User talk:Imperialles/Archive5

Re: TCW Episode Guide
Only that the Weequay pirate Hondo Ohnaka left there after being disgusted by the god Quay and being sold into a life of servitude by his parents. I leave it up to you to decide whether that's notable info or not.  CC7567  (talk) 07:57, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Revertion
Why did you revert my edit on Mandalore the Lesser? I took the facts from | Mandalore's biography page on SWTOR.com. AW8 16:32, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I haven't copy-pasted any text, I just didn't come up with an alternative text to use on some part. AW8 16:36, April 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * How does it look now? I've changed the text and integrated it with your edit. AW8 16:53, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Image cats
My bad, I'll be more careful when putting up images to include appropriate categories. I was thinking about the article and not about the image. &mdash;fodigg  (talk) | 18:09, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Boonta
At the end of the episode, Jord Dusat talks about entering the Boonta Speeder Race. Adamwankenobi 06:56, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Unknown Region races category
Hello! I thought that a category specific to the Unknown Region races was needed since there was category for Unknown Region planets, stars, etc., but I've noticed that you have reverted all my changes. Is there a reason why there is not a need for a category for Unknown Region races? Thanks. Kaitco 06:26, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

QOTD Votes
Dude, do you vote against every single quote on the "Other" page? Seriously, why? --Darth Praxus- Stover Lover 17:08, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

question regarding Voss species article
Hello. I've been doing work on the Voss (species) article, and I was intending to nominated it for a GA, but am not sure it would qualify as we have no information on what the Voss look like at this time. I'd be more than willing to maintain this article as more information is released--just as I plan to with the Gormak article--but my concern is that nominating a species article lacking a "Biology and appearance" section would be frowned upon. Thoughts? &mdash;fodigg  (talk) | 15:44, May 7, 2010 (UTC)

Notability Policy
I got to thinking some time after I started that CT. Something like Darth Vader's lightsaber might not be considered notable under most policies. However, I noticed that Luke, Vader, Maul, and Ventress all have specific pages dedicated to them in The New Essential Guide to Weapons and Technology. I don't know if your rough draft has addressed these or any similar issues, but if not, you might want to do so before presenting it. SinisterSamurai 22:10, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

What the heck, man?!?
Did you just delete my hard works imput on the lightsaber page?!? You know how long it took me to research and find out all that info? A whole week, that's how long! So why did you just delete all that?

cc-7567 lover
 * It was low quality. Feel free to add the information back, but I doubt it will stay there long. --Imperialles 23:27, May 12, 2010 (UTC)

No one is ever nice to me on this site! I only try to help ither people's knowledge about the Star Wars universe!

Links for verification
Company homepage and reference from StarWars.com added to SpecPlate article and talk page. Hope it's enough. Trooper377 13:44, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

TOR cleanup
Hey, I noticed you're doing a clean up for The Old Republic-page, which looks good so far. However, although I understand your motivations, d'you think you could incorporate the images from the former classes gallery into the new classes section in a manner that looks good. For, really, they are quite telling about what each class is about. The lightsaber-specialised force-user having drawn lightsabers in contrast to the Force-specialised ones. The agent being a shadowy figure, the trooper being heavily armed etc. Just something to keep in mind while editing. Swedish guy 20:20, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * I could try. For now, my focus is to eliminate the galleries and replace them with actual text. --Imperialles 20:22, May 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * For Ref #16(Smuggler/gunslinger) is there some reason the date is March 13 2010, not Dec 09 2009? SinisterSamurai 19:18, May 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's when I accessed the page. It's customary to note this when citing web sources (on Wikipedia, at least). We should probably implement a full-scale Cite web template, though, where things like publication date can be noted. --Imperialles 19:27, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Notabillity for Fan Video
I have provided proof of notability for the Three in the Afternoon page. Check it out to see the proof. --Darth Praxus- Stover Lover 03:56, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

8 years old
Hello there Imperialles. Users are not allowed if they are 13 years old. This user says he/she is 8 years old.--Station7 16:34, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

IRC
I apologize for our discussion earlier on IRC. I do realize that we both want what's best for the site, but simply have differing ideas as to going about that. Please accept my apology in the spirit it is given. A post left to me by SavageBob really made me think about things. I will try in the future to make sure I am reading and remembering all of the site's policies correctly, but I will also ask of you to consider some of the ethics in your recent actions. No one was trying to harass you. It's time for us all to move away from this divisive discourse and find ways to get things improved in a constructive manner. Graestan ( Talk ) 16:52, May 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Of course. I realize I may come off as obstinate, but I am merely acting out of my perception of what is best for the site in the long run, and I have never consciously intended to suppress anyone's ability to speak their mind. The tone of our recent conversations colored my responses to you, and for that I am sorry. Shake hands and all that. I hope we can continue to work together in improving the site. --Imperialles 16:58, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

Procedure CT
Hey, Imp. Just letting you know that we've tweaked the wording of the CT on procedure so that a reply is not required. The new wording features this clause removed from option one: "All users who have cast votes prior to the desired change to be included are directly contacted and have expressed either their approval or rejection of said change by commenting under their vote, or the alteration to the vote is rendered invalid." Thanks. &mdash; Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 19:53, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

TSLRCM and TSLRP
Hello. Lord of Hunger again.

I see that the final vote has been tallied and TSLRCM's page has been deleted (or moved to the Fan Wiki). I am not here to dispute that, in fact I am fine with it considering that you made the official rules clear and TSLRCM was not in compliance.

However, I did notice that TSLRP's page was not deleted. I believe you said that you for deleting that page as well since it did not comply with the rules either. However, this has not occurred I understand the votes were tied, but that does not change the fact that the result remains unfair. The TSLRP has not a single attempt to provide official recognition, not even fan recognition, whereas the TSLRCM page had many sources. Furthermore, TSLRCM is a published mod and has active support and improvement, whereas TSLRP's site (the only source of information for that page) is out of commission. I do not wish to tell you how to run this site since you are an administrator, but there are many people claiming bias.

Thank you for your time, Lord of Hunger 19:59, May 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * That discussion was evaluated and closed by, another administrator. Since all such consensus evaluations are up to the individual administrator, I suggest you contact him. --Imperialles 20:02, May 21, 2010 (UTC)

Superchubby (user)
Hi Your block doesn't work on me because i have this account to--Darth Nexu aka superchubby 21:23, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Block
I see you changed my ban/block from 1 year to only a couple of days. May I ask why?
 * You promised to behave. --Imperialles 14:49, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Pretty sure it was changed before anything of the sort was ever indicated from me. You admins just arbitrarily change the rules whenever you wish. We'll see how long it is until my next run-in.
 * I'm pretty sure you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. --Imperialles 15:28, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, implying that my thoughts are completely unfounded... that old tactic. Honestly, I/we wouldn't have an issue with Wookieepedia if you all didn't strike up underhanded comments about our lack of reasoning and/or concept of fairness when we voice our complaints concerning the projects. I can see that we're not the only ones it happens to. I guess I'll join the ranks of the disgruntled and just leave. This place really does suck. ShamelessDreamer 16:03, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Project colon
I was trying to contribute to Forum:SH:Project Colon and of course managed to make a pest of myself. I created a number (and not a small number) of redirects to certain issues, thinking that I could have them redirected for now and then just move them over. Except now I'm getting errors when trying to move pages over an existing page. So...I think it may need a rollback. Sorry. :( If you need a list of all the redirects I created I can compile that for you. &mdash;fodigg   (talk) | 14:54, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Or should I just tag all of those redirect pages for speedy deletion? There are 14 of them. &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 14:57, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Now it's letting me move them over the redirects. I am..wha..I can't even... &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 14:59, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh wait, was I trying to move a redirect page to a redirect page? Wow. Awesome. &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 15:01, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay then&hellip; --Imperialles 15:05, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Lol! Sorry. I frazzled myself. &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 15:07, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * New question, and I'm asking first this time. After making all the article moves (but no cat moves yet), is there a way to request a bot to edit the text of the actual articles to change every link from "Star Wars Legacy" to "Star Wars: Legacy"? Or should I be doing that manually? &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 17:41, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Changing the links can be handled perfectly well by a bot. Try asking here. --Imperialles 17:44, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, request made. Is there a "best practices" way to go about moving categories? There's no "move" button and I know each article would have to be re-linked, which should probably be a bot. I'm just not sure how to go about doing it. &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 17:55, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, categories can't be moved. You have to manually create new ones, then re-tag all the articles in them, and finally tag the old categories for deletion. --Imperialles 17:58, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * So, just to double check, I should go ahead and make the new categories, then request a bot make the changes, then request that the old cats should be deleted? &mdash;fodigg  BlackRebelStarbird.png (talk) | 18:02, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, if you're not intending to fix the category links in the individual articles yourself, you can probably hold off on creating the category. Just give the bot operator clear instructions. --Imperialles 18:04, May 25, 2010 (UTC)