Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.


 * /History
 * /2005 History
 * /2006 History
 * /Queue

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written and detailed
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide
 * 5) &hellip;not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
 * 7) &hellip;have a succinct proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
 * 8) &hellip;have no more than 3 redlinks
 * 9) &hellip;have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles
 * 10) &hellip;not have been previously featured
 * 11) &hellip;be completely referenced with tags for all available material and sources.
 * 12) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced
 * 13) &hellip;provide at least one quote on the article; a leading quote at the beginning is required. Only one quote would be allowed at the beginning of each section at max, although quotes may be placed in the middle of the article.
 * 14) &hellip;include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles.
 * 15) &hellip;include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available.
 * 16) &hellip;pass review by the Inquisitorius review panel.

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under! Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Jaina Solo
Support
 * 1) Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg|25px]] 13:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) --CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 15:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --MJPundefined 13:33, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) --User: Zinnos
 * 5) Adamwankenobi 23:33, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Nice .  .  .  .  10:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Impressive article for one of the principle females of Star Wars. Deserves a FA.  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) --ToRsO bOy 23:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Cutch 02:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Now that most of the typos are gone, I think it's ready to be featured Enochf 11:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Nighthawk leader 07:00, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 12:44, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 19:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Wstonefi 14:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 08:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]]
 * 5)  Lord Oblivion Sith holocron[[Image:Oldsith.png|30px]] 04:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) --Argon Skywalker 09:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Cutch 18:29, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 18:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 01:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) HappyTimeHarry 23:03, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 11)  Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 08:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 12)  Jwebb13 HoloNet [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 00:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) User:Sarah22299 Sarah22299 16:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) User:Sarah22299 Sarah22299 16:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Objections
 * Rewrite the introduction. She's grown up now, therefore her introduction should be about her achievements rather than her parents and training. --Imp 15:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The intro has been reworked. What do you think now?  - breathesgelatin Talk 05:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Need to work out the image issue, there are way too many near the end of the article where there is less text. Either more text needs to be added or some of the images need to be removed. Cull Tremayne 06:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I've played around with the pics, and I think it is now more balanced. --Eyrezer 10:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Lets hope it stays good with all the new info sure to come Jedi Dude 10:58, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Can we get a source for this image? I know it's from a card of some sort, but what card line, etc.
 * Nicely detailed...a little too nicely detailed though. The sections illustrating Jaina's youth and Jedi training could use a lot more cutback on the level of detail; we're summarizing a series of books, not describing certain chapters in individual novels.  An overload of subsections and some of them are rather unnecessary.  I'm also questioning the necessity of the disambuigation notice for the same reason why quotes from Wookieepdians were voted off from being featured QOTDs.  Otherwise, the article seems to be alright. &mdash;Mir  len  05:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, no offense, but that's crossing the line just a bit too much. I realize the Kwenn disambig (sort of) because it's a fairly obscure article, but Jaina Solo is a major character and a main character in the ongoing book series, no one is going to come here looking for the Wookieepedian and be confused that they came to the character. Seriously now. Cull Tremayne 06:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * This issue has been resolved.  - breathesgelatin Talk 05:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Can we get a "Romance" section like on her parents and uncle's article? Between Kyp, Jag and Zekk there is enough candidates. QuentinGeorge 08:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, besides a Romance section, I'm a bit surprised that Jaina has neither a "Personality and traits section," nor a BtS. I know we can write a personality and traits section pretty easily. As for the BTS, I'm not going to be a stickler on that one, just surprised there's not information there already--it seems like there would be something. It bugs me that Jaina is the twin who always gets shortchanged. Oh, and to summarize the still-standing objections: source that one image, get a Romances section, and get a personality and traits section. Has the objection about thinning out the overmuch detail been addressed?  - breathesgelatin Talk 05:48, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Breathes, I've contacted an author for permission to use some BTS from The Other Side of the Sky website, so hopefully we'll have some soon. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 22:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * In a reponse to Breathes's question, I don't think the thinning out unnecessary details has been addressed yet. &mdash;Mir  len  22:51, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I've looked at it and I really don't think there's too much unnecessary detail. If you look at articles like Luke Skywalker and Lando Calrissian, we are trying to give them more detail than they've previously had, IMHO. Can you cite some examples? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I apologize for a late response. Reunion could use a little cut down of detail; there seems to be some detail there that I feel isn't notable.  Perhaps the first three paragraphs in Trip to the Jedi Praxeum, as well as Abduction and First Corellian Insurrection.  Caamas Document section is fine in terms of level of detail, but I can't help feel that it is not very important (and dare I say it? &mdash; unncessary, for it contributes little to the character and story arc).  However, I'll leave it alone for now, because I honestly don't care as to whether or not to include the Caamas Document on Wookieepedia.  The whole Jedi training's subsections could use some shearing as well as the Tempest information. (I'm not familiar with the roles Luke and Lando play outside the movies and NJO and on, so I couldn't comment much on that.  By unnecessary detail, I mean information that seems to be more of a page or chapter summary that a summary that encompasses a whole book: "Jacen ended up being knocked down by the carcass of one of the beasts as the last surviving battle hydra prepared to sting Luke with its venomous tail. The beast was thwarted by Jaina, who used her bare hands to hold it back by its wings. Cilghal then made sure that the creature would not be able to do any harm again by wringing its neck."  What I'm trying to say, is that most of the wording in the previously mentioned sections could be tightened and shortened and still serve the purpose of summarizing a book or series nicely. &mdash;Mir  len  05:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that's helpful. I'll try and cull some of the over-detailed minutiae soon, although I'll leave some background info- I feel a little bit is necessary to understand the actions of the character. I also plan on leaving the Caamas section alone, if that's okay with you. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:03, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I think I've done a decent job of clearing out some of the extraneous detail. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 17:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Many of the quotes need to be sourced. I did two, but I don't have time to hunt them all down. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 18:59, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I like it, but there are not too many images at the top and they seem more jumbled up at the bottom. If you could add more images in and then, even out the frequency of image use throughout the article I will vote for it.--CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 14:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Very good, I like it. CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 15:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I think this article is very attractive and worthy t be a featured article. Zinnos
 * Image issue sorted out, so I'm just being nitpicky here, but the images from the YJK novels are out of order. Where they're placed right now (at least some of them), they don't relate to the history. Cull Tremayne 19:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I changed the Black Sun pic to one from those books. I think that was the only one out of order. --Eyrezer 00:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Only three sourceless quotes left. --Tinwe 17:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * All quotes seem to have sources now. --Tinwe 17:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not exactly certain how well the editing in the article relates to other articles, but... Isn't it a bit iffy? Grand Moff Rhell 02:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Bastila Shan
Support Objections Comments
 * 1) One of the major characters in the EU who has not had her article featured yet. This article is well-written, unbiased and, complies with the guidelines. Factually accurate for one who wants to know a lot about her. Darth Shadow3000 23:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2)  .  .  .  .  07:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) A great character with a great article. JethLordMaster
 * 4) The intro could use somw hwlp, but other than that. Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 08:32, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 5)  Milo Fett Comlink 23:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 6)  Yoshi  626  23:45, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Humorbot5 16:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Lowbacca5 14:46, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Starwarsrulez 04:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Redjetta 20:31, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Adamwankenobi 18:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) -- Scwhinky Comlink [[Image:Fettrockz.gif|20px]] 00:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Lord Hydronium 22:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Lord Hydronium 22:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs a longer intro. Adamwankenobi 23:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Has POV issues, such as "beautiful", but other than that, it's fine. - Sikon 06:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The intro is too small. Rezendi 15:00 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Too short introduction. Overridden by Inquisitorius- Inq:Bastila Shan 21:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC) Image:Bastila ss.jpg, Image:Bastila.jpg and Image:BastilaShan.jpg need correct sources, whileImage:BastilaAvatar.jpg and Image:BMeditation.jpg need sourcing. Needs cleanup to remove excessive links. --Imp 21:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Longer intro placed. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * All images except Image:BastilaShan.jpg sourced, although Wikipedia says it's a screenshot. -LtNOWIS 01:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:BastilaShan.jpg is no longer in the article. - Lord Hydronium 22:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * She's not a major EU character. We should wait until she's appeared in other places --AtomicKetchup 06:59, Janurary 2007 (UTC) Overridden by Inquisitorius- Inq:Bastila Shan02:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Major EU characters don't always have FA, and if we can feature some of the other things we've featured, I don't think the number of sources is as big of a deal. I mean, we featured Second Battle of Borleias (Yuuzhan Vong War), which appears in less than 5 sources, and no one complained about that. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That's not a valid objection. We can feature any article, no matter how minor, so long as it meets the criteria and doesn't have any actionable flaws. We featured Beilert Valance, who is definitely not major. -LtNOWIS 04:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Doesn't have the Prima Guides in the Sources section. Yes, I could add them...but I want to object instead. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 01:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Prima guides sourced. Starwarsrulez 14:12, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Bastila Shan 01:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Might be a little early. Maybe we should wait until she starts showing up in other sources, like comics, references in novels, etc. Enochf 11:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That didn't stop us with Revan. -LtNOWIS 06:50, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The intro has been made longer, and do we have to wait for books to come out mentioning her? That could be a while, since most of the newer books are in the legacy era. She's in the games which is good enough, and she will be mentioned in comics if Kotor 3 comes out Starwarsrulez 01:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No, we don't need to wait. An article is featured based on the information currently available, regardless of whether or not there's new stuff coming out. -LtNOWIS 04:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Luke Skywalker
Support style="color:darkgreen;">Atarumaster88 ]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Objections
 * 1) [[User:Atarumaster88|<span
 * 1) Red Head Rider 17:35, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
 * 2) Herbsewell 20:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Just wish we had the ROTJ pic .  .  .  .  05:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) The vote is 5 to 2. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg |25px]] 21:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) --Eyrezer 06:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Despite the fact that I hate this paticular meatbag emmensely, I have concluded that his article is one of the best I have ever read.-- IG-Prime (Sentience Core)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Garrett Skymaster 00:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Wstonefi 14:47, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Cato Neimoidia 22:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) --Humantoo 23:07, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Ursan Rafin 02:15, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Nighthawk leader 22:21, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Impassioned Jedi 23:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Rezendi 14:27, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 15)  Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 03:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) I can't believe this hasn't been a featured article before, but it should be now Jorrel Fraajic 15:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) -- Darth Phonebook  20:47, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) --Caddaric 01:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) --Palpy 01:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 01:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) Fatguy2006 00:58, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 22)  Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 23:33, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) SkywalkerPL 11:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) Like Jorrel said, how has this not been featured yet?   Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 00:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) I definitely agree. Luke is one of the original characters, so the most is know about him, and more people would want to edit his page, making it increasingly better. Jedi master Rimsek 17:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) Luke is THE hero of the galaxy. He is one of the original characters (the main original character), and, it's a great article! Darth Maddolis 09:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Luke is THE hero of the galaxy. He is one of the original characters (the main original character), and, it's a great article! Darth Maddolis 09:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I think it's still too early. It's a good article, but not featured.  At times it is rambling, at times it leaves information out, and throughout the writing is a bit unpolished or unencyclopedic.  Patience, young Jedi!  --GenkiNeko 01:41, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Part of me hates to do this, but...
 * I don't think the subdivisions make a lot of sense. Why is the Yuuzhan Vong War categorized under "Establishing a New Jedi Order" but the Second Correlian Insurrection its own heading entirely? The subdivisions need to be worked on considerably and made more logical.
 * Certain areas don't make sense if you don't know the sources. For example, in the discussion of Kadann, the text jumps from Kadann to the false Kadann without giving an explanation for that.
 * I think the main picture should be a head shot, not full-length.
 * I haven't read the article extremely carefully, but my sense is that it probably needs a very careful grammar and spell check. Just skimming through I found several issues (primarily with diction), and more worryingly, an OOU statement.

Overall, I think the issues that I have can be cleared up very quickly; this is much stronger than it has been before and it's almost there.  - breathesgelatin Talk 01:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Better sectioning needed .  .  .  .  07:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'd say my previous objections are resolved. Now that I've done a very careful read-through, I have a few more minor things: the section Trials of the Jedi Master is still sort of weak. The writing is far more choppy than in other sections, and it's divided up into short, nonintuitive passages. It sometimes lapses into a play-by-play. For example, could any of the subsections here be either condensed, shortened, or integrated into one another? It seems that different subsections probably need different remedies. I've done the most general sorts of diction improvements, but I don't know these sources well enough to make a huge difference in terms of organization. Specifically, the sections on Kueller and Waru need improvement (and better titles--but maybe the best way to solve that is combination). And isn't the Waru incident technically part of the Empire Reborn movement via retcon now anyway? Also, having read the Dark Nest sections, in certain places they seem to be less about Luke and his actions then they are about the Dark Nest crisis generally. This should be improved. Finally, if we can't get the portrait-style infobox picture approved, the picture in the Talents section should be changed.  - breathesgelatin Talk 05:19, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry to sound like a broken record here, but can we get some more Marvel info integrated? I tried to include the post-RotJ info, but Luke's adventure during and between the films are lacking. I mean the whole Tagge subplot seems relevant and important enough to not be excluded. Cull Tremayne 00:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * This should be easy. We need some more images in about the middle of the bio article- Trials of a Jedi Master and Thrawn could both use a pic or two. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 18:31, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I think there used to be some more pictures there... Perhaps they could be reinserted.  - breathesgelatin Talk 17:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I worked to try and address breathesgeletin's objections, especially the grammar and Empire Reborn sections, but because I know next to nothing about Marvel and the Dark Nest, I can't really help out there. I count two redlinks in the 'in search for a legacy' section, but I have no knowledge of either of them, so I cannot correct it. I looked around for a pic Luke during the Thrawn crisis, but all I could find was on the Heir to the Empire comic book cover, but it is of a very poor quality. I don't own the comics so I cannot scan a pic in. -Solus 19:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Some of the Marvel info has been added. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * How many of these objections have or have not been addressed? -Solus 14:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * My objection regarding Dark Nest still stands; I still think it's covered way out of proportion to its importance in Luke's life. I recently got the 1st and 2nd Dark Nest books and am just about finished with reading them (I already had the 3rd). I will try to see what I can do with it once I finish that. Also, as far as I know, there is still some Marvel information left to put in the article.  - breathesgelatin Talk 00:05, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please examine the relevant section; I've cleared out a lot of the extra material in there. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 18:30, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I still I feel like the Dark Nest section is still pretty long and out of proportion, but I'm willing to live with that at this point. I went through and made some more cuts and factual corrections and in particular diction fixes. I guess I'll go on and strike my objection now. I just hope in the future that other sections of Luke's article are expanded so that the proportions are more realistic.  - breathesgelatin Talk 19:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Many of the quotes need sources. --Tinwe 15:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sourced several quotes, only one unsourced quote that I know if is the one under the Caamas Document Crisis. I'll try to look it up. EDIT: Found it. All quotes sourced. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  19:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * So all that's left now is the Marvel stuff? Or is it finished also?  - breathesgelatin Talk 02:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Marvel still needs work. There's a huge amount of it, and it's hard for me to do. I've done some, but it could use work. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 05:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Many of the pictures are lacking proper source info. Also has a quote from George Lucas which is still marked as needing confirmation. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 23:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I nominated this before, but it was put on IDrive instead. After a week of IDrive along a considerable expansion by me, the page is much larger than it was and is now worthy of being a FA. Not as long as Palpatine, but it is over 120 kb long. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I just did some adjustments to the subdivisions- see if they make more sense now. I'm not sure what you mean on the sources, although I wrote the Kadann section and I don't have either of the sources, so I had to use our articles/the databank. Yeah. That could probably use some work from someone who has the sources. As for the pic- all the other major characters use full body shots- see Palpatine, Anakin Skywalker, Leia Organa Solo, Darth Vader, Han Solo, and many, many more. I'll work on the spelling- where is the OOU? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Good job on the subdivisions generally, though 1.3 still seems that it needs another subheading--it looks bizarre with only one. You could probably smack something above the first text section just for consistency's sake. What I mean on the Kadann section part is that it skips back and forth between discussing the real Kadann and false Kadann without even explaining that there is a false Kadann... which could be confusing. I know about the full body shots but recently there's been a move to shift to headshots. Let's see if anyone else agrees with me; that one is really a minor thing that may just come down to my personal preference. I wouldn't hold the whole nomination up over that if everything else gets fixed. I vaped the OOU that I saw; it was in the Talents section. Just had me worried that there might be more. I'll try to get a copyedit of my own done soon.  - breathesgelatin Talk 02:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Glad to see my lobbying get a mention ;). I too would like a head shot, and one from ROTJ, since it was when he was in his "prime". Head shots are simply more encylopedic, whereas the body shot should go down in the personality section .  .  .  .  04:11, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Like this one? Or is it to close. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg |25px]] 00:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That's perfect! And move the current one down to the Traits and Personality, or Abilities section, and then we'll have something that looks encyclopedic. .  .  .  .  01:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, I went back and fixed the subdivisions- moved one and added three more subsections. I tried to clarify the Kadann section, so I hope that helps. I don't care about the image, and I'll copyedit it eventually. I've already done some. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 17:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The pic looks great in the infobox but that's my opinion. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg |25px]] 23:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Still too many problems for my support. This article reads like a blow-by-blow account "Luke was stopped by Fortuna, then he used a mind trick on him, then he tried to talk to Jabba, then Jabba refused, then Luke used the force to grab a gun from a nearby guard but Jabba used a trap door to send him down to the rancor with one of his guards who got eaten..." It should just be something like: "Luke infiltrated Jabba's palace and tried to convince the crime lord to hand over Han. When Jabba refused, Luke attempted to kill him, only to be sent down into Jabba's secret Rancor pit." Well, that's not great, but still, the article needs condesing. We are an encyclopedia, not an info repository. .  .  .  .  23:16, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I know the section you are talking about and I've been meaning to smack and rewrite it for some time. Certain users are a tad overzealous in adding details, but this isn't Wikipedia and greater license is allowed with minutiae, 4dotE. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 00:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I understand that, but that much detail detracts from the article, and the overall flow of the prose, making it less enjoyable to read. .  .  .  .  01:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Definitely a copyedit should be able to clear that up though. I'm lovin' the new pic.  - breathesgelatin Talk 01:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I've copyedited much of it- including condensing the Endor section and expanding the Thrawn section. I've done up to the Yuuzhan Vong War, but as most of the prose was written by me anyways, someone else should probably look over it. Let me know if anything else needs fixed. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Either a bit more sectioning or condensing is needed from the "Jedi Master" section down. .  .  .  .  07:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Added two more sections. I'm strongly opposed to condensing too much of the prose- look at Palpatine- though I have consolidated some sections. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I finished a fairly thorough copyedit of the whole thing. I've added a bunch of sections, but Dark Nest could maybe be split up. What do you guys think? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 17:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Condense or section the YV war and the Dark Nest stuff, and we're there. .  .  .  .  23:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Much work on Luke have I done. Complete, the sectioning is. Affected my speech all this work has. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 00:23, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Good work on this Ataru. However I think there could be some info from Jedi OPutcast and Jedi Knight: Jedi Academy. Luke was involved in both the sets of events there. The Empire Reborn could be fleshed out in the Waru section, and the Disciples of Ragnos could also get a mention. --Eyrezer 01:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Gaaaaahhh. You ask for something I will be hard-pressed to deliver on: I've never encountered either of those games. I'll see what I can do. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll try and add the Jedi Outcast and Academy content...but let's not go overboard, Palpatine style. .  .  .  .  01:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Come to think of it, we don't really need the JA stuff...he doesn't really do anything in that. .  .  .  .  03:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Good work on the JO addition. --Eyrezer 03:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. .  .  .  .  06:01, 22 October 2006 (UTC)


 * I've done some adjustments on it, but I keep looking over it and I'm having a hard time addressing Breathesgelatin's objections. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 00:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey... just a note. Someone struck out parts of my objection for me. While I actually consider the issues they struck out resolved, in the future I'd appreciate it if you let me strike out my own objections... I'm pretty good about checking up on the status of articles and such. No hard feelings; just FYI.  - breathesgelatin Talk 06:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I did it. I didn't know I wasn't supposed to, I'm kinda new. I apologize. It won't happen again. -Solus 14:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It's all good.  - breathesgelatin Talk 17:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -Solus 19:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Ysanne Isard
Support
 * 1) Red Head Rider 20:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) .  .  .  .  05:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Roron Corobb 21:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) I'm up for giving this article FA status, with the quotes now sourced. Jorrel Fraajic 19:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Redjetta 20:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 01:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) -- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Fynbos 21:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Fynbos 21:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * Needs personality/traits section. .  .  .  .  00:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Added personality and traits section. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:45, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * "While she was officially (in an in-universe sense) killed by Iella, it was theorized and possibly implied in X-wing: Isard's Revenge that she actually survived, and was imprisoned for life in the bow of Lusankya. This is not verified by any canon source." What the? --Imp 19:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * removed. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Head quote needs source. Is it possible to get quotes for the different sections? Image:Ysanne-isard.jpg, Image:20040312175310ysanne isard.jpg lack sources. --Imp 19:58, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Images are now sourced. -LtNOWIS 00:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This quote, "Tall and slender, she wore her black hair long, and the white streaks descending from her temples made her seem more exotic than middle-aged", still needs a source though. :P &mdash;Mir  len  22:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * That quote is from either Rogue Squadron, Bacta War, or Isard's Revenge. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I believe it's in Rogue Squadron, when Sate Pestage Kirtan Loor walks into Isard's command room for the first time. I could check if you would like; I have the book at hand. Jorrel Fraajic 16:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright, found it. Page 122 of X-Wing: Rogue Squadron, when Kirtan Loor meets Isard for the first time on Coruscant. Also found some other quotes that could possibly be used. --Jorrel Fraajic 19:53, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * She appears in Mara Jade: By the Emperor's Hand yet Mara Jade is only mentioned in the intro quote. Is all information from this series included in the article? The header "The fall of Isard's Empire" looks awkward as it is directly beneath the header "Isard's Empire." The "Ships Under her Command" section is clunky, it could be rewritten into an interesting section. --Imp 21:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Isard does appear in MJ:BtEH, but it's almost a cameo. Isard arrests her after the Emperor's death, and then Mara escapes. While she's in prison, she reminisces about her relationship with Isard. I admit that some mention of that could be included, though it will be about a two sentence addition. I agree with all of the other objections. Cull Tremayne 22:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Added as much as I could from MJ:BtEH. Hopefully it's satisfactory now. Cull Tremayne 09:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Imp, it was much worse in prior revisions. See the talk page. I changed it and put it in a BTS section. It could be removed, but eventually the original author will most likely come and want it changed back. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * It's just speculative crap. Away with it! =) --Imp 19:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I sourced Image:20040312175310, but I'm not sure where the other one is even from. It's possible that it's from the X-wing comics, but that pose seems like it's from a sourcebook. Riff uploaded it, so I'll ask him. Cull Tremayne 16:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Could someone confirm that Image:Ysanne-isard.jpg is from Handbook 1: X-wing Rogue Squadron? Cull Tremayne 16:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, it is. Cull Tremayne 16:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Anybody else think it might could use one more image? -- Ozzel 06:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm still not comfortable with some of the phrasing, but it's not a specific enough problem to actually object. I also think it could use more quotes, but I might just be looking for an excuse to re-re-re-re-re-re-re-read the X-wing series. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 01:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I added another pic now. And I agree that it could use some section headers and some more quotes. -- Ozzel 22:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Jedi Exile
Support Objections
 * 1) Sikon 08:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 *  Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 05:55, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) .  .  .  .  00:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Caddaric 21:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Red Head Rider 00:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Red Head Rider 00:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) MPK 01:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Needs more images, and needs sources for the three already in the article. Additionally, this is not a stable article. --Imp 03:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Not a chance, the article is still quite inaccurate and incomplete.– 23:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Too controversial. Featuring it would only attract more people posting like "OMG THE jedi exile is male becuse..." on its talk page - TopAce 19:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Well, since the talk page didn't make it, may as well nominate the article. - Sikon 08:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that when this article goes without being vandalized for more than a few days it should be featured, but not before. -MPK 01:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think we should be held hostage to vandals. If neccesary, we can just protect or semi-protect a featured article. -LtNOWIS 03:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Jabba Desilijic Tiure
Support
 * 1) Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 02:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  23:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Now that I've removed a lot of the extraneous detail and proper expansions, cullings and rewrites have been made. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Red Head Rider 00:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 00:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1)  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 00:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Objections *Needs to adress that Fortuna was his majordomo at the time of TPM. . .  .  .  00:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC) Comments
 * Needs a personality section. --Imp 22:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Now it has one.
 * Nearly all quotes are unsourced. The entire BTS section is completely unsourced. --Imp 03:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Gartogg, could you coordinate with me on sourcing and everything? I'm pretty sure that will be easy, but I don't have many of the things in the Sources or Appearances section.
 * Wow, nones called me that before. lol. The Sorces are complete. Appearances are complete and have been for a while, believe it or not. Fixed them up a while ago. Ha! lol -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 04:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * But did you source the remaining quotes? That's the only thing left, it seems.
 * Okay. Now, only the Big Gizz one isn't sourced. Do you know where it came from? Imp? Any comments?Vladius Magnum 17:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Erm... that's kind of conflicting with info already in the article, despite it being true and G-Canon. It says that Jabba first had Naroon Cuthus, then killed him because he knew too much. After that, Bib and Bidlo Kwerve had to duke it out, Bib coming out on top. But this part is way after the Clone Wars and Episode I. Maybe Bib was all he could get then, then became secondary to someone else, finally coming back by default. ---  V ladius M agnum ( Clan Magnum )[[Image:dasymbol.gif|20px]] 14:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * There. What do you think? ---  V ladius M agnum ( Clan Magnum )[[Image:dasymbol.gif|20px]] 14:43, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Looks great. Sourced the Gizz quote from Shadows of the Empire -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 15:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but G-canon outstrips any content already in the article. You have to find a way around. .  .  .  .  02:01, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I did it. ---  V ladius M agnum ( Clan Magnum )[[Image:dasymbol.gif|20px]] 04:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * So you did. Sorry. .  .  .  .  23:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The bit about the Fromms is out of place chronologically and makes some dubious claims about the use of clones. Green Tentacle (Talk) 12:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm very happy that he has come the way it has. Thanks fotaking care of it in my appsence. :) -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 02:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Kaox Krul
Support Objections Comments
 * 1) QuentinGeorge 11:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) He really looked like Christopher Eccleston. Kuralyov 05:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Cull Tremayne 09:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs personality/traits. .  .  .  .  10:34, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * There's nothing that says it's needed. Kuralyov 05:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Apart from my support. Extra context never hurts - articles that are just pure bio really aren't quite FA quality. .  .  .  .  03:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Added a personality and traits section. I think it's a little redundant when put in relation to the entire article, but meh. Cull Tremayne 09:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Cleaned up some grammar, but the "Marauder" section stops making sense at the end -- it sounds like some stuff got way too compressed, there. Havac 03:30, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Havac cleared this up. Cull Tremayne 09:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Too short of an intro. Quotes are unsourced. More pictures would be lovely.  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 13:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * All the quotes are from one source, so that should be easy. There's not much more than can be said in an intro. There are no more pictures. That is all. :P Cull Tremayne 19:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Quotes sourced. Cull Tremayne 06:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * One redlink? That can be fixed. Also, for those of us not so familiar with the story, the lightsaber part doesn't make sense if you haven't read the book. (Rule 9) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 05:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) This seems far too short to be FA.Darth Ceratis 02:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Rule 2 is broken in the last section. Starwarsrulez 21:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Second of the articles from the NewSithWars Wookieeproject. QuentinGeorge 11:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Kaan
Support Objections
 * 1) QuentinGeorge 11:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  10:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Kuralyov 05:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Infobox image is unsourced. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Image now sourced. QuentinGeorge 08:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Get rid of all the British spellings (Rule 4) and remove the POV material throughout the article. (Rule 2) Atarumaster88 [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:00, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * What are the POV statements that need to be removed? QuentinGeorge 02:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Third of the articles from the NewSithWars Wookieeproject. QuentinGeorge 11:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Valenthyne Farfalla
Support
 * 1) QuentinGeorge 11:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  10:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Probably the most un-Jedi Jedi ever, and basically a ridiculous character in an already weak and silly comic series... but the article's good enough. KEJ 11:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Kuralyov 05:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) --Eyrezer 04:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Skippy Farlstendoiro 09:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * Better sectioning needed. .  .  .  .  10:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Subsections added. QuentinGeorge 10:07, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I just can't support featuring an article with the level of canon conflict we have here. Once the timeline gets ironed out, it would be great, but right now just isn't the time. Havac 20:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. - Lord Hydronium 06:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Too short for FA (I like 1000+ words). And per Havac. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 13:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Fourth of the articles from the NewSithWars Wookieeproject. QuentinGeorge 11:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Jedi ranks
Support

Objections
 * 1) It has potential, but right now it's way too messy. There's no appearances/source section, and it's way too obvious that it has been ripped out of another article. The images mess up the article further. Sorry, but as it is now, I can't support it. KEJ 00:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Needs an intro for starters. .  .  .  .  10:58, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 04:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) It breaks rule 13, it needs a quote at the beginning. Starwarsrulez 21:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Violates rules 3, 4, 7, 9, 11, 12 and 13.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 10:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * To me, this just looks like an expanded list, nothing really that can't be gleaned from other articles. Also, it could use with a bit of cleaning up. 04:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

R2-D2
Support
 * 1) Bounty Hunter Ko-Zap 20:24, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Commander Jorrel Fraajic [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Communications Relay 21:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Objections Artoo Detoo is FA standard!Poof!Wikiyash Comments
 * The YV War and Killik sections are . . . non-existent. Needs a longer intro. Actually, all Post-ROTJ EU needs expansion, in a major kind of way. Also needs to have breakdance mode removed from tools at the beginning of article. A lot of those abilities seem dumb and fanonish- "flea remover" for example. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The "breakdance mode" and "flea remover" are, like it or not, canon, as they appear in the Droids animated series, and are aso listed on StarWars.com. Adamwankenobi 22:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The air cannon, lights and noises are canon. A specific "flea remover" is not. That's merely one use of the aforementioned air cannon. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Removing my vote until the Post-Galactic Civil War section is cleaned and expanded thoroughly. Note that I am in the process of expanding myself, so I'm not just requesting this.
 * I'm working on optimizing as best I can, but my knoledge of the Yuuzhan Vong war, and particularly the Black Fleet Crisis, is limited.
 * There's no way this should be FA until it thoroughly covers the Star comics series. -- Ozzel 06:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * A lot missing from various sources. .  .  .  .  08:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * More information needs to be added from the expanded universe. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 00:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Artoo has never been FA before? Wow. Commander Jorrel Fraajic [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Communications Relay 21:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Tott Doneeta
Support
 * 1) Jagged Fel,  (Yo!)[[Image:JagFel.jpg|20px]]
 * 2) Well written, informative, not a stub, my vote. 23:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) .  .  .  .  08:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) [[Image: Sithlogo.jpg|25px]] Admiral Arm-Ja Scobal, Dark Lord of the Sith (Guestbook) 22:36, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 02:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC) - First, clear out the redlinks. We've been pretty good about having almost all of the new FAs having no redlinks, no reason this shouldn't get the same treatment. Secondly, expand the intro. It's far too short. With the info in the article it should be easy to write a good leader into the main article. Thirdly, least important but I think still warranted, it needs some quotes. A leader quote is essential, and quotes for the different sections if at all possible.
 * Redlinks were my fault. When I copied the article into Word for proofreading, I forgot all of the links. They are all fixed now. 06:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I added a leader quote and added to the intro. But Tott Doneeta really has practically nothing to say. The Leader quote was the best I could find and its still a little rubbish... Jagged Fel,  (Yo!)[[Image:JagFel.jpg|20px]]
 * Nice job on the quotes. I knew you weren't going to get many, but even one helps the article. As for the intro, still way too small. Three sentences just doesn't cut it. Cull Tremayne 01:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice job on expanding, but the intro now reads like a play-by-play. "On this date he went here. On this other date he learned how to do something. On another date he helped someone. On this final date he also learned something new." It needs to read more like an overview of the upcoming article than a point by point summary of his actions. Cull Tremayne
 * Rewrote intro, so it doesn't act as play-by-play. Expanded and removed some unimportant info. 19:29, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Is there a way you can clean up some of the pictures? Perhaps edit out the speech boxes or crop them better? They look woefully terrible as it is. Cull Tremayne 01:58, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Which one(s)? I mean I think most of them look ok. Hows the introduction now? If its still not long enough or is wrong in some way, you'll have to be more specific... Jagged Fel,  (Yo!)[[Image:JagFel.jpg|20px]]
 * It's definitely better, still needs some work. The images I am referring to are here, here, here, and here. The second image just needs the dialogue box just cut off the top. I can live with the second one, though the huge white space on his forehead makes it pretty ugly to look at. The third one just needs some hole patching or a side-crop. The white space draws our attention away from the pic. The last one just looks ugly. It's not good quality, doesn't show Tott that well, and is a compilation of shots. I think either a new version needs to be uploaded, or the dialogue put back in. Wasn't there a discussion about keeping the dialogue and not editing it out? Cull Tremayne 21:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

C-3PO
Support
 * 1) I agree. It is FA material!Force Choke!

Objections Comments
 * Not nearly expansive enough for FA quality. Yuuzhan Vong War section in particular needs expansion. No mention at all of material in Children of the Jedi. No mention at all of Dark Nest Trilogy material, Darksaber material, Black Fleet Crisis material, post-ROTJ Marvel material. This article should easily be 50-100% longer. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 18:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Atarumaster. This article has been on the Improvement Drive numerous times with little change to its greatest weaknesses (really, almost anything post-Jedi Academy Trilogy).  - breathesgelatin Talk 19:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Atarumaster88. .  .  .  .  22:51, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Wow, way to move my comments on Tunroth and put them as a support for your nomination. Why did you do that? Cull Tremayne 01:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Per above. Also, it's got 3 redlinks. -LtNOWIS 02:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed, it still has a long way to go. That one sentence that is simply a roll call of masters between the trilogies needs to be paragraphs, not one sentence. Same as with Artoo. -- Ozzel 20:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * As stated above this article needs a lot of work before it's ready to be featured. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 12:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm going through it this weekend and adding footnotes: any help would be appreciated. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Isolder
Support Object Comments
 * 1)  StarNeptune Talk to me! 17:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  05:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Cull Tremayne 20:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) EAGLES610 15:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) The "walking headache" himself! Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Lord Hydronium 22:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The dialogue is unsourced. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Dialogue sourced Cull Tremayne 04:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In the section A political marriage proposal, could "but was defeated in this task by his mother and her agents." be expanded a little? How did they defeat him? Also, I think the opening paragraph in The search for Han and Leia is still a little vague. When did Isolder discover that Han and Leia had fled to Dathomir? How did he find out? When did Ta'a Chume dispatch the Navy? Why did she do this? Did Isolder tell Ta'a Chume to dispatch the Navy to Dathomir? Cull Tremayne 04:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sourced.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 00:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs more pictures that say something other than this is Isolder. Starwarsrulez 18:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs more quotes. I'd be happy to strike this if it turns out there isn't suitable ones, but I'm sure there must be. --Eyrezer 04:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Isolder 00:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It took me long enough, but I think I finally got it up to FA standard.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 17:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * A really good article, just a small section is too vague and leaves the reader with unanswered questions. Cull Tremayne 04:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Better now. Cull Tremayne 20:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Is there a good close-up pic for the infobox? --Eyrezer 03:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

HK-47
Support Object
 * 1) Darth Ceratis 23:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) RC 2413 15:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Question-in the quote source under 'Personality and Traits', is 'squishy' supposed to be italicised?Grand Moff Rhell 17:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) .  .  .  .  23:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) SkywalkerPL 11:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) --CommanderGree117 17:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Starwarsrulez 18:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It has two red links. Fix those and I'll vote.-- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 12:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Main image is unsourced. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I got rid of the red links. I am currently working on finding the main image's source info.Darth Ceratis 20:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd really like that image sourced and all of the images to use the Information template. Besides that, this seems pretty good. 05:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * All images are sourced now, according to the Information template.Darth Ceratis 21:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro seems a little short. 14:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro made longer. 15:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The new rules don't apply here, per Ataru's comments at the bottom section.-- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 12:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Uhhh, well QuentinGeorge disagrees, and it is his right to object to it. You could perhaps ask the Inquisitorius to strike it. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Too long of an intro (Rule 7) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed (sort of). The intro's still long, but I tinkered with the opening paragraph, and it should be concise, yet informative enough to get the necessary points across.  Or maybe I'm so totally wrong that there isn't even a word for it.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 03:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It's still too long. Condense it to about half of that size! Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The opening paragraph or the entire opening section? Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 06:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This is a little strange: It was too short, so we lengthen it, then new rules come in and it's too long...can we just use the intro as it was originally?Darth Ceratis 02:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The intro is the first section of prose immediately before the main body, and it should be about 6-9 decent sized sentences, IMO. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. never mind what I said earlier, the original intro has nothing with Trials of Obi Wan.Darth Ceratis 23:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Bad introduction (rule 7). --Imp 20:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've tried to cut back on the information, but it is extremely hard. Anyone have any suggestions? 02:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't cut back just organize it so it is more coherent.-- Dooku (Solar Sailer)[[Image:Huppla Pasa Tisc.jpg|17px]] 05:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Question-in the quote source under 'Personality and Traits', is 'squishy' supposed to be italicised?
 * Yes. It's italicized in the subtitles when he says it in the game.Darth Ceratis 21:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. There's three new redlinks concerning bits associated with Trials of Obi Wan. I'm really not too knowlegable about that part of this, so I'm not sure if there even need to be links there or if articles should be created. If someone could take a look at them and fix them, I'd be grateful.Darth Ceratis 01:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I removed the links. I see no standing objections, can this go on the queue?Darth Ceratis 02:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There are some new rules which are in place, one of which is approval by the Inquisitorius. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Galactic Empire
Support
 * 1) Srini 17:24, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Unit 8311 16:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Object
 * Unsourced quotes and images. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Return of Palpatine and Remnant sections need expansion. (Rule 1) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 20:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * A bit more on the branches of administration, possibly using the template.  .  .  .  .  23:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Form IV: Ataru
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 21:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) -- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  StarNeptune Talk to me! 21:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 23:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Now I'll have to go improve the Form V article to keep it in competition....  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 00:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Even if i'm a soresu practicioner i must say that the Ataru article is great!Darth Nospher 14:32, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Starwarsrulez 22:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Few unsourced images. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * All images added. More parts of the article are now referenced. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 17:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Why is the references, BTS, and sources section above the Applications of Ataru section? And at the bottom, there's a large mess with formatting. 14:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops. That was caused by my playing with the reference tags, and I made a coding error. It's fixed now. And it's not completely sourced yet. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, that explains it. I was just wondering why it looked so weird. 16:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Certain images of users need sourcing, there has been no canon established that the jedi exile was a user.Starwarsrulez 18:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC).
 * All images are sourced, last I checked. Which one are you referring to? And, if you play KotOR II, and encounter all three Jedi Masters- which you will, one way or another, you will learn the form one way or another. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 22:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I have played kotor 2 and if you play as a jedi cosular you learn the first three forms ONLY not form 4 and you learn 4 other force forms(one automatically and the rest from the jedi masters). The picture of Anakin Skywalker is unsourced. Starwarsrulez 13:13, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Anakin pic has been changed and the article has been altered to reflect that the Jedi Exile may not have known the form. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * "his mastery of the style made him a virtually unstoppable whirlwind of destruction," "His astonishing moves in his epic duel"&mdash;POVed (rule 2). "This event had a profound effect on Kenobi—after his master's death, he decided to perfect his practice of Soresu, the most defensive of all forms" seems to belong in the Qui-Gon Obi-Wan article rather than this one. --Imp 12:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Form IV: Ataru 00:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It should come as no surprise that I have worked on and am nominating this particular article. It satisfies the new proposals and the old rules. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It's even got a reference tag! :P 21:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Per discussion in IRC, this will be the first Featured Article that must come in under the new sourcing rules. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 17:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * So, every FA nomination above doesn't have to worry about meeting the new guidelines? 18:33, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Correct. We discussed it in IRC and decided that would be a huge pain, so from now on, go by the new rules. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * What rules are those?-- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 23:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Everything has to be sourced with the new footnote tags. For a FA example of what this looks like see Second Battle of Borleias (Yuuzhan Vong War) which Xwing and I sourced earlier. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Isn't that done already? 14:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Now it is. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Form V: Shien / Djem So
Support
 * 1)  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 02:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Objections
 * Needs sourced, (Rule 11) fix all the present tense, (Rule 4). Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I think I've taken care of all usages of the present tense, but let me know if I missed any. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 23:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I still see several mentions of "is" and "are." Most of those happen when something is written OOU- which is also a violation of Rule 4. Example: "It is known that Anakin Skywalker mastered. . . " It would be better to re-write this as "Anakin Skywalker mastered . . . ", IMO. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 00:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Right, I'll go over it again later when I get a minute. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I just recently overhauled this article, so if anyone sees any problems that I missed, I'd appreciate your input. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 02:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * KotOR II quotes would be nice. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Battle of Geonosis
Support
 * 1) Unit 8311 16:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * 1) Rules 11 and 12.-- Dooku (Solar Sailer)[[Image:Huppla Pasa Tisc.jpg|17px]] 22:10, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Needs longer intro (rule 7). Half the article is a list (rule 1). --Imp 20:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) No references. .  .  .  .  22:15, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

George Lucas
Support Objections Comments
 * 1) Lost without him. Can't believe he has been an FA before. He should have been the first one.
 * There are many issues, let's start at the top, the quote needs to be sourced.Starwarsrulez 22:08, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Not referenced. There's a start. .  .  .  .  22:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Armand Isard
Support Objections Comments
 * 1) The fruit of an unhealthy and strange obsession. .  .  .  .  21:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Lord Hydronium 22:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  StarNeptune Talk to me! 06:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 09:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Imp 11:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) -- Dooku (Solar Sailer)[[Image:Huppla Pasa Tisc.jpg|17px]] 11:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Cull Tremayne 07:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) With the new main image, I can agree. 14:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Fynbos 21:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Wording such as "Whilst not inherently evil" and "Palpatine's maniacal genocide" isn't NPOV (rule 2). Other than that, nice work. --Imp 22:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice to see you back, Imp. I've reworded those two, but I'm not really happy with the latter. Suggestions? .  .  .  .  22:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * "Whilst undoubtedly aware of Palpatine's genocidal policy against several non-Human species and the Jedi Order, it is unknown whether he supported this morally."? --Imp 22:17, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed, hopefully. .  .  .  .  01:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Armand Isard 02:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Would a pic of Ysanne Isard be appropriate later on in the article? Also I think a mention of the white streak in his hair would be a good addition somewhere although I see it is mentioned in the infobox. --Eyrezer 02:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I dunno...there are no pics with Ysanne and Armand at the same time, methinks... . .  .  .  02:45, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh and about references in the intro, what's our policy? Personally, when there is an intro paragraph, I don't think it should be referenced as it is only summarising the main text which will reference each point more fully anyway. --Eyrezer 02:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * We reference everything. Everything. .  .  .  .  02:55, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Orman Tagge
Support Oppose
 * 1) .  .  .  .  02:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 14:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]] 15:14, 19 Febuary 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Komari Vosa
Support Oppose
 * 1) Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]] 15:14, 19 Febuary 2007 (UTC)
 * Too short introduction, unsourced and poorly proportioned infobox image, doesn't reference sources and the article is too short in general. --Imp 15:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, the quotes are not sourced.-- Dooku (Solar Sailer)[[Image:Huppla Pasa Tisc.jpg|17px]] 22:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Looks good to me. Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]]

Mount Sorrow
Support
 * 1) Cue insane cackle! .  .  .  .  23:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Great job by Fourdot on expanding! 23:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 00:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Soon as that nose thing is gone.&mdash;Semi-humourless Dan 00:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) --Eyrezer 02:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Though I think there are more worthy subjects to be featured, apparently that has nothing to do with FA. This is a well written article which meets all the criteria. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Now that it has more pictures, I'm happy with it. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 10:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) "If he is worthy, I shall weep for him!" but I cannot deny it is. - Skippy Farlstendoiro 10:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC) (weeping).
 * 9) Imp 00:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Infobox image needs a proper source. --Imp 23:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe I have no sense of humour, but that nose bit is POV (rule 2). Otherwise this is indeed a fine article on a, er, crying, talking mountainy thing. Green Tentacle (Talk) 00:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I fail to see how that is POV, whilst we have speculation that certain ships are from certain manufactures based purely on their design. .  .  .  .  00:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * That's kind of a moot point, though. --Imp 00:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * However hilarious the nose is, it must go. Sorry. *Cull ducks a tomato* Cull Tremayne 00:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Nose thing is grudgingly gone. .  .  .  .  00:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't see this thing on the front page. I think there are many better articles that need featuring more desperately. Besides, the article subject is stupid (yes, yes, I'm a Stradleyist) and could give newcomers a bad impression of Star Wars. - Sikon 09:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a valid objection. .  .  .  .  09:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Valid or not, I stand by it. - Sikon 09:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I stand by Sikon, strong as ever. Star Wars has held strong against many barrages- Ewoks, Jar Jar, Episode II- but everything has it's limit. Sure, one day it's Mount Sorrow, but the next, we have little mount sorrows and laughing birds popping out from our @sses. It's gotta stop somewhere, and it's gotta stop here. Darth Maddolis 09:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * So...is this a new objection? If so, it should be in-line with all other objections, and if so, tell me so I can take it to the Inq to get struck. .  .  .  .  09:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I think people should take KEJ on Farfalla up there as an example: "Probably the most un-Jedi Jedi ever, and basically a ridiculous character in an already weak and silly comic series... but the article's good enough." Featured articles are the best articles, not the most "Oh gee, this subject's so cool!" articles.  Indeed, the subject of the article should be irrelevant. - Lord Hydronium 09:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * This is, without a doubt, the best article ever written about a sentient mountain that cries. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 00:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't wait to see this on the front page. 00:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This is, without a doubt, one of the few articles ever written in detail about a sentient mountain that cries. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm putting this in Comments because I'm not sure it's a valid objection, but it seems a bit short. - Lord Hydronium 09:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I would have thought so too, but under even the reformed FA rules, length is not a problem. As long as it's not a stub or anything ridiculously short. .  .  .  .  09:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

The Haunted Village
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 02:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Same problem I had with it last time: The plot "summary" is a play-by-play. .  .  .  .  08:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Except that you never made that objection last time! "I think it's fine now". :p --Eyrezer 09:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I lied. .  .  .  .  09:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been up for FA before, but it failed because it didn't have enough pictures. I have since added more pics to it and made a couple of changes. The discussion on the old FA nom can be seen here (for convienience), or the original page here . As to the objection about redlinks that is bound to come, there is 3 redlinks in the article: 2 are there twice so it looks like 5, but isn't. --Eyrezer 02:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)