Wookieepedia:AgriCorps/Log/2010 April 17

[22:01]  Welcome to AC Meeting 21. [22:01]  Thanks for showing up. [22:01]  First thing is the lone probed article from last meeting. [22:01]  http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Kelbis_Nu [22:01]  http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/Kelbis_Nu_(second_review) [22:01]  Naru claims to have fixed everything. [22:01]  I cannot vouch for the changes, personally [22:02]  It looks better. [22:02]  Jugs votes keep. [22:02]  But I'm not familiar with any of the material, so I can't say for certain. [22:03]  It passes the look test, and I have no further issues myself [22:03]  I vote keep as well [22:03]  Work was put into it, so I say keep. [22:03]  Keep. [22:03]  Kelbis Nu kept. [22:03]  It looks good, but I don't know the material either. [22:03] <Toprawa> On to new articles. [22:03] <Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/U-E [22:03] <Toprawa> U-E - redlink issues. Plus I don't really know what reference 3 is supposed to mean. If that's an article from the Omnibus, perhaps it needs its own article? Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:00, March 28, 2010 (UTC) [22:04] <Toprawa> No change. [22:04] <Toprawa> I say probe. [22:04] <GrandMoffTranner> Probe it. [22:04] <Cylka> Probe. [22:04] <Cylka> Ref 3 probably means that someone was lazy and never created an article or redlink for the article. [22:04] <Toprawa> Grunny and Jugs vote probe as well. [22:05] <Toprawa> U-E probed. [22:05] <Toprawa> Most likely [22:05] <Toprawa> I have another article not on the list. [22:05] <Cylka> Go ahead. [22:05] <Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Acklay [22:05] <Toprawa> Article has since had one or two more appearances added to it. [22:05] <Toprawa> I'm sure some information can be gotten from them [22:06] <Toprawa> Even if it's a sentence or two at most. [22:06] <GrandMoffTranner> Which appearances would those be? [22:06] <Toprawa> one was a TCW episode [22:06] <Toprawa> I think someone made a comparison to something being like an acklay [22:06] <Toprawa> That should be mentioned, I think [22:07] <Cylka> And there is also the non canon Robot Chicken app. that could go in the Bts. [22:07] <GrandMoffTranner> Sounds like it should be probed then. [22:07] <Cylka> I say probe. [22:07] <Toprawa> I can work with Chack on it. [22:07] <Toprawa> Probe as well [22:07] <Toprawa> Acklay probed then. [22:08] <Toprawa> Unless anyone has anything else, moving on. [22:08] <Toprawa> Discussion items: [22:08] <Toprawa> Discuss changing the 3 week nom inactivity rule to 2 weeks. Jonjedigrandmaster (We seed the stars) 22:08, March 25, 2010 (UTC) [22:08] <Toprawa> Pretty straightforward. [22:08] <Toprawa> Grunny and Jugs support. [22:08] <Cylka> Sounds good. [22:09] <GrandMoffTranner> As do I. Support. [22:09] <Cylka> Support. [22:09] <Toprawa> Support as well. [22:09] <Toprawa> New rule enacted - idle nom limit is now 2 weeks [22:09] <Toprawa> Implementation of Rule 1 more strictly with the removal poorly-written noms. Jonjedigrandmaster (We seed the stars) 22:08, March 25, 2010 (UTC) [22:09] <Toprawa> This is more of a literal "discussion" [22:10] <Toprawa> The thinking is that we can and should be enforcing this as a requirement for some of our more lacking nominations [22:10] <Toprawa> There's a reason they sit there, because they're lacking, to put it nicely. [22:11] <Toprawa> Thoughts? [22:11] <GrandMoffTranner> I'm willing to support this, but I'd like to see more details on how this would be implemented. [22:11] <Cylka> I agree, but we should now detail what well-written is. [22:11] <GrandMoffTranner> Yes [22:11] <Toprawa> I don't know myself, but I believing the thinking is that we be more liberal about starting removal votes for shitting nominations based on this alone. [22:11] <Cylka> For example - minor to no grammar mistakes. [22:11] <Toprawa> shitty* [22:12] <Toprawa> bleh [22:12] <Toprawa> which I have no problem with [22:12] <Cylka> Same for spelling mistakes. [22:12] <Toprawa> Thoughts? [22:12] <Cylka> Maybe start with those two details as a basis. We could probably get rid of a couple noms based on these two alone. [22:13] -->| ChackJadson (~chatzilla@wikia/ChackJadson) has joined #wookieepedia-agricorps [22:13] =-= Mode #wookieepedia-agricorps +o ChackJadson by chanserv [22:13] <Toprawa> That was what influenced this point, I believe [22:13] <Toprawa> What Cylka just said [22:13] <Toprawa> Hey Chack [22:13] <GrandMoffTranner> That sounds good to me. [22:13] <GrandMoffTranner> Hey Chack. [22:13] <ChackJadson> Hey guys [22:13] <Cylka> Hey Chack. [222:13] <ChackJadson> What's up? [22:13] <GrandMoffTranner> The meeting. [22:13] <Toprawa> Chack, we're discussing: <Toprawa>	Implementation of Rule 1 more strictly with the removal poorly-written noms. Jonjedigrandmaster (We seed the stars) 22:08, March 25, 2010 (UTC) [22:13] <ChackJadson> I know, sorry I'm late [22:13] <ChackJadson> Ok [22:14] <Cylka> We are thinking of starting with removing noms having more than just minor grammar and spelling mistakes. [22:14] <Toprawa> We're discussing be more liberal about starting removal votes for lacking noms based on Rule 1: Must be well-written [22:14] <Toprawa> I encourage this. [22:14] <Cylka> We can add to what "well-written" means. [22:16] <Cylka> Just to be clear: [22:17] <Cylka> We are staring to remove noms based on more than minor spelling and grammar mistakes at the moment? [22:17] <Toprawa> Yes [22:17] <Cylka> Ok. [22:17] <GrandMoffTranner> In any case, I support this idea. Something needs to be done. [22:17] <Cylka> Yes, support. [22:17] <Toprawa> Support [22:17] <ChackJadson> Support [22:17] <Toprawa> Grunny and Jugs support as well [22:18] <Toprawa> Ok, Rule 1 enforcement agreed upon [22:18] <Toprawa> ZOMG very important!! Discuss adding a limit of 24 hours to snowball noms, like on the FAN page. Chack Jadson (Talk) 23:55, April 3, 2010 (UTC) [22:18] <Toprawa> Basically, a nom must be on the page for at least 24 hours [22:18] <Toprawa> Regardless of how many snowball votes it gets [22:18] <GrandMoffTranner> Sounds good to me. [22:18] <ChackJadson> Support [22:18] <Cylka> Support. [22:19] <Toprawa> Jugs and Grunny support [22:19] <Toprawa> As do I [22:19] <Toprawa> 24-hour rule enacted. [22:20] <Toprawa> That's all for the agenda. [22:20] <Toprawa> Does anyone have anything else? [22:20] <Cylka> Is this it, then? [22:21] <Cylka> Meeting over? [22:22] <Cylka> ... [22:22] <Toprawa> Do we have anything else? [22:22] <GrandMoffTranner> I guess not. [22:22] <GrandMoffTranner> Aside from world domination, of course. :p [22:22] <ChackJadson> haha [22:22] <Toprawa> Ok, meeting adjourned.