Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Chiss poacher backpack


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Chiss poacher backpack

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 04:19, February 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Not as cool as the Rucksack of the Tusken King.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 00:09, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  I think these guys just put a Chiss flag on the backpack so people don't realize they're really Wroonians when they're backpacking through the Core Worlds. ~ SavageBob 16:05, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Darth Morrt 08:57, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4)  1358  (Talk)  13:53, February 14, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Who rewards it to the spacer?
 * As with the last one, can you find some other pages to link to it? Menkooroo 04:51, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Better?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 12:53, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * "a type of wearable container (or backpack)": Is "wearable container" some sort of in-game descriptor? It might be better to either just say, "a type of backpack" (since that's a definable term already familiar to 99.99% of readers), or "a type of container worn on the back."
 * It is a in-game descriptor. Clarified to just "backpack".  OLIOSTER  (talk) 08:35, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * In the BTS, you say it holds 50 items, which is, I'm assuming, its usefulness. Can we get a comparison though, like, "It can hold up to fifty items, whereas a standard backpack can only hold 20." Or whatever.
 * Clarified.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 08:35, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * The Etyyy link appears to be going to a redirect page. ~ SavageBob 17:01, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * FWIW, it's rather pointless to object to /one/ link to a redirect. It is faster to just fix it yourself. :) 1358  (Talk)  17:11, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * My time on Wookieepedia is rather limited at the moment, so I figure it's better to review like this than not review at all. Plus, I'm constantly getting grief for my linking skillz on the FAN forum, so I don't see why my objection is so objectionable here, especially considering how short these articles are. ~ SavageBob 21:17, February 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 08:35, February 11, 2011 (UTC)

Comments