Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Fehlaaur'aitel'loro


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Fehlaaur'aitel'loro

 * Nominated by:  Grunny  ( Talk ) 07:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Legacy's Thrawn

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Well done. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 22:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) He's not Thrawn though. :P  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  16:18, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Actually, I think the dude is Thrawn's second clone that came back just to be ruled by a bunch of Sith, again. It would make complete sense...probably. ;-) Kilson Likes PIE 20:06, 23 March 09 (UTC)
 * SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie ) 10:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1)  Graestan ( Talk ) 14:13, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) GRAESTAN IS BACK:
 * 2) * The details of Cade are a bit muddled at the end of the intro. It's like he's found, but needs to be found again. Please clear this up.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * The first two sentences of the biography are a bit redundant.
 * 5) **Addressed.
 * 6) * The reason why the sabotage would cause a conflict between the GA and Empire should be explained.
 * 7) **How's that?
 * 8) * It's a bit unclear how the Sith, being described as allies of the Empire, could end a Sith-Imperial war by deposing the Emperor.
 * 9) **Reworded. It didn't, it was just at the end of the war :).
 * 10) * Please explain straight off that Fel escaped the assassination attempt and what he went to do.
 * 11) **Done.
 * 12) * Again, in the bio it's unclear why they'd need to find Skywalker again.
 * 13) **How's it looking now? Thanks for reviewing, Graestan :-).  Grunny  ( Talk ) 07:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) * Graestan ( Talk ) 13:53, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 15) Context on the Galactic Alliance and the Ascendancy.
 * 16) *Good job once again. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie ) 09:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) **Context added on GA, and the Chiss Ascendancy is embedded in the sentence as "two governments" :-). Thanks, Soresu :-).  Grunny  ( Talk ) 10:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * The quote in P&T just looks wrong. Could a comma be missing?  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 17:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes there was a missing comma. Added :-).  Grunny  ( Talk ) 22:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)