Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/Mickey Suttle

Keep

 * 1) He's notable. We shouldn't omit stuff we don't like-LtNOWIS 00:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) We still get some occasional Suttle nonsense. It's good to keep him around to know the truth behind "the official website of George Lucas" (rolls eyes). -- SFH 00:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Expose the fraud! Havac 05:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I agree, although I don’t like him, we need that article in order to identify his nonsense and keep it out of the rest of wookieepedia. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 06:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Maybe having an article on this guy will actually inform some otherwise naive people about what a big fraud he is. That's very useful in my book. KEJ 07:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Delete

 * 1) All this is doing is acknowledging the pathetic man. By having an article, we only incite his nonsense further. He should not be having any more impact on the the Star Wars community then any of us. Indeed. we do need someplace to direct the idiots who believe him but does he really need his own article? No. All we need is a simple page that states that he is a fraud and that anyone putting his crap here will be punished. Simple. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 00:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 00:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)