Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Force cage


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

(+5)
Support
 * 1) Goodwood  [[Image:Redstarbird.svg|20px]] ( Alliance Intelligence ) 02:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I'll second that notion, though for some reason I felt like there should be more... —Tommy9281 ( Safe harbor, my friend. ) 15:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) supergeeky1 \ m / The Cantina 23:17, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Domlith 08:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Toprawa:
 * 2) * You just said this exact same thing in the opening sentence. Please merge these two into the same opening sentence: "First seen some time prior to 3,956 BBY,"
 * 3) * I'm not sure I understand what you're saying here. I thought the fields were located within the tubes? Also, the second sentence of this doesn't read very well. I'm not sure what "semi-portable" is: "was developed that was collapsible for use in the field. Once assembled, these types of portable force cages, similar to ones found in Imperial detention areas, were still semi-portable."
 * 4) * Does GG10 specifically say that bounty hunters used these to deliver them to those who posted the bounty? I ask this, because it seems pretty exclusive and may be extrapolation. For example, how do we know they didn't use them for general transportation of prisoners to wherever, not just to the source of the bounty, if you understand my meaning: "These devices were favored by bounty hunters who needed to secure the live capture of a target for rendition to whomever had posted the bounty."
 * 5) * Please apply and  tags where appropriate. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * Long overdue.-- Goodwood [[Image:Redstarbird.svg|20px]] ( Alliance Intelligence ) 02:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)