Wookieepedia talk:Good article nominations

will this go on the front page then? Jedi Dude 08:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know. I hadn't thought about that. The front page is pretty full right now. 15:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I think we need to promote this category a bit more. It is the same few people that are voting. Any ideas? --Eyrezer 05:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * How about a Senate Hall topic titled "Vote for Good Articles!" 15:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * And a template for the good articles, otherwise whats the point, no one is going to go into the catorgory really. Jedi Dude 17:32, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * There is a template. Currently, it places a green check at the top of the page. However, this design is under discussion and could change. The template is  18:01, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Is there an area to vote on this template? I also think that this category could use boxes for an article's page (when it is nominated) and talk page (when it is formally selected as a GA).  - breathesgelatin Talk 15:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * When you say vote on the template, are you wanting to change it? The tick seems to be working well at the moment. I think the nominated banner is a good idea too. --Eyrezer 03:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I am not specifically wanting to change it. But since XWing328 said it was "under discussion" I thought there might be a place to vote on it. The tick is fine with me. I just think that there should also be a "Nominated as a Good Article" banner as well as a "This is a Good Article" banner for the article's talk page.  - breathesgelatin Talk 04:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * When I looked at the dates I couldn't believe it was only a month ago that it was "under discussion". How fast time flies when you are editing! --Eyrezer 07:06, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * One of the "discussions" in question took place here. Sorry I didn't reference that before. I'll try and throw together a template for nominated articles, so we can see how it will work. 17:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Nominated template
For
 * 17:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 1)  Angel Blue  (Holonet) 17:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Against

Comments
 * Here's a sample template for good article nominees. I plan to create it as Template:Good if everyone's happy with it. 17:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I like it, but I would suggest Template:Goodarticle, Template:Gooda or something along those lines, because that's more specific, which helps those of us who aren't good with remembering template names. -  Angel Blue  (Holonet) 17:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Out of those two, I'd say Template:Goodarticle
 * I created another template based on nominated. It would serve to replace it, and could be used for both good and featured nominated articles. You just have to specify which one, with the variable "good" or "featured". The first one is, the second is .  00:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I think it might be a good idea to have it looking a bit different from the featured article one. Perhaps a different picture. Otherwise it would be easy to mistake them. --Eyrezer 00:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree. And now that I think about it, the one template for both is probably too confusing. What if we used Wikipedia's good article pic? Also, the background color could be changed. Maybe to a light green like #dfd. 01:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I was wondering whether the check couldn't be a little more pronounced? In some cases I've missed it up in the corner of some articles. Perhaps a gold star, or since we're in the Star Wars Universe, the medal given to Luke and Han at the end of ANH.Tocneppil 05:44, 5 October 2006 (UTC)