Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
 * 15) &hellip;if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place your signature in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Krugon

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:33, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More Dark Forces II mp stuff.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:40, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:56, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:38, December 21, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * I'm not sure you can assume he is a cyborg because of his neck guard. Although there does appear to be something on his nose as well. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:34, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Ah, neck guard. Sounds much better than cybernetics, though with how intricate it is we may never know. I removed the mention of it for the neck guard, but I dunno.  The nose attachment could be augmented, or maybe it's just style or some sort of detachable equipment. Hm, I don't know.  It should be mentioned, but I don't know about it being cyber or not in any way.  --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:51, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***To be honest I'm not really sure what to make of the nose thing myself. I'll support the article for now as I'm happy with it, but I imagine other users may come up with better ideas as to how to handle it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:40, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) One thing: "..and he wore a neck-guard. He wore gray..." Kill a wore please.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:45, December 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *Kay. Also added eyebrow color. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 15:26, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * SE
 * 1) * I'm unsure what to make of the nose thing. To me, it could be a tattoo, a mark of some sort, or any number of other things. Any way you could reword this line? Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:44, December 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) **Well, how's that? As I said in the line comment, that's pretty much as descriptive one can get. It's a thing. I listed its color though. Well, maybe it can be described better, but I can't come up with anything better. Maybe, "Krugon had an H shaped silver-blue shape on the beidge of his nose"? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:33, December 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Perhaps you could just call it a marking. Supreme Emperor (talk) 06:22, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ****That sounds a lot better actually. :P  --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:47, December 20, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Rugar

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:23, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Dark Forces II multiplayer character extravaganza continues in the CAnoms page.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:36, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:00, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) * Can you mention that he has almost the exact same face as Admiral, One-Eye, and Santiago? This probably should of also been on the One-eye page to be honest. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:34, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) **Well, if we wanna get technical, only Santiago and Admiral carry the exact same head. They all use the same face as a base, but they all have differences (Minus the two I mentioned). As such, I'd think only Sant and Admiral should have it noted about similar facial models, something already described in Santiago.  Same base, but different faces. Note Rugar's cheek scar compared to the eye scars. Unless you meant that the base alone should be mentioned. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:40, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Fair enough I hadn't noticed all the little scars. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:36, December 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * SE
 * 1) *Can you move the line about his scar above the line about his weapons? Supreme Emperor (talk) 15:41, December 21, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Santiago

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:37, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Rugar's ugly twin.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:03, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * This reminds me. I must find a picture of Jeremay Sann'tiago and write him up simply because he has that name. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:16, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

C-210 Elite Watchman Saboteur

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:09, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Most quest weapons might end up pretty similar to this one.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:46, December 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:32, December 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Xuvva Hunter's Sport Rifle

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:22, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now for an Agent weapon

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:47, December 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  02:01, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Is it Xuvva Hunter's Sport Rifle or Xuvva Hunter's Sports Rifle? You have it both ways in the article.
 * 3) **Whoops it's just sport. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:54, December 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * The credit symbol comes before the number, please correct that in your current articles.
 * 5) **Fixed in all relevant noms. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:54, December 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * More of a question: Do you think that having sport rifle in the title is enough to say that it was a sporting blaster rifle? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  00:53, December 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Yeah I'd say so, added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:54, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Larbec

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:11, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: An a vendor! Diversity is truly the spice of life.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:14, December 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  03:50, December 17, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ivers

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:54, December 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: And another Vendor. Diversity is overrated.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:17, December 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 02:10, December 18, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Master of the universe
 * 2) *A couple things:
 * 3) * Source list?
 * 4) **Whoops thought I copied that across, added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:14, December 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) * And please fix the grammatical error in the last BTS sentence. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:55, December 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **Fixed I think. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:14, December 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Portani

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:05, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now that Cade has made all the redlinks we need to fill em in.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 23:29, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  03:45, December 17, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * "...during the Cold War in which the Republic thought the Sith Empire." What? I'm confused here....
 * 3) **Wow that's an impressive mistake even for me... Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:55, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) *Otherwise, good work on cleaning up Cade's mess ;) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:31, December 16, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Kelen

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:05, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: You'll all get to see his products soon.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:52, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  03:58, December 17, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tash (sergeant)

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:16, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I'm disappointed in his lack of a moustache.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 03:05, December 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  21:27, December 18, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Surrel

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:16, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The last armor vendor.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  06:19, December 19, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Esseles bird

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:16, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Dark Times returns with the first barn burner nom!

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Trip391 (talk) 17:29, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 14:31, December 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:18, December 21, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments