Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer.


 * /History
 * /2005 History
 * /Queue
 * Community vote on the renomination of previous FAs

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must...


 * 1) ...be well written and detailed
 * 2) ...be unbiased, non-point of view
 * 3) ...be sourced with all available sources and appearances
 * 4) ...follow the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide
 * 5) ...not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 * 6) ...not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
 * 7) ...have a succint proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
 * 8) ...have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
 * 9) ...have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Anakin Skywalker

 * 1) Impassioned Jedi 04:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Anakin Thomas 16:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Cariel 05:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Shon Kon Ray 17:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * I count four redlinks in the article. They're nothing too important, but they should probably be cleared up first. --LandoSystem1138 17:38, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Come on people. This was nominated just a month or so ago and little has changed since then. The major objection then was that there is little to no information included from the Jedi Quest novel series, Outbound Flight, and a variety of other EU sources. - Breathesgelatin
 * Also, a bunch of unsourced images. -LtNOWIS 20:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * I think its sad that the article for Star Wars' central character still isn't a featured article. We all need to band together to make it worthy. Impassioned Jedi 20:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Lots of great text and pics, worthy of the title Anakin Thomas 16:42, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Second Battle of Coruscant (Clone Wars)

 * 1) Stake black 13:31, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Maaul 15:34, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --LandoSystem1138 01:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) KEJ 10:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) SkywalkerPL 16:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Darth Cow 9:39, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) --Mr. Perfection 02:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) ThrawnRocks 18:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Wstonefi 19:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Cato Neimoidia 23:06, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Star Destroyer 2500 13:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Grievous7318 16:04, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Roron Corobb 17:15, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) DarkShroud 23:11, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Snoop 12:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 04:45, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Cutch 01:06, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Anakin Thomas 16:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Plokoonmastery 23:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Themelle444 08:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * I find the article to have grammar/writing style lapses that need to be cleaned up. - Breathesgelatin 05:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Short intro, no BTS, needs to be in more categories, and I'd like to see more background to the events that preceded the battle. --UVnet 20:52, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * How can it be in more categories? -- SFH 01:11, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm. Ok you got me there. --UVnet 07:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * There definitely needs to be something about the immense contradictions concerning this battle in Labyrinth of Evil, Star Wars: Clone Wars and Reversal of Fortune. &mdash;MarcK [talk] 12:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with MarcK. The CW/LOE/ROF info needs to be cleared up first. Adamwankenobi Talk to me! My home. 16:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * That will take forever. TIEPilot051999 17:14, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * But it must be done if this article is ever to be featured. Adamwankenobi Talk to me! My home. 03:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * If someone gives me the details of the contradiction concerning ROF, then I'd be happy to write that part since I just read LOE recently. --Razzy1319 04:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll spell and punctuate check it pronto. - TopAce 13:16, 4 June 2006 (UTC). Done, as of 15:31, GMT +1

A very important page, for a very important battle.


 * I think the depth is very impressive

Brisky


 * Agreed with unsigned comment =P -Stake black 18:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a good article, but I think the Battle of Kashyyyk should be featured before this one.---LandoSystem1138 01:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's good, but I'm wondering if the section called Participants is necessary, given that they should all be included in the info-box anyways. I also think there should be one or two images from Battlefront II. KEJ 10:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see some more images, honestly. EAGLES610 19:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's already kind of full of pics. But I agree, it should have at least one Battlefront II screenshot.  Stake Black talk - Contribs at 21:50, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * What I meant was a picture that isn't from Episode 3 or Star Wars: Clone Wars. Sorry, I didn't make that clear...at all. EAGLES610 01:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Mayby finally We'll get battle in Featured article. SkywalkerPL 16:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * The Battle of Kashyyyk (Clone Wars) is actually going to be featured next week. - Breathesgelatin 18:33, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I just completed a thorough expansion of this page, including more about the preamble prior to the battle and much better written information on the invasion and capture of the Chancellor from LOE and CW. Still more can be added, as I based most of my update with information from LOE and the ROTS novel.--Sharkey 19:08, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * So is this ready to go now?  StarNeptune Talk to me! 10:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It doesn't mention the LOE/Clone Wars contradiction, but I don't think that should keep it from being featured. After all, it doesn't look like Leland Chee aims on clearing that up anytime soon. I mean, come on, how can the Battle of Nar Shaada get featured over this?!--LandoSystem1138 19:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

The Force

 * 1) LandoSystem1138 21:40, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Herbsewell - undated, invalid
 * 3) Tinwe 17:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Sikon [ Talk ] 17:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Adamwankenobi Talk to me!  My home. 22:00, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) EAGLES610 00:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) SkywalkerPL 09:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Lord Darasuum 22:42, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Darth Rage 22:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Cato Neimoidia 23:58, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Roron Corobb 16:03, June 1 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) KEJ 09:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Randy Starkiller 18:01, 26 June
 * 14) Anakin Thomas 16:44, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) InblAll the pictures are captioned as of now. 12.44, 21 July 2006(UTC)
 * 16)  Orange_lightsaber  Talk 22:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * Eh... I dunno... I mean it's good but... the force? I mean this article could (and should) probably be one of the longest articles around. A simple check up, brought to my attention that, for example, there is not a single mention that the ysalamiri are force-free. I am sure that other subjects are absent or neglected. --UVnet 02:47, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I think that hand picture at the beginning is kinda stupid. You have to chnage that before it gets anywhere. --MaulYoda 02:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * There are still three uncaptioned pictures. That's my only objection. - Breathesgelatin 09:11, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Ditto. I'll add my support when all of the pictures are captioned. &mdash;Mirlen 20:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Now there's only the Jedi and Rogue shaking hands picture left uncaptioned, as I'm at a loss for what to say there. &mdash;Unsigned comment by LandoSystem1138 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * Actually there're three uncaptioned images: Image:PowerFromWithin.jpg, Image:The Force.jpg, Image:JediAndRogueCooperation.jpg. EDIT: I checked the history, and it seems like Starkeiller has removed the two captions because they're incorrect...? &mdash;Mirlen 20:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree it needs captions and maybe some pictures of the force being used but i give my support.
 * Come on this is just like nominating the lightsaber. I'm sure that these two pages have been viewed the most. Featured articles should bring up high quality articles that are about something that is less obscure than the force --Dumac 00:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This has no relevance to whether or not it should be featured. Refer to "What makes a featured article" at the top of the page. Featured article is a status that any well-written article can deserve, regardless of prominence. - Breathesgelatin 03:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think that it is necasary to have the Force as a Featured article. Many people already look at this thread, and everyone knows that it is there.--Zinnos
 * That is also irrelevent to what makes an article worthy of being FAed.--LandoSystem1138 19:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Comments Have all objections been taken care of?  StarNeptune Talk to me! 10:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * By the Force, it's the Force!
 * This is a great article... It'll get my vote whenever that picture gets a caption... - Breathesgelatin 23:08, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm actually kind of surprised this hasn't been nominated earlier. And Breathesgelatin... Aiddat has added that caption you wanted :) --Tinwe 17:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * UVnet may have a point with his objection. Should this be an improvement drive subject instead?--LandoSystem1138 03:11, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, whoever nominated the article thought that it was up to featured article standards &mdash; so it would depend on one's judgment and perspective of the article. &mdash;Mirlen 20:16, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I brought this up on the talk page, but it's getting no attention, so I'll say it here. Should the light-side, dark-side, etc sections have the quotes from main articles?
 * I don't think it's something you have to worry about, but perhaps inserting quotations for each major section as opposed to a subsection? &mdash;Mirlen 01:53, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I say, the more the better. Add the quotes and extra information in there.--Lord Darasuum 22:36, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Although I think that some of the pictures (rather, all of the pictures) need captions, as some are lacking those, I believed this article is well detailed and should be a featured article. Maybe add some information here and there, and it would be good to go.--Lord Darasuum 22:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The pictures are captioned, there's an extra section on ysalamiri and what not, it finally looks good to go.--LandoSystem1138 19:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Lightsaber

 * 1) --Roron Corobb 11:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Brisky 07:44 4 June 2006
 * 3) SkywalkerPL 11:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Darth Kevinmhk 04:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Cutch 19:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) LandoSystem1138 05:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Nighthawk leader 07:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Anakin Thomas 16:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Superior 22:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Red Head Rider 7:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 11)  Son of Nils Talk[[Image:Sabre_hilt.jpg|50px]] 15:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * no way, this article needs so much word, its being changed all the time, facts aren't certain on it and its just...not FA material which is a shame since it is so vital..Jedi Dude
 * There is something funny going on with the image distribution throughout this article. - Breathesgelatin 14:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Definitely needs some reworking of the whole image thing, but also I'd like to see a better intro, and something nicer in the Appearances, section. "Almost all works of the Star Wars saga"? Then I'd really like to know where no lightsaber's appeared. --UVnet 08:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Not only is it poor quality but everyone knows what a lightsaber is. --Dumac 00:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That has no relevance to whether or not it deserves to be featured. Most everyone knows who Yoda and Padme are, and they are both featured articles. - Breathesgelatin 03:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * "Plus many more colors." Come on. I think this is a good article that should be featured someday, but it still needs considerable cleanup. CaptainPellaeon1138 19:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Very important topic. If it hasn't been one already, it should be one imediatly
 * Great, good article, and very, very important. SkywalkerPL 11:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Contrary to what some of us who can't spell say... I think this is a great article. Cutch 19:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Corrections and mods to style and content have been made. Images are more uniform and less "clustered" now. -  Son of Nils Talk[[Image:Sabre_hilt.jpg|50px]] 15:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Han Solo
Objections
 * 1) Roron Corobb 20:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Kevinmhk 04:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 00:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) LandoSystem1138 23:47, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Yah. -Finlayson 02:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Come on, one of the three leaders of the rebel alliance?...or at least they should have Anakin Thomas 16:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) This is a good article. (of course, I did help with it . . . jk) Atarumaster88 14:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Needs more about the time period inbetween ANH and ESB. Thanos6 03:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Which incidents were the most important, is the question. Perhaps I'll add some stuff from the comics, though. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 00:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The Jubilar incident isn't mentioned, however it is in The New Essential Chronology, so I suppose it's pretty important.Snoop 09:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments

Talon Karrde

 * 1) Thanos6 07:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Yes. Finlayson 01:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * A personality section would be nice, seeing how most, if not all other individuals FAed have more than just a biography.
 * Why not. It could use a longer intro.  Roron Corobb 9:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Outbound Flight

 * 1) Inbl 12:21, 21 July 2006

Objections Comments
 * It could stand to be more in-depth.--LandoSystem1138 19:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Jensaarai
Objections Comments
 * 1) --Eyrezer 10:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Kevinmhk 10:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Adamwankenobi 15:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Jedi Dude 15:30 29 July 2006
 * 5) Roron Corobb 22:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) (OxfordScholar09 19:09, 6 August 2006 (UTC))
 * 1) I liked reading about them and everything, but the subject isn't widely known, and its too small. User:InblInbl 10:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That's not a valid objection. Adamwankenobi 15:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah it is I said it's too small.
 * sign your comment, and its of a good size to. Jedi Dude 14:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The article is over 3000 words. That is quite long enough if you ask me. --Eyrezer 00:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Popularity is of no importance; if we stuck to the really well-known articles we'd run out quite quickly. As for being too short, I direct you to Galactic Republic Chancery election, 32 BBY. &mdash;MarcK [talk] MarcK 00:34, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

This is a very comprehensive article considering the small number of sources it has featured in. Good work, whoever worked on it. --Eyrezer 10:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Darth Kevinmhk 10:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I concur. Adamwankenobi 15:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Its a good article, good length in depth and has a good amount of relevent pictures.

Qui-Gon Jinn

 * 1) A major character, whose article hasn't been featured yet. It's well-written, perfectly fits into the Wookieepedia guidelines, has useful BtS section, factually accurate, contains everything that should be known about him, and has neutral point of view. - TopAce 11:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * I think a quote from the movies (ie, from TPM) would be probably better as lead in. The "Blockade of Naboo" section is also a little image heavy. Apart from that, the article seems fine. QuentinGeorge 11:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * In fact, I suggest it could have many more quotes period. I'm sure there must be a relevant quote for most of the page sections there. --Eyrezer 23:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * An importent chracter, a good amount of images, but a lack of quotes brings the article down Jedi Dude 17:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

The Haunted Village

 * 1) This is our best TV episode article so far. It seems comprehensive and as best as an article on a TV episode can be. Adamwankenobi 20:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * The synopsis is huge! Crikey! That is not the objection, but rather, that being the case I think it needs a number of pictures added to that section. --Eyrezer 01:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I plan to add more images to it soon. Adamwankenobi 01:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * once thats done i think it'l be worth nominating for. Jedi Dude 17:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with Jedi Dude Roron Corobb 19:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Gamorrean

 * 1) A very well expanded article that looks like it includes every little tidbit from every Star Wars RPG and became bigger than the sum of its parts. And I think it's still being worked on, too... Shows you a lot of views of Gamorreans you've probably not seen. Enochf 06:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) This article has literally been transformed from a small stub about the Gamorreans into a HUGE article that is very detailed about their race, their culture and their different appearances.  White bishop 19:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer 03:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Darth Kevinmhk 03:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) this article has some of the best Pictures that i have seen of Gamorreans. It's alsome. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg

Objections Comments
 * It is a great article. I really enjoyed reading it. A couple of points, though. There are a lot of red-links on the page. Also, perhaps some mention of the events of the Eye of Palpatine? --Eyrezer 01:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * How about some more quotes too? --Eyrezer 21:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I like it and would vote for it. I just think it needs to mention probably the most notable Gammorrean, Voort saBinring. - Breathesgelatin 02:31, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Jabba the Hutt

 * 1) I beleive it's a very popular article. I loved reading it and adding stuff of my own. Though it does have a few red links, but I will more than willingly clear them up. Plus it's a huge artical and tons of people add on to it almost every day. --Jabbathehuttgartogg

Objections
 * 1) I still think it needs alot of work before its FA material, maybe with less redlinks, plus theres still alot better FA worthy articles. Jedi Dude 16:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Agreed. Needs to be rearranged, fixed up a littlebit, expanded and checked over and over for proper grammar. -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 05:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)