Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified speeder (Grand Army of the Republic)


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified speeder (Grand Army of the Republic)

 * Nominated by: Tm_T(Talk) 00:05, August 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I know you love it, you definately do.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hey, why not? Menkooroo 01:30, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) --  1358  (Talk) 11:20, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 13:41, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Jujiggum
 * 2) * What evidence do you have for this being "presumably" a 2-seat variant of the BARC speeder? This sounds like speculation to me.
 * 3) **Hopefully sufficiently fixed
 * 4) ***Okay, but please check your grammar here. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 00:08, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Is it ok now? --Tm_T(Talk) 05:23, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) * The BTS should specify why this is ambiguously canon.
 * 7) **Apparently isn't, tag removed
 * 8) ***You mean this is non-canon? Then it needs to be tagged as such, and you should also mention that in the BTS. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 00:08, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Apparently licensed toys are canon as is.
 * 10) *****Okay; I've stricken the objection, but it would probably still be good to make a BTS note of its canonicity, just noting that liscenced toys are canon. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 00:58, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) ******Done. --Tm_T(Talk) 05:23, September 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * 12) *******Hey, just letting you know that I removed the little bit that said it was canon because now that it says that it was liscenced, it's unneeded. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 13:41, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * 13) * Also, where did you get the "BARC-2 speeder" name? If it's conjectural, then it shouldn't be bolded in full form in the intro.
 * 14) **Bolding removed, some explanation about the name in the Bts.
 * 15) ***Please check your grammar in the BTS; also, since the name is completely conjectural, I would suggest actually moving the title of the article to something more appropriate. Maybe something along the lines of "Unidentified speeder (BARC design)" or something similar. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 00:08, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 16) ****Would "Unidentified speeder (Grand Army of the Republic) or equivalent do? --Tm_T(Talk) 18:01, August 29, 2010 (UTC)
 * 17) *****Sounds fine to me. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 00:58, September 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 18) *That's all. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 15:39, August 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * 19) **Good points rised, thanks. --Tm_T(Talk) 20:39, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * Cleaned up a bit of grammar. "Sans" didn't really work, and even if it had, I don't think it's... enough of an English word to be used on an English encyclopedia. Menkooroo 01:30, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, appreciate it. --Tm_T(Talk) 08:16, September 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, I hid the table of contents with NOTOC. Menkooroo 01:35, September 2, 2010 (UTC)