Wookieepedia:Good article nominations

This page is for the nomination of Good articles. For a list of Good articles, see Category:Wookieepedia good articles.

What is a Good article?
A Good article is an article that adheres to quality standards, but cannot reach FA status due to its limited content.

A Good article has the following attributes.

1. It is well written. In this respect:


 * (a) it has compelling prose, and is readily comprehensible to non-specialist readers;
 * (b) it follows a logical structure, introducing the topic and then grouping together its coverage of related aspects; where appropriate, it contains a succinct lead section summarising the topic, and the remaining text is organised into a system of hierarchical sections (particularly for longer articles);
 * (c) it follows the Manual of Style;
 * (d) necessary technical terms or jargon are briefly explained in the article itself, or an active link is provided.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect:


 * (a) it provides references to any and all sources used for its material;
 * (b) sources should be selected in accordance with the guidelines for reliable sources;
 * (c) it contains no elements of original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage, addressing all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FA, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed);.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. In this respect:


 * (a) viewpoints are represented fairly and without bias;
 * (b) all significant points of view are fairly presented, but not asserted, particularly where there are or have been conflicting views on the topic.

5. It is stable, i.e., it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic. In this respect:


 * (a) the images are tagged and have succinct and descriptive captions;
 * (b) a lack of images does not in itself prevent an article from achieving Good Article status.

Nomination of Good articles
To nominate an article for Good article status, list it here. If it has more than five votes after a week, the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the template. The talk page will also be tagged with the GA template.

Tydirium (+5)
Support Objections
 * 1) .  .  .  .  22:07, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 04:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 07:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Good, good...Azzt 01:23, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * For now 04:13, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * I've got several complaints/requests:
 * Quote needs a source
 * Comment from Leland Chee in Bts could use a reference
 * There was one or two more, but I've forgotten. 04:13, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Done...the things you said. .  .  .  .  04:19, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow, that was fast. Thanks. I expanded a tiny bit myself, which is what I had forgotten earlier. 04:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see a bit more detail in the final paragraph anout it being used in the capture of the Star Destroyer before I'll support it. --Eyrezer 10:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * What is that from, though? .  .  .  .  23:29, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Daultay Dofine (+4)
Support Objections
 * 1) .  .  .  .  00:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Cull Tremayne 07:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --mas1@ 04:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Troyb

Comments

Korriban (+4)
Support Objections
 * 1) --Eyrezer 06:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Pretty good for a continuity ravaged planet. .  .  .  .  22:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Cull Tremayne 07:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Per 4dot.Azzt 01:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * A Geography or similar section describing the planet and its terrain might be a nice addition.  Sarendipity  ( Talk to me ) 19:05, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Bahb (+2)
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 04:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  02:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * External links, if applicable. .  .  .  .  06:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Added external link. Are these part of policy now? --Eyrezer 08:14, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't think so, but it's always good to have them. .  .  .  .  02:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok. --Eyrezer 04:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Quotes need to be sourced. 22:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

CompForce (+3)
Support
 * 1) Well-written in an encyclopedic style; well-sourced and with compelling OOU comparisons.--Goodwood 20:13, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) But why not take it to FA? .  .  .  .  20:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) That is a good article, maybe even FA worthy, like Fourdot said. 20:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Objections
 * 1) The third quote needs to be sourced. --Eyrezer 05:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'm going to support this, but I'd like a couple more pics. Surely there would be some from Galaxies. --Eyrezer 08:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I added 3 more pics, a quote, an infobox, and sourced all the pics. I think a section on CompForce members would be good, especially for an FA nom, but support this as a GA. --Eyrezer 05:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Sith Triumvirate (+1)
Support
 * 1) ---  V ladius M agnum ( Clan Magnum )[[Image:dasymbol.gif|20px]] 04:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Made some minor changes, for example. The main pic was incorrect, worth a GA now. [[Image:DarthAbeonisSig2.gif|Jasca Ducato]] Sith Council Sith Campaign 16:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * 1) Small bits of ugly image formatting. .  .  .  .  11:06, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Any way that can be remedied? ---  V ladius M agnum ( Clan Magnum )[[Image:dasymbol.gif|20px]] 04:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Probably, but I'm not very knowledgable in such things. I only know when an article looks ugly. ;) .  .  .  .  04:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ***In what ways? I agree that the image arrangement is bad, though. ---  V ladius M agnum ( Clan Magnum )[[Image:dasymbol.gif|20px]] 20:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Comments

It was hard work and took a while, but I think it was worth it. If anything needs to be fixed right now, it's on the two sections at the bottom. Thanks!, ---  V ladius M agnum ( Clan Magnum ) 04:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC) The titles "Lord of Betrayal," "Lord of Hunger," and "Lord of Pain" seem a little fanon-y. Also, the Exile image seems to be just stuck in there – perhaps it could be replaced with a screenshot of Kreia with her "floating" lightsabers. And maybe "Endgame" could be changed to something like "Downfall" or "Defeat" so it sounds more in-universe.  Sarendipity  ( Talk to me ) 23:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Properly source/describe all the images. 22:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, please! I've complained before about the Sion and Kreia pictures, which are non-canon concept art if I haven't missed some source that canonizes them. Charlii 23:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Irek Ismaren (+3)
Support style="color:#FFA502;">Roron Corobb ]] Talk 00:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) [[User:Roron Corobb|<span
 * 1) --Eyrezer 22:42, 30 December 2006 (UTC) Expanded the intro. Could do with some more work on Eye of Palpatine section
 * 17:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) .  .  .  .  20:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Objections
 * Needs a little copyediting. .  .  .  .  11:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) There seems to be some confusion in the article as to when Irek got the lightsabers implanted. Was before or after he got Cronal's lightsaber through his brain?  StarNeptune Talk to me! 09:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I copy-edited the article. The quote still needs to be verified/sourced. 22:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Corrected and sourced the quote. --Tinwe 15:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Hoth (comic) (+2)
Support
 * 22:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Nowhere else to go this. .  .  .  .  23:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * I don't think it is possibly to expand this short comic any more. Also, the plot and appearances list are very accurate.
 * Despite what I said, I managed to add a tiny bit more. Also, one user commented on the prose - any suggestions? 23:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This seems rather short. I'm not sure it's worthy of GA... --Eyrezer 09:24, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to point out that length is not one of the GA requirements. This article fits all the criteria, except apparently the prose. (Xwing328 wonders to himself why he is so determined to get this article nominated... :P) 16:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Echuu Shen-Jon (+3)
Support Object Comments
 * 1) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 20:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Forgiveness, please! .  .  .  .  08:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Tinwe 09:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Greyman 02:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Skippy Farlstendoiro 15:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) I don't find the writing in this article very compelling at all.  I think it needs a rewrite before it satisfies requirement 1. --Eyrezer 04:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm with Eyrezer. This article just doesn't do it for me... Humbone 20:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It's actually sourced. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Skreej (+3)
Support
 * 1) Jagged Fel,  (Yo!)[[Image:JagFel.jpg|20px]]
 * 2) .  .  .  .  20:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 17:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Battle of Otoh Sancture (+2)
Support
 * 1) .  .  .  .  00:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jagged Fel,  (Yo!)[[Image:JagFel.jpg|20px]]

Object

Comments

Force lightning (+1)
Support Object Comments
 * 1) General Layton
 * 2) T8-13
 * Cut down on the images. .  .  .  .  22:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Which images do you suggest we remove? - User:General Layton

Bail Organa (+3)
Support
 * 1) Tinwe 15:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Cull Tremayne 12:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) QuentinGeorge 08:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Article does not mention the Ghorman Massacre, a very important event in Bail's life. Admittedly, this is one older bit of continuity that the prequels haven't been so kind to, but there still needs to be some mention of it in the article. -- Ozzel 06:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Added Ghorman Massacre info and expanded the "Father of the Rebellion" section. On a related note, Ozzel, since you are the one who uploaded the main image, could you source it? Thanks! :) --Tinwe 09:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. -- Ozzel 06:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * The main image needs a source. --Tinwe 16:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Ryloth (+2)
Support
 * 1) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Ego compels me Enochf 23:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I think the pics need to be sorted out. They are cramped at some points and there seems to be too many pics of the planet from orbit. Surely some more from Platt's Starport Guide would work. The gallery is here. --Eyrezer 04:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Operation: Knightfall (+3)
Support Object
 * 1) - I think its worthy for good article
 * 2) I agree. 21:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I agree as well Micah Giett 13:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments


 * All quotes and images sourced. Images have the template.  21:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

The Envoy (+3)
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 06:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) QuentinGeorge 02:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Tinwe 19:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Verpine (+0)
Support
 * 1) Inquisitor Culator said it's GA material on IRC just now.&mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I know this undermines my nomination, but the article's still missing a source for the lead quote, and there's one claim in the infobox ("no heart") I can't source. Please strike this out as soon as that's fixed without waiting for me to do it.  8) Never mind, the quote's sourced and the unsourced infobox tidbit was removed. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 12:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I think something needs to be added to the paragrah on antenna about how defective antenna resulted in Verpines criminals etc. I remember reading that somewhere. Also, I thought it was a coup attempt rather than a direct invasion by the Killiks. If so, I think that paragraph should be reworded. --Eyrezer 04:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure the source for that was The Courtship of Princess Leia Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Herrit (+2)
Support
 * 1) Fully sourced and has a funny lead quote. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 04:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC) I enjoyed reading that.

Object

Comments

Janek Sunber (+2)
Support
 * 1) Tinwe 13:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Domlith 12:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ebon Hawk (+2)
Support
 * 1)  Sarendipity  ( Talk to me ) 10:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Domlith 12:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Chalmun's Cantina (+1)
Support
 * 1) Domlith 18:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments