User talk:Kwenn

Kwenn, 'welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * Internal pages:
 * Community Portal
 * Manual of Style
 * Online sources
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~. Four tildes produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Community Portal talk page or ask e on my Talk page. May the Force be with you! -- Riffsyphon1024 01:32, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

2 questions
1. Why did you take away the pics from Anakin?

2. On R2-D2, do you want me to replace the film names with thier respective years? Would that be ok? :-?

Anakin Thomas 15:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Because 1) Disambig pages don't need images - we know who the Anakins are, so we don't need to illustrate it. Besides, the page links directly to each article; and 2) I really don't think the list is needed at all. It's trivia, which we tend to avoid here. The info is already in the article proper, and doesn't need repeating - Kwenn 15:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Ya your right Anakin Thomas 15:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Paragraphs
Paragraphs only need two carriage returns in between them&mdash;you keep adding a third carriage return. This results in far too much space between paragraphs. Please discontinue this practice. Thanks. -- Aidje 21:59, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I've noticed that you're not entering extra carriage returns anymore. Thank you. And good work, too. -- Aidje 20:19, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Supershadow
Thanks for all your information a while a go on Supershadow. I was a fool to ever have trusted him, and now when I go back to the site I can see what a fake he actually is. Lucas should Sue him! --Mantus 17:27, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

Clone Trooper List

 * I just had to say that I am astounded at all the new stuff you added to the List of clone troopers. Props to you. -- Riffsyphon1024 18:51, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I frequent the 'Alpha, ARC Troopers and the Commandos' thread over on TF.N, and with all the clone experts on there, you soon build up quite a list. Kwenn 14:58, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Timelines

 * Hmm, thanks for correcting me on that. I wasn't sure if I saw the Dowager Queen crash earlier or not, or I just got lost in the timeline. You seem to have a handle on things, and I appreciate you tweaking the year articles to ensure things are correct, and adding additional little events so we make more articles. :D -- Riffsyphon1024 20:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * No problem. I'm basically going through the TimeTales timeline, picking out notable events, battles, births and deaths as I go. It's a great resource, since it not only gives all known dates, but also includes detailed summaries of referanced material, as well as a few well-informed conjectures on speculated events - Kwenn

Minor edits
A thing to keep in mind is to not classify edits where you add information to an article as minor. It's a common mistake, though (had problems with that one myself). --Imp 21:48, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Aha, OK. I assumed that adding slight or minor information (along with formatting edits, which I assume are minor) was classified as a minor edit. Thanks for the correction - Kwenn
 * No problem, although you're doing it again! :P --Imp 15:39, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Battles of the Mandalorian Wars
Hey, I was wondering where you got the information about those battles? --Imp 12:56, 19 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * I got my info from Timetales, but I all of these battles are referenced in the KotOR games - Kwenn
 * Great, this solves a huge mystery. Thanks. --Imp 19:52, 2 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Preview images?
Hey, I saw your clone commander article and I was wondering where you got that preview-image from? VT-16 20:00, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * You mean the Commander Keller image? It was a preview of Republic #79 posted at this thread over at TheForce.Net - Kwenn
 * Thanks for the pic! Incidently, I was wondering where you found the info on the 'Aerial Initiative Armored Transport', all those months ago. I remember finding a page paraphrasing an official source but I couldn't find it again. You see, I'm working on two AIAT/i articles and I need more sources to back up the theory that there were two types of gunship sharing the same acronym (one from the Old Republic era and one from the Imperial/New Republic era). VT-16 15:50, 4 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * The AIAT/i was created for the Mandalorian article in Insider 80. Since I got the info second-hand (as a UK resident, I have to wait a couple of months for Insider articles to reach the UK mag) I don't know the details, sorry - Kwenn

Clone trooper Fox
Could you have mistaken Fox for Clone Commander Appo? Check both articles and the talk page on Fox. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:46, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC) Forbidden You don't have permission to access /holonet/dictionnaire/photos/perso_clone2_appo_1.jpg on this server.
 * I was referring to the image posted on the Appo talk page. It's Fox, not Appo - Kwenn
 * I see now. What a mistake to make. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:28, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * No problemo - Kwenn

Apache/1.3.34 Server at www.starwars-holonet.com Port 80

Unless I am mistaken, he was sarcastic. Geekmasterflash 20:41, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Fanon names|erroneous
Why on the KOTOR ships and vehicles do you keep calling fanon names "erroneous"? How can they be erroneous when there are no canon names they contradict. A more correct adjective would be "speculative." Just wondering.JustinGann 08:46, 5 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * OK, sorry. Speculative is better. Semantics aren't my strong point - Kwenn
 * Maybe there is a better way to handle them. The line between "fan speculation" and "fanon" is thin. --SparqMan 00:27, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

TK-5282
Hi, I discovered that you contributed the name of a Stormtrooper TK-8252. I already have one with TK-5282. I suspect we both wrote about the one and same person, only that one of us made some typo on the series of numbers. Can you cite your sources and justify the name? MoffRebus 00:20, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I got the designation from the CUSWE's latest update - Kwenn
 * Then I guess he's speaking about the same person, while it was I who made the typo. I am going to merge them. Thanks for the cooperation :)))) MoffRebus 23:20, 25 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Republic heavy freighter
You sir, have the eye of the eagle! Fantastic find!JustinGann 04:06, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Sorry
listen, about that whole Assijj ventress thing, sorry. I just got mad. Sorry. P.h 03:10, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)p.h
 * Nah, don't worry about it. - Kwenn 18:10, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks P.h 22:33, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)p.h

Ani's saber
Hi Kwenn, I've saw you have uploaded a pic of Anakins lightsaber during RotS. I've found another image from the same lightsaber (Image:lightsaber_anakin_rots.jpg). Do I have your permission to replace your pic in the Gallery of lightsaber hilts-page and tag you pic with the {ifd}-template? ----Inmobilus 21:42, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * If you like. Yours does look a little better than the boring old horizontal view I had - Kwenn 22:20, 15 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok :) --[[Image:BFguy.gif]]--Inmobilus 14:17, 16 Jan 2006 (UTC)

MedStar moves
Your MedStar moves created a bunch of double redirects. Please fix those when you have a chance. --SparqMan 22:28, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
 * D'oh. Sorry about that. I just changed them - Kwenn 22:56, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Lannik Chosen One
Could you expand on the Chosen One (Lannik) article if you get a chance? It's on VFD, because a vandal followed a redlink and made up some nonsense. Since Lannik links to it, I replaced it with some slightly more creditable nonsense, but I'd like more information. Thanks, &mdash; Silly Dan 23:14, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help! &mdash; Silly Dan 12:52, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Sev'rance Tann
I don't know why you edited out the possibility of a connection with Jorj Car'das. And as for her CiC status, see the Grievous talk page.
 * Because it's just that: a possibility, not truth and it can't be backed up with any evidence at all. And I suggest you check my message on the Grievous talk page - Kwenn 20:57, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

R5-H6
Hey about that R5-H6 article I found pretty much the same info on this site: []. Don't know if that makes a difference, but thought I'd let you know, just so we're being entirely fair to the author. Thanks. HavetStorm 17:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Red6 is also a common breeding ground of fanon. Most of those (canon) droids on that site come from the Customizable Card Game - and since TF.N's encyclopedia has entries from all CCG cards, and R5-H6 isn't listed on TF.N, I'd say this unit is fanon - Kwenn 17:54, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, just thought it best to check. Thanks HavetStorm 18:36, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
 * He was in the Episode 2 visual dictionary. He may have been cut though, and i'm not sure if ther name is canon. Rod
 * That's the problem; we don't have a source for the name. It's not in the AotC VD - Kwenn 22:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

G1M
Thanks for resolving that, I wanted a third party to do it. Lonnyd 12:16, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
 * No prob - Kwenn 22:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Outrunner
You were wrong about the Outrunner. Check the Dash Rendar's NEGTC entry - "His success allowed him to buy a second ship, the Outrunner." KastMorben 09:54, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Battlefront 2
Good job on that Canon section. I was debating removing parts as it didn't seem to be Canon. Thanks Phillowe88 07:06, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Scalefish
Thanks for helping contribute to the scalefish article and making new pages for each species. Wolfdog 15:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Yoda's hovering chair
What is the number of the Fact File that covers Yoda's flying chair, please? I want a pic for wiki.JustinGann 01:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't know the number since I don't keep the pages in order of publication. But I think it was one of the later ones - Kwenn 15:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Nice Userboxes
You mind if I use your bottom two userboxes? They're really good.


 * Go ahead - Kwenn 18:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Anyway, you're like, -3 days old now? ;p

I know, I know, you're a year old.


 * Er, what? - Kwenn 09:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Past tense
I noticed you were responsible for changing a caption on the second image at Meditation chamber to present tense. It is site policy that all in-universe writing be past tense. Please don't change past tense writing to be present. Thanks.--DannyBoy7783 19:26, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

So Long ShaakTi
Sorry to burst your bubble, but on the deleted scenes of RotS, Grievous kills Shaak Ti in front of Obi-Wan and Anakin. Quidon88 16:34, may 2006 (UTC)


 * ...which has been declared a non-canonical deleted scene. Adamwankenobi Talk to me! My home. 21:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * To Adamwan, you listen. She appears on the Council later in the movie. Moreover, she apparently survives Order 66 (at least for now) since her second death (to be stabbed in the back by Anakin in the Temple) didn't materialize either, and the whole thing's been left fairly ambiguous - Kwenn 09:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Problem with date of Chu'unthor crash

 * Thanks for noticing the problem with this date. I've left the message on the discussion pages of all 3 dates in question, and on the discussion pages of a few users. Maybe this can straightened out.


 * I too have noticed a lot of contradictions on Wikipedia, especially since I've been doing a lot of work on the Timeline of galactic history. The date in question about this crash is a good example as to why I think the timeline should be as thorough as possible. It gives us the opportunity to see these contradictions of information on Wookiepedia and thus gives us an opportunity to resolve these contradictions. Jaywin 16:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * My info&mdash;and that of the Chu'unthor article itself&mdash;appears to be out of date: the New Essential Chronology lists it as 340 BBY, which, according to the Timetales timeline, is also reflected in Power of the Jedi. As the most recent sources, these should be taken as canon. I believe the older sources were Courtship of Princess Leia, Darksabre and the Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels - Kwenn 17:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I just noticed how you fixed the dates in all three articles. Great job! There's an improvement drive going on over at the timeline. Check it out, and maybe we can find some more "questionable" dates! Jaywin 13:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Timeline

 * I left a response for you at Talk:Timeline of galactic history. Jaywin 15:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Izzard
Nice Izzard quote. Cutch 07:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, YouTube's got a good selection of Izzard clips, including a few Star Wars ones, such as Death Star Canteen. If only I had the money to buy his DVDs.... - Kwenn 15:35, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Eh
Going to spoil us all so soon, eh Kwenn? -- Riffsyphon1024 15:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I've added spoiler tags to some of the more revealing articles, but most don't really give much away, I think - Kwenn 15:53, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I now have both Star Wars Insider 88 and Star Wars Legacy 0 so now the articles themselves aren't a problem, but any plot that comes with them may be. I may need to consider a non-leak rule, since the material may change before it is finally released, but I dont know what your source is. -- Riffsyphon1024 23:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Userpage convo

 * Sorry for the shouting and flipping out! No offence was intended against you. Jasca Ducato 19:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Meh. No problemo. Don't worry - Kwenn 19:53, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

R2-D2
Why the hell did you revert what I did Anakin Thomas 18:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC) reply via user page pls.
 * I understand what you mean about viewing the movies wrongly, I still think it should be there, I'll ask Silly Dan and a few others

Naboo Picture Gallery
Why did you remove the image i added to the Gallery of Naboo Images? Is it not convetion, or at least courteous, to state a reason? --Merbabu 14:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I suggest you check the Attack of the Clones section, which is where an image of the Palace Courtyard belongs - Kwenn 14:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, good point - but I did try! Can i "suggest" stating a reason next time. cheers. --Merbabu 14:14, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Kelnor Controversy
My apologies for being hostile about you changing the article. I thought you were trying to sabotage it, when really you were improving it. I see i'm not the first to yell at you - haha.

Sig

 * Thanks, I didn't really know how to do it, RC-1187 00:46, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. No biggie - Kwenn 07:21, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Sw-4
I'm just alerting you that the Sw-4 template for encyclopedic knowledge of SW is going to be deleted in favor of Sw-3, the advanced template, since 95 percent of those who put it as theirs are obviously not that smart. Additionally you and Nebulax were the only two who were intelligent enough, but Neb agreed to be bumped down to the new maximum of advanced. I figure we should leave Sw-4 for people like Abel Pena, Leland Chee, and George Lucas. -- Riffsyphon1024 03:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I'll switch to 3 - Kwenn 08:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Heh. I see you're way ahead of me ;) - Kwenn 08:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Our little new Canon type debate
Reading your profile I find another cool occurrence of in-universe stuff corresponding with out-of-universe stuff. In this case, your Light Side affiliation, which corresponds to your tendency to forgive people who have slighted you; and your republic affiliation, which corresponds to your preference to fix things afterwards rather than preventing them in the first place, like canon inconsitencies. This is further emphasised by your extravagant history of editing. You like fixing stuff that have gone wrong, don't you? -DarthMRN You don't see anything amusing in that? Delete this whole thing if you like. Its not business-related, nor does it contain praise from other memebers, so it doesn't belong on your tidy profile. Now, let's see if I can make that signature appear...(DarthMRN 21:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC))
 * Your point being? - Kwenn 20:07, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * ghkgkjJust an observation of the kind I find amusing. The conclusion to our discussion was that you disagreed because you basically trust the right people to fix inconsistencies eventually, so you don't mind them occurring, and then I find you to be one of the major editors around here. Coincidence? I think not. And you are of Jedi stock to begin with, as well. This is to a great degree their approach as well, no?
 * Not really, since I'm able to separate reality from fiction and, you know, not get overly involved in what is essentially a fictional universe within which any rules regarding levels of officiality are all false anyway, thus making any such argument based around them totally academic - Kwenn 21:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * You'll have to pardon me for any reluctance to believe that someone with your level of knowledge does not have a near religious relationship to Star Wars. Or that such could ever be born from the academic interest you give the impression of having.
 * I am obviously invested deeply in Star Wars, but like I said, I can separate it from real life. And my use of "academic" was in relation to the argument being theoretical or speculative without a practical purpose or intention - Kwenn 21:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Pardon me, but this is getting hilarous. Yet another Jedi trait! All business, no fun. And judging from the above entries, the only acceptable business is related to editing what is wrong with Wookieepedia. Our Galaxy, if you catch my drift.
 * Hilarious - Kwenn 21:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)You are right, the previous entry was hilarious. Now it's getting hilarous. BTW, care to share with a noob how to make those dots appear in front of a sentence. It doesn't work here like it does on the talk pages, so I'm a little lost here.

Hey, Kwenn. It's me again. I'm in need of a Jedi librarian like yourself.
Sorry ot bother you, but you're the only guru I know, and since you are the Man when it comes to editing, I thought I might try to enlist your help with this article. Go to the talk page and see my arguments. Naturally, as a noob I'm to scared to edit anything without double-checking my info, so I thought, hey, why not ask Kwenn. If he doesn't know, no one does. Forgot signatureDarthMRN

Sub Pages
How do you make a sub page? JainaSolo32 17:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Just go to your user page, and in the address bar, type a "/" after the page address, then type the name you want to call the subpage. It will then take you to the "This page does not exist" page, where you can create the subpage. So, for example, it would be http://starwars.wikia/com/wiki/User:JainaSolo32/Subpage" - Kwenn 18:02, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much. JainaSolo32 23:31, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Images - return
I'll know in the Future not to do that, sorry, I'm new. Plese, Could you delete the bigger versions of the two pictures though. the smaller ones are better and look nicer on the Jabba page. feel free to delete the bigger ones at will. Thanks -- Jabbathehuttgartogg
 * No, the bigger images look better. They're of a higher quality. Images can be resized in the articles - Kwenn 19:58, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I thought the bigger ones would've presented a problem, Sorry. --Jabbathehuttgartogg

uploading
How do I reupload an image? I don't want make my same mistake.