User talk:Jack Nebulax

Archived talk: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7

Template Speedy Delete?
Umm...that's because I don't want to have to do the following:

Dreadnaught-class heavy cruiser

Do you see?

It's very irritating to do over and over again, and also how does it hurt?

Cheers,

 Relentless Recusant  20:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Copy-paste helps you there very much. Trust me on that, I do a lot of such.- TopAce 21:00, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah I know, but it is still extremely annoying. How does it hurt, I ask you? Oh, and also, I think it'd be better for Wookieepedia in general for you to respond to me, because there are a handful of article that'd I've written with redlinks to now-nonexistent templates...!!! Cheers,  Relentless Recusant [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] 23:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)


 * RelentlessRecusant, Wookieepedia isn't about finding easier ways to type things. Those template were completely unnecessary, and you made them because you were too lazy to type out the whole thing. As for the redlinks now, it's not my fault. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Dear sir,


 * The way that I see it is that it helps me tremendously, yet does no harm. I have no wish to offend you or start an edit war over the templates. I have a user, Ulgak or something, who agrees that it's more handy and that it could "help clean up the source code of some pages".


 * Hey, see you later!


 * Cheers,


 *  Relentless Recusant [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] 00:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * RelentlessRecusant, Uglek is a fairly new user, and he doesn't represent all of Wookieepedia. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:15, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 *  Fleet Admiral, I recommend you try and look at things from his point of view. I'm not saying he's right (I really have no idea what he's talking about) but at least give him a chance. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:34, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * There was no point for those templates, though. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:33, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't know, don't want to know. I'm more interested in Talk:Imperial I-class Star Destroyer. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * First of all Nebby its UGLUK, second, i know i dont represent anybody but myself, a concept lost on some people who have been around for awhile. thirdly, they are usefull because they do the opposite of your sig, it cleans up some of the source code for the website. Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks 14:09, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * They are not useful. They were just a stupid excuse for people who were too lazy to type the whole thing out. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:53, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Knock it off, Ugluk. You were just originally mad at me for saying that there was a glare on that image of C-3PO, and now you've turned it into a personal vendetta against me. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * that was resolved. i am sick of you and your thinking that you are all mighty.  knock that off. Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks 15:03, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I do not think like that. I know that I am not greater than anyone else here, minus the vandals. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hey, Nebulax...we can resolve this peacefully, right? There's nothing that harms Wookieepedia about my templates. I mean...that's just like asking "Why do they have articles on Wookieepedia?" The answer: "People are too lazy to look up the books for how many proton torps are on an X-wing." By your logic, Wookieepedia itself should be deleted.

Let's not turn this into fight, alright? We both know that both you and Ugluk are productive members of the Wookieepedia society.

Cheers,  Relentless Recusant  15:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * RelentlessRecusant, those templates serve no purpose. If we were to keep making them, Wookieepedia would be filled with unnecessary templates. And no, by my logic, Wookieepedia should not be deleted. Wookieepedia is helpful to those wishing to learn more about Star Wars. Those templates aren't. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:18, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * And, also, if they'd like to ban me, inform them that they're free to do so. I think that my editing on Wookieepedia only benefits the world, and that if they don't want someone to help them write articles on fleet vehicles, sure. I'll roll out the welcome carpet for that.


 * It's in your hands how you want to handle this, Nebulax.


 * Cheers,  Relentless Recusant [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] 15:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Next time, please reply on my talkpage. It's more convenient. Thanks! Cheers,  Relentless Recusant [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] 15:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The only people I like to see banned are vandals. I do not wish to see you banned. However, Wookieepedia has a policy. Those templates were and are going to be deleted. If you continue to create them, you may get banned for that. It's in the administrators' hands, not mine. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Next time, please reply on my talkpage. It's more convenient. Thanks! Cheers, ''' Relentless 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7

Trade Federation assimlation
Hey, what do i need to if i'd like my question answered? (Trade Federation Talk) My apologies if I have done something inappropriate, but I thought it was fairly simple question and that people might have been happy to answer or discuss rather than apparently go out of their way to be difficult about it. many thanks. --Merbabu 14:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * My apologies; I thought you were trying to talk about something else. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Your Admiralness
I was hoping you would go over to this article and vote on merging it.  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 19:59, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank ye.  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 22:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

AT-TE
before this becomes another fight, why dont you come in the IRC so we can end it right now.  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 23:10, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No, because it should be discussed where it belongs. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 23:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * And stop saying that I started this "war". I started a discussion to find out why it was called a long-legged variant, and you flip out saying that it is without a source to back up your claim. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It is interesting that you bring up sources when you dont have one either. in that picture the lets are longer.  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 20:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I was the one asking for a source, Ugluk. I didn't need to have one. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * But you dont have a source to back up what you say either.  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 22:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You still don't get it, do you? I asked why it was called a long-legged variant. I don't need a source to back up that. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you dense? you need a source to prove that there cant be a "long legged variant".  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 22:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Shut up, Ugluk. I asked why it was called a long-legged AT-TE. I didn't say there couldn't be one. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:55, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * "How is the AT-TE in the fifth picture a "long-legged AT-TE"? It looks normal to me." and "Actually, no. If you look closer at the image, the legs are just extended a bit more than normal." and my personal favorite "No, it doesn't. Those are the same legs that the AT-TEs at Geonosis had. Notice how the AT-TE's legs are bent. They were simply extended in that picture. " so lets grow up here nebs.  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 22:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * And let's look at this: "BECAUSE THEY'RE LONGER!" And this: "No its a typical Nebulaxian war starter and i have had enough, just admit that you may be wrong for a change." Now who needs to grow up? And now, I'm ending this discussion. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:59, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * And again i am soooo sorry for not bowing to the wishes of the almighty Jacky-boy Nebs.  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 23:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Ugluk, knock it off. Stop acting so immature. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 23:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Come on you two, it'l be the same as last time, just leave it until tommorow and start afresh. Theres no need for this Jedi Dude 23:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Now, I am ending this topic for good. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 23:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey, it's the Admiral!
Hey, Admiral! Erl here, long time no. . . type? Yeah! Anyway, just an FYI. Rover and Medusas are actually canon, in the Tales From The Mos Eisley Cantina anthology, the Dr. Evazan story. Wanted to let you know cause you did that bang-up job catching it right away. Replaced the Fanon tags with Cleanup (God, why don't people see that commas don't come between a subject and verb?) Thanks!--The Erl
 * Ah, thanks. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

About Leaving
I really hope you don't leave. Not only are you an excellent contributor, but I also count you as a friend (even if we don't always agree). -  Angel Blue  (Holonet) 00:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Tell that to Ugluk... Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:12, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't let one persons views let you leave Jack, your a real prescene here and it would be a real shame for you to leave Jedi Dude 13:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think you should leave either, Jack. You're a big contributor and it wouldn't be the same without you. Plus you'd never get to be Executor Nebulax! Green Tentacle (Talk) 14:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Leaving is the coward's way out. Yeah, I went on vacation, but that was productive. As for some of the more antagonistic users around here, sooner or later their reprehensible, dithering arguments and combativeness will catch up with them. Anyone can cut and run- it takes a true hero to stand his ground. All the same, I hope you stay and continue to improve your way with other people- even annoying ones. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Very sad hearing that you are leaving. Jack, you have been one of our best contributors to Wookieepedia though most other people don't realize it. I understand what you were facing and how much those vandals afflicted you. If you join another Wiki, I hope you enjoy your self there and do well. I will miss you. MyNz 18:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Ugluk, get off of my talk page. I'm tired of you always starting fights. And I've decided not to leave, because that would obviously make Ugluk happy. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Grow the hell up jack, what are you five?  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 20:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Ugluk just have some respect and leave Jack's page as he's requested its the polite thing to do. Jedi Dude 20:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I intend to leave this page, but before i do, Jack you need to get this idea out of your head that I started our little quasi war, it was all you and your superiority complex. i will be gone for the next month and a half, hopefully you can grow up in that time.  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 20:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Leave my talk page alone. If you keep all this stuff up, I'll definitely inform the administrators. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * We're watching. ;) By the way, no blanking of talk pages. --Imp 20:43, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * But it's nonsense. Administrators remove nonsense from talk pages before, so why can't I? Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not nonsense, It's a heated argument. You can't just remove the parts of a discussion that upset you. =) --Imp 20:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately. Plus, it could be evidence in the future. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Quotes within articles
The point of not having links in quotes is as follows: "Redundant internal links should not be added to quotes because they serve little purpose beyond making the quotes appear cluttered and messy. Links should only be added to quotes if they contain that article's ONLY mention of that particular concept, but even then, it is be better to integrate the internal link into the body of the article's text. Piped links should be avoided as much as possible. If the context of the quote is not readily apparent, it is best to add appropriate information to the quote attribution field of the quote template rather than adding piped links to ambiguous pronouns such as "you", "he", or "they"."

- Manual of Style --Imp 21:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I still think it's a stupid rule. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

CIS
I was just wondering about the section I added (CIS effects on the galaxy) and you removed. Personally I thought it fit but heck, that's just my opinion. The reason I added it is because I thought it needed something about the psychological effects on the galaxy. The Revenge of the Sith novel makes that clear. If you can just give me a good explanation of why it was deleted, I'll be fine with that. I'm just curious. Chack Jadson 14:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Technically, everything has an effect on the Galaxy one way or another. This can be explained in the "History" section, but not a separate section. I guess it's my fault not to put some of the information in the "History" section. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright. That's okay then I guess. I was just wondering. Chack Jadson 17:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry about not explaining before. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:04, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

New essential guide
Do you have the New essential guide to characters? If you do can you scan the picture of Zuckuss from it? I fail to have it and it would greatly please his article. I'm asking who I can. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit )  00:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC) It's ok, if you can scan, scan, I can flip it. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit )  00:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I can't scan a picture to save my life. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Nevermind.... -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 00:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't know where my copy is anyway. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

140 is the new 80
Hi Admiral, long time no see. Congrats on your "promotion", I guess 140 is the new 80 now that you're a Grand Admiral. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) 00:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm trying to live a long life. What else can I say? ;) Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That's good to hear. I guess I would have to call you Grand Admiral from now on. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg|25px]] 01:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You don't have to, of course. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That's good. Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg|25px]] 01:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Why remove names?
Why did you remove the name list on the Eclipse article? We always have those for the named vessels in a class. VT-16 07:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Because the Eclipse-class Star Dreadnoughts category makes such a list unnecessary. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:07, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Ataru?

 * Aren't a little old for leaping around? Also, it usually requires Force-sensitivity to use lightsaber forms, especially Ataru. If you didn't post that comment on the Saberbox subpage, I'll remove it. I was just curious, especially since I didn't see the box on your page. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, no one said Ataru was limited to Force users... Basically, my character can handle a lightsaber and perform some Ataru techniques. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 18:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * True, although non-Force users were more likely to hurt themselves if they weren't careful . . . not always true though. Although at 140 for a human- even for a Jedi- it'd be hard to use Ataru. Do you need a walker Admiral? How about a cane? :-P Kidding. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 22:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No, I didn't use it at 140... More like my 30's. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 22:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That makes sense. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Bystander Comment
(Respose to commment on Silly Dans talk)Ugluk made the decision to "leave" (he'll be back next week) all by himself. Don't take matters like this personally. Complicates things and prevents you from doing what you're supposed to do. I know I have nothing to do with this but just thought you should have outside input. -- Redemption Talk 23:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * So Ugluk is, once again, going to return even though he said he wouldn't. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yep. Dramatic "leaves" most of the time go that way. Had he left in peace, then I may buy that he is finished for good but clearly he didn't. -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 00:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hopefully I'll be able to reconcile with him when/if he returns. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps. But even if you don't, I wouldn't dwell nor focus my full attention to that. You're job isn't to be Mr. Friend. It's to make this Wiki bigger and more accurate. -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 00:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 *  However, RFAs tend to go much better when one is not involved in fights, edit wars and arguments. No comment on Ugluk. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Not that Ugluk would vote for me if I had a RFA. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No, but I might. Other users might look at your past history when they decide whether to vote or not. Ugluk is a totally different kettle of fish. Mmm, I'm getting hungry. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, it's probably still a long time until I can get another shot at it. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I have been monitoring this for the past several days, Jack. I don't know what started it; that's for you to tell me, but only if you want to. But I took great care to point out to Ugluk and others, whenever possible, that you've been nothing but a good friend to me, even when we weren't on the same page, and that you could be so to him also, and that neither of you were destined to dislike each other. In fact, it's obvious you don't dislike him at all, and that what happened really affected you. I also extended the same complement to him, since Ugluk's been perfectly nice to me too - and I still think he's a good guy - and I offered to help build a bridge or two. Obviously, he refused.

Let me give you some advice, Jack. Be responsible for how you behave, not how anyone else behaves. Look back on your dealings with Ugluk. Do you really think you laid into him undeservedly? Did you really do anything with the intent to force him out? Or do you feel you were acting in the best interests of the Wookieepedia, as you always do with me? Did you act any different with him than you did with me? And if not, then why didn't I react the same way he did? Did you act this way toward anyone else, and did they react as he did? Look at how he thinks about you, then measure that against what you did, and ask yourself, honestly: do you really think that's who you are?

If you don't think that's who you are, if you don't think you acted any different than you would with me or anyone else, then the conclusion is obvious: it's him that's acted differently. It should be pointed out that, according to him, there are a serious set of bad events in his past, certainly tragic ones, which says he's got a bucket of anger. You didn't put that there. He's also of high-school age, which means that his ability to keep emotions in check is far less than it would be for, say, someone in his 30s like myself. The impetus of his argument is this: he came here to escape his own demons for a while, and you somehow - I'm sure unintentionally - spoiled his fun. Maybe you edited his work one time too many, maybe it was something else. Again, I don't know, you would have to tell me. But the way he reacts is his doing, not yours.

And I might point out that the Wookieepedia is not here for people to run away from something. We're scholars of a sort, though I admit that our subject is a completely fictitious universe created by a chunky ex-racing enthusiast with a fetish for plaid. In that sense, it's escapism for all of us, even those of us for whom life is quite good, but considering how many people buy Star Wars products, I don't think that's anything to be ashamed of. But whatever the nature of this work, we take it seriously, and it's not for those lacking a thick skin, a sharp mind, and plenty of material to bring to the table. Now, is Ugluk of that sort? I don't know. I presume not. But if he reacted this way, indicating a wish to "take his ball and go home," so to speak, then he seems to have brought something contributors here don't need: rage. But did you put that in him? I'm pretty sure you didn't. And you are, too, aren't you?

Keep being just who you are, Jack. If you change your core beliefs because of what others think about them, then what value do they really have to you? What value do you think others will give to them if they can be so easily cast off because of someone else? Western civilization is in the shape it's in because too many people back away from their values in the face of challenge from people who wouldn't understand those values anyway. Don't be one of those, Jack. Keep being who you are, and keep doing what you do here. Keep on promoting yourself to ridiculous new naval ranks, too, if that's what you want. Wherever Ugluk has gone, I wish him well, and I'm sure you do too. But, as Dennis Miller once said, "You can't save everyone, folks. Just try not to be living next door to them when they go off."

I hope that helped, Jack. God bless you. Erik Pflueger  05:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * In the end, I know I didn't make anyone leave&mdash;I don't even think I offered them a choice. Nonetheless, I don't care about Ugluk. I'm doing my job. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That's the spirit! Erik Pflueger [[Image:Galactic_Republic.JPG|20px]] 13:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Revert of Columns
You say they "aren't doing anything" - well, maybe but they work perfectly well on my machine. (I do know that on wikipedia they don't show up on my work PC but they work fine on my home PC). The info appears in two columns - clear as day for me. --Merbabu 11:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Not for me. What browser do you use? Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * lol - it happens. Firefox mostly. I will try now with Explorer. I could even put three in maybe. What size screen you got? Res? I am on 19-inch widescreen, 1440 x 900. --Merbabu 11:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 1152 x 864, though I think the browser is the problem. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:22, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, i get it in Firefox, but not in IE when i tried it. Ditch the IE, my friend. ;-) What do you think - put it back for Firefox? One only sees the code in the edit box anyway. --Merbabu 12:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know. If it doesn't produce an effect on IE, there's no reason to put it in for others. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, if it doesn't produce any effect when using IE, why not keep it in there for Firefox users? Also, get Firefox. --Imp 19:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * What if I don't want to get Firefox? Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Then I'm afraid you'll be columnless. Anyway, the fact that IE sucks should be no reason to remove the columns. --Imp 19:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * So Internet Explorer shouldn't be considered in things like that? Who made up that stupid rule? Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with Jack. The majority of people online use Internet Explorer. If it doesn't work with IE, it should either be fixed or not included. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 19:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Err... let me put it this way: If the code does nothing on IE, then surely it doesn't harm IE users. Including the code, however, means people who use other browsers get a cleaner view of the list. --Imp 20:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Then fix the coding! In addition, those lists don't even seem long enough to deserve columns. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:01, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You fix it, I don't use IE, and I don't know HTML. :P --Imp 20:02, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know HTML either. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * IE users don't actually see anything, unless they go to EDIT they don't see the code. What's the difference to them? Why spoil if for non-IE users if there is no difference anyway? On the other point, fixing the code for IE users is a good idea (if it is actually possible), but i personally haven't got a clue how to do it. I just copied it from code in wikipedia. And once again, should it stop non-IE users benefitting from it? I also take your point on lists needing to be long enough. The Trade Federation article is a funny in that there a lot of small to medium lists forming a very long list. Together it looks better. It works much better when the lists are quite long (some lists in wookiepedia are ridiculously long - but not wide - and could really benefit) But given the possibility that it is a coding issue, i am reluctant to put non-IE complaint coding in other articles. I will investigate re code - and come back to it. --Merbabu 13:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Uh, can we keep this off my talk page? Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 19:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Funny Fanfics

 * Grand Admiral, I was reading Jaina Solo's fanfic and apparently we are supposed to face off- how funny. I haven't played with mine since that whole T&R mess, so I guess I'm behind. Any ideas? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * "That's where my other browser window is focused right now. As for the standoff, I have an idea, but it HAS to be approved by Admiral Jack. Okay- I have a fleet- fairly sizable- with firepower of about 1 Mediator cruiser, 8 ImpStars, 12 BACs, and about 60 smaller ships- and I can sneak around invisibly. I suggest that I appear on his bridge and basically offer a trade to Nebulax- my son is holding his wife hostage because he can sneak around also. If he lets the twins go, she gets released. If not, then it gets messy. Except I'll tell Nebulax that YOU are holding his wife hostage, and you're really hacked off at him. The other part of the deal is that we both part ways in peace and never fight each other again, because if not, my fleet is in position to jump in over his home planet and orbital bombard it as well. Classic carrot and stick."

- Atarumaster88 --This is what Ataru's proposing for the events leading up to the "standoff" but according to him I have to get your approval. So what do you say about this Jack? - Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff )  02:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, about my "wife"... Well, I had something planned where she wouldn't be with me (or on Had Abbadon, for that matter). Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 11:10, 12 October 2006 (UTC)


 * So you're going to be like Boba Fett and dump her or kill her? How typically Imperial. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey Nebulax, I always wanted to ask you this question.....How old are youBobafettH23 19:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * You mean me, or Nebulax? And by the way, I'm not going to dump or kill my "wife". Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Just curious. If you have any ideas for how this standoff might be clarified, let me know. Happy editing. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 20:28, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * How about something like you have a very large fleet that I consider to be a threat? We could work out something from that. Maybe I attack your fleet and you board my command ship. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I've listed roughly what I've got to "play" with above and the full list is on my fanfic page. However, I have a massive advantage in starfighters if you look at the types- I use E-wings, B-wings, and a speedy little thing similar to an Eta-2, or the numbers- about 100 squadrons in that fleet, and I've also got Force-sensitives- at least 9 Battle Meditation users. So while it's not that large, it could be dangerous. And every ship/fighter in my fleet has at least one missile or torpedo launcher. I pride myself on having an advantage in technology and the Force. So, I could bring my fleet to rescue the twins- at last revealing my true strength- but I board your command ship in an attempt to avoid a full-scale battle. I think we should agree to part ways- you get to live, Jaina's twins and Zekk get to live, and we leave in respective peace. Or we can have glorious battle. What do you think?