Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Fighter's Courage

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 18:45, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I'm not even close to done with SWG's paintings and posters.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Paintings are awesome! Hanzo Hasashi 15:31, March 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 13:29, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ~ SavageBob 04:00, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) How do we know she's female? ~ SavageBob 23:36, April 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Based on what female Trandoshans look like in the game. Can be seen here.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 03:19, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ** They look the same to me anatomically; do the female ones have breasts or something that I'm missing? In other words, the figure in the painting could be wearing something akin to a gender-neutral Jedi robe, right? ~ SavageBob 17:13, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***It may not be readily apparent, but I assure you this is a female Trandoshan. It is just a reuse of concept art from the development of the game for female Trandoshans. Can be seen here and here. If this is not enough, I will remove it.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 20:03, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **** In that case, if you can provide a footnote that explains why this individual is being called female, I'm fine with it. Has that concept art been printed anywhere official? That would do. ~ SavageBob 17:08, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Unfortunately not. Just went ahead and removed it.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 23:54, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ****** OK, last question, and I'll drop it: Based on playing the game, do you think it's fair to duck test the Trandoshan in the image as female? I don't want to remove verifiable information if it's there... ~ SavageBob 02:34, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ******Absolutely.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 03:07, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) *******OK, sorry for the runaround. I'd feel more comfortable with a source on the gender, but if you feel it's a duck test, I'm willing to go with that. ~ SavageBob 04:00, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Again, my description reads pretty flat. Any help would be appreciated.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 18:52, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified flower (Ruusan)

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 10:36, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: That would be an interesting day at the construction site. WP:NSW. Think it's the last for my 'Plants of Ruusan' series.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  OLIOSTER   (talk) 09:37, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 10:04, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * If there is any kind of distinguishable info about the birds, then you should create an article for these Unidentified bird (Ruusan). Darth Morrt 10:04, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * I was actually planning to write it once I've got more time, since I just wrote a FAN.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain)`

An Examination and Exploration of a Most Dangerous and Resilient Organism

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 11:09, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:NSW.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) A riviting monograph, this. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:14, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Rubedo
 * 2) * Was the title italicized in the book? The titles of acadrmic papers are supposed to have quotes around them instead. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:59, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **No, no it was not. The original author put the italics there, and I left them. And then removed them.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 01:07, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***ENGL&101 FTW. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:14, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Jujiggum
 * 6) *Are you certain the essay's genre was biology? Or is that your own assumption based on the fact that it included information about orbalisks? Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 01:17, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **I suppose it's an assumption. Given that the entire essay is about orbalisks, which are parasites, wouldn't parasitology be appropriate?  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:49, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Yeah, I guess specifying parasitology would be a better fit. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 15:19, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Done.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 22:23, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Planore

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 08:33, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Not a painting? Well I'll be damned.

(0 ECs/1 Users/0 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Helping out WP:KOTOR now?  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 08:53, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *I am a member!  OLIOSTER  (talk) 09:36, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * No mention in the strategy guide or Kahranna's CSWE entry, and oh wow did the CUSWE get this wrong but I figured I'd link it anyway.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 09:04, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't ever link to the CUSWE, but yeah, they screwed that up pretty badly.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 08:53, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Jood Kabbas

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 13:19, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Some artists to accompany Oli's paintings

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:55, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unna Lettu

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 13:19, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:55, April 3, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Fen Teak

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 13:19, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:55, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  For quality carpets! Menkooroo 04:19, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Kosh (tea)

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 13:45, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: To accompany Kosh on the GAN. Did Riten choose it or another type of tea? Probably the most important mystery left unanswered by Reaves & Perry.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:55, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 00:13, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) This decision is almost as compelling as, "Which seat should I take?!" ~ SavageBob 02:36, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Coruscant Classic

 * Nominated by: <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 12:25, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Just got KotOR working on Windows 7, so I can actually contribute to WP:KOTOR now. Yay. Praise Katarn.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Bothan Beauty

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 13:08, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ...and then I was painting her painting but then he told me to stop so I just painting'd her painting.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Just a note for Bob, the painting's description specifically states the depicted Bothan is female. :P  OLIOSTER  (talk) 13:10, April 4, 2011 (UTC)