Wookieepedia:Userbox proposal

This page is for the nomination of new userboxes. For past nominations, see Userbox proposal/History.

Before you create
Before you propose a userbox, read the following:


 * 1) No nonsense or joke templates. What you think may be funny may not be to everyone else, so it's best to just keep it on your userpage.
 * 2) If you are creating a Star Wars themed userbox, try and keep it OOU (i.e. "This user is a fan of Jedi" is good, but "This user is a member of the New Jedi Order" is not).
 * 3) Any offensive/racist/provocative userbox proposals will be deleted on sight, and the user warned. If the user persists, he/she will be banned.
 * 4) Due to being inflammatory, any religious and political userboxes that are nominated here will be automatically rejected, so don't bother.
 * 5) When nominating a template, keep in mind that the template will be for community use, not just your exclusive use. As a rule of thumb, if you think at least 10 people will use your idea, nominate it. If not, it's best left as code on your userpage.

To use this page:


 * 1) Use the current date as a header, and add the code of the proposed userbox underneath (use the following syntax:  ).
 * 2) Multiple userbox proposals should be presented separately so that the community can vote on each userbox based on its individual merit. Up to three userboxes may be presented for approval under one vote, if and only if, they are closely related in theme or are proposed as alternatives.
 * 3) Add sections underneath for "Support", "Object", and "Comments". Your fellow Wookieepedians will use these sections to support, oppose, or comment on your design.
 * 4) Once a majority has been reached, and two weeks have passed, the userbox will be created as a template for use in the community. If the nomination fails, the template must not be created regardless. If it is, then it will be deleted on sight, and the offender warned.

Support

 * 1) How can you not like this guy? He's amazing!  Darth Anxor ( Rule the Galaxy ) [[Image:Sithempire2.png|20px]] 15:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 06:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Evir Daal 07:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 07:52, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) As much as I'm a Mad fan, this is similar to the rest of the "support" boxes. --  Riffsyphon  1024 17:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Darth Seth 18:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:44, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Heck no. Atarumaster88  23:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * If you've never heard of him, read the MAD magazine. Then you'll know.  Darth Anxor ( Rule the Galaxy ) [[Image:Sithempire2.png|20px]] 15:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  Stake black   msg 01:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) It's out of universe and would connect members of the real-world organization. --  Riffsyphon  1024 17:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 17:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I don't know if there are any 501st females, but if there are 'his' may have to be changed to 'their' so it isn't gender specific. But the box is a good idea  07:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) *Good point. How does it look now?  Stake black   msg 16:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Read the rules- this is not allowed.  Darth Anxor ( Rule the Galaxy ) [[Image:Sithempire2.png|20px]] 11:09, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Why??
 * 3) *You should take a look at Riffsyphon's comment, and, of course, the 501st Legion (organization) article.  Stake black   msg 19:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) **I thought I missed something in the rules, but it appears I didn't --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 07:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Look at the top- Saying you support the legion is allowed, but saying you're a member is not.  Darth Anxor ( Rule the Galaxy ) [[Image:Sithempire2.png|20px]] 11:54, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ****no, that's not what it says, or at least not what it means. It says we need to keep it out of universe and it is out of universe because it's about the membership of a real-world organization, not the membership of the in universe organisation. Read this and you’ll understand.--Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 12:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
I know there is already one supporting the customing organization, but this one is a bit different, and intended only for members :)  Stake black   msg 01:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Sikon 16:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I thought we already had this box... Hmm. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 15:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Me too. Chack Jadson 19:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Why? I admit I don't know much about hacking, but wouldn't this give online hackers something to work with?  StarNeptune Talk to me! 15:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Though an IP address has the ability to change, right? --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * For some people yes. Why would people want to advertise this? Because they might forget to log in or to allow people to track them? —Xwing328 (Talk) 23:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I would never use this, and would be highly annoyed if someone tried to mandate that I use it. I can't find any legitimate reason to oppose it, but I hate this idea. Atarumaster88  23:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I didn't realize that any userbox could become a mandated accoutrement to our user pages. --School of Thrawn 101 08:32, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) zabraks are an important species, after all, darth maul was one of them.-Tarkoon 22:02, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This user supports "just say no" to these userboxes. Atarumaster88  23:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Other more popular species have had their userboxes rejected, so I'll have to oppose this one. Good custom though  01:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) If Twi'lek's couldn't make it, do you think Zabraks can? --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)06:56, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Not if anything to say about it I have--Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 07:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) JMAS 19:11, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) No more. --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:31, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) This user thinks you could make a good case that Darth Maul isn't all that much more important than General Carlist Rieekan, who probably had more dialogue anyway.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 17:04, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) How many people know any Zabraks other than Darth Maul? Darth Seth 20:09, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) *Eeth Koth and Agen Kolar are the only others I know of 06:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) All I can say is this. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 15:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
This user supports the eradication of ALL species support userboxes. Even those that were somehow approved in the past. If this means the creation of a Userbox Reevaluation system of some kind, this user supports that too.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 17:04, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Evir Daal 08:12, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Object

 * 1) They're not  08:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *That's your opinion. He can think what he wants. --School of Thrawn 101 08:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) X-fighter023
 * Halcon Horn Sockpuppet Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) This user thinks that oppose is the appropriate response to this idea. Atarumaster88  16:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Completely different things --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)06:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 19:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oh god, this is really getting weird.  Darth Anxor ( Rule the Galaxy ) [[Image:Sithempire2.png|20px]] 11:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) NO MORE! Please? Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 15:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) This user thinks that the proposer of this box has difficulty distinguishing between black, white, and grey. Never let them do your laundry.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 00:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) *You can think what you like, of course... but their basic philosophy is essentially the same. Evir Daal 07:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * In what way? One approach looks at morality in shades of gray rather than the black-and-white approach of the Jedi, while the other gives morality a miss altogether in favor of personal gain.  While there are benefits to either approach, you'd have to be looking at the world in a very monochromatic way to see the two concepts as being "essentially the same."  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 21:23, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The Potentium, as far as I know, teaches that any means may be used to further a good enough end. This includes the passionate emotions of the Dark Side, treachery, murder, and even torture and brainwashing (as per Vergere). It also believes there is no Dark Side of the Force. These are essentially the basic teachings of the Dark Side. Evir Daal 09:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes they use the darker powers, but they do it for the greater good. The Sith and Dark Jedi either do it for their own gain or for some evil purpose. And while, the Potentium don't believe in a dark (or light) side of the Force, the Sith/Dark Jedi do. 11:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * "[T]hey do it for the greater good." That's what Anakin did when he purged the Jedi, or so he said. That's why Vergere tortured Jacen and sabotaged Alpha Red. The ends can sometimes justify the means, but as Luke said, you shouldn't justify your actions like that too often. Also, I fail to see what Vergere's "greater good" was, throughout the series, it always seemed more like an "evil purpose". She was more evil than most of the established Darksiders of the known galaxy. The whole of the Potentium philosophy echoes the old Dark-side view that there is neither good nor evil, only power. According to Brakiss, the Shadow Academy's doctrine was to combine darkness and light and use it for a greater good. Palpatine said pretty much the same thing, and I'm sure I can find additional examples if I look through the books. Evir Daal 12:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
User:X-fighter023/User:Halcon Horn are multiple accounts run by the same user. Isn't that illegal, let alone voting with both on the same issue? Evir Daal 12:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I noticed this too and have already informed an admin‎ about this --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 12:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * User:Darth Virus is also run by the same person, should we not remove those votes or something? --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 12:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Darth Virus
 * Halcon Horn Sockpuppet Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Object

 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 11:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 11:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 12:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Dear god no. Not even as a custom. Seriously, can we stop with the stupidity? Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 13:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Can we add a new rule? No "Blank is way better than blank" or "Blank is awesomer than anybody" boxes?  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 14:02, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 19:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) JMAS 19:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 01:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) CUSTOM.--Valin Kenobi 07:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This user thinks voting oppose on this box proposal is WAY better than voting support. Atarumaster88  15:50, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) How many people do you expect to use this? Darth Seth 16:04, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Object

 * 1) School of Thrawn 101 11:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Another? --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 07:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Green Tentacle (Talk) 11:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) This user's eyes hurt from looking at this userbox. Evir Daal 12:01, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Indeed.
 * 7) This user supports sensible userboxes. Chack Jadson 19:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) This user supports opposing this userbox. Atarumaster88  15:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Snide Remarks

 * You mean like, "This is a really ugly userbox"? Cull Tremayne 12:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) School of Thrawn 101 05:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Sure.  It's a major galactic government, just like the other ones, right? Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)09:08, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 09:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Pellaeon rules.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 13:37, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) It's like the Empire, just without the EmperorDarth Seth 16:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 22:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) The Remnant eventually turns face against the Vong, right? Enochf 23:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Remnant? It's a prominent faction. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 13:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Fett 1138 ( HoloNet Transceiver ) [[Image:Mandoinsignia.jpg|15px]] 19:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Well, I ahte the Imp. Remnant, but i think it's just like the republic, rebel, etc. ones. Looks perfect, so I say hands-down, good box. Rorwarr
 * 5)  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 00:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Object

 * 1) User:X-fighter023

Support

 * 1) If you oppose, feel free to create a "This user supports the exclusion of silly canon from Wookieepedia" userbox and propose it here. I'll vote for it even if I won't use it.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 21:31, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Valin Kenobi 21:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I wuv my TBT! .  .  .  .  10:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Adamwankenobi 06:24, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This user supports this being a custom userbox. Atarumaster88  03:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I do support the inclusion of all canon, but not this userbox. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:12, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) user hyper covers this, pretty much. Although I'll use it for a custom, with a picture change. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 20:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 07:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Darth Seth 18:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) No I don't. Chack Jadson 19:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Isn't this the same as user hyper? --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 00:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed it is, but this one does show the user to be incredably open about Star Wars: Ewoks and Marvel Star Wars. --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I guess I was unclear on the precise definition of "hyperinclusionist." Perhaps there should be a definition here. I guess I felt like the recent controversies legitimized specific attention to this aspect of SW fandom.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 12:23, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * My eyes! Cull Tremayne 12:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It occurs to me that this might indeed be a distinct concept from user hyper, especially in light of the Breast debate. For example, I consider myself an inclusionist, and I would use this "silly canon" userbox, but apparently I'm not a hyperinclusionist, since I voted "yes" on the Breast VFD.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 20:47, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the two are not necessarily one and the same.--Valin Kenobi 07:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) X-fighter023
 * Hmm, nice idea. I like it. Rorwarr

Oppose

 * 1) This user supports placing four tildes under the oppose column and clicking "save". Atarumaster88  18:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 09:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) No dice. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 13:59, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) This user supports oxygen. - Sikon 14:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Sure. Hey, around here, supporting Lucas is quasi-political anyway Enochf 19:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Kit fisto9 20:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) This is a star Wars wiki, why can't we have a userbox about George Lucas?--Windu223 14:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I think its a pretty cool idea? I mean he created it? Paleontologist.piczo Gree's base[[Image:Commander Gree.jpg|20px]]
 * 5) Yeah, without him, we wouldn't be here.
 * 6) Darth Seth 16:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This user supports Star Wars, but not this userbox idea. Atarumaster88  18:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 22:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Valin Kenobi 03:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) BRO! MANSIERRE! .  .  .  .  09:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Would be a conflict of interest to support him. :P --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:11, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Colored green, the color of money Enochf 10:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Paleontologist.piczo Gree's base[[Image:Commander Gree.jpg|20px]]
 * 3) This user wonders why this support box hasn't come up before. Huh.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 14:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 06:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 10:33, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Well, every other organisation has them. Darth Seth 15:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 17:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Finally ... one I can actually support. For some reason, the lime-green doesn't sit well with me though; I'd vote for gray or blue.--Valin Kenobi 03:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) * I agree- more conservative color is needed 05:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ** Tweaked to a not-so-lime green, howzat? Enochf 09:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) *** Looks great 23:09, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Better. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 09:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) School of Thrawn 101 09:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) I do hate the Trade Federation, but for you CIS and Sith guys out there, then you should like this. Rorwar

Comments

 * Because deep down, I am the Trade Advisor from Civilization II. I propose we build more marketplaces! Enochf 10:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You would defend our cities with haystacks, noble leader?  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 14:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * "Your Einstien sir! Your the E to the MC squared! Like a clockspeed double microchip! We're #1 in science!" ... Where did that come from? 07:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't a Sith see the Trade Federation as being beneath them, something to exploit, but not necessarily support? Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 21:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) From numerous requests. Darth Maddolis 01:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Let's face it, it's worth noting those who don't wear them. .  .  .  .  08:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 09:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This is getting really stupid  03:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I think this moved past "stupid" into the realm of surrealism.--Valin Kenobi 04:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) This user doesn't like this idea. Atarumaster88  04:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 15:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Not useful, or is it? Makes for interesting study later on. --  Riffsyphon  1024 21:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) What's the point? --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)06:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Paleontologist.piczo Gree's base[[Image:Commander Gree.jpg|20px]]
 * 4) This user wears contacts instead! Nyah ah ah! What's next, "This user only occasionally uses his pocket protector"?  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 14:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) this user thinks this is stupid General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 10:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Really, why do people post these things? It's ridiculous - no one's going to use it. Darth Seth 15:07, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 09:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Out of all the dumb userboxes here, this has got to be the dumbest.--Windu223 23:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * It'll probably get shot down anyway, but I may as well try. Darth Maddolis 01:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Uh...why? Cull Tremayne 21:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That's it, all those who vote against this clearly wear glasses. Or, maybe not so clearly. .  .  .  .  04:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well you would be correct about me. --  Riffsyphon  1024 04:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, this is like showing anti-smoking ads to smokers. There's gotta be more than 2 people here who *don't* wear glasses. Darth Maddolis 09:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * i dont but i just think its stupid General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 19:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Support
AT-RT basis''' ]]
 * 1) Maybe another picture? Paleontologist.piczo [[User talk:Paleontologist.piczo| '''MagnaGuard &

Oppose

 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Since the Zann Consortium one failed due to "notability", this one falls under that same pretense. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) This one's already been tried and failed recently  00:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) "This user doesn't." .  .  .  .  09:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) JMAS 11:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 12:03, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) This user does not support many "This user supports" userboxes. Atarumaster88  04:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Screw Bothans. Every last hairy, sneaky one of 'em.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 13:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Snide Remarks

 * Ick. Although Bothans, being mentioned in the films, are a notable species, that picture doesn't cut it. At all. Cortle Steeze 15:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I like bothans, but, well, I always hated that picture from the start when I tried to save it in a folder of mine, and my computer crashed. Plus, you can barely tell they're bothans.

Support

 * 1) Makes about as much sense as the others... QuentinGeorge 11:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Absolutely. .  .  .  .  23:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Ozzel 06:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Because if you're going to have an article, then have a friggin' article. Havac 01:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Double Support

 * 1) How can anyone *not* support this?! supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 16:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm a spoilsport

 * 1) Damn you and your black heart Burl Ives Enochf 13:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Nevah! KEJ 13:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Per Rule 1. Now, if it said "This user is a Burlist," that might be different.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 16:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 22:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) "Nooo! I... refuse!" Evir Daal 08:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This user supports very few "This user supports" userboxes. Atarumaster88  04:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) No way in hell, earth or heaven  Stake black   msg 21:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ...I'm speechless than anyone would even come up with this. Darth Seth 15:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Nevahhhh! Chack Jadson 19:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Alternative

 * 1) Frankly I'd support this one, although I really don't know why.Valin Kenobi 05:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) If the other doesn't go through, this is even more suitable. .  .  .  .  09:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
Does this fall under the joke category (Rule 1)? Jorrel Fraajic 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No way. Anyway, maybe there'll be support for "This user is afeared that Burl Ives will eat his babies." infobox, since that seems to be the mentality. .  .  .  .  23:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Or even...


 * Is "afeared" even a word? --  Riffsyphon  1024 21:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It is now. .  .  .  .  04:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You know, I'd actually support the afeared one. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 09:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Personally, I support this one: Adamwankenobi 10:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

How's this?

I just don't get it, this mad fascination with Burl Ives and Kyle Katarn. Chack Jadson 14:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) School of Thrawn 101 11:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) If we have a "support ewoks" one, why not an "Ewoks had it coming one? It's better than the "Glasses" one (see above). Darth Seth 15:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I like that. "Ewoks had it coming!" Heh, heh, heh. ;) Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 21:28, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Fine for custom. Not here though.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 16:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 22:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Custom.Valin Kenobi 05:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This user sees no redeeming qualities in this idea. Atarumaster88  04:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) *Ewok lover. ;) Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 08:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 10:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 11:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
I'll allow that it's probably not appropriate for a template, but is it, at least, a decently-made and effectively presented userbox or does it need something? --School of Thrawn 101 09:02, 16 April 2007 (UTC)