Talk:Asajj Ventress/Legends

CiC
At what point was Asajj Ventress the C-i-C for CIS forces? I'm aware that she was a Commander, but had not seen any reference to her as the head. --SparqMan 06:23, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Um, pretty much never. That succession box is absolutely bogus. Grievous was in action as early as the Battle of Geonosis, and so pretty much held the position for the entire duration of the war. QuentinGeorge 07:00, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Even though Ventress wasn't C-i-C, she had the opertunity when Dooku placed Durge, Ventress, and Grievous in a head-to-head-to-head fight which determined who would be the C-i-C. Of course, Grievous won. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 12:24, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Which pretty much establishes GG as sole CiC for the entire war. QuentinGeorge 12:25, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * So, on the Asajj Ventress page and the General Grievous page, we'll have to remove Asajj Ventress's name from the C-i-C table. Also, Durge's name will have to be removed from Asajj Ventress's page and Durge's page. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 14:50, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Fixed boxes on Asajj Ventress, Durge, Grievous, and Sev'rance Tann.Cmdr. J. Nebulax 14:55, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Affiliation
It has been made clear that Asajj was not a Sith. She was a Commander in the CIS forces and an agent of Dooku, but it seems a stretch to affiliate her with the Sith. Asajj was no more affiliated with the Sith than Jango Fett or Durge, regardless of her Force skills. --SparqMan 17:41, 5 Jul 2005 (UTC)
 * Was she actually trained by Dooku at any point? And did she know that he was a Sith lord? If both these points are true, then i think it's fair to say that her affiliation is Sith. (i'm just not sure if those two points are true) --Azizlight 15:05, 7 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, and yes. She wanted to become a Sith, but Dooku dodged her requests, teaching her only what was needed to to make her an effective agent. She may qualify as a cultist.
 * Actually, I believe Azizlight's questions have already been answered, anonymous user. Admiral J. Nebulax 03:28, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Any chance the Dark Jedi featured in This Article could be Asajj? And as far as I know, all RPG stuff like that is considered part of the official continuity.
 * I think it's pretty obvious that she's supposed to be Ventress. I knew she was by the fifth paragraph, and the bit at the end practically screams "Ventress! Dooku! Sidious!" :P--Spanky The Dolphin 03:58, 8 Jul 2005 (UTC)


 * As did I, but I sometimes have a way with reading far too much into things.
 * It's MORE THAN OBVIOUS that's Asajj. So obvious I can't believe we're talking about it... --Master Starkeiller 11:22, 9 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Species
I don't think Asajj is a "Rattakian". Osika Kirske looks totally different. QuentinGeorge 04:32, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)
 * Osika isn't a Rattataki. The Rattataki are the bald near-humans. We don't know the name of the "sharkpeople", Kirske's species, yet. --Master Starkeiller 22:16, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Sith
I think Asajj Ventress should be counted among the Sith characters category. I don't believe that she should be counted as a Sith Lord, but she obviously felt that she was a Sith, and seemed to consider herself more Sith than Separatist. -- SFH 03:30, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC) I'm not saying she should be called Darth Ventress. i'm just saying that she seemed to believe that her allegance was the Sith first, the Confederacy second. Also, it is still listed as one of her affiliations...before CIS. -- SFH 00:46, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * Dooku laughed at her and specifically told her that she was "not Sith". You can't get any more explicit than that. QuentinGeorge 03:31, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure she is any more "affiliated" with the Sith than Jango Fett. QuentinGeorge 06:17, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Creator?
Did John Ostrander created Asajj? Thanks.
 * For the love of God, stop removing everything I say!!! Cmdr. J. Nebulax 21:19, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * One: 206.180.134.114, come on and be cooperative. Is it really that hard? Two: Ventress is based on a concept for AOTC that eventually became Dooku, as seen here: Hollis 21:24, 13 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Quote
Would anyone object if I were to replace the current quote. My reason being that since Ventress is not a Sith, the current one is misleading, and is not as much about the character as by the character. My suggestion: "You are no Jedi, girl. You are simply hatred and bile given form."

- Master Fay

Any objections?
 * I agree. That one is far superior. QuentinGeorge 22:53, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree as well. It is much better than the one up there now. Admiral J. Nebulax 00:09, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * It has been added. Admiral J. Nebulax 00:10, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Paragraph on Xagobah
Why was it removed? Sure, it wasn't in the correct spot probably, but, for some reason, Xilentshadow removed it. Admiral J. Nebulax 23:47, 28 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * It was canonically in the incorrect spot. Xagobah is not the place Asajj would want to go to retreat, and if she had brought the medical ship there, wouldn't alpha have been found?--Xilentshadow900 00:21, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Yet what was in the paragraph was true. It was placed in the wrong spot, but it was canon. Admiral J. Nebulax 01:06, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * I'll fix it.--Xilentshadow900 01:10, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Admiral J. Nebulax 01:10, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I've put it in the best spot I could, but it could be better. If only the author of those kids books had been better informed!--Xilentshadow900 01:13, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, it looks good where it is. Admiral J. Nebulax 01:14, 29 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Mira?
How can the bounty hunter Mira, and the Jedi Mira be the same person? Unless I am seriously mistaken, they existed about 4,000 years appart. -- tikaheta -- Ok, thanks! -- tikaheta --
 * They're not the same person. The link is simply screwed up. I'll fix it. -- AdmThrawn --
 * You'll find that tons of links are like that. Admiral J. Nebulax 21:08, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

dead.
dead. she is dead. I read it on the ofcial site. P.h 22:40, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)p.h
 * No you didn't. You read it in your mind. You want to go home and rethink your life - Kwenn 22:41, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * No I didnt, I read it in my mind. I want to go home and rethin-... Hay! no I read it on the site! P.h 22:47, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)p.h
 * If you put that in again, I'll have someone lock the page. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:45, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Just where on the site did you read it? We'd all love to know - Kwenn 22:48, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not on her Databank entry. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:53, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * And don't remove this topic just because you're wrong and you know it. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:53, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * I read itsomewhere it may oficial site. I was pretty sure it was, but every one makes mistakes, right?
 * Yet when you're wrong, you remove a ton of posts. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:59, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * yep. sorry won't happen again P.h 23:00, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)p.h
 * It better not. Admiral J. Nebulax 23:01, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry.Sorry.Sorry.Sorry.Sorry.Sorry. I heard that back in the dark times. the times when I believed supershadow. I know I should be ashamed :( P.h 01:33, 18 January 2006 (UTC)p.h
 * Okay, it's over now anyway. Admiral J. Nebulax 20:03, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Eye Color
Blue? Really? Looks pretty brown in Obsession. I guess you could sort of argue it's Sith eyes, but...still, looks more brown. Yrfeloran 06:07, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes. Comics can screw up minor things like that. Admiral J. Nebulax 12:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

Sabers
Where's it established that Ventress's sabers were Vosa's? Lieutenant Gerard 23:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I believe that they are the same. Admiral J. Nebulax 00:32, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay. Why? Lieutenant Gerard 18:42, 12 February 2006 (UTC)