User talk:Grand Moff Tranner

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #FEFFCF; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Grand Moff Tranner!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Internal pages:
 * Senate Hall
 * Wookieepedia FAQ
 * Manual of Style
 * Reliable sources
 * Guide to image use
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Wookieepedia policies:
 * What Wookieepedia is not
 * User page, user image, and user signature policies

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash;SFH 16:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
 * }

Undoing legitimate edits.
Id ask you to refrain from continuing to remove my well sourced edit on the Vulture droid article.

Atredies
 * Frankly, I don't see the blasters; as for the energy torpedo launchers, you can't exactly see the launchers themselves from the exteriors. Grand Moff Tranner (My personal comlink) 19:30, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, they are there, for a higher depth image watch ICS and freeze it about that frame, all weapons are apparent. The Torpedo launchers are the slits on the central hull as labeled on all other vulture droid diagrams on the main page. Atredies 07:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I will repeat what I said before: I don't see the blasters, and the energy torpedo launchers (assuming they are there) would be inside the body of the fighter and not visible from the outside. I'm normally not a rude person, but please stop complaining on my talk page. Grand Moff Tranner (My personal comlink) 15:19, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

The clone wars animated pic clearly shows that the Octuptarra combat tri-droid has 4 laser cannons not three. Jacenskylo 00:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, but the picture in the infobox shows three. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 00:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Luke
Are you sure he turned to the dark side?(75.22.88.127 19:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC))
 * Um, what are you talking about? Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 22:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Azlyn Rae
Hey, I only changed the "parties unknown" to "parts unknown" because I haven't ever seen anyone anywhere say they are heading towards "parties unknown". Sounds stupid to me. Zadi 12:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not meant to be "heading for parties unknown;" she was working for parties unknown. Hope that clears it up. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 13:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

All right cool. Much better.

I'm sorry to hear about your classmate
I'm glad we resolved our dispute amicably. Starkar Mace 01:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and I'm glad too. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 12:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

For future reference
A warning not to continue a pointless argument is not an invitation to whine some more. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 02:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

CLL-8 Load Lifter
Thankyou for the cleanup on my improvements to the article Grand Moff. Sorry 'bout the whole armour/armor thing, im Australian. Although why did you change the tense to the past? Vaderules 07:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the tip :) Vaderules 07:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. As for the change from present to past tense, the past tense is to be used in articles. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 23:13, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Project Ambition

 * I decided that a fomal greeting was necassary. So anyway, welcome to the project. Your help is appreciated. I look forward towards working together to improve both Wookieepedia and Project Ambition itself.-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 11:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Project Ambition

 * P.S. If you don't mind userboxes, here is one I made for Project Ambition. You may not like it too much, but it's simply another way I'm trying to advertise for and encourage people to join Project Ambition. Anyway if you want to help, or if you just want a unique userbox here it is the source: .-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 16:44, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Crescent-X9
It's cannon, I like the old one more but this new one is cannon I guess that new sources outway old ones. (Thunderer 04:52, 6 June 2008 (UTC))
 * New sources don't necessarily outweigh older ones. I think that the designation may be something along the lines of "Crescent-X9 Coruscant-class heavy courier" or "Coruscant-class Crescent-X9 heavy courier," because I doubt that they'd just throw out the "Coruscant-class" designation. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 11:44, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Your speaking as if their's a reason for the new source not to override the old one sorry but if you don't share I can't agree with you. I hate to be the one to say it but.... we can't use speculation so the name will apear as it does in the actual source the old name will be included in the behind the scenes area. If you still take issue I would skip me and go to WP:TOTJ Thanks for your veiw point. (Thunderer 05:17, 7 June 2008 (UTC))

Ozzel (uh, the article)
OK, I'm not going to say "Well, it's a good start" because that always sounds so deflating. :P I think what you've got there is most of the "meat" of the article, but I think you'll probably need to hunt a bit...deeper for content, and tidbits of info. The P/T could probably do with a bit more info, and there's just some little things, off the top of my head, like information on Ozzel from Piett's entry in GG3. Things like that. Sometimes you'll have to think outside the box as to where your info is coming from. You'll need to completely source your infobox and your BTS, and make sure you squeeze every little bit of information out of every available source, without turning it into a play-by-play. You'll have an uphill battle on the FAN page, I can tell you now. But stick at it, you're doing a good job, and all power to you for working on a topic like this. :) If you have any more questions, just let me know. Thefourdotelipsis 09:01, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I have access to it, and if you come on IRC I should be able to help you out in that regard. Thefourdotelipsis 11:50, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, I just wanted to offer to help you out if you need anything, seeing as I have a personal affinity for the subject matter. ;-) I've never had the urge to fix up this whole article myself, but I'm really glad someone else has. So if you need anything, like help on the BTS, or checking sources, or just proofing, or anything, I'd be happy to help. -- Ozzel 01:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm so sorry, I forgot to respond to you before. At a glance, you need to make sure you have no really short paragraphs, unless you really need to. It might also do to try and work a little bit more out of ESB. Also, I seem to remember that there's a bit of antagonism between Piett and Ozzel, from Galaxy Guide 3. I can't seem to find that info in the article, but if you've got it well and good. It still feels...well, short, but not knowing the source material well enough, I might not be the best judge in that area. I think the best thing to do would be to put it up for nomination, and work through each and every objection. By the time you're done with them, who knows, the article might feel longer. But there are little things, you know...this is more of an expansion rather than a rewrite of the original article, which is not something I wholeheartedly recommend...I generally think it's best to delve into the all the source material again yourself, even if the info was there in the first place. This is generally because then your whole article, well...is your work, so to speak. That's not to say you own it, but the whole thing flows in your style, and it just ends up reading a lot better. It's up to you. If you feel confident, take the plunge, as long as you know that you will work for it. If you don't feel confident, just keep tinkering until you do. I wish I could give you more specific guidance than this, but as I say, I'm not, at the moment, as familiar with the source material as I should be. Thefourdotelipsis 11:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
 * If you're working on Ozzel, you might want to list it under Work-in-Progress on the Project Ambition page. Also, I'm sure that the project would be willing to help, afterall I had intended for Ozzel to be one of our later projects, and I even tidied up his article not too long ago.-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 11:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Appearances vs. Sources
Per your request to move "Star Wars PocketModels TCG" references to a "Sources" section, no problem. Sorry about the delay, but I've fixed the ones (most of them) that I've added, as well as a few that I've found that others have put in. Thanks for the heads up. Gethralkin 06:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Big Deal?
"I answered all your questions. I don't know why you're making such a big deal out of this." - Grand Moff Tranner

I posted a lot of questions directed at you in the D'Astan Starfighter discussion area. Very few were answered at all in a way that is constructive. Acbar finally answered me and gave me a response that was helpful. It seems like you are making this a big deal and need to "calm down". I am responding to the above quote here because your remark about a "big deal" is very much off topic for the D'Astan Starfighter and does not contribute to the subject matter in any way.

I would kindly ask that you keep personal remarks directed at me posted either here or in my personal user talk area please. Thank you in advance for your compliance.

Frank V Bonura STAR WARS Deckplans Alliance Founder 03:16, 19 June 2008 (UTC)FVBonura


 * Yeah, sure, I'm making a big deal out of it. I removed the image you put in and answered your questions, and I'm suddenly a horrible person. Frankly, I think you're making a big deal out of nothing. I ask you to not post on my talk page again. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 13:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Forgive me for intruding, but also, please sign your posts.-- Mitth'raw'nuruodo (Imperial HoloNet)[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 18:35, 18 June 2008 (UTC)