Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Fourth Pius Dea Crusade

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:44, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  02:46, May 28, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Context on the Pabol Hutta.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Create an article for Delacta.
 * 5) **Actually, it's Delacrix. Woops.
 * 6) * You need to mention everything inside the infobox in the body of the article as well. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:45, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:33, May 26, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Crusade
 * 2) *The infobox isn't fully sourced.
 * 3) *"First appeared" in the BTS isn't quite right, as Warfare doesn't go in the "Appearances" section. "First mentioned" or something similar would be more accurate.
 * 4) *Since this is a war, it should probably link to its battles. I'd like to see articles created for the battles of the five planets mentioned. You could give them some chronology, too, by following the arrows; eg, Boonta is attacked before Klatooine, etc. The one arrow launches from Ord Zat, too, which should be mentioned.
 * 5) *Is Vaathknee within the one arrow? It looks like it is. Dennogra and Taskeed look like they might be in the other one, too.
 * 6) *"In the northern regions of Hutt Space..." On to the map in Warfare, those planets are all actually outside of Hutt Space.
 * 7) *Could Pius Dea Era be mentioned and linked somewhere? Menkooroo 01:33, June 10, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Great Northern Crusade

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:44, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:10, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:18, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Interesting. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:41, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Kill the redlinks! You can for sure kill all of them in the main article, but I am not sure about the template, as a bunch of them are inderect mention only and currently subject to trach compact. If they get deleted, only keep the Pius Dea crusades in that template that are actualy mentioned.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Source info box completely.
 * 5) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:57, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *Overwhelmed by the number of crusades you nommed.... :) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:49, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Exiled Jedi
 * 8) * Is it refered to as the Seventh Pius Dea crusade in the book?
 * 9) **Yep. "Great Northern Crusade (7th)"
 * 10) * You need to mention the infobox's previous and next fields in the body of the article, but since they are in the trash compactor I guess you should wait. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:50, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Sorry, EJ. Had a long night, ending up an hour out of the way when I stopped for a DQ shake and took the wrong highway :P But the 6th and 8th are dead, so that objection should be done.  Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:38, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) ***No worries.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:18, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) War!
 * 14) *Similar objections as above --- as the article on the war itself, it should chronologically go through the battles using details gleaned from the arrows. Infobox should list the battles, too (ditto in the above nom). Menkooroo 01:38, June 11, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Foyvè oil

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:41, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Too many accented characters

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:08, June 7, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified six-eyed fish (Naboo)

 * Nominated by: -LelalMekha 20:28, June 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I fear I've caught Cade's nomination-sickness.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Its got a chicken leg. Weird... 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:04, June 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Biigg L
 * Alphabetize your categories.
 * Done. --LelalMekha 19:15, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Good work. ' Biggestleo ' (Meeting Room) 18:01, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Smuggler's Run (painting)

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 22:13, June 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number 3

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:09, June 12, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Battle of Diado

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:02, June 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another one for Warfare

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Ni-Cada

 * Nominated by: ' Biggestleo ' (Meeting Room) 17:56, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: First CAN

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *Him being Cerean needs to be in the body.
 * 3) *You say: "thirty five years before the Clone Wars". You should link that to the correct date of 57 BBY.
 * 4) *You need to say before they met Plagueis they were bargaining with a Barabel for a water skimmer.
 * 5) *Maybe expand the attack part: mention they tracked him with the skimmer, and fought near the water.
 * 6) *You should say they met Plagueis while bearing flagons of liquid from an eatery.
 * 7) *The book describes him as "rangy", this needs to be added.
 * 8) * I think there is enough info to add a Personality and traits section, with things such as Cada's more drawn back attitude, as he withheld the reason of their visit to Abraxin, though Bukk told the Munn anyway.
 * 9) *Thats all for now. I think there is enough info to bring this to GAN, as well as Lo Bukk. Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:57, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Lo Bukk

 * Nominated by: ' Biggestleo ' (Meeting Room) 17:56, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Same as above

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *You say: "thirty five years before the Clone Wars". You should link that to the correct date of 57 BBY.
 * 3) *You need to say before they met Plagueis they were bargaining with a Barabel for a water skimmer.
 * 4) *You should also say both of them felt Plagueis' presence, though did not identify him as a sith.
 * 5) *Maybe expand the attack part: mention they tracked him with the skimmer, and fought near the water.
 * 6) *You should say they met Plagueis while bearing flagons of liquid from an eatery, and how they sat ata table while they talked to the Muun.
 * 7) * I think there is enough info to add a Personality and traits section, with things such as Bukk's more open attitude, as he easily devulged the nature of their mission to the Muun.
 * 8) *It seems to me by the dialogue that Bukk's master kills Lare. This should be added to both articles.
 * 9) *Thats all for now. I think there is enough info to bring this to GAN. These aditions will bring the article over 200 words, which then requires an intro to be written. Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:57, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Decimator (painting)

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 20:17, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Fourth of a series

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:00, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Coruscant Spaceport Docking Bay 84

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:30, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Savage  1138  05:39, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:10, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Forge Guardian

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:51, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Poor jurgoran. You didn't stand a chance against my awesome new blue lightsaber.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Savage  1138  05:39, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:00, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Flesh Raider Ravager Chieftain

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 05:13, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: While he's saying "Jeeh-day...", he's really thinking: Why am I talking like a Yuuzhan Vong?

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Savage  1138  05:39, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *Conjecture template? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:06, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) *The article says he has white tattoos. Are you sure they're tattoos, as the infobox infers via the skin section he has just white stripes. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:09, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Flesh Raider Chieftain

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 05:29, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Victory is mine.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Savage  1138  05:39, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:07, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments