Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

T'nal

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:16, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 7...

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:37, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) How many damn female names are in this book?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:05, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 12:43, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:39, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:40, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

V'ris

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:16, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 8...

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:39, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:06, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:41, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:45, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Lokani Dawn

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:41, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:28, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:07, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you make it clear that the ship left on a voyage? Currently its not stated.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  21:13, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz
 * 4) *Context on Sleeper ship. Winterz (talk) 15:42, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  22:55, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Gan Basso

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:53, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:14, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:08, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:47, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Death date should be in the body of the article.
 * 3) **It's not exactly his date of death, but I made it more clear in the article.
 * 4) * Alphabetize categories. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:30, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:31, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Winterz
 * 7) *"Among his discoveries was Ord Mantell (...) though he met his death in the Datar system" You need to tweak this sentence as it sounds as if his death was consequence of Ord Mantell's discovery.
 * 8) **Done.
 * 9) *"Daredevil" is not a very neutral assessment, if he was regarded as so, you should probably put it that way.
 * 10) **That's the exact word from the OOU source.
 * 11) *Could you please expand the Bts a bit? And don't worry about its size. Winterz (talk) 12:42, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) **There's really nothing more to say. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  22:58, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Gan Basso's starship

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:53, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:15, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) This is hard to type with my left hand.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 10:09, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Mention date of destruction in body.
 * 2) * Since Gan's affiliated to the Republic, the ship should be as well.
 * 3) * Could you mention that Gan died with the ship?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:33, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **All done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:32, April 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Nitpicky, but it's not made hugely clear that Basso used his ship to find places for the Republic.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:10, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  23:00, April 7, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) *Does it really say that Basso was crewing it all by himself? If not, then you should remove the minimum crew part. If it does, then you should probably mention it in the body. Winterz (talk) 15:36, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  23:00, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Curious, is it known if he was using this ship when he discovered Ord Mantell? Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:50, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

Datar system's sun

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:53, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:16, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Added Dogma's EC vote for him:)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:11, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:51, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Please add that Gan was killed in the crash.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:35, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:32, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Bob
 * 4) *You should check sources that mention Datar to see if they mention its sun. There's a chance it's referenced obliquely, I think. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 13:29, April 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ch'hodos's red sun

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 13:44, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It just happened.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Go WP:AST  Stake black   msg 13:49, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Fe Nite (talk) 15:43, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:47, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Winterz (talk) 15:33, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:42, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Isn't this conjecture? Fe Nite (talk) 13:56, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Nope, it's identified as "Ch'hodos's red sun" in the source.  Imperators II (Talk) 13:59, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **That still means it's conjectural, though. It's not a proper name.  Stake black   msg 14:01, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I respectfully disagree. How can we know that the star was not referred in-universe as "Ch'hodos's red sun"?  Imperators II (Talk) 14:05, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****This sort of thing can happen with lightsaber articles, since they would obviously be called "Anakin Skywalker's lightsaber" etc. in-universe, but I'm not really sure if the same applies to planets.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:19, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****I don't know the official policy on this; but, if the source specifically calls it "Ch'hodos's red sun" then that is good enough for me. If it turns out to be conjecture then just put a conjecture template up there. Fe Nite (talk) 15:43, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) "The red star was orbited by the planet of Ch'hodos.[2] By the time of the renewed warfare between the Galactic Republic and the resurgent Sith Empire[2]..." You don't need to ref to ref 2 twice in a row here.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:23, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) *Thanks, good catch. Fixed.  Imperators II (Talk) 20:29, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Darrus Alde

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:38, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:35, April 8, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you give some context on what the Elysium is?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:06, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  23:01, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Borz'Mat'oh

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:38, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:37, April 8, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * You're inconsistent with the capitalization of the last "o" in Borz'Mat'oh. The title and the bolded part have it lower case, while the rest has it upper case.
 * 3) **Bah.
 * 4) * It isn't given a gender, but you gave it the male category. Perhaps you should fix that. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:10, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Bah! Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  23:02, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Edusa revolt

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:38, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Nights of Ryscate and Diamonds

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:38, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:14, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 10:11, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Need to source the main part (do we call it intro or body?)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:54, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  23:03, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Z23-Y75

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 22:12, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In memory of LucasArts :(

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Stake black   msg 18:32, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Good-bye, LucasArts. :( Now, come on, Obsidian. Pick up the slack.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 18:41, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) RIP. :(  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:51, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) I was looking forward to 1313...-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:13, April 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Still waiting on Battlefront 3 :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:46, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) The last sentence of the BtS is a little weird. I'm not sure what you meant.   Stake black   msg 02:23, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *I've re-written the sentence, that help?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:01, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) "... to serve in the droid army of the galactic corporation; the Trade Federation." You're not using the semicolon right here. You probably want a colon instead, as the semicolon necessitates a sentence that is connected to the sentence before the semicolon.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:18, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) *Done.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 01:24, April 5, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) *Considering the large explanation, you should probably ref the Bts ;) Winterz (talk) 15:30, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 22:16, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

45-x-920p

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 03:40, April 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Where is your Layout Guide now?!

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) As long as you tell us who the fat guy is.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:27, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) D'oh!&mdash;  23:01, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Thought this was a badly written image size.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 10:13, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Can a caption be put in the infobox image to say who the fat man is?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:53, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done.  Stake black   msg 02:44, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Doimo

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:09, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 9...

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:28, April 7, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Venenit shadaaga

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  05:13, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The CAN page looked too small. The Codex Project makes use of the new Substance infobox!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:50, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Tetan moon

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 13:50, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:03, April 11, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) One thing: You don't need to link in the quote, as you already have it linked in the body.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:52, April 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Fixed.  Imperators II (Talk) 06:24, April 10, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Brangus Glee's species

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:08, April 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another scrapped Chronicles maquette for WP:ALIENS.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments