Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
 * 15) &hellip;if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place your signature in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Surrel

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:16, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The last armor vendor.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  06:19, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:03, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:54, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * SE
 * 1) * I'm not sure about this one, but based on the quote, could something about her having permission to sell be added? Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:06, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) **It's a generic quote that loads of vendors can potentially say, I'm not sure it needs a mention beyond the fact she is selling weapons, which in itself shows she has permission. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:36, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Fair enough, figured it couldn't hurt to ask :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:03, December 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Voroos

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 02:17, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Technically they might be found on Kubindi...

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:25, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:56, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) So ugly...
 * 2) *Body needs mention of its reptilianism. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:52, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:35, December 24, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ark Brell

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  04:27, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project.

(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  05:27, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:23, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:21, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Always amused by anything relating to Taris. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:16, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

The Corellian

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  04:27, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project.

(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  05:53, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:34, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:45, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:17, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * Since it is in quotation marks in the infobox should his nickname be in quotation marks throughout the body as well? Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:23, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added the quotations around the first mention, but the other mentions are fine without them. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:16, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Dogma wants mention of the Corellian's gender in the body.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:24, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) *Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:34, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Torog

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  04:27, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  05:56, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:23, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Beast.  501st  dogma ( talk )

Object

Comments

Parnax

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  04:27, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  05:58, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:23, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:46, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) How about mention of his gender in the body?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:34, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:36, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Revanite Sith Lord's compound

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  04:27, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  06:05, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:34, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:47, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * The bts seems to be the one from the Sith Lord's page. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:23, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Fixed. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:18, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Could we get a time frame?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:37, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) *Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:36, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Durgolosk

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:01, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's 248 words by my count so good chance it'll go over, but it's here for now.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) You're lucky... 249 words... XD  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:09, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * I believe its hunting and sleeping habits should be moved to a separate section: Behavior.
 * 3) **Moved. Ayrehead02 (talk)
 * 4) * The infobox has the eyes as black, while the body has not mention of coloration.
 * 5) **Woops added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:05, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * How about reffing the Bio and Appearances section ? :P 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:53, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:05, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) Exiled Jedi
 * 9) *Geonosis and the Outer Rim Worlds was a book in Wizards of the Coast's Star Wars Roleplaying Game not in the West End Games version.
 * 10) *The book says ten to fifteen centimeter long teeth
 * 11) *"They spent more time sleeping than hunting, but ate anything they met when they were hunting." Could you change the wording to remove one of the huntings?
 * 12) *The statistics indicate that the creature had good vision and could see well without much light.
 * 13) *The statistics also indicate that the creature had a good sense of smell.
 * 14) *These additions will likely require that the article go to the GAN page for review.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:55, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Kelp gnat

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:56, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now for a GM gnat.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:22, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * "The book does not make clear their level of level of sentience." Despite this, you still say it is non-sentient. I'm pretty sure we can assume its non-sentient if it only sings or whistles when it has been given growth enzymes, so this BtS note can go. Also, I think you are using one too many levels... 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:00, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Changed. Levels? Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:26, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***You were saying "...level of level of sentience...". 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:22, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

How to Get Banned (Have a Mind)

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  05:38, December 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: From the random article button...

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:57, December 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 21:52, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Tis random.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:02, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Alderaanian tourist board Holoplay #2735

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 10:24, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) *"and she watched it many times before she could mourn her loss completely" sounds a bit odd, could you rephrase to something like and watched in many times whilst she mourned the loss of her homeworld.
 * 3) *I think it should be the holoplay not that holoplay at the start of the second sentence, I would change it myself but I'm not 100% sure. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:27, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Puffer turtle

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:27, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A species that would fit in well in the Little Mermaid

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:23, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) A lot of grammatical errors from one who should be a native English speaker, from seeing the home country. Otherwise, article is good. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:47, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Context on the Black Sun.
 * 2) **Added Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:25, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) * Wait, did they use the turtle itself to make music, or copy the sound it made and incorporated it into their works? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:05, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **Made clearer. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:25, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ghazakl worm

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:03, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For the barnburner

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:49, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments