User talk:Kuralyov

 See Archive1 | Archive2 | Archive3

Great Job!
Holy crap I just noticed you had about 41,000 edits! Thats about the amount of articles on Wookieepedia itself. Keep up the good work! BTW: You might want to get a new userbox saying you have over 40,000 edits. I'll put up a proposal. :) Roron Corobb  Talk  00:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Userboxes
If you would like any userboxes made just see my talk page. Happy Holidays! -- Scwhinky Communicate 16:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Celebration IV
I know that you believe that people here at Wookiee dislike you so much that it would warrant you to not attend C4 in May. However as our largest contributor to our site and an admin nonetheless, you are still welcome to help us in our venture at C4. I don't have anything personal with you and that whole subpage matter is now in the past. I would much appreciate it if you can make the trip out there and have fun with us and/or represent us at our table. :) -- Riffsyphon1024 07:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you think the issue is in the past because last time I checked the page was still there. I also am glad that you don't bear anything personal against me, because I do seem to recall that you voted both for keeping the aforementioned page and for removing me as an admin. Given the huge amount of time, effort, and money I have poured into this site only to constantly be considered somewhere between a fifth column and a petty vandal, I'm very hard-pressed to consider spending an even larger amount of money and time in going to represent us at C4, especially since it seems to me the only reason I'm wanted to badly is because so few other admins/major users have decided to go. Kuralyov 03:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well I will be going now as well as jSarek, and a few other users however those other users may not help us two out. Regardless, you are the epitome of the hard-working user. Though we've had our days and things went bump in the night, I feel that connecting at C4 will bring our community together more than ever. I would be delighted in meeting my fellow Wookieepedians at the greatest event this side of the galaxy. --  Riffsyphon  1024 04:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Inferno blurb
Hey, that synopsis has been confirmed by Sue Rostoni as a fake. She's not sure how it got posted to Amazon. Check the talk page for the link to the discussion.  - breathesgelatin Talk 22:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Darth who
It was not fanon it was on the star wars websiteDarth Solus 05:16, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

del
I saw a vandal page at newest articles that must be deleted its name is Sausage!Darth Nospher 10:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

FA noms

 * Thank you for looking over them! You really are everywhere! :-D Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 05:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

New Articles
Hey Kura good to see you again. Those articles were made as stubs per the request of another admin in the IRC channel. I intended to go back and add sources after i finished making them. Sorry for the trouble. HappyTimeHarry 03:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * As soon as i find sources. HappyTimeHarry 03:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry- it was partially my fault and definitely my idea. They'll all be fixed and sourced soon. We're working on it in IRC. Again, sorry about the trouble. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Categories

 * Thanks for fixing those on Somoril- I'm not that great with them. Would you also look at Stacy please? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 22:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

A question...
Just wondering Kuralyov, were you the first user on Wookieepedia? If not, who was? Thanks. Unit 8311 16:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey now Kura. Who is useless? Chad may not be here, but you must see that I have done a good share of the wikibuilding. --  Riffsyphon  1024 19:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Hyperdrive generator problem
McEwok saw fit to twice change information on the I-a2b solar ionization reactor page. The Star Wars Technical Journal has a reference to the ISD having the largest single hyperdrive generator, but the Death Star I schematic from SW:ICS shows individual hyperdrive generators similar to the ones seen elsewhere in the ICS line of books, lining the DS interior (I added their cross-section pictures to the DS I article, and they show that each one is much longer than one whole ISD). In size they are consistent with the rest of the generators and reactors inside the Death Star, i.e. much larger than on a small ship like a Star Destroyer. Unfortunately, some people have problems with ships sporting more impressive equipment in canon.

The first time, I asked him not to revert the passage I rewrote, that said the ISD's hyperdrive is one of the single largest, not actually the largest (which is from older sources), and warned that I'd tell an admin if it happened again. Now he's done it twice in a row and this is the second time he's actively changed or removed canon information (first time was on Utapau military some weeks back), and I want someone with authority to tell him to stop. Incidentally, I think his insistence on making ship equipment not bigger than on an ISD stems from the Trekkie-like belief that any advanced and small piece of equipment can be "modified" or "fine-tuned" to be 1000% more effective, which is not true. It's like suggesting one private motorboat's engine can be reworked to power a cruise ship. VT-16 18:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC) EDIT: He removed the context of this explicit line on the Utapau page and caused it to be locked.

"The Trade Federation protects its position in remote galactic regions by placing embargoes on arms sales to planetary governments. As a result, Utapauns rely upon self-made, downscaled ships - their biggest anti-pirate Rendili Dreadnaught is one-fifth the size of a Trade Federation Battleship."

- Revenge of the Sith: Incredible Cross-Sections, page 22

I would like it opened again and revert it to the way it was. VT-16 23:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Source request
I've been sourcing Pre-Republic era and came across two bits that I didn't know the source for that you added; I was wondering if you could tell me or just add them to the article. Specifically, the bit about the Expansionist Era being the last part of the Pre-Republic era, and the "dark knights" that the lancer droids are associated with. - Lord Hydronium 07:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool find on the dark knights. Thanks. - Lord Hydronium 23:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Luceno Interview

 * Hey, that's some interesting stuff about Luke and Vaapad on the Form VII: Juyo / Vaapad page. Do you happen to have a link for it? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 05:14, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 05:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Constitutional Convention

 * Hey, nice catch with the Constitutional Convention/First Conference of Free Peoples. I like the idea they may have been the same. --Eyrezer 04:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Quite funny, though unsurprising, that nothing was decided. --Eyrezer 05:01, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

User needing a ban.
Hey, Kuralyov. Could you please ban User:Obi-Wan 531 for adding fanart and links to the Boba Fett fan club website to Boba Fett? &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 22:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Checking the block log

 * Hey I'd already banned those guys, could you check the logs first, so we don't overlap? Cull Tremayne 23:39, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

The Admiral's List: Jimas Veltraa Memorial Edition
Before redirecting you should create a article, or you can move to article to your desired name. - Patricknoddy 21:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I am a 2-year Wikipedian, I know what you're doing, and it is not correct. - Patricknoddy 16:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Fodurant
Greetings, I´ve read you changed Fodurant article writing that it was "extremely inhospitable". The planet only appears two times mentioned in the paragraphs of two books, and I don´t find where is that said. Sources would help a lot.

Also, it seems that another planet, Fondurant, is a extended typo of Fodurant. If you know something about it please let me know in Votes for deletion/Fondurant. Thanks. --Palpatine81 22:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I didn´t know "1stm" template, thanks.

Imperial Palace
Hi there. Was curious as to your edit back in September that went way out of left field describing a 'slaughter' of Imperials from New Republic forces. Specifically those that state they killed every person in there "regardless of innocence". I've looked over several sources, including Wedge's Gamble, and there's NO evidence to support these claims. Would you care to elaborate and, more importantly, show any evidence you may have beyond anti NR bias? mikal768

Specifically, here http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Imperial_Palace&diff=715053&oldid=700887 Note there are no new sources backing the claim up in this edit.

Help please!
Hi, this is PacifistPrime. I haven't been using Wookieepedia for a while, and when I tried to log in again I couldn't re-access my account, because I couldn't remember my password (at first) and when I requested that it be sent to the email address attached to that account, I realised that that email account was now defunct (although I have since re-instated it). Anyway, my point is that in the interim I created a new Wookieepedia account under the username "mace'sbigblackcock" and was promptly blocked by you, it seems. Apparently that name violates some (rather puritanical) decency clause in your rules, but that's okay, I don't want to argue the toss. However, due to the block I could neither ask for help to be unblocked, nor could I create a new, less offensive username for some reason. When I finally got my old PacifistPrime account working again, I STILL couldn't edit because now my whole I.P. Address (220.239.53.31.) is blocked. So, I have no problem abandoning the "mace'sbigblackcock" username, but can you please unblock my IP address so I can get back to using my old address. Needless to say, I'm currently writing this from another computer, as it's the only way I could get the ability to edit again. Please let me know what you can do. Thanks, PacifistPrime

Acheron (river)
The article you made about the river Acheron was deleted, per a discussion in the IRC channel. The Darth Who page obviously refers to the "real life" Acheron. --Imp 23:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Email
I replied to your email but i got a "Delivery to the following recipients failed" message in response. Do you have another email address i can contact you through? --Azizlight 22:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

CDEF rifle

 * I noticed you deleted the badly written article on the CDEF rifle. Since the CDEF rifle is canonicel, appearing in Galaxies, I've re-created the article. I've just written a short stub in a less idiotic and childish language than the original version. Just to let you know. KEJ 21:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)