Wookieepedia:Improvement drive

The improvement drive is a collaboration to improve existing articles to Featured article status.


 * /History - For past winners.
 * /Failed - For failed nominations.

Nomination and Voting
Articles to be improved can be nominated by registered users in the "nominations" section below, with an explanation of what work is needed. Please do not nominate articles involved in edit wars. Also, when nominating an article, please put IDRIVE on that article's page so as to inform any visitors of the page of its nomination.

Each Sunday, the article with the most support votes is chosen. Opposing votes are not counted. You can vote for as many articles as you like. Articles need two votes per week to stay on the list.

Note: It is considered somewhat rude not to help improving articles you've voted for.

Collaboration
Here are some best practices to use while working on an article selected for the improvement drive:
 * 1. Plan your contribution. After an article has been chosen, it is a good idea to post your ideas for additions, changes and corrections for the topic on the article's talk page. You can then choose some of the listed contributions to avoid overlapping work.
 * 2. Be quick. Use . Once you have planned your work, make your edits quickly, but carefully. Articles chosen for the drive are the likely subjects of many rapid edits. By entering and exiting EDIT mode quickly, you can avoid another user saving a new edit before you have completed your work. If your edit will be more lengthy, place the  tag at the top of the article, save the edit to make the tag appear, and then begin your work.

Nominations

 * The next project article is to be selected on Sunday January 8.

Please add new nominations at the bottom of the page.

Order 66

 * Nominated December 14, 2005; needs 8 votes by January 11, 2006

Support:
 * 1) CooperTFN 23:23, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) --MarcK [talk] 08:52, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) --Mr. Perfection 08:44, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) RPharazon 16:52, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) AngelQueen 18:47, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) JediDude
 * 7) Clonesoldier91

Comments
 * Sloppy writing, generally haphazard, bad formatting, factual errors, needs fewer pics, more words, or both, lists very incomplete. And it's got bad breath, too.CooperTFN 23:23, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * This is a very intristing subject and it needs to be more informational. IT'S THE VIRTUAL EXTINCTION OF THE JEDI FUCKING ORDER!!!!!!!!! FOR CRYING OUT MOTHER-FUCKING LOUD!!! -- Unsigned comment by Leeboy 13:08, 27 Dec 2005
 * Calm down Cooper. -- Riffsyphon1024 07:39, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * That was so not me. I know how to spell "interesting" and would never hyphenate "motherfucking". =) CooperTFN 07:59, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * needs work, this should be next...its genrally good bit i feel like later battles such as Boz Pity need work.

Galactic economy

 * Nominated December 20, 2005; needs 8 votes by January 17, 2006

Support Comments
 * 1) Srini 10:25, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) King2006 15:14, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) SFH 06:14, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) CooperTFN 09:09, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) SparqMan 09:11, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Imp 11:49, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Clonesoldier91
 * I this this artical is important, so i am re-nominating it. Srini
 * This artical could be intresting, if properly writen. I like know where i can find indormatin about it. King2006

Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords

 * Nominated December 21, 2005; needs 4 votes by January 4, 2006

Support
 * 1) Imp 21:21, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Sikon [ Talk ] 19:00, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) AngelQueen 18:47, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * The game that is our only source of the near-extinction of the Jedi Order could really use a better article. --Imp 21:21, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Stormtrooper

 * Nominated December 24, 2005; needs 6 votes by January 14, 2006

Support
 * 1) Sikon [ Talk ] 19:00, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) --MarcK [talk] 07:34, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) SFH 06:16, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Imp 11:49, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Esplin 02:14, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * That's all? Compated to Clone trooper, it's unforgivable. - Sikon [ Talk ] 19:00, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I think we've lost the right to call ourselves Star Wars fans just for the state of the article. -- SFH 06:16, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Ben Skywalker

 * Nominated December 26, 2005; needs 4 votes by January 9, 2006

Support
 * 1) AngelQueen 04:41, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Sikon [ Talk ] 15:01, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * The page could use some major sprucing, even if there isn't a whole lot currently known about the character at this time. AngelQueen 04:41, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Nobody deserves an article like that. Especially Luke's son. - Sikon [ Talk ] 15:01, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Star Wars: Obi-Wan

 * Nominated December 27, 2005; needs 4 votes by January 10, 2006

Support
 * 1) Cato Neimoidia 08:48, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) AngelQueen 18:47, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) --MarcK [talk] 03:05, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comments Needs way more stuff needed like story, characters, and other stuff. Cato Neimoidia 08:48, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Endor

 * Nominated December 29, 2005; needs 4 votes by January 12, 2006

Support
 * 1) --MarcK [talk] 10:13, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Imp 12:47, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) AngelQueen 18:47, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Holy metal bikinis, this article only has four sentences concerning what happened in Return of the Jedi. Unacceptable. --MarcK [talk] 10:13, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Anakin Skywalker

 * Nominated December 30, 2005; needs 2 votes by January 6, 2006.

Support
 * 1) AngelQueen 04:34, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Parts of this article have been lifted from the databank and are in need of some revision. AngelQueen 04:34, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Han Solo

 * Nominated December 30, 2005; needs 4 votes by January 13, 2006.

Support
 * 1) AngelQueen 04:34, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) --MarcK [talk] 08:14, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; Silly Dan  07:20, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Everything's good except for the post-ROTJ section, which is kinda vague. &mdash; Silly Dan  07:20, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Mustafar

 * Nominated December 30, 2005; needs 4 votes by January 13, 2006.

Support
 * 1) AngelQueen 04:34, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) --MarcK [talk] 08:13, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Imp 11:49, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Needs some serious work. AngelQueen 04:34, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)