Wookieepedia:EduCorps/EduCorps nominations archive/NaruHina


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a EduCorps nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

(3 EC + 7 users/4 EC + 0 users/0)
Two-week deadline from first request, voting ends on 4/12/12.

Support

 * 1) NaruHina has been one of the most prolific contributors to the CAN since its inception with a total of 125 comprehensive articles and continues to tirelessly promote more to the status. Additionally, he continuously reviews the nominations of other users with an ever keen eye for mistakes. As a former member of the EduCorps, I think he would be perfect for it and hey, why not one more? Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 03:39, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm all for adding him to the Parsec-High Club. Oh wait...  But yes, prolific writer, good choice for EduCorps.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 03:51, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Yup. Menkooroo 04:23, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Does anybody have more CAs than Naru?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  04:29, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Of course. Naru's good at it.  Imperators II (Talk) 10:01, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Definitely. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 13:51, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Yep.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:53, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 13:54, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) &mdash;MJ&mdash; War Room Friday, March 30, 2012, 19:48 UTC
 * 10) Yes. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 20:00, March 30, 2012 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) While Naru has been doing a lot of work on the CAN page, I cannot support this nomination. I've worked with Naru, and from what I've seen, he isn't ready to give "over and above the call of duty," as it were. While having many status articles is a fine thing, it is more important for a member of a reviewing panel to concentrate on reviewing articles, rather than nominating articles. A panel reviewer needs to be willing to enforce the policies, and also enforce the things that perhaps aren't official policy, but are what we do on articles. A member of the EduCorps needs to set an example to other users. A panel reviewer needs to be willing to improve themselves, as well as give helpful advice to other users when needed. Perhaps in the future, I'd be willing to support Naru in an EC nomination, but for now, I'm afraid I cannot.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 01:28, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Cal, definitely.  JangFett  (Talk) 01:29, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) I don't think Naru is lacking very much at all, in fact I think he's 99% there. In fact, if things have changed by April 12 I will change my vote to support. I think Naru has played an important role on the wiki for several years by being the "devil's advocate" in many situations, especially where it comes to the nominator-reviewer relationship and objection process. He just needs to finish bridging the gap, which he is almost done with. In the future I'd like to see him object more as opposed to mentioning his reservations in his votes or the comments sections on nominations, and also to make more adjustments to the wording of articles he looks over. Other than that I think Naru is a fine reviewer with a keen eye, and it wouldn't be inappropriate to add him to the EduCorps as long as he continues to churn out so many CANs for the rest of us to review; my reservation there is that I don't want adding someone to a review panel to yet again kill a prolific writer and completely divert their attention.  graestan ( talk ) 04:05, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Per Grae.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 14:34, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

 * Nomination accepted via IRC. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 03:39, March 30, 2012 (UTC)