Forum:CT Archive/Minor amendment to WP:CANON

WP:CANON currently lists, under the What is considered a valid resource? section: "All Databank entries and other articles on StarWars.com". As it reads, this statement implies that every article on The Official Site is a source. Which makes it seem like every single article that has ever been on sw.com that mentions something must be included in its source list. Which... would make FA'ing or GA'ing a lot of articles impossible. My proposal is that the line be changed to:

"All Databank entries on StarWars.com, and any other articles on the site that provide unique canonical or behind the scenes information."

A little bit about my reasoning:, that teaches us how to draw a Lego Han Solo, is not a source for Han. , which includes nothing more than a picture of Cad Bane on a book cover, is not a source for Cad Bane. The monthly comic solicitations are not sources for Cade Skywalker. This seems like WP:Common sense to me --- however, the current wording of the WP:CANON statement implies otherwise.

Um... don't create other voting options? I guess I'm supposed to say that. If you want to tweak my wording, lemme know in the "discussion" section. Menkooroo 14:43, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah baby!

 * 1) Menkooroo 14:43, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Let's talk about it, baby
I included the word "unique" because... well, if an article reads "The lovable Tatooine farmboy Luke Skywalker", that's canonical info right there. So, for example, a preview of a TCW episode would be a source until the episode aired. Unless the preview included some cut content, or something --- then it would have unique bts info. Menkooroo 14:43, June 16, 2010 (UTC)