User talk:AdmirableAckbar

Archives: One Two Three

Reply

 * I'm working on it! I'm working on it! There were errors with transferring it from my computer, so I had to go back and re-adjust all the references because the quotes weren't working. :-S Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 01:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

4-LOM
Ok, here's the Behind the Magic info I had promised you. I've already added a tidbit to the article's BTS and sourced it, but there's a "Costume details" image that shows different parts of the droid anatomy that aren't included in the article anywhere. They include the "servomotor" at the left tricep, the "recharge coupling" in the middle of the torso, the "powerbus cables" linking the torso to the waist, and "intermotor actuating coupling" at the knee joints. No descriptions are given for any of these. You may want to ask JMAS to see if he could grab this image for you, which is located in the "Costume/Model Details" link in his character page. IMO, it would be nice to stick at the bottom of the page somewhere, maybe. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:WOTM
Thank you Acky.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 21:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Inquiry
I'm not arguing with you, and I don't care that you changed my edit on Gilad Pallaeon's page. I'm not like that. The only thing I'd like to know is the reason for the edit. I'm just curious to know so that I won't do it again on other pages.-- JuiceStain  Rock on!   16:10, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Gracias, mi amigo. I'll refrain then in the future. Thanks for being civilized lol. Have a great day!-- JuiceStain  Rock on!  [[Image:epiphone sg-black.PNG|20px]] 16:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

RE:Haako image

 * A-hem, you dont have any right to change the pic, the Rots version is much better and wookieepedia has had this descussion before, and all I see is that they favor the Rots version, and the TPM version isnt all that great. Anyway I've started a vote on the descussion page to find out what the users want, how does that sound?TroybAllSpark Quest contribs[[Image:ProphetofRegret.jpg|25px]] 20:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Fine, we should hold a vote but I guess we will keep that pic until someone decides to remove it. Anyway lets stay possitive, do you see and way to expand the separatist council article?TroybAllSpark Quest contribs 20:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Perhapes more light will be shed during the clone wars 3-d series.TroybAllSpark Quest contribs[[Image:ProphetofRegret.jpg|25px]] 20:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Re
That is fine. I actually haven't done a ton lately either, but I think I'll be able to get some more work done in the next few days.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 21:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'm trying to get some more work done on Car'das too. There's a lot more then I expected!  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 23:05, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the Cookie! It was definitely a nice surprise when I logged on today. So, you think the idea of unidentified ship articles has merit? - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 13:12, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Fact file
Sure, im just off but will be back later on. will have them then. Joker1138 ( Mandalore )

Sorry, having some trouble locating them, do you have a rough idea where abouts they are in the FF? Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) 22:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Sepulchral Night Weequays
-- Darth Culator  (Talk) 00:18, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Jorj
Done with Outbound Flight. Man, that was a lot more than I thought. You can do a final clean up of those sections, but I think it's pretty good. Time for the HoT duology. That shouldn't be too much, just a minor expansion (though that's what I said about Outbound Flight).  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 22:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, I think Jorj Car'das is almost done. If you'd like to put those images in, and due a final review, hopefully we can get it up by the 13th (Invincible day).  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * That's fine. I plan to do a final readthrough too as soon as I can. Nice working with you on this.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 21:48, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Aleema
All done Ackbar. I removed some unneccessary pics. Thanks for looking. —Tommy9281 ( Lússë i Morë Hwesta súya! ) 01:03, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

GAN
Thanks for the tip, Ackbar. I thought it would be frowned upon if I just went and fixed what I thought was wrong with the article. I've seen other users do it, but I figured they knew something I didn't. I'm relatively new to objecting, so please bare with me. Also, it seems confusing to me that Fourdot was the first supporter (assumed as the nominator), and then JMAS is the one addressing the objections. Was I wrong for objecting to the things I did (aside from the typos)? Please advise, thanks. —Tommy9281 ( Lússë i Morë Hwesta súya! ) 18:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Torbin
Thank you. I'll check it out.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 12:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Mando'a reversion
Why did you revert my comment on the Mando'a talk page? I was just pointing that out in case someone wanted to add it to the article. :? Darth Bassan94 21:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Nice
I spotted your note on the FAN page and just wanted to say congrats on getting your 50th FA nom up. Keep up the great work!! --Eyrezer 02:52, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * A little late, but I'd like to second that. Outstanding job. Cull Tremayne 13:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Got it
Hey, sorry I missed ya. Yes, I do have the Fight for Justice journal. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Adminship
Hey, how would you like to be a Wookieepedia Administrator? I'm sure you meet the criteria, and the only things I need to know are age and approval. Please respond. Thanks. ~Roger Roger~ Home of the B1s 20:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * As much as Acky richly deserves to be an administrator, he unfortunately does not meet the site's age requirement. There have been discussions to hold a special vote to allow Acky the opportunity, but then everyone would be clamoring for the same deal. Sorry, Roger Roger. :/ Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:16, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * While I appreciate the offer -- and Tope's comments -- he is right: I'm still a few years too young. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:TOTJ Mandalorian Honor Award
Hey, Acky. I just wanted to say thanks for all of your hard work that you've done as a writer for WookieeProject Tales of the Jedi. Thanks to you and your efforts, WP:TOTJ is more than a few steps closer to being a complete WookieeProject ;) So, I present you with the "Mandalorian Honor Award", created for users who have dedicated outstanding contributions to a WookieeProject. I'm glad to have you on the team, and look forward to working with you and the rest of the project in creating even more complete TotJ articles. Cheers, Greyman  http://images.wikia.com/central/images/9/9c/Jan.png ( Talk ) 02:01, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

HEY!!!!!!!!!!!!
I know, AdmiraleAckbar, I forgot that the Duality I posted was Fanon, and I tried letting other users know to delete it. I'll think it through more clearly & more carefully next time.

3RR
Maybe next time you should try talking it out instead of violating the 3RR rule. Also, I find it funny that you are so intent on removing something that is stated in the opening paragraph, throughout the article, and included in the category at the bottom. But obviously inserting it into the succession box at the bottom would destroy the entire article. Kuralyov 21:04, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

HEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AdmiraleAckbar, it's Darth blight 22:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Darth blight. I forgot that the Duality I posted was Fanon-- now!! I forgot when I posted it, and next time I Edit or start a page, I'll re-think it, and I'm letting other users know to Delete it, if it aldready hasn't been, as I told User:Silly Dan

Moxin Tark quotage
Hey Ackbar. I just wanted to let you know why I thought that the quote for Moxin Tark should be expanded. The way it is right now, it is implying that Cracken considers him one really dangerous individual, above the norm, while in reality he considers him dangerous just because of his previous involvment with the alliance. I think the quote on its current state is a bit misleading and that is why I changed it. Would you reconsider changing it back to its expanded form, now that I have explained the reason for the expansion? Carlitos Moff 06:48, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I am glad we agree. I will change it now. Carlitos Moff 22:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Please mind my advice and Greyman's notice regarding Kura's RFRA. There really is no reason to pursue arguments on it. Graestan ( Talk ) 01:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the tip and sorry about that. Purplegethos 15:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Favor
Hey Ackbar, could you click this link, Water World and tell me if you think it is a bad topic or it is good and can be built upon in the future? Thanks! Purplegethos 12:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I made a few edits to it, I know you perfer it now their, but a lot of new commers won't realy use a search with Category:. here.--Purplegethos 12:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey Ackbar, could you re-evaluate it? I did major re-edits. Thanks.--Purplegethos 14:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


 * OH my goodness, Ackbar. My scanner finally worked and I got the picture of the Kivan wraith. Look at it! I also did a lot of the things you told me? Could you cross off the ones I finished? Thanks!-- —Purplegethos ( Talk ) 21:23, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Who invented the Ubese?
I think you're right about the Shadows of the Empire Sourcebook being the first description of the Ubese, though they were previously mentioned in the SOTE novel and alluded to in the ROTJ novel when their language is named. Thanks for the corrections! &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Tapani Sector

 * Under normal circumstances I would agree with your change. However, another Featured Article, Natasi Daala, has a similar item listed in her homeworld category. Considering the Tapani Sector is a specific location, I believe that circumstances would permit us to allow my change to remain as was, at least until a more specific location can be discerned.--Mith&#39;raw&#39;nuruodo 22:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I don't understand your reasoning for your changes to the Martio Batch article. I have examined his hair colour quite well and have concluded that his hair is undoubtedly black. I have referenced Josef Grunger, so that a comparison may be made to emphasize the validity of my conclusion.--Mith&#39;raw&#39;nuruodo 22:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Wookie Cookie
-- —Purplegethos ( Talk ) 13:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandalisim!
I found this, Skrall. Sorry if you're busy, but I felt I needed to report this70.181.81.245 04:32, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations
Congrats on becoming an Inq!  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Cool. Hopefully we can get it up in a few days.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:40, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Kapp
Are you aware of this image? You might like to use it (or a better version) for his article. --Eyrezer 07:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Tambor
Hey, thanks for the pointer. I got the info added into the article allright. :)

But I will say, these Adventures books sound damn interesting, what with all the wacky continuity tie-ins...so I'll probably revisit them at some point. Well, I'll have to for Anakin. Anyway, once again, thank you for the aid. :) Thefourdotelipsis 10:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Lol
Sorry, I was just editing wanted pagws. We'll see --Darth Revan The Weirdo 20:26, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Ommin
Hey Ackbar,

Again, thanks for looking. I've expanded on the BTS a little. Let me know if it is now satisfactory, of if more is required please. You can drop me a note on my talkpage. Thanks!

—Tommy ( Clean face and hands ) The Anvil 23:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Checking in
Just wondering, can you give me the link to the Wanted pages? It would be appreciated. Thanks! --The User Talk:Darth Revan The Weirdo 00:33, 24 May 2008 (UTC) Also a signature. Darth being my user page Revan being my talk page and Lord of the sith being my contributions. Thanks!--The Darth Revan 00:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Reverts

 * Why are you reverting my edits? Last I checked, the number "8" comes after the number "1".  Jasca Ducato Sith Council 17:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Q-series droideka
Thanks for reviewing it. Your objections have been fixed. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)   talk 08:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

A favour
Hi Acky,

I'm back, editing Czulkang Lah, and reading Aruk Besadii Aora and your other noms with my typical fascination. Thing is, I ordered the New Essential Chronology in order to make my NJO push a little easier, but it hasn't arrived. I was wondering if you had a copy, if only to inform me whether there is any information on Czulkang Lah in it. There's some suspect info which I suspect is 9 parts speculation and 1 part fact, so I need to check! I you check lah's page, it should lead you to the info where it's present in the NEC, if it is at all. I'm not sure how its laid out.

That comprises the favour you owe for the monks ;-) but I would very much like to work on Nom Anor together because he's one of my favourites, his article is shoddy, and I saw he was on your list, as he is on mine.

Harrar 13:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) * Thanks a bunch for that; as I suspected the info was wrong! A late July/early August is great for me; I have Crimson Empire (bought it for the Nom Anor appearances) and the entire NJO except for the ebooks (but I do have Ylesia), plus the NEGtC and the NJO Sourcebook - so I'm able to do whatever info on him. Good stuff then&mdash;thanks again for the info Harrar 18:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Good old Jorj
Hey, I'm going to go ahead and nominate Jorj Car'das for FA in the next day (assuming that's okay with you).  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 15:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * That's okay, I can deal with the objections.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 22:29, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Hello, Ackbar. I just wanted your opinion on the Battle of Muunilinst article, which I'm planning to nom for GA. I know it needs some touch-up in places, but I just want some pointers from you on want to do. I merely ask because I want to minimise any complaints I could get before nominating it. I'd appreciate it if you could take the time. Thanks. Unit 8311 13:27, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. Unit 8311 17:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Re:Boushh
First of all, I need to apologize for not getting back to you earlier on this. I had thought that I'd be able to catch you in IRC, but things haven't worked out that way. I should have contacted you on your talk page earlier and I'm sorry about that. With regard to Boushh in the RotJ radio dramatization, there appears to be no information about the bounty hunter himself. Also, aside from a POV scene involving C-3PO, Jabba and Bib Fortuna behind the curtain while Leia frees Han, the radio dramatization seems to adhere fairly closely to the movie (with the exception some of the characters' expository dialogue). If you need more detailed information, IRC would probably the best place for that&mdash;though I'm afraid my presence there will be intermittent for the next few days.Muuuuuurgh 16:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

WOTM
Wow, I'm honored! The gesture is most welcome, although I'm not sure if I have great credentials regarding other areas such of the site. In the words of Jerjerrod, I will redouble my efforts! Harrar 11:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

What is an inquisitor?
Hey Admiral Ackbar what is an inquisitor and how do you become one? Devan2 20:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

RE:False referencing
My apologies. However, I was sure on some of the sources. Not all of them, e.x. the ones you removed, but some. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 19:39, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Voolviff Monn
I made a careful edit to the "Behind the Scenes" part of the entry, and explained my rationale as to why it made for a better article in the discussion page-and pointed to it. You reverted the edit but never explained why you considered the previous edit to have been better than mine. I'm a reasonable fellow, and I'd like to know the REASON. How was the previous edit considered superior than mine?

Userbox
Hey, I borrowed your WP:TOTJ userbox. Hope you don't mind.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 13:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

RE:
Who said that I was interested in being productive? The Inquisitorius is a pathetic joke, and snide remarks are what the article deserves.--172.190.235.19 22:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Stazi edits
Thanks for the heads up. I checked the edits over, and they all appear to be minor rewordings. No major facts changed or info added. I appreciate you keeping an eye on it. :-) AdmiralNick22 01:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

The reason being...
...that it's bad practice. It's not done frequently, not as far as I'm aware, and usually when it is done it's done after maybe one or two comments have been posted. The better option is to tell the people what they're doing wrong, and then leave it there for other people to see, so they know that it's wrong as well. We don't allow for the removal of personal message from user talk pages, so I don't see why it should be allowed on article talk pages. Thefourdotelipsis 10:10, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Sev'rance Tann
Why did you revert my edits to Sev'rance Tann? They were perfectly legitimate.-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet) 14:52, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * How can I respect your reversions if you neither have the courtesy to explain why you made them nor the civility to discuss them? I want to work this out, but I cannot do that if you refuse to explain your rationale.-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 15:41, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I apologize, I had not expected a late response. Nevertheless, the wording is near-identical to that in the Chiss article. Besides, reverting edits because you think it sounds like original research is inappropriate. You can't go around getting rid of edits based on opinion alone. Whether or not my prose sounds essay-ish or not is not grounds for a revert. I find your neglect to include explanations in your edit summaries for a revert highly rude.-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 15:46, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * How you spend your time is irrelevent; you reverted my edits without explanation or discussion.-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 15:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * How is it original research if I got the information from another article? I did nothing. Besides, I worded it as simply and directly as possible. I'm not sure how you expect me to add in information when the simplist way of putting it was dismissed as "OR" and essay-sounding.-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 16:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Well for that I thank you. I do think that Tann's possible name configuration is worth mentioning, however. Also, if there is OR in the Chiss article, I suggest that it be removed, as their appears to be alot of "theoretically"s and "it can be assumed"s; assuming all of that can be considered indicators of OR.-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 16:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I just assumed you had other priorities and decided to tackle it myself. I assume that since a third party has now reverted it, the consensus is that it should not be added at all?-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 00:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I knew he was (he told me). I did not begrudge him the edits, I simply asked him to wait until a consensus could be made. This however was before I knew about the IRC discussion. It seems though, that it has already been decided by several important Wookieepedians, so I can't see much point in attempting to revive a dying issue (if it is not already dead). Thank you for your cooperation during this time.-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 12:04, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks.
Hey, thanks for that link. I'm pretty sure that's the person I was thinking of.

Do you know what ever happened to that page that had a list that included different lightsaber colors with different jedi wielding them?
 * It was deleted a while ago. Also, please sign your posts. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 18:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Solomahal
This might be of interest for you. An image of Solomahal and Tzizvvt from the original cut of the cantina sequence. I just remembered that this socalled Lost Cut is included on the second BtM disc and was quite surprised to find this shot. --Borsk Fey'lya  Talk 17:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Your objection to Daala's nomination has been addressed.-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 10:46, 19 June 2008 (UTC)