Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month

 Wookieepedian of the Month is an award given to outstanding Wookieepedians each month. To nominate someone, please list the person's username below and give the reason why you are nominating them. Optionally, you may place the UserNominated template at the top of the nominee's user page, but only after asking for and receiving the user's consent to do so. Nominations will be accepted until the end of the month. The administrators will then review the nominations, vote for the WotM, and present the award on the 1st of the following month.

Try to nominate someone who has not received the award before. Nominations for those who have won the award within the past six months will be dismissed.

Please vote only once, and only vote for another user. Duplicate votes, self-votes, and self-nominations will be removed.

Congratulations goes to our most recent winners, and, for May 2007. See History for a complete list of past winners.

Support

 * 1) He has been extraordinarily thorough in going through stuff from the X-wing games. Kuralyov 15:12, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) He's good. And FWIW, I had him in mind for this before he was nominated for adminship. --Azizlight 22:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 06:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Stake black   msg 16:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Skippy Farlstendoiro 17:52, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) He helped promote 10 articles to good and featured status!--Windu223 22:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) I've seen Havac before, and he's actually really handy. I vote for 'im. TheNewDarthMalevlent ( The Sith shall rise to power!) |undefined 02:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 23:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk) 00:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Imperialles 00:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  Lord Oblivion Sith holocron[[Image:Oldsith.png|20px]] 00:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Darth Seth 18:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Objections

 * 1) Nothing personal, I just don't like the way he treats some confused new users  Stake black   msg 23:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Ha ha, that is hilarious. Wait, this is a joke isn't it? I can't think of any other reason why the most consistently rude member of the community would even be considered regardless of his hard work. Sheesh, what the heck is going on around here&hellip; I mean, the guy was blocked yet again today for flaming and personal attacks.– 00:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Call me old fashioned, but I'd prefer to see this award go to someone much, um, nicer. Sorry. -Azizlight 00:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I understand that he works hard but if you're not nice to people, especially the new people, then the pool of creative talent will get smaller and smaller as people are scared off. I agree with Stake black and Azizlight. Mrobviousjosh 00:41, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Same reasons as last month. Chack Jadson 00:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Unfortunately, for the personal attacks, that pushes it too far. TheNewDarthMalevlent ( The Sith shall rise to power!) |undefined 02:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) I agree with Stake and Darth! This user is just to rude.--Windu223 21:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Comments
Same reasons as last month. Thefourdotelipsis 23:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't get me wrong. As far as contributions are concerned, Redemption has easily earned this award. Sometimes it seems like he has uploaded half the images on the wiki, but IMHO, his vicious attitude towards newcomers and anyone who disagrees with him nullifies his accomplishments and makes this wiki a much less enjoyable place to volunteer.– 17:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Sikon 14:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 22:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Comments
Same reasons as last month, plus WC9. - Sikon 14:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm up again? Wow. Thank you, Sikon. And I was hoping that WC9 was okay. Thank you. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)