Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Harbinger


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

(5 Inqs/0 Users/5 Total)
Support Oppose
 * 1) Lord Hydronium 12:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Cull Tremayne 20:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Green Tentacle (Talk) 11:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Imperialles 13:20, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Despite crappy image. Thefourdotelipsis 00:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Two things:
 * 2) * Specifications and layout: Seeing as all these sections are very short, wouldn't it be better to simply merge them all together?
 * 3) **It might...but I liked separating them by deck/general area, and that seemed as good a way as any. - Lord Hydronium 07:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) * Behind the scenes: ""Harbinger" means something that foreshadows events to come." Relevance? It's a pretty common English word. I don't see the need for the explanation.
 * 5) **Removed, apparently, though I thought it was an uncommon enough word to deserve note. Especially since it's somewhat significant in the context of the story. - Lord Hydronium 07:05, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * --Imperialles 16:55, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Doesn't list the Prima Guide as a source. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *It does now, thanks to your dedicated spirit. :-) -- Ozzel 06:22, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * From the lair of Hobbes15
 * Beginning of 1.1, four The's in a row to start sentences. Not terrible, but could be varied a bit.
 * Yeah, there's really no way of getting around that that doesn't sound horribly awkward. There's enough variation in the word following "the", and those words are going to get more focus than the article before them. - Lord Hydronium 20:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I guess I don't have a serious problem with that. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 00:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Since there are multiple references, does the article need to be sourced? I don't think so, but I'm just making sure.
 * Yep. Done. - Lord Hydronium 20:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * If we're saying that the article needs sources, than source the BTS. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 00:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The BTS has sources, just not footnotes. - Lord Hydronium 00:33, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Didn't really read BTS through much. That works, than.
 * That's all on this nom. Good job. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 14:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * That history section's quite good. Cull Tremayne 20:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Good work on the description, though I'd still like to see some more detail on the floor patterns. --Imperialles 13:17, 15 September 2007 (UTC)