Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Anti-Alien League

 * Nominated by:  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Something different for a change.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support GTQ3:09, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 21:32, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 10:24, February 21, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Gorton Colu has a CSWE entry and is mentioned in the KOTOR Strategy Guide --- do you know if either of those sources mention the Anti-alien league?
 * Nope, no mention in the CSWE.
 * Strategy Guide? SoresuMakashi might be able to help you out; he GA'd Colu.
 * I'll see if he can help.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Let me know when you find out whether or not the league is mentioned (directly or indirectly) in the strategy guide.Menkooroo 04:45, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * No mention in the guide.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 17:02, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking that out. I saw some of the inquiries you made on various talk pages --- good hustle! Menkooroo 17:22, February 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * "The Anti-Alien League was a Humanocentrist group formed by Gorton Colu" is currently sourced to The Essential Atlas.
 * Resourced.
 * I could and should fix this one myself, but it'll be handy for you to know if you don't already: Only use punctuation in image captions if it's a complete sentence. Menkooroo 02:43, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:06, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Rubefacient
 * Context of Taris's multiple cities should be added.
 * Done.
 * Mention that aliens were prohibited from UpCity under normal conditions. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * There needs to be a year in the intro
 * Try now.
 * I'm sorry, I was confused by the banner. Because of that banner, I think this should be made with a History section to avoid the dissonance caused by it. I'll not force you to, but it would probably be beneficial. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved the image over. Does this help?
 * Greatly. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * You say the league was mentioned in the game in the body but say it appeared in the BTS.
 * Corrected.
 * Because the article assumes 100% completion, you do not need the clause saying he could be avoided. That is, unless you include the alternate dialogue tracks (which you should).
 * Alternate dialogue tracks? There are no others that mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Revan can ignore the man, can agree with his speciesism, or tell him to screw off. Which of these elicits the mention? If it is the lattermost, remove the portion saying that Colu mentioned it to Revan and say that he could mention it to Revan given the proper dialogue in the BTS. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe he mentions it the first time Revan talks to him (and before any dialogue choices come up).  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:26, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Then say that Revan can choose not to speak to him. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 13:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the runaround. I couldn't wrap my head around it the right way. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Speciesism FTW NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:17, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the article should go into more detail about the player's potential conversations with Colu, The player can agree with him or refute him, if I remember correctly, and the reactions of the side characters (the Wookiee and the Twi'lek) change as well. This should probably all be mentioned in BTS. ~ SavageBob 06:24, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * While that might work in Colu's article, in no other place in Colu's dialogue does it even remotely mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 01:12, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Isn't it still pertinent, though, since Colu is out touting the league? ~ SavageBob 16:21, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, try now.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 19:21, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think that should be in the BTS; the party doesn't have to include Zaalbar or Mission at that point. Instead, I think you should mention that "If the party includes Mission or Zaalbar, they react to his anti-alien rant by blah blah blah" and/or "Colu reacts to the Wookiee and Twi'lek by saying blah blah blah." ~ SavageBob 19:40, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Try now.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 20:00, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry to keep harping on this, but it goes beyond even that. If either the Wookiee or the Twi'lek is in the party, Colu does chide Revan. But there are further levels of interaction depending on whether Revan agrees or disagrees with Colu's rant. If you have the game saved near hear, play through with the two in your party and you'll see what I mean. If not, try to find the dialogue files or a video walkthrough. ~ SavageBob 20:27, February 26, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Also, guest nom for WP:KOTOR.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:58, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Obitoki

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:37, February 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now Podracing: there's a sport. At least when it's real podracing, where as long as you take off your helmet and shed your gloves no one can say a damn thing until someone's knees touch the ice.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support


 * 1) Jinzler 10:57, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) If you ask me, this article is obi-toki, er, okey-dokey! ~ SavageBob 16:16, March 2, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Are you sure this guy actually exist in canon? The Complete Cross-sections states that 18 racer qualified to the Boonta, and Obitoki is not one of them. Furthermore, the novel incorrectly identifies the racers in the scene where Obitoki is first mentioned. It mentions Obitoki, Elan Mak, and Habba Kee passing Anakin in the second lap, but in the film they are Ark Roose, Gasgano and Teemto. Obitoki's scenes doesn't fit well with the film, but the two could be "merged" by stating that Obitoki, Elan Mak and Habba Kee and Ark Roose, Gasgano and Teemto all surpassed Anakin. Darth Morrt 22:46, February 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * How about I just update it with an Ambig tag and beef up the Bts with the explaination? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:49, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * It'd be OK. Darth Morrt 08:56, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Episode I: Incredible Cross-Sections This is the CS book you were referring to? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:01, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is. The book says: "Eighteen Podracers, many well known at Mos Espa, qualify for the great Boonta Eve Race, in which nine-year old Anakin..." And there are listed the names of 18 racer and pictures of their podracers. Obitoki, Habba Kee and Xelbree, the three racers unique to the novelization are not among the 18 listed in the cross-sections book. Additionally, Obitoki is mentioned in the script of TPM. Darth Morrt 21:43, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Updated for these sources. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:58, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it would be useful if you created a Podracer (profession) article to link to. The current podracer article seems to double for both podracer pods and the individuals that flew them, but I think we can justify a separate article. --Jinzler 11:27, February 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:51, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Isn't there a source to state that Anakin is the only Human who can podrace? If so, it's probably worth noting that Obitoki was a non-Human. (Also, not required, but a link to his CUSWE page would be nice as an external link.) ~ SavageBob 02:11, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind; CSWE says "very few Humans could do it." He does have a CSWE entry, though, which has some info that needs incorporating (such as the fact that he's non-Human, and that he is a canonical podracer from the Boonta Eve Classic ). ~ SavageBob 02:14, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the entry is ambiguous over whether he raced in the Boonta. But he did race against Sebulba and experience the mishaps explained in TPM novel, just maybe not when TPM novel says. ~ SavageBob 18:12, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Does the entry confirm he is male? Otherwise updated. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:58, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Here's the full entry: "Obitoki An alien Podracer who competed against Sebulba during the final years of the Galactic Republic. Sebulba used the heat vents on his Podracer to cut through Obitoki's engines, knocking Obitoki out of the race. Another Podracer, Habba, was also knocked out by flying into Obitoki's debris." . So, no gender specified. If I were you, though I'd consider the CSWE stuff canon, but not the stuff from the novel, since that seems to contradict most other sources. In other words, can we assume his race was on Tatooine or in the Boonta Eve Classic? ~ SavageBob 23:29, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * We can't assume it was on Tatooine (I got it in my head that Sebulba only raced there. :P), but I think the generic scenario of the book's story should be fine to include, which gives extra detail on why his pod crashed. Updated again, and thanks for taking the time to transcribe that. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:24, March 2, 2011 (UTC)


 * You'll need to source the bit about him being mentioned in the script, as the script isn't a commercially available product like the novelization is. A google search for "The Phantom Menace script" oughtta gitcha whatcha need. Menkooroo 06:58, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:29, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Good show! Just waiting to see what you have on Bob's question below before I vote. Menkooroo 00:06, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Is he/she mentioned in Star Wars Episode I The Phantom Menace: Illustrated Screenplay? ~ SavageBob 22:44, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:27, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks for checking! ~ SavageBob 00:38, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Fun World Founder's Day

 * Nominated by: Another holiday, another PAR-TAY! Just don't try to get married. ~ SavageBob 03:12, February 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 07:32, March 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Good work, Bob. I feel you may have inspired me...  Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 00:23, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Fizz-Pop Cap (with foil cluster)

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 03:33, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: You know you wish you had one.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 08:16, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * It just occurred to me that "Fizz-Pop Cap" could refer to some sort of pop-top from a soda can instead of the actual hat/cap Spilfer is shown to be wearing. Am I right to assume that "Cap" here is the hat? What do others think? ~ SavageBob 03:02, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Upon further reflection, it's too ambiguous; infobox duly gutted. ~ SavageBob 06:50, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Balderdash

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 04:53, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I have two. Number One: Win on the parts of Mr. Hidalgo and Mr. Ens. *applause* Number Two: A prime example of why Wookieepedia is so addicting. You never know what you might turn up just before you sign off.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) From the Council Chambers:
 * 2) *Otherwise, looks good.  Master Jonathan  (Council Chambers)  Saturday, March 5, 2011, 01:10 UTC
 * 1) *Otherwise, looks good.  Master Jonathan  (Council Chambers)  Saturday, March 5, 2011, 01:10 UTC

Comments

Terrafin

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:11, March 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I'd like to officially motion we begin referring to the "duck test" as the "terrafin test" so it is more alliterative and "Star Warsy."

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi 05:13, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  OLIOSTER   (talk) 12:52, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm never quite sure what qualifies as a sofixit or not, but could you possible add "dish" or something similar to "had a serving of this for breakfast the day"?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 17:02, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:09, March 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * As Battle of the Corellian Queen is a conjectural title, you must link it in a different way "&hellip;took part in the Battle of the Corellian Queen." as that implies it is a canonical title. 1358  (Talk)  15:24, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:01, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Fighter (painting)

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:54, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I will keep nomming paintings until there are no more to nom! MUAHAHAHAHAHA!  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:54, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  1358  (Talk)  19:32, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Again, me fail at precise description, so any help is appreciated.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:59, March 4, 2011 (UTC)

Galactic Solutions Industries

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 14:09, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Not a very large company...

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 23:58, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * I don't really think that Dessel preferring to use them is enough of a link to list "Brotherhood of Darkness" in the affiliation field.
 * Gone.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 21:25, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * If the GSI-24D disruptor pistol doesn't appear until Dynasty of Evil, and Galactic Solutions Industries isn't mentioned in Dynasty of Evil, then can we really say for sure that they produce the GSI-24D? I know it seems like a logical enough assumption, but it's still an assumption. Menkooroo 15:04, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Did Tarkin die on the Death Star given no other information than the original film? Maybe he had an escape pod on the wall next to him... Given the name which specifically has GSI in it (noted to be an acronym for this company's name during PoD) I would be very surprised if it was incorrect. The name itself shows the company. I'll still take it out, because by policy I have to, but I don't like doing it in this case.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 21:25, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * The Tarkin analogy isn't the best one, but the acronym is a good point. If POD establishes that as the Acronym, then I think that you could restore the info and list DOE as an indirect mention in the Appearances section. Menkooroo 05:06, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7am! It's hard to think properly, let alone make analogies at 7am. Changed as per your suggestion.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:38, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Aye, but now you'll need to source the article. :P Remember to source the GSI-24D to DOE. Menkooroo 06:52, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sourced!  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 12:09, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified Sith trooper (catacombs)

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 15:40, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Ouch.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 00:18, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Just as a note, I removed Krayt from the affiliation, as "Darth Krayt's Sith troopers and the "Masters" field does the job of explaining this fella's loyalties. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 00:18, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I do get repetitive sometimes. :P Thank ya! Menkooroo 00:22, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Warrior's Honor

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:45, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Painting painting painting painting painting

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Getting better at the whole "describing it" thing, but if you see ways to improve it, go ahead.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:45, March 5, 2011 (UTC)

Kaul

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 19:18, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another poor soul trapped in the Refugee Sector.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Linking to colors is fine; just make sure you do it in both the infobox and the bio.
 * Done.
 * Context on the Exchange, baby! Even just a coupla words.
 * Done.
 * Ref [3] appears twice in a row near the beginning --- is one of them meant to be something else?
 * Just referencing to much. Removed one of them.
 * Can you cut down on the description of his conversation with the Exile? It's always better to try to get the key points of a convo across rather than offering a recount of every line spoken. As a suggestion, "to which the Exile asked why Kaul didn't just grab the goods himself." could probably be jettisoned entirely. Menkooroo 00:37, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:51, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Palso Thern

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 19:29, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Hmm. I'm not sure an image of an action figure can be considered canonical. I think the design of the action figure is fair game and canon, but the image that's being used in this infobox is basically making the statement, "Palso Thern stood in this exact pose at some point in galactic history." Since it's essentially an image of a representation of him, I think it can only go in BTS.
 * So should the photo from the movie be considered the canon one? And what about Oxixo's photo, as AFAIK he only appears as an action figure, unless some later source confirms he is also in the movie.
 * Uploaded a cropped photo from the film. Hanzo Hasashi 23:16, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * The image is too small for the infobox... Would it be possible to just include the group shot with him in it? ~ SavageBob 17:48, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Meaning uncropped? Hanzo Hasashi 17:59, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that one. ~ SavageBob 16:00, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, I replied to your query on my talk page; yes, he does seems to appear in the PhotoComic, but only from the neck down thanks to some wonky panel cropping. ~ SavageBob 20:54, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Hanzo Hasashi 22:37, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Another thing: If the toy image stays in the article, it needs to be properly sourced: It's originally from the Hasbro "Battle over Endor" pack. ~ SavageBob 16:00, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, will do that. Hanzo Hasashi 18:53, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I don't think that there's anything wrong with using action figures as IU images --- I've seen it done before in non-status and status articles alike. The "stood in this exact pose at some point" argument doesn't really work, else we wouldn't be able to use promotional posed photographs. The action figure image is much better quality than that ROTJ screencap; I'd rather see it in the infobox, personally. Community: Thoughts? Menkooroo 12:04, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's been my personal practice not to use promotional photos unless some other source "canonizes" them first. For instance, CSWE includes lots of promo photos, which, in my opinion, takes them form the promo land to canon. I'd hold to the same standard with action figure photos, personally. ~ SavageBob 17:46, March 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Site policy and the community at large have no problem with promo shots, though, so if others want to go ahead and use them, there are no real grounds for objection. Menkooroo 00:00, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

Oxixo

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 19:29, March 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments