User talk:JangFett

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #FEFFCF; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, JangFett!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Internal pages:
 * Senate Hall
 * Wookieepedia FAQ
 * Glossary of terms used on Wookieepedia
 * Manual of Style
 * Reliable sources
 * Guide to image use
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Wookieepedia policies:
 * What Wookieepedia is not
 * User page, user image, and user signature policies

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash;SFH 22:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * }

Re: Joining TCW Project
To join, you don't have to request it from me; it's not "exclusive". All you have to do is head over to the WookieeProject page and sign your name at the bottom with three tildes under the "Participants" section. We'd love to have more participants; the more, the merrier. :)  CC7567  (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sounds good  JangFett  You want to clone me? 18:24, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

One month already
Hello to all the members of WookieeProject: The Clone Wars! Considering the project has just been launched, we've had a great first month, taking three articles to FA status and five articles to GA status. I would like to remind you to please try to do whatever you can to help out; there are still many potential articles that can be taken up as projects, and many of you are already working very hard on them. In the next month, we have a goal to double (if not multiply even more) our current FAs and GAs, because once Season Two starts airing, there will be a ton of more articles that will require attention, and it's best if we get as many as we can out of the way now. Thank you for contributing! Your project head,  CC7567  (talk) 20:22, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * That sounds good. :) I can try to get the quote to you later today, actually; I just haven't had the time to work on the Battle of the Kaliida Nebula much recently. Trayus and I are just about to start it. :P  CC7567  (talk) 23:28, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, you might want to check out the current GAs just to see what kind of quality is expected for GAs. Cheers. :)  CC7567  (talk) 23:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * By the way, I've noticed that you've made a great deal of edits for the Malevolence. While it's helping the article, you might want to consider using the "Submit" button to check your work before you submit your edit of the article.  CC7567  (talk) 23:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No offense, but I don't think copying other articles (such as the Battle of Phu, Battle of Abregado and Battle of Ryndellia) into the Malevolence article is the way to go. The article needs to be told from the ship's perspective, not from the general battle perspective, which is what the battle articles are in. As well, please check sourcing throughout the article. Also, please remember to respect the Inuse tag on articles (as on the Battle of the Kaliida Nebula), as someone may be editing the article at the time, and when they submit their information, their edit will be lost.  CC7567  (talk) 18:06, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I personally find that copying articles implies that one doesn't feel the need to do any more work, which isn't always the best idea to portray. There's no reason that the article can't be expanded more from the perspective of the ship itself. Also, less can be told from the Republic's point of view. The focus is the Malevolence, not the battles it was in. The Battle of the Kaliida Nebula can also be expanded much more, and more can be said for the warship's characteristics.  CC7567  (talk) 19:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It's up to you what you want to do. You don't have to check in with me with what you plan to do; I was only giving suggestions. Also, a section specifically for the Republic's view of the ship is unnecessary; it can be incorporated into the history.  CC7567  (talk) 19:44, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
Per the title of this section. :P Thanks as well.  CC7567  (talk) 23:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)