Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Unidentified fisherman

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 01:23, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: No, I'm sorry. While this is the finest nomination page ever built, today we're (not) grounded. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 01:23, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 20:30, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Are we sure he actually lived on the river? Is there something I am not seeing that suggests this? graestan ( talk ) 06:01, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Well, the quote says the river is his home. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:51, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **I think we're taking figurative wording a bit too literally, here. graestan ( talk ) 16:39, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Adjusted. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 05:12, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) The links to the battles of Theed in the article seem to be out of order.  graestan  ([[User talk:Graestan|talk ]]) 06:01, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) *Shouldn't be a problem now. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:51, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) What was going on that Kenobi had to jump in the boat? More details about this escort duty are required. graestan ( talk ) 06:01, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *He just had to cross the river. I fudged with the wording to make this more clear. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:51, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) **Was the Queen jumping across the river on boats, too? Since this wasn't in the movie, I don't get why he wasn't just running across bridges with her. Please be more specific. graestan ( talk ) 16:39, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Clarified.
 * 12) We've already cracked 200 words, and I am still asking for more context on the previous objection. Please write an intro. graestan ( talk ) 16:52, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Eh, it's 265 now with the intro. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 05:12, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) **Whenever you're ready, let me know, and I'll archive it.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:23, February 23, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Lee's charge
 * 2) *He was killed on Naboo right? Then this has to be added to the infobox.
 * 3) **Ah, yes, added. Thank you. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 19:42, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *Isn't he a Human?
 * 5) **I don't think the duck test is sufficient in this case. He's very odd-looking...dunno, maybe its just the graphics. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 19:42, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ***FWIW, I think it would be safe to assume he's Human. I don't have access to the game, so I can't say by looking at it, but from that infobox picture, he looks like a Human, just with terrible graphics.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 19:54, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Okay, so categorized. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:08, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:44, February 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) 192 words, part of WP:VG. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 01:23, February 20, 2012 (UTC)

Meatalo

 * Nominated by:  &mdash;NA YAYEN  00:50, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: If in doubt: C4 add more laaaard.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 00:57, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Beefalo. So yeah... NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:36, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  15:18, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I was thinking that you should create articles for the following: Roasted meatalo, Baked meatalo, and lard. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  03:19, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *I disagree with creating Roasted/Baked articles as they could just as easily be merged back into the main article. There is simply a mention in the CSWE entry that they could be baked or roasted, which isn't enough to distinguish them from the main article. That said, I see no problem with an article for Lard, I'll create one later today when I've got some more time. Thanks for the review, Exiled  &mdash;NA YAYEN  10:41, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **That's fine with me.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:18, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Dessert cube

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:35, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Food

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  &mdash;NA YAYEN  00:20, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:11, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  15:20, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified gunman 1

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:19, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: #1

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:11, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified gunman 2

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:26, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: #2

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:11, February 25, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments