Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

72nd Flight

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 19:08, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: SWPM

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:18, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * See below.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:21, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 21:34, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4)  Imperators II (Talk) 22:27, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * If you're going to source the article, every bullet in the infobox must be sourced. However, since it only has one appearance, I would argue that sourcing is unnecessary, but the decision is yours.
 * 3) **Done for all.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 13:42, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * The article needs a Behind the scenes section.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:22, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ** The BTS requirement also applies to your other current CANs.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:25, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Done for all.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 13:42, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) * I think Trade Federation ought to be listed in the affiliation field in the infobox in addition to the Confederacy of Independent Systems and the Confederate Navy; I'd say probably with one bullet under CIS. Again, this applies to all these articles, unless there's a specific reason you didn't include it. Otherwise, nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:14, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ** That would probably work pre-CIS, but the TF and the Techno Union Droid Army and the IGBC all merged their droid militaries into the Separatist Droid Army, and it is difficult to determine which Flights are being represented from TPM to RotS by noting their markings&mdash;unless someone has the time to spend going frame-by-frame to do so. Much like the Retail Caucus-affiliated droid army that Whorm Loathsom commanded, droids are no longer really affiliated with the TF after they are shipped unless they are specifically a TF detachment.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 23:44, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) * One more, applying to all these related articles; intro-exclusive information, such as the fighers' affiliation within the Trade Federation, needs to be added somewhere in the main body.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:21, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **TF references removed.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:59, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Forgive me, as I'm a bit confused. Is it confirmed canon that they were part of the Trade Federation at any point?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:00, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) ****I would have to study the markings of the Flights present on and above Naboo in TPM.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 01:54, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) *****I don't think that's necessary. As long as it's not mentioned in the TCG, it's fine.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 09:58, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) ******Nope, they are not identified as TF specifically.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 07:41, May 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) *******In that case, I would say the article is ready for CA. Nice work, Gethralkin.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:18, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) ********Forgive me, I was a bit hasty. The fact that they were in the service of the CIS during the Clone Wars needs to be mentioned somewhere outside the intro, perhaps in a History section.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:21, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) *********Good work. Please address the same intro-exclusive problems to the other articles, and I will support them as well.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:28, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) **********Done.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 02:35, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Not really an objection, but is there no available image? Other articles from the same sources have them, so why not this? Are they unavailable for some reason? - Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 11:10, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *In fact, consider this a blanket query to include the other three noms on flight groups below. - Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 11:12, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **No good resolution photos have been taken yet of these. We uploaded highres images on our site, but the gallery only needed thumbnails for WizKids' purposes. The other sources that you mention are either higher resolution previews of miniatures by game sites, or that were taken by me for the purpose of uploading here. I am extremely busy, so a photo shoot is not something I can always spend time on. If you know of any images available then, by all means, upload and include them.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:16, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Sorry, but nope. I'm not really up on this game, hence my reason for asking but not for objecting. Hopefully, decent shots will become available. - Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 10:27, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****I am on the lookout for any, and if I get the chance, I will take them myself and upload them. Just too busy to do photography right now.  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 13:18, June 1, 2011 (UTC)

Offices of the Imperial Head of State

 * Nominated by: Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 05:50, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:I hope you'll look the article over.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:58, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) * See below.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 09:56, May 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) *The article is currently missing a BTS section.
 * 3) * Also, try to add some context on the information. What was Coruscant? Who was Jaina Solo? What were their careers, and why did they take them on separate paths?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 15:35, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) **OK, I added a BTS section and I added some more context. I also expanded it a little more.Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 16:49, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) *** Better, but now you have intro-exclusive information; specifically, you mention in the intro that Fel was the Imperial Head of State, and that Coruscant was the GA capital. This info must be in the main body as well. Also, take a look at the formatting in the BTS; you italicize FotJ once and leave it normal another time. Also, the wording in the first sentence, "Fate of the Jedi Allies" is a little awkward. Could you perhaps rearrange the sentence? &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:58, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * Please fix links so they don't point to redirects; specifically, Imperial, Galactic Alliance, and vidscreen.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:58, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ** Imperators got GA and vidscreen, so just Imperial.
 * 8) * I apologize if I wasn't specific enough when I said "context." I'm afraid I think you went a bit overboard with detail, as much of the article as it is currently written is not relevant to the office. We really just need to know the gist of what was said during the conversation in the office, not a history of their relationship.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:37, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) *I downsized on some of their relationship details to concentrate more on the office. Does it need more downsizing or not?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 17:46, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **I'm satisfied, good work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:58, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) Imperators II
 * 12) * I believe that the Imperial state that existed in 44 ABY was the Imperial Remnant, not the Galactic Empire.
 * 13) **I disagree; Jag consistently says Galactic Empire, and corrects those who refer to it as the Imperial Remnant.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:33, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) * All the infobox info must be referenced.  Imperators II (Talk) 17:13, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) **Per CA rules, not if the subject in question only has one appearance.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:33, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) ***It's encouraged, though. (OK, not really an objection, then.)  Imperators II (Talk) 17:41, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) ****True, it is encouraged, so I'd be okay if Cal wanted to do that. Doesn't matter to me.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:58, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) ***** I added references to the infobox now.Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 02:16, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) * The "History" section should begin with mentioning the era during which the offices were on Coruscant.  Imperators II (Talk) 17:18, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) *OK did I miss anymore redirect links?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 17:34, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) **Nope, you got them all, good work. Just see my remaining objection above.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:38, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) *OK good. Is there anything else that I missed that needs to be fixed up?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 18:06, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 23) *If you're going to source the article, you need to source the whole thing (except the intro).&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 09:56, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 24) *I added the sources to the main article. Did I mess anything up?Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 14:33, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 25) **Nope, nice work. Just note that you do not need the template outside the infobox, and you do not need to list the same reference with the full format after the first one. I went ahead and fixed that for you, just see the history for future reference.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:48, May 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 26) Cav:
 * 27) *The History section: the single sentence should be merged into the large paragrapg to create a single paragraph. There are POV issues in the text - calling Bwua'tu a "great" lawyer, for instance. Some context on Tahiri is needed as well, along with the reason for her being on trial.
 * 28) **I think I got it all. Cal Jedi StarForgeSucksGas-KOTOR1.jpg (Personal Comm Channel) 02:07, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 29) *Ref tags are not needed in the BTS section for the Allies information as it is self-sourcing. - Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 11:34, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 30) **Got it. Is that better? Cal Jedi StarForgeSucksGas-KOTOR1.jpg (Personal Comm Channel) 15:33, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 31) Jujiggum
 * 32) *Requires a Conviction update. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 21:01, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 33) **I updated the appearances section. But I've been trying to get my hands on a copy of Conviction without success. So if it needs to be expanded further, it might be a couple of days before I can check the book. Cal Jedi StarForgeSucksGas-KOTOR1.jpg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:15, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 34) ***Yeah, it'll just need a little bit of expansion. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 14:24, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 35) ****OK I finally got Conviction today, but when I glanced through it I didn't see any mention of the Offices of the Imperial Head of State. Is it mentioned by a different name or did I just miss it? Cal Jedi StarForgeSucksGas-KOTOR1.jpg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:16, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 36) *****Appearances are at the beginnings of Chapters 15 and 29. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 20:37, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Phalanx Route

 * Nominated by: &mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 09:46, May 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Here you are, SavageBob :).

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 17:50, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Solid work, TK. Others may find there to be too many M-dashes, but I wanted to break up the very long sentences a bit. It may be better to break them up further if folks don't like the dashiness. ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 19:27, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, nice work, TK!  Imperators II (Talk) 18:41, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) *Thanks :) !&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 18:45, May 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could we just get some context on Cormit and Telupe? I believe that's all I have. Cool article, TK!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:33, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *If there's any precedent consensus and authors' comment regarding this issue&mdash;systems that share their name with a planet have that world located within them&mdash;, then I am willing to add it. However, if there's no such thing, then it would be speculation. Also, there's an ongoing discussion about this in the SH.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 09:17, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **So basically what you're saying is that, although TEA says "Prominent planets in Chiss Space include:", then gives a list of the planets and then a map showing their locations, connecting the dots on the map with the descriptions of the planets is speculation. IMHO, that goes completely against common sense. Just a thought.  Imperators II (Talk) 16:07, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Realistic fanwankery facts added.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 17:09, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Imperators II
 * 6) * I don't think you should pipelink the Catlia and Tenupe systems, because you don't identify them as such in the first sentence. And why pipelink them in the infobox?
 * 7) * The fact that the route began in the Ascendancy's core territory should be added.
 * 8) * I think the route's location in the Unknown Regions and the Wild Space should be mentioned earlier in the article.
 * 9) * I'm not sure if it's really necessary to reference the fact that the route appeared in TEA, but referencing it to page 222 doesn't make any sense at all. I suggest you remove the references 1.09 and 1.10 in the Bts section.  Imperators II (Talk) 16:07, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **Excess refs removed.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 17:09, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) * To be precise, "Chiss Expansionary Defense Force staging planet" has to be sourced to p.221, "jungle world" to p.223, "Chiss" to p.221 and p.223 (because the map doesn't give info about the planets' affiliation), and "star systems" to Appendix (p.229, p.235) (because, imho, the map refers to the planets, not systems).  Imperators II (Talk) 21:15, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) **Done. Thanks for the advice!&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 11:14, May 25, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Bob
 * 2) * Yay, another hyperlane! :) Can you specify how the junction works out with the Vagaari Corridor? It looks like a T-junction, which I think is important to note, since the two routes meeting at Catlia seems to mark the terminus for the Phalanx Route. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:03, May 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Thanks to all for the reviews and diligence!&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 17:09, May 23, 2011 (UTC)

Way of Schesa

 * Nominated by: &mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 11:56, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Bob's dream being fulfilled.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice article, TK. You're a welcome addition to the review pages here on Wookieepedia.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:12, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Thanks! :)&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 13:41, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) What Axinal said. ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 02:44, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) A bit emdash heavy, but I'll let it slide this time.  1358  (Talk)  21:08, June 4, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ecks Dee
 * 2) * The Bts is too similar to your other trade route CANs. There is no point in just copypasting the same text into multiple articles. Please reword.
 * 3) **Done.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 11:53, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * "The Phalanx Route first.." I though the article was about the Way of Schesa...
 * 5) **Sorry&mdash;continuity error removed.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 11:53, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * "Chiss Ruling Families—, within" I don't think there should be commas or spaces after an emdash.
 * 7) **Spacing removed.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 11:53, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) * Please do not abbreviate the CEDF.
 * 9) **Full name substituted.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 11:53, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) * You have two [2] after each other; should one of them be another reference?
 * 11) **Accident; fixed.&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 11:53, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) * Reference 5 has an error: The Essential Atlas, p. i" Page i? 1358  (Talk)  06:49, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) **Pages around the table of contents are marked with Roman numerals in the Atlas (i-x; non-capitalized). Otherwise, thanks for the review!&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 11:53, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) ***I see. 1358  (Talk)  21:08, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) Axinal
 * 16) * Do you think you could create an article for the civil war in which the "former Ruling Family" fought? Actually, an article for the ruling family itself might be good, too, even if both articles would require conjecture tags. Otherwise, good work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:01, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) **Civil war article exists, and I now added the link. Ruling Family article created. Thanks for the review!&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 14:25, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) Imperators II
 * 19) * The TEA description of Pesfavri also mentions that the Way of Schesa was "one of the only hyperlanes leading into the Redoubt". I suggest you add that info. Also, the bit about the route leading into the Redoubt would help the phrase "the other terminal point" make more sense.
 * 20) *In ref[1] you should specify that the grid F-8 is also in the Unknown Regions (and that Pesfavri is in the Unknown Regions, too).
 * 21) * You'll have to source the "Unknown Regions" in the first sentence to ref[1].
 * 22) * Imho, "planets owned" should be changed to "home planets", since this would be more accurate.
 * 23) * In the BTS section, why source with ref[2] only the second sentence when you could source both the second and third sentence?  Imperators II (Talk) 00:10, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 24) **Done. Thanks!&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 08:31, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * You might consider pointing ref[1] to p.145 instead of p.4, as the map there shows much more clearly and distinctly that the Redoubt is located in the Unknown Regions. As you can see, this is not an objection, however.  Imperators II (Talk) 00:10, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes. The map there is indeed of a higher quality. Thanks!&mdash; TK-999  Era-imp.png( Rise of the Empire ) 08:31, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Senin Vant

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:30, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Maybe expansion possible? Any ideas?

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:11, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 10:17, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 22:01, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Rubedo
 * 2) * Context on the Battle of Utapau and the Clone Wars. Give a time reference.
 * 3) * You could also explicitly say the Skyforce was the Utapauan air force.
 * 4) * While we're at it, context on Utapau. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:49, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **All fixed. Any idea Naru if I can bring him up to 250 words. I added much context, but this stuff is all relevant to him.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:59, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Deja vu... NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:09, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) * How do you know if this is a male or female? They look very similar to me.
 * 8) **Said in the book.
 * 9) * Mention the Complete Cross-Sections in the BTS.
 * 10) **Added.
 * 11) * The page in the Cross-section was not about him. Clairify that it was on his ship.
 * 12) **Hope that's better.
 * 13) * His eyes don't look blue to me. They look black. If you include this in the infobox, include it in the article.
 * 14) **Changed and added.
 * 15) * How do you know he was affiliated with the Repuclic? Just because he fought alongside their forces to free his planet, does not mean there was an official partnership. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:09, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) **Agreed.
 * 17) Axinal
 * 18) * Since the Ep. III Incredible Cross-Sections includes the juggernaut and Grievous's wheel bike, it might be good to clarify in the BTS that the ICS is not exclusive to ships.
 * 19) **Added.
 * 20) *I gave the article a minor copy-edit, very nice overall.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 23:58, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) **Thank you.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:49, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) Imperators II
 * 23) * Doesn't Category:Resistance fighters apply here?  Imperators II (Talk) 00:47, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 24) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 07:32, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 25) * Publishing years of the works should be added in the BTS section.  Imperators II (Talk) 17:38, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 26) **Added. Not sure if that is neccessary.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:43, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 27) One last thing. Would it be possible to specify the artist that drew Vant? If so, he/she should be mentioned in the BTS. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:42, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 28) *No that would result in speculation.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:12, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 29) **So the art is not directly attributed? In that case, say that it was either Hans Jenssen or Richard Chasemore. They illustrated the whole book. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:39, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 30) ***Left a note about that in the BtS.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:26, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 31) ****Thanks. Remember to add this to other articles dealing with the CS books. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:49, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 32) Bob
 * 33) * "Senin Vant was a black-eyed Utai male..." Any reason to put his black eyes here? I mean, are there also red-eyed and blue-eyed Utai and it's necessary to distinguish this early in the article? If not, I'd recommend removing "black-eyed" and simply stating at some other point that "He had black eyes." ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 05:13, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 34) **No that was simply because I had to mention the fact (Infobox-exclusive).  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:26, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Has anyone an English version of the Complete Cross Sections to check? In the German version, his name is Senim Vant.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:01, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *I do. His name is spelled with an "n" there. Bonslywizard  Naboo.svg ( Send a transmission ) 21:59, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Thanks.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:23, May 30, 2011 (UTC)

Wom-Nii Gnaden

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:46, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Even more

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:13, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Imperators II (Talk) 18:03, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 05:22, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 05:22, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Say which side the Tide fought for.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:44, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:10, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Imperators II
 * 4) * Category:Individuals of unidentified species?  Imperators II (Talk) 21:46, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 07:54, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Crombach Nebula

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:59, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ...and more

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:39, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 05:24, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Rubedo
 * 2) * Specify its galactic coordinates in the prose.
 * 3) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:59, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Mentioning Gnaden's death in the nebula should be mentioned.
 * 5) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:59, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ***I'm sure glad we have the Department of Reduncancy Department. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:13, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) * Mention that that entry in the Cross-sections was reprinted in the CCS.
 * 8) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:59, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) * Specify the CSWE entry in the source list. Possibly mention this mention in the BTS.
 * 10) **Specified.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:13, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) Imperators II
 * 12) * should be used in the "Sources" section and references.
 * 13) **Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:11, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) * Imho, something's not right with "The The" in the BTS section.  Imperators II (Talk) 11:22, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) **Changed. Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:59, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) * The first two sentences can't be sourced to Revenge of the Sith: Incredible Cross-Sections.  Imperators II (Talk) 18:34, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) **Fixed.
 * 18) * Publishing years of the works should be added in the BTS section.  Imperators II (Talk) 18:36, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) **Added. EAOC has no "real" publishing date.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:03, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

NTB-630 naval bomber

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:08, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ...

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) * Category:Incom Corporation products?  Imperators II (Talk) 18:44, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:16, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Ado Eemon

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:19, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ...

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Imperators II (Talk) 20:10, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 21:57, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * You should probably directly mention (and link) that he was a male in the body of the article. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:11, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:00, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *I am going to look it over one more time before supporting.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:25, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Imperators II
 * 6) * Is it specified whether his "private fleet of gunships" consisted of the Heavy Missile Platforms? If it is, "the" is necessary.  Imperators II (Talk) 18:42, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **It is specified, but what "the" do you mean?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:16, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) Bob
 * 9) * "Ado Eemon was the male silken-tongued ruler[1] of the Mid Rim[2] planet Caramm V during the Clone Wars.." I think you are trying to cram too much information into one sentence here. The way this is worded, it sounds like Caramm V had more than one ruler, like a female one, or one who wasn't silken-tongued. I'd suggest saying something like "Ado Eemon was the ruler of..." and then listing the maleness and smooth-talking bits later.
 * 10) **Reworded.
 * 11) * Can you find a synonym for "gunship" for at least one of the uses?
 * 12) **Varied.
 * 13) * "beautiful" is POV. Can you attribute this assessment to someone or a group? Otherwise, beautiful article. :) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 05:27, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) **Is it still POV if a source exlicitely tells it so. That's the case here. Thanks for the beautiful review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:35, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) ***Not if you say, "So-and-so considered the world beautiful." But apparently not the case here. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:57, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Crombach Nebula

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:46, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: and another one

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Imperators II (Talk) 18:49, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Looks good.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:17, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 05:31, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Could you use a Template:CSWECite for the The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia source in the article? (This will show what entry/entries the battle was mentioned in.)
 * 3) **Used.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:14, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * It would be good to mention what entries it was in from the encyclopedia in the behind the scenes as well.
 * 5) **Only one entry, so I prefer not to.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:14, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *Oops, I meant you to do this only if there was more than one entry.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:17, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) * You linked Wom-Nii Gnaden twice in the infobox
 * 8) **Fixed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:01, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) *Other than that, it looks pretty good.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:56, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **Thank you.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:01, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) Imperators II
 * 12) * Gnaden's rank of a General is infobox-exclusive.  Imperators II (Talk) 21:53, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) **Fixed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:26, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) The Galactic Republic isn't mentioned outside the infobox. 1358  (Talk)  12:10, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) *Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:19, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified assassin (Jurgan Kalta)

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  03:45, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: This one is for you SavageBob.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Goodie (: –Tm_T (Talk) 07:08, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Aw, my very own assassin! :) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:28, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1)  Imperators II (Talk) 18:55, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Tm
 * 1) * As a start: I would remove "'s enemy" from the article name, what do you think? –Tm_T (Talk) 18:24, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) **I agree, done.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:29, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) * I would like to have something about the timeframe he lived earlier than in the very end.
 * 4) **How is this?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:07, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Now its repetitive, vary the wording or remove latter mention of the JCW altogether. –Tm_T (Talk) 20:19, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ****How about now?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:27, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) * "Inventory entry"? I would say "item description" or something less game mechanicy. –Tm_T (Talk) 19:23, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) **Yeah, that did sound bad, fixed.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:07, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) * Hmm, perhaps remove the repetition in the Bts too, you could simply say "the item was also in the guide" or something, I would assume it's apparent the guide has the same item description than the game. (I don't usually even mention the guide in the Bts) –Tm_T (Talk) 20:19, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **I trimmed it somewhat.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:27, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Included, included, repetition. Would it be ok if you just state "the same item description" or such and not reiterating what item and how is that item description relevant?
 * 12) ****Fixed.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:40, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) * Ah, as it's the very same text in the game and in the guide (correct me if I'm wrong), shouldn't it be Mo for the guide too? –Tm_T (Talk) 20:34, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) **All sources are supposed to be mentions only. (I was told not to call it a mention only for a previous nomination.)-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:40, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) ***I disagree on this: if it were describing the article subject, it wouldn't be mention only like it is now. But I leave this matter be for now. (:
 * 16) * One more, AFAIK the name in the infobox should not have "unidentified" nor "(Jurgan Kalta)" as both are OOU identifiers(?). –Tm_T (Talk) 20:51, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) **Do you have any suggestions, because there isn't much else to go on and I'm stumped.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:36, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) ***Just remove those so it says "Assassin" as it's the only "name" we have for they IU wise. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 21:41, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) ****I would like to say that I hav found numerous good and comprehensive articles with this sort of OOU information in the infobox. Just look at almost any unidentified character on the GA list or CA list and you will see what I mean.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:47, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) *****Apparently there's no consistency nor policy on this yet, I would get rid of those but do as you feel best. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 07:08, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

The next Jurgan Kalta nomination.-- Exiled Jedi   (Greetings)  03:45, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey Tm T, I switched out the mention only in the appearances section for an indirect mention only, and I added an indirect mention only to the sources section. (both of which seem correct to me) Please tell me what you think of this change.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:17, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ye, after reading the item description, it's definately indirect mention only. –Tm_T (Talk) 19:05, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

PS-29-3

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: And now, the final JKTCG-exclusive character, to complete one of my ongoing projects.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Looks good to me.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:56, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Imperators II (Talk) 07:58, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Nice work as always, Hanzo. ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 05:34, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * It seems to me that if you have a personality and traits section then you should be able to do a short biography section.
 * 3) *And since you have some sectioning you need to link items once in the intro and once in the rest of the article.
 * 4) *Perhaps more later. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:45, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Responded to all. Hanzo Hasashi 19:46, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * Well... I am now confused, you seemed to contradict yourself by saying that "biography sections are not required unless they fall under 200 words" and that "Sans the intro, PS-29-3 is 176 words long". This seems to say that a biography section is needed since the article is below 200 words without it, please explain this for me so I can make my decision. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  03:11, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **Oops, I meant to say above 200 words. Hanzo Hasashi 03:25, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ***I understand now. Go ahead and remove it. It does seem rather redundant as it is now.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  03:31, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Exactly what I was thinking, thanks for the response. Hanzo Hasashi 03:36, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) Darth Needham
 * 11) *could to try to improve P and T? Darth Needham 18:15, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) **Could you be a bit more specific in what you feel should be improved?  Imperators II (Talk) 19:12, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) ***I would also ask in what way should it be improved? This is the only thing I can think of. Hanzo Hasashi 21:57, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) ****I really think that the Personality in Personality and traits is severely lacking.Darth Needham 20:45, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) *****I know, since there is almost nothing known about him. What I have is all known info. Hanzo Hasashi 20:48, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) Imperators II
 * 17) * Please rephrase the third and fourth sentence of the BTS section so that they don't both start with "His".
 * 18) * In the third sentence of the BTS section you use "also". Considering that his relatively weak statistics could be contrasted with the power boost, I would use "although" or something like that.  Imperators II (Talk) 19:12, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 19) **Responded to both. Hanzo Hasashi 21:57, June 5, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * The Scum and Villainy and Masters of the Force cards both seem to show him flying around the Death Star. Is this solid enough proof he fought in the Battle of Yavin, or could it also have been just a drill? Hanzo Hasashi 17:15, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think that you can assume he fought in the battle.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:45, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe you could still work something from that into the prose?  Imperators II (Talk) 19:12, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Imperators, if you click the links and look at the photos, is that unquestionably the Death Star he is flying across? If so, will add into his article. Hanzo Hasashi 02:52, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, it does look quite similar, but I guess we can't just assume it.  Imperators II (Talk) 07:58, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * With intro, it is currently 247 words, just short of GA quality. As is, I can't think of ways to further increase its word count. Hanzo Hasashi 20:09, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Now, upon seeing DS-181-3 and DS-181-4's GA's, have gotten rid of one sentence from the intro. Article now 232 words, and not so much borderline GA. Hanzo Hasashi 13:30, June 3, 2011 (UTC)

Third Legion

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:43, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: After a while, a little bit WP:TCW from me

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:22, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 21:55, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * I think the civil war on Balith is deserving of its own article.
 * 3) **Linked.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:25, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Also, the BTS could use some expansion, primarily with the inclusion "Assassin"'s airdate.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:30, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Mentioned.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:25, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) Bob
 * 7) * Can you say who it was who sent Anakin and Rex? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 05:38, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:37, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Balith

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:53, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: And one more

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * As with Third Legion, the release date of "Assassin" could be added to the BTS.
 * 3) **Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:34, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Also, the fact that the planet was Republic-aligned is currently infobox-exclusive.
 * 5) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:34, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Caramm V

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:18, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Clone Wars

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) * Please note that TEAOC lists star systems, not planets. Also it has established sectors for Mid Rim systems. So please update the article accordingly, i.e., mention the planet's sector, system and coordinates in prose and add correct information about TEAOC to the BTS section.
 * 3) **Ah thank you. All should be allright now.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:38, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *** "mention the planet's sector, system and coordinates in prose and add correct information about TEAOC to the BTS section".  Imperators II (Talk) 20:36, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Should be allright now.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:43, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) * In the Ado Eemon article, you mention that the planet supplied the CIS with HMPs. Add this info.
 * 7) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:38, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) * If you've added Category:Republic-aligned planets to the article, this information has to be reflected in the main body and the infobox.  Imperators II (Talk) 20:11, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) **That wasn't me, but this info is wrong. Removed. Thanks for your review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:38, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Kallil-virus jelly

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 07:32, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I felt naked without a CA nom. Now if only I knew what the fuck this was...

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 16:37, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Goes great with nutmeat butter! ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 05:40, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) *Considering that the only thing we know about it is that it trembled, this is impressive. My only problem is the word "something" in the first sentence, which I find a little too informal. Could that be replaced with "a substance" or something of the like? Nice work, Naru.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 15:49, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Since we're using that as a category, I suppose it's OK. We don't even technically know if it is a substance or not. That was a bit of a IRC suggested cop-out in the face of complete ambiguity. This is a whole new breed of random name drop. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 15:52, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Balith Civil War

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:48, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's Axinals fault :P

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Always happy to cause trouble. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:51, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * Could you add that Balith was located in the Inner Rim (with proper sourcing, obviously)? Otherwise, good work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:46, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:47, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

All Stars Burn as One

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:14, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Cestus Deception, I present you the official anthem of the Galactic Republic

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work. I've been meaning to work on articles related to The Cestus Deception, including this one, but you beat me to it. Not surprising, considering it's been on my to-do list for over a year now. :P&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:34, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Considering that my brilliantly flawless prose was its base, how could I not? (I kid, I kid. :P) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:23, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) I'd love it if LFL actually recorded this and released it. ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 05:43, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Guh. This was mine months ago when I started and never got back to it. XP (:P) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:16, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Ostrine edge

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:35, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Here is another KOTOR nomination

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support


 * 1) –Tm_T (Talk) 15:22, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Tm
 * 2) * "An ostrine edge was a type of melee weapon edge used around the time of the Dark Wars,[2]" ... that reference cannot be used for all of this, add the missing reference. (:
 * 3) **Better?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:16, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Bts gives an impression that the price of the item meant the player may not find it, maybe mention it's rare beside being random?
 * 5) **Heh, your right, fixed.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:16, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *And this is not obscure ): –Tm_T (Talk) 15:06, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **Well I just thought if you asked most users on this site about an Ostrine edge they would have no clue about it, but maybe not for some users.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:16, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) *And check what I did. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 15:22, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Just to show that I like obscure nominations.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:35, June 6, 2011 (UTC)

Dilonexa I

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "What's your favorite thing about Space? Mine is Space. "

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Tm
 * 2) *First, see my copyedit, some whitespace changes. (
 * Uh, please please make some attempt to make these articles less identical, otherwise they're not worth having the articles of their own I'd say. –Tm_T (Talk) 05:43, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) **I'd like to second this. There honestly is no point in copypasting a dozen of articles, only replacing the name. 1358  (Talk)  08:13, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) ***I could add more templates, but I don't think it's possible to say this completely differently 39 times. I'll give it a shot now that you've asked, but I make no promises about complete individuality across the board. About what kind of ratio of article:template would you prefer should I not be able to change it up every time? Also, I've been talking about this for a while and have had to delay it. If you're concerned about something like this, would you mind talking to me before I put it up next time? Nevertheless, I don't think whether or not they are notable enough to exist at all is an issue here. They're planets. If we have articles on jelly we know nothing about, we should have articles on every planet. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 08:28, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ****I'm not asking complete individuality, you could express things with different words, or reorder bits or... just as long as they don't look each others' clones like they do now. And about notability, I'm not saying they're not notable enough, but having the exactly same text spread thru 20+ (or, as I assume you're plan being, ~40) articles makes not much sense. I know you can do it. And about talking before, I didn't notice these articles until I checked if I had any objections to be struck in this CAN page, otherwise I would have done it. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 09:07, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Excecuting Phase 3 of Operation Centurian Deathstroke. These articles are identical (wanted to make a WP:CAN subpage for this, but whatever). Please leave objections on Dilonexa I. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I did a similar thing to this a couple of months back for a bunch of random "X" assassins. I just had to make each articles writings slightly different in each case, so it's an OK example of what you can do with these. Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 08:24, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Exactly what I (and prolly Xd) am after, I'm sure there's ways to have the same content presented in different ways. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 09:07, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Just a query, and by no means discouragement, because I agree that we should have articles on all of these if warranted, but: is each of these planets mentioned by name in the OS? By this I mean, do we see the names of each of these printed out on the page? We tend not to have articles on planets based on a conjectural numbering from a known planet's name. In other words, we don't have an article on Laboi I even though we have one on Laboi II. Does that make sense? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 16:04, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think I understand what you mean. That there are 22 hot planets in the system, then the habitable XXIII, and then 17 cold planets was specified in Oseon. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:38, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Dilonexa II

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Space. Going to Space. Can't wait. Space."

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa III

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Space. Trial. Putting the system on trial. In Space. Space System. On trial. Guilty! Of being in Space! Going to Space Jail!"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa IV

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Dad, I'm in Space. 'I'm pround of you, son' Dad, are you Space? 'Yes, now we are a family again.'"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa V

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Oh, play it cool. Play it cool. Here come the Space Cops. Here come the Space Cops. Help me, Space Cops. Space Cops help."

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa VI

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Space. Going. Better buy a telescope. Wanna see me? Buy a telescope. Gonna be in Space."

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa VII

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "I love Space. Love Space. Atmosphere, Black Holes, Astronauts, Nebulas, J-Jupiter, The Big Dipper. THE BIG DIPPER!"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa VIII

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Orbit. Space orbit. In my Space suit. Space."

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa IX

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Oh. The Sun.I'm gonna meet the Sun. Oh no. What'll I say? Hi, Sun. Ooh boy."

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa X

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Look. An eclipse No! Don't look!"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa XI

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Come here, Space. I have a secret for you. No, come closer. Space."

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa XII

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Oh. I know. Spell it! S-P-...ACE!"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa XIII

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Hey, Lady, I'm the-I'm the best at Space."

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa XIV

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Gotta go to Space. Comets, stars, galaxies, Orion."

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa XV

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACE!"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * All past quotes from Space Core of Portal 2 by Valve. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Dilonexa XVI

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Dammit, we know! Space. You. In It. WE GET IT!"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Adventure Core of Portal 2 by Valve. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Dilonexa XVII

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Fact: Space does not exist"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Fact Core of Portal 2 by Valve. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:31, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Dilonexa XVIII

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Alright, I've been thinking. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. (Yeah!)"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa XIX

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Make life take the lemons back! (Yeah!) I don't want your damn lemons! What am I supposed to do with these?! (Yeah! Take the lemons!)"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa XX

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Demand to see life's manager! (Yeah!) Make life rue the day it thought it could give Cave Johnson lemons! Do you know who I am?!"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa XXI

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "I'm the man who who's gonna burn your house down! With the Lemons! (Oh, I like this guy!)"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dilonexa XXII

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "I'm gonna get my engineers to invent a Combustible Lemon that burns your house down! *coughs* (Burn his house down! Burning people! He says what we're all thinking!)"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Cave Johnson and GLaDOS of Portal 2 by Valve. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:25, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Kashyyykian giant weaver

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 05:04, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Arachnophobia!

(0 ECs/1 Users/0 Total)
Support
 * Hanzo Hasashi 03:28, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) *Could we get some context on Kashyyyk and Darth Vader?
 * 3) *I think the author and release date of TFU could be added to the BTS.
 * 4) *Otherwise, very cool, if a little scary.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:03, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Do not make unnecessary pipelinks for articles that otherwise don't need pipelinking, such as what you did with Kashyyyk. Just keep it Kashyyyk's. For articles that already need to be pipelinked either way, such as Darth Vader, it is your choice whether or not to include the 's in the pipelink, and I'm fine, and have done, both ways. This is just something that always tends to bother me whenever I see it. Hanzo Hasashi 03:28, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Troig language

 * Nominated by: ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 05:56, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: New canon from a quiz book. Go figure.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:00, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Impressive. Since Troigs are from Pollillus, I think it's safe to assume that the language was spoken on that planet, even if it's not explicitly mentioned in the book. Do you mind adding that to the article?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:58, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Like that? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 21:52, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Works for me, great article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:00, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * It occurred to me that this article doesn't have an infobox&mdash;and looking over articles like Galactic Basic Standard, Huttese, and Ewokese, nor do any of those. Since there is no language infobox, it wouldn't be fair to oppose this article for lack of one. Still, I think it would be a fine addition to the Wook.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:00, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it would be nice. We could crib something from Wikipedia, maybe. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 06:56, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified Twi'lek (Korriban space station)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:04, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Guest nom for WP:TOR, I guess. That Twi'lek that everyone&mdash;not just the smuggler&mdash;ogled in Return.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Imperators II (Talk) 20:19, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Still think the reused model should make the Bts. SinisterSamurai 02:44, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) * I'd say the uniform was black and gray.
 * 3) **Changed.
 * 4) * Shouldn't it be "a Republic corporal"?  Imperators II (Talk) 20:06, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Yes, I suppose so. Changed.
 * 6) **By the way, I de-linked black, since the rules allow to link the article simply to color once rather than every specific color. Thanks for the copy-edit and the review, Imperators!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:13, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Whoops, didn't notice "green" was linked to color instead of green. :D  Imperators II (Talk) 20:19, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) SinisterSamurai
 * 9) * This character has the exact same model as Eleena Daru, down to the outfit and the headdress. The only difference is that the lighting is not consistent between the render/display and Return's space station environment. Compared to other, in-environment shots of Daru, the twi'lek is nearly indistinguishable. If this argument doesn't completely void the need for this article, then the re-use of a model should, at the very least, be mentioned in the Bts. SinisterSamurai 00:04, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **I do not see this as Eleena Daru. The outfit, as you mentioned, is the same, something I never would have noticed. However, this Twi'lek very clearly has green skin, and I don't think that's simply a lighting issue. It also doesn't quite fit canonically, with Daru being a close ally to the Sith, but considering the amount of time that passes between Return and Deceived, that's probably not a wholly valid argument. Still, I think the skin color is at least enough to say that this is not Daru, but I can agree with at least putting something like that in the BTS.
 * 11) ***Struck because of below conflict. SinisterSamurai 02:37, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) * If we are ignoring ducktest policy and determining that this is not Eleena Daru, then we know nothing about this character. She could be a waitress. The smuggler's off-color humor about inspecting troops is not enough to identify the position or affiliation this twi'lek had. SinisterSamurai 00:04, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) **I think that's fair to say. I'll move the article to Unidentified Twi'lek (Korriban space station).
 * 14) * The republic trooper who did the chastising has an existing article: Unidentified Havoc Squad commander, and this article should link there. SinisterSamurai 00:04, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) **Are we sure that this is the same person? There are two troopers present. Can we say with confirmation that the corporal and the Havoc Squad commander are the same individual? Thanks for the review!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:48, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) ***In Return, both troopers are different. One has a big black triangle on his chest, and the other (the speaker), has a knife strapped. The speaker's armor is identical to the Hope trooper. They knife Trooper and the Hope trooper also have the same voice actor. And, when knife trooper removes his helmet after the explosion, we see he shares the same face model as Hope Trooper. SinisterSamurai 02:37, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) ****Good catch. I was pretty confident that the commander was the other guy, just based on positioning and such, but your evidence is sound.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:40, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 18) fihgdihgdsho
 * 19) *I normally don't review on the CAN, but this caught my eye: "The model for Eleena Daru, who appeared in The Old Republic's first trailer, Deceived, appears to be reused for this Twi'lek, whose uniform and headdress are nearly identical to Daru's. However, Daru is a Rutian Twi'lek with blue skin,[3] and the two have not been confirmed to be the same individual." Unless it's confirmed to be the same character, this statement is speculation, which has no place within the article.  JangFett  (Talk) 02:10, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 20) **Classic case of two reviewers wanting two different things :P No slight to either of you, as you both make valid points here. Jang, since I concur that this is speculation, I will remove it. Thank you for your review.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:28, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) ***Personally, I would have worded it less speculatively. There's a fine line between speculation and observation. SinisterSamurai 02:37, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 22) ****I agree there's a fine line, and honestly, there seems to be some inconsistency as to when an observation like that is considered speculation and when it's not&mdash;take, for example, the second paragraph of the BTS in Tynnan, which is a featured article. I'd be more than willing to put that in, less speculatively, if an EC thinks it belongs.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:54, June 8, 2011 (UTC)

Comments