Wookieepedia:Good article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of good articles. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Category:Wookieepedia good articles.

A Good article is an article that adheres to quality standards, but cannot reach FA status due to its limited content.


 * Good article nominations history
 * Good article checklist
 * Good article nomination rules

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This is essential in articles over 1000 words but may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
 * 8) &hellip;have no more than 3 redlinks for articles less than 500 words, no more than 5 redlinks for articles 500 words or more, and no redlinks in the introduction, infobox, or any templates.
 * 9) &hellip;have significant information, especially a biography for character articles. For articles under 1000 words in length, comprehensive detail is required with all information covered from all sources and appearances. For articles over 1000 words, broad coverage addressing all major aspects of the topic is sufficient.
 * 10) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 11) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 12) &hellip;provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
 * 13) &hellip;ideally include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
 * 14) &hellip;ideally include a "powers and abilities" section on relevant character articles, especially for Force-sensitive characters where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
 * 15) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section.
 * 16) &hellip;include a reasonable number of images of sufficient quality to illustrate the article, if said images are available.
 * 17) &hellip;counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a comprehensive article cannot exceed 3000 words.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of good status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add GAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 5) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) Once an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members&mdash;one of which must be an AgriCorps vote&mdash;after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the template. The talk page will also be tagged with the GA template.
 * 6) The article is placed on the Good article list.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 3 weeks.

Good article nominations
To nominate an article for Good article status, list it here. Nominated articles must meet all seventeen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members&mdash;one of which must be an AgriCorps vote&mdash;after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the template. The talk page will also be tagged with the GA template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations please see here. Also remember to add GAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.

Zelka Forn

 * Nominated by: -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  15:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Doctor? Doctor Who?

(1 ACs/5 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 03:46, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Seems mostly fine now. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 08:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 17:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Good job.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 14:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 10:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) LordDeathRay  (My Sith Holocron)

Object
 * 1) From the Council Chambers:
 * 2) * "After the destruction of the Galactic Republic, the main galactic government of the time, warship Endar Spire, individuals brought in several Republic soldiers who had been seriously wounded in the battle." Huh? Either something's missing or there's extraneous words here, because this doesn't make sense.
 * 3) * "Rakghoul this, rakghoul that": Rakghoul is inconsistently capitalized. Most notably, the term "[R]akghoul serum" is used at least once each way. I seem to possibly remember that Rakghoul should be capitalized, but I'm not sure if that is true or if my crazy brain is making stuff up. Which is correct?
 * 4) *I did a copyedit for you. Remember that the Ref template is only used in the infobox&mdash;you had it in the body, too, which I fixed. Otherwise, it's well-written and easily understandable for someone totally unfamiliar with that era. Good job. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 04:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) **Alright, done. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  19:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) Soresu
 * 7) * Benevolent is POV. Please remove.
 * 8) * Linking. Make sure everything is linked once in the intro and the body.
 * 9) * You begin too many sentences with Forn. Try using "he" instead.
 * 10) * Try not to use "grieved" twice.
 * 11) * After the destruction of the warship Endar Spire. Why and by whom was the Spire destroyed? Also, you haven't established where this event happened.
 * 12) * Despite the Sith government, the government that followed the Sith ideology, having an occupation of Taris, which could have seen him arrested and possibly shot, Forn agreed to heal the soldiers. He put a few of the soldiers in kolto tanks, healing medical tanks, in a back room of his facility. this doesn't flow very well. May I suggest something like Despite the fact that Taris was occupied by the Sith, which could have seen him arrested and possibly shot, Forn agreed to heal the soldiers, putting them in kolto tanks in a back room of his facility.
 * 13) * In the intro, you say that Revan killed a patrol to obtain the serum, but in the body, you say he found a corpse. Which is correct?
 * 14) * How did Revan discover the soldiers if they were in a back room? IIRC, he convinced Forn to show him the soldiers. you should probably add that some of them had already died.
 * 15) * Bts expansion. You need to add info about his appearance in KotOR as an NPC, his entry in the CSWE, whether it is possible to finish the game without doing the quest, and how he reacts if you give the serum to someone else.
 * 16) * The bts is too trivia-ish at the moment.
 * 17) * Is it actually essential to the plot that you meet Zelka? Can you actually finish the game without going into the medical facility? If so, then it would be unconfirmed as to whether Revan met him, and an extra bts note would be required. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:59, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 18) **Fixed, although no, Revan looked in the back room. I don't recall any sort of way for Zelka to agree to show him. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  16:47, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) Soresu's second look
 * 20) * There are some previous objections you haven't taken care of. In future, put a message after each objection, to alert the objector to the fact that they are all done, and so that if there are any issues, they can continue the discussion. In this case, to keep it organised, I'll strike all the old ones and reiterate any that are still not addressed.
 * 21) * You begin too many sentences with Forn. Try using "he" instead.
 * 22) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  16:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 23) * How did Revan discover the soldiers if they were in a back room? IIRC, he convinced Forn to show him the soldiers. you should probably add that some of them had already died.
 * 24) **I don't recall any sort of way for Zelka to agree to show him.
 * 25) ***I'm pretty sure that you can persuade Forn into believing that you are a friend of the Republic. He then opens the door. The other way is to bash through the door of course. Instead of just saying he discovered them, you need to elaborate on how. One of these outcomes will have to be expanded upon in the body, while the other will have to go to the bts.
 * 26) ****Yep. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  16:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 27) * After Revan discovers the soldiers, he and Forn have a short converstion, the details of which should be added into the article.
 * 28) * Bts expansion. You need to add info about his appearance in KotOR as an NPC, his entry in the CSWE, whether it is possible to finish the game without doing the quest, and how he reacts if you give the serum to someone else.
 * 29) **You haven't added anything about the CSWE entry or his reaction of you give the serum to someone else.
 * 30) ***Okay. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  16:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 31) * Is it actually essential to the plot that you meet Zelka? Can you actually finish the game without going into the medical facility? If so, then it would be unconfirmed as to whether Revan met him, and an extra bts note would be required.
 * 32) **That was added in before hand; oddly, however, the article includes content however isn't showing anything beneath the first paragraph of the BtS. I'll talk to staff about that. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  16:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 33) * The bts is too trivia-ish at the moment.
 * 34) ** I didn't mean for you to delete that info, I was merely saying that it looked a bunch of facts in a list. The info should be restored and integrated into larger, more orgainsed paragraphs.
 * 35) ***Not deleted. Same problem. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  16:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 36) * This page currently is not categorised. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 23:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 37) **It is categorized, but the categories are in the section not showing. By the time you're reading this, they should be fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  16:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 38) *Hm. Odd. Seems fine now. Alright, done. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  16:38, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 39) **I'll vote as soon as an AC review comes in. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 08:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 40) Graestan the Merciless:
 * 41) * Last names after first mention, please.
 * 42) **What do you mean? -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 43) ***The first time you mention an individual, use their full name. From that point onwards, use their last name only. Using first names is seen as too informal for our encyclopedia. --Eyrezer 04:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 44) **Alright, solely referred to as "Forn" throughout. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  10:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 45) * I'm pretty sure things like "the South" when referring to the Upper City can be dismissed as game mechanics.
 * 46) **Addressed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 47) * "amnesiac Jedi Knight" doesn't quite cut it when referring to Revan. At the time, he was pretty much nothing in terms of being a Force user; I'd almost prefer that his Force sensitivity is left completely out.
 * 48) **Mhm. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 49) * "presumably killed" is speculation. Only say what is known.
 * 50) **Yep. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 51) * Taris has a "main city?" I thought Taris was a city.
 * 52) **Sorted. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 53) * Again, something like "no known family members" is out-of-universe and speculation.
 * 54) **Removed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 55) * Linking needs to be more thorough.
 * 56) **Hm. Could you point out generally where, please? -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 57) * Rakghoul disease needs context in the bio.
 * 58) **Done. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 59) * Second paragraph of the bio needs to be broken up; it's a mishmash of not-yet-converged storylines.
 * 60) **Yep. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 61) * How Shan was on Taris should be provided.
 * 62) **Provided. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 63) * "Which option Revan took was unknown, as neither results in a change of alignment. The nature of the conversation afterwards, unless Revan threatened Zelka, was such that it did not change the plot nor the character's alignment, therefore it's undetermined if Revan ever discovered the soldiers." – This is all pretty unnecessary. You can sum it up by stating that later sources which canonized the light-side path don't mention Forn or the medical facility.
 * 64) **Yep. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 65) * What exactly is meant by "one thousand and fifteen hundred credits?"
 * 66) **Whoops, addressed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  17:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 67) * Graestan ( Talk ) 17:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 68) Bumrushin' the Show with IFYLOFD:
 * 69) * City of Taris? Do you mean the planet?
 * 70) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 71) * Sith government? Was it really a government? Better wording could be used here.
 * 72) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 73) * Give more information on the rakghoul disease in the bio.
 * 74) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 75) * Give more info on Revan and the circumstances of his amnesia.
 * 76) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 77) * Quote for the P&T?
 * 78) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  10:25, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 79) * IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 00:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 80) Attack of the Clone
 * 81) * "In his standing and position as a doctor": redundant; choose one or the other.
 * 82) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 83) * "Forn would not refuse help to anyone, regardless of their homeworld, species, political affiliation, personality, or even if he hated them on a personal level": the last one stands out with the lack of a noun; please reword.
 * 84) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 85) * "medically help or assist": I reworded it to this, but "help" and "assist" are redundant, and "medically" also makes the wording awkward.
 * 86) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 87) * "and individuals brought in several Republic soldiers": unclear; what were the individuals' affiliation?
 * 88) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 89) * "even with the possibility of being arrested or even shot": unclear as to who he would be punished by, and the wording is a bit awkward as well.
 * 90) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 91) * Awkward wording that Forn was upset about the plague; try to word to something clearer.
 * 92) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 93) * "Revan arrived at Forn's facility and convinced him to show them the Republic soldiers, by declaring their loyalty to the Republic." Revan convinced Forn to show who the soldiers?
 * 94) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 95) * What information did Revan agree not to disclose?
 * 96) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 97) * "Although Forn was originally fearful that Revan would betray him, Revan proved him wrong." Sounds strange never mentioning this before; try to move it up. If it happens here, please make it clearer.
 * 98) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 99) * Why was Revan's alliance with the Republic a problem for Forn and/or his decision?
 * 100) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 101) ***Please check this again. Do you meant, "Allied with the Sith as he was, Revan was in favor of Forn’s choice."? Forn's choice was in favor of the Republic, and this wording makes it sound like Revan was allied with the Sith. Please clear this up.  CC7567  (talk) 07:39, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 102) * "Revan refused, however, believing Forn needed them more than he and his companions did." Please replace "them" with something more specific.
 * 103) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 104) * "even if they were an off-worlder, alien, or even if he hated them": same issue with the different elements not matching; please try to reword.
 * 105) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 106) * "Forn considered Revan's spirit very noble": builds too much off of each other using "spirit".
 * 107) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 108) * "for its work on making a Rakghoul serum before it was taken by the Sith": awkward wording.
 * 109) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 110) * "the light side choices are those chosen canonically": do you mean that "the light side choices are canonical"?
 * 111) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 112) * "Although canon dictates that the most light side choices would have to be taken": bit unclear; please check and/or clarify.
 * 113) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 114) * Are dark side points bad? It sounds like it from the use of "however"; please check.
 * 115) **Fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  07:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 116) * CC7567  (talk) 18:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 117) A little expansion on how Revan got Forn to show him the Republic soldiers would be appreciated. Wasn't there several dialogue options, or the option to bypass the door locks? -  Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 14:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 118) *Addressed in IRC. - Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 10:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 119) Toprawa:
 * 120) *Intro objections:
 * 121) **This needs better and more context. For example, when did he arrive? What year? Perhaps why is he arriving? Doesn't have to go into any great detail, but don't assume the average reader automatically knows what's going on: "When the former Sith Lord Revan, in service to the Galactic Republic after having his memory erased, arrived on Taris" Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 122) ***I rephrased this, simply because it seemed confusing. I didn't add the year however.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 12:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 123) Anyway, here's one thing I've got: "Despite an offer of a large deal of credits from the crime lord Davik Kang for the serum." However, in the body, it states that his assistant told Revan about Kang, rather than the crime lord actually ffering him credits.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 12:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * For obvious reasons, I'll withhold my vote until some feedback comes. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  15:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * You're not meant to vote for your own noms. We got rid of that in the GA system revamp. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 04:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

 * 1)  Only one unaddressed objection remaining, yes, but one that's been sitting here for over three weeks. This isn't getting a lot of activity, and unless there's something done soon, it needs to go.  CC7567  (talk) 02:35, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *My bad; miscounted the weeks. It's only been two, but I still think it needs to be addressed soon.  CC7567  (talk) 02:48, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) **Noticing Floyd's unaddressed objection, I'm going to have to reinstate my vote. With so many current GANs, the tolerance for inactivity is becoming lower.  CC7567  (talk) 04:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) *I apologize; I've only just noticed Floyd's outstanding objection. Unfortunately, I won't be able to address it until Sunday afternoon, as I won't even be on site until then. If you feel the need to remove the nom then I'm dissapointed but I understand. If you could, however, give me a little more time, seeing as I didn't realize, I'd appreciate it. :) -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  06:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Moradmin Bast
> JangFett  Talk 00:14, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Nominated by: <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * Nomination comments: Quite solid work, One of the few outside TCW articles I've rewritten :P

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 03:10, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Floyd:
 * 2) * "Moradmin Bast was an Imperial Army general, subordinate to High General Cassio Tagge, and the personal aide to Grand Moff Wilhuff Tarkin aboard the first Death Star, and served as chief manager in the Death Star." Split these sentences up.
 * 3) **Addressed
 * 4) *"Though soon after, Bast was killed when the Death Star exploded near Yavin 4, after Luke Skywalker's proton torpedo entered the Thermal exhaust port in the Death Star." The "Though soon after" is rather awkward.
 * 5) **Indeed, removed that statement.
 * 6) * " Seated to the left of his superior officer, Tagge, the group of command staff stationed in the Death Star discussed the Rebel Alliance, and their victory in obtaining the Death Star plans." Is it really relevant where he sat?
 * 7) **Not really :) Removed
 * 8) * " Motti and Tagge argued about the Imperial Senate's continuous support for the Alliance, though with the intervention of Tarkin, he announced to the assembled command staff the Emperor's dissolution of the Imperial Senate. " Reword. It makes it sound like Motti or Tagge announced the dissolution of the Senate, although it was Tarkin.
 * 9) **Removed that comma and added a period before "Though".
 * 10) * Be consistent on your capitalization of the "Force".
 * 11) **Addressed
 * 12) * "During the Battle of Yavin, Imperial military analysts, who had been studying the Rebels' initial attempt to enter the battle station's northern polar trench, brought to Bast's attention." Brought what to Bast's attention?
 * 13) **Addressed and removed that statement.
 * 14) * "Bast indicated that the small thermal exhaust port was a potential danger to everyone onboard the battlestation. " Tell why the exhaust port is a danger.
 * 15) **Addressed. I stated that it was a entrance to the main reactor; I could say why it was a "danger" in a different sentence, but I don't want to get off topic.
 * 16) * "Though, the engineers stationed on the Death Star experienced slight difficulties, delaying the destruction of Yavin 4." Merge this with the previous sentence.
 * 17) **Addressed
 * 18) * "after one of his fighters bumped his own fighter, " Reword.
 * 19) **haha, Thanks for addressing this objection. Fixed, hope that works
 * 20) * "as well as all the Death Star's commendations," I don't think commendations is appropriate here.
 * 21) **Reworded
 * 22) * Is content of the Legacy section really suitable for Legacy? It's really just "There was a guy who looked like him."
 * 23) **No, removed. The mentioning of the lookalike is in the bts.
 * 24) * Quote for P&T?
 * 25) **The only major quote he said in Episode IV was the "analyzed the attack sir". I don't want to repeat the quote because I used it two times. I moved one variation of that quote to the P&T from the Battle of Yavin section.
 * 26) * "many of whom were also assigned to the Death Star included:" Reword, although I would prefer you cut the part about the other Imperial officers with the same facial hair out entirely. It's not very relevant./s>
 * 27) **Addressed
 * 28) * "The lookalike officer in the Holiday Special has not yet been identified, and his connection with Bast, if any, has not been explained, but it is known that is not Bast, and that Bast died in the Battle of Yavin." Split this sentence up, and the one following it.
 * 29) **Addressed
 * 30) * Watch your linking. Articles are linked to once in the intro and once in the main body of the article.
 * 31) **Fixed
 * 32) * IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 33) Mauser:
 * 34) * One thing is obligatory for all movie noms: check all adaptations. In your case: the novel, the junior novel, the Marvel adaptation, the Dark Horse adaptation, the Manga adaptation, the photo comic, the radio drama, The Rise and Fall of Darth Vader and possibly some others. Simply adding them to the appearances list is not nearly enough: you must check all of them for any new info and inconsistencies.
 * 35) **I completely agree, though I need to check if he was in the novel. I don't quite remember if he was in the 1976 and the most recent adaptions, but I will check. Bast wasn't identified until CCG, he was known by a different name/designation before the CCG. Death Star referred to Bast as "lieutenant".
 * 36) ***Fixed sources and references. Expanded bts as well.
 * 37) ****What about the Dark Horse adaptation and the radio drama?
 * 38) *****He was in the Dark Horse but not in the radio drama. Addressed.
 * 39) * A movie character with lines such as Bast is ought to have more sources mentioning him. Cards from Star Wars Trading Card Game and Star Wars PocketModel TCG are the first ones that spring to mind, but I'm sure there are a lot more. Even the sources, that are already listed, you don't seem to use. Where's the info from the Insider article, Star Wars: The Complete Visual Dictionary, Star Wars Encyclopedia for that matter?
 * 40) **I'll be adding more sources and I'll check those visual dictionaries. Hopefully the newer sources say he is Bast.
 * 41) ***Same comment in the previous objection.
 * 42) *Keeping in mind that those two objections are pretty major and will require a lot of time to get the sources alone, I'd say this article's chances of getting GA'd in the near future are slim at best.  Mauser  Comlink 10:05, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 43) **With respect, Fett, you should have done that prior to moninating the article.  Mauser  Comlink 13:18, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 44) ***Though a article can change throughout the nomination.
 * 45) ****Will give a full review after the last two sources are checked.  Mauser  Comlink 10:59, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 46) Jinzler
 * 47) * The sources list is not in chronological order
 * 48) **I'm aware of that; I'll be adding new sources soon and reorder them.
 * 49) * I may be wrong, but wasn't Bast's rank known only to be "Chief" until the release of Death Star, which confirmed that he was a general? If so, this should be mentioned in the BTS section
 * 50) **CCG referred to him as Chief Bast. Death Star was only "lieutenant". But I'll check the novel just to make sure.
 * 51) * I know that Floyd has suggested that you remove the legacy section but if you keep it, it could do with some slight rephrasing: Two years after Bast's death, a man who served onboard the Imperial I-class Star Destroyer Devastator resembled Bast - this seems to give the impression that the man only resembled Bast while aboard the Star Destroyer. It would perhaps sound better if you changed it to "a man resembling Bast served onboard an Imperial I-class Star Destroyer. Also you could perhaps add a bit more context to this and mention the Blockade of Kashyyyk
 * 52) *My favourite Death Star officer --Jinzler 23:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 53) **I agree :)
 * 54) Mauser strikes back:
 * 55) * Sources needs to be sorted by the order of publishment.
 * 56) **Addressed
 * 57) * Why have succession box, if he's the only person to ever hold such position?
 * 58) *Addresed
 * 59) * Context for the Death Star in intro.
 * 60) **Adressed
 * 61) * In the intro you use the words Death Star too much. Replace some instances with "battlestation" or something.
 * 62) **Addressed
 * 63) * Intro could be expanded.
 * 64) **I dont think so. The intro explains his rank within the Death Star, which is partly revealed in the DS novel. Then sums up his role in A New Hope.
 * 65) * No "remains unknown" is allowed.
 * 66) **Addressed
 * 67) *" either assigned or personally selected" - speculation.
 * 68) **Addressed
 * 69) * "He seems to have functioned well" - speculation.
 * 70) **Addressed
 * 71) * You describe all events in the conference room, though not all of them are relevant to Bast himself. Please re-check.
 * 72) **Addressed
 * 73) * Find at least one more image for the article.
 * 74) **Addressed
 * 75) * The image of Bast and Vader is from the very deleted scene you talk about. Therefore, it is not Bast.
 * 76) **Addressed
 * 77) * You say that Skywalker led a squad into the trench. Read the squad article and reword accordingly.
 * 78) **Addressed
 * 79) ***I corrected it myself.
 * 80) *More to come.  Mauser  Comlink 15:59, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 81) Next round:
 * 82) *Infobox: you don't even say that he was a Human male. Same for the bio.
 * 83) **Actually, it was in the infobox but not in the bio. Added in the bio.
 * 84) ***Sorry, still can't see it in the bio.
 * 85) * "found a potential danger" - what exactly was the danger?
 * 86) **Addressed in the intro.
 * 87) ***The thing is, intro should be self-explanatory.
 * 88) **Expanded the meaning of it in the intro. But it is explained in his bio.
 * 89) * "Bast confronted Tarkin" - that wasn't a confrontation. Besides, you don't even say that he asked Tarkin to evacuate.
 * 90) **Reworded and expanded.
 * 91) * "Bast entered service in the Imperial Army and rose through the ranks" - what's the source for that?
 * 92) **Reworded, that section is sourced to the DS novel.
 * 93) * "Bast had no personal aspirations beyond serving the Empire, and was loyal to Tarkin and Tagge." - that belongs in P&T.
 * 94) **Addressed
 * 95) *Why did the Rebels run out of time?
 * 96) **Expanded
 * 97) ***Again, is that really relevant to Bast? Check the article TK-622 - it only mentions parts of the battle that were essential to his fate, no need to focus on Luke and vader instead of Bast.
 * 98) *Tarkin did not order Bast to fire the superlaser, of that I'm certain. The orders were to another officer.
 * 99) **I'm certain it was Bast and then Bast gave the order to the chief gunnery officer.
 * 100) ***I will double-check it soon.
 * 101) * The whole last paragraph of the bio with the description of the Battle of Yavin looks choppy. Check it again and leave only elements relevant to Bast himself.
 * 102) **Addressed and removed a section.
 * 103) * Expand P&T.
 * 104) **I merged that sentence in the bio in the P&T, though their is not too much information about him and I have listed what is seen in the DS novel and A New Hope.
 * 105) *In Holiday Special Bast's lines from the movie were re-dubbed, you should mention that.
 * 106) **Addressed
 * 107) ***Sorry, you misunderstood me. In the ANH deleted scene he and Vader had one dialogue, while in the Holiday Special it was replaced with a compeletely different one. It's explained in Star Wars: Behind the Magic.
 * 108) *  Mauser  Comlink 17:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 109) Chack Attack:
 * 110) * Your sources are out of order.
 * 111) **Addressed
 * 112) * I'm currently working on Motti, and there ended up being a lot more P&T info than I expected (little tidbits from numerous sources). Are you sure that you can't expand the P&T for Bast? Going along with this, are you sure those are all the sources? I realize his role is less than Motti's but still, I'd think there might be a few more sources than shown here.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 14:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 113) **P&T expanded. I found very little information about Bast from that source, and he did have a rivalry with Motti. I added that in the bio, and more in the P&T.
 * 114) * You may be missing sources. Use Jaymach's site, and check sources like Galaxy Guide 1 and other sourcebooks which deal with that time period.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 11:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 115) **I looked through various of old sourcebooks, and Galaxy Guide and they had Bast, however, they only referred to him as "Chief".  JangFett  Talk 20:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments > JangFett  Talk 00:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Appearances go above sources fyi. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 02:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Opps, must have missed that. Thanks for fixing that Trayus :) <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"

Jaccoba

 * Nominated by: Kilson Likes PIE 06:30, 30 July 09 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Goes along with my Tarkov nom.

(2 ACs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) After a copy-edit. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Looks good after a small copyedit. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 04:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  15:24, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4)  CC7567  (talk) 00:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 20:40, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Can you specify exactly where in the DVD Jaccoba's name origin was revealed?  CC7567  (talk) 00:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Objection time.
 * 3) * “…was a Wookiee boy” – I’d like to see this replaced with “was a young Wookiee male”, to make it more encyclopaedic when referring to the sexes like this.
 * 4) * Context on grantaloupe in the intro.
 * 5) * Same as first objection in first paragraph of biography.
 * 6) * Same as second objection but in first paragraph of biography.
 * 7) * More variation between the introduction and biography; I’m noticing several phrases repeated. No major changes needed, just a few variations of synonyms and the likes.
 * 8) * This isn’t so much an objection as a question; could the P&T be expanded a tad to include such things as what he wore, his relation with his father? I’ve not seen the sources in question.
 * 9) **Not really, I added something else to the end though.
 * 10) *That’s all for now. Otherwise, well done Kilson. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  20:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) **Your objections are addressed, thank you for the review. Kilson Likes PIE 01:57, 17 July 09 (UTC)
 * 12) Toprawa:
 * 13) *My objection here is identical to CC's. I think it would be best to specify in the appropriate reference note where Jaccoba is mentioned in the DVD set. The audio commentary, etc. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) * You're definitely missing information from The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia under the "Jaccoba" entry. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:17, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 15) **OK, your objections are addressed. Kilson Likes PIE 20:41, 27 July 09 (UTC)
 * 16) ***You have done nothing to satisfy my first objection. And to go along with this, the statement regarding how his name was revealed in Insider 90 to be fashioned after Tartakovsky's son is sourced to the DVD release, which makes no sense considering the statement. This should be cleaned up. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) ****I'm not sure if you saw my earlier Tarkov nom, but I was told by a friend the origin of Tarkov and Jaccoba's names in the DVD. However, I was unable to confirm it, and Mauser later told me that this was untrue. I was able to find and confirm the said info in Insider 90. Kilson Likes PIE 05:08, 05 August 09 (UTC)
 * 1) ****I'm not sure if you saw my earlier Tarkov nom, but I was told by a friend the origin of Tarkov and Jaccoba's names in the DVD. However, I was unable to confirm it, and Mauser later told me that this was untrue. I was able to find and confirm the said info in Insider 90. Kilson Likes PIE 05:08, 05 August 09 (UTC)

Comments
 * It's the same with Tarkov; I'm going to have to hold off voting until the CW DVD has been checked. Otherwise, the article won't be confirmed to have proper source coverage. If you need help doing this, let me know, but please try.  CC7567  (talk) 23:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Vote to strike Darth tom's objections (AC only)

 * 1) Objector has not checked them for a while, and they're starting to hold up the nomination.  CC7567  (talk) 21:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  Grunny  ( Talk ) 02:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Unidentified bounty hunter (Sacking of Coruscant)

 * Nominated by: -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  15:22, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: No quotes, so can't think of one. :/

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) All right, but I'd feel better if you added that data to the article. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 09:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 19:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Farl says: Excuse me but, how do you know this person is a bounty hunter? She might be a mercenary, a soldier, a thug, a bodyguard, a pilot... Probably I've just missed that reference in the video, could you humor me and pinpoint it? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:41, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *Good catch, but, as Cav pointed out to me, she's wearing the armor assigned to the bounty hunter class. :) -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  09:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Attack of the Clone
 * 4) *Please vary one of the uses of "as the Sith ".
 * 5) *Please vary "confronted".
 * 6) *Are you sure that the trailer is a source for the fact that she was wearing armor assigned to the bounty hunter class?  CC7567  (talk) 00:24, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments > JangFett  Talk 20:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Ah, missed that, cheers. -- Darth tom  <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  09:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * tag placed <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"

Remove nomination (AgriCorps vote only)

 * 1) The entire premise is speculation, and until there is more information on this individual to clear it up, this will not pass.  Graestan ( Talk ) 16:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) As far as I can see, the very title of this article is speculation/fanon. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Iridonian

 * Nominated by: -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  18:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I is for Iridonian...

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) From the Council Chambers:
 * 2) * BTS: "Previously the term "Iridonian" was used to refer to Zabraks, but the description of their culture." Confusing to the point that it barely makes any sense. Please reword.
 * 3) *"Iridorian" vs. "Iridonian": The article uses both spellings, and it appears that "Iridonian" is correct based on statements in the BTS and on the talk page. I've fixed a couple, but you should look through the article yourself and fix the rest.
 * 4) *&mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 21:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) **Both have since been removed, due to being factually incorrect, so those are addressed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  12:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) ***The first one was expanded on by Mauser and has been struck. The second one, however, is not fixed due to Mauser's reversion; your best bet would probably be to wait a little bit and see if Tranner gets a response from Mr. Chee before fixing it, though I do feel that Mauser is probably right below. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 04:22, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'm pretty sure it's spelled "Iridorian" (which you use throughout the article), since "Iridonian" is used to denote Zabraks from Iridonia. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 20:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * See the BTS and the related discussion on the article's talk page. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 21:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * My point still stands. "Iridorian" is still used throughout the article. Additionally, since "Iridonian" refers to a type of Zabrak, this article should include information on Iridonian Zabraks. For all we know, the being in the main image may be a Zabrak under that armor. Either way, something's just not right - and unfortunately, there's nothing that can be done short of asking Leland Chee about it. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 23:05, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies, gentlemen. I forgot to check the name prior to the article's nomination, despite my own doubt that it was "Iridonian". That's now fixed. -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg <span title="(Imperial Intelligence)" style="color:Black">(Imperial Intelligence)  12:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, you redirected "Iridonian" to Zabrak and changed this nomination to "Iridorian," but Mauser has reverted your changes. So until this issue of "Iridorian" vs. "Iridonian" is resolved, this won't pass. To help speed this up, I've left a post on the "Holocron continuity database questions" forum on StarWars.com, asking Mr. Chee about this issue. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 13:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * To me the case is simple. We have 2 variations of spelling: from KOTOR game and Camaign Guide and we were that LFL considered the one from the game to be a misspelling.  Mauser  Comlink 13:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * In the meantime, I've semi-protected it for a month (which will still let most people frequenting this page edit at will.) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Refresh my memory, but I think we don't ordinarily include the Eras template on sentient species articles. (If we did include it for this article, the "Old Republic" era icon would be the one to use.) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Remove nomination (AgriCorps vote only)

 * 1) Per Tranner's comments above, although I'm pretty certain it's "Iridorian." This is what BtSes are for.  Graestan ( Talk ) 16:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *I rewrote the Bts today to, hopefully, make it clearer what is occurring in this article. Does that help? --Eyrezer 12:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Underwater dweller

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 06:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: U is for underwater dweller. Conjecturally speaking, of course. ~ SavageBob 06:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

(2 ACs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 05:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Again, not much to say. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 10:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  CC7567  (talk) 01:29, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 20:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) --Eyrezer 23:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) IFYLOFD:
 * 2) * "Many members of the species inhabited the Underwater Kingdom, below the surface of Sunshine Lake on the Forest Moon of Endor. Most of these lived in large caves" Are the caves in the Underwater Kingdom? Clarify.
 * 3) * "Meanwhile, a bigger member of the species, Orcon, lived alone in his personal stronghold, a cave within an underwater mountain." This seems out of place at the end of the paragraph.
 * 4) * History section in general doesn't flow very well.
 * 5) * "He rescued them from drowning and dragged them into his people's underwater lair." Using the word "dragged" indicates that he brought them to the grotto against their will.
 * 6) *Nice work.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 18:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) **Thanks for your notes. I've tried to address everything you mentioned. What do you think? ~ SavageBob 00:17, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Looks good.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 05:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * If there's enough info, can the skirmish (or mission or whatever) in Orcon's lair get a stub or link?  CC7567  (talk) 01:29, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Good question. Maybe a "Skirmish in Orcon's stronghold" article would work. I'll see about it soon. ~ SavageBob 11:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Why's the sourcing done by page number? Also, since "Underwater Dweller" is a conjectural title I don't think it should be capitalized. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 10:41, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Good point on the caps; I'll fix it. I always source by page number; makes it easier for others to go back and check the work if they need to look something up. ~ SavageBob 11:03, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Are they actually called underwater dwellers in the comic? If so, the Nickname template should be used instead, although the capitalization would be the same. --Eyrezer 09:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No, they call the Ewoks "surface dwellers," and I think whoever created the article first used that to backform "underwater dweller." Which template would that be then? ~ SavageBob 22:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Stick with conjecture, seeing as it is created by us. --Eyrezer 04:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Broadside (clone)

 * Nominated by: --Clone Commander Lee 18:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My 2nd nom. Thanks to JangFett for the pre-perview

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support Object > JangFett  Talk 18:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC) > JangFett  Talk 23:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1)  CC7567  (talk) 22:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  JangFett  Talk 04:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Fett
 * 2) * Missing quote in the bio. And if you can, add a quote in the P&T
 * 3) **Adressed.
 * 4) ***And the bio?
 * 5) ****I didn't found one.
 * 6) *****What about his quote/the Squadron motto from Shadow of Malevolence?
 * 7) ******Already the head quote.
 * 8) * Add another image in the bio.
 * 9) **I'll ask JMAS.
 * 10) ***Added.
 * 11) * "Kamino" in the infobox is missing a reference
 * 12) **Adressed.
 * 13) * P&T-"He also was used to bet with his good friend Matchstick about the outcome of their missions." Where does it say that Matchstick was is good friend? If you cannot find anything to back it up, remove it.
 * 14) **Adressed.
 * 15) * P&T-"He was proud of his squadron and quoted the Squadron motto in front of his Jedi commanders." Less colloquial. What Squadron motto?
 * 16) **Adressed.
 * 17) ***Not addressed. What I mean is add his line from Shadow of Malevolence.
 * 18) ****Which line ?
 * 19) *****The motto is fine. But change Jedi Commanders to Skywalker, since he addressed Broadside.
 * 20) ******Fixed.
 * 21) * Lee, your missing sources in the sources section.
 * 22) **Which exact ?
 * 23) ***Check the episode guide, the TCG Clone Wars card pack, Visual guides.
 * 24) ****Fixed.
 * 25) * Rewrite the entire B&T. Make sure you link it properly and explain his roles in both Procedure and Shadow of Malevolence.
 * 26) **Adressed.
 * 27) ***Nevermind, I did it myself. Source "Broadside was voiced by Dee Bradley Baker, who voices all of the clone troopers in The Clone Wars television series." to the episode guide.
 * 28) ****Fixed.
 * 29) *More to come Lee. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) You need to merge the first two sentences to make them flow better. More coming, perhaps.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  01:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *Fixed.
 * 3) Your sources section is completely empty. Please, address this before you nominate an article.  Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 06:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) *Fixed.
 * 5) Fett's second look
 * 6) * "Skywalker ordered Broadside to "form up", as he was "drifting" out of formation. Broadside replied that it was due to the fact that the "bird needed a bit more work", at which Skywalker responded by saying that when he was done tuning them, the Separatist would not know what hit them." This sentence is quite confusing. For the "bird needed", does that mean his Y-wing? Context is needed then. I wouldn't say "Separatists" as a whole. Either "Grievous" or the "battle droids controlling the Malevolence ' s turbolasers" would work here.
 * 7) **Fixed.
 * 8) ***What is the "bird needs work"? Context needed
 * 9) ****Fixed.
 * 10) * "But due to the dense defense fire Tano convinced Skywalker to aboard the plan and destroy the starboard ion cannons." What dense defense fire? This sentence is more aimed at the viewers poi. Yes, there was a lot of fire which convinced her to tell Skywalker that they need a new plan. Rewrite this sentence, however, try not to make it Ahsoka's poi, since the main focus is Broadside. Mention that she advised Skywalker that they need a new plan; but straight to-the-point.
 * 11) **Fixed.
 * 12) *<span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) Mauser:
 * 2) * Need quote from bio. The one from Procedure should do.
 * 3) **Added.
 * 4) ***You're quoted it wrong, please re-check.
 * 5) ****Bad mistake. Corrected
 * 6) * Context on Fett clones.
 * 7) **Fixed.
 * 8) * Context on Twilight.
 * 9) **Can't see it.
 * 10) **Fixed.
 * 11) ***Fixed
 * 12) * "Encountering resistance..." - what sort of resistance? You make it sound like they were under fire.
 * 13) **Fixed.
 * 14) ***I meant that the term "resistance" is wrong here. "Protest" maybe.
 * 15) * It was Matchstick who talked to the clone trooper, not Broadsise.
 * 16) *Fixed.
 * 17) * "...clearance required to enter the hangar. Broadside and the rest of Shadow Squadron departed the facility..." - one sentence they enter the hangar, the next one they depart from the facility. Clarify.
 * 18) **Fixed.
 * 19) * "Plo Koon asked Skywalker if Shadow Squadron was able to carry out the assigned task." - how is this relevant to Broadside?
 * 20) **Removed.
 * 21) ***Still: is that bit of conversation really relevant?
 * 22) ****Yes, I think so.
 * 23) * "Upon entering the nebula" - which nebula?
 * 24) **Fixed.
 * 25) * Context for Neebray mantas.
 * 26) **Adressed.
 * 27) ***Can't see it.
 * 28) ****Adressed.
 * 29) * You say that the Malevolence fired it's ion cannon at the squadron after the mention of Matchstick's death, though the events are related.
 * 30) **Fixed.
 * 31) * Check if he has a TCSWE entry. Also check the Clone Wars Visual Guide.
 * 32) **Checked.
 * 33) * The whole article reads too much like a straight line of sentences, many of which begin with no apparent connection with the previous ones. Use words like "Later", "Soon", "Shortly after" more often.
 * 34) **Fixed.
 * 35) ***Only see a couple of instances. You need to check the flow of the prose for the entire article, because I will be coming after it anyway.
 * 36) ****Fixed.
 * 37) * Serious underlinking. You need to link to articles like Battle of the Kaliida Nebula, Starfighter combat, death and many others.
 * 38) **Fixed.
 * 39) ***No. Not by a long shot. You don't link to Kaliida Nebula, Battle of Ryndellia, Bantha formation etc. Check the entire article and link as many subjects as you can, especially relevant ones.
 * 40) ****Fixed.
 * 41) *Definitely more to come.  Mauser  Comlink 11:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 42) Mauser redux:
 * 43) * No source says he was born in 32 BBY.
 * 44) **Removed.
 * 45) * Context for Grievous. Both intro and the body.
 * 46) **Fixed.
 * 47) * Intro: what med center?
 * 48) **Fixed.
 * 49) * Context for Bormus Testing Facility. Both intro and the body.
 * 50) **Fixed.
 * 51) * You need to source 22 BBY with the Clone Wars novel.
 * 52) **Fixed.
 * 53) * Why was Skywalker hunting Malevolence? Also, context for the ship.
 * 54) **Fixed.
 * 55) * What was the Gran worker protesting against?
 * 56) **Fixed.
 * 57) * "Skywalker ordered Broadside to "form up" with his bomber..." - form now on and the to the end of the paragraph you're basically repeating the dialogue. Find a way to present it in a form more accessible to readers.
 * 58) **Fixed.
 * 59) ***Cut unnecessay info myself.
 * 60) * Context for Resolute? Yularen? Plo Koon?
 * 61) **Fixed.
 * 62) * Intelligence didn't report about the battle of Ryndellia, Yularen did!
 * 63) **Fixed.
 * 64) * "Because Ryndellia was near the Mid Rim planet of Naboo, Skywalker concluded that Grievous next attack aim was the Kaliida Shoals Medical Center" - can't make any sense out of it.
 * 65) **Background info.
 * 66) ***I mean how did he conclued the fact. Check the episode, there's a bit more info there.
 * 67) ****Fixed.
 * 68) * Okay, Skywalker concluded Grievous' next target. The next thing you know, they are already departing from Resolute. You're missing the connection between events.
 * 69) **Fixed.
 * 70) * "Shadow Squadron, along with Plo Koon" - uhm? At least mention that he was in his Delta-7B.
 * 71) **Fixed.
 * 72) * What's the conenction between the Balmorra Run and the Kaliida Nebula?
 * 73) **Fixed.
 * 74) * Context for Kaliida Nebula.
 * 75) **Fixed.
 * 76) * "During this..." - during this what?
 * 77) **Fixed.
 * 78) * "Matchstick's fighter was damaged..." - I though they were bombers.
 * 79) **Fixed.
 * 80) * "By this time, the medical center..." versus "Shortly after arriving at the Medical Center..." - so, is it capitalized or not?
 * 81) **Fixed.
 * 82) ***Still remains as it was.
 * 83) ****I don't really understand this objection.
 * 84) *****One sentence the words "Medical Center" are capitalized, the next one - they aren't. Choose one standard way.
 * 85) ******Fixed.
 * 86) *<S>Generally: you need a better description of the battle.
 * 87) **Adressed.
 * 88) ***Still need to expand. Refer to the episode itself or to Battle of Kaliida Nebula if needed.
 * 89) ****Expanded.
 * 90) * "Soon the battle droids, stationed in the Malevolence, fired..." - they fired themselves, Grievous didn't order them?
 * 91) **Fixed.
 * 92) * "the warship's starboard ion cannon" - okay, now we learn that that the warship had an ion cannon. You should give a better description of the Malevolence much earlier on.
 * 93) **Fixed.
 * 94) * You don't even mention that the ion cannon formed a ray and that the squadron tried to evade it.
 * 95) **Fixed.
 * 96) * "In battle, Matchstick's Y-wing engines failed" - it wasn't in battle, it was when they were evading the ray.
 * 97) **Fixed.
 * 98) * "Even after this, Shadow Squadron continued their" - makes little sense, you didn't mention earlier that a full squadron was required for the mission.
 * 99) **Fixed.
 * 100) * "Malevolence droid gunner's fire" - it was just one droid gunner then, right?
 * 101) **Fixed.
 * 102) * "abort the plan and destroy the starboard ion cannons" - and what would they accomplish by that?
 * 103) **Fixed.
 * 104) * By the way, you do not say that the whole objective of the attack was to kill Grievous on the bridge.
 * 105) **Fixed.
 * 106) * "Shadow Squadron managed to destroy the cannons, using their Y-wing's proton torpedoes." - no, they damaged it and it blown up when fired.
 * 107) **Fixed.
 * 108) * "After saving 60,000 clones in the medcenter" - saving from what? You don't even say the station was under attack.
 * 109) **Fixed.
 * 110) *<S>Maybe you should say that the attack on the Malevolence continued, after all?
 * 111) **Fixed.
 * 112) ***Can't see it.
 * 113) ****Added.
 * 114) *****No, it is not.
 * 115) ******Finnaly added.
 * 116) *******Where? I still can't see it!
 * 117) ********In the midle of the Battle section Shadow Squadron continued their assault.
 * 118) **********Ah, there's the problem - we misunderstood each other. You should say that after the Squadron crippled the Malevolence, the Venators continued the pursue of the ship.  Mauser  Comlink  14:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 119) ***********Fixed. --Clone Commander Lee 15:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 120) * "answering on the question of destroying the Malevolence with yes." - very sloppy, reword.
 * 121) **Fixed.
 * 122) *"He was also would face superior officers when his commanders ordered him." - what makes you think that trooper was superior to him?
 * 123) **It was a commander. He had yellow markings.
 * 124) ***Not all commanders have yellow markings. Not all clones with yellow markings are commanders.
 * 125) *<S>P&T requires general expansion.
 * 126) **No more info.
 * 127) ***Yes, there is, you just need to come up with better wording for it.
 * 128) ****Well, it still works not good.
 * 129) * Expand BTS with information about the webcomic.
 * 130) **Which exact ?
 * 131) ***Who worked on it? Who illustrated Broadside? When was it published and where? All general info.
 * 132) ****Added.
 * 133) * More links! The Clone Wars: Procedure and The Clone Wars (web comics) should be linked in the BTS, the body also still requires more links.
 * 134) **Adressed.
 * 135) ***No more links except for those two examples. You need consictent linking, please double-check the entire article.
 * 136) ****Fixed.
 * 137) * Mauser  Comlink 09:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 138) **Should have catched them all. Thanks for the review Mauser. --Clone Commander Lee 11:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 139) Mauser strikes back.
 * 140) *" answering the question of destroying the Malevolence" - what's that supposed to mean?
 * 141) **Fixed.
 * 142) * Both the intro and the bio should say that Broadside was a nickname.
 * 143) **Fixed.
 * 144) * Context for Kaliida Shoals Medical Center in the intro.
 * 145) **Fixed.
 * 146) * "Even after this, Shadow Squadron continued the assault on the the command bridge of the warship. But due to the dense defense from the Malevolence's laser turrets, Tano advised Skywalker to abort the plan and destroy the starboard ion cannons instead in order to save the med center which was still under attack." - split the sentence.
 * 147) **Fixed.
 * 148) * Serious grammar and spelling issues. You need someone to give you a full copy-edit.
 * 149) **I'll ask someone.
 * 150) ***If I may butt in, Lee you should ask a AC member for a review sometime. Seeing that you have a couple of other noms, you should take care of this.  JangFett  Talk 19:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 151) Fett III
 * 152) * Add sections to the bio.
 * 153) **How can i do this ?
 * 154) ***Like this: ===Section=== Make sure you separate them evenly and give a specific name that is related to the proceeding paragraphs within the section. Such as Battle of Kaliida Nebula, ect.
 * 155) ****Added.
 * 156) * "...which was situated in the run" Context on "run", do you mean Balmorra Run?
 * 157) **Fixed.
 * 158) * I'm seeing a repetition of "medcenter". Try and vary your use of "medcenter".
 * 159) **Adressed.
 * 160) * "During the run, Matchstick's bomber was damaged by one of the mantas." How is this relevant to Broadside?
 * 161) **See above.
 * 162) * "Also, as the Squadron was evading the ray, Matchstick's Y-wing's engines failed and caused his fighter to collide with fellow pilot Tag's fighter, killing both pilots and their gunners." Again, this is not relevant to Broadside, but you can mention this but remove unnecessary details and mention his fighter was destroyed, but straight to-the-point.
 * 163) **See above.
 * 164) * A lot of details from the battle are irrelevant to Broadside. Try and remove minor details that aren't related to him.
 * 165) **See above
 * 166) *Lee, you're missing a sources section. Check the online guide, TCG Clone Wars cards, visual guides.
 * 167) **Sourced
 * 168) ***Lee, did you check the visual guide and Star Wars PocketModel TCG: Clone Wars? Their is a template for the TCG Clone Wars if Broadside has a card.
 * 169) ****He has no card.
 * 170) *****Then why would you put the TCG link in the sources section? Make sure you check before you add sources Lee. Did you check the visual guide?
 * 171) ******Checked and removed.
 * 172) * JangFett  Talk 19:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 173) **Checked.
 * 174) **Well Jang, Mauser advised me to expand the battle. So I did it. If you want to clear this, contact him. --Clone Commander Lee 10:49, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 175) ***I respect Mauser, but adding a lot of unnecessary details to the battle will get to play by play and would be centered around the fighters' poi instead of Broadside. I suggest that you remove any irrelevant details from the battle that aren't related to Broadside. For now, I'll strike my objections out. JangFett  Talk 15:42, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 176) Here we go again:
 * 177) * Context for Malevolence in the intro.
 * 178) **Added.
 * 179) * Intro: mention that Grievous was a Supreme Commander of the Droid Armies.
 * 180) **Adressed.
 * 181) * Intro: "one of the most important" - POV?
 * 182) **Fixed.
 * 183) * "Skywalker then led the squadron into the space station to recuperate" - recuperate? They weren't sick as far as I know.
 * 184) **Fixed.
 * 185) * "Grievous ordered to fire the Malevolence's turbolasers at the departing frigates" - what frigates?
 * 186) **Fixed.
 * 187) * "After saving 60,000 clones in the medcenter," - I thought half of them were evacuated?
 * 188) **Fixed.
 * 189) * Once again: the P&T needs expansion.
 * 190) **Expanded.
 * 191) *" the online comic to Shadow of Malevolence" - what's that supposed to mean?
 * 192) **Fixed.
 * 193) * Any info concerning him in the Visual Guide?
 * 194) **Not more as alredy in the article.
 * 195) * Mauser  Comlink 17:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 196) **Got them.Thanks for the third? review Mauser. --Clone Commander Lee 18:10, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 197) ***Axtually, it was the fourth one by my count. Be aware, there's still a couple of objections left from the second one.  Mauser  Comlink 18:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 198) Attack of the Clone
 * 199) * Before I start my copyedit, there is way too much subsectioning in the article and not a good balance between paragraphs. Please standardize your paragraph length and balance out the images a lot better.  CC7567  (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 200) **Fixed.
 * 201) ***Lee, "standardizing paragraph length" means making all the paragraphs more or less the same size, not mashing them all together as you did. It currently looks like an unappealing wall of text.  CC7567  (talk) 21:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 202) ****Now better ? --Clone Commander Lee 11:27, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 203) Fett IV
 * 204) *"After saving 60,000 clones in the medcenter, Skywalker and the squadron landed inside the medical center for regroup" Are you sure they saved all clones?
 * 205) **Why not ?
 * 206) ***If it is a speculation, make sure you source it, otherwise remove.
 * 207) ****Adressed.
 * 208) *****Double check. You can read other articles such as Nala Se or the Battle of the Kaliida Nebula if you still having issues with rewording this.
 * 209) ******Checked.
 * 210) * The article is too subsectioned. Consider merging two of the sections.
 * 211) **Merged
 * 212) ***"Early Life" is too small to have its own section.
 * 213) ****Merged.
 * 214) * "Tano advised Skywalker to abort the plan and destroy the starboard ion cannons instead" No she did not. Ahsoka wanted Skywalker to reconsider his plan, and Plo advised that they should take out their ion cannon.
 * 215) **Fixed.
 * 216) ***Still remains
 * 217) ****Fixed.
 * 218) * "The ion cannons namely were about to destroy the Med Center which was still under attack." The ion cannon doesn't destroy targets, it eradicates their electrical energy.
 * 219) **Fixed.
 * 220) ***Still remains
 * 221) ****Fixed.
 * 222) * "Shadow Squadron managed to damage the cannons, using their Y-wing's proton torpedoes, and the cannons exploded when fired." ...What about the hyperdrive? When Shadow Squadron bombed the side of the ion cannon, it did not explode then. Grievous ordered the ion cannon to be fired, though due to the amount of damage, it overloaded and exploded. That caused the hyperdrive to fail as well.
 * 223) **Fixed.
 * 224) ***Still remains
 * 225) ****Fixed.
 * 226) * JangFett  Talk 18:24, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 227) **Got them. Thanks for the review Jang. --Clone Commander Lee 18:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 228) More for now
 * 229) * "After the briefing, Jedi Master Plo Koon, who had discovered the Malevolence, asked Skywalker if Shadow Squadron was able to carry out the assigned task." How did Plo discover the Malevolence?
 * 230) **Fixed.
 * 231) * " During the run, Matchstick's bomber was damaged by one of the mantas." How is this relevant to Broadside?
 * 232) **Background info.
 * 233) ***Very Play by Play though Lee. I would remove this sentence because its not very important to Broadside's character. But I'll leave that up to you.
 * 234) * "Shadow Squadron arrived at the medcenter shortly before the Malevolence came out of hyperspace and approached the station" This needs clarifying. Who approached the station?
 * 235) **Adressed.
 * 236) * "Shortly after arriving at the Medical Center, Grievous ordered to fire the Malevolence ' s turbolasers at the departing frigates, that were evacuating clones." Grievous ordered whom? "ordered" here will not work, unless you state who he ordered.
 * 237) **Adressed.
 * 238) * "The ion ray approached Skywalker's fighter and he" This is more toward Skywalker's poi. Reword to make it a general poi.
 * 239) **Fixed.
 * 240) * " The ion cannons namely were about to eradicate the energy of the Med Center, which was still under attack" Sort of confusing to what was under attack. The ion cannon or the medcenter. Clarify.
 * 241) **Fixed.
 * 242) * JangFett  Talk 23:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 243) **Got them all and the from your previous previews. Thanks. --Clone Commander Lee 11:22, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 244) CC
 * 245) * Please reword the first sentence of the Bio; it doesn't flow well.
 * 246) **Reworded.
 * 247) ***I'm not seeing any change.  CC7567  (talk) 07:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 248) ****Fixed. --Clone Commander Lee 07:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 249) *****I fixed it myself, but I suggest you take a look at my edit. I believe that I was being quite clear.  CC7567  (talk) 22:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 250) * The Resolute isn't named in the episode; please find the source that does.
 * 251) **Sourced.
 * 252) * Please include something about Matchstick and Broadside's conversation before they departed the fleet. It's relevant.
 * 253) **Added.
 * 254) ***Lee, please watch your verb tense. You added the sequence in present tense instead of past tense.  CC7567  (talk) 07:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 255) * What were the Neebray mantas? They weren't the inhabitants of the nebula, and Koon stated it himself what they were. Please check the episode; I've removed your incorrect context for now.
 * 256) **Fixed.
 * 257) * Why is the Visual Guide under the sources? Broadside isn't explicitly mentioned there.
 * 258) **Removed.
 * 259) *There was a lot of inconsistent linking throughout the article, which I've now fixed, but please proofread more in the future. Articles are only linked once in the intro and once in the body, and please do not link to redirects. Furthermore, I've had to remove a lot of unverified information that was not attributable to the sources you provided. In the future, please make sure your information is legitimate before adding it to the article. I've changed the majority of the grammatical errors myself, as it would take an unnecessary amount of time for me to object to them and for you to fix them, but the only advice I can offer is to work on your English.  CC7567  (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 260) **Fixed. Thank yolu for your work CC. --Clone Commander Lee 06:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Lee, make sure you italicize ship names such as Malevolence.  JangFett  Talk 16:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Can you get a better picture for "early life and Bormus", preferably one that matches the text?  CC7567  (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Hawk (clone)

 * Nominated by:  CC7567  (talk) 08:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Looks like it's clone day for me.

(3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)
Support
 * 1) Gethralkin 04:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Nice work CC.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 00:18, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 21:44, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4)  JangFett  Talk 15:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  Graestan ( Talk ) 23:06, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 7)  Mauser  Comlink 07:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Mauser:
 * 2) * I am unsure about how you deducted Hawk's death at Teth. The scene was cut from the movie, so that variation remains only a deleted scene. The canonical variation appears in the novel, which does not say that Hawk was the pilot of the gunship, and it previously mentioned him a lot. The episode guide doesn't say that Hawk was the pilot of the gunship in the novel, it only says that Hawk was supposed to be the pilot from the film in a scene that was cut. It even says that the removing of the scene "may have ended up saving Hawk's life". All that, especially the note from the Episode Guide led me to believe that the pilot of the shot gunship in the novel was a pilot other than Hawk. Please double-check.
 * 3) **It sounds like you're basing your statement off of the "likelihood" that Hawk would have been identified in the novel as the pilot of the destroyed gunship. Just because he was mentioned extensively in the past and wasn't identified as the pilot of the destroyed gunship later does not mean that he wasn't the pilot. There is absolutely no reason that the film's "variation" is not canonical; it corresponds completely to the novel's version, and I can't note any major differences except for those in dialogue. Furthermore, from the episode guide: "Clone pilot Hawk was originally in the Clone Wars movie, called by Anakin for an extraction from the B'omarr monastery on Teth. That sequence was cut from the movie -- which may have ended up saving Hawk's life, because as it originally played out, that rescue gunship would have been shot down by a vulture droid." This is clearly referring to the scene of the Vulture droid shooting down the gunship, and it even says he was "called for an extraction" from the monastery, which is what the novel supplied. You're right that the episode guide does not confirm Hawk as the pilot of the gunship in the novel, but it indirectly does because the deleted scene corresponds to the one in the novel, which is how I drew my conclusion.  CC7567  (talk) 20:21, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) ***It was the note "may have ended up saving Hawk's life" that confused me most. But I accept your explanation unless some new info comes up. Will give a full review later.  Mauser  Comlink 20:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) ****That did catch me too, but I'm assuming that the episode guide is just joking or misinformed; the lack of a reference to the novelization supports the latter.  CC7567  (talk) 20:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) *****That's still speculation though. Cut content is cut content and is non-canon. Even though the deleted scene may be mostly the same as the one that made the novelization, extrapolating details from the cut scene borders on OR. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 23:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) ******I understand your reasoning, but the two scenes are identical, and it's common sense to draw the conclusion if they're like this. This is speculation, yes, but it's still referencing based on fact.  CC7567  (talk) 00:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) *******Based on deleted fact. Unless there's an official source that confirms that the scene in the novelization and the deleted scene are both canon, we can't just assume. I think it's likely that he died as well, but there's just not enough canonical information to make an assumption without OR. Other deleted scenes have been re-integrated into canon in slightly different ways (e.g., Tosche Station scene) so this could just as easily be one of them. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 02:02, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) ********I'm still finding that there are enough similarities between the two scenes to draw the conclusion, and until different reasoning is provided, this is the way it's staying.  CC7567  (talk) 06:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) ********* I made changes before I noticed it was nominated, but I see that the issue I was trying to address is the being discussed here. I corrected this problem some time ago based on the following precedents: Shaak Ti and Dash Rendar. Both characters had death scenes that were reverted to keep their characters for future use in the Expanded Universe. Shaak Ti was killed by Grievous in a cutscene from Episode III, and Dash Rendar was killed in a collision during the explosion of the Falleen's Fist in the novelization. Gethralkin 22:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) **********Gethralkin, this has already been settled, and it's already been changed in the article. I don't see what the point of continuing the discussion is.  CC7567  (talk) 22:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 12) ***********Having a slow computer day today. The changes weren't showing up on my end. Gethralkin 23:04, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) IFYLOFD:
 * 14) * "Lieutenant Hawk later served in the Battle of Teth, ferrying Skywalker, his Padawan, Ahsoka Tano, Clone Captain CC-7567, and a squad of troops to the surface of Teth. " Reword, since it sounds like Skywalker's Padawan and Ahsoka and separate entities.
 * 15) **Addressed.
 * 16) *In the intro: Context for Rotta the Huttlet and for why Anakin and Ahsoka were looking for him in the first place.
 * 17) **The context is "Huttlet", and I don't see why more context would be relevant or necessary to the intro.  CC7567  (talk) 21:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 18) ***No, it is not. That's only stating Rotta's species. And context is relevant as to tell why they were there in the first place.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 21:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) ****Sorry that I forgot to put something here, but I fixed this a while back.  CC7567  (talk) 22:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 20) *Nice work.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 21:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 21) Mauser redux:
 * 22) * Born on Kamino. Clone of Jango. Trained to be a pilot. - add that to the bio.
 * 23) **Addressed.
 * 24) * "CC-7567 and a squad of troops": not just squad - the Torrent Company. Both in intro and the bio.
 * 25) **I'm only adding "from Torrent Company". I'm rather doubtful that the whole company could fit in one cramped gunship.
 * 26) ***You have a point there.
 * 27) * No links in quotes are allowed, right?
 * 28) **Except when they're not linked elsewhere, and this is the case here.
 * 29) * Maybe Armor and Appearance could be merged into P&T?
 * 30) **I know both are rather scanty, but I don't believe that's a good enough reason for a merge. Both supply an accurate amount of info.
 * 31) * The Pocketmodels card of Hawk for some strange reason shows him in regular Phase I clone trooper armor instead of the pilot gear. Good BTS material.
 * 32) **Addressed.
 * 33) * Now, I really hate to say this, but: Star Wars: The Clone Wars (junior novelization), Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Battle at Teth Star Wars: The Clone Wars Official Movie Storybook and The Clone Wars: Decide Your Destiny: Tethan Battle Adventure all have to be checked for any appearances or indirect mentions of Hawk. I know this will take a while and I'm sorry, but that's what a movie nom means - even if it's the TCW movie.
 * 34) **I'm quite sure I've checked all except the Storybook and Tethan Battle Adventure; I'll get after them as soon as I can get to Borders this week.  CC7567  (talk) 23:46, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 35) ***Unfortunately, it appears these two titles are currently only available in the UK, whereas I'm in the US. I'll get back to you on this as soon as I can find someone who has access to them.  CC7567  (talk) 16:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 36) ****Okay, I've been informed that Hawk appears only in the movie storybook. I'd prefer to verify this myself, but it's going to take me a few weeks to get those two books, as they have to ship from the UK. It's up to you to decide whether that is sufficient.  CC7567  (talk) 23:15, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 37) * Mauser  Comlink 11:52, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 38) Gethralkin:
 * 39) * The term "EVAC" in the quote from the Hidden Enemy episode is an acronym for EV(acuation) AC(tion) and, therefore, should be spelled in uppercase letters: Hawk, we need an EVAC on the South tower.
 * 40) **The episode guide states it's lowercase, and you're going to need to provide an accurate source to override that.
 * 41) ***Good enough for me...unless the subtitles for the episode shows something different, I'm good.
 * 42) * Word repetition: "...kept Skywalker updated with comprehensive updates ..." Can a better phrasing be found? How about: "... apprised with comprehensive updates"
 * 43) **Addressed.  CC7567  (talk) 23:52, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 44) * More repetition: "...was an excellent pilot ,...using him as an exemplary pilot ..." Perhaps: "...excellent pilot ,...using his exemplary skills ..."
 * 45) ** That incorrectly changes the meaning of the sentence, and I don't see a suitable substitute.  CC7567  (talk) 00:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 46) *** I was taking into consideration that they were talking about planning, which the skills of piloting would be used and not the actual piloting at the time of planning, as the sentence suggests. Gethralkin 01:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 47) ****The way it is now means that he was being "used as an example of comparison". I understand your want for word variation, but I don't feel changing the meaning of the sentence will be helpful.  CC7567  (talk) 01:29, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 48) ***** I didn't understand it the way you describe it here. Perhaps this would clarify the meaning: "Hawk was an excellent pilot, and both Skywalker and Rex noted his abilities, using him as an archtype during planning an escape from the Teth monastery." Alternatives can be, standard, precedent. Gethralkin 01:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 49) ******I'm just going to remove it already.
 * 50) *******Fine, but I liked where you were headed with the thought, and I think "archtype" would have been a good word to use, but that's just me.
 * 51) * There seem to be an excess of links that are repeated in several places, where only the first instance of the link would suffice.
 * 52) ** Once in the intro, once in the bio. That's how it is, and it was decided at the September 8, 2008 Mofference.
 * 53) *** I was speaking more in reference to the main body. For example, "The clone trooper nicknamed Hawk was born on the planet of Kamino to serve in the Grand Army of the Republic.[1] Trained as a clone pilot, he was also a lieutenant in the Republic army and was well-noted for his piloting abilities. In 22 BBY,[2] Hawk was dispatched with a contingent of clone troopers to liberate the planet of Christophsis from the Confederacy of Independent Systems." (Can we have a little less blue, please?)
 * 54) ****The redundant linking is gone.  CC7567  (talk) 03:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 55) * Much of the biography is in the introduction. His missions can be relegated to the biography to keep the article simple and less redundant.
 * 56) **Really, now? That's the precedent for all articles. Since there's so little information, all of it goes in the intro. I see no reason to change it.
 * 57) * Including information from different character viewpoints is shifting the focus of the article away from Hawk: For example: "Although they sustained heavy casualties, Skywalker and Tano were able to rescue Rotta and return the Huttlet to his father." It would be more concise and to the point to state that Hawk was involved in the mission to help recover Rotta and that the outcome was a success. Any hardships concerning the mission would be more relevant if posed from his point of view.
 * 58) **Yes, it's not entirely relevant, but there's no reason to leave the reader hanging.  CC7567  (talk) 01:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 59) *** The irrelevant side-notes would do better in the main body than in the intro, which should be more to the point. Leaving the missions he was on is okay, but details are main body material. Gethralkin 04:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 60) ****Fine, addressed.  CC7567  (talk) 04:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 61) * A callsign is not a nickname.
 * 62) **Addressed.  CC7567  (talk) 03:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Don't worry, I made sure to confirm that it was under 1,000 words after I nominated it for FAN. 9_9  CC7567  (talk) 08:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Queel
> QuiGonJinn (Talk) 15:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nominated by: <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * Nomination comments: More TCW

(3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Mauser  Comlink 16:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 21:56, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4)  CC7567  (talk) 23:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  Graestan ( Talk ) 17:53, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 6)  JangFett  Talk 17:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) --Eyrezer 03:37, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Object > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 08:57, 22 July 2009 (UTC) > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 09:21, 22 July 2009 (UTC) > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 14:24, 22 July 2009 (UTC) > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 15:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) IFYLOFD:
 * 2) * Missing Aftermath section.
 * 3) **It is not really stated what happened on Queel after Skywalker and Tano left. After that point, the only mention of the battle comes at the very end of the comic. Skywalker and Tano contact Kenobi, who says the phrase used as the main quote in the article. However, Kenobi's words do not explain if he won, lost or was still fighting when Skywalker contacted him, so there can't be any aftermath section. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) * Mention in the intro that Anakin and Obi-Wan were Jedi.
 * 2) **Mentioned.
 * 3) * Is CC-7567's nickname really necessary?
 * 4) **I think so. IMO, it is unnecessary to state CC-2224's nickname, because he is mentioned only once. CC-7567, however, is mentioned several times in the article and I find it easier to call him Rex.
 * 5) * "Tano then hurtled one of the artillery shells at the remaining guns," I don't think hurtled is the appropriate word here. I would think just putting "Force pushed" would be better, but do as you see fit.
 * 6) **Addressed, I guess
 * 7) * Is there an article for the Separatist agent who stole the data file? If so link to it, and if not create one.
 * 8) **Linked.
 * 9) *Nice work.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 21:39, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) **Thanks. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) Mauser:
 * 2) * ?It's Acclamator, not Venator in the comic. =)
 * 3) **Whatever :P
 * 4) * Casualties: both light and heavy will not do. GAR lost at least one ISP with clones aboard, the CIS lost the artillery cannon and at least one DSD.
 * 5) **Addressed.
 * 6) * At least one more image is needed.
 * 7) **Added.
 * 8) * Add youmay to the Battle of Quell - i'm too lazy to do it myself today.
 * 9) **Added. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) * No mention of that green water creature - whatever it's name is.
 * 2) **Mentioned. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) *Otherwise looks very solid.  Mauser  Comlink 12:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Toprawa:
 * 3) *I'd prefer to see the body of the article split into "Prelude" and "Aftermath" sections, as short as they will probably be. I will leave it up to you to determine where best to divide the information. Also, don't be afraid to expand a little bit on the information in these before and after sections. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:44, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) **As for the aftermath section, there can't be any. See response to Floyd's objection. And the whole "Prelude" is basically only the first sentence, so I don't think that it deserves its own section. And no, it can't be expanded in any way, because of lack of information in the source. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 08:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Some fixes: This article is named through conjecture. If nowhere in canon is a conflict referred to by name, this will always be the case. I went ahead and put the conjecture tag up. I also removed the named reference to the battle from the article text. Finally, "the battle was a battle that" is pretty darned extraneous; let's see if we can avoid that sort of thing in the future. Graestan ( Talk ) 17:53, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Tactical droid 1 (Christophsis)

 * Nominated by: --Kreivi Wolter 19:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Have this article to GA as soon as possible. I will need time to execute the next part of my master's plan.

(1 ACs/4 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Mauser  Comlink 08:04, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 02:20, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4)  JangFett  Talk 03:35, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  CC7567  (talk) 03:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Object > JangFett  Talk 22:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) IFYLOFD:
 * 2) * Badly needs a copyedit for grammar and spelling. I've fixed a lot of it, but you should go over it for good measure.
 * 3) **There's the problem, I'm not a native speaker of English, and I'm not able to speak/write with that perfectly.--Kreivi Wolter 23:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Ah, I see.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 05:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) * Mention that he served in the Retail Caucus, since that's mentioned in the infobox but not anywhere in the article itself.
 * 6) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) * " He had leaked the information about the planned ambush to the Separatist's commander and Dark Acolyte Asajj Ventress, who then gave the message to General Whorm Loathsom, who proceeded it to the tactical droid." I don't think "proceeded" is the appropriate word here.
 * 8) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) * "The Jedi Master and his clones were pinned down, but Skywalker, who was in north tower, signaled a gunship for an evacuation, and then led his clone troopers to help Kenobi along the cables." Doesn't flow well, and what cables? Give context.
 * 10) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 10:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) * "The Republic forces were able to retreat, and took an elevator to the roof, where the gunship was landing. " What gunship? Clarify.
 * 12) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 10:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) * "While they were attacked by a squad of battle droids, the tactical droid, who had left his tank, led a second squad of battle droids to attack, in order to prevent the retreat of the Republic troops." Doesn't flow well.
 * 14) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 10:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 15) * I don't think CC-7567's and CC-2224's nicknames is really necessary.
 * 16) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) * "The head then scorched, and disabled permanently, defacing any changes of further analyses." I can't really make sense of "The head then scorched", and I don't believe defacing is the appropriate word.
 * 18) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 10:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) * Also, how did it disable? Was it damaged previously?
 * 20) ** Gee, I dont really know how to put that... Uuuh, would it be good if I tell that it just deactivated?--Kreivi Wolter 00:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 21) ***I guess.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 05:11, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 22) * "Later on in the Republic command center, the tactical droid's head was put to a robolobotomy, but it only confirmed that the Separatists had gained information about the positions of Republic ambush squad." Then how could they have found out there was a spy? Clarify.
 * 23) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 10:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 24) * "After a duel with Asajj Ventress, Skywalker and Kenobi discovered the full strength of the Separatists forces, as they had planned a full-scale invasion and conquest of the planet, and the tactical droid was replaced by another." Skywalker and Kenobi dueling Ventress and the tactical droid being replaced don't flow well together.
 * 25) **Roger roger
 * 26) * "He used his E-5 blaster rifle with comparable skill in battle, and managed to shoot at least one clone trooper during the firefight." I don't think "comparable" is the appropriate word here.
 * 27) **Roger roger.
 * 28) * IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 22:10, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 29) Fett
 * 30) * "They then asked the Jedi High Council for assistance" Whose they? The Confederacy asked the Jedi for assiastance? Also fragment.
 * 31) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 32) ***Could be somewhat better if "the Christophsians" is added as context for "&hellip;which inhabitants vainly tried to withstand the droid forces", but I'll leave that up to you :)
 * 33) ****Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 10:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 34) * "After landing, the Jedi planned to ambush the tactical droid's forces, while they were marching into Crystal City." This sentence doesn't flow right. I don't recall them marching into Crystal City.
 * 35) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 36) ***Quite confusing still. "After landing, the Jedi planned to ambush the tactical droid's forces, which were going to march under the towers" The Jedi planned to ambush the tactical droid's forces, which were going to march under the towers? Rephrase.
 * 37) ****Uuuh, I dont know where they were heading. Do you?--Kreivi Wolter 00:53, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 38) *****Replace the entire sentence with "After landing, the Jedi began an ambush on the towers", or something like that.
 * 39) ******Is it good now?--Kreivi Wolter 10:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 40) *******Much better :)
 * 41) *More to come <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) Mauser:
 * 2) * "Galactic Republic sent a GAR detachment, led by Jedi Generals Obi-Wan Kenobi and Anakin Skywalker" - sent where and why?
 * 3) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 14:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) * Tactical droid is not the product line, something like IG-series or YT-series is. Thus, I removed that from the infobox.
 * 5) **Roger roger. Thx.--Kreivi Wolter 14:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) * The biography quote's link leads to the same audiofile as the main quote.
 * 7) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 14:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) *** If you use audio files for some quotes, you should do the same for the other two. Either remove the audios for the first two quotes, or ask JMAS for the missing one. Never mid, I've been told that it's not a valid onjection.
 * 9) ****Well, I have already asked JMAS to load it.--Kreivi Wolter 21:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) ****Well, problem fixed by JMAS.--Kreivi Wolter 13:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) * "The Galactic Republic dispatched clone troopers..." - not just clone troopers, but 501st Legion and the Ghost Company.
 * 12) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 14:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) * There should be no revelations in battle articles. You should mention Slick's betrayal and the data's leaking before you say that the Jedi set up an ambush in the towers.
 * 14) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 21:50, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 15) * Split the biography section. The whole last paragraph is completely post-mortern for the droid and should be tagged as such.
 * 16) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 14:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) ***Rename it. Aftermath is for the events, Legacy is for Individuals (even droids).
 * 18) ****Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 19:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) * Actually, the last paragraph contains too much info irrelevant for the droid. Ventress' mission to capture Rotta shouldn't be mentioned at all, for example.
 * 20) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 19:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 21) * Check the video podcast for the Innocents of Ryloth for more info and better sourcing of the tactical droids' charactersitics and traits.
 * 22) **Could you please give me a direct link?--Kreivi Wolter 20:17, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 23) ***There.
 * 24) ****Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 25) * At least something else for the BTS?
 * 26) **Uuuh, the BTS? What's that?--Kreivi Wolter 14:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 27) ***Behind the Scenes. It requires minor expansion.
 * 28) ****Like what? What do you suggest?--Kreivi Wolter 23:31, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 29) *Roger roger.  Mauser  Comlink 13:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 30) Fett will look once more
 * 31) * In the Legacy section, after the robolobotomy information, is the rest relevant to the tactical droid?
 * 32) **Probably not. I shortened it.--Kreivi Wolter 00:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 33) * P&T-"Like all tactical droids, this droid was far more intelligent than standard battle droids, and was able to think independently." What standard battle droids?
 * 34) **Roger roger--Kreivi Wolter 00:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 35) * Like Mauser said, I believe you can expand the BtS and merge the "TACTICAL" sentence with the preceding paragraph.
 * 36) **I'll ask once more: how? You have any ideas? 'Cause I don't have.--Kreivi Wolter 00:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 37) **I merged it to one paragraph.--Kreivi Wolter 10:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 38) ***Looks good
 * 39) * JangFett  Talk 23:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 40) Possibly just one of many:
 * 41) * "Thats just doesn't make sense. Blast!" Probably supposed to be "that?" I'd fix it myself, but I'm not quite sure that's what it is.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:02, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 42) **Uuuuh, now that u mentioned, neither I am.--Kreivi Wolter 00:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 43) ***Well, problem fixed by JMAS.--Kreivi Wolter 13:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 44) Attack of the Clone
 * 45) * Please rename "Downfall and legacy". You're taking too much inspiration from character articles by saying he had a "legacy". Furthermore, please make sure the article conforms to the Manual of Style and Layout Guide before taking this any further.
 * 46) **I checked the links, and I didn't find anything which would surrogate the "Downfall and legacy". It was first Aftermath, but Mauser told that "Legacy is for Individuals (even droids)". Do you have a better idea?
 * 47) ***How about something related to the droid, with something to do with the robolobotomy?  CC7567  (talk) 20:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 48) ****Satisfied now?--Kreivi Wolter 23:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 49) * Since you yourself were the one who originally believed this, please vary "traitor". It's POV-oriented.
 * 50) **According to you, it wasn't last time when we debated about that, and the article is still containing the word. Well, adressed anyway.--Kreivi Wolter 14:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 51) * The episode did not give the slightest indication of a date. The "22 BBY" needs to be sourced to the TCW novel.
 * 52) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 14:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 53) * Are you absolutely sure that he was affiliated with the Retail Caucus? Yes, the Campaign Guide said as much, but you're still assuming that he was assigned to "help the Retail Caucus". Tactical droids weren't even mentioned anywhere in the Campaign Guide.
 * 54) **Maybe he wasn't a member of Retail Caucus, but he wass still allied with their droid forces.--Kreivi Wolter 14:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 55) ***Regardless of whether he was a member or not, my objection about the speculative wording still stands.  CC7567  (talk) 20:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 56) ****Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 57) * In the first paragraph of the Bio, there is too much irrelevant detail. All you need to say of the first campaigns of the battle was that the Confederacy invaded Christophsis and that Skywalker and Kenobi arrived on behalf of the Republic to liberate it. The details of the preliminaries and Slick's views are unnecessary.
 * 58) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 14:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 59) * You're missing a lot of definite articles, i.e. "the", "an", "a". I'd prefer if you improved your English this way.
 * 60) **Ah, yes, that problem. I would really appreciate help with that, as I'm not able to write perfect English. I'm trying to fix them, though.--Kreivi Wolter 23:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 61) * Source for the involvement of 501st Legion and Ghost Company in the battle? Nowhere are they mentioned in the episode or its guide.
 * 62) **Well, it was user Mauser who told about them. I dont know about the source, though...--Kreivi Wolter 14:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 63) ***If he didn't mention the source to you or if you can't clarify it yourself, then it's missourced information and should not be in the article. I can tell you myself that neither the episode nor its guide gave the slightest indication as to the clone units present. Only the film's novelization did, but that didn't cover the episode.  CC7567  (talk) 20:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 64) ****Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 65) * There is an unnecessary sense of chronology throughout the article with excessive uses of "then". Please remove them as much as possible.
 * 66) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 67) * Throughout the article you're putting names to the squads of battle droids, but in the episode, there isn't any indication of this. Please explain your reasoning as to how the droid led a "second squad" to the roof when you don't even name the "first".
 * 68) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 69) * "Before they could leave, however, they were followed by two squad of battle droids." With a new section and new paragraph, I have no idea who you're referring to. The droids? The Jedi? The clones? The Christophsians?
 * 70) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 14:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 71) * Please shorten the details after the droid's robolotomy. There's still an unnecessary emphasis by the amount of detail in there.
 * 72) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 73) * Everything after "which contained such information as his enemies traits and personalities" is a simple recounting of the droid's history, and in no way does it satisfy "Characteristics". Furthermore, you're going past the lines of inferencing and into speculation by saying he didn't "appear" to treat his troops disrespectfully "unlike other tactical droids". There isn't enough information for this to qualify as fact.
 * 74) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 14:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 75) ***"but he was also the only known tactical droid to be ready to leave his secure tank and attack in front of his troops, in order to accomplish the mission." You are still taking way too much inspiration from what are now our obsolete "Trivia" sections by comparing him against the rest of his line. Please remove this irrelevant information; don't compare him to other droids of the same model unless you have a source that explicitly defines your statements as fact. Furthermore, "and managed to shoot at least one clone trooper during the firefight between Republic and CIS." needs to be in the history, not in the "Characteristics".  CC7567  (talk) 20:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 76) ****Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 77) * The Campaign Guide and the Episode Commentary do not explicitly mention this tactical droid, and therefore need to be removed from "Sources".
 * 78) **I disagree. Episode commentary tells about the tactical droids in general, and the Gampaign Guide reveals that they were the battle droids of Retail Caucus. Well, maybe the latter is a matter of debate...--Kreivi Wolter 14:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 79) ***If the source does not specifically mention the article's subject in question, then it should not be listed. My objection about the Campaign Guide still stands.  CC7567  (talk) 20:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 80) ****Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 81) *Overall, there's a great deal of detail that's irrelevant and unnecessary to an article about the droid itself. Please go through the article again and either shorten or remove details that qualify. Furthermore, I am not your "master", however much you go and kid yourself that I am.  CC7567  (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 82) **Just messing around :)--Kreivi Wolter 23:49, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 83) ***Humor's only appreciated if it's taken the right way.  CC7567  (talk) 06:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 84) * "Unlike B1 battle droids, he wasn't identical with any other tactical droid, as all of them had unique personality, voice, and even skin color. He was very calculating, basing everything for percentages readings, which allowed him to know probabilities and chances of each situation he was contributed with." You are still speculating that this droid is based exactly like TX-20, which is who the episode commentary was mainly based upon, and it still sounds like you're trying to compare this droid to others of his line which is unnecessary to everywhere except in the droid model article itself. Saying that this droid had different paintwork than his brothers would be the equivalent of comparing thousands of clone troopers to each other: it's simply not necessary. The episode gave no indication that this specific tactical droid possessed these abilities, and it doesn't matter if that's supposedly what all tactical droids possessed. Unless it was directly confirmed, there should be no reason for these kind of assumptions.
 * 85) **So you suggest that I remove all the information of the episode commentary?--Kreivi Wolter 19:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 86) ***I'm suggesting that you only leave what is directly clarified. Please rewatch the commentary and keep only what Filoni confirms for all tactical droids, not TX-20, in the article.  CC7567  (talk) 22:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 87) ****Roger roger.--
 * 88) * "The Republic forces were able to hold their ground, but were forced to retreat as the battle droids gained an advantage." What advantage?
 * 89) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 19:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 90) ***"Advantage of battle" doesn't change anything. What, specifically, is the advantage? Higher ground? Larger numbers?  CC7567  (talk) 22:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 91) ****Roger roger.--
 * 92) * Please replace "waggled" with something less colloquial and more specific.
 * 93) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 19:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 94) * You need to get in that it was Cody and Rex who analyzed the tactical droid.  CC7567  (talk) 06:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 95) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 19:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 96) Toprawa:
 * 97) *Presenting this in the BTS is rather trivial. Considering it is canonical, this should be moved into the "Characteristics" section instead. I'll let you put it how you see fit: "The word "TACTICAL" is written along the side of the head of this droid in Aurebesh." Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 98) **Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 04:05, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments > JangFett  Talk 22:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Also, do not source the intro. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) *Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 23:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Gor

 * Nominated by: Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 08:46, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: First pet nom ever?

(2 ACs/5 Users/7 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Mauser  Comlink 18:27, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) --Kreivi Wolter 19:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) This thing is called like John Norman's works. Thanks for not mentioning it. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:14, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 23:06, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 03:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 7)  CC7567  (talk) 22:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) About Grievous
 * 2) * Grievous wasn't Supreme Commander, he was a Supreme Commander of the Droid Armies. There is a difference!
 * 3) **Fixed.
 * 4) * Grievous's and Gor's relation should be mentioned in Characteristics.
 * 5) **Now that it's biology and appearance, that information wouldn't really belong. Information that is largely difficult to write about in the first place, as it's never really concretely spoken of. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 18:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) *--Kreivi Wolter 10:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) Mauser:
 * 8) * I believe you've checked both the Visual Guide and Grievous Attacks for any unique info?
 * 9) **Yup. He's kind of a straight-forward guy.
 * 10) * IMO, Characteristics should really be Biology and Appearance.
 * 11) **Good call.
 * 12) *Not sure what esle to add.  Mauser  Comlink 13:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) **Thanks for the review. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 18:00, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) IFYLOFD:
 * 15) * Quote for biology and appearance?
 * 16) **Will that work? Haha, there's not many quotes for this fella.
 * 17) *And that's it. Well done.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 01:42, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 18) **Thank you. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 06:15, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) Just one: could you make the battle at the end a little less play-by-play?  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 20:32, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 20) *I would, but I've already had to cut down some of the pbp. The character's whole life story is based off of that single fight, so that makes it difficult not to be rather play by play. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 20:36, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 21) **Fair enough. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 21:51, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 22) I lied: one more thing :P. I think you should add a Behavoir section, per the LG for non- and semi-sentient species articles. This could possibly be merged with bio and appearance&mdash;such as "Biology and behavior", or "Behavior and appearance" (it's a new type of nom, don't be afraid to try something different)&mdash;or, if there is enough information, just give it a separate behavior section.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 21:51, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 23) *Does that work? There's really not much about his behavior other than "He was aggressive" so I added Grievous's reactions to Gor's death. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 22:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 24) Attack of the Clone
 * 25) * Is it "Roggwart" or "roggwart"? Both the episode guide and The Visual Guide claim the latter, and I'm not sure what we do for species capitalization (or if we even have anything on it).  CC7567  (talk) 03:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 26) **I noticed that too. As far as I've seen, all species are capitalized. I remember seeing somewhere that despite the fact that "Human" is commonly refered to with a lower case "h" in sources, Wookieepedia would capitalize the word. I'm using that same logic for now. If I'm crazy and the whole "human/Human" thing never happened, please, somebody correct me. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 04:49, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 27) ***There is a difference between sentient and non-sentient species. Not all species are capitalized. The trend seems to be that non-sentient species are not capitalized; see: Wampa. So, I have gone through and de-capitalized all mentions of the species. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 28) * "Confederacy of Independent Systems' cyborg Supreme Commander, General Grievous": that's a bit...excess context, wouldn't you say? Please try and shorten it.
 * 29) **Took out cyborg.
 * 30) * Please try and condense the details in the second paragraph of the Bio; yes, some context is needed for the setup of the battle, but this is rather a lot.
 * 31) **I have to disagree with you on that. That information explains why the Jedi were on Vassek, and by extension why Gor died. In addition, that paragraph only has three sentences not directly related to Gor himself, all of which provide necessary context.
 * 32) * If you're going to say that Dooku had to "reassess" Grievous's abilities, then you need to say why, but going with the previous objection, I'd recommend simply removing it.
 * 33) **Done.
 * 34) * Are you sure it was Gunray who went to the Vassek system and not the tracking beacon itself? I can't remember that being in the Decoded episode, which is what it's sourced to. To my knowledge, it's still unclear exactly how the beacon got to the moon.  CC7567  (talk) 04:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 35) **I'll reword this when I have more time. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 16:42, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 36) ***Good?
 * 37) ****I've reworded it a bit more; I still can't find any sources that said Gunray went to the Vassek system.  CC7567  (talk) 22:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 38) * Please vary "in order to". I would also recommend checking for redundant wording.  CC7567  (talk) 20:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 39) **Varied "in order to". Please pinpoint the redundancies for me. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 07:54, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 40) Graestan the Merciless:
 * 41) *"and was one of the few creatures to which Grievous appeared to be attached" – Is this explicitly stated somewhere? It sounds speculative.
 * 42) **Well, his emotional response to Gor's death and his eagerness to see Gor upon his return was what gave it away to me. It's never concretely stated, but that is concretely how it appeared. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 05:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 43) *"digitigrade" – There's enough Star Wars jargon in these articles without zoology jargon as well.
 * 44) **Outta there. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 05:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 45) * Graestan ( Talk ) 23:55, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 46) Toprawa:
 * 47) *Per the objection already made by Graestan, this claim needs to go. It's speculative and Original Research. This can easily be reworded just to say that he showed an attachment to the beast, etc. Avoid weasel words like "apparently" when writing articles: "and was one of the few creatures to which Grievous appeared to be attached."
 * 48) *Ditto here. Also, how do you know he was saddened? That's pretty OR: "The general himself appeared to be fond of Gor, seeking him out immediately upon his return to his castle and becoming both saddened and angered with his pet's death." Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 49) **I've removed both, but I have to say that the saddened and angered part it a pretty common sense-based assumption. Listen to his voice. He doesn't sound like that when droids are destroyed. Look at how he slams his fist down on the console after Gor's death. That's pretty good evidence that he was upset by it. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 02:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 50) **Actually, I've changed my mind. I don't feel saying "appeared" is weasle-ish at all. Because the fact of the matter is that it did indeed appear that way to the viewer. It's not original research because it's the obvious intent of that particular scene to show that Grievous has some kind of emotional response to Gor's death. I will, however, change the word "attached" because I will admit that it is a smidge strong for the situation. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 02:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 51) ***Oh fine I give in. I like how I convinced myself of that. I just can't decide whether to be defiant or cooperative. ;P

Comments
 * I haven't seen a GA or FA for a specific nonsentient character before, so I just did a characteristics section and put its' appearance information in there. A personality and traits section just wouldn't have applied.
 * A soundbyte of Gor's death scream might be nice. :P  CC7567  (talk) 04:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

The Clone Wars: Cold Snap

 * Nominated by: Goes along with my previous Shiv and Mag noms. Also goes along with my personal OOU campaign.
 * Nomination comments: Kilson Likes PIE 12:28, 23 July 09 (UTC)

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Mauser  Comlink 15:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 20:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 03:29, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 03:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  CC7567  (talk) 22:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Mauser:
 * 2) * Get at least one more image.
 * 3) **Added two more
 * 4) *I also made spelling and linking fixes along the way.
 * 5) *You made good use of Procedure formula, did you?  Mauser  Comlink 13:20, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) **Hey, if it's not broke, why fix it. :P Thanks for the copyedit and the review. Kilson Likes 'PIE 15:29, 23 July 09 (UTC)
 * 7) IFYLOFD:
 * 8) * "Shiv tells Flanker that things aren't going well for him right now, because while Shiv was on the night patrol with his commander, Mag, their CK-6 swoop bikes froze up, leaving the two stranded till dawn, when Glid Station could send out a gunship to pick them up." Split this up.
 * 9) *That's it. Well done.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 05:30, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) **Addressed, thanks for the review. Kilson Likes PIE 18:10, 24 July 09 (UTC)
 * 11) Attack of the Clone
 * 12) * "Shiv tells Flanker that things aren't going well for him right now while on patrol with his commander, Mag." The phrasing is a bit awkward here. I get that you're trying to say he's on patrol with Mag, but the chronology doesn't seem to be working. You might want to consider using the word "reveal" more to be clearer.
 * 13) *Please try to run your articles through some sort of spellcheck before nomming them next time.  CC7567  (talk) 05:23, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) "Behind the scenes" in an OOU article? That violates either the MoS/LG, if we have one for such articles, or else just FA precedent. Should be reworded to something more appropriate - "description," possibly. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 11:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 15) *Again, if I might interject, Ackbar. As I noted on the Value of Intelligence nom, Rule 15 states that all GAs must have a Bts as does the MoS. Nayayen [[Image:Old Republic military symbol.png|18px]] talk  21:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) **I agree with Nayayen, all the previous OOU GAs have had a Bts, so I'm going along with GA precedent. Thank you for the review. Kilson Likes PIE 20:06, 03 August 09 (UTC)
 * 17) ***With all due respect, Acky, and I'm not taking sides here, but there's no Layout Guide formula for OOU article sections, and thus no real ruling that says the BTS section can't be used. If you would like to change this, I certainly encourage you to start a CT if you'd like, but either way the nomination should not be held up on this objection. I'm willing to give you guys time to come to a resolution, but I can imagine the AC won't hesitate to take action here in the interest of speeding things along. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 18) ****I would've hoped to have seen common sense favored over rigid rule-following, when the MoS and GAN rules are quite clearly not catered for such an article. But if you'd prefer to follow outdated/incomplete rules that shouldn't apply but have lower standard of articles, that's fine. Sure, there's no established rule saying BtSes can't be in OOU articles, but I've seen them objected to on FANs and none of our OOU FAs or GAs have BtS sections, bar the two most recent OOU GAs which are in the same hasty vein as this one (and were also written by the same author, one of which was passed with a comment objecting to the use of "BtS" - ergo, no actual precedent). The relevant section of the MoS - an MoS which, I will reiterate, is not up to date on this matter, and we have no formal LG rules - also states "This list is typically more flexible than main articles". Also, a proposal on establishing a MoS (which, incidentally, did not include a "behind the scenes" section title) was denied, on the basis that the MoS and LG for OOU articles should be worked out and refined as the articles are made into FAs and GAs, rather than just throwing one together - so why can't we do that now, here? If someone can give me a good - any - reason for calling it "Behind the scenes" I'd be much more willing to back down, but I've yet to see one. And it'd be nice if article quality took precedent over "speeding things along." -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 00:39, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) *****You do not have to get angry or anything, I'm just trying to do what you're doing, trying to make this article as well written as possible. In reality, I'm also trying to create an excepted comic and book layout guide right now, like what you want to do. Several other users are starting to do OOUs, and I want them to look consistent and similar. First of all, I believe it is better to use "Behind the scenes" rather than "Description" or anything else because info that would be defined as Behind the scenes info goes in this seciton, such as the canocity subsection in Value and the other Tales GAs, and when and who published the OOU. Not to sound simplistic, but wouldn't the entire article be the "Description" section? As for the previous GAs that have the Bts section called "Development" (one of which I passed with this mistake) I'll change them to Bts becuase not all the info in there goes along with the development of the comic. Once again, thank you for the review. Kislon Likes PIE 02:45, 05 August 09 (UTC)
 * 20) The Jedi Council missed something...
 * 21) *Sorry for the post-vote objection, but I've just discovered that we can now link to individual pages of the webcomic, so please reference accordingly.
 * 22) *&mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 03:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Wooley

 * Nominated by: --Clone Commander Lee 17:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A minor clone trooper from Innocents of Ryloth

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 06:53, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  JangFett  Talk 17:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Fett
 * 2) * "Kenobi, Cody, Wooley and the rest of Ghost Company boarded the Crumb Bomber and other LAAT/i gunships and attempted to land in Nabat, but proton cannons attacked the Acclamator transports above, and Kenobi was tasked by Jedi Master Mace Windu with taking out the cannons to allow them to land." Run-on.
 * 3) **Fixed.
 * 4) * Lee, like your previous noms, please watch for underlinking and overlinking issues.
 * 5) **Fixed.
 * 6) ***No, I still see many unlinked subjects. droid, Nabat, Innocents of Ryloth are a couple of them.
 * 7) ****Fixed.
 * 8) * "Kenobi, Cody, Wooley and the rest of Ghost Company" Context on "Ghost Squadron".
 * 9) **Fixed
 * 10) ***It was not Wooley's unit. Ghost Squadron is a unit of 212th Attack Battalion.
 * 11) ****Fixed.
 * 12) * "Ghost Company then settled up a base. Shortly after Cody went with Wooley, Waxer and Boil to scout ahead. Cody and Wooley went to investigate the courtyard, and discovered that the Twi'leks were being held prisoner." Very choppy, also the first two sentences are fragments.
 * 13) **Fixed
 * 14) ***Read this Lee: "Ghost Company then settled up a base and shortly after Cody went with Wooley, Waxer and Boil to scout ahead." Improper English. Make sure you proofread what you write, and if it helps, read it out loud. Or it could be your use of punctuation that confuses the reader. I'll correct this sentence, but in the future, you should be able to correct your usage of proper punctuation. More specially: commas, semi-colons, and &mdash (&mdash;), which is used in place of commas sometimes.
 * 15) ****Lee, please rewatch the episode and find where they "scouted ahead". "Ghost Company then settled up a base and shortly after Cody went with Wooley, Waxer, and Boil to scout ahead."
 * 16) *****Fixed.
 * 17) * "After reporting their findings back to Kenobi and Windu, they moved out." Moved out where?
 * 18) **Fixed.
 * 19) * Lee, try and use translating words such as "soon", "then", "however", "though" in your sentences. Go back and correct this issue because it is difficult to understand what's happening chronologically.
 * 20) **Fixed.
 * 21) ***Along with the proofreading, double check to make sure your sentences flow together.
 * 22) ****Checked.
 * 23) * "After they freed Twi'leks attacked tactical droid commander TX-20, the Separatists in Nabat were defeated, and after the transports landed, the army headed to the capital city of Lessu succesfully reteaking the capital and winning the battle." Improper English, also they did not win the battle. Kenobi and his men destroyed the cannons, allowing Windu and his men land and organize for their run on the capital.
 * 24) **Fixed.
 * 25) ***What is the "army of Windu"? More specifically, you should say Lightning Squadron and Windu.
 * 26) ****Fixed.
 * 27) * It is not confirmed that all clone troopers were born in 32 BBY. Their homeworld is Kamino, though unless you can prove that Wooley was born in 32 BBY, please remove it.
 * 28) **Removed.
 * 29) * Lee, I strongly recommend that you go back and proofread this article because I corrected a lot of grammatical issues, spelling, and linking issues.
 * 30) **Fixed.
 * 31) * Only use tags in the infobox, not in the main article.
 * 32) **Sourced.
 * 33) * JangFett  Talk 00:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 34) **Fixed. Thanks for the review Jang. --Clone Commander Lee 12:22, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 35) ***No problem Lee. Remember to proofread, and double check your work. If you have a hard time with using proper punctuation, you can always look on google for guides; also you can look at the FA tutorials here. I'll give this another review soon.  JangFett  Talk 19:25, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 36) From the Council Chambers:
 * 37) * "After they freed Twi'leks attacked tactical droid commander TX-20,": Slightly confusing; I'm not quite sure what you're trying to say here.
 * 38) **Cleared.
 * 39) * Can you split the last paragraph of the bio into two or three separate ones?
 * 40) **Splitted.
 * 41) * The BTS needs a little expansion, primarily context on "Innocents of Ryloth".
 * 42) **Expanded.
 * 43) *Otherwise looks good after a copyedit and some ref cleanup. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 03:48, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 44) **Got them all. Thanks for the review Master Jonathan. --Clone Commander Lee 06:39, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 45) Fett II
 * 46) * "Then, Cody and the Company created a diversion, while Kenobi, Waxer, and Boil freed the prisoners and also managed to take out the rest of the proton cannons." This sentence needs clarifying. What was the diversion?
 * 47) **Cleared.
 * 48) *Good work Lee  JangFett  Talk 16:58, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 49) **Fixed. Thanks for the review Jang. --Clone Commander Lee 17:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Senate Commando captain

 * Nominated by: --Clone Commander Lee 17:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A poor guy who must face Cad Bane. Also my first non-clone nom

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  JangFett  Talk 17:49, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm sure others will find anything I may have missed. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 06:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Fett
 * 2) * Due to the size of the article, you don't need two images.
 * 3) **I don't think so.
 * 4) ***Fixed.
 * 5) * "The captain and his commandos were unconvinced, however, and the captain ordered one of his subordinates to handcuff Bane. Aurra Sing, however, shot and killed the unfortunate man. Unfortunately, the captain had his neck snapped by Bane, killing him." Very choppy.
 * 6) **Fixed.
 * 7) ***"Then Bane attacked the captain hit him against a speeder and grabbed his head. While his men were killed by the disembarking BX-series droid commandos and Weequay bounty hunter Shahan Alama Bane snapped the neck of the captain, killing him." Again, make sure you use proper punctuation. Your comma use is improving, but can improve more.
 * 8) ****Fixed.
 * 9) * Mention that he was a human male in the intro.
 * 10) **Fixed.
 * 11) * "When the speeder of the bounty hunters approached to the blocked sector the captain and his team were sent to arrest the harasser." Improper English
 * 12) **Fixed.
 * 13) ***Again, check your comma usage.
 * 14) ****Fixed.
 * 15) * "When the speeder of the bounty hunters approached to the blocked sector the captain and his team were sent to arrest the harasser. As the speeder landed the captain ordered Bane to take his hands up." Very choppy. Merge The last sentence with the preceding sentence. Also Lee, make sure you use words such as "soon" or "then", to get a sense of chronological order. You said the speeder approached in the first sentence, but it doesn't connect with the next when you say "As it landed". "Landed" isn't proper here as well.
 * 16) **Fixed.
 * 17) ***Still remains
 * 18) ****Fixed.
 * 19) * "The Duros took his hands up, but advised the captain to be not to hasty. The commando then ordered one of his men to arrest Bane. The man was however killed by a blaster bolt coming from a tower. The sharpshooter, Aurra Sing, quickly killed more of the captains men." Rather choppy.
 * 20) **Fixed.
 * 21) ***No, still remains.
 * 22) ****Fixed.
 * 23) * After the captain's death, is the rest of the information relevant to him?
 * 24) **I think so.
 * 25) ***"After all Commandos were dead Bane ordered the droids to take the uniforms of the dead soldiers. The bounty hunters were able to blackmail the release of Ziro by capturing some senators. The bounty hunters escaped with the Hutt, but not before setting up some explosive devices. Luckily Jedi Knight Anakin Skywalker was able to save the senators." This is irrelevant to the captain, no need to explain what happen after his death. Also, with the shortening of the article, two images isn't needed. The images are closed to each other, and should be equally spread apart depending on the size of the article.
 * 26) ****Removed.
 * 27) *More to come.  JangFett  Talk 18:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 28) Fett II
 * 29) * "When the speeder of the bounty hunters approached to the east sector, the captain and his team were sent to arrest the driver, the speeder stopped and the captain ordered Bane to take his hands up." Again, make sure you use transition words such as "soon", "though", "however". You can split this sentence up to make it "When the speeder of the bounty hunters approached to the east sector, the captain and his team were sent to arrest the driver. Soon the speeder stopped and the captain ordered Bane to take his hands up."
 * 30) **Adressed.
 * 31) ***Forgot to mention, state were the speeder stopped. But I fixed it in the article :)
 * 32) * "The commando then ordered one of his men to arrest Bane, however the man was killed by a blaster bolt coming from a tower and the sharpshooter, Aurra Sing, quickly killed more of the captains men." She quickly killed more of the captains men with that shot? While you didn't mention that she or Bane killed his men before, it's redundant here.
 * 33) **Fixed.
 * 34) * "Then Bane attacked the captain hit him against a speeder and grabbed his head." Invalid flow of chronologically. You said Bane attack him then the captain, it is confusing without transition and proper punctuation.
 * 35) **Fixed.
 * 36) * "While his men were killed by the disembarking BX-series droid commandos and Weequay bounty hunter Shahan Alama, Bane snapped the neck of the captain, killing him." I wouldn't say "men" here since you mentioned another "man" that was killed before. Perhaps replace "man" with the rest of the captain's squad.
 * 37) **Fixed.
 * 38) * P&T-"The captain was a well trained Senate Commando." Fragment. Possibly expand, or merge with next sentence.
 * 39) **Fixed.
 * 40) * I suggest that you merge the choppy sentences of the P&T together Lee. Make sure they flow well together.
 * 41) **Fixed.
 * 42) * Expand the BtS, it is too choppy. Read through past smaller character GAs, such as Bel for examples.
 * 43) **Fixed.
 * 44) * JangFett  Talk 16:17, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 45) **Fixed. Thanks for the second review Jang. --Clone Commander Lee 16:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 46) ***Anytime, good work.  JangFett  Talk 17:49, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 47) Soresu
 * 48) *Normally, I'd fix most of this myself, but there's some stuff I think you should know for the future.
 * 49) * First up: References always come immediately after punctuation, not before it, like you did at the beginning of the bio.
 * 50) **Adressed.
 * 51) ** No idea what you've done, but the infobox reffing is not screwed up, and the original objection remains&mdash;there is a reff before a comma. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 52) **Fixed.
 * 53) * led a group of Senate Commandos against Cad Bane during the Senate hostage crisis. Cad Bane and the crisis need context. Also, Senate hostage crisis is conjectural, so you shouldn't be using it verbatim. Maybe against a group of bounty hunters headed by Cad Bane when they attempted to raid the Republic Executive Building would be better.
 * 54) **Fixed.
 * 55) * Senate and Commandos should be consistently capitalised throughout the article.
 * 56) **Fixed.
 * 57) * shot and killed the unfortunate man Unfortunate is POV, please remove.
 * 58) **Removed.
 * 59) * The commandos aren't the underorganisation, it is an underorganisation.
 * 60) **Fixed.
 * 61) * approached to the east sector. Did they approach from the east or head toward the east? Either way, it isn't right. It needs to be either approached the east sector or approached from the east sector.
 * 62) **Fixed.
 * 63) * The Duros took his hands up, but advised the captain to be not to hasty. What Duros? It's confusing, since you haven'y mentioned him before. Maybe if you listed the involved bouty hunters when you first mention the posse. And it's put his hands up, not took.
 * 64) **Fixed.
 * 65) * The commando then ordered one of his men to arrest Bane, however the man was killed by a blaster bolt coming from a tower and the sharpshooter, Aurra Sing, quickly killed the rest of the captain's squad with more shots. Doesn't flow well.
 * 66) **Fixed.
 * 67) * While his men were killed by the disembarking BX-series droid commandos and Weequay bounty hunter Shahan Alama, Hang on. Haven't they all already been killed by Sing?
 * 68) **Fixed.
 * 69) * Although is repetitive in the P&T.
 * 70) **Fixed.
 * 71) * The second sources section is meant to be called "Notes and references"
 * 72) **Fixed.
 * 73) *That's it (for now). Before you nominate in future, make sure you give a good copy-edit to the article. I had to make quite a big copy-edit. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 23:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 74) **Should have catched them all, thanks for the (first) review Soresu. --Clone Commander Lee 10:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 75) ***That's okay, although I should note it's meant to be "caught them all". Catched is not a word. There'll be some more objections tomorrow. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 76) ****Last objection also fixed. --Clone Commander Lee 11:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 77) Makashi
 * 78) * Aurra Sing, however, shot and killed the man, the captain was attacked by Bane who snapped his neck, killing him. Doesn't flow well. Reword.
 * 79) **Reworded.
 * 80) * The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th sentences in the bio all start with "when". Please vary it a bit.
 * 81) **Adressed.
 * 82) * Ordered is a little repetitive in the bio.
 * 83) **Fixed.
 * 84) *That should be all of it, I think. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 13:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 85) **Got them all. Thanks for the second review SoresuMakashi. --Clone Commander Lee 17:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 86) Terms such as "unidentified" are out-of-universe and do not belong in the text of in-universe articles. They might be alright in the title because the conjecture tag nullifies the assertion that the title is an IU term, but they are in no way appropriate in the article itself. Graestan ( Talk ) 16:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 87) *Fixed. Thanks. --Clone Commander Lee 17:32, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Stripe

 * Nominated by:  Mauser  Comlink 09:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another clone for you. 990 words.

(0 ACs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) No problem. Kilson Likes PIE 12:26, 24 July 09 (UTC)
 * 2) Remember that only italics are used in comic quotes, never bold. Otherwise look good after a copyedit. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 04:06, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 03:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) It's the least I could do after you gave me that Wookiee cookiee
 * 2) * "...Rodent tried to escape, though Rex chased him and destroyed him with a blaster shot." Too many pronouns, change the second him to Rodent or the droid.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * "Determined to stop the spy, Stripe had thrown a V-1 thermal detonator at the grate, which evaporated both the droid and a solid portion of the station's interior." Two things wrong here. First, the correct tense would be, "Stripe threw a..." Second, I think you should replace evaporated with destroyed. I believe evaporated only goes along with liquids, not solids, and if not, destroyed still probably sounds better.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * "Stripe proudly responded that the clones never left anything half-done." You repeated the same thing word-for-word in both the biography and the Pts. Just changeup some of the words in one of the sentances.
 * 7) **Tweaked the one in bio.
 * 8) * "The character of Stripe made his only appearances in Mouse Hunt, a short 5-page webcomic, preceding The Clone Wars Season One episode "Rookies" and published on StarWars.com." It's kind of unclear in this sentance whether Rookiees or Mouse Hunt was published on Star Wars.com. You should put published on Star Wars.com right before the preceding Rookies part.
 * 9) **Done.
 * 10) *Other than that, nice job dude. Kilson Likes PIE 12:00, 24 July 09 (UTC)
 * 11) **Thanks for the review.  Mauser  Comlink 12:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 12) IFYLOFD:
 * 13) *<S>Are CC-7567 and CC-2224's nicknames really necessary?
 * 14) **Yes. Both are mentioned more than twice, especially Rex.
 * 15) * Give context on alert code Aurek: What does it mean?
 * 16) **Actually, the source doesn't specify it all, it's only mentioned once. I could assume that it could possibly mean the highest alert, but I won't.
 * 17) *Other than that, looks clean. Very good job.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 23:11, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 18) **Thanks for the review.  Mauser  Comlink 23:19, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) Before I get to anything else, "received his nickname because of the white-colored stripe" is pure speculation and does not belong on Wookieepedia. Graestan ( Talk ) 18:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 20) *Can't say I didn't anticipate that. I believe it is not speculation for the following reason. Per WP:ATT "Editors may make straightforward logical deductions based on fully attributed data that neither change the significance of the data nor require additional assumptions beyond what is in the source. It should be possible for any reader without specialist knowledge to understand the deductions." When we see clone trooper CT-27-5555, it is obvious that he's nicknamed Fives because of numbers in his designations, although the source doesn't say that explicitly. When we see a clone with a white stripe (which is visually underlined several times in the comic) it is similarly obvious where he got his nickname from, without requiring any speculation.  Mauser  Comlink 20:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 21) **With all due respect, Mauser, the origin of Fives' nickname was more directly confirmed than Stripe's. After CT-27-5555 stated his designation to Rex and Cody, Hevy said "We call him Fives," which was more of a hint at Fives' nickname than Stripe's. What if Stripe took it in honor of a fallen comrade and then dyed his hair? What if it was from a tattooed stripe on his arm? Yes, your conclusion is the most probable, but it's still not 100% confirmed. Per the "nor require additional assumptions beyond what is in the source," speculation is still required to deduce the source of the nickname. I'd feel better if it's the reader making the connection on his or her own rather than outright saying it. In any case, it's still not known whether Stripe "received the nickname" or took it himself.  CC7567  (talk) 21:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 22) ***Okay, I'm convinced. Adressed.  Mauser  Comlink 08:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Phaseera

 * Nominated by:  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 06:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Floyd strikes again.

(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 21:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 13:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  CC7567  (talk) 22:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Good work Floyd :)  JangFett  Talk 23:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) --Clone Commander Lee 17:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Soresu
 * 2) * so if the Sith tried to move troops through the valley the outpost would spot them and signal ahead to the base camp, so their defenses would be up and fully operational before the Sith ever reached them. So is repetitive.
 * 3) **Addressed.
 * 4) *However, when the Sith commanders ordered the Gloom Walkers to take the outpost during the daytime, the Gloom Walkers objected It seems like the netire squad objected. Maybe if you cahnged it to "a number of Gloom Walkers" or something like that?
 * 5) **No, they all were. Path of Destruction describes that they were all shocked.
 * 6) ***Including Ulabore? Did he object? SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 12:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) * With the outpost taken out, the Republic camp had no idea that the main Sith force were marching through the valley toward them and were taken by surprise, and the Sith took the planet. Doesn't flow well. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 07:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) **Addressed. Thanks for the review.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 03:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) "Due to a seemingly impossible display of shooting by Dessel..." This is confusing. It isn't clear why his shooting was impossible, or even whether or not it was good shooting.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 15:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) *Addressed. Thanks for the review.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 03:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) From the Council Chambers:
 * 12) *"The battle" section focuses solely on the Gloom Walkers' mission, and then glosses over the rest of the battle with "The Republic forces were taken by surprise, and the Sith took the planet." Is it possible to expand on this or is the information simply not available?
 * 13) *And that's it. Great job. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 02:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Added GAnom tag. --Clone Commander Lee 06:33, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Battle of unidentified planet (tactical droid)
> QuiGonJinn (Talk) 12:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nominated by: <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * Nomination comments: What can I say? I'm really getting into this...

(2 ACs/4 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 22:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 06:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Looking good.--Kreivi Wolter 14:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Why not? Looks good. -Gmalek 19:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  CC7567  (talk) 19:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 02:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Object > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 11:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC) > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 16:44, 26 July 2009 (UTC) > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 11:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC) > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 11:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Soresu
 * 2) * The intro needs to contain more about the actual battle. ATM, its sounding like the tactical droid was alone, since you make no mention of the other droids.
 * 3) **Addressed.
 * 4) * Could the image caption be changed? It should describe what's happening in the picture. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 12:47, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) **Addressed. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) The Grand Master
 * 2) * The BTS could be expanded (mention which episode this led into, etc.)
 * 3) **Addressed.
 * 4) * Please make an Aftermath section. (This led into an epsiode, so I still believe you could have farily significant information there).
 * 5) **The problem is that events in the episode do not have any relation to this battle. Despite what our Battle of Quell artice claims, there is no evidence in the episode that Aayla's ship was attacked while she returned from this battle. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) ***Fair enough. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 16:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) * Also, there is info that is currently only present in the intro: "...during the Clone Wars between the Galactic Republic and the Confederacy of Independent Systems." You should either remove the "between the Republic and Confedercy" part, or move it down to the bio as well. (Right now, the bio doesn't state that the War was between the Republic and Confederacy).
 * 3) **I decided to remove it from the intro.
 * 4) *Good work. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 15:14, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) **Thanks for review. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) Attack of the Clone
 * 2) * I understand your reasoning that we don't know what happened between this battle and Quell, but if the infobox claims that the Battle of Quell is next, then there needs to be a better flow of events. If not, and especially per the TCW web comic&mdash;the majority of the other comics say that they take place "just before" the corresponding episodes, while this one is notably one of the few that does not and states "The events in this story occur some time before  ' Jedi Crash'"&mdash;then perhaps we can't assume the chronology as you're saying.
 * 3) **Point taken and the Battle of Quell is removed from the infobox. Using the same logic, I figured out that we can't say that Mission to Florrum occurred prior to this one, so I've removed Florrum as well.
 * 4) * Please be careful what you assume for the Prelude. All we know is that a trap was set, and I don't see anything to indicate that the tactical droid and its forces were on the planet before Secura lured it to the planet's data banks. The current wording&mdash;"a Confederate tactical droid that commanded the Separatist forces on an unidentified planet"&mdash;suggests otherwise.  CC7567  (talk) 18:45, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) **Addressed. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) Before I'll even look at this: don't use OOU terms like "unidentified" in the IU articles, please. Graestan ( Talk ) 16:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) **Fixed. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 18:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Attack of the Clone II
 * 4) * Per Rule 8, please take care of that intro redlink that I added.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * Are you sure that Galle and Barr were lieutenants at the time? I'm quite certain Reversal of Fortune took place after Headgames, which is where they supposedly first appeared as lieutenants.  CC7567  (talk) 22:40, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) **Fair enough. Fixed. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 12:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Because they would have only a couple of lines, I decided not to use the "prelude" and "aftermath" sections and instead merged everything into "the battle". <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * I'll take another look when I can get to it.  CC7567  (talk) 05:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Should the Jedi Order be mentoned in infobox?--Kreivi Wolter 23:56, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily. Although Aayla is a Jedi, she acted on behalf of the Republic, and listing the Jedi Order seems redundant. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:35, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Barb Mentir

 * Nominated by: --Clone Commander Lee 18:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Minor pirate from TCW The Gungan General

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support Object Comments
 * 1)  JangFett  Talk 16:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Fett
 * 2) * Add at least one more image.
 * 3) **Added by JMAS.
 * 4) * Missing quotes for the head and bio.
 * 5) ** I'll ask JMAS.
 * 6) ***Added by JMAS.
 * 7) * Check your sources. Did you also check the guide?
 * 8) **Checked.
 * 9) ***Lee, that is not the way to source. You just copied and pasted "Shadow of Malevolence" guide, but renamed the title name to "The Gungan General". I suggest that you double check your sources and then add the two guides (Gungan & Dooku) into the "Soruces" section. Also, don't source to the decoded episode on StarWars.com, because they replace them each week. Source Gungan decoded content with:.
 * 10) ****Sourced.
 * 11) *****I redid some referencing and sourcing.
 * 12) * "Around 27 BBY, Barb Mentir was involved in a knife fight, there he lost his right eye in the fight and later wore an eye patch over where it had been." I probably forgot, but did it say around 27 BBY or said couple years before?
 * 13) ** It don't know certainly the info was there before i worked on the article and I can't watch the decoded episode.
 * 14) ***I suggest that you remove it the "27 BBY" with "Before the Clone Wars".
 * 15) ****Fixed.
 * 16) * "Around 22 BBY, the Sith Lord and Separaratist leader Count Dooku crashlanded on Vanqor, after being chased and shot down by Jedi Knights Obi-Wan Kenobi and Anakin Skywalker." So Anakin and Obi-Wan chased and shot down Dooku? You fail to mention their ships. Also too much context on Dooku. You can say Confederate Head of State Count Dooku, or just Sith Lord.
 * 17) **Adressed.
 * 18) * "After trapping the Jedi in a cave, Dooku met some members of Ohnaka's gang. Hondo Ohnaka took the Count to Florrum and captured him there." Dooku was not captured on Florrum. He was taken captive before hand and wasn't released by the pirates.
 * 19) **Fixed.
 * 20) * "Ohnaka contacted Supreme Chancellor Palpatine of the Galactic Republic and agreed to acceppt a ransom in form of spice for the Count." How this is relevant to Barb?
 * 21) **Says why the Republic went to Florrum.
 * 22) * If you're not aware of Barb being on Vanqor, then don't add excessive details about the capture of Dooku, Obi-Wan and Anakin. While you're just summarizing the plot to "Dooku captured", none of the details are related to Barb.
 * 23) **Background info.
 * 24) * "Falso, however, wanted to betray Ohnaka and conspired with Mentir." This sentence doesn't flow well with the next sentence. You say he conspired with Mentir, but then the next sentence, Falso talked with Ohnaka.
 * 25) **Fixed.
 * 26) * "Falso also expressed his sorrows that Ohnka would negotiate with the Galactic Republic diplomats and ordered Mentir to shoot the Republic shuttle down." Expressed his sorrows with whom?
 * 27) **Fixed.
 * 28) * "After landing, Falso was awaited by Falso who asked him if he had completed his task." Falso was awaited by Falso?
 * 29) ** Oops. Corrected.
 * 30) * "Mentir hesitantly told him that the shuttle had crashed in the Doshar fields." told who?
 * 31) **Fixed.
 * 32) * "Falso then asked him if hed had the spice." Fragment, consider merging.
 * 33) **Merged.
 * 34) * "Mentir first appered as an unidentified pirate in The Gungan General the 12th episode of the Clone Wars TV series, aired at January 9, 2009." While it was the 12th episode, don't mention it because of the unestablished timelime. Airdate is fine.
 * 35) **Fixed.
 * 36) * Again, a lot of details aren't related to Barb. The article seems if it is a short summary of "Dooku Captured" and "Gungan General". While you do have most information about Barb, please go back and remove any irrelevant details that don't concern him. Sentences like this: "Dooku then choked Falso to death and escaped in their ship.", shouldn't belong in a article about Barb.
 * 37) **Fixed.
 * 38) *Lee, like your other noms, please make sure you give your articles a good copyedit. I see a lot of grammatical errors, spelling errors, and tense issues. While I corrected most of them, please go back and check for yourself.
 * 39) **I'll can't do a copyedit myself.
 * 40) ***At least try, and once you're done checking, you can ask someone else to give it a copyedit :)
 * 41) ****I read through the article.
 * 42) * JangFett  Talk 19:29, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 43) **I don't get all really well but thanks for the review Jang. --Clone Commander Lee 14:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 44) Few more for now
 * 45) * The "Death as a pirate" section is too small to have its own section. You can merge it with the other.
 * 46) **Merged.
 * 47) * Intro-"However some clone troopers, along with Gungan Representative Jar Jar Binks, had survived the impact and managed to kill all pirates, except Falso, who returned to the base and told Ohnaka that the Republic had sent an army instead of the ransom." Whle you mentioned the clone troopers and Jar Jar in the intro, you failed to mention it in his bio.
 * 48) **Fixed.
 * 49) * P&T-"Also, he was able to fly a Flarestar ship so good to force a Nu-class shuttle, piloted by clone trooper pilots down." A bit too POV
 * 50) **Reworded.
 * 51) ***"Good enough" is still more towards POV.
 * 52) ****reworded.
 * 53) * JangFett  Talk 17:21, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 54) **Fixed. Thanks for both review Jang. --Clone Commander Lee 17:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 55) ***No problem Lee, more to come.
 * 56) Fett will look once more
 * 57) * Intro-"Around 22 BBY, he cooperated with Turk Falso to betray the leader of their gang, who had captured Count Dooku, leader of the Confederacy of Independent Systems." Context on Falso.
 * 58) **Fixed.
 * 59) * "After discussing the ransom with Ohnaka, Falso met with Mentir and told him that the spice was on the way and ordered Mentir to shoot the Republic shuttle down, being careful to not damage the spice." This sentence needs clarifying. It is quite confusing when Falso ordered Mentir to do something. The way the sentence is worded sounds like Falso is telling Mentir to shoot the ship, however, shoot the ship with what? Where is the spice?
 * 60) **Fixed.
 * 61) * "Mentir felt the plan was too risky and asked him about Ohnaka. Falso calmed his fears and claimed they would be long gone before Ohnaka realized what happened. Mentir then took a Flarestar-class Weequay ship and waited in Florrum's atmosphere for the arrival of the Republic shuttle." These sentences are too choppy.
 * 62) **Fixed.
 * 63) * "He opened fire, and after firing two missiles, successfully managed to bring the shuttle down." He opened fire with what? Also after "He opened fire," the next part of the sentence doesn't make sense. "Successfully managed" doesn't work here.
 * 64) **Fixed.
 * 65) * "He returned to the pirate base where he reported in to Falso." Merge this with the next sentence.
 * 66) **Fixed.
 * 67) * "Falso then found Mentir, planning to escape with a ship." This sentence is very confusing. Reword.
 * 68) **Fixed.
 * 69) * BtS- I see a repetition of "He".
 * 70) **Fixed.
 * 71) * JangFett  Talk 00:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 72) **Got them all. Thanks for the third review Jang. --Clone Commander Lee 10:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 73) Fett IV
 * 74) * "After discussing the ransom with Ohnaka, Turk Falso, a fellow pirate in the gang, met with Mentir..." Curious how you say Falso is Ohnaka's second in command in the intro, and then change the context for Falso to "a fellow pirate in the gang". Also, it looks like they're separate. Ohnaka, Turk Falso, a fellow pirate in the gang.. Almost appears if they're three people.
 * 75) **Fixed.
 * 76) ***Prefacing this by stating that I haven't seen any decoded episodes. Is it stated in the decoded episode that Turk Falso is Hondo's second-in-command? If not, then the statement has no basis. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 16:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 77) ****I don't have seen the decoded episode too. So I corrected it. --Clone Commander Lee 16:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 78) *****"After discussing the ransom with Ohnaka, Turk Falso, another pirate in the gang, met with Mentir and told him that the spice was on the way and ordered Mentir to shoot down the" The way it's worded sounds like Mentir is discussing the ransom with three people.
 * 79) ******Changed. --Clone Commander Lee 16:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 80) *Good work Lee, make sure you double check for grammatical errors, underlinking, and tense issues. You can always ask someone to give it a copyedit.  JangFett  Talk 16:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 81) **Fixed. Thanks for the reviews Jang. --Clone Commander Lee 16:11, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

The Clone Wars: Transfer

 * Nominated by:  JangFett  Talk 18:54, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My first comic, well part of TCW, nom. Kilson inspired me to do this :)

(3 ACs/4 Users/7 Total)
Support
 * 1) Glad to see I'm not the only one doing OOUs. Kilson Likes PIE 20:14, 27 July 09 (UTC)
 * 2) No problem; good job.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 22:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  08:27, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4)  Grunny  ( Talk ) 02:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 06:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) --Clone Commander Lee 15:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) Goodie.--Kreivi Wolter 17:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Kilson helps out his fellow OOUers
 * 2) * The Plot section must be written in present tense. You start off writing in present, but you alternate between past and present several times in the section.
 * 3) **Yes, along with my copyedit, QuiGonJinn gave it a copyedit and replaced a lot of past tense wording.
 * 4) * In the Development subsection, you forgot to ref the date of the comic's release with the same ref you used in the infobox.
 * 5) **Addressed
 * 6) *Otherwise, nice job dude. I'm surprised I inspired someone to do something other that eat PIE. :P Kilson Likes PIE 19:37, 27 July 09 (UTC)
 * 7) **Haha, thanks Kilson. Yeah, I plan to do another one of these comics since I know that I should write the plot in present tense :D
 * 8) What do you mean by "Skywalker then brings his attention to his Padawan, Ahsoka Tano."? Is Skywalker bringing the clone's attention to Ahsoka, or is he bringing his own attention to the Padawan? (If it's the latter, then this could probably be left out.) Nice work.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 22:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) *It is the latter, I'll remove it. Thanks for the review Jonny :)
 * 10) Grunny:
 * 11) * "a clone trooper sergeant tells Skywalker", "The clone sergeant tells Skywalker", "Skywalker tells his", "Skywalker also tells his", "Tano tells the Jedi Masters", "Unduli tells her", etc. This is very repetitive, try to mix it up.
 * 12) **Too many "tells". Addressed
 * 13) * The third paragraph of the Plot Summary is a collection of short choppy sentences, try to smooth them out and mix up the sentence structure a bit more. I would try to, but I think it would be good for you to do it.  Grunny  ( Talk ) 02:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) **Addressed, thanks for the review Grunny :)
 * 15) "Behind the scenes" in an OOU article? That either violates the MoS/LG, if we have one for OOU articles, or general FA precedent. Should be changed to something more appropriate, like "description" or somesuch. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 11:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) *I was following Kilson's Procedure GA OOU article. However, I'll change the BtS to "Description". Thanks for the review Acky :)
 * 17) **Per MoS, OOU articles need a BtS. I reverted the "Description" title back to the standard BtS wording.
 * 18) ***See above. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 00:45, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) Soresu
 * 20) * However, Skywalker dictates that she must go and keep a close eye on Gunray, who had been captured in the past once, when Skywalker was younger. How is the fact that he has been captured before relevant? Will it make him more prepared or cautious or something? Also, "Skywalker was younger" is unneeded, since you have already established that it happened in the past. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 08:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 21) **Addressed, thanks for the review.
 * 22) Clone Commander Lee
 * 23) * Add at least 1 more image.
 * 24) **I don't think its necessary.
 * 25) * Include the pages number in the infobox.
 * 26) **Addressed
 * 27) *That's all. I'm writing Bait now. --Clone Commander Lee 15:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 28) **Thanks for the review Lee.
 * 29) ***Anytime Jang, great work. --Clone Commander Lee 15:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 30) About quotes
 * 31) * Would Skywalker's and Tano's dialogue fit better in Plot summary, and the tagline of the comic to the top of the article? --Kreivi Wolter 12:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 32) **You mean the tagline "Ahsoka joins Luminara in Transfer"? Added :)
 * 33) From the Council Chanbers:
 * 34) *We can now link to individual pages of the webcomic, so please reference accordingly.
 * 35) * Under Appearances, you list the wampa as being mentioned in Aurebesh. This appears to be an easter egg, since wampas have nothing to do with the story, and as such it should be mentioned in the BTS, as we commonly do with other Aurebesh easter eggs.
 * 36) *&mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 03:26, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 37) **All addressed. Thanks for the review Jonathan :)
 * 38) ***Not quite. You just added the page to the existing reference. Not everything can be sourced to that page; everything under "Attribution" in the infobox should be sourced to page=69 (the "inside cover" of the issue) while the issue number, "preceded by", and "followed by" fields in the infobox should be sourced to the table of contents (page=1). Also check the references in the BTS. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 04:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Contradictory to Ackbar's objection (for the third time), Rule 15 states that all GAs must have a Bts as does the MoS. Nayayen [[Image:Old Republic military symbol.png|18px]] talk  21:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Quork

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 01:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Q alien. Maybe some of these could ride some Quor'sav and joust with their spears or something.

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) No objections from me. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 07:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 03:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer 23:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Dimean

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 21:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A KOTOR/Species crossover

(1 ACs/4 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Everything looks good! ~ SavageBob 23:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Nice work Ey.  JangFett  Talk 00:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 03:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Impressive when the source is just 9 lines of Jolee rambling. Nayayen [[Image:Old Republic military symbol.png|18px]] talk  23:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  CC7567  (talk) 00:46, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Yarin

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 12:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Only one letter left after this one...

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) IFYLOFD:
 * 2) * First of all, merge together some of the short choppy sentences in the intro,
 * 3) * Context for Anja Gallandro.
 * 4) *Other than that, looks good.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:10, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) **Did the first. As for Anja, I feel that she doesn't really need much context. Going into why she wanted to destroy the spice etc is not relevant to the Yarin at all. I added that she was Human, but not sure what else you had in mind. --Eyrezer 04:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Should the two possible appearances be listed under "Appearances" with the "Possible appearance" template? ~ SavageBob 02:22, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think that is necessary, especially for the Ewoks episode. If the YJK books had been in the opposite order, I would have been more sympathetic, but I don't think it is a strong enough case to add to the Appearances list, even with that tag. --Eyrezer 04:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, couple more things. I've moved the cultural stuff to its own section, since we're still fuzzy on how straightjacketed we have to be from the MoS. Also, was the Skra'akan the source of the damage the Yarin's craft sustained? It's unclear from the current article. ~ SavageBob 02:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, re the first. As to the second, yes it was. Added a little bit more info. --Eyrezer 04:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Lizard Warrior

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 13:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: OK, fine. Let's go for a hat-trick. L is for Lizard Warrior. ~ SavageBob 13:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 23:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) One thing: The last two paragraphs of History have a lot of choppy sentences. Merge some together. Other than that, good work.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:21, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *I've tried to massage it a bit more; is that better? ~ SavageBob 02:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Eminence (Carrack-class)

 * Nominated by: Kilson Likes PIE 17:16, 30 July 09 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Probably should have nominated this a long time ago, goes along with the Braha'tok and Tortarak.

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Objection addressed via IRC  JangFett  Talk 20:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) IFYLOFD:
 * 2) *Infobox not fully sourced.
 * 3) *"During the battle, the Eminence engaged the Braha'tok-class gunship the Braha'tok, a ship less than one third of the cruiser's size. " Doesn't flow well, too many "the"s.
 * 4) *Lots of overlinking.
 * 5) *Mention its involvement in the Galactic Civil War in History.
 * 6) * IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:32, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) **OK, your objections are addressed. Kilson Likes PIE 01:42, 02 August 09 (UTC)
 * 8) "Emperor Palpatine, who was currently on the Death Star, was planning on the Rebel Alliance's fleet attacking the Death Star while they had the chance to destroy the superweapon before it was done, and devised a plan to stop them" Quite confusing, this doesn't make sense if you read it. It should be "Emperor Palpatine, who was currently on the Death Star, predicted the Rebel Alliance's fleet would attack.." or something like that.  JangFett  Talk 04:47, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Karakan

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 22:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: 6 out of the last 8 noms are species!

(0 ACs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Lol. Now GA the gauntlets. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 22:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Short, but good&hellip;--Jedi Kasra (talk) 15:42, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) One thing: Are the effects of the Karakan Gauntlets really necessary in the BtS?  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *As it will still be over the 250 word threshold, no. :P --Eyrezer 02:48, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Just a question first: were the gauntlets compatible with the other species of the Exile's companions? Graestan ( Talk ) 16:21, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) *Good catch! Apparently all of Revan and the Exile's companions could use them - bar the droids - so I added that in. --Eyrezer 05:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Are we sure the singular and plural are the same for their name? And is there no info to add from the CSWE? Oh, and are we sure they are a species and not a planet-ality, like Corellian or Chandrillan? ~ SavageBob 02:23, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I actually discussed this in the IRC about whether Karakan could be an individual. Probably the answer is that we cannot be absolutely 100% certain, however, most indicators point that way. For instance most gauntlets appear to be named after species: Bothan Precision Gloves, Gammorean Gauntlets, Kubaz Scoundrel Gloves, Nagai Combat Gloves, Nikto Soldier Gloves, etc. There are a couple that appear to be the other way, for instance, Taris Survival Gloves and Eridau Accuracy Gloves. The CSWE says "Named for their inventor, the isolationist Karakan" which seems to eliminate a planet name, and as we discussed there, "isolationist" seems far more appropriate for a species than an individual. Consequently, yes, I am satisfied it is intended to be a species. As for plurals, it appears to be the same, yes. --Eyrezer 11:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, sounds good. Perhaps this should be spelled out in the BTS, though, just so all our cards are showing. ~ SavageBob 13:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. --Eyrezer 07:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Dyer

 * Nominated by:  JangFett  Talk 02:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Freeze!"

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 16:40, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) IFYLOFD:
 * 2) *In the intro, you say that Dyer "ordered his men to enter the base" while in the Bio it says he was already there.
 * 3) **Addressed
 * 4) *Mention the Endor Strike Team's intentions in storming the bunker.
 * 5) **Addressed
 * 6) *"Dyer was described as a natural leader, who showed good leadership skills" Aren't these two facts basically the same thing?
 * 7) **Yeah, basically. Fixed.
 * 8) *A lot of the P&T seems to just retell parts of the bio.
 * 9) **I managed to cut down some of the recurring parts.
 * 10) *"Sound Designer Ben Burtt, who sound designed for both the Prequel and Original trilogies of Star Wars, " "Sound designer" and "sound designed" is repetitive.
 * 11) * IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:43, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 12) **Addressed, thanks for the review Floyd :)
 * 13) QGJ
 * 14) * For the Fact Files, you have to list exact pages that mention Dyer. Ask Borsk for help, he is the Fact File guru :P
 * 15) **Addressed and he fixed them :)
 * 16) *" a group of Rebels infiltrated the bunker and surprised the stationed Imperial troops inside the bunker" Bunker is repetitive.
 * 17) **Addressed
 * 18) * Both in the intro and the bio you state that the bunker "was made impenetrable", yet you later say that the Rebels did penetrate it. I think you should better say that the bunker was impenetrable from Dyer/Jerjerrod's point of view or something like that.
 * 19) **Addressed and removed. I didn't think it was necessary.
 * 20) *" a group of members of the Alliance to Restore the Republic, entered the bunker to try and destroy the shield generator, Dyer ordered his men to enter the bunker". Enter the bunker is also repetitive.
 * 21) **Fixed
 * 22) * "Dyer ordered his men to enter the bunker and confront the intruders." Next sentence: "After jumping out from behind a wall, Dyer confronted Rebel General Han Solo". Again, confront is repetitive.
 * 23) **Fixed :)
 * 24) * The last two sentences in the P&T still seem to just retell his bio. Try to reword it so that it showed more of Dyer's personality.
 * 25) **Fixed
 * 26) *That's all, I guess. Nice work. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 16:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 27) **Thanks for the Review QGJ :)

Comments
 * Not an objection, but it would be cool if you found out who portrayed Dyer in the radio dramatization. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 16:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Unidentified New Republic admiral

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 11:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Why? Because I can.

(3 ACs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) All clear. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Nice job. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 01:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Great work.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 14:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) In the intro you say that Sarne ruled the planet, but in the bio you say that he ruled the whole sector. Please clarify.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 14:20, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *He rules both. Kal'Shebbol is his capital, and he rules the Kathol sector. - Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 14:53, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Lucia

 * Nominated by:  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 04:00, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part of FloydProject: Path of Destruction.

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good work Floyd.  JangFett  Talk 03:42, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Soresu
 * 2) *Lucia served in the Gloom Walkers under the command of Lieutenant Ulabore, and by the Battle of Phaseera in 1,002 BBY had seen relatively little combat but was still recognized as one of the best shots in the unit and served as a sniper in battle. Break it up. Also, there are two "served"s.
 * 3) *served as a junior officer. In 1,002 BBY, Lucia and the Gloom Walkers served in the Battle of Phaseera, an effort to capture the Republic manufacturing world of Phaseera. At that time, Lucia had seen little action, but was already regarded as one of the best shots in the unit and served as a sniper in combat. Three serves.
 * 4) *The Gloom Walkers were tasked with taking out a Republic outpost which was overlooking a valley that led to the Republic base camp in Phaseera's capital city, preventing the Brotherhood army from moving through the valley during the daytime without being spotted and their presence alerted to the Republic soldiers in the camp. Break it up. Otherwise, nice article. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:03, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Lahka Khai

 * Nominated by: Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 14:52, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Vestara's mother; courtesy, of course, of Omen/WP:LE. Also, there are no quotes available relating to her.

(3 ACs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good work Jonny :)  JangFett  Talk 15:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 22:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Soresu
 * 2) *Gavar Khai—a member of the Lost Tribe of Sith, descendants of a group of Sith whose starship, the Omen, crashed onto the planet in 5,000 BBY after being knocked off-course during a hyperspace jump while attempting to deliver a shipment of Lignan crystals to Sith Lord Naga Sadow during the Great Hyperspace War. Way too much context. It would be better to cut it off at 5000 BBY. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:13, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) **Shortened quite a bit. Thanks for the review. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 13:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Rishi

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 21:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The TCW comic battle wave continues...

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  JangFett  Talk 17:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Fett gets back into TCW territory
 * 2) * In the intro and body, context on Green Company.
 * 3) **Is this really necessary? I think it's pretty obvious that Green Company is a military unit, and I can't really think of another context for it. CC doesn't contextualize Green Company, for example :P
 * 4) ***haha, all right. Thanks for pointing that out :P
 * 5) * "After Cooker had informed Fisto that he would have no line of sight with the enemy from that position, the Jedi Master finally revealed his plan to the clone; Cooker was supposed to aim for Fisto's shoulder and fire continuously." Correct me if I'm wrong, but the way this sentence is set up sounds like Cooker wants to shoot Fisto's shoulder. Clarification is needed, was this Fisto's plan?
 * 6) **Hopefully clarified.
 * 7) * "At that moment, Fisto was contacted by Cooker, who asked the Jedi to stay down and shot at the cannon, destroying it." Quite confusing. Cooker asked the Jedi to stay down and shot at the cannon, destroying it?
 * 8) **Split into two sentences to make less confusing.
 * 9) * "The Republic forces, along with some of the Rishii warriors then arrived and attacked the mines, forcing the remaining Geonosians to flee." Quite confusing. Should be, "The Republic forces, along with the help of Rishii warriors, that arrived, attacked the mines.." or something like that.
 * 10) **With the help of almighty em dashes, this should be fixed :P
 * 11) ***Much better :)
 * 12) *Overall, good work Qui-Gon.  JangFett  Talk 17:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) **Thanks. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 17:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) Soresu
 * 15) * Context on Green Company in the body. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) **Again, I don't think it is necessary. See above. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 11:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) ***It's okay, I guess. Hwever, note how CC uses "the troopers" or "the clone troopers of Green Company", which is, in fact, context in a subtle way. You link it in the next sentence, which is fine I suppose, just a little less clear. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Again, there's not enough information for an "Aftermath" section. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 21:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Imprint

 * Nominated by: &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 01:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Guest nom for WP:LE. Inspired by Kilson. This is freshly released, so the whole thing is a spoiler.

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:54, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Well done Master Jon. :) Kilson Likes PIE 04:39, 03 August 09 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) You might want to mention that the cover was done by Ian Keltie in the intro, other than that, nice job. It's really cool to see that I'm actually making a difference on the site, and not with PIE this time. :) Kilson Likes PIE 01:30, 02 August 09 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 01:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Soresu
 * 4) *The Tyro gathers Tikk into her arms. Unclear which Tyro you are referring to (I know it says "her", but I would prefer it to be a littel clearer.) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) **Addressed. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 15:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Around 450 words, give or take a few. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 01:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't provide any further details as to what is meant by "imprint", as the story gives no further explanation beyond what is already in the plot summary. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 06:04, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Finn Galfridian

 * Nominated by:  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 03:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part of my Galfridian Project

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support Object
 * 1)  JangFett  Talk 00:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Fett
 * 2) * Intro needs expanding.
 * 3) * "Although the two and their people were able to reach the hangar, the Yuuzhan Vong kept the building under siege." Try to reword "the two and their people". Mention who where the "two".
 * 4) * The "Yavin 4" section is too small to have its own section. Merge the sentence with the bio content.
 * 5) * P&T-"He had a dislike of shopping unless it was for food." Merge these short, choppy sentences.
 * 6) * P&T-"He was forced to take on much responsibility after his father elected to remain on Artorias to fight the Yuuzhan Vong invaders." That is not needed, it is already mentioned in the bio.
 * 7) * P&T-"He confided to Luke Skywalker that he didn't know how to lead, but was informed by the Jedi Master that if he faked confidence, he would get his people's backing." Again, not needed. You're just restating information from the bio. Unless you can state and source that he wasn't a natural leader and wasn't sure of himself in leading.
 * 8) * P&T-"He wanted to join his father's strike force against the Yuuzhan Vong despite the near certainty of death and at one point told Skywalker that he needed to find his mother and sister, despite knowing they were being held in captivity by the invaders." Again, not needed. Rewording content from the bio and then place it in the P&T is not concise.
 * 9) * Overall, try to lessen the play by play detail from the bio. Other than that, good work.
 * 10) **I think I got them all PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 21:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) Soresu
 * 12) *First off, when you type bolded comic quotes, you are meant to use italics instead.
 * 13) ** Addressed  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 22:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) *Context on Artorias. Just "the planet Artorias" should be enough.
 * 15) ** Addressed  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 22:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) *Mention that his Force-sensitivity was discovered in the intro. ATM, he isn't explicitly linked to having the ability.
 * 17) ** Addressed  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 22:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 18) *Context on the Yuuzhan Vong in the intro and body.
 * 19) ** Addressed  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 22:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 20) *Check for underlinking.
 * 21) ** Addressed  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 22:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 22) *his leadership qualities when he was thrust into a leadership role for the citizens of Artorias, confiding to Luke Skywalker that he was in over his head and wasn't a leader. Leader is too repetitive.
 * 23) ** Addressed  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 22:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 24) *was ultimately lost. Due to the timely assistance of Luke Skywalker he was able to evacuate safely from Artorias. However his sister and mother were ultimately captured, Ultimately is reptitive.
 * 25) ** Addressed  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 22:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 26) *Not bad, overall. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 27) ** Thanks :)  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 22:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Caled Galfridian

 * Nominated by:  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 03:48, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part of my Galfridian Project

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 1) Fett
 * 2) * Intro needs a major expansion
 * 3) *I see a lot of play by play detail that is not needed. Try to go back and remove any irrelevant information, or just minor details.
 * 4) *Like Finn, I see a lot of underlinking problems. Any new subject that appears in the intro and main body, in this case his bio, must be linked. i.e, Hoth or Rebel Alliance. During my copyedit, I linked a couple of subjects.
 * 5) * "They were herded into a Yuuzhan Vong slaveship and imprisoned." Merge this with the previous sentence and identify "they".
 * 6) * "Caled ruled an idyllic planet that was so peaceful that it did not even possess a rudimentary defense force." "they" is repetitive. Also, try to reword this sentence. "that was so peace that it did not even possess a rudimentary defense force". Quite confusing, possibly it is the repetition of "they"
 * 7) * "The king and his rushed towards the marketplace to find Caled's wife Nina and daughter Kaye." "the king and his rushed"? Reword
 * 8) * P&T-"However, Caled also showed responsibility towards his people." Try to mention this eariler in the P&T.
 * 9) *P&T- "When the Yuuzhan Vong invaded Artorias, Caled's first action was to rush to the marketplace in order to save his wife and daughter. He personally ordered the Artorians in the marketplace to retreat to the hangar, and once inside, set about organizing a defense. When Luke Skywalker gave him the opportunity to evacuate the planet, Caled refused. He cited his duty as king to keep Artorias safe and wished to look for any signs of his wife and daughter. The king then organized a strike force to attack the Yuuzhan Vong directly." This paragraph just restates what happened in the bio. It is not needed in the P&T.
 * 10) * JangFett  Talk 16:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) ** I think I got it all  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 23:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 12) ***More to come.  JangFett  Talk 00:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) ****Try it now  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 04:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) ****Addressed  PointGiven  ( But...it was so artistically done... ) 21:30, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Lasavvou

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 08:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: None

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Would've supported on FAN if it had stayed over 1000 words.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) * Have you checked the CSWE? QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 07:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) **He does not appear. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:23, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Nayayen
 * 4) * "a branch of the crime syndicate the Exchange." This sounds a little odd, surely just "the Exchange crime sydicate"?
 * 5) ** It is not the Exchange but rather a different, side company that is covertly owned by the Exchange.
 * 6) ***Nevermind, I realized what you ment after posting that. Fixed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:26, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) * You also don't mention that the docking authority was owned by the Exchange in the body of the article.
 * 8) **I thought I'd remedied that already.
 * 9) * Link to CUSWE entry?
 * 10) **It says nothing but "He was stranded and got saved." It doesn't really help the article.
 * 11) * "...Kahranna, as well as her family, with him off the planet." Nar Shaddaa is a moon.
 * 12) **Fixed.
 * 13) * Same planet/moon issue near the end of the P&T and Bts.
 * 14) **Fixed.
 * 15) *Other than that, looks good Naru. Nayayen [[Image:Old Republic military symbol.png|18px]] talk  09:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) *You'll need to take care of that redlink now that Rule 8 has been tweaked to have none in the intro. Nayayen [[Image:Old Republic military symbol.png|18px]] talk 17:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) QGJ
 * 18) **I think you should use the GameLS template in the bio.
 * 19) **The mention of the Jedi Civil War is unique to the intro.
 * 20) **You use the "with what credits he had" construction twice. Try to vary it a bit.
 * 21) **Bts. "If the Exile follows the dark path when the Ithorian asks if she is part of the dock authority, if the player says that she is and that they can negotiate a lower price, he will pay her 200 credits to get more time to pay the fee but never talk to her again." Three "if"s in the same sentence doesn't quite work. Reword.
 * 22) **Good job otherwise. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 21:02, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Lady Blue

 * Nominated by: Green Tentacle (Talk) 22:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: She was a great gal.

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 01:02, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Emon should have kept her for himself :). SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 12:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Object

Comments

The Clone Wars: Shakedown

 * Nominated by: Kilson Likes PIE 04:53, 04 August 09 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Keeping the OOU party going. There are now two other great users who have written OOUs, and I hope many more will come. I'm now considering making an OOU project.

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Watch the spelling mistakes though. I corrected around 5. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 12:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) From the Council Chambers:
 * 2) *The referencing can be more specific, since we can now link to individual pages of the comic. Please update the references accordingly.
 * 3) *Otherwise, looks good after a short copyedit. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 02:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Llokay

 * Nominated by:  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 08:19, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A double nom with Yevra, and part of FloydProject: Path of Destruction.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 1) Fett
 * 2) *"Llokay, along with Sirak and Yevra waited in the library, while Githany lured Bane, who had left his lightsaber in his personal chambers, into the the archives." This sentence is confusing by the way it's set up. Too much is happening. Possibly split up the sentences to ease the clause.
 * 3) *Good work Floyd; a interesting read too :) I need to finish reading Path of Destruction  JangFett  Talk 23:44, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Yevra

 * Nominated by:  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 08:19, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A double nom with Llokay, and part of FloydProject: Path of Destruction.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 1) Fett
 * 2) *"Yevra, along with Sirak and Llokay waited in the library, while Githany lured Bane, who had left his lightsaber in his personal chambers, into the the archives." Same comment as above.
 * 3) *Another good read Floyd. However, I noticed that the article is similar to Llokay :D  JangFett  Talk 23:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

CT-43/002

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 15:05, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A rare non-TCW clone nom. Enjoy.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Fett
 * 2) *Intro-"CT-43, however, turned out to be the only casualty of the entire squad, which eventually completed its mission" Quite confusing. So when CT-43 died the mission was completed? The "its" needs clarifying.
 * 3) *"Clone trooper CT-43/002 was a clone of bounty hunter Jango Fett, born on the planet of Kamino to serve in the Grand Army of the Republic." I believe like all clone articles, the way this sentence is set up sounds like Jango Fett was also born on Kamino. With the removal of the "Born on Kamino" part, the sentence should flow better.
 * 4) * BtS needs sourcing
 * 5) **It's self-sourcing, so it does not.  CC7567  (talk) 23:47, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Thanks for correcting me CC.  JangFett  Talk 23:52, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) *Great work Qui-Gon. Always good to see non-TCW clone articles once in a while :P  JangFett  Talk 23:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * No quotes available
 * No information for a "P&T" section. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 15:05, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

The Clone Wars: The Dreams of General Grievous

 * Nominated by:  JangFett  Talk 16:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Continuing the OOU TCW comic wave.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
 * 1) Kreivi Wolter 03:47, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) From the Council Chambers:
 * 2) *We can now link to individual pages of the webcomic, so please reference accordingly.
 * 3) *Otherwise, great job. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 03:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) **Addressed. Thanks for the review Jonathan :)

Comments

Vestara Khai

 * Nominated by: Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith 16:39, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Just finished a significant rewrite. Important to FOTJ.

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Fett
 * 2) *Before I continue, you're missing sources everywhere.
 * 3) *Missing tags in the infobox.
 * 4) * JangFett  Talk 16:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) First glance from the Council Chambers:
 * 6) *GAN requirement number 9: "For articles under 1000 words in length, comprehensive detail is required with all information covered from all sources and appearances. For articles over 1000 words, broad coverage addressing all major aspects of the topic is sufficient." The article currently stands at only 443 words, disqualifying it from the "broad coverage" provision. This must be expanded up to at least one thousand words at the absolute minimum, preferably more, before I'll even consider looking at it.
 * 7) *&mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 16:58, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Before I review, did you get an okay for this from Grunny? He has reserved this article as his personal project on WP:LE. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 17:12, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I did not, because I was unaware of this. Nowhere on the page nor in the talk page does it say this (though I understand what you're saying).  Also, I don't understand why this article requires 1,000 words; why can it not fall under the "under 1,000 words" category?  I didn't understand that the source requirement was required everywhere, so I will get to adding them.  Lastly, if this is Grunny's personal project, then why are others not allowed to work on the article?  That sounds pretty bad, having an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, except the articles that someone has claimed".  I don't mean to sound bad, I just mean that I should be able to work on the article. Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith 17:24, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, so I remove my comments about article reservation with an apology, because I didn't notice that this was part of a Wookieeproject (which it does say on the talk page). But still, I maintain that I can still edit the article and even bring it up to GA status, especially since Grunny, having claimed it, hasn't made an edit since at least May.  As for Fett's comment I will get to working on it this afternoon. Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith 17:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * As far as the word count, read the rule I quoted. Any article under 1,000 words (which this article currently is) must be comprehensive&mdash;i.e. fully detailed without glossing over major plot points with just a few words. In order to be comprehensive, this article would have to be several thousand words, given that Vestara is a major character in Omen. The alternative is "broad coverage", meaning that the article simply addresses all major points without going into the level of detail required of a comprehensive article. However, such articles must be at least 1,000 words minimum. Any article both under 1,000 words and not comprehensive simply cannot qualify as a Good Article. As far as Grunny goes, I suspect he's waiting for Abyss to be released in two weeks; she is listed in the Dramatis Personae for that book, and as such will need a significant update at that time. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 17:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I understand, thank you for the info. As for Grunny, I've contacted him a few minutes ago, so hopefully I'll hear back soon.  I'd like to see this through (it's my first nomination), so I've asked for both his permission to work on it and his help.  Hopefully I'll hear back soon. Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith 18:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

The Clone Wars: Mouse Hunt

 * Nominated by:  Mauser  Comlink 00:05, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's not my fault, Kilson asked me to do this!

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Well, nonetheless, Nicely done :)  JangFett  Talk 00:50, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) From the Council Chambers:
 * 2) *We can now link to individual pages of the webcomic, so please reference accordingly.
 * 3) *Context on "Shinies".
 * 4) *Otherwise, good job. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 03:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) This isn't an objection but, I see you use "Cody" and "Rex" instead of their designated Clone trooper serial numbers. i.e, CC-2224. Possibly you can use their numbers instead of their nicknames?  JangFett  Talk 00:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC)