User talk:Rgilbert27

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Rgilbert27!
Hello, and welcome to Wookieepedia! I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash; Omicron (Leave a message at the BEEP! ) 20:46, July 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * }

Unnecessary scroll box and word right in pictures
Hi, I appreciate you are trying to help, but some pages don't need a scroll box, just pages with enough sources/references/appearances deserve one. Also Layout guide says that the word right should be included in the pictures, so stop deleting that too. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:24, July 25, 2017 (UTC)

Stub
If there's a char-stub on the page you don't need to then add an update template, the stub already says that the page needs updating, seems unnecessary to have both --Lewisr (talk) 14:13, August 1, 2017 (UTC)

Images
Instead of posting the same message on the talk page of each bureaucrat, changes to the Layout Guide need to be voted on in the Consensus track. However, I doubt an amendment to remove the |right from thumbnails would be a success. Since its presence doesn't really affect the page negatively in any way, it makes more sense to keep it around for consistency and bot parsing. Cheers, 1358  (Talk)  19:20, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
 * Consensus and policy dictates whether |right or not should be included; in this case, policy says it should be. Attempts to remove |right can be construed as disruption and may be met with administrative sanctions. Like I said, changes to policy can be proposed in the Consensus track. 1358  (Talk)  19:47, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
 * You can look at examples in the Consensus track archive and ask for help with the proposal in the Senate Hall. The baseline is that a CT vote needs to contain the exact wording of any new proposals and which parts of existing policy need to be amended. 1358  (Talk)  20:08, August 6, 2017 (UTC)

Warning
You asked to the admins and two of them told you the same I did, stop removing the |right, if you want you can order the way is written, but attempts to remove the |right like the admin above said is disruption and may be met sanctions of them. You're welcome to address it on the Senate Hall or the CT--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:00, August 7, 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why you insist on still removing it when you've been warned against doing so, please stop --Lewisr (talk) 01:24, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

Reply
I do get it, the policy says that it stays so there's no reason to remove it, if you really feel that strongly then start a CT vote as has been suggested to you previously --Lewisr (talk) 01:31, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't really know how you start one as I've never done it myself, ask an admin or someone who has made one in the past and they'll help you --Lewisr (talk) 01:41, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * Go to Forum:Consensus track there's a little box to enter the title of the topic to discuss and then click on create. This will lead you to the blank page, there add why is the CT and the policy change you want. You can see how is done in this example Forum:CT:Naming policy: US vs. UK editions--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:44, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

CT
Hey, I saw that your CT was deleted. If you decide to create another, write the problem how the "|right" makes no difference, then propose what the policy would be after the change. Then for people to vote add 3 sections: Agree, Disagree and comments. Good luck with it--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:42, September 11, 2017 (UTC)

Executor
I've reverted your edits to the Executor/Legends article since they violate our Layout Guide. Please familiarize yourself with that and other policies before making any further edits, and, since the Executor is a Featured Article, one of the very best our site has to offer, please communicate with the article's nominator about making any changes to it. Thank you.  Imperators II (Talk) 15:43, September 13, 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:48, September 13, 2017 (UTC)

Right
I know you've been fighting to remove the |right, but please the policy is still the same, if you're going to move images, add the |right. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:41, October 3, 2017 (UTC)

Marjorie Eaton
What do you mean? --Lewisr (talk) 15:27, December 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * My only suggestion would be to remove the image --Lewisr (talk) 15:31, December 24, 2017 (UTC)

Why you changing categories?
I like, when the different things are separated like issue 1-9 are under "0#", issues 10-19 under "1#". When you put that space between the | and the number, the little titles like "here's everting under 0" don't show up. I find it harder finding things that way.--ZapikCZ (talk) 16:56, January 24, 2018 (UTC)
 * Here are a few examples from the past that are neither like how the canon ones were before nor how you made them, so I don't understand why you did it like you did. Category:Star Wars: Republic, Category:Star Wars: Empire, Category:Star Wars: Rebellion, Category:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (comics).

Special issues
Special issues like Destroyer Down, Annual, Ashcan shouldn't be numbered. I get you're trying to numerize them, but they are not part of the main numbering--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:19, January 26, 2018 (UTC)
 * Besides numbered issues, we shouldn't numbered other issues like Annuals I see you did the same for other series. In my opinion also TPBs and comic arcs shouldn't be numbered too like you did for Darth Vader 2015 series, but the special issues like annuals, one-shots or any other "special" issue should be kept without a number on the category--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:37, January 26, 2018 (UTC)
 * That's the alternative and how it was done sometimes, but usually numbered issues are identified in the categories by series name and number, for example Adventures 01 and special issues by the name of the issue like Ashcan, Destroyer Down, Annual 01, etc.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:03, January 26, 2018 (UTC)
 * Didn't realize about the issue with that, but absolutely will try to keep track of them--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:32, January 26, 2018 (UTC)

Filenames
Hello. I'd like to know why are you insisting on changing filenames, as you did here, even after specifically being told that they should be written with underscores instead of dashes. 06:30, February 5, 2018 (UTC)
 * Again, stop doing this, please. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:36, April 29, 2018 (UTC)
 * You have been warned about this before. Please stop. ' Tommy ' Imperial Emblem.svg ' Macaroni ' 16:19, August 19, 2018 (UTC)

Categories
Categories should be based in alphabetical ordering. Sorting comic issues by arbitrary numbers allows you to see the publication order, but that's not what categories are for, and doing so makes the page more difficult to navigate. For example, if someone was looking for Poe Dameron Annual 1, they would have to look between issues 15 and 16, which doesn't make sense, since it should logically be under a subheading of A. If someone was looking for publication info, they would go to the actual page of the comic, not the category. - Cwedin (talk) 17:59, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know what the categories looked like before, but they still need to be cleaned up, in my opinion. Ideally, the articles on individual issues should have something like, with no space before the issue number. The series pages should have a space with no number, and TPBs should be sorted by volume or something. This would also be easier for maintaining articles of ongoing series; e.g. Poe Dameron Volume 1 is currently listed as "35," which would need to be changed to "36" if a 27th comic issue was announced. -  Cwedin (talk) 18:49, February 9, 2018 (UTC)

Aligning images
Hi. I'd like to know what are you talking about here. I've checked your and previous revision in Oasis, Monobook, and Mercury, and it doesn't "clash" with infobox or anything in either of those skins. In fact, it doesn't appear to be doing anything at all.  Imperators II (Talk) 16:58, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm talking about the possible skins in which you are viewing Wookieepedia content, either the default "Wikia"/"Oasis" skin, the Monobook skin, or the Mercury skin which is used on mobile by default. Look, can you just link to a screenshot of this] revision of the article so that I can see what you're talking about when referring to "clashing with the infobox"? Thanks,  Imperators II (Talk) 17:08, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

Civility
Please, remember to use the summary edit only for constructive comments, the "deal with it" attitude isn't appropiate be careful with your words next time--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:16, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
 * Doesn't matter, you always need to address your objections properly without having a bad attitude against anyone. Now respecting the legends comics we're going to get to them eventually.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:28, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
 * As I said it doesn't really matter, you can be right or wrong. You need to share your objections in a good way without rude/uncivil comments. Try contacting the user and explain why you think they should stay. Just be careful of how you address other users and remember to not break the 3 revert rule--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:06, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
 * You need to learn how to deal with it if you plan to continue editing here especially since disagreements occur frequently. And please don't use the "Talk to DarthRuiz30 and see why your wrong" I'm not suggesting anything, You need to learn how to deal with this kind of situations. In my opinion I don't really know if they should be included in each of the series categories--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:56, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Removing right
Not sure why you're removing the |right from images when you've been told before that it can be construed as disruption. Please stop doing this --Lewisr (talk) 19:03, March 23, 2018 (UTC)
 * Again, you need to add it not removing it.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:19, March 24, 2018 (UTC)
 * You really ought to stop doing this, especially considering the amount of times you've been told about doing so --Lewisr (talk) 18:03, June 12, 2018 (UTC)

Answer
Of course mistakes will go unnoticed we're not here 24/7, but once we find the problem it will be most likely fixed. As for the One Piece wikia, I'm not interested in One Piece never seen it before and not too interested in watching it and if I'm going to spend time doing something I prefer is something that I like.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:07, March 25, 2018 (UTC)

Jordo
Hey, Jordo (commander) is to be moved to Jordo, so in advance all links must point to the latter page. ' Tommy ' ' Macaroni ' 09:24, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
 * That's just the way things are done, please stop changing it. ' Tommy ' Imperial Emblem.svg ' Macaroni ' 09:27, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? I'm not going to help you elsewhere if order for you to obey the rules here. Also, you're linking to the wrong page. It should be Star Wars: Darth Vader: Dark Lord of the Sith Book IV: Burning Seas. ' Tommy ' Imperial Emblem.svg ' Macaroni ' 09:33, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
 * The page you linked to was a redlink too. I was just cleaning up after your error. ' Tommy ' Imperial Emblem.svg ' Macaroni ' 09:40, April 13, 2018 (UTC)
 * I know. So why did you add them? ' Tommy ' Imperial Emblem.svg ' Macaroni ' 09:52, April 13, 2018 (UTC)

Images
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that, per Layout Guide, "Image caption punctuation (i.e., a full stop, or period) is determined by whether the caption uses a complete sentence. Example: "Luke Skywalker, Jedi Knight" does not receive a full stop, whereas "Luke Skywalker was a Jedi Knight." does." I was a bit confused by this at first, but it does make sense. For some more examples, from you recent edits, "Sloane defeated Count Vidian with the help of her rebel foes Hera and Kanan." should have a period/full stop as it is a full sentence, which you rightly added. However, "Sloane's first face-to-face meeting with Jarrus" doesn't need one, as it isn't a full sentence, as the caption makes no sense without the image. I hope this helps. ' Tommy ' ' Macaroni ' 17:13, April 19, 2018 (UTC)
 * Please pay attention to this, because right now you're just adding punctuation to all captions when in most cases it isn't necessary. ' Tommy ' Imperial Emblem.svg ' Macaroni ' 16:16, April 20, 2018 (UTC)

Categories
Please stop making unnecessary categories, we don't need categories for issues within comic series, especially for a 6 issue run --Lewisr (talk) 19:34, May 2, 2018 (UTC)

Trade paperback categories
You should have "Category:Canon trade paperbacks" and "Category:Legends trade paperbacks" as the correct category names instead of having "Category:Canon Trade paperbacks" and "Category:Legends Trade paperbacks" respectively. --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 15:57, May 3, 2018 (UTC)

Capital
Jedi temple is refered to the several temples through the galaxy, Jedi Temple is Coruscant's temple and its always capitalized. Titles before a name should be capitalized just like Lord, Chief Librarian, Jedi Master, Master, etc.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:30, May 6, 2018 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop the aggressive behavior, always make your points in a civil way. If you want a page to be create it, then you can do it, instead of ordering user to do them for you--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:20, May 9, 2018 (UTC)
 * That's not a reason to order users to make them. Everyone here is because they want all of us are volunteers and that's the main reason why there's not a priority list to what should be created first, people edit what they like, should we have the article yes, is it going to be created eventually. If you have questions about how to create a page ask other users, for example go to any book series and click edit thay way you can see how the page is structured. Also in the help section you can read the Manual of Style and Layout guide to learn more about the article creation process--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:48, May 9, 2018 (UTC)
 * Not sure, currently I'm about to go. You can copy and paste but modify everything with the correct info. You can always ask another user to help you, but in a civil way, ask that you're trying to make your first book page and not sure if it will be correct so in that case they can help you, correct it if there's anything wrong and give you feedback to get better at it.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:12, May 9, 2018 (UTC)
 * Unless you're going to do some about the page not existing then don't keep adding it, its better to link to a page that actually exists as it still helps readers with access to the main series --Lewisr (talk) 21:25, May 9, 2018 (UTC)

Appearance lists
Please note that while advisory templates are not necessarily strictly subject to this rule, the Layout Guide specifies that appearance lists will list comic stories by individual issue and not by arc. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 02:51, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
 * "Seen it before" versus "in the layout guide." Guess which one wins? -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 23:13, May 10, 2018 (UTC)

Books
You did a pretty good job with it. Just an advice when copy-pasting be sure to remove all references from the previous article and add the references for the actual book you're creating, same goes for Bibliography. As for help creating more articles, I wouldn't expect help immediately, but I'm sure that they will be created soon. I'll try and see if tomorrow I can get a couple of them--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:05, May 13, 2018 (UTC)

Spaces
Please stop removing spaces between the notes and references and the categories for no reason --Lewisr (talk) 14:18, May 16, 2018 (UTC)
 * Really? So what about this? And this? And the other occasions? --Lewisr (talk) 14:23, May 16, 2018 (UTC)
 * I find that hard to believe but okay, try fix your tech so it doesn't keep happening --Lewisr (talk) 14:30, May 16, 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah I imagine it would be something similar but I am not entirely familiar with that wiki so I can't say for certain --Lewisr (talk) 14:53, May 16, 2018 (UTC)
 * That's some claim but fair enough, have nothing that I can say against that as I don't know what it is tbh --Lewisr (talk) 15:06, May 16, 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure go ahead --Lewisr (talk) 15:15, May 16, 2018 (UTC)
 * Sounds alright, may have to check it out at some point --Lewisr (talk) 15:51, May 16, 2018 (UTC)

Inuse
Please respect Inuse tags at the top of articles. This includes simple maintenance edits like this one. Thank you. 1358 (Talk)  22:07, May 20, 2018 (UTC)

Warning
Again stop removing the |right from the images, you've been warned about this several times.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:49, July 27, 2018 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter if there was or not a |right, if the order of the images has changed, you need to add them. Just because some other pages doesn't have the "|right" in all their images, it doesn't mean its the way to do it. You've been trying to use that reasoning for other issues, and as another comment in your talk page says "Seen it before versus in the layout guide. Guess which one wins?". Eventually other pages will be changed and will follow what the Layout guide says.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:56, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

Oasis
If you don't even know what it is, then don't revert it or modify it. Oasis is default wikia skin, in it the infobox do not clashes. All edits should be done with Oasis skin in mind. I will remove your float, and please do not re-introduce. If you don't know something google it or ask properly, instead of reverting --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:59, August 24, 2018 (UTC)
 * Oasis is the default skin seen by everyone, if you're using another skin then that's up to you, but all will be formatted according the oasis/wikia skin. You'll be breaking the 3RR rule--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:19, August 24, 2018 (UTC)
 * Well I don't know what skin you're using, but I know that the image looks good in it and there's no clashing with the infobox. For more information look for Oasis skin on google, so you know what skin you have. If you've never modified your skin, then you should have the default one. Its just a matter of you figuring out. here how it looks for me and as you can see it doesn't clashes with the infobox. Be sure to click on expand on the contents list and that you're seeing Wookieepedia on the default skin--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:47, August 24, 2018 (UTC)
 * You will need to figure that out, not sure if you have another skin or there's something different, but that image is the Oasis skin also known as wikia skin and per policy from the Layout guide "Images are to be formatted for ideal presentation in the Wikia skin", since that's the skin that every user that visit Wookieepedia sees. Hope you can figure out what skin you're on.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:08, August 24, 2018 (UTC)

Right
You've been told since August 6, 2017. Stop removing |right. You're removing it from Anakin Skywalker/Legends article and in this case many of them had the |right. Removing |right is considered a disruptive behavior since its part of the policy to introduce that term and as an Admin told you since last year it could lead you to a block--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:46, September 6, 2018 (UTC)
 * Then follow the policy and reintroduce the parameter you deliberately deleted when changed from left to right--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:52, September 6, 2018 (UTC)
 * You're welcome to try and create a CT to change the Layout Guide, if you have no idea of how to format the CT page, just go to Forum:Consensus track and look for an old CT and just create your own. Unfortunately until that CT passes then you must adhere to the current Layout Guide and replace the left with a right--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:05, September 6, 2018 (UTC)

Template
Please if you don't know how the template works, then just don't revert/remove. Yes, the text its highlighted by the apostrophes, but that's how the template is formatted and as you can see in the article the entire text is unaffected. If you find something like this, please check out first the templete page instead of just removing. See Majorspoiler for more information, there's even an example there.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:59, September 8, 2018 (UTC)

Inuse tag
In the future, please pay respect to the Inuse template placed at the top of articles, such as Zygerrian/Legends. It signifies that another user is actively working on an article. You made an edit at the same time as I was trying to do one as well, causing an edit conflict and forcing me to re-do a large chunk of work from scratch. Thank you. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 20:41, September 8, 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:13, September 14, 2018 (UTC)
 * You may contact me via our official IRC channel. And please don't use another wiki to message me again. I will not respond to any further off-site messages. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:53, September 14, 2018 (UTC)

Timothy Zahn's Interview
Hi Rgilbert27,

I just wanted to notify you that I will be seeing if I could make an interview to Mr. Timothy Zahn. I have yet to ask him via his Facebook account if he will accept, but I'm sure he will want to share his time with us. Back to the matter, I just wanted to ask you if you would like to ask him some question so I can ask it to him during the interview.

Thanks!

Vader's conspiracy
So, I looked at Darth Vader's conspiracy. I don't know too much about the subject, but at a glance there were two things that stood out: That' everything I've got. Good luck with your editing. SilverSunbird (talk) 01:04, November 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * First, given what little information there is, the "campaign" infobox doesn't seem like the right one. Again, I don't know that much about the topic, so I could be wrong, but it doesn't seem like a good fit.
 * Second, the list of battles seems a bit long, especially compared to the relative brevity of the Appearances list. Is there a reason for that?

Gender TOC
We should not be taking the option to search use the TOC function away from those who choose to use the classic category view and force upon them the need to switch to another view simply to use it. If they use the classic view, then they should be able to use the functionality. Removing it removes choice. - Sir Cavalier of One ( Squadron channel ) 12:27, November 26, 2018 (UTC)

Edits
If things are done a certain way then there's obviously a reason why it was done that way, changing it is why your edits are being reverted --Lewisr (talk) 22:27, December 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * I know it usually goes that way, but on some occasions its best for the article to do things otherwise --Lewisr (talk) 22:32, December 11, 2018 (UTC)