Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



THIS IS A TRIAL RUN.

'''Comprehensive articles are not in effect&mdash;this is merely a trial run to determine whether or not the system can actually work. As such, certain rules may change over the course of the trial run, as we sample different possibilities and variations. If you would like to see any tweaks or amendments or even any additions sampled during the trial run, please make a note of them on the talk page, and we will attempt to work them into the itinerary. This trial is scheduled to conclude on July 1, 2010, after which the entire process will be taken to the Consensus track for either approval or rejection. For further reading, please consult the original Senate Hall thread suggesting this initiative.'''

'''NEW RULE: All nominations will now require at least 1 (one) GC vote before passing. See the pertinent section of the rules for details. This will be in effect until the end of the trial.'''

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles. (Will not be created until trial period is over.)

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "Gray Cadre," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, the heads of the prominent WookieeProjects, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. (Note: This is not applicable during the trial period.) Members of the Gray Cadre will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for In-Universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good Article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add at the top of the article you are nominating. (This will not be done during the trial period.)
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only Gray Cadre votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the Gray Cadre support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and by tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. (This will not be done during the trial period.) When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one Gray Cadre member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two Gray Cadre votes.
 * 6) *Additionally, members of the Gray Cadre can bypass the nomination process. Not including the writer of the article, two Gray Cadre members can sign off on an article's talk page in unison, and those articles will also be instantaneously promoted. This action can only be initiated by someone on the approved Gray Cadre list, and is performed internally. Regular users must go through the nomination process. (This will not be done during the trial period.)
 * 7) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. During the trial period, however, all nominations will be archived on this subpage, and will be divided up into successful and unsuccessful nominations. If the process proves successful, these will retroactively be granted true Comprehensive article status, and the nominations will be more properly archived. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two GC votes, and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by Gray Cadre members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Vossk

 * Nominated by: Tm T 19:59, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Not much of my contribution but had this in mind already...

(0 GCs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) --Skippy Farlstendoiro 16:51, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 18:44, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) It needs to be sourced, and if there's any info from Insider that needs to be added too. I'd say it could expanded a little bit overall too, in terms of context at least. And the BtS needs improvement. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:08, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Better now? --Tm T 14:16, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Can you really source the BtS? If not, then it must go. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 20:26, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) *Totally rewritten --Tm T 14:16, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Could you add some quotes to the article? --Jinzler 14:01, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) *Will try obtain something useful, but cannot promise. --Tm T 17:45, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) Currently you have the entire first sentence sourced to the Insider article, but that article contains only the fact that he was a Guild leader and nothing else. Please correct this so that the first part of the sentence is properly sourced. &mdash; Master Jonathan  New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 16:58, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) *Tried to fix that first sentence, also I'm now unsure if that source identifies him as trandoshan, should that be fixed aswell? --Tm T 17:45, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) The Insider article does not identify his species, so please remove that ref. Additionally, you only need one ref on each line in the infobox anyway, even if multiple sources give the information, so pick one ref on each of the bottom two lines and kill the other one. &mdash; Master Jonathan  New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 17:52, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) I think the term Smuggler's Moon needs to be linked more clearly to Nar Shaddaa. Less Star Wars savvy readers may not immediately connect the two together, and it could cause confusion. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 04:06, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Pollux Hax

 * Nominated by:  Lele Mj New_Jedi Order.svg ( Holoprojetor ) 14:03, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: None

(0 GCs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Jinzler
 * 2) *The article needs to be sourced, in accordance with Sourcing
 * 3) *You should add a quote, anything suitable from the Coruscant chapter of The Illustrated Star Wars Universe will do
 * 4) *Are you sure that it is appropriate to put him in the Near-Humans category? As far as I am aware, he species is completely unknown, he may be Human or he may not be Near-Human, so unless you know of a source that explicitly calls him a Near-Human, you should remove this
 * 5) *You could perhaps mention in the "Behind the scenes" section the author of The Illustrated Star Wars Universe, and the year in which it was published
 * 6) *TISWU says that Hax served as the Emperor's propaganda chief for several years, you should mention this in the article
 * 7) *You should add a "Personality and traits" section to the article and add a brief description of his appearance, per his picture in TISWU
 * 8) *You possible also mention in a P&T that Hollux was pro-Imperial, supported the Empire, etc
 * 9) *In his Coruscant article, Hax mentions that it is unknown what planet the ch'hala tree comes from. This sort of conflicts a bit with a number of sources in the Living Force campaign, where it is well-known that the ch'hala is from the planet Cularin. You may want to consider something about this to the "Behind the scenes" section
 * 10) *Generally, you need to do more work on the article. I hope this list isn't too daunting, so if you need any help with anything, feel free to ask me or any other users --Jinzler 17:45, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) The article should also note who illustrated him. Is his portrait concept art or was it an original work by McQuarrie for TISWU? ~ SavageBob 20:41, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Barrckli

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 11:42, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A B species

(0 GCs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Farl: Individual article for the individual? --Skippy Farlstendoiro 12:03, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) The OS doesn't specify whether Barrckli refers to a species or some other organization. Can you reframe it to make them an undefined social group? ~ SavageBob 19:44, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

SE-14 blaster pistol

 * Nominated by: --KievanMereel 18:32, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A commonly-used sidearm in many video games.

(0 GCs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 1) Consider reading the rules first. -- 1358  (Talk) 17:54, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Rule 8 and 9, the article must be properly sourced, and all sources should be checked prior to nomination. The article fails to do both; please familiarize yourself with the rules above.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:57, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

SE-14r light repeating blaster

 * Nominated by: --KievanMereel 18:32, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Stormtrooper pistol.

(0 GCs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 1) Consider reading the rules first. -- 1358  (Talk) 17:54, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Rule 8 and 9, the article must be properly sourced, and all sources should be checked prior to nomination. The article fails to do both; please familiarize yourself with the rules above.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:57, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

SE-14C blaster pistol

 * Nominated by: --KievanMereel 18:32, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Dr. Evazan's blaster.

(0 GCs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 1) Consider reading the rules first. -- 1358  (Talk) 17:55, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Rule 8 and 9, the article must be properly sourced, and all sources should be checked prior to nomination. The article fails to do both; please familiarize yourself with the rules above.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:57, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Corragut

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 00:56, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A C species

(0 GCs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:31, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) ~ SavageBob 20:13, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Courataine

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 00:56, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A C species

(0 GCs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:31, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) ~ SavageBob 20:12, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Cuvacian

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 00:56, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A C species

(0 GCs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:31, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) ~ SavageBob 20:10, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Dabi

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 00:56, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A D species

(0 GCs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:31, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Yabi dabi doo. ~ SavageBob 20:08, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ronnie the Rocketpack Rodent

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 02:49, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Whee!

(1 GCs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 13:11, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 13:34, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:31, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 05:04, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Dulin

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 00:18, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Hey! It's not a species. Rather a city... or a planet? No, a city...

(0 GCs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:31, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Mandalore City

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:03, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Refer to my GAN comment

(0 GCs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 00:15, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) The final BtS paragraph is not self-sourcing. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 09:49, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Greenputt Governing Council

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 02:33, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Ready for some greenputt?

(0 GCs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 04:24, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Note that on this one, as well as the next five, I've chosen to hide all headers in the infobox, as it looks rather stupid IMO to have only one piece of info and have it under the heading "Other information". &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 02:33, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Professional Greenputt Tour

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 02:33, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Your basic greenputt tour.

(0 GCs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 04:24, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) For this, and all the other tours, you should put the governing council in the affiliation field. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 00:16, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 00:23, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Female Professional Greenputt Tour

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 02:33, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Still the basics.

(0 GCs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) I don't think that sentence about presumably female league is necessary. Presumably is to be avoided whenever possible; I'm sure the reader doesn't need that to written down to draw that conclusion anyway. If you were to do this, you'd also have to say it was likely for professionals too. This goes for the other noms as well. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 04:24, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Asexual Professional Greenputt Tour

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg (Jedi Council Chambers ) 02:33, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I guess this one makes sense from an IU POV.

(0 GCs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Non-Limbed Professional Greenputt Tour

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 02:33, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: How the heck do you swing a club with no limbs?!?

(0 GCs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Not-Dead-Yet Professional Greenputt Tour

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 02:33, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: &hellip;the hell? I guess this is the senior tour.

(1 GCs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 05:06, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 13:19, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Yes, the Non-Sentient Professional Greenputt Tour is coming. It'll be up here as soon as Skippy verifies a source for me. &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 02:33, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Non-Sentient Professional Greenputt Tour

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 16:41, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Last greenputt nom for now. I may do greenputt itself later if I can track down a copy of Planet of Twilight. Much thanks to for helping with sourcing on this one.

(0 GCs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Menkooro whiskey

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 04:22, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Heh.

(1 GCs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hah. Interesting choice. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 08:09, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Xicer9 atgar.svg( Combadge) 23:45, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) I had no idea there was a food infobox. By the way, this inspired me to do Domaine de la Maison sur le Lac, so thanks. And I'm thanking the alcohol, not the author. Kidding. Kind of.  Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 00:18, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Imperialles 13:17, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * If there's a better infobox than the device one, let me know. Menkooroo 04:22, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * The food infobox, mayhaps? :P Thefourdotelipsis 04:42, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * I am dumb. Fixed. ^^ Menkooroo 05:18, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

Wookiee Trade Guild

 * Nominated by:&mdash; priceline negotiator [[Image:Priceline.JPG|20px]] 22:00, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: 231 words. I think I can get this to GA with a little more content.

(0 GCs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) *Very good, I'm just not sure that "dismayed" is the right choice of words for the Federation's reaction? Is that how it comes across in Battlefront? I can't remember. Thefourdotelipsis 02:04, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) **It was more of just aggravation that an inferior company was not paying their tax. I changed it to aggravation.&mdash; priceline negotiator [[Image:Priceline.JPG|20px]] 02:08, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Fett
 * 4) *Are you certain that you've checked all sources, post-2004? I.e, CSWE, Battlefront's Prima guide? They may have a mentioning somewhere.
 * 5) *Where did this "28 BBY" originate? You keep changing from "In 28 BBY" to "Around 28 BBY."
 * 6) **I changed it to be specific to 28 BBY.&mdash; priceline negotiator [[Image:Priceline.JPG|20px]] 03:17, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) *In the history, start the section with what the Wookiee Trade Guild was, then go into the whole Taxing.
 * 8) **Done.&mdash; priceline negotiator [[Image:Priceline.JPG|20px]] 03:17, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) *"The Guild resisted the taxation, much to the aggravation of the Federation," Why did the guild resist to it?
 * 10) **Battlefront doesn't clarify.&mdash; priceline negotiator [[Image:Priceline.JPG|20px]] 03:17, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) *You mention the Guild built an army to fight against the Trade Federation's army. Did they create their army as a result to fight the droids? Please clarify.
 * 12) **Battlefront doesn't clarify. The Guild just has an army.&mdash; priceline negotiator [[Image:Priceline.JPG|20px]] 03:17, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 13) *"[...]began between the Guild's army and the Federation's droid forces, under the leadership of Count Dooku" So Dooku led both armies?
 * 14) **Fixed.&mdash; priceline negotiator [[Image:Priceline.JPG|20px]] 03:17, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 15) *The ending of the history is very rough, as you vaguely say "the battle ended because the droids beat the Wookiees." Could you somehow expand the Guild's and their army's role within the battle?
 * 16) **In Battlefront, the battle changes everytime, and especially in the first one, there aren't any set objectives or anything, so there's no set story to the battle. I can't really specify the Guild's role in the abttle other than they were defeated.&mdash; priceline negotiator [[Image:Priceline.JPG|20px]] 03:17, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 17) *More to come.  JangFett  (Talk) 03:00, June 17, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * According to this question and Leland Chee's reply further down the page, the storyline of Star Wars: Battlefront is only S-canon, but the "locations, characters, and technology" are C-canon. That means this article either needs to be tagged with Ambig, or it needs Ambigstart and Ambigend in appropriate locations. I am of the opinion that nothing here falls into C-canon as described by Mr. Chee and that the article should simply be tagged Ambig, but I've never dealt with any ambiguous source before, much less a combination S- and C-canon source like Battlefront. Could someone more knowledgeable about this type of thing chime in? &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 23:34, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * IIRC, if it contradicts C- or G- canon in any way, we need to tag it, but if it jives just fine, there's no need for a tag. Thefourdotelipsis 00:11, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * That's not how I understand S-canon. My understanding is that if S-canon "contradicts C- or G- canon in any way", then it becomes non-canon. It's when both there is no contradiction with higher canon and it is not referenced in a higher canon source (both of which I believe are the case here) that it's ambiguous and needs to be tagged as such. At least, that's how I understood it after spending an hour reading through the Holocron questions thread on SW.com to find the one post that I linked above. Did I completely misunderstand something here? &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 00:17, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not really sure about it, so I'm going to keep the tag off. It doesn't contradict anything right now.&mdash; priceline negotiator [[Image:Priceline.JPG|20px]] 01:34, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * This is rather infamously a point of contention&mdash;the only problem I have with adding the ambig tag is that the wording doesn't quite apply to what S-canon is, and the tag, as far as I'm aware, is only used on content from the "ambiguous RPG magazines." Of course, while pretty much everything from Marvel has been referenced elsewhere by now, I can't recall that we ever put any templates on the isolated Marvel content. This falls into much the same category. Perhaps we should have an S-canon tag or something. But as far as I understood S-canon, being "secondary," it's canon until proven otherwise. Thefourdotelipsis 01:56, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, Star Wars Tales 1–20 are considered S-canon until referenced or contradicted, and we tag them as ambiguous. It seems to me that for the sake of consistency, we should do the same here. &mdash; Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 02:04, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, like Thefourdotelipsis says, we should create a template specifically for S-canon sources that have not been contradicted.&mdash; priceline negotiator [[Image:Priceline.JPG|20px]] 02:06, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * The ambiguous template is fine. ambig  JangFett  (Talk) 05:25, June 17, 2010 (UTC)