User talk:Imperialles

Flits
Hi Imp. I wrote up an article on the flits of Galaxies fame, making use of the screenshot you uploaded. Would you be able to get a second image that would be appropriate to place further on in the article? Perhaps some kind of action shot, or one of a group of flits on Lok? --Eyrezer 19:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll try and grab one when I'm home on leave (Feb. 5th). --Imperialles 23:54, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Eyrezer 21:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Inqmoot 23
The twenty-third Inq meeting has been scheduled for Saturday, February 21st at 7pm Eastern time. Your presence or input on the meeting page would be appreciated. Graestan ( Talk ) 16:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Visas Marr FAN
Hey Imperialles. I believe that I have addressed your objection to Visas Marr. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at the article when you have a chance and let me know if there is anything else you feel needs more work. Thanks. Cylka  -talk- 08:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Cheers. --Imperialles 11:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

S-100 objection
Hey, I was wondering if you'd take a look at your objection to S-100 Stinger. Some attempts were made to get a better image, but WotC uses mono-molecular paper or something and what's there really is better than almost anyone is capable of. Red is unavailable for scanning until further notice. Graestan ( Talk ) 00:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Ditto Graestan (minus the mono-molecular paper part), regarding Darth Reave. All options have been exercised. —Tommy Dark side Master SWGTCG.jpg ( Nine two eight one ) 00:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Per above for Darth Azard. I have attempted to re-scan them many times with no noticeable improvement.  Grunny  ( Talk ) 03:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Fixed. For the record, that new CT is a disaster. --Imperialles 08:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Query
I don't intend to go around shrinking images at this time (even though we probably should be shrinking them). It's one thing for someone to be bending Fair Use by, on his own recognizance, uploading an image that's of better quality than is needed for an article; it's another thing entirely for formal processes of our site to be demanding them. While your claim that "there is nothing about fair use that expressly forbids the use of high resolution images" is technically true, in the CT itself I quote a relevant portion from Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corporation. It presents a test for one of the four areas of fair use evaluation that our use of higher-resolution-than-necessary graphics would not pass. And to "strive for high quality in textual and graphical form" IS becoming an image library, if image quality becomes an end unto itself rather than a means of supporting our articles. jSarek 10:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

The new Triage system
After the Inquisitorius' most recent meeting, it was decided to enact a triage system for dealing with the large number of nominations on the FAN page. The Triage page has been set up in the Inquisitorius forum to make it easier for Inqs to see what nominations are best focused on for clearing out the nomination page. This is a tool for helping Inqs combine their efforts on articles, and shouldn't be taken as mandatory; as usual, any Inq is free to review any article they want. - Lord Hydronium 03:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

RFB
Imp, I couldn't have done it without you. I am honored to finally take my place at your side. I've always looked up to you since I first came to this site, and I promise to make you proud. Thank you for your vote, and thank you for your blessing of my new tools. I remain at your service. Graestan ( Talk ) 18:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)