Talk:New Sith Order

"Little is known about this new threat save that it first made itself known via an attack on the Jedi Temple and a threat to the Emperor.". Smells like fanon to me. (Well more like SuperStupid to be honest). ANyone provide a source? Jasca Ducato 16:57, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Publisher's summary, Star Wars: Legacy 1, plus some leaked pages that appear to show an attack on the Jedi Temple. Yrfeloran 17:05, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Where are these leaked pages? Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 20:35, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'd like to see those. :) VT-16 17:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Please no fanon, please... Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 20:05, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No colors or dialogue/ text boxes, just art, and they're not consecutive pages but a sampling throughout the comic. They look legit, and a comment from Jan in regards to criticism on a design point leads me to believe they're real. The feature seems to have been pulled from the archive at Silver Bullet Comics (where they were first posted), (presumably DHC being Not Happy about the leak). The pictures are those starting with "swleg1" here Yrfeloran 21:57, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow. If this is truly what is going to be in it, I can't wait for the whole series. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 23:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. I'm still not convinced about this series as a whole, and Jan's art never appealed to me, but there are some interesting aspects of the Sith designs. Their clothing remind me more of the ancient Sith from Naga Sadow's era. If they truly are decendants of Lumiya's teachings, that would make sense, since she studied Dark Side teachings on Ziost, home of the ancient Sith Empire. VT-16 00:02, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, the one thing I find strange is that they're still using the standard stormtrooper armor. That doesn't seem right. They should have invented new stormtrooper armor by then. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 01:06, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Ever heard the old saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix it?" Whatever Emperor's in charge has heard it. :) But, of course, there COULD be new armor, and these stormtroopers are just wearing the old standard for whatever reason. I guess we'll find out when they release the comic. Demented Smiloid 01:35, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Still, I find it hard to believe. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 01:56, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, the stormtrooper armor being exactly the same is a little bit awkward. I guess they didn't feel the need to change things around. One thing, though: isn't the new Empire supposed to be more "benevolent" in that time? I remember reading something about that. Then why do they fight with those Sith? Hmmm... maybe they took over the Empire or something... (Wonder if we'll see some familiar ships still being used at this time, the Dreadnaught-class lasted well over a 150 years at least. VT-16 08:41, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Please, another Eclipse-class Star Dreadnought... Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hahaha, that would actually be pretty cool. I mean, this series just reeks of wank to me anyways, so they might as well have some fun with it. Judging by the look of those Nu Sith, spikes and the color black are "in" this year, so the Eclipse would fit right in. 8) VT-16 22:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps there's someplace we could put suggestions for the series. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 00:36, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Who reformed the sith that is the question
 * Probably Lumiya. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 15:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

what if its not lumiya what is it was callista or someone totally unexpected
 * I'm just guessing. We don't know yet. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 15:53, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

the fact is that most people beleive it is lumiya what if it was jacen what if the new empire was the hapan empire reformed and jacen rebuilt the sith
 * A brilliant theory, slightly marred by the fact that Jacen Solo is not, and never will be, a Sith Lord. The Empire in Legacy appears to be an advanced version of our beloved First Galactic Empire. Lumiya is the best bet at the minute, though who knows what LotF will bring? - Kwenn 17:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Hopefully not another Palpatine clone with his spirit inside... That's so 10–11 BBY. ;) Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 19:52, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

WHOAH! This actually looks awesome, and it makes sense after all with minions angered by the loss of palpatine, it seems fitting that a new order would avenge him. Cade Skywalker is one powerful mofo! These sith aren't playing around. For the first time they combine a legion of troops and an army of sith going in to destroy the jedi. This hasn't been done before. Bane's idea failed, though if Vader never recieved injuries on mustafar, the sith would probably endured forever, and yes this order is started by Lumiya. These Sith seem very powerful, but Cade is an obvious threat to them. He demonstrates amazing skills as do other jedi. I guess the NJO is more powerful than any previous incarnation. Hopefully down the road we'll see them expand outward to other galaxies to conquer. Dude I wish I could write just one Star Wars story, just one. I think this series will be ok, it's just new ground for fans. Admit it, we all wanted to see the sith re-emerge. I look forward to seeing Cade's progress.
 * Again I ask, where is the source for Lumiya starting this order? Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:08, 6 April 2006 (UTC)


 * You don't need it, and if you haven't firgured it out by now then i feel sorry for you. DarthMalus 05:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Wrong, we do need it. And while it's pretty much obvious, we need a source. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:48, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Alt-armor.jpg|thumb|right|200px]]Re: Stormtrooper armor. Legacy 0 states that the stormtrooper corps are now open to aliens and that armor is modified to fit them. There is a small pic of two alternate helmets for aliens. --Eyrezer 01:21, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I realized that when I got Legacy 0, but I'm surprised they still used regular stormtrooper armor with only minor differences for Humans. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Now that I think about it, this Silver Bullet Comics is creating a spoiler situation here. Shouldn't we wait until an issue comes out instead of going there to find bootlegs. Jan and John would want you all to spend your hard earned 2.99. -- Riffsyphon1024 08:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Justification
Is it just me or is the whole justification of controlling the galaxy in order to save it a little Revan'ish, i mean he had to conquer the galaxy to protect it from the First Sith Empire, and now these guys. Jasca Ducato 10:07, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It seems that all or most of the Sith Lords did what they did for the same reason. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * There is nothing worse than a self-rightous tyrant. -- SFH 14:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I remember reading in the new Insider issue that the Legacy Era Sith wanted to control the Galaxy to make it better. It says that this made them different from other Sith. Actually, I think all Sith shared this idea, like I said above. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:22, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * All Sith are control freaks, and nobody wakes up the morning and says "Ah...another day to be evil." outside looney tunes. The fact is, Sith have different values, which most of us would find to be amoral at best, many of them even seeking power for its own sake, but all of them seeking to mold the galaxy into a shape that they find more appealling to their values, and ultimately, better (In their own eyes). --68.0.144.96 07:43, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Palpatine also seemed to want to bring peace to the galaxy&mdash;as long as he was the guy in charge, which I think is probably the outlook shared by Darth Krayt - Kwenn 07:56, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure that all Sith share that outlook...hehehe.--68.0.144.96 07:58, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Exactly. The Galaxy, in their opinion, has to be saved from everything else&mdash;which, in the Sith's point of view, is evil. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:50, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thus the idea of the Sith'ari was brought into creation. Not only would he destroy the Sith and bring about a New Sith (presumably the Legacy Sith), he would unify the galaxy under one government. When you look at it from a Sith's point of view once the galaxy has gotten over the original shock of being conquered they would carry on pretty much the same under Sith control as they would under Republic control. Jasca Ducato 14:28, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No, the Sith'ari didn't bring about the Legacy Era Sith. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Do you know that for sure, no. Like i said, he presumably did. If Anakin hadn't killed Palpatine Lumiya wouldn't have become Sith and the Legacy Era Sith would have no basis for the war (the galaxy would already be under Sith control}. Jasca Ducato 14:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Still, did Vader create the Legacy Era Sith? No, he didn't. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:38, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The point is, Luke could have killed Palpatine at Endor. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:41, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps Vader...or the "Sith'ari" did not create the Legacy Sith, but, for the sake of argument, by that same token (Assuming that Lumiya did organize the Legacy Sith) he was not solely responsible for the Empire, or its destruction. Instead, his actions allowed for them to happen. By betraying Mace Windu, Palpatine's Empire (which had already been in the works for some decades) came to fruition, and by redeeming himself and killing Palpatine was he able to allow the Alliance its opportunity to restore Galactic Order (Which they had also been trying to do for some time)... but if you think about it, Vader's actions have always been the "allowing" factor, rather than the absolute directing of events. Thus, his actions may have led to Lumiya's indesputed rise as the new Dark Lady, and perhaps to her creation of the Legacy Sith, and so, (Given that such speculation is even true) by Vader's usual pattern, his actions have been deciding, but not directing, and so thus can one say that the theory put forth by Jasca is plausible at this point in time. Still, we'd have to wait to find out all the details, and there might still be room for dispute... For the sake of argument, of course.--68.0.144.96 02:02, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The legacy of the Sith'ari says that by destroying the Sith he will lead to the creation of another, more powerful Sith Order. It doesn't say "Darth Vader will kill Darth Sidious and wipe out the Sith but then personally go to Korriban and take a new apprentice whom he declares the first of the new Dark Lords." Does it? Like 68.0.144.96 said, Vader's affect was more in-direct than direct. Jasca Ducato 10:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, but how do we know that it absolutely had to happen this way? If Luke had killed Palpatine at Endor, Palpatine's spirit could have still traveled to Byss. Therefore, Vader's part was indirect, but if we replaced him with Luke when Palpatine was killed at Endor, the Legacy Era Sith would still live. I'm not arguing that Vader wasn't the Sith'ari, but Vader could have died at Yavin, and it might not have stopped the Legacy Era Sith from being around in 140 BBY. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 12:26, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, by that same Token, if Anakin had never come to the Republic, Sidious' plans (Which had been in motion long before Anakin's coming) may have still come to fruition. There's no way to no for sure. But... my main point is that Vader had a hand in training Lumiya, by both repairing her broken body and instructing her in the ways of the dark side... years before the Battle of Endor. It's through these indirect yet deciding events that Vader MAY have had a hand in the formation of the Legacy Sith. Again, this is for sake of argument, and there is no way at this point of telling if Lumiya even had anything to do with the Legacy Sith, let alone the prophecy of the Sith'ari alluding to its creation.--68.0.144.96 22:38, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Exactly. We could guess all we wanted. And how do we know for sure that Darth Krayt didn't just find a Sith holocron and train himself? He could have forged a new chain of Sith. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 23:18, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I think Jacen is Darth Krayt. Stinkywookie 15:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Jacen couldn't be Darth Krayt unless he joined the Sith before 30 ABY. And he joined 40 ABY. According to the Darth Krayt page, he organized the Sith on Korriban around 30 ABY. - Bub
 * Yeah. I read that after I wrote this but I am still hoping that was wrong.  Stinkywookie 15:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, if they meant 130 ABY, it would work. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, we need to get an answer for that. Stinkywookie 15:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Of course, we don't know if Jacen is Darth Krayt. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * LOL. I realize that.  I was talking about whether the date was 30 or 130. Stinkywookie 15:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I know, but if the date was 30 ABY, we could rule Jacen out as Darth Krayt. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 16:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * exactly Stinkywookie 16:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Who knew that one year could be so important to an issue? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Something I haven't seen anyone bring up yet, remember the weight of the conversation Jacen and Lumiya had about Jacen finding a suitable Sith apprentice? Sounds like foreshadowing to me. What if Jacen finds Krayt and his fledgling order on Korriban during his studies, and Krayt is Jacen's apprentice.  There HAS to be SOME connection between Jacen and Krayt.  Just have faith that the keeper of the holocron would never let such a blaring error through.  ps - whats with the server today?  Slow as hell. Lonnyd 20:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * See here. Anyway, that's an interesting theory. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Members

 * Okay, so Darth Krayt is the guy with two lightsabers, the Aayla-wannabe we still don't have a name for, so that leads to two questions: 1) who is the guy third person, Darth Talon or Darth Nihl, and 2) where is the other one? -- SFH 16:01, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * So I guess I'm wrong about Krayt being Jacen eh? Oh Well.  Would have been cool.  Is he Vong?Stinkywookie 16:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The Nagai on the right is Darth Nihl. There's also a Chagrian called Darth Wyyrlok, and a Darth Stryfe - Kwenn 16:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I just added that the Legacy Sith seem to have abandoned the Rule of Two. (sigh)...and I thought the names were already bad. So which one is Talon? -- SFH 16:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * If people will stop editing i'll get my message in! Actually, the Sith on the left is Darth Krayt, the middle one is unknown and the other is Darth Talon. Jasca Ducato 16:15, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The Darth Nihl page says he's the Nagai. Which is correct? - Kwenn 16:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, thought you were talking about the one on the left (with two sabers) Jasca Ducato 16:39, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * This is so confusing... Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 17:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * OK, so: Krayt is the Vong-a-like Sith Master; Talon is the tattooed Twi'lek; Nihl is the Nagai; Wyyrlok is the Chagrian - Kwenn 17:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Wait, are you saying Krayt is a Vong? -- SFH 17:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * No, Vong-like. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 17:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh thank god. If it had been a Vong, it would have officially become some fanonists creation. -- SFH 17:24, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * If it was a Vong, I'd shoot myself. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 17:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Darth Krayt – Vong 2.0. Jasca Ducato 17:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * He could be a genetically-altered Vong... If that was the case, I wouldn't shoot myself. ;) Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 17:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, Darth Krayt – Vong 1.5. Jasca Ducato 17:40, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Or perhaps he's a species related to the Vong that they brought over to populate a planet... Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 17:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Possibly. The Sith-Imperial War began because Vong-terraformed worlds were sabotaged by the Sith, resulting in mutations among the populace. Krayt could be one of the victims - Kwenn 17:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow. That would be awesome if my theory was correct... Hopefully I'll be able to get Legacy: 0 tonight. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 17:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It's possible its just sith armor. Jasca Ducato 17:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * True... Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 17:58, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I like the mutated-Vong theory. I hope they don't just get rid of them.  Stinkywookie 18:03, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You mean the Vong themselves? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 18:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I have the unpopular opinion of liking the Vong.  They are completely different than anything else in the galaxy and you couldn't use the force on them.  Pretty cool.  Also, there is a lot of ground to cover about how they are dealing with their new life. Stinkywookie 12:03, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Anyway, after examining an image of Krayt, it appears that he's a humanoid wearing Sith armor like Jasca Ducato suggested. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 12:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I've added him to the Sith armor page so that should sort out any fanon like "he's a miniture Krayt Dragon". Jasca Ducato 20:02, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Good lord, I'd hope no one would say that... Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Names
I've added a NPOV BTS with the fan criticism of the Sith names as being unimaginative - a fan attitude that is reflected in this community as well. Is that a problem? KEJ 23:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I think so. You and two others have it out for the names, based on the criticism that they are unimaginative.  I disagree.  Or at least, I think subsequent Sith names are no more imaginative.  As soon as I saw Darth Wyyrlok, I figured at least THAT ONE would be good enough, but it got just as much criticism.  Seriously - Darth Traya? Oh, she betrays stuff.  Darth Plageius?  Oh he messes with germs, I get it. Lonnyd 23:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I've seen some similar criticisms on some user pages. I should point out that my main opinion is not so much that they are unimaginative. I think they're plain lame, but that would not be a serious enough criticism to go any BTS section (and it would of course be highly POV). You're right about 'Traya' though ... that's a pretty lame Sith name too. KEJ 00:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Also, I do agree that "Darth Stryfe" is a pretty lame name. Lonnyd 00:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I thought we were trying to steer clear of the "some fans" commentary in BTS. It will always sound like a rogue fan did it unless it was something overwhich there was public outcry and is of historical or contextual note (removal of Ewok celebration song, death of Chewbacca, etc.). It doesn't add to the knowledge of a reader. If they think the names are silly, then they'll come to that conclusion. --SparqMan 00:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * We should definitely not have fan criticism in the Behind the Scenes section. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

New Sith Order
I've been seeing this term thrown around alot lately. Is it canon? If so, source? Lonnyd 01:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It's really conjecture. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Public face

 * "Darth Wyyrlok was the public face of the order"...Are we saying that the Sith are in the Public Relations business now? -- SFH 00:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, wasn't Darth Vader the public face of the Sith during his time? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah. And look at the rep they got. -- SFH 01:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * True... Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Makes perfect sense if the former Speaker of the Senate was of the same species. -- Riffsyphon1024 08:15, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * True. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Devaronian?
I've seen it said elsewhere by fans that Maladi is a female Devaronian, but is there any source for this? Female Devaronian are not meant to be red, and they are meant to be covered in thick fur, ranging from brown to white, as per the Alien Anthology. This description doesn't fit Maladi. --Eyrezer 12:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

As to the unidentified Sith, they are from the leaks to Silver bullet, namely Zabrak and Quarren here and Gotal and Savrip here. The Zabrak can also be seen partially in this one, far right.--Eyrezer 12:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Nobody cares about species accuracy. - Sikon [ Talk ] 13:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * As I said elsewhere, look at Jeisel. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well that's a shame. Never mind. --Eyrezer 01:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

30 ABY Not Entirely Accurate
In the comic prologue, the holocron says "Nearly 100 years ago", and though the first thought is 30 ABY, around the year 40 ABY would still be "almost 100 years". I'm just saying it's too ambiguous to state that directly., and it would be better if either omitted it, changed it to a wider range (30-45 ABY) or just use the same phrase. --Sauron18 16:06 29 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Legacy is set in 130 ABY, so "nearly a hundred years ago" is still c. 30 ABY. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 21:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I know, I just thought it sounded a bit too direct. Even though it does say "around". Is there another way to make it seem less specific yet basically say the same thing? --Sauron18 17:33 29 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Well, I think it's better to have a certain year, even if it's c. (year). Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:53, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * True, but the more you say it, the better "Circa" sounds than "around", makes it seem more ambiguous, and yet still being specific enough, for now. --Sauron18 17:55 29 June 2006 (CDT)
 * Well, if we find out that Krayt is Jacen, then we can put "Sometime after 40 ABY". Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:57, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Red Skin
Why does it seem that mostly all the peon Sith have red skin, even though, most of their specoes don't have red skin? Sato Stars 00:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Probably full-body tatoos. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:19, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Kinda like Maul in other words. There has to be a significance to it though. But then again, Nihl and Krayt aren't red. Hm... Sato Stars 06:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually Maul was naturally red. --Sauron18 06:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm gonna have to go with full body tattoos also, unless they all ingested some sort of drug that pigments their skin red. As a side note: this is the first time I've ever seen a red Rodian. Too bad he only lasted two panels. :(  StarNeptune Talk to me! 06:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah it's probably tattoos. --Sauron18 07:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Well I guess since they had over a hundred years and all, I guess they found a way to do it:) But anyone think it has something to do with rank maybe? Sato Stars 07:22, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Possibly, like the sith minoins are red while the highest is not? I don't know, i think Krayt isn't red because of his illness? Or maybe he was in status when th sith decided to don there tatoos. I think its good though, seeing all these different species as sith. Jedi Dude 07:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe the Sith minions decided to use it as a homage to the old Sith species. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 13:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, good point. It's also a really good way to tell who's a Sith and who's not. But ya know, I think they'd be really un-nonchalant(not a really word) I think you get what I'm saying. Sato Stars 21:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Krayt tattooed a bunch of Sith lords and probably wanted everyone to do so to identify of the Sith species of old, regardless of their species. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Well then, those're some pretty good points, I think we pretty much got that down.lol. Thanks for some clearification guys. Sato Stars 06:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Darth Millennial
Could Darth Millennial have had something to do with the new Sith order?--Darth Oblivion 17:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)