Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer.

The nomination process is experimental. Feel free to post suggestions to the talk page.


 * /History - for past winners.

Sign below an article you find excellent. You can vote for as many as you like. If your favorite article is not present, feel free to add one (with an optional reason), but remember to sign it. Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating and keep the list in alphabetical order.

Every Sunday the article with the most votes is highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template.

Aayla Secura
Comments
 * 1) Padme829 03:24, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)Padme829
 * 2) Sith Lord 04:50, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * This is a very complete article!Padme829 03:24, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)Padme829
 * You're right, but we still miss a lot of the 'Clone Wars Aayla'. --[[Image:BFguy.gif]]--Inmobilus 19:55, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * After looking at it, I believe it still needs to be expanded some, needs red links filled in, and needs to be cleaned up some. Adamwankenobi 06:30, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * It needs a lot of work. I added some things to the Clone Wars section but it still isn't half complete. --Master Starkeiller 19:13, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Anakin Skywalker
Comments
 * 1) QuentinGeorge 08:44, 29 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) MarcK 08:57, 29 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Jasca Ducato 17:33, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) SFH 03:11, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Most of the Clone Wars section is straight off the databank. That doesn't equal "Featured Article" in my book. --Death Regis 00:07, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Removed my vote until that portion is improved. QuentinGeorge 06:27, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * It's a definite copyvio, as well. Aaargh! QuentinGeorge 06:30, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * But the copyvio info has now been removed and replaced with our own info. -- SFH 03:11, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Nope. It's been put back in there again. QuentinGeorge 08:21, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Anakin Solo
Comments
 * 1) Divinity 10:55, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Another well written article that should be featured as well. Even though I don't really like this character that much, I think it deserves to be in the same position as Jaina and Jacen Solo. After all, I think all three articles on the Solo kids are really well written. So if this one's good, why not? - Divinity 10:55, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Beilert Valance
Comments
 * 1) Kwenn 19:20, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) AngelQueen 00:00, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Shadowtrooper 03:36, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) SparqMan 21:19, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * A great article on one of the more obscure, yet popular and fascinating characters. Well written and informative - Kwenn
 * This article puts articles on major players like Ackbar and Wedge Antilles, or even Leia Organa Solo and Luke Skywalker to shame, and he appeared in only three comics. It's a fine piece of work&mdash;one of the best on Wookieepedia. --SparqMan 21:19, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * It will need a few more redlinks filled to garner my vote. -- Riffsyphon1024 05:36, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Delta Squad

 * 1) Dark Lord Revan, 19:28, 24 Nov 2005

Comments
 * Waaaaaaaaaaaay too short to be a featured article. Kuralyov 23:34, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)


 * It looks flashy but doesnt have alot of substance. OOM-30 19:18, 25 Nov 2005 (CET)


 * Are you KIDDING me?! This article is NOT suited for featured nomination. ColdFusion900 15:01, 27 Nov 2005


 * Ah ha ha ha ha ha ha! Good one. --Maru  (talk) Contribs 00:13, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)


 * Absolute opposition. Did you mean to nominate this for the improvement drive?  It's a stub.  &mdash; Silly Dan  00:48, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)


 * Yeah...oops-Dark Lord Revan


 * Maybe it was put up as a joke. Adamwankenobi 01:04, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Ewok
Comments
 * 1) 24.247.124.158 19:51, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) AngelQueen 13:37, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) FrozenPhoenix32 8:15, 4 Oct 2005
 * 4) RPharazon 01:37, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Adamwankenobi 14:39, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) &mdash; Silly Dan  19:43, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) AdmiralKadann 16:21, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * It's very long and has just about every single fact on Ewok culture. --24.247.124.158 20:38, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Please sign up first. QuentinGeorge 22:52, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * I say give it a go-go. It's good, and it's long and it has an indepth history of the Ewoks, plus behind the scenes stuff. Frozenphoenix32
 * As Hal on Undergrads said, "Yaaay! Ewoks!" - RPharazon 01:37, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree. The article definately is featured-quality. Adamwankenobi 04:16, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Hold on a sec, after looking at the appearances section, I know that there are several Children's books and a comic series about them, it still needs tose added. Anyone? Adamwankenobi 02:59, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * I'll vote for it if someone can fill in some redlinks and add more pictures. &mdash; Silly Dan  18:49, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * I've added some pictures and there's not many redlinks left. Could somebody upload a picture of an Ewok shaman?
 * Added a picture of Logray. As we continue working on it, it'll be ready for the front page by the time it's accumulated to votes.   &mdash; Silly Dan  19:43, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Galactic Civil War
Comments
 * 1) Padme829 21:45, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829
 * 1) While this article has a good start, it is still too much of a review of the OT films. It would be great if we could expand the focus to include the general trends of the conflict across the galaxy - including those battles between the Empire and non-Alliance forces. --SparqMan 05:56, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) The 15 or so years after the Battle of Endor are all in one paragraph.  This needs to be expanded. --Novajoe23 19:13, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Gilad Pellaeon
Comments
 * 1) Novajoe23 18:35, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) AdmiralKadann 19:05, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Sikon [ Talk ] 11:23, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Kuralyov 23:34, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Maybe a little short, but a nice article overall. Sikon [ Talk ] 11:23, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Grievous
Comments
 * 1) MarcK 06:07, 12 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Gwai Lo 02:47, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Sorry, but needs a lot of work. The prose is a bit clunky for my liking, and it goes into overly-minute details for combat (it gives a blow-by-blow account of the Battle of Hypori.), while neglecting other information. QuentinGeorge 10:57, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Did some changes.TIEPilot051999 03:15, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Han Solo
Comments
 * 1) Jill Tan 19:01, 02 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) --Darth Mantus 18:35, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Divinity 05:30, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) AngelQueen 00:00, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose for now, but only because the last section needs serious expansion. I'm pretty sure his activities in the NJO books amount to more than the couple of sentences I wrote without ever having read the books in question.  &mdash; Silly Dan  23:31, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Imperial I-class Star Destroyer

 * 1) MarcK 20:02, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) ColdFusion900 16:19, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Shadowtrooper 03:50, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) AdmiralKadann 19:06, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Holy crap this is a good article. MarcK 20:02, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree. This is an amazing article and should be featured. ColdFusion900 16:20, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed, so long as we get better, less blurry pics up there. If I have time, I'll just take some shots of ISDs from the films. [[Image:Tbhelm.gif|30px]] Shadowtrooper talk 03:51, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Great article, but does Earth have to be mentioned within the In-Universe text? -- Riffsyphon1024 19:58, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Jacen Solo
Comments
 * 1) TIEPilot051999 00:51, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Divinity 03:11, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) AdmiralKadann 12:26, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I hate the character with a passion words cannot adequately describe. That said, this is a well written page about him that reminds me of the times before the NJO.TIEPilot051999 00:51, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Jaina Solo
Comments
 * 1) Divinity 12:40, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Padme829 03:18, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)Padme829
 * 3) TIEPilot051999 20:38, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) AdmiralKadann 16:19, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I think this article is really well written. Like her twin Jacen, she should be featured as well. - Divinity 12:40, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed. She is a worthwile read.Padme829 03:18, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)Padme829
 * Why not?TIEPilot051999 20:38, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Kyle Katarn

 * 1) TIEPilot051999 23:47, 19 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) KEJ 12:19, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) hash 01:29, 22 Nov 2005 (GMT)
 * 4) JoJoTrue 18:25, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Sikon [ Talk ] 11:26, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Lando Calrissian
Comments
 * 1) QuentinGeorge 09:51, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Padme829 03:09, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829
 * 3) AngelQueen 00:00, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * It would be nice if we could get articles (at least some stubs) done to fill in the redlinks. QuentinGeorge 06:25, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * It's very complete, except for the redlinks.Padme829 03:09, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829

Luke Skywalker
Comments
 * 1) Sikon 15:41, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) AngelQueen 22:08, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) MarcK 02:48, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Divinity 05:32, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) TIEPilot051999 19:01, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * It's an excellent article! It should definitely be displayed with pride!AngelQueen 22:08, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * In any article deserves to be the featured one, its this one. TIEPilot051999 19:01, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Mandalorian
Comments
 * 1) QuentinGeorge 07:14, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Riffsyphon1024 04:41, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) --Darth Mantus 14:16, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Xilentshadow900 17:58, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Sith Lord 04:51, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) KEJ 00:00, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I think this is a fairly comprehensive look at Mandalorians. QuentinGeorge 07:14, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed, Quentin. -- Riffsyphon1024 04:41, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Aye, now with the culture section, its even better. Right, I'm done tooting my horn. Xilentshadow900 17:58, 30 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Mara Jade Skywalker

 * 1) Padme829 16:44, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829
 * 2) AngelQueen 00:00, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Jed-eye 00:00, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Mara Jade rocks! Also she's considered one of the best EU characters by many fans. Divinity 05:36, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * She's easily one of the best characters in the EU. And those who don't know who Luke Skywalker's wife is should visit this article. Jed-eye 11:37, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Object. Just so we're clear, a featured article isn't made great by its subject, but by its content. This one for example is extremely scarce for easily the most popular female EU character, and one that's up there with the most popular EU characters overall, such as Quinlan Vos and Thrawn. Hence why it's currently on the improvement drive. --MarcK [talk] 11:52, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with MarcK. QuentinGeorge 08:22, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I too agree with MarcK. Adamwankenobi 06:33, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Alright then. Since many have objected to this article, why don't we removed it from the featured article section until it has been improved, shall we? - Divinity 14:54, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm really sorry if I made a mistake for not noticing that this article is poorly written. If this article needs to be improved, then I'm removing my vote until the improvement is done. - Divinity 08:38, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Mustafar
Comments With RotS DVD and Trials of Obi-Wan coming out soon, why not? Tam 18:37, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) AngelQueen 13:41, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Tam 18:37, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't be too eager to nominate something for a reason like that. These articles need to have a higher set of standards than they do to be featured, IMHO. Adamwankenobi 14:23, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Redlinks need filling. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:03, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * It needs some expanding and cleanup, IMHO. Adamwankenobi 06:32, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Nom Anor
Comments
 * 1) StarNeptune 16:30, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Ywingempress 00:10, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Divinity 05:33, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Palpatine
Comments Cato Neimoidia 09:06, November 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Cato Neimoidia 09:06, November 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Very good, long, article.

Padmé Amidala
Comments yes i want to know more about mustafar
 * 1) AngelQueen 22:31, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Darkshadow 19:13, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Padme829 21:49, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829
 * 4) Dil 23:50, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * It would be nice to get some of the redlinks filled with articles. QuentinGeorge 06:59, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Done! :) AngelQueen 13:11, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Quinlan Vos

 * 1) TIEPilot051999 15:50, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * A few redlinks need to be filled, but on the whole, it looks pretty good.TIEPilot051999 15:50, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Strongly oppose; still needs a hell of a lot filled in, which I'm currently working on. Once we get his biography more fleshed out this shall certainly be a candidate. --MarcK [talk] 04:46, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Soontir Fel

 * 1) &mdash; Silly Dan  03:49, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) AdmiralKadann 13:39, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 23:58, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Having never read the Rogue Squadron comics, almost all I know about this guy is in this article. Well written, seems to be complete.  &mdash; Silly Dan  03:49, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * This is a very good article. AdmiralKadann 13:39, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The Star Wars Holiday Special

 * 1) Adamwankenobi 08:11, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) MarcK 15:49, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Thinortolan 16:21, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Riffsyphon1024 05:46, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) ColdFusion900 15:32, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Novajoe2318:58, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) KEJ 23:56, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) THX-1138 01:26, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) TKRKS 21:57, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comments I have worked on this since around March on wikipedia. A while back, I copied and pasted it here, as it seems to cover pretty much everything about the special. After some intense wookieefying, I believe it's now up to the standards of being a featured article on here. Take a look at the page and tell me what you think. (I think that if the SuperShadow article can be featured, anything can.) Adamwankenobi 08:12, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... Supershadow is different. He's just some retard. He doesn't give Star Wars a bad name. This is a monstrosity that should stay away from the main page. The article is very good, but I think this disgusting thing would give a very bad image of Star Wars if it was in the front page. --Master Starkeiller 15:37, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, come on, it's not that bad. :) And besides, the article specifically addresses why it is so hated (I made sure of that). It basically covers everything I could think of, and I belive it is quite comprehensive. It tells (as you've seen) much about the production, story, what people generally think of it, all of the plot elements, etc. It seems to be quite informative about such an obscure topic, which is what I speciallize in on here. I think it at least gives a neutral view of it, similarly to SKot Kirkwood's starwarsholidayspecial.com. Adamwankenobi 15:47, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree, more important than the fact of Holiday Special being the worst official SW production ever, is that the article is impresive. Also can serve as an example of errors that shouldn't be repeated ever :) Thinortolan 16:21, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * By the Force, its effing huge! -- Riffsyphon1024 05:46, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't give a Hutt's butt whether the Helliday Special sucks or not; this article is good, and that's what counts. KEJ 23:56, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Cool! I'm currently trying to get this a featured article on Wikipedia as well. They're giving me some very strict ideas of what changes I should make. But, I think, for the purposes of this wiki, I'll leave the version here as it is. Adamwankenobi 21:22, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Thrawn
Comments
 * 1) AdmiralKadann 17:36, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) --Maru (talk) Contribs 02:27, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) --SOCL 04:09, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Kuralyov 17:03, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) KEJ 23:51, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Twi'lek
Comments
 * 1) Padme829 00:28, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829
 * 2) Rhysode 11:15, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) AdmiralKadann 12:04, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Riffsyphon1024 17:12, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Sith Lord 04:52, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) KEJ 23:50, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I think this is a very complete look at the twi'lek culture.Padme829 00:28, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Wow! Excellent article.
 * Those few redlinks need filling but great article overall. -- Riffsyphon1024 17:12, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Yup, great article.... just needs some more pics of Twi'leks - preferably females ;-) KEJ 23:50, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yoda
Comments
 * 1) Novajoe23 15:35, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Master Starkeiller 18:01, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Riffsyphon1024 20:09, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) --MarcK [talk] 00:20, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Sith Lord 04:52, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Good this article is. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:09, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yuuzhan Vong
Comments
 * 1) DarthExodus 15:32, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) MarcK 11:19, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) AdmiralKadann 16:19, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)