Talk:Second Galactic Civil War

Insurection seems like a loaded term in my opinion. Would Second Corellian Crisis be a more neutral term? -- SFH 22:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I second that. Crisis would be better Stinkywookie 18:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I'm actually glad they're almost making the Galactic Alliance bad guys, or at least controversial. I hated their name. I hope in the end, after this, after the Legacy stuff, they stick with the name (and form of Government) "Republic". -Aiddat 21:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Naming
Shouldn't this be listed as a conjectural name, since, to the best of my knowledge, the authors have never referred to the war as the Second Corellian Crisis? 64.12.116.9 16:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

I personally like the GA government. That asside everything from Op. Roundabout to the end of the Correllian Blockade should be named the Corellian Crisis. However the Battle of Hapes and the majority of events in Tempest should be considered a seperate catagory of the Hapes Civil War. Further more the Battle of Gilatter VII and everything after that should be put in the catagory of a galactic civil war. In Inferno "The galaxy has esploded into all-civil war..." this means that Gilatter VII and the events of Sacfrice will be the catalyst for the eventual civil war. Apotheoses Jedi 01:28, 2 April 2007

Layout
It seemed to me, when I read through, that the section "Operation Roundabout" seemed rushed and kind of sloppy. Could we put it into a seperate article like everything else so it could be given a more detailed look there? As it is, I was either confused or overloaded with information. --OompaLoompa of DOOM 02:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Date
How do we know it ends around 42 ABY? Chack Jadson 21:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If you've read the series, you'd know why. TheNewDarthMalevlent ( The Sith shall rise to power!) |undefined 15:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

"Confederation-Galactic Alliance War" source?
I'm assuming this is from Exile, but does it actually call it that, or just the "Corellia-GA war"? If the latter, we need to put a conjecture tag back on here. Kuralyov 04:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's called the "Corellia-GA war". Abbreviation or not, I'd say it's more encyclopedic as the source names it. - Lord Hydronium 19:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Why was the name changed from an official one to a conjectural one? Also, isn't this a bit absurd, since GA is short for Galactic Alliance? VT-16 13:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Sources for the quotes
I have add sources for almost all the quotes in this page, although I'm not sure about the first one by Luke. I am sure I read it before, but I'm not sure which book it come from. I think the source could be either Bloodlines or Tempest, but I could be wrong. 219.95.56.172 05:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Second Galactic Civil War
In Inferno novel's synopsis it says "the galaxy has exploded in all-out civil war." Srini 06:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * So, that doesn't mean that the conflict was called the "Second Galactic Civil War".  Jasca Ducato Sith Council 09:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The Clone Wars were a civil war as well, but that was never named such. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 15:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

New Jedi Order
Perhaps we should make the Jedi have a side all of their own in the infobox? 220.239.55.193 10:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The Jedi Order MUST have their own side. I am suprised so many people keep thinking that the Jedi join the Confederation. Far from it. They merely stop actively supporting the GA because of Darth Caedus. The NJO should be showed as a neutral third party. AdmiralNick22 16:26, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Dose any boby think the Jedi/wookiee/Hapen fation should get there own artical besides me.User:admiral James Kaizer

Hapes Consortium
Hapes should be put in the same infobox section as the New Jedi Order. They're in all this together (Reminds me of a song I know).--The All-knowing Sith&#39;ari 14:51, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Main Image
Should the image of Luke and Lumiya's final duel really be the main image. This wasn't a battle of the Confederation-Galactic Alliance War, this was Luke's personal vendetta against Lumiya. I suggest putting the image of Caedus with the starfighters in the background.--Jedi Kasra 22:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree. I always thought the picture of Caedus with the starfighters fit better. If no one objects, I say go ahead and change it. Tarvin Calaan 02:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Go ahead it's better then then current one.User:admiral James Kaizer
 * Since no one has objected so far I'm going to go ahead and change it. Tarvin Calaan 19:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The main image should be Jaina vs Caedus because that will most likely be the end of the war and it looks better then just having Caedus' head there.--Darth Revanon 1:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think the image of Jaina dueling Caedus should be used as the main pic because that's like using the Luke/Vader duel as the main pic for the Galactic Civil War or the Vader/Kenobi duel as the main pic for the clone Wars. Though those duels are important (as the duel between Caedus and Jaina undoubtably will be), it doesn't portray the war itself. The current image of Caedus at least shows a battle going on in the backround. So Darth Revanon, please mention any changes ur gonna make to the main image here to see if anyone objects before u change it. Tarvin Calaan 17:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


 * ok change it bak then.--Darth Revanon 1:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok I will. Tarvin Calaan 17:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

The Splitting of the Alliance
Umm yeah source? Im taking it off since we don't have one yet.


 * There is a source. Its stated in either Gilad Pellaeons spoiler or Tahiri Veilas. So maybe we should put it back, but that isnt the very first thing thats gonna happen in Revelation because there is the Battle of Fondor and the Battle of Roche. so maybe the splitting of the alliance would go somewhere in the middle. and who knows wat other events, if any, are likely to emerge.Darth Revanon 03:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Should the Imperial Remnant be seperately mentioned in the infobox as combatants? Because the Remnant is part of the Galactic Alliance, I think it's unneccesary to put the Alliance and the Remnant in there seperately. Tarvin Calaan 18:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Talking of such things, shouldn't we have "Imperial Remnant (Daala's faction)" in the Resistance to Jacen Solo box?--The All-knowing Sith&#39;ari 13:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I dont think so cause she only commanded the maw fleet and the imperials sided with Caedus Steves490 23:03, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
 * But what I'm saying is since the Remnant is part of the Galactic Alliance to start with, do we need to put them in there seperately. If they get put in seperately, wouldn't that mean we have to put every member of the Galactic Alliance in there seperatly. When u say Galactic Alliance, the fact that the Remnant was on that side as well should be implied. Tarvin Calaan 22:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Jedi Coalition

 * I think that the Resistance to Jacen should be renamed Jedi Coalition and given their own article. This is a name given to them in Invincible and I think its official enough. Does anybody agree? Steves490 18:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * As far as the name goes, if that's what the book says than I say go with it. But no matter what it's called, I think an article for the resistance to jacen needs to be made. It has to big a role at this point to still not have it's own article. So yes, I agree with with you. Tarvin Calaan 18:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Yea, we should make an article. But Who changed the picture?? The picture that I think needs to be here is the one with Jaina fighting Caedus.--Darth Revanon 4:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I updated this page with the Jedi Coalition name and left an unstarted article link for the side that we should fill in and "WOOKIFY" ASAP. Steves490 20:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok so now that we have it called Jedi Coalition, should we change the Battle of Centerpoint Station and the Battle of Fondor to Jedi Coalition Victories instead of Resistance to Jacen Solo victory??--Darth Revanon 5:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * YES!! actually between the two of us we already did but change the name everywhere its the resistance. btw who changed the pic? Steves490 21:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yea i think that all the places that said Resistance to Jacen Solo have been changed. Now who is going to actually create the article?? And as for who changed the image, look above at the part thats Main Image.--Darth Revanon 5:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Starting the new article sounds fun and all but I personally would rather help beef up the article once its got the core of the whole article in place. Right now I am waaaay to hungry to do it but since we put the empty link in all the battles they were in I'm sure sombody will get to it. If nobody does I'll do it later when I'm not so sleepy and can think. Steves490 21:53, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yea thats true. Hopefully it can be done soon though lol.--Darth Revanon 9:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Everybody editing LOTF articles, i am writing the basic core foundations of the Coalition article and it should be finsihed by late tonight. After that all your help will be appreciated Steves490 03:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

First Battle of Fondor
I think that the only possible event that could be considered the first battle of Fondor in this war is the confrontation between the Anakin Solo and the fondorian fighters early in Revelation. does anybody object to this? If not I will start an article. Steves490 21:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)