Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Star Wars: Empire at War


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

(-1)
Support

Oppose
 * 1) From a quick glance at the legal scratchpad of Atarumaster88
 * 2) *Lots of things wrong with this. There's no plot summary, for one.
 * 3) *Doesn't describe gameplay modes.
 * 4) *Majority of the article is a list.
 * 5) *No referencing at all.
 * 6) *No development history section.
 * 7) *Marginal coverage of review.
 * 8) *Marginal coverage of development team, etc.
 * 9) *This is a very ambitious project and I think you're going to have to overcome a lot of obstacles (namely me and other reviewers, to put it bluntly) before this hits GAN. Mega props if you can satisfy the requirements and do it. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 20:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Maybe I'll just scrap the nomination. It's worth the trouble, but you do have a good point.JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * For one, I'd have to spend a lot of time for this; I'm writing a fanon and I'd rather spend time doing that.JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't have a major commitment to this site, although I love it.JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * What is that you say?JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Give me three good ones on why I shouldn't screw the whole thing. I can come up with one.JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Your going to contribute greatly! It is worth the trouble. JadenKorr13 05:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Is it too much to ask to get signature on these statements? Is it too much to ask to for the nominator to support the article as well? —Tommy  [[Image:Red lightsaber.png|20px]] ( There are no Jedi here ) 22:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

JadenKorr13 03:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)