User talk:Cade Calrayn

 Find archived discussions here: I | II | III

So that's what they meant by "fallen".
Actually, I thought "fallen" referred to the fact that he had just gotten his limbs hacked off and was lying on his stomach in burning hot lava. Just me, though. "Sith Lords roasting on an open fire..." ;-) --User: Dr. Anonymous1 16:09, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

Cade Rules!!
Hello Cade Calrayn you are truly awesome with you're star wars collection can you stop deleting my edits Darthdead0 16:41, June 20, 2012 (UTC)

White Maw
As I was saying, are we going to merge this with Pirate Confederation or not?--Mike Gilbert 22:32, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

Dathomirian 1st appearance
Hello, Cade. I just noticed you reverted an anon's edit on the Dathomirian article. I did not wish to challenge your edit flat out and stupidly, but I do think Anon was right. Technically, the first retconned appearance of a Dathomirian *was* Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, wasn't it? Best regards. --LelalMekha 08:35, June 23, 2012 (UTC)

Spam
What do you mean he was putting spam on my page? Don't take me wrong, it took up alot of room, but spam? JediMaster22 20:20, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean. I appreciate the concern, but it really doesn't bother me that much. Thanks again. JediMaster22 20:27, June 23, 2012 (UTC)

Skavak and Nok Drayen
Skavak did not die on Ord Mantell he died on a vessel about to be sucked into a black hole and Nok Drayen died of sickness in a medical facility on Nar Shaddaa. --Darth Deon 01:50, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

but there is no source for Skavak being killed on Ord Mantell. --Darth Deon 01:54, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NT6FPGUUrsY&feature=relmfu --Darth Deon 01:59, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Sy Myrthian Insurrection
Could you read over the first paragraph on page 112 in Warfare? Does it seem like: I'm currently going with option 1, though I'm not 100% sure. Thanks, 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:24, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) The 12th partictpates in all battles
 * 2) Dodanna and Tallon participate in all
 * 3) Both the 12th and those two are at each battle
 * After examining the passage again, I think 3 is the right way to go. Thanks anyways. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:38, June 28, 2012 (UTC)

Question
Yeah, why did you revert my edits to the Luke Skywalker page?Supershadow3 (talk) 04:15, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

I understand the requirements for having everything verified, however, my understanding of a "community" is to help one another towards a common goal. Would it not be just as appropriate to help one another to verify everthing that is place in wookieepedia? I see a lot of unverified stuff still on many of these pages and not a single person has either removed it or attempted to add verification on it. Do you have any ideas on how we may be able to fix this problem? (unkas2)

Puny human
I have addressed your insignificant objection on Decimator (painting)!  OLIOSTER  (talk) 20:30, July 1, 2012 (UTC)

Executor edits.
Hi.

I originally added in that section because there were concept artworks for the Executor. The pictures also pretty much told what date they were made on, so I tried to follow through with the directions. If it's not acceptible enough for you, at least tell me how to properly add it in, because the section seems necessary. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 16:40, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Great Northern Crusade Nom
Just letting you know that you have objections on your Great Northern Crusade nomination that are over a week old.-- Exiled Jedi   (Greetings)  12:46, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Insult
Actually, I usually don't bother reading the templates at the top. I guess I don't take Wookieepedia quite as seriously as some people. lol I'll be sure to make a note of that, though; don't worry. Incidentally, I guess you inadvertently answered my previous question to you, Adolf. lol &#34;Light burns out; darkness is eternal.&#34; -Darth Creditor (talk) 00:56, July 13, 2012 (UTC)

CT amendment
This is to inform you that a small amendment has been made to Forum:CT:Subcategorization and MW 1.19. The reasons for the amendment are laid out there. Please review it and make sure that you are still in support. Thanks. &mdash;MJ&mdash; Training Room Friday, July 13, 2012, 14:21 UTC

Romance
Yo Cade, could you please check this history section out and see if the information in the bts is correct? I honestly don't know. Thanks,  JangFett  (Talk) 15:03, July 14, 2012 (UTC)

User page
Arashi-Senpai is my other account. That is why I'm editing it. please stop revising it.

War
HI, I just have a quick question: On page 112, the part of the Reconquest of the Rim that displays the Listehol Campaign shows Sikurd as a blue point. Despite the fact that there is no written description of it, that would point out that a battle took place there, right? Thanks, 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:29, July 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Guess I'll have to make the article soon then. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:54, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Actualy, if you look at the map, it appears the grayish dots are for battles, while the blue dots are for important worlds in the campaigns. However, if a battle took place at an important world, the blue dot overrides the grey one. This means that there was no battle at Sikurd. (To prove my point, look at the five veils Campaign minimap. Enarc is a blue dot, and no battle was ever fought there, though it was an important part of the Campaign) Do you agree? If so, I'll get rid of the Battle of Sikurd. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:18, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Heck, I have nothing to do at the moment, so I'll just revert and delete all that stuff about the Battle of Sikurd. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:56, July 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Thats OK. I saw the massive Mon Cal debate, though didn't read it. as it's way too long. (Also, when I said grey dots above, I meant white ones) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:29, July 16, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Personal attack
DigiFluid has already warned him on his IP's talk page, but I'll be keeping an eye on him. If he makes another attack, I'll block him accordingly. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 16:11, July 17, 2012 (UTC)

Biggs' story
Hello, please say me where is the proble before revert my edits. Hk 47 (talk) 15:51, July 18, 2012 (UTC)

Baral and this thing called Promised One
Hi, looks like you added Baral being Promised One (and suggesting Rukil was also that) and then added succession box. I wonder isn't the group of the outcasts called "Promised Ones" instead of one individual in the group? Also, succession box for what? (– Tm_T@Wookieepedia:&#126;$ 06:45, July 20, 2012 (UTC)

Flesh Raider uprising
Hey Cade,

FAnoms can't actually just be removed. They need to go through the official removal process, which can only be done by INQs. You can request the nom be removed, but it needs to be archived as a failed nom. I'll need to put it back on the FAN page, but do you want me to remove it? Menkooroo (talk) 20:42, July 20, 2012 (UTC)

Desolator crisis
Hey Cade, I saw that you made a conflict nav box template for the Desolator crisis. It looks good, but do you think these are necessary? Aren't the listed conflicts all part of either the Cold War or Second Great Galactic War? If so, can't the crisis be added into those respective boxes as a campaign? Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 05:26, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

Talk pages
Instead of removing a user's comment from a talk page without any explanation, you should leave a response on the talk page informing the user of whatever reason you would have had for removing the comment and/or place on the user's talk page (when relevant). Regardless of what the user in question has to say, there is no need to remove a comment without giving the user an explanation. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 00:35, July 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Talk pages, and what counts as an appropriate comment, are becoming a bit of an issue from what I've seen. The only talk page edits that should be reverted, in my opinion, are personal attacks and vandalism; everything else would technically fall under the umbrella of "good faith" edits, even if the posts are in violation of the Talkheader template. I'll admit I've reverted talk page edits of all kinds over the years, but in most cases talk page editors are just relatively new users with little understanding of site policy. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 00:49, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

T7 Sources
Hey Cade, was just looking over the sourcing you did for T7 and first off thanks for the help! Secondly, I noticed a couple pieces of T7's equipment were labeled with fact tags and as those are taken from descriptions of T7's in-game abilities was unsure how to properly source them. What's the correct approach in this case? Thanks! JethLordMaster  (Xia Order) 22:45, July 24, 2012 (UTC)


 * Relevant info can be confirmed here: http://www.torhead.com/npc/2EGHQAY/t7-o1  Specifically the EMP Blast and Intercept abilities.  JethLordMaster Ying yang copy.jpg (Xia Order) 22:48, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

The Old Republic game
Hey Cade got a question for ya. With the new update for Star Wars: The Old Republic it says that it will run on old computers now. The question I got is any idea how old that will run and has it decreased the computer cores needed to run it, and can you get the update without having the game installed. The reason I ask is I got the game back in January and have never played it to date. When I tried the Installation process told me that I meet all requirements except that it needs more CPU cores to run it. I would appreciate it if you can get back to me on this subject, but if you can't it's no biggie. DarthRevan1173 (talk) 01:07, July 25, 2012 (UTC)

I am not sure...

Okay, I know that the Mando'a page does not have all of the mando'a words in it. I memorize mando'a and I am ABSOLUTELY SURE. But, uh... you can't put Karen Traviss's website as a source and then add all of the missing words to it, right? (I ask because I was considering this) Vor'e... --Aryn Tarra (talk) 19:02, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

B4D4
I was just looking through the talk page, i saw that and thought it was interesting. I did not notice the date, sorry. Matt Seay (talk) 21:30, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

RE: Yavin Celebration
Hey Cade. Thanks for the tip. I do intend to do something status-wise with the article when it's ready, so all advice is welcome. ;-) When it's finished, I'll have someone proof-reading the article before actually nominating it. You know... language, grammar and so on. Im' considered "upper intermediate" level in the English language, but it's still difficult to write up such lengthy entries. --LelalMekha (talk) 22:53, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

Jorin
Hey, I'm working my way through all CSF related articles, including characters. I'm wondering if you are still actively working on Jorin or if I could hijack the article from you and take it to GAN. I know its on your project list so I wanted to check with you before I did anything. Coruscantfan (Talk) 23:43, July 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, I've listed him on the nomination page. Coruscantfan (Talk) 18:15, July 29, 2012 (UTC)

Twins page
Why were my edits to the multiple births pages undone? The 'See Also' sections are for listing related topics. Syalantillesfel (talk) 03:10, July 28, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified Vulture-class droid starfighter
Hey, I just noticed the nomination and deletion of the article about the Unidentified Vulture droid that appeared in Nomad Droids, and I felt it was really unjustified. Unfortunately I was away and couldn't participate in the voting. Here are the reasons I think it was notable, even though it did not have a quote:

Compared to the rest of the vulture droids that appeared in that episode, this one was the only one who followed R2 and 3POs ship down in the planet's atmosphere, it shot the ship's engines and was the reason they crash landed in the first place, and had a rather unique destruction scene, where R2 performed a dog fighting maneuver on him (also,the droid was initially confused as to where the ship had gone, and uttered something in binary while looking around for them). I think that's enough notability, it was not just a background character. TheMasterMind (talk) 09:14, August 2, 2012 (UTC)