User talk:Hk 47

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Hk 47!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Please do not remove talk page and forum comments, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask one of our administrators. May the Force be with you!
 * }

Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:48, December 11, 2010 (UTC)
Please remember to sign your comments by typing four tildes after your message, like so: ~ Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:48, December 11, 2010 (UTC)

Sourcing
Hi, since you've been doing some revamp for Timeline of the Galactic Civil War and the related battles, it would be good if you would source your edits too. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 15:51, December 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no source in all the page Hk 47 16:13, December 30, 2010 (UTC)hk 47
 * So where you take this information from? If you do not know the source of the information, it most likely is best left out, and if you do, you are able to source the information then. Lack of sourcing in the pages already isn't an excuse to left it out now. –Tm_T (Talk) 14:05, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Of couse, I use only the informations containing in the pages. Hk 47 14:02, January 2, 2011 (UTC)Hk 47
 * Wookieepedia is not a source, pleace take a look at Sourcing, thanks. –Tm_T (Talk) 15:59, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * I repeat, source your changes, especially when you remove already sourced information like in here. –Tm_T (Talk) 16:13, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Removing content
Please do not remove content from Wookieepedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 18:23, January 5, 2011 (UTC) I have corrected the page of kalast. There was a mistake in the class of the isd. Hk 47 19:33, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok but I have explicated my modifications in talk page. I'm sure for taris but perhaps I made a mistake for the kalast page. Hk 47 19:29, January 5, 2011 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not add nonsense to Wookieepedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the Jundland Wastes sandbox. Thank you.  JangFett  (Talk) 19:53, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * What is the problem ?Hk 47 21:49, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Sourcing
Hi, I like to repeat this for you again: source your changes or they might end up being reverted as possible fanon, thanks. –Tm_T (Talk) 12:01, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Anx Minor
I was wondering if you had any further plans to work on the Battle of Anx Minor article, as I am interested in promoting it to Good Article status. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 21:26, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have corrected the chronology with the essential atlas I just have but I have no more information.

Missions to Ord Mantell
I'm not quite sure what you're trying to accomplish with these Mission to Ord Mantell articles, but you're going about it all wrong. "Third Second Mission to Ord Mantell" makes no sense, and I have deleted it, in addition to reverting your changes to Second Mission to Ord Mantell. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 16:57, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * This is an official administrative warning. Kindly stop doing whatever it is that you're trying to do, or you may be blocked from editing. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 17:01, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * I try to shift the missions to place another I will create but you don't have let the time to finish it. The new mission is from classic star wars in 0 ABY.Hk 47 17:10, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Now you can correct it, the Mission to Ord Mantell (0 ABY) is the first.

Regarding CSDs
Hey Hk 47, in the instance of tagging articles with the Delete template, make sure that it wouldn't be more appropriate to just redirect the article, or to put it up for TC. In the instance of Cor Run, it turns out by examining the Cor Lane article that "Cor Run" is a valid alternate name for "Cor Lane". The Cor Run article should therefore redirect to Cor Lane, and not deleted. Also, I have a question regarding Valc: first off, are you certain that there aren't multiple Valcs, seeing as the article you believe it actually means is numbered as "Valc VII"? Could "Valc" not also exist? Please be certain that The Essential Atlas makes no reference whatsoever to a plain "Valc". If it does not, then the Valc article should still not be deleted&mdash;it needs to be redirected either to Valc VII or perhaps to the Valc system article; or it could even be made into a disambiguation page for the two articles. Thanks. Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 14:52, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

TEA
Please don't add information in the Bts sections about planets "not" mentioned in The Essential Atlas. If the Atlas doesn't appear in the Sources section, it's obvious the planet isn't mentioned there. Imperators II 16:13, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Please be aware that The Essential Atlas Online Companion does not include any planets in its index. If you look at the index's titles at the top of the page, you will see that it clearly lists star systems. As such, the Online Companion should not be added to planet article Sources lists. Please do not continue to add this item to these articles. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:55, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes but the information about the systems concern also the planet(s) inside.Hk 47 18:09, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, it doesn't. Listing the Online Companion is misleading and incorrect. If the planet itself isn't mentioned, the item should not be added. Thank you for your cooperation. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:11, March 15, 2011 (UTC)

Help
Dear Hk, we've got a user called Darth owski, who keeps adding fanon to Makatak tribe. Could you please help?&mdash; TK-999  (Talk) 18:14, March 20, 2011 (UTC) Then sorry for bothering you.&mdash; TK-999  (Talk) 18:27, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't do anything I'm not an administrator. You must contact one of them.Hk 47 18:17, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Sourcing TEA and TEAOC
Please source your edits. Thank you.  Imperators II (Talk) 18:58, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, you do realize that you have to reference each field in the infoboxes of the articles, don't you? It would really be sad if someone later had to reference them all just because of your unwillingness to do so.  Imperators II (Talk) 19:22, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have already created ot completed hundreds of infobox of planets and other things from TEA. If I have to reference each line, it will take years to finish. Hk 47 19:31, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Don't exaggerate. And, since it's the site's official policy and will have to be done anyway, you just intend to leave it to others? Please mind the policy in your future edits, or they will be reverted as unverified info. Thank you.  Imperators II (Talk) 19:39, April 27, 2011 (UTC)

Image caching issues
Tag the image with WISS if it doesn't appear to update properly. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 21:18, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the deletion. Hk 47 21:20, May 24, 2011 (UTC)

Invasion of Kashyyyk (Galactic Civil War)
As decided on the GAN page, the invasion and the battle are to be considered two separate events as the the battle took place well after the invasion. The Imperials had already built a base and enslaved most of the local Wookiees before the Rebels even found out. MasterFred (Whatever) 14:10, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes but the invasion took place just after the clone wars. The wookies are already enslaved in all sources of the galactic civil war. And they were freed in galactic battleground.Hk 47 14:54, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

9 ABY
Hey Hk. Please note two things: Thank you.  Imperators II (Talk) 19:17, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Per the Manual of Style "a subject should be linked once upon its first [..] mention in the article's main body." Thus, since First Battle of Nomad City, Second Battle of Nomad City and Third Battle of Coruscant (Galactic Civil War) are already linked to from the article's "Events" section, it's unnecessary to link to them again in the "Battles" section.
 * 2) Per the sourcing policy the full reference only needs to be applied in the first insertion point of citation. Thus, since " " is already used in the "Events" section, you should use " " in all the subsequent insertion points of citation.
 * Yes I know, I was correcting it when you did it.

Ganis
Dear HK-47 have you got any image of Ganis?I search they.Thanks you :D Waiting an image, Bounty Killer Thanks
 * There is no picture of him.

Flash image
Hello. What is your reasoning for identifying this image as Flash? As I have done extensive work on the article, Flash cannot be determined to be a specific clone trooper during group scenes, and only an extrapolation of his death scene gives any clue as to his identity. Where exactly does this image come from in the episode (a time code would be appreciated), or have you just selected a clone trooper at random from the scene to portray Flash? - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 21:43, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * There is 3 "white clones" in the episode. So I took a picture of the clone not represented in the article of the 2 others.

Red Sky, Blue Flame
Hello Hk 47,I noticed you place this short story at 23 ABY. Did you actually read it? It so strongly implies, it happened just after events of Vision of the Future novel. Though there are some inconsistencies already described in the Red Sky, Blue Flame article like Jagged Fel's age and apparent death of Kres'ten'tarthi and later apearance in Survivor's Quest. I think those were reasons why this particular story hasn't any date there. I think according the narration it should be at the same year as VoF with already written BTS discrepancies.Jedi Marty 22:20, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes I read it and of course it seems to happen just after VotF. But the age of Jag Fel, the death of Stent and the intervention of the editor place it definitely after Survivor's Quest. So 23 aby is a good date. It concurs with the date of birth of Jag. I explained it in the Behind the scenes.Hk 47 23:53, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, but it contradicts Jag Fel's own article in what he's eleven during "Red Sky, Blue Flame" and his article is FA. Btw he was born at 7 ABY, so he should be 14 at 21 ABY in order for math to work not at 23 ABY. So, it can't happened after Survivor's Quest. Btw it's weird for Kres'ten'tarthi come to Chiss academy with "4 year old News" about Thrawn's supposed return, which we know Luke and Mara dealt with during Vision of Future events. I think "Stent" supposed death could be easy retconned that he didn't die, but was unconcious or something. You don't actualy see him killed, but aftermath of Clawcraft explosion if I remeber that correctly. And Fel age could be a simple mistake that writer confused with chiss age (they matured twice faster than human).Jedi Marty 10:54, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * So there is a mistake in Jag Fel's article. I don't know if you read it but there is a moment in Red Sky, Blue Flame where there is a discussion about chiss and human ages and it explains very clearly that Jag was humanly 14. Anyway the editor sated it happens c. 22 ABY to solve all this problems. Hk 47 11:02, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Liberation of Kashyyyk
Funny&mdash;on p. 72 it says "Kashyyyk endured until 5 ABY, when the New Republic chased off the last Imperial holdouts." Is the battle dated to 4 ABY somewhere else except p. 196?  Imperators II (Talk)

Re:Upload
What are you trying to upload? Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:27, July 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Pictures.Hk 47 11:06, July 24, 2011 (UTC)

Thrawn Campaign
You are either very mistaken, lying, or attempting to troll me, and I cannot in good faith allow any of those options to stand. Your present set of edits constitute multiple canonical logical impossibilities. For example: you insist on Battle of Ukio (44:7:29) that the next successive battle is the Battle for the Katana fleet (44.6.29), which occurred a full month earlier. But on the Katana Fleet page, the next battle is the more accurate Battle of Sheris (44.7.6). I'd prefer not to have to highlight every single error in your present interpretation, but there is no excuse for the mangled snarl you keep trying to enforce. Bear in mind I own a copy of the Atlas as well, and can review every date on the fairly tightly organized sequence of events that is the Thrawn Campaign. In the interests of good faith, I invite you to review your figures and edit the timeline accordingly. If not, I will be forced to consider this bad-faith edit warring and will take this to a higher authority for mediation.  DD97 Which bear is best? 15:12, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thanks for the professionalism. I did come across something I missed the first time in my research, wanted to have you take a look at it and get your opinion.  On the Thrawn map in the Atlas, there's a date of 44.7.14 very close to Poderis. Do you suppose that that date might be (somehow) in reference to the Poderis mission]?  If so, that particular mission my need to get pushed back in the campaign timeline.  What do you think? [[User:Dangerdan97| DD97 Which bear is best? 22:12, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * After looking over it thoroughly, I'm pretty sure the Mission (which takes place in HttE), and the Battle (which is apparently set after the end of DFR) are separate events, inentionally or not. I'd leave both articles as is until a future source says otherwise.  DD97 Which bear is best? 20:43, September 14, 2011 (UTC)

Essential Atlas
Hi Hk 47!

I couldn't help noticing that you have The Essential Atlas. That is one of my favorite books! I read it all the time and it is the best! I think one of the best parts is near the end of the book where it shows you where the Yuuzhan Vong came from and which planets they took over first.

form--Unidentified Jedi Master 02:13, October 26, 2011 (UTC)

Yes, it's a great book but there is still a lot of work to integrate all its content !Hk 47 18:37, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello,

VSD(s) Protector
First off, excellent work getting that little snarl sorted, the CSWE must be quite the boon for situations like these! As for sourcing, I was wondering how specifically the Encyclopedia divided the sourcing for the three Protectors. Most importantly, is there any chance that the Protector from EaW/FoC is the same as the one from TIE Fighter? I haven't played the EaW games, but I'm aware the campaigns span a good amount of time. I thought that maybe, if the Protector only shows up in early missions (ie pre-3 ABY), then maybe it is Harkov's Protector. That still leaves most of the entry for the "new" Protector intact, just with XWA and Force Heretic as it's only appearances. This is all hypothetical depending on how easy it is to disentangle the Protector's chronology in EaW. Let me know if this seems feasible. Thanks!  DD97 Which bear is best? 02:54, October 29, 2011 (UTC) So for the CSWE, it's very simple, there is three different entries for the Protector : Protector (1), Protector (2)...
 * Thanks

For Eaw and Foc, it's less clear. The games just features a VSD Protector wich is not different for all others VSD in the games. But this ship can be found in 4 ABY, aftter the battle of Endor, so it's more probably the VSD II rather than Harvok's VSDI wich is destroyed in 3 ABY. Hk 47 10:59, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * So it does appear before 3 ABY in EaW? If so, is there any chance it is depicting one Protector at the earlier stage, and then a successor ship in 4 ABY? The main issue is that right now, as the articles stand there are two Protectors co-existing at the same time, which is unlikely to the point of being impossible. I'm just trying to reconcile that issue.  DD97 Which bear is best? 17:34, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's possible. So we can also add an EAW appereance in all the protectors.Hk 47 20:17, October 29, 2011 (UTC)

Systems
Hi again.

I was wondering, do you think we should create a list of known systems? :] --Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn 03:13, November 1, 2011 (UTC)

Your edits
You should be aware that the Essential Atlas Online Companion only lists planetary systems, not actual planets, which is clearly labeled in the pdf file's table headers. As such, adding the Companion to the Sources lists of planet articles, as you are doing, is incorrect. You should instead be creating articles for these specific systems if you choose to continue along this line of editing. Either way, I would ask you to please stop what you're doing. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:49, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes I know. But how do you want I indicate the sources from the appendix in the planets' articles.Hk 47 17:54, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * You should not be trying to indicate the Companion in the Sources lists of planet articles, because the planet itself is not named within the Companion, so it therefore does not constitute a source for that subject. They should only be listed in the designated system articles. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:57, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * This is what I used to do, but others said me to source each line in planets' articles, even for TEA and the online companion.
 * They most likely meant for you to reference each line in the article, which is also called sourcing. This is different from the Sources list. Instructions on referencing can be found on this page. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:09, November 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, they said me to source the lines of the system info in the infobox of the planets article with the oline companion as a source. So do i have to do this ? Hk 47 18:25, November 22, 2011 (UTC)