Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights

This page is for requests for user rights.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Requests for rollback
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * 4) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * 5) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Questions

 * 1) Why should you be granted rollback rights?

Requests for adminship
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They are of adult age (18 years or older).
 * 4) They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * 5) They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * 6) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 7) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 8) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
 * 9) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * 10) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

Questions
Here are some general adminship questions. They are 100% optional, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them. :)

Borsk Fey'lya (4 admins + 1 users/0 admins + 0 users/0 admins + 0 users)
Two week deadline from the date of first request, voting ends 0:00 UTC, 6 July 2008.

Support

 * Now, aside from his namesake (*wink*), I would like to nominate for administrator rights. Borsk is always willing to help out users (and there are quite a lot) who ask him for help; he's demonstrated that he is great with interacting with users who approach him for any reason, whether it be for help, complaints, or requests; he never, from what I've been able to see, treats any other users with disrespect or anything resembling a negative attitude; he always attempts to find that middle ground in any dispute that he is involved in; and he always stands by his decisions and choices with a firm, but civil, demeanor. From what I've managed to see, taking things personal is not something Borsk practices, and his attitude in resolving disputes that other users may have with him is admirable. Likewise, Borsk is also a machine when it comes to content edits, and has contributed much to the community through various means. He's been around the site for a long time as a solid, quality, contributor and has demonstrated time and time again that he is committed to Wookieepedia and its continued improvement. I firmly believe that having Borsk Fey'lya (not the Bothan!) as an Administrator would only benefit the site and add to Wookieepedia's increasing stature through his continued efforts.  Greyman ( Talk ) 22:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) An excellent candidate. Graestan ( Talk ) 22:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) --Charitwo 22:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Well established user with good reputation. -- SFH 23:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) He'll put the tools to good use. -- Ozzel 23:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments

 * Borsk has accepted the nomination via email. Greyman ( Talk ) 22:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Requests for bureaucratship
Rules:
 * Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.


 * 1) They are an administrator.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * 3) They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 6) Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month&mdash;from the day the nomination is put forth&mdash;are counted).
 * 7) Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 8) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.