User talk:DarthRuiz30

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, DarthRuiz30!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash;SFH (talk) 03:07, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * }

KB
Just a heads up: your question has been moved to Forum:KB:Jedi Temple of Devaron?.  IFYLOFD  ( Enter the Floydome ) 01:17, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks I'm sorry for my mistake --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:21, January 7, 2015 (UTC)

Ghost
No, I was just cleaning up some of the writing and fixing a redirect. I'll try to look for it in my next viewing. -  AV-6R7  Crew Pit 23:04, December 17, 2016 (UTC)

The 178th Legion
Please do not undo necessary cosmetic changes. We've tried our best to improve the article as far as our knowledge of wiki-editing reaches. If you have any suggestions or corrections to make, just let us know. --The 178th Legion 00:26, December 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * I've been working on the page, I liked the change but the keep cells on the memeber list--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:43, December 19, 2016 (UTC)

Our sourcing policy dictates that the entirety of an article must be sourced. The added piece of information is not contained within the cited episode, and therefore an appropriate reference must be provided. --The 178th Legion 02:26, December 25, 2016 (UTC)
 * I dont know about you. And stop offending me in my talk page, Also explain before attacking. If you're refering to the protectors been eliminated, the episode clearly states that they where wiped out--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:39, December 25, 2016 (UTC)

Hey DarthRuiz30, it's us, the 178th Legion! Sorry for any inconvenience, we didn't mean to offend you! Our attempt to reason didn't go as planned, it seems. The Protectors obviously were doing Mando stuff till Saxon made a horny Mando super comMando move. In truth, the Protectors are just fragmented; their leader Rau survived the onslaught and kicked Imperial Mando ass. --The 178th Legion 21:23, December 25, 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem, just like this we can resolve this in a more civilized way, the episode includes references from both Rau and Saxon saying he killed the Protectors that why we keep it as dissolved or destroyed faction, until we learn that maybe there are more Protectors hiding somewhere, I think we're going to keep it that way. Happy Holidays --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:39, December 25, 2016 (UTC)

Wulff
Wulf Is Confirmed Space Ninja Pirate Robot (talk) 20:24, January 4, 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you have a source?? --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:26, January 4, 2017 (UTC)

pictures
I see you uploaded some pictures of the LightMaker from that youtube video...theres a great shot of the Y-wings conducting the bombing run that I think would make a great picture for the Battle of Scarif page or Gold Squadron page. I'm a horrible editor, anyway you could do it? &mdash;Unsigned comment by 73.114.33.240 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * Sure, will do it later --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:22, January 23, 2017 (UTC)


 * great, thank you! &mdash;Unsigned comment by 76.24.10.30 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * done--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:36, January 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * looks great! Do you think we should add it into the Battle of Scarif page? I think Jon Vander's page is probably set on pictures but it would be a nice addition to Scarif
 * Battle of Scarif has enough pictures, and vander's has the cockpit view. I think its ok for now. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:39, January 26, 2017 (UTC)

Shadow Trooper
Hey, I was wondering why you have reverted my edits on shadow troopers. I am a big star wars fan aswell and I just wanted to add the fact that these troopers are intended for stealth purposes. I can remove the whole legends bit if that's not really wookiepedia's style. Thanks &mdash;Unsigned comment by MLGGetReked (talk &bull; contribs).


 * Thanks for trying to help the wiki, but you're adding legends material to a canon article and also you're speculating about them, there hasn't been any official source saying they do stealth missions or even if they're an elite unit. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:38, February 17, 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for the clear up. I wasn't too sure about wookiepedia's format for assumptions and the incorporation of legends. I'll keep that in mind next time. Thanks and have a good day :). --MLGGetReked (talk) 23:57, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

new media
Theres a great new video released by the ILM channel on the making of the battle of scarif. Some great new official shots of the ion torpedo attack
 * Thanks, but I think we're good on those pages. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:41, February 27, 2017 (UTC)

Help
hey halp me set up a new page on the wiki i am not sure how to add the sources or where the templates are
 * Gladly I could help but please, remember to sign your comments with --~ ~ ~ ~ like that only that without spaces--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:41, February 27, 2017 (UTC)

can you help getting this picture up of the imperial fleet orbiting the Yaast system I am not sure how to obtain images for the data network but i have the image but I dont think I am allowed to upload pictures and thanks for helping me set up this page
 * Will try to do it later. Again please sign your comments--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:15, February 27, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Help
Ah, yes, that annoyingness. I have encountered that same error a couple of times and if I'm remembering correctly it was that one of the following from a foreign site: ' { } " One of those might be preventing it. Also, I may take the liberty of checking you workbench out myself in case I see something right away. Cheers! – Nivlacanator (talk) 00:25, March 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks I will start to look for those right away. Also is workbench 1 in case you want to take a look --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:28, March 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. I checked it out, but nothing stood out. What I would suggest is taking a section or paragraph at a time and transporting them to the relevant page and saving. That way, you can narrow down the issue much easier. – Nivlacanator (talk) 00:35, March 2, 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice, and found the problem was a minor detail --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:49, March 2, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Help
Oh yes, I have encountered this error so many times! The easiest way to solve this issue is to transfer your article section by section, in my opinion. By moving into smaller pieces, you can locate the exact sentence and change it. Sometimes the part you get may not have any issues at all (even an admin told me once that the piece of text I showed him was perfectly fine), in that case you need to rewrite that entire part. Hope that helps!  AnilSerifoglu  (talk) 01:27, March 2, 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for actually giving a proper reason. This whole night I have been going back and forth with edits with little to no reason as to why my edits were being reverted.--RemingtonV (talk) 04:04, March 3, 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes those are not relevant for the wiki, just because he says meatbags or was tasked to protect the oulander doesnt mean that he isnt an assasin droid. Also like I said those are in game abilities not real abilities, that's why many of your changes are being reverted--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:06, March 3, 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, his saying meatbags is a story element. He does it in the cutscenes. He also confirms that his primary function is that of a bodyguard, when the Outlander asks him.--RemingtonV (talk) 05:05, March 3, 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah but we can't speculate for that, he just say it that's it, there's no further explanation and should be like that. and the bodyguard thing is just a function of it, but its still an assassin droid- --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:57, March 3, 2017 (UTC)
 * Im not speculating. Its not speculation if the character themselves say it. I'm not saying we should change his category from assassin droid, as he is a variant of the HK line and he can still perform as an assassin droid. But his primary function is still as a bodyguard. There is a line in introductory paragraph pointing out that he is a bodyguard, I was putting in a note that he is the "first" HK unit primarily designed as a bodyguard.--RemingtonV (talk) 05:05, March 3, 2017 (UTC)

HK-47's page will remain locked until we resolve this dispute.
Why did you insist that the HK-47 fought on Yavin 4 is a duplicate? I know of no confirmed source on this, beyond HK-55 merely speculating such was the case. --RemingtonV (talk) 00:19, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

The rebellion
Hi DarthRuize30,

Thank you for volunteering to help with updating the rebellion article. By all means, you are welcome to help. I've been a bit busy with university studies and other matters so I appreciate it when other Wookieepedians like you chip in to help. Sometimes, I feel a bit overstretched. Since February last year, I have undertaken the task of updating the Rebels episodes plot summaries, the battles and missions, and the various characters. It's good that we help ease each other's burdens. By the way, have you considered volunteering for Wookieepedia: WookieeProject: Rebels? Wish you all the best and may the Force be with you. Andykatib 05:22, March 3, 2017 (UTC)

Hello, you deleted my addition to the CT-7567 (Legends) page, claiming it as "vandalism". I simply added Rex's appearance in the story SkyeWalkers. May I ask how that's vandalism? Thank you. Sombraptor (talk) 16:00, March 13, 2017 (UTC)Sombraptor

The rebellion
Hey Ruiz. I wanted to let you know about a project that I'm working on since it could potentially impact your featured article nomination for the rebellion. To give you some backstory…

The article the rebellion was created after Fire Across the Galaxy when we still knew very little about how the Rebel Alliance came to be formed. It was essentially a way to capture info about the broader rebel movement. However, and I say this as the person who created the page, it was never particularly accurate. It assumed that the rebellion of Star Wars Rebels was something other than the early days of the Rebel Alliance, before the official establishment of the Alliance. It treated it as a distinct organization. Incorrectly, in my opinion, many Wookieepedia editors have adopted the idea that the rebellion and the Rebel Alliance are distinct.

I do not believe that the rebellion article should exist. I think the information about it should be covered in the various rebel cell pages, like Phoenix Squadron, Spectres, and Massassi group, and that an overview of the early days of the rebellion should be given in an Origins section on Alliance to Restore the Republic.

What I plan to propose is that we do a few things:
 * We get rid of the rebellion page and merge the information into the correct pages, based on what I said above.
 * Affiliations on individual character or organization pages should be updated to reflect pre-Alliance cell affiliations and, ultimately, the Alliance itself. So infoboxes would no longer list affiliations like The rebellion ==> Phoenix Squadron, it would instead say Phoenix Squadron.
 * We create a new event article called early rebellion against the Galactic Empire, to capture information about the pre-Galactic Civil War conflicts. Because there is still a rebel movement that still had a major impact on the galaxy and had many connected events.
 * We get rid of made up events like Lothal insurgency and instead just treat the events of Star Wars Rebels as being part of early rebellion against the Galactic Empire.

I have started working on that page on my workspace. You can find it at User:Brandon Rhea/Rebellion. An anonymous user took some of that information and created early rebellion against the Galactic Empire, so I've tagged it as being in use since I'm working on the page already.

What do you think? - Brandon Rhea (talk) 20:30, March 28, 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I think I disagree in some parts of the proposal, I agree there should be an early rebellion against the empire page since many conflicts had an impact on the galaxy, but the rebellion or the rebel network like it was called before it was an organization, We have seen that they had a Rebel command and leadership, in my opinion that indicates some sense of unity that will later be reflected into the Alliance, I guess we could make a consensus about what other think about it, but for me Its an organization that was lead by Command and was reorganized into the Alliance and that their members were more organizations. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:38, March 28, 2017 (UTC)
 * It had a loose leadership, but that all just structured itself into the Rebel Alliance. It didn't stop being one organization and then become another organization. It's all one thing that evolved over the course of many years. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 20:40, March 28, 2017 (UTC)
 * I see what are you trying to say and agree that the rebellion was the informal Alliance. but from my point of view those were two different things, for example Honorable Ones they mention rebel command that rebel command can't be the same Alliance Command we know from the Alliance, that show us the cooperation and evolution of the rebellion as a organization until is reorganized and formalized as the Alliance. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:44, March 28, 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm curious: why do you think Rebel Command and Alliance Command are not the same thing? One just evolved into the other, rather than them being two distinct article-worthy organizations. There is nothing in canon, from what I've seen, that talks about "the rebellion" and its constituent parts as this wholly separate thing from the Rebel Alliance. That's essentially something we here at Wookieepedia made up. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 20:47, March 28, 2017 (UTC)
 * Just to throw in my two cents but I'm on board with the project. would definitely clean up most of these articles.Jkirk8907 (talk) 20:49, March 28, 2017 (UTC)
 * You may be right on the Command thing that it was a simple evolution or just a name change, but I think Ahsoka book identifies it as the rebellion or something like that. And also we haven't seen any sources indicating that are the same thing, we even have that Secret Cargo is the birth of the Alliance per Databank and RO Ultimate Guide --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:51, March 28, 2017 (UTC)
 * In this case, we don't need a source to confirm that they're the same thing. The burden of proof would be on proving they are not the same thing. The entire show is based on the formation of the Rebel Alliance so, for the purposes of articles, we can assume this is all one evolution of the same thing. To treat them as two separate organizations is what would require proof. Remember what Jyn said in Rogue One? "The Alliance or the Rebellion or whatever you're calling yourselves these days." It's pretty clear that this organization has been around for awhile and they simply adopted the formal name of Alliance to Restore the Republic/Rebel Alliance under a more formalized structure. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 21:00, March 28, 2017 (UTC)
 * So Brandon Rhea it we're going to be combing the rebellion and Alliance to Restore the Republic pages into one, would pages like rebel Fleet and the Alliance Fleet, the Rebel intelligence and Alliance Intelligence as well as Alliance High Command and Rebel Command be all combined in one respective page for each organization?Jkirk8907 (talk) 21:04, March 28, 2017 (UTC)
 * Wait until a decision Jkirk--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:07, March 28, 2017 (UTC)
 * In my opinion I dont see it that way, but I'm good if the community decided that The rebellion page shouln't exists and if you continue the Early rebellion against the Galactic Empire proyect (which I'm in) I would be Ok, maybe its just me that sees it that way, maybe not, maybe its because the time I invested to the page I don't know, but whatever the result is I'm good and willing to help in the proyect to move on. Like I said before I think we both have our points, pros and cons, I say we should see what the community thinks about it. Thanks for the heads up --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:07, March 28, 2017 (UTC)

About the vandalism thing. I just wanted to say sorry and that it wasn't me. I left the computer open and my friend was teasing me and trying to get me blocked.

message
User warning: Three-Revert Rule.

You have come close to violating, or have already violated, the Three-Revert Rule.

If you continue to edit-war, an administrator will block you from editing. Please reconsider your approach, and pay attention to the advice others provide.

--Jenth hunter (talk) 23:09, May 10, 2017 (UTC) same goes to you, already explained to you on your talk page. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:10, May 10, 2017 (UTC)

I'm not going to keep reverting your error because I don't need to get myself blocked. But why do you insist on removing something that is helping users, are you trying to confuse them?

It was just the comment on my ability to speak my native language. I accept your apology, no harm done. I would have rathered you just point out where I should have put it rather than just undermining my efforts. Thanks. Hope it is cleared up now, just don't need folk getting confused since there is more than one weapon which was used.

--Jenth hunter (talk) 23:27, May 10, 2017 (UTC)
 * Tried to tell you both on talk page and on edit message, you kept reverting. For those cases use a Template youmay its useful for occassion where users can get confuse. And I'm sure I never insulted you and less because I would never comment on the ability of speaking a language--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:31, May 10, 2017 (UTC)

Any how, words can be easily misinterpreted on the internet. Glad it has been resolved now, I hope the edit is satisfactory now. Hopefully it can just be left as it is now. Thanks for your understanding.

Image editing
Just wanted to advise you that although your efforts are appreciated, I have reverted your replacement of File:Executor Ciena Ree.jpg. Per Images section 5 item 2, text should only be removed from speech bubbles if the bubbles are truncated, not if the entire speech bubble is contained within the uploaded image. Thank you. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 16:18, June 4, 2017 (UTC)

Nute Gunray Picture
This rule is the stupidest rule ever instituted, especially when Pablo Hidalgo has expressed interest otherwise. I am surprised so many are conforming to this unnecessary rule which only limits the options and quality of photos. I hope that this rule gets changed or people choose to stop conforming to it.
 * I know, I'm a supporter that all promo pictures shouln't fall to this rule, but until now the rule still applies, I'm hoping for a change--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:35, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * Let me know if you hear of a change just in case I don't get the memo.
 * The Nute Gunray picture that is a screenshot from Revenge of the Sith is better suited for the profile image because it does not have a distracting background and is better sized for a profile image.
 * I'm not the only one who thinks that's a better profile picture, The SWE picture was used as the profile picture for Nute, It looks better than the screenshot from the movie. If you feel distracted for the purple background you can try to remove it and update the picture. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:51, June 13, 2017 (UTC)
 * Going by the new rule concerning canon images isn't the purple background Nute image not acceptable? The image comes from the now obsolete Encyclopedia and there is no verifiably canon source for the purple background image. Is there?
 * Encylopedia is canon, and many images have that background so theres no policy there. Go to the talk page of the article to discuss about it thanks --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:00, June 13, 2017 (UTC)

Breha
What about the episode 3 picture or her Databank? I guess it won't be of amazing quality but at least it's live action which is preferred to the comic issue, unless there's one elsewhere --Lewisr (talk) 21:26, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * Its the same image that's been used to describe that she adopted Leia--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:28, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * Might be better to swap the images around and crop the image so its just Breha or something like that --Lewisr (talk) 21:31, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * And remove the image or leave both of them the original and the cropped?--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:32, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * I think if its used in the infobox then remove it from the main body--Lewisr (talk) 21:35, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, sounds good. P.S. This is why that policy is not that good in some cases --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:37, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * I understand, I didn't realise it would affect this many pages, I kinda just wish I never said anything to you about it in the first place --Lewisr (talk) 21:41, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * Lol, It's all good, we can still try to use the SH forum to convince others and take it to a concensus --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:45, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * Agreed, hopefully something can change --Lewisr (talk) 21:48, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * Please do. This is getting a bit ridiculous. -- Lelal Mekha  The Uprising crest.png(Audience Room) 22:02, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
 * In any case, I'm keeping all the pages edited bookmarked in case there's a change in the policy, so I can quickly find the articles changed--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:08, June 8, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Cato
Woops, I just checked and can't find that image in SW Card Trader. I must've remembered wrong. My mistake. Brules  Talk  00:55, June 13, 2017 (UTC)

SWE Access?
Is it possible to still access the now obsolete SWE? How can the content be deemed canon if it can no longer be accessed?
 * If you to a certain article that had an encyclopedia entry, theres a backup link in which you access to the website. Certain function are not functional but the entry should be intact--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:11, June 13, 2017 (UTC)
 * All of the Encyclopedia article backup links now receive error codes and redirect to the current Databank on StarWars.com? Is this a new issue or has it been noted before?-- Benjay2345 (talk) 07:21, June 13, 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmm weird, it works for me, try coping and pasting the link in the search bar, maybe that can work--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:20, June 13, 2017 (UTC)

Episode Guides
I'm not going to press it as it's not such a big deal, but the information from older episode guides are canon, check this forum. But seens as the link to the guide is dead it's not worthwhile keeping the image --Lewisr (talk) 01:11, June 20, 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the info. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:14, June 20, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Force Collection

 * No worries, just need to work out the name reference for Globe of Peace and Vizam now. That gallery is indeed accurate, although not entirely up to date. I updated the appearances section of the app's page earlier this week so that should be pretty much up to date and give you an idea of who else has images on the app. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:13, June 23, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Question

 * Yup, Janu Godalhi is indeed identified by name in the Visual Encyclopedia. The image used is also the same one as on the legends page but without the background. Not sure if that qualifies them as separate images or not. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:05, June 23, 2017 (UTC)

Knights of Ren
I see what you mean, but for TFA etc we said the Knights of Ren appeared only in the vision even though Kylo is one. So that means we either have to change it to them appearing in TFA etc or remove it from the TLJ page until we know the whole group will appear --Lewisr (talk) 17:24, June 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * I think it should be better to chnage the TFA page, since they do appear, is kind of when we add Jedi Order prganization into an appearance or how we add Clone Captain when Rex appears in Rebels--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 17:32, June 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * Yeah I agree with that --Lewisr (talk) 17:36, June 24, 2017 (UTC)

Three-revert rule
Hi Ruiz. Although Wiki585 is breaking the rules by removing talk page content, you're also breaking the rules right now. Specifically, Three-revert rule. In doing so you are engaging in an edit war. Please leave the talk page alone for now and leave it for an admin to deal with. Thanks. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 22:52, June 26, 2017 (UTC)
 * So is Wiki, Vandalism to other user pages, 3RR, and removing messages. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:58, June 26, 2017 (UTC)
 * As good as it is to be vigilant, sometimes, on the internet, it pays not to be in that trolls love to feed off such zealousness. But you've reported him, so it shouldn't be too much. Be wary of trolls is all. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 23:12, June 26, 2017 (UTC)
 * Correct. Don't feed the trolls by constantly engaging with them. Sometimes a report is best. By reverting over and over, you were giving him the attention he wanted. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:24, June 26, 2017 (UTC)
 * Yup, sorry for that. Already reported--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:26, June 26, 2017 (UTC)

Matchstick and Broadside
Is there a way you can get a better picture of them in the film? From the image you put on the talk page its not easy to tell --Lewisr (talk) 20:21, June 27, 2017 (UTC)
 * Fair enough then thank you, sorry for the delayed response btw --Lewisr (talk) 23:42, June 27, 2017 (UTC)

I like Barriss Offee too.

Forces of Destiny YouTube thumbnails
Just curious, how are you retrieving the thumbnails for the Forces of Destiny videos in such high quality? Just wondering your method for future reference. Thanks. --Benjay2345 (talk) 20:12, July 5, 2017 (UTC)
 * Its a secret.... just kidding....I take it directly from the video, since its a scene from there I just need to try and try until you I the same image. That's what've been doing since BB-8 Bandits.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:15, July 5, 2017 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks. I had been using an online YouTube thumbnail grabber and it gets them in slightly less high of quality. This method makes sense. Thanks for the advice.--Benjay2345 (talk) 20:17, July 5, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Cast or Credits
According to the Layout Guide, articles on published works should use "Credits," not "Cast." It's not really a pressing issue, but any instances of it should be corrected eventually. - Cwedin (talk) 02:13, July 6, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Multiple appearances
I see what you mean, and it probably will end up going that way. I initially did it on Obi-Wan Kenobi's page before changing it back until it's clear how we are adding them. I brought it up on the talk page for Star Wars: From a Certain Point of View so I'm sure it'll be sorted quickly --Lewisr (talk) 02:25, July 13, 2017 (UTC)
 * Well that was resolved sooner than I anticipated --Lewisr (talk) 03:07, July 13, 2017 (UTC)

Naval officer
Hey the clone naval officer appears in battlefront 2, here take a look
 * As I said and this is explained in the talk page, it could be another branch of officers, Naval officers as the name suggest were stationed in starships only--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:24, July 14, 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the info

Barash vow
Hey, I only placed that there because I read through a comic that implied the Jedi in the notable persons for the baresh vow stated he took it to live in the force, that sounded like the oneness state to me.
 * That's why I removed it, its pure speculation--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:39, July 15, 2017 (UTC)

No speculation is: "the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence." Jedi Master KIRAK INFIL’A the noted barash taker literally quotes "For my transgressions I took the Barash vow to live inside the force until my true path as a jedi became clear" - This isn't mere grasping for straws.
 * Theory is the keyword here, is still something you came up with it. It doesn't mention "Becoming one with it for a period of time"--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:05, July 15, 2017 (UTC)

Paraphrasing, but sure. Go ahead and not accept the edit. It's just right there in print that he stated he lived INSIDE the force. What other jedi technique allows such intimacy? Oh right, oneness. - mic drop. I'm out, I'm done.
 * Please sign your comment, and feel free to leave this on the article talk page. Its easier to disucuss with other members of the community. And also that doesn't mean anything, we don't know if there's other technique that allows it, but as I said go to the article talk page--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:10, July 15, 2017 (UTC)

My only speculation is the question as to his meaning, I "speculate" he meant - The Barash Vow is a form of exile until a Jedi lives firmly in the Jedi code experiencing Oneness - there's where speculation comes in. I left it as a the comment to mean a possibility. Yes its theory there, but the point is no there are no other known abilities that describe a similar intimacy except oneness to "live in the force".

I apologize for letting my own arrogance to show but I felt insulted by you because of the "speculation" comment. "without firm proof" to what I wrote which the hard proof was the comic itself. I would sign in and would love to sign my posts but I do not remember my password or username (I assumed it was Reiles Cole) I had, years back an account I even made my own fanfic story for him in this wiki. I hadn't signed in since cause If theres a chance to reclaim my old account I can use it.