Wookieepedia talk:WookieeProject The Clone Wars

Canon
Should there be a standardized subheading in the "Behind the Scenes" section of articles about episodes addressing canon conflicts caused by the show? For example, in the Lair of Grievous article, there would be a subheading labeled "Continuity" mentioning Kit Fisto's mysterious presence of eyelids, Grievous revealing his four arms to a Jedi who escapes and talks to the council, R6 droids decades before their invention, the whole Grievous "choosing" his modifications deal, etc. Or should we just assume things like this aren't erroneous and not mention them at all? - Milo Fett [Comlink] 22:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I think that would be good.  &mdash;Lucius malfoy7  [[Image:Nute777.png|20px]] ( Give it up for Lil' 'Soka Tano, ladies and gents! ) 22:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Right now it's somewhat disorganized and it says "bloopers" in one article and "mistakes" in the next. - Milo Fett [Comlink] 22:40, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It doesn't need to be mentioned on every article, only where it's completely necessary and directly related to the article in question. It should be included anyway, regardless of the project. Please judge scrupulously on what to include, as some stuff comes close to original research. Also, just a note for future reference: it's "Behind the scenes", not "Behind the Scenes". &mdash; CC7567 [ http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/thumb/5/5f/Rex.png/20px-Rex.png] (s)talk 22:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I realize continuity errors should be documented anyway, I just meant there should be a standardized format for doing so for TCW, which contains more continuity errors than possibly any other EU work. I'm not counting errors related to the timeline (Anakin's scar, Ventress, etc.) because the official statement is that it's currently being rearranged and there's no official new timeline yet. - Milo Fett [Comlink] 22:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed; statements about gaps, holes, or errors (Wat Tambor never escaping, Eeth Koth in Wild Space) should be the only material included.  &mdash;Lucius malfoy7  [[Image:Nute777.png|20px]] ( Give it up for Lil' 'Soka Tano, ladies and gents! ) 22:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll use the "Lair of Grievous" article as an example, since I don't think I should have reverted the entire edit. Mentioning the Nautolan's lack of eyelids is fine, but since the "R6 unit" is named and has an article, it can be mentioned there, not in the episode in which it appears. Also, implications fall under both speculation and original research, so please do not add them. "Gaps" in continuity falls under original research, and is not directly related to the episode, so it should not be included. As for a standardized format: there is none, and since it can easily be changed/applied, it doesn't need to be part of the project. &mdash; CC7567 [ http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/thumb/5/5f/Rex.png/20px-Rex.png] (s)talk 23:01, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Duly noted; I unreverted it and only included the part about the eyelids. - Milo Fett [Comlink] 23:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * What was the reasoning behind reverting Duel of the Droids? - Milo Fett [Comlink] 23:13, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It was original research; I restored it. &mdash; CC7567 [ http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/thumb/5/5f/Rex.png/20px-Rex.png] (s)talk 23:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * In a way, the Continuity errors in the Behind the Scenes makes the articles look dull. Prehaps organizing it to match the article than just having run-on sentences with no bullet points.  JangFett  You want to clone me? 18:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Previously Featured
I added a previously featured section for articles that were taken to FA or GA before the project. Im not sure I got the nominators correct so if I made a mistake please correct me. :) Dark Lord Trayus 01:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Articles under review
In addition to the "Current FAN and GAN" sub-section I would like to propose to the project leader to create a "Articles under review" subsection, similiar to the one WP:KOTOR has. The reason is, currently Wat Tambor needs to be updated with the content presented in Liberty on Ryloth and this project seems like it's up to the taks to do so.  Mauser  Comlink 15:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * It sounds fine to me; thanks for the suggestion.  CC7567  (talk) 15:55, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

To Project Members
Hey guys, I need a little quote help. (If only we had a JMAS of quotes on this wiki... Sigh.) I am trying to bring Onaconda Farr to GA status, but, before nomination, I need a suitable heading quote and a quote from Bombad Jedi. If any of you have candidates for either, I would be forever thankful if you would leave me the quotes on my talk page. Thanks, Lucius malfoy7 23:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

What do I do?
What can I do to help?--Darth Malice the Destroyer 23:45, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * There a lot of things you can do to help; the main one is to try and contribute to articles. There's not really other things to do, since that's the main objective of the project. :)  CC7567  (talk) 23:57, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Cross out
How can you cross an article out ? My article Zak (clone) is complete. How can it be taken to featured status ? --Clone Commander Lee 12:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not quite there yet. For more information on featured articles, visit Featured_article_nominations. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 13:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * With all due respect, Milo Fett, please elaborate if you're going to say that. Clone Commander Lee, the reason we cross articles out in their lists is to get a better idea of what's being covered and what's still open for others to take up as projects.  CC7567  (talk) 16:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, Lee, please note that there's a 1000-word requirement for featured articles, so unless the article can be expanded, it's currently at the requirement for a Good article nomination. I would also recommend that you ask one of the more experienced members (such as myself or another AgriCorps member) to take a look at the article before you nominate it, just so that you get the basics down.  CC7567  (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Noted; I was rushed for time and hoped the standards for a featured article would be of use. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 19:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I placed the good article nomination on the arrticle how can you vote for it at the Good article nomination. --Clone Commander Lee 06:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll take it up with you on your talk page.  CC7567  (talk) 07:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Rugor Nass
Rugor Nass is awarded to good status with this project. Please list him on the page. --Clone Commander Lee 14:21, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Rugor Nass does not even have one support vote yet. It has not achieved good status at this point, and will not until all objections have been satisfied and the nom itself has a minimum of five support votes, three of which need to be from members of the AgriCorps. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 14:41, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Lee, if you mean it's being nominated on behalf of the project, please consult the edit history for the project page. Nass does not fall under the criteria as a "project" based on the series. He appears in too many other places, and as such is not a project nomination in the truest sense.  CC7567  (talk) 19:17, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Audio files
I am able to provide audio files from any of the episodes of the TV series (sadly, not able to extract them from the film ). So if anybody would like audio to go with quotes on their projects, just give me a holler. I'm currently working through putting audio files in for all the TV series articles that have already reached FA and GA status. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 13:43, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I've got the film DVD if anyone needs clips from that as well. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 22:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ditto here, I'm now able to also extract audio from the film. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 04:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, now it's official, I've ripped the DVD to my hard drive and can now get audio from the film and all episodes. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 14:24, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Bounty Hunters affiliation
Since BH have no affiliation, as long as they are paid, isn't it wrong to affiliate them to the "Order of the Sith Lords"? Shouldn't them be affiliated to "Bounty Hunters"? Alexrd 16:48, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * You mean Cad Bane, right? Since he had worked directly for a Sith Lord, I think the title applies. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 18:39, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * I disagree. Just because he's worked for Darth Sidious and the Confederacy does not mean he is affiliated with them. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:41, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, it would. That's like saying that just because Shahan Alama worked for Cad Bane's posse doesn't mean he's affiliated with Cad Bane's posse. Or, for another example, just because Wilhuff Tarkin worked for the Galactic Empire, doesn't mean he's affiliated with them. That's not true. The definition of "affiliate" is to connect or associate oneself (which would include "to work for") an organization/movement etc. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 19:44, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Notice how Boba Fett isn't affiliated with the Order of Sith Lords because even though Vader gave him orders from time to time, he was working for the Empire. Sidious presumably wanted a holocron (just any old holocron would do, apparently) for his own ends, and Bane even referred to him as a "Sith Lord employer" or something, not as someone working on behalf of the Confederacy. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 21:04, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * I guess it comes down to your interpretation. To use an example of being a contract worker as opposed to a direct employee. I work for a a company. I am affiliated with them because I am an employee. We hire someone to repair our generator if it malfuctions. He is a contract worker. He is not affiliated with us any more than he is any other company that hires his services. He is affiliated with only himself. Same goes here to my way of thinking. To me, to say Bane is affiliated with The Sith or the Confederacy is to say he supports or believes in their cause. He doesn't. He believes in only himself. That's how I view affiliation. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 23:09, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Ultimately, yes, Bane's affiliations are to the highest bidder. If it really becomes a problem, then I have no problem changing it to that, but I believe it's fine the way it is right now.  CC7567  (talk) 23:14, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Per CC.  JangFett  (Talk) 23:17, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Funny you say that, CC. :) If it were still up for GA nom with the affiliations as is, I'd have had to object. What you just said, I think, is perfect for what the "affiliations" section of his infobox should say: Highest bidder, and it can be referenced to his Databank entry. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 23:40, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
 * Would being on retainer count? I don't think there's any source saying he is, but would it? — Milo Fett [Comlink] 00:28, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
 * So, wouldn't be fine to just affiliate bounty hunters to bounty hunters? Can't that be an affiliation category? I think JMAS has explained my point. Alexrd 17:47, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * "Highest bidder" is still more specific and what they're actually affiliated to. Cad Bane isn't affiliated to a "bounty hunter"; he's affiliated to the highest bidder, and so are most other hunters.  CC7567  (talk) 20:31, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok. What about the other Bounty hunters? I wasn't talking just about Bane. Cato Parasitti, and the others need to be changed too, right?Alexrd 17:26, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome to change them yourself if you so see fit. No one's preventing you from editing the page.  CC7567  (talk) 18:24, October 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * With some exceptions, of course. For example, numerous sources say Boba Fett wouldn't work for the Rebel Alliance because he viewed them to be evil. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 19:37, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Cartoon Netowork's Dataclips
On the Cartoon Network's website, there are some dataclips on the video section that have some good info, like Plo Koon's Delta-7B be called the Blade of Dorin. Can these info tips be considered canon info? Alexrd 10:44, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, go ahead. Just make sure to source them properly.  Mauser  Comlink 10:48, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * What episode is that on? — Milo Fett [Comlink] 22:05, October 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll take care of it shortly Milo. :) -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 23:46, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * I've moved the page to Blade of Dorin and added the CN website dataclip to the sources with the 1stID tag. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 23:55, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

Webcomics
I noticed that the links of the several webcomic articles (like The Clone Wars: The Fall of Falleen) aren't redirecting to the comic itself anymore, but to the last page of the The Clone Wars: Act on Instinct. I think that they have changed something on Starwars.com.--Kreivi Wolter 19:45, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * We basically need to go through every season one web comic article and correct those external links. They're a few web comic GAs that may need a referencing change, and yes, the external link to the respective web comic in those articles needs changing as well.  JangFett  (Talk) 19:48, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * May we just link to the main webcomic page rather than individual pages?  Mauser  Comlink 19:50, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * For the GA web comic articles, information listed in their infoboxes source to the individual pages. For an example you can see: The Clone Wars: Transfer article. If you mean just link to the main web comic page on StarWars.com, I don't think that's sufficient. For user-friendly purposes, linking to the individual comic is better.  JangFett  (Talk) 19:55, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * So we just have to go through every damn article? Damn it! Curse those SW.com guys! Dont they realize what work it is to do this again? And the articles were GA already! ... Well, seriously talking, at least The Clone Wars: Covetous doesn't need changing, as I'm just gonna write it. But what if the SW.com changes it again? Do we then just have to do this over and over again?--Kreivi Wolter 20:28, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, no. I'm pretty sure they will keep it as is. As you can see through this link: they bunched season one web comics in the category "season1". Then season two will be "season2," and so on.  JangFett  (Talk) 20:46, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure hope so, especially theres going to be even the Season 3.--Kreivi Wolter 21:05, October 16, 2009 (UTC)