User talk:Cevan

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Cevan!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash; Stake black   msg 14:16, June 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * }

Appearances
Please do not simply change all of the links in Appearances lists to canon links. The App template has additional parameters, c-fieldname and l-fieldname, that should be used to differentiate the canon and Legends links. Additionally, most of the links in the Appearances list should not be changed to canon links as they are not named in the new canon. Cade   Calrayn  23:46, June 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * 90% of TCW content was given names in sources other than the actual episodes or episode guides, like characters, ship names, planet names, years, etc. You can't just overwrite the Legends information with NuCanon; information from both continuities must be presented. Also, concept art should not be used in the biography, as it's not actual canon/Legends-canon content. It's just behind the scenes stuff. Kanan's picture is not concept art; it's a cropped version of a promotional shot. The commandos never actually appeared in the episode, so those character models are still just BTS material. As for Trench, I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. That's an Encyclopedia picture. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  00:08, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * What about Darth Maul, Dooku, Yoda, and more? All of them have concept art images in their bios. Also, the commandos did appear in the episode. Cevan (talk) 00:29, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Bah. Blame SW.com's stupid redesign. That's not the kind of concept art I was thinking of. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  00:56, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Does this mean that the commando images are ok to be put back up, then? They are actual models that appeared in the show; they're just in a certain pose, like all other TCW character pictures (such as the Trench picture, Maul, and others). Cevan (talk) 01:01, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, hence why I restored them. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  01:02, July 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah ok, thanks! I didn't see you had restored them. In that case, any chance I could have the three-revert rule warning you posted taken away? My reverts that got me that warning were all to get the pictures back, which turned out to be ok to stay on the pages. Cevan (talk) 01:06, July 6, 2014 (UTC)

Warning
Insider fiction starting with issue 150 (and the first part of Blade Squadron) is considered canon, per a message in the actual issue. Please do not continue to remove Blade Squadron content. Thanks. Cade   Calrayn  15:45, July 5, 2014 (UTC)

Image sourcing
Hey Cevan! Be sure to add a description and source to File:DS Boss.png or else it may be deleted, per the image policy. You can do that by clicking here, clicking the edit button, and then adding the description and source to the relevant fields on the template. Let me know if you have any questions about that. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:01, July 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for fixing that! Just so you know as well, I fixed the links in your use of SW. Click here to see how that template is meant to be used so it works correctly. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:10, July 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the fix! I was wondering what was wrong with it. Cevan (talk) 23:13, July 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * No problem. Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:35, July 5, 2014 (UTC)

Eras
Please stop replacing eras tags with "pagename/Canon". Firstly, you shouldn't be removing the eras tags, period, and secondly, the article will automatically show the tabs if an article exists at "pagename/Canon". The tabs shouldn't be showing if the canon article hasn't been made yet. Cade   Calrayn  23:31, July 6, 2014 (UTC)


 * I haven't removed any eras tags. I did add one to a page without a canon counterpart though, which is my mistake. Do you happen to know where I removed an eras tag? Cevan (talk) 00:43, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Here, here, and several others. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  00:47, July 7, 2014 (UTC)

Valon Rudhor
Hi Cevan. I've tagged the page Valon Rudhor for deletion. It appears, based on your copy/paste from Baron Rudhor, that your goal was to move the content to the correct name. Creating a new page is not the correct way to do that. If the Baron Rudhor page needs to be renamed, please actually rename the page. You can click the Edit drop-down menu and then select the "Move" option. If you're using the Monobook skin, the "Move" button is at the very top of the page. Doing it this way preserves the edit history. However, because you've created Valon Rudhor as its own page, you will need to wait for an administrator to delete Valon Rudhor before Baron Rudhor can be renamed. Thanks. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 16:41, September 20, 2014 (UTC)


 * Alright then, thank you. Cevan (talk) 16:46, September 20, 2014 (UTC)
 * The page has been renamed. Feel free to make the appropriate edits. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 16:51, September 20, 2014 (UTC)

Italics
Cevan, please remember to add the end of the italics to italicized content. You've been leaving Star Wars: Kanan instead of Star Wars: Kanan - without the second , everything after it is italicized. Cade   Calrayn  20:59, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
 * Similarly, please use instead of just  . Thank you.  Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:35, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * Just curious, what's the difference between the two? I saw several other people just doing so I assumed that was alright to use. Cevan (talk) 19:51, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
 * This is only something that just started recently. See this for the explanation. ProfessorTofty (talk) 19:56, October 13, 2014 (UTC)

Spiran Caf
The article's name is referenced in Spiran Caf due to the fact that it's identified in the trivia gallery but not the episode. Without the reference after the name it is currently cites the episode as the origin of the name (reference 2) which is incorrect. The entire body of an article needs to be referenced correctly including the name in articles this short. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:16, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't see any need for citing the name when it quite clearly has next to the trivia guide in the sources, which just so happens to be the only source. Cevan (talk) 19:42, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Referencing is needed as well as 1stid, an while it is the only source it isn't the only referenced material so it needs to be clarified it wasn't from the episode. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:41, November 16, 2014 (UTC)

Wookieepedian of the Month nomination
Hi! Just wanted to let you know that I nominated you for Wookieepedian of the Month for December. Please see here. You may want to create at least a small userpage so that people will know something more about you. ProfessorTofty (talk) 21:37, November 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * Wow, thank you so much, Tofty! I'll get to work and put together a small userpage right away. Thanks again! Cevan (talk) 21:41, November 30, 2014 (UTC)
 * I have renominated you for Wotm for January, as it was decided that there was not enough votes to make a decision. AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 02:18, December 1, 2014 (UTC)

Pit Droid award
Because it looks like the WoTM thing didn't really get off the ground, but I still thought you deserved something, and then I found this. ProfessorTofty (talk) 20:31, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * (Applause) Congratulations! AV-6R7 User talk:AV-6R7 22:11, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, Tofty! Cevan (talk) 22:48, December 5, 2014 (UTC)

CR90 corvette/Canon
Hi Cevan. Please do not re-add CR90 corvette/Canon unless you source the information. As you know, saying what a source is in the edit summary is not enough. If the source is on Facebook, please add the source to the articles using Template:FacebookCite. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:32, December 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * Will do! Just curious, how much information must be sourced? I noticed that the Correlian Engineering Corporation was not sourced at all, and wasn't spoken of in the Databank entry either, however it was not removed. I know it was in the Facebook image as well, but it was there long before CR90 corvette was confirmed. Just wondering, thanks! Cevan (talk) 23:56, December 16, 2014 (UTC)

Confederacy move
I saw your message about wanting other people to help with the changing of "Separatist Alliance" back to "Confederacy of Independent Systems/Canon" on the naming/linking. I'm willing to help, and should be able to be back on in about 2 to 3 hours to do so. But could you let me know when you're done with it for the time being so that we don't end up treading on each other's toes, as such? ProfessorTofty (talk) 22:11, January 28, 2015 (UTC)


 * Certainly! I'm afraid I wasn't thinking and haven't kept track of every page I've edited, however here's a list of the ones I know for certain are done:


 * -Confederacy of Independent Systems


 * -Dooku


 * -Jabba


 * -Sith


 * -Separatist Droid Army


 * -Galactic Republic


 * -Jedi Order


 * -Grievous


 * -Nute Gunray


 * -Trade Federation


 * -Droid


 * -Battle droid


 * -B1 battle droid


 * -B2 battle droid


 * -B2 grapple droid


 * -IG-86 sentinel droid


 * -Holowan Laboratories


 * -General


 * -A Death on Utapau


 * -In Search of the Crystal


 * -Crystal Crisis


 * -The Big Bang


 * -Sullust


 * -Star system


 * -Qui=Gon Jinn


 * -Yoda


 * -Temple of Eedit


 * -Devaron


 * -Zygerrian


 * Cevan (talk) 22:42, January 28, 2015 (UTC)


 * Special:WhatLinksHere/Separatist Alliance. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  23:02, January 28, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. that's all I really needed. Just a heads-up so I knew when you had stopped for the time being. I'll go ahead and get started now. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:13, January 29, 2015 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm done for now, so if you or anyone else want to do anymore, go ahead. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:45, January 29, 2015 (UTC)

Edit summaries.
We are aware of your reasoning for changing the links. Please stop using the same lengthy edit summary for all of the changes; it is clogging the Recent Changes. Cade   Calrayn  22:36, January 28, 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry Cade; I just figured it'd be better to put that in so no one comes after me asking why I reverted it, and I could point them in the right direction. I won't do it anymore, though. Cevan (talk) 22:43, January 28, 2015 (UTC)

Yavin
It is established by Leeland Chee, that the Battle of Yavin took place Nineteen Years after Revenge of the Sith, and Thirty Two Years after The Phantom Menace. --Marcuspearl (talk) 21:40, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, but the only way Grint and Aresko could've been killed 4 years before the Battle of Yavin is if the battle took place on Empire Day, which I highly doubt it did. Here's a tweet by Chee himself saying so. Cevan (talk) 22:23, February 3, 2015 (UTC)

Skirmish with Imperial troopers
Hey Cevan. What event is this referring to? - Brandon Rhea (talk) 20:02, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * That would be Zeb's encounter in Entanglement. Since someone made an event for Art Attack, I figured events should be made for the other Rebels shorts as well. Cevan (talk) 20:06, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I'm not sure that's really notable enough for a page. It's basically a fist fight in the streets. The reason that the Art Attack one can definitely be considered notable is how it was later referenced in The Rebellion Begins, with Sabine having been put on Lothal's most wanted list, and in other sources. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 20:10, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Very well then. What about the event in The Machine in the Ghost? That was an actual planned attack by Hera, Kanan, and Chopper on an Imperial convoy. While we don't see the actual raid in the short, we do see them escaping and being pursued by TIEs. Cevan (talk) 20:25, February 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree that the event in "The Machine in the Ghost" is notable enough for an article. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 20:38, February 8, 2015 (UTC)

Consular-class
I've moved the page to the correct name, which takes over the redirect. If someone clears up the redirects caused by the page move, I'll delete the /Canon page as well. - Sir Cavalier of One ( Squadron channel ) 00:47, February 12, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much! Cevan (talk) 00:48, February 12, 2015 (UTC)

Inuse
Hi Cevan. This edit makes two instances in the last few minutes where you haven't respected the fact that I've tagged an article as Inuse. When an article is tagged as Inuse, it's disrespectful to edit because doing so can cause edit conflicts&mdash;which it did, in both cases. Please be more cognizant of this in the future. Thanks. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 21:29, February 18, 2015 (UTC)
 * My apologies Brandon. You see, I had actually made some edits before you did, however was unable to submit them as you submitted yours just before I did. As a result I decided to change them real quick before you began overhauling the article. Cevan (talk) 21:32, February 18, 2015 (UTC)

The Bad Batch
Hey Cevan. Please see my response to Brandon here, and let me know if you have any questions. Thanks.  CC7567  (talk) 21:54, February 22, 2015 (UTC)

Canon articles and redirects to Legends articles
Hey. Regarding your recent deletion tag on Typho, there is no need to delete a redirect to a Legends article to make way for the Canon article if the Canon article doesn't exist yet. In that case, it's simpler and faster to just edit the redirect and replace it with the new Canon article. Having the old redirect revisions left in the page history doesn't hurt anything. Deletion of a redirect to a Legends article is only needed if the Canon article has already been created under a different title and needs to be moved with the "move" function. Thanks! &mdash;MJ&mdash; Council Chambers 21:03, February 24, 2015 (UTC)