User talk:Rgilbert27

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: silver; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Rgilbert27!
Hello, and welcome to Wookieepedia! I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Wookieepedia aspires to be a reliable source for all Star Wars fans to read and draw information from, and as such, fan-created continuity and fan fiction are not allowed within our articles. All in-universe material must be attributable to a reliable, published source.

Do not remove talk page and forum comments, including your own, as they are part of the public record. Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.

For an optimal viewing experience, Wookieepedia recommends using the Monobook skin. For help changing your skin preference, see Help:Skin.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash; Omicron (Leave a message at the BEEP! ) 20:46, July 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * }

Unnecessary scroll box and word right in pictures
Hi, I appreciate you are trying to help, but some pages don't need a scroll box, just pages with enough sources/references/appearances deserve one. Also Layout guide says that the word right should be included in the pictures, so stop deleting that too. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:24, July 25, 2017 (UTC)

Stub
If there's a char-stub on the page you don't need to then add an update template, the stub already says that the page needs updating, seems unnecessary to have both --Lewisr (talk) 14:13, August 1, 2017 (UTC)

Images
Instead of posting the same message on the talk page of each bureaucrat, changes to the Layout Guide need to be voted on in the Consensus track. However, I doubt an amendment to remove the |right from thumbnails would be a success. Since its presence doesn't really affect the page negatively in any way, it makes more sense to keep it around for consistency and bot parsing. Cheers, 1358  (Talk)  19:20, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
 * Consensus and policy dictates whether |right or not should be included; in this case, policy says it should be. Attempts to remove |right can be construed as disruption and may be met with administrative sanctions. Like I said, changes to policy can be proposed in the Consensus track. 1358  (Talk)  19:47, August 6, 2017 (UTC)
 * You can look at examples in the Consensus track archive and ask for help with the proposal in the Senate Hall. The baseline is that a CT vote needs to contain the exact wording of any new proposals and which parts of existing policy need to be amended. 1358  (Talk)  20:08, August 6, 2017 (UTC)

Warning
You asked to the admins and two of them told you the same I did, stop removing the |right, if you want you can order the way is written, but attempts to remove the |right like the admin above said is disruption and may be met sanctions of them. You're welcome to address it on the Senate Hall or the CT--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:00, August 7, 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why you insist on still removing it when you've been warned against doing so, please stop --Lewisr (talk) 01:24, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

Reply
I do get it, the policy says that it stays so there's no reason to remove it, if you really feel that strongly then start a CT vote as has been suggested to you previously --Lewisr (talk) 01:31, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't really know how you start one as I've never done it myself, ask an admin or someone who has made one in the past and they'll help you --Lewisr (talk) 01:41, August 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * Go to Forum:Consensus track there's a little box to enter the title of the topic to discuss and then click on create. This will lead you to the blank page, there add why is the CT and the policy change you want. You can see how is done in this example Forum:CT:Naming policy: US vs. UK editions--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:44, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

CT
Hey, I saw that your CT was deleted. If you decide to create another, write the problem how the "|right" makes no difference, then propose what the policy would be after the change. Then for people to vote add 3 sections: Agree, Disagree and comments. Good luck with it--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:42, September 11, 2017 (UTC)

Executor
I've reverted your edits to the Executor/Legends article since they violate our Layout Guide. Please familiarize yourself with that and other policies before making any further edits, and, since the Executor is a Featured Article, one of the very best our site has to offer, please communicate with the article's nominator about making any changes to it. Thank you.  Imperators II (Talk) 15:43, September 13, 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 17:48, September 13, 2017 (UTC)

Right
I know you've been fighting to remove the |right, but please the policy is still the same, if you're going to move images, add the |right. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:41, October 3, 2017 (UTC)

Marjorie Eaton
What do you mean? --Lewisr (talk) 15:27, December 24, 2017 (UTC)
 * My only suggestion would be to remove the image --Lewisr (talk) 15:31, December 24, 2017 (UTC)

Why you changing categories?
I like, when the different things are separated like issue 1-9 are under "0#", issues 10-19 under "1#". When you put that space between the | and the number, the little titles like "here's everting under 0" don't show up. I find it harder finding things that way.--ZapikCZ (talk) 16:56, January 24, 2018 (UTC)
 * Here are a few examples from the past that are neither like how the canon ones were before nor how you made them, so I don't understand why you did it like you did. Category:Star Wars: Republic, Category:Star Wars: Empire, Category:Star Wars: Rebellion, Category:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic (comics).

Special issues
Special issues like Destroyer Down, Annual, Ashcan shouldn't be numbered. I get you're trying to numerize them, but they are not part of the main numbering--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:19, January 26, 2018 (UTC)
 * Besides numbered issues, we shouldn't numbered other issues like Annuals I see you did the same for other series. In my opinion also TPBs and comic arcs shouldn't be numbered too like you did for Darth Vader 2015 series, but the special issues like annuals, one-shots or any other "special" issue should be kept without a number on the category--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:37, January 26, 2018 (UTC)
 * That's the alternative and how it was done sometimes, but usually numbered issues are identified in the categories by series name and number, for example Adventures 01 and special issues by the name of the issue like Ashcan, Destroyer Down, Annual 01, etc.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:03, January 26, 2018 (UTC)
 * Didn't realize about the issue with that, but absolutely will try to keep track of them--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:32, January 26, 2018 (UTC)

Filenames
Hello. I'd like to know why are you insisting on changing filenames, as you did here, even after specifically being told that they should be written with underscores instead of dashes. 06:30, February 5, 2018 (UTC)

Categories
Categories should be based in alphabetical ordering. Sorting comic issues by arbitrary numbers allows you to see the publication order, but that's not what categories are for, and doing so makes the page more difficult to navigate. For example, if someone was looking for Poe Dameron Annual 1, they would have to look between issues 15 and 16, which doesn't make sense, since it should logically be under a subheading of A. If someone was looking for publication info, they would go to the actual page of the comic, not the category. - Cwedin (talk) 17:59, February 9, 2018 (UTC)
 * I don't know what the categories looked like before, but they still need to be cleaned up, in my opinion. Ideally, the articles on individual issues should have something like, with no space before the issue number. The series pages should have a space with no number, and TPBs should be sorted by volume or something. This would also be easier for maintaining articles of ongoing series; e.g. Poe Dameron Volume 1 is currently listed as "35," which would need to be changed to "36" if a 27th comic issue was announced. -  Cwedin (talk) 18:49, February 9, 2018 (UTC)

Aligning images
Hi. I'd like to know what are you talking about here. I've checked your and previous revision in Oasis, Monobook, and Mercury, and it doesn't "clash" with infobox or anything in either of those skins. In fact, it doesn't appear to be doing anything at all.  Imperators II (Talk) 16:58, February 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm talking about the possible skins in which you are viewing Wookieepedia content, either the default "Wikia"/"Oasis" skin, the Monobook skin, or the Mercury skin which is used on mobile by default. Look, can you just link to a screenshot of this] revision of the article so that I can see what you're talking about when referring to "clashing with the infobox"? Thanks,  Imperators II (Talk) 17:08, February 11, 2018 (UTC)

Civility
Please, remember to use the summary edit only for constructive comments, the "deal with it" attitude isn't appropiate be careful with your words next time--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:16, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
 * Doesn't matter, you always need to address your objections properly without having a bad attitude against anyone. Now respecting the legends comics we're going to get to them eventually.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:28, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
 * As I said it doesn't really matter, you can be right or wrong. You need to share your objections in a good way without rude/uncivil comments. Try contacting the user and explain why you think they should stay. Just be careful of how you address other users and remember to not break the 3 revert rule--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:06, February 18, 2018 (UTC)
 * You need to learn how to deal with it if you plan to continue editing here especially since disagreements occur frequently. And please don't use the "Talk to DarthRuiz30 and see why your wrong" I'm not suggesting anything, You need to learn how to deal with this kind of situations. In my opinion I don't really know if they should be included in each of the series categories--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:56, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Removing right
Not sure why you're removing the |right from images when you've been told before that it can be construed as disruption. Please stop doing this --Lewisr (talk) 19:03, March 23, 2018 (UTC)
 * Again, you need to add it not removing it.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:19, March 24, 2018 (UTC)

Answer
Of course mistakes will go unnoticed we're not here 24/7, but once we find the problem it will be most likely fixed. As for the One Piece wikia, I'm not interested in One Piece never seen it before and not too interested in watching it and if I'm going to spend time doing something I prefer is something that I like.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:07, March 25, 2018 (UTC)

Jordo
Hey, Jordo (commander) is to be moved to Jordo, so in advance all links must point to the latter page. ' Tommy ' ' Macaroni ' 09:24, April 13, 2018 (UTC)