Forum:SH:Canonicity of the 2014-2015 fact file run

I've recently been looking through some of the newer issues of The Official Star Wars Fact File (2014) and found that it's begun to include a lot of articles on Star Wars Rebels and other new canon content like the comic series Star Wars: Darth Maul—Son of Dathomir. These articles seem to include some pieces of unique and new content. For example, issue 72 contains information about Stygeon Prime which I don't think is repeated elsewhere, including its diameter and a slightly more detailed description of the Spire, meanwhile issue 68 reveals that Sabine's helmet was inherited and so she hasn't modified it at all plus describes her receiving Mandalorian warrior training as a child under Almec's government before even entering the Imperial Academy. I could have missed this information being included in some other source&mdash;and would be thankfully for anyone pointing out if I have&mdash;but if it is unique then how should we handle it? The other content in the fact files uses large amounts of information from legends, but not necessarily more than Ultimate Star Wars or Star Wars: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know did and seems to have stopped including any information based on the legends timeline (i.e New Republic or Old Republic) along time ago. Currently neither legends nor canon articles seem to have been updated with most of the information from the fact files and so I was wondering what our stance was on them and where this new information should be included? I've attempted to ask the magazine's official twitter account for clarification but as usual it has been to no avail, although a tweet from the offical account may receive more attention. Ayrehead02 (talk) 02:26, October 25, 2015 (UTC)