User talk:Jediknight19bby

Welcome, to the talk page of Jediknight19bby. Feel free to bring all your complaints, comments, and suggestions on this page.



Your edit to Administrators
You aren't an administrator: please don't claim otherwise. Thanks, &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Userpage
Please not that your userpage is not supposed to beyour primary source of edits, as dictated by User page policy. -- SFH 00:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Warning
17:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Stop putting banned tags on users that have not been banned, or you yourself will get banned. -- SFH

Voting
Be sure that when you vote, you place your name at the bottom of the list, not the top. If you look at them, you'll see that the votes are in chronological order from oldest to newest that way. -- Ozzel 19:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Fanon
QuentinGeorge 04:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Editing archives

 * Please note that all of Consensus Track discussions that are archived clearly state in big red text not to edit them. They are preserved for our records only and are not active. Therefore, do not change any more archived files please. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 16:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you're talking about. Jediknight19bby 19:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You added a vote here, where the vote was already over, hence the "The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it." -- Ozzel 20:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I didn't see that. Jediknight19bby 16:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Problems
Do not remove FA nominations. I see this is far from the first warning you've gotten. You aren't going to get many more of them. Kuralyov 16:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Then someone on the Inq. should. Ephant Mon needs much more user dedication and hard work to become a featured article. It should be an improvement drive, how about that? Jediknight19bby 16:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If other users and/or the Inquisitorious don't think the article is good enough for FA, then it will never make it anyway. A nomination is far from a guarantee that it will become an FA. -- Ozzel 19:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

The Point of Wookieepedia
Please stop lying and annoying other users. You do not know James Luceno and you are not an administrator of Wookieepedia. Please refrain from adding Fanon articles to this wiki (e.g.Founding Jedi), and, if it gets deleted, do not start winging about your edit count. Also, please do not nominate FA nominations for the improvement drive, and please do not remove FA nomination tags from articles. Also, please state the reason for your opposition to an FA nomination. Also, as I am the person behind Ephant Mon's FA, please tell me which section needs expanding. (this may as well be a rhetorical question as I severly doubt you have any knowledge of the EU) AdmirableAckbar 15:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It should have a prelude in the beginning about when he met young Jabba the Hutt, and their exploits before they interfered with Jedi business by kidnapping Ki-Adi Mundi's daughter. Besides, that Darth Plagueis book was being written by someone who is not a Star Wars author but I do know. The Founding Jedi are as much canon as the Jedi Order are, just we don't have a real name for them. If you want to complain, complain to Ozzel, the admin who helped me out with the Founding Jedi page. Jediknight19bby 17:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * obviously the founding jedi do exist, however they have never featured in a canon storyline or source, therefore are fanon. If the darth plauegius novel was being written by someone who is not a star wars writer then it is fanon. What source documents Ephant' exploits with Jabba pre-Cerea? I'm almost certain there are none, at least not with anything more specific than "Ephant and Jabba smuggled and generally were criminals together". But, if you know of such a source (and a real one at that, not one being written by your friend), please tell me of it. Also, as i'm sure you know, this is a wiki, and can be edited by anyone, so if you feel the article is missing something, feel free to add it (if it's Canon) AdmirableAckbar 20:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

sorry and thanks
thanks for helping with the Ephant Mon article. Any other help is much appreciated. Sorry for seeming harsh with my earlier comments, i was just frustrated that you nominated Mon for the ID, as I have been putting in a lot of work on ot lately. Once again, sorry and thanks AdmirableAckbar 15:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You are forgiven. I guess I shouldn't have pulled it as a nom, it does have potential. I don't know what I was thinking, probably because I was frustrated with the Jedi Order page, and still nobody was supporting all the work I did on that page. In fact, I'm going to delete my opposition to Mon's page and make it support. Jediknight19bby 19:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * thanks. once again, i'm sorry for seeming so pissed off. AdmirableAckbar 19:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: References
Hey, check out this link → Sourcing to learn about how and when to reference in an article. If you need an example, just check out any FA. Cheers, Greyman ( Paratus ) 22:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Jediknight19bby 17:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Jedi Order
As an Inquisitorius, it is my job to monitor the FA nom page. Despite the work and improvements you have made to the page, it is far too short to fulfill its potential. As I said on its Inq page, I deleted it after 10 days without any significant activity. I stand by this decision. --Eyrezer 07:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Jedi Order Help
if you like, i can help you with the Jedi Order a bit AdmirableAckbar 18:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not the best at referencing, and, with the work you did on Ephant Mon, I think that the Jedi Order can be a good article in no time. There isn't a lot to source, since there's only a little bit that we can do, since the opening paragraphs and the list of notable members cover nearly half of it. I guess I could use your help. Thanks. Jediknight19bby 18:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help. Jediknight19bby 20:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You want me to apologise. Tough luck. &#123;&#123;SUBST:User:Jasca Ducato/Sig}} 20:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * calm down both of you. jediknight19bby, i doubt that Jasco Ducato realised i had made edits other than the pics. Jasco, i don't mind about the pics, but please check through the article for other changes before reverting AdmirableAckbar 21:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * yeah if i get a chance i'll be glad to help AdmirableAckbar 22:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

WOTM
i know i already agreed, but i might ask you to wait another month or two before nominating me. Thanks, AdmirableAckbar 10:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Yaddle
about Yaddle, you're welcome to make a start on her if you like, but i won't be starting for a little while. AdmirableAckbar 10:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Banned
I'm not really banned, so you'd know. I just put it there because it was funny and, like Sikon, I kept it. No worries, I can still contribute. Jediknight19bby 15:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I will ban you if you try moving your talk page to a new article again. Kuralyov 17:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * What's wrong with that?Jediknight19bby 17:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You moved your talk page to the main namespace, just like a real article; we can't have that. User talk pages need to stay like they are. -- Ozzel 17:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * if everyone put their talk page where they wished, this wiki would be in shambles AdmirableAckbar 17:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Bubo
hey, i'm trying to get Bubo to GA status. It's only a short article, but is fully sourced and referenced. I was wondering if you'd have a look over it and then vote on the GA nomination page. Thanks, AdmirableAckbar 19:20, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Death Star II
it looks really good, well done. I added an appearance. The only problem is that you're not meant to have references in the opening paragraph, any info there is to be repeated later on (and referenced). other than that it's perfect AdmirableAckbar 11:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Inquisitorius pages
Don't vote on Inquisitorius pages. Only Inquisitors are supposed to vote there. You can post comments about the article if relevant. You can vote for FA noms here.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 15:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Jedi Order
Why did you revert my edit? I cleaned up the references, if you look closely at the bottom of the page it currently lists Revenge of the sith about 4 times, and that's just one of the references that are listed multiple times. I changed them so the list contains all sources just once, while all the references in the article are still in place. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 16:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I didn't notice that. Thanks. I might source the Post-Ruusan masters a bit today. Jediknight19bby 16:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it, it's a simple misunderstanding, just revert your revert and the references will be cleaned up again. You would also have a perfect example when you start sourcing the Post-Ruusan masters, and if you need any help with the references, I spent my entire morning figuring out how to reference it this way and I'd be happy to help. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 16:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Featured Articles

 * I don't normally do this, but I highly recommend you read some of the other Featured Articles and get a better understanding of how the process works. There's a Wikipedia link to "What is a featured article." that I recommend you read also. I appreciate your enthusiasm to help edit, but you should seriously clean up your prose and the quality of your articles if you want to write FAs. Ask some of the Inquisitors at WP:INQ for help if you need it, but as of right now, Jedi Order, Ephant Mon, and Luke Skywalker won't be FAs. And I think you really don't know what you're getting yourself into with Luke. Trust me, I've been there. Also, you have a habit of objecting to articles without a good policy-based reason. That's not allowed. Again, I don't want to discourage you from participating in the Featured and Good article process, but I (and others) would like to see you contribute in a more informed way. And there's no such thing as officers on a wiki. Cheers. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 06:26, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ever heard of requirement 2a? You're not on the Inq., so don't go bossing everyone around about FA noms. Officers are just on the Jedi Order talk page to prevent a lack of communication between users. Source Daric LaRone, and I'll vote for it. My fellow users and I have worked on Ephant Mon and the Jedi Order substantially, and we are open to suggestions. Jediknight19bby 16:23, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You seem to have misunderstood a number of things about what I said. First: Get this very clear: I didn't boss you around. I gave you advice.
 * Second, what requirement 2a? You mean un-biased? Where is my article writing unbiased? Give me examples.
 * Third, I was on the Inq. thank you very much. I helped create it. However, even though I'm not on the Inquisitorius, I know very well what Featured Article quality is, and your three noms are NOT it.
 * Fourth, read the policy. It says that Daric LaRone doesn't have to have reference tags. This is now the second time I've said that to you. And the Inqs have struck the objection.
 * Fifth, you'll see my suggestions for improvement on Ephant Mon on the FA nom list.

Atarumaster88  ( Talk page ) 03:55, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * As an Inq myself I agree with everything Ataru said there. Like he said, he was a founding member of the Inqs, and even if he weren't he's still had a lot of experience working on FAs. Experience means advice worth listening to. Getting an article to FA isn't an easy task, and the bigger the subject, the more work it's going to take and the harder it'll be. If I were you I'd take advice from the people who have done things like this before. - Lord Hydronium 04:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I meant requirement 2a for good article- it still needs to be sourced. Look! Jediknight19bby 14:48, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It's up for FA, not GA. The requirements and rules are different. Even if they weren't, the policy still says that single-source noms don't need to be sourced. LaRone appears in 1 source: Allegiance (novel). Since that's his only source or appearance, all the information in the article has to be from that source. Hence, articles with only source or appearance don't need to be referenced with the tags. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 15:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot. Now I understand. Jediknight19bby 18:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Sep. Droid Army GA
Hey Jediknight19bby. Just wanted to let you know that a GA nom has to be on the GA page for a full week, have 5 votes, and no active objections, to be considered a GA. It can be found here. Don't worry about it, it was an honest mistake :D. Cheers, Greyman ( Paratus ) 22:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Re:New Droids
hey, sorry about the delay, i just got back. i don't think i have the time, effort or IQ to do the technical side of the droid, so sorry, but i'll have to pass on it. Maybe someone else would be willing to do it. AdmirableAckbar 23:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Just replied to your comment...see my talk page. —Xwing328 (Talk) 19:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Re:Sig
This should answer all your questions on making a signature. AdmirableAckbar 17:39, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That page isn't entirely right in certain aspects, so if you have any trouble just gimme a message. here's my new sig by the way: [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 18:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * hey, i see you're online. If you like, I can make you a signature. If you tell me what colours, words, links ect... you want, i'll make you a sig. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 22:45, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * User: Jediknight19bby/Signature. I'm going away, so take care of the Jedi Order page for me. Thanks. Jediknight19bby 01:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * looks good. To make it appear when you type four tildes, go to my preferences at the top of the screen. In the nickname section type and then click on raw signatures directly under that. Viola! now you have your own cool sig. [|this page] has loads of colors you can use, if it's any help. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 12:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

GA and FA icons on your userpage
Hi Jediknight19bby. Ummm, I noticed that you have the GA and FA era icons on your userpage. I know with the Category for GA's, the icon links the article it's on directly to the GA archive, seen here > Category:Wookieepedia good articles. As you can see, your userpage shows up under the "J" section. I just wanted to let you know, since I didn't want to see any admins come down on you anymore than they already have. It would probably save you a lot of eventual grief if you just removed the icons from your userpage. Humbone 01:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You have to remove this icons. If you don't, I will. Wookieepedia policy, only actual GAs and FAs get the icon. Chack Jadson 12:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I think he's away, so probably isn't getting these messages. It's probably best to remove them, and tell him you have done so. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 12:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I've removed them. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 12:48, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Darth Plageuis subpage
hi, I made a tiny edit to your Darth Plageuis subpage. Hope you don't mind. ;)  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 11:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't mind at all. A good pic, since we've never really seen Darth Plagueis's face. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 13:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Poll
What kind of Wookieepedian am I? Great/Excellent user Good user 50% Good 50% bad Bad user The worst user ever

Let me know.  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 18:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Appearances can be deceiving. Don't go by polls like this...it makes you look shallow.--Goodwood 21:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Userpage policy

 * JK19BBY, it's come to my attention that you have fanon on two separate pages- both a userpage and a subpage. Per User page policy, it's only permissible to have fanon on a single page, so if you'd consolidate it, that'd be appreciated. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 18:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Removed. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 18:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Attention
I may be taking a temporary leave of absense from Wookieepedia. You have 2 weeks to make me change my mind. When I edit, you think


 * The one who nominated Ephant Mon for ID while it was up for FA
 * The one who added fanon
 * The one who is disworthy to be on this wiki

Not


 * The one who turned the Jedi Order from almost a stub to a referenced GA nom
 * The one who sourced the Yaddle pics and helped it to GA status

And so on. I realized I'm not wanted here. The choices is yours.  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 21:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep Me

Throw Me Away

Comments
 * About as self-centered as they come. I won't give you the satisfaction of a proper answer, however.--Goodwood 22:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * maybe people's opinions would change if you stopped making things like this and got your head down and edited. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 22:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It's stuff like this that really piss people off. supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 22:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with Supergeeky1. You can't just arrive in a new 'community' and expect everyone to notice you and to expect your share of power. Most users sign up to edit, but you seem to have signed up to be recognized. Try stopping focusing on yourself and start focusing on the wiki. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 22:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Since voting would be redundant...I'm going to be frank. If you are honestly going to pull this sort of shit here then the truth is that I would not want you to be editing on the pure and simple reason of lack of maturity. This is simply flouncing at it's worst. You put Jack Nebulax to shame with this sort crap. This is the internet. Nobody gives a damn about your feelings. Quit feeling sorry for yourself and just edit, Goddammit. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 22:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You want to impress people or whatever dream you have here, contribute to articles, not to the actual community. Then I'll vote for you to stay. supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 22:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * two questions: (1) have you got a reply of any sorts? (2) why is it that you think you're not wanted here? [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 22:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, at this point, he isn't wanted here. Until he can show that he can be a good editor and not just somebody who edits his user page, then he's not. supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 22:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * ok, sorry to keep posting, but your "Bad" list greatly outweighs your "Good" list. Sourcing some Yaddle pictures isn't exactly a mean feat, and while I appreciate the good work you've been doing on the Jedi Order page, I feel it has been nullified by the fact that you act like it is your page. I would like you to stay, but only if you attempt to contribute to this encyclopedia in a constructive, non-controversial way, which at the moment is not how you contribute. Anyway, this is the last I'm going to say on this matter. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 22:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Anon Complaint
I don't have any idea where to put this but i'm the guy who you said was putting "fanon" in i suck at making new pages and i was going to put the sourcein so just LAY OFF A LITTLE (this was placed above, then removed, but i put it back in a more relevant spot   TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 22:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC))