User talk:TheWookieeMan/archive1

Images
While all good-faith contributions to Wookieepedia are appreciated, we ask that you please refer to Images, which can be found under the "other policies and guidelines" link in your welcome message, and familiarize yourself with the sourcing and licensing requirements before uploading any more images. The only uploading method supported by Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to enter this information. Wikia's non-standard upload forms are not supported under Wookieepedia policy, and ignorance of the uploading rules is not an acceptable excuse. Continued violation of the image policy or falsification of any information in an upload description are considered vandalism and will likely result in a block. Thank you. Cade   Calrayn  20:24, August 9, 2014 (UTC)
 * This is your second warning. Special:Upload is the only permitted upload form. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  22:10, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * It's quite simple. Using the "Add an image" button in the photos box will result in the image's deletion. We do not support that upload function nor permit images that are uploaded without proper sourcing and other information. Using Special:Upload to upload an image is the only way to upload an image here. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  22:17, August 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * Because that wasn't a type. There's no need to capitalize the header, particularly when the article name is conjectural. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  00:27, August 18, 2014 (UTC)

Redlinks
Hi Wookieedude12! Just to let you know that I reverted your edits on Roan Novachez. Ideally, we want to get rid of redlinks not by unlinking, but by creating those articles in need. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me! Cheers.  Stake black   msg 14:54, November 2, 2014 (UTC)

Egon
Where did you get this information? AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 22:46, November 2, 2014 (UTC)

Carida incident
Hello, here, you said "Make sure all links are links to canon articles even if they are redlinks." However, only canon articles sharing the same name as a Legends article have the "/Canon" disambiguation. For example, the page you edited, Carida incident. --Alientraveller (talk) 17:02, June 29, 2015 (UTC)

Copying and not having a source
You shouldn't copy and paste from one article to another, as the information for both infoboxes is not the same. Also, if you don't have a source for information, then don't add it, as you should only be adding information from a source that you physically have access to. Trip391 (talk) 04:02, August 3, 2015 (UTC)

Zabrak
Regarding the specific type of Zabrak seen in the Jedi Academy please see this conversation I had regarding this. Unless homeworlds are mentioned in the books, and I don't believe they are, I don't think we can really say that these characters are anything other than simply Zabrak. ProfessorTofty (talk) 16:07, August 3, 2015 (UTC)

New articles / edits
I wanted to draw your attention to a couple of problems with the Jedi Academy-related articles that you're editing / creating. You seem to be copying some of the basics from other pages and then filling in the new information. That's fine, but you still need to preview what you're submitting to make sure that everything looks okay. For one thing, you're using references, but the articles that you're creating lack a "Notes and references" section with the appropriate tag. Secondly, in the infoboxes, you're listing the character species, but you're listing "Source" instead of including an actual reference. If you're not sure of the species, then you should leave it out, or if you are sure, then you need to include the appropriate reference. Finally, the articles that you're creating need categories - for example, Lackbar should be categorized as Mon Calamari, Female, Jedi Masters, etc. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know and I'd be happy to help out. ProfessorTofty (talk) 16:30, August 3, 2015 (UTC)
 * Please keep in mind that in-universe articles should be written in the past tense. I.E. "were," not "are." ProfessorTofty (talk) 04:34, October 8, 2015 (UTC)