User talk:Jediknight19bby

Welcome, to the talk page of Jediknight19bby. Feel free to bring all your complaints, comments, and suggestions on this page.

By the time discussions are over, we should all look like the above.

Your edit to Administrators
You aren't an administrator: please don't claim otherwise. Thanks, &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Userpage
Please not that your userpage is not supposed to beyour primary source of edits, as dictated by User page policy. -- SFH 00:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Warning

 * Stop putting banned tags on users that have not been banned, or you yourself will get banned. -- SFH 17:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Voting
Be sure that when you vote, you place your name at the bottom of the list, not the top. If you look at them, you'll see that the votes are in chronological order from oldest to newest that way. -- Ozzel 19:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Fanon
QuentinGeorge 04:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Editing archives

 * Please note that all of Consensus Track discussions that are archived clearly state in big red text not to edit them. They are preserved for our records only and are not active. Therefore, do not change any more archived files please. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 16:11, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you're talking about. Jediknight19bby 19:46, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You added a vote here, where the vote was already over, hence the "The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it." -- Ozzel 20:37, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I didn't see that. Jediknight19bby 16:38, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Problems
Do not remove FA nominations. I see this is far from the first warning you've gotten. You aren't going to get many more of them. Kuralyov 16:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Then someone on the Inq. should. Ephant Mon needs much more user dedication and hard work to become a featured article. It should be an improvement drive, how about that? Jediknight19bby 16:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If other users and/or the Inquisitorious don't think the article is good enough for FA, then it will never make it anyway. A nomination is far from a guarantee that it will become an FA. -- Ozzel 19:24, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

The Point of Wookieepedia
Please stop lying and annoying other users. You do not know James Luceno and you are not an administrator of Wookieepedia. Please refrain from adding Fanon articles to this wiki (e.g.Founding Jedi), and, if it gets deleted, do not start winging about your edit count. Also, please do not nominate FA nominations for the improvement drive, and please do not remove FA nomination tags from articles. Also, please state the reason for your opposition to an FA nomination. Also, as I am the person behind Ephant Mon's FA, please tell me which section needs expanding. (this may as well be a rhetorical question as I severly doubt you have any knowledge of the EU) AdmirableAckbar 15:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It should have a prelude in the beginning about when he met young Jabba the Hutt, and their exploits before they interfered with Jedi business by kidnapping Ki-Adi Mundi's daughter. Besides, that Darth Plagueis book was being written by someone who is not a Star Wars author but I do know. The Founding Jedi are as much canon as the Jedi Order are, just we don't have a real name for them. If you want to complain, complain to Ozzel, the admin who helped me out with the Founding Jedi page. Jediknight19bby 17:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * obviously the founding jedi do exist, however they have never featured in a canon storyline or source, therefore are fanon. If the darth plauegius novel was being written by someone who is not a star wars writer then it is fanon. What source documents Ephant' exploits with Jabba pre-Cerea? I'm almost certain there are none, at least not with anything more specific than "Ephant and Jabba smuggled and generally were criminals together". But, if you know of such a source (and a real one at that, not one being written by your friend), please tell me of it. Also, as i'm sure you know, this is a wiki, and can be edited by anyone, so if you feel the article is missing something, feel free to add it (if it's Canon) AdmirableAckbar 20:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

sorry and thanks
thanks for helping with the Ephant Mon article. Any other help is much appreciated. Sorry for seeming harsh with my earlier comments, i was just frustrated that you nominated Mon for the ID, as I have been putting in a lot of work on ot lately. Once again, sorry and thanks AdmirableAckbar 15:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You are forgiven. I guess I shouldn't have pulled it as a nom, it does have potential. I don't know what I was thinking, probably because I was frustrated with the Jedi Order page, and still nobody was supporting all the work I did on that page. In fact, I'm going to delete my opposition to Mon's page and make it support. Jediknight19bby 19:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * thanks. once again, i'm sorry for seeming so pissed off. AdmirableAckbar 19:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: References
Hey, check out this link → Sourcing to learn about how and when to reference in an article. If you need an example, just check out any FA. Cheers, Greyman ( Paratus ) 22:17, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Jediknight19bby 17:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Jedi Order
As an Inquisitorius, it is my job to monitor the FA nom page. Despite the work and improvements you have made to the page, it is far too short to fulfill its potential. As I said on its Inq page, I deleted it after 10 days without any significant activity. I stand by this decision. --Eyrezer 07:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Jedi Order Help
if you like, i can help you with the Jedi Order a bit AdmirableAckbar 18:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not the best at referencing, and, with the work you did on Ephant Mon, I think that the Jedi Order can be a good article in no time. There isn't a lot to source, since there's only a little bit that we can do, since the opening paragraphs and the list of notable members cover nearly half of it. I guess I could use your help. Thanks. Jediknight19bby 18:58, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help. Jediknight19bby 20:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You want me to apologise. Tough luck. &#123;&#123;SUBST:User:Jasca Ducato/Sig}} 20:53, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * calm down both of you. jediknight19bby, i doubt that Jasco Ducato realised i had made edits other than the pics. Jasco, i don't mind about the pics, but please check through the article for other changes before reverting AdmirableAckbar 21:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * yeah if i get a chance i'll be glad to help AdmirableAckbar 22:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

WOTM
i know i already agreed, but i might ask you to wait another month or two before nominating me. Thanks, AdmirableAckbar 10:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Yaddle
about Yaddle, you're welcome to make a start on her if you like, but i won't be starting for a little while. AdmirableAckbar 10:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Banned
I'm not really banned, so you'd know. I just put it there because it was funny and, like Sikon, I kept it. No worries, I can still contribute. Jediknight19bby 15:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I will ban you if you try moving your talk page to a new article again. Kuralyov 17:12, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * What's wrong with that?Jediknight19bby 17:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You moved your talk page to the main namespace, just like a real article; we can't have that. User talk pages need to stay like they are. -- Ozzel 17:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * if everyone put their talk page where they wished, this wiki would be in shambles AdmirableAckbar 17:32, 22 June 2007 (UTC)