Wookieepedia:Good article nominations

This page is for the nomination of Good articles. For a list of Good articles, see Category:Wookieepedia good articles.

What is a Good article?
A Good article is an article that adheres to quality standards, but cannot reach FA status due to its limited content.

A Good article has the following attributes.

1. It is well written. In this respect:


 * (a) it has compelling prose, and is readily comprehensible to non-specialist readers;
 * (b) it follows a logical structure, introducing the topic and then grouping together its coverage of related aspects; where appropriate, it contains a succinct lead section summarising the topic, and the remaining text is organised into a system of hierarchical sections (particularly for longer articles);
 * (c) it follows the Manual of Style;
 * (d) necessary technical terms or jargon are briefly explained in the article itself, or an active link is provided.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect:


 * (a) it provides references to any and all sources used for its material;
 * (b) sources should be selected in accordance with the guidelines for reliable sources;
 * (c) it contains no elements of original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage, addressing all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FA, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed);.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. In this respect:


 * (a) viewpoints are represented fairly and without bias;
 * (b) all significant points of view are fairly presented, but not asserted, particularly where there are or have been conflicting views on the topic.

5. It is stable, i.e., it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic. In this respect:


 * (a) the images are tagged and have succinct and descriptive captions;
 * (b) a lack of images does not in itself prevent an article from achieving Good Article status.

Nomination of Good articles
To nominate an article for Good article status, list it here. If it has more than five votes after a week, the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the template. The talk page will also be tagged with the GA template.

Irek Ismaren (+6)
Support style="color:#FFA502;">Roron Corobb ]] Talk 00:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) [[User:Roron Corobb|<span
 * 1) --Eyrezer 22:42, 30 December 2006 (UTC) Expanded the intro. Could do with some more work on Eye of Palpatine section
 * 17:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) .  .  .  .  20:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 12:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Objections
 * Needs a little copyediting. .  .  .  .  11:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) There seems to be some confusion in the article as to when Irek got the lightsabers implanted. Was before or after he got Cronal's lightsaber through his brain?  StarNeptune Talk to me! 09:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It seems to be clarified. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I copy-edited the article. The quote still needs to be verified/sourced. 22:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Corrected and sourced the quote. --Tinwe 15:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Echuu Shen-Jon (+3)
Support Object Comments
 * 1) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 20:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Forgiveness, please! .  .  .  .  08:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Tinwe 09:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Greyman 02:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Skippy Farlstendoiro 15:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) I don't find the writing in this article very compelling at all.  I think it needs a rewrite before it satisfies requirement 1. --Eyrezer 04:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm with Eyrezer. This article just doesn't do it for me... Humbone 20:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It's actually sourced. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Skreej (+3)
Support
 * 1) Jagged Fel,  (Yo!)[[Image:JagFel.jpg|20px]]
 * 2) .  .  .  .  20:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 17:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Battle of Otoh Sancture (+3)
Support
 * 1) .  .  .  .  00:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jagged Fel,  (Yo!)[[Image:JagFel.jpg|20px]]
 * 3) --Palpatine81 23:16, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Force lightning (+3)
Support Object
 * 1) General Layton
 * 2) T8-13
 * 3)  Stake black   msg 18:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Domlith 12:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Cut down on the images. .  .  .  .  22:58, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Which images do you suggest we remove? - User:General Layton
 * I think the images are fine.  Stake black   msg 18:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Superfluous Palpatine.  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 07:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Ryloth (+3)
Support
 * 1) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Ego compels me Enochf 23:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Stake black   msg 17:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I think the pics need to be sorted out. They are cramped at some points and there seems to be too many pics of the planet from orbit. Surely some more from Platt's Starport Guide would work. The gallery is here. --Eyrezer 04:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Verpine (+2)
Support
 * 1) Inquisitor Culator said it's GA material on IRC just now.&mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 04:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I know this undermines my nomination, but the article's still missing a source for the lead quote, and there's one claim in the infobox ("no heart") I can't source. Please strike this out as soon as that's fixed without waiting for me to do it.  8) Never mind, the quote's sourced and the unsourced infobox tidbit was removed. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 12:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I think something needs to be added to the paragrah on antenna about how defective antenna resulted in Verpines criminals etc. I remember reading that somewhere. Also, I thought it was a coup attempt rather than a direct invasion by the Killiks. If so, I think that paragraph should be reworded. --Eyrezer 04:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) *I'm pretty sure the source for that was The Courtship of Princess Leia Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:55, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ** So, could you put it in? There's also some info on Talk:Verpine which should be incorporated, assuming someone with access to the primary source can confirm and work it in. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Just added it. Sorry it took so long. --Eyrezer 04:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) **** Thanks! Now if someone could clear up the bit about Verpine queens from The Swarm War, we're set. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 11:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Herrit (+3)
Support
 * 1) Fully sourced and has a funny lead quote. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 04:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC) I enjoyed reading that.
 * 02:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Janek Sunber (+2)
Support
 * 1) Tinwe 13:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Domlith 12:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Chalmun's Cantina (+1)
Support
 * 1) Domlith 18:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Valenthyne Farfalla (+2)
Support
 * 1) Lord Hydronium 02:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 03:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Giles Durane (+1)
Support
 * 1) Ozzel 06:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments

L8-L9 (+5)
Support
 * 1) A little moral-boosting project for me. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 14:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jinko 22:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 01:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 13:21, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Fully sourced, images are plentiful. Only thing keeping me from taking this to FA is a lack of length. Among other things you people will ultimately find ;-) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 14:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Taris sewers (+2)
Support
 * 1) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 13:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Good work on a not-so-good place. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 13:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * I feel this is a fairly comprehensive look at the sewer system of Taris. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 13:20, 5 April 2007 (UTC)