Talk:Revan/Legends

See also Talk:Revan/Archive.

Male Lightsider
What exactly is the source for saying that male lightside is the official ending? After, all, Sith Lords leaves all options open. I imagine it'll be pretty controversial to keep it as it is without a source. --Fade 13:39, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) 1)The question remains. In an RPG where the character determines the sex, appearance and powers of the character, how can there be "canon"??
 * The continuity guy (Leeland Chee) at the OS boards has confirmed the lightside ending is canon, and that Revan's sex will be "unspecified for the most part". If possible, the article should be rewritten in a non-gender specific way, but that may be difficult. QuentinGeorge 22:32, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * We could just include a disclaimer; "Revan's gender is specified by the player. For the purposes of this article, masculine references were used for the sake of simplicity"- something like that. It's better not to have that official male bit, considering we have no direct source for it, and that female Revan is just as, if not more, popular than male. --Fade 22:38, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * (Among others) Dan Wallace confirmed that Male Revan is the offical stance. Tam 15:21, 20 Jul 2005 (UTC)

2)Who are Leeland Chee and Dan Wallace, and why is their word gospel?
 * The player may determine anything, but there is only one option that actually "happened" in the fictional universe. So if you play a DS Revan, then your story never happened. It must be decided for the purposes of continuity, so that further authors who refer to the KOTOR era can base their works on the canonical story. (KOTOR II shows an alternate way by allowing the player to choose the first game's ending, but KOTOR III probably won't, because implementing all 16 combinations would be nearly impossible.) Leland Chee is the Keeper of the Holocron and the one responsible for continuity management, and Dan Wallace... well, just read the article. - Sikon 13:17, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT)
 * In Dark Forces: Jedi Knight, the player may choose to follow the light side or dark side, with different endings, but Jedi Outcast and all subsequent media assume the light side ending. Just an example. 68.126.252.191 22:34, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

First of all, Star Wars Tales is canon after issue #21, as it is no longer published under the Infinities label. You can argue if this is valid, but not on the Revan talk page, but on the SWT talk page. Second, don't assume what the author of the Databank article "meant". In the DS ending, the Republic fleet loses the Battle of Rakata Prime, so it cannot destroy the Star Forge. According to Bastila's holocron in KOTOR II, the Star Forge is destroyed at least a year later when Revan suddenly leaves it to rot. Therefore, the Databank entry presumes the LS ending.
 * Nowhere has any official statement been made canonizing Revan:
 * The article sources the Star Forge entry, in the Star Wars Databank, on "light side" continuity.  The entry states: "The Republic used a captive Revan to piece together clues as to the Star Forge's location, and eventually discovered the Unknown World. Republic forces attacked en masse, and despite devastating losses, were able to defeat Malak and the Star Forge.".    However, it should be noted that if you click on Behind the Scenes above the Star Forge entry it states: "Although the branching nature of KOTOR's storyline allows for an ending in which the dark side triumphs and the Star Forge remains intact, Star Wars continuity maintains that one way or another, the Star Forge was destroyed.".   The author of this entry clearly makes an effort to say that there isn't a canon ending when he says that either way, light side ending or dark side ending, the Star Forge was destroyed.
 * Star Wars Tales 23 features Shadows and Light which, according to this article, has something to say about Star Wars Continuity. But according to Dark Horse Comics: "Star Wars Tales features the world's greatest comics creators and their spins on the Star Wars saga, both within and beyond the continuity!", it doesn't.  It states here that nothing in Star Wars Tales can be considered canon, unless canonized elsewhere ofcourse.
 * At the end of the article it states: "...the canonical Revan is confirmed by Leland Chee to be male." using this source in which Leland Chee answers the included question:
 * I've been wondering how specific the information in the holocron is regarding games (KotOR 1 & 2, DF2: Jedi Knight...) is where the storyline can take an obviously distorted path by going dark or light, or doing things in a different order. Alternate endings and customizable characters are noted in the Continuity Notes field. If needed, a definitive ending is chosen (ie the light side ending in Jedi Knight) and recorded into the database. Another example is the decision to make Revan a male character. Again, these types of things are only determined when needed.
 * He basicly says that Revan has been entered into the Holocron Continuity Database as male. However the Wiki entry for the Holocron Continuity Database has a quote from Leland Chan which says, "In addition to being an archive for information that has already been published, the Holocron is a tool to track everything that is currently in development. Information is entered at the earliest stages, so there is information about products that won't be released until years later. It is also used to store unpublished reference information."
 * Earlier in this discussion it mentions that Dan Wallace has said a word or two on the canonizing of Revan but, as far as I have found, that stems from this statement he made on the Jedi Council Forums: "...LFL has told me that the official continuity stance on KOTOR is: Mr. Revan, light-side ending." . Having said this he still left Revan's gender and the ending to KotOR ambiguous in the New Essential Chronology and since LFL told him in private, it cannot be considered published canon. -Valacar Nov. 10, 2005

Considering the Holocron, there was a long discussion on this wiki about whether it can pose as a source by itself if the information does not appear in other sources. The result was yes, since information entered in the Holocron will be respected by future EU writers. Again, this is probably arguable, and you can reopen that discussion, but until you convince the majority that the Holocron is not a valid source, the Revan article will continue to state that Revan was male. - Sikon [ Talk ] 01:54, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)


 * The official Starwars.com database still makes no mention of Revan's gender, and even more interesting avoids any hints (for example pronouns) about it in articles about Bastila or Malak. Therefore it seems that it is wanted to keep that question unsolved. Therefore, I definitively believe this article needs to be rewritten in a way which highlights that Revan's gender is unknown. If new informations are being released (for example with KotOR III) this can still be reworked, but right now we cannot simply distribute informations that are not backed up strong enough. - Tulon 23:45, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Since the Databank entry was added, LucasArts has confirmed Revan's status as a male lightsider. Even the Chronicles section on the KotOR II site was written without knowledge of Revan's canon status - Kwenn 22:55, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Is this certain? I mean, if we take a look at KotOR II: the game seems to handle Revan as a female by default. The player has the opportunity to change this by 'correcting' Atton, telling him that Revan was male. And before the Databank entry is updated (which would be the only definite source for Revan's gender, imho) I rather believe the actual game authors than some guy from LucasArts who might have misunderstood or just missed something there. - Tulon 06:20, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Atton does initially think Revan is female, but if you say that you don't care who Revan was, he will be set to LS male by default. And in any case, that choice is just gameplay mechanics - you don't seriously believe that Exile can change history (including Revan's gender and alignment) by picking the right answers, do you? :) - Sikon [ Talk ] 05:32, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * No, but I believe that the player has influence on the game background by picking answers like this. The same happens when Atton asks you what color your lightsaber had. Depending on what you answered, Atris would later show up with a lightsaber of the color you were able to pick. The fact that Atton believes Revan was female could well be interpreted in a way that the game designers were designing Revan to be female by default. They just allowed the player to change this by correcting Atton, depending on what gender the player chose in KotOR I. - Tulon 15:15, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Thought this one might be interesting for this discussion, it is a quote from one of Bioware's guys: "I think the point is that KotOR is a finished product - and nobody, not even George Lucas, could pass over the simple reality that KotOR offers both an initial gender choice, and an alignment choice during the game. So, even if George Lucas ever declared that Revan could not be a woman/a man, it would be nothing but an untrue statement." Makes sense to me. - Tulon 17:40, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * It makes no sense to me. Lucas is the ultimate owner of the Star Wars universe, and his decisions override anything. Nobody, least of all BioWare employees, can change that. Besides, that BioWare guy was talking about KOTOR as a self-sufficient RPG, not the Star Wars universe in general. It's a universe, not a multiverse, alternate histories and parallel dimensions don't exist in it - save this stuff for something like Star Trek. Either Revan was a man or a woman, not both. - Sikon [ Talk ] 18:33, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * In my opinion the character Revan is property of it's creator - and not Leland Chee's, whose reasons to choose a gender are more than questionable. Especially after all effort that had been put in both KotOR -AND- the _official_ Star Wars database to _not_ give a hint on Revan's gender. If anyone has the right to override Bioware's decision to leave the gender undecided it is George Lucas only. And even then it would seem quite unreliable. Don't you still think "Han shot first" in Mos Eisley, for example? In my opinion this wiki entry needs to be rewritten in a neutral way, including a special note on Revan's gender where it is stated that his creators (BioWare) and the official database still hold on to a neutral gender, whereas only Leland Chee chose to make "him" male in the publicly inaccessible Holocron. Does this sound like a good compromise to you? - Tulon 08:15, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope. For one thing, Lucas didn't create Revan, nor has anything to do with him. He leaves the EU to the authors, artists and continuity guys - such as Leland Chee. And the Holocron, although publically inaccessible, is the source for everything Star Wars, used by all the authors to help keep their work in continuity. So if Chee has stated the Holocron lists Revan as a male lightsider, then that is canon. Oh, and also, the Databank entry was written before Revan's gender was fixed; and few entries get updated unless part of a complete themed update - Kwenn 09:25, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * I see your point, but if Revan really would be male this would render KotOR a non-canon game - which kinda is a paradoxon, since Revan originated from this game. And I think that the creator of a character should have the last word on him, not some other guy that rarely has to do anything with KotOR at all. Especially when such a decision is made out of "reasons of simplicity". - Tulon 13:45, 11 Jan 2006
 * You may like it or not, but the Star Wars universe as a whole belongs to Lucasfilm, and it is their duty to preserve continuity, including elimination of alternate histories. Whoever the original author is (excluding Lucas, who almost always has the final word), they can retcon everything. What isn't clear? Rendering Revan male doesn't make all of KOTOR non-canon, it only makes the gender-specific elements non-canon. View them as gameplay mechanics, like levels, Force points or character classes. - Sikon [ Talk ] 13:11, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Why is the light side considered canon? The comic book shows him in the dark side robes and the official knights of the old republic 2 web site refers to him specifically as (male) Darth Revan, the Dark Lord of the Sith after he defeats Malak on the Star Forge in the chronicles section. Only the official Star Wars site hints that he's light side with only minor things like saying the Star Forge was destroyed by the Republic, etc. It doesn't actually say the canon ending is light side. So I hope this is taken under consideration. --Kotor mark 20:06, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Lucas has stated that whenever there is a choice between lightside and darkside in the games that the lightside is canon. In some ways that blows (particularly because the lightside ending in JA is so lame) but it makes a degree of sense. If the game is not a guaranteed blockbluster and merits no sequels where the light may triumph in the end this means it doesn't interfere with established Star Wars continuity. The Republic existed continuously for some twenty-five thousand years and if Revan went DS this would effectively render this continuity inaccurate. -- Niirfa-sa 21:46, Feb 12 2006 (UTC)
 * As I mentioned before, the Chronicles of the Old Republic section on the KotOR II site was written before it was decided to make the Male Lightsider story canon, which is also why the Databank is ambiguous, and why it didn't include a Revan article in the KotOR updates. Further, the comic book (Shadows and Light, from Tales) has only one panel including Revan, and that's part of a vision seen by Duron Qel-Droma - I think Revan is dressed that way just so the audience can identify him as Revan, though in-universe, the explaination is simply a case of the vision not being accurate on the specifics. And IIRC, Duron has the vision at the time Revan is fighting in the Mando Wars, so he may well be wearing his armor and mask at this time, and thus this is how Duron would visualize him - Kwenn 21:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Either that, or the choice between LS and DS robes is also gameplay mechanics, like Starkeiller suggested. - Sikon [ Talk ] 10:30, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

I think it's a bit of an insult to force Revan to be a Light Side Male. I was a Dark Side Male in the game, and that seemed to mix very well with KOTOR II, where the Jedi Order is nearly destroyed at the beginning of the game. It would also be possible for Revan to nearly destroy the Republic as, though it stood for 25,000 years, Palpatine makes careful note that its incarnation before the Galactic Empire rose to power had "stood for 1,000 years." To force a "canonical" interpretation of Revan is a slap in the face. The great thing about KOTOR was that the player could create Revan, could mold him/her into whatever they wanted, could be a part of Star Wars canon without being told, "Nope, this is the way it is LOL. LIGHT SIDE WINS!" With KOTOR II leaving the option of 4 different Revans open, I see no reason to consider the holocron entry to make it canon. It's an inaccessible database, not the Star Wars bible.

Knight?
Was Revan a Knight by the end of KOTOR I? He was only a Padawan during the game. And was Bastila granted Knighthood anytime between the two KOTORs? - Sikon 05:12, 21 Jul 2005 (UTC)


 * It is hard to believe that Revan wouldn't be knighted after striking down a Dark Lord of the Sith. Although you don't hear much about Revan afterwards, it is highly unlikely that he wasn't. As for Bastila, she was already a Jedi Knight in KOTOR I, assigned to help Revan. She also at one point believed that if she completed her task of helping Revan, she might even become a Jedi Master. --Raganork 06:05, 22 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * Revan was a Knight before he went to fight in the Mandalorian Wars. --Imp 06:58, 22 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * Bastila was a Padawan in KOTOR I. (Master Zhar to the player: "Padawan Bastila you are already familiar with".) - Sikon 07:32, 22 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * Bastila was a Padawan when you first meet her in KotOR I - it's entirely possible however that she was promoted to Knight just prior to being assigned to the mission with Revan. This is ifurther mplied when Vandar tells Bastila to take "the Padawan" (Revan) with her during the Dark Side ending.  Had she been a Padawan also this would have been an inappropriate thing to say.
 * I agree, I think her rank was upped just before going with Revan to look for the Star Forge. However, having a Padawan leading a Padawan while rediculous does occur. If I remember correctly Juhani was a Padawan and, having killed her master, was sent under Revan's (alt) care.--Dustin Asby 01:28, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Juhani didn't kill her master - see her article. - Sikon [ Talk ] 06:23, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)


 * On the official Knights of the Old Republic 2 web site, the chronicles section specifically refers to him as Jedi master Revan before the Mandalorian War. --Kotor mark 20:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: Every instance where the Chronicles contradict ingame information, they are ignored. Most are happy to ignore them entirely. Revan was a "young Jedi Knight" before the Wars according to numerous sources, most of them Jedi Masters(Ulicus 20:03, 16 February 2006 (UTC))

Fall to the Dark Side
Does anyone know when Revan actually fell to the Dark Side? KOTOR I shows that Malak and himself turned to the Dark Side as early as finding a Star Map on Dantooine, while KOTOR II tells that Revan was consumed by the Dark Side on Malachor V. Anyone have a logical explanation for this inconsistency?--Raganork 06:32, 22 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, he obviously was on Malachor V before going after the star maps. --Imp 06:58, 22 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually, Revan and malak never fell to the Darkside until after the Mandalorian War. In the cutscene with them in the Rakata temple on Dantooine Malak actually says something on the lines of "If we enter this room we shall be taking our first steps [towards the darkside] and shalln't be able to return". Jasca Ducato 08:12, 26 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * That assumes you completely disregard the Chronicles which seems to be a popular thing to do, despite the fact that they also have to be considered canon since they are done with Lucasarts approval. The Chronicles state that Revan fell to the Dark Side immediately upon discovering Malachor V. This trend of people ignoring the Chronicles because they are unpopular is a strange one.--67.187.144.76 14:31, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT)
 * People ignore the Chronicles because they contradict the games. Revan was *not* a Jedi Master and Kreia would not have become a Sith after Knights of the Old Republic: Why would she feel guilty about Revan's fall if he had returned to the light? Etc. The Chronicles *are* right to say that Revan turned to the dark side on Malachor however, since this is said in KotOR II.

Similarity to Darth Vader
Like Darth Vader, Revan wears an armor that covers most of his body. -- Eddyward Telerionus 15:55, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC) But look at the picture again, do you see the armor? -- Eddyward Telerionus 20:45, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Right... Why are you telling us? Also, Revan wears robes and a mask, not armor. --Imp 16:05, 5 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually, the torso and hand area's look pretty armour-ey to me. Personally, I like the concept of armour-robes in general (apart from the obvious mobility problems) Lord Patrick 08:19, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * But look at the picture Imp, Revan was wearing armor. You can't see his face. -- Eddyward Telerionus 02:52, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * The reason you can't see his face is because he's wearing a mask, not armor. And even if he was, what's your point? MarcK 03:17, 8 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Revan as a Sith Lord wears chest,leg and arm plates made of a type of armor. It is not like a armor suit like a Mandalorian but rather a unique design probably fashioned by Revan or a Sith warrior. The mask (despite having a resembelance to Mandalorian armor) is not connected to armor in anyway but is rather a simple face mask. Darth Revan also wears black robes with a hood over his body. The armor in the end is not a full suit but rather robes with armor plating and gauntlets. - Maphisto86
 * Also note that Vader needed his suit to survive, and Revan does not. -- Riffsyphon1024 19:20, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Well, is there a picture of Revan as a Jedi without the mask and armor? -- Eddyward Telerionus 00:45, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, John, he did survive without his mask and robes in KOTOR... --Imp 00:48, 14 Aug 2005 (UTC)


 *   "Well, is there a picture of Revan as a Jedi without the mask and armor?"   Err, NO! The hole point of the game is that you don't know who Revan is until the Leviathan level. So why would they post a picture of Revan without his suit of armour! That completely ruins the surprise! No offense, but i would see it as common sense. Jasca Ducato 17:45, 3 Sep 2005 (UTC)


 * Not to mention that there are like 6 or 8 male faces to choose from. Have you played the game? Perhaps we should reiterate the spoiler warning. I personally don't care if I see book or comic spoilers, but I don't ever want to see game or movie spoilers (regarding SW).--Dustin Asby 01:36, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The name's Revan, Darth Revan
Perhaps we should change the page name from "Revan" too "Darth Revan". This article is after all about a Dark Lord of the Sith called "Darth Revan". I mean, there are two articles for Malak, one for him as a Jedi and one for him as Darth Malak. I think it should be changed. Thats all! Jasca Ducato 18:24, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Uh, there's only one article for Malak. Kuralyov 18:30, 31 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Darth Malak redirects to Malak. Darth Revan redirects to Revan.
 * The article is entitled Revan because he did not bear the Darth title as a Jedi. Out policy states that any title which was not used absolutely all of the time is not to be included in the article title. – Aidje talk 22:08, 3 Sep 2005 (UTC)

So Darth Vader Never used the title as the Jedi Anakin, but you have him listed as Darth Vader?--192.31.106.35 12:59, 10 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Wookieepedia consensus (which, in this case, I heartily object to) insists that Anakin Skywalker and Darth Vader are fundamentally two different people, while the other Darths (including Darth Sidious, AKA Palpatine) are not. jSarek 20:22, 10 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Where is this consensus and where can I object to it?--Dustin Asby 01:38, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Athlete
I've never played this game...but was Revan an athlete as his categorization suggests? --SparqMan 17:42, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, he became Taris Swoop Race champion prior to its destruction by the Sith. Jasca Ducato 17:45, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Revan was also the champion of the Taris dueling ring, after beating Twitch 151.203.151.111 17:50, 4 Nov 2005 (UTC)

The image for Malak's defeat on the star forge
I don't think this image should be included here. The light side ending is the canonical ending and in the image Revan has on his dark side robes. I understand the avoidance of showing his face because it can change for each player but the image technically argues the canonical ending to the game. I like the picture though. --DannyBoy7783 19:25, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Still, it's from Shadows and Light. It can be argued that Duron Qel-Droma's visions were not accurate, and besides, Duron acknowledges Revan's light side alignment by predicting that Revan will use his robes, which are restricted to the light side. Besides, even a dark side Revan cannot get the full clothing, with the mask. I think it was just a way of hiding Revan's face. - Sikon [ Talk ] 05:11, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * If it's from a canonical story, that's how it happened. I don't see why light side Revan can't wear armor? Does armor define one's morality? Does the "restricted to the light side" nonsense apply for Revan's armor too? --Master Starkeiller 11:09, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * His mask looks more like a Mandalorean mask, doesn't it? KEJ 11:33, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Starkeiller, the problem is, only DS Revan can create a copy of his old robe on the Star Forge. LS Revan can instread create a "Star Forge robe", which looks differently. - Sikon [ Talk ] 12:06, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * That's just gameplay mechanics. We got an image from a comic and some gameplay mechanics. Which is correct? The image from the comic. That's how I see it. --Master Starkeiller 12:30, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Makes sense. - Sikon [ Talk ] 13:23, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Give it a description similar to the one on Bastila Shan's page (rather than the 'artist's rendition' one) and I see no problem. --Fade 13:25, 12 Dec 2005 (UTC)

HOW DO U GET REVANS OLD ARMOR IN THE KOTOR GAME....DO U NEED CHEATS?!!!


 * Why is the light side considered canon? The comic book shows him in the dark side robes and the official knights of the old republic 2 web site refers to him specifically as Darth Revan, the Dark Lord of the Sith after he defeats Malak on the Star Forge in the chronicles section. Only the official Star Wars site hints that he's light side with only minor things like saying the Star Forge was destroyed by the Republic, etc. It doesn't actually say the canon ending is light side. So I hope this is taken under consideration. --Kotor mark 19:58, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The light side ending is considered canon because every LucasArts game ends canonically as the light side choice. There is a definite source for this on one of the talk pages. As for the image: He has a blue lightsaber. That counts for something. In the game, he cannot wear his robes because the light and dark side "special robes" have different characteristics. In a comic, it's not a problem. - TopAce 20:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The whole "he's got a blue lightsaber" thing seems odd to me. The ENTIRE image is blue tinted. Malak didn't canonically have a blue head... it's a vision. (Ulicus 20:00, 16 February 2006 (UTC))

Eye Color
I do not agree with the statement that Revans eyes were Yellow. When your character in Kotor slowly turns to the darkside, their eyes don't turn yellow. In fact the iris and pupil dissappear, leaving the ciliary body (=the white stuff). This is with both a male and a female Revan. So.. why don't we change the eye color to.. uh... white? ----Inmobilus 17:50, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * According to the canonical light side ending, Revan only spent a little time being the Dark Lord of the Sith, apart from that, he was the servant of the light side. - TopAce 16:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)

Most Powerful Sith Lord of All Time change
I've changed "Thought by many to be the most powerful Sith Lord of all time" to "Undoubtedly one of the most powerful Sith Lords of all time".

The latter is accurate, the former reeks of a fanboyish attempt to convince people that Revan *is* the most powerful Sith Lord of all time, while covering their tracks with "thought by many". Now, Revan may well have been the most powerful Sith Lord of all time - but presenting it as "almost fact" is a mistake on Wookiepedia, because we can't say for sure. --(195.92.168.176 08:46, 26 January 2006 (UTC))
 * I have removed this fanwankery completely. Have you considered registering, by the way? --Imp 08:50, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I think it's fair to say that Revan was up there with the elite, I just don't think it's right to present him as "the best and greatest there ever was" when there's no hard evidence supporting this. He *might* be, but "might" and "maybe" has no place on Wookiepedia. The most we can say is that he is the most powerful Force user/individual of his generation. Oh, and I may register later... I thought my wikipedia account would work here too. It didn't. (195.92.168.176 09:08, 26 January 2006 (UTC) Ok, registered. (Ulicus 09:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC))
 * I think it should be added again, it gives readers the same feel the the Republic felt during the Jedi Civil War. Just imagine the odd Coruscanti talking about him; "He's undoubtedly one of the most powerful Sith Lords of all time". Jasca Ducato 15:30, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It's still there in the JCW section, as "one of the" it's just the "considered to be one of" in the first paragraph that was removed. (195.92.168.175 17:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC))
 * Commendable change. Yes Revan was one of the most powerful. I think to avoid fanon inserts on the page that we require user to suggest a change in the discussion section, and if it is agreeable, then we open the page up for edits.nI get tired of little fanboy jerks editting pages and putting in their own incorrect opinions. DarthMalus

Quite a large early edit
I've edited much of the "early life" and "Mandalorian Wars" section to more closely match what we are told in the games, as well as to be more accurate. Saying that Revan was "Possibly born on Deralia" is about as necessary and informative as "Revan was possibly born on Tattooine" - Revan was "possibly" born anywhere, because we don't know where he was born. Some of the edit is more stylistic in nature however. If it's considered to be too dreadful, change it back.(195.92.168.175 17:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC))

THE MOST POWERFUL SITH LORD OF ALL TIME
Obviously the candidates for this are Darth Sidious and Darth Revan
 * You know, this is subjective. I approve Revan and understand that many fans of different Jedi/Sith Lords would like to read positive things about their favourites, but understand that this is an encyclopaedia which should be factual. - TopAce 19:55, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't like the "most powerful" part. You would have to pit Sidious and Revan against each others to have a proof.  Sidious probably qualifies for "the most successful" Sith Lord, while Revan is "the best strategist".  They are both powerful in their own rights, but we simply don't have enough material to draw such extreme conclusions.  --DarthMuffin 14:28, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Spoiler tags
I would like to enquire why we suddenly stopped using the spoiler tags. What happens to Revan is not something you experience everyday and is undoubtedly the twist in the whole KotOR storyline. This is not like Anakin turning Darth Vader, that everyone knows about. I would support inserting a spoiler tag. - TopAce 19:58, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I second the motion... it should come as a shock to the player when first playing KOTOR. -Maphisto86 8:55, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Main Picutre Change...
Why was the picture reverted back to the old one? The picture of Revan from KOTOR II was much better! -Maphisto86 8:57, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

I agree! Does anyone have the old picture so that we can switch it back? -DarthMuffin 9:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Lightsabre fighting style
The article reads : "As he is believed to have been a practitioner of the lightsaber Form X, Jar'kai, it is possible that he received some instruction from Master Kavar as well, a known as a master of that form, though Revan was clearly more than competent in the more traditional forms of lightsaber combat also. "

Do we have any proof of this? Yes, as a player character, he can dual wield. But he clearly uses only one sabre in the cinematic. I do believe that being alone against three Jedi would be a good enough reason to take out a second sabre if he was really good with two blades. I know he is shown with two sabres in the KotOR 2 cave, but I do think that the KotOR 1 cinematic is a better reference. -DarthMuffin 9:35, 14 February 2006 (UTC) I don't see what the problem is with him dual-wielding in the KOTOR II vision. Yes, he dual-wields. And Bastila joins Malak in the Mandalorian Wars. And your companions try to kill you and Kreia. It's a vision, not the real Revan. It's canon that the Exile saw a vision of Revan dual wielding in Ludo Kressh's tomb, but that says nothing about Revan himself. The only times we see the actual Revan he has the one blade. - Lord Hydronium 00:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I think all information about KOTOR lightsaber forms should be excluded for characters for whom it isn't officially confirmed. It's nothing but speculation. The game engine cannot render lightsaber forms conclusively, and I think even the KOTOR II engine, which includes the forms, renders them identically. - Sikon [ Talk ] 10:35, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I second that. None of the player characters of the KotOR series should be attributed a fighting style anyway (we'll have to check the Exile).  Also, the "Revan's Fall" cinematic in KotOR 1 is a rather solid proof that he might not have been that proficient with Form X.--DarthMuffin 14:22, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * As a piece of trivia, the Kotor II vision of Revan uses two sabres. Of course, he's a vision, so who knows. Other canon sources have him use one sabre more often. --Fade 14:24, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It isn't even clear if that vision of Revan is from the past or from the future (I think it's from the past, but some people will disagree). Of course, Duron's vision of a single light blue lightsaber can be just as well erroneous (see discussion about robes, above), but at least it can be precisely dated. As for fighting styles: Kavar, Vrook and Zez-Kai Ell are all masters of Ataru, Shien, Juyo and Niman (which means every master is fluent in all these four forms), Exile can mix up to six forms (for him, Juyo and Niman are mutually exclusive), but doesn't specialize much at any of them. That's basically all we know about all KOTOR characters. - Sikon [ Talk ] 15:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the Kotor II stuff is bullshit. We should use Kotor I as reference. Revan wields only one lightsaber.
 * Personally, I've always been hesitant about even using the Master's styles from Kotor II as anything more than a gameplay mechanic. After all, the styles they know are heavily dependent on the Exile; order the planets are completed, Exile's class, etc. The only one I would say could be predicted with some certainty would be Kavar, because he uses two sabers, and there seems to be only one style that deals with two sabers. --Fade 15:26, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * So do we have a consensus? We could erase the part referring to the "Jar'Kai" and keep the article in accordance with the cinematics of KotOR 1 (canon) and Duron's vision (canon?).  The fan picture of the two-sabres stance can be left there though; we could just modify the text to make it more general.--DarthMuffin 16:55, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * No, we don't. I don't think the information should be deleted but perhaps moved into the Behind the Scenes section along with the picture. Jasca Ducato 18:01, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * So, what now? Are we gonna change it? I think we should do it.
 * When I restructured the early portion of the article, I wasn't sure whether to include that reference or not. On the forums/boards I visit, there generally seems to be a consensus that he was capable of the style (explaining the Korriban vision), but that it was not his preferred choice (explaining the cinematic).  I didn't mean to imply that it was his primary style (which is why you have the "though he was clearly more than competant in traditional lightsaber forms also" bit), just that he was suspected to have utilised it, so if that's the way it comes across, then it is right to remove or change it.  Ultimately, I think that him using two blades in the vision was Obsidian being a little silly, but whatever. (195.92.168.173 19:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)) - Whoops, forgot to log in for this: (Ulicus 20:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC))
 * This wasn't silly, this was crap. Besides, I concur with ya, Ulicus. We could just "mention" the Jar'Kai crap in the "Behind the scenes" section? And we should really get rid of this Jar'Kai stuff.
 * I understand what you mean, Ulicus. But when I first read that part, I was really under the impression that you meant that his favoured style was dual-wield, but that he was also good with one sabre.  --DarthMuffin 21:59, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'd agree with you Darth Muffin, the more I read it, the more it seems like that to me as well. It's funny, since all I was trying to do was emphasise that "Revan studied under a lot of masters" and hint that he knew Form X without it sounding boring. How about something along these lines as an alternative: "Since he is believed to have learnt/understood/known/mastered, though not favoured, the Lightsaber Form X/whatever, it is possible he recieved some instruction from Master Kavar blah de blah - continue as normal"? If people would *really* prefer it to be moved entirely into a behind the scenes section, then so be it - but ideally only cut and move the Form X/Kavar stuff out of the paragraph, I think the other "learning under Zhar/Kae other masters" stuff works well as it is.(Ulicus 00:25, 17 February 2006 (UTC))
 * I'm not entirely sure if it's a good idea to completely move it to behind the scenes, since Revan does use two sabres in the K2 cave. Even though we all seem to agree that this was a rubbish scene, it's still in the game.  To clear out any confusion, we could try something like : "Revan might have studied under Master Kavar, since he appears to be proficient with the lightsaber combat Form X.  However, he seems to favour the dueling techniques of the single saber".  Or something among these lines.  That being said, I'm a long time opposer to any kind of Star Wars dual wielding, and I really wouldn't mind tossing Form X out of the window.  --DarthMuffin 01:51, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Right, I've changed it. Since we've only got one scene that shows pre-mindwipe Revan using a single lightsaber, and only one scene showing a (presumed) vision of a premindwiped Revan using two sabres - to justify claiming he favo(u- I'm english goddammit!)red one blade over two, I've drawn attention to the fact that he was facing multiple opponents when on his flagship which is whe-... Ok, now that I think about it, since using one blade helps defensively and using two helps offensively... maybe he used two blades when facing one opponent (as in the Exile's vision) and one when facing multiple... I mean, he's a master tactician, he'd probably change his style and approach to suit the situation. This calls for a slight edit - brb. (Ulicus 00:20, 20 February 2006 (UTC))
 * Ok, so now it's: "Even so, by the time of his supposed 'death' on board his flagship years later, Revan seemed to have favored the use of a single lightsaber for dealing with multiple opponents." That way, we're dealing strictly with what we know from the game as opposed to what we prefer. In the only instance of seeing a non PC Revan fight multiple opponents, he used one blade. In the only instance of seeing a non PC (albeit vision) Revan face one opponent, he used two. Thoughts? Is this good enough? Too much in favour of Jar'Kai? (Muffin, I sypathise with your dislike of dual-wielding, but it's in the highest form of canon there is... so no windows, ok? :) ) (Ulicus 00:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC))
 * Yeah, you're right, Hydronoium. The Kotor II Scene is crap, especially Revan wielding two lightsabers. And no, he shouldn't have two sabers (It's ONLY a vision of the Exile.). Look at the "Shadow and Light"-Comic and you'll see him wielding one lightsaber. So forget this stupid two lightsabers thing and consider him wielding always one lightsaber.

Alright, this is kind of going nowhere right now. We all seem to agree that a change is needed, yet we do nothing. Ulicus, I'm not really comfortable with the "dealing with multiple opponents" part. I know that the mechanics of KotOR make it so that a single blade will give more defense, but if I were outnumbered by three Jedi, I would really consider using a second sabre if I was really comfortable with dual-wielding. Let's deal with facts : we only have one canon reference of Revan with a lightsabre in hands, and that's on the bridge of his flagship. In this particular scene, he happens to use a single sabre. I therefore suggest that we clearly state that his preferred style of combat was the single sabre. No more, no less. Form X can be kept in the main artcile (such as "Revan might also have been proficient with the use of two sabres at the same time, though he clearly preferred duelling combat"). Or we can choose to toss it in the behind the scenes section, and include a small paragraph to explain why we decided to put it there. Either way, we need to move on. --DarthMuffin 22:24, 22 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Since nobody replied, I concluded that we had reached a consensus. I have modified the "Jedi Training" section so that it now states that Revan favoured the use of a single lightsabre.  The Jar'kai content has been moved (with a mention of the Exile's vision) to the "Behind the Scenes" section, right next to the Jar'Kai picture.  --DarthMuffin 18:08, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'll reply, the man against dual wielding. U did a good job, DarthMuffin. Since we all know that he wields only one lightsaber, we should concentrate on making the main picture better, see topic below :D.

Image
Redemption 21:42, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Can someone identify a source for the Jar'Kai sketch? I remember I once thought about adding it a long while ago, but wasn't sure whether it was fan art. If it is, it has no place here. We have it labelled as concept art, but where is originally from? --Fade 19:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It definately is a concept art of some sort. I think a copy of it can be found on . It is of Jar'kai however, that i know for certain.
 * I concur with DarthMuffin, but the main picture should be changed as soon as we have a better picture. Back to topic, the Jar'Kai-style stuff shall be removed and replaced by other setences; I'm convinced someone can express that according to the conversation.
 * What's wrong with the main image? --Fade 20:15, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, the two lightsabers are disturbing and it's ingame-graphic. The images of Malak, Palpi, Vader, etc. are far better. Let's just keep an eye open for better pictures; and now, we still want to change the Jar'Kai stuff, don't we?
 * The reason it's the best image we have is because there aren't many good Revan pics around. --Fade 20:30, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * You're absolutely right, Fade. That's why I was writing "Let's just keep an eye open for better pictures" ;-).
 * Not sure if this is the best quality or if its too dark. But...here ya go.
 * I actually quite like that picture. The darkness adds to his "mystique". But my above statement still stands. Jasca Ducato 21:50, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I like the picture, too.
 * It'd be perfect if it the quality was turned up a notch. --Imp 22:51, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if I can up the quality but perhaps if the image is sized down a little then it'll show better quality. Redemption 03:14, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Where did you get the image from. If i know the where the original file is then i may be able to pixilate a decent image for use. Jasca Ducato 09:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * ...You can barely see anything in it. We don't want a testement to Revan's chameleonic powers, do we? --Fade 11:59, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the picture would be perfect, if the quality would be turned up; I concur with Imerpialles. What now?
 * To tell you the truth, its an image of my own. Created from the model files in the game in Gmax. Redemption 13:41, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Working on it as we speak. Jasca Ducato 13:50, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but i cant find anyway of sorting out the resolution on the image or pixelating it. If somebody does no a way can you leave a notice here for me, then i should be able to do it. Until then can people please support me when i tell Rodtheanimegod4ever not to keep changing the main image to [[Media:Revan.jpg|this crap Taris one]]. Jasca Ducato 14:22, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * I really like Redemption's pic, if it can be enhanced then I'm all for it being used. Having said that, I've just uploaded a pic myself, unfortunately, given my PC spec the graphical quality isn't as good as it could be. Perhaps someone could take a similar screenshot on a higher end machine? [[Image:Darth_Revan_arms_crossed.JPG|thumb]] (Ulicus 20:25, 16 February 2006 (UTC))
 * [[Image:Revanfull2.png|thumb]] I did the best I could in the quality...its a little better at least... Redemption 22:40, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * It's good Redemption. But i don't like the fact that his legs disappear into the background. As for Ulicus' image. I might be able to ge a decent image. Luckily i keep a saved game set just before the duel with Malak while set on darkside. Jasca Ducato 09:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Try a couple (I mean, if you don't mind :) ) I was just thinking it might be better to have a shot of him just *before* that part - when the camera is focused on his upper body (the part where you'd usually see him 'gloating wickedly' if you've not got the robes hacked in)... but maybe people want a full body shot, I dunno. S'up to you. (Ulicus 13:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC))
 * Are there ANY objections to the new black background Revan image? Is the quality good enough? Redemption 00:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Although i like the picture i would have to object. The main reason being the quality of the image. If someone can provide me with a decent program to do that or at least a link then i will do it. Jasca Ducato 21:02, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Good article
Just wanted to say well done to all who have worked on this article. It was a very enjoyable read! Eyrezer 22:44, 24 February 2006 (UTC)