Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Vendaran

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 10:28, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 14:26, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:05, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:16, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Well-done. Any thoughts on Bob's question, though? Menkooroo 05:55, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Toprawa:
 * 2) * Do we have any establishment of whether it's "Near-Human" or "near-Human"? I see this alternating constantly across the wiki, and that article seems to capitalize more than not. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:47, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Unfortunately, there is no consistency across various sources. I.e.,
 * 4) ***Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game, Second Edition uses "Near-Human".
 * 5) ***Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded uses "near-human".
 * 6) ***The Essential Guide to Alien Species uses "near-human".
 * 7) ***The Star Wars Customizable Card Game uses "near-human".
 * 8) ***Ultimate Alien Anthology uses "near-Human".
 * 9) ***The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia uses "near-human".
 * 10) **I'm happy to work up a CT on this to lear Wookieepedia policy on this, in line with our policy on capitalising "Human". Do yo want to wait for that to pass first before striking? --Eyrezer 00:19, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Very interesting. Thanks for looking into all of that. Please feel free to start a CT if you wish, but the nom probably doesn't need to wait for something so minor. I trust it can be updated if necessary per any decision we may reach. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:16, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Any post-New Republic history that can be gleaned from the Atlas? Since they're colonists, we can't assume anything about the pre-NR stuff, but for that period and later (or at least post-NR), there might be a factoid or two in the maps. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 14:49, November 17, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified Duros (chop shop)

 * Nominated by: -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 00:58, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:51, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 23:52, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * See above.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:08, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Bob
 * 2) * How do we know it's a male?
 * 3) **Bah! Stupid complicated species. :P Removed.
 * 4) * Can you add some BTS context on the use of the image? ~ Savage BOB sig.png 15:12, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:36, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) Exiled Jedi
 * 7) *How about an article on the droid? Doesn't he count as a character as well? (P.S. Don't forgot to link to this on the other two articles as well.)-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:52, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) **Got it.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 21:42, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Verpine (chop shop)

 * Nominated by: -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 01:00, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:52, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 18:44, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 23:55, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:29, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * See above.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:08, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Could you mention he worked in a chop shop in the article? Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 14:52, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Added.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 15:29, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Bob
 * 2) * How do we know it's a male? I think Verpine are hermaphropditic.
 * 3) **According to our article on Verpines, it says that some are hermaphroditic while others are not. So I just removed it all together since we don't know what this guy is.
 * 4) * Just a tad of context on what this image is supposed to represent would be good for BTS. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 15:15, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:40, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Devaronian (race)

 * Nominated by: -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 01:06, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:44, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Hope he wins. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 15:53, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * See above.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:09, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * A better scan of the picture would be nice. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:30, December 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you could mention the Zabrak that started the race. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  14:23, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Added.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 21:58, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Bob
 * 2) * His horn color is probably worth mentioning somewhere.
 * 3) **Added.
 * 4) * Context on the image's use in TEA. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 15:17, December 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **And added.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 16:46, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Korriban (Clone Wars)

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:10, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part Four

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 18:52, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Good job.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 21:25, December 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object Bob
 * "Youmay" goes before "Conjecture".
 * Adressed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:45, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * If all those events mentioned in the "Concurrent" and "Next" sections of the infobox are indeed accurately placed there, then they need mentions in the article as well. -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 05:54, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * No because there is no relation between those events.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:45, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * As I said above, if they are indeed accurately placed, they need placement in the article. Otherwise, it is infobox exclusive info, and that's no good. It wouldn't be too difficult I wouldn't think to fit them in there somehow. However, I would suggest that you first double check to make sure that these events truly were concurrent and not mistakenly placed there.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:03, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * The placement is correct. However, I asked for some assistance. Mentioning all these battles would be completely useless.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:40, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * I had already asked an administrator before I had reviewed this article, and he said that the battles needed to be added in the article. So please find a place for them in there somewhere.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 15:05, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, ok. Adressed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:56, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey guys, it is not necessary to list all of the previous, concurrent, and next battles in the article itself. While we typically strive to include all information in the infobox, that is usually because that information is directly related to the article's content. However, past, present, and future battles often have absolutely nothing to do with the subject battle. Of course, sometimes they will, in which case they should be mentioned regardless of whether or not they're in the infobox, for the simple reason that they affect the subject matter. But in a situation like this, where that is clearly not the case, adding that information is not necessary. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 16:45, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with Jon; it's really just overkill to list every battle that just happens to take place before, after, or around the same time as the subject battle. When it comes to infobox-exclusive information, it's easy to go overboard with wanting to get all of it into the body of the article&mdash;in some cases, it's simply not necessary. In this case, it's definitely not necessary, as the other battles listed in the infobox have no relevance to the subject battle. I would urge everyone to be careful in the future about arguing for getting infobox-exclusive info into the body of an article. The more proper thing to look at would not be infobox-exclusivity, but relevance, which isn't the case here.  CC7567  (talk) 18:22, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) CJ's right; there can't be any infobox-exclusive info. You could just say something like, "The battle occurred concurrently with other battles on X, Y, Z, and A," and then pipelink Xy, Y, Z, and A to the infobox battles. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 15:28, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done like this.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:56, December 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Lanos

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:58, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part Five

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Random Article on the CAN. Just doing my part. :P By the by, is Wild Space any good? Miller is great, but TCW in any form carries a stigma to me. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:58, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) The infobox exclusivity bothers me. This can be handled with some deft wording. But I seem to be in the minority, so... ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 15:28, December 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Bob.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:46, December 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) All those battles are infobox exclusive. ...Good luck with that.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:41, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Please take a look at my answer to Cal above. And yes, Wild Space is good enough to deserve a read.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:41, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Infobox-exclusivity is infobox-exclusivity. Furthermore, I clicked Mission to Barab I and it seems that your cuncurrent events aren't listed consistently. Mission to Barab I says that the Battle of Falleen and Battle of Bothawui were cuncurrent with it, but that would mean they were also cuncurrent with the Battle of Lanos. If I gather these articles correctly, they were mentioned at some Jeci Council meeting. If so, I have an idea for how to get the articles in the body. Mention the meeting and say it was reported alongside all the concurrent events. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:36, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Adressed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:03, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Sorry to pop in and wiki-lawyer. :/ I'm not too experienced with Battle articles, but I recently got three of them to GA status, and the "previous" and "next" battles from the infobox being infobox-exclusive was never a problem. I think they might be an exception to the rule, as they usually have nothing to do with the article's subject. Menkooroo 12:26, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Conscious of the fact that I'm not terribly experienced with Event articles, I've asked CC and Jon, both of whom are, to weigh in. This seems to be an issue that would affect all future (and past) Event articles, so let's all work it together. Cheers, everyone. :D Menkooroo 12:36, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ******Hey guys, Menk is correct, for exactly the right reason. While we typically strive to include all information in the infobox, that's because that information is directly related to the article's content. Since past, present, and future battles often have absolutely nothing to do with the subject battle, their addition to the article body is often unnecessary. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 16:48, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) *******Same as above. Remember to look at relevance first&mdash;that's definitely not the case for this battle&mdash;and infobox-exclusivity second.  CC7567  (talk) 18:22, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ********Alrighty then. Reverted to before I said anything. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:38, December 22, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Ambrian cheroot

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 12:35, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Short break from the battles. Other Wild Space stuff

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I wasn't sure what the best way to talk about these would be. I tried to imagine "cigarette" every time the article said "Ambrian charoot" and copy edited accordingly. You still may want to change some of my wording around to match the original source if you need to. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 15:29, December 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:21, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I think it should have a BTS note mentioning that Ambria exists. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:26, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:21, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * No infobox for spices, drugs and medicine?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 12:35, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't have access to the source, so a factual question: Is it "cheroot" or "cheerot?" In the BTS, you call them "cheerots."-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 05:04, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * "Cheroot" is correct. The error in the BtS is fixed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:21, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Larbo Nelik

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 12:56, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another short break

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Bob
 * 2) *Do we know she was a Podracer during the last decades of the Republic? If we don't, perhaps you should add "who lived during the last decades" instead?
 * 3) **Changed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:08, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *Podrace is coming up a redirect for me, so be sure to pick the correct target.
 * 5) **Better?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:08, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *Can you add a bit of context to BTS about how or why she came up in Wild Space? Otherwise, she seems completely unrelated to the book. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 15:58, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **Contexted. Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:08, December 28, 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) The_Cal_Jedi
 * 2) *"Nelik had a terrible crash" - "Terrible" sounds POV to me. Perhaps a less POV term is needed, or else just leaving that word out would be good.
 * 3) **From what POV is such a crash not terrible. No just a joke, replaced with "massive".  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:25, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *Otherwise, good work.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 05:09, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:25, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Ord Mantell (Clone Wars)

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:07, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Back to the battles. Part Six.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Cal Jedi
 * 2) *Youmay goes above Conjecture.
 * 3) **Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:28, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *Context on Clone Wars.
 * 5) **Added a small mention, although IMHO it's pretty unneccessary.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk
 * 6) *Something about Grievous being a cyborg needs to be mentioned in the body.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 05:16, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **Added. Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:28, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Mission to Barab I

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:38, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part Seven

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Gungan observer

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:45, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: What can I say. I like Gungans. And those from MedStar especially.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:19, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) The links for Otollo redirect to Otolla, is Otollo correct? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  16:33, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Quite funny. It seems to be a redirect. And the German word is "Otollo". Interesting for our species guys. For now changed to "Otolla".  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:36, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Bob
 * 4) *I'm not against the use of technical vocabulary, but could you specify that the "buccal cavity" is in the mouth?
 * 5) **Better?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:12, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *Similarly, I can't find a definition of "vaciosed" anywhere. What does it mean? Can you perhaps use a more common synonym? ~ Savage BOB sig.png 16:10, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **That English is high above my standard. Therefore I took the word from the novel. However, an error occured, the right word is "varicosed". Is that better or could you find a synonym? BTW: Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:12, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Anoth (Clone Wars)

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 09:26, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part Eight.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 14:55, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  16:30, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Cal Jedi
 * 2) * Youmay goes above Conjecture.
 * 3) **Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk
 * 4) * Infobox exclusive stuff, such as: Battle of Bakura, BBY date, "High General" Obi-Wan Kenobi, and "cyborg" general. -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:47, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Added Bakura, removed "High General" as we cannot be sure that Kenobi was that at this point. Cyborg and the date were already in there.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:18, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Naru added the date for you.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 14:55, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Bakura (Clone Wars)

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 09:35, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part Nine.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 14:46, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:07, December 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:18, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Two things, I guess. This battle is during the flashback and not after the main part, right? Otherwise we might have to say its in 21 BBY, per SW Annual 2011. And should the traitor go in the infobox under the CIS? Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:40, December 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, a clear date is given by the novel itself. And for the traitor: We don't know if he is really someone who participated in or if he just gave information to Grievous. Therefore he is not in the infobox.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:42, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) **Got it, thanks for clearing that up. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 14:46, December 13, 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) Cal Jedi
 * 2) * Youmay goes above Conjecture.
 * 3) **Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:26, December 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Infobox exclusive info, such as: previous battle, BBY date, that Obi-Wan was a "High General," and that Grievous was a "cyborg." -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:43, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Anoth added, BBY date added, Obi-Wan see above and cyborg stuff added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:26, December 18, 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * An article should be created for the traitor.
 * 3) **Linked and created.
 * 4) * If any context can be added on the Ruling Synod please do so. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:23, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **No context.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:39, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Aqualish defector

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:53, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Forget to add this nom yesterday...

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good job doing this whole pile of noms. :) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 13:58, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  14:09, December 29, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * "and was wounded during the battle." - What battle? Either a rewording or some context on the battle would be good. -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:23, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Better?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 12:41, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Is "he was operated on" all the information there is? Nothing about post-op or anything? Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 17:26, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, nothing.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:24, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that you should swap the affiliations in the infobox to reflect chronological order. Should you really have a "formerly" tag for the CIS, since it all happened a long time ago it seems that it is all "formerly". What do you think? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:07, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Swapped the infobox chronology.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:09, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you mean by the second part. Could you please explain this?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:23, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Since everything in Star Wars happened in the past, and since all in-universe articles are written in past tense, it seems that the "formerly" tag after his affiliation to the Confederacy is not really correct. I hope this explains my point better, sorry for the confusion before.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:27, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. I understand your point, but as we only know his fate until the point he was with the Galactic Republic, his CIS affiliation is "formerly" and has to be tagged that way. Also if we just leave both there, it would suggest that he serves both sides at the same time.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:30, December 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * I see your point, unless someone else objects its fine with me.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  14:09, December 29, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Murr Danod

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 05:25, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I just want to party!

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Then one foggy Christmas Eve, I supported another obscure TPM character nom. Hanzo Hasashi 05:30, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 09:46, December 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Hey, maybe the barn-burner will be able to get a CA!-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:11, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4)  grunny &#64; wookieepedia :&#126;$ 08:27, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Nice work on this TPM CAnom!!! (BTW, this is my first CAnom review as an official EduCorps member. :P)-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:42, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Jaanu

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:28, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Can't believe that the CSWE is the only source.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Strange.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  14:12, December 29, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I do not believe that your reference should point to the Chankar Kim entry. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:04, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Eh, fail. Changed. Something like this should really not happen.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:12, December 28, 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) Cal Jedi
 * Hmmm.....
 * 1) **Added.
 * 2) *While I'm objecting to the above, I might as well object to this: I think it should be added in who fought the Clone Wars. Example: "...the Clone Wars, raged between the Galactic Republic and the Confederacy of Independent systems between the years..."-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:56, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done (also see above). Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:31, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Sounds an awful lot like Saato. Wonder if that's who the authors of the CSWE meant. --Craven 01:14, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Indeed, but what can we do? At least TCW is not the first media which shatters canon.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:12, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified space battle (Saesee Tiin)

 * Nominated by:  JangFett  (Talk) 03:43, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) I hope that this not the only unidentified CW battle article.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:13, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, if only we had more nice articles about the good Clone Wars.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 04:13, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Wookiee's Codpiece

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:06, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: No comment. I'm of the impression that that's the wise thing to do.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 09:31, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 06:04, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Context on the quote for who this guy is talking to. -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 04:41, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:48, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Commenor system

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:24, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In which a battle is fought and Neville professes his undying love for the fair Lady Lovegood.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) HP freak.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 09:33, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 04:56, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Chun

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:54, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: No idea.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Chun's Theory of Reductional Infinity

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:54, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Urgh.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

S'hrah

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:11, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I'm a article writer and not a....

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
 * 1) Dangit man, I'm not a doctor! Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 18:15, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments