Wookieepedia:Inq/Meeting Sixteen

Wookieepedia &gt; Inquisitorius &gt; 

Meeting Sixteen will take place at 0:00 UTC on Sunday, April 13th, which is 7:00pm Eastern Time on Saturday, April 12th for North America.

Articles to be reviewed

 * Beilert Valance – placed on probation during the last meeting. Vote to strip FA status, or keep.
 * Mandalore the Ultimate – placed on probation during the last meeting. Vote to strip FA status, or keep.
 * CC-1138 – I (Greyman) haven't had time to update it with True Colors info yet, but I should be able to find time before the meeting. If not, we shall vote to put it on probation or not.
 * Tavion Axmis – not enough for probation, in my opinion, so I really just mention it here in the hopes that another Inq has more knowledge of the subject: Is anyone able to source the infobox, as well as the third paragraph in the "Desann's apprentice" section? If you are familiar, the sourcing would be appreciated.
 * Actually, Jorrel Fraajic has since sourced the required info :) Greyman  http://images.wikia.com/central/images/9/9c/Jan.png ( Talk ) 04:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * The Keeper – contained erroneous information relationing to its connection to Akurians. I've cut some of this out, but the article needs to be cleaned up.
 * Already taken care of by 4Dot. --Eyrezer 10:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Padmé Amidala – Insufficient sourcing, quotes in prose, fact tags.
 * Imperial I-class Star Destroyer – A rough read in the intro and history section, insufficient sourcing, references aren't linked.

Other agenda items

 * Inq inactivity – Something needs to finally be done. Certain Inqs feel like they have an obligation to hold up more than their end of the bargain, and it's about time the rest of the Inqs step in and do the job or admit that perhaps this isn't for them. We've beaten this issue to death over and over, and listened to the pleas of those who don't care enough to give even thirty minutes every couple of weeks to look at a nomination, but as things certainly haven't changed since then, they're going to have to in the very near future. The Culator quote heading this meeting's page might be funny to everyone, but for some, it's also a slap in the face.
 * Discuss the possibility of swelling our ranks. Enough with how User A feels about User B, the Inq is about reviewing featured article nominations, and if someone's doing it, and doing it well, those who dislike him or her should suck it up and entertain the notion that the Inq could stand to gain something in his or her appointment.
 * Finding some type of middle ground with regards to the Face vs. Helmet debate. As seen on Jodo Kast's FAN, there is a bit of discussion surrounding whether we should use unmasked images for normally masked characters in the infobox, even if those unmasked images are not the best that LFL has licensed, or that is available. Currently, we have several current FA's such as Durge, Grievous, and Carnor Jax where the Inq have approved articles with masked infobox pictures, even though unmasked pictures are available. Now, granted, I'm sure everyone could come up with arguments for either side of the debate. I've always approached this type of thing on a "case-by-case" approach, for obvious reasons&mdash;Grievous is a good example of this, considering that his unmasked face is not the latest image we have available for him; or, Boba Fett, where the only unmasked images we have are of him as a small child, or ambiguous images. What I recommend is simply finding that middle ground, and looking at it from a case-by-case approach. If not, then an argument could be made for Jax's article, which we do have a nice unmasked image of him for (along the same lines as Jodo Kast's unmasked image), and it would be need to changed. If we can get the Inq to agree on a nice, neutral, middle-ground which treats all articles equally (regardless of topic, or author) then I think we can avoid future conflicts, as is currently seen on the FAN page. Greyman  http://images.wikia.com/central/images/9/9c/Jan.png ( Talk ) 03:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Non-Inq votes on FAs - I know this has been discussed to some extent, but nothing has ever come of it. I feel like we need to give up some of our monopoly on FA approval. Anyone can object to an FA, but it can only pass when 5 Inqs vote for it. I know this makes some of our more involved non-Inq users feel a bit disenfranchised. We should come up with some kind of compromise like making 4 regular user votes equal to an Inq vote. Or something. (I don't have all the answers all of the time, just most of the time.) -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 11:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Will be there feigning interest

 * 1) Should be available. Greyman  http://images.wikia.com/central/images/9/9c/Jan.png ( Talk ) 03:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I'll clean up The Keeper, to boot. Thefourdotelipsis 04:22, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) So far, so good. —Xwing328 (Talk) 04:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Will be on the park bench in front of Mount Sorrow; wake me. Graestan ( Talk ) 04:36, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Preliminarily. There's always a chance of RL interference. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 18:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Same as Ataru. I'll most likely be there, but I might be late or have to leave a touch early. I'll definitely leave my $0.02 with someone if I can't make it.  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 13:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Other comments

 * Can I come? —Tommy9281 ( Talk ) 07:20pm, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Only as a spectator. The right to participate and vote is granted to Inquistors because we're eeeviiiiilllll (and it's our job.) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 23:32, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Why do the infobox dates differ from the date listed in the intro?  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 21:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops, my mistake when I created the page, Chack. It's been fixed now. Greyman  http://images.wikia.com/central/images/9/9c/Jan.png ( Talk ) 22:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, thank you.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)