Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights

This page is for requests for user rights.

Voting will last two weeks from the date of nomination, ending at 0:00 UTC of the fourteenth day, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Requests for rollback
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.
 * 4) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted.
 * 5) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for the request to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)

Questions

 * 1) Why should you be granted rollback rights?

Trak Nar (5 admins + 4 users/0/0)
Voting ends Friday, 24 April 2009

Support
 * 1) Upon viewing Trak's recent contributions to the site, I wholeheartedly believe she is more than deserving of the rollback tool. She makes copious amounts of edits, including more than her fair share, more than most users and many admins, of watching the recent changes and reverting baloney. She has also proven herself patient and more than civil with newbies, vandals, trolls, and other bad guys from mythology. Trak is good people. I haven't asked her what her views on candy are, though. Graestan ( Talk ) 04:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) I've heard that her views on candy are SPOILER. She still gets my vote. 05:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  Grunny  ( Talk ) 14:36, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 15:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) With even more examples of her tireless vandalism reverts. &mdash; CC7567 [ http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/thumb/5/5f/Rex.png/20px-Rex.png] (s)talk 17:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) Per Graestan. Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 17:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) She should have earned her candy the first time. jSarek 20:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) Because sometimes Trak's the only one awake to rollback vandalism anyway ^_^ Enochf 21:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * 9) Definitely shown herself to be a diligent RC patroller. - Lord Hydronium 22:03, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments
 * Accepted nomination on IRC. Graestan ( Talk ) 04:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Requests for adminship
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They either are of adult age (18 years or older) or have two years' worth of solid contribution to the site.
 * 4) They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * 5) They have had at least some major article contributions.
 * 6) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 7) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 8) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
 * 9) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * 10) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

Questions
Here are some general adminship questions. They are 100% optional, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them. :)

Requests for bureaucratship
Rules:
 * Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.


 * 1) They are an administrator.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * 3) They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 6) Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month&mdash;from the day the nomination is put forth&mdash;are counted).
 * 7) Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 8) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.