User talk:JRT2010

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, JRT2010!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Please do not remove talk page and forum comments, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask one of our administrators. May the Force be with you!
 * }

Re:Starkiller (clone)
What you could do, and should have done, is discuss the issue with the IP in question rather than engage in an edit war with him. Now you've violated the Three-Revert Rule, and have come extremely close to being blocked. Keep this in mind should any additional disagreements arise in the future. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 03:13, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

Aberrant clone
I made the page simply to have an excuse to upload that concept art. In the process, I completely forgot to add any categories. You seem to have an interest in it, so I hereby charge you with the holy mission of Categorization. Also, you can move it to a new name if you want. SinisterSamurai 23:53, November 24, 2010 (UTC)

Signing
Hey there, please sign only using four tildes, not  or something like that. Cheers. 1358 (Talk)  18:22, November 27, 2010 (UTC)

Revan
Yes, and as you've pointed out, the main point here is that others considered him to be a great tactician. You should clarify that this was how he was perceived by others, and avoid using absolute phrases like "the greatest military tactician of his time" and "unrivaled mastery of warfare," unless those exact words were used in the game, in which case you must mention who said them. As for the Cathar section, there is no need to go into such exact detail in the intro, especially when a great amount of detail concerning the incident is mentioned below. Another small note, it's typically best to avoid describing persuasion and charisma as skills, we don't want to reference game mechanics in our articles. Most of the changes you've made now fix the problems, so I wouldn't worry about it, just keep these ideas in mind in the future. Happy editing! JethLordMaster  (Xia Order) 22:15, December 5, 2010 (UTC)

Starkiller (clone)
I've semi-protected it for 3 months. In future, you can request article protection here, where you may get a quicker response. Hope that helps. Cheers -- Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 09:46, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Dark Apprentice's Eye Colour - Red or Yellow?
Would you say the Dark Apprentice's Sith eye colour is red or yellow? I already had this discussion with Grand Moff Tranner, and I only succeeded in making him mad because it degenerated into a disagreement over whether or not details of his physical appearance from the non-canon ending should be allowed to be included in the info box. 173.180.89.129 11:39, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree entirely with you, but Tranner probably won't, so let's wait and see what the future holds. The only problem is that whether or not there will be a The Force Unleashed III is up in the air due to the restructuring of LucasArts.  173.180.89.129 04:12, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

Tarkin edit
If you take a look at your addition to the Tarkin article, you will see that it's very play-by-play. While the article itself is not a featured status or at least high in quality article, basic policies, such as writing quality, still apply. Hope you understand now.  JangFett  (Talk) 18:44, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * You can always go back and shorten or remove any redundant detail. Sorry if I discouraged you in any way. :)  JangFett  (Talk) 19:14, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Right, and I agree. However, it's not very encyclopedic to add-in redundant or unnecessary fluff within the article, and we try to avoid this.  JangFett  (Talk) 21:25, April 22, 2011 (UTC)

Bane
As Darth Bane is a featured article, please consult with the nominator before making major edits. Thanks. 1358 (Talk)  19:08, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * If you go to the original nomination, which can be reached via Bane's talk page, you'll see it's . 1358  (Talk)  19:22, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's about it. 1358  (Talk)  19:38, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

Fel Empire
Hey there! Just letting you know that I removed the info you added to Fel Empire. The Fel Empire ceased to exist in 130 ABY, and saying that it began to exist again in 138 ABY is, at this point, speculation. The comic that was released this week makes reference to only one new Galactic Government at the end, and it's neither the Fel Empire nor the GFFA, but what's seemingly a new entity that combines three other ones. We don't know anything, anything at all about the Galactic Federation, and we can't add speculation on it to our articles. I hope that helps. Also, a reminder to add Majorspoiler to the top of any article that you add major spoilers to. Cheers. Menkooroo 15:04, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it should have its own article, yeah. I'll make one tomorrow if I have time. I just edited the GFFA page; I'll edit Second Imperial Civil War now. Thanks for the heads-up. Menkooroo 15:13, May 28, 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey JRT2010,

I watched you edit the article and was very pleased and impressed by the fact that you chose to do something that had been neglected for whatever reason. Thank you for your effort, it is greatly appreciated. I hope to see more good work from you in the future.  —Tommy  9281  Saturday, July 9, 2011, 11:29 UTC 

Nemesis-class
Hey JRT,

Good work on the Nemesis-class gunship. You've added a significant amount of information; would you be interested in a GAN or FAN nomination? If so, I can guide you down that path. Let me know what you think.  —Tommy  9281  Sunday, July 10, 2011, 15:54 UTC 
 * Great. Start here, where you will learn the formal layout for, among others, starship articles. Also consult the manual of style, which will give you additional pointers on article subtleties. Once you're all set, let me know, and we'll go from there. Depending on the final product, you may end up with an FAN if the article is large enough (1,000+ words), but if not, a GAN is just as good. Any questions, don't hesitate to ask.  —Tommy  9281  Sunday, July 10, 2011, 17:00 UTC 
 * You are doing very well. You will find many times that there are no "sources," as we define them, for many topics. This is okay, as you have the "appearance," which is the game itself. So long as you've included all applicable information, you'll be good. The in-game databank is part of the game, and would therefore count as part of the game, so you would just list the game as the "appearance" without any necessary specification of the databank. Another thing, you'll need to eliminate the redlinks per nomination rules.  —Tommy  9281  Monday, July 11, 2011, 00:31 UTC 
 * Make sure you add the rebellion era with a reference to the infobox. By chance, are you able to access IRC?  —Tommy  9281  Monday, July 11, 2011, 00:56 UTC 
 * That's fine about the era, I saw your edit summary. As for IRC, while it is a chatroom for this Wiki's users in it's simplest sense, it also is a very effective and useful tool for Wookieepedians to communicate quickly with regard to articles. You should stop by sometime, I'm often around, and you and I can work with each other in real-time that way. Just a thought.  —Tommy  9281  Monday, July 11, 2011, 01:34 UTC 
 * No problem, I'll help you with that. Give me a bit of time, as its middle of the night here right now. In the meanwhile I want you to read up on IRC, because I'd like for you to access it at some point so you and I can work together in real-time.  —Tommy  9281  Monday, July 11, 2011, 08:25 UTC 
 * Okay, so click on the IRC link to connect. It should lead you to either #wookieepedia or #wookieepedia-social. Either one, I'll be in, and will see you when you arrive.  —Tommy  9281  Monday, July 11, 2011, 16:52 UTC 
 * Are you still interested in this project? If so, are you capable of accessing IRC to discuss?  —Tommy  9281  Saturday, July 16, 2011, 20:36 UTC 
 * Get on now, if you aren't already. Tell me what username you are using, and what channel you are in, and I will attempt to locate you.  —Tommy  9281  Saturday, July 16, 2011, 20:47 UTC 

Thanks
Thank you for you contribution to Nemesis-class gunship. Anakin Skyobiliviator 23:32, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

That right.
Have you ever wondered why this article haven't showed up within three after the game's release? I waited and waited with no results, then I got a bit angry and decide to submit it to the senate hall, but they ask me to send it to request list...and *POOF* it happens. Anakin Skyobiliviator 23:55, July 10, 2011 (UTC)

Editing Jedi Exile
Hi I've recently added a comment on the talk page for the Jedi Exile, since I'm kind of new perhaps you could help me editing the article, so please check the talk page and advise me. Kittor 15:08, July 11, 2011 (UTC)Kittor

Unverified Information
Before I get into the major issues I see in the P&T addition you added into Ahsoka Tano article, going back to what you said with Wilhuff Tarkin, you do not own the article. Simply put, your explanation for my reverting&mdash;"Yeah, considering the fact that I wrote the TCW section here. It was fine then. I don't see how my last edit made it less than before, so why undo it?"&mdash;was very much uncalled for, as you do not own that section or any of the article because you simply wrote in it. While it may be fine for a nominator of a FA/GA to take care of his or her promoted article, nonpromoted articles may be edited by anyone. This does not mean someone cannot edit in promoted articles, however. Unless your edits are in good faith, follows all official Wookieepedia policies, adheres to either the FA or GA rules, then it's more than fine. In the case of Tarkin, anyone could edit in the article and doesn't need the approval of whomever wrote a section or part that has been edited. That being said, as for the Ahsoka case, while you may or may not know, I am currently mass rewriting the article both in-wiki, albeit the majority outside. Remembering and looking at all my notes I took, and they all came from official sources, I have never seen certain facts you've inserted in the P&T. Where in the TCWVG, Rising Malevolence, does it state "Like all Jedi, Ahsoka Tano was trained to adhere to the principles of the Jedi Order and the light side of the Force." or in familiar terms? Likewise, other phrases such as, "In combat, Tano displayed extreme determination to achieve victory at all costs.", "In accordance with her predatory Togruta nature,", "Athough Tano's Jedi training prevented her from acting through extreme hatred and anger,", "As such, her behavior was frowned upon by the more traditional members of the Order, such as Master Luminara Unduli", "Much like many of her fellow padawans,", "In spite of her shortcomings, Ahsoka Tano was also selfless and empathetic.", "Like virtually all of the Jedi,", "she fought bravely on the frontlines of the Clone Wars, often risking her own safety by leading clone troopers into battle.", "Despite being an adolescent teenager,", "Unlike her master,", "Ahsoka Tano was fiercely loyal to the Jedi Order and the Galactic Republic.", "'Her devotion to duty was part of the motivation that drove her to fight in a war," "Tano was among the limited number of people who understood Shyriiwook," are all unconfirmed, and riddled with speculation terms and viewer-pov, which, if not sourced properly, will be viewed as fanon and will be reverted. While you do have the idea and sense of how a P&T is assembled, speculation and viewer-pov is not permitted, and will be reverted by either myself or someone. Not only this, you may receive an official warning for the insertion of fanon into articles. Keep in mind, that while I am not against any of your edits, and any sort of warning I give to you is not to be taken offensively, if something does not follow any of our policies, then appropriate action will be taken.  JangFett  (Talk) 15:52, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, if you have any other questions regarding this, I am currently on IRC and available to talk.  JangFett  (Talk) 16:14, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * If you heard this or not, it is very difficult to tell if someone is being sarcastic over the internet. Regardless of humor, what I have said is true. As for Ahsoka, you must source everything instead of assuming people think as you do, and either out examples, or in other cases contextless, sentences in the P&T that are prone to speculation and/or assumptions, which is which is against one of our policies. I do not have to correct bad edits while simply reverting is the logical conclusion for this, which you seem to have an issue with. As the 3RR rule is coming up, I will not be reverting again, unless someone else does, but please see what you can do to try and eliminate all cases of speculation. Again, please do not take any of my edits against your work offensively. I am trying to help you, not be against you.  JangFett  (Talk) 16:54, September 26, 2011 (UTC)