Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights

This page is for requests for user rights.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Requests for rollback
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * 4) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * 5) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Questions

 * 1) Why should you be granted rollback rights?

Jedimasterfiolli (15 admins + 8 users/0/0)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends 3 July 2009.

Support
> JangFett  Talk 23:44, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Good, active user, who's been around for a couple of years now. By his own admission, he's not as much of a recent changes patroller as others, but he has demonstrated that he can be trusted to use it responsibly and I can't see any reason for him not to have the tool at his disposal when required. Green Tentacle (Talk) 22:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Bene! Optime! Graestan ( Talk ) 22:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 22:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Imperialles 22:17, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 22:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) "This guy's not an admin yet?" Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) Well, of course! Cylka  -talk- 22:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) Yada-yada candy ©  Mauser  Comlink 22:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) Geez, how long until everyone becomes an admin? :p Per GT. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 22:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 10)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 23:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) Candy candy yada yada.  CC7567  (talk) 01:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 12)  Grunny  ( Talk ) 01:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) —Xwing328 (Talk) 02:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) Havac 03:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 15) Dangit, that crazy Russian stole my line. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 03:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) Per Mauser. jSarek 03:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 17)  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 03:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 18)  OLIOSTER  (talk) Imperial Emblem.svg 11:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 20:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Per Mauser and CC <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * 1) Per Tranner. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 23:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Per everyone. - Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 07:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Candy-flavored pasta? Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 15:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Optional candidate Q&A

 * Accepted nomination on IRC. Green Tentacle (Talk) 22:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Requests for adminship
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have two years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * 4) They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * 5) They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * 6) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 7) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 8) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
 * 9) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * 10) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

Questions
Here are some general adminship questions. They are 100% optional, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them. :)

Requests for bureaucratship
Rules:
 * Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.


 * 1) They are an administrator.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * 3) They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 6) Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month&mdash;from the day the nomination is put forth&mdash;are counted).
 * 7) Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 8) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.