Wookieepedia:Requests for adminship

This page is for requests for adminship. Voting will last two weeks, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted admin status.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian (or yourself) for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have had at least some major article creations.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.

Keeping in mind we won't choose admins solely on number of contributions, here is some info that may help with decisions (taken from the stats page on Nov 14, 2005):

Current top ten contributors
Please see the Wookieepedia stats page for more recent numbers.
 * 1) JustinGann - 12,485 total article edits.
 * 2) Riffsyphon1024 - 10,858 total article edits. (Admin)
 * 3) Kuralyov - 5,895 total article edits.
 * 4) MarcK - 5,621 total article edits. (Admin)
 * 5) Azizlight - 4,370 total article edits.
 * 6) StarNeptune - 3,895 total article edits. (Admin)
 * 7) QuentinGeorge - 3,816 total article edits. (Admin)
 * 8) SparqMan total - 3,399 article edits. (Admin)
 * 9) Aidje - 2,993 total article edits. (Admin)
 * 10) Imperialles - 2,930 total article edits. (Admin)

Administrators votes must be unanimous to be accepted.

Azizlight (10/1/0)
Deadline is January 31, 2006 (two weeks after six months completed)

Support

 * *Raises hand* --Azizlight 14:17, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. In my mind, I honestly thought he was already an admin.  :D  WhiteBoy 00:51, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * "Project Delta Sauce" is admin-worthy by itself. Then there's the fanon hunt, which was a genius idea (I have a burning hatred for fanon, and he made it easier to kill). So, definite support. &mdash;Darth Culator   (talk)  01:21, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Whether we waive the six month rule or not, I say definately Azizlight. QuentinGeorge 09:03, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. We're too young and too in need of good, reliable admins to get hung up on a six month rule. jSarek 10:22, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Waive the six month rule, and let Aziz loose on all the fanon! =Þ StarNeptune 18:44, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Support, ignoring six month rule for now. &mdash; Silly Dan  18:48, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. --MarcK [talk] 00:04, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. -- Riffsyphon1024 08:09, 10 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. About time! --Imp 13:33, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. I think he'd be a good admin (and let's face it we need more admins, so I'd say "%&¤# the six months rule!" too) KEJ 14:52, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

 * Oppose. Give it another two months for the six month rule.  WhiteBoy 01:43, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)