Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Unidentified long-necked riding beast (Cerea)

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:39, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:I realise how boring these articles are...

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:15, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:00, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * You can't use the category for named creatures. Its not named.... 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:24, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Yeah I did think about that but was just going by the example of the several other identified creatures in that category. Is there a more appropriate category for individual creatures? Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:52, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I couldn't find one. You could make a cat for unidentified creature individuals or something like that. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:02, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Is that really necessary its already in unidentified individuals.Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:23, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****I guess you can keep it then, but I don't think we consider a mount an individual. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:15, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Aylayl

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:42, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:10, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 17:55, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4)  Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:03, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Dirha

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:44, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:20, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 18:00, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:59, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5)  Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:03, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * For the primary terrain section in the infobox, I would put after 25 ABY, as the planet was not always Vongformed. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:13, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Good point. How's that?  Imperators II (Talk) 20:55, April 25, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Diyu

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:45, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:15, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 18:01, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

The Godsheart

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Hutts, too, have made their impact on STAR Wars

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:47, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:16, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 18:04, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ilos

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:19, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:43, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 18:03, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * I'd say that the Origins of the Jedi map on page 119 of the atlas shows Ilos in Hutt space between 25,000 BBY and 22,000 BBY earlier than Great Hyperspace War map showing 5,000 BBY. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:58, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think that can be extrapolated from the earlier map, considering it only has the reference points of Boonta and Sleheyron, whereas the 5,000 BBY map shows that the Hutt Space extended as far as Randon and Sneeve (perhaps even Boz Pity), thus definitely placing Ilos in that region.  Imperators II (Talk) 14:14, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Given that the earlier map contains Boonta the region of Hutt Space in it is larger than that shown in the actual Hutt Space map and so it includes all the systems on the Hutt Space map plus more as far as I can tell. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:11, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * Firstly, both maps show Boonta within Hutt Space. Secondly, no, Hutt Space in the 25,000&mdash;22,000 BBY map does not include all the systems from the Hutt Space map (see almost everything south of Varl). So I still believe it is safer to state that Ilos was in Hutt Space by 5,000 BBY&mdash;which can clearly be seen from the map, and the relative location of Randon and Sneeve makes it easy to see&mdash;than to try to guess whether or not Ilos fell within the Hutt borders by 22,000 BBY. That earlier map just doesn't show the Coreward edge of Hutt Space in enough detail to allow us to pinpoint Ilos's location relative to it.  Imperators II (Talk) 22:30, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * Both maps do contain Boonta but the map of Hutt space with no timeframe doesn't was my point and your right I totally forgot about the bottom of the region. I still reckon that if you look at the scaling of the image Ilos is within the borders but to be honest it is to close to guess work so I guess the 5,000 BBY map is the safer bet. Sorry for making a fuss. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:43, April 25, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * Ahem... I'll just leave this right here... http://masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/Ilos --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 19:00, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Ilos Minor

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:20, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:45, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 18:04, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Kafane

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:00, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:33, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 23:37, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * I understand your current model for these Hutt planets' articles is good but still all articles are looking the same except for a few details. I'll ask you to recurr to more diviersity in both this and the nom below, turning this into a formal objection. Make the changes necessary for them to differ the previous articles' structure. Winterz (talk) 18:07, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Better? Darn, a person cannot batch-nom a bunch of really similar articles any more...  Imperators II (Talk) 20:51, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***eheheh. Winterz (talk) 23:37, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

M'Hanna

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I think that a planet of black dust with supersonic winds directly results from massive barn-burning all over the planet.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:01, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:34, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 23:38, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sakifwanna

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:02, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:43, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Saqqar

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Gigantic ruins of towers and half-burnt barns...

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:04, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:45, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tisht

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Not much is known about this planet. In-universe.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:05, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:45, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Usk (planet)

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:08, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:48, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Xolu

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:09, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:50, April 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Zisia

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:11, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:11, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:55, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) What do you mean by rich? Is it in wealth? Resources? Clarify.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:51, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Unfortunately, TEA only says Zisia is rich and does not elaborate on that. :(  Imperators II (Talk) 18:57, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Exiled Jedi
 * 4) * Could you mention what the population is the average of? I believe it is stated on the key to the population map. Please take care of this on all you current and recent nominations. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:11, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **What do you mean? As stated in the article, it's "the local population average of the region of space containing Zisia."  Imperators II (Talk) 07:07, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Yes, but is it the average per system, per planet, or some other average? Right now it's kind of ambiguous.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:48, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ****On second thought, I think it is clear enough as it is.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:54, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Capabara plant

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:50, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Barn burner sub-page for the Tal Nami

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:27, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:45, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Please refer to the plant as non-sentient in the body. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:03, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:05, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Egoa tree

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:50, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:As a biology student I must say I find the growth rate of a meter a day slightly bothersome...

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:29, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:48, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * You don't call the tree non-sentient in the body. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:55, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:05, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Durable plastifoam

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  14:26, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero keeps on going.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:39, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Durable packing material? Quite an invention...-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  19:22, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:30, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Shock buzzer

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  14:26, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero brings you Kira when she's channeling a little Joker.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:40, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  19:25, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:31, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Imperial major

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  14:26, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero. Companion to Praven, the badass.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:42, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:32, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  19:33, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Phrayan

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  14:26, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:43, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) He looks kinda purple.....  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:33, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) The skin color is hard to classify, he's not quite purple and not quite blue...-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  19:38, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tera-Su

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  14:26, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:43, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) How many trainers are there?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:35, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) *1 more trainer from ROTHC, and 10 vendors. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:36, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  19:41, April 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Attack on the Tsyk system

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:49, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:An article about a dot on a map.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good job.  Imperators II (Talk) 22:02, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:01, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:43, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) * The map on p. 219 says the yellow dots represent systems attacked by the Vong, so the article will have to be moved accordingly.  Imperators II (Talk) 19:52, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Corrected the article. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:57, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Please mention the context of the battle, i.e. the preceding battle of the campaign and the route taken by the Vong to attack the system.  Imperators II (Talk) 20:02, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **I added the preceding battle and the way in which the Vong reached the system. Is there a following battle I should add as well? The map shows Tysk as a dead end. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:24, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * Please provide an image from the map.
 * 7) **Uploaded the best quality I can and tagged it with the quality template. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:11, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) * I'm not sure the info about the Tsyklen and Hutt species is relevant to the battle.
 * 9) **Removed it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:11, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) *** Actually, scrap the entire part about Tsyk&mdash;it just has nothing to with the battle.  Imperators II (Talk) 21:22, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) ****All gone. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:24, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) *" a map detailing conflicts in the galaxy during the war called "collapse of the Core."" Please clean this part up. What war? Are the conflicts called "collapse of the Core" or the war is?  Imperators II (Talk) 20:47, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) **I've cleaned it up a bit. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:11, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) * Actually, the map only says the Vong attacked the system, and does not say that there was any resistance to the attack (i.e., a battle). So please move the article to "Attack on the Tsyk system".  Imperators II (Talk) 21:22, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) **Moved it and the article on the previous battle. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:36, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 16) * It seems to me that the Online Companion reference isn't necessary.  Imperators II (Talk) 21:39, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 17) **Removed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:00, April 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 18) 501st
 * 19) * You might want to take the size of the infobox picture down a bit, as to remove some of the blurriness, like this. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:09, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 20) **Shrunk to 150px Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:59, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Attack on the Circumtore system

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:55, April 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Another bright yellow dot

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  19:18, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:02, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Shouldn't you take care of the merge and decide which name to have the article at?
 * 3) **Merge is sorted thanks to Cade. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:37, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * You use variants of travel in two consecutive sentences. Could you use a synonym for one of them?
 * 5) **Changed the second travelled to advanced. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:37, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * "No information is given about the outcome of the attack although a separate map shows Hollastin was under Vong control by 27 ABY." Don't you mean to say that Circumtore was under Vong control? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:37, April 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Ah whoops indeed I do. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:37, April 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) 501st
 * 9) * Same objection about blurriness as above. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:11, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) **Shrunk to 150px Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:58, April 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Shettora

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:24, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For the Barn Burner

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:01, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) -  Princess   GLG  23:58, May 1, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * You you refer to the Hutt as he in the main body but say it's gender isn't identified.
 * 3) **Fixed.
 * 4) * Can you give a publishing date for Pirates & Privateers
 * 5) **I don't think it's necessary because Shettora didn't appear in P&P, but if you insist, I'll do it.
 * 6) ***I generally prefer dates on everything but I won't insist. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:01, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) * Can you mention the region of the galaxy Brentaal IV is located in? Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:28, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **There you go. Thanks for looking it over. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:45, May 1, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Princess
 * 2) * Black market needs linked. - Princess   GLG  19:20, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done, but in the future, a single missed link is usually something the editor can fix during a copyedit. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:23, May 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Duly noted. - Princess   GLG  23:58, May 1, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Don't you need to source that Shettora was a hermaphrodite to another source? I doubt its in The Far Orbit Project.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  00:42, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **There you go. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:08, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Tsyklen forger

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:36, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Sub-page for Tsyklen as part of the burner.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *"She was a round, hairless individual with wide eyes and taut skin as well as seven fingers slender enough to be mistaken for tentacles and two opposable thumbs on each hand." I think you are missing something here. It doesn't sound quite right. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 17:17, May 3, 2013 (UTC)

Comments