Talk:Wookieepedia

Logo
The first logo for SWW seems to have been created by Sikon according to its history. I did not have the capability to create it. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't create them - I merely bumped earlier revisions of wiki.png into separate images. - Sikon 14:14, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Quote
That quote from Pena needs a source ;o) --Eyrezer 07:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It's from when we added him as an Official Friend I believe. -- Riffsyphon1024 07:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

As Cofounder
I don't think it would hurt to add my name up to the top of the article next to Chad, would it? --  Riffsyphon  1024 03:57, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Go ahead Riff, since you won't accept WOTM noms. :-D Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Wookieepedia.org
We might want to add a reference to wookieepedia.org. I followed a link there once, and I for a moment thought that this site was thoroughly vandalized! We should add it to prevent confusion. User:82 Airborne

Katarnipedia?
When did this become Katarnipedia?
 * I don't know, probably somewhere around April 1st, maybe? -- Ozzel 08:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Who is that Kyle Katarn? 83.45.23.69 19:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Kyle isn't that unknown is he? --  Riffsyphon  1024 06:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There's a good chance you'll find out who Katarn is by clicking this link. KEJ 12:28, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Question
The April Fools section reads "Most of the sites were reverted to normal on april 2nd except a couple which were "lost" and had to be restored from an earlier incarnation."

No actual contributions were lost were they? Adamwankenobi 10:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC) User:Excelior the III 10:55, 11 July 2007
 * I seem to remember some being mentioned as being lost... but that could be an April Fools' joke itself. Delete that bit of information if you want. KEJ 12:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The only way to "lose" contributions would require someone to go into the database itself and manually remove them. I doubt any contributions were lost. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 22:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Um, the template has changed. Is someone going to fix that?

Wookieepedian?
Wookieepedian redirects to wookieepedia. Should wookieepedian redirect to list of Wookieepedians?--Windu223 13:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed it. - JMAS 13:24, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No, it shouldn't. Because it would be a self-reference that way. - Sikon 14:31, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

LucasArts and the Wookieepedia text
Although it is a touchy issue, I see no reason to exclude such an important fact simply because the community dislikes it. I agree that it was an unwise move of Sikon to send the letter to LucasArts, but to outright deny the issue and threaten a ban to anyone who acknowledges it seems to me an awful lot like censorship. Adamwankenobi 20:19, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm tempted to put it back in, under the "Popular Acclaim" section... it shows how good Wookieepedia is :-) I don't think "LucasArts used Wookieepedia text in describing some elements of their game Star Wars Battlefront: Renegade Squadron" causes any harm. But I don't have the balls to do it myself :-) --Azizlight 07:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Victims of the Great LucasCruft Purge and other SW articles nominated for deletion
Do we really need to list all these on this page? I'm thinking not. --Azizlight 07:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No, we don't. - Sikon 07:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Someone wanted to merge the Great LucasCruft Page to here. Why couldn't they leave it where it was? --  Riffsyphon  1024 15:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Article Improvements
I'm just starting a checklist here of things we might want to add to this article. However, we don't want this to just turn into a help file describing every feature of the site. Feel free to edit it with anything that needs improvement. —Xwing328 (Talk) 05:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * This can really be a great article, and I would hope to get it to Featured Status one day. But we need help expanding the sections, and as NPOV as possible. --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:08, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Strange, how did those 2003's get in there? --  Riffsyphon  1024 07:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Sections describing the history behind and function of key site features:
 * Community Portal
 * Forums
 * Senate Hall
 * Consensus Track
 * Knowledge Bank
 * IRC
 * Wookieenews
 * Featured articles
 * The Inquisitorius (this might just be under the history)
 * Good articles
 * Mofferences
 * WotM
 * Improvement Drive (and the death of...)
 * Reference system (finally deciding to source every article)
 * Design features
 * Era icons
 * Search icons
 * Article milestones
 * First article?
 * 50,000: Solitaire
 * Longest article: Palpatine
 * Most frequented article: Palpatine
 * Most edited article: Star Wars: Battlefront II (http://wikistats.wikia.com/wikistats/EN/TablesWikiaSTARWARS.htm - as of February 23, 2008)
 * Projects
 * WookieeProject Images/ICP - the largest project undertaken by the community

I Just Don't Know...
  Click for article navigation  Official friends of Wookieepedia zh-hk:[[Media:[[Media:Example.ogg]]]] How can Lucas Arts just keep making expansions for the saga the preludes were great but all these new games like the most recent "Star Wars: The Force Unleashed", looks great but its just one more thing to talk about and then it gets old. In my opinion i think there should be more movies than games.Darth Tray&#39;tar002 19:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)Darth_Tray'tar002