Wookieepedia:Good article nominations



This page is for the nomination of good articles. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of good articles, see Category:Wookieepedia good articles.

What is a Good article?
A Good article is an article that adheres to quality standards, but cannot reach FA status due to its limited content.

A Good article has the following attributes.

1. It is well written. In this respect:


 * (a) it has compelling prose, and is readily comprehensible to non-specialist readers;
 * (b) it follows a logical structure, introducing the topic and then grouping together its coverage of related aspects; where appropriate, it contains a succinct lead section summarizing the topic, and the remaining text is organized into a system of hierarchical sections (particularly for longer articles);
 * (c) it follows the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies;
 * (d) necessary technical terms or jargon are briefly explained in the article itself, or an active link is provided.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect:


 * (a) it provides references to any and all sources used for its material;
 * (b) sources should be selected in accordance with the guidelines for reliable sources;
 * (c) it contains no elements of original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage, addressing all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FA, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed);.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. In this respect:


 * (a) viewpoints are represented fairly and without bias;
 * (b) all significant points of view are fairly presented, but not asserted, particularly where there are or have been conflicting views on the topic.

5. It is stable, i.e., it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic. In this respect:


 * (a) the images are properly sourced and have succinct and descriptive captions;
 * (b) a lack of images does not in itself prevent an article from achieving Good Article status.

Nomination of Good articles
To nominate an article for Good article status, list it here. Nominated articles must meet all six requirements stated above. If an article has a net total of five votes of support (+5) after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the template. The talk page will also be tagged with the GA template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations please see here.

(+2)
Support
 * 1) Nominated. Sourced more or less everything and crammed in all info as I could think of in there. Unit 8311 17:38, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  13:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Goodwood  [[Image:Rebsymbol2.png|20px]] ( For the Rebellion! ) 14:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Good enough.  Stake black   msg 20:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) I haven't read it, but there's no unsourced statements in the infobox. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 17:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) From the Forest of Goodwood:
 * 3) * Quote is not sourced.
 * 4) * Infobox needs to be fully sourced.
 * 5) **Source tag needed for name (as in the name given for "Model").
 * 6) * The sentence "The Variable Geometry Self-Propelled Battle Droid, Mark I, or Vulture droid starfighter, was a lethal droid starfighter used by the Trade Federation[4] and later, in much vaster numbers, the Confederacy of Independent Systems." needs to be rewritten for clarity and grammar.
 * 7) * "Lethal" in above example is POV.
 * 8) * Grammatical error here: "and could reach 1200 km/h in an planet's atmosphere." Link to atmosphere also needed.
 * 9) * Please break up and/or reword this sentence: "While in this walking mode, a droid starfighter could also latch onto surfaces in zero gravity, allowing the fighters to patrol from the outside hulls of capital ships instead of wasting energy in flight or using valuable hangar space."
 * 10) * The third paragraph in the Description section is a single sentence. Either merge it with another paragraph or expand.
 * 11) * Same for the last paragraph.
 * 12) * Prose issues throughout the article.
 * 13) * Please rewrite the BtS section, clarifying the mechanics of the Battlefront games in relation to vulture droids.
 * 14) * Last two statements in BtS need to be sourced and could possibly be expanded (first from the specific Clone Wars episode, second from the games).
 * 15) *TIMMMMMMBERRRRRRR!!-- Goodwood [[Image:Rebsymbol2.png|20px]] ( For the Rebellion! ) 21:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) **Just when I thought everything was sorted...okay, quote sourced, infobox sourced, done, done, done, done that, done that, that as well, please clarify what you mean by prose isssues--as far as I'm concerned, the prose is nice, formal and encylopedic, done that. Unit 8311 09:23, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) ***Though there's a couple small nuggets yet to fix, thank you for addressing these objections. The article is much better for it.-- Goodwood [[Image:Rebsymbol2.png|20px]] ( For the Rebellion! ) 01:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) ****BTS sourced, I think the source for that is the NEGVV, but could somebody please do me a favour and check. Unit 8311 18:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) *****There. EVERYTHING is now sourced. There is now no reason why this should not become a GA. Unit 8311 11:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) ******You'll notice it's called Good Article, and not Sourced Article. Being sourced is not the only factor involved in an article becoming a GA; being well-written and comprehensive is as important (I'm not saying this article lacks said requirement; just a general comment). -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) No info from the NEGTV&V. I'm sure some info could be added from some of the non-referenced appearances/sources. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) *Oh for...just like before, I don't own the NEGVV, but I'm sure any information from there is already in the article. In any case, it's far more comprehensive than it once was. And doing the second one would make the article, as you once said, very 'listy'. Unit 8311 20:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) *Whether or not you own the book is irrelevant. And "far more comprehensive" than it once was does not mean it is comprehensive enough. And unless you or someone else trustworthy can categorically tell me that no additional info can be added from it, then my objection stands (I would do it myself, but I don't own the book). I'm sure you can add the info without making it listy. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) **I can check, and add any missing info.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) ***Please do that Chack, I would appreciate it. Unit 8311 20:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) ****Just checked and almost everything appears to already be covered in the article. I added a small bit from the book, and now it looks good.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 27) *****Okay, that objection's been struck. Just noticed an unsourced statement in the infobox which needs fixing; other objection stands, I'm afraid, at least for the moment. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) ******Sorted that. I'll see what I can do about the other one, Your Fishiness. :) Unit 8311 21:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 29) Baktoid Armor Workshop in the infobox needs a reference tag. I'm pretty sure this is the same thing that Ack mentioned above ;)  Greyman ( Paratus ) 20:04, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 30) *Sorted that. Unit 8311 15:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 31) Toprawa says:
 * 32) * The intro nees to be expanded, including a mention that they participated heavily in the Clone Wars, and particularly important battles.
 * 33) * Rephrase this sentence. I don't like when sentences start off with "but": "But the Trade Federation solved this issue by sending Vulture droids into battle in timed, rotating swarms."
 * 34) * Rephrase this. Is there such thing as a non-deadly blaster cannon? "In combat, these wings split up to reveal these deadly blaster cannons."
 * 35) * What do you mean "they were followed by"? Rephrase: "The blaster cannons were followed by two energy torpedo launchers that would weaken enemy targets before the starfighter delivered a laser cannon barrage"
 * 36) * I dislike the way you begin this section. It seems like you stole this sentence right out of a source. Don't assume the reader knows what happened at Naboo, especially considering you didn't link anything to a specific battle: "Like the Armored Assault Tank and other Trade Federation vehicles, the droid starfighter endured rigorous testing before its deployment at Naboo."
 * 37) * Do a better job of going through and making sure important things, i.e. battles, are linked.
 * 38) * This sentence is confusing. Rephrase: "were also produced by bodies such as Baktoid rather than their original Xi Char developers"
 * 39) * This sounds awkward: "They were deployed by the Confederacy forces in their millions against"
 * 40) * Oh, please do not link something to Wikipedia in the main article body. This is acceptable in the BTS only. If you've done this somewhere else that I've missed, get rid of it: "General Grievous also used them for suicide attacks designed to sow chaos, by making them perform kamikaze attacks on civilian targets"
 * 41) * At the end of the first paragraph in the "Clone Wars" section, you structure three sentences in a row in identical fashion, by using "also." Reword.
 * 42) * Capitalize "Clone Wars": "Years after the clone wars"
 * 43) * Reword this empty construction, "of this": "However, the Galactic Empire learned of this"
 * 44) * Include where the droid first appeared in the BTS. Hint: I'm guessing it's not the Episode I novel. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 45) **My mistake, I meant to say "not the Episode I movie." Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 46) **Groan...fine, sorted all of that. Just one thing--this sentence is confusing. Rephrase were also produced...etc''...er, how is that confusing? Unit 8311 18:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 47) ***Further work on the unstricken objections is still needed. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 48) ****Done now. So, is the article finally worthy? Unit 8311 19:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 49) *****One objection remains. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 50) ******Done that--is it what you had in mind? Unit 8311 21:12, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 51) Some more things:
 * 52) *Reposition the images to they alternate from left-right down the page.
 * 53) * Position the last image at the bottom of the page so it is within the appearances scroll box.
 * 54) * Reposition the new "first appearance" BTS info at the top of that section, and properly format the "Episode I" title, including it's full name in italics. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 55) **Done. Anything else? Unit 8311 18:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 56) ***Need to throw a ref at the end of the Ep 1 novel appearance info, as with the other BTS info. Also, the last two pictures within the article body itself are still poorly positioned. You need to stick the Naboo pic somewhere farther up the article, still on the right side, which can be difficult, I understand, given the small amount of information. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:48, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 57) ****Think that's kinda pointless, but still done. I've adjusted the two pics so they look better positioned on my browser, but I can't do anything else about it without repositioning them to the wrong sections. Nonetheless, that's sort of sorted, and it's not totally ruining the article anyway. Unit 8311 21:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 58) *****Since it's clear the pics don't fit well, one of them needs to go. I suggest the Naboo pic, since it's pretty much identical to the infobox picture. Also, make sure the source list is in chronological order by date of OOU publication. The Databank entry needs to be the last thing in the list. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 59) ******Naboo pic chucked out, then. Sources ordered. Anything else you've got to throw at me? Unit 8311 22:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'd just like to point out that everything has to be sourced to be a GA, not just "oh, well, most of it is, why not?" Please don't nominate an article if you recognise everything is not sourced. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 17:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure about this, but shouldn't the intro be left unsourced?  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 23:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * If possible, yes. It is not hard to put the information that one wants to source into the actual body of the article in question, thus creating a clean looking introduction. However, there are a small number of examples where this doesn't work. This should answer any questions about where/when to source. Cheers, Greyman ( Paratus ) 01:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Just curious, but what was the consensus on sourcing the name? Does it need to be ref'd or not? Hobbes ( Tiger's Lair ) 19:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The main name doesn't need to be referenced in the infobox, if that's what you're talking about. However, there's nothing wrong with providing a citation for it in the main body of the article, if it's something you feel requires one. Greyman ( Paratus ) 20:03, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Heh, that was a bit of stupidity on my part. Goodwood objected to the name not being sourced earlier, and I didn't notice that it was sourced in the infobox. He forgot to strike the objection, and I thought it might have just slipped his mind, so I commented. Never mind. Hobbes ( Tiger's Lair ) 00:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

I would nominate this article for sure! It's one of the most comprehensive articles I've read! Two thumbs up! Oh, yeah, and I don't really think that one missed source or whatever it was is a super huge deal! Keep up the good work!J Wilson 05:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)J Wilson
 * Unit, I wish you wouldn't take criticism for your articles so begrudgingly. You can't really expect to submit something and not have people object towards it. Accept criticism with open arms, for we are here to help turn articles into the best condition possible. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Per T&R. Moaning about objections is unlikely to make the objector want to strike them. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know. I'm just not in the best mood today, that's all. I just want to thank you for helping me make the article better. Unit 8311 19:53, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

(+3)
Support
 * 1) Sourced everything, images sourced, expanded much of the article. Unit 8311 19:01, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Well detailed, well written, has enough images without going nuts, looks like a good one to me. Jedibob5 22:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC) (Vote struck per Single issue voters policy.  Greyman ( Paratus ) 01:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC))
 * 1)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  22:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Darthtyler http://images.wikia.com/swfanon/images/1/18/Scuba_Diver.gif Talk 05:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Kilson 07:03, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Domlith 10:13, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  Stake black   msg 19:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Just from a quick glance:
 * 2) *The "Droideka series and variants" should be expanded somewhat to discuss the main differences between the models mentioned -- right now, that section does not meet GAN rule 1(a).
 * 3) * The BtS needs to be de-triviaized, and the bullets need to be removed -- again, per rule 1(a).
 * 4) * The two pictures in the "Appearances" section need to be incorporated into the main body or removed entirely. Remember that pictures need to support text so as not to break Fair Use.
 * 5) *Still way to many pictures&mdash;article looks cramped and cluttered. See comment above this.
 * 6) * Having two pictures in the "Description" section makes it looked cluttered. The best of the two should be picked and enlarged a tiny bit to fill the space.
 * 7) * All reference links need to be linked per policy.
 * Greyman ( Paratus ) 16:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) *Done that, done that, done that, to me it doesn't look cluttered--not on my browser anyway, done that. Unit 8311 21:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) **Simply moving the pictures from the Appearances section up a bit has now cluttered that section&mdash;two pictures in the "Droideka series and variants" section are not needed at all. Not every picture of a Droideka needs to be included in the article&mdash;only the ones that support the text. Likewise, I still feel that the same applies to the "Description" section, especially since I'm looking at it from three different browsers + two different computers and it still looks cramped. Also, the "Droideka series and variants" objection still has not been met: What's the main differences between the P, W, and Q series? Right now, Rule 1(a) is still not met there as those three sentences should be expanded. The Grapple model -- You say "melee", but does that mean that it was strictly a hand-to-hand fighting droid? Any information on why they were made? etc. The BtS looks good, no further concerns there, and the reference links as well. Greyman ( Paratus ) 22:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Okay, done that, done that, no major differences between those series are ever specified, clarified that. Unit 8311 08:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ****I've cut down slightly and rearranged the images. It doesn't look particularly cluttered any more to me. Unit 8311 18:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Seems a bit listy, with lots of small paragraphs. I'd like to see some of them fleshed out or merged, preferably the former. Could also be expanded a bit, I reckon; no real info from the NEGTD or Galaxies. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) *Doesn't seem listy to me. In any case, I've added in a bit more info from galaxies. Most information from the NEGTVV is recycled from previous sources to the best of my knowledge, and in any case I don't own it. Unit 8311 20:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) **There are many two or three line paragraphs. I'm sure more info could be added from Galaxies, though consider that part of my objection null. Per above, if you can categorically state that no info can be added from the NEGTV&V, then I'll strike it. Otherwise, it stays. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:26, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Toprawa says:
 * 9) *The intro needs to be expanded.
 * 10) *There are too many pictures given the limited amount of article text. Remove some so that the pictures alternate from left to right down the body of the page.
 * 11) *I severely dislike the way you incorporated the origin of the word into parentheses. Shorten what you have in parentheses to just the alternative names, and include the description of how the name came to be in the article.
 * 12) *Clean up this quote caption: "Obi-Wan Kenobi, upon seeing a droideka upon Saak'ak"
 * 13) *What is this hiding in the "Editing" view of the article? "" Seems important enough to incorporate into the article.
 * 14) *Bullet points in the article? Unnecessary, especially in this case. Incorporate the bulleted items into prose.
 * 15) *Expand the BTS, including notable appearances, etc.
 * 16) *The "Description" section is poorly written in general, specifically:
 * 17) *The section is in need of a better written introductory sentence.
 * 18) *You kind of jump into the idea that droidekas were produced as a sort of improved alternative to B1's. Expand on and clarify this.
 * 19) *Rephrase, clarify this: "These shield generators were somewhat powerful"
 * 20) *Clean up this phrase; it is confusing and rather POVish: "light-based trickery"
 * 21) *Move their origin and creators to the beginning of the section, then rename the section to correspond with this restructuring
 * 22) *Avoid this one sentence paragraph: "Droideka dispensers were sometimes used as transport and dispense for these droids." Expand on what a droideka dispenser is.
 * 23) *Granted this is not a FAN, but it still seems like there is much too little information considering the length of the appearance list. A much more expansive history section is needed.
 * 24) *Move the Databank source entry to the bottom of that list. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 25) **Yay, another list of complaints. Okay, sorted most of that, but I have some things to say: clean up this phrase; it is confusing, etc, etc...how is that confusing and POV-ish? And as for the history section, as I said below, I can add some more if I delve deep enough, but bearing in mind that lots of droideka appearances are essentially background decoration, I feel it would simply clutter it up. Nonetheless, I will expand it by a bit. Also, regarding your complaint about the name origin in the intro, I disagree, and I feel that there is nothing wrong with it. Unit 8311 18:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * Considering the number of appearances and sources, I think the Clone Wars section should be expanded.  Stake black   msg 12:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but I don't own every single EU piece involving the Clone Wars. Most of those appearances are probably just background ones anyway, and mentioning every single one would turn the Clone Wars section into a long list of battles droidekas appeared in. Unit 8311 13:37, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, that makes sense :)  Stake black   msg 19:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

(+1)
Support
 * 1) Nominated.  Stake black   msg 19:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Eh.. bullets in the BTS?. Change to prose, please.  Hobbes ( Tiger's Lair ) 01:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Thanks for the tip. ^^  Stake black   msg 17:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) From the Forest of Goodwood:
 * 4) *The article's first sentence: "The Battle of Korriban was a major conflict in 14 ABY, during the Disciples of Ragnos crisis", needs to be rewritten and either expanded to form another paragraph, or merged into the one following it.
 * 5) *"In Korriban"? Don't you mean "on" Korriban?
 * 6) *Tense issues in the introduction: "the Disciples have gathered themselves" needs to be fixed.
 * 7) *The entire introduction is very badly-written and in dire need of a rewrite; its basically two run-on sentences.
 * 8) *The main body could be greatly expanded, so much so that this could even squeak by the 1,000-word Featured Article barrier. As it is, there are three stubby paragraphs and one long one; this needs to be corrected/expanded.
 * 9) *This sentence: "The Disciples of Ragnos gathered on Korriban, as Tavion Axmis began the process of using the Scepter of Ragnos to try and resurrect Marka Ragnos herself" reads awkwardly.
 * 10) *I'd like to see a "Prelude" section added that touches on the events that led to the battle itself, such as the rescue of Rosh Penin and other, related events from the game.
 * 11) *This sentence: "An army of Jedi was dispatched from Luke Skywalker's Jedi Praxeum to Korriban." smacks of OR (Original Research), which is verboten. There was no "army of Jedi", it was the current class of students.
 * 12) *I have problems with this statement: "An epic battle erupted between light and dark Force users, as the Jedi battled the Disciples of Ragnos across the desert and tombs of the Valley of the Dark Lords." First of all, it's a deep mountain gorge, not a desert, and second, there needs to be more detail here, broken up into different sentences, that follows the storyline of the final level in JK:JA.
 * 13) *I can't see there being a lack of quotes to add to the article; there should be one for the intro and at least (bare minimum) one more for the body.
 * 14) *Grammatical error in this sentence: "Jaden Korr, who had just left Taspir III, landed on the planet and met a few of his Jedi fellow trainees, including the Jedi student."
 * 15) *The "Cult of Ragnos Campaign" box needs to be added at the top of the "Battle" infobox, or at least centered.
 * 16) *Please remove this sentence: "It is unknown if the Jedi student actually survived." Such statements are frowned upon.
 * 17) *The last paragraph of the Battle section needs revision. The order seems mixed-up and the writing is awkward.
 * 18) *"As Korriban was the graveyard for the Sith, it became for the Disciples of Ragnos as well—and Tavion with them." Err, that's a bit of a non-sequitur, methinks, given a certain person's persistence.
 * 19) *Last sentence of the Aftermath section is a run-on and reads awkwardly. Truncating the Star Destroyer link thusly, and adding a link to Imperial Remnant is desirable as well.
 * 20) *Image placement issues.
 * 21) *While we're at it, can we get a shot of Jaden vs. Tavion inside the tomb, or perhaps one of Ragnos' spirit?
 * 22) *Last sentence of BtS section is blatant OR. Please remove.
 * 23) *TIMMMMMBERRRRRRRR!!!-- Goodwood [[Image:Rebsymbol2.png|20px]] ( For the Rebellion! ) 22:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) **Okay, I've re-written most of the article. What do you reckon?  Stake black   msg 17:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * Err, no offense... but this is not even close. Expect a laundry list when I get back from work.-- Goodwood [[Image:Rebsymbol2.png|20px]] ( For the Rebellion! ) 12:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I know it's not good. But I want it to become a good article, so criticism is most welcome. Cheers.  Stake black   msg 19:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, and please don't take this list personally. It would be advisable in future to make sure you've done all that you think possible to improve an article before nominating it for Good or Featured status.-- Goodwood [[Image:Rebsymbol2.png|20px]] ( For the Rebellion! ) 22:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem, mate. I'll try to fix those things, thanks for pointing out. Btw, what do you mean by "OR" in the last sentence of the BtS section? Cheers.  Stake black   msg 23:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Original Research, which is not allowed on Wookieepedia. Hobbes ( Tiger's Lair ) 02:29, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

(+4)
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 10:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 01:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Cull Tremayne 10:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * 1) A few things from around the Family-sized pasta bowl of Fiolli:
 * 2) * First sentence is not really clear as to what is ambiguous, the species or the planet. A personal preference of mine would be to not use parenthesis in this situation.
 * 3) * Intro paragraph: perhaps mention their heightened culture as a reason they viewed the rest of the Galaxy as unrefined.
 * 4) * B&A starts right into "Their bodies&hellip;." A reiteration of the species name might be useful.
 * 5) * B&A also makes no prose statements about species type or size of the being.
 * 6) * Were "finicky" and "meticulous" used in a source or spoken by a person? If so, a quote might be nice in this section to amplify it. Also, the sentence that contains those words does not seem to be NPoV, even though they are in quotes; Perhaps it should state that their attitudes or actions gave rise to the species being labeled such?
 * 7) * The home planet is not mentioned in the S&C section.
 * 8) * "In the Galaxy" section should probably restate that the species, for the most part, was either isolated from the Galaxy or did not travel. Whichever is better, I am not certain.
 * 9) * The information about Plo Koon, I thought, came from Tales not Jedi Chef. If it is Tales, it should be marked with the ambig tags or moved to BtS if still relevant.
 * 10) **Jedi Chef is Tales. --Eyrezer 08:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) *** My apologies, but I believe it should still be marked with ambig tags.  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 16:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) *Kudos for finding some relatively obscure information and making an article out of limited resources.  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 16:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 13) **I think I've dealt to all of these now - except the Tales tag. I purposely worded it vaguely enough that I don't think it needs the tags. --Eyrezer 22:53, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) ***Thank you. Nice work.  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 01:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I checked Rebellion, and the species is not mentioned. Only Sabodor is given a mention. I might consider removing the Rebellion appearance. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

(+3)
Support Oppose
 * 1) A little short, but a nice complement to Tarrin Datch. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I agree. More ESB articles, please. Graestan ( Talk ) 23:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer 04:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments

(+3)
Support
 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 10:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) ;-) --Azizlight 22:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I wish I could go there someday... Harrar 19:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  20:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Source the infobox exports. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * Beat, et al. Thefourdotelipsis 10:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

(+4)
Support
 * 1) Harrar 19:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I like these because my knowledge of the NJO is somewhat lacking.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) "However, S'yito was alerted that something may have been amiss by the unusual fact that a sabacc game was taking place (as cover for Cracken and Page) while the prisoners ate their food." Avoid parentheses. If it's important enough to be in the article, insert it somewhere. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) *I wiped the pitiful parentheses from the face of the article. Harrar 21:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Yo.
 * 4) * "S'yito was assigned to the prison planet of Selvaris, holding the rank of subaltern and a subordinate of the penal colony's chief officer, Malik Carr." Please rephrase, perhaps as two separate sentences.
 * 5) *Move "Speaking fluent Basic" to the next sentence.
 * 6) * Very impressive for how minor a character he is.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 22:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) **I have done all that you seek. I was surprised as well about the amount of info there, but he does get one POV scene and appears in five or so others. Knowing Luceno's penchant for immersive continuity, he'll probably appear again in a later novel! Harrar 19:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * Another character. But a Yuuzhan Vong character! Harrar 19:26, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * How do you pronounce this anyways? Sy-eeto? Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:42, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Not too sure&mdash;there are several possibilities. I reckon it's sharper on the 's', maybe "Tsi-toe"? We can but guess. Harrar 19:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I might recommend asking Chack to strike this directly on his talk page. I think he's taking a vacation, and may not see this for a while. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

(+5)
Support
 * 1) Harrar 22:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) And non-Yuuzhan Vong related (for the most part)!  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 22:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Very nice, Harrar. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:59, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Good, good. Kill him. Kill him now.-- Goodwood [[Image:Rebsymbol2.png|20px]] ( Alliance Intelligence ) 02:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 21:15, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * To make up for S'yito, a planet! Harrar 22:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

(+4)
Support Object
 * 1) As nominator-- Goodwood [[Image:Rebsymbol2.png|20px]] ( Alliance Intelligence ) 19:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 20:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 01:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * Something I meant to do a looooooong time ago.-- Goodwood [[Image:Rebsymbol2.png|20px]] ( Alliance Intelligence ) 19:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)