Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer.


 * /History
 * /2005 History
 * /Queue
 * Community vote on the renomination of previous FAs

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must...


 * 1) ...be well written and detailed
 * 2) ...be unbiased, non-point of view
 * 3) ...be sourced with all available sources and appearances
 * 4) ...follow the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide
 * 5) ...not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 * 6) ...not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
 * 7) ...have a succint proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
 * 8) ...have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
 * 9) ...have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Second Battle of Coruscant (Clone Wars)
Objections Comments
 * 1) Stake black 13:31, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Maaul 15:34, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --LandoSystem1138 01:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) KEJ 10:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) SkywalkerPL 16:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Darth Cow 9:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) --Mr. Perfection 02:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) ThrawnRocks 18:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Wstonefi 19:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Cato Neimoidia 23:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Star Destroyer 2500 13:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Grievous7318 16:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Roron Corobb 17:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) DarkShroud 23:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I find the article to have grammar/writing style lapses that need to be cleaned up. - Breathesgelatin 05:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Short intro, no BTS, needs to be in more categories, and I'd like to see more background to the events that preceded the battle. --UVnet 20:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * How can it be in more categories? -- SFH 01:11, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. Ok you got me there. --UVnet 07:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * There definitely needs to be something about the immense contradictions concerning this battle in Labyrinth of Evil, Star Wars: Clone Wars and Reversal of Fortune. &mdash;MarcK [talk] 12:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with MarcK. The CW/LOE/ROF info needs to be cleared up first. Adamwankenobi Talk to me! My home. 16:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * That will take forever. TIEPilot051999 17:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * But it must be done if this article is ever to be featured. Adamwankenobi Talk to me! My home. 03:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll spell and punctuate check it pronto. - TopAce 13:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC). Done, as of 15:31, GMT +1

A very important page, for a very important battle.


 * I think the depth is very impressive

Brisky


 * Agreed with unsigned comment =P -Stake black 18:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a good article, but I think the Battle of Kashyyyk should be featured before this one.---LandoSystem1138 01:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's good, but I'm wondering if the section called Participants is necessary, given that they should all be included in the info-box anyways. I also think there should be one or two images from Battlefront II. KEJ 10:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see some more images, honestly. EAGLES610 19:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's already kind of full of pics. But I agree, it should have at least one Battlefront II screenshot.  Stake Black talk - Contribs at 21:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * What I meant was a picture that isn't from Episode 3 or Star Wars: Clone Wars. Sorry, I didn't make that clear...at all. EAGLES610 01:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Mayby finally We'll get battle in Featured article. SkywalkerPL 16:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The Battle of Kashyyyk (Clone Wars) is actually going to be featured next week. - Breathesgelatin 18:33, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I just completed a thorough expansion of this page, including more about the preamble prior to the battle and much better written information on the invasion and capture of the Chancellor from LOE and CW. Still more can be added, as I based most of my update with information from LOE and the ROTS novel.--Sharkey 19:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Mitth'raw'nuruodo
Support Objections
 * 1) Herbsewell 23:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 2)  StarNeptune Talk to me! 11:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Darth Kevinmhk 12:30, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) I've been waiting on someone nominating this. :) &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 12:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) TIEPilot051999 16:26, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) SFH 19:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Orpheus 05:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) One of the few interesting EU characters, and a good article, too. KEJ 07:25, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Even though I'm not fond of Thrawn, it is a good article.  Stake Black talk - Contribs at  21:51, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) SkywalkerPL 17:01, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) ThrawnRocks 04:51, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Kir Kanos (Hail the Empire!) 21:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC) Yes, it finally fits the new requirements.
 * 13) Adamwankenobi Talk to me!  My home. 22:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) EAGLES610 00:53, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Cato Neimoidia 23:04, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) LandoSystem1138 03:44, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) UltimateMandalore555 22:37, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) Snoop 15:15, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) Roron Corobb This article is pretty good. 16:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) FrozenPhoenix32 04:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Great article. 5:23, 20 Jun 2006 (UTC)
 * 21) Thrawn3.14 00:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 22) My favorite character. :) CaptainPellaeon1138 01:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I hate to ruin the party, but there are really a lot of redlinks in this article. The intro could probably also use some beefing up. Both of those things can be fixed very easily though, and after that I will throw my support behind Thrawn as well. :) - Breathesgelatin 09:34, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree. The intro could actually be better and I would also like to see perhaps a nicer BTS. Also I sure would like to know where Image:Thrawn.jpg came from (and who is the actor) and the same for Image:Thrawndeathjpg.jpg, Image:Vadergrandadmirals.jpg and Image:Thrawn.JPG (and perhaps renaming it?). --UVnet 07:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * And you know what? I don't care how many times we've been over this but I still think this should be moved to Thrawn. --UVnet 04:37, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * It's already been decided in Consensus Track. Mitth'raw'nuruodo is the proper title by the consensus of Wiki members. - Lord Hydronium 06:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * As I said, I'm sorry but I don't care how many times we've been over this... --UVnet 02:41, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think, other than the quote, it mentions Thrawn's ability to glean info from a species just from their art, and that is a cool and key aspect of the character worth mentioning .LandoSystem1138 00:05, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) If memory serves, and it often does, he's already been a FA. TIEPilot051999 16:07, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * He's deffinately not been, but many people confused the Chiss being FA as Thrawn. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 16:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, then. TIEPilot051999 16:26, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * This is a good, solid article, and definitely seems to be FA material. Orpheus
 * Thrawn is one of the most influential and important warlords during the time of the New Republic. He is also one of the most complex and brilliant characters in the entire Expanded Universe.  The article not only needs to be well written, but known to be about a critical role in the Star Wars Sega.
 * Agree SkywalkerPL 17:01, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Exuse me, but the fact that the article has a "few" red links has nothing to do with why it should not being a featured article. If you see it says "reasonable amount of red links", and I think that 12 red links should be able to be ignored considering that the article follows every other requirement to be a FA.
 * I respectully disagree. I think 12 is a large number of redlinks, and furthermore, some of those redlinks contain information that is necessary to understand important aspects of Thrawn's life. It should be easy to clear up the redlinks, however. - Breathesgelatin 12:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I almost agree, but still think that it is FA material. Kir Kanos (Hail the Empire!) 21:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Is this going to become a FA, or not?
 * It can't until the objections are removed. - Breathesgelatin 21:23, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I know that but are they ever going to be removed
 * Well I for one am not deleting my objections until those redlinks are gone. - Breathesgelatin 01:01, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Still has a few reddies in there. Can't quite call it the best. -- Riffsyphon1024 05:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Most of the redlinks are minor, inconsequential things or are explained in the article. I don't think they pose a problem. CaptainPellaeon1138 01:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Galactic Civil War

 * 1) User:Herbsewell - no date, invalid
 * 2)  Stake Black talk - Contribs at 22:27, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 07:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) QX100 17:48 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * Sorry, but no. Intro is too short. Normally I'm not a stickler about BTS but for a topic as big as this I'm sure there's something that can be said. The images that have been selected seem odd to me... I feel like there should be more images or at least more representative images. There are some formatting issues. The article includes mostly movie information, which is fine, but there is lots of EU information that is left out. Obviously not all the EU information can be included on the main page, but the EU information that does appear doesn't necessarily seem to be the most important EU aspects of the war. Am I way off on this one? Maybe it's just too late for me to think properly. - Breathesgelatin 09:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm with you on the EU thing. Totally. Intros etc. are not my forte, so I can't tell you. But 2 paragraphs post endor? There are 15 years left!-- The Erl of the  talk  What I do 23:50, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * See above comments. Adamwankenobi Talk to me! My home. 12:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I also agree with pretty much all of the above. -- Ozzel 20:49, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, its very in-depth, right up until the end. Skywalka 05:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * It's only about half done...maybe if it was retitled "Galactic Civil War, part 1". 8) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Okay, I added a much better infobox image and lengthened the intro considerably. I think this can be featured eventually, but it still needs a lot of work until then.  --Thetoastman 02:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a good article - but major events like the Thrawn Campaign, Return of the Emperor, establishment of the Jedi Academy and attacks + peace/Caamas Crisis need to be expanded upon. =) Rhysode 09:37, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

The Force

 * 1) LandoSystem1138 21:40, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Herbsewell - undated, invalid
 * 3) Tinwe 17:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Sikon [ Talk ] 17:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Adamwankenobi Talk to me!  My home. 22:00, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) EAGLES610 00:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) SkywalkerPL 09:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Lord Darasuum 22:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Darth Rage 22:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Cato Neimoidia 23:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Roron Corobb 16:03, June 1 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) KEJ 09:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Randy Starkiller 18:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * Eh... I dunno... I mean it's good but... the force? I mean this article could (and should) probably be one of the longest articles around. A simple check up, brought to my attention that, for example, there is not a single mention that the ysalamiri are force-free. I am sure that other subjects are absent or neglected. --UVnet 02:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that hand picture at the beginning is kinda stupid. You have to chnage that before it gets anywhere. --MaulYoda 02:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * There are still three uncaptioned pictures. That's my only objection. - Breathesgelatin 09:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Ditto. I'll add my support when all of the pictures are captioned. &mdash;Mirlen 20:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Now there's only the Jedi and Rogue shaking hands picture left uncaptioned, as I'm at a loss for what to say there. &mdash;Unsigned comment by LandoSystem1138 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * Actually there're three uncaptioned images: Image:PowerFromWithin.jpg, Image:The Force.jpg, Image:JediAndRogueCooperation.jpg. EDIT: I checked the history, and it seems like Starkeiller has removed the two captions because they're incorrect...? &mdash;Mirlen 20:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree it needs captions and maybe some pictures of the force being used but i give my support.

Comments
 * By the Force, it's the Force!
 * This is a great article... It'll get my vote whenever that picture gets a caption... - Breathesgelatin 23:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm actually kind of surprised this hasn't been nominated earlier. And Breathesgelatin... Aiddat has added that caption you wanted :) --Tinwe 17:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * UVnet may have a point with his objection. Should this be an improvement drive subject instead?--LandoSystem1138 03:11, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, whoever nominated the article thought that it was up to featured article standards &mdash; so it would depend on one's judgment and perspective of the article. &mdash;Mirlen 20:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I brought this up on the talk page, but it's getting no attention, so I'll say it here. Should the light-side, dark-side, etc sections have the quotes from main articles?
 * I don't think it's something you have to worry about, but perhaps inserting quotations for each major section as opposed to a subsection? &mdash;Mirlen 01:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I say, the more the better. Add the quotes and extra information in there.--Lord Darasuum 22:36, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Although I think that some of the pictures (rather, all of the pictures) need captions, as some are lacking those, I believed this article is well detailed and should be a featured article. Maybe add some information here and there, and it would be good to go.--Lord Darasuum 22:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Battle of Nar Shaddaa

 * 1) DarthLumiya 19:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Thanos6 10:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) EAGLES610 02:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Objections

Comments
 * It seems to me like it could use a better intro. EAGLES610 00:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I think I've done all I can with this article, but I don't know if I'd say it's good enough to be featured. As for the into...that's not something I'm too good at. If somebody thinks they can improve it, plesae do so. Red XIV 01:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Now that I think about it, something should be inserted about this being the first large-scale battle that Han Solo fought in. Seeing as he later became an important military leader for the Rebellion/New Republic, that's a fairly significant fact in Galactic history. Red XIV 04:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Some of the stuff about Roa seems a little irrelevant to the big picture. Maybe include Bria's theory that this was a plot to ruin Sarn Shild. And more pictures would be nice, but I guess there aren't really any more in existance. Other than that, this is a good, complete article. -LtNOWIS 17:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Clone Wars

 * 1) Wstonefi 19:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) LandoSystem1138 22:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Adamwankenobi Talk to me!  My home. 22:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Novajoe23 17:05, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) --Eyrezer 12:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Commander Jake
 * 7) TIEPilot051999 17:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) EAGLES610 01:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Rhysode 10:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 10)  Polifemo (talk to me) 04:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Lord Vader 15:08, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Snoop 14:16, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Great article and really detailed. MaulYoda
 * 14) KEJ 09:46, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * *Definitely detailed too major a topic. --MaulYoda 00:51, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm confused...what's too major of a topic?EAGLES610 00:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * It means that it's too important a topic, like too well known or, you know. --MaulYoda 02:02, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree about the picture intro. What was the rationale for having that in the first place? - Breathesgelatin 09:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Previous objection withdrawn now that the picture intro has been removed. I do have one more concern. Namely, since clearly this article was the work of many wookieepedians, there seems to be a lack of consistency in the article. For example, the Year One campaigns are explained briefly and each section has a picture. In Year Two, some of the campaign's explanations are too wordy (people should just click on the battle or mission pages to get the extremely detailed info) and lack images. I think that this should be cleaned up for consistency although I think the article is in every other way worthy of being an FA. - Breathesgelatin 22:05, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The beginning is really quite sloppy. MaulYoda
 * Quite a short intro. Also pretty lousy BTS for such a major subject. And, as always, it sure would be nice to know where Image:Troopers2-6.jpg, Image:Ruins of Kessia.JPG, Image:Pengalan.jpg and Image:84PalpatineSpeechFinal.jpg came from. --UVnet 06:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * It talks about every important battle and campaign in the war. It's also absolutely freaking huge. Definitely featured-worthy, IMO.Wstonefi 19:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I accidentally deleted the objections when trying to add my comment. Could someone revert it back please? Sorry!--LandoSystem1138 03:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Very comprehensive and well-written. The fact that it is a major topic is irrelevant. If something is featured quality, its featured quality. Besides, we've had major topics be featured before, like Anakin Skywalker and Yoda.
 * Never mind the topic thing. --MaulYoda 16:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * still needs work, i agree with the comment saying that some bits are to wordy, for example Mace Windu on Harun Kul, the section is huge, has no picture (such as Kar Vastor) and i think is more detailed than the actual article..il have to go chec k on that though. Jedi Dude
 * Waaaaaay too long. Period.  For an article about a war, it goes into far too much detail about the actions of individuals, especially when those actions don't really affect the course of the conflict.  There should be short summaries about the battles, not longer versions of the article of each one.  --Thetoastman 01:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Tahiri Veila

 * 1) Breathesgelatin 01:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) SFH 20:20, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) BambookidX 02:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) EAGLES610 15:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Darth Kevinmhk 04:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * Oh come on... the intro is one line! BTS could be nice. --UVnet 07:00, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I think this article is really well put-together. I realize it needs a longer intro but that can easily be written. In fact, I would do it now if I weren't so drunk. Seriously. - Breathesgelatin 01:40, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * You were too drunk to change it, but sober enough to properly nominate and format it? -- SFH 20:20, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't have nominated if I couldn't have formatted... but I didn't trust myself to write a paragraph. heh. - Breathesgelatin 04:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I liked the older default picture better, but...meh - EAGLES610 15:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Qui-Gon Jinn

 * 1) --Roron Corobb 20:35, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) LandoSystem1138 03:18, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) CaptainPellaeon1138 01:47, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * 1) Short intro...EAGLES610 00:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Cato Neimoidia 14:38, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) It needs better pic distribution, per Cato Neimoidia. - Breathesgelatin 14:47, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Not anywhere near featured status. --UVnet 08:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * There are like a million pictures bunched up together in The Blockade of Naboo section while in some of the other sections which may even be longer, there are no pics at all. Even if the sections are about novels, there should still be at least one picture somewhere in the world. And if they don't, even out the pics in the The Blockade of Naboo section to make it look better. -- Cato Neimoidia 14:38, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Lightsaber

 * 1) --Roron Corobb 11:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Brisky 07:44 4 June 2006
 * 3) SkywalkerPL 11:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Darth Kevinmhk 04:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Cutch 19:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) SonofNils 03:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) LandoSystem1138 05:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments Very important topic. If it hasn't been one already, it should be one imediatly
 * Great, good article, and very, very important. SkywalkerPL 11:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Contrary to what some of us who can't spell say... I think this is a great article. Cutch 19:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * 1) no way, this article needs so much word, its being chnaged all the time, facts aren't certain on it and its just...not FA maerial which is a shame since it is so vital..Jedi Dude
 * 2) There is something funny going on with the image distribution throughout this article. - Breathesgelatin 14:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Definitely needs some reworking of the whole image thing, but also I'd like to see a better intro, and something nicer in the Appearances, section. "Almost all works of the Star Wars saga"? Then I'd really like to know where no lightsaber's appeared. --UVnet 08:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Yuuzhan Vong

 * 1) EAGLES610 19:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) MyNz 12:53, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Darth Kevinmhk 04:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) SFH 18:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * Looks good, except the picture distribution is completely erratic. Needs to be cleaned up. - Breathesgelatin 14:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Lot's of unsourced pic s . Image:Vong-rpg.jpg, Image:Vongpriest1.jpg, Image:Nom anor2.jpg, Image:Tsavong lah.jpg and Image:HidingFromTheVong.JPG. --UVnet 08:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I've sourced all but the Nom Anor picture (which was already sourced) and the Hiding from the Vong one. -- SFH 18:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I swear I've seen the Hiding from the Vong one on StarWars.com or something a really long time ago, but it could have just been a repost from somewhere else. EAGLES610 20:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * It gives a nice backround of the Vong, and is very nicely written. EAGLES610 19:41, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * However, it needs the pictures to be layed out nicely and I might have to update the notable Yuuzhan Vong section. MyNz 12:53, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Ferus Olin

 * 1) Roron Corobb 17:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Novajoe23 14:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) EAGLES610 18:52, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Cull Tremayne 05:08, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Adamwankenobi Talk to me!  My home. 05:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Wstonefi 01:33, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Nighthawk leader
 * 8) DarthMaul431 17:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * Needs a better intro. BTS would be lovely. --UVnet 07:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Looks great, just need to expand the intro. - Breathesgelatin 14:53, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it needs a longer intro. Give me a few...maybe I can whip something up.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 09:37, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I managed to expand a bit from what info I gathered from the article, but since I've never read any of the books he's featured in, I didn't go into too much detail. Anyway, check it out and see if it satisfies any objections or if it needs more work. [[User:StarNeptune|<span style="c