Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Huwhaka revolt


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Huwhaka revolt

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 14:31, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Adventure. Heh! Excitement. Heh! A Jedi craves not these things.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:45, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 00:16, January 24, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Among the combatants were the reformed Black Knights, a dark side faction: dark side of what?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:36, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Changed to "a faction of dark side Force-users." Hope that's clearer. Tinwe (comlink) 15:02, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Jujiggum
 * 4) * First sentence is a bit redundant.
 * 5) **Trimmed.
 * 6) * "&hellip;who had been destroyed by the Jedi&hellip;" Seeing as this is immediately followed by a reference to their many returns, perhaps "defeated" would be better than "destroyed" here.
 * 7) **I suppose you're right. Changed.
 * 8) * Just to verify: there is no conclusion presented for the conflict? No mention as to the Jedi winning/being successful (even if it doesn't say whether the Black Knights were eradicated)?
 * 9) * And also just to verify: there's nothing on the origin of the name "Huwhaka," is there? Nothing to connect it to the Black Knights or that grants it as a place name, or anything like that?
 * 10) **No and no, to both questions. Be assured, if such info could have been gleaned from The Jedi Path, I would have done it. :) Actually the opening quote of the article is all the book has to say about the revolt. I guess you could take Yoda's mention of "adventure" as a sign that the Jedi were successful, but that might be reading too much into it. Tinwe (comlink) 20:31, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Cool, I just feel obligated to check. :) I'm not going to make an objection out of it, but it might be worth a BTS note to say that the source doesn't actually mention the outcome of the revolt. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:45, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) ****Good idea, I've done that. Thanks for the review! Tinwe (comlink) 11:55, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) * Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 18:56, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments