User talk:Alexsau1991

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #FEFFCF; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Alexsau1991!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Internal pages:
 * Senate Hall
 * Wookieepedia FAQ
 * Manual of Style
 * Reliable sources
 * Guide to image use
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Wookieepedia policies:
 * What Wookieepedia is not
 * User page, user image, and user signature policies

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash;SFH 21:33, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * }

Explanation
First, several other admins agreed in IRC that it was worthy of deletion. Second, I do stand by my decision, and here's the reasoning behind it: If we were to follow your logic, we'd have an article on every noun that's ever used in canon. That means things like "leader" would have an article. That means things like "breath" would have an article. These are words that have no difference in their "real life" definitions and "canon" definitions. "Lift-tube music", although it is a parallel to "elevator music" is unique to canon. Some things aren't different from real life to canon, but have articles anyway. This is because some aspect of that word in canon is different from real life. For example, our sleep article exists because some species do not require sleep&mdash;something one would not find on a regular encyclopedia article on sleep. On the contrary, there is nothing different in the usage of the term "pretender" from canon to real life, and since it's not a proper title, we don't need an article on it. I realize it's kind of hard to understand at first, but there is a fairly definitive guide for what should and shouldn't have an article.

Lastly, there is a right way and a wrong way to ask why an article was deleted and possibly request its undeletion. The right way is to politely ask the administrator (in this case, me) why it was deleted. The wrong way is to imply that "I have no life" and the "reason for deletion was bollux." Both of those are personal attacks&mdash;which will earn you a block if you repeat the offense. Now, I'm going to assume good faith and leave it at this, but I won't be so patient in the future. I recommend you read the policies I've linked to here, as well as What Wookieepedia is not and heed their advice. If you have questions about anything I've said, just ask me on my talk page or via e-mail, and I'll do what I can to answer them. Cheers. Atarumaster88  ( Talk page ) 06:48, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Revan vs. Bastila image
Hey there. I'm just wondering why you think that this is not canon. I've explained on the talk page why there isn't a contradiction, so maybe you can explain your reasoning also. Just because it didn't happen in the game, doesn't make it non-canon. Cylka  -talk- 21:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC) Yet i did not Alexsau1991 09:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That image is labeled as concept art because we know that Atris and Nihilus never fought. We know that Bastila and Revan did fight. What I am saying is that 1 source (i.e. game) doesn't always tell us what happened. Images in canon sources show events that did happen, unless it is specifically stated otherwise. So no, like I said, just because it didn't happen in the game is not a good reason to say that image isn't canon and that something couldn't happen. Cylka  -talk- 22:14, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Whatever about your beef with the image, but contradict is not an appropriate template for an image. Please do not readd it. You're close to breaking the three revert rule, too. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Capture of Darth Revan
Alexsau, will you please stop changing the infobox image in Capture of Darth Revan. This is the third time you have done so. While you have not broken the three revert rule, you are going against the spirit of the rule. The image that is currently in the infobox is the one that is preferred since we prefer art work images to screenshot images as the main image. Cylka  -talk- 19:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

The Old Republic
Kindly stop adding "Unidentified" to the Jedi class. It's not unidentified. The reference link says, "Choose to be a Jedi, a Sith, or from a variety of other classic Star Wars roles..." It does not say "Choose to be an unidentified Jedi." -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 02:18, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * I put unnamed Jedi Class as you have said your self it says "Choose to be a Jedi, a Sith, or from a variety of other classic Star Wars roles..." it does not say "Choose to be a Jedi, a Sith Warrior, or from a variety of other classic Star Wars roles..." - there was a dispute about putting Jedi since we do not know what the class will be called, I happened to mention on the talk page that I was going to label it "Unnamed Jedi Class" before I changed it, and then you changed it back with out mentioning on the talk page that you were against having it us "unnamed". As of now we do not know what the class will be called - most likely Jedi Knight but we dont know that, we do how ever know that the class will not be called "Jedi"; and fyi I put the reference link up, so I was aware of what it said. ░▒▓ Alex | Talk  ▓▒░ 15:22, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

Hey! im working on a new Star Wars novel (or graphic novel) taking place in the OLD REPUBLIC ERA and i was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on what they would like in the story? thanks.

TFU 2

 * As far as we know as of right now, Yoda, Darth Vader and Juno only appear through a voice over. Once it can be verifiably proven that they will appear in the game beyond that, then by all means, edit the article, but until then.  OLIOSTER  (talk) Imperial Emblem.svg 19:59, January 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * She probably shouldn't be listed as such just yet either.  OLIOSTER  (talk) Imperial Emblem.svg 20:03, January 10, 2010 (UTC)