Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Unidentified Usk species

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:25, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:My species nom for the barn burner with the least info so far.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 14:03, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:03, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer (talk) 07:59, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 11:15, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Alphabetize categories please. :)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:17, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *I knew there'd be something obvious I forgot to do :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:38, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Dwarf opee sea killer

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 22:48, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Why not?

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:44, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:29, May 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 11:16, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Context on Naboo and Aquilaris.
 * 2) **Added.
 * 3) * "which makes less than 10 meters." I think you're missing a "them" in here.
 * 4) **Added too.
 * 5) * I would add context and say that Otoh Gunga was on Naboo, and that Binks was a Gungan.
 * 6) **Fixed.
 * 7) *Otherwise, good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:18, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **Thanks. --LelalMekha (talk) 23:28, May 6, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ib-Dunn

 * Nominated by: Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:36, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Another for Project Novels, also for the Hutt Barnburner

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:44, May 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:11, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 09:28, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * Could you mention the author of the encyclopaedia?
 * How do you want me to word this one as the encyclopedia has 7 authors.
 * I always go with just Sansweet and Hidalgo as I think the others are listed as "with help from" or something. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:40, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Done and done.
 * I think the first sentence might be missing some punctuation.
 * Split the sentence, is this better?
 * Can you mention Ogomoor's race? Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:47, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Mentioned. Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:53, May 9, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Just a little thing: in the infobox, you give the Hutt's full name, while the body doesn't have the full name for the introduction of the Hutt. You should be consistent, and use just name "version" for the introducing.
 * 3) **Like this?
 * 4) * You might want to add context on the Separatist Crisis. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:25, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:17, May 10, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * This article is short enough that it doesn't require an intro right? Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:36, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yup it only requires an intro if it's over 200 words and this is way below that. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:47, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified Hutt (medpacs)

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:43, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero and BarnBurner stuff.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:41, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:55, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 00:39, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Does the source actually call him a hermaphrodite? If not, you need to source it to something else.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:37, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Blarg. Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  20:44, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Hutt's palace

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:43, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero and BarnBurner stuff.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:44, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:41, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Mandalorian clan

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:43, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero and BarnBurner stuff.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:17, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:33, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * The article currently says the clan was killed, could you change the sentence to something like all members of the clan were killed or the clan was destroyed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:45, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:54, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) I think you should change it so it doesn't say that he informed the clan, as that would infer that he contacted them, which the quote makes clear that he didn't.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:44, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) *Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  03:05, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Attack on a Hutt's palace

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:43, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero and BarnBurner stuff.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:17, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:45, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  15:19, May 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:58, May 11, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * Same objection as I had with the clan. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:47, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:55, May 9, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Holo-scriber

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:52, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Sub-page I forgot to nom from the Tsyklens

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:14, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 11:18, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Princess
 * 2) *Can you specify what kind of book it is in the Bts? (novel, young reader, etc.)
 * 3) *I'm not quite sure, but I think you need an eras tag. - Princess   GLG  21:09, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **After further looking I'm still not sure if the article needs an eras tag. I have been looking at CAs on technology and some have eras tags, but others don't. For example, Jizz-box and Gravcouch do, but Holoplaque doesn't. So unless someone with more experience than me can say for sure which way it should be, I'll leave it up to you. - Princess   GLG  11:34, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Bosph language

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:35, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Sub-page for Bosph.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:19, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Just watch some of your linking. - Princess   GLG  01:08, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 11:19, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Heklu

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:43, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:One of several sub-pages for Riileb before I nom it.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:06, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Is Heklu supposed to be capitalized? In the BTS it is not. Is this correct, or a mistake?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:10, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *It's not meant to be capitalised. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:05, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Bob
 * 4) *In page ranges, be sure to use an n-dash rather than a simple dash. You get an n-dash by typing – instead of just typing -. So, for example, typing pp. 1–3 gives you pp. 1–3. (You'll have to read this comment in edit mode, since the nowiki command doesn't seem to be working right now...)
 * 5) **Added in. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:47, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *Sudlow's compilation was 1998, no '88, right? ~ Savage BOB sig.png 14:30, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Silly mistype on my part. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:47, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) *Your link to the roleplaying game is currently going to the Wizards of the Coast version. Be sure for all these WEG articles that you're pointing to the West End RPG! :) ~ Savage BOB sig.png 14:35, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Fixed and I'll go through fixing everything else. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:47, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Hutt-Riileb conflict

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:46, May 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Another Riileb sub-page.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * 201 words! Needs intro, or the loss of a word or two. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:12, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Should be below now :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:16, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) *What Insectoids?
 * 5) *"..them one of the few species independent species in Hutt Space." This doesn't quite sound right.
 * 6) *Remember to change the things that pertain to Bob's objections above to here, as you have the same BTS. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:10, May 12, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Kiskua's moon

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 15:11, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For WP:AST and the barnburner

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:20, May 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) -  Princess   GLG  11:19, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Princess
 * 2) * An individual who visited the moon at that time in order to observe the process of biogenesis was able to obtain various biochemical compounds and bring them back to an individual they worked with. They worked with? Do you mean he worked with? - Princess   GLG  02:10, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **No, "they" is also used as a singular pronoun to refer to a person whose gender is not known.  Imperators II (Talk) 04:09, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Ah, I see, I still think its confusing, but if that's the way your supposed to do it... - Princess   GLG  11:19, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Ayrehead
 * 6) *Can you mention the name of the quest? Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Like that?  Imperators II (Talk) 11:45, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Roberts

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 09:23, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Don't bother objecting about the infobox, it's fine where it is :)

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) -  Princess   GLG  11:25, May 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:41, May 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments