Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights

This page is for requests for user rights.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Requests for rollback
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian. (Please ensure they accept the nomination first.)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * 4) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * 5) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * 6) At least ten eligible Wookieepedians must contribute a vote.

Questions

 * 1) Why should you be granted rollback rights?

Requests for adminship
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian. (Please ensure they accept the nomination first.)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have one and a half years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * 4) They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * 5) They have had some form of major wiki contribution.
 * 6) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 7) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 8) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
 * 9) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * 10) At least ten eligible Wookieepedians must contribute a vote, three of which must be administrators.
 * 11) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

Questions
Here are some general adminship questions. They are 100% optional, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them.

AnilSerifoglu (7 admins + 8 users/0/0)
Two-week deadline from first request. Voting ends October 13, 2019.

Support

 * 1) For the consideration of the Wookieepedia community, I nominate the good name of AnilSerifoglu to be our next administrator. One thing I've always said about Anil is that, no matter what it is on Wookieepedia, he wants to help. With an eager attitude and a willingness and openness to learn new things, Anil has sort of become our jack-of-all-trades, and certainly a master of one. Having joined Wookieepedia in 2015, Anil has established himself as one of our leading Canon editors. He was crowned Wookieepedian of the Month for April 2018, and since then has been named to each of the EduCorps, AgriCorps, and Inquisitorius review boards, where he consistently does excellent and reliable work. As a frequent patroller of the Recent changes and a constant presence on our IRC channel, Anil was granted Rollback privileges in December 2018. But perhaps most significant of all, Anil has effectively become Wookieepedia's social media manager. As a member of our Social Media Team, he has since taken over leading posting responsibilities of all three of our official social media accounts on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, and does an absolutely phenomenal job. This is a critical and invaluable role Anil fills to an extent no one else on Wookieepedia has before. As he represents our brand name to the rest of the world outside the wiki, it wouldn't be a stretch to say he is our chief ambassador. To put all of this into summary, Anil has simply achieved every position he possibly could have on Wookieepedia up to this point, except for one, and I don't think anyone else has done more to be deserving of this nomination at this time. Congratulations, Anil. You've done well and should be very proud of yourself. Wookieepedia thanks you for all of your hard work. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:35, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 2)  IFYLOFD  ( Talk ) 18:35, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 3) Nothing I need to add here. Anil is an outstanding user and will make an excellent administrator. 1358  (Talk)  18:38, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 4) Congrats Anil, well deserved! --Lewisr (talk) 18:40, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 5) An absolute joy to work with. I look forward to seeing where you go from here mate! Tommy  Imperial_Emblem.svg  Macaroni  18:42, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 6) Good to have you around, Anil.  Imperators II (Talk) 18:44, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 7) Been wondering how long it would be before Anil was nominated. :P Not much else to say. Anil's very friendly, a hard worker, and one of the most active reviewers on the nomination pages. An excellent choice for admin, happy to vote for him!  Fan26  ( Talk ) 18:46, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 8) Well earned! Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:48, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 9) Anil's an excellent choice for admin! :D 18:56, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 10) Per all of the above. Congrats! - Cwedin (talk) 19:04, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 11) Absolutely deserving. -  AV-6R7  Crew Pit 19:10, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 12) Congrats Anil, Welcome to the team--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 19:34, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 13) Echoing everyone else! Infinitely kind, helpful and knowledgeable user and I know Wookieepedia will be better now that he's got a few more tools to work with :) Toqgers (talk) 22:42, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 14) Very much deserved!! Congratulations Anil, great work on the site and on social media!-- Vitus Infinitus  Talk 22:47, September 29, 2019 (UTC)
 * 15) Absolutely one of my favorite people to work with on the Wook. He's even helped me with real-world projects helping my team and I get ready for the opening of Galaxy's Edge. A stellar person and an invaluable asset to the wiki. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 00:04, September 30, 2019 (UTC)
 * 16) Definitely, nice work. Zed42 (talk) 00:24, September 30, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

 * Nomination accepted via IRC. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 18:35, September 29, 2019 (UTC)

Requests for bureaucratship
Rules:
 * Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (Please ensure they accept the nomination first.)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.


 * 1) They are an administrator.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * 3) They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 6) Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month&mdash;from the day the nomination is put forth&mdash;are counted).
 * 7) Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 8) At least ten eligible Wookieepedians must contribute a vote, five of which must be administrators.
 * 9) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.