Wookieepedia:Userbox proposal

This page is for the nomination of new userboxes. For past nominations, see Userbox proposal/History.

Before you create
Before you propose a userbox, read the following:


 * 1) No nonsense or joke templates. What you think may be funny may not be to everyone else, so it's best to just keep it on your userpage.
 * 2) If you are creating a Star Wars themed userbox, try and keep it OOU (i.e. "This user is a fan of Jedi" is good, but "This user is a member of the New Jedi Order" is not).
 * 3) Any offensive/racist/provocative userbox proposals will be deleted on sight, and the user warned. If the user persists, he/she will be banned.
 * 4) Due to being inflammatory, any religious and political userboxes that are nominated here will be automatically rejected, so don't bother.
 * 5) When nominating a template, keep in mind that the template will be for community use, not just your exclusive use. As a rule of thumb, if you think at least 10 people will use your idea, nominate it. If not, it's best left as code on your userpage.

To use this page:


 * 1) Use the current date as a header, and add the code of the proposed userbox underneath (use the following syntax:  ).
 * 2) Multiple userbox proposals should be presented separately so that the community can vote on each userbox based on its individual merit. Up to three userboxes may be presented for approval under one vote, if and only if, they are closely related in theme or are proposed as alternatives.
 * 3) Add sections underneath for "Support", "Object", and "Comments". Your fellow Wookieepedians will use these sections to support, oppose, or comment on your design.
 * 4) Once a majority has been reached, and two weeks have passed, the userbox will be created as a template for use in the community. If the nomination fails, the template must not be created regardless. If it is, then it will be deleted on sight, and the offender warned.

Support

 * 07:05, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Great idea --Jedimca0 (, Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 07:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) We have user BS, do we not? How does the Zann Consortium fall into the excessive userbox category, yet other criminal and lesser-known orginizations don't? 17:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, if only because relatively smaller organizations like the Hapes Consortium have their own userboxes. Plus, I've found myself categorizing more than a few articles dealing with them, so I'm all in favor of getting their name out there.  If you think it's an excessive userbox, there's a userbox out there to let you say so.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) "This user supports the Odra Insurrection!". .  .  .  .  09:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This user supports very few "This user supports..." userboxes. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) This user supports pants! Havac 17:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) This user WOULD support this userbox if the Zann Consortium appeared in even half the sources that Black Sun did. <:) &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 18:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As nominator. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 15:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) If people need a userbox to be able to tell what your user name is then they have a serious problem. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 15:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This is for their real name. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 15:46, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * So, then, what goes where the image would be? Their real picture? "That's like putting your whole mouth in the bowl!" .  .  .  .  02:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Uh, their name. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 11:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Again? That's like putting your mouth in the bowl twice! .  .  .  .  21:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 15:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) .  .  .  .  09:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) This user's name is not important, and he doesn't like this idea anyway. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Even Captain Obvious wouldn't use this. --  Riffsyphon  1024 19:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Stating one's name doesn't really require a box. -- Ozzel 20:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Dumb,Dumb,Dumb. Troyb 00:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) I think this userbox was shut down before it even started. How sad, it was doomed to failure. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)00:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Kinda reminds me of the time I tried to make a "Twi'leks are hot" userbox without entering Orn Free Taa into the equation.... Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 10:08, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 01:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 01:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Lord Titze 06:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Ranat 23 01:05, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 06:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * 1) ... And the point is...? - Sikon 15:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) The point is to be dumb. Troyb 00:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) We should have country userboxes. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 12:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) We've rejected country ones before. They're better as custom boxes or we'd have to have loads of them. Green Tentacle (Talk) 11:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) There's nothing wrong with saying what country you're from: we just don't want (a) official userboxes, which would divide us all up into national categories unnecessarily, and (b) lead to more specific real-world sociopolitical userboxes which would clog up the userbox list and possibly encourage off-topic flamewars. At least, that's the current reasoning.  If someone wants to change that policy, we can debate it for about a month on the consensus track and probably get nowhere. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 12:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) If accepted, prepare for the other 279 countries to follow. --  Riffsyphon  1024 19:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Agree, you could always make one yourself. The problem is an official userbox. Sorry.  Lorth Needa Striptease 20:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Only as custom  05:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 13:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Ditto to everything above. - JMAS 13:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) This user is from a country. Possibly. This user is opposed to this idea. Definitely. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) I'll have to vote against myself, as country userboxes have already been rejected. Sorry, I didn't know. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)23:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 01:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Ranat 23 01:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Canadians are fictional, surely. .  .  .  .  03:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 06:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * This is my test. If this is rejected, I won't suggest other country userboxes --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)11:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I have a nicer-looking Canadian flag on my userpage, if you want to switch. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 12:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, thank you. Much, much nicer. --Ryluk ShoujaBounty Hunters Guild12:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It looks like this pole is closed. I didn't realize that country userboxes had already been rejected, otherwise I wouldn't have suggested these. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)09:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Next thing you know, we'll be getting "This user is from Earth." --  Riffsyphon  1024 06:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Who the hell would admit to being from that backwater planet? Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 10:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * You'd be surprised. ;) --  Riffsyphon  1024 04:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * In all honesty, I'm from Corellia, but I've lived on Earth all my life. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)22:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Got stuck hitchhiking, huh? Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 03:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I'm something of a nonviolent protester myself. CooperTFN 07:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm a kid and CooperTFN warned me about a no-kids policy they might create, so I'll say yes. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 18:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
-- Oh, crap! I just spewed Pepsi all over my monitor! :D Jwebb13 HoloNet 22:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 23:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) What's next, "This user opposes MediaWiki 1.9.1?" The vote is over. And I feel I should point out that (commences Peter Falk voice) someday ya may not mind so much. &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 23:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Aw, boo-hoo. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 23:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) No way, since why should anyone not support Wookieepedia policy? Jeez. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 12:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I find your lack of faith disturbing. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Not if anything to say about it I have --Jedimca0 (, Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 15:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Ozzel 20:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Ranat 23 01:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) This never exsisted. .  .  .  .  03:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) This user also opposes "This user opposes..." userboxes. 06:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) What, you didn't like my userbox opposing excessive userboxes? I may not always agree with the Inquisitors' decisions, but I think their existence will be beneficial to the quality of the site. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 10:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) This user opposes opposing this user. Havac 17:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * I find it bloody hilarious that the people who hate/dislike/are pissed off by the Inq are people who contribute nothing to FA. .  .  .  .  22:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well cooper did make the Booster Terrik page. He's probably just concerned because now he has to go back and source that whole thing. Cull Tremayne 22:49, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * While fout-dot's comment is interesting, I've moved beyond my need to be involved in everything that happens to Booster's article. Granted, I only became aware of the whole Inquisitorius thing because of Booster's recent involvement, but it doesn't really bother me if it's retroactively declared a non-Featured Article; I had no overwhelming desire to see it Featured in the first place - and I don't particularly expect anyone to go through the whole thing and rewrite the prose anytime soon, anyway (no matter how much they're bothered by the gundark line). I suggested the userbox because I wanted a way to indicate my dissent without getting dragged into a big debate that A) I don't currently have the attention span for, B) I know better than to think I'd win, and C) I'm certain the Inqs themselves are all tired of having already. Of course, that all likely extends to this not getting anywhere either, but it was something to try, at least. CooperTFN 07:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Point. But dissent just won't do. :P .  .  .  .  07:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Precisely. http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/54.gif CooperTFN 07:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * To the lay people. This user box does not exsist. It has never exsisted. The exsistence of this userbox and its ideals are the foulest lies of the infidels. If you are considering thinking that this box exsists, turn your attention elsewhere. It doesn't exsist. .  .  .  .  09:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Does anyone have a reason why it's a bad userbox, or is it just about disagreeing with the sentiment? CooperTFN 20:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes. I do. Making userboxes like this is divisive, as it would help demarcate a line between Inquisitors and their supporters and those opposed. That's like putting up a userbox saying "This user disapproves of Karen Traviss." It's inflammatory, encouraging more discussion on a consensus-approved topic. If you don't like the Inquisitorius, first, please give us some to work and get all the glitches straightened out of the system, second, tell us what we can do better here, and third, if you really hate it after careful consideration, put up a vote on CT to remove it. And also, I'd just like to point out that if the Inquisitorius hadn't mandated sourcing of Featured Articles, things like Palpatine, Jaina Solo, and Padme Amidala never would have gotten sourced. Guess what? Two are completely sourced and the other one is in progress. And sadly, something as seemingly innocuous as a sign of nonviolent dissent, Cooper, would have been taken and used as a protest symbol. It's happened before, sadly.  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Point taken. My issue with it - and for whatever it's worth, I wasn't aware of the Inq's creation at the time, so retroactive dissent is all I have - is more about the concept itself than any specific concerns regarding the individuals involved; there are a few of you whom I actually have a lot of respect for. I have to say that I have a hard time envisioning any real damage being done by the existence of this particular userbox - Karen Traviss, perhaps, but this, not so much - but I get what your'e saying. CooperTFN 08:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) A re-tooling of the previous nomination.  14:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Full vote. --Jack Phoenix (Contact) 17:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, the other one was bad. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 19:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Darth tader ( General ) [[Image:MandalorianKOTOR.jpg|20px]] 19:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Although to make them consistent, it should be "contributes TO".--Valin Kenobi 04:23, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 04:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 06:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1)  Riffsyphon  1024 17:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Xerox, away! .  .  .  .  23:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Even though I don't like fanon, I do like this.  Lorth Needa Striptease 20:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 13:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Although I don't. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Yes. It's been a while since I've been on there, but yes.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 01:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Lord Titze 06:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Ranat 23 01:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, not that I contribute. 06:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Jedimca0 (, Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 18:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As nominator. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 13:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This user hates fanon. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  - breathesgelatin Talk 19:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Valin Kenobi 20:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Don't provoke a breeding ground. --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 05:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) This user hates this idea. This user also hates fanon in article namespaces. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  23:31, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) This user hates this idea so much. Troyb 00:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 01:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Ranat 23 01:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This user loves Star Wars 06:23, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Well, since we may have one that says "This user also contributes to the Star Wars Merchandise Wiki," why not retool this one to similarly say "This user also contributes to the Star Wars Fanon Wiki"? (Not that I would use it. Which is why I'm not voting.) &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 13:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * That would be better. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As nominator. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 12:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Again, fine as custom userboxes, but not needed here. &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 13:20, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  - breathesgelatin Talk 19:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Valin Kenobi 20:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 22:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]] 00:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Great customs though  05:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) This user wants both of this proposals to die and will be glad when they do.  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) I demand a "This user was somewhat aroused by Femi Taylor's exposed breast." .  .  .  .  23:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 01:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Ranat 23 01:14, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 06:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As nominator. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 13:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

 * 1) Didn't we already decide against something very similar to this? Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Fine as custom userboxes, but unneeded as templates. Wildyoda 19:00, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 21:56, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) What Wildyoda said  22:26, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) I have to place my vote here.  Wildyoda, you said it; they're great custom userboxes, but we don't need them as templates. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)23:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) This user is a fan of very few "This user is a fan of . . ." userboxes. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:39, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) —Xwing328 (Talk) 06:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8)  - breathesgelatin Talk 19:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Previously shot down.--Valin Kenobi 20:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]] 00:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) You obviously haven't looked in the archives, have you Patrick? --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) This user is not a fan. .  .  .  .  23:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 01:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Ranat 23 01:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 06:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Adamwankenobi 19:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ahh, what the hell. &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 23:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) While not my favorite I support them for those that might like them. Darth Sarge 23:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  06:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) im with darth sarge General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 10:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Valin Kenobi 20:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) MTFBWUA. Starkiller1996 Adidas F50+[[Image: 79jawas.jpg|20px]] 18 March 2007, 16:36 (UTC)
 * 6) Jedimca0 (, Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 15:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) When I finally give in and undertake serial cannibalism, these userboxes will make it easy for me to choose people who obviously won't be missed. Frankly, if you enjoyed the Holiday Special, then you have it coming.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Yikes! *runs and hides* :P Adamwankenobi 02:00, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 01:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) We have to account for the crazy people, too. .  .  .  .  03:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not crazy, I'm "differently sane." Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 10:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

 * 1) Someone's gotta be number one. They're not really films, and if your favourite "film" is not one of the six, that's a little messed up. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)23:37, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Ugh. No. A line must be drawn somewhere, and I draw it by the 6 major films. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) *Thank you, Atartumaster88. Someone here is sane. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)23:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 07:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Per Atarumaster88. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 18:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Ranat 23 01:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 06:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Per Atarumaster88. C-3POwen 18:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) There would be no users of these userboxes. Hopefully. Havac 17:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Per Gonk (below). Adamwankenobi 19:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Would anyone actually be using these? I'll support them if there are people who'll use it, but they seem a bit pointless if they aren't. 06:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well... I know I will. :P I think about the same amount of people will use these as will the Episode I userbox. Adamwankenobi 06:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * None of them are films. They're tele-movies. Well...the HS at least. Since the other two recived theatrical releases outside the US. .  .  .  .  21:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wait a minute, they released that schlock in theaters? And I thought that the American movie industry was out of ideas.... Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 10:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * At first I agreed only because I thought people would use these, but then I thought they're not really part of the Star Wars movies. If these are made then other userboxes such as ones about the cartoon episodes and the future live-action and 3-D shows, so it could get a bit out of hand. - 07:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Lucas personally said that if he could, he would smash all copies of the holiday special with a sledgehammer. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)22:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)