User talk:Imperialles

Imperialles, -- Riffsyphon1024 23:28, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

Trouble with that "e"
Just how are you able to create the little "e" with the accent on it? It does not show up at the bottom of my edit window. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:11, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, I simply copied it from the article on Padmé Amidala, by following the link in your post. Imperialles 06:13, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, well that works too. Like I did with Alpha O2, except that "O" has a slash thru it. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:18, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Palpatine
I think it was you that managed to separate the Palpatine and Darth Sidious articles back to what they were from KFanII's merge. If so, you have done us all a favour. Many thanks --Mantus 15:33, 18 May 2005 (UTC)


 * No problem, it was really just a revert. Imperialles 15:36, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

Online Sources
Since this has come up a couple of times, I just want to remind you to be very careful of what online sites you reference. Most of them aren't very rigorous, and the lack of rigor perpetuates misinformation from one site to another. Some fan sites other than mine that I trust (and even with them, I still try to doublecheck elsewhere if I can): Nav-computer.com; The Completely Unofficial Star Wars Encyclopedia; TimeTales Chronology; and Nathan Butler's Timeline. If you want online primary sources, you've got Starwars.com, HoloNet News, Wizards of the Coast Star Wars content, and Decipher's SWCCG archives. I hope this is helpful. :-) JSarek 21:44, 18 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Ah, what can I say, other than that I was young and foolish until I stumbled upon the Supershadow website, saw how idiotic it was, scoured through its pages, and removed Supershadow content I had added from this site. Won't happen again, chief Imperialles 21:47, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * S'okay. This wasn't meant as a chastisement; I just remembered you also had info from that galaxy map website that turned out to be deceptive, so I thought I'd provide a couple of sites that I (generally speaking) trust to be accurate for you to use. JSarek 21:53, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * We live and learn, and I suppose my lesson of the week is "Check your sources". Thank you. --Imperialles 21:55, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
 * We should make a list of trustworthy sources for all users. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:50, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Removing OOU from Battles
This OOU-removal crap is getting out of control. Why did the various movies and novels have to be removed. Someone can get lost in this. Remember, its not just us using this thing, but maybe someone completely new to the saga. I urge you to re-insert those OOU titles. -- Riffsyphon1024 18:49, 22 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Look, a distraction! --Imperialles 18:55, 22 May 2005 (UTC)

Imperialles!!!
Do not respond to me with any use of swear words, or I swear I'll make an agreement to ban swear words from Wookieepedia - and all Wikis, if possible! KFan II 21:07, 24 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Language police = thought police. Plus, it was just used to emphasize. --Imperialles 21:17, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * I have to agree with KFan that there's no reason to use such language. There are other, less offensive ways to emphasize a point. However, if you do want to use such language, I consider that to be your problem and I don't think that I need to argue the point or try to correct you. – Aidje talk 21:44, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * If you want to make an argument, feel free. However, the mere stating of an argument will not guarantee its popularity or validity. Also, threats have little place in a civilized debate; I feel the same way about threats and ad hominem that you do about profanity.--Eion 21:56, 24 May 2005 (UTC)


 * I'll take my chances using 'profanity' to emphasize until an administrator tells me to do otherwise. Also, who was the above comment directed at? --Imperialles 22:03, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
 * at KFan II, I have no problem with profanity. I just have no need for it most of the time.--Eion 22:53, 24 May 2005 (UTC)