User talk:Hanzo Hasashi

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Hanzo Hasashi!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Please do not remove talk page and forum comments, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash; Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * }

Reply
Also, you might have to wait a few days to edit the GAN page, still. Good to see you got your account working.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I can nominate for you. You get the credit for it, don't worry. ;)  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * All right, it's nominated.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Re: Wallen
I struck the sentence, BtS, and Lego objections; you fixed up the first two well enough, and since you can't add anything about the Lego Star Wars game, then I suppose that objection is pointless. However, I cannot strike the P&T objection, purely because it is required, and there's no way of avoiding that rule. Yes, you'll have to force the P&T, and if you have trouble, see about that, he's very good at writing forced P&T's. And what about the two questions I asked? Any quotes, and the redundant BtS sourcing? Cheers, DC 21:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks great, all objections stricken, AC vote given. Great job, DC 22:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll reword the P&T a bit for you. Unfortunately, the links to the online cards no longer work, so there's not much we can do about that. I'll try looking for them tomorrow. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 22:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, yes - I don't see anything that's majorly wrong with it. But that doesn't mean others with find things to object to. Just keep up the good work, and Wallen will become a GA. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 23:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but that's not the way I work. If that objection was the only thing preventing the article from passing, then yes, I would strike and support. I'm not doing this to be mean; I just want to ensure that this article will be fully sourced. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 21:10, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't "support it more;" I can either object or support. And frankly, it's not the job of the AgriCorps - or anyone else - to hold your hand and guide you through the entire nomination. This is your work; therefore, it's your responsibility to see that the article contains all the info out there on Wallen. Once that is done, and I'm satisfied with it, then I will strike my vote and support. Until then, I ask you to wait. My first Featured Article nomination took a long time to pass; Good Article nominations can be the same. But Wallen will pass much faster if you take each objection and fix it right away. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 23:39, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Pardon me for butting in, but I read you're in need of CCG pics for this article. You can probably find the ones you need here.  Good luck! :-) jSarek 01:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Very well, but I would like to see Toprawa's and Cav's objections satisfied before supporting. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 12:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * First off, sorry for answering a question on your talk page, Tope. Hope you don't mind. Anyway, AFAIK, you need to be registered for a few days (about 5) to edit the GAN page, regardless of how many edits you have. And mainspace edits are edits to articles, not forums, talk pages, or your userpage. Also, please be patient and stop badgering users to review your article. They'll get to it soon, don't worry.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 22:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, that's understandable that you want it to get passed ASAP.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 22:49, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Striking other users' objections
Do not strike other users' objections on the GAN page. It is up to each individual objector to strike their own objections. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 00:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Wallen sources
Sure I can check those sources for you. Give me a few days to go through my collection, and I'll add them to the source list. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 12:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

Fanon warning
- Lord Hydronium(Oya!) 01:33, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Not intended to be fanon. Hanzo Hasashi 01:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Scripts aren't movies. And please understand, the transition process is long and we need to stay organized. Random users moving things willy-nilly is not going to help here. If you want to participate in the process, we'll have sign-ups starting on the 6th. - Lord Hydronium(Oya!) 01:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop adding unverified information to articles, such as Chiraneau. While it's obvious those are all the same actors given it's just reused footage, nothing ever states those are the same IU characters. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Trooper
I added a note to the article saying the canonicity of the comic is in question.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 23:21, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh, probably not. Don't think it matters.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 23:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Executor characters
I'm going to politely ask you to drop the subject of Executor officers dying at Endor. I asked you once before when this conversation was ongoing to drop it then. I know you want to believe that every officer on the bridge died, and when you find a speck of information that seems to allude to that, you want to jump on it, but the information just isn't out there. If it was, it would have been added to the article already. Please do not add unverified information to an article unless a source explicitly states that someone died. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry bout that, sometimes I still make assumptions based off of established facts, and no I am not just trying to say what I want to be the case, I just sometimes jump to conclusions about alot of things, like when I tried to say Cane Adiss's fate was unknown because the Databank says so, even though apparently manual of style rules are not to say *insert name here*'s fate is unknown even if an official source says that it is, and when I tried to add in the info that Endicott was at the superlaser just based on seeing him there ROTJ (which you later on indeed added to his page). By no means am I trying to influence the canon or think that I have control of the canon, that was more of a thing of the past during my days as an anon, but I still do make mistakes sometimes. :)Hanzo Hasashi 01:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Understood, no worries. I just want to avoid rehatching old debates. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:44, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Nevar
Thanks for getting that Nevar spelling bit. You'd think 7 people looking at it would have caught it. :P Kudos for having that knack for finding little bits of missing stuff in these CCG articles. :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:08, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Insider 83
Hey, Hanzo. Do you still have Star Wars Insider 83? Where exactly does it mention R3-O1? Thanks for any help, ~ SavageBob 03:21, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response. I asked another user to check for me, and he said he didn't find any mention, so it must have been a mistake by the Yodapedia people. I appreciate your help! ~ SavageBob 23:51, January 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re: May CAN
Hi, I misremembered. This wasn't a CT, just a discussion on SH, here: Forum:SH Archive/Request for comments: Apparently human characters. It wasn't put on CT, but was accepted by many expirienced users. Common sense rules! I won't object your nomination. I hope an Educorps member will join the discussion soon. Darth Morrt 03:33, November 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re: My CAN objections
Done. However, could you, in the future, wait a week before you remind me? I tend to check the nomination pages regularly. :) Cheers. 1358  (Talk) 20:16, November 15, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Davod Jon
Struck. Thanks for reminding me; I completely forgot about that. Cheers. 1358 (Talk)  18:52, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

Stormtrooper species
Hey, Hanzo. I've been looking high and low for some source that names TIE pilots as Human, but so far no luck. There is this, from Star Wars: The Complete Visual Dictionary, p. 232: "Made up of clones, as well as human recruits, Imperial Stormtroopers are first-strike units sent into critical combat situations in support of both the Imperal Star Fleet and the Imperial Army." This might be a better reference for future stormtrooper articles, since the CSWE alludes to the Human species but doesn't outright say it. I'll let you know if I find anything on the TIE pilots, but I'm running out of places to look... (You could always start a Knowledge Bank thread on it, though; more people would see the question there.) ~ SavageBob 21:58, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, is there a way to cite the Complete Visual Dictionary? And should the articles I just added (RGA-972 and NT-311) be cited with Complete Visual Dictionary, or can I keep the CSWE citations I added earlier today? Hanzo Hasashi 02:23, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * You can just cite the CVD normally; there's no special template for it. As for whether you should keep the CSWE sources or change it, I'd say you can probably leave your older ones as they are, you should probably start using the CVD, and for the ones that are currently nominated, change to CVD only if you feel like it. :) ~ SavageBob 03:03, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Already done, thank you. And thanks for informing me about the Knowledge Bank, too. :) Hanzo Hasashi 04:29, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

DV-523
For the record, please do not come begging me for votes. I will get to the article eventually when I have time. 1358 (Talk)  19:23, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Archiving CAN's
Hey, Hanzo. Just a reminder to follow all of the instructions for archiving successful CA nominations. Go for it! Menkooroo 02:41, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Whoops, seems I spoke too soon. Seems like you have it well in hand. Sorry! Menkooroo 02:43, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks for the reminder anyhow. Hanzo Hasashi 02:45, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think you got everything except this. I took care of it for ya, but definitely remember to update it next time. Also, be sure to add successful at the top of each archived nom page, so that it'll be uneditable and look like this. Menkooroo 04:42, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for both. With the archived nomination pages, I knew I was missing that part, but couldn't figure out what to do. It did not help that I could not even view the sources of past ones. But I saw that you took care of those by the time I went back to those pages to attempt to archive them. Hanzo Hasashi 05:04, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Please add the revision numbers at the same time as the milestones. You are not in a hurry, so please follow proper procedure. 1358  (Talk)  19:32, March 6, 2011 (UTC)

Self-archiving CANs
Hey, Hanzo. Again, I strongly recommend that you not archive your own noms to the CAN page. It's a conflict of interest in my opinion, since whoever archives a nom and either passes or fails it is supposed to also make sure that all objections have indeed been addressed. There is not a rule against self-passing and archiving, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea. In short, there's no rush to get these entries off the page, so if you have a little patience, someone else will archive your successful noms for you. Sorry if this comes off as scolding; I really do appreciate the effort you put into your CA noms, and I'm glad you're so gung-ho about contributing. :) ~ SavageBob 22:20, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's not just my own noms, I've archived any noms that have had either 2+ EC votes after at least 2 days or at least 4 votes if there's 1 EC vote after a full week in the past. I have also seen this done before by other users after enough time passed based on the number of votes. And I have only archived noms with all objections struck. Hanzo Hasashi 23:13, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's fine for other people's noms, but I'm just suggesting that it's a conflict of interest for your own stuff. And I'm not accusing you of doing anything wrong, so sorry if it came off I was saying you had archived things that shouldn't be archived. I'm just saying that, in principle, it would be better to let someone else do it. If I notice others archiving their own noms, I'll suggest that they not do so as well. In the end, this is just my opinion, of course. But it may be something we have to address in the future if others aren't as honest about it as you are. :) ~ SavageBob 00:03, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Does the EC have the problem that the Inq had in the past of things just waiting days to be archived? This may be a symptom more than anything. Graestan ( Talk ) 00:14, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sometimes, but seemingly not as much now. Hanzo Hasashi 02:06, March 10, 2011 (UTC)

The Corn Man
Hey! Yeah, the artwork from the side of the action figure packaging is definitely canon. Check out Keyan Farlander for a Featured article that uses it. I'll review Oxixo soon, I swear! Menkooroo 04:52, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Rokon
I would like to ask why you removed my added BTS sentence in Rokon. I did not suggest or argue that it was the inspiration or origin of the name; I just thought it may fit in the article, like with Csilla or Csaplar. Feel free to provide me with the explanation if I'm mistaken.&mdash; TK-999  (Talk) 14:45, March 24, 2011 (UTC) Thanks for explaining.&mdash; TK-999  (Talk) 15:27, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * See Good article nominations/Hija, an ultimately successful nomination. On that nom, it was discussed whether Hija being Spanish for daughter is worth noting, and the conclusion was that, without proof of the Spanish word being the inspiration, it would not go into the BTS. Hanzo Hasashi 15:15, March 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem, your edit was in good faith, and I learned a Hungarian word that day. :) Hanzo Hasashi 15:30, March 24, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Vandolay
Thanks for the request, but I am not a quite good reviewer&hellip;&mdash; TK-999  ( Rise of the Empire ) 15:20, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, that's understandable. Hanzo Hasashi 15:31, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

Re: NT-311
Hey Hanzo, I didn't really contribute to the article per se&mdash;I didn't make any sort of copy-edit or prose fixes or anything; I just added the Cacleanup template because it shouldn't have been removed&hellip; I didn't have time to review the article yesterday, but I've reviewed it today. Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 14:30, May 5, 2011 (UTC)

Re: TK-622
Yeah, Akobi's entry is one of the victims of the Databank purge. In such cases, there are several possible solutions to access the data. Hope that helps :) QuiGonJinn  (Talk) 21:56, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Look at the Internet archive like I did with Able. If this fails, then,
 * 2) Check out this Chinese site, which basically includes all the databank entries. Here's Akobi's, for example.
 * 3) Check The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia. There's a 99% chance that the entry's the same as the databank's one.

Tantive IV
I think it would only be OK to say that they participated in the battle if it were a live-action shot on the card of one of the rebel troopers from the film. As it stands, I think it would unfortunately be speculation to say that they participated in the battle. Menkooroo 03:03, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Updating articles
Hello, Hanzo. I've noticed that you are frequently very enthusiastic to update a Featured or Good status article when you learn of new or missing information, particularly, it seems, articles I have helped write and nominate. Your boldness is appreciated, but, as the primary author and essentially the foremost monitor and caretaker of these articles, I would appreciate it even more if you would first give me an opportunity to add the update myself rather than jumping right in and trying to do the update as soon as possible. In this specific instance, I refer to Davin Felth. Simply sending me a talk page message or leaving a notice on the article's talk page will be sufficient to inform me that an update is required. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:27, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, that is true I like updating various quality articles. However, I never really keep track of who's the one who originally nominated them, however the ones I am most familiar with are the minor movie characters, and coincidentally it appears you have done the most work on those ones. In any case, point taken, I shall from now on either leave talk page messages to the original nominators, or on the article in question's talk page. Hanzo Hasashi 19:58, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Dyer
Thanks; I'll take a look at the article when I have time.  JangFett  (Talk) 04:36, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it needs to say "Dyer is part of Tempest Squad, Dyer commanded Tempest Squad" or something along those lines. In the Tempest article, do you know where Dyer is said to be a leader of it? I don't know where that or how Tempest originated, besides Igar and the AT-STs/AT-ATs.  JangFett  (Talk) 15:11, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's fine then. I don't think Dyer is part of the squad, unless it's mentioned somewhere. I don't think so, though.  JangFett  (Talk) 15:27, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Nothing?
I will but only if you can honestly tell me that you can't even infer anything about his personality. (if you can I'll put a vote in to support it). Darth Needham 17:53, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Captain Needa
If that is the case, I'll update the article once the book is released. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 18:17, June 12, 2011 (UTC)

CA Archiving
Hey Hanzo,

Just a heads-up that you archived Balith Civil War when I still had an unstruck objection. The objection was addressed, but it still needs to be struck. No need to undo the archiving here, but definitely be careful in the future. Cheers! Menkooroo 11:06, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries. It's not a big deal. :) Yeah, the objection was satisfied. Menkooroo 03:39, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

Head-to-Head for Zuckuss and 4-LOM
Any new information from that book? Or is it regurgitated stuff from other sources? The Character Encyclopedia is already on my buying list (planning to grab that next week or so, actually), but if you happen to have the info from that, it'd be greatly appreciated. If I can get these outta the way prior to Zuckuss getting re-featured on the 17th, that'd be great.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 03:45, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well as you can see from this forum, I own neither of these, but the user Sompeetalay, also one of the admins of the Dutch wiki Yodapedia, does, and he has updated articles with those sources on that site. It would appear that only Head-to-Head gives simply their heights in kilograms, which can also be done with real-world math. It doesn't seem like the Encyclopedia has anything new. Hanzo Hasashi 03:59, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Aloo there!
Hey! I noticed that you added the Character Encyclopedia as a source for Sim Aloo. Is it by any chance this picture? I'm on a source hunt for the dude with the tall hat. Thanks! Menkooroo 05:29, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Panno
Thank you, Hanzo. I'll add the information into the article. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 16:17, July 4, 2011 (UTC)

Hi!
Yeah, I'd be happy to do a pre-nom for him. I just checked the CSWE, and he doesn't have an entry. He does, however, appear in the ROTJ photocomic. The top of his face, from the eyes up, is visible in a screenshot of the rebel briefing. Nothing in the ROTJ comic adaptation, but I'll check the manga for ya. I'll get back to you with pre-nom results! Menkooroo 14:21, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * You were right about the manga. Storybook should be available to me in about an hour. No way I'll be able to get the Disney Book and record. :P Hey, send me an e-mail at gradualferguson@hotmail.com. Some of these sources are easier to track down than you think, and I can tell you how! As for Midge, just two small things:
 * Mon Mothma inspiring him to join the Alliance would probably be at home in the bio, too.
 * "Destroyed" is used twice in a row when the Battle of Endor is discussed. Can you change one of them up?
 * All from me! Menkooroo 14:44, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Satisfied like a fox! Menkooroo 15:18, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I will! But first... I think you forgot to add it to the bottom of the GAN page. :) Menkooroo 02:12, July 9, 2011 (UTC)

Chee on Facebook
If you're going to keep linking to Leland Chee's Facebook page, please link to specific posts. Linking to the main blog page will be useless after enough posts pile up to bury whatever fact you're trying to source. Under the top post in a thread, there will be a date or time, such as "X hours ago" or "Xday at X PM" which is actually a link to the individual post. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 17:39, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks for that. As you can see, Chee's just established more canon facts recently both today and yesterday. Hanzo Hasashi 18:25, July 8, 2011 (UTC)

You tawny boy
As you can see here, Yutani is in the Return of the Jedi Storybook, seated next to a glum-looking Lieutenant Page. You could probably say that he's in Star Wars: Return of the Jedi 3: Mission to Endor --- although we don't see the faces of either him or Page, we see their legs, and we know from the film that those are their legs. added it as an appearance for Page when I was writing him last summer, and I agreed with his logic. As he's sitting immediately behind the main characters, he's easier to spot than some of the other characters in the briefing scene.

In Star Wars Manga: Return of the Jedi 2, there's just white space behind the main characters, save for one panel which I've just e-mailed to you. There's a moustached-man behind them, in between the two H's, who actually looks a lot like Yutani. Considering the detail that the manga adaptations often go to to include miniscule characters in the background, I'd say that it's our man. Take a look for yourself.

He is in the photocomic, seated next to Page and behind the heros. He does NOT have a CSWE entry. Hopefully this helps! Let me know if you need anything else. Menkooroo 15:22, July 11, 2011 (UTC) As far as Grond goes: I really have no idea. I'm just learning the ropes of the INQ Redux page, and I really don't know about the AC one. I'd recommend asking a member of the AC. Menkooroo 02:03, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Update: Something for the Sources section --- Return of the Jedi Official Poster Monthly 4 . We see everything but his head sitting behind Han in a screenshot of the briefing scene. Menkooroo 15:43, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) I'd recommend merging Heavy weapon specialist and Heavy Weapons Specialist. They're the same thing.
 * 2) Can "Alliance Special Forces" in the infobox be sourced to the film, or should that be to the CCG card?
 * 3) That's all. Good job! Although I'm wondering if the info about him carrying custom repulsorlifts might be more at home in Personality & traits. Not sure... think about it. Menkooroo 04:31, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done, and the last one I indeed moved. Thanks for the prenom! Hanzo Hasashi 14:43, July 13, 2011 (UTC)

Re: AC redux
You're right, Grond may require a trip to the AC redux page given the amount of changes that have happened. I will bring this up at the next AC meeting on the 30th. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Kilson ( Let's have a chat ) 04:34, July 14, 2011 (UTC)


 * After taking a quick glance, the only two things I could find were these:
 * You might want to mention that he was stationed on Endor in the Intro, probably in the sentence where you mention Vader's arrival.
 * In the Bts, you need to make it clear that the original Grond in Episode 6 was not confirmed to be Grond at first. Also, try putting the Bts in chronological order of events that happened.

Otherwise, it looks good. Kilson ( Let's have a chat ) 16:11, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately, a GA that undergoes major editing after it passes needs to be put on the Redux no matter what. However, we will decide if it needs to be Reduxed at the meeting. Good job working through those objections. Kilson ( Let's have a chat ) 21:15, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * I would say yes. Kilson ( Let's have a chat ) 21:20, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

Yutani

 * Hey. I don't have Behind the Magic. I know Bob does, but he won't have access to it for a few more weeks. Menkooroo 03:59, July 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hmmm... I think it might be prudent to add them here, yeah. I'll be happy to support them, however. :) Menkooroo 04:27, July 25, 2011 (UTC)