Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Anti-Alien League

 * Nominated by:  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Something different for a change.

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 21:32, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Gorton Colu has a CSWE entry and is mentioned in the KOTOR Strategy Guide --- do you know if either of those sources mention the Anti-alien league?
 * Nope, no mention in the CSWE.
 * Strategy Guide? SoresuMakashi might be able to help you out; he GA'd Colu.
 * I'll see if he can help.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Let me know when you find out whether or not the league is mentioned (directly or indirectly) in the strategy guide.Menkooroo 04:45, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * No mention in the guide.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 17:02, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking that out. I saw some of the inquiries you made on various talk pages --- good hustle! Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * "The Anti-Alien League was a Humanocentrist group formed by Gorton Colu" is currently sourced to The Essential Atlas.
 * Resourced.
 * I could and should fix this one myself, but it'll be handy for you to know if you don't already: Only use punctuation in image captions if it's a complete sentence. Menkooroo 02:43, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:06, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Rubefacient
 * Context of Taris's multiple cities should be added.
 * Done.
 * Mention that aliens were prohibited from UpCity under normal conditions. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * There needs to be a year in the intro
 * Try now.
 * I'm sorry, I was confused by the banner. Because of that banner, I think this should be made with a History section to avoid the dissonance caused by it. I'll not force you to, but it would probably be beneficial. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved the image over. Does this help?
 * Greatly. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * You say the league was mentioned in the game in the body but say it appeared in the BTS.
 * Corrected.
 * Because the article assumes 100% completion, you do not need the clause saying he could be avoided. That is, unless you include the alternate dialogue tracks (which you should).
 * Alternate dialogue tracks? There are no others that mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Revan can ignore the man, can agree with his speciesism, or tell him to screw off. Which of these elicits the mention? If it is the lattermost, remove the portion saying that Colu mentioned it to Revan and say that he could mention it to Revan given the proper dialogue in the BTS. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe he mentions it the first time Revan talks to him (and before any dialogue choices come up).  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:26, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Then say that Revan can choose not to speak to him. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 13:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the runaround. I couldn't wrap my head around it the right way. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Speciesism FTW NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:17, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the article should go into more detail about the player's potential conversations with Colu, The player can agree with him or refute him, if I remember correctly, and the reactions of the side characters (the Wookiee and the Twi'lek) change as well. This should probably all be mentioned in BTS. ~ SavageBob 06:24, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * While that might work in Colu's article, in no other place in Colu's dialogue does it even remotely mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 01:12, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Isn't it still pertinent, though, since Colu is out touting the league? ~ SavageBob 16:21, February 12, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Also, guest nom for WP:KOTOR.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:58, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Arbo

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 19:22, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Chirpa, you got served. ~ SavageBob 19:22, February 13, 2011 (UTC)

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) He got chirped. Menkooroo 17:20, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 02:23, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer 10:21, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Why don't you mention the Grundaak directly? Darth Morrt 08:02, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * The Duloks never mention the Gru[n]dakk by name at this point, so Arbo has no idea that's the creature they have in mind. It'd be a bit anachronistic to mention him by name, in my opinion. They've also framed the creature by creating fake tracks and whatnot, but I feel like going too deeply into their ruse would be off-topic for the article. ~ SavageBob 15:57, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * The cite_web in the middle of a sentence in reference 2 looks really yucky and detracts from the flow of the sentence. Can you give that reference some general cleanup? The amount of different sources mentioned and linked to is pretty confusing --- is there any way you can keep it simpler and to the point? Menkooroo 14:02, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * The references reference the things immediately preceding them, so that ref's just used for the date. I'm not sure how better to do this, since the date and name of the village are never given in the source. I could strip those elements out, but I don't think that would help the article. Are you suggesting I just lump all the refs for that sentence at the end of the sentence? That'd sacrifice accuracy for aesthetics, but it may be worth it. In other words: clarify your objection, Menk. :) ~ SavageBob 15:57, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Wait, I think I understand: You mean the reference itself. How's that look? ~ SavageBob 16:04, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * P-p-p-perfect! Menkooroo 17:20, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * No image of him? Darth Morrt 01:29, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nope. The book shows Teebo, Logray, the Woklings that get kidnapped, and the warriors who go to fight the monster, but Arbo is not depicted. ~ SavageBob 02:24, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

TC-17

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 08:04, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: No CSWE. WP:NSW's third CA if it passes.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Darth Morrt 14:52, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Glad to see all of these WP:NSW CAs!  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 21:26, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:33, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Quick question: do we know for certain that multiple units in the Brotherhood uesed TC-17s, and not just the Gloom Walkers? Also, I've fixed this myself since it's a minor problem and easily fixed, but since I've noticed it in many of your noms, please remember to italicize novel and source titles as appropriate in the BTS.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 15:41, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Seemed like it was a fairly standard issue rifle for the Brotherhood. Sorry about the titles, I've been getting better at that, but it's not perfect yet.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 21:17, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **The problem is that that's exactly the kind of supposition we can't really make. If the source doesn't actually give any indication whatsoever that it was used for any unit other than the Gloom Walkers, then we can't say so ourselves. Check out the wording adjustment I made to avoid making this supposition in the article. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 21:26, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I've made some minor changes in the article. Feel free to revert anything you found incorrect. I've taken care of short sentences, outdated infobox and underlinking. Darth Morrt 09:06, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the copy-edit. No real problems with anything, but does Brotherhood of Darkness belong in the culture area? I thought that was so that the certain weapons (e.g. some tribal spear) could have a box for their origins.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 09:16, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * You're right, removed. Darth Morrt 14:52, February 15, 2011 (UTC)

Intense Performer

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 19:03, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another stupid painting from that stupid guy that played SWG.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  1358  (Talk)  19:09, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 14:59, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:56, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) What do you mean "played" SWG? We all know you love those avatars, quests, and Twi'lek/Human mother/daughter gender confusions. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:33, February 19, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

The secrets of forming group minds

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 07:02, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Because Olioster can't have all the slots in the art and media category.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hah!  OLIOSTER  (talk) 12:56, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 15:05, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:43, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Menkooroo 11:30, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Toprawa:
 * 2) * Shield of Lies can't be both a "first appearance" and a "mentioned only." It's either one or the other. I'm guessing is what you're looking for here.
 * 3) * You can't come up with more succinct and less, forgive me for calling it a rambling title? Maybe "Unidentified group minds publication," or "Unidentified publication (group minds)" or something? Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:18, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) **D'oh... had a brain fart regarding the templates; that's fixed. As for the title, the OS says, "the secrets of forming Bilar-type claqa group minds," so I was trying to cut it down from that (whereas I've used Kube-McDowell's other pseudo-titles). No title I can think of sounds any more elegant than the one we've got, but I could live with "the secrets of forming group minds", or something. With the conjecture tag, it really doesn't matter too much, though I get you on the clunkiness. I'm just not sure how to get away from it. ~ SavageBob 04:26, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **ETA: I've moved it to The secrets of forming group minds. ~ SavageBob 04:28, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ***That works for me. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:43, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you add a caption to the infobox image, a la articles like Gunray On Top?
 * Yo! Luke was a Jedi Master at this point, not a Jedi Knight! :D Menkooroo 09:16, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Both deeds done, good sir. ~ SavageBob 15:58, February 16, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Should I use the media infobox? ~ SavageBob 16:13, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * If there is information to fill it with, go for it.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 16:14, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done! ~ SavageBob 16:52, February 15, 2011 (UTC)

Principles of Power

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 16:51, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Why all these related book noms, Bob?

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Darth Morrt 06:05, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Remember to strike objections, Morrt.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 17:18, February 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Other in-Universe book use the picture of the author or the subject in the infobox: My Ar'krai, The Lost Twenty: Dooku's Rise. Darth Morrt 17:42, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Images added to all of them. How's that? ~ SavageBob 23:15, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Excellent. Darth Morrt 06:05, February 16, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

H'kig book of laws

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 16:51, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Where'd you get the idea to combo this stuff?

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  OLIOSTER  (talk) 23:51, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 08:18, February 19, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sith book of offerings and rituals

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 16:51, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: From YOU, all right? I learned it from watching YOU!

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 15:27, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  OLIOSTER  (talk) 23:51, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Darth Morrt 08:20, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Those gosh darned Youth-Oriented Universities. They're terrible influences. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:51, February 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Endor landscape painting

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 23:45, February 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I hear you like paintings.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) If you squint just hard enough, you can see Nho'Apakk. ~ SavageBob 16:28, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Jinzler 19:20, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Olioster writing about a painting? Who would have guessed?  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 04:55, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Darth Morrt 08:31, February 19, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Just playing devil's advocate here, but if the work is simply titled Painting in the game, how do we know it's Endor? ~ SavageBob 16:18, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Its in-game description specifically states its the landscape of Endor. Should I mention this in the BTS?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 16:20, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it might be worth changing that note to say something like, "Although the game lists the work's title as simply Painting, the descriptive text says blah blah blah." ~ SavageBob 16:24, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 16:27, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Just a thought, couldn't all these painting use the IU media infobox? Media type: painting and the era could be filled, but some may have author or release date too. Darth Morrt 08:31, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * My main reason for not using infoboxes is that the 250 pixel limit makes the pictures of the paintings look bad.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 17:38, February 19, 2011 (UTC)

Haggleday

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 16:24, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's getting quiet up in here. Time for a party!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Cult of Darth Phobos

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 14:04, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A supplement to my FAN. More to follow soon.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) For I Am Fearsome
 * 2) * "She organized a cult devoted solely to her and sent her agents across the galaxy to recruit more members and to assassinate Jedi and Sith leaders." This is a triple "and."
 * 3) **Addressed.
 * 4) * "Rumors of Phobos' survival also continued to exist for centuries, and "The Hidden Fear" became a subject of ghost stories among Jedi Padawans." This sentence could probably be removed. It doesn't deal with the cult.
 * 5) **I was kinda thinking that as she was the leader of the cult, this might be relevant, but yeah, you are probably right. Removed.
 * 6) * The text says the cult dissolved sometime around the Great Schism of 2,000 BBY, but the infobox cements the date as 2,000 BBY.
 * 7) **Decementized (I think I just made up a new word).
 * 8) *Were they really affiliated with the Sith? The Sith and Jedi worked together to destroy them.
 * 9) **Well, Phobos was a Sith. If they were devoted to her, then they were devoted to the Sith as well.
 * 10) ***They devoted themselves to her after she had been cast out of the Sith Order. Phobos dedicated herself to causing problems for the Sith; it seems to me that neither she or her subjects are particularly partisan to the Sith. However, as I was writing this, I thought that you were probably going for the en mass Sith, not just the Sith Order. Is that so? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:01, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) * That she was worshipped by them is infobox-only.
 * 12) **Addressed.
 * 13) * Mention the company that made those versions of the game, Krome Studios, in the Bts.
 * 14) **Addressed.
 * 15) ***And LucasArts did what? *snicker* NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:01, February 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) * Isn't there a way to specify the cult was mentioned in the TFU databank as a tag on the Appearence list? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:48, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) **Addressed. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 12:55, February 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Obitoki

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:37, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now Podracing: there's a sport. At least when it's real podracing, where as long as you take off your helmet and shed your gloves no one can say a damn thing until someone's knees touch the ice.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Smoked terrafin loin

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 07:14, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Hobbie Klivian-related.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) No kidding. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 16:04, February 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Darth Desolous's martial art

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 13:47, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I promised you more.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Shodon Ko

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 14:38, February 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Guest nom for WP:TOTJ, I guess?

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments