Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Sarlacc


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Sarlacc (+5)

 * 1) I think the sarlacc is a very interesting creature that should be recognized in the community, that's why I nominated it. Brain40 17:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 00:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC) I had my go at the article...now I support.
 * 1) Roron Corobb 17:18, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Good article? its great! i congratulate you brain40. Jacen Solo ( Request Audience ) 17:19, 28, September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) .  .  .  .  01:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * 1) Not that I think it's bad, but it changes a lot from day to day so I don't think it's stable enough. Seems like a work in progress. Green tentacle 10:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Poor grammar, especially in the "Anatomy" section. --Imp 11:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * It's been pretty stable for a while now so I'm removing my objection. Green Tentacle (Talk) 14:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Hey Imp, why are you still objecting, I, along with some other users have recorrected the grammer. 13:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I left a comment on his talk page, but I haven't heard back from him yet. 19:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm....strange. 17:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)