Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

 The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.


 * Featured article history
 * Featured article queue
 * Featured article nominations history
 * FA queue checklist
 * What is a featured article?

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e. it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box.
 * 8) &hellip;have no more than 3 redlinks and none in the introduction, infobox, or any templates.
 * 9) &hellip;have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
 * 10) &hellip;not have been previously featured on the Main Page. Otherwise, it can only be restored to featured status.
 * 11) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 12) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 13) &hellip;provide at least one quote on the article. A leading quote at the beginning of the article will be required only if there is quotable dialogue by or about the subject. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
 * 14) &hellip;include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles.
 * 15) &hellip;include a "powers and abilities" section on all relevant character articles, especially for Force-sensitive characters where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
 * 16) &hellip;include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available.
 * 17) &hellip;pass review by the Inquisitorius review panel.
 * 18) &hellip;counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 1000 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc).

For more information on what makes a featured article, see What is a featured article?

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above. Note that a previously featured article cannot be featured on the Main Page again; however, it can be restored to featured status.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 Inquisitor supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added to the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article."
 * 6) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.

How to vote:

Also remember to add FAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under! Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) Once the article has five supporting Inquisitor votes and no outstanding objections after at least a week, the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article." Although articles do not need regular users' votes to pass, non-Inquisitors are encouraged to review articles and participate in the process.
 * 6) Per Inquisitorius consensus, no Inquisitor may use their Inqvote on their own nominations.

Every Sunday and Thursday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the Featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the Featured article template. Nominations that are inactive with outstanding objections for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list by the Inquisitorius.

Derek Klivian

 * Nomination by: - Havac 16:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My other summer nom. Image replacement by Red is ongoing. Havac 16:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

(4 Inqs/1 users/5 total)
Support
 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 00:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Hugetastic. --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 01:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 3)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  13:33, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Witty message here. Cull Tremayne 15:30, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) User:Camodroid11 16:42, 2nd january 2008 9(utc)
 * 6)  Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 21:28, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) The SOTE section doesn't seem to mention Klivian specifically at all. Does something specifically say he was present there? There seems to be a few areas where you mention the Rogues as a group and not Klivian as an individual, and the same question applies. If he's not, then I think it might be just a bit too much of a stretch, especially when you're committing that level of detail. "Organa" is rather abruptly re-introduced in the Mission to Mrlsst section - this should probably be tweaked. And I'm counting 5 redlinks. Thefourdotelipsis 02:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) *Redlinks reduced within acceptable limits. Leia reintroduced. The Rogues thing is a general "We know he was in the squadron at this time, we know the full squadron was here, ergo he was here, though we'll keep it fairly generic." Havac 04:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) **Right. I get what you're saying, but since nothing is explicitly stating that he was there, I think that at least the SOTE section could but cut down. Thefourdotelipsis 23:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Stuff
 * 5) * "Klivian's fears proved unfounded as Antilles and Calrissian made their way through the Death Star to its main reactor and destroyed it, killing Darth Vader and Galactic Emperor Palpatine." If you're going to source this to RotJ, then I'm not sure that I can agree with this sentence. The film doesn't really show either of them dying as the result of the Death Star's destruction.
 * 6) * Under Victory at Endor: "By that time, Klivian had built a reputation for frequent crashes, and his friends joked about his supposed affection for bacta treatments." Can you choose a different lead-in? Only because you mentioned his reputation earlier under Rogue: "He quickly developed a joking reputation for enjoying bacta due to his numerous crashes and injuries". Obviously both statements are sourced to different books/times, but in the article he already had that reputation, and him building it up even further is kinda confusing, especially with no further crashes really specified.
 * 7) **I agree that they are in two different contexts, but I'd still recommend a reword of the second mention, since "By that time" implies that he didn't have that reputation before, which obviously isn't true in the context of the article. Cull Tremayne 01:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) * Under Mission to Mrlsst: "Antilles prepared a strike on the Imperial base while Loro led a commando mission to rescue Leia Organa, whose presence on-world and capture one of Loro's fighters, Vance Rego, had reported." What does the last part of this sentence mean? Rego captured "Organa" or something? Obviously confused by Rego's double-cross, but still no idea what's going on in this sentence.
 * 9) *I'm about halfway through, just hampered by other stuff. Cull Tremayne 16:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) * Under Kidnapping on Corellia, last section: "Their ship was underarmed for dealing with the attackers, but Horn intervened in his X-wing, shooting down the attackers." Can we get a synonym for one of those "the attackers"?
 * 11) * Under Extracting the Emperor: "Klivian had been enjoying some downtime, attempting to pick up women at the base pool with Janson, but Pestage had fled the manipulations of Director of Imperial Intelligence Ysanne Isard on Coruscant and been imprisoned" Can this be reworded somewhat? I realize that the sentence is trying to tell us how Klivian's romantic pursuits were interrupted by the Pestage mission, but as is, it sort of reads that Pestage's conflict with Isard is somehow related to Hobbie's poolside activities.
 * 12) * Per your response to objections on the 181st FAN, would you object to creating a redlink for the false 181st? In the same vein, a link to the false Harran might be appropriate as well, even though the current article combined both characters.
 * 13) *No prostitute link or a pic of Klivian with a Bothan escort? I am shocked, sir, shocked. Cull Tremayne 05:11, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) AdmirableAckbar:
 * 15) *" longtime friend...good friend" in the intro is a tad repetitive; see if you can replace one of them with something else.
 * 16) **Revocabulariated. Havac 04:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) * "but felt it wise to remain silent on the matter..." - we don't know why, do we? It just sort of reads oddly at the minute, like the reader's supposed to know why.
 * 18) **I've broadened the statement a little to suggest his motivation better. Havac 04:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) * Could we get an actual picture of the mutiny itself in the "Mutiny..." section, if there is one? Or something more illustrative than Biggs and Hobbie standing facing each other? A crop of Image:SWEMP9-FC.jpg might be good.
 * 20) **That cover doesn't depict anything that actually happened, and there isn't any art of Klivian in the mutiny itself. Havac 04:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 21) ***Fair enough. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 22) * The reflist looks a bit messy at the minute. I think you should go with either a double column or a scrollbox, or neither, but not both.
 * 23) **Yeah, I don't see the point in both, either. The double columns were put in by some guy named Yk. Havac 04:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 24) * "received facial wounds, but received medical treatment for both injuries" - repetitive. Please find a way to reword it in a way that you find satisfactory.
 * 25) **Changed up. Havac 04:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 26) *"Klivian later had a Death Star II kill silhouette painted on his fighter, suggesting that he was part of the attack run against the Death Star as well" - speculation. Just state the facts and let the readers draw their own conclusions.
 * 27) **I reworded it. Havac 22:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 28) ***It's better, but I'm not really sure about it. How do we know it was the Death Star II? Maybe it was a joke, or something. I wouldn't say the presence of a Death Star kill silhouette definitely attested to his participation, even if it is probable. Can't we just say "Klivian later had a Death Star II kill silhouette painted on his fighter" and leave it at that? -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 22:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 29) * "Afterward, the Rogues captured Grand Moff Nivers at Tandankin." Is there really nothing more that could be said about that? It's understandable that you're trying not to get too detailed into the stuff which Hobbie isn't mentioned directly in, but I think a few sentences more info would be good.
 * 30) **It's about six pages, really, all of some guy getting shot down by an AT-AT and Wedge shooting up a pillar to take out their fighters. I've expanded just a little, but I really can't go beyond that. Havac 22:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 31) ***Fair enough. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 22:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 32) * "They were taken into town" reads a little funny, like she's taking them for a night out or something. "the town" or somesuch might work better.
 * 33) **Changed. Havac 22:57, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 34) *"Approximately six months after the mission to Ciutric IV" - this should read with a date after Mindor, if available, since it's the last event covered.
 * 35) **Good stuff. I'm up to Endor, and I should get a significant amount more read later this evening/tomorrow. Up to Pirates and Pestage Defeating Zsinj, though I'll need to get back to the Mindor section.. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 36) Preliminary: There are quite a few redlinks.  Graestan ( Talk ) 19:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 37) *Redlinks are down within limits. Havac 18:54, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 38) Graestan the Merciless:
 * 39) *I don't think the extra sourcing is necessary on most of the points in the P&T. Maybe if you were making a contradicting statement or something, but not what you've got. Please remove.
 * 40) **All the double sourcing is because I'm either citing a trend, which requires at least two instances of it occurring, or (most of the time) I'm combining statements from two sources. Havac 22:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 41) ***Could you not cite the parts of the statements to their sources? Graestan ( Talk ) 22:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 42) ****I haven't done that for any other article, and I prefer not to get into "Klivian was cynical[3] and dour[2], as well as occasionally irritable in the morning,[5] much to the displeasure of his colleagues.[2]" For general statements, it's not always that easy to do, and for more specific statements, it ends up looking really messy and intrusive. I've never gone with mid-sentence citations, and I don't think there's a requirement to do so. Havac 00:15, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 43) * It's speculation to say that Klivian spoke to prostitutes "possibly as a result" of his romantic lack thereof, and certainly a stretch to say that his exchange with one on Corellia was "engaging" prostitutes.
 * 44) **Speculation-type language removed, and I didn't say he engaged a prostitute -- just that he was willing to engage them. Which we see -- she comes on to him, and he says, "I'm busy. Be around later?" Unless he's randomly lying to her and leading her on for no particular reason, he's willing to engage prostitutes. Havac 22:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 45) * Having just read the Darklighter comics, I believe it is imperative that at least in the BtS you describe Biggs' feelings concerning Hobbie in the comics, which are very far from friendly. It's one of those barely concealed loathings.
 * 46) **Expanded on. Havac 22:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 47) *That's all for now. Graestan ( Talk ) 20:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Just a suggestion: Couldn't you get some better images for the Darklighter section? At the moment, it's just various headshots of him, or him lying in bed...I think that panels of him actually doing something would illustrate the article much better. Thefourdotelipsis 02:11, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * What's the deal with the Klivian surviving Hoth? I thought that the only source that addressed it was the NEGtC, but in that section you've sourced it to "Who's Who". Is that right? I only ask because Kesin Ommis doesn't source that pilot's survival to "Who's Who", instead it sort of infers that Ommis survives based on Klivian's survival in the NEGtC. What exactly does "Who's Who" say about Klivian in the BoH? Cull Tremayne 16:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Jamming in more NEGTC citations is all I really wanted to see. :P Cull Tremayne 01:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Mohs

 * Nominated by: Yrfeloran 08:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Pure Lando Calrissian Trilogy pyramid-power crack. Check your laws of physics at the door - you're in for a wild, wild ride.

(3 Inqs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Had no trouble with this when it was up for GA. Cull Tremayne 09:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Just read this book for the first time.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  13:58, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Me too. Thefourdotelipsis 13:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) The last section of the biography, and its corresponding part in the intro, stray really far from the subject. The focus should stay on Mohs, with the Lando/Vuffi plot only in there for context on his story. Related to that, it also seems to be written in Vuffi's and Lando's perpective; you have comments like "revealed to be a Sharu", and the part where Lando returns to the ship to find what Mohs has become. It should be kept in the perspective of Mohs, so you talk about him changing into the other form and waiting for Lando in the Falcon. - Lord Hydronium 03:26, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I think I've addressed this. Yrfeloran 07:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) In addition to Hydro's objection, the part where the perspective leapt out to me the most was when Mohs and Vaa "vanished" from Calrissian's sight. So, per Hydro. Thefourdotelipsis 09:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Specific objection addressed. Yrfeloran 07:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) From Xwing328:
 * 6) *Around the "Within the great pyramid" section: The previous sentence says they were transported into the pyramid. The next sentence says Mohs falls through the wall, and then Lando arrives. Could this method of transportation be clarified? Are they just falling through a wall or being beamed in?
 * 7) *Possibly a link to Mohs' mother.
 * 8) *You say the Falcon fled the system. This could use a touch of context, imo, but not too much to make the article focus more on Lando than Mohs. Were they running from something in particular, was the world being destroyed in its transformation, what? —Xwing328 (Talk) 01:54, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) Toprawa:
 * 10) *A preliminary objection: I'm not a big fan of alternating between calling him a Sharu and a Toka between the infobox and the first sentence of the introduction, despite the pipelink. It's just confusing, and I would request choosing one or the other for uniformity. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * There's got to be some sort of award for "most consistently traitorous sidekick". Yrfeloran 08:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Lando Calrissian

 * Nominated by: Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 20:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: From the two directors that brought you Tales of the Jedi and Wraith Squadron! From the project behind Jaina Solo! From the minds behind Mara Jade Skywalker, an action-packed adventure filled with suspense, betrayal, romance, and, of course, inimitable charm. Now playing: The smoothest FAN ever to grace this page, Lando Calrissian!

(2 Inqs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) As co-nominator. Greyman ( Talk ) 20:45, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Objections will be fixed soon as sources are checked by several users, including myself.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  01:29, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Imperialles 23:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

I dare object to Lando
 * 1) No info whatsoever from Lando Calrissian: Idiot's Array and Crisis on Cloud City. Not smooth. Thefourdotelipsis 03:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) *The latter has been addressed; I've asked Borsk about the former. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 21:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) **Former is also addressed now. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 20:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Ditto Galaxy Guide 2: Yavin and Bespin. - Lord Hydronium 03:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) *I've went ahead and added a sentence or two of some background information for this objection. I looked over my copy of the source again and couldn't see anything new beyond the sentences I just added. Is there something specific you're thinking of that I could work in? Greyman ( Talk ) 13:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) ** There's some other bits on pages 50, 76, and 88. - Lord Hydronium 08:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Information added. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:11, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) * The mentions of Ymile are rather confusingly arranged. There's a picture of her near where Lando wins the bet with Raynor, but no reference to her in the text, then much later in the article it mentions she helped Lando win. That second part should be noted and clarified at the time it actually occurs; also, she should be linked there, since she isn't at the moment. - Lord Hydronium 00:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) * Succession box should include Treece; Action Tidings and the Cloud City Databank entry both say he was the Administrator of Cloud City. - Lord Hydronium 00:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) **Fixed the Ymile bits and buffed Lady Luck overall. Also, adjusted succession box, reffed from the actual Marvel comics though. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 01:15, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) * Information missing on how Lando got back Cloud City, from The New Essential Guide to Characters. Geonosis and the Outer Rim Worlds not in; amongst the things to add is a bit in there about how Lando raised Tibanna profits that's also in the NEC. - Lord Hydronium 07:29, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) **The Tibanna profits bit is already in there, just referenced from another source. The Cloud City re-taking has been added. Still working on GATOW. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:11, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 13) ***Two tidbits from GATORW added. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 16:41, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) ****Added it to the "Sources" list as well. - Lord Hydronium 23:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 15) ***Oh, I see; I was searching for "percent". - Lord Hydronium 19:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 16) * More NEGTC tidbits: Lando giving control of Cloud City to the Ugnaughts after Zorba cedes it. Lando refusing to go to Chewbacca's funeral out of guilt. From GG3: Lobot convinced Lando to help Leia and the group. - Lord Hydronium 07:45, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 17) **All of the above fixed. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:11, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 18) *More missing sources: Rebellion Era Sourcebook, Roleplaying Game Revised Core Rulebook, Roleplaying Game: Saga Edition Core Rulebook, Dark Empire Sourcebook, The Truce at Bakura Sourcebook, Han Solo and the Corporate Sector Sourcebook (I just spotted a small mention, but there could be more), Heir to the Empire Sourcebook, The Last Command Sourcebook, and Star Wars Trilogy Sourcebook - Special Edition. For now. - Lord Hydronium 23:23, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 19) **Rebellion Era Sourcebook is listed now, but it needs information from it. There's some on Page 111, for a start. - Lord Hydronium 07:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 20) ***The info on that page was already in the article. Could you tell me what specifically you are referring to? And the rest of the sourcebooks have been checked and added.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 19:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 21) * for The Truce at Bakura, but it contains unique information to add. - Lord Hydronium 23:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 22) **Fixed. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 19:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 23) *In addition to the above, the following appearances and mentions are missing: Out of the Closet: The Assassin's Tale, Darksaber, Force Heretic I: Remnant, Therefore I Am: The Tale of IG-88, Payback: The Tale of Dengar, The Last One Standing: The Tale of Boba Fett, X-wing: Rogue Squadron, X-wing: Wedge's Gamble, X-wing: Wraith Squadron, Young Jedi Knights: Heirs of the Force, Young Jedi Knights: The Lost Ones, Young Jedi Knights: Lightsabers, Young Jedi Knights: Darkest Knight, Young Jedi Knights: Shards of Alderaan, Young Jedi Knights: Jedi Bounty, and Young Jedi Knights: The Emperor's Plague. - Lord Hydronium 01:17, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 24) **Chack and I have addressed these. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 19:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 25) *Almost forgot: None of the movie novelizations or radio dramas are included. - Lord Hydronium 01:19, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 26) **This particular objection has been addressed, along with adding a number of other ESB and ROTJ-related appearances. I've checked both novelizations and will check with Tope to make sure there's no new info in the radio dramas. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 18:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 27) **Han will have these objections down! We've gotta give them more time! (In all seriousness, we are working on these). Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 16:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 28) *Sorry, haven't checked those yet, but another: Galaxywide NewsNets from Adventure Journal 14. "Calrissian Resurfaces as Baron Administrator". - Lord Hydronium 06:36, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 29) **Mined. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 16:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 30) Gah, redlinks in source list, mine Databank and Wizards. Those first two totally slipped me mind.  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 03:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 31) *Red links busted. Greyman ( Talk ) 16:56, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 32) *Databank has been mined and source list updated. Greyman ( Talk ) 15:32, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 33) Infobox not fully/correctly sourced.  Graestan ( Talk ) 04:24, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 34) *I think I got the missing reference. If you desire other sourcing, please let me know. ;-) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 20:22, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 35) **Got it on the second try. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 21:26, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 36) I'd like to take Yrf's comment below and turn it into an actual objection; for instance, I know there are quotes to be had by or about Lando and/or what he was up to at the time for the LCA, TTT, and BFC. Ideally, since the sections are so long, each should probably have a quote.  Graestan ( Talk ) 13:48, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 37) *All sections now have quotes except three tiny sections in the "Non-canon appearances" section in the BtS since quotes do not exist for those parts. Greyman ( Talk ) 16:32, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 38) **Hope you found at least one funny one from LCA. ;) Graestan ( Talk ) 23:12, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Image:Lando91.jpg, Image:LanLukVil.jpg, Image:Weaklando.jpg, Image:Lando&Luke Marvel71.jpg and Image:Lando&Han captive.jpg could all do with a re-scan. Other than that, excellent work, and about time! :) --Imperialles 13:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) *All done. I was bored and Ataru mentioned it at the right time. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 00:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Image placement is irrelevant to the text in a number of locations. SinisterSamurai 07:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) *I've moved a few things around. As it stands, there are two images that aren't directly pertinent to the sections they are in: the Caamas Document crisis section, and in the Kessel investment sections, where we used generic Lando images to fill gaps that would have left lots of text with no complimentary images. As it is, there's a good balance of images to compliment the text, but by removing those, the article's appearance would suffer accordingly. And there is article precedent for using generic images to fill "gaps". If there were more relevant images that could be substituted in, just point me in their direction and I'll gladly change it, but for now, it should stay as it is. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) **Looks good.
 * 5) Needs info from Star Wars: Power of the Jedi. Thefourdotelipsis 08:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) *Added.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 21:55, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Not a formal objection, but there's space for a lot more quotes in the article. Yrfeloran 04:13, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Who portrayed Lando in Dark Forces: Soldier for the Empire audio drama? Mauser 13:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Bakura Incident

 * Nomination by: - Andykatib 5:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My first major project here and a significant Expanded Universe event. I managed to correct most of the errors so it is up to you now to decide. Andykatib 5:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

(0 Inqs/0 users/0 total)
Support

Object
 * 1) From the desk of Atarumaster88
 * 2) * The intro could do a better job of setting the stage for the Battle of Bakura. How did the Rebels get there? How did the battle start? Etc. By and large, this needs to be about doubled in length
 * 3) * Redlinks in infobox.
 * 4) * You'll need a link to the conquest of G'rho
 * 5) * Who is "The Admiral" mentioned in 3rd paragraph of Background? Please provide context.
 * 6) *You'll need to explain the advantages of enteching humans a little more clearly please for the sake of the reader, as well as Sibwarra's role therein.
 * 7) * Is Shreeftut or whatever a title or person? There should be consistent capitalization depending on which one it is.
 * 8) * Please limit the use of parentheses in articles.
 * 9) * Per Toprawa in that a lot of the article goes beyond the scope of its topic. Some topics I would recommend shortening:
 * 10) **The Imperial takeover of Bakura could easily be reduced to a single paragraph.
 * 11) **The interception of the message droid by the Rebels could also be shortened.
 * 12) **The Truce section could also be shortened some&mdash;it gets into a lot of play-by-play.
 * 13) **You don't need drastic cuts, IMHO, just some trimming and condensing here and there. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 20:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) *Correct these and I will continue my review. I would also caution you to beware of POV. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 01:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 15) Toprawa:
 * 16) *I didn't think I'd ever say this, but this article is way too detailed. This isn't so much an article on the battle as it's a summary of the novel itself. I would strongly recommend going through and strictly condensing the narration into details about actual conflict. A good prelude summary is always essential for a battle article, but be careful of going off on extraneous tangents from the battle itself. As a way of keeping the article focused, try sectioning it into three major sections, "Prelude," "The battle," and "Aftermath," and subsection from there. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:38, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 17) *I just finished re-reading through TaB last night, and after perusing the TaB Sourcebook this morning, while it may be a bit radical, this article, as it is written right now, should really be under the title "Bakura Incident," to encompass the entire proceedings, and a separate, much shorter, less-comprehensive article should be devoted to the final battle taking place in the book. Really, that final battle should be under the title "Third Battle of Bakura" and the battle taking place at the beginning of the book should be under "Second Battle." Moreover, our article Bakura Truce, I believe, should simply be a redirect to a "Bakura Incident" article. If you're willing, Andy, I would recommend just reworking the introduction a little bit, and perhaps any other necessary parts of the article, to reflect the greater Incident, and try to nominate that. It would certainly take less work on your part. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 18) **Andy, I personally agree with Toprawa. The Bakura Incident includes so many angles, the Rebel Alliance, the Ssi-ruuvi Imperium and the Galactic Empire. All three have their own agenda and there is much chaos that ensues. Great work has been done in writing the article, but I think it could be moved and reworked a touch to encompass all three angles, as well. &mdash; Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 16:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) ***I am currently reworking this article to meet its new title: Bakura Incident. I'll be adding information from a number of sources over the next few days/weeks/whatever as I go, and will apprise you when expansions are complete. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 00:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 20) References needed in the infobox for:
 * 21) *Strength -> Orbital Repair Platform
 * 22) *Casualties -> 60+ TIE/ln starfighters
 * 23) *Casualties -> Half of the garrison defected to the Alliance, dead or missing —Xwing328 (Talk) 02:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 24) **Objection outdated due to infobox swap. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 00:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Not bad for a first shot, but this will need some work. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 01:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I managed to correct bullet points 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 to my best abilities though I will need help with points five and seven. I haven't be able to do that much work on Wookieepedia because I am preoccupied with other things in Malaysia though I found some really good, cheap Star Wars books and comics that I like. Andykatib 05:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Attention all: Ataru has indicated that he is interested in taking over this nomination.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 14:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Vote to remove nom (Inquisitorius only)
 * 1) This article has not been touched by Andykatib in over a month, and he is editing other articles here, so it seems he's given up on this one.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  13:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Indeed. The oldest objections seem to be 2 months old today, and no effort has been made to address the other objections, which are quite hefty, in any way. The nominator's contribs would seem to indicate he has moved on. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:21, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Tam Elgrin

 * Nominated by:  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 04:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My first-ever GA, over 1000 words, so I thought, "What the hell. I'll try it."

(3 Inqs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Next time, though, make sure you copyedit more thoroughly, 'cuz I might not be able to fix everything. ;-)  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 04:54, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Aaaallston!!! Cull Tremayne 00:55, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 3)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  02:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) From the Desk of Atarumaster88
 * 2) * The intro could be a little longer. Try expanding it from stuff relevant to Danni Quee and Tarc.
 * 3) **Addressed.
 * 4) * Contextify Antilles on first mention.
 * 5) **Addressed.
 * 6) * P&T can be much, much larger. (And should be).
 * 7) **Addressed.
 * 8) ***Yes, but you did so with a lot of redundant referencing. Not that I couldn't go in and fix it, but some lessons are better learned by experience. If two sentences in a row are referenced from the same source, there's no need to add additional tags. Additionally, the P&T doesn't flow well and could use restructuring. Take it slow, organize it well instead of rushing the fix. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 02:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Addressed, I hope.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 02:44, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) *****There's a whole bunch on pages 159-162 of the paperback that could go in there. Take your pick, but in particular, some of Tser's comments are really good stuff. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 02:53, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) ******Well this objection was a doozy, wasn't it? :) Addressed.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 03:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) * The relationship with the Solos, Tarc, and Elgrin should be expanded.
 * 13) **Addressed. Thanks for the review.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 23:27, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) *Due to my large knowledge of Enemy Lines, I was able to do a lot of cleanup myself, but be aware that there was lots needed. Have a Super Terrific Friendly Un-frustrating day. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 20:53, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 15) "However, by reviewing Elgrin's Coruscant recording, Danni Quee discovered that Elgrin's story was a lie; Elgrin was alone, and thus did not escape the Yuuzhan Vong." - A little bit of elaboration on how this conclusion was made would be appreciated. Thefourdotelipsis 03:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) *Addressed.  IFYLOFD  ( Come with me if you want to live. ) 02:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) "Elgrin was an awkward man..." This is awkward. I don't like this wording (first sentence of P&T). Otherwise, good job.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  03:19, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 18) *All righty. Addressed.  IFYLOFD  ( Come with me if you want to live. ) 00:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) I was just sitting down to read this, but noticed I should leave preliminaries: The P&T is far too windy and seems to completely retell portions of the story. Please make it more concise and to-the-point. Graestan ( Talk ) 06:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 20) *Addressed, I hope.  IFYLOFD  ( Come with me if you want to live. ) 02:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Zonder

 * Nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis 14:02, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part of FourDotProject: Evasive Action

(3 Inqs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 12:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Sure doesn't look like any Selonian I've ever seen.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  03:49, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Ekria is next then? Cull Tremayne 06:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) "Offee, being a healer, was sent to Felucia in the waning stages of the war, and Zonder accompanied her." The connection with Offee being a healer and being sent to Felucia isn't clear here. Might be best to clarify or remove it. "At Employment Center D4176, which was meant for non-Humans only." Not sure if this was meant to be part of the previous sentence or the next, or if it's missing something. Other than that, excellent, and I only just noticed the Jokhalli/divot thing, which is really cool. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 02:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) *First is tweaked, second has been fixed. Thefourdotelipsis 07:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) From the cockpit of Xwing328:
 * 4) *"Within four days, all water..." How do they know the 'four days part? Is it something as simple as, "Based on their calculations, within four days,...?"
 * 5) *What do you mean by "dispatching the astromech droids?" —Xwing328 (Talk) 00:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Maybe there should be something in there about how his active life was untypical for Selonian males? Yrfeloran 22:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

IG-72

 * Nominated by: -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Interesting at first but it goes downhill from there.

(5 Inqs/0 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) IGs are awesome.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  02:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Kill. Kill. Kill. --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 18:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, what a crappy main image. Cull Tremayne 20:53, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 1)  Graestan ( Talk ) 02:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Nice --Eyrezer 17:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Chack Attack:
 * 2) * "gaining notoriety for the IG-series" A bit of context on why the fact that he was of the IG series was notable waould be good.
 * 3) **I think you're misinterpreting the text. Its saying that his actions as a bounty hunter made more people aware of the existence of the IG-series.
 * 4) ***Bah! I completely misread that. I thought you mean the was notable because he was an IG.
 * 5) * Can we get a date on his hunt for Tallon in the intro?
 * 6) **Done.
 * 7) * What were his seemingly random choice of targets? You mention that his targets appeared random to many. Do we know what was the pattern was, then?
 * 8) **Not really. The implication is that he was taking down people for the Empire, but it's not canonically established.
 * 9) ***I suspected that this wasn't revealed (it's not like you to miss stuff). No problems here then.
 * 10) * "The four IG-88s carried on with their planned Droid Revolution, but by the time of the Battle of Endor they had all been destroyed or deactivated." I'd say this bit is unneeded.
 * 11) **Well, I don't like to end bios too suddenly, and this sentence essentially serves as a compressed legacy section. It's not essential but I think it's somewhat relevant and does more good than harm.
 * 12) ***You're right. I was a little unsure about this objection for that reason.
 * 13) *Good work overall.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) **Thank you very much. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:55, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 15) Why no mention of his stealing the Moldy Crow (just before the Teth thing), per  and the CSWE? --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 21:16, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 16) *Because I wasn't aware of its existence. :-P Now added. Good spot. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 17) Good. Now what about the fact that his remains were never found, according to CSWE? --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 06:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 18) *Added the "physical evidence of the destruction was ever found" (though I'd already done that...), if that's what you're referring to. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 12:26, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 19) **Didn't see it before. Now I do. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 18:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 20) Toprawa:
 * 21) * Are you sure he appears in the Rebellion era? The Rebellion era starts with the Battle of Toprawa, 0 BBY, which would mean that his death in Tatooine Manhunt would need to take place within the short number of days/weeks between Toprawa and the Battle of Yavin.
 * 22) **Yep, it does; it's semi-concurrent with ANH.
 * 23) * I'm left itching for more information here: "IG-88A invited IG-72 to allow him to upload his own programming and memory onto IG-72's computer core, as the the other IG-88 droids had done, so that he would join them." Join them how? A little bit more here.
 * 24) **Added a little bit. Let me know if you'd like more.
 * 25) ***I'm not sure what happened, but your second edit removed all of the changes in response to my objections. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 26) ****Gah. Should be good now. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 15:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 27) * I've taken this sentence out of the biography. It just seems rather out of place in the flow of the article, and it's really more P/T info anyways. If you would like to salvage any of this for the P/T, I would encourage it: "IG-72 was known to prefer dead bounties to live ones, and lived to kill beings"
 * 28) **Added a variation of it to the P&T.
 * 29) * I'm not sure the "Despite" works here. It would seem to me appropriate that he avoid the Core Worlds because of his criminal prominence: "Despite his prominence in criminal circles, IG-72 avoided the Core Worlds" Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 30) **Removed the despite.
 * 31) ***It was replaced per everything else. Still, can we say "Because of his prominence..."? I don't know how much that fits. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 32) ****Should be good now. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 15:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 33) * Can you be more specific here with a location and incident? During the docking bay fight on Tatooine, for ex? "and used explosives in a heavily-populated area."
 * 34) **Done.
 * 35) *Is there nothing to say for his presence on Cloud City with Jodo Kast and the Gang?
 * 36) **I wouldn't say so. It's just cover art - there's nothing to say about Leia's presence on Tatooine in this picture, for example.
 * 37) ***Well, the difference is that I don't believe anyone would try to assert that that movie promo is an IU image, whereas this shot of IG-72 has been retconned to be an IU image in more than one source. I might also point out that this article even features the image within the biography of the article, which also asserts its IU-ness. I feel some sort of mention of the image should be made somewhere within the IU portions of this article. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 38) ****Where has it been retconned to be an IU image? And if it has, was it this image with IG-72 and Kast et al. or the same image that depicts IG-88 and Fett et al.? The fact is that this event never occurs in the story, and the presence of all of those characters on Bespin directly contradicts Tatooine Manhunt, since they were all working for different factions and IG-72 was hiding in Mos Eisley for days during the adventure. Covers take artistic license. And we frequently have promo images in IU sections of articles, so I don't see the problem here. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 11:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 39) *****If it wasn't an IU image, then it would need to be removed from the biography, since we don't include non-canon images in the article proper, just like we wouldn't include non-canon bio info. And I'm guessing that if the current infobox image wasn't available, then this shot would be used instead. We include promo photos in biographical sections because they can legitimately be considered canon. Take, for example, the cover of Cracken's Rebel Operatives, which, despite being conceptual art, has been retconned to be an IU scene. Regardless, the fact that this image features in the IU timeline of Star Wars: The Ultimate Visual Guide, along with dozens of other IU shots, would make it IU by my estimate. Just because an image appears on a cover doesn't mean it necessarily corresponds to the story; again, per Cracken's Rebel Operatives. There's nothing to suggest this image can't be canon. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:59, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 40) ******So you'd like to see something akin to "At some point in his existence, IG-72 stood alongside bounty hunter Jodo Kast; Jungen and Vytor Shrike, who may or may not have been bounty hunters at this point; and a LOM-series protocol droid on the planet Bespin" added to the article? Regardless of the IU-ness of the image - and it's appearance in The Ultimate Visual Guide doesn't really apply, because that was likely representing Boba Fett et al. - I just find that a little ridiculous, and it's interpreting the image way too literally. The cover is intended to portray the characters, not establish events that don't fit with the source. So, we can use it to portray the characters in articles no problem, but taking its entire content literally seems a bit much. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:58, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 41) *******I don't think it's too much to make a minor mention that at some point his travels took him to Cloud City. And of course this image in Ultimate Visual Guide applies since this image has been retconned to be him, not Boba Fett, regardless of the book's intent. Moreover, this same image is in Rebellion Era Sourcebook accompanying descriptions of Jodo Kast, etc., so you can't really say this doesn't apply. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:37, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 42) * Can we specify which sources these are? "However, later sources have established that the later option is the canonical outcome." Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 43) **It's got two ref tags - do you want me to spell it out in the prose? Thank you for the review. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 44) ***I went ahead and did so. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 45) * Following my BTS edits, I don't know what year this is referring to. 1995 or 1989? Also, what source describes this? Pretty vague here. "In the same year, an "IG-series assassin droid" is described as the companion of Dace Bonearm; subsequent sources have established this to be IG-72." Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 46) **Gah, that's very sloppy on my part. Should be good now. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 15:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Working on getting a better infobox image. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:14, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Due to constant removal of information/ addition of fanon, I have protected the article from anon editors. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 12:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Missile Boat

 * Nominated by: MIS Tau 1 22:28, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I've merged/deleted/restored this article similar to it's FA status

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Looks to be back where it was. Thefourdotelipsis 04:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Back to where it was when it was first reviewed. Cull Tremayne 10:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) A paragraph in History is unsourced. Also, wasn't Thrawn an admiral when the missile boat was developed? If so, you should refer to him as "Admiral Thrawn" in the intro.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 13:53, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) From the Chron-O-John of Green Tentacle:
 * 3) *The infobox isn't fully sourced.
 * 4) *Fourth paragraph of history isn't sourced.
 * 5) *"The abundance of missiles led to the development of previously unorthodox tactics, much to the chagrin of Imperial commanders, as advanced missiles were relatively expensive." Can you check that? I don't recall the game mentioning Imperial commanders having issues with its use.
 * 6) *"It was at this time that Thrawn revealed his new starfighter, the Missile Boat, to the Emperor." This too. Can't find a specific reference of when he first informed Palpy about it.
 * 7) *The hull's RU rating could be mentioned under shields and armor.
 * 8) *"Despite all efforts by Missile Boat pilots, the Empire was forced to evacuate the research platforms." V1 & V2 should probably be split into two articles, both of which should be linked in here.
 * 9) *"Missile Boats were responsible on more than one occasion for protecting convoys carrying other Missile Boats from Zaarin's raiders." Only one that I can find since the other was a decoy.
 * 10) *According to the game, Zaarin's destruction of the few Missile Boat manufacturing facilities also contributed to their withdrawal from service.
 * 11) *Maarek Stele should probably be mentioned a little earlier than he is, since he was involved in most of this. A little context for him might be useful too.
 * 12) *The BTS could be expanded a little. For example, the usual stuff about its first appearance and that it was limited to multiplayer in XWA.
 * 13) *There's no mention of the training missions. If not a training section, then they should at least be mentioned under history as they appear to be simulations of some of the ship's early uses. Green Tentacle (Talk) 22:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Image:Mis2zn2.gif needs work, and I don't think Image:MissileBoat-TFDOTEOSS.jpg is actually a book cover. I'm assuming simply fair use? —Xwing328 (Talk) 04:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Image:MissileBoat-TFDOTEOSS.jpg is from the back cover of the guide it's sourced to. Bookcover is used on that kind of excerpted image all over the place. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 02:28, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) *Also, since Image:Mis2zn2.gif was intended to highlight the DOS version of the game, which tops out at 256 colors, the only work it needed was to be converted from the deprecated GIF format, which is now done. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 21:56, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

IG-88A

 * Nominated by:  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Finally, it's done. The walking, canon defying droid!

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Killer. Cull Tremayne 19:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Excellent. Quite polished. Thefourdotelipsis 23:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Stuff
 * 2) * How sure are we that the picture being used is IG-88A? Isn't it more likely that it's IG-88B?
 * 3) **Added another image.
 * 4) ***Nice.
 * 5) * Can we get more detail on his reactivation? I'm thinking specifically in regards to his appearance in Star Wars 85: The Hero. How did he fail to capture Lando? What was his role there?
 * 6) **Added some info. I'm pretty sure that's all IG-88A did in that comic.
 * 7) *** Hate to object further, but it's missing a few key points as to how the comic concluded and IG-88A's role in it. Specifically, I'm thinking of the death of this guy, and some more details as to how Drebble failed to bring Lando back to his homeworld. Cull Tremayne 16:04, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) ****Expanded it a bit more. I don't want to stray too far from IG-88A.
 * 9) *****Much better.
 * 10) * In addition, is that really all we know about his role in YJK? You were able to get three whole sections just from the short story "I Think Therefore I Am". Surely more can be mined from three books than a paragraph and a half.
 * 11) **It's been expanded, but IG-88A is really a background character in the stories. He has a pretty minor role, and in Delusions of Grandeur he's only present for like one page.
 * 12) ***Fair enough.
 * 13) * Beef up the BtS please. Explain how TNEGtC explained that it was IG-88A in Marvel. Explain why it needs to be IG-88A in Forces of Corruption and not IG-88B. (He is able to infect the Death Star, etc.) Explain his weird appearance in Kenix Kil: The Bounty Hunters and why it needs to be IG-88A. I don't think it's specified that it's IG-88A in that story, there's only a pic of him.
 * 14) **BTS greatly expanded. Let me know if something still needs improvement.
 * 15) * Gotta question some of the sources and appearances there. Why do we assume that it's IG-88A in Lego Star Wars, or the Complete Visual Dictionary? Is he specifically mentioned as such? Unless IG-88A is mentioned specifically, it probably shouldn't be listed should it?
 * 16) **Corrected.
 * 17) * Sorta in conjunction with the previous objection. Should we be using Image:IG-88 equipment.jpg? It's essentially the same image as Image:IG88B.jpg, meant to represent IG-88B. So is this pic actually of IG-88A specifically?
 * 18) **Replaced.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 12:50, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 19) *Other than that, nice to see Count Droidfish's balonium wiped away. Nice job. Cull Tremayne 00:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 20) I think the Equipment and abilities section should be proseified and expanded. I'd expect it to be quite large given the amount of info I think we know. I think the P&T could be expanded a fair bit too; it should talk about his self-confidence or whatever you'd call it, his ambition, etc. The BtS could also be expanded a bit with his history and the original stuff from WEG/EGtC and the differences with it and Tales. (I know I said that wouldn't be necessary but on second thought I think it is). -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 00:29, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 21) *I still think a mention of the fact that his - or, at the time, "IG-88"'s - backstory originated from WEG (namely, Galaxy Guide 3), until Anderson adapted and expanded it. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 22) **Fixed now, I think.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 17:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 23) ***Looks good. I'd like to see the WEG stuff pushed up a little in the BtS, ideally before Therefore I Am is mentioned. You could go from talking about ESB to mentioning WEG creating the backstory, and then go on to Therefore I Am, and then go into the details about WEG, or something like that. That's my suggestion, anyway. :) Overall the BtS looks a little unwieldly...it could possibly be reorganized a tad, but I'll have a proper look tomorrow or Friday and get back to you on that with more specifics. The stuff about IG-88D and SotE doesn't seem very relevant, though - I'd suggest axing it. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:20, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 24) I think the BTS needs to be structured more appropriately for the character's OOU history; he wasn't really created for ESB if that character turned out not to even be him. Don't feel you have to do the standard linear "He was created for X, used in Y, etc." format if it doesn't really fit for the character. - Lord Hydronium 06:23, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 25) *Fixed.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 17:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 26) Xwing328's short list:
 * 27) *Is IG-88A equipped with regular blasters or blaster cannons? Infobox says one, "Equipment and abilities" says another.
 * 28) **Fixed.
 * 29) *Redlink in the infobox. —Xwing328 (Talk) 22:01, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 30) **Fixed. Thanks for the read.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * After reading IG-72, why not read this one?  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reviews, everyone.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Dur Gejjen

 * Nominated by:  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 08:11, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: This article was almost comically short before.

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 01:59, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Headshot! Boom!  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  23:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Jaina Solo:
 * 2) * There's no mention of his young family.
 * 3) **There isn't any real info on his family. Just that he's Nov Gejjen's son.
 * 4) * "Little did Gejjen know, the Galactic Alliance, Gejjen's enemies, had acquired proof that Gejjen was behind the assassination attempt on an Alliance ally, Tenel Ka."--How did they acquire the proof?
 * 5) **Addressed.
 * 6) * "Solo formulated a plan: Galactic Alliance Chief of State Cal Omas would meet Gejjen on the Deep Core planet of Vulpter. Omas would come under the guise of peace, calling for an end to the ever-escalating conflict between the Galactic Alliance and the Confederation forces."--This needs to be cleared up a little. If I recall, Jacen didn't plan the meeting between Omas and Gejjen. How did he know that Gejjen was meeting with Omas on Vulpter? -- Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 00:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) **Addressed.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 02:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Some concerns have been listed on his talk page by an anon. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 17:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) *They have been addressed.  IFYLOFD  ( Come with me if you want to live. ) 02:28, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) Chack Attack:
 * 11) * Your quote says that Antilles resigned, but twice in the article you say that Gejjen fired him. Which is it?
 * 12) *It's weird. He fire him, but Wedge basically said "You can't fire me, because I quit!"
 * 13) **I'd like to see it clarified a bit in the article. Something to the effect of: "Though Gejjen tried to fire Antilles, the general resigned instead" would be good.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) * "set up the coup on the life of Sal-Solo." This should be rewritten to make it smoother.
 * 15) *Addressed.  IFYLOFD  ( Come with me if you want to live. ) 00:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) *Otherwise, it's very good.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 13:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) From the desk of Atarumaster88
 * 18) *It'd be nice if some reasoning for his assassination attempt on Antilles was succinctly explained in the intro.
 * 19) *"asking Gejjen to keep contact to a minimum, and to feed information of Sal-Solo's location for the time being." This doesn't make sense and/or is awkwardly wording. How are they supposed to get Sal-Solo's location with minimal contact?
 * 20) *"The plan was carried out and Sal-Solo was killed, with Fett teaming up with his granddaughter Mirta Gev and Han Solo." This last clause doesn't really fit well here.
 * 21) *"Angered by Antilles' failure, he demoted Antilles from his position as Five Worlds military commander," Unclear antecedent.
 * 22) *Have a Super Terrific Friendly Un-frustrating day. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Sev'rance Tann

 * Nominated by: -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) What, no support yet? Seems OK to me Enochf 20:10, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) From the desk of Atarumaster88
 * 2) *Seems to me that there should be some more battle links in the intro. Tann stole the Decimators. Another possible link for her death on Krant, no?
 * 3) **Linked Battle of Krant, every other battle is already linked.
 * 4) *The link between Sarapin and plunging the Core into darkness is not contextified in the intro.
 * 5) **To be honest I don't think it really needs to be - this happened and this happened as a result of it, and the specifics of why aren't particularly important at this point - but I've added in a small mention of the geothermal generators.
 * 6) *"Although very successful," A bit POVish. (intro).
 * 7) **Reworked a tad.
 * 8) *"Welcome to the Sarapin System, Sev'Rane. You now stand before one of the most heavily guarded planets in the Galaxy" Is the typo in her name in the game?
 * 9) **Nope, Enochf fixed it.
 * 10) *Second paragraph of "Into the Core Worlds" could use some variety with diction. Particularly since we're talking about "power relays", the word "powerful" just seems . . . off. I dunno, could just be me.
 * 11) *Contextify Jabba on first mention.
 * "k, they are not referring to in the game itself, so presumably others were unaware of her origins" Wording is a bit off here.
 * 1) *All small objections overall&mdash;good work, Acky. Have a Super Terrific Friendly Un-frustrating day. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 02:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Blah
 * 3) *In the Battles on Sarapin section: "Additionally, lava blowholes dotted the area, with magma containing deep within fissures spitting out frequently, destroying anything that was standing over the blowhole." Needs a reword. Is this supposed to be, "with magma contained deep within fissures that spewed lava frequently"? Or something similar?
 * 4) *Under the P&T, end of second section: "she killed one of the wild creatures she had been told to tame despite him having done nothing wrong, in order to engender obedience among his comrades." The length of this sentence is a bit unwieldy, mind splitting it up?
 * 5) *Last sentence of P&T: "Ultimately, Tann was more at home as the general than the Dark Acolyte; none were able to outfox her tactically during the month she lasted of the Clone Wars, but she was defeated in lightsaber combat." Why the general and the Dark Acolyte? Should that be "as a general" and "than a Dark Acolyte"? Only because "the Dark Acolyte" reads weird, since there were plenty of them. Additionally, "during the month she lasted of the Clone Wars". Is "of the Clone Wars" the best way to say that? This whole sentence could use a reword. Cull Tremayne 08:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Nice work on the images there :) Yrfeloran 06:50, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I notice that you mention that Tann lead from the front several times, with the source linking to the game. Can we be sure that this isn't just game mechanics, or the gamer's choice? You don't have to bring Tann along on all these attacks do you? In fact, can't you just load her into a shuttle or something and bring her along? If its possible to play the game without her leading from the front, should those mentions remain? Cull Tremayne 08:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Is there any info to necessitate a "Powers and abilities" section, as she is a Dark Jedi? —Xwing328 (Talk) 06:36, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Krag (Zorbian)

 * Nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis 12:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Ewoks line also had a very gay pirate...

(4 Inqs/1 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) He was really an uncommon villain. When he said "and such a pretty one at that" (about Princess Kneesaa a Jari Kintaka), we can't assure if he was on envy or having a crush on her. -- Delmar Nori 01:48, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) What is it with you, and, ah, pirates? Reddjak and now Krag? :P  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  23:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Cull Tremayne 21:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Though what's up with the quote in the "Expedition" section? Seems like a coding mishap of sorts. --Imperialles 12:12, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) &mdash;  Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 01:01, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Not necessarily an objection, but is there a specific reason that Kneesaa isn't referred to by her surname? Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:13, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * "Kneesaa a Jari Kintaka" appears on the head text and during two sessions of the article. The princess' surnames were revealed only on The Essential Guide to Alien Species (2001), after all her appearances until now. Maybe the writers didn't wish to remember Kneesaa's full name during all the article. -- Delmar Nori 01:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments


 * I think Krag only knew that Kneesaa was a very pretty girl, although her species wasn't a model of beauty (Ewoks were beautiful only for those who likes teddy bears or similar creatures). I think that's not envy. Wicket would become jealously, if had seen Krag stroking Kneesaa's chin. -- Delmar Nori 01:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe Chirpa's ass was in the way or something. :P Thefourdotelipsis 22:54, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

T1-LB

 * Nominated by: Ajeanette 6 January 2009

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Chack Attack:
 * 2) *"T1-LB, nicknamed "Elbee" by Jedi Padawan Zayne Carrick, was a one of the LB-series bulk-loading droids in service for the Jedi Academy on the planet Taris." Could you add a date for this?
 * 3) *Addressed Ajeanette 31 January 2009
 * 4) *"However, Zayne Carrick survived the attack." Presumably, he was targeted then. This needs a bit more context.
 * 5) *Addressed Ajeanette 31 January 2009
 * 6) *"until his latest function for the Jedi Tower and Academy located on the planet Taris" Bad wording. Also, what was this function?
 * 7) *Addressed. I also mentioned the function earlier in the same paragraph. Ajeanette 31 January 2009
 * 8) *"At the time of the vision each of their Padawans wore a red suit while navigating by the Force to the camp leading the Masters to conclude that one of their own Padawans would bring about the return of the Sith and endanger the galaxy." Run on sentence here.
 * 9) *"go between" A little too colloquial
 * 10) *Addressed Ajeanette 31 January 2009
 * 11) *"decided that they would strike down their Padawans in response to the vision when he discovered that T1-LB had witnessed the entire scene." This is confusing. T1 witnessed the vision?
 * 12) *Addressed Ajeanette 31 January 2009
 * 13) *"one of the Padawans, who had escaped his Masters after they killed his four classmates and attempted to do the same to him" This wording could be a little better.
 * 14) *"Last Resort departed for the war front where Mandalorians and Republic forces were bogged down, but as supplies began to run low the fugitives raided a mining colony on the planet Vanquo" This is also a bit of a run on sentence, and should be rewritten.
 * 15) *"but in order for T1-LB to perform any command his companions often had to employ reverse psychology or references to Lucien Draay" This would go better in P&T, which I see you already have. Perhaps expand on that a bit.
 * 16) *"Then Camper directed the starship towards Jarael's location" Awkward wording.
 * 17) *When Jarael reached the droid" Can you rephrase this?
 * 18) *That's it.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 20:10, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Telos IV

 * Nominated by: Cylka  -talk- 23:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My first FA nom. On advice from Graestan...

(2 Inqs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Graestan ( Talk ) 23:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Nice job. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 23:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash;  Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 17:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Object &mdash; Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 17:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) A couple of noodles from the Pasta Bowl:
 * 2) * "Telos once possessed an enormous planet-wide polar irrigation system, one that rivaled Coruscant's own." Seems POV-ish. I do not recall anything in TSL that says it rivaled Coruscant.
 * 3) **Bao-Dur does comment on it being "like the one on Coruscant". The sentence has been so amended.
 * 4) ***Fair enough, but "very" was removed, as that is PoV-ish.
 * 5) * I believe, although I could be incorrect, but the history section needs GameLS and Endgame for the portions pertaining to the Exile's mission on Telos.
 * 6) **The template(s) have been added.
 * 7) * "The search for the ship led the Exile's group to an old military base&hellip;" Is there an article on the military base? I believe a link is needed, but I cannot seem to find the article.
 * 8) **There is an article. Link has been inserted.
 * 9) * When mentioning the arrival of Carth Onasi, I think it might be beneficial to mention there that he was a Telosian. It serves as a plot point for his motivation in the game.
 * 10) **Added.
 * 11) *Otherwise, nice article, Cylka.
 * 12) **Objections addressed.-- Goodwood [[Image:Redstarbird.svg|20px]] ( Alliance Intelligence ) 01:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Karazak Slaver's Cooperative

 * Nominated by: Skippy Farlstendoiro 19:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My first FA nomination. Correct the article wherever is needed, please. Correct me wherever I need.

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Hi Skippy. Could you expand the introduction of the article a bit more. Could you also add a couple of sentences to the Behind the scenes about when the KSC first appeared in canon, and later developments, etc. Also, could you remove the references in the intro paragraph, and, while keeping the various names in the intro, also place that information in the main body of the article as well. --Eyrezer 14:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done, done and done. Only the first sources and appearances are listed in BtS; I don't want to re-tell the list of sources and appearances in prose.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 11:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Cav's squadron briefing:
 * 4) * Acquisitions specialists were also used to define the potential value and risk of a specific person or small group, if a contract for them was possible. Not sure what you mean here - are they used to scout out potential targets already identified, or to find them and offer them for sale?
 * 5) **Canonically, only after a request. Changed.
 * 6) *The developer, maximum responsible of the operation, was to coordinate the plans with strike team leaders, and to give the final "go". Sometimes, the executive leadership of the Cooperative could differ the developer's judgement. These sentences appear to be missing a few words, or use the wrong ones in some places. Please revise to give some clarity.
 * 7) **Reworded it; I hope it's clearer now.
 * 8) ***I changed something to make it a little clearer - can you check that it is correct?
 * 9) ****Looks like what I understand reading the OS. I mean: Yes, it's correct.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 13:01, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) * Any information of what the Slavers did with the subjects they bought off Thulaka?
 * 11) **No idea. The KSC might sell them or eat them for what I know. No changes to the article.
 * 12) ***Fair enough.
 * 13) * At least three teams - three teams of who or what?
 * 14) **Changed: Strike teams, as defined in the same article.
 * 15) * Check your source ref tags - the should come after punctuation, not before. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 19:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 16) **Done except twice: Before a hyphen and before a closed parenthesis; in both cases I thought it would have been ambiguous otherwise. Tell me to change it and I will.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 11:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) ***Generally, I would avoid using parenthesis altogether in an article, and have removed two and replaced them with &mdash; instead. I would look to remove any and work them into the article body as sentences. I think using a ref tag before a hyphen is the standard; I'm sure I've used it myself. Nice work, Farl - told you that you could produce a FAN :) Just check the unstruck objection for me, and I'll support it. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 19:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Lancer Brunou

 * Nomination by: Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 14:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: DarkStryder is back. Beware.

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 17:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  20:28, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Toprawa:
 * 2) *Can something not be worked into the article explaining, per the BTS, that he eventually jumped ship to return to Sarne?
 * 3) **I'm not entirely sure it can be. Brunou has no fixed fate in the adventure, leaving it to the whim of the gamemaster and players. He's not mentioned again in the series, and adding a possible fate when there is a choice of two seems to close to speculation.
 * 4) ***My concern and interpretation of this is that the article asserts he survives as long as until the artifact is chucked out into space. Is there more adventure content that can happen after this point in which he can still die/not die? I'm taking this to mean that even though he can die at any point, the article asserts he lives and thus I would think that he would live long enough to join the FarStar and abandon ship, if you understand what I'm saying. Is this incorrect? Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) * Not an objection, but I made a minor change in wording here, and I just want to make sure I haven't changed the meaning here at all: "and he ordered Jelok to abandon the secondary base camp after he reported Tansad missing and that two technicians with him were shot by sniper fire from the jungle." Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) **Seems fine to me. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 15:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) Some things:
 * 8) * You refer to the enemies as both hostiles, and "hostiles". Please standardize it.
 * 9) **Standardized to hostiles without the quotation marks.
 * 10) * Also, are there any more details on what/who exactly the hostiles are? Are they the missing troopers?
 * 11) **That's my reading of it, implied by the fact that the Plaque of Victory increases hostile feelings and turns people against each other, and that the troops who went out in search of the hostiles turn up dead in the exact spot that the remaining troopers fired at. However, it's never spelt out specifically in the article. Add this to the fact that there is an adventure hook that shows that the Aaris species are not entirely extinct, makes it a little unclear, so I erred on the side of caution on this one by not pinning it down. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 15:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 12) *Good job, Cav.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 19:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Horton Salm

 * Nomination by: Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 12:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Shock horror! Non-DarkStryder nom goodness!

(1 Inqs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) "Gray Leader, standing by."  Graestan ( Talk ) 17:18, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2)  Grunny  (Talk) 06:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) From Graestan the Mighty:
 * 2) * Cav. Cav. Cav, Cav, Cav. You don't mention Y-wings in the intro whatsoever.
 * 3) **Grae. Grae, Grae, Grae, Grae. I do now.
 * 4) * It should be mentioned in the bio that Gray Squadron and Aggressor Wing flew S3s, and that Defender wing flew A4s (source for the A4s being Wedge's Gamble).
 * 5) **Mentions included.
 * 6) * Jake Farrell also flew on the Death Star run.
 * 7) **Discussed in IRC.
 * 8) * A mention of Commando Team One in the Brentaal section would be more than appropriate.
 * 9) **Discussed in IRC.
 * 10) * Second paragraph of "Initial raid" is a bit unwieldy.
 * 11) **Split into two paragraphs.
 * 12) * "Training commander" is an incredibly long section with one monster of a paragraph at the beginning. Please restructure.
 * 13) **Broken up, split into sections.
 * 14) * Same with the second paragraph of "The First Battle of Borleias."
 * 15) **Broken up into two paragraphs.
 * 16) *More later. Graestan ( Talk ) 06:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) **I am awash with anticipation :P - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 13:28, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 18) * Context for the Redemption scenario.
 * 19) **Added.
 * 20) * Context for Home One.</s.
 * 21) **Added.
 * 22) * You should mention that the pilots were kept in the dark as to Boreleias's location if you're to later mention that Horn found the location through Whistler's data.
 * 23) **Added.
 * 24) * Context for the Katana fleet.
 * 25) **Added. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 10:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 26) *That's all. Graestan ( Talk ) 03:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 27) Okay, I had to come back with one more. No Fact File information? If so, any you want to share? ^_^  Graestan ( Talk ) 05:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 28) *Struck before I added, eh? Trusting of you :) Found and added in any case. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 09:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Several of the internal links to the Battle of Brentaal IV article don't quite match up yet - they will do when I post my rewrite of that article in the next day or two. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 12:19, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Sio Bibble

 * Nomination by: Thefourdotelipsis 10:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Old-school GA. Outrageously good.

(1 Inqs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Treacherous bubble!  Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 11:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) --Skippy Farlstendoiro 11:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Farlstendoiro speaking. Does anybody copy?
 * 2) * Dren Melne is repeatedly called "Melene".
 * 3) * More context in the following:
 * 4) ** taken to Camp Four for "processing." What does "processing" mean exactly? If source does not specify, what about taken to Camp Four for something the Federation called, euphemistically, "processing"
 * 5) ***Removed processing altogether. Besides, I didn't like the "Four for". :P
 * 6) ** claiming that the death toll from the occupation was reaching "catastrophic" levels The death toll of whom? Naboo people? Soldiers? Civilians? Federation people? Both? Others? Who is dying? Why?
 * 7) ***We don't even know if that's true. It could have been a fabrication at Gunray's behest, it could be in earnest...I figure the way to play it safe is to use the exact wording, and stay vague.>
 * 8) ** helping Amidala present Nass with the Globe of Peace. What's the Globe of Peace and why are they presenting it to Nass? What about: helping Amidala present Nass with the Globe of Peace as a gesture of good faith and continued relations between the Naboo and the Gungans (if that's what they did)
 * 9) ***Again, I really don't know. I figure if people want to know about that, they'll click on the link. Plus, I think people will figure out enough from the name of the object. Thefourdotelipsis 11:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) *I don't usually vote FA because user votes don't hold any real value; but Sio's going to get my vote soon.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 09:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) **Thanks for the review, Farl. Thefourdotelipsis 10:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 12) Chack Attack:
 * 13) *"Bibble was disappointed with the lack of result, and did not look forward to informing Amidala about the lack of developments." Guess. Hint: you use a certain "l" word too much.
 * 14) *"considered himself a philosopher." Could "and a pacifist" be added in there too to make it a bit more, well, sensible?
 * 15) *"of their eliminated communications capacity." I suggest changing this to read something like "of the comm jamming" or whatever.
 * 16) *Otherwise, sweet. Oh, and "balk", not "baulk". :P  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:06, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Brentaal IV (Galactic Civil War)

 * Nomination by: Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 14:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Complimenting Horton Salm above, and Dar Keyis over on the GAN page.

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  14:05, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Why did Fel want to find his wife? Some context on this would be helpful. Otherwise, nice work, though beware of British spellings.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  14:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *Added some context. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 09:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Mission to Prakith

 * Nomination by: —Tommy9281 [[Image:Dark Side Master TotG.jpg|17px]] ( Peace is a lie ) 04:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Nomination comments: And so it is with this one as it has been with those that came before&hellip;minus the flowers ;)

(0 Inqs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Darth Acheron123
 * 06:48, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Visas Marr

 * Nomination by: Cylka  -talk- 01:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It appears that one can never move too quickly.

(1 Inqs/5 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good stuff, Cylka.-- Goodwood [[Image:Redstarbird.svg|20px]] ( Alliance Intelligence ) 02:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Sure, sure, win Round One, get a head start on Round 2 :P NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 03:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Why do I get the sense WP:KOTOR is gearing up for a WP:TOTJ-like run?  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  21:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Good as far as I'm concerned.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 17:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 23:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Once again, great work on this one! 05:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Chack Attack:
 * 2) * "The Sith Lord Darth Nihilus, one of the leaders of the Sith Triumvirate, brought devastation to the world as well as the Jedi Order, killing all organic life, yet leaving Marr alive, albeit with damaged vision." Split this, and talk about the destruction of the Order more.
 * 3) **Split and elaborated.
 * 4) * Clarify that Nihilus is this foe when first mentioning him in the body.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * "Marr's first genuine encounter with the Exile left her disquieted. It had been some time since someone was concerned more for her well being than her physical state. She felt that the mercy the Exile showed not only towards her, but others as well, would serve as a weapon for her enemies. Nevertheless, impressed by the Exile's skills, Marr rediscovered hope and came to consider that perhaps the universe was not as her master had showed her, and that maybe with her help the Exile might be able to stop him. She found solace in the knowledge that her master did not understand nor see the Exile. But she cautioned that the Exile needed to understand why this was if she was to have a chance at defeating Nihilus. She refused to guide the Exile to him untested and without her potential realized, as she felt the Jedi was not yet ready to face such a threat and feared to lose her only hope. She foresaw that they would meet in the near future, however." This just seems a bit too flowery, and that it could be simplified a bit (moreso the second part of my objection).
 * 7) **It's been cut down a bit and simplified.
 * 8) * "Marr felt compelled to behold what lay beneath Nihilus's death mask in order to sever the last remaining bond between them." What was beneath it? "A man, nothing more" right?
 * 9) **Added that in.
 * 10) * At one point you pipelink Darth Traya to Kreia. I'd explain a liitle that Kreia was Traya.
 * 11) **Explanation added.
 * 12) * Intro exclusive info, when you say that she would help rebuild the Jedi Order.
 * 13) **It's in there now.
 * 14) * Context on Mira.
 * 15) **Added in.
 * 16) *Otherwise, it's excellent. Good work.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 01:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 17) **Addressed by Goodwood  [[Image:Redstarbird.svg|20px]] ( Alliance Intelligence ) 02:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 18) There's a lot of short and fragmented paragraphs here, especially in the "Powers and abilities" and "Behind the scenes" sections. Try and merge a few paragraphs, or flesh them out enough to warrant being single. The current style looks a bit too "trivia list"-like, in my opinion. This objection falls under FA rule #1. --Imperialles 12:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 19) *Addressed. Cylka  -talk- 16:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Gjon

 * Nomination by:  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 01:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More fun than a pillow fight!

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 06:50, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) I want sources for the BTS stuff, especially the MGR-1 factoid. --Imperialles 11:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *Sourced the missile thing. Tell me if you think it's not an "official" enough site and I'll change it. As for the rest, I think they're all self-sourcing, making referencing redundant, but if you still want them to be referenced, I'll do it.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 13:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) **Well, "official-er" is better. Anyway, thanks; objection struck. --Imperialles 14:56, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Chack, I checked the CSWE, and it refers to Gjon as a M'haeli rather than a H'drachi. Also, it makes mention of a cybernetic tool extension in place of a right arm. These need to be added into the article. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 17:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) *I saw that too in CSWE, and it turns out that M'haeli is simply the H'drachi homeworld. I suppose that should be added for homeworld then. As for the tool extension info, I'll add that too.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 18:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments
 * Just passed GA. 1,104 words.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 01:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Arhul Hextrophon

 * Nomination by: Green Tentacle (Talk) 23:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Can't let his assistant upstage him.

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Historians Anonymous.  Graestan ( Talk ) 06:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 13:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Jutka

 * Nomination by: Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 15:31, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Inspired by the CWSE not realizing that a Tuhgri and a Human are different species. But, hey - it's DarkStryder!

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 06:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Substance
 * 2) * Intro: "Tracking the signal, they discovered a damaged mining drone that Jutka hoped could be used to signal their homeworld, or attract rescuers to their plight." Who is "they"? Did you specify earlier who was in the escape pod? The whole crew of the ship? The pronoun doesn't give enough info IMO.
 * 3) **Added clarification of who is in the pod to the intro (and bio), replaced "they" with "Tuhgri".
 * 4) * In the P&T: "Although initially wary of the FarStar crew, he was able to be diplomatic when he realized that they meant them no harm and convinced them to work together towards a common goal." Who is "them"? You go from Jutka being diplomatic then directly to the FarStar meaning "them" no harm? This whole sentence just gets confusing near the end. Could some of the pronouns be swapped in order to clarify who is working with who?
 * 5) **Reworded. Hopefully it is clearer now.
 * 6) * Is that all that can be said in the BtS? Aren't there non-canon RPG paths that can be elaborated upon? For example, is it possible for the FarStar crew to kill the Tughri during that first encounter when they appear hostile? A little elaboration about his use in the RPG might be worth it. Cull Tremayne 02:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) **Added a little about the other option that can be taken upon first meeting Jutka and the Tuhgri. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 09:51, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Nice job. Cull Tremayne 06:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Skor II

 * Nomination by: ~ SavageBob 04:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I've been working to expand and update the Squib article to get its FA status restored, but I thought I'd do a little work on their homeworld while I was at it.

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) -- Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 12:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * 1) Cav's squadron reclamation:
 * 2) * In the infobox, you give Skor II's location in the Calaron sector as a definite location, but in the body of the article, you say it may lie in the sector. While I understand that Rebellions information is occasionally fuzzy on planet location, the article must be consistent with itself. So either it is the Calaron sector, and the main article reference changed to reflect this; or if it is only the possibility, then the infobox reference should reflect this; or remove all references to its sector location from the main body of the article, and keep it all in the BTS. - Cavalier One' [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 12:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) **Hmm. Thanks for the reasoned objection. I was following the lead of Gandolo IV, another featured article on a planet, that does the same thing with the planet's distance from Coruscant. Perhaps that article needs updating. I'll think over the choices and change the Skor II article to comply with one of your suggestions soon. Thanks again, ~ SavageBob 22:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) **OK, I think it's probably best to reserve ambiguously canonical information such as this to the Behind the Scenes section, so I've removed the mentions of the Calaron sector from the infobox and the main part of the article. Would you mind taking another look? ~ SavageBob 12:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) **Actually, on second thought, most articles with ties to Rebellion seem to take the attitude of "treat it as canon unless a later source says otherwise." Considering the nebulous location of the Calaron sector, I guess it's best to keep this info in for now. ~ SavageBob 12:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) ***That would have been my choice, too, but with the additional contradictory information I thought it best to leave it up to you since you had done the legwork on the research. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 12:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Unless it has been placed into a different sector, the REB placement stands. Leland Chee's ruling on REB placements can be found here. You can use that to reference your decision in the BTS. I dealt with a similar situation in Atrivis sector, if you want to check that BTS. --Eyrezer 21:29, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) *****Ah, thanks for the link. I've added a note about this to the article. ~ SavageBob 07:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Green Squadron pilot (Battle of Endor)

 * Nominated by: Graestan ( Talk ) 17:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Copy, Gold Leader!" Graestan ( Talk ) 17:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

(5 Inqs/1 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) If only the power of the AgriCorps worked here... Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 20:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer 21:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) -- Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 10:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) Bah, my vote edit conflicted the other day, apparently. &mdash;  Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 23:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Under "Personality and traits" is the following phrase: "the Green Group pilot complied". Is there a reason for saying "Group"? If not, then I think it needs to be changed to "Squadron" to be consistent with the rest of the article. Otherwise it is a very well-written article. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 04:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh, I was just trying to go more with the movie, which never mentions squadrons at all and instead calls the fighter units "group." But I've changed the instances over to "squadron" as you've asked. Graestan ( Talk ) 23:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) **As long as it's consistent - that's what counts. Good job overall. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 23:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments


 * Cracked 1K words. This guy ain't Jake Farrell, for the last time. All sources have been researched. Graestan ( Talk ) 17:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Darth Azard

 * Nominated by:  Grunny  (Talk) 12:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My first FA nom :)

(2 Inqs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Support thee, I do. —Tommy9281 [[Image:Dark Side Master TotG.jpg|17px]] ( Peace is a lie ) 22:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Already raked this squid over the coals on the GAN.  Graestan ( Talk ) 22:39, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 23:12, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 06:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * Azard appears in the latest Legacy issue, Star Wars Legacy 32: Fight Another Day, Part 1. It looks like he'll also be appearing in issue 33 as well. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 00:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I've added Legacy 32. I'll just have to wait until Legacy 33 comes out :).  Grunny  (Talk) 03:21, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Ozzik Sturn

 * Nominated by: Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 23:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Wait, let's be civil!

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 23:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Soresu
 * 2) * Sex and race should be in intro
 * 3) **Done. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 14:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) * IIRC, Wookiees are hostile to Starkiller too during his mission to destroy the tractor pins. If so, you need say that Wookiees were also killed by him along with the stormtroopers. 07:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) **Wookiees are not hostile to Starkiller; you as the player can kill them, but they don't try to kill you. As a matter of fact, they try to help you. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 14:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) ***I must have killed them for fun without realizing they weren't enemies :P. They're like animals, and I slaughtered them like animals! 23:34, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Brianna

 * Nominated by: 01:42, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Nomination comments: As recommended, trying for FA after GA success.

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 06:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

S-100 Stinger-class starfighter

 * Nominated by: Graestan ( Talk ) 06:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: One-shot deal. Graestan ( Talk ) 06:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

(1 Inqs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) -- Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 11:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Cylka  <font color=#00A693>-talk- 05:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 12:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Cav's squadron briefing:
 * 2) * "Passengers: None" is unsourced in the infobox.
 * 3) **Done. Graestan ( Talk ) 00:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) * In the "Role" section: "before newer craft capable of carrying more armor for their ion engines' capacity were developed." This is a little unclear; I assume it has to do with some type of power to weight ratio, but I could be wrong. Please reword a little for clarity.
 * 5) **Explained more explicitly.
 * 6) * Again, "Role" section: "Because of their light armament off the manufacturing line, the Republic authorized the S-100 for civilian purchase." I assume this means that the fighters were sold to the civilian market without modifications or downgrading from military specs? You mention that they were sold with stock armament in the History section. If so, a little mention of this might be needed here. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 14:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) **Let me know how I've done with this one. Thanks for your review. Graestan ( Talk ) 00:19, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) Cylka:
 * 9) * Were the Jedi pilots that were testing the Star Saber XC-01 starfighters based on Ossus as well? It seems a bit unclear to me.
 * 10) **Added a more suitable descriptor to Ossus. Graestan ( Talk ) 23:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) * Maybe it might be worth mentioning that even though the Stingers were sold to civilians, civilians were thought to be better off with freighters or transports for their needs since the Stinger's stock weapons wouldn't provide them with much protection.
 * 12) **Added. Graestan ( Talk ) 23:11, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 13) *It'll be nice to steal a little of this glory for the KotOR project. :-P <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: times, cursive; font-size: 16px"><font color=#008080>Cylka  <span style="font-family: times, cursive; font-size: 13px"><font color=#00A693>-talk- 17:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 14) In the intro, you state that it is 11.5 metres in length, while in the infobox and body, you state that it is 11.  06:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 15) *11. Fixed. Graestan ( Talk ) 07:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Keir Santage

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel )
 * Nomination comments: You've got Tycho Celchu, and Lando Calrissian, Horton Salm and Green Squadron pilot are all up on this page. Introducing the latest in the completely informal series "Pilots who made the Death Star II run"&mdash;Keir Santage! And its 1,047 words. So add, don't subtract. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 13:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Graestan ( Talk ) 16:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Copy, Gold Leader:
 * 2) * The pipelink for "Ordnance and Supply Command" looks like a decapitalized proper noun. Could we perhaps either tweak the wording of the pipe or simply link the article? Same thing in the bio.
 * 3) **Not sure on the this one. The source (Santage's CCG card) has procurement as decapitalized. A little research told me that procurement was under the auspices of the Ordnance and Supply Command, hence the pipelink. I think procurement, in terms of the card, was intended as a hint to a game mechanic of Santage's - namely that starfighters have a lower deploy cost at his location. So therefore, I took procurement to mean the O/S Command, but kept it decapitalized as per the source.
 * 4) * Can we break the bio in two with a "Battle of Endor" section? It's up to you. Maybe one of the quotes inside the Death Star would be appropriate as a header.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * You should probably reword the listing of the reactor assault group to reflect that Celchu was in Green Squadron and Salm was Gray Leader&mdash;as it stands, it sounds as though they were in Red or Gold Squadron.
 * 7) **Done.
 * 8) * I don't believe it can be said definitively by Rogue Squadron that Santage flew with Janson and Klivian at all.
 * 9) **I went with the Rogue=Red, Red was known to include both Klivian and Janson at the time of the Battle of Endor (Galaxy Guide 5). I've removed the reference, though, just in case. - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 11:17, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 10) *Great work. I'm loving what we're doing, here. Graestan ( Talk ) 05:21, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) **Me too. Now I have two projects .... - Cavalier One [[Image:FarStar Logo.jpg|20px]]( Squadron channel ) 11:17, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Comments

Maren Kelsome

 * Nominated by: Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:46, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Crushed by AT-AT.

(1 Inqs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  20:08, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 21:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) How can you not notice an AT-AT creeping up behind you, even if it's going fast and you're on the comlink? It wasn't hiding behind a tree or anything. 07:19, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Darth Reave

 * Nominated by: —Tommy  [[Image:Dark Side Master TotG.jpg|17px]] ( Nine two eight one ) 15:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I am not mistaken my Lord! It was Tommy9281 I saw on the GAN!

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Oppose

Comments

Denal

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Be mindful of the Living Force...[[Image:Quigonheadshot.jpg|16px]] 17:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My first-ever FA nom.

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Oppose

Comments
 * Only slightly less cooler than Rex. QuiGonJinn Be mindful of the Living Force...[[Image:Quigonheadshot.jpg|16px]] 17:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)