User talk:Ayrehead02

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Ayrehead02!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Please do not remove talk page and forum comments, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask one of our administrators. May the Force be with you!
 * }

Terror Trooper
Do you think you could upload an image of the terror troopers from the Boba Fett video, I'm not good at uploading pictures, and I think it would improve the page.  GalenMarek1 Leave a comment. 19:03, October 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you want to properly tag an image (like the one you uploaded for the above request) as poor quality, add Imagequality in the "attention" field. That will add it to the appropriate category for someone to see and deal with. NAYA   YEN   21:05, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Capitalization
Your capitalization seems to be off, such as in Galactic cultures - A Visitor's Guide to the galaxy. The title has some odd capitalization, but in the article itself, it is Galactic Cultures- A Visitor's Guide to the Galaxy. Whichever one is the canon name and capitalization must be the articles name, and it must match in the article's body.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 22:05, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. If this happens again, just click the button at the top of the page that says move and it will allow you to move the article to it's correct name.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 22:23, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

Dining at Dex's
Congratulations on removing the redlinks in the Dining at Dex's page! I'm really impressed by the amount of work you've done to create articles for all of the items that needed one. Narbflick 14:30, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Speculation
Please look at this discussion to see why I am reverting your recent edits. All info must be verifiable and unless you have a source for your entries, they have to be removed. Thanks. <- Omicron (Leave a message at the BEEP! ) 21:22, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Unless you have a source to state that Christophsian sugar was from Christophsis, then it's just speculation. For all we know, it could be called that because it's popular with Christophsians or some other reason. <- Omicron (Leave a message at the BEEP! ) 21:33, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * We don't know it's a reference to the planet. For instance, London Broil has absolutely nothing to do with London. Again, unless you have a canonical source that states the food item is related to the planet, it can't be added. <- Omicron (Leave a message at the BEEP! ) 21:39, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * If you can find documentation from the author, then I think that would be acceptable for a BTS section. See this discussion for more details. <- Omicron (Leave a message at the BEEP! ) 21:54, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd say probably not. That's just a generic statement. Like I said, if you can find some verification that the food item is named for the planet, then it's just speculation. <- Omicron (Leave a message at the BEEP! ) 22:07, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

Just a quick head's up...
The category you're looking for is Category:Clothing. I've fixed the category for you in your articles.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 21:44, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Reference
Hey, Ayrehead02. If you take a look at WP:S, if there's only one appearance/source, then you don't need to have references in an article. I would also like to say that I've been noticing that you've been placing Ref tags when you do source an entire article. As for its main usage, infobox and generally succession boxes require them, not the body.  JangFett  (Talk) 15:25, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, Ayrehead02. While Jang is correct in saying that it is not required, it is okay if you want to add references to one source articles. Some users do not, some do. Many of our Comprehensive articles have them, even if they only have one source, and others do not have references. Also, while WP:S shows that it is all right to place " " in a once-used reference, many users still use the full " <ref name= " for the reference. Just thought I'd give you the heads up. Cheers.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 19:28, February 7, 2012 (UTC)

dude get a grip on yourself

wookieepedia can not have a page for every single piece of armour there is

if there is anything relevant to them such as: darth malak wore them in his final duel with Revan(i know he didn't,that was an example)sure. but if you are just putting pages up for the sake of it. Don't --Grand master aylard 18:15, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

Tor Armour
You may want to consider that the majority of Sith armour is confined to a single article, Sith apparel. The tag has been added, and containing instructions on what do do if you disagree with deletion: ''If you disagree with its speedy deletion, please explain why on its talk page or at Speedy deletions. If this page obviously does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from articles that you have created yourself.'' As per-guidelines I am going to revert the removal of the deletion tags. Alexsau1991 (talk page) 20:50, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * While the policy you mentioned does state that items may have articles, it is a matter of interpretation on whether every piece of generic clothing gets an article of it's own, the vast majority don't. In my experience generic equipable clothing for RPGs, don't. These aren't unique pieces of armour like Darth Vader's armor; though as the Sith apparel article shows, many unique pieces of armour don't even receive articles of their own. Alexsau1991 (talk page) SithEmblemTOR.PNG 21:12, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * There are many examples true, though in the great scheme of things there are very few when considering the number of these clothing in existence in star wars lore. I would actually support the deletion or merger of some of the generic armours from kotor. Since we are unlikely to agree, you might want to post your opposition to the deletion on one of the articles talkpages, to let other's share their opinion. Alexsau1991 (talk page) SithEmblemTOR.PNG 22:35, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

i was not telling you to stop i was merely making a point--Grand master aylard 17:13, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

And thanks yourself for being polite and reasonable on the topic, as you say allot of people are not. I was actually unaware (which after looking at the tags I feel stupid for) that they were speedy delete tags, I was under the impression that they were simply delete tags as they are on most other wiki ive worked on. But it's good to get clarification on where clothing in general stands when it comes to Wookieepdia; now based on all the arguments I won't support their deletion. Alexsau1991 (talk page) 17:36, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

TOR
Hey Ayrehead,

Please send me an email, I'd like to talk with you regarding TOR. Thanks,  —Tommy  9281  Wednesday, March 7, 2012, 02:00 UTC 
 * Sorry about that, you can reach me at anvil9281@gmail.com. Look forward to hearing from you soon.  —Tommy  9281  Thursday, March 8, 2012, 12:56 UTC