Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/First Battle of The Graveyard


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

(1 Inq/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) It's not the biggest article to be nominated, but it's pretty good. I'm just sad they're no other images, but I couldn't find anyothers. Kilson LOVES PIE 09:95, November 22 2007
 * 2) It is well written and gives a through description of the battle, shame about the lack of imageryWilhelm screamer 02:01, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Now satisfies all the words thanks to some serious squeezing.  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 00:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) It doesn't meet FAN rule #18 &mdash; hence why I cleaned it up and nominated it for GA instead of FA in the first place. I knew that I would be hard pressed to meet rule #18 without adding fluff.  Greyman ( Paratus ) 15:42, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *It now does. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 00:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I don't think it meets rule #7. Starwarsrulez 18:54, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh, we have several FAs that have similar leads. Anyways, like I stated above, to add anything further to the article would be fluff and repetitive. Greyman ( Paratus ) 19:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Fine then, but it needs more images. Starwarsrulez 02:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Not a rule based objection, per the following: Unless someone is able to get screenshots from their PSP (which might be very difficult), or LFL releases more pictures of this battle, that single picture in there (compliments of JMAS) is all there is for now. So, more images would indeed be welcomed, but are not "needed" since none are currently available. Greyman ( Paratus ) 02:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * This is about 80 words shy of 1000, but the "Aftermath" section is already full of fluff. I would strongly recommend that the nominator take this to GA instead. Thefourdotelipsis 22:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
 * It actually already is a GA. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 08:52, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Remove Nom (Inq only)
 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 21:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Doesn't meet Rule 18, and only has one edit since 12-1.  Hobbes ( Tiger's Lair ) 01:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 17:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 4)  Graestan ( Talk ) 01:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * 5)  Greyman ( Paratus ) 04:07, 10 January 2008 (UTC)