Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Tusken relic cave

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 14:36, April 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: *Tusken noises*

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:11, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 22:43, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:29, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Assuming Winterz's satisfaction. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:41, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * Context on Tatooine, Galactic Civil War.  Stake black   msg 20:27, April 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Context added. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:30, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Could you mention Tatooine's galactic location? i.e., system, region. And appropriately sourced. Cheers.  Stake black   msg 16:40, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't see why that is necessary. The location is on the planet, not in space. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 20:09, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * It's usually asked. But in any case, nevermind.  Stake black   msg 20:38, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Article for the Tusken tribe?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 01:56, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) ** Done (link at tribe.) Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 16:02, April 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Winterz
 * 5) *Please fully link the "SWG: An Empire Divided" and fully indicate it so in the Bts, otherwise we have no idea what the "Empire Divided" is.
 * 6) ** An Empire Divided was just the subtitle they used for the initial release of the game. I've added the subtitle to the BTS link to avoid any confusion. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 20:36, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) *Not sure about this but the external links are likely too many. Just the respective article should do it. Winterz (talk) 02:26, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **Agreed. Removed. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 20:36, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ziugen

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 01:27, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Are we factory-workers? Are we farmers? No, we are slaves in the Hutt Space!

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:40, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:46, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) For future reference, there's no need to add the "___ was located in the territory of ____" anymore; it's rather frowned upon as fluffing now. However, the stuff about the Hutts is fine here, I think.  Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:38, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) *Thank you for the heads-up, Cade. I've removed the extraneous territory information from my nominated articles now.  Imperators II (Talk) 17:19, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Winterz (talk) 15:53, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Say what, Cade?
 * 2) * Recover the territorial part, sir. Winterz (talk) 02:30, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **No, Winterz, it's not necessary. I didn't do it on Amador, and it's really utter speculation to even mention the info. Yes, it's located in the territory, but we don't know whether the planet was part of the government, and saying that "___ was located in the territory of ___" is basically trying to hint at affiliation when there isn't a link. Regardless, it's a moot point here, as he didn't remove anything. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  02:35, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Actually, if the planet really appears (as in named) on the map within said organization/faction then this means it belongs to that faction. Winterz (talk) 02:54, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Eh, I'm fairly certain that's wrong, but this isn't the place to discuss it. However, you should still strike your objection, since he didn't remove anything&mdash;Hutt Space is mentioned in the article. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  03:10, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Yeah..nice try, Mr. We'll discuss this later on IRC. Winterz (talk) 04:00, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ******O_O  I honestly totally missed that. I have no idea why that was removed; it's perfectly valid info, as it's Hutt Space.  Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  04:02, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) *******OK, let's get this straight, then. Cade, which part specifically were you against&mdash;the "territory around Ziugen was part of Hutt Space by the year..." or the "territory around Ziugen was explored by the year..."? I'm confused.  Imperators II (Talk) 08:57, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) ********Since Cade has dismissed his charges, I've reverted your latest edit, Imperators. Please, do the same on all your noms ;)
 * 10) ********What I was referring to was the information from the Atlas about the region's political affiliations, such as "by 137 ABY the region around ____ was under the control of Darth Krayt's Empire." Not all planet articles have that info; it's article-length-fluffing at best and speculation-inspiring at its worst. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:08, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) *********Yeah, well, that's exactly what I originally had (and have now again) in the article. "By 12,000 BBY the region around ____ was under the control of the Hutts." How is that different?  Imperators II (Talk) 15:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) *********Gah. I think Hutt Space is different, as the region is almost entirely under the control of the Hutts, but this is probably an issue that has to be settled with a CT after further discussion. I'll talk with Winterz about this. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:19, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) * Explanation for the infobox-exclusive coordinates in the Bts. Winterz (talk) 13:15, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) **Will that suffice?  Imperators II (Talk) 15:15, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) *** Nah, that's not what I meant. You should explain why they're infobox-exclusive and also reveal their non-canonical status. Winterz (talk) 15:31, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 16) ****Winterz, that's entirely overkill. I didn't have to do it on Uphrades, Berrun, or Nathema; they just have to be mentioned as gird squares. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:34, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 17) *****Okay then. Winterz (talk) 15:53, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * You should wait till May 1st to nom more Hutt articles. We're having a Hutt Barn Burner! 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:18, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Great. :D  Imperators II (Talk) 15:13, April 20, 2013 (UTC)

Near Pando

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 01:56, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:43, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) I remember making the article for Malabar Construct.....  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:00, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:21, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Nar Haaska

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 08:39, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I don't get it. The less important a Hutt Space trade world seems to be, the higher the average population in its locality.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:01, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:05, April 20, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * Can you swap the population estimate and the Vong information round so it's chronological? Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:51, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done.  Imperators II (Talk) 20:57, April 20, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Elgit

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 10:48, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: What can I say? The Hutt Space has a lot of trade worlds.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:54, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:54, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Keldooine

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 11:54, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Hutt Space trade worlds strike again!

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:55, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:56, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Cerean hopper

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:20, April 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Another pretty obscure creature who needed some love.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:14, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 02:32, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Could we have an article for the hopper? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:16, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Written and nom'd below. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:59, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Once again, I don't think we can consider it non-sentient, just from a picture. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:19, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **removed it from body and infobox. Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:51, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Cerean riding beast rider

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:20, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Just a guy trying to ride on his beast

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:58, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) You should add categories for unidentified gender, and maybe unidentified species.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:21, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:50, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Alphabetize them please. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:16, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:47, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****You didn't do it quite right, so I fixed it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:58, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Thanks Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:20, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Cerean riding beast

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:39, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:I realise how boring these articles are...

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:15, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * You can't use the category for named creatures. Its not named.... 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:24, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Yeah I did think about that but was just going by the example of the several other identified creatures in that category. Is there a more appropriate category for individual creatures? Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:52, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I couldn't find one. You could make a cat for unidentified creature individuals or something like that. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:02, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Is that really necessary its already in unidentified individuals.Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:23, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****I guess you can keep it then, but I don't think we consider a mount an individual. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:15, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Cerean hopper

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:59, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Don't get too excited now

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:06, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * You are not using "it's" right. That is a contraction for "it is." Use "Its" instead. I've fixed it for you now in your noms, but take care in the future.
 * 3) **Ah thank you I'll make sure that I do. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:48, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * The little bit about the omnibus and the trade paper back is not really needed in the BtS. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:30, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Ah fair enough should I remove it from all the articles then? Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:48, April 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Sure. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:06, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ilosian

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:01, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:First nom for the barnburner!

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice one. Wish we knew what they looked like! ~ Savage BOB sig.png 15:46, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:08, April 22, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Langoonan rebellion

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:32, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:A subpage for another barnburner species nom.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:20, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * The first sentence seems a bit awkward with all of the commas. Could you fix that? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:59, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Is that any better? Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:47, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Nectoral syrup

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 19:56, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:43, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:22, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) You don't need to link in the quote. Otherwise, looks good.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:03, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done.  Stake black   msg 02:19, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Langoonan death mask

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:26, April 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:A second subpage for the Langoonans.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work on the Barn Burner noms.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:29, April 23, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Affavan

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Barn -> burn.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:29, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Alee

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Can you swap the Vong and population info to make it chronological? Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:40, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Done.  Imperators II (Talk) 14:04, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Aylayl

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:42, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Dirha

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:44, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Diyu

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:45, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

The Godsheart

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The Hutts, too, have made their impact on STAR Wars

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:47, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ilos

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * I'd say that the Origins of the Jedi map on page 119 of the atlas shows Ilos in Hutt space between 25,000 BBY and 22,000 BBY earlier than Great Hyperspace War map showing 5,000 BBY. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:58, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think that can be extrapolated from the earlier map, considering it only has the reference points of Boonta and Sleheyron, whereas the 5,000 BBY map shows that the Hutt Space extended as far as Randon and Sneeve (perhaps even Boz Pity), thus definitely placing Ilos in that region.  Imperators II (Talk) 14:14, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Ilos Minor

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Kafane

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:00, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

M'Hanna

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I think that a planet of black dust with supersonic winds directly results from massive barn-burning all over the planet.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:01, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sakifwanna

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:02, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Saqqar

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Gigantic ruins of towers and half-burnt barns...

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:04, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tisht

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Not much is known about this planet. In-universe.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:05, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified orbital station

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:06, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Usk (planet)

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:08, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Xolu

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:09, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Zisia

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 23:13, April 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:11, April 24, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Capabara plant

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:50, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Barn burner sub-page for the Tal Nami

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Egoa tree

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:50, April 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:As a biology student I must say I find the growth rate of a meter a day slightly bothersome...

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments