User talk:Hk 47/Archive

Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:48, December 11, 2010 (UTC)
Please remember to sign your comments by typing four tildes after your message, like so: ~ Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:48, December 11, 2010 (UTC)

Sourcing
Hi, since you've been doing some revamp for Timeline of the Galactic Civil War and the related battles, it would be good if you would source your edits too. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 15:51, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no source in all the page Hk 47 16:13, December 30, 2010 (UTC)hk 47
 * So where you take this information from? If you do not know the source of the information, it most likely is best left out, and if you do, you are able to source the information then. Lack of sourcing in the pages already isn't an excuse to left it out now. –Tm_T (Talk) 14:05, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Of couse, I use only the informations containing in the pages. Hk 47 14:02, January 2, 2011 (UTC)Hk 47
 * Wookieepedia is not a source, pleace take a look at Sourcing, thanks. –Tm_T (Talk) 15:59, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * I repeat, source your changes, especially when you remove already sourced information like in here. –Tm_T (Talk) 16:13, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not add nonsense to Wookieepedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the Jundland Wastes sandbox. Thank you.  JangFett  (Talk) 19:53, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * What is the problem ?Hk 47 21:49, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Sourcing
Hi, I like to repeat this for you again: source your changes or they might end up being reverted as possible fanon, thanks. –Tm_T (Talk) 12:01, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Anx Minor
I was wondering if you had any further plans to work on the Battle of Anx Minor article, as I am interested in promoting it to Good Article status. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 21:26, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have corrected the chronology with the essential atlas I just have but I have no more information.

Missions to Ord Mantell
I'm not quite sure what you're trying to accomplish with these Mission to Ord Mantell articles, but you're going about it all wrong. "Third Second Mission to Ord Mantell" makes no sense, and I have deleted it, in addition to reverting your changes to Second Mission to Ord Mantell. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 16:57, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * This is an official administrative warning. Kindly stop doing whatever it is that you're trying to do, or you may be blocked from editing. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 17:01, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * I try to shift the missions to place another I will create but you don't have let the time to finish it. The new mission is from classic star wars in 0 ABY.Hk 47 17:10, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Now you can correct it, the Mission to Ord Mantell (0 ABY) is the first.

TEA
Please don't add information in the Bts sections about planets "not" mentioned in The Essential Atlas. If the Atlas doesn't appear in the Sources section, it's obvious the planet isn't mentioned there. Imperators II 16:13, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Please be aware that The Essential Atlas Online Companion does not include any planets in its index. If you look at the index's titles at the top of the page, you will see that it clearly lists star systems. As such, the Online Companion should not be added to planet article Sources lists. Please do not continue to add this item to these articles. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:55, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes but the information about the systems concern also the planet(s) inside.Hk 47 18:09, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, it doesn't. Listing the Online Companion is misleading and incorrect. If the planet itself isn't mentioned, the item should not be added. Thank you for your cooperation. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:11, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Help
Dear Hk, we've got a user called Darth owski, who keeps adding fanon to Makatak tribe. Could you please help?&mdash; TK-999  (Talk) 18:14, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Then sorry for bothering you.&mdash; TK-999  (Talk) 18:27, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't do anything I'm not an administrator. You must contact one of them.Hk 47 18:17, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Sourcing TEA and TEAOC
Please source your edits. Thank you.  Imperators II (Talk) 18:58, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, you do realize that you have to reference each field in the infoboxes of the articles, don't you? It would really be sad if someone later had to reference them all just because of your unwillingness to do so.  Imperators II (Talk) 19:22, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have already created ot completed hundreds of infobox of planets and other things from TEA. If I have to reference each line, it will take years to finish. Hk 47 19:31, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't exaggerate. And, since it's the site's official policy and will have to be done anyway, you just intend to leave it to others? Please mind the policy in your future edits, or they will be reverted as unverified info. Thank you.  Imperators II (Talk) 19:39, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

9 ABY
Hey Hk. Please note two things: Thank you.  Imperators II (Talk) 19:17, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Per the Manual of Style "a subject should be linked once upon its first [..] mention in the article's main body." Thus, since First Battle of Nomad City, Second Battle of Nomad City and Third Battle of Coruscant (Galactic Civil War) are already linked to from the article's "Events" section, it's unnecessary to link to them again in the "Battles" section.
 * 2) Per the sourcing policy the full reference only needs to be applied in the first insertion point of citation. Thus, since " " is already used in the "Events" section, you should use " " in all the subsequent insertion points of citation.
 * Yes I know, I was correcting it when you did it.

Ganis
Dear HK-47 have you got any image of Ganis?I search they.Thanks you :D Waiting an image, Bounty Killer Thanks
 * There is no picture of him.

Flash image
Hello. What is your reasoning for identifying this image as Flash? As I have done extensive work on the article, Flash cannot be determined to be a specific clone trooper during group scenes, and only an extrapolation of his death scene gives any clue as to his identity. Where exactly does this image come from in the episode (a time code would be appreciated), or have you just selected a clone trooper at random from the scene to portray Flash? - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 21:43, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * There is 3 "white clones" in the episode. So I took a picture of the clone not represented in the article of the 2 others.

Red Sky, Blue Flame
Hello Hk 47,I noticed you place this short story at 23 ABY. Did you actually read it? It so strongly implies, it happened just after events of Vision of the Future novel. Though there are some inconsistencies already described in the Red Sky, Blue Flame article like Jagged Fel's age and apparent death of Kres'ten'tarthi and later apearance in Survivor's Quest. I think those were reasons why this particular story hasn't any date there. I think according the narration it should be at the same year as VoF with already written BTS discrepancies.Jedi Marty 22:20, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes I read it and of course it seems to happen just after VotF. But the age of Jag Fel, the death of Stent and the intervention of the editor place it definitely after Survivor's Quest. So 23 aby is a good date. It concurs with the date of birth of Jag. I explained it in the Behind the scenes.Hk 47 23:53, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, but it contradicts Jag Fel's own article in what he's eleven during "Red Sky, Blue Flame" and his article is FA. Btw he was born at 7 ABY, so he should be 14 at 21 ABY in order for math to work not at 23 ABY. So, it can't happened after Survivor's Quest. Btw it's weird for Kres'ten'tarthi come to Chiss academy with "4 year old News" about Thrawn's supposed return, which we know Luke and Mara dealt with during Vision of Future events. I think "Stent" supposed death could be easy retconned that he didn't die, but was unconcious or something. You don't actualy see him killed, but aftermath of Clawcraft explosion if I remeber that correctly. And Fel age could be a simple mistake that writer confused with chiss age (they matured twice faster than human).Jedi Marty 10:54, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * So there is a mistake in Jag Fel's article. I don't know if you read it but there is a moment in Red Sky, Blue Flame where there is a discussion about chiss and human ages and it explains very clearly that Jag was humanly 14. Anyway the editor sated it happens c. 22 ABY to solve all this problems. Hk 47 11:02, July 3, 2011 (UTC)