Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Hangar 8122

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:01, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: TCW Webcomics location

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good job, Gethralkin!-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:57, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:51, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) * See below.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:27, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * You mention the facility as a station once, but you do not link to space station. If it is a space station, please link it. Otherwise change it to facility, which is the term you used before.
 * 3) **Fixed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:16, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Context on Bormus. Is it a planet? Where is it located?
 * 5) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:16, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *I also took care of a few linking problems. (Jedi, The Clone Wars, The Clone Wars: Procedure) Try to link everything the next time.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  11:53, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **Oops, you did link The Clone Wars, sorry.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  11:54, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) Axinal
 * 9) * I have trouble with the phrase "Gran planet". Compare it with the phrase "Human planet," which to me makes it sound like the planet itself is Human. Could you perhaps say "Gran-affiliated planet" or something of the like? Otherwise, very nice.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:37, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **No Gran is big enough to be a planet!!! Fixed. ;)  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 00:03, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ***You've obviously never heard of Jabba the Gran. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:20, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) * Also, would a quote be possible, even if it doesn't mention 8122 directly? I think even the line spoken by the guard, "I can't have you come in here, troops," would be fine.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:57, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) **Quote added. Also, I split the article to include an intro and it still comes under 250 words.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:00, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) ***No problem. In that case, you're obviously free to remove the intro if you wish. If you do intend to keep the article sectioned, however, it might be good to find another quote for the History section.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 10:19, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) ****Intro removed. Please check.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 01:53, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) * Some context on R2-D2 should be added, and I think that's all I have. Good work!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 10:17, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:13, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) * After some rewriting, the article only mentions Shadow Squadron once, and there is no context for it at all. They should be mentioned earlier in the article as approaching the hangar along with Skywalker and the others.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:27, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) ** Skywalker and the others never approached the hangar. They sent the clones to get the Y-wings while they stayed back with the gran official.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 15:49, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) ***Oh, wait. I see what you mean. The way it ended up, Shadow Squadron appeared to be there already instead of arriving with Skywalker. I have fixed it to be less ambiguous.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 15:56, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) ****Yeah, basically, I just wanted Shadow Squadron introduced earlier in the passage so readers would understand when they were admitted. Looks good now.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:10, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) Imperators II
 * 23) * As with L-2832, the "History" section needs to be outlined in the intro.  Imperators II (Talk) 14:49, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 24) **The History section was a test to see if making an intro would bring it over 250 words or not. Since it was reasonably under, the article has been recombined&mdash;with your edits left in, though. Thanks for catching those.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 01:53, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 25) * Is is necessary to put commas before and after "and R2-D2"?
 * 26) **Fixed, but part of another fix.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:13, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 27) * Currently ref[2.2] is followed by ref[2.3], which doesn't make sense.  Imperators II (Talk) 08:39, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 28) **Oops, didn't catch that. Thanks. Fixed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:13, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 29) Jujiggum
 * 30) *Per our images policy, the text bubble in the main image should be filled in. Text bubbles should only be blanked if they are cut off by the image's edge.
 * 31) **The image I had with the bubble filled with text was replaced by JMAS with one that had the bubble blanked. I suppose you could find out why he replaced the image.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 06:31, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 32) ***JMAS used this reasoning concerning speech bubbles. However, the image in question in his discussion actually follows the rules being that the bubble is partial. I have replaced the 8122 image with one that adheres to the image rules in lieu of a reasonable argument against showing bubble text. I also think that the text (per his argument) actually fits the subject of the article, so there really is no reason to blank it. To sum up: problem fixed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:38, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 33) *Also, why don't you mention specifically that the bombers were stored in the hangar?
 * 34) **Thought I did, but looking at it again, it is only implied in what I wrote. Fixed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 06:31, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 35) * Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 18:04, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * The article is currently 190 words, so while it's technically below the 200-word threshold for the necessary attempt at an intro, it might be worthwhile to try sectioning the article a bit to see if it can reach GA potential. This is not an objection or a demand, just a thought.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:37, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * I will see what I can do. It might be possible, but I can see it easily being a restatement of intro to body, as there is not really a whole lot on the hangar itself. The quote you mention above would probably work. Most of the text was originally in the Bts, though, so it might work either way.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 00:13, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with it as a CAN, so no worries if it doesn't work out. It won't affect my vote.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:21, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Aquachair

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:23, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The wonderful world of furniture, part 1

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:01, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:11, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * From the BTS: "as part of a larger articles [...]" What is a larger articles? This would ordinarily be a sofixit, but when I checked the Alien Encounters page, it says it's the title of several articles, so I'm not sure whether it would be more proper to remove the "a" or the "s." I'll leave it up to to you. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:50, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **I was a bit confused by this objection at first, but then I realized the error you were pointing to. Perfect example of being too close to the material, I guess! Fixed. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:54, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Heh, probably partially my fault for pasting just those few words without context. Either way, nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:01, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Exiled Jedi
 * 6) * Again, if it is possible, please remove the large blank area.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:02, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **I'm not sure what you're talking about. Everything is formatted as is standard, with no extra spaces at all. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 18:25, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Well, the page displays on my computer with a large blank area, I think it might be related to the image placement. Anyone else have this?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:40, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Do you mean at the bottom of the page? That is from the image placement, but the only option to fix it is to remove the image. I think it's better to have an image that pertains to the BTS than to not have one, right? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:44, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) *****I have some suggestions here. If you don't like it, I will agree with you that having an image is better than having none at all.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:03, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ******Yeah, the problem with those is that it forces the section headers for "Appearances" over to the right, which is generally a no-no. Again, it may just be that the article is too short to have images at all, in which case I can remove them. It's a gray area, I admit. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:06, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) *I'll take the image then.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:11, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Gravcouch

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:23, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The wonderful world of furniture, part 2

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:55, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:12, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Could you possibly get rid of that large blank area after the quote at the beginning of the article?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:59, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **I'd be happy to, but I don't see one. :( ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 18:29, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***As with the other article, the page displays on my computer with a large blank area. I think it might be related to the image placement. Anyone else see this?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:42, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Again, because the image only pertains to the BTS and not the body, the only option is to have the image and the whitespace, or to have neither. I thought it would be better to have the image, but I can cut it if others prefer it that way. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:49, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *****I have a suggestion here. If you don't like it, I will agree with you that having an image is better than having none at all.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:04, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Floating pond

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:51, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Iyra furniture, part 3

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:58, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Since you sourced some of the article shouldn't you source all of it?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:57, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **How do you mean? I can source the fact that the pond is referred to on a certain page of the 2nd edition of the book, but how do I source that it doesn't appear in the first edition? At any rate, I think the BTS should be self-sourcing, but I'm open to suggestions. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:51, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *Oh sorry, that was just me being slightly stupid. It's fine the way it is.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:58, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Breeding grounds (F'tral)

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:42, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Everything you ever wanted to know about Iyra but were afraid to ask.

(1 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good work, SavageBob.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:58, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Imperators II (Talk) 23:00, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:30, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:30, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) *Could you add a ?
 * 3) *Not an objection, but I'd like to point out that this whole article is TMI. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:11, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) **Actually, the infobox brings up a question: Should I use the eras templates for this article? We know about the breeding grounds from Obo Rin's work, which was done during the Rebellion era in this case, but I'm not sure whether it should apply here. And am I using the "Affiliation" field correctly? Finally, Wookieepedia is not censored. ;P ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:28, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ***I'd say no to the eras field, because it is a natural location that seemed to be used as part of an instinctual ritual, rather than something that was constructed privately. As for the affiliation field, it's fine with me, as it seemed to be used exclusively by Iyra&mdash;and, personally, I feel bad for any poor Human that happened to wander by this area at the wrong time of year :P. I'm open to discussion on all of this, but I think the infobox as it stands works perfectly fine.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:30, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified caged Iyra

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 23:02, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Someone at WEG had a really sick fascination with Iyra. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 23:02, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) I may know someone else that is also overly fascinated by Iyra...-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:05, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * :) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 23:24, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 18:08, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:16, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:16, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Heh, I saw the article on the recent changes page and looked it over ahead of time just knowing that it would end up here.-- Exiled Jedi   (Greetings)  23:07, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Rees Alrix

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:58, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Yoda: Dark Rendezvous Jedi Part 3 (of 4)

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:29, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * You should mention directly that she was a member of the Jedi Order. (I know that this is rather picky, but I have seen other people bring similar things up.)
 * 3) **No problem, you're correct. Added.
 * 4) * You seem to have a problem with your first reference, it links to the encyclopedia not Dark Rendezvous.
 * 5) **Fixed.
 * 6) * I would change the mentioned only tag for Dark Rendezvous to "first mentioned".
 * 7) **Done.
 * 8) *Other than that the article is very good.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:16, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) **Thank you.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:22, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) Axinal
 * 11) *"While a Knight, the Clone Wars broke out across the galaxy [...]" This is a dangling participle, and currently implies that the Clone Wars was a Knight. Could you possibly rephrase the sentence, or at least the first phrase, to clarify that Alrix was the Knight?
 * 12) **Done.
 * 13) *I haven't read Dark Rendezvous, so I'm not sure on the context, but he opening quote implies that Leem took multiple apprentices, with Alrix being the first. Could this information be integrated into the body somewhere?
 * 14) **I fail to see why this should be interesting for Alrix's article that she was the first/second/third Padawan.
 * 15) *Nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:55, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) **Thank you.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:37, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Tarisian Tourism Board

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:31, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's about time I got back to some KOTOR.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) –Tm_T (Talk) 06:45, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Imperators II (Talk) 08:52, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:06, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:04, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * I do not believe that you can source the 3,956 BBY date to Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, since the game does not mention that date. That will mean you have to source the rest of the article as well. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:16, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **The Knights of the Old Republic Campaign Guide would suffice.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:38, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Bah, always the one thing. Fixed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:26, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * The decapped second name is intentional. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:31, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Eremin Tarn

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:27, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Yoda: Dark Rendezvous Jedi Part 4 (of 4)

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *In the quote I would say Jedi Master Maks Leem instead of just Leem. I think that it would sound a lot better this way.
 * 3) *I think that you need to mention his affiliation to the Jedi Order and the Galactic Republic more directly in the body of the article.
 * 4) *Is there any information on who the principled person he defied the authority of? It seems strange the way it is, but if there isn't any more information then just leave it the way it is.
 * 5) **It does seem strange, as the way it's written right now I'm not sure whether you're saying Tarn defied the authority of a principled person, or if Tarn himself was a principled person. I suggest rewriting it to remove the ambiguity.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:59, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *On Sian Jeisel's page it calls her as a Jedi Master, but on this page you call her a Jedi Knight. I would try to find out which is correct.
 * 7) Rubedo
 * 8) *"A headstrong student, Tarn defied the authority of many people, including his Master and also a very principled person." This needs rephrasing. Not sure what you're goingfor with that last bit: is Tarn the principaled person or is it a third person (possibly a new article there).
 * 9) *"...a Jedi Knight who believed that the Jedi should fight against the seemingly corrupt Republic rather then defend it." I think you're mixing psat and present tense here. Possibly rephrase. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 06:49, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Botiq

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 06:49, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Dear LucasArts: Please. We just want to know. WHAT IS THIS?

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) *The advert can be seen in HoloNet News Vol. 531 45, which is set in 13:2:28. Doesn't that mean Botiq also advertized in 23 BBY?  Imperators II (Talk) 07:55, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Exiled Jedi
 * 4) *Can you really say for sure that it was an organization?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  11:00, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments