User talk:JSarek


 * Archive 1 (28 Apr 2005 - 10 Dec 2005)
 * Archive 2 (5 Jan 2006 - 31 Jan 2007)
 * Archive 3 (5 Feb 2007 - 24 Dec 2007)
 * Archive 4 (3 Jan 2008 - 23 Dec 2008)

Dejarik
Hi, sorry I didn't read your question on Dejarik talk page. Well, I didn't know how to write other way. What I meant was: in those two novels Han Solo at Stars' End and Han Solo and the Lost Legacy was clearly description of dejarik without written word "dejarik". Just description like holomonster, some specific strategy like Ilthmar Gambit, gameboard master control etc. I was thinking to put there, but it's not possible appearance of subject, it's sure appearance :) when all that description clearly leads to dejarik game. I guess it's probably confusing, but like I said I don't know how else to write that. Thank you for asking.--Jedi Marty 10:46, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Star Wars PocketModels
I selected the standard summary for "reverting vandalism" on Star Wars PocketModel TCG: Scum & Villainy is because I thought you were the other user still trying to redirect another article about an expansion from the same game - Star Wars PocketModel TCG: Clone Wars Tactics. The reason the titles are spelled out complete is because that it is the best way to differentiate them from other games with expansions bearing the same titles, as well as other phrases in-universe. For example, compare Order 66 to Star Wars PocketModel TCG: Order 66. Or Ground Assault to Star Wars PocketModel TCG: Ground Assault. Try typing Clone Wars to find the PocketModel game expansion of the same name. It also makes finding the expansions easier as they all begin with the same identifier. Gethralkin 22:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Good point. I'll add the youmay template. I was thinking of it earlier, but got side-tracked on something else... Gethralkin 05:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I've added the disambig templates to the rest of the expansions. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Gethralkin 05:25, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: Url
Thanks for that url. When it was given to me I looked for other cards that mentioned Wallen or had a picture of him, and after looking through all the Endor Expansion and Death Star II packs, I can confirm that there are no more sources mentioning Wallen, just the CCG card for him. :)Hanzo Hasashi 01:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Page Deletion
Hi. Was wondering if you could delete this article for me. Completely forgot that I already made one before. Sans the "'s" on Besany. Thanks. --ToRsO bOy 07:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Blasted. jSarek 07:12, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated. =)--ToRsO bOy 07:16, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

9G
Does the book list DeepSpace Industries as the manufacturer or Arakyd or what?JustinGann 10:45, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently, just "DeepSpace." jSarek 10:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, CUSWE indicates the First Edition has "DeepSpace Industries"--could you look up and see if that is so, whether the 9G has a pic in there, etc. I am strongly suspicious that this is just another name for the 6G2. Also, is there a color version of the 6G2 pic somewhere? I keep thinking there is for some reasonJustinGann 10:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't have the First Edition, just the Second Edition. The Second Edition just lists its model as "DeepSpace 9G Explorer Droid," in much the same way as it refers to the R2 as the Industrial Automaton R2 Astromech Droid."  I've not found any other reference to the company, though I admittedly haven't looked much beyond the relevant pages for the 9G. jSarek 11:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

IR-3F
a query, is there any reason to regard one depiction of the IR-3F as more canonical than the other? While the P&P pic is neat looking, I think the TABSB one makes more sense, due to the obvious resemblance to the IPV-1. Still, that is just personal taste. But is there anything in textual descriptions that would favor one over the other?JustinGann 10:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Even better, I can't find a reference to the current main image explicitly being the IR-3F. Feel free to swap 'em. jSarek 11:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Zebra
 also, can you shed any light on this query?JustinGann 10:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope, I've never seen the pic before. Might have come off of a back cover of a WEG book, maybe. jSarek 11:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I see "link suggests" when I am making atticles or in the search bar, but sometimes it doesn't show up in the upload pic image box...Why is that?JustinGann 10:05, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Query
I have some questions regarding your recent CT. Do you intend to shrink existing images to comply with the CT? Did you consider that there is nothing about fair use that expressly forbids the use of high resolution images? You state in the CT that we are turning into an "image library", but this is not true; we strive for high quality in both textual and graphical form. Or, at least we used to. --Imperialles 08:47, 6 March 2009 (UTC)