User talk:Plagueis327

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Plagueis327!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash; &mdash;MJ&mdash; (Holocomm) Friday, December 23, 2011, 00:00 UTC
 * }

Hey, hi there! I'm new around here so I have a couple of questions. How can I edit semi-protected articles in order to add more sources and appearances?


 * You have to wait until you are "autoconfirmed", which will occur your account reaches four days old. Note that additionally, some articles are also "supersemiprotected" through the abuse filter; on those you'll also need to have made 150 edits before you can edit them. Also, please sign your comments on talk and forum pages with, which will automatically convert into a link to your userpage and a timestamp. Master Jonathan Holocomm Friday, December 23, 2011, 00:11 UTC

Than you so much for the advice! And yeah, sorry, I'll remember to sign my posts and comments :D Plagueis327 00:15, December 23, 2011 (UTC)

Yes please. I did not mean to make a mess, but Wookieepedia's sourcing directions were no very clear. Something was cited as 30 to Riptide, but it wasnt cited correctly. Could you fix it.24.193.145.164 06:01, December 25, 2011 (UTC)

Already done! And don't worry, I'm new too! Plagueis327 06:09, December 25, 2011 (UTC)

Encyclopedia
Hey Plagueis327. Please make a look to follow the Layout Guide when adding sources to articles&mdash;in particular, Encyclopedia entries always come after everything else, so the Book of Sith, even though it's unreleased, needs to go before them. I would suggest going through your recent edits to make sure all are in compliance with policy. Thanks, and Merry Christmas. :)  CC7567  (talk) 22:49, December 25, 2011 (UTC)

Ok, I'll check it out, sorry about the mess, and Merry Christmas! :D Plagueis327 22:51, December 25, 2011 (UTC)

Hey again, Plagueis. I just wanted to advise you to make use of the "Preview" button to submit larger edits at a time, instead of making a series of minor edits. The reason is that an overabundance of edits to the same page tends to clog up the Recent Changes page and makes vandalism less easy to spot. We all make mistakes and have to make minor edits to correct them, but if you could avoid making an excess of edits where not needed, that would be great. Thanks. :)  CC7567  (talk) 01:29, December 27, 2011 (UTC)

No problem, I'll bear that in mind, and sorry for the disturbance! :D Plagueis327 01:30, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hiya. Just wanted to let you know that per a recent CT Databank entries are not the same as the new Encyclopedia on source lists. They are to be treated as though they were released in September 2011 and sources more recent than that are to be listed under them with Enc entries after that. Also, please make an article for Family Tradition and update Operation: Knightfall for any new information therein (I can update it if you'll give me the info). The article can lose its status because of a redlink in the source list. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:28, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Got it! And no problem, the mention of the event is too little. But I'll take care of it, and thx for the info! :D Plagueis327 14:52, December 29, 2011 (UTC)

Mortis
Please know that Youtube is not a proper source for articles or for uploading images. Please have patience and wait for the release of the book before uploading poor quality images. Thanks,  JangFett  (Talk) 20:58, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, no problem. Sorry for the inconvenience! :D Plagueis327 20:59, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for understanding. :) Once the book is released, higher quality images, plus more information about Mortis' appearance in the book, will be available.  JangFett  (Talk) 21:00, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * I already pre-ordered the book, so once it is released, I'll be pleased to help as much as possible! Plagueis327 21:02, December 28, 2011 (UTC)

TCW DVD collections
Hey Plagueis. To be honest&hellip;there really doesn't seem to be a good reason to treat DVD collections as a source for every single subject that appears in every single republished episode. We don't treat trade paperback collections for comics or even Omnibus publications as sources unless they release new info that wasn't present in the original comic, and for the most part, that isn't the case for the DVD collections in regards to the episodes. If you have better reasoning on why they should be treated as sources, I'd be happy to hear them, but otherwise we shouldn't be going overboard with mass-listing DVD collections as sources. Thanks.  CC7567  (talk) 06:32, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Almost every single first CW season episode contains a documentary which speaks about almost everything present in the episode. That's why I'm adding it. However If you don't think that should be that way, I'd be happy to solve the problem, sorry for the inconvenience, it won't happen again. Plagueis327 16:17, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's fine&mdash;I understand about The Complete Season One, what with the episode commentaries that we don't see anymore. It's just that that doesn't seem to be the case for the second and third season, which was my main point earlier. I would just recommend looking at the DVD commentaries again and removing The Complete Season Two and The Complete Season Three from subjects that aren't mentioned in the commentaries.  CC7567  (talk) 23:07, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I'll take care of it, sorry about that, and thanks for point it out. Plagueis327 23:17, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Please help
Do u know where I can find a copy of the Wrath of Darth Maul to read?24.193.145.164 23:51, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Hey, Hi there! No, unfortunately I don't know where to get a copy of "The Wrath of Darth Maul", the place from where I get information regarding with the book is Google Books. Here's the link: http://books.google.com.mx/books?id=9iKFvh0z3CAC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Darth+Maul&hl=en&sa=X&ei=lYQCT5_MNo7AgAfyjK22Ag&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Darth%20Maul&f=false And BTW, I would try to get the book in either Banes and Noble or Amazon.com. Good luck, and thx for your question! :D Plagueis327 04:33, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Bravo 1
Could you show the the quote in which Olie's ship was mentioned in Darth Plagueis? If it somehow mentioned Olie at the battle, that doesn't specify the ship. NaruHina Talk  23:39, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Sure, no problem Plagueis327 23:40, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Go here:http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/034551128X/ref=s9_simh_gw_p14_d0_g14_i1?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=center-2&pf_rd_r=113EFJZA2MA7BB8CEBE3&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=470938631&pf_rd_i=507846 and write "Bravo" in the "Search Inside this book" section. It'll show you a little excerpt from page 275, showing you the name of the ship, and of Ric Olié himself! Plagueis327 23:42, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * That is bizarre. And awesome! :3 Just as a note, you can shorten external links with single brackets like this: [www.website.net Bunch of words] That's just a single space between the link and text. Cheers. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:09, January 4, 2012 (UTC)   NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:09, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Ok, thx for the advice. Glad you could use that link! :D Plagueis327 01:10, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Stop
Plagueis, this is not a source. Only official sources, such as source books, various SW.com articles, should be added to articles, not this. Please take a look at our canon policy before continuing to add nonsense sources to articles.  JangFett  (Talk) 01:56, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Got it, I was already warned by other user. I'm terribly sorry about this. I really thought it was a source. I'll read your Canon Policy right away. Plagueis327 01:57, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Preview
Haha You are quite the active editor. lol Could you try using the "Preview" button more so all your edits don't clog up the Recent Changes page. I know you want to get to 15,000 edits, but you'll make it eventually. lol It's just hard to keep up with the RC page when every five minutes it's filled with all new edits by one user. Thanks! :) MasterFred (Whatever) 19:39, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, no problem! I'll try to slow down! And thx for the good advice! :D Plagueis327 19:40, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ha, no problem. lol MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 19:42, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

TEA
Helo, please stop you edits from TEA and remove the others, you are making huge mistakes. You can't put TEA as a source for planets but only for star systems. And you can conclude about the planets affiliations only if the system is clearly represented on the maps. Hk 47 20:26, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * The reason why I conclude the affiliation of some planets with certain groups, is because those places are marked as being part of such organizations in TEA. Plagueis327 20:56, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Where Caprioril is mentioned as part of the New Republic ? And why are you adding planet stub everywhere ?  Hk 47 21:54, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Uh, the article itself said that before I added the source. And I'm adding planet stub everywhere because all of those articles are too small. Plagueis327 21:57, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Stop this imediatly, it's stupid. If the articles are small, it's simply because there isn't mmore informations. You can't do this if you are not sure there is more to say. And TEA doesn't mention Caprioril, so you invent a source? Stop this and remove your edits.Hk 47 22:05, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Listen, there's no reason to offend each other's work? is it? Anyway, I didn't invent a source, the article said that the planet was affiliated to the New Republic before I edited it, so I thought that I could relate it with TEA, by adding a source. Anyway, if it's so annoying to you my "stub" editions, I'll remove 'em at once. Sorry for the inconvenience. Plagueis327 22:08, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok tanks, and don't edit the articles anymore if you are not sure of what you do. Hk 47 22:27, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, thx, and sorry for all the trouble! I promise to make a better work! Plagueis327 22:30, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Planet stub
Hey there. Why are you removing Planet-stub from articles that are obviously planet stubs? Menkooroo 22:47, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh my. So, there's a guy who told me that I should remove 'em all, and now you tell me to keep 'em. Ok, the reason why I'm removing 'em is because they can't be planet-stubs, because there's not enough information to improve 'em anyway. What should I do? Do I leave them with that category, or do I remove it? Plagueis327 22:50, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Unless you can prove the articles' sources do not have enough information for the articles themselves, simply removing a ton of stub templates isn't proper. Plagueis, if you are confused about what you could accomplish here on Wookieepedia, you can take a look at this as a start. Throughout your talk page, many have warned you and discussed about sources and various things you have done incorrectly in the past. Try not to mass remove templates unless you can confirm the article doesn't need it. Expanding a stub, however, could be an option.  JangFett  (Talk) 22:59, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, many of the planets I checked today are just mentioned in The Essential Atlas. Aside from that, there's just no more information about those planets; I understand that is considered a "stub", but I'm a little but confused here, How can they be stubs, if there's no information to change that? Plagueis327 23:01, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * If it's a TEA-created subject, then a stub template may not be needed. However, even though it's new, it could possibly have information about it in TEA itself. Although, yeah, that's not always the case. I also noticed most of the articles you've been removing templates from come from novels. If you're not sure, it's best to leave the template alone unless you can confirm it through a source yourself. I hope you're not judging an article by its size either.  JangFett  (Talk) 23:06, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Articles like Clær could easily have more info on them. It's pretty difficult to write any complete planet article and have it be below 250 words --- the Dilonexa planets are clutch examples of that. Menkooroo 23:08, January 4, 2012 (UTC)