User talk:Jensaarai

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Jensaarai!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Please do not remove talk page and forum comments, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask one of our administrators. May the Force be with you!
 * }

Form IV: Ataru

 * I appreciate that you're trying to help, but I've been reverting your edits to that article, because they've generally added POV and lowered the quality of the prose to the article. I'm sorry I haven't addressed this with you before, but just wanted to let you know. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 06:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, the Shaak Ti one isn't pure Ataru, which is why I removed it. Also, as the person who wrote/co-wrote the other three saber form FAs, I'm pretty sure that none of them have "weakness" sections specifically dedicated to them. They're incorporated into the applications and description sections to avoid making lots of little sections. As for pics, the issue will be finding one that we know canonically is representative of Ataru. That's the tricky part. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 06:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * On Shaak Ti, I realize that, but I'm hoping to stick to strictly Ataru pictures in order to provide more representative pics. As for the SW.com ones . . . they're all of people that are already pictured in the article, at equivalent or lower quality. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 06:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Questions

 * On the Jar'Kai project, simply be bold and work on it&mdash;no submission necessary. As far as the lightsabers are concerned, I think it definitely would be Asajj's. Though, IIRC, we generally don't make articles for individual lightsabers, so I would refrain from creating the article. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 15:13, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Jar'Kai
Hey, nice job on the article. One thing, Dooku was not Greivous' Sith Master, since Grievous wasn't Force-sensitive. At any rate, Dooku was restricted by the Rule of Two, though this did not stop him from teaching Ventress a few Sith techniques.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 14:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

FA edits

 * Please be more conscientious when editing our featured articles. Edits like your recent ones to Form IV: Ataru, which added POV and a spelling error to the article, detract from the quality of those articles. Also, repeated reversions of your adding low-quality or too many images to articles are growing rather tiresome. Please keep your tendencies towards such excesses in check in the future, or you may face a short block for disruption. Thank you. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 01:53, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
 * One, quality counts for a lot. Replacing old high-res images with new low-quality images is not good ju-ju. Two, if you weren't so prone to utterly rejiggering the article/image layout when you add new images, I'd be more sympathetic. Three, re: Yoda vs. Dooku, it's your personal opinion that bladelock images are bad and that Yoda vs. Dooku is the most epic use of Ataru, so taking the position that everyone else is somehow doing the wiki a disservice by not agreeing with you immediately will get you nowhere. Regardless, if you get a higher-quality image, I won't object to it replacing the other image. My warning about not screwing with FAs anymore still stands. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 02:11, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

Wow
I just have to say "whoa" on your efforts to complete a whole history of the Sith. You are creating a comprehensive and detailed history that even the star wars database can't rival. I also noticed that there is no mention of Darth Phobos in the history. Is there any reason for this? I was just wondering because she was pretty major. Is it the fact that she was not a Dark lord of the Sith? User:Revanthereformer1138

Assistance
Hello,

I see you're working on Vodo, and thank you for tackling such a project. As Wookieepedia's current director of all things TOTJ, I'd like to lend whatever assistance I can. I've already seen a few things I can help with while watching your progress, but will only do if you require/request a helping hand. Let me know your thoughts on the offer, and keep up the good work. —Tommy9281  ( No truth in me ) 17:21, October 8, 2009 (UTC)