User talk:JangFett

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent;" {| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent;"
 * valign="top" width="71%" style="background: #FFFFFF; border: 0px solid #bdbdbd; padding: .5em 1em;"|


 * valign="top" width="71%" style="background: #FFFFFF; border: 0px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em;"|

Meeting 55
Jangeth pls, Meeting 55 has been scheduled for February 23 at 4PM ET (9PM UTC). Please make an effort to show up. 1358 (Talk)  16:21, February 6, 2013 (UTC)

Re:3RR
Jang, I did. I reverted him once and left a message, and was in the process of rewriting the Dark Acolyte table into a list when he edit-conflicted me. That's when I left him alone and sought out an admin. Cade  Calrayn   20:51, February 8, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Zabrak
In the Encyclopedia it states that Maul's, as well as Opress', species are Dathomirian, not Zabrak. Also, in the BTS section of the Maul article states that his species was changed from a Zabrak to a Dathomirian.  Darth Pythonis  (Talk) 15:15, February 9, 2013 (UTC)

FAN page reviewing
Hey, Jang,

Per the discussion at the recent INQ meeting 55, I've just now gone and left personalized talk page messages to a whole whack of users, asking them to review more on the FAN page. I went for people who review a lot on the GAN page, people who nominate FANs but never review others' work, and more --- hopefully we'll be able to kick-start a reviewing revolution.

With that said, I believe I'd be remiss if I didn't extend the appeal to the Inquisitorius, as well. I'm not trying to single any one person out, and to emphasize that point, I'm leaving the exact same message on every INQ member's talk page rather than personalizing them like I did with the non-INQ mesages. Every INQ member save five, that is, and those five members have been reviewing FANs frequently enough that they don't need any sort of push like this. Everyone other than those five INQs, yourself included, has reviewed less than twelve FANs since the beginning of July (addendum specifically for Jang: I counted INQvotes, so your count only begins in September, after you became an INQ). A few meetings ago, we agreed on eight FAN reviews per month as a good number for which to strive. I've now encouraged a large number of non-INQs to review more frequently, and the Inquisitorius as a whole should be actively participating in that revolution if not leading it. So, as an INQ, please review FANs more often. Cheers, and have a great day! Menkooroo (talk) 08:11, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

IPs
Hey Jang. I disagree on that. We should try to get the vandals to do productive work, instead of shunning them. Many of them might be just testing, or even contributing in a wrong way, but in good-faith. I seriously believe the first message any user should get is a welcome, not a big, red, threatening warning sign. That's just counterproductive and scares away potential new users.  Stake black   msg 15:39, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Intro
Hi Jang, can you please point me to the policy that states no references in the intro? Rokkur Shen (talk) 14:39, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Queequeg
I've also reverted your edits to Queequeg as it is only a nickname as many of the action figure archive names are. No official name has been given to this character. Unless you can provide one. Leland Chee specifically refers to this character as "Weequay hunter" in his blog hence the addition of the CCG card "Weequay Hunter" of which the images are identical and of the same character. Thanks. Rokkur Shen (talk) 14:46, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Trivia?
Sure, it makes sense. However, adding information related to the episode, which is not included anywhere else in the article, and is confirmed by Lucasfilm makes sense too. I'm still on the side of expanding the Wook, not reducing it. Hope it makes sense too. :) Cheers, -- XXLVenom998 ''' (Surprise me!) 08:35, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Could you please tell me who the hell made these rules? Just doesn't make any sense. Maybe next time we should consider to make a poll or something on voting for rules actually. -- XXLVenom998 ''' (Surprise me!) 16:43, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Anyhow, it is not just about the Jedi funeral. Sometimes any extra information would do a good service in understanding things. But you've got the point as well. However, about the episode, I link you this on IMDB, there was some misunderstanding about Poggle the Lesser and Wat Tambor (though I personally know where they appearaed), other viewers didn't get it where and when did they appear, and there were references to Wookieepedia too (you will find it in there). This is partly the reason why I think a little trivia is not always bad, it is helpful if extra information is included in the articles. Of course, I'm not talking about things like "Yoda is holding a Gimer stick while talking with Mace Windu" if you know what I mean, but when it is disputable if a character appeared in an episode, like it was on the talk page of the episode (Admiral Yularen's appearance was under a dispute), it would be useful if he is not only listed in the Appearances, but a few words are written about those who have a disputable or simply not too clear appearance (of course not talking about those who have lines like Yoda in the episode). Hope it makes my motivations clear. I only want the best, no offense! :) -- XXLVenom998 ''' (Surprise me!) 17:14, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * The stuff about the Republic Police Cruiser is not trivia, at least not the part about it originally being part of another project. Besides, if we are going to report information on the Wiki, we are supposed to list ALL of it. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 23:16, February 24, 2013 (UTC)

Imaged nom
Hey Jang. What's wrong with having an image displayed at the nomination page? It may be uncommon, but is there a rule against it?  Stake black   msg 20:38, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

gold six
What's a GA, and why should I talk to that other guy? Good article, got it. Except it's not. Why should it ignore the Gold Six reference in TCW film, especially when Gold Six is listed on the TCW film article? And why does the top section repeat the entirety of biography section?--Rpmdkc (talk) 03:33, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll talk to him. But yes, it clearly says Gold Six in the opening of the movie. Did you read my edit before you reverted it? It's the same exact audio file as they used in Downfall of a Droid. There's nothing unsourced there. Should I assume I'm not allowed to edit "Good Articles?" --Rpmdkc (talk) 03:48, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

??
What the almighty hell? I just said my opinion about the nomination, and said facts. Could you please cite the comment which was the "rude one"? :) -- XXLVenom998 ''' (Surprise me!) 19:29, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Are you serious? Is that really considered a personal attack? Oh dear... -- XXLVenom998 ''' (Surprise me!) 14:58, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

My goodness
My goodness, what is up with people not allowing others to voice opinions? It's ridiculous. My claims have been backed up by supported facts. I provided concise references as well. What makes it any different? Iteachvader (talk) 23:28, March 3, 2013 (UTC)

Ahsoka Tano
Hi Jang, I'm glad we were able to work out our questions about Ahsoka Tano without conflict. However, can we start a vote to change the image, maybe the HOBS one or a higher-quality promotional one, or at least crop the person to Ahsoka's right completely? His presence in the picture is rather distracting. As for the quote, I'll search for a better one and we can once again move the now-leading quote to the Christophsis section and the now-Christophsis quote to Force powers as I had them.-- ID-21 Dolphin  (Talk) 20:02, March 5, 2013 (UTC) Ahsoka Tano: So, if you're a captain, and I'm a Jedi, then technically I outrank you, right? Captain Rex: I my book, experience outranks everything. Or, this one. Yes, it is another quote about Skywalker and Ahsoka, but Ahsoka's fate is so tied to the actions of other characters... Ahsoka Tano: So, what's the plan? Anakin Skywalker: Oh, I thought you were the one with the plan. Ahsoka Tano: No, I'm the one with enthusiasm. You're the one with experience, which I'm looking forward to learning from. -- ID-21 Dolphin  (Talk) 22:27, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Great. I just changed the picture- or did you want a vote before that? As for the quote, I wouldn't be opposed to the Ventress quote and might change it, though I still think the "Wookiee Hunt" quote describes Ahsoka's character development through the series and Anakin's great influence on her. Finally, would you have the time (I'm far too busy unfortunately) to write a quick relationships section as exists in most major character articles, covering Anakin, Lux, and maybe Padme, Plo, or Obi-Wan as well? Thanks.-- ID-21 Dolphin  DolphinJedi.png(Talk) 21:23, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * I see. Well, nice project. Why don't you copy and paste all the longer sections that are already written into the existing article? I'll look for quotes. Since we already have a great P&T quotes, though, would you object if I put the Wookiee Hunt quote as the leading one upon showing you the other options I've found?-- ID-21 Dolphin  DolphinJedi.png(Talk) 21:40, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. How about this- I'll put the Wookiee Hunt quote for now, then show you the quotes I find, and then we can decide, perhaps making it a community vote. Honestly, I have a few problems with the Ventress quote: it describes a biased viewpoint (NPOV?) of Ahsoka as she acted in the first few episodes but doesn't describe her real personality traits or character development. Ahsoka isn't particularly filthy, sure she's obnoxious but others may call her independent-minded, and describing her as Skywalker's pet is a much more simplistic and uninteresting, in my opinion, viewpoint than the quote from Wookiee Hunt. While part of the quote is about Anakin, the part about Ahsoka not only surviving in an impossible situation but also leading others to survive showcases her character very well.-- ID-21 Dolphin  DolphinJedi.png(Talk) 21:57, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Are there any other quotes you find good, perhaps insisting more on Ahsoka's character development?-- ID-21 Dolphin  DolphinJedi.png(Talk) 22:25, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * How about this one? Sure, it reveals a lot about Rex as well as Ahsoka, but it does show Ahsoka's inexperience at the beginning of the war, something which her character arc changes.
 * To quote Jonjedi: "Real life? What is that?" (Are we allowed to nominate Wookieepedia talk page quotes to the Other QOTD section?) Good luck.-- ID-21 Dolphin  DolphinJedi.png(Talk) 04:29, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * The first one is good. I'll also look at the TCW novel.  JangFett  (Talk) 23:38, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Great. Oh, I was rewatching "Padawan Lost" and found a good quote.

Though I must say, once again, te Wookiee Hunt one is my favorite...-- ID-21 Dolphin  (Talk) 00:18, March 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * So, are we using the Rex one, the Wasskah one, or one from the novel?-- ID-21 Dolphin  DolphinJedi.png(Talk) 02:47, March 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * I do not mean to intrude on your efforts, but this link might help you guys out.&mdash; 20:56, March 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, I put in the Rex quote. By juggling the quotes the Wookiee Hunt quote still looks better, but if you're dead-set against it, I don't mind it this way.-- ID-21 Dolphin  DolphinJedi.png(Talk) 04:03, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm still confused by why you're so reticent, but ok. You're sure there's nothing from your sandbox that you want to copy? There are certainly some old episodes for which your summaries are more detailed.-- ID-21 Dolphin  DolphinJedi.png(Talk) 04:18, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. Are you planning on working a lot on it in the coming months? It's sort of a good moment, especially since she might not have too many new appearances in the short-term future.-- ID-21 Dolphin  DolphinJedi.png(Talk) 04:21, March 7, 2013 (UTC)

Re: Skytop Station
Actually right in the middle of editing the article when you sent me that. :P Will have it and the other Clone Wars–related stuff done by the meeting.  CC7567  (talk) 22:07, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * Actually, I believe there's some info that needs to be added to R3-S6. I gave it to Trayus on his talk page a while back, so it should all be there. (The "canon conflict" that I mentioned isn't actually a canon conflict, I believe; it should be added somewhere.)  CC7567  (talk) 22:11, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nah, the only good stuff was a Clone Wars timeline that wasn't even correct. Also, would you mind tackling CC-1138? I can take a look at it sometime if you can't, but there's a good amount of rejiggering required, since the True Colors info needs to be moved to the 21 BBY part of the article (since the Star Wars Character Encyclopedia verified that the Battle of Mygeeto started in 21 BBY instead of 19 BBY). I can try to look up stuff if you need it. (And your user page says you're looking after Bacara, anyway. :P)  CC7567  (talk) 22:20, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * That, and adjust some of the ROTS-leadup parts of the article so that the context on Mygeeto (and relevant stuff) is provided before then with the True Colors info. In addition, once True Colors is moved, the ROTS part needs to state that he "returned" to Mygeeto, two years after he originally operated there (to reflect the information from the Character Encyclopedia). Also, I think a Bts note might be helpful to clarify the ambiguity with True Colors, and the fact that the Character Encyclopedia verified the chronology, but I can help you with that part if it's confusing.  CC7567  (talk) 22:30, March 8, 2013 (UTC)

I wish I had a good answer for you regarding To the Vanishing Point, but it's difficult to interpret the comic with the source material that's followed it. For the location of the comic's battle, the comic almost certainly suggests that it is not Mygeeto, but the CSWE either made an unintentional or intentional retcon in stating that it was Mygeeto. For the timeline, I don't believe any source has nailed down a specific date for the battle&mdash;though based on pure conjecture, I would think that To the Vanishing Point should be placed closer to 19 BBY, with ROTS (as opposed to 21 BBY, with True Colors). I'll try to catch you on IRC sometime tonight or tomorrow to discuss this.  CC7567  (talk) 19:53, March 15, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Spring break?
I'm just passing through, so unfortunately I won't be around for long. Still, it's been a while since I deleted something. :p Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 15:29, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Hey
Don't have too much of a party. :P  CC7567  (talk) 04:48, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

RE: WOTM, you are
Thanks! Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:53, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Gregg
I somehow find this hard to believe, but if you insist on keeping it like that, oh well. :S --Wuher MosEisley  14:23, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

?
Provide me with a valid source that works and I may believe you. April Fool's is well and truly over. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:01, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

Sith Emp
Hi Jang, my objections stand. I was about to strike them as by objections had initially been addressed weeks ago. The problem was that they were almost immediately reverted as Cade changed his mind yet again. I've clearly outlined my issues on the nomination page. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:58, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Hope this will satisfy all parties: Forum:CT:Move_Sith_Emperor_to_Emperor_Vitiate. Rokkur Shen (talk) 04:16, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * I respect that decision. Rokkur Shen (talk) 04:20, April 9, 2013 (UTC)