Forum:SH Archive/Too many era tags?

I've started noticing pages where the era tags are, I think, being used incorrectly. People seem to be adding "assumed" eras to the list. The latest example I found was Dani, whose entry places her in the Rise of the Empire era and Rebellion era. Now, Dani has made no appearances prior to 0 ABY, and we have no real information about her from before then. Shouldn't this mean she only gets a Rebellion tag, or are we deciding that if someone is old enough, and apparently lived in the era, that era should be included? I mean, who knows? Maybe Dani spontaneously generated shortly before the issue she first appeared... I'm just curious what the policy on this is. --JMM 17:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)