Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Great Northern Crusade

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:44, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:10, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:18, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Interesting. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:41, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Provided that Menkooroo's objections are taken care of.&mdash;  07:46, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Kill the redlinks! You can for sure kill all of them in the main article, but I am not sure about the template, as a bunch of them are inderect mention only and currently subject to trach compact. If they get deleted, only keep the Pius Dea crusades in that template that are actualy mentioned.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Source info box completely.
 * 5) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:57, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *Overwhelmed by the number of crusades you nommed.... :) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:49, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Exiled Jedi
 * 8) * Is it refered to as the Seventh Pius Dea crusade in the book?
 * 9) **Yep. "Great Northern Crusade (7th)"
 * 10) * You need to mention the infobox's previous and next fields in the body of the article, but since they are in the trash compactor I guess you should wait. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:50, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Sorry, EJ. Had a long night, ending up an hour out of the way when I stopped for a DQ shake and took the wrong highway :P But the 6th and 8th are dead, so that objection should be done.  Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:38, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) ***No worries.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:18, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) War!
 * 14) * Similar objections as above --- as the article on the war itself, it should chronologically go through the battles using details gleaned from the arrows. Infobox should list the battles, too (ditto in the above nom). Menkooroo 01:38, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) **Objection amended to not speculate on battles but to use the arrows for chronology and list the planets as being in the invasion corridor! Menkooroo 00:22, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) **Can we get Pius Dea Era linked somewhere here too?
 * 17) **Not an objection here, but let me know when you add chronological arrow stuff to the crusades that have already been brought to status. Menkooroo 03:48, June 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Metrisse

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:14, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Composed the Études of Time and Space

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:58, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:57, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Battle of Metalorn (Imperial Period)

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:49, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another for Warfare

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Seems a little run-onish, but maybe that's just me. Good job. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:25, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *If so, I should probaly split up Siege of Sy Myrth, as its even more run-onish :) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:28, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:40, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:48, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Rubedo
 * 2) * "It was part of the Sy Myrthian Insurrection, when Imperial forces attempted to drive the remnants of the Condeferate army out of the regions of Sy Myrth and the Kreetan Narrows after the Confederate's defeat during the Clone Wars at the hands of the Galactic Republic, which had become the Empire after the Clone Wars." This is a run-on in the grammatically incorrect sense, an appositive within an appositive. You do have to reword it.
 * 3) **Done. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:37, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Sy Myrth is a planet, not a region like the Narrows, so the context there doesn't work. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:40, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:37, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ***This way, the Narrows now have no context.
 * 7) ****Fixed.
 * 8) * You mention this was after the Battle of Diado in this article, but not in the Diado article. Furthermore, in the Metalorn battle article, you don't mention that was followed by the Siege of Sy Myrth. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:01, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Remedied in both.
 * 10) * "It was part of the Sy Myrthian Insurrection, when Imperial forces attempted to drive the remnants of the Condeferate army out of the regions of Sy Myrth and the Kreetan Narrows after the Confederate's defeat during the Clone Wars at the hands of the Galactic Republic, which had become the Empire after the Clone Wars." While we're talking about the Battle of Diado: grammatically incorrect run-on. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:01, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Fixed.

Comments
 * Just a tip, since I write articles like this frequenntly, you're too married to these phrase positions. I don't like the rewording rule, myself, but so long as it's going to be enforced with votes... Diado, Metalorn, and Sy Myrth are virtually identically constructed. You introduce the battle as between the Empire (Formerly the Republic!) and CIS holdouts, then explain the Sy Myrth Insurrection using virtually the same nested appositive, then say the 12 was involved. Try shifting around the order of those basic pieces at least. How about introducing the battle, then have the next sentence bring in the 12th and Dodonna? This allows for a lead-in, probably within that same sentence, for the Empire that triumphed against the CIS in the Clone Wars as the Republic. Holdouts were at Metalorn, hence the battle was fought. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:01, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * I've reworded Metalorn. I'll have to do that a bit to Siege as well. Thanks for the review. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:03, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Darth Bandon's Jedi Master

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 22:57, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Don't know why I haven't done this sooner&hellip; Let's go, WP:KOTOR!

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support Object Comments
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:36, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 14:47, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:53, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 14:34, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * First of all, lack of BtS.
 * 3) **Darn it, fixed.&mdash; 00:10, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *I'll look it over more later. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:00, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done.&mdash; 00:50, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * You should start the article with "a" instead of "this", and change the context after accordingly. Using "a" is the excepted way for writting conjectrue articles. The bio start should be changed also.
 * 7) **Intro still needs it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:52, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Got it.&mdash; 00:55, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) * You mention the Jedi Civil War in the intro, could you do do in th bio? Just a small mention would do. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:46, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) **Done.&mdash; 00:50, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) * There are four instances of Jedi in the first sentence. Could you change it to less somehow? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:01, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) **I think I got it.&mdash; 01:08, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) * One last thing. The article should be moved to Darth Bandon's Jedi Master, as Master is supposed to be capitalized. Thats it, good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:16, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) **Done. I don't remember the reasons behind why the name was the way it was, but it's moved now.&mdash; 01:20, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

Founder's Day

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:39, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Happy Birthday, Wookieepedia! :D

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:46, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:55, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ' ℬiggestℒeo ' (ℳeeting ℛoom) 19:43, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * WP:ENT! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:04, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Jumerian

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:23, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More than likely a pseudo-mistake we made that became canon. Didn't know they were a species until the CSWE had a one sentence article on them that matched ours from 2006 verbatim but for some procedural tweaks. Fun facts.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:07, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) What would a lamp sing about?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:58, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) An article for the singing lamp would be nice.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:39, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *That's what I get for nomming something the day I wrote it. Missing stuff. :\ The article already existed, actually. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:40, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Great to see another guest nomination from you, Naru! A couple of points: the quote makes clear that the lamp was a wedding gift. Can you add this to the article? Is there any context that can be added from the Essential Atlas' placement of their homeworld or NR membership? Cheers, --Eyrezer (talk) 22:04, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Guest for WP:AS! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:07, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Four Dimensions

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 15:46, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "LEEEEEET THE REBELS. LEEEEEET THE REBELS IN. Let me tell you one thing! (LEEEET THE REBELS) I want you to siiiing along with the "Four Dimensions"! Hey! And open up your heart! AWWWWW! Come on! (REBEEELS!) And let in Rebels. Ev-e-ry Day~! LEEEEEEET THE REBELS. LEEEEEEEEEEET THE REBELS IN. THE REEEEBELS IIIN.~

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:54, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * WP:ENT! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:04, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Bureaucracy Blues

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:32, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A beton-nya mombay m'bwa! Mombay n'bwa~a~aaaa! Bureaucra-cyyy~ B-lues! Togo~ togu! Ya e'um pu-kay~. Mob un~ loo? Hkeek n&mdash;kull-a~uh Pe-rupa! Shooto~ga~wa~. Ashuna ha'mfoo, Gomjam Hun~ee~ya. Go-omjam m&mdash;m'bwa. Ike~e Uti~ni~.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:55, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * WP:ENT! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:03, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Battle of the Gizer system

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:22, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In which a duck is dissected.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Looks good. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:41, June 28, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

BTL-S3B Y-wing starfighter

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:45, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Found this in Warfare, decided to nom

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Did a few minor fixes. Good work. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 14:33, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Annexation of the northern Hutt territories

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:52, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Trasemene got too long for CAN, so Annexation beat him to being nommed

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:17, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * I see the map and why you thought to capitalize "northern," but that is not a proper noun. It was merely the start of the sentence. There is no political area called the "Northern Hutt territories." The Imperials claimed Hutt territories that were in the north. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 07:05, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, moving the page to Annexation of the northern Hutt territories. There, done. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:23, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Judging from the map arrow pointing to it, I would be inclined to say that the annexation was considered part of the Insurrection, so the "post" in the infobox would be unnecesary. However, if the prose says the annexation was "after" the insurrection then that line shoukd be removed from the infobox entirely. It was either part of the conflict or it was not. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 06:15, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Trasemene ended the Insurrection, but the annexation was a direct result of the Insurrection. Would'nt it be okay to leave the "Post-Insurrection" part because it was an important factor? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:57, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, because it was not part of the insurrection itself. It was a big chunk of the aftermath, as in after the conflict had already concluded. That infobox field shoulld not have "pre" or "post" anything. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:51, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Got rid of Post, added Reconquest of the Rim as that was the general conflict. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:59, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * That works. Now the Reconquest of the Rim needs to be explicitly mentioned since that name is canonical. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:33, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:38, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * It was going to be a quick fix, so I did it myself. I ended up changing the article's structuring more thanI wanted too in the process though, how things are introduced. The issue was that both the Insurrection and the annexation were part of the Reconquest. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:17, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for changing it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:21, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified clone trooper (Kaliida Shoals)

 * Nominated by: ' ℬiggestℒeo ' (ℳeeting ℛoom) 22:26, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: TCW

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good work. Looks like it'll remain a CAN. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:09, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  JangFett  (Talk) 00:36, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Could you reword the following: "...and was ordered by Skywalker to make sure Shadow Squadron's ships were ready when Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi called them for support." This is because it is exactly the TheMasterMind's words, and noming something that contains a significant portion of its contact written by another user is frowned upon. The rewording will clear this issue up.
 * 3) **If I might jump in here, that doesn't generally apply when the wording already existed in the article when you started writing it. It's more about copying from separate articles. If that wording existed because the original author copied from another of his/her articles, keeping that would obviously be inappropriate too. What I'm more concerned about is that The MasterMind was wrote that five days ago. Does he know you're putting this up for status? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:37, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***What I meant is Leo added a bit to an article Mastermind essentialy completely wrote. Granted Leo did ref it and context it, leaving the article at 50% Leo and 50% Mind. As I said before, its frowned upon to nom an article someone else wrote. Rewording that bit will take care of that. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:51, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Not if TMM had plans to nom this himself. Taking articles out from under people is a no-no, completely reworded or not. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:02, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *****If TMM has no plans to nom it, and Leo rewords that part, everythings good. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:14, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ******I'll ask him. ' ℬiggestℒeo ' (ℳeeting ℛoom) 22:19, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) *******I've got his permission.
 * 9) ********That part still needs to be reworded. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:47, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) *********Reworded.
 * 11) * Context for Battle of the Kaliida Nebula
 * 12) **Done.
 * 13) * Add his height to the main body.
 * 14) **Done.
 * 15) * Source for around 21 BBY. I believe it is Star Wars Annual 2011. Also, its not around, but in.
 * 16) **Done.
 * 17) * Homeworld of Kamino, and maybe something about being a clone of Jango Fett.
 * 18) **Done.
 * 19) * Mention that he wore white Phase 1 armor.
 * 20) **Done.
 * 21) *Looks good, 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:21, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 22) **Thanks for the review. ' ℬiggestℒeo ' (ℳeeting ℛoom) 23:33, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 23) * The article currently sits at just over 200 words, so a short intro will have to be written. However, I don't think this will take it over 250 words. Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:47, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 24) **It's just below 250 words. ' ℬiggestℒeo ' (ℳeeting ℛoom) 00:06, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 25) Jangeth
 * 26) * Context on Obi-Wan, Kaliida Shoals Medical Center, Anakin, Ahsoka, and Shadow Squadron in the intro
 * 27) **Done.
 * 28) * "served the Grand Army of the Republic in the Galactic Republic." It's pretty redundant to say both the GAR's full name followed by the Galactic Republic. You can say the Galactic Republic's Grand Army or any variation of that.
 * 29) **Done.
 * 30) * You can separate all that information regarding his height and armor into a P&T.
 * 31) **Done.
 * 32) * Context on Kaliida Shoals Medical Center
 * 33) **All you need to say would be "Republic" in front of it to specify its allegiance, because the name pretty much describes its a medical centre in the Kaliida Shoals. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:40, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 34) **Done.
 * 35) *For pipelinking, the "'s" after Shadow Squadron needs to be placed within the double brackets. So it needs to be Shadow Squadron's . Even that "'" in the bts. I already took care of these so please be careful in the future.  JangFett  (Talk) 14:28, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 36) **Okay.
 * 37) * The last sentence of the intro is the same as the last sentence of the bio. "he met with Jedi Knight Anakin Skywalker and Padawan Ahsoka Tano and was ordered by Skywalker to make sure the ships of Shadow Squadron, a Republic starfighter squadron, were ready when Jedi Master Obi-Wan Kenobi called them for support." Please see what you could do to reword either the intro or bio.  JangFett  (Talk) 18:32, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 38) **Done. ' ℬiggestℒeo ' (ℳeeting ℛoom) 19:00, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 39) ***Still remains; basically it needs to be reworded.  JangFett  (Talk) 19:03, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 40) ****Looks like I reworded that by accident as I tried to get it away from the Master mind 's words for my objection above. Done. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:09, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Leo, you might still be able to fit in Jang's objections without making it over 250. However, in the event you can't, I'll archive it so you can send it to GAN. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:40, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) *I think it's below 250. ' ℬiggestℒeo ' (ℳeeting ℛoom) 18:16, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

90,000 BBY

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:32, July 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The closest prior date is 10,000 years away, so no proem section. The nearest later date is more than 30,000 years away, so no direct legacy. And, yes, Star Wars: 1313 will probably retcon there being more than a thousand levels to Coruscant. Currently, "hundreds" is the canonical number. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:32, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Looks good. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:01, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash;  21:27, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Lightsaber Techniques Painting

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:20, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another rescue....

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) I changed "seven" to "eight" in the body as there's actualy eight forms on the poster. Otherwise, looks fine.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:19, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Hah, guess I should pay more attention. Perhaps I should note in the BTS that the cards description says there are seven? Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 12:33, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **That would be good. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:10, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Love it.&mdash;  21:28, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Fighter Study (painting)

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 14:18, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Eight.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:18, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash;  21:29, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Weapon of War

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 14:18, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Nine and final.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) That's a weird starfigter...  501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:19, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash;  21:33, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Serrian salt

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  04:26, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Dex's Diner!

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) But is it kosher? XD&hellip;&mdash;  06:00, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:02, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Pash Cracken's protocol droid

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo (talk) 05:26, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Why is it late? Screw you, that's why!

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Good work.&mdash;  05:57, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:04, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Comments