Wookieepedia:Improvement drive

The improvement drive is a collaboration to improve existing articles to Featured article status.


 * /History – For past winners.
 * /Failed – For failed nominations.


 * For larger-scale collaborative projects, see WookieeProjects.

Nomination and voting
Articles to be improved can be nominated by registered users in the "nominations" section below, with an explanation of what work is needed. Please do not nominate articles involved in edit wars. Also, when nominating an article, please put IDRIVE on that article's page so as to inform any visitors of the page of its nomination. Please add new nominations at the bottom.

When you vote, please add your vote to the vote total at the Current Ranking section, and make the necessary changes.

Each Sunday, the article with the most support votes is chosen. Opposing votes are counted as negative votes. You can vote for as many articles as you like. Articles need two votes per week to stay on the list.

Note: It is considered somewhat rude not to help improving articles you've voted for.

Collaboration
Here are some best practices to use while working on an article selected for the improvement drive:
 * 1. Plan your contribution. After an article has been chosen, it is a good idea to post your ideas for additions, changes and corrections for the topic on the article's talk page. You can then choose some of the listed contributions to avoid overlapping work.
 * 2. Be quick. Use . Once you have planned your work, make your edits quickly, but carefully. Articles chosen for the drive are the likely subjects of many rapid edits. By entering and exiting EDIT mode quickly, you can avoid another user saving a new edit before you have completed your work. If your edit will be more lengthy, place the  tag at the top of the article, save the edit to make the tag appear, and then begin your work.

Nominations

 * The next project article is to be selected on Sunday, July 15.

Please add new nominations at the bottom of the page.

Current Rankings

 * 1) Darth Maul (4)
 * 2) Airen Cracken (5)
 * 3) Teren Rogriss (2)
 * 4) Bacta (1)

Airen Cracken

 * Nominated June 26, 2007; needs 6 votes by July 17, 2007

Support Comments
 * 1) Ozzel 05:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Sure. Fnlayson 05:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Greyman ( Paratus ) 14:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Darthtyler Talk 20:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 18:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This article could be so much better. -- Ozzel 05:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Teren Rogriss

 * Nominated July 4, 2007; needs 4 votes by July 18, 2007

Support
 * 1) This article could go a lot farther.--Goodwood 20:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Probably.--Darthjamikal 23:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Darth Maul

 * Nominated July 8, 2007; needs 6 votes by July 29, 2007

Support
 * 1) Darthjamikal 12:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Goodwood 19:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Unit 414 23:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 18:47, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * There is too much non-canon information. -- Darthjamikal 12:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What's wrong with that? Unit 8311 16:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * There's almost as much non-canon info as there is canon info - that's what's wrong.--Goodwood 19:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually there is more non-canon information than canon in the article -- Darthjamikal 23:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It's about half and half. But that's beside the point. It doesn't matter how much non-canon information is in an article - it just means there are a lot of non-canon sources. Have you not noticed that articles like this are 100% non-canon? There's nothing "wrong" with it. Darth Seth [[Image:Stormtrooper helmet.jpg|20px]]( Imperial Commander ) 17:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Bacta

 * Nominated July 10, 2007; needs 2 votes by July 17, 2007

Support
 * 1) Ozzel 20:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments