User talk:KEJ/Archive 2

Userboxes

 * I got two on your page. You beat me! I could only do two of those. I will see if I can ever get them done. -- Scwhinky Communicate 17:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I got three done now.-- Scwhinky Communicate 18:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * THX, take your time ;-) KEJ 18:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I got another done. -- Scwhinky Communicate 00:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This is getting easy. Just a few more. -- Scwhinky Communicate 01:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I like the blue milk one.... :-) KEJ 09:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool ;-) KEJ 21:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * what is wrong with this talk page?! You should have someone fix it. -- Scwhinky Communicate [[Image:Fettrockz.gif|30px]] 22:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * what is wrong with this talk page?! You should have someone fix it. -- Scwhinky Communicate [[Image:Fettrockz.gif|30px]] 22:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * what is wrong with this talk page?! You should have someone fix it. -- Scwhinky Communicate [[Image:Fettrockz.gif|30px]] 22:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Peace indeed
...and there's no real problem...but how do you just come up with a policy? As far as I know, there's been no change of policy regarding this sort of system. . .  .  .  10:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC) respective talk page''': Well, In that case, I'll keep posting my replies on your talk page as well. Anyway, are you referring to the 'dos and don'ts' guideline that says that one should take it to the CT if one wants to change an existing policy? I've just skimmed through the official policies-pages, but I can't find any official policies regarding voting competitions. Can you point me to them? KEJ 11:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC) I don't see any reason to break from the status-quo, and start using a format unfamiliar to other users. That's all. . .  .  .  11:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC) format of voting competitions "Coolest thing..." and "Miss Star Wars..." etc. It's my impression that in the "Miss/Mr Star Wars" competitions voters did not generally drop comments in the middle of the votes. Anyway, we could discuss from here till the end of the world about the form of whatever de facto standard policies we might have. I don't think there is a standard policy or even a general status quo, since  these competitions have been very adhoc-ish till now. However, since they appear to be becoming more and more common place, I think we need a de jure policy. I'll take it to the CT right away. KEJ 11:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, "policy"'s not a good word. Then call it a rule for the individual contest. KEJ 10:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * So...you do "own" the contest...somehow. .  .  .  .  10:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I own nothing on this wiki, I'm just trying to prevent the page from becoming too messy. KEJ 10:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm more of an advocator of communicating on each user's respective talk page, but I'll play ball here. As for the page...I would advise that you stick to standard policies, instead of taking it upon yourself to enforce your own ideas. I'd take it to the CT before doing it willy-nilly. .  .  .  .  10:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * '''I'm more of an advocator of communicating on each user's
 * Well, I can't quite point you to policies and things, but
 * It seems there is no real policies regarding the

Votes for deletion/Clone advisor
Hey KEJ. Would you mind giving some reasoning behind your vote to keep Clone advisor? Thanks. &mdash;  SparqMan  Talk 17:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC) KEJ 17:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC) Not at all. That's why I asked if you would mind doing so. &mdash;  SparqMan  Talk 20:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC) giving an order like in 'Would you mind doing the dishes in stead of playing Star Wars Galaxies all the time'. Sorry, I just misunderstood. I guess I'm getting paranoid. My reason is that a clone advisor appears in a canonical source, and also Ray Kaufman's remarks. I know you won't buy this argument, but that doesn't change my vote. I like your comment of the "clone ramp-walker" though, but I'd advise you to remove the redlink, ortherwise someone might create the article. Peace. KEJ 20:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Does one have to justify or explain one's votes?
 * Ah, oh, I though the 'would you mind' was kind of a polite way of