User talk:Gethralkin/Archive000

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #FEFFCF; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Gethralkin!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Internal pages:
 * Senate Hall
 * Wookieepedia FAQ
 * Manual of Style
 * Reliable sources
 * Guide to image use
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Wookieepedia policies:
 * What Wookieepedia is not
 * User page, user image, and user signature policies

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash;SFH 22:22, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * }

Fanart
Just thought I'd let you know, putting the ARC-170 onto a starry background and adding other shrunken down versions of the fighter around it, as you did with File:TacARC170fighterSPRazorSquadron.jpg, is considered fanart, which isn't allowed at Wookieepedia. Just blacking out the background, as Darth Culator had done to File:TacARC170fighterSP.jpg is fine however. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 20:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

PocketModels
Hey, I really wouldn't consider the PocketModel packs to be appearances. They're really sources. So, if you could please put them in the "Sources" sections from now on, I'd appreciate that. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 19:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Could you plase not put them as appearances? I don't want to have to follow you around to every article you edit. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 19:32, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 13:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Resolute
Just to let you know, I reverted your edit to Resolute (Venator-class) because all those statistics, though true for the Venator-class, are not necessarily true for each individual ship. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 23:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Uploading
If you are going to continue uploading images, please use the template correctly. The licensing tag goes IN the template, not with a separate heading outside the template. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 19:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Oops, yeah, sorry about that. I was just clicking on the drop down for the standard Screenshot template, but didn't pay attention to where it was going to end up.Gethralkin 20:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Two ways to go about it. The easier is to just not touch the drop down licensing box when uploading and directly put the licensing tag in the template. Second option is continue using the drop down box to select the licensing tag, but then editing the summary to move the tag into the template once the image is uploaded. The first option is easier. But it's your choice. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 20:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I'll remember that.Gethralkin 20:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

+ or -
The plus and minus numbers on an edit are the number of characters/spaces added or taken away in that edit. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 16:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Problem reports
Allow me to introduce you to Mr. Redirect, who could have helped you with every single one of your recent problem reports. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 00:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Implacable
May I ask what source states that this image is the Implacable? The Databank, IIRC, does not state that particular image to be any specific ship. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 22:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Scum & Villainy

 * While Star Wars PocketModel TCG: Scum & Villainy's title is fully spelled out, easily differentiating that article from other uses of the term, the "youmay" template is still needed for people who come to that page first. jSarek 22:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Thanks for tackling the job. :-) jSarek 04:37, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Clone Wars Conquest
Here is the link Usitgz 05:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

On this link it said power match Icon not Match Icon. Usitgz 05:59, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Padme
I'll check sources, and hopefully find something that can put an end to this. Oh, and thanks for your civility here. I always appreciate it when people are able to keep a level head about things and discuss them calmly.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 12:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Trespass
First, the current plot summary is taken from the official site - it should be removed and an original one is to be written. Second, this summary should be in present tense, since it is part of an out-of-universe real world article. Mauser 06:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, that's what I'm talking about: the summary you edited is taken from [starwars.com] and should be removed before a new one could be written. Also, plot summaries are always considered to be part of out-ot-universe and are written in present tense. Check any other plot summary. Mauser 07:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * "Articles about books, movies, games, or other real-life Star Wars material should obviously be written from an out-of-universe perspective", that applies to TV episodes as well. Mauser 07:09, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Let's say you wrote original, non-copied summary of the episode Trespass. When you put it in the articles like Orto Plutonia, Chi Cho and Obi-Wan Kenobi it is in-universe, and should be in past tense. But when present in the article for the actual episode, it should be in present tense, like the rest of the article. Note that we never say "Heir to the Empire was a novel"... Mauser 07:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Battle droid 685
With regards to this droid's naming, BF2 established that droid names started with "Unit." Should that be translated to this guy? NaruHina Talk  08:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Since it was me, who originally created the article, I say yes. I just went with the Episode Guide when I named him, but Unit 685 should do. Mauser 08:08, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Lag, I'm afraid
The servers usually catch up after a while. Some computers, like mine, just can't get rid of older versions, until an exterior server decides to get rid of it. I usually just wait. VT-16 14:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Some notes on the trash compactor process
The TC is best saved for when there might be legitimate debate on an article being allowed or not. If it covers the same ground as a proper article, but it's at the wrong title, you can change it to a redirect, possibly with a template like R from misspelling. If there's no reason for it whatsoever, use a template like delete. Also, use four tildes to sign your name when you start a TC discussion. Thanks, &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I figured it was better to delete them since I was the one who created it and the links associated with it, which I corrected, by the way. But, I see also that the same mistake could be made again since one of the errors was due to an overexposed image. I signed the Tc pages, but two admins reverted them - I didn't know I couldn't correct my mistakes on them, sorry about that. Gethralkin 23:18, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Ordering Source lists
Please make sure when adding items to an article's Source list that you order the items by correct OOU publication date, per Wookieepedia's Layout Guide. This is especially important when editing Featured articles, such as Tycho Celchu. This particular edit is problematic, since you placed these items in the list incorrectly. Toprawa and Ralltiir 07:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You didn't need to remove them, you just need to order them correctly. Toprawa and Ralltiir 07:09, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I was cutting and pasting after I got your message, and you caught me in mid paste. Thanks for the heads up. I'll go back and correct the other sources I placed, as well. Gethralkin 07:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Leia Organa Solo article
Sorry, I see what you mean about the use of the adverb 'ever". However, for the sake of presentation, I changed the opening line to Leia Organa Solo (born Leia Amidala Solo) was at various stages of her life... as it fits with the wiki's uniform article layout better. --Markrox91 03:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Re:Klivian
I didn't leave Vander's in, I simply wasn't aware of it. The reason I reverted your edit is because the first part of it isn't relevant to the intro, didn't mesh well with the intro, and because it linked to a CCG card. The second part wasn't correctly sourced. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

ST 321
Since you are the person who added the information about the "ST" in ST 321 standing for "Surface Transport" I'm assuming that the information comes from the Pocketmodel TCG. If that is true, could you please include the information in the main body of the article (not only the intro) and properly reference the statement. Thanks. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 15:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Well, I got the info from Galaxy Guide 8: Scouts, by Bill Olmesdahl *#38; Bill Smith, West End Games, 1993. However, when looking up the reference, I discovered that I was mistaken in calling it "Surface Transport", and that the initials stand for "Space Transport" instead. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Gethralkin 04:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Hawk
Gethralkin, regardless of whether or not Hawk died in the deleted scene, please do not make any major edits without the nominator's permission if the article is currently going through a nomination process. That goes especially for adding unsourced and unnecessary information to the article that detracts from its quality.  CC7567  (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I should have been clearer: please do not edit the article at all without the nominator's permission if it's currently going through or has gone through a nomination process. It's up to the nominator to decide what is acceptable quality for the article. Furthermore, yes, you did add unsourced information. Do you see those two last paragraphs of the biography? Do you see how there's no ref number at the end of the sentences? That's unsourced information. Once an article has achieved a higher status, that is the way it should stay unless there is good reason for it.  CC7567  (talk) 22:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If I may butt in, Gethralkin, I think what CC is trying to say is please don't make huge, sweeping changes that completely alter the dynamic of a nominated article without the nominator's permission. Removing half of an article's content like that just on a whim was not the way to go about it. If you have concerns, please do leave objections to the nomination on the GAN page. That's what the nomination process is all about. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Gethralkin, please stop striking my comments on the GAN page. You have absolutely no reason to strike any comments but your own.  CC7567  (talk) 04:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If I wasn't clear with the above message, please stop. The comments of others are not your concern.  CC7567  (talk) 04:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Gethralkin, kindly stop ignoring these messages. My comments are not yours to strike, and there's a reason I've reverted your last few changes.  CC7567  (talk) 04:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Understood.  CC7567  (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)