User talk:JangFett

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent;"
 * valign="top" width="71%" style="background: #FFFFFF; border: 0px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em;"|

SWPM Friend of Wookiee nom
Hi, JangFett. I was wondering if you would be able to support the nomination for the Star Wars PocketModel TCG official website to become friends with Wookieepedia&mdash;like the former Decipher SWCCG committee site&mdash;since there are many articles that link to the SWPM site for source images&mdash;except that these images aren't restricted like the the ones currently on SWCCGCC. Thanks! &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 13:30, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Headache
I actually could've sworn that I saw a 21 BBY date elsewhere in the book, but I can't find it at the moment. In any case, I think the best we can assume is that it's an error on the author's part&mdash;I have no inclination to go along with it. At this point, I'm about ready to shout down anyone who makes the mess even messier. :P  CC7567  (talk) 20:56, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Gank AC page
Hey, Jang, can you point me to the AC page about the current probe of Gank? I"d like to work on the article, but the template on the page currently goes to a redlink, so I'm not sure what needs to be done. Thanks! ~ Savage  01:33, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Kep-She
Good evening sir or whatever time of the day is when you read this message. I found the Essential Guide to Warfare in your collection and wondered if you could help me out a little bit with the info about Kep-She? Thanks for any sort of reply.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:34, April 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 15:33, April 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem, I actually never considered to leave the article at its current state and will detail the background of the battle a little bit more.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:30, April 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * I worked a little bit more on the article. If you still have some ideas how to improve the article please let me know.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 20:13, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

But...
It was not triva, it was an animation error. I just thought it was important to point out. If there is no diffrence could you explian, please?--Darthahsokaboyfrenidfett 21:19, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Rattatak dating
Jang, on the article Mission to Rattatak, I changed the infobox for the battle to fit between the Mission to The Wheel and the First Battle of Kamino. It's been reverted on the Kamino article, so I ask you: when does this event take place? Leland Chee said it was mere weeks after Geonosis, but this was later changed to two months (in the Dooku article, it's placed right before Kamino). Also, is it true that the NEC says the battle took place in 24 BBY? If so, that would be a rather odd retcon, as it would place the event OUTSIDE of the Clone Wars.

Also, I'm working on brining the Battle of Nelvaan article up to a higher status - since you seem to be knowledgeable when it comes to the old CW show, could you possibly help out? Thanks, Chip Brown 15:53, April 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Also, in the article Battle of Ilum, there used to be a mention of the battle's appearance in Clone Wars Chapter 1 which has since been deleted. I think there was a mention on the old Cartoon Network CW site that the snowy world with the dome in Chap. 1 was indeed Ilum, but this link is dead. Now, would it be appropriate to re-add the Chap. 1 mention, or does verifiability take place over truth? Chip Brown 10:58, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Consensus
I'm sure the Agricorps as a group have the right to tinker with the archiving instructions, but I'm skeptical that one member can unilaterally declare them a "mess" and re-order them as he pleases. They were modeled after the FA instructions, which no Inquisitor has had a problem following, and which aren't ordered arbitrarily. You add the article to the queue at the beginning, and since you already have it open in edit mode, you add the FA star and hit save. You don't have to open the article in edit mode at all for the remainder of the process. The community ratified modeling the GA queue after the FA queue, and I wouldn't be skeptical if the AC as a group discussed changing at a meeting, but consensus isn't generally unilaterally ignored. Menkooroo 00:46, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * The instructions page was indeed part of the discussion, and the vote: Vote # 1 read: "Approve... the proposed updates to Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/instructions." I'm not following precedent here; I'm following community consensus. In this case, consensus does dictate that what was established in the FAN carries to the GAN. It's what was approved. Deciding that it's "in need of fixing" is highly subjective. Menkooroo 01:02, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Have you not read the CT? Vote #1 explicitly approved this edit. It included a link to this page and said "These are the proposed changes." It seems like you're not familiar with the CT; take a few moments to read it over so that you can understand what was voted on by the community. Let me know when you've read it. I'm not accusing you of violating any policy, and I apologize if that was what I came across as. It just seemed at first glance like an active attempt to subvert consensus, but now I understand that it was ignorance of the CT. Menkooroo 01:12, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't mean "ignorant" as an insult. You expressed doubt that this edit had been approved by the CT when Vote #1 clearly did approve it. It wasn't a stretch to assume based on that that you weren't familiar with the CT. If you are, in fact, familiar with it --- why should an individual user's subjective declaration of a "mess" trump community consensus? Menkooroo 01:23, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Still waiting on an answer to this question. Since the community voted for this edit, why should an individual user's subjective declaration of a "mess" trump community consensus? Menkooroo 16:12, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

About a GANom (unidentified young new recruit)
Hello, JangFett. I wanted to ask you, if you have time, if you could review the GANom of the "unidentified young new recruit" article. It's already been reviewed in detail by SavageBob and Clone ommander Lee, but I still wish to know the opinion of other editor&mdash;especially ACs, of course... I've been on the Wook for five years, but it's my first try at a GA. It went through a lot of hard work, and I hope it will end up being accepted. :) Who knows, if this one works, perhaps I'll try with others? Cheers.--LelalMekha 15:47, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I wouldn't want to sound impatient. Did I? Well, most probably. :$ I guess this what it does on your first GANom. ;-)--LelalMekha 16:04, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

TCW timeline (not really) in The Ultimate Visual Guide
Have you gotten Star Wars: The Ultimate Visual Guide: Updated and Expanded yet? In the introduction, Windham says that the order in which TCW episodes presented comes with input from Leland Chee and is actually chronological, but I'm having trouble just following the order that Windham is trying to suggest, what with all the placement of pictures and grouping by topics ("Monsters," "Witches and Demons," etc.) instead of anything that seems like what we've seen before.  CC7567  (talk) 03:33, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll have an SH thread up soon and then you can see what I'm talking about.  CC7567  (talk) 05:01, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * How different is the placement of the episodes?  JangFett  (Talk) 05:03, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * You'll see in about seven minutes. :P  CC7567  (talk) 05:04, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

Verhandle
I'm having trouble uploading an image to the article, Verhandle, which I recently created. It claimed that if I contacted an administrator, you might be able to help me. The site claimed an error due to "combined user upload," or something like that. Do you know what the problem is?--Cheesetater 03:59, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Retcon?
With the release of The Clone Wars episode Citadel Escape wouldn't that make the appearance of his lightsaber retcon in Coruscant Nights I: Jedi Twilight? DarthRevan1173 01:06, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Where is my screenshot??
My screenshot, which was deleted a short time ago, was properly sourced, fit into the article, and had a proper name, so I would like to get some explanation on its deletion. --XXLVenom998 16:32, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Lego Star Wars stop motion videos
Hi! I have a new account on Youtube and I was wondering if you'd like to take a look at it if you have the time! My channel name is LJ1138. Please comment if you like what you see!

Blank sections
what exactly are you talking about? i have not edited that page in a while.--CC-1990 21:37, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * I was busy making the new Updated visual guide page. I probably just thought i would add it when i was done.--CC-1990 22:00, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Hardcase
When did that user insert "trivia"? I don't see it in any of the pages you referenced.