Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Abbaji

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 17:10, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:29, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) How bout adding it's atmosphere type to the body?
 * 2) *Argh, done.
 * 3) **Still remains. Are you sure you saved the page?
 * 4) ***Now. Winterz (talk) 19:27, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) I've done it here, but in the future add near the top of the article to get rid of the table of contents when we have this short of an article.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:38, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *Well I tried to find that code to remove the content table, but apparently it vanishes after being inserted. Winterz (talk) 19:00, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **The table of contents only pops up for some noms, so you were probally looking at those who did not have the template. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***TOC's appear when there are three or more section headings of any level. - i.e. a Behind the scenes, an Appearances section, and a Notes and references. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:42, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abbaji Minor

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 20:26, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Cade, I think Winterz is challenging you for the maximum number of noms on this page.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:19, October 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Sky's the limit! :p Winterz (talk) 14:49, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **If war is what you want, my young friend, then war is what you will get! !crazylaugh Now, to find some CANoms... Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:43, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Could you add the Carrion sector to the main article?
 * 2) * 501st dogma ( talk ) 20:59, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Winterz (talk) 21:30, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Authors for Atlas? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:25, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **I just can't get enooooough. Done. Winterz (talk) 22:28, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Base D8-Red

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:42, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:The opening nom for The Far Orbit Project project!

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 20:56, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Capital! I've been waiting for this project to start. Move over, Cav. Menkooroo (talk) 12:26, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Tinwe (comlink) 10:16, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Can you be more explicit about the theme here and in the previous article publication in the BtS section?
 * 3) **That better?
 * 4) * Context on the SpecNav and Ubiqtorate (the latter is optional since most people won't understand what is an Imperial Ubiqtorate) Winterz (talk) 23:55, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Contexted for SpecNav, but I did not do so for Ubiqtorate. Thanks for looking it over. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:31, October 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * One question, why the references? I thought you said it wasn't necessary when you only had one source :> Winterz (talk) 20:58, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not necessary, but it's encouraged.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 23:29, October 2, 2012 (UTC)

Ulicia

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:41, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:26, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you give context on Direx? Also, does the prisoner have enough info the warrant an article?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Winterz (talk) 21:58, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Lankashiir

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 16:13, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:35, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Authors for the Atlas?
 * 2) * Main terrain needs to be mentioned in main article.
 * 3) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done. Winterz (talk) 21:58, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) 502
 * 6) *"Outside the Star Wars universe, the name of the planet may be a reference to Lancashire, a county in England." It's always tempting to guess like that, but this kind of speculation falls under our No original research policy and is a big no-no if there's nothing to back it up. Menkooroo (talk) 12:28, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Good, it looks prettier without it. Still, considering that it wasn't me who added it, I thought the info could be relevant in some ways. Winterz (talk) 13:47, October 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abregado-fus

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:41, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * Savaged&hellip;
 * With this and the other planet noms below, you should be able to tell a bit more about the planet's place in galactic history by going through the maps in both The Essential Atlas and The Essential Guide to Warfare. You should be able to tell what regions of the galaxy it was in (the Slice, etc.), what territories it fell within during various periods, when its general vicinity was known to the galaxy at large, etc. You might be able to steal a bunch of this info from the Gados article. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 18:59, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * You know, that always made me wonder. If the planet or system's name don't appear in the map, wouldn't it be speculating claiming they fell under X's territory? :s Winterz (talk) 18:53, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delayed response. It's not speculation to say it fell within a territory. It'd be speculation to say that it was allied with such and such a political body or empire without appearing on the map though. But we can assume that if a planet is in, say, grid I-2, and I-2 is part of Darth Krayt's Empire, then the planets in I-2 physically were located in that territory. That's exactly the kind of contextual information Fry and Wallace were going for when they created the Atlas. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 17:34, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. Winterz (talk) 17:24, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, better! I know you're probably trying to keep the word count down on this and the others, but you should really add dates for when it fell within those various territories... ~ Savage BOB sig.png 12:16, October 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Though I'm supporting, I don't think you can call its primary terrain "gas gaint". 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:41, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Yeah that kept me wondering for a while too. However I back checked major gas giant articles like Endor (planet) and Bespin, and they all say in terrain "Gas giant", I guess that serves to explain that there isn't any solid terrain, just gases. Winterz (talk) 11:56, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **I guess you can keep at that since other articles do it the same way. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:09, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Don't concentrate on keeping the word count down. I used to do that, but you can really limit yourself and it really won't end up as comprehensive as it should be for a CA. If it goes over the word limit for CA nomination, then it can qualify for GA nomination. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 12:35, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) *Hmm that's not exactly my intention, Gethralkin. However, even with proper context, these articles will not reach the 250 words. Also it's better to keep it CAN as all my GAN slots are occupied right now. Winterz (talk) 13:43, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) **Well, there are some who challenge the 250 word count as a hard limit because it is really a bench mark with a range prompting nomination supporters to review&mdash;if the article reaches over 200&mdash;if the nomination can be lengthened to 250 or more and if not, why not? The idea is that if you come close, then more could possibly be added to reach GA status. Regardless, I understand if any of the articles don't have enough info to bring it up to that, but trying to pare any of them down to force a CA (as was suggested by Savage's comment above) is frowned upon. What's best for the article is more important than what's best for the editor in the eyes of the EduCorp. Still, if it can't even be brought between 200 to 250 words, then you shouldn't worry too much, but don't let the load of articles you are working on dictate the quality of status articles you are nominating. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 14:07, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ***I think you're confusing things. Never did I showed any sign of not wanting to expand to its max quality. In fact, I complied with what Savage asked but as I forgot to add the dates as well, he assumed I was trying to keep it short. And now you're using his assumption as something that I've said, which is incorrect because I didn't. duh Gethralkin ;) Winterz (talk) 15:23, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ****Oh, well sorry for the misunderstanding. I don't get to get on here very much anymore, and I only took what was posted at face value. I hope I didn't offend, I was just expressing the problem I ran into when I initially began posting CANs. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:53, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *****No problem at all, aside from this Comments section being larger than the Objections one. I think you should expand the latter just to balance things up :p Winterz (talk) 18:01, October 30, 2012 (UTC)

Abregado-san

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Cade, Winterz is winning this contest!  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:44, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Abregado-dai

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Three in a row...fus-san-dai!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I need EC back up here... Too many noms to deal with alone.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:47, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Abregado-taki

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 23:04, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Sorry EduCorps!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:38, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Your ref in the main body of the article is formatted wrong. Use in the infobox only. You should be using  in the body. Please look over your other noms and see if they are formatted correctly.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:15, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) **Wow, I really wasn't aware of that. What is the difference? Anyways, corrected it in all my 17 noms, thanks for the heads-up! Winterz (talk) 15:44, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Truthfuly, I have no idea what the difference is, but that's how we properly reff an article. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:38, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abrion Major

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 23:43, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work on all these noms.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:41, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Same reffing problems as before.
 * 2) * You should mention that it seceded to the CIS.
 * 3) * Humans as the immigrated species needs to be mentioned in the main body.
 * 4) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:20, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. I decided to remove the immigrated species and language from the Infobox as I couldn't find any source that confirmed it. Winterz (talk) 15:48, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Ahlenn

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 00:51, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I've got nothing better to do this weekend!

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Evidently.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:42, October 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Neither did I - 400+ edits in about four hours yesterday! Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:19, October 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Same reffing problems.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:23, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Corrected. Winterz (talk) 15:45, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Battle on the Ash Plains of Lenico IV

 * Nominated by: Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 06:23, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:48, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:19, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Coruscantfan (Talk) 00:52, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Engagement in the asteroid-hives of Gelpog the Tyrant

 * Nominated by: Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 06:23, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:52, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, now you can actually understand what the destruction of an Imperial flagship is supposed to be. Get crackin' on it! Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:19, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) *Challenge accepted. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 17:00, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Anskow

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 21:04, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Better safe than sorry was his philosophy

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:38, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 501
 * 1) * Could you add that Jedi were fugitives at that time?
 * 2) **Done.
 * 3) * Article for the cantina? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:56, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 20:22, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Tasiele Shan

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 04:08, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Sideproject Encyclopedia. Meet Satele's mommy!

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) I won't ask for an article for the planet.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:37, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 12:04, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 20:03, October 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * The planet seems relevant enough to receive its own article. Winterz (talk) 15:29, October 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ** * grumble grumble grumble * Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:17, October 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Wouldn't it be 'awesome' if you could organize the content chronologically? :p Winterz (talk) 19:08, October 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 19:11, October 23, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Darth Nostrem

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:29, October 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:15, October 31, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Darth Nostrel
 * 2) * What's a Kaggath?
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Could we maybe have context on the Great Sith War?
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * Context for Dromund Khas.
 * 7) **Done.
 * 8) * You need to say he's male in the body of the article.
 * 9) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 19:10, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:43, October 14, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Thalmussen

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:44, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Presenting Operation Battlegrounds first CAN (would have been my third if the others hadn't wound up on the GA page)

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:18, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Let's keep this a CAN.
 * 2) * Context on Alaris Expanse?
 * 3) * Please do not link to things in Quotes
 * 4) * Could you give us a description of the ship? The picture does give a bit of the appearence.
 * 5) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:10, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) **I've done the first two but I'm not exactly sure what to say in a desciption of the ship.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 09:30, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Just saying that it had two engines would do I think. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:49, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ****I've put it in.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:01, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Rage (Lancer-class frigate)

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:59, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:More Far Orbit!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Coruscant Security Special Investigation Panel

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:02, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For WP:TOR

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:48, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) One thing: You need to say the headquarters are in Galactic city.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:56, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Headquarters has been added. Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:05, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **It still doesn't say that they were headquartered in Galactic City. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:28, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I thought you only do that when you don't know the name of the actual HQ building/complex/etc. So in this case their headquarters should be "CSF Headquarters" and their location (aka the location of the HQ) is Galactic City, Coruscant? Coruscantfan (Talk) 23:21, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ****I just want it in because the infobox has it, and the body should have everything save the eras the infobox has. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Ah, ok. Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 00:03, October 23, 2012 (UTC)

Telissa

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 06:49, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I would have nommed this ages ago had I had a source for the date. Which, thanks to The Essential Reader's Companion, I now do. :)

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:32, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 19:26, October 20, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Context on Belasco?
 * 2) **Contextified. Tinwe (comlink) 05:20, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) *Looks good otherwise. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:03, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Winterz
 * 5) * Senate Building's location?
 * 6) * Mention the Republic in the body.
 * 7) **Blarg. I really should know better by now. :P Addressed. Tinwe (comlink) 19:22, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) *Good work. Winterz (talk) 14:46, October 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * I know we don't normally source release dates, but there's no rule against it either, is there? Tinwe (comlink) 06:49, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Not that I know of, I've just never seen anyone else ask for a release date to be sourced. Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:10, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * My comment (about my own nomination) wound up in your nom comments section by accident, Coruscantfan, so I took the liberty to put it back here. :) Tinwe (comlink) 05:14, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified SIS director

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:01, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:TOR

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Welcome back to the CANs. Winterz (talk) 13:30, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:59, October 22, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Context on the SIS Winterz (talk) 18:30, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 12:49, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 501
 * 1) * It sounds like the enycyclopedia was published by Kindersley. Is that true?
 * 2) **Clarified.
 * 3) * You need to say he is male in the body. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:35, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 23:24, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * [My comment here was actually for my own Telissa nomination that wound up in this section by accident, so I put it back where it belongs. Tinwe (comlink) 05:14, October 18, 2012 (UTC)]
 * That makes so much more sense! :) Coruscantfan (Talk) 12:49, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Green/Aura

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Aurabesh

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Apparently there isn't a code for that, yet. :/ Winterz (talk) 18:56, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:41, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Is there any way to remove the "< Green"? Considering that the Green article isn't related to these ones.
 * 3) **I have no idea how to remove it. I noticed it when I first created the article, but did not know how to eliminate it.
 * 4) ***I'll leave the question at Darth Culator's talkpage, will sign my support once I have a reply. ;)
 * 5) * Context on Sienar Fleet Systems.
 * 6) **Contextified.
 * 7) *** Lol, I was expecting some more specific context like "a subsidiary of the massive company X", not just two obvious words. Winterz (talk) 18:48, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ****Does that satisfy your objection? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:31, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *****Meh, I guess so. Winterz (talk) 13:09, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * (objections apply to both 'Aurabesh') Winterz (talk) 14:43, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Both articles have been upadated according to your objections. Thanks for the review(s). 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:17, October 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Green/Besh

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Aurabesh

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 20:52, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:37, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Hey! Far-Orbit! Far out!
 * 2) * TFOP was a direct supplement to Pirates and Privateers. The way you've written it here, it's like TFOP was just riffing off the theme.
 * 3) **It was a supplement to the RPG just by existing. It was also a direct supplement to Privates and Privateers, like a sequel to it but not. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:25, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***That any better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:38, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Yep. Just needed another tweak. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:37, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * The scenario hooks have names. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:44, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Both fixed. Thanks for looking it over. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:53, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Don't forget to apply these changes to Aura. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:25, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Fashaka

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:49, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:27, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Xenopathology

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:49, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:39, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I know I've already supported, but could you say that Xeno was studied at the University of Coruscant?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:44, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:18, October 28, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Xenopathologist

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:49, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:59, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you link to Coruscant?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:41, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *I guess... Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:40, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Resh (individual)

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 06:21, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:13, October 31, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Shouldn't Korriban's Flame be italicized?
 * 2) **I honestly don't know... it's a space station, so it's a grey area. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:41, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ***I think you should do it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:53, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ****Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:16, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) *Otherwise, looks fine. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:55, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Darth Lokess

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:37, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:13, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Masanya

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 15:15, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Expanding game-referenced articles.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 501
 * 1) * First of all, you have quite a few redirects. Please get rid of these. If you go to your preferences, and then go into gadgets there is an option to trun all redirects orange. This will help you find them.
 * 2) **Done. Thanks for that tip. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 06:45, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) * You have to mention everything mentioned in the intro and the infobox (besides the eras) in the body of the text. Right now, there is a bit missing, including the fact that it is a CR90.
 * 4) **Fixed. Let me know if I missed anything. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 06:45, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Please note that you can link to an article three times: Once in the infobox, once in the intro, and once in the rest of the body. There are some things that you can link to in the body.
 * 6) ****Okay, I think that should fix it. Let me know. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 02:34, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) * I think the BtS could be expanded. You should mention where it first appeared and it's other appearance.
 * 8) **Done. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 06:45, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *Fix these, and I will continue my review. Good job. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:56, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) *Currently, we are at 300 or so words, whcih means it can't be a GAN. Do you want me to finish my review before we move it to the GAN page? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:28, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Yes, please. It would be nice to have everything tidied up so that the GAN can pass muster quickly. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 22:23, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) *The intro has two "during"s in it. Change it to one please.
 * 13) **Done. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:59, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) ***No we have two "fought"s.
 * 15) ****Got it. Thanks. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 15:12, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) *Context for Galactic Civil War in the History. Also, could you clarify that the Battle at Endor was between the Empire and the Rebels?
 * 17) **Done. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:59, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) ***It looks good, though it is quite long for a context. I have no problem with it's length, but I don't think we can source the context of the War to cards list as it is now. Reffing that context would eliminate that problem. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:35, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 19) ****How's that? &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 15:07, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 20) * Does Empire at War have any info for the article, or is it just mentioned?
 * 21) **Done. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:59, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 22) *Looks good otherwise. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:34, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Gungan sling painting

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 18:00, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More silly stuff from children's video game.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:23, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  13:47, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) I want an article for the "Gungan Sling Brigade." :)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:59, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Exiled Jedi
 * 3) * Perhaps the natural "paint ball" should have an article since the Gungans grew them? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:00, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **I'd be happy to oblige, but I wouldn't know which category I should use. The game says they grow these paint balls in Otoh Gunga, but it's never said if these are fruits, herbs, mushrooms or anything... --LelalMekha (talk) 19:59, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ***I just created the article anyway. --LelalMekha (talk) 01:35, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *Nitpicky, but if the crowd goes wild, maybe a quick mention in the article that it was a crowd-pleasing sport?
 * 7) **Done. --LelalMekha (talk) 13:38, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) *"The Gungan performers used to grow their natural "paint balls" in their underwater city of Otoh Gunga." I'm confused by this sentence --- should there be a word after "used" ? What did they use? Without another word in there, the tense seems off. Menkooroo (talk) 14:19, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Actually, "used to grow" was put for "grew" our "would grow". Since it's confusing, I've just reworded it, and it now says: "The Gungan performers grew their..." --LelalMekha (talk) 13:38, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) **Actually, "used to grow" was put for "grew" our "would grow". Since it's confusing, I've just reworded it, and it now says: "The Gungan performers grew their..." --LelalMekha (talk) 13:38, November 5, 2012 (UTC)

Augwynne Djo's male servant

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 18:42, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: There are worse fates than being a benevolent witch's maleling, I guess.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:41, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Such as being a maleling to a Nightsister...-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  12:39, October 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * Can you mention and link Witches of Dathomir somewhere in the article? I feel like it would be good context for both the Singing Mountain Clan and the Nightsisters.
 * Added. --LelalMekha (talk) 14:22, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Isn't Han still a general, not a captain, at this time?
 * Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 14:22, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Our article on Minister of State also claims that Leia didn't hold the title until one year after the events of Courtship. Can you check that out? Menkooroo (talk) 14:14, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Fixed too. I wasn't sure what title Leia held at the time, but COPL calls her "Ambassador Organa". --LelalMekha (talk) 14:22, November 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Coruscant Security officer (Organa staffer's sister)

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 17:36, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another person with no name.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:50, November 5, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Denjax Teppler's body double

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo (talk) 13:30, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Out of the frying pan, into the fire

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) I was pretty sure that the affiliation section of the infobox was for an organization, not a person. Could you change it if that is so? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:55, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Yeah, it was a bit of a stretch. Removed. Menkooroo (talk) 05:44, November 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Zalor Minister

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 00:03, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I found another CA nom! Barn burner 5.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * 1) I wasn't sure what format to use for the sections since there isn't any in the Layout Guide, so I just used "Role" and "History" because I thought they would be the ones needed for this type of article article.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 00:03, November 6, 2012 (UTC)

Battle of Rirsack

 * Nominated by: DjMack (talk) 05:00, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Simple enough

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Rirsack
 * 2) *Check the date --- I don't think you mean 13 BBY.
 * 3) *A tip for CAnoms with only two sections --- be sure to hide the table of contents by adding somewhere at the top of the page.
 * 4) *"Unknown" should never be used in the infobox --- it may be unknown to us, the reader, but it's not unknown to the people in-universe. If it's not known, it should be left blank.
 * 5) *There's a pretty big mistake in the "name" field of the infobox.
 * 6) *Watch out for double-linking --- Han Solo seems to be linked twice.
 * 7) *Is this battle actually mentioned in the Atlas Online Companion? I thought that only the systems were mentioned in it.
 * 8) *Can you give some more details on the comics in "Behind the scenes?" Author, release date... We usually like to include them since who created the battle and when it was first introduced into canon are relevant details. Menkooroo (talk) 05:39, November 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Rirsack

 * Nominated by: DjMack (talk) 05:12, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Might as well get all Rirsack articles nominated.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Scimitar 2

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:59, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments