Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Ephant Mon


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

(6 Inqs/5 Users/11 total)
Support
 * 1) AdmirableAckbar 19:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Chack Jadson 12:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jediknight19bby 20:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) jSarek 12:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 13:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  Greyman ( Paratus ) 13:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Graestan 17:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 8)  Darth Culator  (Talk) 19:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Lord Hydronium 21:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 11)  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 14:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Does not meet rules 3, 9, 11, 12 and 17 .  Greyman ( Paratus ) 21:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *it now meets rules 3, 9, 11, 17. we're still trying to find source for main image. AdmirableAckbar 17:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I question whether the ice planet event happens in his "youth" considering the presence of Imperial snowtroopers. QuentinGeorge 03:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) **probobly a gaff by EGTC AdmirableAckbar 23:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) *** Something needs to be done since, as written, it makes no sense. QuentinGeorge 23:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ****fixed. i took the safest option and removed all mention of the empire. AdmirableAckbar 00:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) *****actually it was decades after Cerea business, which was around 32BBY, so it should be right about the imperials, but not the young bit (he may have been young, i'm not an expert in Chevin lifespans). I'm going to change it back, but without the young bit. AdmirableAckbar 21:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Please strike QG's objection. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 14:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) *Jediknight19bby, you must provide a reason for your opposition. AdmirableAckbar 23:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) **Struck his objection. QuentinGeorge 23:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ***hear hear. now all you have to do is block him AdmirableAckbar 23:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) There's a point in the BTS that should be sourced. --Eyrezer 02:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) *which one? AdmirableAckbar 10:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) **I put the source tag next to it. Shouldn't be too hard to find the source for it I hope. --Eyrezer 10:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) ***it is now referenced. t'was from the databank AdmirableAckbar 14:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) *It was removed the other day when you put it up on the ID, for the reason that it is an FA nom and certain people are working on to make it FA. Greyman ( Paratus ) 17:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) **could someone please srtike Jediknight19bby's vote again. To jediknight19bby: how does it need to be expanded. Some sections could even be described as too detailed, and every appearance of his is covered. The article still needs tweaking, but certainly not the improvement drive. AdmirableAckbar 15:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Decapitalize "Head of Security" and capitalize the "force" in the intro- grammar error. POV in first sentence of biography-That whole first paragraph has nothing to do with his biography. Present tense in "Exploits on Cerea". That section also doesn't read well (Rule 1). Lots of spelling and grammar errors "strom", etc. POV (Rule 2)- "idiotic Gamorreans", etc. Last part of "Skirmish at Carkoon" needs reworded as it is confusing. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 04:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq/Ephant Mon 21:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, we'll try and expand. Hey, Ack, here's a temporary page with the only excerpts I could find concerning EM from the novels: User:Enochf/Ephant Enochf 12:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * the main pic has been replace temporarily 'till it's sourced. the article now meets rule 12
 * Nice job on this article so far, AdmirableAckbar. I struck rules 12 & 17 from my objection since they've been cleared up!  Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Has been completely re-written. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 16:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I think I've managed to get the major style problems cleaned up. jSarek 12:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)