Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Warb Null


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

(5 Inqs/4 Users/9 Total)
Support
 * 1) --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 22:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Livingston [[Image:Jedi Order2.jpg|25px]] ( The Force will be with you. Always. ) 00:35, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Nice work. I like. Thefourdotelipsis 01:54, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 14:15, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  &mdash;Graestan  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( This party's over ) 00:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  Greyman ( Paratus ) 20:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:09, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 03:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Imperialles 18:51, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Only one thing I have a problem with after a few minor edits...
 * 2) *At the end of the article under Powers and abilities you pronounce his strength in lightsaber combat, then say that his armor was cumbersome and made him slow. This alone seems a contradiction, but then the next paragraph says that his armor was above all what made him a difficult adversary for any oponent, even though you had just finished explaining that it was due to his armor that Ulic was able to defeat him.
 * 3) **One can still be a good duelist with a cumbersome suit. Basically every suit of armour that has ever existed has been cumbersome, yet people could still be good swordsmen. "Although it granted him a great many advantages, Warb Null's cumbersome suit of armor meant his moves were slow." The armour gave off dark side energies, so to speak, which made him difficult for Jedi to fight, yet still had its disadvantages. Anyway, I've clarified it a bit. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 15:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I completely understand what you are saying and I agree, it was mostly in the way that you were saying it and a few words you used that made it seem contradicting. The edit you did fixed it right up. :)
 * 5) * BTW: Feel free to use a word other than defeat, but murdered certainly isn't the appropriate word, as Ulic was working as a peace officer for the government, and to murder someone is to kill someone in a situation where it is against the law.
 * 6) **I know what you're saying, but I beg to differ. It doesn't really matter; defeat is fine. I'd also prefer if you would not object to something you've already fixed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page if you want to discuss this issue, but this isn't really the place. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 15:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Well I wasn't sure if you would be happy with "defeated" as you seemed to want to stress the fact that Ulic killed Null, and defeated doesn't automatically mean killed. I only wanted to make minor surface edits to the article as you did a terrific job on it otherwise, so I wasn't sure if you would consider that edit to be something that would change the meaning of your words, which is something I didn't want to do without your further input.
 * 8) * Livingston [[Image:Jedi Order2.jpg|25px]] ( The Force will be with you. Always. ) 14:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) **Thank you for your comments and input --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 15:35, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Some image objections (as everyone loves those):
 * 11) * Image:WarbNullNiceHat.jpg needs a re-scan. It's severely distorted.
 * 12) **Killed it.
 * 13) * Image:Warbnull.jpg&mdash;the same image twice in the same article?
 * 14) **It's been done before and it'll be done again, but yeah, removed the other one.
 * 15) * Image:Warbnulldeath.jpg could also benefit from a rescan. Heavy .jpg artifacts.
 * 16) **On it.
 * 17) ***Uploaded a better version. Greyman ( Paratus ) 17:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) * Image:Warbnullfight.jpg. The above applies to this one as well.
 * 19) **On it.
 * 20) ***Uploaded a better version. Greyman ( Paratus ) 17:24, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
 * --Imperialles 23:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your delightful objections :P --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 13:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius 19:32, 5 November 2007 (UTC)