Talk:Breast/Legends



Mon Calamari
if you look at the portrait of admiral Cha Niathal, she seems to have breasts, this may be worth mentioning

Ben Skywalker
The Ben quote, can someone give me its context?

Top Picture
I have a serious problem with this picture. It's um.... well, i think we all know what a breast looks like, I don't think we need a picture of a naked Twi'lek to explain that they have 'em.69.88.211.46 21:25, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Canon is canon. Be mature about it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:27, March 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, but should we really have this up? We don't want some browsing seven-year-old to see it.
 * Sorry if this sounds harsh, but this is not cencored media, we simply document what is part of Canon Star Wars Universe. Also, if a person is able to browse to this article, they is able to find much more "troubling" imagery around the internet. –Tm_T (Talk) 14:23, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, last time I checked, Visions was not official canon.69.88.211.46 16:15, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * My bad, forgot to add "mostly" while editing my reply. –Tm_T (Talk) 16:34, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nor is it official non-canon. Please, don't make a simple picture a bigger issue than it really is. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 17:27, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm just sayin' can we maybe move it and replace it with another picture in this article?69.88.211.46 17:36, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * So your argument is that this image isn't suitable for some random seven-year-old? You then go on to state we all know what a breast looks like. Does this hypothetical seven year old? If not, now they do. The image used is the most appropriate and informative depiction of a breast we have in the Star Wars universe. Using anything else would be lowering the quality of the article by making it less informative. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 17:47, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * In response to the original poster, no, we're not removing it. And it's not our responsibility to make Wookieepedia a family-friendly site for seven-year-old children surfing the Internet unchaperoned. It's the parents' responsibility to shelter their kids if they're so concerned about it. As explained already, Wookieepedia is not censored. We document officially licensed Star Wars material, whether it's canon or non-canon. If some people aren't mature enough to handle it, that's not our problem. Be an adult. Cope with it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:50, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm late to the discussion (seems to have finished, actually), but if a 7 year old sees a breast, he's not going to start injecting heroin and killing his family. Furthermore, the picture shows a breast. That's it. It shows the subject of the article, breaks no laws, and fits with our policies. What you think will happen when the kid sees the picture?  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 04:30, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Where exactly did this picture come from, anyways? I was unaware that any of the comic series showed nudity. 99.141.194.0 15:04, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Star Wars: Visions says File:Aayla sleeping.jpg. –Tm_T (Talk) 15:15, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Not to bring up an old topic, but I feel like it should be noted that this is the only image on the entire wiki that shows nudity. This isn't like wikipedia where everything is covered from Dora The Explorer to BDSM. People have certain expectations of Star Wars, and nudity is entirely not one of them. I'm not going to be a prude and say the image should be deleted, but I do think it should be relegated to a gallery and not the topic photo of an article.
 * People have certain expectations of Star Wars, and nudity is entirely not one of them. We're not the people who create Star Wars. We're the people who document the creations of the people who create Star Wars. If you have a problem with Star Wars nudity, go complain to the people who created it. The image isn't going anywhere. As I said before, be an adult. Cope with it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:25, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Alright, if you're going to be that way: User_image_policy "6.Images must be "safe for work": no nudity, excessive gore, or other content which is unsuitable for a family audience, or would be likely to disturb or offend other users." Granted it's talking about User images specifically and no mention is given to it in Images, but as I said, this is the first time this situation has arisen. Regardless, I think the latter part of that policy is very, very clear. This image is nudity, from most people's viewpoint it is unsuitable for a family audience, and it is obviously disturbing or offending to other users, otherwise we wouldn't be having this discussion. If that policy isn't grounds enough for the immediate deletion of this image, it's at least grounds for a vote on clarifying Wookieepedia's official policy for nudity in licensed material. Don't brush it off with you're "cope with it" thing, this is an official policy issue. Really though, if we're all honest with ourselves, this particular article has always been a joke and I wouldn't say the image is worth fighting for. Just pitch it and put a metal bikini there and people will probably be able to figure out on their own what breasts are.98.27.213.72 20:32, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * This article isn't a joke to me atleast (joke articles are not usually in the main namespace anyway), and if you really insist we shouldn't have breast being shown in the article about, well, breast, then by all means create an user account and set up a well formed and reasonable Consensus track discussion. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 21:20, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've had a user account here since '06. I stopped using it a long time ago because I was getting sick of the elitist cabal that evolved in the ranks of the admins. Stuff like the inconsistencies in their criteria for featured articles, notability guidelines, user pages, etc. "Enter the beurocrats, the true rulers of Wookieepedia." If I have to dust off that profile I will, but I'd like to see the admins do the right thing on their own for once.98.27.213.72 21:38, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Per Tope, everyone is taking is way too seriously. If you don't like it, then ignore it. It's canon, George Lucas approved material. I don't get why everyone is so fussy over some canonical image on an article that really is something minor. I think that's enough.  JangFett  (Talk) 21:41, May 28, 2011 (UTC)