Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/The Clone Wars: Shakedown


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

The Clone Wars: Shakedown

 * Nominated by: Kilson Likes PIE 04:53, 04 August 09 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Keeping the OOU party going. There are now two other great users who have written OOUs, and I hope many more will come. I'm now considering making an OOU project.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Watch the spelling mistakes though. I corrected around 5. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 12:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 01:11, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer 02:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 4)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  00:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) From the Council Chambers:
 * 2) * The referencing can be more specific, since we can now link to individual pages of the comic. Please update the references accordingly.
 * 3) **Just to clarify, the same goes here as on Cold Snap above. Make sure each item is referenced to the correct page number rather than just adding one page number to the existing ref. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 04:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) *Otherwise, looks good after a short copyedit. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 02:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) **Adressed.  Mauser  Comlink 23:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)
 * 1) Nominator has recently been blocked from editing for a significantly extended period of time. The article can be re-nominated if and when the nominator returns. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:23, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *I'd like to take over this one. It follows an established format, so it should be an easy one to follow.  Mauser  Comlink 22:21, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) **Well, now he is banned permanently. Damn it! We lost our leading Clone Wars OOU-maker. Well, what about the article now?--Kreivi Wolter 20:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) ***If Mauser wants it, he can have it.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 14:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)