Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month/March 2006


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of monthly Wookieepedian of the Month nominations. Please do not modify it.

Support

 * 1) Azizlight 06:07, 1 February 2006 (UTC). Has stood out as a very reliable contributor. And he's the man :-)
 * 2) Jaymach Ral'Tir 06:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC). Support. Too lazy to give reasons. :)
 * 3) Riffsyphon1024 06:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC). Has brought some good stuff to this wiki.
 * 4) Imp 06:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC). I see a good administrator candidate as well here.
 * 5) StarNeptune 14:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC) From one Cooper to another. :D
 * 6) DannyBoy7783 19:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC) I see CooperTFN around here quite a bit doing work.
 * 7) Admiral J. Nebulax 21:11, 1 February 2006 (UTC) He definitely deserves this.
 * 8) Many constructive comments on talk pages, too. &mdash; Silly Dan 13:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) TIEPilot051999 02:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Cato Neimoidia 02:22, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Yup, everything above ↑
 * 11) Tam 19:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC) Coop rules.
 * 12) AdmiralNick22 18:18, 27 February 2006 (UTC) A fine choice for Wookieepedian of the Month.
 * 13) RMF 21:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC) Difficult choice, these other candidates are outstanding as well.

Comments

 * http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/34.gif http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/18.gif http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/54.gif CooperTFN 08:05, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Riffsyphon1024 06:12, 1 February 2006 (UTC) I will continue to nominate him until he is WOTM.
 * 2) Imp 06:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC). Jaymach deserves this for the amazing work he's done on such obscure sources.
 * 3) StarNeptune 14:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC) Same as last month.
 * 4) SFH 15:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Loads of interesting articles from obscure sources. &mdash; Silly Dan 13:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Kuralyov 03:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) [[Image:Tbhelm.gif|30px]] Shadowtrooper talk 00:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Cato Neimoidia 02:30, 9 February 2006 (UTC) Many new articles, yes, very good.
 * 9) Support (again). WhiteBoy 06:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Cull Tremayne 01:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC) Dang those obscure sources, just too interesting I tells ya! I can't get any work done.
 * 11) It's been hard to decide between Jaymatch, Erik Pflueger and CooperTFN. Personally, I always enjoy interesting information on obscure sources. This is MHO, never suggesting that any of these is better than the others. Skippy Farlstendoiro 11:51, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Admiral J. Nebulax 15:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC) Wow, these WotM candidates really deserve this. It's very hard to decide!

Support

 * 1) Imp 06:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC). Erik is one of our great writers, having written not only one, but two amazing featured articles.
 * 2) CooperTFN 08:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC) Notthing ths plase needz mroe then good writters.
 * 3) Master Starkeiller 12:31, 1 February 2006 (UTC) What Imp and CooperTFN said. Erik deserves it.
 * 4) QuentinGeorge 08:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC) Support. Two featured articles. Natch. Now to get him to write more.... QuentinGeorge 08:41, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) [[Image:Tbhelm.gif|30px]] Shadowtrooper talk 00:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) &mdash;Darth Culator   (talk)  14:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Admiral J. Nebulax 15:34, 18 February 2006 (UTC) You deserve this, Erik.
 * 8) Cato Neimoidia 21:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC) Thats it, I'm voting for Cooper, Jaymach, and Erik.

Comments

 * All the candidates have strong points in their favor: CooperTFN has gotten us publicity, Jaymach gets us info from sources I've never even heard of, but Erik's writing quality has inspired me to improve my own. &mdash;Darth Culator   (talk)  14:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Ditto, DC...tough call between Cooper, Erik, and Jaymach. WhiteBoy 19:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.