Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Vilosorian


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Vilosorian

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 09:02, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Thanks to for the CSWE info

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) So basically this world's been occupied by every government organization ever. Next thing you know it'll be infinite empire territory too. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:26, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Perhaps they are related to the Dazouri. ~ SavageBob 04:01, December 8, 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 22:19, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:08, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5)  Grunny  ( Talk ) 04:48, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Toprawa:
 * 2) * Are we sure "metamorphosizing" is a word, or is this word used canonically? Because I'm pretty sure "metamorphosing" is the word.
 * 3) **The source uses "metamorphosized". I think I've changed the tense correctly. --Eyrezer 02:14, December 25, 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Seems they've created a new word in that case. Fair enough. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:12, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) * The second paragraph of the "History" section has little to nothing to do with the Vilosorian species itself. The species, in fact, is not once mentioned within that paragraph, as this is all information that should properly fall under the Vilosoria article, where the planet's history can be recounted in detail. Unless you can directly tie this information back to specific Vilosorian involvement, I suggest removing this paragraph, or otherwise find some way to heavily condense this information into a significantly smaller amount of text. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:53, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) **It was partly this objection that inspired this Senate Hall thread. I'd appreciate your input. I'd prefer not to have to include that info in the Vilosoria article itself (if I were ever to write it), but at the moment, leaving it out could leave open claims of not including relevant info. Damned if you do... --Eyrezer 00:07, December 26, 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) ***I'm away for about a week, but will get onto these objections on my return. --Eyrezer 23:09, December 27, 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) ****How does it look now? --Eyrezer 19:51, January 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) *****I like that much better. Good job. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:08, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

Comments