Wookieepedia talk:WookieeProject The Clone Wars

Canon
Should there be a standardized subheading in the "Behind the Scenes" section of articles about episodes addressing canon conflicts caused by the show? For example, in the Lair of Grievous article, there would be a subheading labeled "Continuity" mentioning Kit Fisto's mysterious presence of eyelids, Grievous revealing his four arms to a Jedi who escapes and talks to the council, R6 droids decades before their invention, the whole Grievous "choosing" his modifications deal, etc. Or should we just assume things like this aren't erroneous and not mention them at all? - Milo Fett [Comlink] 22:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that would be good.  &mdash;Lucius malfoy7  [[Image:Nute777.png|20px]] ( Give it up for Lil' 'Soka Tano, ladies and gents! ) 22:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Right now it's somewhat disorganized and it says "bloopers" in one article and "mistakes" in the next. - Milo Fett [Comlink] 22:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It doesn't need to be mentioned on every article, only where it's completely necessary and directly related to the article in question. It should be included anyway, regardless of the project. Please judge scrupulously on what to include, as some stuff comes close to original research. Also, just a note for future reference: it's "Behind the scenes", not "Behind the Scenes". &mdash; CC7567 [ http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/thumb/5/5f/Rex.png/20px-Rex.png] (s)talk 22:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I realize continuity errors should be documented anyway, I just meant there should be a standardized format for doing so for TCW, which contains more continuity errors than possibly any other EU work. I'm not counting errors related to the timeline (Anakin's scar, Ventress, etc.) because the official statement is that it's currently being rearranged and there's no official new timeline yet. - Milo Fett [Comlink] 22:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed; statements about gaps, holes, or errors (Wat Tambor never escaping, Eeth Koth in Wild Space) should be the only material included.  &mdash;Lucius malfoy7  [[Image:Nute777.png|20px]] ( Give it up for Lil' 'Soka Tano, ladies and gents! ) 22:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll use the "Lair of Grievous" article as an example, since I don't think I should have reverted the entire edit. Mentioning the Nautolan's lack of eyelids is fine, but since the "R6 unit" is named and has an article, it can be mentioned there, not in the episode in which it appears. Also, implications fall under both speculation and original research, so please do not add them. "Gaps" in continuity falls under original research, and is not directly related to the episode, so it should not be included. As for a standardized format: there is none, and since it can easily be changed/applied, it doesn't need to be part of the project. &mdash; CC7567 [ http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/thumb/5/5f/Rex.png/20px-Rex.png] (s)talk 23:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Duly noted; I unreverted it and only included the part about the eyelids. - Milo Fett [Comlink] 23:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * What was the reasoning behind reverting Duel of the Droids? - Milo Fett [Comlink] 23:13, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It was original research; I restored it. &mdash; CC7567 [ http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/thumb/5/5f/Rex.png/20px-Rex.png] (s)talk 23:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * In a way, the Continuity errors in the Behind the Scenes makes the articles look dull. Prehaps organizing it to match the article than just having run-on sentences with no bullet points.  JangFett  You want to clone me? 18:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Previously Featured
I added a previously featured section for articles that were taken to FA or GA before the project. Im not sure I got the nominators correct so if I made a mistake please correct me. :) Dark Lord Trayus 01:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Articles under review
In addition to the "Current FAN and GAN" sub-section I would like to propose to the project leader to create a "Articles under review" subsection, similiar to the one WP:KOTOR has. The reason is, currently Wat Tambor needs to be updated with the content presented in Liberty on Ryloth and this project seems like it's up to the taks to do so.  Mauser  Comlink 15:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It sounds fine to me; thanks for the suggestion.  CC7567  (talk) 15:55, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

To Project Members
Hey guys, I need a little quote help. (If only we had a JMAS of quotes on this wiki... Sigh.) I am trying to bring Onaconda Farr to GA status, but, before nomination, I need a suitable heading quote and a quote from Bombad Jedi. If any of you have candidates for either, I would be forever thankful if you would leave me the quotes on my talk page. Thanks, Lucius malfoy7 23:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

What do I do?
What can I do to help?--Darth Malice the Destroyer 23:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * There a lot of things you can do to help; the main one is to try and contribute to articles. There's not really other things to do, since that's the main objective of the project. :)  CC7567  (talk) 23:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Cross out
How can you cross an article out ? My article Zak (clone) is complete. How can it be taken to featured status ? --Clone Commander Lee 12:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not quite there yet. For more information on featured articles, visit Featured_article_nominations. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 13:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, Milo Fett, please elaborate if you're going to say that. Clone Commander Lee, the reason we cross articles out in their lists is to get a better idea of what's being covered and what's still open for others to take up as projects.  CC7567  (talk) 16:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, Lee, please note that there's a 1000-word requirement for featured articles, so unless the article can be expanded, it's currently at the requirement for a Good article nomination. I would also recommend that you ask one of the more experienced members (such as myself or another AgriCorps member) to take a look at the article before you nominate it, just so that you get the basics down.  CC7567  (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Noted; I was rushed for time and hoped the standards for a featured article would be of use. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 19:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I placed the good article nomination on the arrticle how can you vote for it at the Good article nomination. --Clone Commander Lee 06:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll take it up with you on your talk page.  CC7567  (talk) 07:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Rugor Nass
Rugor Nass is awarded to good status with this project. Please list him on the page. --Clone Commander Lee 14:21, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Rugor Nass does not even have one support vote yet. It has not achieved good status at this point, and will not until all objections have been satisfied and the nom itself has a minimum of five support votes, three of which need to be from members of the AgriCorps. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 14:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Lee, if you mean it's being nominated on behalf of the project, please consult the edit history for the project page. Nass does not fall under the criteria as a "project" based on the series. He appears in too many other places, and as such is not a project nomination in the truest sense.  CC7567  (talk) 19:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Audio files
I am able to provide audio files from any of the episodes of the TV series (sadly, not able to extract them from the film ). So if anybody would like audio to go with quotes on their projects, just give me a holler. I'm currently working through putting audio files in for all the TV series articles that have already reached FA and GA status. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 13:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I've got the film DVD if anyone needs clips from that as well. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 22:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ditto here, I'm now able to also extract audio from the film. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 04:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, now it's official, I've ripped the DVD to my hard drive and can now get audio from the film and all episodes. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 14:24, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Bounty Hunters affiliation
Since BH have no affiliation, as long as they are paid, isn't it wrong to affiliate them to the "Order of the Sith Lords"? Shouldn't them be affiliated to "Bounty Hunters"? Alexrd 16:48, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * You mean Cad Bane, right? Since he had worked directly for a Sith Lord, I think the title applies. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 18:39, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * I disagree. Just because he's worked for Darth Sidious and the Confederacy does not mean he is affiliated with them. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:41, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, it would. That's like saying that just because Shahan Alama worked for Cad Bane's posse doesn't mean he's affiliated with Cad Bane's posse. Or, for another example, just because Wilhuff Tarkin worked for the Galactic Empire, doesn't mean he's affiliated with them. That's not true. The definition of "affiliate" is to connect or associate oneself (which would include "to work for") an organization/movement etc. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 19:44, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Notice how Boba Fett isn't affiliated with the Order of Sith Lords because even though Vader gave him orders from time to time, he was working for the Empire. Sidious presumably wanted a holocron (just any old holocron would do, apparently) for his own ends, and Bane even referred to him as a "Sith Lord employer" or something, not as someone working on behalf of the Confederacy. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 21:04, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * I guess it comes down to your interpretation. To use an example of being a contract worker as opposed to a direct employee. I work for a a company. I am affiliated with them because I am an employee. We hire someone to repair our generator if it malfuctions. He is a contract worker. He is not affiliated with us any more than he is any other company that hires his services. He is affiliated with only himself. Same goes here to my way of thinking. To me, to say Bane is affiliated with The Sith or the Confederacy is to say he supports or believes in their cause. He doesn't. He believes in only himself. That's how I view affiliation. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 23:09, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Ultimately, yes, Bane's affiliations are to the highest bidder. If it really becomes a problem, then I have no problem changing it to that, but I believe it's fine the way it is right now.  CC7567  (talk) 23:14, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Per CC.  JangFett  (Talk) 23:17, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Funny you say that, CC. :) If it were still up for GA nom with the affiliations as is, I'd have had to object. What you just said, I think, is perfect for what the "affiliations" section of his infobox should say: Highest bidder, and it can be referenced to his Databank entry. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 23:40, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Would being on retainer count? I don't think there's any source saying he is, but would it? — Milo Fett [Comlink] 00:28, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
 * So, wouldn't be fine to just affiliate bounty hunters to bounty hunters? Can't that be an affiliation category? I think JMAS has explained my point. Alexrd 17:47, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * "Highest bidder" is still more specific and what they're actually affiliated to. Cad Bane isn't affiliated to a "bounty hunter"; he's affiliated to the highest bidder, and so are most other hunters.  CC7567  (talk) 20:31, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok. What about the other Bounty hunters? I wasn't talking just about Bane. Cato Parasitti, and the others need to be changed too, right?Alexrd 17:26, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome to change them yourself if you so see fit. No one's preventing you from editing the page.  CC7567  (talk) 18:24, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * With some exceptions, of course. For example, numerous sources say Boba Fett wouldn't work for the Rebel Alliance because he viewed them to be evil. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 19:37, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Woah Woah. Can you state that source?

Cartoon Netowork's Dataclips
On the Cartoon Network's website, there are some dataclips on the video section that have some good info, like Plo Koon's Delta-7B be called the Blade of Dorin. Can these info tips be considered canon info? Alexrd 10:44, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, go ahead. Just make sure to source them properly.  Mauser  Comlink 10:48, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * What episode is that on? — Milo Fett [Comlink] 22:05, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll take care of it shortly Milo. :) -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 23:46, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * I've moved the page to Blade of Dorin and added the CN website dataclip to the sources with the 1stID tag. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 23:55, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * What about creating a neat template for those dataclips? I was thinking about something like TCW, but with the Cartoon Network logo. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 16:33, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't think that's really needed, Qui-Gon.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:20, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

Webcomics
I noticed that the links of the several webcomic articles (like The Clone Wars: The Fall of Falleen) aren't redirecting to the comic itself anymore, but to the last page of the The Clone Wars: Act on Instinct. I think that they have changed something on Starwars.com.--Kreivi Wolter 19:45, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * We basically need to go through every season one web comic article and correct those external links. They're a few web comic GAs that may need a referencing change, and yes, the external link to the respective web comic in those articles needs changing as well.  JangFett  (Talk) 19:48, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * May we just link to the main webcomic page rather than individual pages?  Mauser  Comlink 19:50, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * For the GA web comic articles, information listed in their infoboxes source to the individual pages. For an example you can see: The Clone Wars: Transfer article. If you mean just link to the main web comic page on StarWars.com, I don't think that's sufficient. For user-friendly purposes, linking to the individual comic is better.  JangFett  (Talk) 19:55, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * So we just have to go through every damn article? Damn it! Curse those SW.com guys! Dont they realize what work it is to do this again? And the articles were GA already! ... Well, seriously talking, at least The Clone Wars: Covetous doesn't need changing, as I'm just gonna write it. But what if the SW.com changes it again? Do we then just have to do this over and over again?--Kreivi Wolter 20:28, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, no. I'm pretty sure they will keep it as is. As you can see through this link: they bunched season one web comics in the category "season1". Then season two will be "season2," and so on.  JangFett  (Talk) 20:46, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure hope so, especially when theres going to be even the Season 3.--Kreivi Wolter 21:05, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

"Dibs" on articles
I think it's great how people are taking an active role in working on TCW related articles. I do have a problem with people putting the tag on an article and leaving it up, for all intents and purposes, indefinitely with the following message "This article is actively undergoing a major edit for as long as The Clone Wars series lasts". The article in question is not actively being edited when the character isn't in every episode, and quite often doesn't show up for several episodes in a stretch. Not to mention the article hasn't been edited by the individual who placed the tag in 18 days. Does anyone else think this is going too far? -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 18:23, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * You'll have to talk to Tranner about Yularen. For me, I don't place any Inuse tags in my reserved articles until I'm ready to work on them. However, few articles that I am about to do, i.e Battle of Devaron (Clone Wars), have the tag.  JangFett  (Talk) 19:41, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * The article in question has an inuse tag to prevent people from adding unsourced information and from altering the information that is already there, as I have been working on it on a separate page and will be occasionally updating the actual article with my work. JMAS, if you have a problem with me, my work, or how I'm handling this, how about trying to talk to me directly rather than posting your complaints about me here? I don't like people attempting to criticize me behind my back, no matter how much they try to hide it. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 19:47, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * My apologies Tranner if you mistook this as being personally against you. It wasn't however. It was regarding the editing practice employed, not the person who employed it. I didn't mention you by name because it was an example. I've seen the Inuse tag placed long term like that before and it usually gets removed by someone after the placeholder hasn't made edits in after an extended period. The Yularen article was just the most recent one I've noticed and hence got used as the example. It was not personal. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 20:00, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * JMAS, this has more relevancy to the policies for the Inuse tag than to this project itself. I would recommend taking it elsewhere, as WP:TCW doesn't have the responsibility for a practice adopted by the whole wiki.  CC7567  (talk) 21:21, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it was because this example was TCW related as were a good many of the previous examples I'd seen that I just put it here. I'll think on it and work up a potential CT proposal on the issue. Everyone else, please consider this discussion closed here, don't add to the topic here. Thanks. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 22:53, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

Some thoughts about the clones
Landing at Point Rain made me wonder about something - I think we treated our clones and their specializations wrong all the time. Advanced Recon Force trooper, Clone naval officer, Clone cold assault trooper, Clone jet trooper - it looks like those specializations aren't assigned to each clone once and for all, but vary depending on the mission. Set the video games aside - the various clone costumes are necessary for the game variety - and let's look at other stories:
 * Waxer and Boil appear in regular Phase I clone trooper armor with markings of 212th Attack Battalion in Innocents of Ryloth - but appear as Advanced Recon Force troopers in Landing at Point Rain.
 * In Liberty on Ryloth a clone trooper is mounting a native blurrg - does that immediately make him a Blurrg trooper?
 * Ponds appears as a Clone naval officer in Innocents of Ryloth. Yet in later appearances he is wearing Phase I armor with markings and is revealed to be a clone trooper commander.
 * Rex is wearing specialized armor on Orto Plutonia, but does not necessary become Clone cold assault trooper.
 * Wolffe, a clone trooper commander, is dressed as a Naval officer in Rising Malevolence, and as a Clone cold assault trooper on Khorm.
 * Thire's designation is referred to as both Clone shock trooper and Coruscant Guard.
 * Rex, Denal, Coric and other clones utilize jetpacks without becoming Clone jet troopers.

Okay, some of you may say that we should distinguish them by their training, not their armor/outfit. Then you will remind me that Advanced Recon Commandos were trained by Jango Fett, Clone commandos were trained by the Cuy'val Dar and Clone trooper commanders were trained by Alpha-17 (although TCW makes me wonder how long will the last part remain untouched). And I will say you that:
 * A regular clone trooper can become a Republic Commando.
 * In True Colors Delta Squad utilizes SCUBA armor and equipment on Dorumaa. Are they Clone SCUBA troopers now?
 * A regular trooper can be promoted to the rank of clone commander (I know, that one is highly ambiguous).

What's the point of all that? I say that each of those specializations (with exception of military ranks) is not a rank or a specialized clone variant, but merely an occupation. A clone goes to an ice/snow planet and wears special protective gear, but does not get the designation of a Clone cold assault trooper; he picks up a big gun, but does not become Advanced Recon Commando heavy gunner/Clone heavy gunner/Clone heavy trooper, holding a flamethrower does not make one Clone flame trooper and using jetpack does not turn him into a Clone jet trooper. So, whenever we start our articles - especially good and featured articles - with words "CT-XXXX was a Clone naval officer/Clone cold assault trooper/Clone marine", we are actually incorrect. It should rather be "CT-XXXX was a clone trooper, assigned as a naval officer/weapon specialist, starfighter pilot to...". This way we could all list all positions/ranks held by a clone without making it look like he was trained to be a Clone advisor - and only Clone advisor - from his birth. We would also have to rewrite most of those "clone specializations" articles to reflect that is was not a specialization of some clones and not others, but rather a set of armor and equipment best suited for a specific mission. Yeah, and game mechanic articles like Anti-air clone trooper, Clone trooper grenadier and MEC trooper should be just gone in my opinion.

So, what do you think? I posted it here, because it affects many project's articles, but maybe I should bring it straight to SH?  Mauser  Comlink 20:41, November 8, 2009 (UTC)
 * Unless it's explicitly stated as an "occupation" and not a "variant," I do not see much that we can do. If a clone is explicitly referred to as a flame trooper, then I do not see why we should override canon. Otherwise, no, we should not be assuming this much. However, equipment may or may not distinguish training, so please keep that in mind.  CC7567  (talk) 20:59, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

Bad Kitty
I have a question I'd like people's opinion on. Bad Kitty served as Kenobi's LAAT/i during the Second Battle of Geonosis. It was shot down and crashed with only Kenobi and Trapper surviving. The gunship was very clearly mangled and not flight worthy (one of the wings snapped off) when Waxer and Boil rescued the two survivors. Later in the episode, when they storm the droid foundry, and the LAAT's come through the receding shield and land, Ki-Adi-Mundi jumps out of either a miraculously repaired Bad Kitty or a second LAAT/i with the same customization. Do we assume there is a Bad Kitty 1 and a Bad Kitty 2? Or do we assume that the sole Bad Kitty was repaired by the time the assault on the foundry happened? Thoughts? -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 00:40, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * If the second one is not identified specifically? No, I do not believe we should. They could be sister ships, coincidentally have the same design, or some other oddity that will probably remain unexplained for eternity. Either way, the only gunship identified is Obi-Wan's, and that's the way it should stay.  CC7567  (talk) 01:39, November 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * I belive that there are 2 Bad Kitties because Obi-wan's Bad Kitty has 2 beam cannons on each side of the doors, and Mundi's Bad Kitty doesn't have those beam cannons.User:Vitor guerra
 * This talk page isn't for speculation. Please only continue this discussion if there's a canonical issue that needs to be raised that does not concern this already identified error.  CC7567  (talk) 23:09, November 26, 2009 (UTC)

Characters
I think it would be a really good idea to add the characters appearances to this article (or a separate article) in like a table, so Anakin might be in 27 episodes, so in the table its like (-- is a column separator) Character -- Appearances Anakin Skywalker -- 27 Yoda -- 26 Mace Windu -- 16

And have it wikisortable, but default is highest to lowest number of appearances. And their appearances are located on the character pages, so it wouldn't be that hard to do. I think this would be a really good idea! (although might work better on its own page.)Iamthecoinman 16:28, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * This project is for promoting articles related to TCW, not organizing them in extravagant and profound ways. If you'd like to do this, please do this yourself. WookieeProjects write articles, not trivialize them.  CC7567  (talk) 19:58, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Your absurdly negative view is not warranted at all. Its a good idea, and it hardly 'trivializes' it. Iamthecoinman 20:16, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * Considering he's the leader of this WookieeProject, he has the final word. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 20:18, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
 * You're going to have to explain exactly how this helps to achieve WP:TCW's goals before this is adopted in any manner. Right now, the only objective that is implied is to create an unnecessary arrangement of articles. If you feel the need to do this, you're welcome to do it yourself instead of asking help from a project to which it is irrelevant.  CC7567  (talk) 20:23, December 12, 2009 (UTC)

Tactical droid 1 (Christophsis)
I dont own the Star Wars: The Clone Wars: The Complete Season One, so I can't say anything about this, so I ask: Is this droid specifically named as TJ-55? I'm under the assumption that the name is only in the concept gallery. Is it canonical? Kreivi Wolter 19:53, January 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * If it's only concept art, not necessarily. However, it needs to be judged on a case-by-case basis, so how the information is presented needs to be confirmed.  CC7567  (talk) 07:26, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * So, can anyone provide the information how it is presented, or should we remove the name in the infobox? Kreivi Wolter 18:12, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

Non-canon
Are the non-canon TCW articles (for example Unit 2953) part of this project? Kreivi Wolter 14:27, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Site
Why isn't this site trustworthy? It has a lot of already confirmed and coherent spoilerific info with official pics. Alexrd 01:20, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Official pictures does not mean immediate officialness&mdash;they could very well just be leaked. Be patient for a source that is directly affiliated with LucasFilm Animation to confirm the information, as that is the only way it can be guaranteed as such.  CC7567  (talk) 01:24, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, I understand. Alexrd 01:26, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify that, that site is from the Hong Kong broadcaster of The Clone Wars, as such, I think it has some credit because it's the official broadcaster of the show on that place. It has as much affiliation as the CN website, which is the official broadcaster on the US. Alexrd 19:21, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Please read Talk:Embo.  CC7567  (talk) 20:18, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Unidentified
I noticed that nearly all of the droid articles, like OOM command battle droid (Ryloth), have been moved under the title "Unidentified...". But I thought that the droid characters dont need this kind of title. Any opinions about this? Kreivi Wolter 07:59, May 4, 2010 (UTC)

The Narrator
Is the narrator of the series in- or out-of-universe character, or is he considered a character at all? Kreivi Wolter 19:26, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * That is a very good question. I would think he'd have to be IU, because he's in the episode, as a newsreel. So it would be like he's a newscaster. *shrug* -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 19:30, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * No. He's not a character or even confirmed to be one.  JangFett  (Talk) 20:26, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, and it would be merely an assumpion to consider him to be part of the canon. Well, maybe someone will confirm his status in the future. Kreivi Wolter 09:51, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Lack of Sources for the Head of State
Any of the FA and GA of this project haven't properly sourced the Dooku's title Head of State, which isn't mentioned in any of the series' episode. I noticed this while nominating this here. So, do we just need to source them all? Kreivi Wolter 19:45, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Update for the project page
I think the project list needs to be "updated". Cause, now, there is two users who both have claimed Doctor (tactical droid) for their own. Im not sure how does this works, so, can someone, who knows what to do, do something for this? Kreivi Wolter 09:38, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * That would basically mean setting some sort of limit on the amount of projects or simply removing all current projects in order to let those active claim them. Both solutions could be implemented, but as one of the users who claimed Doctor is active and the other isn't, I don't see a problem as long as they resolve it themselves.  CC7567  (talk) 19:43, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Whatever you say. Kreivi Wolter 08:10, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Necessary?
Are these articles relevant or necessary? Alexrd 22:03, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Unidentified Death Watch Mandalorian 1
 * Unidentified Death Watch Mandalorian 2
 * Unidentified Death Watch Mandalorian 3
 * Unidentified Death Watch trooper
 * Unidentified Mandalorian Guard
 * Unidentified Twi'lek (Child)
 * They are, actually. Personally, I don't mind it, and Wookieepedia has a lot of extra, stub articles. If those articles were removed, what about the others? Hope this makes sense to you.  JangFett  (Talk) 22:23, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * It still doesn't. What "others" are you talking about? Alexrd 09:10, July 2, 2010 (UTC)