Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Holodarts

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:03, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For the people who don't actualy want to throw darts to play darts

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  14:38, December 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 18:03, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Stake black   msg 20:54, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * The BTS does not mention the holodarts at all. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:07, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Ouch. Fixed. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:36, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Stake black
 * 5) * The category you used is OOU. Prefer instead.
 * 6) * "ex-Imperial". What does that mean? Please explain it in the article.  Stake black   msg 19:32, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Both done. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:10, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Mellcrawler

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:09, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: They smell bad... really bad...

(1 EC/1 User/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:34, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Stake black   msg 20:21, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * I'm not sure you need to source the fact that Sullust is a planet. I'd much rather have the second ref at the end of the first sentence. Referencing the word "was" doesn't look good to me.  Stake black   msg 20:04, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * I reorganized it a little bit, but I need to provide a source that says Sullust was an Outer Rim planet.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:15, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Esu Rotsino

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 23:56, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another non-GB nom! Also a quick barn-burner inclusion, and sort of cheating since its 2013 down here :P

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:13, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  20:34, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Stake black   msg 20:13, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * I always recommend against using "formerly" next to affiliations in infoboxes, as infoboxes are supposed to represent an individual's entire life rather than be a snapshot of the moment in time that the individual appeared in canon. For instance, Imperial defectors to the Alliance who then go on to serve the New Republic generally don't get a "formerly" next to anything. Make sense? Menkooroo (talk) 04:35, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * That was already in the article when I started working on it, and I forgot about it. I normally don't use formerly in my articles either. Should I change it to defected or something?  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 22:09, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * My advice would be to not include any disclaimer at all. Simply listing the various affiliations from throughout her life is, I think, the best way to go about it. Menkooroo (talk) 15:42, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * It is done.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 21:30, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Is Article of Secession supposed to be capitalized, because the body has it capitalized, while the quote attribution has it not so. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:49, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *It's meant to be in caps, but I just typed it wrong. Anyway, done now.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 06:52, January 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * This one's got me puzzled. Should the information about the name being an anagram on Sue Rostoni be sourced? It may appear self-evident, but this is very close to crossing the OR line.  Stake black   msg 20:01, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * It doesn't need to be sourced since you the reader can see that the same letters are in each, which is the definition of an anagram. It would original research if the article claimed that the anagram was intentional, (which is almost certainly was) without sourcing it.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:09, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair point.  Stake black   msg 20:13, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Coruscant Security Force incident support vessel

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 17:37, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A random speeder article

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) A random vote for a random speeder article.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:53, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  00:33, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * BtS?
 * 3) **Oh, wow!!! That's not embarrassing... Coruscantfan (Talk) 23:16, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Also, I'm not sure about keeping the See Also section. Is it really needed?
 * 5) **Well, the point of the See also section is to guide people to other similar articles which is what that is. Coruscantfan (Talk) 23:16, January 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * 501st dogma ( talk ) 22:33, January 2, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Evas VI

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 22:52, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Yeah right, like if I was gonna leave this page without any of my noms :p

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:01, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  16:17, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Stake black   msg 20:53, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Grammar's bad here - "and it could rain for even three days followed." Please remedy this.
 * 3) **How is it now? :x
 * 4) * Rainy needs to be sourced in the infobox!
 * 5) **Derp just noticed it, fixed.
 * 6) * I don't know much about the climate part of the infobox, but perhaps humid should be added to it? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:38, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Per my comment below, I'm gonna go with whatever people say so I added that. Winterz (talk) 15:46, January 6, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Stake black
 * 2) * I think you can create a History section before the "By 0 ABY" bit and lose the NOTOC.  Stake black   msg 19:52, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **I know this isn't my nom, but a history section, along with a description section, are only used when the article has an intro, and, as the article is less than 200 words, this is not required. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:06, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I won't object with it, then, but as a matter of style, I think it would be better.  Stake black   msg 20:11, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * Is the climate section of the Infobox correct? I'm not sure about it. Winterz (talk) 22:52, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * I think that's fine.  Stake black   msg 19:52, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified Selkath Jedi (Clone Wars)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 23:51, January 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Please be gentle.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 00:04, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:00, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:52, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Shouldn't the Jedi Academy Training Manual be listed under sources with the first pictured tag instead of in appearances? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:09, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Thanks for catching that.&mdash; 16:51, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Stake black
 * 5) *Was he only pictured? How much information does the source supply? That information is vital for the BtS section.  Stake black   msg 19:46, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **Yes he was, the caption to the image only says "A Selkath Jedi Uses A Pushing Slash."&mdash; 21:41, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **It would do good to explain this on the BtS section.  Stake black   msg 21:53, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Isn't that a use of Force Push? Even if not, he clearly used telekinesis and you should link/mention it in the article, regardless of my support already being there. Winterz (talk) 00:04, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. The image is a demonstration of a technique called "pushing slash" which redirects to the lightsaber combat article.&mdash; 00:14, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Pia

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 17:15, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Is it normal to fall in love with a picture?

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) It is normal for those who love art :> Winterz (talk) 18:06, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) A really fine piece of art, indeed. --LelalMekha (talk) 19:19, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  19:26, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash; 19:34, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:00, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Even if you don't use all the fields of the infobox, you should provide all of them in the article. Therefore, please reload your infobox.
 * 3) **Okay.
 * 4) * Please mention her skin and eye color in the body of the article.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * You could mention that her robes were hooded. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:51, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Fait accompli.  Stake black   msg 19:16, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) Since you've sourced the rest of the article, please source the body.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:55, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) * A-Done!  Stake black   msg 20:58, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * To clarify, this is all the information there is to her:
 * "The portrait was inspired by the beautiful, mysterious handmaidens of Queen Amidala of Naboo. Pia is meant to express quiet reserve, patience, compassion, and attention. I painted her from life over a period of six months, from November 2008 to May 2009."  Stake black   msg 17:15, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Niian

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 18:06, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Stake black   msg 20:51, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:59, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:46, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * In the infobox, I think that tropical should go under climate, not atmosphere. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:59, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Lol, that was my initial intention, my bad eheh. Fixed. Winterz (talk) 19:10, January 6, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Stake black
 * 2) * You can create a History section. Breaking it down will make it better for reading.
 * 3) **For the same than what Dogma said above, I'll have to skip this. I understand you think it would have a nicer appearance and structure but really, it wouldn't. I'd have to section every sentence and that would only make it worse ;)
 * 4) * You say that Niian was first mentioned in Breaking Free. You could also include the fact that it was the only mention so far.  Stake black   msg 19:23, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Winterz (talk) 20:33, January 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Tanque tea

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:56, January 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A MedStar nomination

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 00:08, January 7, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments