Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

 The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.


 * /History
 * /2005 History
 * /2006 History
 * /Queue

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
 * 5) &hellip;not be the object of any ongoing edit wars.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box.
 * 8) &hellip;have no more than 3 redlinks.
 * 9) &hellip;have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
 * 10) &hellip;not have been previously featured on the Main Page. Otherwise, it can only be restored to featured status.
 * 11) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 12) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 13) &hellip;provide at least one quote on the article; a leading quote at the beginning is required. Only one quote would be allowed at the beginning of each section at max, although quotes may be placed in the middle of the article.
 * 14) &hellip;include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles.
 * 15) &hellip;include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available.
 * 16) &hellip;pass review by the Inquisitorius review panel.

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above. Note that a previously featured article cannot be featured on the Main Page again; however, it can be restored to featured status.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under! Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Human
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 7:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Doesn't cite sources. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 15:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * As per Imp. .  .  .  .  21:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ditto (Rule 11) 15:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is basically a citation problem, but I am disturbed by the "racial and ethnic characteristics" section. It needs to go unless it can be written in a properly cited in-universe style.  - breathesgelatin Talk 05:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * And some MOS ignorising. .  .  .  .  23:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Humans suck.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 00:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Question: Should Bts include a note about how we decided to change the capitalization of Human for consistency, etc? 15:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps so. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I made a note of it. Chack Jadson 01:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Burl Ives
Support
 * 1) Yay! Burl Ives! .  .  .  .  23:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If only to encourage a consistent policy with regard to barely-SW-relevant RL people, I vote yes. Yes! Excelsior to Burl! &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 00:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Changed my mind too.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 17:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I vote yay! If only to please the ewok-spirits. &mdash; Jinko 01:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Changed my mind, sorry. - Jinko 13:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Despite probably being the FA with the least canonical significance (aside from Suttle, who was and is a joke), this is worthy of the title. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) * Neutral until definition of FA is clarified. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Tentative support, providing FA rules don't drastically change. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I was going to say something about the "Ives of March", but that would be totally lame. :-P Cull Tremayne 21:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Shaelas (Ahto City)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 22:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Lord Hydronium 00:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Adamwankenobi 21:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 14:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Ozzel 02:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Curse you Burl Ives! Curse you and all you stand for! Enochf 08:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 04:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Burl Ives so deserves it. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 18:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) BambookidX 23:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

' Objection 1 and 4 through 9 are not valid under the FA nomination rules. Objections that do not fall under rules 1 through 15 will be disregarded. ' -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 14:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * To spite 4dot Because it contains too much information that's not relevant to a Star Wars encyclopedia. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 23:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) *Pfft. The article deals with Burl Ives. Ives participated in Star Wars. The article is legit. Why can't the expansion be so? .  .  .  .  23:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I have no problem with non-SW content. The problem is that aside from one line, it doesn't address the Star Wars content at all. His voice work for SW needs to be a bigger focus. Havac 00:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) *His...few lines in a telemovie which has absolutely no documentation whatsoever? .  .  .  .  00:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) **Yes. Havac 00:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Second objection...too many redlinks...while they don't appear red, they link to non-existant Wikipedia articles. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Includes a lot of information irrelevant to Star Wars, which is the subject of Wookieepedia. Our articles on real-world stuff only mention Star Wars-relevant facts while delegating everything else to Wikipedia. - Sikon 04:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) *Fixed. .  .  .  .  01:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) *Agreed. Darth Maddolis 04:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) **So, basically, the article should read "Burl Ives narrated Caravan of Courage". That's BS in the highest. .  .  .  .  01:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ***. -LtNOWIS 02:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ****Exactly. .  .  .  .  23:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Curse you Burl Ives! Curse you and all you stand for! Enochf 11:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with Sikon. I'm not saying the article should only have SW stuff in it, but since Ives has such little to do with SW, the article is limited in it's SW referrences, and since this is a SW wiki, an article with such a small percentage of SW in it should not be an article Featured on a SW wiki. If you read above, in the 16 requirements, it doesn't actually mention that the article requires anything Star Wars about it- of course, that means that the article passes the requirements, but it also means that any random Featured Article from wikipedia could be imported in the sense that it'd pass requirements (although I realise that we do not copy articles 100% from wikipedia). It is fine for a good article, but to be featured on a Star Wars encyclopedia is a bit much. Darth Maddolis 07:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No way. This article is unwookieepedic as argued by Sikon and others. KEJ 08:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * As per Sikon, Maddolis, KEJ. --Eyrezer 09:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Per everybody else. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Spelling and grammar errors throughout. British spelling. Does not follow MOS. Rules 1 and 4. Has a wookify tag on it. Atarumaster88  ( Audience Chamber ) 21:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) I know, Fourdot'll just cross me out, but I feel I have to protest. If I'm irrelevant in saying that this is all completely irrelevant to SW, then clearly we need to change the rules. For Heaven's sake, people, this is supposed to be a Star Wars encyclopedia! Evir Daal 08:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Look, bub, I didn't strike any of these objections, and obviously you missed the point at which Burl Ives narrated Caravan of Courage. .  .  .  .  08:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Oh. Then I'm real sorry I accused you. I just made an assumption, since you seemed to be the article's greatest proponent, and didn't bother checking the history, though I realise now I should have. Please accept my heartfelt apologies. I won't change my opinion, though. My protest might be deemed irrelevant, but I don't think this warrants FA status. That should be reserved for Star Wars articles. No, I didn't miss the Ewoks reference, but I might well have, dwarfed as it is by all the rest... which IMO is completely irrelevant to SW. Evir Daal 08:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Apology accepted, but tell me this: Why do we even have a Burl Ives article, then? .  .  .  .  08:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) ****If it's policy, we'd better abide by it, as OOU articles are apparently accepted. Personally I'd rather see only things mentioned IU having articles, actors etc could fit into the BTS sections of IU articles, but I'll accept the majority view. But I don't think something with this little importance to SW should be featured. Evir Daal 08:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) *****But you can't object to an FA on the basis of it's subject. You can only object on qualitative grounds. .  .  .  .  09:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) ******Well, then someone will cross me out sooner or later for being irrelevant. Till then, I'm exercising civil disobedience. ;) Evir Daal 09:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Does not follow WP:LG, which states "official and canonical information only." The Burl Ives article is full of non-official information, though I admit that it doesn't fall under the canon ruling. Also, I find it funny that the Inq is able to veto the votes of the majority based on a minority group which contains the articles primary supporters. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 08:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Burl Ives doesn't have any continuity retainers, I'm afraid. And let's pitch out all the unlicenced magazine articles while we're at it. .  .  .  .  10:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ** No, I'd have to remove a whole paragraph from one of my pet articles. And it's the paragraph with pirates in it. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 01:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) *All the information is official. It's just not released by LFL. It's all verifiable (per the citations), however, which is the point of that requirement. - Lord Hydronium 03:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Has a wookify tag on it... indeed. §6. KEJ 09:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) *This has been fixed. - Lord Hydronium 03:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Jedipilot94 19:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) *No rule, no objection. See above. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Xwing328's comments below convince me to object based on the only interpretation of rule 9 possible for a real-world article, and the several CT threads this has inspired lead me to object under a broad interpretation of rule 5 (though those threads are leading towards a consensus which would allow articles like this to be featured, and this objection in particular to be struck.) It needs more expansion on the Star Wars role he played rather than everything else he did in his life. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 23:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) *I understand this sentiment, but what else can really be said? .  .  .  .  01:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ** Is there any BTS information about the making of the movie he narrated? Why did he only narrate the one?  What did he do as narrator? &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 01:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) **Not a well documented film, so I don't know, and he narrated as a narrator. .  .  .  .  04:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Anyway, objection adressed. .  .  .  .  04:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) He has barely any ties wahtsoever to starwars. One thing. thats it. the articles good, but not relevant enough to be supported by the sane. RC 2413 02:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) I just gotta say, even if im struck out, which I know I will be, this seems like incredible fan-wankery (and he is not even a character!). I know that people like Burl and all, but all he did was narrate a series!  His page is longer than Lucas, who people seem to ignore!  He is a man worthy of hard work on an article, not a narrator.  This whole page belongs on wikipedia.  I think it would be misleading to put this on the main page and call it a Featured Article.  All I have to say now is wow. Just wow...irrlevant to the max.(I know irrelevance isn't a rule, but really guys??)Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) [[Image:Oldsith.png|30px]]15:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Burl Ives is, like, teh mohtst imhportant pserson in Schtar Whores. He must be ohn teh main paeg! .  .  .  .  23:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Just wondering, but did you misspell 'Star Whores' intentionally, or is there not some hidden meaning behind it? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  12:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh? No, I was just in a mood. .  .  .  .  21:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I could tell by the rest of the sentance&mdash;which was funny&mdash;I just mean that a 'whore' is a harlot/prostitute. I was wondering if you meant it to be taken that way. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This objection struck because it doesn't fall under any rules


 * Puh-lease, this is Wookieepedia, not IMDb. KEJ 08:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * BTW, who struck those votes? KEJ 08:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Havac struck his own objection. Darth Maddolis 08:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright. Fair enough. KEJ 09:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The real world biography stuff for Burl Ives is lucky enough to be let on the article (due to a vote, http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Real-world_biographies based on simply allowing the content to be on wookieepeia), but making the article an FA is just plain silly. Darth Maddolis 09:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This could really use some expansion on his narrator role. What did he narrate? How much of the episode was narrated, the entire thing, or just one line? Any quotes to give an example of his narration? etc... If anybody has this episode, please expand it. 20:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Tis done. .  .  .  .  02:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Sio Bibble
Support Oppose
 * 1) .  .  .  .  07:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Shaelas (Ahto City)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 22:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 08:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Good article.--Windu223 23:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced infobox picture. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 12:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. -- Ozzel 00:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Small, but my main issue is the present tense and speculation at the end. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced P&T. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. .  .  .  .  21:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * A small one, but unsourced last paragraph of Biography. And as mentioned, it's very short, though apparently that's not objection-worthy. - Lord Hydronium 00:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. .  .  .  .  21:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced images. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sourced. .  .  .  .  23:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It can be further expanded. C'mon. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 18:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Personality and traits sounds a dab POV to me. Also, what is (53BrS), and why isn't it linked to something that explains WTF BrS is?  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 12:07, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Four sentences for the intro? I know we don't have an objection for articles being "too short", but this just looks small, even with 3 pictures placed in the main text. Cull Tremayne 21:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Struck my objection but I agree with Cull about the length. Green Tentacle (Talk) 08:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Korriban
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 08:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) SkywalkerPL 12:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * The History section is fine, but you need more about the planet itself. More about the inhabitants, the society structure there, and the key locations. .  .  .  .  21:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fauna should be expanded. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 22:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see A) More on the state of Korriban during its heday under the Sith b) A section on its terrain. Apart from the pictures, there's nothing here that describes the world itself and the landscape. The comics and games are enough to go by, surely. QuentinGeorge 08:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Great Jedi Purge
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 11:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) No arguement here. .  .  .  .  23:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 07:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Lord Hydronium 03:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) It could be a lot better with all those sources, but I think it's enough now to get FA'd  Stake black   msg 15:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Chack Jadson 19:25, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Doesn't cite sources. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 15:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed.-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 15:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro is incredibly short and not good enough for the FA box (Rule 7). Cull Tremayne 00:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Again, fixed. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 10:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced images. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't find the source for the Jedi in disguise picture. Anyone mind helping? -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 18:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's definatly a cropped image. There are these odd bluish boxes around the outside...Magazine cover?Amthyst fire 15:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The art style and color of the bluish boxes suggest to me it's one of the later WotC RPG books, possibly the Power of the Jedi Sourcebook or the Hero's Guide. jSarek 23:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's from POTJ - I have the book in front of me. That being said, I have a few objections. Mainly, the "MIA" section. It's a load of poodoo, and should be removed. 1) It's basically a big list saying, "We don't know anything about these people". Duh. Logically we just need a list of survivors and victims - anyone else is of "unknown" status. Secondly, K'Kruhk, Jeisel and A'Sharad are survivors, not MIA. Full stop. They are explictly stated as surviving the Purge in the NEC, a book which, in universe, is written 32 ABY, decades after the Purge. If it says they survived, they survived. End of discussion. QuentinGeorge 03:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Man, you need to calm down. First off, I put K'Kruhk, Jeisel and A'Sharad in the survival section. Second, we don't know anything about those people. That is why the MIA section is there. People have debated about the MIA, survivors, and victims sections on the talk page, and they've been made to the best of the article's ability. If you truly think it needs to be fixed up more, then request for it to be done on the article's talk page. That's what the talk page is there for. By the way, thanks for the source on the image. Last, Green Tentacle, you can strike your objection because we now have the source for the Jedi in disguise picture. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 4:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Second, we don't know anything about those people. - then why bother putting them there? An article is supposed to be about known, canon information. I'm sorry, but a section that basically says, "We don't know" is pointless for an article of this type. If you don't know about an individual, then don't add them to the page. There's no need for a "status unknown" list. A reader can infer that any Jedi not listed on the victim or survivor list is of an unknown fate. I won't strike this objection until that superfluous list is removed. QuentinGeorge 06:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but you can't just delete an entire section in an article. There's a point to that section, and it was made for a reason. People need that list to inform them who's survival is unknown. People can infer for a couple of Jedi, but not the entire group of unknown Jedi. There are just too many. I really don't care if you don't strike that objection. If the Survival Unknown section is really that bad, then either: 1) Ask for the section to be deleted on the talk page, 2) Do it yourself, or 3)Ask the Inquisitorious or the Administrators to do something about it. That section needs to be there. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 16:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Since I've been given implicit permission to do so, I have removed said redundant section. Now I'd like to see that bulleted BTS turned into neat and clean paragraphs. QuentinGeorge 08:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ughhh...fixed. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 12:07, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments


 * I'd like to see some more images, and please, better ones.  Stake black   msg 19:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Added one under Siege of Naboo. It's of pretty good quality, but other than that, the article has enough. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 20:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Why is the Conclave on Kessel image not in the Conclave on Kessel section?  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 12:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't really know why, but when you edit it, there's a request not to change where the Conclave on Kessel image is. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 16:19, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, is the Kaminoan Resistance paragraph necessary? There were no Jedi involved in that IIRC.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 12:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think it is, so I deleted it. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 16:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Atton Rand
Support Oppose
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 19:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 08:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) .  .  .  .  23:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Alright, but that "game completion scenario" is ugly. Chack Jadson 00:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Atarumaster88  21:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  Stake black   msg 19:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see this article reference specific conversations or events in KOTOR II. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 18:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, that shouldn't be hard. I'll get to it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * See Jedi Exile for a good example of KOTOR referencing. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Finished. I hope I didn't go overboard. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro fairly short. Cull Tremayne 00:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro expanded. Does this suffice?
 * Yes, sorry about being slow on the uptake. Cull Tremayne 12:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that another image, preferably one from the game, would look better in the infobox.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 12:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I am unable to capture (high-quality or otherwise) a screenshot. So I can't really do anything about that. I am not partial to the other head-shoulder shot in the article... but if I have no other choice I'll do it. Best thing to do is to just wait and see if JMAS or Redemption see this. - Solus  (Bird of Prey)  19:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The current one is promotional, crisp and nice. I see no reason to change it. It's fine. Though if you absolutely MUST change the infobox, change it to that headshot thats in the article by doing a quick switch-a-roo. Though put a vote on the talk page first just to see what everyone else thinks. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 00:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The sourcing style isn't consistent. .  .  .  .  23:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What does that mean? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * ...with other sourced articles. I thought we decided not to specify moments in the game. Therefore, every KOTOR II source should just be attributed to KOTOR II. .  .  .  .  04:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * So that was decided against, then? - Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 06:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * May I be told which one's been formally decided upon? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've done as was requested, so uh, could 4dot and Imp see if they can cross out their oppose votes? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  13:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Factual error in intro: "However, she eventually freed him from his past, and he went on to train other Jedi in the years ahead." To the best of my knowledge, this is an assumption. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 18:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is speculation expounding upon what Kreia said about him, and has been removed. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I did a general overhaul of the article not long ago, and the only thing (that I know of) that needs to be cleared up is the canonicity of some of the Kotor II sidequests, which will be brought up in the next Inq meeting, so I can't do anything about that until then. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It was decided that we should be as vague as possible when writing about optional content. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. I didn't know that that entailed un-detailed game referencing stuff. I'll go resource it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Uh, is it possible to say this is an early entry for the Wookiee-Cast thingy and that I forsaw it the whole time ? For 4dot especially and for anyone else that has eyes maybe: see note under the 'Cannok' nom. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What else needs to be done here, as nothing has happened to this nom for several days. Imp's objection, in leiu of the new rule-thing, is moot, and would someone either back up, comment on, or strike Shaelas's objection? At the moment, nothing's really happening here.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Lightsaber
Support Objections
 * 1) Siteoftupac 19:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs citations. .  .  .  .  00:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Present tense- Follow MOS. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Redlinks. Better sectioning needed. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 18:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Redlinks indeed.  Stake black   msg 22:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The entire article is one big list. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 18:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Manaan
Support
 * 1) -- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 04:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Well, gee. .  .  .  .  04:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 08:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jinko 20:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 20:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Although this is my least favorite world of all KotOR. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 20:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  Stake black   msg 21:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Kylekatarn 21:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Lord Hydronium 23:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Enochf 23:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * POV (Rule 4). Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Where?-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 15:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that's been sorted now. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Swoop.jpg is unsourced and any chance of a link to the source for Image:ManaanWalls1319.jpg? Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 20:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * <One ref tag seems to be empty, and the article needs a spelling check. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 04:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done.-- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 22:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There is no empty ref tag that I can see, and I am not sure if "needs a spell check" is a valid objection.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 16:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It is a valid objection. Proper formatting and all that. Or under "well-written" Atarumaster88  04:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Too many images. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 18:46, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done.-- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 22:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Manaan 23:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC) I raked the article for grammar and spelling errors. Feel free to check my changes. --School of Thrawn 101 16:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Let us hope this goes even better...-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 04:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I did a semi-extensive generic clean-up of the article fixing things such as spelling and rewording anything I thought needing. Good enough, Ataru? - Jinko 20:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Excellent job everyone. Atarumaster88 [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 20:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The paragraph about Manaan being taken by and later entering the New Republic says it's from the NEC, but I've looked and can't find any mention of Manaan in that era. Is there a page number? - Lord Hydronium 04:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I wondered about that too. I checked the NEC, and it is in there. Sort of. While the NEC does not mention Manaan directly, it covers Ackbar's conquest of Imperial worlds in the inner rim. However, I am still looking for mention of Manaan joining the New Republic. Perhaps that was implied too, but it is unlikely. Despite being conquered, I doubt that the Selkath would abandon their neutrality all together, and join the Republic.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * In that case, we should clarify the statement to remove any speculation. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. How about now?-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 17:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm still not sure if it should be included as taken by Ackbar if NEC doesn't explicitly say so. Better to say that it was possible or something. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I removed the speculation. --Eyrezer 06:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

CompForce
Support
 * 1) Danik Kreldin 00:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC) - McEwok and I breathed a lot of life into this article, really expanded it and so forth... think it looks good.

Oppose Comments
 * 1) No reference tags (Rule 11). Other than that a once-over doesn't find anything lacking. Cull Tremayne 01:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Cull. .  .  .  .  09:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I'd like some information about specific instances and actions CompForce was involved in. The entire paragraph devoted to Post-Endor history appears to be conjecture. Atarumaster88  21:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Three redlinks should probably be filled in. Cull Tremayne 01:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Tavion Axmis
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 10:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Themelle444 18:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's an easy fix, but POVity POV POV POV. .  .  .  .  21:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Where?-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 22:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * "Overconfident", "Deadly", "Swift", "Devious"... .  .  .  .  22:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I was able to address the ones you listed above, except for overconfidence. From both sides, it was clearly obvious that she was overconfident. I made it sound more neutral, and it was the best I could do. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 3:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Mmkay, I've made some changes, but the prose is in need of a lot of work. A lot of sharp, short sentences that don't flow well. .  .  .  .  03:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks better now. I'll work on the sentences.-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 4:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The sentences are longer and I made sure they flowed better. Is it better now?-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 4:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Enough for me to strike my opposition. .  .  .  .  00:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Remove the bullets in the BtS, thanks. QuentinGeorge 08:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed.-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 15:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Present tense needs corrected. Atarumaster88  21:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs a general copyedit. Atarumaster88  21:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Grappa (Rodian)
Support Oppose
 * 1) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  21:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Cull Tremayne 23:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Grappa had maybe one or two paragraphs of page time. The vast majority of this article is hypothetical extrapolations and discussions about other events.Kuralyov 16:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you provide any examples? -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 23:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Personally, I think that the only part that strays directly from Grappa is the description of the Jade Sabers intent. But then, that's needed to provide context to Grappa's actions, so it's kosher. .  .  .  .  23:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Grappa (Rodian) 02:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Any objections to the lack of images will be stricken. There aren't any. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I want "tapir" to be un-redlinked. :-P Cull Tremayne 23:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Taken care of. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 03:33, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Ahto City
Support Oppose
 * 1) -- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 06:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) KEJ 08:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Nice work, Shaelas. I know how much work that must have been. - Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 04:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) .  .  .  .  04:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Some of the intro is in present tense. --Eyrezer 07:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Corrected.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 15:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Too many images. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 18:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No there's not, I checked.-- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 22:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Copyedit this. Imperial and Force-sensitive both get capitalized, among others. Atarumaster88  21:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done.-- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 16:55, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Let's see if this goes as well as the others.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 06:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The Notable residents or visitors section is cool! --Eyrezer 07:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It is, but it would be even cooler if it listed all notable (named) residents and visitors like Tansarii Point Station does. KEJ 08:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That swoop image should be replaced with one of the Ahto City swoop track (it's Citadel Station now). It's not rules-based, though, so I'm not objecting on it. - Lord Hydronium 19:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't find one. I can't make one either. I am not sure what function the computer has to allow you to upload images from a game, but I don't even have the game for the PC. So someone else would have to get an image. I'm sorry.-- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 20:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Zayne Carrick
Support
 * 1) Nominated. - Sikon 13:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 16:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) A compelling read. .  .  .  .  23:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 02:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Lord Hydronium 10:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Fix up those couple of unreferenced paragraghs. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 14:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sourced unsourced paragraphs I could find, except for the intro, which doesn't need to be sourced. - Sikon 14:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced quote in the "Master Raana's bounty" section. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 18:49, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * POV, esp. in intro Atarumaster88  21:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Where exactly? - Sikon 07:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I guess this is exempt from Fourdot's FA contest, because so many people worked on it since the beginning of the comic series. - Sikon 14:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it probably is...sorry for misleading you there, Sikon. There's still a lot of KOTOR articles than need FAmanship, though, so if you still want to go for gold, the opportunity is there. .  .  .  .  00:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Melvin Fett
Support
 * 1) Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  22:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Why not? KEJ 07:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Hah, even though this is not canon, it's awesome :P  Stake black   msg 19:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * This article claims that Chee declared the story non-canon in a forum post, but doesn't provide a link to it. - Sikon 10:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Removed. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 06:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Is there a source for "He was related to fellow hunters Jango and Boba Fett on the mother's side"? From the body, that sounds like it's speculative. - Lord Hydronium 03:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd say its based on the fact that a) He's Boba's cousin B) Boba had only one parent c) That parent, Jango, had only one sibling D) That sibling was female. QuentinGeorge 07:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * We don't know that Jango only had one sibling. -LtNOWIS 07:10, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not bad speculation, but the intro states it as fact. And I suppose it's also an assumption that he's Boba's first cousin. - Lord Hydronium 07:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Removed. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 06:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * It may be a little short, but there's little more actual information I can add. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Cannok
Support Oppose
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  00:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Infobox image of poor quality. Rule 15.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I am unable to get any better, and, frankly, it seems of pretty good quality to me. What's wrong with it?- Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Too much speculation and pointless bits. Examples:
 * "They were not known to be cannibalistic." Do we need to note everything that a species isn't? I'm sure there's a lot of things they're not, but unless this is something particularly important or unusual, I don't see the point of it. Similarly, "Interestingly, they were never known to claw anyone."
 * The entire last paragraph of "Characteristics". Too many "maybe"s. - Lord Hydronium 10:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe this has been fixed. Does it meet with your approval?- Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Is 100% guaranteed that Exile did slay all the cannoks? If so, then I'll strike. Atarumaster88  21:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I double checked this fact and it proved untrue, and it has been fixed in the article. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  21:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * A test if you will. For the Wookiee-Cast thingy (See also the early entry Atton Rand). Note for the 4dot especially and for anyone else that has eyes maybe: See note under the Laigrek nom. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs a few more quotes though. Put some in and I'll vote.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Quotes. All right. Got it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been deemed an appropriate submission for the Wookiee-Cast Featured Article Competition. .  .  .  .  00:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Laigrek
Support
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  .  .  .  .  02:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Atarumaster88  21:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Infobox image of poor quality. Rule 15.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll see what I can do about that.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Redemption fixed it up nicely. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Cut content within prose. .  .  .  .  00:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * By that I assume you mean culling. Will can do. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I mean the cut content should not be noted within the main body of the article. .  .  .  .  00:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay. I'll revert my culling and take out the cut content. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually, the cut content is meant to stay in the main body of the article as the CT ended with no consensus on having it removed. That's the entire point in the cutstart and cutend templates. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 13:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speculation/pointless comments:
 * "Though an insect" - is that confirmed? They're called "insectoid" everywhere else in the article.
 * "It is unknown if they could walk up walls." Why note this?
 * "they lowered themselves to the ground to reduce air drag" - is this canon or speculation?
 * Not part of the above examples, but "They emitted a shrieking, clicking, chirping kind of scream." just sounds really unencyclopedic. - Lord Hydronium 10:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been mostly addressed. In the third example, it is a fact that they lowered themselves, though 'to reduce air drag' is speculation and has been removed. For the last example, may I know what is unencyclopedic about it? I am not questioning you, I just am unable to fix it until I know what to fix. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's all those adjectives piled on in a row, along with "kind of"; it sounds very informal. - Lord Hydronium 02:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, I think this has been taken care of. It's been changed to "a chirping shriek."- Solus (Bird of Prey)  11:30, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Lead quote is unsourced. Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * How could I miss that? Anyway, it's sourced now.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Another experiment. May have fanwankery, but that's why the Inqs have a shot at it. For the Wookiee-Cast thingy. NOTE: See big note under the GH-7 nom. Right now! I demand it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You must put in more images before I can vote.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll ask Redemption.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * More quotes are available I think.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but you'll have to give me some time to get to the part in the game and take notes. Bear with me. PS I have to play it on another computer that mine can't talk to, because my computer can't play TSL, so I can't toss a screencap from that computer to mine, and I am unable to upload images on the other. Just to clear up any confusion.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been deemed an appropriate submission for the Wookiee-Cast Featured Article Competition. .  .  .  .  00:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

GH-7 medical analysis unit
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  00:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) jSarek 21:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Lord Hydronium 03:52, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Infobox image needs sourcing and cleanup of its infobox template. jSarek 03:11, 15 April 2007(UTC)
 * 2) *Done. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  11:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Not quite. The image is clearly not a screenshot from ROTS. .  .  .  .  12:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I wasn't aware of that. After some digging though, I found the source.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) ****And, with a little tweak to the copyright template, it now meets with my approval. jSarek 21:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) It's a fairly minor point but the reference to their use on Boz Pity in the intro should be expanded on within the main article as it is currently unsourced. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * My lab rat-droid-thing. For the Wookiee-Cast thingy. BIG NOTE: See big important note under the Ravager nom. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * A few more images are needed before my vote can be cast.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I added a pic, any more would be overkill.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * More quotes are available I think.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I can get a quote from the droid, if you'll just give me a sec. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Added quote. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been deemed an appropriate submission for the Wookiee-Cast Featured Article Competition. .  .  .  .  00:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Buzk
Support
 * 1) Master Fetty 12:14 11 April 2007 (GMT)

Oppose Comments
 * Needs citations, all of the sections need some sort of expansion. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 13:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Christian, and needs proper Intro. .  .  .  .  23:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Just not so good article DARTH SIDIOUS2 09:41, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yep. Should be a GA. Chack Jadson 11:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is for the Wookie-Cast Featured Article Competition.
 * This has been deemed an appropriate submission for the Wookiee-Cast Featured Article Competition. .  .  .  .  01:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I just don't think it is long enough for FA status. I'd suggest it for a GA instead. --Eyrezer 04:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Jango Fett
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 17:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jango Fett107 16:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Yeah, I can see it Enochf 23:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) (In Tem's accent) Looks good to me. Adamwankenobi 03:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) yeah man! General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 11:53, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Good to see a major character nom. Atarumaster88  21:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Good article! DARTH SIDIOUS2 18:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Unsourced quote. Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 12:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Quotes in prose, and a few unsourced statements in the BtS, but otherwise, fine. .  .  .  .  22:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Severely lacking in detail to the point where, unless you've read the sources, it's almost impossible to understand what actually happened. Havac 19:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I want more sources for the "Weapons" section. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 06:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Tholme
Support
 * 1) Absolut Pimp. .  .  .  .  03:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 07:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 09:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Cull Tremayne 08:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 21:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Lord Hydronium 05:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Themelle444 07:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Looks good to me. Also, I just love Jedi who survive Order 66. Reading about them gives me such a warm, happy feeling inside. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 21:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 13:41, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Has an unsourced quote. Could also do with more quotes. --Eyrezer 05:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Added some quotes, but...bluh. Not a nessecity. .  .  .  .  08:24, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fix British spellings. I don't care what country one is from, but TPTB have said American intro. Copyedit the whole thing. Atarumaster88  21:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 22:21, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Anti-Sith coup attempt
Support
 * 1) Lord Hydronium 05:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Absolut Stupid. .  .  .  .  07:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Cull Tremayne 13:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Themelle444 15:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Atarumaster88  22:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Kuralyov 05:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 06:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 13:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * A very good article. Kuralyov 05:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Anti-Sith coup attempt 23:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well-written and interesting for a story I cared little about. Cull Tremayne 13:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Second Battle of Jabiim (Clone Wars)
Support

Oppose Comments
 * Yep, well, whoever you are, you're going to have to source the BTS. .  .  .  .  13:08, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, that's easier said than done... I was the one who added the part with the Vietnam War, since that's what a lot of people I've been talking with have compared it to, but sourcing it... must fan speculation in BTS be sourced? Then I'll probably have to remove it. Any other comments? Evir Daal 13:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Surely this can be expanded much, much more. For all of the sources this appeared in and was mentioned in, how can sourcing only cover the four comics? That just seems ludicrous to me. Additionally, an aftermath or legacy section is sorely needed. This battle created a huge conflict in the GCW, and no mention is made of it with appropriate sourcing? Cull Tremayne 13:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, you see, in most of those sources it's only mentioned or appears very briefly, so it's hard to find relevant content from them. The Empire comics, though they don't have that much to do with it directly, are the weak point, since I don't have them. Could someone else maybe help me with that, please? Evir Daal 14:11, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The New Essential Guide to Droids has quite a bit surrounding the A-series assassin droid's role in the battle, though that doesn't seem to be sourced or mentioned. In quite a few other sources, there are mentions that the early battle is not going well, etc. However, there doesn't seem to be much info surrounding the early battle before Skywalker and Kenobi arrived. Stuff like that. Cull Tremayne 14:17, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't have the NEGD either... Since I obviously haven't done my homework on this one, could I withdraw it and try again later? Evir Daal 17:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No mention of the Cestus Deception goof up. -- Ozzel 21:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sourcing appears to be incomplete. No mention as to why Anakin was a 1st Lt. instead of a Commander. Atarumaster88  22:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you can withdraw it if you like. Cull Tremayne 22:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Anzat
Support Oppose
 * 1) Let's see how this one does.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Atarumaster88  22:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Thefourdotelipsis 00:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * This just happens to be the quickest way in finding out what needs to be done in an article&mdash;and if you want more quotes, I don't have any sources that include Anzati in it (besides NEGAS, and that's a little short on quotes), so I'd needs some help there.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Olana Chion
Support
 * 1) Absolut Retcon. .  .  .  .  02:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Nicely done for a 2-source character  Stake black   msg 17:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Cull Tremayne 17:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Atarumaster88  22:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Can we fix the picture in the profile so it isn't off centre? QuentinGeorge 09:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That's the nature of the image, unfortunately. .  .  .  .  09:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yep, only the right side been cropped. There's no more image on the left. So it's either off-center and full width, or centered and not wide enough to fill the infobox. I prefer the way it is now. -- Ozzel 06:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Hey Jude...thanks for the source. Cull Tremayne 17:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Refrain? .  .  .  .  23:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Shelkar
Support
 * 1) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Factual error: No proof whatsoever that Revan did the Sunry quest. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 17:43, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I fixed it.-- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 18:53, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'm not sure if this is a rule yet, but this is only about 900 words. I'm not sure you could get 100 more words without stretching and additional redundant wording. As well as this is now the what, fourth article about a Selkath topic? They all seems to cover the exact same kind of information, as most had some mention of the court proceedings. Cull Tremayne 20:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not a rule yet. Nothing close either. Also, all four Selkath-related nominations are based off of one source (for the most part), how much information do you think your going to get?-- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 21:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't think I'm going to get different information. That's exactly my point. Cull Tremayne 21:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I count 958 words, for what it's worth. -LtNOWIS 21:47, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sans headers, images, and quotes, I only count 933. Cull Tremayne 22:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Stranger
Support Oppose
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 01:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Lord Hydronium 02:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Havac 18:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Absolut What? .  .  .  .  22:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Nice. Chack Jadson 19:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * It is the creepiest thing to come out of Ewoks, and I think a case can be made, for all of Star Wars. :-P Cull Tremayne 01:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Battle of Endor
Support
 * 1) Excellent article on one of the Galaxy's greatest battles. Chack Jadson 19:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Needs referencing, longer intro, and info from The Truce at Bakura Sourcebook (namely the use of Interdictors and the DSII's gravity well, and more on the post-Death-Star-destruction battle). - Lord Hydronium 19:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Hydro. .  .  .  .  23:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Guri
Support
 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 21:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) How many votes do I get? Enochf 21:46, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Could use some copyediting, but it's good enough. Havac 02:03, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * A cross section, such as the one in the Essential Guide to Droids, would be helpful. -LtNOWIS 01:42, 24 April 2007 (UTC)