Wookieepedia:Userbox proposal

This page is for the nomination of new userboxes. For past nominations, see Userbox proposal/History.

Before you create
Before you propose a userbox, read the following:


 * 1) No nonsense or joke templates. What you think may be funny may not be to everyone else, so it's best to just keep it on your userpage.
 * 2) If you are creating a Star Wars themed userbox, try and keep it OOU (i.e. "This user is a fan of Jedi" is good, but "This user is a member of the New Jedi Order" is not).
 * 3) Any offensive/racist/provocative userbox proposals will be deleted on sight, and the user warned. If the user persists, he will be banned.
 * 4) Due to being inflammatory, any religious and political userboxes that are nominated here will be automatically rejected, so don't bother.
 * 5) When nominating a template, keep in mind that the template will be for community use, not just your exclusive use. As a rule of thumb, if you think at least 10 people will use your idea, nominate it. If not, it's best left as code on your userpage.

To use this page:


 * 1) Use the current date as a header, and add the code of the proposed userbox underneath (use the following syntax:  ).
 * 2) Multiple userbox proposals should be presented separately so that the community can vote on each userbox based on its individual merit. Up to three userboxes may be presented for approval under one vote, if and only if, they are closely related in theme or are proposed as alternatives.
 * 3) Add sections underneath for "Support", "Object", and "Comments". Your fellow Wookieepedians will use these sections to support, oppose, or comment on your design.
 * 4) Once a majority has been reached, and two weeks have passed, the userbox will be created as a template for use in the community. If the nomination fails, the template must not be created regardless. If it is, then it will be deleted on sight, and the offender warned.

Support

 * 1)  Riffsyphon  1024 22:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Probably won't pass, but it would be presented as Out of Universe. --  Riffsyphon  1024 22:14, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Like you said, it may not pass, but it certainly should open up some interesting discussions.... Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't want to encourage too much speculation but even though Jacen is getting a different Sith name, who's to say he won't change it. --  Riffsyphon  1024 22:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 20:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) An amazing skill I wish I had.  Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]] 20:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * I assume no one has proposed this before ("mod" does not come up in the History page). Also, if anyone has a better picture, please feel free to change. 20:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * No, no and no. Green Tentacle (Talk) 16:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Negative. 17:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Especially the third one. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 17:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) This user does not support many "This user supports..." userboxes. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 17:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]]13:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Makes it easy to find the Inquisitors. 13:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Since some users already think they're Inquisitors. --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) This is going to happen in about 9 hours unless a whole host of oppose votes show up. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 17:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Assuming someone considers nominating me, wink, wink.... Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Because there's not an actual Inquisitorius yet. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 13:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Judging by the votes the Inquisitorius idea will be going ahead so I created this. (Once there page is Edited the red link will be complete.) Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]] 13:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Can someone clue me in here? I see nothing in the Senate Hall so I'm lost....--Valin Kenobi 05:56, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * See Forum:Featured Article Reform Proposal. Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:30, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you.--Valin Kenobi 13:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) It wouldn't look good if the guy who created this thing didn't support it. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) In most cases, I fall into this category. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 22:43, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Excessive. --  Riffsyphon  1024 23:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Green Tentacle (Talk) 23:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) YES! 23:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) You know me with my anti-zodiac box and a zodiac box. I'll use it without the "excessive" and with my myriad of galactic governments. Hooray irony! Wildyoda 00:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Now I can support this. 15:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) .  .  .  .  21:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) I love the image. Chack Jadson 16:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) You bet, but see comments. - JMAS 22:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 01:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Valin Kenobi 01:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 13)  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 17:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Perhaps it could be reworded as "This user does not support excessive "this user supports..." userboxes" 22:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm willing to make the change if the majority of those supporting it want me to, so sound off if you're interested. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 00:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm using Version II now. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Version II: 23:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I do prefer Version II. I mean, "This user supports..." are good, just not in excess. The original seemed too much like "dislikes all "This user supports..." userboxes." 01:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I think I'm gonna just make Version II the official one to be voted on.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 03:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * How about rewording it to "This user opposes ..." instead of "This user does not support ..."? - JMAS 22:45, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * But therein lies the irony.--Valin Kenobi 01:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 21:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) N ighthawk L  eader    21:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Well, I created a pro-smuggler box, so I'd better back this one.... Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 21:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Look, the way I see it, all these IU support userboxes may be annoying, but if you've already got a bunch, why not make more? -- Darth Phonebook  19:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:17, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This user supports very few "this user supports . . . x" userboxes. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) X Policy. --  Riffsyphon  1024 21:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) *Hah! ;) Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) This user does not support "This user supports..." userboxes :P 23:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Ugh. Wildyoda 00:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Nothing wrong with the idea, but this thing is hideous, and so is Bossk. Cortle Steeze 03:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Valin Kenobi 02:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 01:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Two main problems with this one: the background color's so dark that I couldn't read the text, and, really, what the hell were you thinking making a pro-Bounty Hunter box that not only didn't have a picture of a Fett, but did have a pic of Bossk?  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah I agree. The picture probably should be of a Fett - N ighthawk L eader    02:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah youre probably right that was pretty stupid of me General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 11:36, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I disagree. With Boba, it may be confused with our wonderful Fandalorian/Mand-aid whatsits we have. -BaronGrackle 16:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Confusion I can handle. Using an idiot like Bossk to represent all Bounty Hunters, though, that's kinda tough to swallow.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 23:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Would this alternative one be any better? (or is it worse than the original?) - N ighthawk L eader    03:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, it has a Fett, and I can read the thing, so I like it. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Isn't there dispute over the canonicity of that image? -- Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 03:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure it was Insider art, or maybe a comic cover. But I've seen it before.--Valin Kenobi 01:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 15:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Um, duh? 15:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1)  Riffsyphon  1024 18:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 18:13, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Lord Titze the Dark Wanderer 18:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 21:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Sure, why not?-- Darth Phonebook  00:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 18:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I may have been the one to coin the term, so I suppose I should support.--Valin Kenobi 03:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 22:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) It's not exactly me, but it's a good idea.Grand Moff Rhell 01:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Hyperinclusionism is a uniquely Wookieepedian editing philosophy. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 15:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I assume this means including everything. :) --  Riffsyphon  1024 18:12, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Same here. If it's mentioned, even as a joke (Nostril of Palpatine), it's got an article! 19:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Could someone tell me the difference between the standard inclusionist and a hyperinclusionist? See, I would consider having "Nostril of Palpatine" as inclusionist, whereas I would regard not including it as either mergist or deletionist, depending on whether you want it somewhere or not. Will there be templates for hypermergist or hyperdeletionist, as well? -BaronGrackle 13:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Inclusionist: If it has sources and is mentioned, it's in. Hyperinclusionist: If you see a tiny sliver of an unknown ship, the hair of some character, or overhear a trivial conversation, it's in. I'm pretty sure that's what Culator means. As for the hypermergist and hyperdeletionist, I'm sure they could be made. I'm not sure how to implement those, though. 17:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * JustinGann would fall into this category. :) --  Riffsyphon  1024 21:20, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Support
style="color:Blue;">Admiral Ackbar Bitakore]] 14:48, 5 Febraury 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) N ighthawk L  eader    09:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 12:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Of course I'm for it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  14:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Yes.-- Darth Phonebook  15:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) BaronGrackle 15:34, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Lord Titze the Dark Wanderer 15:48, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Why are you guys so strongly against it? Chack Jadson 01:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) This seems good!  N@M3Le$ [[Image:PloKoonweildssaber.jpg|15px]]Please, can someone talk to me?! 18:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 02:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 21:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) [[User:Starkiller1996|<span
 * 1) Cortle Steeze 23:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1)  StarNeptune Talk to me! 15:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) You know...some users here even like Star Wars itself...a shocker, I know! &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 15:44, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Are you serious Jaymach? 16:02, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) I'm so shocked... How many people here like Star Wars? &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 23:49, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Who doesn't? --  Riffsyphon  1024 03:30, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Some people here like WookieeCookiees also. I don't see that up. :-P Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 15:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) No. Wildyoda 21:11, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Too much awesomeness.--Valin Kenobi 03:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Made by Solus. Reproposed in order to have it able to be voted on separately. - <font face="Courier New"><font color="#3333FF">N <font color="#00CC33">ighthawk <font color="FFCC33">L eader    09:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps "enjoys" is too weak of a verb for one's focus/specialization? -BaronGrackle 16:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ataru, don't even give anybody the thought :P  Hey, I know, while we're at it, why don't we do "This user enjoys Wookieepedia" and "This user enjoys Episode I" and "This user enjoys Episode II"  See how quickly this could get out of hand? 18:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * To answer Chack's comment, I'm so against these partially because it's a complete waste. You can easily put the userbox on your page without making a seperate template just for it. In fact, all you have to do is copy and paste the code above. It doesn't do much good in helping categorize Wookieepedians either, unlike some such as User 5000e. Additionally, it justs opens the door for more unnecessary boxes. 00:57, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

January 27, 2007 (ends February 9, 2007)
Mess around with the colors if you want, you get the idea...

Support

 * 1) -- Darth Phonebook  02:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) <font face="Courier New"><font color="#3333FF">N <font color="#00CC33">ighthawk <font color="FFCC33">L  eader    04:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) This will help to see who the more experienced wookieepedians when us less experienced wookieepedians need help.Lord Titze the Dark Wanderer 06:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I like. Although I'm not quite sure the exact date I started... 07:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You can go to the Wikistats page and if you've contributed enough, it will say when you've started. --  Riffsyphon  1024 18:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Newbish question: Where is the Wikistats page? 19:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Good idea.  Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]] 21:17 29 January (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 23:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I would like to see the color's tweaked a bit, specifically no pink in any of them. :) - JMAS 15:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  Riffsyphon  1024 18:14, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Got to like this!  N@M3Le$ [[Image:PloKoonweildssaber.jpg|15px]]Please, can someone talk to me?! 18:38, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 21:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) The colors make me want to die a little, but it's a great idea, so I'll vote like I'm color-blind. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 01:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) INTERESTING STUFF!  .  .  .  .  22:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * The 2+ one would be used until next year when a 3+ would be added, etc... -- Darth Phonebook  02:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Instead of having to create a new userbox for this every year, why not employ a variable in one box similar to the one used in user age?  StarNeptune Talk to me! 03:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I like the concept but agree with streamlining it. And it technically won't be more than two years until March 10 for us. --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Like that? -- Darth Phonebook  17:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks good. I would be willing to vote for that version.– 03:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Although we'd have to update it monthly. --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * And unlike the other version, there wouldn't be an option of categorization. -- Darth Phonebook  00:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Why don't we just stick with years, because updating every month is ridiculous and people don't care if a person was here for 4 months but rather 1 or 2 years or more, because they might be more helpful. --  Riffsyphon  1024 03:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Or we could just use the original templates and only have to update it every once and a while. -- Darth Phonebook  15:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Or we could support all concepts so that the user can pick whatever form they like. I would only have to use the one for 2 years, but many others may decide to go with months as well. --  Riffsyphon  1024 21:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


 * There, I tried to change the colors around a bit, if you don't like them, then change them however you want. -- Darth Phonebook  19:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I like the new colors. Very consistant. 13:53, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I think this is a new one. If not this one, then how about a "this user supports Star Wars music" box? I'll get to it soon. Chack Jadson 20:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) dun dun dun, dun DA-dun, dun DA-dun... - S olus  (Bird of Pre  y)  14:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Ranat 23 20:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 20:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Of course! -- Darth Phonebook  01:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) About time! --JethLordMaster 21:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC-8)
 * 7) Lord Titze the Dark Wanderer 23:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 13:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 1)  Orange_lightsaber  Villip 01:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Even if not made into a template, I'm still going to be using the idea... 18:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Cutch 18:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Total awesomeness. He wrote many of the classic themes that we know today.--Goodwood 22:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) What goodwood said.-- Scwhinky Communicate [[Image:Fettrockz.gif|20px]] 22:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Do we really need an "is awesome!" box for everything? This would not be a good precedent.– 23:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Who doesn't think he's awesome! But a userbox for everything awesome would probably kill the server in their sheer abundance. —Xwing328 (Talk) 16:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) There's just too much awesomeness. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 20:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) See comment.Valin Kenobi 21:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) What Ataru said. ;) Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 00:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) The pro-awesomes are winning... vote now! Vote now! -BaronGrackle 20:28, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Per Xwing328. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) If this one goes through it will lead to a heap of people in the real world being "awesome" - <font face="Courier New"><font color="#3333FF">N <font color="#00CC33">ighthawk <font color="FFCC33">L eader    05:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Bah! -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 22:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) To quote Anakin Skywalker: "How can you be a Star Wars fan, and not like John Williams?" To which Alfred Newman replied: "Take a seat, young Skywalker". Remember? .  .  .  .  09:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Gah...how many "is awesome" templates do we need to oppose before people will stop adding them? &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 22:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Per Xwing328 and Nighthawk leader. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 22:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Geez, what's next? "Natalie Portman is Awesome"? "Harrison Ford is Awesome"? "Ray Park is Awesome"? Let's get a handle on this and contain it now.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 18:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) The one with that you enjoy Star Wars music would fit more because of all the "awesome" userboxes that would come.  N@M3Le$ [[Image:PloKoonweildssaber.jpg|15px]]Please, can someone talk to me?! 18:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Who doesn't? .  .  .  .  02:12, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I love his music too, but I think we're heading down a slippery slope of tons and tons of userboxes for every little thing.--Valin Kenobi 21:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, he is the composer of Star Wars music. This is more general and important than many proposed "is awesome" userboxes. How about "supports Star Wars music" then? Chack Jadson 01:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Isn't this a rhetorical question on this kind of wiki. Of course people support Star Wars music, but that doesn't mean we need a box for it. --  Riffsyphon  1024 04:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Pro-awesomeness rules! Chack Jadson 21:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, it's been two weeks. What happens now? Chack Jadson 13:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * My guess is, now, it will get added as is until it is either edited or voted for deletion. -BaronGrackle 23:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * What about this? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  19:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Personally, I'm still opposed, and the vote is too close to be considered a decisive majority either way. 19:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd support this version, but shouldn't it be proposed as a separtate userbox since this one's for the music and the original's for the composer? - <font face="Courier New"><font color="#3333FF">N <font color="#00CC33">ighthawk <font color="FFCC33">L eader    05:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You're right, it should. I like it BTW. Chack Jadson 21:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I say re-propose the music one.-- Darth Phonebook  00:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)