Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Crab-stuffed creampuff

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:54, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: What can I say? They amuse me.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) I remember these things. Ugh, crabs.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 16:01, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:02, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  14:13, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Menkooroo 05:33, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Sorry; I got lazy and forgot to support. :P ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 19:20, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Someone got lazy and just added the note that "Life Day means birthday" (in not so many words) to the article Life Day, but in reality, we've got two different phenomena here: the Wookiee holiday, and the birthday analog. In short, I think the link to Life Day should be changed to Life Day (Mon Calamari) or somesuch so this will be cleared up. Other than that, it's all good! ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 05:32, May 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. There's that buzzword again. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:39, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Per the naming policy, the article should probably be named Crab-stuffed creampuff.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:42, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Nice catch. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:39, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Can the name Dac be sourced to The Doomsday Ship?
 * The specific name isn't what needs to be sourced. That it is from their homeworld is clear from the quote in the article. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:13, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, that it is from their homeworld can be sourced with The Doomsday Ship, but the fact that their homeworld is Dac still needs a source, maybe from Geonosis and the Outer Rim Worlds.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:09, May 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna plead no contest to this. The name itself is not what needs to be sourced, merely the information that it comes from the Mon Cal homeworld (which is called Dac). However, I don't feel like arguing over this. I'm busy this week. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:57, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm fairly certain that the name still needs to be sourced For example, I use "Bright Tree Village" in a lot of my Star Wars: Ewoks noms, but since the village is never named in the series, I'm told to source it to The Essential Guide to Characters or something. Either way, that's my last objection, so good work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:02, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Just de-pluralize the name in the infobox, and I think that's all I have. Nice work!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 11:55, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sofixit next time. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:13, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you give an indication of the timeline in the bio? There's no indication outside the infobox that this takes place during the rebellion era, and Mafusa presumably had more than one birthday/lifeday. Menkooroo 14:23, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. About as Rebellion Era as it gets. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:38, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Ree Ohr

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 12:15, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A character so obscure, nobody has bothered to create an article for her for all these years. A rarity, to say the least.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 15:29, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 06:47, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) And I am sure there are many more.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  14:22, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * I think some of the phrases in the first sentence should be swapped around, as the way it's written right now implies that the Clone Wars was the site of a battle between the Republic and the CIS. Otherwise, a well-written article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:10, May 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Addressed. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 14:53, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) "Republic female Human" sounds weird. It sounds like "Republic Human" is a type of Human. Maybe reword? Menkooroo 16:48, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

132nd Forward Division

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 09:43, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:13, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * Could you add an ?
 * 3) * Would it be possible to specify "unit" here? I'm presuming this was part of the Alliance army, so maybe say army unit; if we can't confirm it was part of their army, per se, maybe just "military unit".
 * 4) * Also, I don't believe "Division" should be capitalized in the second sentence. Correct me if I'm wrong.
 * 5) *Other than that, good work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:43, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) Would the "members" field of the infobox be a better place for Belyssa? I feel like the "leaders" field is reserved for leaders of the whole operation rather than any named officer. Let me know what you think. Menkooroo 04:00, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Ur

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 20:39, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Tusken Raider

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:13, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) This was actually on my long-list of articles to write. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:53, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Menkooroo 07:07, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Urur

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 20:39, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Tusken Warrior

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:13, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:56, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Menkooroo 07:08, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * Just one question. You mention that he was restricted to defending his tribe, and would take his brother's place should he be killed. What "place" would that be? Do we know what Ur could do that Urur couldn't?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:20, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Nope. All the information I write is all the available info on the card. Hanzo Hasashi 23:09, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***All right, then. Nice work!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:13, May 6, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

71st Elite Mechanized Assault Group

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:42, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Star Wars PocketModel TCG unit

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:51, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ecks Dee
 * 2) *Very short article; characteristics and history could be merged into the intro.
 * 3) **Again, this is not against the CA rules. He can subsection the article if he wants to. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:06, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I haven't said it's against the rules; the appearance of the article is just better when half of it isn't headings. 1358  (Talk)  17:35, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) * You don't need to bold the subject outside the intro.
 * 6) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:29, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) *Intro-exclusive info.
 * 8) **What do you mean? Please explain.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:29, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ***"an elite Imperial Remnant battle group during the Imperial Civil War." This information can not be found outside the intro. This could be fixed by just merging the sections. 1358  (Talk)  17:35, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) ****Tell me if what I've got works. If not I'll rework it to merge it.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 01:38, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) * Please do not use parenthesis in the prose. 1358  (Talk)  14:55, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) **Done.

Comments

98th Elite Mechanized Assault Group

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:42, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Star Wars PocketModel TCG unit

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:58, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Bonslywizard  Naboo.svg ( Send a transmission ) 23:42, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) * The "Characteristics" section (or rather, sentence) could definitely be fixed up a bit. Right now, it's pretty confusing.
 * 2) **Reworked. How does that sound?  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:23, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) * The "History" section is pretty confusing also. Change that a little.
 * 4) **Removed. No specific history recorded that I know of, except that they participated in the Imperial Civil War.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:03, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) * Only bold the name in the intro. Never the body.
 * 6) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:03, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) * "Century tanks of the 98th Elite were often called upon to lead strikes on mission objectives." Okay, so what kind of strikes? Does the card say?
 * 8) **Removed. A different elite century tank unit was a lead position assault group, not this one.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:03, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) * "Century Tanks" are capitalized the first time, but not the second. Which is it?
 * 10) **No caps. Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:03, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) * Parentheses are almost never used in articles around here, so it would be best if these were removed.
 * 12) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:03, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) *I'll have another look once these are addressed. Anyway, welcome to the CAN page! :D Bonslywizard  Naboo.svg ( Send a transmission ) 00:00, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) *Okay, you really changed the article alot since last I checked, so I'll re-review. Bonslywizard  Naboo.svg ( Send a transmission ) 21:33, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) * Are you sure that this unit existed during the Rebellion era, as the article currently states? Given that they are an Imperial Remnant unit, they could have existed during the Rebellion era, the New Republic era, or later eras. Therefore, you can't make any assumptions about which publishing era they feature in, unless the source dates their existance to a more specific time. If that is the case, then please cite the dating in the article. If not, then please remove any mention of the Rebellion era. --Jinzler 13:55, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) **Removed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:27, May 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) Jinzler
 * 2) * Could you perhaps include some context on what a century tank is?
 * 3) **I thought the link to the century tank article would suffice. It has in the other century tank Assault Group articles&mdash;like the 88th Mechanized Assault Group&mdash;that are nominated on this page. What did you have in mind?  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 04:32, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I was thinking maybe just something along the lines of stating that they were a type of attack vehicle developed by Santhe/Sienar Technologies. Given that a large proportion of the article is related to the tanks, I think that such additional detail would be useful here. What do you think --Jinzler 08:54, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Minor description put in, including reference to alternate name. Didn't want to go into too much detail. How's that?  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:27, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * century tanks of the 98th Elite were more formidable than standard units, such as used by the 88th Mechanized. What do you mean by "standard units" here? I presume this is referring to standard Imperial mechanized units, or something along those lines, but article is currently unclear. Please specify.
 * 7) **The 88th Mechanized used stock century tank units. They would be considered the standard. The 98th and other Assault Groups modified their century tanks to the needs of the particular group they were in.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 04:32, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) * I see that you have now added The New Essential Chronology to the source list. If the unit appears in the NEC, then that might be worth a mention in the "Behind the scenes" section. Also, as there is more than one source you will need a "1stm" template next to whichever one was the first to mention the unit.
 * 9) **Isn't enough?  Gethralkin  Hyperwave  04:32, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) ***I see you logic in using that template, but the Layout Guide [Wookieepedia:Layout_Guide#Appearances advises] that the "1stID" template should only be used when a subject is not named in its first appearance and is first identified by a later source. A "1st" or "1stm" template is still needed for the source that mentions the subject first. --Jinzler 08:54, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ****Done. NEC was wrong source though, probably copied over accidentally.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:27, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) *I look forward to seeing more nominations from you in the future. And my use of timestamping here is correct, per my comments below :P Jinzler 17:09, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) **Yeah, yeah, yeah... ;P  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 04:32, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'm curious to know why someone has added the "Unsigned" templates to Bonsly's objections above. While all user comments are required to be signed, this rule has always been interpreted in the context of nomination pages as meaning that just one timestamp is needed to sign all of the objections made by a user at one time. I don't see why things should be any different here. --Jinzler 13:55, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bonslywizard did not sign his objection vote at the beginning as is standard, so I could not tell who made the comments. There have been several times when comments were made and then other users addressed each itemization so it obscured who was who. Rules for signing comments is outlined in the Signature policy.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 14:16, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am fully aware of our signature policy, but it seems that we have differing interpretations of it. Regarding your confusion, when users make a large number of objections to an article on a nominations page at one time, it is commonplace for them to choose only to sign the last objection. You can thus tell who made the objections and when by looking at the bottom of the listed objections, to see who has signed them. This is compliant with the signature policy, because where objections are made together, they can be seen as one combined comment, and so only one signature is needed to serve them, and this should be enough to show who made the comment. Furthermore, if you take a look at the Featured articles nominations page and the Good article nominations page, you will see that the method of making objections used by Bonsly above is regularly used by many users, including administrators and members of the Inquisitorius. It is therefore a seemingly valid interpretation of the signature policy and is used on Wookieepedia on a regular basis. If you believe this interpretation is incorrect, then I recommend you take your concerns to the Senate Hall. I urge you to reconsider your use of the "Unsigned" template on Bonsly's comments above, because he has done nothing wrong. --Jinzler 14:47, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * This topic is perhaps better suited to User Talk pages, as it distracts from this page's purpose. Please leave me a message if you wish to discuss it further. Thanks.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:47, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

T81 Division

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:43, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Star Wars PocketModel TCG/TCW tie-in unit

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice job. After you removed the references in the intro, I consider this ready for CA.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 16:27, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Object


 * 1) "TK Tri-Nine"
 * 2) * Needs referencing, as there are multiple sources and appearances. &mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 16:54, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **References supplied.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 14:09, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Looks better. I gave it a copy-edit, and will decide whether there are any more issues later.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 15:03, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) * Lacks Star Wars Annual 2011 info: the date for Mission to Rugosa has been supplied. &mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 16:54, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * Some links are missing. &mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 16:54, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **This should be a quick "do-it-yourself" fix. (Or at least you could tell the nominator which links exactly you've noticed to be missing.)  Imperators II (Talk) 19:16, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) * Since the article has only 108 words (period), I don't think it is necessary to make it have an intro and headings. If the need for sub-sectioning arises, then it should have for better legibility. &mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 16:54, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) **Just to interject, a CA may be subsectioned according to the LG if the nominator so chooses. This isn't against the CA rules. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:37, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) ***Both sofixits done.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 19:36, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * GTQ
 * 1) *Correct me if I am wrong but I don not believe that you should have sources in the introduction GTQ ( Problems? ) 21:56, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) ** It is permissible. See Xizor as a reference.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:41, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ***It is not permissible. Xizor is not an article of status and the reference is marking the pronunciation of his name, not information in the paragraph. Remove them. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:23, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ****Removed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 01:37, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****If the article contains a body, the introduction should not have references. 1358  (Talk)  17:32, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Removed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 02:15, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) Axinal
 * 8) * Please source EVERYTHING in the infobox.
 * 9) * Could we get context on Asajj Ventress, 224, and Jek, Rys, and Thire?
 * 10) ** I see context on Ventress and the clones, but 224 could still use some.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:37, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) *** Context still needed on all of the above.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:02, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) **** Nice work on the context in the body, but Asajj Ventress and 224 could use some context in the intro as well. However, the article is now 291 words, and thus qualifies as a good article nomination.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:52, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) ***** 249 words not including Bts, which can be allowed. What do you think?  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:37, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) ******Actually, it's not allowed. The BTS is always included in the word count, per rule #13: "...counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration."&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 09:12, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) *******Oops. Late at night edit, and I glanced at the History and thought it was the Bts.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:42, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) ********I personally would have rather seen the article go to GAN than shortened to stay within the confines of a CAN, but that's not a formal objection. Nevertheless, I believe some expansion is necessary. In the intro, why did Ventress send the battalion to Rugosa? Also, in the history section, I think the battle could be explained in greater detail, rather than just the fact that the battalion was "routed."&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:46, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) * Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe SWA 2011 places most of TCW around 21 BBY, so "Circa 21 BBY" might be better than "In 21 BBY"&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:04, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) * Also, the article is missing a BTS.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:05, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) ** The BTS could still use some expansion; you should mention "Ambush", because it's its first appearance, and mention that it received its name in the TCG.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:37, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) ***Does the BTS imply that the TCG came before "Ambush"? If so, why is "Ambush" listed as its first appearance? Even if the TCG only has a picture, it could still be listed as its first appearance, with a template after it.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:58, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) ****I was told by several members (including an admin) that TCGs did not count as appearances. Only as sources.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:52, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) *****That's true in the sense that they go under the Sources section rather than the Appearances section, but it still deserves a template at the very least.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:48, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 23) ******I see what you mean. Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:04, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 24) *This is just a question out of sheer curiosity, not an objection per se: How is it that we know that the division we see in "Ambush" is the T81? Is that established in the TCG?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:46, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 25) **Yes. The Division is named on the miniatures and vehicle units from the Division appear in a couple of the cards featuring scenes from the episode.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 05:52, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 26) Rubedo
 * 27) * Mention that they appeared in TCW in the BTS.
 * 28) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:54, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 29) ***There is a bit of a form for including this appearance in the BTS. Base it off of articles like Unidentified clone trooper pilot (Bothawui) or Unidentified Gotal bounty hunter. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:29, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 30) ****Okay. Fixed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 23:12, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 31) * Why the double refs on everything? One would suffice.
 * 32) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:53, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 33) * Context on 224.
 * 34) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:52, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 35) ***He needs to be mentioned in the intro as the ground leader. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:29, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 36) ****Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 23:12, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 37) * Asajj should be mentioned in the intro.
 * 38) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:52, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 39) * Where is the article on B1 battle droid 2?
 * 40) ** droid 2 is a different article. Not sure what naming conventions got them sorted that way.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:52, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 41) ***Then change 3 to 2 on the Rugosa Droid article. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:29, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 42) **** I am using most of my time on the articles that I am working on without having to worry about articles other people have written. Besides, I removed the references to the droid two days ago, so it shouldn't matter.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 23:12, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 43) *****They still need to be referenced in the article because they are members of the Division. You can't omit them just because the notable members section was removed. Move the article and mention them in the history somehow. You're working on your article by moving the other article to the correct position. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:42, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 44) ****** Aargh! Okay, fine. Fixed. ;p  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:37, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 45) * The Notable Members section should be axed unless you're willing to turn it into a semi-Main Characters section.
 * 46) **Generally, unidentified members that don't do much aren't consided "notable" anyway. Just don't include them in the infobox and mention them in the body.
 * 47) **Removed. Except for the B2-HA commander.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:52, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 48) ***The two droids should still be mentioned in the prose. How do you know the B2 held a command position (as the body says) and why is he notable? He just shot at one of the clone troopers. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:29, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 49) ****As I stated, I removed the two B1 droids&mdash;please check the article. As for the B2-HA, they are used as commanders. Except in this episode where it isn't observed conversing with other droids, non-OOMs address B2-HAs as "sir," making it pretty obvious they have higher rank even when they aren't shown giving commands or leading, as they do in the battles of Christophsis, Devaron, for instance.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 23:12, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 50) *****OK, but higher rank doesn't automaticaly equate to command status over the Division. You need a source specfically saying that this particular droid held such a position. Again, you still need to mention the B2s in the prose. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:42, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 51) ******Okay, fixed. The B2s were already mentioned. I think you mean B1s, which I have now included.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:37, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 52) *******I'm not sure if we can say for certain that that B1 is part of the T81. He didn't take part in the ground assault, but was instead stationed on a ship in space. If we can discern that he was from the T81, then his mention should come earlier and it should explain what he did. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:18, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 53) ******** Which B1? You are not being specific. There are two articles of B1s from Rugosa&mdash;that I have included at your insistence&mdash;and both of them are not particularly notable.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:44, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 54) *********Looks like the admins agree with me. It's been deleted as not being notable enough, and the other is not verifiable as belonging to T81.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:56, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 55) *********You included them in the article. I had you keep them in the prose because I trusted that you had verified them as part of the T81 because they were in the members sections. Regardless of notability, if they have an article and are part of a group, they get mentioned. It's as simple as that. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:56, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 56) **********I was not the one who put them in the article. Grand Moff Hopkins put them there. I added them to the prose because of the objection you raised to do so. Furthermore, this is the reason for admin deletion: "19:39, May 21, 2011 CC7567 (Talk | contribs) deleted "Unidentified B1 battle droid 2 (Rugosa)" ‎ (I'm not seeing proof of notability)." So, as you see, notability does factor into this.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 00:33, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 57) * Each member from the infobox needs to be mentioned in the prose.
 * 58) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:52, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 59) * Is this an armored division or a battalion? Pick one descriptor, use it for both intro and body.
 * 60) **A droid battalion is a subdivision of a droid Division. Different organizational structure than the Republic uses.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:52, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 61) ***Do you have a source that says this was just a battalion and not the whole Divison? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:29, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 62) ****Please look at the article. Reference 4 cites the source.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 23:12, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 63) * Context on the bid to secure a treaty with Katuunko.
 * 64) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:52, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 65) ***Why was she trying to impress Katuunko. You still have to mention the potential traty. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:29, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 66) ****Fixed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 23:12, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 67) * Are they part of the CIS or the Trade Federation? The infobox says the Droid army belongs to the CIS, not the TF.
 * 68) **Oops. Don't know how that got in there.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:52, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 69) * It seems liike Asajj should be listed as a founder.
 * 70) **Nope. There is no evidence that she founded the Division. Only that she had it assigned to her.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:52, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 71) *That's it for now. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:24, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 72) *Is merely saying "T81" a canonical shortening of "T81 Division"? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:56, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 73) **Yes. Just as saying 501st is just as canonical as saying 501st Legion. If the term Division is a common designation of a military group or subgroup, then it works as a label instead of a unique moniker. SInce there are several Divisions in the Droid Separatist Army, then the term Division is not unique. The alphanumeric preceding the group category is the unique operand. Therefore, "T81" is understood as "T81 Division" when the article initially puts it in context. The use of 501st and 212th follows the same line of logic.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 00:33, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 74) ***The difference there is that those two are from another military outfit and have both been explicitly referenced as "501st" and "212th." If they had not, it wouldn't be appropriate to call them those names in their articles. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 15:45, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 75) *Looking back upon it, the context on the treaty situation still isn't sufficient. Why was Yioda on Rugosa? Where did these clone troopers come from? The gambling nature of the arrangement needs to be established.
 * 76) **Yoda's presence is explained. Gamboling = bid.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 00:33, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 77) ***He is not explained. Why is he on the planet? Simply saying "bid" does not mean that the Republic was trying to get access to the spaceways as well. I did not mean be more specific about the clones' rank: were they with Yoda the whole time? It does not establish that if they had killed Yodfa, the Separatists would have won the treaty. It doesn't establish that their failure caused the Republic to get the treaty. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 15:45, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 78) *Unidentified OOM command battle droid (Rugosa) Is this the other OOM command droid? If so, then remove references to him in the T81 article. If not, then that OOM needs his own article as Unidentified OOM command battle droid (T81 Division).
 * 79) **This is definitely not necessary. You are, in fact, referencing the wrong droid. There was an OOM&mdash;other than the one you have linked in my article&mdash;that was standing next to 224 when Ventress gave the two of them orders to find Yoda. He is not shown after he walks away with 224 from that meeting. The only thing known about the OOM's fate is through inference&mdash;the OOM was part of the battalion, the entire battalion was destroyed, therefore the OOM was destroyed. Based on the precedent set by the above mentioned B1 article deletion concerning notability, this droid does not seem to deserve an article, either. It should be enough to say in this article that an OOM droid was a commander additional to 224.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 00:33, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 80) ***Notability is not an issue here: he's notable because he was a commander of the battalion. If you're going to refernce him as a leader of the battalion, he needs his own article. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 15:45, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Okay, it's been rewritten, so please check it again to see if I have missed anything. Thanks.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:50, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * There is still some context missing on individuals like Asajj Ventress and 224, and as the article is currently 244 words by my count, it's likely that after this is added, it will qualify as a good article nomination.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:55, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 249 not including the Bts and category headings.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:37, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bts also counts toward the total word count, so it's 271 words. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 16:01, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hang on. My mistake. I glanced at the wrong section and thought the Bts was the biggest thing on the page. Tired eyes.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:42, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay. Now it is 247 words.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 02:17, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Alain (Human)

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 20:49, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Unit Scrounge

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 15:40, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi
 * 2) * I believe there is no evidence that he necessarily fought the 501st during the events of ANH, as the card never explicitly states it, nor does his CSWE entry. Does anybody else believe otherwise? Hanzo Hasashi 20:49, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) *Text from his Quick Draw card: fighting against oppression can be dangerous business. Oppressors carry blasters, and so does Alain. I do not believe any of this is necessarily from his POV, and chose not to include it as any new info in his bio. As with above, if somebody else believes otherwise, please respond. Hanzo Hasashi 21:07, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Axinal
 * 5) * In the Personality and Traits, you mention a Hakin. Who is Hakin? I figure this is supposed to be Alian and would therefore qualify as a Sofixit, but I want to be sure Hakin's name isn't there for some other purpose.
 * 6) **Right, that was just a careless mistake on my part, Hakin was another Rebel trooper I brought to comprehensive status. Hanzo Hasashi 14:28, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) * Could you tell us what a scrounge is?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:09, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) **A scavenger, will write. Hanzo Hasashi 14:28, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ***Nice work!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 15:40, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

Precht

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 20:49, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Green Recruit

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:14, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 14:46, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Can you give a little more detail in ref [2]? Does the card indicate that he was a recent recruit at the time of the Tantive IV destruction?
 * 2) *His year of service was never given, however, it could have only been 0 BBY at the latest. Should I change it to simply say during the Galactic Civil War, also getting rid of ref [2] in the process?
 * 3) **I think the ref is OK. Maybe just a little more explanation within ref [2] itself as to why it says what it does (something at the end like "Therefore, Precht must have blah blah blah...").
 * 4) ***See if it's better now. Hanzo Hasashi 14:09, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) I'd say that ref [5] probably isn't necessary. If it's visually a DH-17 on the card, I think you can just source the card. Like, if there was an X-wing fighter on the card, you wouldn't need to source anything else to say so. Menkooroo 02:49, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *Gotten rid of. Hanzo Hasashi 03:48, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Same as above with Private Alain. Hanzo Hasashi 20:49, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

72nd Flight

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:08, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: SWPM

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:18, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * See below.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:21, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * If you're going to source the article, every bullet in the infobox must be sourced. However, since it only has one appearance, I would argue that sourcing is unnecessary, but the decision is yours.
 * 3) **Done for all.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 13:42, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * The article needs a Behind the scenes section.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:22, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ** The BTS requirement also applies to your other current CANs.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:25, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Done for all.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 13:42, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) * I think Trade Federation ought to be listed in the affiliation field in the infobox in addition to the Confederacy of Independent Systems and the Confederate Navy; I'd say probably with one bullet under CIS. Again, this applies to all these articles, unless there's a specific reason you didn't include it. Otherwise, nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:14, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ** That would probably work pre-CIS, but the TF and the Techno Union Droid Army and the IGBC all merged their droid militaries into the Separatist Droid Army, and it is difficult to determine which Flights are being represented from TPM to RotS by noting their markings&mdash;unless someone has the time to spend going frame-by-frame to do so. Much like the Retail Caucus-affiliated droid army that Whorm Loathsom commanded, droids are no longer really affiliated with the TF after they are shipped unless they are specifically a TF detachment.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 23:44, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) * One more, applying to all these related articles; intro-exclusive information, such as the fighers' affiliation within the Trade Federation, needs to be added somewhere in the main body.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:21, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **TF references removed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:59, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Forgive me, as I'm a bit confused. Is it confirmed canon that they were part of the Trade Federation at any point?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:00, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) ****I would have to study the markings of the Flights present on and above Naboo in TPM.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 01:54, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) *****I don't think that's necessary. As long as it's not mentioned in the TCG, it's fine.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 09:58, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) ******Nope, they are not identified as TF specifically.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:41, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) *******In that case, I would say the article is ready for CA. Nice work, Gethralkin.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:18, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) ********Forgive me, I was a bit hasty. The fact that they were in the service of the CIS during the Clone Wars needs to be mentioned somewhere outside the intro, perhaps in a History section.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:21, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) *********Good work. Please address the same intro-exclusive problems to the other articles, and I will support them as well.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:28, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) **********Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 02:35, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

128th Flight

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:08, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: SWPM

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 03:24, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

28th Flight

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:08, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: SWPM

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 03:24, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

31st Flight

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:08, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: SWPM

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 03:24, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Nala Hetsime

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 22:18, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Same first name as The Lion King main female character

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:42, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 08:50, May 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * I think the fact that the full card image features an AT-AT in the top corner is a prime indicator that he fought at Hoth. Also, being in Rogue Squadron and flying a T-47 while stationed at Echo Base implies this as well. Reference to the Battle of Hoth should be included. - Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 14:43, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Written. Hanzo Hasashi 19:56, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * It looks like that's the Rebel insignia on his helmet. The Rogue Squadron insignia wasn't created until a couple years after the Battle of Endor. Menkooroo 03:51, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * You are right, fixed my mistake. Hanzo Hasashi 15:47, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Ururur

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 22:18, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "The Sandpeople are easily startled but they will soon be back and in greater numbers."

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:28, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 16:44, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Merumeru's battle staff

 * Nominated by: GTQ ( Problems? ) 03:24, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support Object Comments
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:26, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * See below.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:07, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Assuming Ax and Bob's objections are dealt with.  Bonslywizard  Naboo.svg ( Send a transmission ) 00:46, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Bonzlywizard
 * 2) * Context on Mermeru.
 * 3) * If the staff's only mention is in the DB, what info did you get from the Campaign Guide?
 * 4) * Could you maybe try to get a picture of it, assuming it's what Mermeru's holding in the DB pic?
 * 5) **Okay, better, but the pic's waaay too small. Could you see if you can get a bigger version? If you can't I could give it a try. Bonslywizard  Naboo.svg ( Send a transmission ) 21:57, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *This your first nom? If so, welcome! If not, er...welcome back. Bonslywizard  Naboo.svg ( Send a transmission ) 18:12, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **Context added on Merumeru picture added too. The campaign guide mentions nothing that is not there but I have made mention of it in behind the scenes GTQ ( Problems? ) 21:43, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ***I'll give the pick another shot GTQ ( Problems? ) 22:03, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Quality of the pic is bad but when aiming for such a small area of an already small pic It is hard to get good quality GTQ ( Problems? ) 22:13, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) Axinal
 * 11) * Because the article has multiple sources, it needs referencing.
 * 12) * I'd argue that the article could be expanded. Does TCWCG mention when specifically Merumeru used the staff? Even if it doesn't, the pic is from Episode III, so it's probably safe to say he wielded it during the Battle of Kashyyyk.
 * 13) *I removed the 250px designation from the picture, as it became too blurry.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:37, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) **TCWGC only mentions what is in the databank according to Jinzler as I do not have TCWGC but I referenced it. I added ROTS to the appearances and mentioned he used during the battle  GTQ ( Problems? ) 23:35, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) ***Good work, the picture is much better, as well. I'd just rearrange the BTS to make it a little more chronological, as RotS came before TCWCG and the Databank entry.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:31, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) ****Done GTQ ( Problems? ) 01:05, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) *****Better; I gave the article a copy-edit, removed the template from the text, since it's only needed in the infobox, and also moved some of the refs around in the BTS so the entire paragraph isn't sourced three times. I also rewrote the BTS a little to make it more accurate.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:26, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) ******Thanks for all the help GTQ ( Problems? ) 01:31, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) Is there any reason to believe this is a unique item and not, simply, a staff used in battle? In other words, why is "battle staff" worth giving its own article when we wouldn't do the same for "tall Human" or "open door"? If there is no evidence it's a unique item, I suggest moving the article to Merumeru's battle staff or, potentially, Wookiee battle staff if any source explicitly calls it such. ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 16:23, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) *Merumeru's Databank entry puts "battle staff" under his "Weapons" list, but it's safe to assume it wouldn't put "Tall Wookiee" under his Species category. I personally don't see a problem with this having its own article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:28, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) ** OK, but what distinguishes "battle staff" from "staff", an article we already have on long poles used to hit people with? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 16:51, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) ***Hmm, fair question, but again, I would point to the fact that the DB's infobox specifically identifies it as a battle staff, whereas it would not identify Merumeru as a tall Wookiee or Luke's lightsaber as a green lightsaber.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:05, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 23) **** I see what you mean, and I guess on that basis I can live with an article called "battle staff," but it needs to be generic and cover every battle staff used in Star Wars, not focus only on Merumeru's weapon. Otherwise, the article should be renamed "Merumeru's battle staff." I mean, Kenner and Hasbro alone have introduced tons of "battle staffs" into canon, and these all would need to be included in a generic "battle staff" article. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png
 * 24) *****Yes, I see what you mean. Perhaps GTQ could move it to "Merumeru's battle staff"; would that then need a Conjecture tag?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:27, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 25) ****** Probably would need a conjecture tag, yes. There's also an issue of folks in the past not liking articles on specific weapons used by specific characters; the SH is here. I don't think there was ever any consensus, but just beware that "Merumeru's battle staff" will likely meet with grumbles from some. ;) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 01:31, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 26) *******I think I should keep it here because as Axinal has said it is specifically calls it a battle staff in the DB so I think it is good as it is unless it is met with a general consensus that I should move it then I will move it  GTQ ( Problems? ) 01:52, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 27) ********I agree; I, too, would like to hear another opinion on this, but I say keep the article as is for now until we can reach an agreement on whether the subject is worthy of an article, and if so, what it should be named.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:01, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 28) *********Upon going to the staff article I found it listed multiple kinds of staff so maybe a battle staff is just a different kind of staff GTQ ( Problems? ) 02:04, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 29) ********** You're welcome to keep the article at "battle staff," but, again, it will need to cover all battle staffs, not just Merumeru's. You'll have to incorporate the Massassi battle staff and the Gungan battle staff from here at the very least; I suspect there may be other weapons out there called "battle staffs." ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 02:28, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 30) ***********Ya know what I'll move it but I need some help doing that as last time I tried i duplicated not moved the article GTQ ( Problems? ) 15:43, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 31) ************Check that moved it GTQ ( Problems? ) 23:11, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 32) * OK, a few more issues: You should provide a physical description of the weapon at some point. What color was it? Is it possible to tell how long it is in comparison to Merumeru's height from the film? How did Merumeru carry it and wield it?
 * 33) * Next, you should probably link to the staff article at some point in the article. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 23:32, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 34) **added staff link told how long it was the only problem with this is that you never actually see him fight with the staff just hold it up in the air but if you really want me to do it I can try. GTQ ( Problems? ) 23:39, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 35) ***Better! I think you still need to go into some detail about the context in which he wielded it. Check out the articles on Guanta and Lachichuk and see how we've described the situation where Merumeru waves the staff over his head. I think you should probably describe this event too. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 15:47, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 36) *Another concern: Why are "appearances" being privileged in the BTS rather than sources? I'd suggest simply saying what the staff's first appearance was, then saying that a promotional image of Merumeru wielding the staff has since been printed in several sources. You can list them if you want, but it might be enough to say "several sources" and then add footnotes for all of them. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 15:47, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 37) **All have been dealt with GTQ ( Problems? ) 19:57, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 38) A few problems now arise that you have moved it. It will need a template at the top, and you should probably remove the  template from the sources section. You could, however, mention in the BTS that the weapon was identified as a "battle staff" in Merumeru's Databank entry. Also, the article should be renamed "Merumeru's battle staff" (note the lowercase b). Once these have been addressed, I will be willing to support again.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:07, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 39) *all have been addressed GTQ ( Problems? ) 02:01, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 40) **Not quite. Please remove the template from the sources section, and, instead, mention in the BTS that the item was called a "battle staff" in Merumeru's DB entry.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber
 * 41) ***Ok sorry I miss read your objection they have been fully addressed now GTQ ( Problems? ) 01:15, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 42) ****Good work, I'm satisfied.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:18, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 43) The Wookiees are back!
 * The image that the battle staff appears in (which we've taken to calling the "Rawr" image over in the Barnburner HQ) appears in quite a few sources, so I've gone ahead and updated this article's Appearances and sources sections. They're all just, so you don't need to research them to find any information. However! As I've added two items to the "Appearances" section, the sentence in Behind the scenes that states "The battle staff's only appearance to date in Star Wars canon is in Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith." is now incorrect. Please revise.
 * 1) *"The Wookiees Are Back!" from the Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith DVD shows some behind-the-scenes footage of the staff. It's available on youtube here, and beginning at about 4:50, it shows Axel Dench filming the scene where he holds the battle staff. Using that as your source, you should talk about the filming of the scene, describe the prop that Axel used, and mention that it was digitally turned into a battle staff during the film's post-production. Let me know if you need any help with this. Menkooroo 07:25, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) **Done thanks for the review Menk assuming your done GTQ ( Problems? ) 21:02, May 21, 2011 (UTC)

Offices of the Imperial Head of State

 * Nominated by: Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 05:50, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:I hope you'll look the article over.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:58, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * See below.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 09:56, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) *The article is currently missing a BTS section.
 * 3) * Also, try to add some context on the information. What was Coruscant? Who was Jaina Solo? What were their careers, and why did they take them on separate paths?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 15:35, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) **OK, I added a BTS section and I added some more context. I also expanded it a little more.Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 16:49, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) *** Better, but now you have intro-exclusive information; specifically, you mention in the intro that Fel was the Imperial Head of State, and that Coruscant was the GA capital. This info must be in the main body as well. Also, take a look at the formatting in the BTS; you italicize FotJ once and leave it normal another time. Also, the wording in the first sentence, "Fate of the Jedi Allies" is a little awkward. Could you perhaps rearrange the sentence? &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:58, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * Please fix links so they don't point to redirects; specifically, Imperial, Galactic Alliance, and vidscreen.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:58, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ** Imperators got GA and vidscreen, so just Imperial.
 * 8) * I apologize if I wasn't specific enough when I said "context." I'm afraid I think you went a bit overboard with detail, as much of the article as it is currently written is not relevant to the office. We really just need to know the gist of what was said during the conversation in the office, not a history of their relationship.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:37, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) *I downsized on some of their relationship details to concentrate more on the office. Does it need more downsizing or not?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 17:46, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **I'm satisfied, good work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:58, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) Imperators II
 * 12) * I believe that the Imperial state that existed in 44 ABY was the Imperial Remnant, not the Galactic Empire.
 * 13) **I disagree; Jag consistently says Galactic Empire, and corrects those who refer to it as the Imperial Remnant.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:33, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) * All the infobox info must be referenced.  Imperators II (Talk) 17:13, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) **Per CA rules, not if the subject in question only has one appearance.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:33, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) ***It's encouraged, though. (OK, not really an objection, then.)  Imperators II (Talk) 17:41, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) ****True, it is encouraged, so I'd be okay if Cal wanted to do that. Doesn't matter to me.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:58, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) ***** I added references to the infobox now.Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 02:16, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) * The "History" section should begin with mentioning the era during which the offices were on Coruscant.  Imperators II (Talk) 17:18, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * OK did I miss anymore redirect links?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 17:34, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nope, you got them all, good work. Just see my remaining objection above.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:38, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * OK good. Is there anything else that I missed that needs to be fixed up?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 18:06, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * If you're going to source the article, you need to source the whole thing (except the intro).&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 09:56, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * I added the sources to the main article. Did I mess anything up?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 14:33, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nope, nice work. Just note that you do not need the template outside the infobox, and you do not need to list the same reference with the full format after the first one. I went ahead and fixed that for you, just see the history for future reference.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:48, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Wurokkk

 * Nominated by: MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 18:23, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Second barn-burner nom. First CAN ever!

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:10, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:45, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Bonslywizard  Naboo.svg ( Send a transmission ) 23:18, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Heh, cool article&mdash;and music-related, too. Just one question: "...it was thought he may have had a sonic 'surprise' waiting for his escorts." Do we know who, exactly thought this?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:31, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) *Heh, yeah, I figured this would get brought up. The excerpt from Geonosis and the Outer Rim Worlds says, "Wurokkk might have had other sonic-based surprises in store for his escorts." I couldn't think of a way to put this. This is a roleplaying guide, and the whole escort scene only takes place if one chooses to investigate and confront Wurokkk. How should I treat this? MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 18:37, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) **Hmm, good question, and I can't say I'm sure how I would treat this. If that GATORW is written from an in-universe perspective, do we know who "wrote" it? If not, it might be good to just say "it was possible" rather than "it was thought." I'm sure an EC member will have a more advanced opinion on this.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:07, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ***OK, I'll see if it's written IU and ask an EU. Thanks for the help. :) MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 13:09, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ****It's not from an IU perspective, so I changed it to "possible." MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 17:04, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) *****Good enough for me; nice work!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:10, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) Exiled Jedi
 * 7) * Shouldn't Geonosis and the Outer Rim Worlds be a source?
 * 8) **I believe I can either use it as a source or a reference. I've chosen to use it as the latter. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 13:09, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ***I think that references are in addition to sources, because the book is a source and the references are like quoting the source.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:22, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) * I also think that you should mention the book's authors and the company that published the books.
 * 11) **Mentioned. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 14:21, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) *That's all from me. Keep up the good work.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:29, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) **Thanks for the review! MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 13:09, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) Bonslywizard
 * 15) * "He eventually assembled a piece specifically designed to provoke an aggressive reaction in Biths by subliminally affecting their biorhythms and brainwaves." What do you mean by "piece"? A song, or something else?
 * 16) **I figure he means "song", but that word is usually frowned upon when referring to music without lyrics.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:04, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) ***So "musical piece" then. Bonslywizard  Naboo.svg ( Send a transmission ) 00:13, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) ****Specified. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 16:32, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) * "After investigation discovered that the aggressive Biths had attended numerous Shluur concerts, the Wookiee was escorted off-planet" If investigation found that the Biths were at the band's concert, why was only this Wookiee kicked out?
 * 20) **That's all the book says, but I assume it's because he was the band's composer. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 13:09, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) ***So you could mention that investigation not only discovered about the Bith's whereabouts, but also about Wurokkk. I don't think the police would just "guess" it was this guy. Bonslywizard  Naboo.svg ( Send a transmission ) 00:13, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) ****I think that's what you're looking for. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg<sup style="color:green">(Whatever) 16:32, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 23) *All from me. A Wookiee composer? Awesome! Bonslywizard  Naboo.svg ( Send a transmission ) 23:55, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 24) **I know, right?! I saw this in the barn-burner list and was in love. :P Not with the Wookiee of course. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg<sup style="color:green">(Whatever) 13:09, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 25) Bob
 * 26) * You'll need to add a "Sources" section that lists Geonosis and the Outer Rim Worlds with the 1stm tag. Keep in mind that "Notes and references" doesn't take the place of a complete list of Sources and/or Appearances in which the subject is mentioned.
 * 27) **Well, this settles the above discussion with ExileJedi. Fixed. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg<sup style="color:green">(Whatever) 17:02, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 28) * "eccentric" comes off a bit POV for a neutral article. Is it possible to weasel a bit on this and say he "was considered eccentric by [group X] or something?
 * 29) **That's what the book says. It doesn't say who considered him to be that. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg<sup style="color:green">(Whatever) 17:02, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 30) * Be careful with "comprise" -- I think "compose" would work better here. (SOFIXIT, I know, but I'm in a rush and may not get to it until later).
 * 31) **Fixed. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg<sup style="color:green">(Whatever) 17:02, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 32) *"it was thought that..." By whom? Can you recast this sentence to include someone doing the action? All for now. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 16:42, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 33) **Same as your second objection. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg<sup style="color:green">(Whatever) 17:02, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 34) * Oh, one more thing: In BTS, can you say in what capacity he is introduced in GATORW? Is he a gamemaster character? Part of some adventure? Merely referenced in source text on Clak'dorr? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 16:44, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 35) **Fixed. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg<sup style="color:green">(Whatever) 17:02, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 36) *** OK, I just checked the book, and he seems to appear in an adventure seed, not in the book's source text. This means two things: First, you need to add templates around the adventure material to indicate that you have followed the events as if the players follow the adventure as written. You can use RPGseed and Endgame for this. Second, the seed itself should count as an appearance. For something so short, I'd say it's up to you if you want to create an article for the seed (there's precedent both ways), but at the very least, I'd change "Sources" to "Appearances" and format the title like this: "Beat of a Different Drum"&mdash;Geonosis and the Outer Rim Worlds. That way you indicate what adventure within the book he's a part of. (That's how I understand procedure as of now. Things may change depending on what happens in this thread, but that's probably a ways away). Let me know if you need any clarification. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 15:33, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 37) ****Simple enough. I think I got it right. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg<sup style="color:green">(Whatever) 17:05, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 38) *This is looking really nice, Fred. I cleaned things up a bit (the RPG templates should only be placed around the stuff that could possibly change due to player character actions, and there was a bit of info missing). I also trimmed some of the extraneous detail from the BTS. Even with that, I wonder if there's not enough info here to add a P&T section about him? You're right on the cusp of being GA length, so it might be worthwhile to add a short intro and a P&T section and taking this to GA instead of CA. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 20:35, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 39) **This is what it looks like with an intro and P&T. Way over the CA limit. Tell me what you think. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg<sup style="color:green">(Whatever) 17:17, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 40) ***I think you could swing it as a GA. For P&T, though, I'd scale back to just the two traits we really know about him: He was intrigued by Bith brainwave patterns, and he showed no remorse (and actually showed satisfaction) when his scheme caused Biths to go wild. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 15:40, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Gaxxan brain-slug

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:40, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Should stay on this page.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:35, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * The second sentence of the BTS should probably be sourced to the strategy guide rather than the game.
 * 3) **Oops. It is fixed now.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:39, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * One question: The Gaxxa article says that the planet was "believed to be the home of the Gaxxan brain-slug." Does strategy guide make any mention of the planet Gaxxa, specifically a possible connection to the slugs? If so, this should be added to the article; if not, I don't think any change would be necessary.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:09, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **I do not own the book, but I will try to find out.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:39, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ***This isn't a huge deal for me, but it would be nice to know. Would you be able to find out from the entry in KOTOR, sine the BTS says that they were the "same entry"?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:13, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ****I may be wrong, but I think that the statement in the Gaxxa article is derived from the fact that the authors of The Essential Atlas stated their intention to create homeworlds for various unplaced species, based on the implied context of their names. Thus, this would imply that Gaxxa is the homeworld of the Gaxxan brain-slug. However, I'm not sure exactly where the authors said this. I think that a species expert, like Eyrezer or SavageBob, might be able to help you. --Jinzler 10:44, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) *****SavageBob helped me through it. Gaxxa is the homeworld of the Gaxxan brain-slug.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:09, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ******Cool, nice work, Exile.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:35, May 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments The next article in my series of Jurgan Kalta nominations.-- Exiled Jedi   (Greetings)  13:40, May 17, 2011 (UTC)

Phalanx Route

 * Nominated by: &mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 09:46, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Here you are, SavageBob :).

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:50, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Solid work, TK. Others may find there to be too many M-dashes, but I wanted to break up the very long sentences a bit. It may be better to break them up further if folks don't like the dashiness. ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 19:27, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Could we just get some context on Cormit and Telupe? I believe that's all I have. Cool article, TK!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:33, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *If there's any precedent consensus and authors' comment regarding this issue&mdash;systems that share their name with a planet have that world located within them&mdash;, then I am willing to add it. However, if there's no such thing, then it would be speculation. Also, there's an ongoing discussion about this in the SH.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 09:17, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **So basically what you're saying is that, although TEA says "Prominent planets in Chiss Space include:", then gives a list of the planets and then a map showing their locations, connecting the dots on the map with the descriptions of the planets is speculation. IMHO, that goes completely against common sense. Just a thought.  Imperators II (Talk) 16:07, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Realistic fanwankery facts added.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 17:09, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Imperators II
 * 6) * I don't think you should pipelink the Catlia and Tenupe systems, because you don't identify them as such in the first sentence. And why pipelink them in the infobox?
 * 7) * The fact that the route began in the Ascendancy's core territory should be added.
 * 8) * I think the route's location in the Unknown Regions and the Wild Space should be mentioned earlier in the article.
 * 9) * I'm not sure if it's really necessary to reference the fact that the route appeared in TEA, but referencing it to page 222 doesn't make any sense at all. I suggest you remove the references 1.09 and 1.10 in the Bts section.  Imperators II (Talk) 16:07, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **Excess refs removed.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 17:09, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) *To be precise, "Chiss Expansionary Defense Force staging planet" has to be sourced to p.221, "jungle world" to p.223, "Chiss" to p.221 and p.223 (because the map doesn't give info about the planets' affiliation), and "star systems" to Appendix (p.229, p.235) (because, imho, the map refers to the planets, not systems).  Imperators II (Talk) 21:15, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) Bob
 * 13) * Yay, another hyperlane! :) Can you specify how the junction works out with the Vagaari Corridor? It looks like a T-junction, which I think is important to note, since the two routes meeting at Catlia seems to mark the terminus for the Phalanx Route. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:03, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) **Done. Thanks to all for the reviews and diligence!&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 17:09, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Ebon Squadron

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 03:50, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: SWPM

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * Could you perhaps just specify that the supplement was called the Imperial Power-up Pack in the BTS?
 * 3) *Also, if the squadron's era is confirmed as the Rebellion era (as opposed to, say, the Rise of the Empire era or the New Republic era), it should be added to the infobox. If not, the tag should be removed.
 * 4) *Other than that, nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:54, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done and done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:01, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ***My second objection, regarding the eras, has not been addressed.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:28, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ****The Squadron is not confirmed for any Era. That is why I removed the tag. Was there something else you were referring to?  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 21:21, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments