Forum:Administrative autonomy

There has been a growing trend in recent months toward admins undermining other admins, to the point where certain people have chosen or nearly chosen to resign in disgust.

I would like to bring this issue out in the open, and make a rule about it. To end the political tug-of-war once and for all. Even if it doesn't pass, we shall see who does and who does not have a proper degree of respect for their fellow administrators.

We elect administrators for a reason: To ensure the smooth operation of Wookieepedia. When admins and bureaucrats undermine the decisions made by their colleagues, it creates anarchy. This needs to end.

The rule I propose is simple: '''Be it a matter of deletion, blocking, or interpretation of existing policy, no single member of the administration or bureaucracy may overturn another administrator's decision. Reversal of an administrative decision will require discussion with the administrator whose decision is in question followed by a majority decision by available administrators either in IRC (by accepted Mofference voting procedures) or the administrators' noticeboard (by accepted Consensus Track procedures). The format and timing of these discussions may not be engineered to skew the vote.'''

This rule will then be codified in Administrative autonomy in precisely these words, no more, no less.

This is an admin-only, yea or nay vote.

For

 * Darth Culator (Talk) 16:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)