User talk:DarthRuiz30

 Find archived discussions here: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Wullf Yularen
Hi there, just wondering why you undid my edits? Was it because I didn't provide an adequate source? I put the Republic Navy in because they are the parent organisation not Anakin's task force. Kind regards  Tomotron  ( talk ) 03:50, July 16, 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply, according to what you said, I'm going to change the task force to the Republic Navy with that sub-bullet, is that fine? Kind regards  Tomotron  Imp roundel 2ndempire.svg ( talk ) 04:10, July 16, 2019 (UTC)

Dating
SWTOR progresses in real time, according to Charles Boyd (lead developer). Only exceptions are the class stories (which take place over the course of four years) and when there are canonically confirmed time-skips (5 years from chapter one of KotFE to start of chapter two, and six months from last chapter of KotFE to chapter one of KotET). The dating for the rest of the events that have occurred throughout the course of the game line up in accordance to that, beginning with the Battle of Illum in 3640 BBY (thus lining up with the 2011 launch of vanilla). RotHC was released in 2013, which means that its events occur in 3638 BBY; SoR was released in 2014, thereby taking place one year later, in 3637 BBY. Likewise, KotFE begins in 3636 BBY, as it was released in 2015. The canonical five-year timejump between chapters one & two would therefore place chapter two's date at 3631 BBY. The remaining chapters were subsequently released over the course of the next nine months. Adding the six month time gap between the TotFE & KotET roughly lines up with the latter's release in late 2016, meaning the Eternal Empire collapsed fell in either late 3630 or early 3629, depending upon how much time passed between the first chapter and final chapter of KotET. Regardless, the Battle for Iokath (released in March of 2017) would have to have occurred sometime in early 3629, with the Umbara and Chiss flash-points occurring later that year, respectively. Naturally, following that same formula, both the Nathema flashpoint and "Jedi Under Siege" should be placed around 3628 (AKA 2018), with all content scheduled to come out *this* year taking place in 3627, unless stated otherwise. We've been consistent in having our articles reflect this principle in the past, so it makes little sense to arbitrarily deviate from this pattern, as we seem to have done in each article involving post-KotET events & conflicts. Therefore, I propose that our articles continue to reflect said principle until officially stated otherwise. The fact that in-game time corresponds with real-world time was first confirmed by Charles Boyd in a tweet (which I'll link you to), and since that confirmation we have dated events accordingly. https://twitter.com/Charles_Boyd/status/676795856591261696 Darth Ravigious (talk) 04:47, July 16, 2019 (UTC)


 * Ah, okay. Never mind then. I played the Nathema FP once, but I personally don't even remember the "six years" comment. Since it's in universe information, I suppose that it'd be confirmation that the FP occurs in 3630. My apologies; I wasn't aware of that comment (or at least forgot about it). If there's anything I can do to help clean up the aforementioned references, just let me know. Darth Ravigious (talk) 03:58, July 17, 2019 (UTC)

Hunt for Ziro
Hi. Why did you delete my quote on the page for The Clone Wars: Season 3: Episode 9: "Hunt for Ziro"? I know it's kind of unconventional to have additional quotes in these pages, but there really should be a section or something for these quotes.

Thanks for pointing out my mistake
Some time ago I accidentally added a picture of the Cold Weather AT-MP Mark III to the Cold-weather AT-ST Mark III. And yes this happened twice. Goodbye. RC-0407 (talk) 22:32, July 18, 2019 (UTC+1)

RE:Thrawn: Treason
Alright sounds good! I wasn't planning on adding anything further, just create some articles with basic information. Thanks for letting me know!-- Vitus Infinitus  Talk 21:06, July 19, 2019 (UTC)
 * Like wise, wasn't going to do anything anyway but thanks for the heads up--Jkirk8907 (talk) 23:13, July 19, 2019 (UTC)

Category rename
Hey there, would you mind renaming Category:Images of Tooka dolls when you have the chance? I accidentally capitalized the T in tooka when it shouldnt be. Toqgers (talk) 21:56, July 19, 2019 (UTC)
 * Understood. So just need to create with new title and mark the old one for deletion since it's not possible and not as important to retain edit history like with regular articles anyways? Either way, much appreciated! :P Toqgers (talk) 22:05, July 19, 2019 (UTC)

Allegiance banner
Why did you delete the image I just uploaded of the new Allegiance artwork? Just curious --Benjay2345 (talk) 08:08, July 20, 2019 (UTC)
 * Lately we've been losing images because we don't save an archive url from their source so we started to add archive urls just in case. Given that there's a weird bug were you can't edit the source field in files, we have to bypass the bug by reuploading. Hope that clears any question.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:10, July 20, 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah it does. Do you want me to reupload the image? --Benjay2345 (talk) 08:12, July 20, 2019 (UTC)
 * I was about to do it, don't worry.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:14, July 20, 2019 (UTC)

Seems like you are targeting my edits
Hey, not to be rude or anything but it seems like you are targeting the edits I am making? The higher resolution png version of the Visual Dictionary is a completely acceptable image. I have linked to a source that shows the book cover is credible (StarWars.com) and simply got a higher quality version from another source. This has always been acceptable. Could you please stop targeting edits I am making and unnecessarily reverting them? This has happened with pretty much any edit I have made in the last few days. You are going to make it where contributors like myself won't want to contribute. A book cover is a book cover. A higher quality version of it should be used especially since I even sourced where it came from. Your claim that it is unsourced is false. There are plenty other completely unsourced images that you could spend your time deleting. --Benjay2345 (talk) 00:45, July 22, 2019 (UTC)

RE:Advices
Hey Ruiz, thanks for the tips! I remembered to do "Thrawn: Treason" rather than "Excerpt" when I was almost done, but next time I'll definitely remember to do it from the beginning haha. Thanks Ruiz!-- Vitus Infinitus  Talk 13:13, July 23, 2019 (UTC)

Thrawn copy paste
Hey, I'm here to report that I think someone put the summary from the Thrawn: Alliances page onto Mitth'raw'nuruodo. I can’t fix this as I’m away from my computer for a while.--Editoronthewiki (talk) 02:53, July 24, 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, there is an issue as the “later” section basically goes over everything in Alliances again, and it’s where Anakin Skywalker and Jedi General are linked. I thought that it was copy paste as it just seemed like it was.--Editoronthewiki (talk) 12:25, July 24, 2019 (UTC)

Regarding Editoronthewiki
I think Editoronthewiki and Afilmfanforlife are the same user, judging by their edits to pages. What do you think?--91.139.4.218 11:20, July 24, 2019 (UTC)

Second Imperial Civil War
I had read several times the Legacy comics, because its my favorite of all Star Wars stories, but to show this conflict as 2-factions in War with each other in Wiki is just simply wrong, the past view of 3-factions is far more accurate. The comics most likly referes only to the events between 137aby-138aby, at the imperial civil war started already in 130aby with Krayt taking the imperial seat, during 130-137aby for 7 it was made very clear that the empire-in-exile and GA-Remnants had just one common goal, the defeat of the sith. But the end-goal of both factions were different, Roan Fel wanted his Empire back and Gar Stazi wanted to re-establish the GA. During those first 7years they attacked independently from each other the sith, without having any kind of alliance.

The Alliance starts in 137Aby! Not before.

If we just observe those events from a bigger perspective, the alliance between those 2 factions were really short, in the best case 1 years between 137aby and 138aby. Thats just 1 of 8 years during the entire civil war. Besides during the endbattle in Coruscant, Roan Fel as Leader of his Imperial Faction, even tried to wipe out all Life of Coruscant inclusive his GA Allies, which shows that the short-term alliance with the GA wasnt important for him at all.

Conclusion: the Alliance between the GA-Remnant and Fel was short and temporary in nature, in a long 8-year war, it isnt logical at all to put those 2factions as 1faction. It just falsify the events and struggle of this conflict for those who didnt read the comic at all. You cannot say there were an Alliance between 130-138Aby its simply false, and this Articale is about the Second Imperial Civil War which play during 130-138aby.--Darthfreebo (talk) 08:59, July 28, 2019 (UTC)

Second Imperial War

 * I have recently re-read them as well and basically half way through the series the Empire-in-exile, the Galactic Alliance Remnant and the New Jedi Order form an Alliance to take down the Darth Krayt's Sith Empire. so basically the 3-sided battle became two-sided as all three organizations had a common goal.--Jkirk8907 (talk) 09:45, July 28, 2019 (UTC)
 * Done.--Jkirk8907 (talk) 09:54, July 28, 2019 (UTC)

Vandalism
Hi, I found that the page Jawa Pilot had been vandalised (see revision here) I've removed the vandalism but I think I need to address this to you. GeneralGrievous7 (talk) 16:09, July 29, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Audiobooks
Just removing useless redlinks from appearences list. Dont understand actually why this anonymous' edits (about audios) were not reverted in time. --С уважением, Starit (обс) 21:41, July 29, 2019 (UTC)

Jedi
For the 'Jedi' Cannon page the Notable Members section wasn't added on to for a long time so why remove it? It has been there for years with the same Members.

Shouldn’t we delete the 'Notable Members' for every page if we're doing it for the Jedi? It's kinda wack otherwise--NikoJ11 (talk) 05:01, July 30, 2019 (UTC)

I’m not going to do anything stupid. 71.209.222.24 02:53, August 1, 2019 (UTC)

Unidentified Interdictor vessel

 * Hi there, it seems the ship have hanger bays when you look up very closely from the Windfall so it does have TIEs. Regards  Darth Tomotron  Revanchist Sith.svg  (talk)  09:42, August 3, 2019 (UTC)
 * Also I saw four gravity well projectors and 7 ion engines (3 main and 4 backup), this should be fine to add right?  Darth Tomotron  Revanchist Sith.svg  (talk)  10:07, August 3, 2019 (UTC)
 * It's fine, we're all busy in some way and btw you're right about the TIEs not coming out of the hangars! Cheers  Darth Tomotron  Revanchist Sith.svg  (talk)  07:46, August 5, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Gatalentan tea
Okay, thanks for letting me know! I'll go reply on the nomination page for Lockin's email. As for every mention, yeah, it should go in the BtS if it depends on class or faction alignment. Don't worry, if it pushes the article over 250 words you'll be fine, because unless I'm missing something the BtS generally doesn't count towards that limit.  Fan26  ( Talk ) 16:12, August 6, 2019 (UTC)

In use
Hello. I didn't see Lewis's edit until after I had made mine. It seems we were working at the same time. Adamwankenobi (talk) 21:42, August 7, 2019 (UTC)

RE:Dark Lord of the Sith
Just realized that he wasn't actually called as a Dark Lord of the Sith. I changed the Darth article's intro wording as that's what confused me-- Vitus Infinitus  Talk 23:21, August 12, 2019 (UTC)

RE: Crisis on Naboo
The section header of the box in which the previous and upcoming episodes are listed in for each Clone Wars episodes' page is "Episode chronology", which should imply chronological order.-- Maxar1898  Talk

RE: Timeline of Canon media
Why did you undo my edits on the Timeline of canon media page? While it is true that in real life, "Massacre" was released after crises of Naboo, the Timeline of canon media page focuses on the in-universe Star Wars chronology, and "Massacre" chronologically takes place after "Witches of the Mist", not "Crisis on Naboo".-- Maxar1898  Talk

RE: Massacre
This is in response to the message you left on my Talk page. The page you referenced in that message actually makes the same mistake as our Wiki: if one were to actually watch the episodes "Witches of the Mist" and "Massacre", you would find that they actually go in DIRECT chronological order, since it is right after Ventress's betrayal by Savage Opress.-- Maxar1898  Talk

Image deletion
Could you please delete the Fobosi_Dod.gif file? I forgot to put the proper source and description and want to reupload it with them.--Alex of Star Wars (talk) 09:03, August 18, 2019 (UTC)

Legends Sith
Why did you undo my edits to those legends Sith, I was only re-formatting stuff.  Darth Tomotron   (talk)  00:14, August 19, 2019 (UTC)
 * You know what, I take that back. I realized what I did wrong, no need to list "Sith" as an organisation because of the Sith Empire(s) etc, the individual belonged to. Kind regards  Darth Tomotron  Revanchist Sith.svg  (talk)  09:29, August 20, 2019 (UTC)

Tank Squadron
Hello, I am contacting you following the withdrawal of the modification of the following post: Unidentified Tank Squadron.

I think I provided a proof with an image of the series, which shows the same AT-TE that used on Felucia. These are also always with the 104th and not with the 501st (revoila an image to appyer my proposal)

Sorry for my english a bad (I'm Belgian) https ://nsa40.casimages.com/img/2019/08/28/190828121831974975.png

--Guigui2772 (talk) 22:15, August 27, 2019 (UTC)

I still send you a message for once again confirmed my proposal. As I tell you the squadron belongs to the 104th Battalion, we can see that the squadron is present on the moon Oba Diah's, also a page of a character (existing on the wiki) shows that it is 104th, I you show my images that proves my proposal, if you want to change yourself the page time better, just take into consideration my words

Gunner Clone Page: https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Unidentified_clone_tank_gunner_(Felucia) The AT-TE in the episode the lost ones: https://nsa40.casimages.com/img/2019/09/01/190901114349425931.png AT-TE on Felucia: https://nsa40.casimages.com/img/2019/09/01/190901114350472690.png --Guigui2772 (talk) 21:46, September 1, 2019 (UTC)

Edits
Was in the middle of an edit when you undid my changes. I was trying to keep in line with the rules of the site. Did not appreciate that. Lost work while you reverted the changes. Next time message me first. Now I've got to start again. Seriously, would people stop hitting the delete button and message the editor first. People put time into this and when you do that you make them literally waste their time. Have consideration for others.

Image Concerns
I have some concerns about the placement of File:Unyielding EaW.png. It's a Canon image only located on a Legends page... an FA, no less (Operation: Knightfall). Would you please help address this concern? I would myself, but I don't have the authority. I tried to add it to another page, Jedi Youngling, to make it more convenient for removal from Knightfall, but you reverted my edit. Twice. (I saw your explanation of why you did so. Apologies, just trying to help.) Thank you for your time! 104.189.157.130 23:41, August 31, 2019 (UTC)
 * Removed and the image has been moved to Anakin Skywalker. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:04, September 1, 2019 (UTC)

I understand
Hi DarthRuiz30,

I initially wanted to put the explanation on why Julen Rakab's mother is known to have died on 32 ABY, but I desisted because I thought it would seem a bit unorganized the page if I put such a large reference. Anyway, I wanted to tell you that I learned my lesson and that I would like to know if perhaps we can have a fresh start again ;)

On the other hand, I wanted to ask you something about Wookieepedia's policy about spoilers. When exactly the spoilers are allowed to be posted here? Did the pages are protected until 00:00 p.m. on Hawaii? Because I think that in my country the movie is to be released one day before the U.S. release and I'm going to see it on its premier day.

Thanks X9 The Android (talk) 02:41, September 1, 2019 (UTC)

I added sources to the update I made to the page. I am getting sick and tired of people wiping out my posts in the space of a second without letting me know, editing my work, or making minor corrections to the material. Is that all you guys do? you see something you don't like and you just wipe it? I added sources this time. What the hell else am I supposed to do? I have edited other wikis, added sources, and I've never had near the trouble you people are giving me. Have some consideration for other peoples time and effort. People spend up to hours trying to add to this sight. The least you could do have some damned respect for their time and effort. I feel like I'm in a lose lose situation here. I don't add sources my stuff is wiped. I write about stuff literally everybody knows about. Still wiped. I add the damned sources. STILL WIPED. The heck is wrong with you all.

Datapad screenshots
I haven't been able to really hop on the Datapad app in a long time, so I just wanted to say thank you so much for adding all these screenshots. You're awesome. MasterFred (Whatever) 20:21, September 7, 2019 (UTC)

Reverting
Hi,

What's the reason for reverting me on Ground assault vehicle ?

Ldgdps (talk) 02:07, September 16, 2019 (UTC)