Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Unidentified Rebel sergeant

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 07:37, March 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "The Marines have landed and have the situation well in hand!"

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work, though try to get the first edition to see if there is any more info. 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:05, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *There wouldn't be more info. It's just a "the quote was there." NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:33, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) He forgot to call them monkeys. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 17:07, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Great quote. Hanzo Hasashi 00:44, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * The article refers to the sergeant as male, but the character is categorized as unidentified gender. Hanzo Hasashi 15:02, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Fixed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:47, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Crap. I noticed a mistake after I slapped on the tag, as is my custom. I don't know if he was mentioned in the first edition. If someone has it, please let me know. I'll try to find a copy on Monday. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 07:42, March 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't find a copy of the first editon anywhere. Anyone know a Wookieepedian to ask about WEG books? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:47, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified street musician

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:37, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another mozz box player for WP:ENT!

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 18:39, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  nayayen ★talk  21:14, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 01:06, March 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * The individuals mentioned in the rpg seed section are the player characters.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:37, March 12, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified resort club (Bespin)

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:21, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The club...

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  nayayen ★talk  21:14, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 21:34, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 15:25, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * The individuals mentioned in the rpg seed section are the player characters.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:21, March 12, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified criminal (Bespin resort club)

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:21, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The crook...

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 18:40, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  nayayen ★talk  21:14, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 15:22, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * The individuals mentioned in the rpg seed section are the player characters.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:21, March 12, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified speeder (Bespin resort club)

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:21, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The getaway car...

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 18:42, March 12, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * This is a bit picky, but I think you can add an infobox here. There are some fields that can be filled in; "role," "skeleton," etc.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 15:29, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Added.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:18, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * The individuals mentioned in the rpg seed section are the player characters.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:21, March 12, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified rebel group

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 02:02, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:TCW IS OVER FOR NOW! For WP:VG.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:14, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Cue Ride of the Valkyries. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 16:51, March 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * I didn't mention the stormtrooper or HJ-377 in the body since I don't think they should be mentioned specifically aside from the Empire.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 02:02, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

Zug Tassik

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:14, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: One of Three

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  nayayen ★talk  12:00, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Tinwe (comlink) 14:35, March 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Just needs something about the holo image not allowing skin or eye color identification, so people don't assume he's blue. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 14:22, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Adressed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 15:54, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Omar Toggs

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:27, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Two of Three

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  nayayen ★talk  12:00, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Tinwe (comlink) 14:33, March 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) With Toggs, I think it'd be safe to say he had green skin in the body and infobox, but mention that his eye color is ambiguous in the BTS. Other than that, he looks good. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 14:19, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Adressed. Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:17, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Toli-X

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 14:34, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: This article used to be a total copyright breach.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice to see some Jedi Apprentice noms.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 15:02, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Provided that EJ's objection is taken care of. Looks good otherwise.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 02:11, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  16:22, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I think we should probably have an article for the Toli-X vaccine. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:16, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *There ya go. Tinwe (comlink) 06:23, March 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Sapir tea

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 08:47, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Not Jedi Apprentice this time, but Watson nonetheless.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Secrets or Legacy also count.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:53, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  nayayen ★talk  11:14, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sapir

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 08:47, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Given that I nominated sapir tea, I felt obliged.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Indeed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:54, March 25, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I'm not sure that mentioning how the tea was served on Coruscant is really that relevant to the article about the plant. At least the second half of the last sentence, if not the whole of it, could probably be taken out.  nayayen ★talk  11:13, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Chuhkyvi Jedi

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 10:00, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Trés cool. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 22:04, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  nayayen ★talk  11:18, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Provost

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:49, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Go Raiders!

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  nayayen ★talk  11:22, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Return of the Jedi
 * 2) *As a starter, the Notes and references are above the Appearances, where it shouldn't be.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 01:25, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Up is down, black is white! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:39, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Munn City

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:52, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Please, refrain from the obvious joke. She doesn't deserve acknowledgement.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Battle of the Nazzri system

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:03, March 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In which it is pointed out that one or two or three is easy to produce, but longer projects are rendered difficult, overly time-consuming, or nigh-impossible for a solitary user to do, and that the argument for the practice's usefulness is undermined greatly by this.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments