Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Jean-Luc Picard


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Jean-Luc Picard

 * Nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis 00:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Engage...?

(3 ACs/10 Users/13 Total)
Support
 * 1)  CC7567  (talk) 06:25, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) I planned to nominate it myself sometime, but oh well.. QuiGonJinn There's always a bigger fish. 09:15, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Make it so! Xicer9 atgar.svg( Combadge) 10:35, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) When you were talking about this in IRC, I was hoping you were kidding. :p Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 11:06, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 11:14, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) "There &hellip; are &hellip; four &hellip; lights!"  Graestan ( Talk ) 01:47, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * lol, good to go... –Victor  Redstarbird.svg ( talk page ) 08:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) We need to get this to 1000 words somehow.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 16:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Someone should do Xenomorph as well --Jinzler 21:02, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) As a huge fan of both Star Wars and Star Trek, I support this, although it is a bit weird for an article about Picard to appear here :P.  OLIOSTER  Sith_Emblem.svg 19:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) I've never seen a single Trek in my life - Jean would be ashamed of me. :( -- Darth tom Imperial Emblem.svg (Imperial Intelligence)  20:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Whaaaaaaa? 20:52, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) "The line must be drawn here! This far, no further! And I will make them pay for what they've done!" Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Xicer
 * 2) * "After having suffered at the hands of the Borg, and endured many adventures with his crew on the Enterprise-D..." 'Endured' should be changed to 'enduring'
 * 3) **Not my nom, but I had to butt in. :P This objection falls under the "sofixit" policy. If it's this minor (one word) than you should change it yourself.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 01:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) ***And "endured" is correct anyway. Thefourdotelipsis 05:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) * The page that currently links to 'Borg' is not the same Borg being talked about in the article. The link should either be removed or a new article on the Borg should be created.
 * 6) **Fixed.
 * 7) * "The Enterprise-D was the flagship of Starfleet." This sentence seems kind of thrown in there randomly. It should be reworded to flow better with article, or given better placement.
 * 8) **Tweaked.
 * 9) * "In his spare time, he would practice being a musician." Shouldn't this be in the P&T?
 * 10) **No, because it's not a part of his personality. It's a hobby.
 * 11) *Otherwise, very nice. Brilliant timing too! Xicer9 atgar.svg( Combadge) 01:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 12) **Thanks for the review. Thefourdotelipsis 05:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) Floyd:
 * 14) * Contextify the Borg in the intro.
 * 15) **I'm afraid I can't do that, since all that's given in the article is that he's "a victim of the Borg."
 * 16) * "Flunked out" Rather colloquial.
 * 17) **Tis. Changed.
 * 18) * Contextify Starfleet.
 * 19) **Done.
 * 20) *I'm not gonna lie, this is awesome. Good job.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 01:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 21) **Thanks, Floyd. Thefourdotelipsis 05:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 22) Attack of the Clone
 * 23) * Are the refs really needed? There's only one source.
 * 24) **Not needed, but just a personal thing that I choose to do. Makes things easier if another source pops up, or I need to cite something in the BTS at some stage.
 * 25) * Per Floyd; context isn't necessary for everything, but it would be nice to know what Starfleet was and what the Borg were.
 * 26) **See above.
 * 27) * Who were Riker and Geordi? Context is given for everyone else in that sentence, so it's a bit confusing.
 * 28) **Same story, basically, they're given no context in the source.
 * 29) *Excellent work.  CC7567  (talk) 02:43, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * 30) **I thank you, sirrah. Thefourdotelipsis 05:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Does Mirror, Mirror give any more information? Such as how the Enterprise entered the galaxy or any details on their encounter with the Empire? Xicer9 atgar.svg( Combadge) 01:24, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I'm afraid it's all rather vague. Thefourdotelipsis 05:55, 8 May 2009 (UTC)