Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Stinger


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

(5 Inq/1 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 01:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) A very easy read. Good work --Eyrezer 07:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Objections resolved over IRC. Nice job. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:29, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Quality work. Thefourdotelipsis 09:12, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Good stuff. -- Ozzel 10:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 14:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Toprawa:
 * 2) * "Potentially" deadly? I think it would be best to just say "deadly.": "making the ship both fast and potentially deadly"
 * 3) * I think it would be best to indicate specifically what speeds the X-wing and TIE travels at, to give a greater idea of the ship's approximate speed in the absence of a solid number: "Together, these engines combined to produce a sublight speed greater than that of the T-65 X-wing starfighter and only slightly below that of the TIE/ln starfighter"
 * 4) **Not an objection, but in addition to this, I would recommend piping the TIE/In starfighter link to be TIE Interceptor, the more common name. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 01:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) * Saying the cargo space took up an excessive amount of space reads a bit redundantly. Please reword: "the crew quarters and cargo space took up an excessive amount of space aboard ship."
 * 6) * You begin the previous sentence the same way as this one. Please reword to mix it up a little bit: "Though the Stinger sank into the swamp"
 * 7) *Very nicely written. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:07, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius 15:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how "canon" this news article is, but I think there is a unique piece of info in it about the "outlaw techs" doing the modifying, rather than Guri herself. --Eyrezer 07:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * IRC consensus said canon, so I've added it. Thanks for the pointer. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Just a request, since it's a matter of opinion: could the first and second images be moved down? It's just that, on my resolution (layman's) the image is next to the infobox, and squishes the text. Thefourdotelipsis 02:34, 13 April 2008 (UTC)