Talk:Clone assassin

Old history on Wikipedia:
 * (cur) (last) 23:30, 29 June 2005 John-1107
 * (cur) (last) 19:46, 25 June 2005 Kuralyov m
 * (cur) (last) 18:22, 20 June 2005 Jedi212
 * (cur) (last) 18:14, 20 June 2005 218.103.244.242

Teras Kasi
Is specific mention made of this? The Teras Kasi fighting style is often mentioned all overt his wiki but without specific canon to back this up it shouldn't be used.--DannyBoy7783 00:34, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, we could always ask whoever added it. Admiral J. Nebulax 00:44, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * It was added by User:216.228.55.139 and stuck. Can anyone back this up? --SparqMan 04:54, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * I've got the urge to put a Sourcless tag on this article. Brawler-class? Come on. This is not OK. --AdmThrawn 04:59, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * you could remove the brawler class if you want too, it was just a name to differentiate the snipers and the ones we see "brawling" with obi and yoda in the game --Razzy1319 05:04, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * It's still full of inaccuracies and conjectures. There's no proof that they're ARCs. No proof that they were trained to fight Jedi. No proof of the Teräs Käsi statement. No proof the clone assassins went on to train 501st troopers, Storm Commandos, and Coruscant Guards. --AdmThrawn 05:10, 17 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Clone snipers?
Why were clone sharpshooters redirected here? In Battlefront I and II, they were basically just clone troopers with sniper rifles. I don't recall seeing any indications of ARC-level training. Furthermore, clone sharpshooters were at the Battle of Geonosis. It says clone assassins were created in response to Dooku's dark jedi, which was after the war had began. -LtNOWIS 20:52, 17 February 2006 (UTC) I will now provide the articles i have with sources (that i provided immediately): The point is that YOU said i did not provide sources for anything, but i just proved that that was only for TWO articles. So your comment on my sources was just something you made up to dampen my efforts. Good bye. Ok. THAT is REALLY immature. Using a vandalism page? HAH! You've been going after me, and i've turned the tables. In case you haven't noticed, you have been doing this to me as well. So if i go on the vandalism page, YOU do to.
 * Remember, Battlefront and it's sequel go against canon. Admiral J. Nebulax 21:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * That's true. But I still don't see any evidence for the "clone sharpshooters = clone assassins" statement the article makes. -LtNOWIS 21:33, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I see what you mean. Admiral J. Nebulax 01:48, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah. They never ever called clone sharpshooters clone assassins. EVER.
 * Again, saying something without a source to back it up. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 12:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * If there is no freakin source, why don't you remove the section about the clone sharpshooter for gosh sake?
 * You were the one that said "they never ever called clone sharpshooters clone assassins". So I asked you for a source on that. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 19:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * There is no proof clone shaprshooters were clone assassins. There is no proof that clone assassins were sharpshooters. THERE IS NO SOURCE. Your just a jerk who likes to push little teenagers around. This thing is innacurate and the innacuracies should be deleted. If I wrote an article with this many un proven innacuracies, you would flip out. Why is this article any different? Huh? Find a source that calls a clone sharpshooter a clone assassin. But there is not one. It is fanon. FANON: The thing you despise so much. Admiral, i despise you. This whole article doesn't have a source for the clone assassins training sharpshooters. And your asking ME for a source! Talk about hypocrisy.
 * Of course you don't have a source. You never had a source for anything. And I'm not "a jerk who likes to push little teenagers around". And if you despise me so much, then stop posting on my talk page. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 21:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I do have sources for things. You just chose to ignore it. What your telling me is that i have to prove that Clone Sharpshooters were not Clone Assassins. That is totally illogical. Even YOU admitted that it was probably innacurate that they were clone sharpshooters. I think YOU should prove that clone assassins are clone sharpshooters. THAT is logical.
 * Yes, I have said that, but I said "probably" because I didn't have a source to say "ye" or "no". You cannot give a definite answer here without a source. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 21:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Your comment about me not having sources was aimed to degrade, bully, and intimidate me because you yourself know that i do have sources for most of my stuff. Only two things (besides the fanon) have you pegged with sources template thing, and I am NOT intimidated by you and your encyclopedic "knowledge".
 * No, the comment was not ment to. It was a fact, because you never provide sources when asked. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 21:44, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe it is because, unlike you, i have a life besides star wars, such as school, friends, and possibly i get grounded. THAT is the only reason I do not provide sources as soon as your majesty demands them, and also I live with six other people who use the computer and i cannot have unlimited access to it.
 * I do have a life besides Star Wars. And even when you are on, you never provide a source. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 21:48, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Clone snipers in Battlefront were tactical sharpshooters, not assassins. Unless there's evidence to suggest they're related to clone asssasins, they shouldn't be on this page. There needs to be proof of a connection, not a lack of disproof. That said, you need to calm down Ghost1591. If you make personal attacks and such, you might get temporarily banned. -LtNOWIS
 * Thank you, LtNOWIS. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 21:50, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I will now provide a list of articles I have made without sources (besides the fanon, and you will also notice these DO have sources NOW):
 * ARC trooper assault rifle
 * Under-barrel micro rocket launcher
 * SC Blaster rifle
 * Separatist Commando
 * Clone heavy gunner
 * Elite rifle
 * Clone trooper elite
 * Knuckle plate vibro blade
 * Clone sniper
 * ARC trooper armor
 * 501st Special Operations Division
 * Special Operations Brigade
 * GAR Special Operations Unit
 * R-1 recon droid
 * Commando recon droid
 * Clone recon trooper
 * Clone paratrooper
 * Yet those articles you provided sources to immediately are not in need of a source now, as is your statement. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 21:54, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * So i kinda just proved that I do actually have sources for stuff, which is kinda a problem for you, huh admiral? Since I have now proven my point and defeated the almighty admiral, i hereby leave to watch a movie.
 * No, because I did not ask you for sources on those articles. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 21:56, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, maybe I did, but I was referring to the ones that you didn't provide sources for. And while you're gone, make sure you learn how to become more mature. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 21:59, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * First of all, I'm not the one being immature. YOU are. Your just having a fit because a 14-year old teenager just proved something you said wrong, and YOUR not happy about that and YOUR going to try and bully me (once again). I really don't care what the heck you think about me, just like you don't care what i think about you. Now lets leav it at that.
 * Sure, I'm the immature one. You were the one who was complaining about me on my talk page and trying to make a fool out of me on this page. Next time you make a personal attack on me, you're name will be up on the vandalism page. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 22:05, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No, I haven't been making personal attacks against you. Besides, if you make another personal attack directed at me, you'll be banned, as LtNOWIS stated. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 22:08, 4 March 2006 (UTC)