Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Fizz-Pop Cap (with foil cluster)

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 03:33, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: You know you wish you had one.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Menkooroo 08:16, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) SinisterSamurai 05:12, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  OLIOSTER   (talk) 04:49, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) I suppose it isn't necessary, but could you include either Spilfer's infobox image, or a cropped version that focuses on the cap? SinisterSamurai 22:59, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *I would like to, but there are a couple of problems. The image would look best in the infobox, but I don't want to give the impression that Spilfer's hat is the Fizz-Pop Cap in question; it could also be a bottle cap that isn't depicted in the image, say. Second, if I put his image anywhere else, it has to be left-justified in the BTS section, but this breaks the page, causing the image to cut through the next two headers below it and into the notes on my screen. So I made the decision not to include the image after all. If you have any suggestions for how to make it work, though, please let me know! ~ SavageBob 18:20, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **If you aren't certain that the cap is the hat or is on the hat, then no prob, Bob. SinisterSamurai 05:12, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * It just occurred to me that "Fizz-Pop Cap" could refer to some sort of pop-top from a soda can instead of the actual hat/cap Spilfer is shown to be wearing. Am I right to assume that "Cap" here is the hat? What do others think? ~ SavageBob 03:02, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Upon further reflection, it's too ambiguous; infobox duly gutted. ~ SavageBob 06:50, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Oxixo

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 19:29, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) SinisterSamurai 05:15, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Capstick:
 * 2) * Jedi-Business.com Provides Oxixo's homeworld as Kamino. Are you able to tell if that information is on the packaging? SinisterSamurai 16:49, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **No it isn't. Is that website a canon source, or just a fan site? Hanzo Hasashi 20:31, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Definitely a fan site, but I wondered if they had acquired the information from a canon source, or simply assumed and invented the info. SinisterSamurai 05:15, March 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) Stick-cap
 * 2) *Good show! I'm just wondering if "In 4 ABY, the Alliance to Restore the Republic's fleet attempted to attack and destroy the Galactic Empire's second Death Star superweapon during the Battle of Endor." can be sourced to the action figure, or if something like The New Essential Chronology (which establishes 4 ABY and stuff) would be better. Menkooroo 13:39, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Jedi-Business.com has some nice shots of Oxixo, but mentions that the mold is identical to Mianda's. Mianda's review mentions that he is in turn a re-release of The Legacy Collection's TIE fighter pilot. that figure's review has a really nice face shot, wherein their logo can be easily cropped to make a very decent info-box proportioned image. Jedi-Business mentions that there are some minor facial color differences between Mianda and the LC's Pilot, but I can't see any difference. It's up to you if you want to swap out images. SinisterSamurai 16:49, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * If we start accepting any fan-made shot of the action figures as canon, I think it'll signal that we've crossed a line. Just saying, Hanzo, do as you wish, but I think this is something the community should address. ~ SavageBob 23:47, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Rebelscum doesn't have this figure profiled yet, so it's tricky. As soon as they do, the article will have to be updated to include Template:HasbroCite. Pictures of the action figure from rebelscum have traditionally been OK to use in articles, but I think that rebelscum is the exception rather than the rule. I'd recommend waiting until rebelscum does have a profile on this guy in their action figure photo archives before nominating him for a status article, personally. The article will have to make some changes to its template and likely its lead image at that time, and I think it would be best to wait until we can say for sure that the article is complete before calling it "comprehensive." Just a recommendation. Menkooroo 03:37, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Personally, I'd recommend the box image if any toy image is used. I don't think waiting is necessary per se, just caution on what image to use. :O ~ SavageBob 05:20, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Will change the image some time later today or tomorrow. Hanzo Hasashi 20:31, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Turns out both Oxixo and Thern's images are already the box images. If you look at the back of the box, those images are directly from there. Hanzo Hasashi 04:11, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's what I thought. I was a bit confused by your message, but now I see we were both confused. :) ~ SavageBob 04:29, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Reridan Reksiss

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:20, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: This person needs to be used in something.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I was wondering if "actor" was enough indication that the character is male... I eventually decided that the answer was: "Yes." Menkooroo 02:17, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Shimazu
 * 2) * I'm guessing that you don't like ref tags on single-source articles. SinisterSamurai 22:08, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **As stated above: per Sourcing Rule #5, ref tags on single-source articles are not required. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:16, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Gaeriala Boosin

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:20, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A musician to go with these song noms.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Boo! Sin! Menkooroo 02:14, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ishida
 * 2) * No ref tags? SinisterSamurai 22:07, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **And once again: ref tags are not necessary on single-source articles per WP:S rule 5. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:19, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Gelesi's wife

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:43, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My FAN's pulchritudinous sweetheart.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Menkooroo 04:38, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Yimmy's vife
 * 2) * Context is needed on Gelesi. The article introduces him like the reader should know who he is, but not everybody has read the FAN. :P
 * 3) *Maybe create an article for the Captain of the Guard? The one currently linked to is a position in the Republic's Senate Guard. Probably not what you were looking for. Menkooroo 15:00, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done both. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:35, March 16, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Gelesi's daughter

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:43, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Contrary to popular belief, my FAN and previous CAN were not polyphiloprogenitive.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ask Menkooroo: always a good solution.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:17, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Menkooroo 04:39, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Do you need a P&T here? There's nothing about her personality in it, and the near-human thing would fit in the main section easily.  Holocron  Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 02:20, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *I couldn't think of a way to integrate it into the body without disrupting the flow. "at least Near-Human" cannot just be handled with a ref tag explaination and it needs the clause about Gelesi to make sense. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:32, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Well, that makes enough sense for me to strike the objection, anyone with experience want to comment?  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 12:34, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Don't call me daughter, not fair to me
 * 5) * I'm with Holocron on this one. If the leading quote of this article is the only reference to Gelesi's daughter, then we can't assume anything. That reference isn't enough to assume that the daughter isn't adopted, and even if it was, the info currently in p & t isn't enough to justify a p & t --- I really think that it's gotta go (ditto the near-human reference in the infobox). Menkooroo 15:03, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) **That makes sense. Removed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:25, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Excellent! Now create an article for this particular Captain of the Guard (or else expand the existing one?) and we'll call it a deal. Menkooroo 11:55, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ****I already expanded the existing one, and I added context on Gelesi in both articles. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:53, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * The beast rider was going to kidnap and 'marry' her? Sneaky developers.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 12:34, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Testosterone

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:39, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I'm sorry. Beethoven's Fifth came on the radio when I revisited this page and it ended when I pressed "Edit." This was divinely ordained.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) This stuff makes me rage!  OLIOSTER   (talk) 03:20, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Why not?  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:26, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  1358  (Talk)  08:58, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Whenever we have articles on things that have the same in-universe name as they do out-of-universe, I don't think it's OR or a stretch to assert that that thing should be understood to mean what we think it means. In other words, SW novels and sources are written in English for an English-speaking audience (until translated), so if a character mentions a, say, pillow, then it's safe to assume they mean a pillow. In this case, mentioning that testosterone is a hormone strongly associated with males would not be OR in my opinion. At the very least, I think you need to mention what testosterone is in the BTS, with a reference to a (non-Wikipedia) definition of the stuff. ~ SavageBob 15:23, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I updated it for all those sources except for A Hero Seeks Not Vengeance, SBob. Since I can't find a copy of it, could you tell me what the context of the mention is? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:17, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * All it says is If the heroes go off on a testosterone high and glory in the prospect of combat, then Meera will echo whatever action they take, in reference to the Heroes of Cularin and Meera Lisso.--Jinzler 21:20, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Would you say that fits into "aggressive"? In my Rifts campaigns that usually means we destroy another planet. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:27, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * The appearance list isn't complete until all of Kyle Katarn's appearances are added!  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:26, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Kyle is testosterone in human form. And in answer to your question Naru, I do believe that this can be interpreted as meaning that testosterone was associated with agressiveness. --Jinzler 12:33, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Rokon

 * Nominated by: NAYAYEN &mdash;it appears to be a frammistat 23:51, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Let's Rokon Roll.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:55, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 13:41, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Family Bonds

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 09:13, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Lumpy's single appearance in SWG.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Yes! Lumpy! Amazing! I love you! Menkooroo 11:57, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) No! Lumpy! Abhorrent! I hate you! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:32, March 17, 2011 (UTC) :P

Object
 * 1) Harrumph
 * 2) *Article for Life Day robes?
 * 3) *Article for Life Day orbs?
 * 4) * Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 09:20, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Created a stub for each and linked in the article.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 09:27, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Scintil vine

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:32, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: No CSWE. No quotes. WP:NSW. If you don't like the 1 line infobox, just get rid of it.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 12:02, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tass root

 * Nominated by: <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 05:32, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: If you don't like the 1 line infobox, just get rid of it. WP:NSW. No quotes. No CSWE.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 13:43, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

In the Political Pit

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:47, March 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The PolPit is on! Tonight: The Cabal: Fact or Fiction? Binks and Ween will be here to analyze. Comprehensive Articles: Are they a threat to Good Article nomination numbers? Reksiss and Boosin on that, with a chart by 4Dot coming eventually.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments