User talk:Jedi Wolf

Jedi Wolf, welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * Internal pages:
 * Senate Hall
 * Wookieepedia FAQ
 * Manual of Style
 * Online sources
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * What Wookieepedia is not
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~. Four tildes produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash; MyNz 21:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, I'm happy to join.

Talk Pages
Please do not edit comments on Talk Pages in the way you did with Talk:Sith fighter. It just makes the History of the page confusing. If you have a comment of your own, then you're welcome to add it of course. Charlii

Mrisst
Where does the Corporate Alliance affiliation for Mrisst come from? I noticed you added this affilation, but no additional sources. Could you please explain this? Thanks. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:11, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Same question about Abonshee, actually. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Fakir Sector is controlled by the Corporate Alliance and those planets are in that very sector.
 * I see. It's a little bit more speculative that I might like, though....but if there's a source explaining the Corp. Alliance controlled that entire sector with no exceptions, I guess it's OK.&mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:20, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, would you mind adding that source to Fakir Sector? It only has pre-prequel sources. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Succession boxes.
Please stop messing around with succession boxes. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 22:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Unsourced additions.
Please stop adding unsourced additions to articles. I noticed that you keep putting in speculation in government infoboxes. Unless you have a source for your addition, don't add it in. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 22:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Again, do not add things in to articles without a source to back up your claim. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:00, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Beyond Form VII

 * Check Hero's Guide Web Enhancement and you will see neither Sokan, Shien nor Niman (Jar'Kai) had a "number". There is only seven classic forms, from Shii-Cho to Juyo / Vaapad, beyond Form VII all other lightsaber combat forms simply has a name, but not a number. Darth Kevinmhk 02:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

So why was Shien considered to be form IX ?

Star Destroyer articles.
Stop making your edits to the Star Destroyer articles. Your edits are incorrect. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 19:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Ranks
Can you please stop adding ranks to character information. You keep adding things like "General Revan" or whatnot, and tbh no-one knows his true rank. So please desist from adding these. Thanks. Jasca Ducato 20:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Aggressor-class destroyer
Concept art on the Forces of Corruption website says that the Aggressor-class destroyer was created by Tyber Zann using a modified version of plans found in the wreckage of the Death Star. Please stop adding to the article that it is a Mandalorian design. The concept art in question can be seen by going here, then Gallery, then Concept Art. You'll need to use Windows Magnifier or some other similar program to be able to read the writing properly. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 17:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * If it was built by Tyber Zann, then why is it on the list of Mandalorian spaceships. Jedi Wolf 1:12, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Merges
You know, Jedi Wolf, merges are only for articles that are about the same thing that were created independent of each other. You can't just make the article and put it up with only the merge template. -- SFH 01:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)