User talk:Purpilia

Nova
Hi there. I noticed that you added Nova (Jedi) to the Nova disambiguation page. Who exactly is this Nova and where did they appear? It would be a good idea to either write an article, even if only a stub about them, or to point another wookieepedian towards your source so they can get cracking on it. I was unable to find such a character by searching the CUSWE or google, and I was wondering if you could fill me in. (Also, on a side note, please don't blank your talk page. Archiving it is cool, but not blanking it). -- Wild yoda - talk - contribs - 06:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

"Nova is actually a character from Light and Shadow who, at the end of the story, begins training as a Jedi. A page does need to be made for her, however. —Jaymach Ral'Tir" Thats the answer I got so I went ahead and made a page for her.Purpilia 23:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism?
Hey, didn't mean to accuse you, so sorry about that. No problem with the Shaak Ti image. It's just that only the image was changed and not the caption, so I wasn't sure whether it was a legit edit or subtle vandalism of the kind that we've experienced a couple of times here. That's why I asked whether it was vandalism rather than stating that it was vandalism. So, once more, sorry if the question made you feel uncomfortable. KEJ 06:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Valorian Jedi Enclave
Hi Purpilia,

I nominated this article, Valorian and Visionelle for deletion, because I think they are not canon. Unfortunately some parts of the official Star Wars Galaxies website feature player-created content that is not part of the official continuity. --Craven 17:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The articles have been deleted (Trash compactor/Valorian Jedi Enclave). &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries
While I can certainly appreciate your stance (trust me), please refrain from swearing in your edit summaries like you did here → "Okay, one more of the 'oh she is a great warrior' shit, will be undone no matter how nicely it is worded, unless you remove one of the twenty or so statements." Your cooperation is appreciated, thanks. Greyman ( Paratus ) 05:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

about Shaak Ti's "role as a Jedi"
that wasn't fannon info that was from power of the jedi sourcebook, you should look for it.

Block
You have been blocked from editing for 3 days. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list, along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. --Imperialles 21:53, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Categorization
Please refrain from recreating your redundant (Images of Humans affiliated with the New Jedi Order) and poorly worded (Images of individuals affiliated with Bane's Sith Order) image categories. I blocked you because you chose to ignore my previous warning. I trust this won't be a problem from now on, and I have thus lifted your ban. --Imperialles 01:22, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Apostrophes
You don't use an apostrophe in simple plurals. Graestan ( Talk ) 05:18, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I dont know what you specifcally are refering to but Im sure it was an error on my part, xaxaxa! Purpilia 05:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Har-har-har. But seriously, the Manual of Style is policy, and you need to recreate Category:Images of diner patron's with the correct lack of punctuation. Graestan ( Talk ) 05:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks! Purpilia 16:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Wookiee-cookie
&mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Aww, thanks! Purpilia 04:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Category:Images of Elom
I looked at the category, and it is populated with pictures of Eloms, not of Elom. Graestan ( Talk ) 04:15, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I didnt realize that Elom had the plural 's'. I'll change it now. Purpilia 04:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Images of individuals
Remember to include the Category:Images of individuals by name in every category of individuals you add, such as Category:Images of individuals by name/A or Category:Images of individuals by name/X. Enochf 02:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, knew I was forgeting something. Thanks! Purpilia 03:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Pictures
Hey there. I did see that Jedi in the comic, but the reason I deleted the pictures you uploaded was because they were labeled wrong. Feel free to upload those pictures again, but remember to a) add the correct source, and b) concept art from the artists website is to be considered non-canon unless LFL says otherwise. As such, if you chose to upload them again, the only place they would be able to be placed is in the articles Behind the scenes. If those pictures are canon and licensed with LFL, then feel free to add them to the main body of the article :) Cheers, Greyman  http://images.wikia.com/central/images/9/9c/Jan.png ( Talk ) 04:03, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

King Ommin
Hey Purpilia,

There used to be a page for Images of Ommin, but somewhere somehow it disappeared. I was wondering if you could create one please? —Tommy9281 ( Maybe it is time to liberate YOU! ) 21:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure I am happy to create it. Here you go: Category:Images of Ommin! Purpilia 21:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Image Categorization
Hey Purpilia,

Thanks. I see you've been cleaning up my images, and I appreciate it. I wasn't sure if I was categorizing them right, and in the future, I'll try to follow your lead. Thanks again! —Tommy9281 ( Surely you can do better! ) 23:21, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

TopTrumps

 * Are they licensed? It certainly makes Kit Fisto far too young to have trained Bant Eerin. QuentinGeorge 22:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I assumed that they were simply because they were featured in the new Insider and the issue had four with it. The site address is as follows:  Purpilia 03:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Infoboxs
Hey Purpilia, I noticed you'd been taking the Death dates out of the Infoboxes for characters. You said the reason you were doing it was because there should be a whole Paragraph about their deaths, not just the date. There should be a Paragrph about their deaths is enough is known about it, however, this does not mean that their death dates should be taken out of the Infobox, the Infobox allows the reader to see the Basic summary of the character without having to read the whole article. Thanks - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 18:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * My point is that this guy has been putting the death date in before the release of the book. I know Reckoning is out now but, in my opinion, if he knows they died why not put an explanation? I am not saying he is wrong, but apparently no one can double check it so I think he needs to explain more. So until we have reason to believe these characters are dead, we should remove the dates. Purpilia 18:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok. Sorry your explantion didn't make much sense to me, you seemed to be changing it just because there wasn't a paragraph about it. Sorry - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 18:37, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem; there is only so much room in those explanation boxes its hard to make a coherent argument. Purpilia 18:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, sorry didn't notice the ref was incorrect, My fault, sorry it just looked sucpicous RC-1136 18:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Its fine. But like I said, it keeps getting added without any proof. And because most people obviously dont have the book, we cant check it with anyone. Purpilia 18:45, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey! :)
Hello! Sorry for bothering you but you might remember me, we've talked a few lines on the Jedi Archives article. I was looking for a picture you told me you could scan. LelalMekha 20:46, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Monn image
Hello. Please provide a source for the Monn image you recently added to that article. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Spoilers
Please remember to indicate you are adding info about yet-to-be-released works in your edit summaries, to avoid spoiling anybody. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 11:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Right, sorry. Thanks for the reminder! Purpilia 18:02, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Pic
Hey, glad you liked the shot. I got it from TheForce.Net article about some of the staff getting a demo of TFU. Link: http://www.theforce.net/latestnews/story/The_Force_Unleashed_XBox_360_PS3_115998.asp The Secret Apprentice  ( Personal Comm ) 14:42, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Idiot
Ahsoka Tano is no Jedi padawan she is a knight Do not delefe come you Automatisch virus.

I say Admin: He do you block. Master190 16:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Pay him no mind, he's permabanned. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 16:28, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I totally agree. Also, just for the record, she's a padawan.74.186.151.239 00:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC).

Knights Billet
What is your reason fo wanting to delete Knights Billet?  Ifindyourlackoffaithdisturbing  ( Oya Manda! ) 23:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It is a duplicate of the page I created a while ago. Purpilia 00:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Order 66
Where was it stated that Etain and Zey die? Presumably in RC: Order 66, but do you personally have a copy, is this from forums, or what? Galen Marek  ( Personal Comm ) 23:59, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You were right in assuming it was from the book. I have it yet have not started it. I read that they died from a number of people at JCF.com and figured I would add it while I was disposing of the bullets on the Great Jedi Purge page. Purpilia 00:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Where did u get it? I dont have it yet, but i thought it wasnt out yet either. Also what si the URL for that JCF site? And how can Sev be in it if he was lost on Kashyyyk. Unless they rescued him.... Thanks. Galen Marek  Starkiller Eclipse smooch.jpg ( Personal Comm ) 00:26, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I just happened to find it in my local Boarders. I was really surprised. The Jedi Council Forums discussion is at; http://boards.theforce.net/literature/b10003/29086975/p5 . And I believe that Sev was only mentioned.

Image sourcing
A few notes on image sourcing: 1 - thanks for tagging all those Hyperspace images. They get deleted on sight. 2 - listing "starwars.com" as a source doesn't count and will be rolled back unless you link to a specific page. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 20:38, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Well unfortunately, most of the pages they are from don't exist anymore, so I can't go through and source them properly until the pages are restored. Purpilia 23:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Mission to Kashyyyk (Clone Wars)
Hello Purpilia, you recently edited Mission to Kashyyyk (Clone Wars) to say that Delta Squad was led by Etain Tur-Mukan during the rescue of tarfful, as far as Star Wars: Republic Commando goes this is incorrect. I'd revert the edit myself save for the fact that I have not yet read Order 66: A Republic Commando Novel, please check and then either revert your edit or leave me a message explaining why your statment is correct, cheers — RC-1136 Hate Mail Here 14:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * In Order 66 she leads them on part of the mission, though I am unfamiliar with the story that was established before hand. So I was hoping if I added it in there, it would be a starting point for other edits. As with other events in Order 66, some details have been changed and I am not completely sure how to go about modifying it. So, if you think it should be deleted, go for it and we can wait for someone who is familiar with both stories to blend it together. Either way works for me! Purpilia 20:32, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * First thanks for taking such a sensible approach to this. I think I'll have to get the book, should be finished in about a one to two weeks. In the meantime may as well just let your edit stand, cheers — RC-1136 Hate Mail Here 09:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Mace as Grand Master
Hey, I noticed that you added Mace Windu to the list of Grand Masters, with The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia as your source. I was hoping you could provide a quote and/or page number, as I have been unable to find any mention of Mace as Grand Master. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 16:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, I found it. But it seems to me like "Grand Master" and "Master of the Order" are two separate titles, despite their similarities. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 16:09, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

New pages
Don't forget the era tags! Graestan ( Talk ) 02:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks! Purpilia 02:55, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, it's quite cool that you're going through the CSWE and creating articles for everything that we don't have. However, please be aware that you're neglecting to put categories on several of these new articles. In addition, please cross-reference these articles with the CUSWE. Bob Vitas was heavily involved in the creation of the book, and so most, if not all, the articles in the new Encyclopedia will be in his online resource. The difference is that the CUSWE tells us where exactly the object first appeared. So, for example, you made the article Acey with only CSWE as a source, but if you look up Acey on the CUSWE, we can see that the character originally came from Jedi Quest: The False Peace. Just something to think about. ;) Cull Tremayne 02:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, cool. Purpilia 02:05, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It is also important to check the sources cited by CUSWE to see whether the subject makes an appearance or is only mentioned (I'm not accusing you of not having done so, but this is just something to keep in mind). Additionally at times CUSWE can be woefully non-specific in its source citations. One example that comes to mind would be its citation of Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game in a number of its entries, rather than the specific official publication in which the information originally appeared. If you don't have access to the source that CUSWE cites in order to verify the appearance or mention, my advice would be to only put the Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia down as the source and use the "" template at the beginning of the "Sources" heading.Muuuuuurgh 02:39, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

CSWE
Hi, Purpilia.

I am thrilled that you are going through the CSWE, as well, adding the sources to the articles. Just a thought, I was curious if you had run into this issue yet and what your thoughts were. I have been working through book two (starting with "H"), and have had to create quite a few articles. I've also noticed that some articles use slightly different names. We have an article called Scrubber droid, while the CSWE calls it Hangar deck scrubber droid. I created the redirect, but on the sources list I added the following: *The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia (See "Hangar deck scrubber droid") I did this to allow those who wish to find the article in CSWE the ability to do so. I think we should both try to do this, but I was curious if you preferred that wording, or would you prefer something such as "Entry as 'Hangar deck scrubber droid'" or another idea? I also think that other articles, such as Jeff Pill which we create from info in CSWE should have something that links to the original article since there is no article just on Jeff Pill (that I've found yet). What do you think? &mdash; Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 02:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I forgot to mention, we have a template, C which allows small text, so we do not have to use the html tags. &mdash; Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 02:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay thats awesome! I'm all for the (See "X" article) format; its short and simple and too the point. And thanks for the template, that will come in handy. I'll try to start using it right away! Purpilia 03:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome. If that's the one you prefer, then I'll stick with it, also. Happy exploring! &mdash; Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 03:17, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Ordo Skirata
Hi. I'm guessing that you have your own Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia based on the recent additions you've made on the page. I was wondering if you could do me a favor. I'm currently working on the Ordo Skirata page and I want to know if he has an article or page in the encyclopedia. Thanks. --ToRsO bOy 03:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah he is in there but nothing new and nothing extravagant is included. basically it says he was a Null ARC and he was trained by Skirata. Nothing past that basic stuff. And there you have it! Purpilia 03:27, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Much thanks. I can at least add it as a source. :) --ToRsO bOy 11:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Kel Algwinn
Hey! I noticed that the CSWE apparently kills off Kel Algwinn. Do you mind typing up the full entry or at least the part about his death? I'm curious to see if they consider him to be a Jedi/"redeemed" or not. Thanks a lot. Kebla 04:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * "An ancient Sith apprentice who trained at the Sith Academy on Korriban four millenia before the Battle of Yavin. Kel harbored doubts about the true nature of the Sith, which he admitted to his comrades, some of whom were actually Jedi Knights who had infiltrated the Academy. The Jedi later implored Algowinn to leave, and he found himself torn between loyalties. When the Sith students eventually turned against the Jedi, Algowinn was killed in the fighting. And there you have it! Purpilia 16:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks again! Kebla 19:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeeru Chivkyrie
Hey,you recently added The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia to the article Yeeru Chivkyrie. Could you tell me what the CSWE says about him, so that I could add that to the article?  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk  17:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * An Adarian, he was one of the Rebel Alliance's primary supporters in the Shelsha sector, and leader of the resistance group Republic Redux. Purpilia 18:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright. Thank you for the information.  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk  19:28, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Removing info
Please do not remove key sections for featured articles like you did with the BTS for Villian Dance. An article cannot be an FA without a BTS, and it is appreciated if you do not remove it, or other important sections.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh sorry I didnt realize; I was just going through and I thought it odd to have a rather redundant BtS section that stated something detailed in the Sources and Appearances section. But, whatever it doesn't really matter! Purpilia 00:47, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Wookie Cookie

 * Eeeee! Gee, thanks! Purpilia 01:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

..........
stop doing "spam" edits.--Bull36 01:56, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry I am not at all sure what you are talking about. Purpilia 02:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

CSWE Help
Hey, I noticed that you've been adding a lot of info from the Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia and I was wondering if you could help me out a little. I'm currently writing an article on the Imperial Sentinels and I was wondering if there was any new information on them in the book. It's currently the only source I don't have about them and it would be a great help if you could let me know of any new information. Thanks again. Xicer9 ( Rawr) 02:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Not really sure what to consider as new, but the entry is only two sentences long. It basically states that they were large guards used to protect the Emperor's citadel, and they may have been droids or cyborgs. Purpilia 02:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that's all I needed. :) Xicer9 Atgar.svg( Rawr) 02:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad I could help! Purpilia 02:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Handmaiden Sisters
Hey Purpilia. I was wondering if I could ask you for a big favor. I noticed that you wrote that the CSWE states that the Handmaiden Sisters were trainees until they left the Order after the Jedi Civil War. This actually contradicts the game, since the game stated they never were trainees or even Force-sensitive. I was wondering if you would be so kind as to copy the entry for me so that I could take a look at it. I don't doubt that that is what it says, it will simply help me correct some articles. I would really appreciate it. Cylka  -talk- 02:13, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Well done
Hi Purpilia. I'm awarding you the diligence award for the superb work you've done and continue to do on integrating the colossal amount of information in The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia to the site. -- Harrar 09:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)




 * Thanks alot! Glad I can contribute something to the Wook! Purpilia 23:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Shadowfeed in CSWE
Do you know where the CIS Shadowfeed appears in CSWE? It doesn't seem to have an entry of its own, but you added it to the article's sources list. Cheers, -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh it has an entry, yet very small, on page 128. Hope that helps! Purpilia 22:40, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Black Fleet info
You made an interesting edit that seems to provide information on Black Eleven. Can you tell me what the exact phrasing in your source is, please? Thanks!! --McEwok 16:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * "Instead the Astrolabe was destroyed by the Yevethan battle cruiser; the Yevetha claimed they were defending their territory against New Republic spies. In fact, the Yeveha had moved their entire Black Eleven Fleet to Doornik-1142 to conceal it." Thats just the fleet part, there is the description of the star before that. Hope that helps! Purpilia 19:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Interesting. Thank you!! The only thing we knew about Black Eleven before was that it had been at one of the Yevethan worlds before they rebelled from the Empire. This confirms that it was captured. From what you quoted, it sounds like there's more on the "battle cruiser" - the Purity, which is really just a name in the novel? Any of the Black Fleet shipyards (Black Eight, Nine, Eleven, Fifteen) mentioned elesewhere? Or indeed, the Type II shipyard design? --McEwok

Eshan and the Echani
Might i ask where you got the information about this planet Eshan and it being the Echani Homeworld, as i don't recall ever reading about it or seeing it mentioned anywhere else.--Kahn Iceay 06:44, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Its from the CSWE under echani (The fighting style). It says " originated with the Echani people of Eshan and was modified by the Sun Guards of Thyrsus. Purpilia 01:25, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Does it have any other information in it, the CSWE, regarding the Echani as a People and a culture? With so little to go on from the games I was hoping that some canon information about them would come out as 99% of fanon anyone tries to make for them or anything really is just cliched and silly. --Kahn Iceay 18:59, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Not really, it details some of their weapons and the fighting style but nothing new besides the mention of Eshan. Purpilia 19:32, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

CSWE

 * Possibly premature as I see G is still part of Vol.1, but nonetheless, well deserved. --Eyrezer 02:55, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Dash
That I would introduce you to the wonderment that is WP:DASH. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Getteles/Getelles
Hi Purpilia,

Great to see you're still going with the CSWE, We all can't thank you enough! I saw you created a page for Moff Getteles; in fact, there's already a page for Moff Getelles (notice the spelling), who is the same character. I was wondering if it was an error on your part or on the encyclopedia's?

-- —Harrar  ( Cut the comm chatter ) 17:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

—Harrar ( Cut the comm chatter ) 17:16, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, I hate to ask, as it seems a bit rude, but these new entries are your own words, right? :P --
 * Ahhh, thanks that was my mistake, I normally double- and triple-check but obviously I didn't... And yeah they are, though I have noted that many of the articles in the CSWE are direct copies of the CUSWE, haha. So, I'll go ahead and change that Getelles thing. Purpilia 17:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay that's great, and I'm very impressed that you check and triple check, as well as don't get tempted to copy info straight in. Keep up the good work! - —Harrar  ( Cut the comm chatter ) 17:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Sourcing
Please remember that all new edits to Wookieepedia's Featured articles and Good articles must be properly Sourced. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:09, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Since you've evidently chose to ignore this message, please consider this follow-up message your official warning. If you continually fail to source the edits you make to Featured and Good articles, you may find yourself blocked from editing. Thank you for your cooperation. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh sorry, I hadn't seen it... I dont know which article(s) you are talking about but I'll go back and look and make sure I pay more attention in the future. Purpilia 18:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Another request to please make sure you source the contributions you make to Featured and Good articles. This first requires you to pay attention to which articles are status articles before editing by seeing whether an article has a blue check mark or a blue star in the upper right-hand corner of the page. Our sourcing guidelines and how-to can be found here: Sourcing. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ugh, sorry again; I didnt see it and I have no idea which article that was was. I'll take a break now... Purpilia 06:06, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Ghrag
I noticed you made the article Ghrag Mercenaries. Unfortunately, an article pertaining to this group already exists under Ghrag. If Ghrag Mercenaries is their proper name, please move Ghrag to it.  OLIOSTER  (talk)  17:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Which leads me to believe the search bar doesnt work, or I am just an incompetent speller because I searched for it! Oh well, I'll merge it. Purpilia 18:03, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Its all good, I've done the same thing. I took the liberty of adding the information from your article to Ghrag and added the encyclopedia as a source.  OLIOSTER  (talk) Sith_Emblem.svg 18:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * A question, if I may. In the encyclopedia, is the word mercenaries capitalized when mentioning them for the first time? If it is, its probably their proper name.  OLIOSTER  (talk) Sith_Emblem.svg 18:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes it is capitalized. Purpilia 20:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Then probably best to go the other way and merge Ghrag into Ghrag Mercenaries.  OLIOSTER  (talk) Sith_Emblem.svg 20:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmmmm, I thought I did...Obviously not. That is what I meant to do. Purpilia 21:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Redirects
Hey, just wanted to tell you that the proper formatting for redirects looks like this: #REDIRECT Article name, there should be no space between the number sign and "REDIRECT".  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk  17:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Acquisition of CSWE
Hello Purpilia. I just wanted to let you know that I've recently acquired the CSWE myself and want to add obscure bits of information from it. I know you've been going through some sections of the book and others have taken their own areas. What letters generally have not been covered already? --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I have complete the entire first book and I am up through Madrix Hansor in the second book. I have gone in order completing entrees while I have noted that some people start and pick back up in spots. So anywhere after "H" is untouched by me at least, so feel free to start adding there! Purpilia 05:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Rodian Salvage Cartel
Hello, Purpilia, and thank you for your continous TSCWE campaign. Regarding your recent edits to pages Heavy Defenders and Drexl Roosh's gang: don't you think that perharps Drexl Roosh's gang is the Rodian Salvage Cartel?  Mauser  Comlink 15:38, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I wondered but was to lazy to check the other entries to see if they were separate. I'll go ahead and check and rename it if I find anything indicating they arent just a smaller unit but I am sure that they are one in the same. Purpilia 15:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I checked and it is very vague about any connection. By vague I mean there is nothing at all that even hints at them being together. Drexl Roosh's entry just says he was a criminal clan leader operating on Raxus Prime; the Rodian Salvage Cartel entry states that they controlled large areas of the aforementioned planet. So I don't know where that leaves the Gang article; are they a division or a group of members in the Cartel, or are they the Cartel? Purpilia 15:47, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The name Drexl Roosh's gang comes from The Force Unleashed Campaign Guide and it doesn't mention cartel at all.  Mauser  Comlink 21:11, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Hey Purpilia
Hey Purpilia, I see that you have the TCSWE and I was wondering if you can look up information about Ahsoka Tano. I'm doing a long term co-project on her for WP:TCW, and could use the information listed in TCSWE. While I'm in no rush, you can take your time with looking her up in the encyclopedia. :)  JangFett  Talk 04:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, sorry it took me so long to get back to you. Her entry is pretty short and mundane; it mentions that she likes to give things nicknames and list a bunch of childish terms, which is what takes up most of the blurb there. Purpilia 03:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Great, I can source the "nickname" thing to CSWE. :) Also, do you mind looking up information about Moradmin Bast? Thank you so much, Purpilia.  JangFett  (Talk) 21:35, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * "Bast, Chief Moradmin"---Chief personal aide to Grand Moff Tarkin, rarely underestimated enemies, cunning and patience learned from hunting big game as a child, died on the Death Star. Purpilia 15:55, October 18, 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Purpilia. :)  JangFett  (Talk) 15:56, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

CSWE
Hi Purpilia. As you've worked through the CSWE, have you noticed many new planets from the encyclopedia? I know there has been a couple, such as Antamont and Aridka. If you are aware of any more, could you let me know? Those two examples were previously unidentified worlds only given a name in the CSWE. --Eyrezer 03:05, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, no problem, if I come across anything I'll let you know! Purpilia 03:10, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

The Eddawans
Hi, I was wondering about an edit you made to Joli Ti Eddawan's page. Could you please give me the quote from the Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia that says she died? I'd like to see it; I didn't know there was any information about the Eddawans besides Legacy of the Jedi. Thank you! --Crazy Jedi Girl
 * it just says that she and her father were ambushed by pirates and never seen again. I guess I just assumed that meant they died. Purpilia 04:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:19, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

Sourced info?
Hey Purpillia, I noticed you are adding info to articles about planets, systems etc. I'm unable to find anywhere in the same sources. Where exactly you're getting these information from? They're not in the appendix in case of The Essential Atlas. Thank you.--Jedi Marty 17:48, October 23, 2009 (UTC)
 * Nevermind I found those under name of the main planets in Part II (I almost forget about them). Thank you for your valuable contributions. Cheers and keep up a good work.--Jedi Marty 18:03, October 23, 2009 (UTC)

Idlewil liquor
Your article on Idlewil liquor mentions Star Wars Adventure Journal 13 under Appearances. Tell me, could you precise the specific article or short tale where it is mentioned? I'm interested on featuring the article on Shashay and I'll need very exact sourcing. Thank you very much. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 08:02, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * I think its actually Journal 11 and Im not sure which article it was in. I think Peter Schweighofer wrote it if that is any help. Purpilia 16:04, October 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * Journal #11 and Schweighofer sounds like Smuggler's Log, a series of articles that "introduced several characters in the perspective of Platt Okeefe." The Log in #11 dealt with Pok Nar-Ten, Gjeel Dhantra, Klatooinian Trade Guild, Kuuvat and Nazrita Villache. Do you think it could be the source? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 15:47, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm going to assume yes. I got this information from the CUSWE and it seems to be accurate on all other counts so I'd trust it. Purpilia 16:36, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

Unidentified Jedi
Purpilia, I must say to you that I am strongly against the articles you're creating for unidentified Jedi. Not only they are extremely trivial and redundant, many of them also too much assumptions, incorrect ones as in the case with SWG TCG cards. I ask you to leave your opinion on why should they be allowed to exist in this Sh thread. Thank you.  Mauser  Comlink 18:14, November 26, 2009 (UTC)

Darth Bane: Dynasty of Evil
Hi Purpillia, I noticed you're creating new articles from just released novel, which is wonderful. I just want to let you know 980 BBY is in Rise of the Empire era and not Old Republic era as you're putting in infoboxes. Cheers and keep up a good work.--Jedi Marty 22:17, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
 * Ha so it is. Thanks!!! Purpilia 23:04, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:52, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

Ahsoka edit
Hey, Purpilia. I was reading your edit in the Ahsoka Tano article, and it's proper if you use last names after the person has been mentioned. It's very encyclopedic, and has been used extensively in FAs/GAs.  JangFett  (Talk) 23:02, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Right. So I am curious as to why you reverted my edits, as I changed all the first names to surnames.Purpilia 23:45, March 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the confusion.  JangFett  (Talk) 00:01, March 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha no problem!!!Purpilia 00:38, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Aargau
Where did you get this information from? --Imperialles 13:59, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I used the maps in the Essential Atlas to find the categories and the first paragraph. The second was already sourced, and the last paragraph comes from the book too I believe. I don't have it with me or I would check. Purpilia 16:43, April 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Found it all. Cheers. --Imperialles 16:45, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

Holocron Vault
Just to let you know, I've removed extensive amount of unverified information from the Holocron Vault article. There's no indication that the "vault" appeared outside of TCW, as it was created recently in canon. Unless a newer source says the vault has been used prior to 22 BBY or has been rebuilt in later eras, then we can readd information.  JangFett  (Talk) 15:59, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * The information was all sourced. The vault is the obvious source of the Dark Holocron obtained by Lorian Nod in Legacy of the Jedi when he steals it from the Jedi Temple Library. All the rest is the history of the Temple...and as the Vault is in the Temple it is relevant. So I don't understand why you removed the information...Purpilia 17:45, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, no, that was the Holocron Chamber. The vault is something different, that was created for TCW. Anything else is OR/speculation, and has no place within an article.  JangFett  (Talk) 16:06, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * No. The Holocron Chamber is in the Tower of First Knowledge. The Vault is in the library. Nod says he was in the library when he took it.Purpilia 16:58, June 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Does the text say Holocron Vault, though?  JangFett  (Talk) 15:30, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Does it need to? Where else would the Dark Holocron be kept? On some shelf??? TCW states that the holocrons stored in the library are in the vault. Nod took it from the library. I think that it is a reasonable assumption that is the most likely case. No it does not state Nod went into the library and took the artifact from the vault but I think it is ridiculous to split hairs over the fact. Purpilia 17:13, June 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's OR/speculation. There's no confirmation that is was the vault. The information should be removed.  JangFett  (Talk) 15:38, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't it be defined as whats under "What is not original research?" I am making a logical assumtion based on the data provided. The holocron comes out of the library. The holocrons are stored in the library's holocron vault. Doesn't sound like I am pulling this out of thin air does it? Does it change the substance of what happened? No. Am I making up plot points or new settings? No. I am using data from a Lucas approved television show to highlight information from a story.Purpilia 16:05, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, you are adding speculation into that article. It's not confirmed if it was the Holocron Vault or not.  JangFett  (Talk) 16:22, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry to butt in. But Jang is correct. Yes, TCW depicts the holocron vault as containing holocrons. But the thing is, Legacy of the Jedi does not. For all we know, the holocron in LOTJ could be being stored somewhere else for any number of reasons. Assuming that the holocron in LOTJ is in the holocron vault would be like assuming that a Twi'lek character was born on Ryloth. Yes, other sources confirm that the Twi'lek homeworld is Ryloth, but you can't assume that every Twi'lek character was born there. It's speculation, and so is assuming that the holocron in LOTJ is in the holocron vault. Menkooroo 16:27, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Open discussion, your not butting in. While I disagree, I'll concede that arguement. What about the rest of the article. The vault would have been controlled by the Sith during the occupation of the Temple and destryoed during the Yuuzhan Vong War. Agreed? Purpilia 17:28, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Purpilia, I'm going to have to ask you to read over WP:ATT. Basically you're only speculating and adding in unverified information into articles, based on what you think. The unverified information you keep readding into the Holocron Vault article has been reverted again. Please do not readd it, unless a source confirms the holocron was in the Holocron Vault. So far the only confirmed appearance of the Vault was in a TCW episode.  JangFett  (Talk) 19:33, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Right...I just said I was fine with that. But I asked about whether or not it was okay to state that it was taken by the Sith during Operation Knightfall and that it was destroyed during the YVW along with the rest of the Temple. So what is your opinion on the latter? Purpilia 04:52, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Not unless it's confirmed.  JangFett  (Talk) 05:08, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * How can you logically argue that the Holocron Vault, part of the Temple, was not taken over or ransacked by the Sith? Is it not clearly stated that the Galactic Empire maintained martial control over the complex? Purpilia 07:02, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * If I might interject before this debate causes more trouble than it's worth, mentioning that the Temple itself was taken over by the Empire and was later ransacked by the Yuuzhan Vong in the Holocron Vault article would be the ideal solution to this problem. That leaves it to the reader to interpret whether or not the Holocron Vault is subject to that information instead of presenting it as fact when no source directly clarifies it. Although yes, the assumption that the Vault was taken over by the Sith and later the Yuuzhan Vong is logical, it is still an assumption, not a confirmed fact. It may be that both factions either respected or ignored the Vault enough to leave it alone&mdash;no source has outright refuted that idea despite its unlikelihood, and it nevertheless shows that the article should not assume too much when there are other as-yet possible ideas out there.  CC7567  (talk) 07:25, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Again, please do not add in unverified information into the Holocron Vault article. There's absolutely nothing in the upcoming Jedi guide that mentions the information you keep adding into the article. If you haven't realized, anything that's a preview is discouraged, as it is subject to change. Please take a look at this CT for more information:  JangFett  (Talk) 06:24, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * As I cited, the book's preview underlines the words Holocron Vaults and has a scribbled note regarding the theft of the holocron. And then the fact that the Vaults are in the Archives proves they survived into the Galactic Civil War. But whatever.Purpilia 06:30, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Tru Veld page
Just out of curiosity, no hard feeling or anything, just wondering why you erased my quote from Tru Veld's page about Ferus's point of view on Tru from The Last of the Jedi: Underworld.173.28.73.21 04:30, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just the way it was worded was not correct. In the articles its not proper to add things like "In this book, it said this," or "Someone thought this." But if you want to add a "personality and traits" section, which could definately be beneficial to the article, you could write that stuff in your own words and just source it as which ever text you got it from! Hope that helps! Purpilia 04:38, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Er'stacia / Er'stacian
Hey, Purpilia. I'm getting ready to expand the Er'stacian article, and I noticed you added The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia to the list of sources for both that article and for Er'stacia. I asked on Forum:Entry requests for the entries from CSWE, but says they don't have entries. Do you remember where they are mentioned? Is it in Mace Windu's entry, perhaps? Thanks! ~ SavageBob 17:25, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, found it: under Megalith. ~ SavageBob 20:37, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Jin-Lo Rayce
Thanks for adding the category to Jin-Lo's article.&mdash; 17:48, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Holocron Vault
To JangFett and Purpilia: regardless of who may be in error, please stop warring on the Holocron Vault page. Any further conflict will result in the page being locked and potential blocks being handed out, as this is not the first time that both of you have initiated a revert war on the page. Please instead discuss the problem with each other and reach a proper agreement more peaceably instead of grappling over it and turning the site into a battleground. Thank you.  CC7567  (talk) 20:58, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha tried the whole discussion thing...but thanks for the warning. I think we were ablt to beat it down to the bare minimum of what needs to be written. Purpilia 21:02, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

Moving pages
Hey Purpilia, when moving pages, please make sure you use the move function as opposed to simply redirecting the page to a new title, as you did with Jedi battlemaster&mdash;this is done because the page's edit history is saved when you move it, as opposed to redirecting it. Thank you. Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 03:15, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Great! Thanks so much for letting me know! I really appreciate it! Purpilia 04:14, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 21:55, October 4, 2010 (UTC)

Force speed
Hey Purpilia, I noticed you put the Merge template on Force speed, which I'm sure you know is a good article. I was wondering, what source states that Force speed is the same ability as Altus sopor? I think it would be a good idea to talk to, who took Force speed to GA status, before merging the two, in case he has already considered the matter and there is a valid reason for keeping the two separate. Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 23:41, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Same thing with Force Body&mdash;what source says that the two are the same? Just because their effects are similar doesn't mean they are automatically the same power. I would suggest reverting Force body back to its pre-redirect form before going further. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 23:43, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * And sorry for the multi-post here, but I want to especially reinforce this second point, because Force body is a canonical name for the Force power, as it was named in the trading card. And since Force Body and Altus sopor have both been canonically named, then you should not redirect one to the other unless there is a source that clearly states that they are the same power. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 23:46
 * Yeah, I didn't merge it because it was a good article. I am using The Jedi Path and going off of what it says. Basically, all of these abilities are the same and stem from this which says in very few words that they are all just variations on the same root ability. But this is just my interpretation of course... Purpilia 23:48, October 20, 2010 (UTC) October 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * If it's just your interpretation then you should by no means just start merging and redirecting articles&mdash;this needs to be discussed and looked into further before more articles are merged/redirected. It's better to be safe and make sure that the information we are presenting is 100% correct than to be too hasty and make mistakes. Again, I'd suggest undoing your redirect of Force Body. I don't have The Jedi Path so I personally can't weigh in on the situation, but I know other users do. In this case it would be best to start up an SH forum, asking around for other users' opinions, before you unilaterally start making big changes. And as for Force speed, it isn't usually best to just slap a merge tag on a good article; always check in on the article talk page or the talk page of the nominator first, just to be safe. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 23:55, October 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey Purpilia. Having just read over the section in The Jedi Path, I really don't think they should be merged. The section basically describes three "families" of Force techniques that fall under control, similar to how Ayna-seff is a Force technique of the Hassat-durr family for the Baran Do. This is the complete section on Altus sopor: Altus sopor is the traditional term for the ability to increase one's focus on the Force. You can practice this self-directed ability during each of your five daily meditations. In time you will learn to merge into the Force so that you become nearly invisible to others.  That is not enough to merge canonically named Force powers into it.  Grunny  ( talk ) 04:23, October 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, sounds good! Purpilia 04:56, October 21, 2010 (UTC)

Fae Coven
Hey, Purpilia. I've been working on the Jenet article, and I noticed that you recently named Fae Coven a Jenet based on The Jedi Path: A Manual for Students of the Force. The searchable version of the book on amazon.com does not give any hits for the word "Jenet," so can you tell me what page of the book it is that names her as one? And what page is the image of her you uploaded on? Thanks for your help! 00:41, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah the pic is on the third to last page (I don't have it with me right now). And her species isn't named in the book, the author confirmed her species on JCF, but I was just lazy and didn't source that...but I mean there is a picture of her so it still works though it should be changed to reference his notes. Hahaha anyway that should answer your questions!!! Purpilia 01:20, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, that helps. Are there any key words or phrases on the page her pic's on? I'm trying to find it on Amazon, but I need either a page number or some key phrase to search for. In other words, it'd be awesome if you could check the book when you get access to it again! ~ SavageBob 02:07, November 5, 2010 (UTC)

Noric Gestal's fate
Hey, Purpilia! I'm trying to expand the Gotal article with information form Twi'light Storm, and I noticed you had created the article for Noric Gestal, the Gotal slaver. In your article, you say that in the barroom brawl in the adventure, Gestal is killed. I can't find where this is mentioned, though. Could you point me in the right direction? What page is that? Thanks! ~ SavageBob 16:23, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't have it in front of me but I am guessing that its in TCSWE but I cant be sure. I wont be able to put my hands on my copy for a while as I am back at the university. Actually...looking at the article I saved the wrong copy when I was working on articles from the book! FAIL! I saved my notes from the TCUSWE and didn't post my version of the article, which I still have saved on my computer (at home). That's embarrassing.Purpilia 18:12, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, I didn't realize that Gestal had an article in the CSWE. I'll check it when I get home. Thanks for the heads up, and no worries about the confusion. :) ~ SavageBob 20:05, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

Moving pages
We're going to need you to stop trying to move pages from names they have been called in official materials to names you pull out of your ass. Considering your block history, that will be the last straw. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 18:51, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Awww thanks for being so polite. And yeah, no problem. Purpilia 19:21, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * And its actually called "Arka Jeth's praxeum" in the god damn infobox image, so you might wanna get on that ;) Purpilia 19:28, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's acknowledged as a misspelling, smartass. But by all means, keep pushing and see what happens. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 19:37, December 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh lets try and be civil. No need to threaten me or call me names. Purpilia 19:41, December 19, 2010 (UTC)

Jedi Trials
Hey Purpilia,

I noticed that you had done several edits to the Jedi Trials article. In one particular edit, you removed information regarding Nomi Sunrider under the edit summary of "Removing all the lists that are just speculative..." While I understand the removal of lists, the information regarding Sunrider is far from speculative, and despite it being sourced, you removed it. I was therefore wondering what your basis for such an edit was? Thanks, —Tommy 9281 17:29, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * The example given, using her skills to defeat the thugs attacking her child, was not one of her trials. While it could have been, as far as I am aware, Thon never declared that she was taking the Trial of Courage or whatever. Its like all of the speculation on Kenobi or Skywalker's trials. Purpilia 04:26, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Darth Desolous
There seems to be a disagreement over Darth Desolous and what exactly he was in TFU. Currently, Darth Desolous is nominated to be a Featured Article. As the edit warring is considered disruptive by the rules, and editing a nominated article without the nominator's blessings is considered poor form, you should bring the disagreement up as an objection on Featured article nominations/Darth Desolous. The INQ will be required to either strike or endorse your objection before they can graduate or dismiss the article. This will ultimately resolve the edit war, allow the article to be worked according to standards, and achieve a final consensus on the matter without breaking any more rules and risking a ban. SinisterSamurai 20:07, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Please take a look at my proposal regarding this matter on the FAN page and tell me whether you agree with it or not. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 17:12, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've made the appropriate changes to the article. Please see if that satisfies your objection. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 11:47, March 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, looks good. Purpilia
 * Can you strike your objection on the FAN page, then? QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 13:59, March 26, 2011 (UTC)

Core Worlds Security Act
Hey Purpilia, when you created Core Worlds Security Act back in 2009, you added in Star Wars Insider as a source, but didn't specify which issue or article. Would you happen to remember where you saw it? Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 06:18, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it was issue 73. Purpilia 13:07, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Jedi biographies
Hey Purpilia! I doubt there is any hint in the Dark Lord that the Jedi whose articles you've created were discovered to be Force-sensitive by doctors. If there isn't, it's speculation and should be removed.  Imperators II (Talk) 16:21, April 13, 2011 (UTC)

Antmuel VI
Hey, Purpilia! I notice that you had expanded the article on Antmuel VI with information taken from The Essential Atlas. I've been looking for data on the planet, but I cant' seem to find it in the Atlas. Do you remember what page the info comes from, or in what section? Thanks! ~ Savage   03:44, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, where in Heroes & Rogues is the rotation period, orbital period, etc. detailed? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 03:49, April 18, 2011 (UTC)

Covenant Shadow
Hi Purpilia. In 2008, you added the sentence "After the execution of Operation: Vindication, all Shadows were either killed or taken into custody by the Jedi Order." to the article on the Covenant Shadows. What was the source for this? I have been trying to track it down without any luck so far. Cheers. --Eyrezer 11:04, August 16, 2011 (UTC)

Bar patron categories
Deleted per precedent. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 04:26, October 29, 2011 (UTC)

TOR and 88000
Hey Purpilia. Wanted to say thanks for getting this new TOR material up fast and as a result, you pushed us over 88,000 articles. Huzzah! :D --  Riffsyphon  1024 07:49, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Glad to help! Purpilia 20:42, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

Belth Allusis
What is the source for him being the member of the Jedi High Council? QuiGonJinn (Talk) 10:38, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't source it. It is from The Journal of Master Gnost-Dural.Purpilia 22:24, December 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks. Is there any other info of note on him? QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 14:27, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I am going to have to reread the article and compare them to see what info is new an what is not. I can post that info here if you wanna add it. Purpilia 20:42, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Please do. I'd appreciate that. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 13:52, December 22, 2011 (UTC)

Speculation
Hi Purpilia. Please do not add speculation and original research as you did to Jedi Council of Seers. The quote I have now added at the top of the article is the only mention of the council and gives no mention of them being on Ossus or acting in advisory capacity to the Jedi High Council, nor even that it was made up entirely of Jedi Masters. Everything must be verifiable and your own assumptions and interpretations do not fit that. Cheers, grunny &#64; wookieepedia :&#126;$ 05:55, January 30, 2012 (UTC)

Theed Royal Library
Hi there, just to let you know I reverted Theed Royal Library. It actually is not part of the palace complex--it's out in the streets of Theed. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 00:19, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh okay! Sorry about that; thanks for letting me know! Purpilia 00:28, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello again. I saw you edited this and Theed Courthouse. Are there any indications that Theed courthouse is a legislative building, or is the information you added speculation? Thank you. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 03:24, March 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Haha having a bad week. Thanks for pointing it out; I just minced my words. Purpilia 03:35, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

Murttoc Yine
Hi Purpilia, I saw the work you have done on Murttoc Yine. I would have to say good job expanding an article that was once a few sentences. Are you planning on making him a GAN? Hanzo Hasashi 19:35, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Meditation
If you need anything on findsman meditation or Zuckuss's meditations, let me know and I'll dig out the appropriate sources. :)  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:37, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes please!!! Hahaha I know only Jedi and Sith so any additional information you can add would be greatly appreciated!!!! Purpilia 05:39, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Then tomorrow, first thing, I'll dig through my stuff and pull out the appropriate sources. Currently, they're still packed away, as I had just recently moved, but they're more or less accessible.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:43, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, here we go...
 * In Alien Anthology, in the Findsman Prestige Class system:
 * Meditation rituals
 * Methods of such rituals kept secret from all others except other members of that findsman's sect.
 * Meditation must be without interruption for the findsman to gain benefit, and the findsman doesn't tolerate the company of those who rush them.
 * Meditation rituals can be used to access certain Force abilities, such as Battlemind, Force Whirlwind, Force Healing, Farsight, etc.
 * Meditations take up to two hours to complete.
 * In Of Possible Futures: The Tale of Zuckuss and 4-LOM:
 * Zuckuss prefers to meditate in hyperspace.
 * Meditate in a city, you sense the actions of its citizens
 * Meditate in orbit above a planet, you sense where that world's cultures were heading
 * Meditate in hyperspace, you sense the underlying feelings that motivate the majority of sentients and glimpse the destiny of the galaxy
 * Zuckuss averages two-hour meditations. One meditation lasted for 2.11 hours.
 * Zuckuss once received knowledge within 8.37 minutes of a meditation, but 4-LOM concluded it to be an anomaly.
 * Zuckuss maintains a 91.33725 chance of being correct, which gave him a greater accuracy than most Gands.
 * When meditating, Zuckuss maintains a regular respiration rate: Inhales, holds breath for one beat, exhales, holds breath for one beat
 * When meditating, Zuckuss views his visions as swirling mists that shroud certain information.
 * 4-LOM has also meditated.
 * He sequestered himself in Acquisition cell one, with his legs crossed, hands in lap, forefingers turned under thumbs.
 * He had to override his logic programming in order to receive "visions" much as Zuckuss does.
 * After they had joined the Rebel Alliance, 4-LOM continued to practice meditation and has had several visions, one which he related both to Zuckuss (who didn't doubt him) and eventually to Luke Skywalker:
 * 4-LOM saw himself sitting with young Jedi Knights in a newly-established academy. He could not tell if he had learned the ways of the Force, or if he was still attempting to learn them.
 * In Galaxy Guide 3: The Empire Strikes Back (Second Edition):
 * Meditations on average take about three hours.
 * In Alien Encounters:
 * Findsmen derive "omens" from their elaborate and arcane rituals.
 * Non-Gand find the accuracy of these rituals to be unsettling.
 * In How the Other Half Hunts
 * Zuckuss's meditative rituals decipher the "swirling mists of the future."
 * In Aurra Sing: Dawn of the Bounty Hunters:
 * Zuckuss usually hides his beliefs and practices from others.
 * Only 4-LOM is witness to Zuckuss's rituals.
 * 4-LOM shows curiosity about the rituals and wishes to function the same as Zuckuss.
 * In Star Wars: The Official Starships & Vehicles Collection 8:
 * Findsmen use meditation to focus their Force abilities.
 * That's it that I could come across on the topic of meditation. Hope that helps!  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:34, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * D'oh! GIANT Freudian slip on my part.  I meant to say Meditate in hyperspace, not "mate"!  Sorry about that, I didn't catch it until right before I went to bed. XD  Trak Nar  Ramble on 03:20, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hahahaha no big deal! Thanks for all the info; it was a great help! Purpilia 13:40, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Template:Jedi Lords
Hey, what're you trying to do? 1358 (Talk)  19:31, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * I am trying and failing to add Berethon to the template haha. I know there is a simple explanation as to what I am doing wrong but obviously I am clueless hahaha. Any help you can offer would be greatly beneficial. Purpilia 19:32, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * And Newar Forrth needs to be added as well. Purpilia 19:36, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Both done. You just happened to include some source code that didn't belong. :) Cheers, 1358  (Talk)  19:39, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nice, thanks alot! Purpilia 19:41, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

1stID
Hey Purpilia. Thanks for your work with adding all the Warfare info to the site. :) Since you're using 1stID a lot, please note that no italics are required for usage of the template. When you get the chance, please take a minute to correct the use of italics with the template. Thanks.  CC7567  (talk) 05:11, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for the heads-up; I'll get on that ASAP! Purpilia 15:34, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

Warfare
Hey Purpilia, I saw that you've been doing a lot of great work with the Essential Guide to Warfare. Do you want to join Wookieeproject: Warfare? We'd love to have you!

Just sign your name with three tildes in the participants section. Thanks! Cade  Calrayn   13:30, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

WP:Warfare
Welcome!

Sidrona Diath
Hey, Purpilia, why'd you remove everything about Sidrona Diath being Supreme Chancellor? I have no idea who the character is, but I was just wondering what changed. Cade  Calrayn   15:05, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * No one could come up with a source. I asked over at Jedi Council Forums and people who had the sources listed on the page could not find anything on his Chancellorship. If you have a source, feel free to re-add the info back. Purpilia 15:11, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * A few of us checked through the Tales of the Jedi Companion, which was purportedly the source, and couldn't find anything on it. I've now tagged Galactic Republic Chancery election, 4,000 BBY with Verify, as the TOTJ Companion doesn't seem to be the source. Menkooroo 19:35, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds good to me! Purpilia 19:38, May 10, 2012 (UTC)