User talk:XXLVenom998

Sourcing
Please read Wookieepedia's sourcing policy. The Network is not directly mentioned in Episode II, so stating that it appeared in Episode II is not sufficient. You need to source the article with the source that states that the Network appears in Episode II. Thank you. --Jinzler 20:12, January 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Please do not continue to remove the tag from Mid Rim Lending Network until the article is properly source.  Thank you. <- Omicron (Leave a message at the BEEP! ) 16:20, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Rattataki‎‎
Sadly, TCW retconned and changed Ventress' specie. She is no longer a Rattataki‎‎, per higher TCW's higher canon status than C.  JangFett  (Talk) 16:56, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Sourcing, again
Please stop removing the "Verify" tag from the Mid Rim Lending Network until the article is sourced to a verifable source. The sources that you have added to the article are not verifiable sources; you need to source the article to an official Star Wars source, as is explained in Sourcing. --Jinzler 17:39, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Let me reiterate this, please stop removing the Verify tag until you can provide proper sources as detailed in the link given above. Further removal of the template will be treated as vandalism and can warrant a block.  &mdash;NA YAYEN  18:18, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, you have added 3 links to sites that are not reliable sources. Please source the article to the actual piece of Star Wars material that it appeared in; this is how sourcing works.  &mdash;NA YAYEN  18:24, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Copyright violation
Do NOT copy text verbatim from other sites. Any such additions will be removed, and you will be blocked from editing. Thank you. 1358 (Talk)  18:42, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

Unverified info
Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you.  CC7567  (talk) 04:08, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Please adhere to the warning above. Thanks,  JangFett  (Talk) 17:06, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Your infobox additions. The infobox currently lists only confirmed/mentioned articles, not "insert your own here."  JangFett  (Talk) 17:11, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, but that does not mean he's a "notable/famous" member. The ones that are listed are confirmed to be one, but I'm too sure about some of them. If you have a source that does say this Lee-char is a notable member, then please source it, otherwise he's already listed in the list of Mon Calamari people in the article.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:46, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * We cannot assume based on our own assumptions. Unless a source states otherwise, it's considered to be speculation.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:52, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * If you're talking about TCW, that is a source, but it did not claim that he is a famous member. Again, you cannot add speculation into articles. Doing so will result in your work being reverted, and, if it persists, a block by an administrator. Please familiarize yourself with our policies before continuing to edit.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:57, February 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I mean no hard feelings or trying to discourage you from editing, but saying you will speculate or ignore various policies by stating "it's silly" is unsettling. Please see WP:ATT and WP:S.  JangFett  (Talk) 18:04, February 11, 2012 (UTC)

Crash-landing on Geonosis‎
Please don't remove the "Delete" tag from the Crash-landing on Geonosis‎ article. The Second Battle of Geonosis already covers this subject, so the article is not needed. Thank you. --Jinzler 17:49, February 13, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Image
I'm not really sure what problem you are encountering without more information. You may want to try reading Guide to image use as well as double checking the instructions on the upload file page itself and ensuring all your fields are correctly filled out. Coruscantfan (Talk) 18:29, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm not sure what's going on with that. I would contact one of the site administrators and see if they can figure it out for you. Here's the list of administrators. Coruscantfan (Talk) 00:33, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Image uploads
Hello, you need a verified email address to upload files. You can do this in Special:Preferences. Also, please make sure to name your better with a name that is more descriptive than "Screen shot 2011-09-09 at 7 07 19 AM.png". Thanks. 1358 (Talk)  14:06, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Please take a look at this link to make sure you know what the file description page should look like. Thanks. 1358  (Talk)  14:35, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Can you tell me where you got File:Grievous VS Ventress at Dathomir - Massacre.png‎ from? http://starwarscanada.com which you listed as source gives me a 404. Thanks. 1358  (Talk)  19:11, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Since I'm up, I took a peek at the log and had deleted your image.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:15, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

Linking
Just to let you know, this is not how to properly link. If you're going to link something, albeit want to lowercase it, you can simply do carbonite, without having to pipelink it as carbonite. This goes with Luke Skywalker's as well, which is incorrect. The only time you could pipelink is when you're linking to conjectural titled articles or putting a word, such as "s," within the double brackets. For the conjectural example: Battle of Bomis Koori IV cannot be linked to that, but rather a battle. For the "s," if there's more than two Imperial-class Star Destroyers, this needs to be Imperial-class Star Destroyers (notice the "s" is within the double bracket.) Hope this helps.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:40, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not properly formatted. My examples above should help you in the future. If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to ask.  JangFett  (Talk) 22:14, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

Image template
Please only add the "Image" template to articles for which an image actually exists in canon. You recently added the template to both the Darkstaff and Skirmish in the Cularin system asteroid belt articles, yet images for neither of these things exist. Therefore, adding the template to these two articles was unnecessary and unhelpful, so please bear this in mind in the future. Thank you. --Jinzler 22:55, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

Amor infobox
We have an Armor infobox specifically for armors. Hope that helps. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 14:20, February 16, 2012 (UTC)

TCW episodes
Please do not change "is scheduled to air" to "aired," as you did here, because in the United States alone, the episode did not air yet. Please wait until tonight or at least midnight before actually changing it. Thanks,  JangFett  (Talk) 14:47, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * I understand that it's the 9th. However, the episode itself did not air yet.  JangFett  (Talk) 15:07, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * We're an English wiki, and per precedent, we go by the timezones of the US.  JangFett  (Talk) 15:37, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * To clarify: Wookieepedia is in UTC but we tend to list airdates and such (including spoiler periods) according to US release dates. 1358  (Talk)  15:42, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

Licensing tags
Please do not select obviously inappropriate licensing tags when uploading images. Images from The Clone Wars episodes should use TV-screenshot, not CopyrightedFreeUse as the images have not been released as such. Please also make sure to crop any letterboxes and the like from images before uploading; jpegcrop is a good program for doing so without degrading image quality. Thanks,  nayayen ★talk  20:22, March 13, 2012 (UTC)

Savage
Please note the Wip tag listed on top of the Savage Opress article. Your amount of little edits are going against the tag and will only create issues and edit conflicts for CC7567, who is currently writing the article. If you see issues in the article that need to be taken care of, I would recommend that you talk to him on his talk page or the article's talk page. The article is still undergoing major edits and is not complete. Thanks,  JangFett  (Talk) 13:21, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * While I am not here to argue, I have to say that you did edit in the main article many times, most of which have been reverted by either me, CC, or someone else, and you began a minor edit war. If you take a look at the history section of the article, CC7567 is still working on the article. Making minor edits during a certain time period when he's not editing in the article could work, but then again we're not sure if he's working on it. This happens to me many times and people assume I'm not working on an article, but I am. Avoiding edit conflicts is ideal. Talk pages come in handy here and you could use them. Until the template is taken down, I would avoid making edits to the article.  JangFett  (Talk) 13:45, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Editing articles is about quality work, not quantity or how fast you can write. Give it time and please have patience.  JangFett  (Talk) 14:24, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

New policy
Please do not revert perfectly valid edits. They are no vandalism. Please see this new policy. It's all real.  JangFett  (Talk) 15:38, April 1, 2012 (UTC)