Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Sanctuary III

Sanctuary III

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 01:46, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Former CA nomination that now qualifies for GA nom.

Support

 * 1)  —Tommy   9281  Wednesday, June 1, 2011, 09:15 UTC 

Object

 * Before I could give this article a review, there are some preliminaries that need to be taken care of. In the infobox, you're missing Ref tags, your intro needs to be proportional to the body. Have you checked every source or at least season one sources such as the visual guide, S1 guide, episode guide, dataclip on Cartoon Network's website, Insider? Even the smaller sources, such as the kid short stories. I think you could expand the Sanctuary III's role in SoM, even if it had a small appearance. Your current description of what it did in SoM also lacks context, ie the medical center. Per the SW Annual 2011, the events of this episode takes place in 21 BBY, so you could mention this somewhere in the article and source it to it.  JangFett  (Talk) 02:32, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ref tags have been added to the infobox.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 05:15, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Intro filled in. Working on the references from the show&mdash;might even upload a "live" image.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave
 * The WizKids review is canon, as it was done by a representative of the company.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave
 * SW Annual 2011 included.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 06:58, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sourcing still remains.  JangFett  (Talk) 14:16, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have included as many sources as I could find. The only view of the ship is when it is docking in a brief clip. No other mention of the ship is made other than it being identified and described by WizKids.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 04:24, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * I named some of the sources you could check above. If you don't have some or most, I would be able to check for you. Before you nominate an article, however, you should always check for sources. While the Sanctuary is not that old, various TCW sources could still show it.  JangFett  (Talk) 04:58, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * If you know any other instance of where the Sanctuary III is mentioned or shown, by all means, please let me know.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:53, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * However, have you at least checked yourself?  JangFett  (Talk) 15:25, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have checked all the source material that I have access to.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:44, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * You should always check for sources prior to nomination. Whether you have access to them or not, it's your responsibility to check for sources. I have listed a few sources that you could check and should have access to&mdash;the episode guide, or on cartoon network.  JangFett  (Talk) 20:34, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

Ecks Dee

 * Reference two needs to be pipelinked. You can check other status articles for examples of what I mean.
 * Reference 2 is from the film, not an episode.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:43, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * I noticed the other references that weren't pipelinked and fixed them.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:25, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nor did I ask you to format it like an episode. I asked you to format it properly&mdash;the parenthesis should not be there and film should be unitalicized. 1358  (Talk)  17:54, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Pipelinked = parenthesis? I guess I didn't understand your first comment. I also didn't know a film's name should go un-italicized. Moot point, now, though. A better reference of size was found in another source that I have included.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 01:00, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * This is what I was referring to, but I guess this'll do. 1358  (Talk)  19:09, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 20:30, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Its hyperspace capability needs to be mentioned in the article proper.
 * Being that the ship has been specifically modified, it can not be verified what the actual hyperspace rating is based on the stock value.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:43, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * I did not ask you to include the rating, but the capability itself&mdash;a fact currently present in the infobox. 1358  (Talk)  17:54, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. I went ahead and used the stock Pelta values, too. I figure that the attributes should be the same except where the modifications that were mentioned have been made.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 01:00, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, that's not what I wanted at all. If you read my initial objection, I told you to mention "the ship is hyperspace capable" in the article itself, not only in the infobox. You shouldn't assume the stock values apply for each ship. 1358  (Talk)  19:09, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, no stock values and hyperdrive equipped.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 20:30, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * How are these two facts related at all? "Although maneuverability with its sublight drive was poor [...] the hospital ship was equipped with a hyperdrive that propelled it through hyperspace" Please make a better connection. 1358  (Talk)  20:56, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * There are some parameters in the infobox that can be used &mdash; "First sighted" or whatever it's called, for example. 1358  (Talk)  05:16, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * The only instance of this in the Individual Ship infobox is Firstuse. The use in SoM is not necessarily the first.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:43, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * The parameter description in Individual ship infobox says this: "firstsight – If we don't know the launch date, list the date it was first seen." 1358  (Talk)  17:54, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I see what the problem is. The Ind. Ship that was initially used does not even have Firstsight, so I think that the template has been redone since. I have updated the article with the current template format with the date added.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 23:46, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * The subject doesn't need to be bolded outside the intro. 1358  (Talk)  19:09, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oops. Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 20:30, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Twin

 * "Though not able to inflict a great amount of damage, Sanctuary III was capable of delivering more than a comparable ship its size with its turbolaser batteries." I'm having difficulty understanding what you are trying to say here.
 * That's all.  —Tommy  9281  Tuesday, May 31, 2011, 22:27 UTC 
 * How's that?  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 04:48, June 1, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

 * Please archive the CA nomination before you take it to GAN next time. Perhaps the CAN page needs a note on this... NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:43, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have already made the proper notation required of me on the CAN page as is stipulated by the CAnom Instructions. Please check the instructions in the section marked CAN status review and you will find that I have followed them to the letter. The CAN entry must stay pending the outcome of the GAN.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 04:32, May 16, 2011 (UTC)