Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Halurium

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:57, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Nights

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:14, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Tinwe (comlink) 08:53, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sonic Servodriver

 * Nominated by: OtterSurf (talk) 20:44, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Word count might be a tadge over, but I think I've got everything I can into the article. Tried to get word from Reaves or Perry for a comment, but to no avail.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Satisfying the listed objections will do it. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:25, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) As long as you deal with my former Clone Wars objection that EJ has brought back to life. Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:01, August 31, 2012 (UTC)

Object 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Sonic the Servodriver
 * 2) * Context for the Clone Wars.
 * 3) **Still remains.
 * 4) ***Heck, since the Clone Wars had nothing to do with the article, I'll withdraw this objection. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:26, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) * As you sourced the body, could you source the infobox?
 * 6) **Completely source the infobox please, the affiliation part needs to be done. Also, only use for the first reference. After that, use . Another thing, reffs in the infobox should have  around them, like this  .  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:24, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) *Otherwise, fine work. The word count's not nearly 250, so you're good there.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:00, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * You should mention where the drink was served, was it the Rimsoo Seven cantina? Please also put the cantina that served the drink in the affiliation field.
 * 3) **You need to source every field of the infobox.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:40, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I didn't see this objection before removing that from the infobox. How could we say that the drink was affiliated with the cantina if it's not stated or implied to be an exclusive beverage?  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:25, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ****I see your point, I'll remove the affiliation from the infobox.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:31, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *You'll need to find a source for the Doctor Who and Hitchhikers part of the BTS. Note that Wikipedia is not a source. Also, you will need to source the Star Wars part to MedStar II.
 * 7) ** Here's an article you can use as a source for Doctor Who's device: Please use Template:Cite web to format the source. Here's an article where I used it.
 * 8) **As for the Old Janx Spirit, I'm not sure what you could source it to, but I think it should probably be mentioned.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:40, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **You could always source it to the HHGTTG book. Use MLA format. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:14, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * Source the era field of the infobox.
 * 11) * The found field for the infobox should have Drongar in it.
 * 12) *I wouldn't worry about going over the word limit, you're only at 132 words currently.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  01:00, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) * Oh, and you should add to MedStar II in the appearance list.
 * 14) * Could you also provide the year of publication for the novel in the BTS? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  01:01, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) *I think that the context on the Clone Wars is necessary for this article, since it is a time the drink was produced and consumed.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:31, August 31, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Done, Dogma. OtterSurf (talk) 21:17, August 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * EJ, done all I can. The only real problem is the sourcing for the DW/HHGTG reference! I may just have to drop it. OtterSurf (talk) 17:07, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Didn't you say one of the authors told you that the other wrote the scene in question? That would be something you could add. Publish a screenshot. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 09:54, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Sourcing is done, formatting and all. OtterSurf (talk) 20:02, August 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * You still need to source the HHGTTG line. Do you know how to use MLA format? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:52, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Got the screenshot of the email from Perry. Looks like that'll be all. OtterSurf (talk) 20:22, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Homonix Rectonia

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 08:22, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Gotta ask the same as the anon on the article's talk page&mdash;what were the parents thinking?

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) The name's Rectonia, Homonix Rectonia. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:02, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Nice article, the name... not so much.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:43, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) "The Jedi Code in is classical form? Oh, you kinky beast, you." NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 10:01, August 25, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Verre Sydia

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:46, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 1 of the T7-O1 conversation CANs.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:57, August 24, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Stop spamming the CAN page!
 * 2) * Before I continue my review, add an intro. The article's over 200 words. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:31, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Not anymore. I lopped the last line off the BTS, as it's more about her husband and not really necessary. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:46, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * The husband's article says she worked during the Galactic War. Her's does not. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:10, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **BLARG. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 00:15, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * What's wrong with hiring bounty hunters? How does this connect Sydia with the Empire? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:17, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **The very next sentence explains what Sandafar did, my friend. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 14:13, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) Exiled Jedi
 * 9) * "As Sandafar had killed an Imperial spy by the name of Eckhorn Baliss to stop a list of Imperial traitors in the Republic from getting out, and later killed the Rodian Shafu in the same manner when the former slaver was getting close to locating the list for the Jedi Order, the duo suspected that Sydia's stance against the Empire was a cover." Please break up this sentence. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:49, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:12, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) *I believe that you should mention that she had a husband before you mention that he was a spy.
 * 12) **I can't really without making the wording awkward, IMO.
 * 13) *In her husband's article you mention that in 3,663 BBY that he accessed her senate accounts. Using this information and the rough time the Jedi Knight class plays during, couldn't you provide a trameframe or times that she was a senator? (Her senator career may not have been continuous.)-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  01:28, August 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) **Is that really necessary? It seems kind of reaching to me. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 07:23, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) ***I think its necessary, because from gmae we know that she was a senator and was married at that time. You might be able to rework the article to present the information in chronological order.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  00:16, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Eckhorn Baliss

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:46, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 3

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:36, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Tinwe (comlink) 07:09, September 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  13:31, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I said stop spamming!
 * 2) * Context for Alderaan
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * You need to mention that he is male and Human in the body.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * Could we have an article for the ship? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:39, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Fine. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 14:21, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Please link the date of death some where in the body. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:00, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:09, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) Exiled Jedi
 * 11) * Did he appear, or did you mean to say first mentioned in the appearance list?
 * 12) **Fixed.
 * 13) * You're probably going to need to source the year to the Daniel Erickson post with some additional explanation. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:59, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:10, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) * Could you make it clear in the article that he died when his ship was sabotaged? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:56, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:40, September 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) Tinwe
 * 18) * The next to last sentence of the second ref should read "the events of the Prologue and Act I occur in 3,643 BBY" instead of Act III, no? Normally I would have sofixed this, but I thought I'd check with you first since I know squat about TOR myself. Tinwe (comlink) 10:03, August 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 19) **Good catch! Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:42, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Terrin Sandafar

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:46, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 4!

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:01, August 24, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * You use "When the Senator's husband learned" twice after one another. Reword.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * "former Rodian smuggler Shafu" This guy's a former Rodian? Also, I though he was a former slaver, not a smuggler.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * Link and context for Nar Shaada. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:44, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:57, August 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Is Zallow alive at this time? The Husband's article idicates Zallow's dead, while this one portrays him as alive. Which is true? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:15, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **It's post-Treaty. Fixed. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 14:21, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) Exiled Jedi
 * 11) * Since there is an article for Alderaanian, I believe that at some piint you should link to that article.
 * 12) **Done.
 * 13) * You should also make a clear connection that she was from the planet Alderaan.
 * 14) **Done.
 * 15) * Please source the year using the Erickson post with the additional information.
 * 16) **Done.
 * So, who was the employer that killed her? If it was the Senator's husband, please mention it in his article. If it was another unnamed character, then you will need to create a new article.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  14:13, September 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) **Yeah, it was. Added Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:41, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) ***For an article on a character, I believe you should present information in the order it happened. Therefore, I believe that you should mention her death before the part about the Hero of Tython.
 * 3) ***Also, could you add the fact that Sydia's husband killed Sandafar in the husband's article? It's already a CA and it does not mention this.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  00:21, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Second Battle of Azure

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:29, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In which hopes are shattered.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:43, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  14:22, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * In which rets are conned! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:02, September 3, 2012 (UTC)

Skwelli

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 11:20, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Jedi Path.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:45, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  05:19, September 5, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments


 * 193 words, so please don't go wild with the copyedits. :) Tinwe (comlink) 11:20, August 24, 2012 (UTC)

Lesser Houdoggin

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:43, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Nights

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:20, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 09:27, August 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Who doesn't envy other species in certain circumstances? :P Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:10, September 5, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * I don't think I can say anything about its sentience.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:43, August 24, 2012 (UTC)

Takhal nut

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:05, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A nut for Project Nights

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:26, August 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Winner takes all nuts. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 10:04, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Another good quick read. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:54, September 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Battle of the Exodeen system

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:50, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In which the end is nigh.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:37, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  03:12, August 27, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * In the first sentence I believe there may be a mistake, because by my reading of it you use "its" to refer to the Mandalorian Neo-Crusaders. Seems to me that it should be their, but I wanted to make sure I read it correctly.
 * 3) **Very nice catch. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:00, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * If you source the body, shouldn't you also source the infobox? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  00:34, August 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Whoops. I knew I forgot to take somethingout. Removed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:00, August 27, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of the Quermia system

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:40, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:As I was bored and couldn't think of anything to nom, I decided to work on NaruHina's shedscorcher.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Thanks for helping out! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:07, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  14:25, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Enthusiasm!
 * 2) * "The Mandalorians Neo-Crusaders, who were invading the Galactic Republic via three routes as a part of the Mandalorian Wars, a conflict fought between the two sides, triumphed.&hellip;" This is apositive withing an apositive. It needs breaking up.
 * 3) * "The battle in the Quermia system was only referenced in The Essential Atlas, released in 2009 and written by Daniel Wallace and Jason Fry." Double "and." Rephrase. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:56, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Both taken care of. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:28, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Just putting in dashes isn't going to cut it. They don't work like secondary commas. Now the apositive describing the Neo-Crusaders has no defined end point. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:32, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ****Fixed. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:42, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) *****Cool beans. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:02, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of the Makem system (Mandalorian Wars)

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:10, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Scorch that shed!

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:42, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) WP:KOTOR for the win&hellip;&mdash;  15:39, September 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  00:31, September 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Battle of the Sy Myrth system

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:44, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Here's another one!

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:47, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) "Occuring as the Mandalorians struck at the Galactic Republic along three routes during the Mandalorian Wars, the engagement in the Sy Myrth star system&hellip;" I know you're going for a "meanwhile" sort of opening to this sentence, but it reads like you're trying to describe the Mandalorian Wars as an engagement in the Sy Myrth system. As it sits, the context of the Mandalorian Wars as a conflict between the Republic and Mandalorians isn't connected to the war's name.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:28, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Sorry about putting it in the wrong place. xD NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:34, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Is that better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:37, September 1, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of the Jaminere system

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:39, September 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Ditto

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:17, September 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Battle of the Florn system

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:17, September 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Eevee!

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:41, September 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * By the way, there is no continuity between Florn and Charros and Eres III. Those just physically took place after. They don't need to be mentioned in the body. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:20, September 2, 2012 (UTC)

Battle of the Taskeed system

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 17:25, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:31, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Harvus

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 05:23, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: MOAR

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:04, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * I'm not sure how the last body sentence is relevent to the article. Please remove it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:10, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:12, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Alchenaut

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 11:35, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More The Jedi Path comprehensiveness.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 09:14, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:17, September 11, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Is there any source that states there are thousands of herbivore species on the moon, because the quote only says there are thousands of herbivores, not herbivore species.
 * 3) * 501st dogma ( talk ) 20:15, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Hmm, I suppose you're right. Removed the "species" part. Tinwe (comlink) 05:50, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ***"Herbivore," by definition, is a category of species. There can be herbivorous plant species and herbivorous animal species, but there cannot be herbivorous rocks. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 09:14, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ****I assume 501st meant that we can't be sure whether the "thousands of herbivores" mentioned in the quote are actually from thousands of different species, which is a valid point. Anyway, I'm inclined to think that there was at least one other herbivorous species on Alchenaut besides the o'cerry, otherwise the "pan-species cooperation" part of the quote wouldn't make much sense. :P Tinwe (comlink) 11:09, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) *****Ah, that makes sense. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:14, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ******That's what I meant. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:17, September 11, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * For WP:AST. Tinwe (comlink) 11:35, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Protogeyser

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 11:35, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Even more The Jedi Path comprehensiveness.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:16, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * For WP:AST. Tinwe (comlink) 11:35, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Fusion Flame

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:11, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Millennium Falcon is ten times better than all of LOTF and I'm not a hundred pages into it.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:03, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Source end of body.
 * 2) **Fixed, by the way. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:29, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) * You don't mention the Falcon by it's real name any where in the body, even though you refer to "that name". Fix this.
 * 4) **Stellar Envoy is its real name from that time. Unless you'd have us call Leia "Leia Organa Solo" in an article set in 0 BBY. "That name" refers to the Envoy name and that it will be given that name after the race with the Fusion Flame is mentioned. &hellip;It's timey wimey. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:36, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Then what name is this referring to: "In 18 BBY, the ship that had beaten the Fusion Flame, by then given that name,...."? I assume you meant to put to Falcon's name here and then forgot. 21:16, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ****The subject of the sentence bolded: "In 18 BBY, the ship that had beaten the Fusion Flame, by then [named the Stellar Envoy]&hellip;". This is set up by "It once raced another ship, later called the Stellar Envoy&hellip;" two sentences before. It had not been named Stellar Envoy when they raced and, by 18 BBY, it had been. I changed it preliminarily to say Stellar Envoy there, but I think it's clunky. See what you think. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:29, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) *****At a glance, it looks good. However, on the topic of the Falcon, you have the pilot of the Falcon, not the Stellar Envoy, saying the quote. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:40, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ******Now that's a mistake. Fixed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:42, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) * 501st dogma ( talk ) 20:21, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * No, there should not be an article on the Falcon pilot at the time of the race. The scene is far too ambiguous. The entries could have been from any of the pilots we know about or none or multiple entries could have come from the same pilot and therefore there's no benefit to having "Unidentified Millennium Falcon pilot 1–6". NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:11, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Eckhorn Baliss' ship

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:47, September 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It returns!

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:22, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:10, September 13, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * It says it was mentioned in a conversation, so is there any quote? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:04, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 04:07, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * &hellip;T3 was better. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:10, September 13, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Fir Megsan

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:53, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Gender and species neutral writing sucks, if you didn't know.

(0 ECs/1 Users/ 1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:29, September 13, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you make it clear in the BtS that the light side option does not involve the killing of Praven?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:25, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 00:42, September 13, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Fir Megsan's father

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:53, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: What kind of parent names his kid "Fir Megsan"?

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:02, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you make it clear in the BtS that Praven is not actualy killed?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:28, September 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 00:42, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Still stands. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:31, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Woops. Fixed. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:38, September 13, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Tel Trevura

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:12, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Just under 250... Stupid BtS almost put it over.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Usma

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:15, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero continues to wage war upon the EduCorps!

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:27, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I propose the motion to temporarily ban the user known as Cade Calrayn in order to stop him producing so many damn CAnoms.
 * 2) * You're missing context for Coruscant in the bio. Could you link to Coruscant as well in the intro?
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) *Otherwise, looks good. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:07, September 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **!crazylaugh Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 14:26, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Usma's Padawan

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:15, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Moar! Moar! MOAR!

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) --LelalMekha (talk) 22:40, September 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:31, September 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Same objections as Usma's.
 * 3) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:10, September 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * 501st dogma ( talk ) 00:08, September 14, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Hismauli hawk-snake

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:18, September 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I was bored. So I nommed.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

A-4P0

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 04:05, September 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More.... more....

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments