Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Abbaji

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 17:10, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:29, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) How bout adding it's atmosphere type to the body?
 * 2) *Argh, done.
 * 3) **Still remains. Are you sure you saved the page?
 * 4) ***Now. Winterz (talk) 19:27, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) I've done it here, but in the future add near the top of the article to get rid of the table of contents when we have this short of an article.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:38, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *Well I tried to find that code to remove the content table, but apparently it vanishes after being inserted. Winterz (talk) 19:00, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **The table of contents only pops up for some noms, so you were probally looking at those who did not have the template. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***TOC's appear when there are three or more section headings of any level. - i.e. a Behind the scenes, an Appearances section, and a Notes and references. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:42, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abbaji Minor

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 20:26, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Cade, I think Winterz is challenging you for the maximum number of noms on this page.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:19, October 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Sky's the limit! :p Winterz (talk) 14:49, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **If war is what you want, my young friend, then war is what you will get! !crazylaugh Now, to find some CANoms... Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:43, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Could you add the Carrion sector to the main article?
 * 2) * 501st dogma ( talk ) 20:59, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Winterz (talk) 21:30, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Authors for Atlas? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:25, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **I just can't get enooooough. Done. Winterz (talk) 22:28, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Ulicia

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:41, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:26, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you give context on Direx? Also, does the prisoner have enough info the warrant an article?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Winterz (talk) 21:58, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Lankashiir

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 16:13, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:35, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Authors for the Atlas?
 * 2) * Main terrain needs to be mentioned in main article.
 * 3) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done. Winterz (talk) 21:58, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) 502
 * 6) * "Outside the Star Wars universe, the name of the planet may be a reference to Lancashire, a county in England." It's always tempting to guess like that, but this kind of speculation falls under our No original research policy and is a big no-no if there's nothing to back it up. Menkooroo (talk) 12:28, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Good, it looks prettier without it. Still, considering that it wasn't me who added it, I thought the info could be relevant in some ways. Winterz (talk) 13:47, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) *One more question: Anything from the Atlas on parts of space under which it later fell? Any Imperial warlord territories, New Republic, Krayt's Empire...? Menkooroo (talk) 09:59, November 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Info added, sir. Winterz (talk) 21:48, November 12, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abregado-fus

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:41, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * Savaged&hellip;
 * With this and the other planet noms below, you should be able to tell a bit more about the planet's place in galactic history by going through the maps in both The Essential Atlas and The Essential Guide to Warfare. You should be able to tell what regions of the galaxy it was in (the Slice, etc.), what territories it fell within during various periods, when its general vicinity was known to the galaxy at large, etc. You might be able to steal a bunch of this info from the Gados article. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 18:59, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * You know, that always made me wonder. If the planet or system's name don't appear in the map, wouldn't it be speculating claiming they fell under X's territory? :s Winterz (talk) 18:53, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delayed response. It's not speculation to say it fell within a territory. It'd be speculation to say that it was allied with such and such a political body or empire without appearing on the map though. But we can assume that if a planet is in, say, grid I-2, and I-2 is part of Darth Krayt's Empire, then the planets in I-2 physically were located in that territory. That's exactly the kind of contextual information Fry and Wallace were going for when they created the Atlas. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 17:34, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. Winterz (talk) 17:24, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, better! I know you're probably trying to keep the word count down on this and the others, but you should really add dates for when it fell within those various territories... ~ Savage BOB sig.png 12:16, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * How's that now? :) Winterz (talk) 00:05, November 8, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Though I'm supporting, I don't think you can call its primary terrain "gas gaint". 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:41, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Yeah that kept me wondering for a while too. However I back checked major gas giant articles like Endor (planet) and Bespin, and they all say in terrain "Gas giant", I guess that serves to explain that there isn't any solid terrain, just gases. Winterz (talk) 11:56, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **I guess you can keep at that since other articles do it the same way. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:09, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Don't concentrate on keeping the word count down. I used to do that, but you can really limit yourself and it really won't end up as comprehensive as it should be for a CA. If it goes over the word limit for CA nomination, then it can qualify for GA nomination. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 12:35, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) *Hmm that's not exactly my intention, Gethralkin. However, even with proper context, these articles will not reach the 250 words. Also it's better to keep it CAN as all my GAN slots are occupied right now. Winterz (talk) 13:43, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) **Well, there are some who challenge the 250 word count as a hard limit because it is really a bench mark with a range prompting nomination supporters to review&mdash;if the article reaches over 200&mdash;if the nomination can be lengthened to 250 or more and if not, why not? The idea is that if you come close, then more could possibly be added to reach GA status. Regardless, I understand if any of the articles don't have enough info to bring it up to that, but trying to pare any of them down to force a CA (as was suggested by Savage's comment above) is frowned upon. What's best for the article is more important than what's best for the editor in the eyes of the EduCorp. Still, if it can't even be brought between 200 to 250 words, then you shouldn't worry too much, but don't let the load of articles you are working on dictate the quality of status articles you are nominating. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 14:07, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ***I think you're confusing things. Never did I showed any sign of not wanting to expand to its max quality. In fact, I complied with what Savage asked but as I forgot to add the dates as well, he assumed I was trying to keep it short. And now you're using his assumption as something that I've said, which is incorrect because I didn't. duh Gethralkin ;) Winterz (talk) 15:23, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ****Oh, well sorry for the misunderstanding. I don't get to get on here very much anymore, and I only took what was posted at face value. I hope I didn't offend, I was just expressing the problem I ran into when I initially began posting CANs. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 16:53, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *****No problem at all, aside from this Comments section being larger than the Objections one. I think you should expand the latter just to balance things up :p Winterz (talk) 18:01, October 30, 2012 (UTC)

Abregado-san

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Cade, Winterz is winning this contest!  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:44, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Abregado-dai

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Three in a row...fus-san-dai!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I need EC back up here... Too many noms to deal with alone.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:47, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Abregado-taki

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 23:04, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Sorry EduCorps!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:38, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Your ref in the main body of the article is formatted wrong. Use in the infobox only. You should be using  in the body. Please look over your other noms and see if they are formatted correctly.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:15, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) **Wow, I really wasn't aware of that. What is the difference? Anyways, corrected it in all my 17 noms, thanks for the heads-up! Winterz (talk) 15:44, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Truthfuly, I have no idea what the difference is, but that's how we properly reff an article. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:38, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abrion Major

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 23:43, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work on all these noms.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:41, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Same reffing problems as before.
 * 2) * You should mention that it seceded to the CIS.
 * 3) * Humans as the immigrated species needs to be mentioned in the main body.
 * 4) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:20, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. I decided to remove the immigrated species and language from the Infobox as I couldn't find any source that confirmed it. Winterz (talk) 15:48, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Ahlenn

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 00:51, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I've got nothing better to do this weekend!

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Evidently.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:42, October 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Neither did I - 400+ edits in about four hours yesterday! Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:19, October 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Same reffing problems.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:23, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Corrected. Winterz (talk) 15:45, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Battle on the Ash Plains of Lenico IV

 * Nominated by: Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 06:23, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:48, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:19, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Coruscantfan (Talk) 00:52, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Engagement in the asteroid-hives of Gelpog the Tyrant

 * Nominated by: Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 06:23, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:52, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, now you can actually understand what the destruction of an Imperial flagship is supposed to be. Get crackin' on it! Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:19, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) *Challenge accepted. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 17:00, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Rage (Lancer-class frigate)

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:59, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:More Far Orbit!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Coruscant Security Special Investigation Panel

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:02, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For WP:TOR

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:48, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  00:01, November 13, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) One thing: You need to say the headquarters are in Galactic city.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:56, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Headquarters has been added. Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:05, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **It still doesn't say that they were headquartered in Galactic City. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:28, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I thought you only do that when you don't know the name of the actual HQ building/complex/etc. So in this case their headquarters should be "CSF Headquarters" and their location (aka the location of the HQ) is Galactic City, Coruscant? Coruscantfan (Talk) 23:21, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ****I just want it in because the infobox has it, and the body should have everything save the eras the infobox has. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Ah, ok. Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 00:03, October 23, 2012 (UTC)

Green/Aura

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Aurabesh

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Apparently there isn't a code for that, yet. :/ Winterz (talk) 18:56, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:41, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Is there any way to remove the "< Green"? Considering that the Green article isn't related to these ones.
 * 3) **I have no idea how to remove it. I noticed it when I first created the article, but did not know how to eliminate it.
 * 4) ***I'll leave the question at Darth Culator's talkpage, will sign my support once I have a reply. ;)
 * 5) * Context on Sienar Fleet Systems.
 * 6) **Contextified.
 * 7) *** Lol, I was expecting some more specific context like "a subsidiary of the massive company X", not just two obvious words. Winterz (talk) 18:48, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ****Does that satisfy your objection? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:31, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *****Meh, I guess so. Winterz (talk) 13:09, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * (objections apply to both 'Aurabesh') Winterz (talk) 14:43, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Both articles have been upadated according to your objections. Thanks for the review(s). 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:17, October 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Green/Besh

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Aurabesh

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 20:52, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:37, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Hey! Far-Orbit! Far out!
 * 2) * TFOP was a direct supplement to Pirates and Privateers. The way you've written it here, it's like TFOP was just riffing off the theme.
 * 3) **It was a supplement to the RPG just by existing. It was also a direct supplement to Privates and Privateers, like a sequel to it but not. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:25, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***That any better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:38, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Yep. Just needed another tweak. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:37, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * The scenario hooks have names. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:44, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Both fixed. Thanks for looking it over. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:53, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Don't forget to apply these changes to Aura. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:25, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Xenopathology

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:49, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:39, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I know I've already supported, but could you say that Xeno was studied at the University of Coruscant?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:44, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:18, October 28, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Xenopathologist

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:49, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:59, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you link to Coruscant?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:41, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *I guess... Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:40, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Resh (individual)

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 06:21, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:13, October 31, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Shouldn't Korriban's Flame be italicized?
 * 2) **I honestly don't know... it's a space station, so it's a grey area. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:41, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ***I think you should do it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:53, October 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ****Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:16, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) *Otherwise, looks fine. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:55, October 26, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Rirsack

 * Nominated by: DjMack (talk) 05:12, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Might as well get all Rirsack articles nominated.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) A couple things...
 * 2) *First of all, in the following sentence, "Rirsack[1] was a planet located in the Belsmuth sector of the Outer Rim.[1]", you use reference 1 twice in a row. You do not need to do this, and should remove it, as just using the reference after Rim will state that all the stuff before that, including Rirsack, is reffed to 1.
 * 3) *Please check the reffs in the body. You are repeatedly using the long method, when you only have to do that once, and you have already done one long reff in the infobox.
 * 4) *Please add that it was in the Rirsack system to the body.
 * 5) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:46, November 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Scimitar 2

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:01, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Hanzo

 * Intro needs to be expanded to be a summary of everything known about the article, including the history and whatnot.
 * Please check it. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:00, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think it's a bit too little context. The idea with Wookieepedia is to be able to tell about any individual article to somebody who has no Star Wars knowledge. Also no sourcing the intro. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:11, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Article needs to be told in chronological order instead of starting at 4 ABY, and then going back to 3 ABY.
 * Oops, fixed. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:00, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * The body seems to say Scimitar 2 was actually flown during the Battle of Endor, but clearly that was not the case as Jonus can be clearly seen trying to evacuate the Death Star before its destruction, and thus very clearly saw no action. I don't think we can see it in Return of the Jedi either.
 * Ah, good catch. Fixed. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:00, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Missing a behind the scenes section.
 * Most importantly, this article is definitely eligible for at least GA status, not CA. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:20, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Not quite 200 words, but even without a bts (which I will add later today) I will see what I can do to expand it to GA length. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:00, November 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Also as I believe this TIE bomber was in Empire Strikes Back, have you checked for it in the adaptations, as well as any sources that mention the scene in question? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:20, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hanzo added this into the hidden blank CANom below, so I'm assuming this is the one he meant. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:12, November 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually about the Empire Strikes Back appearance: can it be proven that this was one of the TIE Bombers from the film? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:11, November 7, 2012 (UTC)

Otoh Mandassa

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 08:03, November 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In honor of GB's 11th anniversary

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Ebenmal system

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 14:50, November 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:I love it when authors go back to fill in gaps.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments