User talk:Imperialles

Cropping
I need you help. Can you please show me how to remove the speech bubbles from the images that I uploaded? Andykatib 10:35, 4th July 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not the speech bubbles that are the issue. Parts of the black frame surrounding the image in the comic itself are visible in the image. Generally, we try to avoid that. I am not sure I can do anything to improve these specific images as I don't own a copy of the comic. I have tagged the image with maintenance templates; hopefully one of our scanning experts will address the matter soon. --Imperialles 10:39, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Welcome home
First I'd like to say, welcome home, Imp. Secondly, would you mind sharing where you found the Timeline videos for TOR at 1920 x 820? The official site only has them at 1280 x 720. Thanks. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 21:24, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it's good to be back. As for the videos, I used the HD versions at GameTrailers.com. The heightened resolution might be artificial in that I viewed the videos in full-screen mode, and took screenshots. At any rate, the reason I overwrote some of your uploads was merely due to my eye and intense hatred for .jpg artifacts&mdash;the versions I uploaded used virtually no compression. --Imperialles 21:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Image quality?
Hey Imperialles, I was just wondering why a few of my KotOR images were marked with the tag. Is it because the images aren't like most of the other robe images from the game? Or is it because the actual quality of the images is low? If the former, I couldn't get the same kind of images because those robes weren't upgradeable and using the upgrade screen is the only way I could get those images, so I was forced to put the robes on NPCs and take a screenshot. If the latter, I could try to upload better quality images if you could tell me what was wrong with them. Thanks. Xicer9 ( Combadge) 15:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Several of them were a bit dark. Try using the Levels function in Photoshop to brighten them. Furthermore, try to use as little compression as possible when saving the images as .jpgs; that way you significantly reduce the prevalence of unsightly .jpg artifacts. --Imperialles 15:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Triage
A new Triage meeting has been scheduled for Sunday, July 19, at 0:00 UTC. Please try to attend. Thank you.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 15:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

RFRA questions
Those are the questions that you removed from the RFRA page. I'd like to see you put them back, or at least the one (for bureaucrats) that reads "What should happen to admins/bureaucrat candidates who disappear for awhile without warning, leaving many questions, projects, and that sort of thing hanging?" I can understand you removing the communist question (were people really concerned about that with you?) but I'd like to see the others put back, silly as most of them may be. Having said that, it's not that a big a deal, but I'd like to see if you're open to the possible of putting at least some of them back.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 13:26, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks Imp. Glad you figured out I meant RFA, and not RFRA. :)  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 14:02, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry
I got over excited about making these articles is there any way to fix my problem I have made. -- Darth Vochkalie  15:14, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

I would like to join your group I feel horrible for what I did and I want to make sure this will never ever happen agian. Also Are you going to remove me from Wookieepedia because I am not a mean vandalist just a partially new wookieepedian who wants to help this site grow and prosper. -- Darth Vochkalie  15:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Would it be ok if I joined your group because like I said I want to make sure that other people in the future dont make the same mistakes I did. Please I feel horrible and I want to join you because you are now like a role model to me. -- Darth Vochkalie  15:41, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Inq meeting
Greetings. An Inq meeting has been scheduled for Saturday, August 1 at 23:00 UTC. Please see here for details. Hope to see you there.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 11:59, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

KOTOR TC
Hey Imp, I've closed the KOTOR spacecraft TC. Thought I'd leave the merging of information to you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:00, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 * How generous. --Imperialles 22:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Inq meeting 28
Hello. Inq meeting 28 has been scheduled. It will be held Sunday, September 6th at 0:00 UTC. Cheers.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 15:24, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Discussion - "Payback: The Tale of Dengar"
Do you think the discussion page for "Payback: The Tale of Dengar" should be deleted? Its a request to obtain an illegal copy of the story. What does that have to do with the article?-- Frank V Bonura 12:17, September 30, 2009 (UTC)

inuse
I'm sorry about not being able to get to the articles I've tagged, but because in the past two weeks my grandmother died and I nearly died myself after a pretty bad case of swine flu I haven't been around to getting to it. I'm probably going to quit editing here anyway. DjMack 18:29, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't really see the relevance. I was making a technical comment, I have no interest in your personal life. --Imperialles 20:31, November 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm just saying that I have better things to be worrying about then me realizing I left some tags on a Wookieepedia article. DjMack 21:56, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

Battlefront III
Hello, Imp. I see that you have redirected the page Star Wars: Battlefront III to Battlefront and protected it indefinitely. I too have read the news about the game being ultimately scrapped in favor of PSP in mobile games, however, since the game was not just a rumor, but actually was in development, it deserves an article, much like Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 3 and other canceled products. I ask you to unprotect the page, and I will edit it accordingly to it current canceled status.  Mauser  Comlink 17:38, November 19, 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree with Mauser. It does deserve a page, seeing how there was a trailer, a logo and pretty much everything else for it.--DK743 00:22, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree also. A canceled product that was officially confirmed to be in development at some time should have an article, which is what we have Canceled and Category:Cut stories for.
 * I'd also have to agree. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 00:45, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * Show me proof that the game was actually in development, and I will unprotect the page. --Imperialles 01:49, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * Aren't the links from the history of that page enough proof? Also, when you redirected it, you said that "It's just been revoked" - surely you know the link then.  Mauser  Comlink 06:27, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * Looking over not only the linked articles, but the concept artwork on the page itself, sure look like proof of development to me. There's even links to leaked gameplay footage in those articles, though the video itself now seems to be defunct. jSarek 07:46, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to accept Amazon listings, etc. as proof of development. The gameplay footage I have not seen; as you said the video is defunct. Furthermore, the video supposedly shows storyline elements from Star Wars Battlefront: Elite Squadron, which makes it likely that the footage is in fact from that title. Get me an official statement, or at least a reliable source. --Imperialles 10:06, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure that this is the footage in question: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p842PtJWYW8 . It appears that much of the storyline from Elite Squadron is in this trailer. Though whether or not it is actually a Battlefront III....well, who knows? Although if this video is not directly Elite Squadrons footage, and coupled with the concept art, I thing that perhaps the page should be set up again. Dr. Kermit ( Complain. ) 02:32, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * If we dont return the article itself, then lets at least tell that it has been canceled. Dummies like me, I just spent an hour or so while searching the article.--Kreivi Wolter 17:01, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
 * We don't even know for sure that it's ever been in development. How can we then know it's been canceled? --Imperialles 11:47, December 2, 2009 (UTC)