User talk:206.21.130.63

Regarding your edits to Ferus Olin
As I do not wish to violate the three-revert rule, I would like to state my reasoning for reverting your edits to the article back to my previous version.
 * Here is your first edit.
 * "A duel ensued, and as Vader evaded an attack from Olin, he choked him with the Force before ordering stormtroopers to imprison Antin and the Jedi."
 * I reverted this because: a) it wasn't a duel, all Ferus did was attack Vader twice, Vader stepped aside, and choked him. Their lightsabers didn't even contact each other, and b) it wasn't clear who did the force choking.


 * I see now, although I didn't before, that you added "the Sith" in place of "he" to make this clear in your second edit. However, it still was not a duel, and so I reverted you again.


 * And here is your third edit.
 * "A duel ensued, though as Vader evaded an attack from Olin, the Sith dwarfed him in power, and choked him with the Force... et cetera.
 * This was reverted because:
 * 1) The duel thing.
 * 2) It doesn't make sense&mdash; it essentially states 'even though there's a duel, Vader's avoiding an attack.' This is very unclear.
 * 3) "dwarved him in power," although somewhat true, is unnecessary information and partially violates Neutral point of view.
 * 4) Finally, I saw nothing wrong with the original wording, and I didn't see any improvement made in your edits.


 * I apologize for my reversions, but there was no legitimate improvement made in any of your edits. Also, in the future, if you see a tag on an article, that means major edits are being made, and as a courtesy, you should refrain from making minor edits such as the ones you did to Ferus when the tag is up to avoid edit conflicts. Thank you, and have a nice day.  Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 23:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)