Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Wedge Antilles


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

(-2)
Support Oppose
 * 1) Thire 4477 08:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Looks sourced and covers all major aspects. -Fnlayson 04:43, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) *There are entire paragraphs that have no reference tags. Greyman ( Paratus ) 08:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) I haven’t read the entire article yet, but I think it needs a lot of work;
 * 2) *it has on it, it needs to be fully sourced.
 * 3) *One of the images needs to be properly sourced.
 * 4) *I also think the intro could be expanded a bit.
 * I'll read the rest of the article later today and expand this list if necessary. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 10:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Needs to be fully sourced per GAN rules. Greyman ( Paratus ) 14:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per everyone else- has a sorry level of detail, poorly referenced. Basically, absolutely no way. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 15:40, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Aatru is right. This has no shot. Needs sourcing and probably an expansion.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 18:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Removing from the article does not mean it is referenced, the article needs to be fully sourced if it is to become a Good Article. I've put the template back on so every one will be able to see it needs more references, this way it is more likely that someone (that has the right sources) will help reference the article. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 09:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)