Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Bloodsoup


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

(+0)
Support Oppose
 * 1) QuentinGeorge 11:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC) - as far as I can see, there is no length requirement for GAs.
 * 1) No BtS or era tags. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:53, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) *Era tag added. I can't see any requirement for a BtS above and, frankly, this article has no need for one. What do you want put in the BtS? QuentinGeorge 23:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * This is certainly not meant to demean you or your work in any way, QG, but this is a perfect example of why the GAN needs a length requirement. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:49, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Does anyone think we need a length requirement for GAs? No offense, QG, but this is ridiculous. This article is basically a stub. Sure, there's no more information available, but complete articles are different from good articles. I'll propose a new CT soon for GA length.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 19:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You might want to let 4dot's current Alternate-FA CT play out first, Chack. Just to see what might happen to the GA process, anyways. Greyman  http://images.wikia.com/central/images/9/9c/Jan.png ( Talk ) 19:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Good idea. I'll do that.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 19:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)