Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Balith Civil War

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:48, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's Axinals fault :P

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Always happy to cause trouble. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:51, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Look at it this way, we have another quality article.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  11:55, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 18:02, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ...and here. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 18:39, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 18:25, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * Could you add that Balith was located in the Inner Rim (with proper sourcing, obviously)? Otherwise, good work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:46, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:47, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Bob
 * 5) * As with the other articles, please say who sent the dynamic duo. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:37, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) **As with the other articles, added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:29, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) Jeff
 * 8) * Does the episode actually say anything about the Civil war beyond that one quote? Does it say that the Third Legion is going to Balith to assist one of the factions, and that that faction pledged allegiance to the Republic? If that quote by Obi-Was is all that's said, then we can't assume anything. Maybe the Third Legion were sent to act as neutral peacekeepers.
 * 9) **As Blue Beret's you think? :P You're right it's not directly said and therefore removed from all three articles.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:45, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) *Remember . Menkooroo 10:25, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) **Thanks, I'll do.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:45, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) ***You can start by doing for this article. :P Also for Third Legion. Menkooroo 06:53, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) ****Uh oh. Done for both.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:56, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) Jujiggum
 * 15) * If the sides are unknown, then leave the combatants section empty. Besides, for all we know, the civil war could have more than just two combatants, so your current entries are speculation. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 17:52, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) **Done. To be honest, I found "one side" and "another side" pretty stupid anyway.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:11, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

All Stars Burn as One

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:14, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Cestus Deception, I present you the official anthem of the Galactic Republic

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work. I've been meaning to work on articles related to The Cestus Deception, including this one, but you beat me to it. Not surprising, considering it's been on my to-do list for over a year now. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:34, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * See below.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:59, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Considering that my brilliantly flawless prose was its base, how could I not? (I kid, I kid. :P) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:23, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) I'd love it if LFL actually recorded this and released it. ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 05:43, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:03, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6)  1358  (Talk)  05:41, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Seeing as you use CSWECite in the sources, it would be appropriate to do so in the reference as well.  1358  (Talk)  10:02, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:57, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Please fill the reference citation template with page number(s). 1358  (Talk)  12:46, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:16, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Exiled Jedi
 * 6) * I was wondering, was this song actually played in the book? If it was then I would change the Behind the scenes where it says mentioned to appeared.
 * 7) **Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:30, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) * The same goes for the appearance list for the item. If the item made its appeared in the book then please indicate this by placing the first appearance template. If it was first mentioned in the book, you can easily indicated this as well by using the first mentioned template.
 * 9) **Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:30, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) *Good job, I just wanted some clarification.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:42, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) **No problem.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:30, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) Axinal
 * 13) * Could you add ?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:59, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) **Of course. Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:15, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Guh. This was mine months ago when I started and never got back to it. XP (:P) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:16, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that someone forgot to put the closing marker when they struck something, since I did not strike my support. I am not sure what was intended so I will leave it up to the person that did it to fix it.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:24, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Ostrine edge

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:35, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Here is another KOTOR nomination

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support


 * 1) –Tm_T (Talk) 15:22, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 00:25, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:57, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Tm
 * 2) * "An ostrine edge was a type of melee weapon edge used around the time of the Dark Wars,[2]" ... that reference cannot be used for all of this, add the missing reference. (:
 * 3) **Better?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:16, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Bts gives an impression that the price of the item meant the player may not find it, maybe mention it's rare beside being random?
 * 5) **Heh, your right, fixed.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:16, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *And this is not obscure ): –Tm_T (Talk) 15:06, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **Well I just thought if you asked most users on this site about an Ostrine edge they would have no clue about it, but maybe not for some users.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:16, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) *And check what I did. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 15:22, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) Bob
 * 10) * It's strange to say it can allow a weapon to damage objects it strikes; presumably the weapon would have damaged those items anyway. Does it make the weapon do more damage than it otherwise would have done? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:47, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) **Yeah, I meant that it dealt damage from the cold in addition to normal damage. I fixed this to make it clearer now.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:07, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Just to show that I like obscure nominations.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:35, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Kashyyykian giant weaver

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 05:04, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Arachnophobia!

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi 03:28, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 10:10, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Good job.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:03, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) That girl is poison... ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 18:01, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5)  1358  (Talk)  05:40, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * Could we get some context on Kashyyyk and Darth Vader?
 * 3) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 14:27, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***What I meant was this: What is Kashyyyk? Who is Darth Vader? Just one or a few words each should suffice.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 14:31, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Ah, I see. Fixed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 06:17, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * I think the author and release date of TFU could be added to the BTS.
 * 7) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 14:27, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) *Otherwise, very cool, if a little scary.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:03, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) **Thanks.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 14:27, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) No Ref tags outside the infobox.  1358  (Talk)  10:05, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) *Fixed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 14:27, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) Bob
 * 13) * Does the original source call it poison? Technically speaking, spiders produce venom. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 20:51, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) **Yes the source mentions poison coming from mandibles. Venom generally refers to toxins that an animal armed with such injects into a victim's skin/body by way of a bite or sting, either to defend itself or when hunting. However, even though poison refers more commonly to a substance that causes biological disruption through absorption, the distinction between toxin and poison is not always observed, even among scientists. In addition, the derivative forms "toxic" and "poisonous" are used synonymously. I will therefore rephrase the sentence to be more correct and still be faithful to the canon material. A caveat: the book doesn't mention the delivery process of the poison, so it could even be that the upraised mandibles spray the victim with the poison.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 04:48, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Do not make unnecessary pipelinks for articles that otherwise don't need pipelinking, such as what you did with Kashyyyk. Just keep it Kashyyyk's. For articles that already need to be pipelinked either way, such as Darth Vader, it is your choice whether or not to include the 's in the pipelink, and I'm fine, and have done, both ways. This is just something that always tends to bother me whenever I see it. Hanzo Hasashi 03:28, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Point taken. A habit I picked up from before the was made.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave  09:28, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * It would be speculation to say so, but I wonder if these are the same arachnids that terrorize the characters in "Pax Empirica—The Wookiee Annihilation." ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 20:51, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * As big as a TIE fighter is pretty big for a spider. However, the Pax Empirica spider didn't seem to be the active pack hunter that the giant weavers were mentioned to be.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 15:09, June 11, 2011 (UTC)

Troig language

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 05:56, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: New canon from a quiz book. Go figure.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:00, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:14, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:49, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4)  Imperators II (Talk) 15:20, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Impressive. Since Troigs are from Pollillus, I think it's safe to assume that the language was spoken on that planet, even if it's not explicitly mentioned in the book. Do you mind adding that to the article?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:58, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Like that? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:52, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Works for me, great article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:00, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Exiled Jedi
 * 5) * Shouldn't Obsessed with Star Wars be shown to be the first mention in the sources section?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:46, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) **Why? It's the only mention.  Imperators II (Talk) 15:48, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Yeah, but there might be another one in the future, so it might as well be added now for clarification purposes later.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:56, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ****Fair enough. Added the 1stm template. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 20:45, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) *****We do not use the 1st or 1stm temmplates on single appearance articles. The Mo tag was correct. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:16, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) I think that referencing the differences between naming conventions in Basic and Troig constitutes a mention of the language. Or at least an indirect one, depending upon the wording.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:25, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) *Hmm. I can see that. How's it look now? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:18, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) **Great. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:49, June 12, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * It occurred to me that this article doesn't have an infobox&mdash;and looking over articles like Galactic Basic Standard, Huttese, and Ewokese, nor do any of those. Since there is no language infobox, it wouldn't be fair to oppose this article for lack of one. Still, I think it would be a fine addition to the Wook.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:00, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it would be nice. We could crib something from Wikipedia, maybe. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 06:56, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified Twi'lek (Korriban space station)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:04, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Guest nom for WP:TOR, I guess. That Twi'lek that everyone&mdash;not just the smuggler&mdash;ogled in Return.

(1 ECs/5 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Imperators II (Talk) 20:19, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Still think the reused model should make the Bts. SinisterSamurai 02:44, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) I suppose this will do. –Tm_T (Talk) 06:22, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Heh.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:43, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) GTQ ( Problems? ) 22:11, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 17:26, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) * I'd say the uniform was black and gray.
 * 3) **Changed.
 * 4) * Shouldn't it be "a Republic corporal"?  Imperators II (Talk) 20:06, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Yes, I suppose so. Changed.
 * 6) **By the way, I de-linked black, since the rules allow to link the article simply to color once rather than every specific color. Thanks for the copy-edit and the review, Imperators!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:13, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Whoops, didn't notice "green" was linked to color instead of green. :D  Imperators II (Talk) 20:19, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) SinisterSamurai
 * 9) * This character has the exact same model as Eleena Daru, down to the outfit and the headdress. The only difference is that the lighting is not consistent between the render/display and Return's space station environment. Compared to other, in-environment shots of Daru, the twi'lek is nearly indistinguishable. If this argument doesn't completely void the need for this article, then the re-use of a model should, at the very least, be mentioned in the Bts. SinisterSamurai 00:04, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **I do not see this as Eleena Daru. The outfit, as you mentioned, is the same, something I never would have noticed. However, this Twi'lek very clearly has green skin, and I don't think that's simply a lighting issue. It also doesn't quite fit canonically, with Daru being a close ally to the Sith, but considering the amount of time that passes between Return and Deceived, that's probably not a wholly valid argument. Still, I think the skin color is at least enough to say that this is not Daru, but I can agree with at least putting something like that in the BTS.
 * 11) ***Struck because of below conflict. SinisterSamurai 02:37, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) * If we are ignoring ducktest policy and determining that this is not Eleena Daru, then we know nothing about this character. She could be a waitress. The smuggler's off-color humor about inspecting troops is not enough to identify the position or affiliation this twi'lek had. SinisterSamurai 00:04, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) **I think that's fair to say. I'll move the article to Unidentified Twi'lek (Korriban space station).
 * 14) * The republic trooper who did the chastising has an existing article: Unidentified Havoc Squad commander, and this article should link there. SinisterSamurai 00:04, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) **Are we sure that this is the same person? There are two troopers present. Can we say with confirmation that the corporal and the Havoc Squad commander are the same individual? Thanks for the review!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:48, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) ***In Return, both troopers are different. One has a big black triangle on his chest, and the other (the speaker), has a knife strapped. The speaker's armor is identical to the Hope trooper. They knife Trooper and the Hope trooper also have the same voice actor. And, when knife trooper removes his helmet after the explosion, we see he shares the same face model as Hope Trooper. SinisterSamurai 02:37, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) ****Good catch. I was pretty confident that the commander was the other guy, just based on positioning and such, but your evidence is sound.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:40, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) fihgdihgdsho
 * 19) * I normally don't review on the CAN, but this caught my eye: "The model for Eleena Daru, who appeared in The Old Republic's first trailer, Deceived, appears to be reused for this Twi'lek, whose uniform and headdress are nearly identical to Daru's. However, Daru is a Rutian Twi'lek with blue skin,[3] and the two have not been confirmed to be the same individual." Unless it's confirmed to be the same character, this statement is speculation, which has no place within the article.  JangFett  (Talk) 02:10, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) **Classic case of two reviewers wanting two different things :P No slight to either of you, as you both make valid points here. Jang, since I concur that this is speculation, I will remove it. Thank you for your review.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:28, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) ***Personally, I would have worded it less speculatively. There's a fine line between speculation and observation. SinisterSamurai 02:37, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) ****I agree there's a fine line, and honestly, there seems to be some inconsistency as to when an observation like that is considered speculation and when it's not&mdash;take, for example, the second paragraph of the BTS in Tynnan, which is a featured article. I'd be more than willing to put that in, less speculatively, if an EC thinks it belongs.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:54, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 23) Tm
 * 24) * Didn't the Sith attack happen right after the oogling? The article currently presents these two events as rather separate, try tie them together. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 08:38, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 25) **Heh, how's that? Thanks for the review!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 11:47, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 26) Bob
 * 27) * "...the smuggler admired her form..." This is obviously what is intended, but can we say it without it being speculative? Could he have been admiring her outfit? Could he have known her from somewhere and was just trying to figure out where? You get what I'm saying, I think... ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:25, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 28) **Meh, I don't think it's being speculative...but I suppose I could change the wording around a bit. How's "leered at her"? Thanks for the review!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:07, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 29) ***I'm still a bit uncomfortable with "leered," as it implies lascivious intent, but I won't hold the nom up longer. :) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:25, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 30) ****Thanks, Bob. :) If there is something you have in mind specifically, feel free to change the article or post it here or on my talk page.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:53, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

PTB-625 planetary bomber

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:50, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Last nom from the Cross Sections

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:23, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:12, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:00, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * This might seem a bit nitpicky, but you mention in the infobox that it was used by the Republic Navy, but in the body you only mention the Republic. Could you add that it was used by the Navy?
 * 3) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:36, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Also, could you add the publish date for the RotS cross-sections?
 * 5) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:36, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *Otherwise, a nice-looking article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:52, June 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **Thank you.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:36, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) Rubedo
 * 9) * Reload the infobox. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:59, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **Done. Just that you know it, I hate you for doing this to me. :P  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:03, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Hate my computer, Scrappy. I did this for you and it decided to close down my Internet before I could save. :P NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:00, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) Tm
 * Ok, I'm nitpicky and love these details: would it be bad if you would specify the CSWE appearance in Bts section? IIRC it's mentioned only one entry and that's listed as a source. –Tm_T (Talk) 18:52, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) **Specified.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:43, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Iyra language

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 02:13, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Hurry up with that language infobox, Axinal! :) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 02:13, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Pullmani Aletheiara Fhtagn Belaqua. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:52, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:21, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:09, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Menkooroo 17:16, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5)  Imperators II (Talk) 15:11, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * I'm getting there :P. Yesterday was a looooong day. I have only one tiny problem with this article: In the BTS text you say that the language was indirectly mentioned in GG4; but in the Sources section, you don't have an template. I understand that this is because the language is never specifically named, and thus you couldn't really say it was directly mentioned, but it was still not quite indirect. It just seems# a little inconsistent to me at the moment, but I understand the reasoning behind it, so I am willing to let it go if you don't think there's a better way to do it. Other than that, it's a nice article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 10:39, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **No, you're right. The problem is that we can only use either 1stm or Imo, since there is no "First indirectly mentioned" template. But I think perhaps Imo is the more relevant one here, so I've gone ahead and changed it. Thanks again, and let me know when that infobox is ready to roll! ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 20:44, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***You can't do ? I've done that with some of my articles, I think. Either way, I don't mind it the way it is. Nice work, Bob!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:21, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Exiled Jedi
 * 6) * Have you checked if it is in Galaxy Guide 4: Alien Races, Second Edition?
 * 7) *Other than that, a very good article.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:29, June 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) **Yeah, I did check, and for some reason the line about "F'tral" meaning "water" was cut out. Thanks for the review! ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 20:44, June 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Hangar 8122

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:01, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: TCW Webcomics location

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good job, Gethralkin!-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:57, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:51, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * See below.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:27, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * You mention the facility as a station once, but you do not link to space station. If it is a space station, please link it. Otherwise change it to facility, which is the term you used before.
 * 3) **Fixed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:16, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Context on Bormus. Is it a planet? Where is it located?
 * 5) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:16, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *I also took care of a few linking problems. (Jedi, The Clone Wars, The Clone Wars: Procedure) Try to link everything the next time.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  11:53, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **Oops, you did link The Clone Wars, sorry.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  11:54, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) Axinal
 * 9) * I have trouble with the phrase "Gran planet". Compare it with the phrase "Human planet," which to me makes it sound like the planet itself is Human. Could you perhaps say "Gran-affiliated planet" or something of the like? Otherwise, very nice.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:37, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **No Gran is big enough to be a planet!!! Fixed. ;)  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 00:03, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ***You've obviously never heard of Jabba the Gran. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:20, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) * Also, would a quote be possible, even if it doesn't mention 8122 directly? I think even the line spoken by the guard, "I can't have you come in here, troops," would be fine.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:57, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) **Quote added. Also, I split the article to include an intro and it still comes under 250 words.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:00, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) ***No problem. In that case, you're obviously free to remove the intro if you wish. If you do intend to keep the article sectioned, however, it might be good to find another quote for the History section.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 10:19, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) ****Intro removed. Please check.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 01:53, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) * Some context on R2-D2 should be added, and I think that's all I have. Good work!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 10:17, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) **Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:13, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) *After some rewriting, the article only mentions Shadow Squadron once, and there is no context for it at all. They should be mentioned earlier in the article as approaching the hangar along with Skywalker and the others.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:27, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) Imperators II
 * 20) * As with L-2832, the "History" section needs to be outlined in the intro.  Imperators II (Talk) 14:49, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) **The History section was a test to see if making an intro would bring it over 250 words or not. Since it was reasonably under, the article has been recombined&mdash;with your edits left in, though. Thanks for catching those.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 01:53, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) * Is is necessary to put commas before and after "and R2-D2"?
 * 23) **Fixed, but part of another fix.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:13, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 24) * Currently ref[2.2] is followed by ref[2.3], which doesn't make sense.  Imperators II (Talk) 08:39, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 25) **Oops, didn't catch that. Thanks. Fixed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:13, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 26) Jujiggum
 * 27) *Per our images policy, the text bubble in the main image should be filled in. Text bubbles should only be blanked if they are cut off by the image's edge.
 * 28) *Also, why don't you mention specifically that the bombers were stored in the hangar?
 * 29) * Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 18:04, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * The article is currently 190 words, so while it's technically below the 200-word threshold for the necessary attempt at an intro, it might be worthwhile to try sectioning the article a bit to see if it can reach GA potential. This is not an objection or a demand, just a thought.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:37, June 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * I will see what I can do. It might be possible, but I can see it easily being a restatement of intro to body, as there is not really a whole lot on the hangar itself. The quote you mention above would probably work. Most of the text was originally in the Bts, though, so it might work either way.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 00:13, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with it as a CAN, so no worries if it doesn't work out. It won't affect my vote.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:21, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Aquachair

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:23, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The wonderful world of furniture, part 1

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:01, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:11, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * From the BTS: "as part of a larger articles [...]" What is a larger articles? This would ordinarily be a sofixit, but when I checked the Alien Encounters page, it says it's the title of several articles, so I'm not sure whether it would be more proper to remove the "a" or the "s." I'll leave it up to to you. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:50, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **I was a bit confused by this objection at first, but then I realized the error you were pointing to. Perfect example of being too close to the material, I guess! Fixed. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:54, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Heh, probably partially my fault for pasting just those few words without context. Either way, nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:01, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Exiled Jedi
 * 6) * Again, if it is possible, please remove the large blank area.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:02, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **I'm not sure what you're talking about. Everything is formatted as is standard, with no extra spaces at all. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 18:25, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Well, the page displays on my computer with a large blank area, I think it might be related to the image placement. Anyone else have this?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:40, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Do you mean at the bottom of the page? That is from the image placement, but the only option to fix it is to remove the image. I think it's better to have an image that pertains to the BTS than to not have one, right? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:44, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) *****I have some suggestions here. If you don't like it, I will agree with you that having an image is better than having none at all.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:03, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ******Yeah, the problem with those is that it forces the section headers for "Appearances" over to the right, which is generally a no-no. Again, it may just be that the article is too short to have images at all, in which case I can remove them. It's a gray area, I admit. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:06, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) *I'll take the image then.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:11, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Gravcouch

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:23, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The wonderful world of furniture, part 2

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:55, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:12, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Could you possibly get rid of that large blank area after the quote at the beginning of the article?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:59, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **I'd be happy to, but I don't see one. :( ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 18:29, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***As with the other article, the page displays on my computer with a large blank area. I think it might be related to the image placement. Anyone else see this?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:42, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Again, because the image only pertains to the BTS and not the body, the only option is to have the image and the whitespace, or to have neither. I thought it would be better to have the image, but I can cut it if others prefer it that way. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:49, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *****I have a suggestion here. If you don't like it, I will agree with you that having an image is better than having none at all.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:04, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Floating pond

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:51, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Iyra furniture, part 3

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:58, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Since you sourced some of the article shouldn't you source all of it?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:57, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **How do you mean? I can source the fact that the pond is referred to on a certain page of the 2nd edition of the book, but how do I source that it doesn't appear in the first edition? At any rate, I think the BTS should be self-sourcing, but I'm open to suggestions. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:51, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *Oh sorry, that was just me being slightly stupid. It's fine the way it is.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:58, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Breeding grounds (F'tral)

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:42, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Everything you ever wanted to know about Iyra but were afraid to ask.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Good work, SavageBob.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:58, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Imperators II (Talk) 23:00, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified caged Iyra

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 23:02, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Someone at WEG had a really sick fascination with Iyra. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 23:02, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) I may know someone else that is also overly fascinated by Iyra...-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:05, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * :) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 23:24, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 18:08, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 18:08, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Heh, I saw the article on the recent changes page and looked it over ahead of time just knowing that it would end up here.-- Exiled Jedi   (Greetings)  23:07, June 13, 2011 (UTC)

Brinebrew

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 07:43, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: What do Iyra drink after watching the cage dance and visiting the breeding grounds? Now we know. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 07:43, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support


 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:57, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Salty beverage... gotta try something. –Tm_T (Talk) 18:14, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Hey SavageBob, pass the Brinebrew.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:59, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * Could we perhaps get some context on The University of Sanbra Guide to Intelligent Life? Is it a book? A holodocumentary?
 * 3) * Also, the second half of the body is not sourced.
 * 4) *Otherwise, very nice.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 10:23, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Ah, I had meant to source that Sanbra was a planet, so I had to source everything and forgot to source everything. :) Should be done. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:22, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Rees Alrix

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:58, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Yoda: Dark Rendezvous Jedi Part 3 (of 4)

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *You should mention directly that she was a member of the Jedi Order. (I know that this is rather picky, but I have seen other people bring similar things up.)
 * 3) **No problem, you're correct. Added.
 * 4) *You seem to have a problem with your first reference, it links to the encyclopedia not Dark Rendezvous.
 * 5) **Fixed.
 * 6) *I would change the mentioned only tag for Dark Rendezvous to "first mentioned".
 * 7) **Done.
 * 8) *Other than that the article is very good.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:16, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) **Thank you.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:22, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Tarisian Tourism Board

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:31, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's about time I got back to some KOTOR.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *I do not believe that you can source the 3,956 BBY date to Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic, since the game does not mention that date. That will mean you have to source the rest of the article as well.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:16, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * The decapped second name is intentional. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:31, June 16, 2011 (UTC)