Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/IG-100 MagnaGuard


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

(+5)
Support
 * 1) Nominated. Sourced virtually everything and crammed as much info as possible in there. Unit 8311 16:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Domlith 18:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  00:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 09:41, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Kilson likes PIE The page is good, but I have a feeling that it is missing a few of its appearances. 18:33, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) I agree with Kilson that it seems like some appearances may potentially be missing, but a good article otherwise. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) I've only scanned through it, so I may have more objections at a later date. The known Magna guards needs to be sourced, and in my opinion, should be made into a prosified paragraph, though that's more of a request. Also, there's no references from the databank: if there is additional info there, then it needs to be added. Also has a blank reference and an unsourced image--  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 16:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Sourced that. Most of the info from the databank is already in there and in other sources, so that's not that necessary. De-blankified the reference and sourced the image. Unit 8311 16:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I've punctuated your quotes and images for you. Need to remove sourcing from the introduction, or at least move it into the body instead. Also, after referring to someone by their full name once, only refer to them subsequently by their last names. Ex, a first reference to Obi-Wan Kenobi should only be followed by calling him "Kenobi" from thereon out, not "Obi-Wan." He's not your friend. Toprawa and Ralltiir 09:01, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) *Sorted that above. Unit 8311 18:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) In the sentence, "MagnaGuards were first used in combat during the Battle of Parein II 4...," I myself don't even know who this "Sannen" is. It's best to give some sort of title, ex: "the MagnaGuards killed the bounty hunter Sannen," or whatever he/she is. Also, sort of the same thing should apply even for those more well-known characters. The first mention of Boba Fett a few sentences later should read, "During the Second Battle of Xagobah, the bounty hunter Boba Fett," or something to give him a better introduction. The sentence "Shaak Ti faced off dozens MagnaGuards," is missing a word. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) *Gah, you've good sharp eyes...sorted that. Unit 8311 11:10, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * In reference to my opposing comments, I'm not sure you fully understood what I was saying about only using last names in subsequent mentions. This goes for all subsequent references in the body of the article, as well, not only quotes. I've gone ahead and made the change from "Obi-Wan" to "Kenobi" and "Anakin" to "Skywalker" in several instances myself, so no worries. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)