Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
 * 15) &hellip;if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place your signature in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Surrel

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:16, December 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The last armor vendor.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  06:19, December 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:03, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:54, December 31, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * SE
 * 1) * I'm not sure about this one, but based on the quote, could something about her having permission to sell be added? Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:06, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) **It's a generic quote that loads of vendors can potentially say, I'm not sure it needs a mention beyond the fact she is selling weapons, which in itself shows she has permission. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:36, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Fair enough, figured it couldn't hurt to ask :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:03, December 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Voroos

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 02:17, December 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Technically they might be found on Kubindi...

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:25, December 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:56, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 03:56, January 1, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) As long as EJ is satisfied.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:48, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) So ugly...
 * 2) * Body needs mention of its reptilianism. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:52, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:35, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Exiled Jedi
 * 5) *This is at 200 words, so you need to section the article.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  04:09, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Kelp gnat

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:56, December 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now for a GM gnat.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:22, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:47, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * "The book does not make clear their level of level of sentience." Despite this, you still say it is non-sentient. I'm pretty sure we can assume its non-sentient if it only sings or whistles when it has been given growth enzymes, so this BtS note can go. Also, I think you are using one too many levels... 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:00, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Changed. Levels? Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:26, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***You were saying "...level of level of sentience...". 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:22, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Exiled Jedi
 * 6) *Due to the quote, I was wondering if the article should be moved to "Rodian kelp gnat" since we have articles at similar titles such as Ylesian white worm and Mantellian Savrip.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  04:14, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Alderaanian tourist board Holoplay #2735

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 10:24, December 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:31, January 3, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * "and she watched it many times before she could mourn her loss completely" sounds a bit odd, could you rephrase to something like and watched in many times whilst she mourned the loss of her homeworld.
 * 3) **Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:36, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) * I think it should be the holoplay not that holoplay at the start of the second sentence, I would change it myself but I'm not 100% sure. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:27, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Changed. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:36, January 3, 2014 (UTC)


 * SE
 * 1) * Can you add in a release date in the bts? Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:00, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) **Done. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:17, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) *Can you give more detail about the regions it advertises? The panel gives a few more details. Supreme Emperor (talk) 13:43, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) **More detail added. But I wouldn't add more than that, because it would ultimately lead to repeating everything that is on the panel. --LelalMekha (talk) 14:19, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
 * As far as I'm aware, # is an invalid sign to use in titles, show it shouldn't be included in a .  Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  06:24, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * If it's not allowed, then I'll change it, but the # sign was explicitely used in the comic, so what should I do? --LelalMekha (talk) 10:36, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * You can use it in the article body, just don't use it in the Title, I believe... Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:20, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Okay, then. Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 14:19, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Puffer turtle

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:27, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A species that would fit in well in the Little Mermaid

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:23, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) A lot of grammatical errors from one who should be a native English speaker, from seeing the home country. Otherwise, article is good. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:47, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:10, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  04:25, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Context on the Black Sun.
 * 2) **Added Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:25, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) * Wait, did they use the turtle itself to make music, or copy the sound it made and incorporated it into their works? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:05, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **Made clearer. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:25, December 30, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ghazakl worm

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:03, December 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For the barnburner

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:49, December 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Eeenteresting.  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 03:23, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:31, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * SE
 * 1) *Did the quote actually say preform, or is that just a typo?
 * 2) **It's a typo, but I fixed it. Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Thanks Trip.
 * 4) *Can you reword the last sentence of the bio? Reads a bit odd to me. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:21, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) **How's that? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:52, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified mercenary (Baroonda)

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 00:03, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part of my own Podracing project, though this character is not, in fact, a racer.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:35, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:30, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 16:54, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:04, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Context on Baroonda?
 * 3) **How does that look?--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 01:28, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) *Otherwise, good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:50, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) Ayrehead
 * 6) * Could you specifically say it was the Holonet news, or even a specific writer for the Holonet news, who called the future into question. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:01, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) **The article didn't seem to attribute an author, but I linked to the edition. How does that look? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 21:52, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * 8) *** Ah if there's no author thats fine. Can you clarify that it called the future of podracing into question due to the actions of the mercenary, or is that not the case? Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:31, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Ah, good idea. It was one of several, actually. I've added that info i now. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:25, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Gondar

 * Nominated by: Trip391 (talk) 06:43, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Novels and Barn-Burner

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 23:16, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * SE
 * 1) *Needs a NOTOC
 * 2) **Done
 * 3) *Also, the article is short enough to not need an intro. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:40, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done Trip391 (talk) 04:50, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) 501st
 * 6) * Echoing SE's objection, the history section and the section above should be combined into one, with no header. Right now it looks like the top one, which I assume is the biology and appearance one, is the intro, which is not the case. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:12, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done
 * 8) *A BtS note mentioning how Gondars received an entry in TCSWE might be warranted as well. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:12, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 9) **Forgot I did this yesterday Trip391 (talk) 06:02, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 10) Savaged&hellip;
 * 11) *Rather than "poor-tasting coffee was compared to the sweat of a gondar," can you say who compared coffee to their sweat and when? In other words, I think Triv Pothman should be mentioned in the body as the one who made this comparison, and we should get a date for when it happened.
 * 12) *I suspect the "appearances" list should be beefed up quite a bit. Any time Lando appears in that armor, we need a notation of it with "tusks only" off to the side. Take a look at User:SavageBob/Adaptations for some ideas of where to look. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 13:56, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 13) **I looked through our category of images of Lando and added the sources obvious from there. I'd say be sure to check all visual adaptations of ROTJ (the comics, storybooks, etc.), and be sure to check things like Official Poster Monthly. There will likely be tons of appearances due to this being a movie critter (albeit only its tusks), so I'm happy to strike this objection if you check through the obvious visual tie-ins to ROTJ; people will continue to add new ones as time goes on. :) ~ Savage BOB sig.png 14:03, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Isn't "1stm" not needed if it first appeared in the film? Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 16:56, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) *I figured it was like that before because only the tusks appeared in ROTJ, and it wasn't mentioned as a Gondar until Children of the Jedi, but I changed it to Mo. Trip391 (talk) 21:09, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified Yavin 4 monster

 * Nominated by: Trip391 (talk) 06:43, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Novels and Barn-Burner

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * SE
 * 1) *Needs a NOTOC
 * 2) **Done
 * 3) *Also, no intro required
 * 4) **Done
 * 5) ***Actually, it is required with an article of this size. I'm getting about 210 words when I use spell check. Please re-add it Trip. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:15, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 6) ****Re-added Trip391 (talk) 21:09, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) *Any applicable quotes? Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:43, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 8) **Added another one Trip391 (talk) 04:50, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 9) 501st
 * 10) *First of all, the intro is rather short. At least make it two sentences. If that brings it over 250, we can just send it to the GAN page.
 * 11) **Lengthened
 * 12) ***It would be nice it you added that it existed on the moon by 23 ABY.
 * 13) * Please note that the layout you are currently using is not meant for non-sentient species. Here is the formal layout, and using it would involve splitting the Description into two sections: Biology and appearance, and Behavior. Please do so.
 * 14) **Split
 * 15) * It should be added to the body that it is carnivorous.
 * 16) **Done
 * 17) * Context on the Lightning Rod, Peckum, the two Solos, and Tenal Ka is needed. Yavin 4 also needs context in the body.
 * 18) **Done
 * 19) * Is this article about the monster itself, or the monster's species? I just want to clarify.
 * 20) **The species, and I based the way I wrote it off of Snow monster Trip391 (talk) 06:54, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 21) * When you create the Behavior section, add in there that its habitat is the jungle.
 * 22) **Done Trip391 (talk) 06:54, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 23) *These objections will probably take it over 250 words, but I will continue my review here if you like, and we can archive it when I'm satisfied. Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:00, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 24) *Sentience needs to be mentioned in the body and the intro. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:45, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 25) **Done Trip391 (talk) 06:02, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Thunderhead hawk

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:19, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:54, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:41, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Balmorran maweater

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  20:31, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:46, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:45, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Would the category: Extinct Creatures be fitting for this article?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:57, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:16, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) Ayrehead
 * 4) * Does the game make it clear if all of them were wiped out or just the ones on the mainland? Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:01, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) **All of them. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:49, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Greater crested gundark

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  20:31, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Trip391 (talk) 21:34, January 6, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:19, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:47, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 15:19, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Is it non-sentient? Sentient? Or is there no confirmed sentience? A category is needed in each of those cases.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:58, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:17, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Since regular gundarks are confirmed to be non-sentient, is there any reason to think this would be any different? Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 23:19, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) *Nope; added. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:13, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) **The Gundark category is in the semi-sentient category, is this an mistake? Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:44, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified Dac sea monster

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:17, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Codex Project Stage 3: Crewskills begins early.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:42, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * This sounds more like it should be an individual creature article not a species unless it talks about multiple dead monsters. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:59, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) **Fixed. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  18:49, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) *** I'm not sure it should be in the species of Dac or extinct species categories now. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:02, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Well, the text implies that it's a unique or previously-unknown specimen, so I think that the Species of Dac category is at least valid. I've removed the extinct one though. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:14, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Gohai

 * Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 08:24, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: 1st nom

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) *Hi and welcome to the comprehensive nominations page! It's always great to see users starting to get articles to status. There's a few things you've not included in the article that are required for a status article which I'll run through below, but you may also want to read the manual of style and the layout guide for help with future articles. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:55, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) *The article needs a behind the scenes section stating what source it appeared in including date and author. This applies to your other two articles as well. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:55, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) *There's quite a lot more information you can add based on the creatures appearance in the image, e.g it has four limbs, a tail, two ears, black skin, a mouth with teeth and eyes. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:55, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) *You need to add that it's a non-sentient species to the body and also add the article to the category non-sentient creatures. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:55, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 6) *Is there a quote you could add? If the bounty hunter book is anything like the Jedi and Sith ones then it has little scribbled notes which you can quote. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:55, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) *Context is needed on Nexu and Gundark. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:55, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 8) *The second sentence doesn't quite read right, I think "If they charged at a being, it was recommended the target dropped to the ground" would be clearer. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:55, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 9) *The Bounty Hunters Code should be in a sources section not an appearances section as it is a sourcebook not a novel. It also needs a first mentioned tag next to the source. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:55, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 10) *The information in the infobox also needs to be referenced like the body has been. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:55, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

BAX-7 landspeeder

 * Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 08:35, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: 2nd nom

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

88-R Nightscreamer

 * Nominated by: Manoof (talk) 08:39, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: 3rd nom

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) A Force user
 * 2) *It needs some work to match the Layout Guide, like what Ayrehead says above.
 * 3) *Additionally, per the Layout Guide, anything in the intro needs added to the body section.
 * 4) *In the body, context on what Ikas-Adno is. You could just say that it was a company.
 * 5) *Additional context needed on the Nightscreamer in the body. So its a vehicle?
 * 6) *In the infobox, you could probably fill in the pilot/passenger sections.
 * 7) *Just a question. Does the source indicate specifically when it was used or who could buy it?
 * 8) *Nice article. I will take another look at it when these are addressed. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 15:15, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Comments

Jet-wing

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:10, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A brief break from creatures

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * The article currently has a ground vehicle infobox which doesn't suit it, but I have no idea what to change it to. It isn't an aquatic, ground or repulsor lift vehicle and isn't a starship which are all of the vehicle infoboxes I can find. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:12, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified Gall sergeant

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:52, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another Inside Job article

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

G'nook

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 14:43, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For the barnburner

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:41, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * You need to say that they're simians in the body, since its in the infobox, and ape like isn't technically the same. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:56, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) **Although "simian" and "ape-like" have never been explicitely described as being the same thing, the Sanyassans' facial features have been described as both "ape-like" and "simian" in different sources. Then there's also the word "primate"...--LelalMekha (talk) 15:02, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) *** Hmm that is confusing, in that case can you be consistent between the infobox and the body. One has simian and one has ape like, they should have the same. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:09, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 5) ****I'll stick with the exact vocabulary that was used in the book, then. Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:14, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 6) * Also are there any quotes you could add? Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:57, January 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * 7) **No quotes at all. It was all described in narration. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:02, January 8, 2014 (UTC)

Comments