Talk:Padmé Amidala/Legends

So what's her name?
Thanks! WhiteBoy 22:21, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * First: Padmé, Middle: Amidala, Last: Naberrie
 * or is it like the Pope where her "official" name is Amidala.
 * I think that her official name was only Amidala during her time as queen (maybe?). I'd say that "Padmé Amidala Naberrie" would be her official name. Unfortunately, this would result in virtually every link to this article being via a redirect. This wouldn't be the end of the world, though. It would be the same sort of situation as what you did with X-wing starfighter. (Of course, there's always her married name of "Skywalker"... buahaha). -- Aidje 23:44, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * It's hard to say without knowing the tradition of the Nabooo. Most state names are kept until death, but with the peculiar Queen process of the Naboo, it is difficult to say. How is she refered to in EPII? I forget if they call her Senator Amidala. If so, it is safe to say that she would drop Naberrie entirely, or put it inbetween Padmé and Amidala. A seperate issue is whether she took the name Skywalker, or if Nabooian or Tatooinean culture encourage/accept that practice. Does a source list her with Skywalker at the end of her name? --SparqMan 02:47, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Birth Name = Padmé Naberrie. Royal Name = Amidala. Senatorial Name = Padmé Amidala QuentinGeorge 08:57, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * So if the head of the article says "Padmé Naberrie Amidala Skywalker", and we use the married names for Leia, why not Padmé? --SparqMan 18:50, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Since her marriage was secret, I doubt that she changed her name to Skywalker. That would be a dead giveaway. – Aidje talk 19:33, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree and unlike Leia, we have no reference of her being refered to or prefering to include her husband's name. I think Skywalker should be struck from the article top-line. --SparqMan 19:46, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Its seems only right to stick with prescident and add Skywalker to the end of her name. She never formally added it herself but this was only out of necessity.
 * Yeah, well, I don't think that her marriage to Anakin Skywalker ever became public knowledge. Not to mention the fact that it is not unusual for women who have attained a certain degree of notariaty and fame to keep their maiden name and not take their husband's at marriage. So I think it should be kept as-is, unless some canon source for her taking the name of Skywalker can be found. I mean, with Leia it makes sense, as she is referred to by her married name of Solo on several occassions. Chervil [[Image:Mandoinsignia.jpg|20px]] 03:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Name is confusing, I think their surnames depends on what they want it to be. I mean her sister didn't take her own husband's name. And her nieces (sister's daughters) took their mother's last name. 24.14.120.92 01:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Successor in the Senate
I am unaware of any source that says that Jar Jar succeeded Padme as the Senator for Naboo. As such, I'm removing it. If anyone can come up with a source (rather than mere conjecture) for where this comes from, I'll add it back in. QuentinGeorge 06:11, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

I think that her full name is Padme Naberrie Amidala Skywalker. She went by Amaidala so her family wouldn't be attacked by people that didn't like her.

Padme Length of Life?
I am confused as to the length of Padme's life. We were lead to believe in Return of the Jedi, that Leia recalled her mother (she stated that she was kind, beautiful and sad) and that she died when Leia was very young, suggesting perhaps that she lived the early part of her life with her. However, Padme dies at Leia and Luke's birth, making it impossible for either child to remember her. I thought perhaps Leia was refering to her adoptive mother, but this cannot be accurate, as her adoptive mother died when the planet Alderaan was destroyed (and when Leia was grown). Has anyone else noticed this, and can perhaps shed some light on this matter? Could Leia really have remembered her mother from such an early age?
 * Has it been confirmed that her mother died with Alderaan, and not of some other cause long before the loss of Alderaan? Because this is the only solution that has made sense to me. JSarek 00:12, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * No, it's not been confirmed that Breha died with Alderaan's destruction. As JSarek said, Breha could be the mother Leia remembered. Or it could be some mysterious Force-related memory. QuentinGeorge 06:09, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * I gathered it was Force related- Padmé was in a pretty emotional state when she gave birth, resulting in Leia sensing it unconciously. --Fade 07:46, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * I, too, took it as being Force-related. I believe her mother was killed in with the Alderaan explosion, and our own article says as much.  WhiteBoy 07:59, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * I dont want to confused anyone more than I'm sure everyone else has, but to add to more questioning on Leia's part, go read ROTJ(the novel) where Luke is asking her about her mother, its vaguely mentions Leia remember not only her sad and kind mother, BUT a trunk? yeah, what was that about? Another writer's mistake I think!--Kaosburning 03:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

As to the question of this being a force related power it is a two sided problem. On the one hand I am geared toward this perhaps being a force power of infant awareness that Leia has come to develop and perhaps even passed on to her children. One of whom while still in the womb even managed to tip the balance in a force duel between Luke,Leia and the clones of Emperor Palpatine in "Planet of Twilight". I feel that this might also explain why Leia would exhibit so much of Padme's politically defiant personality, being that perhaps during her childhood she was abled to retain a force impression of her mother..this impression may have been imprinted in the force by the powerful connection Vader bonded with Padme as they both lay unconscious..the one that killed her. How luke was unabled to retain or gain such an impression and Leia was is not quite understandable to me perhaps it is a feminine bond that mother and daughter shared. Also Why Vader was unabled to sense the family connection from Leia during her capture on the Death Star, but was abled to do so with Luke in "Empire Strikes Back" is also a part of this issue, or did he just know from his use of the skywalker surname (did Vader personally kill the Lars and get the information about Luke?) It begs the Question what role does gender play in the developement of force senses? On the other hand How Leia could possess such power and still not be aware of her heritage(indeed she rejected her heritage and consequently, her force power even after her it was revealed to her due to her hatred of Vader) is also an issue with this theory, but not so much so since a force sensitive is powerful no matter if they are or are not aware of it.

Replacement?
"Due to tension between George Lucas and Natalie Portman in 2003, Lucas reportedly asked Keira Knightley (Sabé from Episode I) if she would be willing to play Padmé in Episode III; she declined, however, as she was busy filing King Arthur (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0349683/combined)." What is the source for that?
 * It's a ridiculous rumour from IMDB and should be removed. Natalie was always contracted to do all three. QuentinGeorge 22:47, 23 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * IMDB relies on (often unverified) user submitted data, and therefore should NOT be regarded as confirmation. This rumour should be removed unless a reputable source (like the OS) agrees with it. QuentinGeorge 04:06, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * Not only IMDb reported the rumor, Keira Knightley herself even said something about it. And it doesn't even matter if it was true or not - the point is, there was a rumor that existed that was circulated at some point, and as such, deserves mention. Kuralyov 04:12, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * Then show me the source that says it then. QuentinGeorge 04:36, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * Two minutes of searching gave me this: "...As for Portman, rumors began to circulate that she was unhappy, and looking for a way out of her contract. According to one Internet story, Lucas had even sounded out Keira Knightley about taking over Portman's role for the final film, due in theaters in 2005." If you want the original story on the original page, however, then yiu're welcome to sift through 2-year-old archives.

Like I said, even if the rumor isn't true (it probably wasn't, as you pointed out), the fact that it existed at all means it should be mentioned here. That's all it said, was that it was a rumor. Or should I delete all unsubstantiated rumors mentioned on various articles here? Kuralyov 05:17, 24 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I think it should be deleted from this page. Dylankidwell 02:46, 21 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Cause of death
Did Padmé die from anything Anakin did? Sure, his Force choke may have injured her momentarily, but it hardly seemed enough to threaten her life. It seemed more likely that she died from birth complications, or other mysterious circumstances. I did not read the end of the novelization with great care, and may have missed the explicit explanation. Any help? --SparqMan 00:51, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * I figured it was a broken heart. Lame, I know, but it apparently does happen. And it's apparently reversible, too. I guess the med droids weren't aware of this research. :-) – Aidje talk 04:20, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Or to put it another way "she gave up the will to live". In other words, her injuries weren't life threatening, but the stress of the events of the past weeks led to complications. QuentinGeorge 06:06, 10 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Google T-Bone's blog for that. 07:58, Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Another option was thought of: Anakin used force Drain on her. Explains why he was able to survive the burns Revan 04:14, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
 * As mentionned above, T-Bones blog clearly states she died of broken heart. Without the Force choke however, it may not have been deadly methinks...--Petiflo 17:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Well the force choke is definitely not the cause of death for Padme. Yes, it knocked her out, but she was still alive.  It was the "will to live" thing she died from.  The last sentence in the "Post Mortem" section needs to be revised, unless that is the way Luke thinks she died.  However, this needs to be noted that the force choke is not what killed her. --Taybo20 22:08, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Palace portrait
So Leia walks past a picture of Padme, and still doesn't recognize her in 25 years later? In fact, should't Padme be some sort of mythical hero in Imperial Culture, do to bringing about Palpatine's election? -- SFH 15:02, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * Unseen Queen actually clarifies that Luke and Leia knew who "Senator Padme Amidala" was, they just never knew that she was their mother. QuentinGeorge 20:14, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * And yes, I agree that Amidala's history and association to Palpatine (and the fact her rebellious leanings remained secret) would have made the Empire laud her as a martyr figure for propaganda purposes, and no doubt that is why Palpatine hung the portrait in the Imperial Palace. QuentinGeorge 08:50, 29 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * That's a nice theory. But, it it seems that the people of the GFFA circa 0 BBY and beyond simply forgot about here. Nobody ever mentions her in the OT except for that scene in ROTJ when Luke asks Leia if she rememebers their mother. Jed-eye 11:52, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * That could be fixed easily enough: amend QG's theory to "...made the early Empire laud...". After all, by the OT, the Palpatine election was 32 years past, and Padme had been dead for 19 years, so the Imps likely had newer and more relevant propaganda symbols to trumpet.--Valin Kenobi 05:16, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I have been wondering about this. If Leia claimed that she remembered Padme in ROTJ, why is it she can't recgnize her mother in that portrait? Besides, haven't Leia noticed that this "Senator Padme Amidala" kinda looks a lot like her mother whom she claimed that she could remember as "beautiful, kind, but sad"? Even though she said that she could only remember her "just a little bit". - Divinity 11:59, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, you sort of answered your own question there. It's unlikely that Leia had a perfect image of her ingrained in her head; and if she did it's even more unlikely that any woman would look the same when comparing what she looked like when giving birth (not to mention crying for Anakin), and what she looked like when posing for a senatorial portrait. --MarcK [talk] 12:05, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Also, consider that the panel was drawn right after Portman was cast, thus the portait was likely made around the TPM era (perhaps right after newly elected Chancellor Palpatine moved into the Palace, he commissioned the portrait?) ... thus you'd also consider the additional difference in appearance between 14 years old and 27.--Valin Kenobi 05:21, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * The artwork was done in 1997 - when Natalie Portman was 16. Hence, if it is a depiction of Padme at the same age, it's a portrait of Padme in 30 BBY - QuentinGeorge 12:28, 17 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Sure, but Natalie was 16 when she played Padme aged 14 in TPM. So Padme at age 14 looks like Natalie at age 16. Of course, Padme at 24 and 27 looks like Natalie at 19 and 22 respectively, but we won't go into that. :p--Valin Kenobi 17:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

"well-toned stomach"
"Padmé had a close encounter with a nexu that ripped the buttom part of her shirt, completely exposing her well-toned stomach."

Is this really necessary???


 * Nope, but fun to think about! ;) Adamwankenobi 12:42, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)


 * White cut-off....WHITE...CUT OFF!! Revan 04:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Excellency?
Were Senators addressed as "Excellency"? If yes, then we should correct Palpatine's Styles of Address section as well. - Sikon [ Talk ] 17:52, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Training
Didn't Panaka give Padme some training. Like, fighting training so in case she needed to fight she could?

First appearance?
Why is it listed that she first appeared in TPM, when her likeness was first seen in a painting in The Last Command 5? Adamwankenobi 23:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * All taken care of, move along... ;) --Imp 23:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, I just saw. :) Adamwankenobi 23:52, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Episode III Profile Promo versus Episode II Wallpaper
Objections? --Redemption 03:08, 7 March 2006 (UTC) I think its a great pic.--Dil 01:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC) I like a picture of her as Queen; in traditional costume.
 * Full-body pics are generally less good. This one's better, IMO. -LtNOWIS 01:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I concur. Adamwankenobi 01:32, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd prefer if she didn't have the "Leia hair", but don't let that stop you. -- SFH 03:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Her "rumifications" robe alright? --Redemption 04:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No need for "versus". In Greece there's a saying: "Όλοι οι καλοί χωράνε", which roughly means: "It fits as long as it's good". I put both in the article, though the one where she has her hood up is much better for main pic. --Master Starkeiller 13:32, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Quote relevance
I don't think the quote on the top of this page, taken from Leia's comment in ROTJ, really applies anymore because it's established that she was referring to her foster mother, Bail Organa's wife, and did not know Amidala any more than Luke had. DarthVaderwillriseagain 02:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)DarthVaderwillriseagain
 * That's not correct. Leia is referring to Padmé. QuentinGeorge 22:02, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Obviously, Leia is talking about her REAL MOTHER, who, in my opinion, is the best character of all the Saga: Padmé. Hammu Amidala
 * I concur with Hammu Amidala. Lord Aco
 * Of course you do: you are Hammu Amidala's sockpuppet. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:22, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Ouch. But, on topic, the quote definitely is about Padmé- Luke asks her, after all, "Do you remember your mother?  Your real mother?"  Padmé knew full well that Bail Organa's wife was not her real mother.  Is it unrealistic that a newborn baby would remember her first twenty-second glimpse of another human?  Of course.  But, regardless, Leia could not have been referring to anyone but Padmé. --Thetoastman 16:50, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm so glad to read you people saying that. I've had such a hard time on french forums with this plot-hole I thought I was the only one to think that way. Tell me, did Lucas state himself that Leia is indeed talking about Padmé or is any other official source ?--Petiflo 17:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The Force is a universal plothole-filler, you just need to make stuff up more or less believably. - Sikon [ Talk ] 17:10, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Sikon and (despite the puppetry) Hammu Amidala are entirely correct. Maxi big, the Force. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Either way i think the quite should be "...I truly deeply love you."
 * That's not a quote about Padme, and hence is not suitable. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

then teh quote should be, "It's funny Padme, because you act as if you're prohibited, adn your're not, while Anakin acts as if he's under no prohibitions, and he is!" OR "You're so tied up in your responsibilities that you don't give any weight to your desires." Both are quotes of Sola describing her sister. DarthVaderwillriseagain 20:40, 19 May 2006 (UTC)DarthVaderwillriseagain
 * Too specific. "Beautiful, kind but sad" is perfect. --Redemption 17:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree. It's also (a) how we were introduced to the character in reality, and (b) a lead-in to the statement in the BTS section that Leia was indeed remembering Padmé. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 17:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Then let's go for it. Unprotecting the page. - Sikon [ Talk ] 19:01, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

A vandal erased the whole page.
Revert it we mustYoda 16:38, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

whats with the goarge bush picture
 * Someone vandalised the main image. Reload, it should be OK now. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 01:42, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Force Sensitivity
In a AOTC deleted scene Yoda says to Padme that she is strong in the force or something like that. Is Padme force sensitive or was he referring to the unborn twins.
 * I hardly think one could sense twins that were not conceived for another two years. But no, she's not Force sensitive, at least not so-much-so for it to be noticable; otherwise Anakin would have picked up on it, surely? Besides, bear in mind it's a deleted line - Kwenn 21:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * It's in the novelisation. "With you the Force is strong, Senator Amidala". But whatever. (195.92.168.170 00:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC))

I'd like to believe that she was force sensitive. I think she is actually listed in the new Star Wars Databank under "force sensitives" (and people do tend to be more force sensitive than some other species). I think that might make her eligible for the netherworld of the force, even though she doesn't appear in movies as a force ghost.

And by the way, Anakin did pick up on her being force sensitive. He reached out to her through the Force just before going to confront Palpatine/Windu as he sat in the Jedi council room and she was in her apartment. It says in the novelization of ROTS that they were spiritually in the room with each other. I think when he woke up as Darth Vader he also reached out through the Force to search for her but didn't feel it (don't hold me to this though)

Delegation of 2000

 * Since Padme was part of the delegation of 2000 shouldn't there be a section or a little more info on her role in that organization. JainaSolo32 23:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Question about Ellie
Where in The Phantom Menace does this character appear? I have scoured the novelization and cannot find any reference to her or the title Princess of Theed. Dmoon1 06:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * She's an extra from TPM, played by Madison Lloyd (sister of Jake). Her backstory is probably elaborated in one of the Episode I guides. QuentinGeorge 06:16, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tip. Dmoon1 15:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * During the parade at the end of the film. She's the little girl standing behind Anakin - Kwenn 15:28, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Do you know what guide or source book this is in? That's what I was looking for. Dmoon1 04:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The Ellie page lists Star Wars Insider 39 as its only source, so her name was likely revealed there - Kwenn 19:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Question about Leia
Near the end of the "Last days" section, the article says that "Padmé Amidala managed to give birth to twins, Luke Skywalker and Leia Amidala Skywalker." Should Leia be referred to as "Leia Amidala Skywalker?" After all, there's no reference to Padmé putting "Amidala" in her name. Should it be "Leia Organa," "Leia Organa Solo," or something entirely different? -GrammarVader 19:44, 6 Sept 2006(UTC)
 * Leia Amidala Skywalker was her name until the Organas adopted her. So that's correct at the time.  The article mentions the name change in the next section. -Finlayson 03:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Name
Should it be Padmé Amidala Skywalker?--Darth OblivionComlink 01:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Two things...
--SWME 23:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * ...Padmé being force-sensitive is not confirmed (although it is a possibility,but it's not confirmed). So don't add her to the Force-sensitives category.
 * ...How was Padmé affilating with the Empire?
 * Oh come on! Why do alot of people ignore my comments and edits ?!--SWME 19:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Can someone please reply to me NOW ?!--SWME 21:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * She was technically an Imperial Senator for about the last third of episode III. I've never heard of her being Force-sensitive, though. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Neither did I. On the Imperial affilation note, it's been over a year since I watched Revenge of the Sith (wich was also one of the only two Star Wars movies I have seen before, the other being The Phantom Menace) and I also didn't know alot about Star Wars that time, although I was following the events in Episode III.--SWME 22:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * There's a deleted scene in AOTC where yoda mentions that she is Force-sensitive. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg|25px]] 22:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Which one is that? I've heard talk about how Padmé is supposedly Force-sensitive, but I always dismissed it as fanon.-- Lord Oblivion Comlink[[Image:Oldsith.png|30px]] 23:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * WHAT? "The Force is strong in my family"...Padme too? What scene is that? .  .  .  .  02:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

"The Force is strong in my family," is what Luke said to Leia on Endor in ROTJ, bracing her for the truth about their father. It's open to interpretation whether that includes Padme or not (though it should!)

If she was force-sensitive while pregnant with the twins could (and did) she slip into a force ghost and then visit Leia because she knew Leia's location? Star Wars: Enterprise 23:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

If this conversation goes the way it has been, I won't even get a reply. Star Wars: Enterprise 23:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Imperial Senator
Technically, Padme was a member of the Imperial Senate for a very short time. - Sikon 17:50, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, not exactly. She was still in the Rupublic Senete when Palpatine announced the formation of the Galatic Empire. The Imperial Senete was formed sometimes later.BobafettH23 00:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This is like my discussion of whether or not Darth Vader was Galactic Emperor for a very short time. .  .  .  .  00:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Good to know, by the way, he wasen'tBobafettH23 00:44, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Which Movie?
In Which Movie Does THis Happen? > > " Amidala was briefly seen in a hologram projected by R2-D2 while Luke was fixing him in 35 ABY. R2 showed Anakin telling her about his dream of her dying in childbirth. Until this revelation, Luke and Leia had been unaware of the identity of their mother, though they were aware of a "Senator Amidala" who served in the final days of the Old Republic. However, they had no inkling of their relation to her. "


 * Not a movie. It's in Dark Nest III: The Swarm War - \\Captain Kwenn// &mdash; Ahoy! 17:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * In which part of episode III did we see R2 filming Padme??--The All-knowing Sith&#39;ari 17:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Age
Why did Naboo elect a 14 year-old girl to a government office?--Herbsewell 01:34, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Because Star Wars children tend to be smarter than real-life children. 24.14.120.92 01:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That wasn't the reason, and I asked that months ago.--Herbsewell 01:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * She was really charismatic and well-liked, and her predecessor was corrupt and unpopular. -LtNOWIS 01:56, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Naboonians are idiots. Why didn't someone else run?--Herbsewell 01:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Like most monarchies, the Naboo monarch mainly acts as a figurehead and has a council to advise them on various matters. And someone else DID run - Sio Bibble - however, he didn't win. QuentinGeorge 02:14, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Then someone else should have ran. Doesn't she have access to the treasury?--Herbsewell 02:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * And? Naboo is a constitutional money. Just like modern constitutional monarchs (e.g. Westminster ones) cannot spend money without the consent of parliament, neither can Amidala. And as we see throughout her 8 year reign, the country ran quite efficiently, so much so that they continued to elect young women as their figurehead rulers. QuentinGeorge 02:23, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well no. The time after that they elected someone who was quite older.--Herbsewell 02:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Jamilla was older than Amidala, but Apailana was only 13. Anyways, real-world voters do weird things to. Like when Marion Barry was re-elected, even though he was caught smoking crack cocaine. -LtNOWIS 02:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Why did they elect Apailana?--Herbsewell 02:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Jamillia was older than Amidala when elected, but still younger than Amidala at the end of the term. As I have stated, Naboo prospered in the eight year reign of Amidala, so from then on they elected young monarchs. Why is this so difficult to accept? QuentinGeorge 02:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Because you don't elect minors to anything.--Herbsewell 02:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm starting to spout out opinions so we better just leave this discussion where it was months ago.


 * Who's "you"? What "you" do is irrelevant, since the Naboo clearly do elect "minors", clearly consider them to rule well, and so continue the practice. QuentinGeorge 02:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I just said that was my opinion.--Herbsewell 02:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Kylantha must've been pretty young when she got elected, since the image on her page is after she'd been in office for about 18 years. -LtNOWIS
 * She could be in her mid thirties.--Herbsewell 03:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Image
OK, there seems to be some conflict over the main image for this article. So I'll just post the options that have been battled over, and ask for people's opinions on it.

Option 1 (current image)

 * 1) Fits quote perfectly.  Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 03:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Yeah, I think I prefer the current one. -- Ozzel 03:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Cull Tremayne 03:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Tinwe 13:45, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 15:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Option 2

 * 1) See new comments. - JMAS 03:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Cull Tremayne 04:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC) -- Seems to be much higher quality.
 * 3) Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 04:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Vryce 04:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Natalie Portman. Natalie Portman. Natalie Portman. .  .  .  .  04:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

New Comments
OK, since none of the other images were even close to being liked, why do we need to use a version of the image with a white background that was pieced together from 2 different size/quality images? Why not use the actual screen shot of the deleted scene? The background is in no way distracting. The current image (Option 1) is grainy, and the color of her face is completely uniform, meaning it looks like it was airbrushed on. It looks unnatural. - JMAS 13:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I cannot see any grain on the first image. And the second image is freakin yellow. You call that natural?! I'm not sure what is with this little crusade you've started but it's seriously pissing me off. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 04:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I hear that Border Collies see a tinge of yellow where there is absolutely none.... .  .  .  .  04:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Dogs also have a tendency of biting annoying little gargoyles arms off when something pisses them off...-- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 04:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Some of them even eat their own shit. *Insert Woody Woodpecker laugh here* .  .  .  .  04:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll tell you then it's better then any of the shit that garbage pit you call a mouth spews out everyday. Figuratively speaking with Internet boundaries of course - though I'm sure that it's true anyway. Such a shame we can't put that to test. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 04:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Come, come, my child. There's no need to breach Civility, you know. I'm sure, if you put your mind to it, you can communicate just like a person with all the correct appendages still atatched. Who knows...someone might even feel like talking to you one day. .  .  .  .  04:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe. Such a shame that nobody in the right state of mind would ever have the desire to even acknowledge your existence, boy. Now, run along. You're beginning to bug me. Like a gnat. Like a wee insect that's too stupid to realize it should stop landing on your arm. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 04:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * How kind of you to acknowledge my exsistence then. .  .  .  .  04:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Whoever said I was ever in the right state of mind? Though I'm still sane enough to admit it unlike some others. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 04:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes. Self-depracation. The last resort of all men. And women. .  .  .  .  05:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Old Comments
IMO, in the current image, it looks chopped off on the right, and she is looking off to the side, not forward. I think Option 3 is the best image choice by bar, followed by Option 2. - JMAS 03:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Are these all we have? She looks quite constipated in two and four, and three doesn't help with the "glare". Although image 1 is chopped off and she's looking the wrong direction, it seems to be the best image by far. Cull Tremayne 03:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Like I said before, number 2 looks like she's constipated. Number 3 has a weird glow and isn't that great of quality (expression - not fitting for someone like Padme). And number 4 has very weird colors. And Cull, if you thought the current one is the best then why did you vote for option 3? -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 03:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You know what? I have no idea. I claim brain fart. Cull Tremayne 03:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * New Option 4: Bedtime Padme? No way in hell. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 04:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh puhlease. But anyway, now that Option 1 is no longer chopped off, I do like it better. But not as good an image as Option 3. There is nothing wrong with its lighting, it's merely the lighting choice the photographer chose for that particular shoot. - JMAS 04:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually Ozzel and Oblivion seem to have reverted it - not sure why. Option 3 has awful lighting. It looks weird and like what was said before, she has a weird smirk.-- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 04:16, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * While I still like the original version of #1, I could be persuaded to go with #4. So persuade me. :-P -- Ozzel 04:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Padme. In. A. Nightie. ;) - JMAS 17:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)