Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights

This page is for requests for user rights.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Requests for rollback
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * 4) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * 5) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Questions

 * 1) Why should you be granted rollback rights?

(16 Users + 13 Admins/0/0)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends May 27th.

Support

 * 1) Basically, Farl's a good egg. The guy's been a mainstay for longer than than you or I, and in my experience he's always been a very civil, very courteous user who is more than willing to help out. He's also working up a bit of frequency as a writer in the WP: Aliens cult, which is something I like to see, and he's also clearly got the best interests of the Wook at heart. I'm confident that he would use the fancy extra button as any other honourable rollbacker would, to combat evil and such. Also, why not? Thefourdotelipsis 01:34, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Of course. --Imperialles 01:36, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Skip to my Farlstendoiro. —Tommy 9281 01:37, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 01:38, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Good dude.  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 01:39, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) Had it coming for a long time. Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 01:41, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) "Why not?" is my guiding philosophy for granting rollback. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 01:58, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) Per Culator. Grunny  ( talk ) 02:36, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9)  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 02:47, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) I have no objections. Havac 02:56, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) I'm actually surprised that he doesn't have such rights yet.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 03:38, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 12) Wait, Farl doesn't have rollback? How did that oversight happen?! Needs immediate correction. UPDATE: And Trak edit conflicts me with the exact same sentiment. More proof it needs to be fixed! jSarek 03:39, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 13) Fourdot sums it up pretty good. -- 1358  (Talk) 04:39, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 *  CC7567  (talk) 05:20, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) LtNOWIS 07:21, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Seems like a grand idea. ~ SavageBob 07:24, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Let's skip(py) the formalities. --Eyrezer 08:40, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:40, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 11:28, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) This many votes and no candy references? Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:50, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:19, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 18:34, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) Why not. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:17, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) Absolutely. - Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 19:42, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) Why not? Well, as long as he pledges to watch the RCs, particularly when his American friends are all still snug in their beds. Graestan ( Talk ) 20:47, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 12) Absolutely, long time coming. Dedicated to working on all types of articles, big or small.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 02:24, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 13) Per above.  JangFett  (Talk) 23:13, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 14) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 00:34, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 15) Lord Hydronium 00:45, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

 * Accepted via good old-fashioned talk page correspondence. Thefourdotelipsis 01:34, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

(15 Users + 13 Admins/0/0)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends June 7th.

Support

 * 1) Xicer is an excellent user and a good guy. Active, responsible, reliable, helpful, and trustworthy -- he's a model user and a rising star on the Wook. I think it's about time he got rollback. Havac 21:43, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2)  OLIOSTER  (talk) 21:50, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) LtNOWIS 21:58, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Onwards and upwards. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 22:53, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Yes!  JangFett  (Talk) 23:12, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6)  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 23:16, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) Why not? Grunny  ( talk ) 00:12, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) Absolutely. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 00:13, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9)  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 00:14, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) Obligatory candy reference. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 00:15, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) Graestan ( Talk ) 00:19, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 12) Yep. ~ SavageBob 00:32, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 13) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 00:48, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 14) Xicer is a strong asset to the wiki. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:21, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 15) Xicer has done nothing to offend me. Yet. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 02:25, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 16) Could probably go for the full user rights package. --Imperialles 02:27, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 17) Per all the above.-- 02:29, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 18) I narrow my eyes at him, though. Rieekan sources indeed... Thefourdotelipsis 02:43, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 19) —Tommy  9281 02:53, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 20) &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 03:09, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 21) —Xwing328 (Talk) 03:19, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 22) Per Imperialles --Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:16, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 23) --Eyrezer 06:34, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 24) Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 09:48, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 25) Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:04, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 26) It took me this long to notice this. Shame on on me. Xicer is an excellent contributor; productive, friendly, IRC-regular and everything mentioned above. Good luck. -- 1358  (Talk) 18:08, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * 27) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 00:34, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * 28) Lord Hydronium 00:45, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

 * Accepted via IRC. Havac 21:43, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

Requests for adminship
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have two years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * 4) They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * 5) They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * 6) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 7) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 8) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
 * 9) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * 10) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

Questions
Here are some general adminship questions. They are 100% optional, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them.

Requests for bureaucratship
Rules:
 * Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.
 * Self-votes will not be counted in the vote totals.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.


 * 1) They are an administrator.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * 3) They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 6) Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month&mdash;from the day the nomination is put forth&mdash;are counted).
 * 7) Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 8) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.