User talk:JangFett

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent;"
 * valign="top" width="71%" style="background: #FFFFFF; border: 0px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em;"|

Unidentified black-mustachioed Sanyassan GAN objections
Hello Jang! I just wanted to tell you that your current objections on the Unidentified black-mustachioed Sanyassan GAN are know two weeks old. Whenever you have a bit of spare time, could you please check on them? Thanks in advance. ;-) --LelalMekha (talk) 08:42, September 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry... I forgot what your talkheader said, I guess. No hard feelings, I hope, I do not wish to bother you. --LelalMekha (talk) 08:44, September 4, 2012 (UTC)

Speculation
It's interesting how you accuse me of speculating when according to Witwer's interviews, such as this he and Dave Filoni came to the conclusion that the Son's personality is an amalgam of the characteristics of several dark siders, such as Starkiller, Darth Vader and the Emperor. In another interview Witwer says that the Son is essentially all of those characters. So while I appreciate your advice, the information you removed was verified by the actor who played the Son and the show's supervising director. JRT2010 (talk) 05:01, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * If the Son is the embodiment of the dark side of the Force, then yes his powers are "related" to Palpatine, as you put it, which makes him (i.e. the dark side) the source of the Emperor's own powers. Furthermore, in the episode Altar of Mortis, the Father states that the Son's descent into the dark side makes the Sith (i.e. Palpatine) even stronger. JRT2010 (talk) 06:28, September 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * My mistake then. I thought Witwer's and Filoni's take on the character would have been enough, seeing as how other articles base some of their information on the statements of authors when their sources aren't clear enough. (ex: Jan Duursema and the Galactic Alliance Remnant; Zahn's confirmation of the direct link between the Hand of Judgment and the new 501st, including units like Aurek-Seven.) Regardless, I'll be more careful to remember that anything authors, or actors and supervising directors for that matter, speculate about is not canon until it's in print. JRT2010 (talk) 18:34, September 8, 2012 (UTC)

Merchandise?
Hey JangFett. I can understand the Darth Maul DVD being merchandise but the galactic pop up book. Its not merchandise, its a book. Origami yoda and the other pop up book have a place on this wiki, why doesnt this? And another thing. What is the purpose of exporting stuff to the merchandise wiki? I looked at the things to be exported and some of it should'nt go. Also why export at all? Isnt the point of this wiki, to make it grow and have a wide variety of articles. We are currently the largest fan wiki in existence, and have been oficially acknowledged many times. The merchandise wiki should be for just action figures or toys not board games and other products. Please think about it.Opress100 (talk) 21:25, September 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Opress100, I totally agree with you. I'm sick of pages being deleted or shifted to other wikis. Jartka&#39;irn (talk) 15:30, September 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * This is a wiki for the recording of canon and non-canon material. If a product does not advance either or even reiterate canonical details&mdash;no, books of quotes don't count&mdash;it is simply merchandise. They have no plot and are merely objects branded with "Star Wars." The community decided not to cover such products&mdash;the individual action figure packs, the activity books, the tie-ins to other product lines&mdash;and that is why the Merchandise Wiki was created. If you want to expand articles on such products, expand them over there. That wiki needs more love anyway. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 15:57, September 10, 2012 (UTC)

Dyer

 * Hey! I don't have 91. I had a hard copy of it but my Insiders are now in a box in storage somewhere. I should get rid of my subpage claiming that I still have them... I think I have 122 on my hard drive. I'll check when I get home from work today. Menkooroo (talk) 00:41, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Good news! Although I don't have a hard copy of Issue 91, I do have scans of the article in question, Comic Marvels. The closest that article comes to mentioning a Tagge other than the Baron is when it says that he's the "head of a prestigious Imperial family." Issue 122's Launch Pad namedrops Orman Tagge in a promo for the first A Long Time Ago omnibus. So, no Cassio to be seen. Menkooroo (talk) 12:22, September 17, 2012 (UTC)

AC Meeting 50
AC Meeting 50 is scheduled for this Saturday, September 22, at the usual time, 4 PM ET. Apologies for the short notice. Please remember to leave notes if you cannot attend. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:11, September 20, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Hume Tarl
Hey Jang. When you get the chance, please make sure to check your objections to the Hume Tarl FAN; they're currently over a week old. Thanks.  CC7567  (talk) 01:12, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

AC Meeting 51
Hey Jang. Meeting 51 is scheduled for this Saturday, the 20th. Make sure to come as your favorite Jedi Council member, or leave notes if you can't attend. Hope to see you there!  Eeth Koth  (talk) 01:33, October 15, 2012 (UTC)

Meeting 53
Hey Jang,

An early heads-up that Inq Meeting 53 has been scheduled for Saturday, November third at the usual time. Hope to see you there, and if not, be sure to leave some notes beforehand. Cheers. Menkooroo (talk) 12:15, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Steelers
I did have a valid reason for the words I removed from the Steela page, and I did mention it in the "talk" section for her page.

User

 * Thank you!--12.71.5.221 15:19, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * I was a little confused because the novel Jedi Trial showed the the timeline 22 BBY.--12.71.5.221 15:30, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll try. But incase if I make a mistake, please help add the source.--12.71.5.221 15:36, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Your welcome friend.--12.71.5.221 15:37, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok then! Thanks. I know its worth of practice, but I'll try. Thank you so much.--12.71.5.221 15:58, October 27, 2012 (UTC)

fwsfs
With regards to the issue of Steela's age: I think you misunderstood my point about the 1800s. This may be 2012 and "not the 1800s", as you write, but the fact remains that this sci-fi/fantasy series often includes elements from fantasy worlds and real-life historical times, such as people of younger ages being considered adults. It is NOT based on what is happening in the real current world of 2012. If that were so, the series would have no creatures of any species other than humans. Look at the page for Boba Fett. He gets married at sixteen.

72.28.171.22 22:06, November 7, 2012 (UTC)

Disney ACmoot
ACmoot inbound. Please bring a weapon of your choice for article slaying.&mdash; Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 00:14, November 14, 2012 (UTC)