Wookieepedia:Trash compactor/TCW non-notables - Chapter II

TCW non-notables - Chapter II
Again we strike at the heart of the non-notable masses that are occupying unworthy space within Wookieepedia. Apologies in advance for the recent "heavy pressure" around the TC. Anyway, quite a few more this time that don't meet the minimum requirements, imo, here they come:

Unidentified IG-100 MagnaGuards (Skytop Station)

 * Unidentified IG-100 MagnaGuard 2 (Skytop Station)
 * Unidentified IG-100 MagnaGuard 3 (Skytop Station)
 * Unidentified IG-100 MagnaGuard 4 (Skytop Station)

Delete

 * 1) Winterz (talk) 15:52, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified Vulture-class droid starfighters (Skytop Station)

 * Unidentified Vulture-class droid starfighter (Skytop Station)
 * Unidentified Vulture-class droid starfighter 2 (Skytop Station)
 * Unidentified Vulture-class droid starfighter 3 (Skytop Station)

Delete

 * 1) Winterz (talk) 15:52, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified B1 battle droids (Rodia)

 * Unidentified B1 battle droid 7 (Rodia)
 * Unidentified B1 battle droid 8 (Rodia)
 * Unidentified B1 battle droid 9 (Rodia)
 * Unidentified B1 battle droid 10 (Rodia)
 * Unidentified B1 battle droid 12 (Rodia)

Delete

 * 1) Winterz (talk) 15:52, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified LM-432 crab droid

 * Unidentified LM-432 crab droid

Delete

 * 1) This one's slightly more arguable but its so called "notable-interaction" is attacking Jar Jar and not being among a group. I say, burn. Winterz (talk) 15:52, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Because of interaction with major character. KEJ (talk) 16:19, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified clone trooper pilot 2 (Rodia)

 * Unidentified clone trooper pilot 2 (Rodia)

Delete

 * 1) Winterz (talk) 16:01, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Because of participation - albeit minor - in a slightly notable event. KEJ (talk) 16:20, January 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * 2) *So all pictured characters that appear in a.. notable battle for instance, they all deserve articles just because of participation? You should re-think that argument, sir. Winterz (talk) 16:24, January 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * 3) **Dude, I am not going to discuss anything here beyond my vote. It could be construed as disruptive behavior, and users could get banned, which I am not interested in. KEJ (talk) 16:27, January 13, 2014 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Stop with that. Discussions are allowed, as long as they remain civil. The user that was banned was sticking his nose in affairs that didn't concern him and even ignored the warnings. So no, you're not getting banned for further expanding your argument. Anyway, I would intend to pursue this discussion (in the respective section on the bottom), if you do to, respond there. Winterz (talk) 16:38, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

Unidentified Senate Commando 3 (Tranquility)

 * Unidentified Senate Commando 3 (Tranquility)
 * Unidentified Senate Commando 4 (Tranquility)

Delete

 * 1) Winterz (talk) 16:01, January 13, 2014 (UTC)

Keep

 * 1) Because of interaction with a major character. KEJ (talk) 16:19, January 13, 2014 (UTC)