User talk:DarthRuiz30

 Find archived discussions here: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Wullf Yularen
Hi there, just wondering why you undid my edits? Was it because I didn't provide an adequate source? I put the Republic Navy in because they are the parent organisation not Anakin's task force. Kind regards  Tomotron  ( talk ) 03:50, July 16, 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply, according to what you said, I'm going to change the task force to the Republic Navy with that sub-bullet, is that fine? Kind regards  Tomotron  Imp roundel 2ndempire.svg ( talk ) 04:10, July 16, 2019 (UTC)

Dating
SWTOR progresses in real time, according to Charles Boyd (lead developer). Only exceptions are the class stories (which take place over the course of four years) and when there are canonically confirmed time-skips (5 years from chapter one of KotFE to start of chapter two, and six months from last chapter of KotFE to chapter one of KotET). The dating for the rest of the events that have occurred throughout the course of the game line up in accordance to that, beginning with the Battle of Illum in 3640 BBY (thus lining up with the 2011 launch of vanilla). RotHC was released in 2013, which means that its events occur in 3638 BBY; SoR was released in 2014, thereby taking place one year later, in 3637 BBY. Likewise, KotFE begins in 3636 BBY, as it was released in 2015. The canonical five-year timejump between chapters one & two would therefore place chapter two's date at 3631 BBY. The remaining chapters were subsequently released over the course of the next nine months. Adding the six month time gap between the TotFE & KotET roughly lines up with the latter's release in late 2016, meaning the Eternal Empire collapsed fell in either late 3630 or early 3629, depending upon how much time passed between the first chapter and final chapter of KotET. Regardless, the Battle for Iokath (released in March of 2017) would have to have occurred sometime in early 3629, with the Umbara and Chiss flash-points occurring later that year, respectively. Naturally, following that same formula, both the Nathema flashpoint and "Jedi Under Siege" should be placed around 3628 (AKA 2018), with all content scheduled to come out *this* year taking place in 3627, unless stated otherwise. We've been consistent in having our articles reflect this principle in the past, so it makes little sense to arbitrarily deviate from this pattern, as we seem to have done in each article involving post-KotET events & conflicts. Therefore, I propose that our articles continue to reflect said principle until officially stated otherwise. The fact that in-game time corresponds with real-world time was first confirmed by Charles Boyd in a tweet (which I'll link you to), and since that confirmation we have dated events accordingly. https://twitter.com/Charles_Boyd/status/676795856591261696 Darth Ravigious (talk) 04:47, July 16, 2019 (UTC)


 * Ah, okay. Never mind then. I played the Nathema FP once, but I personally don't even remember the "six years" comment. Since it's in universe information, I suppose that it'd be confirmation that the FP occurs in 3630. My apologies; I wasn't aware of that comment (or at least forgot about it). If there's anything I can do to help clean up the aforementioned references, just let me know. Darth Ravigious (talk) 03:58, July 17, 2019 (UTC)

Hunt for Ziro
Hi. Why did you delete my quote on the page for The Clone Wars: Season 3: Episode 9: "Hunt for Ziro"? I know it's kind of unconventional to have additional quotes in these pages, but there really should be a section or something for these quotes.

Thanks for pointing out my mistake
Some time ago I accidentally added a picture of the Cold Weather AT-MP Mark III to the Cold-weather AT-ST Mark III. And yes this happened twice. Goodbye. RC-0407 (talk) 22:32, July 18, 2019 (UTC+1)

RE:Thrawn: Treason
Alright sounds good! I wasn't planning on adding anything further, just create some articles with basic information. Thanks for letting me know!-- Vitus Infinitus  Talk 21:06, July 19, 2019 (UTC)
 * Like wise, wasn't going to do anything anyway but thanks for the heads up--Jkirk8907 (talk) 23:13, July 19, 2019 (UTC)

Category rename
Hey there, would you mind renaming Category:Images of Tooka dolls when you have the chance? I accidentally capitalized the T in tooka when it shouldnt be. Toqgers (talk) 21:56, July 19, 2019 (UTC)
 * Understood. So just need to create with new title and mark the old one for deletion since it's not possible and not as important to retain edit history like with regular articles anyways? Either way, much appreciated! :P Toqgers (talk) 22:05, July 19, 2019 (UTC)

Allegiance banner
Why did you delete the image I just uploaded of the new Allegiance artwork? Just curious --Benjay2345 (talk) 08:08, July 20, 2019 (UTC)
 * Lately we've been losing images because we don't save an archive url from their source so we started to add archive urls just in case. Given that there's a weird bug were you can't edit the source field in files, we have to bypass the bug by reuploading. Hope that clears any question.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:10, July 20, 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah it does. Do you want me to reupload the image? --Benjay2345 (talk) 08:12, July 20, 2019 (UTC)
 * I was about to do it, don't worry.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:14, July 20, 2019 (UTC)

Seems like you are targeting my edits
Hey, not to be rude or anything but it seems like you are targeting the edits I am making? The higher resolution png version of the Visual Dictionary is a completely acceptable image. I have linked to a source that shows the book cover is credible (StarWars.com) and simply got a higher quality version from another source. This has always been acceptable. Could you please stop targeting edits I am making and unnecessarily reverting them? This has happened with pretty much any edit I have made in the last few days. You are going to make it where contributors like myself won't want to contribute. A book cover is a book cover. A higher quality version of it should be used especially since I even sourced where it came from. Your claim that it is unsourced is false. There are plenty other completely unsourced images that you could spend your time deleting. --Benjay2345 (talk) 00:45, July 22, 2019 (UTC)