Wookieepedia:AC/Log/2011 July 30

[06:06]	CC7567	*Okay, welcome to AC Meeting 37 [06:06]	CC7567	Who's logging? [06:06]	grunny	o/ [06:06]	CC7567	Kay. [06:06]	CC7567	First up is old articles from last meeting [06:07]	CC7567	http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?diff=cur&oldid=3586595 [06:07]	CC7567	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/Shaliz%27Na [06:07]	CC7567	http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Shaliz'Na&action=historysubmit&diff=cur&oldid=35865953 [06:07]	grunny	keep [06:07]	Tommy9281	Keep. [06:07]	Jujiggum	Keep [06:07]	IFYLOFD	Keep [06:07]	Kilson	Keep. [06:07]	CC7567	Updated, and not enough for Redux, so keep [06:07]	Toprawa	Keep [06:07]	Toprawa	sorry [06:07]	CC7567	Shaliz'Na kept [06:08]	CC7567	That's it for old stuff [06:08]	CC7567	Then we move on to new stuff [06:08]	CC7567	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Grond_(Imperial) [06:08]	CC7567	Grond (Imperial) has received some expansion over a recent retcon that occurred after it passed, and it might need to be reduxed. Kilson(Let's have a chat) 04:40, July 14, 2011 (UTC) [06:08]	Toprawa	I would encourage redux. [06:08]	Kilson	I'll take this one, if it's cool. [06:08]	Jujiggum	Redux [06:08]	CC7567	Has it already been updated? [06:08]	CC7567	Or... [06:08]	Kilson	Yeah. [06:09]	Kilson	http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Grond_%28Imperial%29&action=historysubmit&diff=3622299&oldid=3558803 [06:09]	CC7567	Redux [06:09]	Kilson	This is the level of change that happened. [06:09]	Kilson	So yeah, Redux. [06:09]	Tommy9281	Redux [06:09]	CC7567	Grond Reduxed. [06:09]	grunny	reux [06:09]	grunny	redux* [06:09]	CC7567	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Starck is currently being worked on [06:10]	CC7567	by Tranner [06:10]	Tommy9281	By whom? [06:10]	Tommy9281	Thanks [06:10]	Toprawa	it should be a pretty easy BTS update [06:10]	Toprawa	I'm surprised he didn't get it already [06:10]	Tommy9281	Leave it then [06:10]	grunny	"Abstain: Starck. I will get around to updating it, but not until I get back from vacation. " From Tranner [06:10]	IFYLOFD	Yeah, leave it [06:10]	CC7567	Spare this one [06:10]	Jujiggum	Spare [06:10]	Kilson	Leave it. [06:10]	CC7567	Starck spared [06:10]	CC7567	Anyone got any more articles? [06:10]	Jujiggum	None from me [06:10]	Toprawa	Nothing else in maintenance [06:10]	IFYLOFD	Nope [06:10]	grunny	nah [06:11]	Tommy9281	Nothing [06:11]	CC7567	Kay, moving on to discussion [06:11]	Kilson	Nothing on my end. [06:11]	CC7567	Following up from last meeting, we are to re-evaluate GAN Rule 7 and the issue with requirements for intros. Hopefully more members will be present to voice their opinions at the meeting so that everyone's voice gets heard, and so that we can hopefully make a good decision about it. CC7567 (talk) 21:51, June 25, 2011 (UTC) [06:11]	CC7567	Anyone want to explain this one? Because I can't quite remember what the issue was here [06:11]	Jujiggum	Basically, I'm a bit worried people will start taking advantage of the system. [06:11]	Kilson	I don't really see an issue with this. [06:11]	grunny	I don't either [06:11]	Tommy9281	Neither do I. [06:11]	Toprawa	I agree with the comments made on the page - there is less of an issue than some people want to make out of it [06:11]	Jujiggum	I'm fine if we treat it case-by-case [06:12]	grunny	the rule as is allows the exceptions that are needed [06:12]	Jujiggum	But we need to make sure we're adamant about it [06:12]	Kilson	Yeah, sounds good to me. [06:12]	grunny	which are incredibly few [06:12]	Toprawa	There are one or two people on the site who may seek to take advantage of it because they disagree with it, but we know who they are. [06:12]	grunny	we can handle the rest [06:12]	Jujiggum	Aye [06:12]	CC7567	Sure. [06:12]	Tommy9281	Agreed? [06:12]	Kilson	Yep. [06:12]	Toprawa	And if they don't like the rules, they can stop writing articles. [06:12]	IFYLOFD	Yup [06:12]	CC7567	Everyone votes keep as is, then? [06:12]	grunny	yep [06:12]	IFYLOFD	Keep [06:12]	Jujiggum	Keep as is [06:12]	Toprawa	Agreed [06:12]	Kilson	Keep. [06:12]	Tommy9281	Agreed. [06:12]	CC7567	Okay, Rule 7 kept as is [06:12]	CC7567	Anyone have any other discussion items? [06:12]	Toprawa	No [06:12]	Tommy9281	No [06:12]	grunny	nope [06:12]	Kilson	No [06:12]	Jujiggum	Nothing from me [06:13]	Tommy9281	Damn this was efficient. [06:13]	Jujiggum	Nicely done [06:13]	Kilson	Agreed. [06:13]	CC7567	Kay, who's got the paperwork assignments? [06:13]	Tommy9281	Roll the dice [06:13]	Toprawa	I'll have to look it up from past meeting logs. [06:13]	Toprawa	For the sake of record-setting, we should move on from here [06:13]	CC7567	Okay, AC Meeting 37 is DONE. [06:13]	CC7567	PEACE.