Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Funeral of Marka Ragnos


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Funeral of Marka Ragnos

 * Nominated by: —Tommy9281 Dark side Master SWGTCG.jpg ( Talk ) 08:01, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Something I created as a noob, and perfected as a vet.

(5 Inqs/1 Users/5 Total/INQCON 5)
Support
 * 1)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  22:53, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) I read the article, then went to re-read the omnibus containing these events. Only wish LFL could make this into a good movie.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 12:15, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) You are right, Tommy. This has come a long way. &mdash;  Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 02:15, September 4, 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) --  —Harrar  ( Cut the comm chatter ) 15:31, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  CC7567  (talk) 06:40, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 14:23, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Chack Attack:
 * 2) * "coveted sixth position" I assume that this is the position where he presides over the ceremony based on what you later say in Kressh's section. Anyway, I don't think this bit here is necessary, since it leads the reader wondering what that position is.
 * 3) **Should be good now.
 * 4) * "His claim was met with hostility by Kressh." Not sure if claim is the right word here, since he didn't claim anything, just arrived, right?
 * 5) **Addressed.
 * 6) *Good work overall.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 11:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) **Appreciate the review, Chack. Please advise if anything further is required. —Tommy9281 Dark side Master SWGTCG.jpg ( Talk ) 14:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) Harrar
 * 9) * In the intro, "A duel of Sith swords" doesn't read right, unless I'm reading it wrong?
 * 10) **Should be good now.
 * 11) * In the first paragraph of the funeral, I think you need to qualify "the slaves, whose lives were of little consequence" so it doesn't sound POV. I.e. Who were the slaves' lives of little consequence to.
 * 12) **Addressed.
 * 13) * Not an objection, but did you not want quotations for each of the participants?
 * 14) **Addressed.
 * 15) *I've come to recognise the unique style of your writing Tommy, and I gotta say that its always a pleasure to read. -- —Harrar  ( Cut the comm chatter ) 15:11, September 13, 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) **Thanks, Harrar, I really appreciate that. Please advise if anything further is required. —Tommy9281 Dark side Master SWGTCG.jpg ( No truth in me ) 04:03, September 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) Attack of the Clone
 * 18) * Is there any way you can nix all the "unidentified"s in the infobox? It's not in the actual body of the article, but this should not be cause for an OOU perspective.
 * 19) **Addressed.
 * 20) * Please at least link the duel between Ragnos and Simus.  CC7567  (talk) 06:27, September 18, 2009 (UTC)
 * 21) **There is no article for said duel to my knowledge, mainly because the details are so scarce. I can create a stub if you like, so just let me know. Anyhow, thanks for the review, CC. Please advise if anything further is required. —Tommy9281 Dark side Master SWGTCG.jpg ( No truth in me ) 22:15, September 18, 2009 (UTC)
 * 22) ***I'd prefer if you do, since it sounds like it's possible. If it isn't, please clarify why.  CC7567  (talk) 02:29, September 19, 2009 (UTC)
 * 23) ****Addressed. Thank you for the review, CC. Please advise if anything further is required. —Tommy9281 Dark side Master SWGTCG.jpg ( No truth in me ) 06:14, September 22, 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Is it a conjectural title? -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 12:02, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * It is not. Naga Sadow says, "I have come to take my place at the funeral of Marka Ragnos." —Tommy9281 Dark side Master SWGTCG.jpg ( Talk ) 14:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Couldn't the Wook's interview with Carrasco, Jr. be considered a source rather than a "See also" thing? On Tott Donetta's article the interview with Gossett is considered a source.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 21:49, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
 * No, it's just the same as any other interview with anyone on another site or author comments, which aren't considered sources. I fixed Tott's article. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)