Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Darth Maleval


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Darth Maleval

 * Nominated by:  Grunny  (Talk) 03:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Second Quarren Sith.

(5 Inqs/1 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) Already gave it the Treatment on the GAN.  Graestan ( Talk ) 01:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) "Nothing will convince me the computer doesn't cheat." User:Darth Jadious 13:55, 19 Febuary 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) —Tommy  [[Image:Dark side Master SWGTCG.jpg|17px]] ( Nine two eight one ) 02:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 4)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  00:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Very nice, Grunny. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 6) My only suggestion is that we get a better infobox image. Otherwise, I give it my stamp. &mdash;  Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 19:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Second paragraph of Bio, particularly the last sentence, could be written a bit cleaner. Otherwise, nice work.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  23:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) *I have rewritten the paragraph a bit, how's it looking now? :-)  Grunny  ( Talk ) 13:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Toprawa:
 * 4) * Please create an article for the Borosk base they attacked. Article needed since redlinks are not allowed in the intro.
 * 5) **Created.
 * 6) * A bit more context for the "Sith me" line. I'm assuming this is the expletive counterpart to "Fuck me." Also, is he saying this in reaction to Maleval's apperance? Why did he say that?
 * 7) **Contextified.
 * 8) * Please specify what this confrontation was, rather than requiring the reader to rely on memory: "as seen during his confrontation with Hondo Karr"
 * 9) **Done :).
 * 10) * I'm hard-pressed to understand how this BTS sentence is relevant: "In The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia, released in 2008, a picture of Azard was included among images of other One Sith Darths." Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 11) **Removed :). Thanks for reviewing and improving the article, Tope :-).  Grunny  ( Talk ) 05:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Comments


 * Could we get the bio subsectioned? I think that'd look better. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 00:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've subsectioned it, How's it looking? :-)  Grunny  ( Talk ) 00:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)