Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Tanque tea

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:56, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A MedStar nomination

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 00:08, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:29, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 10:58, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * In the bit about the root fragements could you say they were put in the tea? It just doesn't sound right to me at the moment.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 06:33, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **How is it now?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:58, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***All good.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 10:58, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Why's the quote ironic? Shouldn't it be sarcastic? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:17, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *That was my doing, I added it because I felt it was necessary for easier understanding. Also, ironic is the same than sarcastic, dogma ^^ Winterz (talk) 00:20, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **It's not quite the same thing. Sarcasm is what is in the quote. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:03, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Lol dogma, Sarcasm is Irony. Winterz (talk) 01:16, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Just to let you both know, I changed the quote description to say that she was teasing Vondar.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:55, January 7, 2013 (UTC)

Blaster pistol (Coruscant police droid model)

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 18:07, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My ongoing obsession with all things CSF

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 19:57, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:15, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  04:34, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * You need to mention Coruscant in the bio.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Mention of the encyclepedia entery in the BtS would be good. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:47, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 23:12, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Exiled Jedi
 * 7) * Please provide a little context about when and where the scuffle occured and who it involved.
 * 8) **Done.
 * 9) * "The blaster pistol was issued to the planet Coruscant's police droids should they feel the need to use lethal force." This sentence makes it sound like they were issued the pistols whenever they felt the need to use lethal force. Please reword.
 * 10) **Done.
 * 11) * I can't see anything in the encyclopedia entry that says the blasters were used only for lethal force. I think it would probably be better to say something along the lines of the guns were used by the police droids to apprehend criminals, including instances where the droids deemed lethal force to be necessary. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:43, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 00:39, January 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) * One more thing: Star Wars Encyclopedia links to the 1998 book. Please link to this article instead. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:49, January 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 03:16, January 8, 2013 (UTC)

Pleiades

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 20:01, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another fleetingly mentioned only Star Wars Art: Visions article.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:04, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) “Can you bind the chains of the Pleiades&hellip;?"&mdash;  16:05, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:11, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Is the website considered canon? If not, we can't say it is a constellation.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:49, January 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * It's the author himself. This would be equivalent of sending an e-mail to him and asking for a canonical answer, as we have done in the past frequently.  Stake black   msg 00:06, January 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Even if the website is by the author, it does not make it canon. For example, take all the pictures of ships published on Ansel Hsiao's site. They're not considered canon even though they are better images than the ones presented in Warfare. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:43, January 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I agree with this assessment, but in any case, I changed it now.  Stake black   msg 03:12, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * The book has this to say about it:
 * A Twi'lek Jedi Knight has a Sith warlord on the defensive in a skirmish on Endymion, a remote desert outpost in the Pleiades. As war sweeps across the galaxy, life-and-death struggles like this occur on every scrap of interplanetary dust that can support life.
 * Haynes' website has this to say:
 * A Twi Lek Jedi Knight has a Sith Warlord on the defensive in a skirmish on Endymion, a remote desert outpost among the constellation Pleiades. As War swept across the Galaxy, life and death struggles like this occurred on every scrap of interplanetary dust that could support life.  Stake black   msg 20:01, January 10, 2013 (UTC)

Zelashiel

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 03:20, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I enjoyed writing this.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:57, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:18, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 21:42, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * You shold say what year Bane mentioned this guy
 * 3) **No specific year was mentioned, since Bane's text, The Rule of Two, was written during his time as the Dark Lord, I just put that it was during his time as Dark Lord.&mdash; 15:49, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * I've been told not to link things in quotes, so it may not be best to have the angels bit there.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 11:04, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **I do agree, though I thought it would be a good idea since Wallace himself linked it.&mdash; 15:42, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) 501st
 * 7) * Why is there a random ) in the middle of the quote?
 * 8) **Wallace's mistake.&mdash; 15:42, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) * Perhaps you should add the fallen from grace part to the BtS?
 * 10) **Done.&mdash; 15:42, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) * 501st dogma ( talk ) 14:22, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) Exiled Jedi
 * 13) * Why are you using a different template for the BTS quote? The formatting doesn't look quite right. Would it be fine if you used the normal quote template?
 * 14) * I assume that Zelashiel was Force-sensitive. Could you make that clear in the article?
 * 15) * Since the Book of Sith is an in-universe book, could you link to and mention the book in the body of the article?
 * 16) * "prior to his destruction of the Brotherhood of Darkness, which ended the New Sith Wars." Could you make it clearer who destroyed the Brotherhood?
 * 17) * The last sentence is also kind of confusing. Could you reword it? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:07, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 18) **Taken care of all, I think.&mdash; 16:27, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Eberon–Kashyyyk War

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:57, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Hmm... Wookiees vs. spiders. Who would win?

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) The Wookiees.&mdash;  19:39, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:07, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Since the book doesn't say who fought in the war, could you have a sentence in the BTS saying that the book doesn't establish the combatants in the war?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:57, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Thresh-ahantu Azuloz

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:57, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Just a name. But what a name!

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; 19:39, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:53, January 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:12, January 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Bill 1979

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 00:54, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Kel Dor Sith Lord

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 06:24, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Powah!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * The Jedi Academy Training Manual was unclear as to what era the character falls under, so.&mdash; 06:26, January 14, 2013 (UTC)