hard (if not impossible) to prove a negative, so I've tried to make it a bit more ambiguous whether the "cut" was from the script or the film itself. ~ SavageBob 23:33, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Maysano

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 05:31, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: He finally has a name!

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) This guy's cool. Almost as cool as a Gotal. Menkooroo 13:27, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:TCW.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:23, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) --Eyrezer 09:51, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Gotal gambler

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 08:02, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Is that a bandwagon I see?

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) I love you guys. Menkooroo 13:21, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Time to nom Ssty, Ey! ~ SavageBob 17:07, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Royal straight flush Gotal.  1358  (Talk) 07:36, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Gotal patron

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 08:02, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Why, yes it is!

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) This Gotal was in the casino winning money because Gotals WIN AT EVERYTHING Menkooroo 13:25, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) An Eyrezer article from TNR that's not an obscure sentient species! ;P ~ SavageBob 17:03, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) I am starting to like Gotals.  1358  (Talk) 18:20, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Crystal Jewel patron

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 08:02, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I needed to create this article for the above Gotal, so here it is.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Is he a man? Or is he an astro-man? Menkooroo 13:30, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Gotals and men, Gotals and men, they go together like a horse and carriage... Or not. ~ SavageBob 17:05, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Siro

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 15:04, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My penultimate nom for Gotal week.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 09:54, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I somehow overlooked this Gotal. ~ SavageBob 19:55, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Even without an intro, you are currently at 252 words, making this ineligible for CA. Give it a mini-intro and take it to the GAN!  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 15:05, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Count again! :^P I removed some extraneous stuff, and not just for the sake of the word count (for truth! I did it before I read your comment). Yay salience! Menkooroo 15:12, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **Haha, well you're now at 247 words. I still think it would be most beneficial to give this a short intro and put it up to GAN, seeing as it is just three words short and the whole purpose of the CAN was to make it so articles that phsyically couldn't get up to 250 words could still have some sort of status, but I suppose that's up to you. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 15:25, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I actually feel pretty bad about the amount of context that's in the article already. I cut out a lot during my first draft in order to keep the article as focused on Siro as it could possibly be, and even so, not very much of it is about the Goat. An intro here would be difficult to do without a lot of context itself, and the repeated detailing of context would, IMO, make the article seem like it was more about the events surrounding Siro's death than about Siro. Keeping it short and sweet gives it the focus that it needs when it's so context-heavy. And I mean, if a character only appears in like, two lines out of the entire book, do we really need to make him a GA when we can just as easily make him a CA? Menkooroo 15:58, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Fair enough; like I said, it's up to you. :) Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 16:12, October 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) Ranks should be capitalized if they are referring to an individual per our MoS. 1358  (Talk) 19:26, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Ossluk's gloves

 * Nominated by: Tm_T(Talk) 14:54, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Small gloves doesn't fit.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  OLIOSTER  (talk) 15:01, October 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) If it doesn't fit, you must've quit. ~ SavageBob 17:29, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Shouldn't you add something to the effect that the gloves were picked up by members of Revan's party? It could be placed with one of the KOTOR game completion templates. --Eyrezer 10:03, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *AFAIK by the nature of these mostly rare random drop items, it is very likely that you don't even encounter these gloves when trying to find them. Thus I'm not sure if could mention this in any other way than already done in the Bts. –Tm_T(Talk) 14:31, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **Also, they would be found by the Exile, if anyone, not Revan.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 16:56, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) You should also describe the color and appearance of the gloves. Did they have any special effects/bonuses? This should be detailed in the BTS. --Eyrezer 10:04, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) *Just in case the information is needed, in game, they increase your Constitution and Dexterity by 1 and Strength by 2.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 16:56, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) **Done in a way, let me know if this is good way to do it. (: –Tm_T(Talk) 17:53, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Gotal Rebel guard

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 10:20, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: One more Gotal for good luck

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 11:18, October 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I feel like Paul Harvey should be reading these CAs about Gotals. ~ SavageBob 15:05, October 27, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Solanus

 * Nominated by: Xicer9 atgar.svg( Combadge) 21:59, October 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A result of boredom. Just a bit under the GA word limit.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * :^P Menkooroo 05:11, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) "&hellip;preferring to spend its time playing with itself." *Snicker.* ~ SavageBob 19:51, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I don't think the sector can be sourced to the Atlas Appendix. --Eyrezer 10:05, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Good catch, fixed. Xicer9 atgar.svg( Combadge) 13:49, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified female duelist

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 16:00, October 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Theed Palace librarian

 * Nominated by: OLIOSTER  (talk) 18:16, October 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Trivia games in my MMO?! It's more likely than you think!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I was going to say SWG goodness but I realized I don't like SWG. :P  1358  (Talk) 18:18, October 31, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Thanks to Xd for looking it over.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 18:16, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

Gulper

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 09:22, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Should gulpers be included in the bio's last sentence? Menkooroo 10:30, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * What Menkooroo said. Otherwise, the sentence comes off as a non-sequitor. ~ SavageBob 19:30, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Marsh-gunny

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 09:22, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: None.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Grunny  ( talk ) 07:16, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Atrivis Advancer

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 19:30, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: None.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

ST-4402

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 17:38, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Fairly obscure CCG character, being mentioned by one source alone. Also I am assuming ST-4402 is a human, because IIRC non-humans only existed within stormtrooper ranks after the formation of the New Republic. Somebody please correct me if this is not necessarily the case. Hanzo Hasashi 17:38, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is there anything worth noting from his CCG card mechanics in the BTS? Sometimes, it's worth noting that the character had "average strength" or whatnot or if he or she had any special abilities. Apparently, writers sometimes use such stats as guidelines when they incorporate such characters into stories. ~ SavageBob 19:22, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * When in battle against an alien ST-4402 is power +2. I don't think that's worth noting. Hanzo Hasashi 19:59, November 1, 2010 (UTC)

TK-420

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 18:38, November 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: One away from the big time (TK-421).

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Another obscure CCG character mentioned by only one source alone. As with ST-4402, assuming TK-420 is a human, as I believe all stormtroopers during the Rebellion era were human. Hanzo Hasashi 18:38, November 1, 2010 (UTC)