Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month

Wookieepedian of the Month is an award given to outstanding Wookieepedians each month. To nominate someone, please list the person's username below and give the reason why you are nominating them. Nominations will be accepted until seven days before the end of the month. The administrators will then review the nominations, vote for the WotM, and present the award on the 1st of the month.

Try to nominate someone who has not received the award before. Nominations for those who have won the award within the past six months will be dismissed.


 * History – For past winners.

Support

 * 1) Azizlight 06:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC). Has stood out as a very reliable contributor. And he's the man :-)
 * 2) Jaymach Ral'Tir 06:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC). Support. Too lazy to give reasons. :)
 * 3) Riffsyphon1024 06:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC). Has brought some good stuff to this wiki.
 * 4) Imp 06:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC). I see a good administrator candidate as well here.
 * 5) StarNeptune 14:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC) From one Cooper to another. :D
 * 6) DannyBoy7783 19:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC) I see CooperTFN around here quite a bit doing work.
 * 7) Admiral J. Nebulax 21:11, 1 February 2006 (UTC) He definitely deserves this.
 * 8) Many constructive comments on talk pages, too. &mdash; Silly Dan 13:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) TIEPilot051999 02:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Cato Neimoidia 02:22, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Yup, everything above ↑

Comments

 * http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/34.gif http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/18.gif http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/54.gif CooperTFN 08:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Riffsyphon1024 06:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC) I will continue to nominate him until he is WOTM.
 * 2) Imp 06:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC). Jaymach deserves this for the amazing work he's done on such obscure sources.
 * 3) StarNeptune 14:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC) Same as last month.
 * 4) SFH 15:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Loads of interesting articles from obscure sources. &mdash; Silly Dan 13:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Kuralyov 03:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) [[Image:Tbhelm.gif|30px]] Shadowtrooper talk 00:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Cato Neimoidia 02:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Many new articles, yes, very good.
 * 9) Support (again). WhiteBoy 06:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Imp 06:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC). Erik is one of our great writers, having written not only one, but two amazing featured articles.
 * 2) CooperTFN 08:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC) Notthing ths plase needz mroe then good writters.
 * 3) Master Starkeiller 12:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC) What Imp and CooperTFN said. Erik deserves it.
 * 4) QuentinGeorge 08:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Support. Two featured articles. Natch. Now to get him to write more.... QuentinGeorge 08:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Tbhelm.gif|30px]] Shadowtrooper talk 00:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) &mdash;Darth Culator   (talk)  14:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Comments

 * All the candidates have strong points in their favor: CooperTFN has gotten us publicity, Jaymach gets us info from sources I've never even heard of, but Erik's writing quality has inspired me to improve my own. &mdash;Darth Culator   (talk)  14:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Mike Kazz I think I should be nominated because im new and i just got done writing and improving at least 20 articles!!!If u dont belive me go check my Bio!!

Object

 * 1) Er...I've never even heard of you. --MarcK [talk] 01:30, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Less than 250 edits, and most of them are to the fictional biography on your userpage? My advice, if you want to be WOTM, is to concentrate on article contributions and wait for someone else to nominate you. &mdash; Silly Dan 01:34, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yup, what Silly Dan said. -- Cato Neimoidia 02:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Hell no. -- Riffsyphon1024 05:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Comments
Uhhhh no not to my story if u had scrolled to the bottom of my bio u would see the articles I created because it would say the name of the article I created then would saty created after it meaning i created it but u would have to know that if u read the complete thing!!!! And if u never heard of me then check my bio! Mike Kazz
 * No offense, but to be around for all of one week and expect to be Wookieepedian of the Month (especially with your spelling and grammar) is just plain silly. --MarcK [talk] 01:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

ya but who cares how long u have been around and how many errors i make someone will fix them plus like i said at least 20 articles!!!! to be around 1 week and make that many is almost amazing ehnough to be wiki of the month!!!!
 * I've been here for six months, and I am still nowhere near WOTM material. There are people who have been here just as long (or longer) and still haven't gotten it. And I have seen your work. Most of them still need to be wookified. Sorry if I'm harshing on you, but it's really just not going to happen at this time. -- SFH 02:02, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

WHAT DONT U PEOPLE UNDERSTAND? IT DOSENT MATTER HOW LONG U HAVE BEEN HERE!!! YES PEOPLE WERE HERE LONGER THAN ME BUT MOST OF THEM PROBALY HAVENT EVEN CREATED 3 ARTICLES!! DO U SEE WHAT IM SAYING? SORRY IF IT LOOKS LIKE IM YELLING BUT I JUST DONT UNDERSTAND WHY U DONT UNDERSTAND???.......
 * There's more to Wookieepedia than just creating articles. RMF 02:11, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

POINT IS CREATING ARTICLES AND MODIFIENG THEM ARE A REALLY BIG HELP AND THATS THE ONLY REASON I NOMINATED MY SELF WHO CARES HOW LONG IV BEEN HERE?
 * The fact that you created 16 articles in the span of a week is all fine and dandy, but in all of them you showed that you clearly don't understand how wiki articles are supposed to look; quality over quantity and all that. Just stick around, make this wiki better as much as you possibly can, make yourself a part of the community, learn how to edit an article and some day you may be WOTM material, but not today. --MarcK [talk] 02:16, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

THANKS MARCK. i know i dont know formatting but i just figure i write the facts and someone elas can modify it


 * I agree that's a good idea. Here's some easy tips for you: your pages aren't linked and your sources list don't have *s in front of them. I could make over 50 articles in one week if I had a good resource book and wanted to. Right now I'm making articles from The Essential Guide to Alien Species but they're not very long or anything so they're not that good. If it was that easy to become WOTM, everyone would have it. I mean, there's over 24,000 articles here. After a while, you'll get it eventually, but until then, just edit this wiki regularly until someone nominates you. -- Cato Neimoidia 02:31, 10 February 2006 (UTC)