User talk:Vitus Infinitus

 Find archived discussions here: 1 2

Re-inuse
Sorry about that I wasn’t paying attention I have been editing on my breaks at work and missed the inuse template. - Red Duel 18:29, December 2, 2018 (UTC)

Moving articles
Hi, Vitus. If you're going to move articles related to Canon/Legends disambiguation, we require that you fix the links in the process, otherwise many, many things become broken. All of the articles that linked to Jerec for the Legends Inquisitor will now be broken, as will everything that pointed to whatever article you've moved to that new title. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:14, January 13, 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. For future reference, if there's a big move like this with too many links to manually update, it's best to leave a request on Bot requests and someone will (eventually) get it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 02:19, January 13, 2019 (UTC)

Hey
Hey. I was wondering why we are not including Blitz in the list of Canon Advanced Recon Commandos?


 * -Chillerrr1234 Talk Page 18:52, January 24, 2019 (UTC)

RE: Minister of the Interior
Hi Vitus. My interpretation would be that under the current rules you wouldn't be able to make the Minister of the Interior article and should just link to the title when referring to him in articles. As to the precursor species and those other articles, I'd argue that because it's more ambiguous as to whether those are the same thing as their named legends counter parts the articles are probably ok. Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:08, January 25, 2019 (UTC)

24th Bombardment Squadron
Hi. You hit 24th Bombardment Squadron, which I'd recently revised, with the Cleanup and Citation tags. I've added references to the sources (not hard), and removed the Citation tag. Was there anything else you felt warranted the Cleanup tag? Wookieeperial (talk) 15:08, January 26, 2019 (UTC)

Cite web template
Hey Vitus, a reminder that you don't need to add every single field, like the usage instructions mention, you should add only the ones needed like this. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:43, February 1, 2019 (UTC)

Canon planets improvement drive
Hello, Vitus! I wanted to ask how interested you'd be in a collaborated effort with several other users to improve the quality of many of our canon planet articles, as a large number are in dire need of help. This would include adding images, expanding, updating, reorganizing per the Layout Guide, sourcing, etc., and of course, people are welcome to take articles to status. That's not required, though, as we'd just be looking to make the articles more complete and presentable. Would you be interested? MasterFred (Whatever) 18:06, February 6, 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries! I understand. Here is the project page just in case anything happens to intersect with your GAR work. Happy editing! MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 00:40, February 7, 2019 (UTC)

FAN
Hey, Vitus. Apologies if I offended you with my comments on your Inquisitorius Headquarters nom. While I'm still a little disappointed about your satisfaction of my objections, with your duplicate links and incorrectly sourced info, I think I could've worded it more constructively. I'm also sorry to see your noms are nearing/are in the 2 week deadline for responding to objections. You have worked really hard on these and it'd be a shame to see them fail after all this, and I hope you haven't been put off by my comments. You are a quality editor and you shouldn't feel bad for a slight mistake. We all make them, and I shouldn't have responded like that. I do hope you try again for your articles.  Tommy   Macaroni  21:09, February 17, 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey Tommy, no worries! I wasn't offended by your comments I haven't read them till now and it's understandable. I'm sorry for my lack of addressing objections and fixing them improperly when I do, I have a lot of things going on right now in my life and I'm also very busy outside of the Wook so my FANs aren't a priority right now. I'll try to address all objections as soon as possible to avoid getting them removed. Again, no worries about your response, an apology isn't necessary!-- Vitus Infinitus  Talk 16:42, February 18, 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay good, I'm glad to hear that.  Tommy  Imperial Emblem.svg  Macaroni  16:52, February 18, 2019 (UTC)
 * And yeah don't worry, real life can be a bitch sometimes :P  Tommy  Imperial Emblem.svg  Macaroni  16:52, February 18, 2019 (UTC)

/* Would like clarifications on using materials */
Hi! User Lewisr referred me to you as you might be better able to help me figure something out. I'm a newbie when it comes to editing wiki pages and I'm curious about specifics within the source materials.

For example, the Jedi Temple Guardian info on page 72 in Nexus of Power. It mentions how their armor weaves layers of protective fabrics and how it provides a subtle but effective defense against blaster bolts and lightsabers. To me this sounds like Armorweave, but the term armorweave is not brought up within the info block about them in the book. Would this mean I can't say their robes incorporate Armorweave?

Another thing, it gives the weapon stats of the Temple Guard Lightsaber Pike. Everything about it is akin to the standard double bladed lightsaber except for two things. 1) It has the Defensive property, and 2) it has the Stun property allowing a blade to deal 4 stun damage instead of regular damage. Does this warrant adding in the fact that the Temple Guard lightsaber pike has a stun setting? As for the defensive property, this means it adds 1 more difficulty check against melee attacks, meaning it's good vs melee weapons (like lightsabers). I think this would lean more towards speculation but in the past (Legends) it has been mentioned that the pikes were made of lightsaber resistant materials. Does this bit of info prove that? (I don't think so but I can only hope)

I'm fairly certain the contents within this book are canon as the back has the Disney logo and the book contains info on Lothal and other Canon content along with new information on other planets that contain a Force Nexus of sorts.

What are your thoughts on the matter?

I think the robes incorporating armorweave and the pike being better against melee weapons within the RPG due to lightsaber resistant materials leans more towards speculation. But the book makes it clear that it's able to perform Stun damage. It also mentions how they have the ability "Force Bind" which allows the Temple Guards to immobilize a target within short range. Could this be considered official information as well?

--Ruchalus (talk) 04:28, February 21, 2019 (UTC)Ruchalus

Canon Gar Project

 * Yeah, you're welcome. Wish you the best with it!  Fan26  ( Talk ) 18:17, February 21, 2019 (UTC)

Tierny archival links
Hey Vitus, just to let you know, you forgot to add the archival link to the source on Tierny. Essentially, you just have to copy the link into the wayback machine and then copy the archive date in the url back into the "archivedate=" field in the template.

And sorry if I just caused an edit conflict-I realized that I had ignored the massive edit template when I corrected the link only after I hit publish.  Fan26  ( Talk ) 15:18, February 22, 2019 (UTC)


 * Alright, good to know.  Fan26  ( Talk ) 15:33, February 22, 2019 (UTC)

Special forces category
Hey Vitus, yes I'd probably say its a good idea, I am somewhat surprised it hadn't been made before. Just looking at Special forces/Legends seems its a good shout --Lewisr (talk) 19:05, February 22, 2019 (UTC)
 * It says 'a particularly stubborn Special Force pilot' referring to Unidentified Special Forces TIE pilot, not sure if that helps or anything --Lewisr (talk) 05:31, February 24, 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah sounds good --Lewisr (talk) 05:35, February 24, 2019 (UTC)

Climate Disruption Arrays
Hello Vitus Infinitus, Please do not remove the game in universe section, it is additional information, its been there since four to three weeks, I haven't had anyone complain about it. It was also approved to be added. Thanks, May the Force Be With You! Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 17:13, February 26, 2019 (UTC)User:SupremeCommanderRaxus
 * Thank you, I wasn't aware of the tweets. Sorry for the confusion I caused. May The Force Be With You! Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 19:08, February 26, 2019 (UTC)User:SupremeCommanderRaxus

Images
Hey Vitus, do I really need to rename those BFII images? Surely if they feature the outdated armour details I can just delete them, because we can't use them in canon articles?  Tommy   Macaroni  20:57, February 27, 2019 (UTC)
 * That was me who tagged them initially, but if they're outdated then deleting them is probably is the better option --Lewisr (talk) 21:00, February 27, 2019 (UTC)