Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Jango Fett


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

(+2)
Support
 * 1) Ataru said it might make it through GA.  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers ) 15:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Not a bad article aside from the lack of detail that it would need for FA. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 15:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Chack Jadson  Talk  01:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Not a bad article. Unit 8311 16:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Master Aban Fiolli (Alpheridies University ComNet) [[Image:NewRepublic.png|20px]] 20:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Redundant internal links in several quotes. These should be removed per WP:MOS (Criteria 1.c). --Imperialles 19:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Just from a quick glance:
 * 3) *Infobox information needs to be sourced. His homeworld, death, hair color, eye color, and all of his affiliations. Must be fully sourced per GA rule 2(a).
 * 4) *Succession box dates, at the least, should have reference tags&mdash;it wouldn't hurt to provide reference tags for his predecessor and successor as well.
 * 5) *Large parts of the article are too crammed with pictures and take away from the visual flow of it. This is per GA rule 1(c), specifically here.
 * 6) *Remove random pointless image from the Sources section.
 * 7) *Why is the template just randomly placed in BtS? Both it and the  template should be stacked lower in the article where there is abundant space&mdash;such as the "Sources" section.
 * 8) *If there is going to be a section on Jango's vehicles it should be complete. The information right now for Slave I basically says "He got a ship: it was sabotaged; he got a new one; eventually his son took it." what missions did he do with these ships?? Why are they important enough to be in his article? Rewrite and expand with relevant information per GA rule 1(a). Greyman ( Paratus ) 14:20, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Has a general half-done look to it. I.e. the vehicles section --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 15:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Working on the excess linking Imp mentions. -Fnlayson 05:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)