Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer.

This process is still somewhat in an experimental stage; therefore, several rules have yet to be set in stone, such as when and how failed nominations are eliminated, what makes an article "featured," and so on. See the following pages for ongoing discussion and proposals:


 * Consensus track/Featured article elimination process
 * Consensus track/Featured article ground rules
 * Consensus track/Featured article criteria
 * Wookieepedia talk:Featured article

Also, for a spiffy-looking gallery and summary of past winners, see below:


 * /History

Sign below an article you find excellent. You can vote for as many as you like. If your favorite article is not present, feel free to add one (with an optional reason), but remember to sign it. Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating and keep the list in alphabetical order.

Every Sunday the article with the most votes is highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template.

Aayla Secura
Comments
 * 1) Padme829 03:24, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)Padme829
 * 2) Sith Lord 04:50, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Cato Neimoidia 18:19, 28 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Inmobilus 15:17, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) JediDog 03:27, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose. I find it funny that this is nominated for both featured article and weekly improvement drive. It needs serious cleanup work and redlinks filled. Might need some expanding as well. Adamwankenobi 13:59, 13 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * This is a very complete article!Padme829 03:24, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)Padme829
 * You're right, but we still miss a lot of the 'Clone Wars Aayla'. --[[Image:BFguy.gif]]--Inmobilus 19:55, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * After looking at it, I believe it still needs to be expanded some, needs red links filled in, and needs to be cleaned up some. Adamwankenobi 06:30, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * It needs a lot of work. I added some things to the Clone Wars section but it still isn't half complete. --Master Starkeiller 19:13, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with Starkeiller. Once it's complete it'll definitely be a candidate, but for now, oppose. --MarcK [talk] 01:49, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, not nearly good enough to be featured. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Anakin Skywalker
Comments
 * 1) QuentinGeorge 08:44, 29 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) MarcK 08:57, 29 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Jasca Ducato 17:33, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) SFH 03:11, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Most of the Clone Wars section is straight off the databank. That doesn't equal "Featured Article" in my book. --Death Regis 00:07, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Removed my vote until that portion is improved. QuentinGeorge 06:27, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * It's a definite copyvio, as well. Aaargh! QuentinGeorge 06:30, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * But the copyvio info has now been removed and replaced with our own info. -- SFH 03:11, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Nope. It's been put back in there again. QuentinGeorge 08:21, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, full of copyvio and whatnot, plus it's nominated for the improvement drive --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Anakin Solo
Comments
 * 1) Divinity 10:55, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) AdmiralKadann 16:53, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Another well written article that should be featured as well. Even though I don't really like this character that much, I think it deserves to be in the same position as Jaina and Jacen Solo. After all, I think all three articles on the Solo kids are really well written. So if this one's good, why not? - Divinity 10:55, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * The Force is strong with this one! - AdmiralKadann 16:53, 7 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Objection. The intro to the biography and the childhood section have some redundancies. His role in the Corellian Crisis is just a few words. The Training on Yavin IV section is in need of serious stylistic overhaul. Mykyr/death section as well. Looking again, whole chunks of this are lifted from the CUSWE entry: . --SparqMan 07:47, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, not good enough, quite simply. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Beilert Valance
Comments
 * 1) Kwenn 19:20, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) AngelQueen 00:00, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Shadowtrooper 03:36, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) SparqMan 21:19, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Riffsyphon1024 08:26, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Tam 11:00, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * A great article on one of the more obscure, yet popular and fascinating characters. Well written and informative - Kwenn
 * This article puts articles on major players like Ackbar and Wedge Antilles, or even Leia Organa Solo and Luke Skywalker to shame, and he appeared in only three comics. It's a fine piece of work&mdash;one of the best on Wookieepedia. --SparqMan 21:19, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * It will need a few more redlinks filled to garner my vote. -- Riffsyphon1024 05:36, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * No redlinks remain. Any other remaining objections? --SparqMan 07:36, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Good job. It gets my vote now. -- Riffsyphon1024 08:26, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Chiss
Comments
 * 1) ColdFusion900 19:09, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) StarNeptune 08:09, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Riffsyphon1024 08:23, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I think this is a long and well-written article. ColdFusion900
 * All I have to say is...wow. Just wow. StarNeptune 08:09, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Very complete and has more images than Google on Chiss. -- Riffsyphon1024 08:23, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Darth Maul
1.Star Wars Guy 18 Dec 2005

Comments
 * I liked this article very much and didn't know about Luke's "encounter" with Maul untill I read it. -Star Wars Guy
 * Oppose, needs more information outside the BTS section --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Galactic Civil War
Comments
 * 1) Padme829 21:45, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829
 * 1) While this article has a good start, it is still too much of a review of the OT films. It would be great if we could expand the focus to include the general trends of the conflict across the galaxy - including those battles between the Empire and non-Alliance forces. --SparqMan 05:56, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) The 15 or so years after the Battle of Endor are all in one paragraph.  This needs to be expanded. --Novajoe23 19:13, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Galactic Empire
Comments
 * 1) TIEPilot051999 23:25, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm suprised I haven't voted for this page yet. It's plain awesome. You guessed it, it's Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!).
 * Much like the Galactic Republic page, it's very well written and informative.TIEPilot051999 23:25, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I didn't vote for this article only because I think the Empire rocks. This is a very well written article, especially the "Origins of the Empire section. More people should vote for this. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!)
 * Oppose, not elaborate enough on many sections. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Galactic Republic
Comments
 * 1) TIEPilot051999 23:21, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) It's a very well written article.TIEPilot051999 23:21, 1 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Gilad Pellaeon

 * 1) Novajoe23 18:35, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) AdmiralKadann 19:05, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Sikon [ Talk ] 11:23, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Kuralyov 23:34, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Jedimasterjaramillo 21:25, 08 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Darthcraigious 02:14, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)]]

Comments
 * Maybe a little short, but a nice article overall. Sikon [ Talk ] 11:23, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, needs more info from the Swarm War. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Grievous
Comments
 * 1) MarcK 06:07, 12 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Gwai Lo 02:47, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Cato Neimoidia 10:27, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Darth Monkey 01:35, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) OOM-9 01:47, 6 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but needs a lot of work. The prose is a bit clunky for my liking, and it goes into overly-minute details for combat (it gives a blow-by-blow account of the Battle of Hypori.), while neglecting other information. QuentinGeorge 10:57, 15 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Did some changes.TIEPilot051999 03:15, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * I like the photo where you see Grievous before a cyborg. I found some information about Grievous that I might add. Darth Monkey 01:35, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, a large portion of the artticle is devoted to his ...lightsaber collection. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Han Solo
Comments
 * 1) Jill Tan 19:01, 02 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) --Darth Mantus 18:35, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Divinity 05:30, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) AngelQueen 00:00, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose for now, but only because the last section needs serious expansion. I'm pretty sure his activities in the NJO books amount to more than the couple of sentences I wrote without ever having read the books in question.  &mdash; Silly Dan  23:31, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose Needs more work, especially in the post ROTJ section. Also, can someone scan the pic of Han Solo as an Imperial recruit from the New Essential Chronology ? QuentinGeorge 02:16, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, currently nominated for the improvement drive, which it needs. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Imperial I-class Star Destroyer

 * 1) MarcK 20:02, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) ColdFusion900 16:19, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Shadowtrooper 03:50, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) AdmiralKadann 19:06, 22 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) CooperTFN 07:30, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) DarthVader 02:15, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Kir Kanos 19:05, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Thinortolan 01:11, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Holy crap this is a good article. MarcK 20:02, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree. This is an amazing article and should be featured. ColdFusion900 16:20, 5 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed, so long as we get better, less blurry pics up there. If I have time, I'll just take some shots of ISDs from the films. [[Image:Tbhelm.gif|30px]] Shadowtrooper talk 03:51, 8 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Great article, but does Earth have to be mentioned within the In-Universe text? -- Riffsyphon1024 19:58, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Pretty. CooperTFN 07:30, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * This article kicks butt. It has charts and many other features which no other article on a vehichle could ever hope to have. Kir Kanos Hail the Empire.
 * We need just three more votes, loyal Imperialists, in order to beat the Rebel Scum, Kyle Katarn.
 * This one has to be the next, let's keep polishing the others to reach the quality level of this article --Thinortolan 01:11, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I think that it needs a history section. I will put that at the top of my to-do list. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!)

Jacen Solo
Comments
 * 1) TIEPilot051999 00:51, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Divinity 03:11, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) AdmiralKadann 12:26, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) ~Mandalore the Ultimate~ 03:07, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC))
 * 5) Jed-eye 22:07, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I thought it had pretty good material and was pretty complete but it was rather poorly written.
 * I hate the character with a passion words cannot adequately describe. That said, this is a well written page about him that reminds me of the times before the NJO.TIEPilot051999 00:51, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Jacen's my favorite EU character! Jed-eye 22:07, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Jacen's just plain awesome! ~Mandalore the Ultimate~ 22:45, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC))
 * You have to focus on how the article is written, not wether or not he is cool or not, or a rebel scum or not. You have to admit that the ISD I article is pretty awesome You guessed it, it's Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!) (in opposition, don't count my vote). Check out my page.

Jaina Solo
Comments
 * 1) Divinity 12:40, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Padme829 03:18, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)Padme829
 * 3) TIEPilot051999 20:38, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) AdmiralKadann 16:19, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I think this article is really well written. Like her twin Jacen, she should be featured as well. - Divinity 12:40, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed. She is a worthwile read.Padme829 03:18, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)Padme829
 * Why not?TIEPilot051999 20:38, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Lando Calrissian
Comments
 * 1) QuentinGeorge 09:51, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Padme829 03:09, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829
 * 3) AngelQueen 00:00, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * It would be nice if we could get articles (at least some stubs) done to fill in the redlinks. QuentinGeorge 06:25, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * It's very complete, except for the redlinks.Padme829 03:09, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829
 * New Republic-era details are pretty scant. Doesn't even mention the Teljkon vagabond. Could use more info on his various wifes/lovers... --SparqMan 23:30, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Luke Skywalker
Comments
 * 1) Sikon 15:41, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) AngelQueen 22:08, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) MarcK 02:48, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Divinity 05:32, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) TIEPilot051999 19:01, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Rhysode
 * It's an excellent article! It should definitely be displayed with pride!AngelQueen 22:08, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * In any article deserves to be the featured one, its this one. TIEPilot051999 19:01, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Mara Jade Skywalker

 * 1) Padme829 16:44, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829
 * 2) AngelQueen 00:00, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Jed-eye 00:00, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Mara Jade rocks! Also she's considered one of the best EU characters by many fans. Divinity 05:36, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * She's easily one of the best characters in the EU. And those who don't know who Luke Skywalker's wife is should visit this article. Jed-eye 11:37, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Object. Just so we're clear, a featured article isn't made great by its subject, but by its content. This one for example is extremely scarce for easily the most popular female EU character, and one that's up there with the most popular EU characters overall, such as Quinlan Vos and Thrawn. Hence why it's currently on the improvement drive. --MarcK [talk] 11:52, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with MarcK. QuentinGeorge 08:22, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I too agree with MarcK. Adamwankenobi 06:33, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * ObjectAs do I. My vote was temporarly removed because I said that Thrawn rocked. The article shouldn't be judged by how much or like or dislike the article, or wether the subject is tratiorus and a rebel scum. It's all about content. That's why I worked on the Thrawn article for so long. Make the Mara Jade article up to the same status as Thrawn and then we'll talk. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!)
 * Alright then. Since many have objected to this article, why don't we removed it from the featured article section until it has been improved, shall we? - Divinity 14:54, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm really sorry if I made a mistake for not noticing that this article is poorly written. If this article needs to be improved, then I'm removing my vote until the improvement is done. - Divinity 08:38, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, i expanded the NJO info as much as I can. Jed-eye 22:03, 11 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, way too short. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Mustafar

 * 1) AngelQueen 13:41, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Tam 18:37, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Comments With RotS DVD and Trials of Obi-Wan coming out soon, why not? Tam 18:37, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't be too eager to nominate something for a reason like that. These articles need to have a higher set of standards than they do to be featured, IMHO. Adamwankenobi 14:23, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Redlinks need filling. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:03, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * It needs some expanding and cleanup, IMHO. Adamwankenobi 06:32, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose --Imp 12:50, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Nom Anor

 * 1) StarNeptune 16:30, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Ywingempress 00:10, 26 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Divinity 05:33, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Comments

Padmé Amidala
Comments yes i want to know more about mustafar
 * 1) AngelQueen 22:31, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Darkshadow 19:13, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Padme829 21:49, 16 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829
 * 4) Dil 23:50, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * It would be nice to get some of the redlinks filled with articles. QuentinGeorge 06:59, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Done! :) AngelQueen 13:11, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, her biography needs expansion. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Quinlan Vos
Comments
 * 1) TIEPilot051999 15:50, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) ColdFusion900 21:57, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Master Illidan 01:44, 8 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) The Wolfe 02:07, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Hman 03:54, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * A few redlinks need to be filled, but on the whole, it looks pretty good.TIEPilot051999 15:50, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Strongly oppose; still needs a hell of a lot filled in, which I'm currently working on. Once we get his biography more fleshed out this shall certainly be a candidate. --MarcK [talk] 04:46, 26 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, this doesn't quite cut it. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Raid on the Jedi Temple

 * 1) 69.201.195.115 21:12, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Bly1993 21:17, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * I think the article is good enough to be a FA.69.201.195.115 21:12, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, this article isn't up to featured article status. And isn't there some rule against anon nominations? --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd hardly call the second biggest thing to happen in Revenge of the Sith to be "anon".TIEPilot051999 23:24, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Uh... "anon" refers to the user who nominated the article. He hasn't registered, thus he is an "anon". --Imp 00:00, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh. Stupid me.TIEPilot051999 00:02, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * It gets my vote.Adventfear 23:04, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Shadows of the Empire

 * 1) Bly1993 21: 16, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) General Kenobi 23:25, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments


 * I thenk the article is pretty good on whole. Opinions? Bly1993 21: 20, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I think it needs more pictures and amybe some cleanup. Adamwankenobi 07:36, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I've cleaned it up, and am satisfied with it now. I think it is ready to be a FA candidate now. General Kenobi 23:25, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Soontir Fel

 * 1) &mdash; Silly Dan  03:49, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) AdmiralKadann 13:39, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 23:58, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Having never read the Rogue Squadron comics, almost all I know about this guy is in this article. Well written, seems to be complete.  &mdash; Silly Dan  03:49, 24 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * This is a very good article. AdmiralKadann 13:39, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, needs redlink filling. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Thrawn

 * 1) AdmiralKadann 17:36, 3 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) --Maru (talk) Contribs 02:27, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) --SOCL 04:09, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Kuralyov 17:03, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) KEJ 23:51, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Darth Ocean 18.37, 4 Dec 2005 (GMT)
 * 7) Geekmasterflash 04:13, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!) 13:41, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * This article is pretty good but is not up to the Featured Article status, yet. I will place this at the top of my to-do list. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!)
 * If it's not up to featured status, then why did you vote for it...? --MarcK [talk] 13:44, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Because I think It will be by Sunday, and because I felt like it, and because Thrawn is cool. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!) 15:53, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Because of that comment, I removed your vote. Keep it up, and I will remove all your votes. StarNeptune 04:53, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * That's nice, very nice indeed. Thank you for your comment, sir StarNeptune. I will take your "words of wisdom" into account. Did you read the other reason that I voted for Thrawn. It is at the top of my to do list Neptune. Maybe if you helped with the article, this debate would not be present. I apoloigze for my bias and prefenance which caused me to vote for Thrawn. I do believe that this article is well written. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!) Sorry for the trouble.
 * It is to my understanding a more or less democratic system. While I find the article to be very, very good I wouldn't want my vote stricken if my reasoning wasn't up to par. If it shouldn't be a feature then the votes will be against it. The system works, the system is great...bow down before the system. Geekmasterflash 04:58, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * His vote was stricken because he said himself the article is not up to par, and that he only did it because he thought Thrawn was cool. If you want to debate this, take it to either my talk page, this page's talk page, or the ground rules link up top. StarNeptune 05:06, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * After a discussion I had with a few others, his vote has been restored for now. StarNeptune 06:28, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Hew StarNeptune, what ever happened to democracy. You are unfit to be an admin.
 * StarNeptune, do you think that people really add pages to the list of Featured Articles because they think that the article is written well. Look at the first few comments under the Mara Jade Featured article section.
 * Mr Anon. You are treading on thin ice here. Notice that the Mara article HASN'T been selected? Actual article quality is the main consideration when choosing featured articles.QuentinGeorge 02:39, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Okay guys, now that this whole debarcle is over, I think that the article is up to featured article status. Thanks for the help. We have really come a long way in a sinlge day. Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!)
 * I would hold off on this article until we've settled on how to handle the continuity errors. --SparqMan 00:30, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * This week is our week guys! Do you want all of our work to be for nought? I didn't think so! Vote now or make the article even better. Our only competition is Yoda. Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays, Kir Kanos (The Empire Rocks!).

Twi'lek
Comments
 * 1) Padme829 00:28, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)padme829
 * 2) Rhysode 11:15, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) AdmiralKadann 12:04, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Riffsyphon1024 17:12, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Sith Lord 04:52, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) KEJ 23:50, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Sikon [ Talk ] 07:25, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I think this is a very complete look at the twi'lek culture.Padme829 00:28, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Wow! Excellent article.
 * Those few redlinks need filling but great article overall. -- Riffsyphon1024 17:12, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Yup, great article.... just needs some more pics of Twi'leks - preferably females ;-) KEJ 23:50, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * This is a very complete and well-written article, though I second KEJ.
 * Oppose, could use expansion still. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Warren Fu

 * 1) WhiteBoy 23:26, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Not to toot my own horn too much here, but I'm proud of the article. :)  Plus I think it'd be good to have an OOU article every once in a while.  WhiteBoy 23:26, 23 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Oppose, while not a bad article, it just isn't featured article material. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Xandel Carivus

 * 1) TIEPilot051999

Comments
 * A surprisingly well done article about a second rate character in a third tier comic. Living proof that even the background guys deserve their time in the spotlight.TIEPilot051999 23:28, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Yoda

 * 1) Novajoe23 15:35, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Master Starkeiller 18:01, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Riffsyphon1024 20:09, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) --MarcK [talk] 00:20, 17 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Sith Lord 04:52, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Cato Neimoidia 16:33, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Divinity 09:32, 4 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Darth Mantus 13:41, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) Palpy 17:21, 22 Dec 2005 (EST)
 * 10) TKRKS 16:10, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * 11) AngelQueen 19:50, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Good this article is. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:09, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Yuuzhan Vong

 * 1) DarthExodus 15:32, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) MarcK 11:19, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) AdmiralKadann 16:19, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Farmer88 17:10, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Oppose, more a compilation of lists than an article. --Imp 22:26, 30 Dec 2005 (UTC)