Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Four-Eighteen

 * Nominated by: Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:19, March 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Another for project novels, this time from Rogue Squadron.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:15, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 23:38, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Context on Rogue Squadron. It would be nice if you added mention of the Galactic Civil war as well.
 * 3) **Funny enough this one popped into my head on the way to work today. I was hoping I could fix it before anyone noticed I was missing context on it :P
 * 4) ***Techincally, the Alliance transforms into the New Republic after 4 ABY, so the Empire is fighting the NR. That should be stated as the combatents of the Galactic Civil War here.
 * 5) ****Changed
 * 6) * You could add unidentified gender and unidentified species as categories.
 * 7) **Added
 * 8) * Where exactly was the trooper killed? The raid article seems to say that the raid happened in an Alliance base, which should be mentioned.
 * 9) **The novel never states where he died, just that 4-18 was down. All I know for sure is that he died on that raid.
 * 10) * You need to mention that he was in the Stormtrooper corps in the body. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:45, March 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) **Added
 * 12) * Link and give brief context to Loor in the quote attribution.
 * 13) **Linked and gave context, do I also link his name in the article or just the quote?
 * 14) ***Since you have his name in the article, link it and the context there instead of in the quote. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:21, March 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) ****Like this? Supreme Emperor (talk) 00:54, March 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 16) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:45, March 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 17) **Thanks, Supreme Emperor (talk) 00:58, March 25, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Shouldn't a nickname tag be used since this probably wasn't the guys real name?
 * 3) **Done
 * 4) ***Can you also specify that it was only a designation in the body?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 05:53, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Done.
 * 6) * Four-twenty should probably be in the body somewhere since he's mentioned in the quote.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 00:21, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Added Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:41, March 30, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) *Reload infobox.
 * 3) **Reloaded
 * 4) *Does the raid have a conjectural name?
 * 5) **Yes
 * 6) *Good work, Sup. Winterz (talk) 16:37, March 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Thanks. Supreme Emperor (talk) 20:14, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * In general, be careful with assuming genders when there is none. It seems to be a mistake made by way too many users. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:56, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Will do. Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:42, March 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Note that when hidding content in the Infobox you should use "1" instead of "y". Winterz (talk) 16:54, March 31, 2013 (UTC)

Omega alert

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:32, March 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero. No pictures this time, unfortunately.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:08, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; 03:24, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 10:41, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * Hey
 * 1) *May I ask what Tander means with "compromised"? You should probably mention it within the article.
 * 2) **The word compromised explains it perfectly. "To expose or make liable to danger, suspicion, or disrepute."
 * 3) ***Thanks for clearing that up, captain. But to whom? That is what you need to mention in the article. Winterz (talk) 22:08, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ****Already did that, Winterz. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:32, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) * Would it harm if we linked "Power Guard Project"? Winterz (talk) 16:50, March 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **No real need to here. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  16:22, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Is a reason given why the alert was broadcast?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 01:21, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Given. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  16:39, March 31, 2013 (UTC)

Four-Twenty

 * Nominated by: Supreme Emperor (talk) 18:36, March 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Another novels one, basically identical to Four-Eighteen

(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:18, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:32, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; 03:34, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Why do these articles have so much maths.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:32, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Its sort of frowned upon when you use the same text in multiple articles. I suggest changing it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:29, March 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Fair enough, i'll reword it tonight. Supreme Emperor (talk) 22:32, March 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***How does it look now? Supreme Emperor (talk) 22:45, March 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****A bit more would be nice. Just use synoyms, and flop around your sentences. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:07, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Flipped the sentences around a bit more and did some rewording, how does it look now? Supreme Emperor (talk) 01:19, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) * Take into consideration my objections for this guy's twin here too. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:52, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **Think i've got them fixed now, have I missed any?
 * 9) Hanzo
 * 10) * This is probably a sofixit, but get rid of any mention of the trooper being male (I notice the end of the bio) when the gender is unidentified. Something to keep in mind for the future, and a mistake that's way too common. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:12, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) **Oops, good eye :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 01:05, March 28, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) *Same objections as in the Four-Eighteen's nom. Winterz (talk) 16:53, March 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Consider it done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 20:14, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Accellerite

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  17:04, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Assuming Winterz' satisfaction.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 23:39, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Can you say which war the Battle of Corellia was in?
 * 3) **Not seeing this one changed.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 10:44, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:31, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) *Say whenever it was that Qui-Gon tracked the bomb on the Aurorient express.
 * 6) * Who is the Xenopatholgist?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 01:26, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **All done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  16:43, March 31, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Heyo!
 * 2) *Mention that the compound was created by Doc and used to cure Nem'ro specifically.
 * 3) **What do you mean? I state that he made it to cure a disease.
 * 4) *Expand the comic part in the Bts section.
 * 5) **That's still fluff, Winterz.
 * 6) *Conflict of the Battle of Corellia?
 * 7) **Done.
 * 8) *Give a time reference to Doc's (yes, mention Doc's feat) and Qui-Gon's events. Winterz (talk) 17:04, March 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Already gave it for Qui-Gon, and done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:31, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified Sullustan Jedi (battle droids)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 20:13, March 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The rampage continues&hellip;

(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 01:28, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) So many GCW Jedi and battle droids. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:28, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  03:17, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:02, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Alphabetize categories.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:28, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done.&mdash; 15:21, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Bob
 * 4) * Again, I think you need separate sentences on his clothing and his physical appearance; the former presumably changed, but the latter not so much. You should also indicate that "At the time of the battle..." for his clothing, so as not to imply that he never changed clothes.
 * 5) *Seems that he's getting a second wind in this image. Mention that? ~ Savage BOB sig.png 11:37, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **Both done.&mdash; 15:21, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ***"Gaining a second wind" is an idiomatic expression and shouldn't be interpreted literally. Can you reword? ~ Savage BOB sig.png 11:17, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) *Bit more! The opening sentence is redundant; we essentially hear that "A Jedi ... trained as a Jedi." Can you reword? ~ Savage BOB sig.png 11:15, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Fixed.&mdash; 17:34, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) Emperor
 * Can you reword the first line a bit? Currently, it sounds like it refers to all Sullustans. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:19, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Would "Sullustan individual" work?&mdash; 01:26, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified Dark Jedi (Force drain)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 04:04, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: When did Gene Simmons become a Dark Jedi?

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Assuming Bob's satisfied. Winterz (talk) 22:12, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Bob
 * 2) * Indicate that "At the time of his attack" or whatever for his clothing, since he presumably changed clothes from time to time.
 * 3) * The article is ambiguous in its use of pronouns, since it's difficult to tell at times whether we're talking about the Dark Jedi or the victim of his attack.
 * 4) * The first sentence is somewhat clunky (and missing an a). Can you recast it? Maybe, "By some point before the end of the Galactic Civil War, a humanoid male Force-sensitive had fallen to the dark side and become a Dark Jedi. During that conflict, he attacked..." (I don't think you need to indicate the factions in the GCW as you've been doing in each of these noms, though it's fine to do so if you wish. :))
 * 5) * The individual being drained is clearly a Human male. Indicate that? ~ Savage BOB sig.png 11:41, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **Please take a look, I reworked it a bit.&mdash; 15:33, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) *Can you fix the n-dashes? N-dashes should only be used when you have two words being connected that have equal weight. An example would be the Corellian–Coruscant Treaty or something like that. In most compound adjectives, a simple dash - is fine, and I think all of the words in this nom fit that bill.
 * 8) *I agree with Winterz about release dates for this and all your other TCG noms. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 11:24, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Both done.&mdash; 17:37, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) Winterz
 * 11) * You should give the cards expansion a release year. Winterz (talk) 17:20, March 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) **I honestly don't see the point, since the release date has nothing to do with the character himself, but done.&mdash; 17:37, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) ***The point is for the reader to know how old/recent the subject is ;). Winterz (talk) 22:12, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Sullustan Jedi (Tràkata)‎

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 04:45, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another one&hellip;

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:01, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 10:51, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * I would mention right way that the Dark Jedi was a Twi'lek. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:48, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done.&mdash; 15:34, March 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Twi'lek Dark Jedi (Tràkata)‎

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 04:45, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: And another&hellip;

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:55, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 10:50, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Your first reference has some issues...
 * 3) *Your second reference has the wrong set name in it.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:56, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **Both fixed.&mdash; 18:47, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ursi

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:34, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 4...

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 17:12, March 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 10:49, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:54, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Zwevel

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:48, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 5...

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 10:48, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:56, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ossyth

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:01, March 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 6... There are dozens of articles to do from this book...

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) With all these articles we're going to need a gemstone of name section on the CA page.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 10:47, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:57, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified asteroids

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 12:34, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Yay! Space-rocks!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:08, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I think there is a rule that you can't have text in infobox pictures. Please remedy that.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:34, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done, if you really think that's better.  Imperators II (Talk) 08:11, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **You don't have to cut the text box out. You could just white the text in the text box out. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:24, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Like that?  Imperators II (Talk) 13:51, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) CC-8
 * 6) * I know this will probably make you do a decent re-write, but I don't think having that amount of writing before the article's subject is introduced is really the way to go.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:04, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done.  Imperators II (Talk) 18:24, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) *I'm not entirely sure if the title is the best it could be, I mean if there was an article about a group of droids it wouldn't be called "Unidentified droids", I'd move it to "Unidentified asteroid field" or "Unidentified asteroid cluster" take your pick.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:39, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * You could probably mention in the BtS that the asteroids were not formally given a location in the source.  Stake black   msg 18:34, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Added.  Imperators II (Talk) 19:52, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

T'nal

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:16, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 7...

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:37, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) How many damn female names are in this book?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:05, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

V'ris

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:16, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part 8...

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:39, April 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:06, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Lokani Dawn

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:41, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:28, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:07, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you make it clear that the ship left on a voyage? Currently its not stated.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  21:13, April 2, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Gan Basso

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:53, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:14, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:08, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Death date should be in the body of the article.
 * 3) **It's not exactly his date of death, but I made it more clear in the article.
 * 4) * Alphabetize categories. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:30, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:31, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Gan Basso's starship

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:53, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:15, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Mention date of destruction in body.
 * 2) * Since Gan's affiliated to the Republic, the ship should be as well.
 * 3) * Could you mention that Gan died with the ship?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:33, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **All done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:32, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) *Nitpicky, but it's not made hugely clear that Basso used his ship to find places for the Republic.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:10, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Datar system's sun

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:53, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:16, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Added Dogma's EC vote for him:)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:11, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Please add that Gan was killed in the crash.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:35, April 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:32, April 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Muldoon family

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 01:56, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk )
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:41, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Can you find a better way of mentioning the nun. I was pretty confused until I checked the picture, and I know the nature of this book, but it really is pretty confusing.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:15, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **How's that?  Stake black   msg 18:31, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ch'hodos's red sun

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 13:44, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It just happened.

(0 ECs/1 Users/0 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Go WP:AST  Stake black   msg 13:49, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Isn't this conjecture? Fe Nite (talk) 13:56, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Nope, it's identified as "Ch'hodos's red sun" in the source.  Imperators II (Talk) 13:59, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **That still means it's conjectural, though. It's not a proper name.  Stake black   msg 14:01, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I respectfully disagree. How can we know that the star was not referred in-universe as "Ch'hodos's red sun"?  Imperators II (Talk) 14:05, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****This sort of thing can happen with lightsaber articles, since they would obviously be called "Anakin Skywalker's lightsaber" etc. in-universe, but I'm not really sure if the same applies to planets.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:19, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) "The red star was orbited by the planet of Ch'hodos.[2] By the time of the renewed warfare between the Galactic Republic and the resurgent Sith Empire[2]..." You don't need to ref to ref 2 twice in a row here. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:23, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) *Thanks, good catch. Fixed.  Imperators II (Talk) 20:29, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Darrus Alde

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:38, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Could you give some context on what the Elysium is? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:06, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Borz'Mat'oh

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:38, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *You're inconsistent with the capitalization of the last "o" in Borz'Mat'oh. The title and the bolded part have it lower case, while the rest has it upper case.
 * 3) *It isn't given a gender, but you gave it the male category. Perhaps you should fix that. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:10, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Edusa revolt

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:38, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Nights of Ryscate and Diamonds

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:38, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:14, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Z23-Y75

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 22:12, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In memory of LucasArts :(

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Stake black   msg 18:32, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Good-bye, LucasArts. :( Now, come on, Obsidian. Pick up the slack.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 18:41, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) The last sentence of the BtS is a little weird. I'm not sure what you meant.   Stake black   msg 02:23, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *I've re-written the sentence, that help?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:01, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) "... to serve in the droid army of the galactic corporation; the Trade Federation." You're not using the semicolon right here. You probably want a colon instead, as the semicolon necessitates a sentence that is connected to the sentence before the semicolon. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:18, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) *Done.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 01:24, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

Comments