Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Venator-class Star Destroyer


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Venator-class Star Destroyer

 * Nominated by: Czethros ( Kar'taylir ad meg hukaat'kama ) 11:44 7 March 2009 (CET)
 * Nomination comments: First attempt at a FA nom.

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) QuiGon's Words of Wisdom:
 * 2) *Unsourced items in the infobox
 * 3) *"In terms of firepower, these weapons rivaled the main battery on the later Imperial-class Star Destroyers." and "and played pivotal roles in the repulsion of the CIS forces and the rescue of Supreme Chancellor Palpatine" are not sourced
 * 4) *Needs more quotes
 * 5) *No TCG sources? I know at least one card.
 * 6) *Republic origin section could be expanded a lot. Venators were involved in many battles and were used in different ways. Anakin's smashing of a Venator in Storm Over Ryloth into a Lucrehulk-class ship is only one example.
 * 7) *The information about the Venator in Empire at War in the Bts could use links to "at least one or two screenshots" that featured it. And the meaning of the word Venator should be sourced.
 * 8) *Also, check for more appearances/sources. As it is the main warship class of the Republic, it is heavily featured in the Clone Wars media. QuiGonJinn Be mindful of the Living Force...[[Image:Quigonheadshot.jpg|16px]] 12:17, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'm very curious to know why people are nominating articles that they haven't even worked on. I think it's about time that we establish a policy regarding this. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 14:05, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Meh, I don't think a policy is necessary. The Inqs will just keep voting to remove these noms, and they'll get off the page within a day or two.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 03:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (Inquisitors only)
 * 1) A lot of work still to be done on this, and Czethros hasn't touched it previously. Were this to stay here, it would be a very long, ugly process to get this to pass.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  03:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Would greatly benefit from another run through the GAN process before it's ever ready for FAN. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Took a glance at it, and it is severely lacking, fails to meet basic FAN requirements.  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 23:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Let's let the AgriCorps tear this ship a new... porthole before anyone even thinks of FANing it. --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 23:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)