Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Aquachair

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:23, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The wonderful world of furniture, part 1

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:01, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:11, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * From the BTS: "as part of a larger articles [...]" What is a larger articles? This would ordinarily be a sofixit, but when I checked the Alien Encounters page, it says it's the title of several articles, so I'm not sure whether it would be more proper to remove the "a" or the "s." I'll leave it up to to you. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:50, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **I was a bit confused by this objection at first, but then I realized the error you were pointing to. Perfect example of being too close to the material, I guess! Fixed. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:54, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Heh, probably partially my fault for pasting just those few words without context. Either way, nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:01, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Exiled Jedi
 * 6) * Again, if it is possible, please remove the large blank area.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:02, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **I'm not sure what you're talking about. Everything is formatted as is standard, with no extra spaces at all. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 18:25, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Well, the page displays on my computer with a large blank area, I think it might be related to the image placement. Anyone else have this?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:40, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Do you mean at the bottom of the page? That is from the image placement, but the only option to fix it is to remove the image. I think it's better to have an image that pertains to the BTS than to not have one, right? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:44, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) *****I have some suggestions here. If you don't like it, I will agree with you that having an image is better than having none at all.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:03, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ******Yeah, the problem with those is that it forces the section headers for "Appearances" over to the right, which is generally a no-no. Again, it may just be that the article is too short to have images at all, in which case I can remove them. It's a gray area, I admit. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:06, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) *I'll take the image then.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:11, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Gravcouch

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:23, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The wonderful world of furniture, part 2

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:55, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:12, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Could you possibly get rid of that large blank area after the quote at the beginning of the article?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:59, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **I'd be happy to, but I don't see one. :( ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 18:29, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***As with the other article, the page displays on my computer with a large blank area. I think it might be related to the image placement. Anyone else see this?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:42, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Again, because the image only pertains to the BTS and not the body, the only option is to have the image and the whitespace, or to have neither. I thought it would be better to have the image, but I can cut it if others prefer it that way. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:49, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *****I have a suggestion here. If you don't like it, I will agree with you that having an image is better than having none at all.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:04, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Floating pond

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:51, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Iyra furniture, part 3

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:58, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 10:29, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Menkooroo 00:18, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Since you sourced some of the article shouldn't you source all of it?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:57, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **How do you mean? I can source the fact that the pond is referred to on a certain page of the 2nd edition of the book, but how do I source that it doesn't appear in the first edition? At any rate, I think the BTS should be self-sourcing, but I'm open to suggestions. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:51, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *Oh sorry, that was just me being slightly stupid. It's fine the way it is.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:58, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Breeding grounds (F'tral)

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:42, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Everything you ever wanted to know about Iyra but were afraid to ask.

(1 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good work, SavageBob.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:58, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Imperators II (Talk) 23:00, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:30, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Star Wars RP, where a kid can be a kid. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:32, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Star Wars RP, where a kid can be a kid. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:32, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) *Could you add a ?
 * 3) *Not an objection, but I'd like to point out that this whole article is TMI. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:11, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) **Actually, the infobox brings up a question: Should I use the eras templates for this article? We know about the breeding grounds from Obo Rin's work, which was done during the Rebellion era in this case, but I'm not sure whether it should apply here. And am I using the "Affiliation" field correctly? Finally, Wookieepedia is not censored. ;P ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:28, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ***I'd say no to the eras field, because it is a natural location that seemed to be used as part of an instinctual ritual, rather than something that was constructed privately. As for the affiliation field, it's fine with me, as it seemed to be used exclusively by Iyra&mdash;and, personally, I feel bad for any poor Human that happened to wander by this area at the wrong time of year :P. I'm open to discussion on all of this, but I think the infobox as it stands works perfectly fine.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:30, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Rees Alrix

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:58, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Yoda: Dark Rendezvous Jedi Part 3 (of 4)

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:29, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:12, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) * Sorry, see below please.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:27, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * You should mention directly that she was a member of the Jedi Order. (I know that this is rather picky, but I have seen other people bring similar things up.)
 * 3) **No problem, you're correct. Added.
 * 4) * You seem to have a problem with your first reference, it links to the encyclopedia not Dark Rendezvous.
 * 5) **Fixed.
 * 6) * I would change the mentioned only tag for Dark Rendezvous to "first mentioned".
 * 7) **Done.
 * 8) *Other than that the article is very good.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:16, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) **Thank you.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:22, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) Axinal
 * 11) * "While a Knight, the Clone Wars broke out across the galaxy [...]" This is a dangling participle, and currently implies that the Clone Wars was a Knight. Could you possibly rephrase the sentence, or at least the first phrase, to clarify that Alrix was the Knight?
 * 12) **Done.
 * 13) * I haven't read Dark Rendezvous, so I'm not sure on the context, but he opening quote implies that Leem took multiple apprentices, with Alrix being the first. Could this information be integrated into the body somewhere?
 * 14) **I fail to see why this should be interesting for Alrix's article that she was the first/second/third Padawan.
 * 15) ***I thought it might be a nice addition, but I suppose it's not necessary.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:12, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) *Nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:55, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) **Thank you.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:37, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) * Sorry, just noticed something minor; A requirement for becoming a Jedi Master is successfully bringing a Padawan through the Trials of Knighthood. Because Alrix was Leem's first student, it stands to reason that Leem was not a Jedi Master when she selected Alrix, contrary to what the article currently states.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:25, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) **Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 19:29, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) * Also, as I mentioned in the Eremin Tarn article, the affiliation field in the infobox should be reorganized to reflect the hierarchy of the Republic and the subsidiary Jedi Order.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:27, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) **See above, please.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 19:29, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Tarisian Tourism Board

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:31, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's about time I got back to some KOTOR.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) –Tm_T (Talk) 06:45, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Imperators II (Talk) 08:52, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:06, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:04, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * I do not believe that you can source the 3,956 BBY date to Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, since the game does not mention that date. That will mean you have to source the rest of the article as well. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:16, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **The Knights of the Old Republic Campaign Guide would suffice.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:38, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Bah, always the one thing. Fixed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:26, June 18, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * The decapped second name is intentional. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:31, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Eremin Tarn

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:27, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Yoda: Dark Rendezvous Jedi Part 4 (of 4)

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:42, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:53, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Looks good.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:18, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * In the quote I would say Jedi Master Maks Leem instead of just Leem. I think that it would sound a lot better this way.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * I think that you need to mention his affiliation to the Jedi Order and the Galactic Republic more directly in the body of the article.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * Is there any information on who the principled person he defied the authority of? It seems strange the way it is, but if there isn't any more information then just leave it the way it is.
 * 7) ** It does seem strange, as the way it's written right now I'm not sure whether you're saying Tarn defied the authority of a principled person, or if Tarn himself was a principled person. I suggest rewriting it to remove the ambiguity.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:59, June 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Hope it is better now.
 * 9) * On Sian Jeisel's page it calls her as a Jedi Master, but on this page you call her a Jedi Knight. I would try to find out which is correct.
 * 10) **Done. Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:42, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) Rubedo
 * 12) * "A headstrong student, Tarn defied the authority of many people, including his Master and also a very principled person." This needs rephrasing. Not sure what you're goingfor with that last bit: is Tarn the principaled person or is it a third person (possibly a new article there).
 * 13) **See above.
 * 14) * "...a Jedi Knight who believed that the Jedi should fight against the seemingly corrupt Republic rather then defend it." I think you're mixing psat and present tense here. Possibly rephrase. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 06:49, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) **Done. Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:42, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) Axinal
 * 17) * The Affiliation field in the infobox should be reordered to reflect that the Jedi Order is part of the Galactic Republic.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:20, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) ** I don't recall that this should be the case in any article.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 19:22, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) ***Also the Jedi Order is "allied" with and protects the Republic, but is not part of itself.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 19:23, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) ****Hmm, for some reason I thought I remembered several articles indenting Jedi Order underneath Galactic Republic, but after looking over several articles with status, it seems I was mistaken. My apologies.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:42, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Botiq

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 06:49, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Dear LucasArts: Please. We just want to know. WHAT IS THIS?

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) In a universe where hyperspace capability is commonplace, I should hope the footwear is unspeakably comfortable.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:28, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:08, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Made in sweatshops by poorly paid Ugnaughts, no doubt. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:29, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Bootiqs. :P  Imperators II (Talk) 20:02, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) * The advert can be seen in HoloNet News Vol. 531 45, which is set in 13:2:28. Doesn't that mean Botiq also advertized in 23 BBY?  Imperators II (Talk) 07:55, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **No, year 13 on the GrS calender means it takes place in 22 BBY: 35 - 13 = 22 BBY. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:45, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I've found out that what I thought about the difference between the start times of BBY and BrS was wrong. You're right. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:53, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Exiled Jedi
 * 6) * Can you really say for sure that it was an organization? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  11:00, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **Good point. It could be an über-trendy designer's name or something. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 18:57, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ***This is another cop-out like with Kallil-virus jelly. I couldn't very well assume it was a person, so I went with something ambiguous. I'm open to suggestions if you have any alternatives. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:45, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ****This is just a suggestion, but what if you skipped directly over what it was, and just focused on what it did? Ex: "In 22 BBY, Botiq advertised in the planet of Coruscant's HoloNet News [...]" That would make the categorization a little more difficult, but it's just a thought. This is a tough one. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:54, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) *****We do actually have to call it something, unfortunately. Even if that calls for an opening sentence that reads like "A slider was a type of food." NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:00, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ******On the other hand, you could keep it the way it is, and just mention in the BTS that you actually have no kriffing clue what it is (a little more formally, of course). It's also probably safe to assume it's a reference to the real-life Botique brand, but as speculation policies on the Wook are quite strict, it's probably not a good idea to put that in the article itself.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:04, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) *******Actually, upon reflection, I'm not 100% sure we have to say "organization" or what have you in organization articles because it's self evident. I'll look into this. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:06, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) ********Two possibilities: "...was an entity..." or "In [date], Botiq was an advertiser in HoloNet News..." ? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 20:20, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) *********Ah, "entity" would work! Still needs a category though... If only we had a Category:Things or Category:Miscellanea. I dunno, "Organizations" would still probably work for categorization purposes. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:25, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) **********You could make a category for advertisers. (Just a thought)-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:26, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) *********** You could also simply put it in Category:Society or Category:Society and culture. Again, just a suggestion there. Also, could you add the Eras tag? Otherwise, I think I'm ready to support this article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:49, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) ************Um...Sure? I guess that's vague enough to work. Also, era tag: *facepalm*. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:17, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) Bob
 * 19) * Can you use the HNN template? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 16:35, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) **Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:23, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Ho'Din herbal tea

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 11:08, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Menkooroo 11:38, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Looks perfect to me.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:10, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  OLIOSTER   (talk) 12:39, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) *Bob
 * 2) **Nothing in the "Found," "Edible," and "Inedible" fields? Do we not know what world(s) she operated on, for instance? And should we assume the teas are or are not potable to her Human targets? (Incidentally, the food infobox should probably be updated with an extra field for beverages: "Potable="). ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 16:27, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Axinal
 * 4) *While people probably preferred them hot, it's probably safe to say they could be served cold, so could "steaming beverages" be rephrased to reflect that they were usually served steaming? Aside from that and Bob's objections, very nice.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:03, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Shiltu

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:58, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Typical greedy Hutt

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good work.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:29, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:34, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Menkooroo 00:13, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * You should mention that he was a hermaphrodite with a male personality in the body of the article. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:19, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:26, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Does Battle Surgeons actually say he's a hermaphrodite? If not, I think that needs to be sourced to a sourcebook or something. Menkooroo 03:26, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) *Not really, so sourced otherwise.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:21, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Gungan harvester

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:00, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Typical clumsy Gungan

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good work again.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:34, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:15, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * You should create an article for the hopper vehicle that the Gungan used. (Assuming that there isn't one already.)
 * 3) **Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:30, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Please provide context on Republic Mobile Surgical Unit 7. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:25, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:30, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) Axinal
 * 7) * The template should be added, as should Category:Unidentified individuals. Otherwise, very good.
 * 8) **Done for both.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:23, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) * Oop, also the tag.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 10:30, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **I'm almost sure it was there, but it seemed like I had a spelling error.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:23, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Calamasthon Defiance

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:33, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Making waves.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:38, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Looks good.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:52, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:28, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * Could you add the eras tag?
 * 3) * Could "seismic" safely be linked to groundquake, and "rain" to water?
 * 4) *Nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:58, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Naru fixed the first, and the other two I think are reasonable. Thanks for the review! ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:48, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Randon system

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:15, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Look closely at the maps from TEA. There's canon to be found there.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 10:33, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Good work, Naru.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:01, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Battle of Random system.  Imperators II (Talk) 20:41, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *You, sir, know the whole reason I started this article. The project grew. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:03, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * Would you be able to upload the image from TEA for use in the article? I think that's all I have. Nicely-written article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:32, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:49, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Exiled Jedi
 * 5) * Is the planet Randon explicitly mentioned or could it be the Randon system? I ask this since the Atlas uses the system name most of the time. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:45, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) **Did not take that into account. Crap. Should I change this to "Battle of Randon system"? I've fixed the article's content. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:49, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Feh. Changed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:01, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) * By extension of this previous question, are the other planets in the article explicitly mentioned to be planets, or could they be merely refering to systems as well. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:47, June 21, 2011 (UTC)

Freedom (painting)

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 12:27, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Menk demanded more paintings.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Looks good to me.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:41, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:01, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) *I just want to double-check the facts here: Are the thoughts that the painting was contradictory, and that it may have been changed in a rush, mentioned in the game, or is it speculative?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:22, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **The items description mentions all of this.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 18:54, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Cool, just checking. Great work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:01, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Cargo Port Blueprint

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 12:44, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Posters are just a different kind of painting.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:03, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:19, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * I'm thinking the words "cargo port" in the text should be linked to something, perhaps hangar. Thoughts?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:30, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Sounds good. Done.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 18:54, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Exiled Jedi
 * 5) * Shouldn't you say that it is a comprehensive article nomination on the article itself?
 * 6) * Could you provide translations for some of the Aurebesh text on the blueprint? It seems to me that this could be a good thing to add to the article if it isn't just gibberish. If it is gibberish I would consider mentioning this in the BTS. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:21, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **Noted the bit at the top. Everything else is too small.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 21:15, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Coronet Skyscraper Blueprint

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 12:44, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Its blue and printy.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:27, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) It's still a gorram painting! Do translate the Aurebesh. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:37, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:21, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Oli's back! Menkooroo 00:17, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Again, I believe you forgot to put the comprehensive article nomination on the article.
 * 3) **For the future, you may add this yourself. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:37, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I wasn't sure if I should, thank you for informing me.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:21, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) * The Aurebesh text should be translated and mentioned in the article. If it is gibberish it should be mentioned in the BTS. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:24, June 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) **Noted the lettering at the top. Couldn't decipher what the big lettering on the right side says. Everything else is too small.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 21:15, June 22, 2011 (UTC)