Forum:CT Archive/Longer Sentences, Poetic Adjectives, and so forth

Wookieepedia &gt; Consensus track &gt; 

This is admittedly a very small&mdash;and probably egocentric&mdash;issue in the grand scheme of things, but a couple users have come forward since I finished the Booster Terrik article saying that they have a problem with the text as being too florid and/or grammatically loose by what could be considered encyclopedic standards. I have a very intentional writing style, and if I can't produce things that read like Booster reads, I'm not going to be of much use, so I wanted to get a handle on just how many people take issue with it.

If you don't feel like going through the entire Booster article, I'd say the preceding paragraph is a pretty good indicator of the style I'm talking about. http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/1.gif CooperTFN 03:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)