Talk:Imperial Army/Legends

Imperial Army Organization
Currently writing the section. Provisionally, I merely quoted the Imperial Sourcebook's summary into the section. I'm in the process of paraphrasing its contents. When that is posted, the quoted summary will be deleted. Kazuaki Shimazaki 16:04, 11 Aug 2005 (UTC)


 * Finished putting in the future layout. There really isn't much more to say about the higher levels, but there's plenty to be said for the lower levels. Probably sometime tomorrow... Kazuaki Shimazaki 17:45, 11 Aug 2005 (UTC)


 * Moving on and putting everything up to battalion. As an aside, there is a brief mention in the ISB about how popular an assignment repulsorlift battalions are because of Imperial emphasis on using them for maneuver rather than hard assault. Unfortunately, in the next section (on Regiments), it discusses how line regiments would typically use their repulsorlift battalion along with the assault battalion for hard battles while not commiting their line battalions - which is rather contradictory to the previous section - thus a brief discussion on whether the assignment to repulsorlift units is good (in terms of being lacking hard assaults) was deliberately added. Kazuaki Shimazaki 09:51, 13 Aug 2005 (UTC)


 * As mentioned, the line between unit and subunit is not perfectly clear in the Imperial Army (and really anyplace). After much deliberation, I decided to lump the Company into the "Units" section. Kazuaki Shimazaki 09:51, 13 Aug 2005 (UTC)


 * I will soon get a copy of the Imperial Sourcebook 2nd edition and be able to help this article out! --24.247.124.158 21:16, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Doom

 * Why is this article doomed? it looks great to me! (maybe a little incomplete but it's still very long and detailed) --24.247.124.158 20:11, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree. Removing. MarcK 21:16, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Stormtroopers

 * Are they an entire different organization than the army? --24.247.124.158 21:21, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, found the answer. --24.247.124.158 22:32, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)

AT-ATs
First up, I'm quietly flattered that 24.247.126.44 has taken over stuff from the Systems Army page I wrote. Secondly, VT-16 has moved the AT-AT and Juggernaut to mech. infantry, but under the ISB OB, this would have the odd effect of turning them into nominal "repulsorlift" units! I suspect that AT-ATs at least are "heavy tanks" on the WEG model, but that may be pure fan inference; should we enter them under both "armor" and "repulsorlift" categories for now?