Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Ven (Peace Brigade)

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:13, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Look&mdash;whoever you are&mdash;you don't know the first thing about Wotson. Me and him will always be a team. You trying to pick a fight or what?

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Besides a little copy-edit, looks good.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 17:32, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *The 1st template is not used when the subject appeared in only one source as it's redundant. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:21, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Per this-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 19:23, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Huh. News to me. Someday we're going to have to make a list of all the rule applications being started on the nom pages. In the meantime, it's not a big enough deal to argue over. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:34, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:42, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Skirmish on Cholganna

 * Nominated by: Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 07:38, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: There are far too few nominations on this page.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 13:04, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:11, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Ha! Finally more CAs than GAs! :P -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 17:25, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4)  Imperators II (Talk) 15:40, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) * Umm, what evidence is there to the claim that this event was part of the Great Galactic War? Isn't that just an assumption?  Imperators II (Talk) 20:35, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Based on the context (the Padawan appeared to know what Maggot was talking about, indicating this wasn't a pre-war conflict), I inferred that it occurred during the Great War. That being said, I suppose Cholganna's location in the galaxy leaves the possibility open that this was part of the Imperial expansion... so I could land either way on this. I'll take it out of the GGW for now, until I can find anything more solid information on the event.  Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 00:36, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified hyperspace scout 2

 * Nominated by: -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 19:00, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:We ought to get Daniel Wallace to review this one.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:01, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) You have to source that that's Daniel Wallace to something. A comparison between that picture and one of Wallace would work, if there's never been a statement on it before. Same for Fry.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:31, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Is that what you were looking for?-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:54, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Good, but I meant a textural source. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:31, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Sorry, let me clarify that again. I mean a textural citation. It needs a ref tag. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:01, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Ref added. Thanks for the review.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 18:39, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *****It read a bit choppy to me, so I reworded it. Nice work. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:01, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) Even more interesting than Guybrush! I don't think a single image is enough to say "on occasion" or "sometimes," though. "On one occasion" would be more appropriate. You could also slightly detail that occasion --- mention that they studied a holographic map. Might also be worth translating the aurebesh in the picture and mentioning just what on the map they were studying. Menkooroo 12:08, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) Also, isn't there a caption to the image identifying them as Hyperspace Scouts? If so, that'd count as a mention rather than just a . Menkooroo 11:33, November 6, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified hyperspace scout 1

 * Nominated by: -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 19:00, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Jason Fry needs to give this guy some back story so I can GAN him.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:02, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Bob
 * 2) *Not sure the visual comparison is sufficient for us to take that this is based on Fry. It is based on Fry, but you'll need to dig a bit to find a source for that. I know there have been various interviews with Fry and Wallace published where this was discussed, so maybe search around a bit. The artist is Chris Trevas, which should also be mentioned. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 12:25, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Here's one. Good source for a BTS quote, too. Search "hyperspace scouts" to find the exact spot. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 12:30, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Mission to Hutta

 * Nominated by: Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 20:17, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: First Cold War event article of mine.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:24, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Imperators II (Talk) 15:41, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  1358  (Talk)  18:49, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Nice article from one of my favorite books.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 18:51, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Per the MOS, you'll need to replace the dialoge with the quote template. -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 18:46, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sofixited in my copy-edit&hellip; sorry, didn't notice the objection. :P 1358  (Talk)  18:49, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Heh, that works. :P -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 18:51, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Perry

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:44, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: He's a semi-aquatic egg-laying mammal of action! He's a furry little flat-foot who'll never flinch from a fray-eay-eay! He's got more than just mad skills: he's got a beaver tail and a bill and the women swoon whenever they hear him say: *fails at the platypus sound* He's Perry! PERRY THE PLATYPUS!! PERRY! A-gent P~!

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Cool down.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:45, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Besides fixing a couple of redirects, looks nice.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 18:51, November 2, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) *See objections for Quinze.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 12:11, November 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Quinze

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:51, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Fancy a game of Fifteen?

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:12, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:51, November 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) *You refer to Quinze as "him" in the body, but use the unidentified gender category.
 * 3) *I think the Quarantine section warrants its own article.
 * 4) *Otherwise, nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:19, November 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * See Quinze. Does this qualify for our duck test policy? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:51, November 3, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified female mimph

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:57, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Hooray! More Ewoks!

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:36, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 11:58, November 6, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Great work. Just one question: Can you add a few words to the quote attribution so as to reveal what it has to do with this specific Mimph? Menkooroo 11:44, November 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Will do. Thanks for the review!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 11:53, November 6, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Argauun

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:32, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Never thought, that I would do a species...

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:30, November 5, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified mimph infant

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:44, November 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 09:09, November 6, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Grub-tea

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:37, November 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Urgh

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments