Forum:User:Kowakian 1

Wookieepedia &gt; Administrators' noticeboard &gt; 

Recently, Kowakian 1 was banned by Kuralyov. According to Ugluk's talk page, Kuralyov banned the former vandal only because he had previously been a vandal. Kowakian's recent contributions show no vandalism, and I ask that a)Kowakian be un-banned and b)Kuralyov be dealt with for this abuse of his powers. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 01:21, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * While I do agree with Jack about this ban being wrong, I think it was probably just a mistake on Kuralyov's part. Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks 01:24, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * A mistake? Kuralyov banned Kowakian for no good reason. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't buy it. Give the guy a chance to make a brand new name and see how it goes. I find it hard to believe that he would honestly attempt to cotribute something of value with a name that is extremley well known for vandalism. If I were him, I would have created a new one and try to create as much difference from the vandaliser-me and the contributer-me. -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 01:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, he's no longer a vandal. Therefore, he should be un-banned and Kuralyov dealt with for clearly abusing his powers. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:40, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If you were a vandal and wanted to actually contribute something, would you want to use the name that you also used to vandalize? -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 01:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * That is beside the point, Redemption. This isn't about his choice of user names. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes it is. If the guy was being serious about reforming, then he'd ask for a new account. Start off fresh and new. -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 01:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Redemption, enough. Kowakian 1 was banned for no good reason by Kuralyov. Please stop trying to change the subject. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm raising a point to you on why he should not be unbanned. This has everything to do with the subject. You're just avoiding what I'm trying to prove. -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 01:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Redemption, why are you supporting Kuralyov on this? Kowakian 1 created this account to escape his vandalism days under the Crumb user names! He has not done anything bad for a long time! Now he has been banned for no good reason by Kuralyov! This is completely unfair to him! Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * While I will not blatantly accuse him of still being vandal, I remain very suspicious and distrustful of him.--Darth OblivionComlink[[Image:Oldsith.png|30px]] 01:50, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * You can have your opinions, but he should be un-banned and Kuralyov dealt with for an abuse of his powers. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * As far as I can tell, Kowakian 1 has not vandalized with that account, and therefore should be unbanned. Perhaps Kuralyov suspected that Kowakian 1 is a sockpuppet of the recent Kowakian/Crumb vandals, and that's why he banned him? --Azizlight 01:55, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Why is this happening now? wouldn't he have banned him 'a Long time ago" as Jack says. This isn't crap, it's bullshit. Kuralyov obviously either wants attention or something for doing this. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 01:57, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Look up User: Kowakian. Guy vandalised your page and StarNeptunes in April. Kowakian, Salcious and Crumb names are all under the sock-puppet suspects. And when I say new accounts, I mean BRAND new. Nothing at all connected to Kowakian, Salacious or Crumb. Hell, I'd be okay with "monkey-lizard". And I'm as to curious why you seem hell-bent on getting Kuralyov punished. Kowakian is a suspected sock-puppet name as would Crumb be. I'd do the same in his position. Want a name, then don't use one that'd be on the sock-puppet page. -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 01:58, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Redemption, Kowakian 1 has not vandalized any article. Kowakian 1 was created when the original Crumb vandal turned over a new leaf. Now, once again, I ask that Kowakian 1 be un-banned and Kuralyov punsihed for abusing his powers. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 02:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * "Turned over a new leaf." We shall see.--Darth OblivionComlink[[Image:Oldsith.png|30px]] 02:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Would that be why Dann was banned permanently and without warning for a single fanon edit to Darth Bane? As for Kowakian 1, I'm more dubious of him than I used to be, but he has not only not vandalized for months, he was away for most of the summer, so I'm inclined to assume he has nothing to do with our recent vandals (who seem to have gone on from Salacious Crumb to the Jedi Exile anyway.) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:03, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with Az it was probably an accident. Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks 02:04, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Maybe, but he should have checked Kowakian 1's contributions first. Now, please un-ban him. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 02:05, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * And Darth Oblivion, how much longer should we wait to see if he turned over a new leaf? Another year? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 02:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * If it was entended,He took the time to make the template reason, it still doesn't answer why he waited this long. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 02:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Let's get Kuralyov over here. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 02:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Good Idea. What would happen if found guilty? --  Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 02:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * But Kowakian (without the 1) has vandalised. Seems like another sock puppet name. And I seriously don't buy this "turned over a new leaf" crap. If some guy in a prison said "Oh, I've turned over a new leaf", you think they are going to just let him out? Don't think so. It takes months of good behavior for that and so far, with his reputation, I don't think he can be trusted as of yet. Plus, it doesn't help that he REMOVED the template from his userpage. Anyone with common sense knows you don't remove unless the charges have been cleared and someone with actually banning powers should remove it. And right now, it's apparant to me that perhaps your intentions of this should be investigated. Especially with your hopes of becoming an admin. Mudslinging at a current admin would put you in a pretty nice spot if he was punished wouldn't it? <--Conspiracy theory. =P And I'd still like to raise the point that anyone would want to create a new account, that wouldn't be suspected of sockpuppetry, to actually contribute something. -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 02:09, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Wow a fromer Vandal wants to be unblocked. He's going with "I changed my ways" excuse isn't he? Very interesting ...... -- 02:11, 24 September 2006 (UTC)