User talk:Corellian Premier

{| width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #FEFFCF; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome Corellian Premier!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * Internal pages:
 * Senate Hall
 * Wookieepedia FAQ
 * Manual of Style
 * Online sources
 * Guide to image use
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * What Wookieepedia is not
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * How to write a great article

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash; MyNz 21:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * }

Disruption of Comm 4
Hey Corellian Premier, I saw the article you created for the Disruption of Comm 4, and there are a few things that you should add to it to make it more encyclopedic. In the main article (not just in the infobox) you need to put the battle into context - when was it fought, who were the combatants, why did it occur, what was Comm 4, etc. Otherwise, the article really only means anything to somebody who already knows all about it. Also, you should put links to things in the main article (like the pilot that you name, and for that matter you should link to the source). Doluk 15:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nice work on improving the article - it reads much better to me now. Doluk 23:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: Battle of Ryloth losses
While yes, there are merits in specifying exactly how many starship casualties there were, it tends to be a bit moot if we don't know exactly how many were destroyed and if there were probably a lot more than those we know. Thank you for your contributions to the article.  CC7567  (talk) 20:04, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Venator Turbolaser
It's not confirmed. Unless you can find a source that specifically says those are the correct Turbolasers, then you can add them in. That list is also incomplete.  JangFett  (Talk) 21:08, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

164.107.226.134
That's not exactly vandalism.&mdash; BobaFett1 Bounties collected  21:38, May 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay...&mdash; BobaFett1 Bounties collected Jaster's Feather.svg 19:26, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Recent Vandalism
Any time.  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 21:46, May 9, 2010 (UTC)

Falcon
Please clean up your recent edits to Millennium Falcon. We write in present tense, for one thing.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:32, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * It is past tense. I'm sorry about that, I have no clue what I was thinking. Anyway, thanks for your hard work, and I'm just gonna sign off now...  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:43, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Mos Eisley
In all the ten years I've been playing the game, every single time I've played the level the guy gets shot down and says "I'm clear but my fire is down", always in the same part too. Either I suck at the game or its scripted. DjMack 00:11, July 19, 2010 (UTC)

Christian
Can I use your Christian Userbox.  Darth Rage Leave a message after the beep 00:24, July 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re: FAN nomination process

 * Heavily dependent on the quality of your article, the length of your article, the appeal of the article to the Inquisitorius. Could range anywhere from a week from the best, most popular, shortest articles, to a couple of months for something longer. If your article has numerous objections pile up quickly, expect to be there awhile. I'm not really an expert on this matter any more, but I'd say a good median time is anywhere from two weeks to a month. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 17:22, July 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Palmer CAN
Simply contact any member of the EC, and they will start an EC vote to remove the nomination. Since it is a nominator request, the vote should pass with no problems. Just remember to put it up for GAN when you feel up to the challenge. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie the truth  ) 01:17, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Battle for Naboo
Hey. If I've understood the mission correctly, during the disruption of Comm 4, Sykes, Kael, Adela Tyché, and Vedd Deviss flew N-1 starfighters, and Kol Kotha flew Borvo the Hutt's starfighter. As for your second question, I've just started replaying the game, so I have not reached the final level yet. I'll let you know when I do, though. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 14:56, August 4, 2010 (UTC)

No HUD
Does Battle for Naboo have an option to remove the HUD and UI, like a cheat or menu option? If so, please make sure all future uploads are taken with the UI turned off, in order to better keep with Wookieepeedia's image guidelines. SinisterSamurai 15:55, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Uhm, no, I can't say there is. Sorry.

Torkil Mux
It was kinda sloppy, but looking at it again, I'd say it can be re-added, just touched up. I made some changes and put the section back.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 16:15, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Replies
Hey there. I think I'll just reply to all of your messages here. First of all, I've reached the final level, but I'm still not sure whether Hollis or Deviss participated in the battle. It is quite hard to tell by the voice acting alone, especially to a non-native English speaker like me. It'd help if there were subtitles, but there aren't any. However, I'm more inclined to say that they did not participate based on what I could hear. Second, yes I would like to take over Adela, but only if you are not interested in her anymore. All that her article needs is a bit of detail, and then you can safely take her to the GA nomination page. Lastly, yes, I do have the PC version. I believe this explains some minor differences that we've encountered in our playthroughs. I plan to GA Kael, and I am going to add the picture of his downed starfighter later. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 11:13, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Your nom for Barren planetoid
Do you want me to remove the nom from the CAN page?&mdash; 03:33, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I did already ask Grand Moff Tranner to remove it. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 22:21, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Re: South ridge
The LucasArts watermark should be removed. Apart from that, it looks fine to me. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 16:04, October 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just save the current image to your hard drive, crop it with JPEGcrop, and re-upload the new picture under the same filename. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:35, October 2, 2010 (UTC)

You've played a lot of Battle for Naboo, right?
Is the resistance movement ever referred to as the Naboo Underground? Or just the Naboo Resistance? SinisterSamurai 07:18, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, neither. Sykes just goes on and on about the 'fight against the TF.' Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 15:58, October 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * But the OOU briefing for several missions refer to "the resistance." Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:12, October 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. Thanks. I had previously merged Naboo Underground and Naboo Resistance based on existing BFN info on Wookieepedia. However, I will probably split them back up again, now. SinisterSamurai 04:04, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

Trade Federation escort cruiser
Hey! Thanx for the clarification! I rewrote the Trade Federation escort cruiser article. Tell me what you think! J.C'Boath III 02:20, October 10, 2010 (UTC)

Borvo the Hutt's starfighter
Hey, I just wanted to let you know that I removed that article from the CAN since it was over 250 words. You can now nominate it to become a GA. Also, remember to not capitalize "I" in —if you do it, the era icon does not show up. Cheers. 1358 (Talk) 10:22, October 17, 2010 (UTC)

Re: CANS
Are you sure you want those two removed? I'm actually halfway through striking my objections for Feretina right now, and the base article is almost done (only 1 or 2 outstanding objections). SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie the truth  ) 02:05, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, whenever you are done with Ferentina is fine. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:07, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is there a particular reason why? SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 02:12, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure. They are ready to be removed, and I can concentrate on my remaining noms. And I was going to wait to move the Base page until it was removed so I didn't have to deal with changing all the links yet. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 02:27, October 18, 2010 (UTC)

CAN Objection
I'm sorry I delayed the minelayer's CAN passing. I didn't get 13's message until today. Aside, congratulations. NaruHina Talk  22:32, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Redirects
As far as I know, it's Special:MyPage/Wikia.css. 1358 (Talk) 07:38, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Nod Kartha FAN
Hey Corellian Premier,

I just wanted to contact you regarding the Battle of Nod Kartha nomination. There currently are objections that have been left outstanding for approximately fifteen days. I want to stress that if there is no activity on the nom within the next seven days, then the Inquisitorius will remove it from the nomination page. If situations have arisen that have hindered your ability to maintain the nomination, please let one of us know so that we can take the appropriate course of action. If the nomination does end up being removed by the Inq, you can renominate it at a later date so long as you intend to see it fully through the process. Please advise either way, and thanks for your contributions to Wookieepedia. —Tommy 9281 19:38, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, i've been really busy lately. These five page papers start to add up. Anyway, I am still planning on working on it. Thanks for enquiring. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:49, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey no problem, I completely understand. I would suggest though that you leave a note on the pages comments section so that other Inqs don't prepare themselves to remove the nom. —Tommy 9281 22:50, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just want to let you know that you still have a single outstanding objection for this nom. You might want to hurry up and address it before another Inq feels inclined to begin the removal process. Thanks, —Tommy 9281 15:29, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

Vacation
Given your recent vacation notice, please be aware that your nominations on the GAN page will removed within the next few days unless you demonstrate a continued dedication to working on them. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:51, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * This goes for your lone FAN page nomination as well. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:54, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * As I will be away from the computer for well over a week, that is unfortunate, but hey, if thats the policy... Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:12, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Carida as a Good Article
Do you mean every thing needs to be linked once on the whole page of just each section? User:Grand Moff Hopkins
 * After the intro and infobox, it is just one link throughout the entire page. You don't have to re-link something in each section.

WP:RWM and LMW
Hello there. :) I just wanted to invite you to WP:RWM. If you're not interested, no biggy. Also, as you're a Christian, I wanted to let you know of LifeMusic Wiki, and Protestant Christian music wiki. I'd love to have you on both RWM and LMW. Anyway, nice talking to ya! :) MasterFred (Whatever) 15:12, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi there! Thanks for the invitation, i'll keep it in mind. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 18:09, February 18, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Shon-Ju organization
Sure&mdash;if it exists and it's unique, it's canon. I can't remember exactly what it's called in the comic, so you might want to check it to find the best name for it, even if it ends up being conjectural.  CC7567  (talk) 09:45, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Double Re:
Hey there! I will definitely review the red dead head. Probably... later today. As for the H'nemthe, I assumed that she was dead based on Aayla's line "I was the only one to survive." I took that to mean everyone in the cantina. Fair? Menkooroo 03:50, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, and thanks! Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 03:53, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Review: The planet that the moon orbits should get its own article, if it's mentioned at all in the book. Ditto the sun.
 * So should the sun be "UnID star (Sixela system)"?
 * In the intro: A little context on the Falcon (even just "starship").
 * Done.
 * Article for the battle between the two opposing fleets? The intro even calls it a "battle."
 * Gah! How'd i forget to put that in there?
 * The Description section should mention barren red rock.
 * Inputted.
 * The "History" section reads too much like a plot summary of the Rebel Force book, with a lot of details about the events that aren't all that relevant to the moon itself. I would suggest reading some other featured and good articles on planets & moons to get an idea of what level of detail is required --- this article will need some considerable paring down of detail. The events can be summarized more succinctly; try to keep details limited to the most important parts of the events and things that are directly relevant to the moon.
 * Cut some things out.
 * A picture somewhere in the article wouldn't hurt. One of Luke from the cover of Uprising would work. I can crop it and upload it for ya if you want. Menkooroo 14:48, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, if you don't mind. And thanks for the review! Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 22:52, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Second Battle of Kessel
Do you have anyother objections for my Second Battle of Kessel nom? You striked (I know it isn't a word, just go with it) all of your objections but didn't support. Did I miss something? Kilson 02:26, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello there, I have striked all the objections I currently have, although I am withholding support for the moment until I am sure it is ready, which at your current rate will be soon!. And unofficially, we are not required to support it after placing objections. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 02:31, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * I know, I just assumed you would support once all of your objections were addressed. It's cool though, support when you think the article is ready. Kilson 00:23, March 17, 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Barkhesh
No, I do not believe it would be. The battles in the game - in any game, not just Rogue Squadron - should not be known by the OOU level descriptors; the battles at Balmorra and Thyferra, for example, would not be titled "Imperial Construction Yards" and "Moff Seerdon's Revenge". Furthermore, "rendezvous" implies only a meeting; while the mission was initially intended as just a rendezvous mission, it became a battle/skirmish, thus rendering the fact it was intended to be a rendezvous invalid. The title is already noted as being conjecture, and the level name is noted in the BTS section. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 00:38, April 2, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Official Starships and Vehicles Collection issue 62
No, not really. The magazine includes an extensive article on Gavyn Sykes, which summarizes his exploits in the game. There's no new new info. QuiGonJinn (Talk) 20:56, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 00:57, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Kung'urama'nuruodo‎
Just to let you know, Kung'urama'nuruodo‎ is under WP:TCW's scope, and Jedi Kasra reserved the article as an intended project for himself. While it's fine to edit in the article, you should let Kasra know if you're planing on taking the article to featured status in the future, or at least maintaining it. You never know what he might have planned for the article, or if he's working on it. :)  JangFett  (Talk) 04:39, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh okay, I didn't realize that, thanks. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 16:38, May 24, 2011 (UTC)

Kae Kwaad
Hey Premier, just letting you know that a new voting option has been created on the Kae Kwaad TC per general demand. Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 14:36, June 2, 2011 (UTC)

Grassy Plains
Nope, no plans. Feel free to take a whack at it. Good luck! Menkooroo 09:14, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Starships & Vehicles Collection 62
Sorry for the late reply. RL is a bitch :P Anyway, I'll be happy to drop the magazine to you via e-mail. You just have to set your e-mail in your preferences, confirm it, and check "enable e-mail from other users." QuiGonJinn (Talk) 15:01, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it totally is...email should be ready now. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:20, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

Re:FA redux
When a Featured Article undergoes a major rewrite, it will usually get sent to the FA redux page by the Inquisitorius to ensure that the new version of the article adheres to FA standards. Once there, the Inquisitors will review the article as if it were any other FA nom. If you're not done with the Battle of Grassy Plains article by meeting time, you should just leave a note on the meeting page saying that you're working on the article. This way, the Inq will know that the article's issues are being fixed, and they will probably vote to extend probation (in which case they will probably vote, at the next meeting, to send the article to the redux page for further review). Hope that helps. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 20:42, July 17, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Toprawa
To respond to your query on my talk page, I have two basic issues overall with the images in the article. Firstly, I think the two images in the "Prelude" and "The battle" sections can be increased in size significantly. And regarding the image that was stuck into the Sources list, while there isn't a hard-and-fast rule restricting images in these sections, it's general practice that we try to avoid sticking images into articles below the Behind the scenes section. In this specific instance, the image is crammed into the Sources dropdown list, meaning we can't even see the entire picture in its full state. We have to scroll up and down to see the entire image, which makes it look unsightly. Plus, I'm not sure that image is even showing us anything vital that we couldn't do without. It's basically the same image as in the BTS section. I would just recommend simply removing it entirely. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:29, July 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks. I went ahead and made those changes. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 19:41, July 30, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Battle of the South Ridge
Hey CP! About the Battle of the South Ridge, I actually just kinda glanced through it. I don't have that game (though I'd like to get it :P) so I can't say that I could take it to GAnom. But, if you were saying that you want to take it that would be great! Let me know if you plan on taking it and I'll give it a pre-nom review for you. Let me know what you think. See ya. Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 19:10, August 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, first make sure that it is not over 1,000 words. If that's the case then you may want to consider making it an FAnom.
 * Just for a reminder right off the bat, it's usually not the best to start out an article by saying "This battle" it would be better to say "A battle".
 * You should say which company made the game, such as LucasArts.
 * If there is other sources than just the game, then they should be mentioned in the BTS section, too.
 * After glancing through it, it looks like it could use a good copy-edit.
 * "When the Queen returned to Naboo after fleeing the invasion in the year 32 BBY, the Security Forces were given a needed boost." There is several things that can be fixed in this sentence. First: What queen? Naboo has had many queens. Second: Context on Naboo. Third: Context on invasion. Fourth: the last part makes no sense. You should clarify what Security Forces, the Naboo Security Forces? and maybe say something like "the queen returned to Naboo after fleeing the invasion in the year 32 BBY, giving the security forces needed enthusiasm", just something along that lines. Fifth: Context on invasion.
 * "After the meeting, Lieutenant Sykes in a Gian speeder and other members of his resistance cell received a message from Captain Panaka on the coded RSF channel, directing them to rendezvous on Rasker Hill, near the south ridge." This sentence needs some rewording and it is a bit of a run-on sentence. Also, it's best to say Royal Security Force rather than using the shortened RSF.
 * Again, it's best to use Single Trooper Aerial Platform instead of STAP.
 * "If the forces made it there, the Gungan Grand Army was doomed" this sounds a little like speculation. See if you can reword it so it doesn't sound so speculatory.
 * The article needs a good copy-edit like I said before. Don't forget to avoid shortened uses (AATs, MTTs, STAPs). Also, try to avoid overuse of the semi-colon ( ; ). Take some time to go through the article and fix it up, and I think it will turn out good.
 * Is there a quote for the "Prelude" and "Aftermath" sections?
 * Not anything that directly relates to it, although I probably could add something from the subsequent mission. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 17:26, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * "Light to medium" in the infobox sounds a bit speculatory. Does Battle for Naboo say "light to medium losses", or does it just depend on how the game works?
 * It just depends on how quickly the player destroys the attacking TF forces. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 17:26, August 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll be giving you more stuff on and off as I look through the article. Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 19:23, August 15, 2011 (UTC)

GAN
Hey CP! Are you still planning on doing Battle of the south ridge? I'm only asking because you haven't seen to have done anything with it in a while. Let me know. Cheers! Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 21:17, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh hi! Yeah, its in the works. I'm trying to get an INQ to get a copy-edit going on it, and i still need to do some minor things to it. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 22:00, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Alrighty. Have you tried ? Unless my memory fails me, he does copy-edits. Good luck! Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:04, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey, just to let you know, I've given the article a preliminary copy-edit to get someone started. Good luck again! Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:11, September 10, 2011 (UTC)

Re: copy-edit request
Hey Corellian, I unfortunately don't have much spare time right now. I'll definitely try to get to it as soon as possible, but I can't make any promises. Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 18:11, September 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Heh, me too. Sounds good. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower

Re: CSF in SW: Obi-Wan
Hey, yes, if you could give me as much information as possible that would be great! Thanks. Coruscantfan 15:26, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. One problem: The Coruscant Guard is a clone unit formed in 22 BBY. If you have the game, can you double check if it actually says Coruscant Guard? If it doesn't say that, I'll correct the Star Wars: Obi-Wan article. If it really does say Coruscant Guard in game, I'll have to take a look and see how/where I'm going to write that in. Thanks. Coruscantfan 01:41, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was wondering about that...the game does in fact specify Coruscant Guard. Not sure if it is meant to be the CSF. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 01:48, September 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking, I'll probably add it to the CSF and make in a note in the BTS since there is too much other cannon contradicting the possibility it was the Coruscant Guard as we know it. Thanks. Coruscantfan 19:21, September 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Subject 1157
First off, I haven't seen the video he was from in a long time, could you tell me where I might be able to find the video so I can watch it again before reviewing the article for comprehensiveness. If that is impossible, I will review the best I can on memory.-- Exiled Jedi   (Greetings)  22:37, September 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * The video was from the TFU II website--unleashed2010.com. It's no longer there after the website change last year...and i don't know if it can be found via the "wayback" machine website. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 23:01, September 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * So did he just appear in one of the preview videos, or did he appear in multiple preview videos?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  01:25, September 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * He wasn't in a preview video per se...the website for awhile was from his perspective while he was in his cloning tank, and users could play minigames and unlock visions Subject 1157 experienced. Does that help? Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 02:58, September 27, 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Naboo trading cards
Are the card you're looking for from the CCG? All of those are available here. Menkooroo 05:50, September 25, 2011 (UTC)

Weapons research facility
I've addressed a few of your concerns with the nom, thanks for the time-DjMack 04:50, September 26, 2011 (UTC)