User talk:QuentinGeorge/Archive5

 See Archive1|Archive2|Archive3|Archive4 =Messages=

Halagad's date of death
Hey Quent! Ages ago you put it down as 1 ABY, i just wanted to verify where that came from. Thanks. --Azizlight 04:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oooh, now that was a while back. It's definitely before 5 ABY - since Rahn knows about it. In fact, according to the Dark Forces Saga, it was even before Rahn met Morgan. The involvement of the Rebel Alliance means it must be later than 2 BBY. Beyond that, I can't remember. QuentinGeorge 06:23, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks man. --Azizlight 22:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Corpsey's Pic
I have cropped out the letterbox...and I have uploaded the new pic multiple times. Is there any particular reason it is still showing the old version? --School of Thrawn 101 07:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, nevermind...the old one is now without the letterbox. How do I delete the new image I've uploaded? --School of Thrawn 101 08:06, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding C'baoth's Birthdate
You're absolutely right: the book does say he was 38 during the events of The Phantom Menace, establishing a birth year of 70 BBY. I apologize, I don't know how I missed that, especially when I was quite familiar with the rest of that section - I was using Dark Force Rising to subtract his age, based on the book's birthdate of 4/3/112, from the date of departure for Outbound Flight as given in that book - 4/1/64. Oh, how things have changed since. All I can use in my defense is the cliche "my bad." I maintain, though, that though the calendar and the year itself is inaccurate and superseded by later EU work, the day and month is probably still good. Simply subtract 35 from 70 BBY and you get the ReSynchronized Date: 35BrS:4:3. Would you agree? Erik Pflueger  22:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Selkath
Hey QG. I made a number of changes to the Selkath articel, including placing Qual chronolically earlier as you suggested. I hope it addressed your objection. --Eyrezer 07:00, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the Venator-class Star Destroyer page.
Quentin, if I may suggest so, we should unlock the page to see if User:Darth Windu does anything to it. If he can't talk this out on the talk page and ends up reverting it on the actual page, he should be banned. In fact, shouldn't he have already been banned? He did break the 3-Revert-Rule already. If you could respond on my Star Wars Fanon wiki talk page, I'd appreciate it. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) (Record of Imperial Service) 11:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The discussion about the role is over, we voted on the matter and if you agree, the page can be unlocked.--Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 13:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Could you check the Venator page again, it appears that Darth Windu is unable to except the result of the vote and keeps changing the role. The page was locked yesterday, and unlocked after Windu had been warned, which had no effect. I see no way of resolving this edit war anytime soon, so any help you can offer will be welcome. Thanks --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 07:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

The behind-the Scenes story of the Finis Valorum page
"Not for Valorum it didn't." That's what you wrote when you edited the Valorum page. What you may or may not know - and which I myself only just discovered - is that some yutz - I don't know who - was too lazy to write anything original about Valorum and just ported over everything I wrote about Palpatine and Valorum from my work on the Palpatine page - stuff that was all written from Palpatine's point of view, which was why it was said that the session went splendidly - it did for him. I see that quite a lot: people just aren't very willing to work, and just carry my stuff over to other subjects. I should be complemented, but I'm not. I hate it. I realize it may be part of the game on any Wiki, but that doesn't mean I have to like it. That's why you had to make the edits you made. Frankly, the whole thing should be edited, so that someone would get off their heinders and do some actual work. Erik Pflueger  23:09, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Olana for FA
Hi QG. The infobox pic has been changed for Olana Chion has been changed as per your objection. Hopefully you'll be able to strike your objection. --Eyrezer 04:25, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

CIV souvenir
Hey.... is there anything you'd like from Celebration IV? I'll see if i can get it for you. --Azizlight 01:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah cool, doesn't sound too hard. I'll try my best :-) --Azizlight 08:34, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

What is your problem?
Why the hell are you lashing out at me for trying to improve the K'Kruhk article? &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 11:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Join the source Brija Kiall
I am recruiting people from all over Wookiepedia to help source Brija Kiall. Join Us....TheMasterDestroyer 9:40, May 17 2007

Major Spoilers

 * I have no idea why you are adding major spoiler tags to the major character articles, so I've removed a couple. I've looked at the history, no spoiler material has been added, and Sacrifice isn't out for ten days, give or take. I'm a bit confused- could you explain? Atarumaster88  13:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Aah, I see. IIRC, official policy is to not add info about the work until it's released, but that's a good precaution. Thanks. Atarumaster88  13:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
 * FYI, I think your Durge objection on the FAN page has been addressed. Atarumaster88  13:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

GA Nom
Hey QG, I just noticed that your vote to support Dace Diath on the GA page doesn't have your name attached to it. If you could post your name next to your comment and support, that would be great. Cheers! Greyman ( Paratus ) 16:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

When did Giju join the Republic?
There's a contradiction over when Giju joined the Republic. I was wondering if you knew what to make of it. See Talk:Core Founder and Talk:Giju. ~ Jaywin

Congrats
On your newest WTS entry. I especially got a kick out of the "brush fires" comment. Glad to see someone there had brains. Kuralyov 05:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sure I don't know what you mean....http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/13.gif QuentinGeorge 05:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Dude, you rule!!! Congrats! :-) --Azizlight (in New York)16:40, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * That cracked me up. Good stuff, Quentin. -- Trip 14:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Humanocentrism
Why revert my edit? The previous version stated untrue facts. I maintain that the Old Republic was not Human-controlled. Palpatine's closest advisors were Aliens, as were the majority of the Senate. Sith, even the Jedi Council was Alien-dominated.  Commander Daal  09:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Palpatine's closest advisors were human or Near-human. The Senate was emasculated and robbed of its oversight of the war by Palpatine's decrees. The seeds for the Empire were planted -the actual declaration of a new order didn't actually change anything. Additionally, most of the paragraph you deleted had nothing to do with Palpatine specifically, it was talking about the Republic as a whole. QuentinGeorge 09:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * No, what I was talking about was whether the Republic was Human-dominated or not, which it emphatically wasn't. Aliens, including Mas Amedda, Sly Moore and others, were elevated to the Republic's highest offices. Palpatine was personally no Humanocentrist, and there is no evidence of such tendencies in the Republic system. On the contrary, the Separatist leader, Count Dooku, was a known speciesist. And as a sidenote, what says that, for example, the Youth movement was Humanocentric?  Commander Daal  [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 10:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Known speciest my eye. The only place that EVERY appears is in an internal monologue in the ROTS novel, there's no evidence that anyone even SUSPECTED Dooku held these views. On the other hand, there is ample evidence of humanocentrism in the Republic (note, this is different to being "speciesist"), from the Cloak of Deception novel's remarks on the human-only satuary outside the Galactic Senate, to the accusations of pro-human bias in the Judicial Alliance, to the pro-human COMPOR forcing Tannon Praji to deport certain species of aliens. The list goes on. Palpatine was never a speciesist, but the article isn't about Palpatine, its about humanocentrism throughout the different time periods. The Empire inherited its attitude from the Republic, not from Palpatine. QuentinGeorge 10:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, I admit you may be right on Dooku, since I can't remember exactly where it was stated, but I fail to see how a system that was basically governed by aliens could discriminate against them. Once again, proof that COMPOR et al were Humanocentric is requested.  Commander Daal  [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 10:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you so much!
Thank you so much for helping me understand what all of those seemingly contradicting birthdates for Anakin Skywalker actually meant! I actually understand it now. (Amazing, isn't it, how thick I can be sometimes. :-P Bit sad, really...) Thanks again! --Crazy Jedi Girl 21:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fanon
There is no fanon that I am creating. I know the person writing the Darth Plagueis book. Jediknight19bby 15:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You know James Luceno personally? I doubt that. Besides, the book has been cancelled. QuentinGeorge 23:28, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Darovit
I just found your responce on the tfn thread:

Someone said: "Wouldn't it make sense for Tomcat to kill Zannah?"

Your reply: ''"Not considering he is a force-blind hermit with no lightsaber and missing one hand, and his cousin (not sister) Zannah is a Sith Lord who BLEW OFF HIS HAND WHEN SHE WAS AN UNTRAINED CHILD.

''I'm sorry, but there's no way for that encounter to be anything but Tomcat=Pwned! The limbless bugger would be like Monty Python's Black Knight. "What are you going to do, bleed on me?"''

Nice!! --Eyrezer 03:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Aaah...memories.... QuentinGeorge 03:37, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Vandal
Please block User:Xnotetoseifx. He is vandalizing articles. So far I reverted some of his vandalism, and Unit 1138 reverted the rest of it. Just thought I'd let you know.  Victor  ( talk ) 07:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Darth Zannah
Hey QG. Funny enough, Darth Zannah was on my list to source, cleanup and take to GA&mdash;but I sat down to work on it today and noticed that you had just recently did a lot of work on it! I expanded the intro today, but I was wondering what your plans are for the article? Would you mind if I nominated it for GA? Or did you have something else in mind for it? I don't want to step on anyones toes :D, Cheers. Greyman ( Paratus ) 13:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Go right ahead. I was just doing a cleanup. QuentinGeorge 21:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Padmé Amidala article
Can I get you to protect the Padmé Amidala article from anon/new user editing. An anon keep adding nonsense. Thanks - JMAS 03:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Question
On the Jedi High Council talk page, you said: The New Essential Guide to Characters explicitly says that Rancisis did not join the Council until after 44 BBY. Could you give us a quote, as Cull Tremayne asked?

I can't check for myself, as I don't have the book, but the article on the book doesn't even say that Oppo Rancisis is in the book. He's not on the list of characters. Also, it says here that Oppo Rancisis was a lifetime member of the Council, and he was on the Council during the first section of Legacy of the Jedi, which took place in 89 BBY, as Dooku was thirteen. Did Jude Watson screw up again? Or did The New Essential Chronology screw up? It's been known to do that...

So unless Oppo Rancisis left the Council at some point and then was re-elected after 44 BBY as a lifetime member, it can't be true that he wasn't on the council until after 44 BBY. Well, that wouldn't work either, would it, because what you said that the book says would mean that he had not been on the Council at all before, right?

If it's in there, then we would have another wonderful conflict between two canon sources. Joy. If that happens, which book would override the other?

Okay, sorry about the rambling. Main point: Could you give us a quote? :-) --Crazy Jedi Girl 12:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I don't have the JA books, so I can't confirm his appearance there. Oppo's in the NEGTC in the "Jedi Council members" section. QuentinGeorge
 * Actually, Legacy of the Jedi isn't part of the Jedi Apprentice series, even though it's by the same author. If you want to download it, or any other books, you can go here: [] It's in the first section, the one about Dooku and Lorian Nod. I'll find the quote saying that he was on the Council, I just have to find the book as it's buried somewhere in the mess in my room. :-)

Unfortunately I don't think you can download the New Essential Guide to Characters from that website, so if you have the book, could you please tell me exactly what it said about Oppo Rancisis? Thank you! --Crazy Jedi Girl 15:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)


 * All right, here's the quote from Legacy of the Jedi: ...The door suddenly hissed open. Oppo Rancisis, Jedi Master and revered member of the Jedi Council, stood in the doorway. And this bit of the book took place in 89 BBY, like I said.

Could you please give me a quote from the NEGTC?

Thank you! --Crazy Jedi Girl 14:08, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I have the book, though it's not with me atm, and I'll get the exact quote a little later. Oppo appears under the heading of Jedi Council members, which is why he doesn't show up on the Table of Contents. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 13:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ooooh, thank you! :-) How'd you stumble across this anyway? :-P --Crazy Jedi Girl 00:31, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The exact text:


 * Ah. Thank you! So now what do we do with Legacy of the Jedi? Do we write it off as a screw-up and pretend she never wrote that particular sentence, or do we say that it was the NEGtC that made a mistake, or do we try to figure out a way for both to be true, or do we just grab our aching heads and scream in agony? --Crazy Jedi Girl 19:37, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

ITS NOT FANON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The Greedo the Elder and Darth Vader sense thing was expressed in an interview in the unaltered edition commentary in A New Hope.
 * Post proof or retract. QuentinGeorge 07:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Ephant Mon Objection
hi, you posted an objection to Ephant Mon on the FA nom page awhile back. Could you look over it and see if your objection still stands? it's been proofreaf by several inqs and your objection is the only thing stopping it from becoming FA. Thanks,  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 21:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, I believe you have an objection to Tavion Axmis that has been addressed. Thanks. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 14:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Kee
My fault, QuentinGeorge. I'm assuming that it was revealed that she was Devaronian in Legacy 14? Jesus Freak NK says NK's 'mazin' articles 03:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * You got it. QuentinGeorge 04:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Bane FA Objection
Hey, just letting you know that the Darth Bane edit conflict has been resolved. Chack Jadson 19:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Winter Celchu FA Objection
I've believe we've come to a conclusion about sourcing Winter's birthdate. Please let me know if you have any other thoughts!  - breathesgelatin Talk 22:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * pokes  - breathesgelatin Talk 08:42, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Reverting
hi there i was just wondering why you reverted all my edits on A'sharad Hett as i was just trying to expand it and make it easyer to see which comics he appears in though seeings how you are admin you probably had good reasons why i was just interested and while i am here maybe you profered it the way it was and i understand that a few of my edits were pontless (sorry hit Save Page instead of Show Preview) but there were a few things that in my opinon improved the artical such as listing all his appearances Because he doesnt appear until half way through Outlander and is absant during a few other issues of comics that is listed there also i re wrote part of the last part of the Seige of Saleucami because i just didnt sound right (winning the Battle, Which he did) (parraphrasing). once again could you please explain why and or let me re edit it without reverting it, it would be most appreciated thank you (sorry to cause such a fuss but A'Sharad is my Favourite Character) thanks again  The Dark Lord  ( Embrace The Dark Side! ) 10:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)