User talk:Silly Dan

Silly Dan, And I just want to make sure that all the articles that you will write are not word for word from those West End Games Books. -- Riffsyphon1024 04:53, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * They shouldn't be (in addition to being obvious copyright violations, they would contain irrelevant game stats and take way too long to type in. 8) )Silly Dan 02:38, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed on the game stats, because those are considered non-canon by LucasArts anyway. -- Riffsyphon1024 02:46, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Weequay
I was looking at the starwars.com Databank entry on Weequays as an outline for a better Weequay article, and in the process saved it by accident. Here it is, if you'd like to use it for a basic structure:
 * Thanks! I've also got a copy of Galaxy Guide 12 which can be used as a source. Silly Dan 11:36, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

Vodran kajidics
WhiteBoy put up a request for sources on the article kajidic. I added the source for the information I had added, but I don't know where your information about Vodrans comes from. If you wouldn't mind adding the appropriate source to that article, it would be appreciated (I don't doubt you, I just thought I would bring this to your attention so that it wouldn't go unnoticed by the one who knew). – Aidje talk 14:44, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Sourced. -- Silly Dan  02:46, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I figured it probably came from one of those big alien sourcebooks you seem to love so much. :-) – Aidje talk 02:51, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Navcomputer.com as source
Hi Riff: I don't think we should list nav-computer.com as a primary source in our articles, as it's not an official site. (That's why I removed it from the Kathol Sector article, replacing it with the RPG books which described it.) We should keep the "sources/references" sections for official publications.

On the other hand, it's a good resource, and it'd probably be a good idea to put relevant nav-computer.com links in as external links (maybe with a template, similar to how we do things with the databank?) -- Silly Dan  01:08, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I left an open space for a Nav-computer source template on one of the template message pages. Also, note that when I provided that source for information regarding galactic geography, it was based on the maps he made, which were fairly detailed, especially in the inserts. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:16, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * The correct page is Star Wars:Template messages/Sources of articles -- Riffsyphon1024 01:18, 30 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Galaxy Guide Titles
Since I think you're the party who set the precedent for titling the Galaxy Guides with a hyphen between title and subtitle instead of a colon, I though I should let you know I've retitled them to match the punctuation that the Galaxy Guides themselves use on their spines (a colon, or colon before hyphen, in the case of Galaxy Guide 12: Aliens - Enemies and Allies). jSarek 11:31, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, not sure why I didn't do that in the first place (every time I put a reference in, I used a colon and had to change it on preview). Thanks. -- Silly Dan  11:34, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually, thank you - I stopped for a moment to write a change in the Talz article, and when I finished most of what I had left to change was already fixed. Thanks for saving me a lot of work. :-)  jSarek 11:48, 1 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Silly Dan: message from JustinGann
I have read Cestus Deception and the dashta eels actually are sentient, but the sit is kind of complicated. Dashtas are a sentient race, but some of their babies are born as sorta "duds" that are not sentient. These babies are given by the Dashtas to the other Cestian peoples, whom use the non-sentient "dud" babies as the Force-sensitive brains of the JK droids. But the more fully developed dashtas are every bit as sentient as humans, perhaps more so, although this is a closely guarded secret from the galaxy at large.
 * Ah, OK. Thanks for clearing that up! (PS: please sign messages on talk pages with  or ~ to include the date -- it's easier to figure out who's who.)  &mdash; Silly Dan  00:30, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the help getting Mosep started
I've been wanting to fill in some of the blanks on this site. Thanks for all your help.

K'Kruhk's Hat
Thank you for adding that section to the K'Kruhk page. I thought about doing it myself when it was first mentioned on Talk:Palpatine but I didn't get around to it in time. May the freakin' sweetness be with you! :-) -- Darth Culator 00:56, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * If only we could consult the hat for advice on the Palpatine edit wars....help us, freakin' sweet hat, you're our only hope.  &mdash; Silly Dan  03:34, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * The Hat told me the best solution is the "Old Republic records" idea. You have already said it yourself: "Since the vote has swayed towards 'no question mark', this information says 82 rather than 84, and no one's raised any serious objection to McEwok's suggestion that we add a BTS note saying 'it's not clear how much of Palpatine's background might have been fabricated by Darth Sidious', I propose we do that and archive this talk page." — Silly Dan 16:21, 3 Sep 2005 (UTC). We should have done that already... --Master Starkeiller 19:51, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Hey, I'm not an admin. I'm willing to wait until one of them logs on and makes a decision.  (Should point out I said edit wars - this last one is just one in a series.  I blame the Sith. 8) )  &mdash; Silly Dan  19:54, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Of course you should blame the Sith. You should blame them for starting the war in the first place. This edit war is about the age of a Sith! *Winks*--Master Starkeiller 19:58, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Forgot password
S.D., I forgot my Password, so I am creating a new account called wattamb3000.
 * You know, I think there's a way to get the site to email you a new one. &mdash; Silly Dan  22:28, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game

 * Thanks for taking on the challenge of straightening this out. I thought about it, took one look at the amount of work it would take, and decided I would let it slide since no one else seemed to notice.  I commend you on your work ethic. :-) jSarek 07:05, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it would've been nice if I had actually checked the cover of my books before citing them... 8) &mdash; Silly Dan  11:24, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)