Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Lizard Warrior


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Lizard Warrior

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 13:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: OK, fine. Let's go for a hat-trick. L is for Lizard Warrior. ~ SavageBob 13:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support Object
 * 1)  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 23:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 23:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) I'm not a big fan of your referencing, but to each his own.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  12:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  JangFett  Talk 20:48, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) One thing: The last two paragraphs of History have a lot of choppy sentences. Merge some together. Other than that, good work.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 02:21, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *I've tried to massage it a bit more; is that better? ~ SavageBob 02:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) From the Council Chambers:
 * 4) * "Graak, on the other hand, was left to his fate.": What fate? It's a bit unclear as it stands.
 * 5) *Otherwise looks good. 1210 words, so you might want to consider going for FA once this passes. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 18:08, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) **Thanks for the review! I've made it more explicit; is that better? And, yeah, this may end up on the FAN page one of these days! ~ SavageBob 06:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) Fett
 * 8) * Were they called the "Lizard Warrior" in Ewoks 4? Possibly it falls under a conjectural title, because it not having a canonical name. Perhaps adding
 * 9) *Other than that, great work man. Interesting read.  JangFett  Talk 23:34, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) **Yeah, they are called "Lizard Warriors" in the comic. It could be a nickname given them by the Ewoks, but we can't really speculate about that one way or the other without more evidence. What do you think? ~ SavageBob 14:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Possibly will do since we're not aware of their true canonical name. Probably say "This species, named the Lizard Warrior by the Ewoks,"  JangFett  Talk 15:19, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 12) ****I guess I mean, how do we know it's conjecture? Why is "Lizard Warrior" treated any differently from Mimph or Strutter or Gorax or Teek? I actually think it takes more conjecture to not consider it the real name than to just take the comic for what it says. ~ SavageBob 20:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) *****Yeah, I see what you mean SavageBob :) All right then, great work.

Comments