Talk:Soontir Fel

Old talk
What timeframe are we dealing with here exactly? -- Riffsyphon1024 06:04, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
 * The dates used in this article are not the BBY calander, correcting them from the *Star Wars Timeline Gold--Eion 06:13, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
 * What do you mean about the timeframe? --Gladius
 * He was thrown by your use of the GR calendar, and was asking in what era these events occured.--Eion 06:33, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

Is there yet a consensus on what dating system will be used? I prefer the Great Resynchronization for in-universe articles, as it sounds more 'official.' I noticed his birthdate was changed to the Battle of Yavin system, which is in my opinion one that carries much less realism with it. --Gladius
 * The official dating system of Lucasfilm is the BBY/ABY calendar. Every back cover chronology is in the BBY/ABY system. The official system by consensus at SWW is probably BBY\ABY. It makes a certain sense IU if you remember that the Rebellion won, and probably instituted a calendar that marked their first great achievement as its center, what they say as the turning of the tide, the destruction of the first Death Star. In addition, IU/OU is a rarely used concept here, though often fun, it is difficult to maintain a clear division in articles. I use suspension of disbelief, which has always worked fine for me.--Eion 06:33, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
 * More importantly, the average, run-of-the-mill Star Wars fan has no idea the Great Resynchronization dates even exist, let alone what they mean. They're not going to be informative to anyone but the most hardcore fans who've read Holonet News or Galaxywide NewsNets.  We should stick with the BBY/ABY system; it even has in-universe validity, as can be seen in The Essential Chronology. JSarek 18:56, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
 * And even those who have heard of the Great Resynchronization rarely use the dating system, since we're all so accustomed to placing the Battle of Yavin at Year 0. Yes, from an in-universe standpoint it makes little sense, but we, of course, aren't in that universe, and so we should use the most acceptable and easy to use dating system. I don't think many are going to bother to convert all the dates from the Yavin timeline to the GR system. Kwenn 19:01, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Understood. I still prefer the GR one, but what y'all say makes sense. Ah, well. Damn those impudent rebels. [EDIT: Forgot to log in] -- Gladius 23:31, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

Nit picking...
Actor is the PC term for both male and female performers, but I won't complain. ;-) --SparqMan 00:15, 11 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Marriage
It says here that Fel started dating Wynssa after the Battle of Yavin, then proposed marriage "around the time of the Battle of Yavin." Sounds like an oops to me.Kuralyov 02:20, 13 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Baron
This is going to sound stupid, but is the name "Baron" a title given to him, making his real name Soontir Fel, or is his first name actually Baron? If it is a title, then shouldn't a remark be made as to how he came to have this title?--SOCL 03:15, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * It's a title. QuentinGeorge 03:19, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * I see. How did he come to have this title?  He is very apparently not a noble by birth...--SOCL 03:35, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Apparently granted by the Empire. I don't know the specifics. QuentinGeorge 03:57, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * The Making of Soontir Fel shows when he was given it (I recall him receiving some mace as a sign of the title). --SparqMan 04:01, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Endor
Was Fel at Endor? The SW CCG seems to place him there (in command of Saber Squadron), but doesn't that conflict with his defection to the Alliance? --SparqMan 18:46, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC) He defected after the Battle of Brentaal. --SparqMan 18:59, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * I believe he was at Endor. And I don't think it conflicts with his defection&mdash;I always thought he defected after Endor. Admiral J. Nebulax 18:47, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Oops. Admiral J. Nebulax 21:21, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * No oops. Looking at the comics, that was after Endor. So it all works out. My bad. --SparqMan 22:58, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, then. Admiral J. Nebulax 23:45, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Eye
If Fel refused an eye replacement while under the Empire of the Hand, why does he have one as an Assistant Syndic? Also, if the Empire of the Hand had limited resources, why would its joining the Imperial Remnant turn the tide of the Galactic Civil War? -- SFH 21:00, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Picture Caption
The picture of Fel under the capture and defection section of his article has him marked as a colonel when his rank insignia is obviously that of a Brigadier or Brigadier General. At the lowest he could be a HIGH colonel but that insignia generally has four code cylinders, this has two, one more than General Veers who was a Major General. It should be changed. Commander Black
 * No, it shouldn't, since he is specifically referred to as colonel numerous times in that comic. Kuralyov 23:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * That's the problem... Some people accidently don't follow canon when making books or comics. Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 23:42, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean now because I saw a thing on Imperial rank insignia that was EXTREMELY wrong but it showed that same insignia as the rank of colonel so though its wrong it isn't at the same time. Commander Black
 * We have a correct (as far as I know) ranking system here where you can double check if you ever need to. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:15, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

37th Imperial Fighter Wing, not 137th

 * You see, in The Making of Baron Fel, it said it was 37th that Fel first got assigned, not 137th. Darth Kevinmhk 11:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * But does it say 137th anywhere? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Dunno, I dont know abt Fel that much. Anyone else can help? Darth Kevinmhk 11:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that might have been a mistake in the comic. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:30, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * According to 137th's article, the comic is the only time it was mentioned. (Of course, that article maybe an incomplete one) So we need other sources badly. Darth Kevinmhk 11:33, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Just a note: 37th was mentioned in the same X-wing issue more than 1 time (the time as shown in pic), and 137th never appear in X-wing comic. Darth Kevinmhk 11:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:47, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Just checked, Handbook 1: X-wing Rogue Squadron used 37th also. Darth Kevinmhk 08:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Then I guess it should be changed. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)