User talk:Exiledjedi/Archive 3

WP:KOTOR
As of 0:00 UTC (8:00 PM EST), I have assumed responsibilities for leading this project, due to my predecessor Cylka's inactivity. Wherever she is, I wish her well in her endeavors, and should she come back, I will gladly turn over leadership back to her. Over the next few weeks, I look forward to reviewing more articles and also wish to get more KotOR-related projects off the ground, and look forward to moving forward to bettering this project and ultimately Wookieepedia. Thank you for your continued service to Wookieepedia.&mdash; 01:07, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
Hey, just wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:09, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

GAN
Hey, EJ. Not sure if you saw this question or not, so I thought I'd ask you here. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:34, December 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Gotcha, thanks for the heads up. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:45, December 30, 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
Hey, I wanna wish you a happy new year! :) --XXLVenom998 (talk) 11:03, December 31, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Wookieepedian of the Month
Hey there, just saying thanks for congratulating me on my WOTM victory. Really appreciate it.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 08:34, January 1, 2013 (UTC)

BT7 Thunderstrike
Hey, EJ, got something for you. According to this email, the CA BT7 Thunderstrike is actually just the BT-7 Thunderclap. So, should I simply merge the two, or is there some EC magic that must be worked first? Cade  Calrayn   03:52, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
Hey, EJ. I just wanted to express my thanks for your support on the RFB nomination. You're a real asset to the article nomination system, and I'm glad we've been able to work together. Thank you. :) Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:34, January 11, 2013 (UTC)

WP;Novels
Hey, just wanted to ask you if you would be interested in joining | Project Novels. Thanks, Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:07, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Explorer's Guide
Actually, all vendors, trainers and non-class mission givers appear in the guide. I just remembered this when writing Travin. Cade  Calrayn   03:49, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * Cormun - yes
 * Veshta - not by name ("Sith Inquisitor/Warrior Trainers")
 * Mallohe - no, as there's not a map of the spaceport
 * Forris - as "Trooper Trainer"
 * They're just marked with a symbol on the map and listed in the legend like above.

JCF quote sources
Hey. While I appreciate your help with fixing the JCF links, please don't use URLs of the form http://boards.theforce.net/threads/legacy-war-2.31264735/page-5#post-31459953 for quote sources, as such link are dependent on the page number. That should be shortened to http://boards.theforce.net/posts/31459953/ to ensure that the link still leads to the right place if the ability to customize the posts-per-page setting is offered in the future&mdash;the same reason that the "url" parameter of the JCFcite template is deprecated in favor of "postnum". Thanks. :) &mdash;MJ&mdash; Training Room 00:54, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

Still JCF business
Hey EJ, I noticed you fixing my mistakes there on the JCFcitations, looks like I was inserting the wrong number :/, so I wanted to thank you. Feel free to sign your name on the ones you helped by correcting my mistakes. Winterz (talk) 02:38, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * You have my gratitude, EJ. Keep up your good work. Winterz (talk) 13:54, January 30, 2013 (UTC)

Smapp
Here you go. Sorry the image is terrible, that's the best I could manage...

 Stake black   msg 01:13, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * I also found this tidbit in a different page: "Doctors on Outer Zznza advise: Cook Smapp over eliptical flame to reduce solar scars."  Stake black   msg 17:39, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * It's in the "Aliens Kidnapped by Humans" tabloid-like bit. But it's only a footnote, there's no context on it. That's really all the info available.  Stake black   msg 23:55, January 31, 2013 (UTC)

FAN page reviewing
Hey, EJ,

I'm writing this to you on behalf of the entire Inquisitorius. At our recent meeting, we discussed the current lack of non-INQs who are actively involved in reviewing on the FAN page, and we decided that the best solution was to simply appeal to people to review more. This first paragraph is being sent verbatim to a whole bunch of people, but the following one is being written specifically for you.

I'll be honest: You're one of the best reviewers on the site. I'm always very impressed by the reviews you frequently give on the GAN page, and I would personally love to see you bring those skills over to the FAN page. I know that you don't nom FAs tooooo often, but I think you do frequently enough that reciprocating by actively reviewing others' FAnoms wouldn't be amiss. You have a lot to bring to the table. So, yeah, the INQs are trying to give a huge kick-start to the somewhat-stagnant FAN page, and we'd love for you to join in the revolution. Cheers, and have a great day! Menkooroo (talk) 07:10, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Bounty Hunter screenshots
Thank you for the Wookiee-cookie! I've been meaning to do them for ages and finally got round to getting an emulator of the game this week. Glad that they were helpful :) Ayrehead02 (talk) 02:18, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

Consensus track notice
The MOS CT has been slightly amended. Please review the change to determine whether to adjust your vote. Thank you. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 23:45, March 4, 2013 (UTC)

Meteor
Hey, EJ, I thought you might find this page useful. It's still a work in progress, but I'm planning to finish going through the conversation files, the Codex, and the Encyclopedia for stuff you can work on. Cade  Calrayn   16:37, March 6, 2013 (UTC)

Zeuol GAN
Hey Exiled Jedi. When you get the chance, please make sure to check your objection to the Zeoul GAN. They've been addressed for over a week, and the nomination is otherwise awaiting archiving. Thanks.  CC7567  (talk) 17:54, March 6, 2013 (UTC)

CT change
Hey, EJ. A heads-up about a change to Forum:CT:OOU Layout Guide: Published narrative works: Per the discussion section, "Cast" has been changed to "Credits" and will now include crewmembers as well. Take a look and let me know what you think. Menkooroo (talk) 04:31, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * The next change is an aesthetic one about image alignment in the "Main characters" section. Take a look. Menkooroo (talk) 04:04, March 17, 2013 (UTC)

Sith Emperor (third option)
Hi, upon comments from User:LelalMekha a third option has been proposed. Feel free to review the changes to the voting options @ Forum:CT:Move_Sith_Emperor_to_Emperor_Vitiate. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:46, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

10-4TO
Hey, EJ, when you get a chance, could you take a look at your objections to 10-4TO? It only needs your and Cav's votes to pass. And am I right in thinking you're going to nominate Riegenn Hetuu and his associated articles? Thief :P Cade    Calrayn  19:03, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Obri in Insider 141
Hi Exiledjedi! I've noticed you have Star Wars Insider 141 in your possession. Could you please tell me what does the short story Dawn of the Jedi: Eruption have to say about the planet Obri? It's currently a Good Article, and I'd like to update it. Huge thanks!  Imperators II (Talk) 08:55, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Wow, really thanks! So is Obri just mentioned, or does it actually appear in the story (like, visible in Zerist's sky or something)?  Imperators II (Talk) 12:58, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nope, that sounds as a  to me. On an Eruption-related note, can you also look up if there's anything on Sunspot and the moon of Ashla? Thanks again!  Imperators II (Talk) 13:25, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you!  Imperators II (Talk) 13:06, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

WOTM
Hey EJ, just wanted to say thanks for supporting my nomination for WOTM last month. I really appreciate it. Supreme Emperor (talk) 13:57, May 2, 2013 (UTC)

re: Yoxgit
From page 191, entry for Ugnaught: ''At least one Ugnaught has begun a new life away from Bespin. Yoxgit made a fortune illegally selling tibanna gas to arms dealers, then jumped planet for Tatooine, where he finds work with Jabba the Hutt.'' <- Omicron (Leave a message at the BEEP! ) 16:28, May 19, 2013 (UTC)

WP:VG milestone
Good day, gamers! WookieeProject Video Games has reached a new milestone. The members of WP:VG have taken 100 articles to Comprehensive status! The 100th article was Inspector-General, from the Star Wars: The Force Unleashed II in-game databank. The full list of articles can be seen here. WP:VG and its members can be proud of the accomplishments we have made. As we near the two year mark of this ambitious project, we look back and see all the great progress and improvements we have made to Wookieepedia as a whole and the video game aspect of the wiki in particular. Most of these 100 articles would have probably been lost in the shuffle had it not been for the hard work, dedication, and patient perceptiveness of the users who comprise WP:VG. Out of all the current WookieeProjects, WookieeProject Video Games has the second highest amount of Comprehensive articles to its name. I would like to say good work and congratulations to all the members of WP:VG. Keep up the excellent job, and May the Force be with the Gamers!&mdash; Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 20:38, May 28, 2013 (UTC)

Secrets of Tatooine
Hey, EJ, could you take a look at my request relating to Boorka's possible appearance in Secrets of Tatooine on the BB6 page. Thanks.  Commander Code-8  You lost the game! 08:08, June 24, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Human
Thanks for letting me know, EJ. I'll get to it asap.&mdash; Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 13:04, July 2, 2013 (UTC)

Hammer (Z-6 rotary blaster cannon)
Hi! I noticed you put the Hammer (Z-6 rotary blaster cannon) in the Category:Blaster cannons. I was wondering: At the top of the "Blaster cannons" category page, the description says, "This category is for any blaster that is mounted." But these rotary blaster cannons are not mounted. Should the category description be changed?--Richterbelmont10 (talk) 22:08, July 24, 2013 (UTC)

Wrist Rocket
Hi! I'm interested in your thoughts on this.--Richterbelmont10 (come in R2!) 01:54, July 27, 2013 (UTC)

Galactic Empire edits
While your edit is appreciated, the page currently has a template called Inuse at the top. This template means that someone is currently working on improving the article, and to avoid edit conflicts, no one other than the placer of the template should edit the page while the message is visible. Thank you for your cooperation.

Wookiee honor family
I can't believe I missed that. I spent ages trying to find if we had an article on it. I've sorted it out now. Thanks for the heads-up. - Sir Cavalier of One ( Squadron channel ) 12:54, August 26, 2013 (UTC)

New WP:VG leadership
Hey, EJ, I just wanted to notify you of this. Cheers.&mdash; Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 14:04, August 26, 2013 (UTC)

CAnom - Ao Var
I answered all of your objections, so I am puzzled as to why you stated that "nearly every objection is contested." If you ask me if information is available and it isn't and I say so, then what's the problem? From your last comment, it appears that you thought Sterling Hershey was the author of the game, and I now see why you kept asking me to put an author. Allow me to explain: Hershey is shown as an author on the Beginner Game page, but it isn't (or wasn't, because I have updated it) put into context. His extent of authorship is, however, detailed on the BETA page. No indication is given anywhere on FFG's site or Hershey's site that Hershey is author of more than, in his own stated words, the Beta test's "Game Master chapter, the Beta test adventure, and some others that were not included in the Beta." The Beta test adventure was "Crates of Krayts," not "Escape from Mos Shuuta." Therefore, the author of EfMS is unknown at this time. This would also extend to the character folios, which were not written during the Beta test. Any of the Beta test that Sterling Hershey authored&mdash;the Game Master chapter&mdash;would be subject to changes before its final incarnation in the Beginner Game. So, Sterling Hershey may not be the sole author of the Game Master chapter, but that is the extent of his possible authorship, depending on how much the beta translates directly to the Beginner Game and how involved he was in the changes made. Therefore, it is speculation to assume that he had anything to do with anything other than the Game Master chapter in the Beginner Game. Your only other objection that you did not strike was answered. Aside from Cade's interruption, your question concerning MJ's Tc comment was valid. I answered it explaining that MJ established what I should put and that Menkooroo elaborated how and where. I also edited a bit more to fit what you were looking for and noted to you that I did so and wanted to know how it looked. You never replied whether you approved of the change or not. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 15:52, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Not my intention to be combative. Although, that is how peer review has always been conducted traditionally, and how the doctorate thesis process is still performed. As to the listing (maybe everyone gave up reading anything after the vote to close, I don't know), what MJ and Menkooroo specifically said was:"MJ: 'cite everything to the game itself (Beginner Game),' Geth: 'what about instances like Ao Var that are soley [sic] in the short story [vignette]… a unique reference not used elsewhere in the boxed kit?', MJ: 'In that case, simply list the Beginner Game itself as the appearance…, and use… 'Star Wars: Edge of the Empire Beginner Game, Pash's character folio' [as the specific reference]…' Menk: '[The character folio] is not an in-universe short story that belongs in an 'Appearances' section; it's an encyclopedia entry that would go in a 'Sources' section—.'"I am reading that I do not put "Star Wars: Edge of the Empire Beginner Game, Pash's character folio" in Appearances. I am supposed to put that into the Sources. Am I not reading that correctly? &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:59, August 31, 2013 (UTC)

WOTM nomination
Thank you for supporting my nomination of WOTM for September 2013 as result for recognizing my work and hopefully some improvement for our beloved wookieepedia. -- Jedi Marty (talk) 23:28, August 31, 2013 (UTC)

WP:VG
Hello there, this is your local tyrannical dictator project team lead. Now that things have settled down a bit I wanted to bring this to your attention. Anyway, check it out when you get a chance and leave a comment, and keep on trekkin'. Corellian Premier The Force will be with you always 16:29, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

D'nar

 * Apologies about the delay in the processing of the nomination.  CC7567  (talk) 16:20, September 17, 2013 (UTC)

Kenner blog
Hello Jedi, I discussed this with Toprawa, and he thought Tim isn't an official authority on canon, and "Throughout the article, he's constantly pointing out that certain action figures may or likely correspond to different canonically named characters." The other one actually provided new bts info, and that's why I believe it still counts as an official source. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:15, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Ancient blaster rifle
The sources I've encountered so far seem to describe it as a model of "ancient" origins, so I believe it's a legitimate article. Hope that helps.  CC7567  (talk) 02:19, September 21, 2013 (UTC)

Recognizing your leadership
The EduCorps is undergoing some major changes, and it needs a strong leader to guide the way. You are that leader. You're undertaking the heavy lifting, and everyone is looking to you for the next step. Outstanding work. No hard work should go unrewarded. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 03:03, September 22, 2013 (UTC)

Corso Riggs's weapons
Hi Exiledjedi. Why are you creating a category for Corso Riggs's weapons? Categories are not used for weapons that are used by a single individual. -- Richterbelmont10  ( come in R2! ) 04:01, September 24, 2013 (UTC)

Guide to Warfare
Thanks for catching that comment by Fry way down on the page - I definitely didn't read past the end of the article itself.--Demos Traxen (talk) 21:46, September 28, 2013 (UTC)

EduCorps things
Hello, EduCorps member. This is a general message to you, as an EC member, regarding EC membership responsibilities. In accordance with recent site mandate, it is now the responsibility of all EC-exclusive members (EC members who are not otherwise also members of the Inq or AC) to maintain the Comprehensive article system by reviewing CANs and attending EC meetings. Since the beginning of this initiative, several members of the EduCorps have made no effort to meet their new responsibilities, so the EC came to a formal agreement to send out general notices to all EC members reminding them of their expected responsibilities. For those EC members who do not meet their responsibilities, an effort will be made to remove their membership. The next EC meeting has been scheduled for next weekend, on Saturday, October 12, at 7 PM ET. Hope to see everyone there. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:48, October 4, 2013 (UTC)

Ellberger
Hello EJ, just thought that you should update Dineé Ellberger's BTS with a note on Insider giving her first name. Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:12, October 12, 2013 (UTC)

EduCorps Meeting 4
Greetings fellow EduCorps! Our fourth meeting will be held Saturday October 26 at 7 PM ET. I hope to see your there!  OLIOSTER  (talk) 14:19, October 13, 2013 (UTC)

RE: CAN nominations

 * Thanks for the reminder I'd totally forgotten those noms some how! Fixing the objections now. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:15, October 25, 2013 (UTC)

Re: EduCorps
Well sure, glad to have been given the opportunity. Corellian Premier The Force will be with you always 00:58, October 27, 2013 (UTC)

RE: Educorps membership
Hi, I'd love another chance to join the Educorps if the corps feel I've improved enough to join! Thank you for the opportunity. Ayrehead02 (talk) 03:22, October 27, 2013 (UTC)

WOTM
Hi Exiled Jedi! I just wanted to post a little message to thank you for supporting my nomination for Wookieepedian of the Month. I couldn't be more grateful.--LennyF (talk) 15:51, November 1, 2013 (UTC)

Hey teammate
So what's the cliff notes version of when to archive CANs? Corellian Premier The Force will be with you always 22:06, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * If a CAN has been on the page for more than two days but less than a week, it needs four EC votes to archive. After a week, it needs either three EC votes or two EC votes and three regular votes. Don't forget to add the tag to all of your votes on the CAN page and to add your name to the EduCorps list on the EduCorps page. It is good to have you aboard!-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:42, November 10, 2013 (UTC)

EC
Thanks :) Glad to be aboard :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 21:56, November 11, 2013 (UTC)

RE: CAN archiving
Hey Exile thanks for the heads up, I was actually just about to archive all the other finished CAs and then put them on history, random and the CA list at the same time. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:59, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Done all the rest now thanks for finishing the attack one for me! Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:50, November 14, 2013 (UTC)

EC Retirement
Hey EJ. I'm retiring from the EduCorps as I am getting to busy to have time to come here, and I couldn't find where else to say it so I figured I'd leave a message with another EC. If there's somewhere you can point me just let me know. Cheers.  Commander Code-8  You lost the game! 04:58, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

CT:Re-opening TOR and video game canon
I thought you may wish to participate in Forum:CT:Re-opening TOR and video game canon seeing as you were involved in the consensus reached at Forum:CT:TOR and video game canon. --Gnarscien (talk) 16:25, November 17, 2013 (UTC)

Paul Blake Rodian
Hello, you removed my post concerning Paul Blake and Rodian 3. While what you state is true concerning Paul Blake could have played any of the Rodians, I would urge you to compare, with some magnification, the two images below:

static1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130318210838/starwars/images/7/7f/Unidentified_Rodian_3_DB94.png

let-the-wookie-win.com/images/20110705073344_freeborn_blake.jpg

As you will see, the comparison shows:

1. Blake in a location near the position of Rodian 3 (to the right of Falcon entry ramp) 2. Rodian 3's gun belt is much lower than the other two Rodians (which wear theirs quite a bit above the hips.) Rodian 3's is quite a bit below the hips - and exactly matches the position of the belt on Blake's waist in the on-set pic. 3. A very prominent and deep fabric crease in the crotch area of Blake's costume that runs up past the belt - this exact crease is seen on Rodian #3 and not the other Rodians.

I am basing this on a single image of Rodian 3 on the wiki page - I do not have a blu-ray of Star Wars available at the moment, but will check the moving image of Rodian 3 to see if there are any further links to Blake. Simply based on the above (belt position alone,) there is some reason to believe it is Blake as Rodian 3.

At minimum, the information that Paul Blake played one of the Rodians in D94 should be included. Despite being mentioned in the "Making of Star Wars" hardcover, it is a little-known fact that in addition to playing Greedo, Blake also played one of the Rodians in the docking bay where the dialog "you fried poor Greedo" is used!

124.185.49.73 23:27, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * I added information to each article that Blake played one of the three Rodians. I don't think there is enough to say that he played a particular one.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  04:41, November 19, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. On the subject of Rodians, I also added an entry about Beedo. There are in fact two identical Rodians in Jabba's palace (at least two pics show them in the same shot, one from the new making of ROTJ book shows Marquand directing them) and it's unclear which one is "Beedo." The key difference between the ROTJ Rodians including Beedo and the SW Rodians is that the latter are wearing Hoth Rebel vests (color altered slightly to be more orange than tan, and collars worn up) complete with Rebel rank insignia on the breast.

Lew Brell
The article was in dire need of cleanup and contained much duplicate text and information. I realize 4,000 characters less is a bit shocking and may be cause for alarm, but I urge you to carefully view the version before I had done my edits and compare it to my latest version. As far as I can tell, no information was lost from my edits, only duplicate information removed and the article made more concise and copy-edited. I propose that my changes be restored and you may restore any information you feel was lost from the previous versions (though I do not see any). --Gnarscien (talk) 05:51, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Per your response on my talk page, I will restore my changes and re-add the lost information to the 'Behind the scenes' section, but the 'Personality and traits' section contained only duplicate information that was described elsewhere in the article. If you feel any more information is missing from the article after I restore, please re-add it, but I ask that you do not revert my entire edit again, as it was the result of extensive clean-up, copy-editing, improved conciseness, and removal of duplicate information. --Gnarscien (talk) 06:09, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * I have restored much of the information from the 'Personality and traits' and 'Behind the scenes' section. The article should be good now. --Gnarscien (talk) 06:13, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Per your response on my talk page: The introduction section contained too much information for an introduction section. That information is presented elsewhere in the article. I did restore the 'Personality and traits' section, and the 'Behind the scenes' section. --Gnarscien (talk) 06:15, November 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * I urge you to consider that the current state of the article is not acceptable. Please read it carefully before making a judgement. --Gnarscien (talk) 06:19, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

I wanted to apologize if you felt I was in any way disrespectful during our dispute over this, or that I was edit warring. I have settled for simply making corrections to the article's spelling and punctuation without removing anything. I still feel it needs a great deal more work, but I realize that feeling is not mutual. --Gnarscien (talk) 08:43, November 20, 2013 (UTC)

EC Meeting 6
Greetings, EduCorps Meeting 6 is scheduled for Saturday, December 7th at 7 PM ET. If you are unable to attend, please leave notes on the meeting page on how the articles under review should be handled. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:37, November 22, 2013 (UTC)

Puck Naeco
May I ask you to say, is Puck Naeco should be read as /pʌk ni:kɔɪ/ ? Sightsaber (talk) 08:12, November 29, 2013 (UTC)

Rogues Gallery 146
I see you have already been working on the pilots, featured in the upcoming Rogues Gallery from Insider 146. Do not hesitate to ask anything to me, Sander or Kevin if you should have any questions. All the best ! --Sompeetalay (talk) 23:40, November 30, 2013 (UTC)