Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights

This page is for requests for user rights.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Requests for rollback
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * 4) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * 5) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Questions

 * 1) Why should you be granted rollback rights?

Chack Jadson (8 admins + 12 users/0/0)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends 12 August, 2008.

Support

 * 1) Chack is a friendly, trustworthy editor, and is constantly reverting vandalism; giving him rollback will make this easier and will be to the site's benefit. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Lord Hydronium 21:19, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Ozzel 21:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) SFH 21:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Trusted users with rollback is always a good thing.  Madclaw Shyriiwook! 21:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Chack's one of those users who you figure already has Rollback. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Uh, candy! Like candy! There, said it first! :-P Well deserved indeed. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 21:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Absolutely. --Charitwo 22:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Figures I'd get stuck by an edit conflict when I'm voting from the kriffing cell-phone. —Tommy9281 [[Image:Red lightsaber.png|20px]] ( Peace is a lie ) 22:06, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) He doesn't have rollback candy yet? This is a situation that must be rectified. jSarek 22:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 22:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 22:32, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 7)  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 22:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Goodwood  [[Image:Redstarbird.svg|20px]] ( Alliance Intelligence ) 23:24, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) indeed, well deserved, RC-1136  Copy 08:39, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) Imperialles 10:12, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 10:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 12:06, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Requests for adminship
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They are of adult age (18 years or older).
 * 4) They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * 5) They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * 6) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 7) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 8) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
 * 9) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * 10) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

Questions
Here are some general adminship questions. They are 100% optional, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them. :)

Requests for bureaucratship
Rules:
 * Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.


 * 1) They are an administrator.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * 3) They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 6) Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month&mdash;from the day the nomination is put forth&mdash;are counted).
 * 7) Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 8) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.