Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
 * 15) &hellip;if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place your signature in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Surrel

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:16, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The last armor vendor.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  06:19, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:03, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:54, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * SE
 * 1) * I'm not sure about this one, but based on the quote, could something about her having permission to sell be added? Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:06, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) **It's a generic quote that loads of vendors can potentially say, I'm not sure it needs a mention beyond the fact she is selling weapons, which in itself shows she has permission. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:36, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Fair enough, figured it couldn't hurt to ask :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:03, December 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Voroos

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 02:17, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Technically they might be found on Kubindi...

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:25, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:56, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 03:56, January 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) So ugly...
 * 2) *Body needs mention of its reptilianism. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:52, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:35, December 24, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Kelp gnat

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:56, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now for a GM gnat.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:22, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:47, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * "The book does not make clear their level of level of sentience." Despite this, you still say it is non-sentient. I'm pretty sure we can assume its non-sentient if it only sings or whistles when it has been given growth enzymes, so this BtS note can go. Also, I think you are using one too many levels... 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:00, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Changed. Levels? Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:26, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***You were saying "...level of level of sentience...". 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:22, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Alderaanian tourist board Holoplay #2735

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 10:24, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:31, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * "and she watched it many times before she could mourn her loss completely" sounds a bit odd, could you rephrase to something like and watched in many times whilst she mourned the loss of her homeworld.
 * 3) **Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:36, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) * I think it should be the holoplay not that holoplay at the start of the second sentence, I would change it myself but I'm not 100% sure. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:27, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Changed. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:36, January 3, 2014 (UTC)


 * SE
 * 1) * Can you add in a release date in the bts? Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:00, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) **Done. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:17, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) *Can you give more detail about the regions it advertises? The panel gives a few more details. Supreme Emperor (talk) 13:43, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
 * As far as I'm aware, # is an invalid sign to use in titles, show it shouldn't be included in a .  Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  06:24, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * If it's not allowed, then I'll change it, but the # sign was explicitely used in the comic, so what should I do? --LelalMekha (talk) 10:36, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * You can use it in the article body, just don't use it in the Title, I believe... Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:20, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Puffer turtle

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:27, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A species that would fit in well in the Little Mermaid

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:23, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) A lot of grammatical errors from one who should be a native English speaker, from seeing the home country. Otherwise, article is good. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:47, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:10, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Context on the Black Sun.
 * 2) **Added Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:25, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) * Wait, did they use the turtle itself to make music, or copy the sound it made and incorporated it into their works? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:05, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **Made clearer. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:25, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ghazakl worm

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:03, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For the barnburner

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:49, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Eeenteresting.  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 03:23, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:31, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * SE
 * 1) *Did the quote actually say preform, or is that just a typo?
 * 2) **It's a typo, but I fixed it. Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Thanks Trip.
 * 4) *Can you reword the last sentence of the bio? Reads a bit odd to me. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:21, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) **How's that? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:52, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified mercenary (Baroonda)

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:03, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part of my own Podracing project, though this character is not, in fact, a racer.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:35, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:30, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 16:54, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Context on Baroonda?
 * 3) **How does that look?--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 01:28, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) *Otherwise, good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:50, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) Ayrehead
 * 6) *Could you specifically say it was the Holonet news, or even a specific writer for the Holonet news, who called the future into question. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:01, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) **The article didn't seem to attribute an author, but I linked to the edition. How does that look? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:52, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Ah if there's no author thats fine. Can you clarify that it called the future of podracing into question due to the actions of the mercenary, or is that not the case? Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:31, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Gondar

 * Nominated by: Trip391 (talk) 06:43, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Novels and Barn-Burner

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * SE
 * 1) *Needs a NOTOC
 * 2) **Done
 * 3) *Also, the article is short enough to not need an intro. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:40, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done Trip391 (talk) 04:50, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) 501st
 * 6) * Echoing SE's objection, the history section and the section above should be combined into one, with no header. Right now it looks like the top one, which I assume is the biology and appearance one, is the intro, which is not the case. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:12, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done
 * 8) *A BtS note mentioning how Gondars received an entry in TCSWE might be warranted as well. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:12, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Isn't "1stm" not needed if it first appeared in the film? Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 16:56, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) *I figured it was like that before because only the tusks appeared in ROTJ, and it wasn't mentioned as a Gondar until Children of the Jedi, but I changed it to Mo. Trip391 (talk) 21:09, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified Yavin 4 monster

 * Nominated by: Trip391 (talk) 06:43, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Novels and Barn-Burner

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * SE
 * 1) *Needs a NOTOC
 * 2) **Done
 * 3) *Also, no intro required
 * 4) **Done
 * 5) ***Actually, it is required with an article of this size. I'm getting about 210 words when I use spell check. Please re-add it Trip. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:15, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 6) ****Re-added Trip391 (talk) 21:09, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) *Any applicable quotes? Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:43, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 8) **Added another one Trip391 (talk) 04:50, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 9) 501st
 * 10) *First of all, the intro is rather short. At least make it two sentences. If that brings it over 250, we can just send it to the GAN page.
 * 11) *Please note that the layout you are currently using is not meant for non-sentient species. Here is the formal layout, and using it would involve splitting the Description into two sections: Biology and appearance, and Behavior. Please do so.
 * 12) *It should be added to the body that it is carnivorous.
 * 13) *Context on the Lightning Rod, Peckum, the two Solos, and Tenal Ka is needed. Yavin 4 also needs context in the body.
 * 14) *Is this article about the monster itself, or the monster's species? I just want to clarify.
 * 15) *When you create the Behavior section, add in there that its habitat is the jungle.
 * 16) *These objections will probably take it over 250 words, but I will continue my review here if you like, and we can archive it when I'm satisfied. Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:00, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Thunderhead hawk

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:19, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:54, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Balmorran maweater

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  20:31, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Would the category: Extinct Creatures be fitting for this article? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:57, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Greater crested gundark

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  20:31, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments