Template talk:User hyper

Support

 * 1) Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 15:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Um, duh? 15:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1)  Riffsyphon  1024 18:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 18:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Lord Titze the Dark Wanderer 18:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 21:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Sure, why not?-- Darth Phonebook  00:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 18:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I may have been the one to coin the term, so I suppose I should support.--Valin Kenobi 03:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 22:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) It's not exactly me, but it's a good idea.Grand Moff Rhell 01:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 00:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) BaronGrackle 15:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Hyperinclusionism is a uniquely Wookieepedian editing philosophy. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 15:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I assume this means including everything. :) --  Riffsyphon  1024 18:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Same here. If it's mentioned, even as a joke (Nostril of Palpatine), it's got an article! 19:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Could someone tell me the difference between the standard inclusionist and a hyperinclusionist? See, I would consider having "Nostril of Palpatine" as inclusionist, whereas I would regard not including it as either mergist or deletionist, depending on whether you want it somewhere or not. Will there be templates for hypermergist or hyperdeletionist, as well? -BaronGrackle 13:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Inclusionist: If it has sources and is mentioned, it's in. Hyperinclusionist: If you see a tiny sliver of an unknown ship, the hair of some character, or overhear a trivial conversation, it's in. I'm pretty sure that's what Culator means. As for the hypermergist and hyperdeletionist, I'm sure they could be made. I'm not sure how to implement those, though. 17:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * JustinGann would fall into this category. :) --  Riffsyphon  1024 21:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Upon reflection, I did create an article on the cross, so I suppose it would be dishonest to not put this on my page. -BaronGrackle 15:44, 13 February 2007 (UTC)