Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

X-1 (assassin)

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number one!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Hey there! Since the article has an intro, keep in mind that the body operates entirely independent of the intro --- that is, everything that's been established in the intro needs to also be established in the body. As such, it's usually a good idea to begin the body similar to the intro, with something like "X-1 was an assassin..." Right now, the body starts out by talking about Rezi Soresh, and it's kind of like "Wait, who?" The body also doesn't mention that X-1 was created by Soresh, just that he was used by him.
 * Got rid of intro on all of the articles. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Does he die? "Dispatched with a vibroblade" makes it seem like he does. Menkooroo 16:17, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Replaced with the less ambiguous phrase, "killed". --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Excellent! A couple more: "Soresh wiped their identities from the system"... what system?
 * Not too sure what system it is referring to. The sentence in the book is "...had their former identities completely wiped from the system..." Some sort of universal Empire identification system I'm guessing. Not to sure how to say that. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 21:34, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Consider putting it in your own words, and making it seem less vague. You can do it! :) Menkooroo 05:58, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Is it true that X-7 was already Soresh's personal assassin in 7 BBY (per Nahdar's comment below)? If so, isn't it fair to say that X-1 died before 7 BBY?
 * In my research, I can't find any mention to anything prior to the Battle of Yavin concerning X-7 or any of the others. I'm not 100% completely acquainted with everything said in the books so I may be mistaken. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 21:34, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Might be worth asking on Nahdar's talk page if that info is indeed from the book. Menkooroo 05:58, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * The only other thing I would recommend would be to make some revisions to all of the other X-articles you have nommed so that they're not just the same article copied and pasted six times. It's better to write a unique article each time that gets the same important points across, but in a different way. I'm currently doing the same thing with a bunch of similar articles, see here here and here if you want to get a better idea of what I'm talking about --- same points, different sentences expressing them. Make sense? Menkooroo 20:44, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Will try and take this into account. I don't have that much time, so writing six different articles about the same points will be fairly difficult for me. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 21:34, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * It won't be as difficult as it seems --- just change the sentences around so that the wording isn't exactly the same, ya know? Menkooroo 05:58, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like SavageBob did that job for me, thanks for that! --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 05:49, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've splitted the article into two sections. IMO, it looks better this way, but feel free to revert it if you disagree. If the sectioning is good for you, please put the appropriate ref at the end of the first section. Darth Morrt 03:24, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 04:47, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Does the source give X-1's species? Darth Morrt 03:24, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * No mention of species anywhere. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 04:47, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same objections as X-2, below. ~ SavageBob 18:06, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 05:49, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Comments For all clones of Project Omega: Soresh didn't train them to hunt Skywalker. X-7 serves him seven years before the Death Star blows up. Nahdar Vebb 21:34, December 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Got rid of it. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

X-2

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number two!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Same objections as above (both mine and Nahdar's). If he dies, "Death" should be listed in the infobox. Aaaand the other stuff too. Menkooroo 02:33, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Death date is added to all articles now --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Please check your link for male; it should probably be pipelinked to sexes.
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 05:49, February 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * "six other men" -- were they indeed all male? Star Wars stuff tends to avoid using words like "men" and "women," I suppose because they seem to imply human. Perhaps change the word to "beings" or "people"? ~ SavageBob 17:51, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * The sentence in the book is "The young men obey." According to Wikipedia, "men" is refers to a Human, whilst "male" refers to the gender. X-7 also is a human, so I'm gonna be bold and change the species of them. Thanks for the copy-edit btw. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 05:49, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

X-3

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number three!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Like above. Menkooroo 02:33, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same as X-2. ~ SavageBob 17:51, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 05:49, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

X-4

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number four!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Same as above. Menkooroo 02:34, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same as X-2. ~ SavageBob 17:52, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 05:49, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

X-5

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number five!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * And again. Death, intro/bio separation, clarification of what year they were trained. Menkooroo 02:34, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Year isn't specified, "prior to Battle of Yavin" is what I said. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same as X-2. ~ SavageBob 17:52, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 05:49, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

X-6

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number six! Not doing X-7 cause I'm lazy.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * One more time. Death, intro/bio separation, clarification of what year they were trained. Menkooroo 02:35, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same as X-2. ~ SavageBob 17:53, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 05:49, February 1, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Anti-Alien League

 * Nominated by:  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Something different for a change.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Gorton Colu has a CSWE entry and is mentioned in the KOTOR Strategy Guide --- do you know if either of those sources mention the Anti-alien league?
 * Nope, no mention in the CSWE.
 * Strategy Guide? SoresuMakashi might be able to help you out; he GA'd Colu.
 * I'll see if he can help.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Let me know when you find out whether or not the league is mentioned (directly or indirectly) in the strategy guide. Menkooroo 04:45, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * "The Anti-Alien League was a Humanocentrist group formed by Gorton Colu" is currently sourced to The Essential Atlas.
 * Resourced.
 * I could and should fix this one myself, but it'll be handy for you to know if you don't already: Only use punctuation in image captions if it's a complete sentence. Menkooroo 02:43, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:06, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Rubefacient
 * Context of Taris's multiple cities should be added.
 * Done.
 * Mention that aliens were prohibited from UpCity under normal conditions. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * There needs to be a year in the intro
 * Try now.
 * I'm sorry, I was confused by the banner. Because of that banner, I think this should be made with a History section to avoid the dissonance caused by it. I'll not force you to, but it would probably be beneficial. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved the image over. Does this help?
 * Greatly. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * You say the league was mentioned in the game in the body but say it appeared in the BTS.
 * Corrected.
 * Because the article assumes 100% completion, you do not need the clause saying he could be avoided. That is, unless you include the alternate dialogue tracks (which you should).
 * Alternate dialogue tracks? There are no others that mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Revan can ignore the man, can agree with his speciesism, or tell him to screw off. Which of these elicits the mention? If it is the lattermost, remove the portion saying that Colu mentioned it to Revan and say that he could mention it to Revan given the proper dialogue in the BTS. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe he mentions it the first time Revan talks to him (and before any dialogue choices come up).  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:26, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Then say that Revan can choose not to speak to him. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 13:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the runaround. I couldn't wrap my head around it the right way. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Speciesism FTW NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:17, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Also, guest nom for WP:KOTOR.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:58, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Ryssk

 * Nominated by: SinisterSamurai 17:36, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I could never hold onto Asia.

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 03:30, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Start with Australia! Actually, better yet, play Catan instead. Menkooroo 17:28, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Take Park Place and Boardwalk! Pamper your enemies with the finest of hotels! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:45, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) From the Star Forge
 * 2) * Context on Mika Anjiliac Chiera.
 * 3) **Done. SinisterSamurai 15:07, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * "Era" means publishing era, in this case Rise of the Empire era.
 * 5) **Changed the infobox, which is what I assume you mean. CSWE specifically says early ears of the New Order. For the sake of accuracy, the Bts bit shouldn't be changed. SinisterSamurai 15:07, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * No mention is given of when Ryssk worked for Mika in the body of the article.
 * 7) **Added SinisterSamurai 15:07, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) * Context on Tempest Feud.
 * 9) **Added SinisterSamurai 15:07, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) * Maybe context on Dosh.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:12, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) **Dosh's context is that it is something that can be spoken. SinisterSamurai 15:07, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) * "In the early years of the Galactic Empire" is currently sourced to Tempest Feud.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 22:30, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) **I am ashamed to have missed that. SinisterSamurai 01:15, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) Crossed the Rubecon
 * 15) * "Ryssk was an apt pilot, navigator, and mechanic, was proficient in stealth and demolitions, and spoke both Galactic Basic Standard and Dosh" This is a triple "and." Break it up.
 * 16) **How's that? A quick Google search indicates that there are almost no correct alternatives for "and" when using it to link nouns and noun phrases in a lsit. SinisterSamurai 16:56, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) ***How you do it doesn't matter, there shouldn't be more than one in a sentence; two at the most, and only when dealing with a lengthier list. For an example, you may say "he was a skilled pilot and mechanic, as well as a demolitions specialist" in some other article. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:07, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) **** No, I meant: "How does that change I made suit you?" I broke a single sentence with three lists into two sentences. Still three lists (Skills, skill-titles, and languages) between them. SinisterSamurai 21:31, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) *****Your solution was fine. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:45, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) * "Tempest Feud, an adventure published for Wizards of the Coast's roleplaying game in early 2002, is written to take place in any era." Connect this sentence to Ryssk's appearance in the source. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:32, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) **Rearranged. Ryssk's connection to TF is detailed before Era discussion, rather than after. SinisterSamurai 16:56, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) ***Does his gender neutrality really deserve its own "paragraph"? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:07, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 23) ****I felt it was worth mentioning that "he" doesn't have a canon gender. 1, as a way of explaining to the reader/reviewer why I don't use "He" or "She" in the article, and 2 because I felt it was a notable fact. I gave it its own paragraph because I don't recognize it as being part of the same point about whether or not Ryssk hunted the players, nor as part of the point about when the adventure took place. I understood that to be a requirement for what necessitates a separate paragraph. Is that not correct? SinisterSamurai 21:31, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 24) * You need to say this took place in the early years of the Galactic Empire in the body. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:09, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 25) **It does say that in the body, unless I'm misunderstanding you. SinisterSamurai 21:35, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 26) ***Sorry, I missed it because of the break. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:45, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments According to Cut & Paste Word Count, the article content is 236 words long. SinisterSamurai 17:36, January 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * If you add some context, address the objections and add an intro, the article will be more then 250, so eligible for being a short GA. Darth Morrt 11:36, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Current count is 246. I feel that an introduction would simply be repetitious. In Tempest Feud, Ryssk is one part of a short paragraph and a single statblock. I promise you that the IU information in the article is already stretched to the limit, short of additional context. And context is something I'm wary of. I have other articles where entire paragraphs are used simply to establish context. Since it is something that could be added almost infinitely, small articles can be easily drowned by context. (What is a grenade? What is an ion? What is a Hutt? What is a hyperdrive? What is the Empire? What is a Palpatine? What is a bounty hunter? What is a Trandoshan? Why is your article on Galactic history titled after such a minor part of it?) SinisterSamurai 15:07, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Most recent count is 235. SinisterSamurai 16:57, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

Black Sun Ace fighter helmet

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 02:26, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A very cool helmet from SWG.

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Provided the below is remedied. As far as the helmet goes, eh. A Guri faceplate would have been better. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 09:04, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:10, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Menkooroo 12:07, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) * The last part of the body ("spacers who had looted it from the wreckages of a destroyed Black Sun vessel") implies all the spacers looted it from one ship.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 03:36, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) **Better?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 20:51, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Much better.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:10, February 4, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Other than a redirect, your user page, and the CAN page, this page is orphaned. Can you link to it in some other pages? Preferably some IU pages as well as the "Appearances" section of Star Wars Galaxies. Menkooroo 02:56, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added it to the SWG article. Any suggestions for IU article?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 07:11, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, no. I couldn't find anything suitable. :P Also! Sorry for not objecting to this before, but does the helmet cover your entire face? If so, could you make a note of that in the article, so as to indicate that it's not just a head-helmet? Menkooroo 11:17, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Added.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 11:23, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

Tenant

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:11, February 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: His first name is "David." It is canon, canon, CANON!

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 02:59, February 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Guest nom for WP:TCW.

Sossen-7 sublight engine

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:42, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: VROOOOOMMMM VEEEERRRRRR-YUUUUMMMMM VUUURRRR!

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 05:05, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Seems like there are a few more indirect appearances, as well as some  to be added to the "Sources" section. Menkooroo 03:46, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I put just the appearances confirmed by the Databank. It seemed logical to me that it would still be there in the others, but I wasn't sure that would be appropriate. As for the sources, the engine is not referenced and is not pictured, so those would be inappropriate. That is, unless we can infer that those two jets jutting from each wing are the Sossens. The Databank confirms there is more than one on the skiff. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:05, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * If an appearance of the J-type star skiff in a film or TV episode is an indirect appearance for the engine, then why wouldn't a picture of the craft in something like Star Wars: Complete Cross-Sections be an indirect appearance as well? Menkooroo 04:25, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * I reason that it appearing in a source, such as TCW, is it in action, so that would constitute an indirect appearance. If we cannot say that those two jets are the Sossens, then a picture would be just a picture of the skiff itself. That would be like taking a picture of a ship and saying the landing gear indirectly appeared. Meanwhile, if the action were live, as it is in a books, and we know that the engine was installed on the ship at that time, that is an indirect appearance because it is obviously operating, IMO. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:51, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, according to our page on the RB, a J-type skiff does not appear in the Complete Cross-Sections. It says a J-type 327 Nubian royal starship appeared in Ep. 1, but no skiffs in Ep.3 (When this would be sourceable) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:03, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's a good point. Well-reasoned! Menkooroo 05:05, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'll let someone else make the official determination, but technically a guest nom for WP:TCW. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:27, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * With the adding of more TCW sources, it's evident. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:05, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Team Fondor

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Before I dispense with the sardonic comments, I point out these are not completely copied and pasted and the related articles are presented in pairs.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) You talk about bolo-ball coming home. And then, one night in Rome... we were strong. We had grown... Menkooroo 01:10, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Team Fwillsving

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: GO LAKERS

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 04:01, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Good job finding a stash of easy CA's. For great justice.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 11:57, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Team Kubindi

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: LOSERS! *detonates a thought bomb*

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) It could have been our songs in the street, it was nearly complete, it was nearly so sweet... Menkooroo 01:12, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Can you word this one differently than the previous one so that they're not identical? Removing the bit about Kerlay Utanks might be a good idea too; seems less relevant to go into detail about the celebrating fans when it's not Team Kubindi that they're celebrating. Menkooroo 04:03, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:23, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Team Kinyen

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: All your teams are belong to us.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Three lions on the shirt. Jules Rimet's still gleaming... Menkooroo 01:14, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Can you mention that their game against Yagh'dul was in the cup's opening round? Menkooroo 04:06, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. You'd like me to do this with the others? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:25, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes please. :) Also, might want to check again who won the match. Don't think it was Kinyen. :D Menkooroo 13:14, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Since the infobox doesn't really tell much, how do you feel about adding "Galactic Cup of Limmie" to the affiliation field? Might be a good way of establishing what exactly the team is in the infobox. Menkooroo 13:14, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:15, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Team Yag'Dhul

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: GO CATS!

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) You have no chance to survive make your time.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 12:02, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) No more years of hurt... no more need for dreaming. Menkooroo 01:17, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Team Kothlis

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The reason America doesn't like soccer.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) It's coming home, it's coming home, it's coming, Bolo-ball's coming home Menkooroo 05:07, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Team Ord Mantell

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Stealers.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) We still believe, we still believe, we still believe! We stiiilll believe. Menkooroo 05:08, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Team Tralus

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Saints.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) My baby takes the morning train! He works from nine 'till five, and then --- Menkooroo 05:10, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Team Ralltiir

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Seahawks. See? I didn't.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) He takes another home again! To find me waiting for him. Menkooroo 05:11, February 9, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Kerlay Utanks

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Don't even judge. If you were a character in a fictional universe (or, maybe, not so fictional), you'd do it too.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Onila Richblum

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Truly inspiring.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Rebel commando (brown hair)

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:50, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Just so I can say 15/30.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Wonder where he was going? Menkooroo 13:20, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) I know you liked the old picture, but this is for the best.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 03:52, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) *Best for what? The article or Wormie's reputation?! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:56, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) **The article, of course!  OLIOSTER  (talk) 09:51, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you give just a bit more context? Maybe establish that the briefing is happening, what its purpose is, and that this guy attended it, before you note that he left it. "He left the briefing room..." kinda comes out of nowhere.
 * If he's only seen during the briefing, can we really say that he served "during the Battle of Endor" ?
 * Can you mention that he was played by an uncredited actor in the bts? Menkooroo 04:18, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done, done, and done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:38, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * This shows him without that brown-haired Jedi. Darth Morrt 04:22, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Can we please leave the current one? It's amazing. It holds a special place in my heart. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:38, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with Morrt. The current one just looks too silly to me.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 11:28, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * That one would have to be brightened up. The current one has much better lighting. Menkooroo 13:20, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Brightened... NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:21, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Aurilian sculpture

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 08:42, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Something from the old SWG.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Dude... c-c-c-Combo Breaker. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:28, February 8, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Chiss poacher backpack

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 04:19, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Not as cool as the Rucksack of the Tusken King.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

CS-33 Firespray stun rifle

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 08:57, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Damn. Only got to combo-break two noms, not the ∞ that NaruHina managed. No CSWE.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

RCLU

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:23, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Republican Civil Liberties Union. Yes, I was as surprised as you are.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments