Forum:CT Archive/Fanon limits - revised proposal

In light of the overwhelming craziness of the Fanon go boom CT, I thought I'd revisit my own suggestion in a new setting, absent the enormous heated debate, and four-dot's, let's say...slightly roughshod handling of the matter. It's become clear that many of you will not stand for a complete ban on user page fanon, and for a lot of understandable reasons, but looking at things like this, can't we agree that some kind of regulation might be helpful? As I stated on the original fanon page, I don't believe edit percentage rules help with the real issue here - the Recent Changes page may be cleaned up a bit, but it still allows otherwise productive users to waste as much time as they want on something that benefits no one - including them. I think that a length limit, in conjunction with the edit percentage limit, would be a reasonable compromise. I'd also appreciate it if we can keep comments on this page down to things specifically related to the idea of word limits; if you want to write a huge treatise for or against fanon in general, go join the melee on the other page. CooperTFN 01:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Word limit on fanon bios - length TBD

 * 1) CooperTFN 01:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * To keep things simple, I'll just do pro- or anti-limits for now. If pro wins, then we can discuss specific numbers. CooperTFN 01:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)