Forum:Balance of the "Force"

Forums &gt; Senate Hall &gt; 

By the force, I mean the powers behind this wiki. It is my understanding that some people and situations are getting out of hand. Someone very wise once said,"This wiki is not a democracy." Obviously indicating tyranny or monarchy, or oligarchy, or federalism, or republicanism, or...anarchy. But that isn't my point. I believe that the wiki should be more flexible and balanced. Although I think we should all be more concerned about the encyclopedia, but this is obviously a community gone wrong. One that needs to be made right and one that to be protected. I believe a few additions or alterations of policy are in order. First I think we should have a page or system that will allow a supermajority of users to be able to undo a decision that an administrator's desicion(i.e. an unfair or unreasonable ban). Also, on the subject of banning, I believe that the community should decide who is banned. I think that administrators, if they want someone banned, should block a registered user that is doing things, and should have a vote on whether this person should be banned. Then once the vote is over the person shall have their block removed and shall either be allowed to go about their business, or be banned. Finally I think that one single person who's duty is to be fair and balanced in their descisions, should be elected as a "Mediator", to settle or negotiate disputes, such as edit wars (Note: There should only be one, so that there actions are easily followed so that we can make sure they are doing there job and not abusing power. Also the community only, should be allowed to take their power away). I want some disscusion on these matters before any action is to be taken.-- IG-Prime (IG-2000) 22:51, 24 January 2007 (UTC)