User talk:DarthRuiz30

 Find archived discussions here: 1 | 2

RE: Anon template
Okay thanks! -- B32  (Talk) 03:15, January 27, 2018 (UTC)

Imperial II
See what on User:Tommy-Macaroni?

Droid
If the super tactical droid gets marked for deletion again can you remove the Delete tag.
 * Do you think Unidentified super tactical droid is worthy of having a page?

3630 BBY
I have noticed that you keep putting events of KOTET in 3630 BBY. This is incorrect, because on Iokath Quinn says it has been "six years, eight months and twelve days" since the disappearance of Sith Warrior, and Elera likewise says it's been six years for the Trooper. If we assume 3637 BBY to be correct date for the First skirmish with the Eternal Fleet, then six years from that puts Iokath and everything that preceedes it in 3631 BBY at the latest. The template that you use is based on a tweet, but tweets should not be treated as official sources, and even if they were, the game itself contradicts it. I think we should go by what the game says, especially since the tweet mentions real time approximation for Ilum-to-KOTFE only. What do you think? --77.111.244.60 09:42, January 29, 2018 (UTC)
 * If the problem is that template usage is required, can I just correct the template itself? I have already tried that some time ago, but my changes were reverted. There are just so many reasons why basing the timeline on that tweet is wrong, especially when the game itself provides more accurate dating. --77.111.244.26 08:44, January 30, 2018 (UTC)

Aphra Image
Thanks for your help with editing this! Still getting the hang of adding photos. Stardust (talk) 20:02, January 31, 2018 (UTC)

Verify
When should I remove "verify" on Unidentified super tactical droid? Thanks.

TC
Do you think I could trash-compact Unidentified super tactical droid? Shoretrooper TK-32028 (talk) 07:07, February 3, 2018 (UTC)
 * Can you do it for me? Thanks. Shoretrooper TK-32028 (talk) 07:07, February 3, 2018 (UTC)

Rocket droids
Do you think any of the unidentified Rocket battle droids deserve canon pages? Thanks. --Shoretrooper TK-32028 (talk) 00:04, February 4, 2018 (UTC)

OOM commander
Do you think I should create a canon page for Unidentified OOM command battle droid 1 (Ryloth)? I feel it deserves a page--Shoretrooper TK-32028 (talk) 08:04, February 4, 2018 (UTC)

Fandom
When I say Fandom I mean this, so it links with this wiki as Wookiepedia is also part of FANDOM. I assume that is why Brandon linked it in the first place --Lewisr (talk) 21:42, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean though I disagree in this occasion, its not such a big deal though so not gonna make a big deal out of it by reverting again or anything --Lewisr (talk) 22:05, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah I understand what you mean, either way is fine as it still links to pretty much the same kind of thing --Lewisr (talk) 22:21, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
 * I used a GoT Wiki link (and hopefully they'll also use Wookieepedia links) because that kind of cross-wiki linking is good for the SEO of both wikis. Wikis get a boost from Google when they "talk" to one another. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 22:50, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
 * Well in that case feel free to revert it Brandon, since I've never seen linking to other wiki, I felt it was more appropiate to follow the standard way of doing it linking to wikipedia--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:10, February 8, 2018 (UTC)

Open Circle Fleet
Hey DarthRuiz, I noticed you added Battlefront II to the Open Circle Fleet article, and I was just wondering where it appeared in it. Thanks, Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:43, February 8, 2018 (UTC)

The Commander Droid
I thought I was putting it on the canon version, sorry if it wasn't I'm on mobile so it is harder to work

Y-wing starfighter
There's always a bit of truth in Legends and disambiguation pages. --178.220.70.149 06:29, February 12, 2018 (UTC)
 * It's just an option. --178.220.70.149 06:46, February 12, 2018 (UTC)

RE: Thanks
No problem! Took a while but we got there --Lewisr (talk) 07:47, February 14, 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for helping out taking off the moviespoiler template on the pages! --Lewisr (talk) 20:43, February 15, 2018 (UTC)

Re:Civil
It doesn't change the fact that they along with Kanan have images that clash with the infoboxs and on pages with little to no info plus you and Lewisr had left out one issue in your hunt the other day and legends can do some rearrangement as well seeing as the order is no better than canon was.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 06:12, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Still does not change the fact they clash and that AnilSerifoglu keeps removing comic strips despite that some of them are part of the series.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 06:58, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

I do not have the gift of words as some people so why don't you talk to AnilSerifoglu and see why AniSerifoglu is wrong.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 08:32, February 18, 2018 (UTC)

Corrected link
I'm new to this and I provided the correct Amazon link for Smuggler's Blues. Next time do a simple Amazon search instead of just blindly reverting.2604:2000:614B:D500:5EF:87E9:B560:22E 05:10, February 19, 2018 (UTC)

Security droids
Do you think any of the unidentified OOM security battle droids at the Citadel deserve canon pages?--Shoretrooper TK-32028 (talk) 19:30, February 22, 2018 (UTC)

RE: Nexus of Power
I was under the impression that since Ilum is a canon subject, and pretty ingrained in canon, that anything relating to it would be the same? I understand that the Tython/Auratera/Empress Teta topics from Nexus of Power aren't canon because two of those worlds were only recently introduced, and Auratera wasn't ever canon until Nexus of Power. So it only applies for things like Bardotta or Aleen, since they were canon before? Sorry if it seems like I have a lot of questions, I don't entirely understand where the line is drawn in FFG. -  The Grand Chewbacca  (' Talk ') 00:40, March 5, 2018 (UTC)
 * Oh, alright. I've been working on the Ilum page in my workbench, so I'll fix those subjects. I'll try to be careful when creating these pages in the future, I guess. I hope this can be figured out soon. Thanks for the clarification! -  The Grand Chewbacca  (' Talk ') 00:47, March 5, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Infobox
Got it, thanks for clearing that up for me!-- Vitus Infinitus  Talk 21:27, March 5, 2018 (UTC)

TLJ Novel
Sorry for the delayed reply, I did see your message then forgot to reply for some reason! Yeah the book does confirm that Nien Nunb was in a ski speeder during the battle --Lewisr (talk) 23:09, March 7, 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem --Lewisr (talk) 06:15, March 8, 2018 (UTC)

Lothal government building
The floor, in the shot where we first see Ahsoka, is the same floor. The room also has the same basic layout. It is definitely the same room where they met Trayvis, just with all the furniture removed and the back wall blown out.SilverSunbird (talk) 10:02, March 11, 2018 (UTC)

Re:R r
How many day, weeks, months would go by unnoticed if no one actually fixed the problem the pages have? If you have time then help me on One Piece Wikia!--Rgilbert27 (talk) 21:26, March 24, 2018 (UTC)

RE: Thanks
Hey no problem, glad to help out! --Lewisr (talk) 04:53, March 25, 2018 (UTC)

Solo Jabba
I'm sorry. I didn't know I was using an unreliable source. 5:27 PM; March 25, 2018 Ghost of LucasArts

RE:Advice
Oops, thanks for the heads up-- Vitus Infinitus  Talk 04:25, March 29, 2018 (UTC)

Solo Novel
Hey Ruiz, nah its cool no worries, you did what I was going to do anyway so no harm done! --Lewisr (talk) 23:15, March 29, 2018 (UTC)

Reason for my changes

 * The reason I keep reducing the number of commanders is because I'm thinking in terms of overall theatre commanders. So unless a source puts them in as a theatre commander, its just too many captains on deck and we might as well place every officer, pilot or soldier who served as a commander. This way is much cleaner and easier in my opinion.--Shannon, Jedi Knight (talk) 07:56, April 2, 2018 (UTC)
 * When it comes to squadron leaders I can see it for Yavin and Hoth but for Scarif and Endor it would just be too much - General Merrick was in charge of the Yavin 4's starfighter contingent which means he is a theatre commander at Scarif, and Lando was in charge of the starfighter forces at Endor. As to Motti, Bast and Yularen, we know they are aboard the Death Star but we don't see them command anything and there is no source for them too, same with Willard, Hudsol and Leia (Willard and Hudsol were under Dodonna's command while Leia is just a spectator in the battle). Micha Evon I'm willing to give way on but to be honest he'd be under Rieekan or Ledick Firest's overall command. Montferrat, Needa and Lennox would be under Ozzel and Piett's overall command. We know Rex was at Endor but he hasn't been established as being in command of any unit yet. Madine and Hera, meanwhile, just command one ship under Ackbar's overall command and Cracken is simply a gunner under Lando regardless of his rank. Derlin and Leia would be under Han's command. Chirpa is overall commander of the Ewok forces. It's about who is overall command based on on-screen evidence and sources I can find.--Shannon, Jedi Knight (talk) 08:26, April 2, 2018 (UTC)

Versio at Endor

 * Hi, the reason I remove Versio from the commanders list is because he isn't the overall naval theatre commander. The reason I cleared it out was to show overall theatre commanders (Piett vs. Ackbar, Calrissian as leader of the fighter wings, Dyer and Hewex vs. Han and Chirpa on Endor) otherwise it was just cluttered and hard to follow. From what appears on-screen in Star Wars Battlefront II, Versio commanded just one ship at the Endor, the Eviscerator. That would imply he served under Piett's overall naval command. Also the reason why Sloane has late battle next to her name is because she assumed command of the fleet after Piett's death as shown in "The Levers of Power". Those are my reasons for the change and I'm attempting to open up a discussion on this in the Senate Hall forums. And I also when I get a spare chance am going to clear out the Legends commanders lists as well to deal with overall theatre commanders.--Shannon, Jedi Knight (talk) 14:20, April 9, 2018 (UTC)

Death Star
do you agree that the ds-1 orbital battle station needs to be a sphere used for the diameter? i never knew that a spheroid could. i just know that a sphere needs to used for the diameter.

hi darthruiz30, I seen something on the internet about the death star being 160 km 99.4 miles, I did see it, It was made by an author, I'm just replying to what you said about that being the source.

I think it was an official source, but it could be or not, I seen this on the images of it on the internet. it compared the death star II 200 km 124 miles death star 160 km 99.4 miles, maybe you can search for it on google or something. but you don't have to use it, since it couldn't be official or not. it looked like it was edited by an article, if I could send you a picture of it. I would.

also, it had all the technicial specifications for both death stars. it is related to canon.

do you like the death star as a sphere or spheroid, because I made it a sphere, in a Disney official made death star rouge one, it looks like a sphere.

ok, i'll be done with these questions, I'm using a pc that belongs to my brother, so were probably done talking. to me all this seems complicated. I'm not a big star wars editor, you can use the official information if you want to.

did you know vscalf23 has his own star wars Wikipedia, he says it is an alternative to this Wikipedia, his expanded universe is called timeline, star wars timeline wiki, you can go to his profile and see, he has a couple of articles he made already, actually he is me. it was just something I thought about, it was an inspiration from canon. only one expanded universe.

i have some official information, it comes from my lucasfilm official star wars poster, it says that 160km is 99.4 miles. but it is about the first death star. i had it not off the internet, i bought it publicly.

ok i found the information, but it may be official from something different, amazon, but it's a picture. that possibly could be used.

it comes from a official book called star wars encyclopedia and other vehicles. it says that the death star is 160 km 99 miles, the second death star is 200 km 124 miles. i also have a official star wars death star poster it says 160 km 99.4 miles.

here is the last thing i have to say, you can still say that 160km is 100 miles. but it is between 160.94 km and 160.99 km, which resluts in 100 miles. i found a website called calculateme.com. this is where i found this information. so you can still say 160 km is 100 miles. because from what i've seen. i searched 160 km to miles, this was one of the results i found.

hi, i know i've sent you way too many questions, but there is one more, did pablo hidalgo use the spheroid for the VFX diameter. because if not, it should be used as a spheroid, that's in my opinion. i know that the sphere should be used, but what if the spheroid was correct for the VFX diameter.

in legends, the death star was a sphere, but you can say that in canon too? but before that. i agree with what pablo hidalgo wrote. so you may never see those edits by me again ok? i would rather you editors edit things yourselves. like i was saying. does it really matter what you call it, i just know it said spheroid before it was edited to sphere, but i will agree with it being a sphere, spheroid was the original edit. would someone edit it back to spheroid by any chance?

AT-DT
Hey Ruiz, where is AT-DT named on this or http://www.starwars.com/news/solo-a-star-wars-story-products-revealed this]? I for the life of me can't find it anywhere --Lewisr (talk) 04:56, April 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Awesome thank you! --Lewisr (talk) 05:02, April 11, 2018 (UTC)

RE: Small Question
I think if its only mentioned as F-143 then it should be just F-143, but you might want to get another opinion on that as I'm not 100% certain --Lewisr (talk) 05:27, April 11, 2018 (UTC)

Daniel Mallory Ortberg
I see you've reverted all of my edits regarding Daniel Mallory Ortberg. As you can see from https://www.thecut.com/2018/03/daniel-mallory-ortberg-interview-heather-havrilesky.html, Ortberg is transgender and now uses the name Daniel Mallory Ortberg. According to many notable organizations, including the GLAAD Media Reference Guide, one is to refer to a trans person as their chosen name. I would very much like to know why you disagree with this. Dscarpa (talk) 16:09, April 16, 2018 (UTC)

Star Wars: Forces of Destiny comics
Shouldn't we move the issues to new pages given that "Adventures" is not part of the series name? --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 20:10, April 30, 2018 (UTC)
 * Going to rest for a bit. Thanks again. Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 21:43, April 30, 2018 (UTC)

Phasma fell in Battle
Point taken, it's probably gonna end up being literally fell knowing how the star wars writers minds work haha --Orcward silence (talk) 09:17, May 3, 2018 (UTC)

C Le
And in what context should there be capital letters?--Rgilbert27 (talk) 08:28, May 6, 2018 (UTC)

SWTOR 5.1 onward is still KOTET
Hi. I noticed that you've been changing elements introduced to SWTOR from Update 5.2 onward to list only the base game instead of Star Wars: The Old Republic: Knights of the Eternal Throne expansion. This is incorrect because we are still in the current expansion cycle until Update 6.0 hits. The loading screen still shows KOTET poster, and Charles Boyd explicitly called it the end of KOTET on his twitter. For comparison, everything from 4.1 to 4.8 is still obviously part of Star Wars: The Old Republic: Knights of the Fallen Empire and not the base game and is listed as such, it would be weird if 5.0 was the expansion but then further additions to it in 5.1 suddenly reverted back to the base game. This is not exclusive to TOR, other MMOs are always being treated as their latest expansion until the next one hits, regardless of interrim updates. --77.111.246.6 08:36, May 8, 2018 (UTC)
 * But Chapters 10-16 are treated as part of KOTFE, and not the base game, even though they were released after 4.0. Expansion content means not just strictly what was released on launch date, but also every subsequent update until the next expansion. You can't even play Chapter 10 without doing the main KOTFE content, just like you can't do Ziost without finishing SOR first. It's a universal practice in the game industry to call the games with Expansion Packs by the latest expansion name, when referring to the current state of the game. In case of SWTOR, it means that Updates 4.0.1 onwards are part of KOTFE expansion, 5.0.1 are part KOTET expansion and so forth. Not to mention, that it looks extremely weird when Indo Zal first appears in KOTET and then appears in the main game; it doesn't make sense chronologically because he was never part of the base game or pre-ROTHC updates. --77.111.246.6 07:21, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
 * But the expansion includes not just the main story, but every related gameplay activity as well: Eternal Championship is part of KOTFE even though it wasn't released until 4.3, and second wave Uprisings are part of KOTET despite being released with 5.1. Look at it from the subscription standpoint: if you're F2P or former sub, then without access to SOR you can't do Ziost, without access to KOTFE you can't do Eternal Championship and without access to KOTET you can't do Uprisings, Iokath or the new flashpoints. That clearly indicates where each piece of content falls. --77.111.246.6 10:08, May 10, 2018 (UTC)
 * If you insist that everything except strictly expansion updates applies only to the base game, it creates a lot of inconsistencies within articles. For example, Battle of Rishi Hard Mode was added in 3.1., does that mean that Mokan appears in Star Wars: The Old Republic while the rest of the flashpoint appears in Star Wars: The Old Republic: Shadow of Revan? Or that the latest returning companions (Ashara Zavros, Andronikos Revel, Felix Iresso and so on) do not appear in KOTET at all, despite their alert missions definitely taking place after KOTET Chapter 9 chronologically? Gungus Boga was not part of KOTFE Chapter, and Eternal Championship was added in 4.3., does that mean that things within one update can belong to different expansions? We should be as specific as possible: you can say that Heskal appears in Star Wars: The Old Republic and be techically correct, but listing Star Wars: The Old Republic: Knights of the Fallen Empire is more specific and informative. But most importantly, it preserves the timeline of the Appearances section, otherwise it becomes much harder to trace the subject's history. Just look at Nathema article: it leaves an impression that the planet appeared in the game before Star Wars: The Old Republic: Knights of the Fallen Empire, which is not the case. When you list 1.X updates as the base game, 2.X updates as Star Wars: The Old Republic: Rise of the Hutt Cartel, 3.X as Star Wars: The Old Republic: Shadow of Revan and so on, it creates a clear visual indication of the time period, at which subject was added to the game. Otherwise, you're just confusing readers, when things are continuously present in Star Wars: The Old Republic before their "First appearance" in the expansion - hoes does that supposed to make sense? --77.111.246.18 07:35, May 14, 2018 (UTC)

Pirates Price
I don't understand when I add Star Wars: Pirate’s Price to the 2018 page, it appears as a redlink? Can you help me fix it? Thanks! The Hungry One 2 (talk) 18:30, May 8, 2018 (UTC)

Re:W
But I don't know how to make a book page plus it has been a year since the series got started and no one, not even the users who made the other series book pages, has made a page for book 1.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 21:42, May 9, 2018 (UTC)

All I know is mostly copy and paste, if I were to copy from an old page and then paste on the new page could I count on you, or any user, to correct it and not just have it deleted.--Rgilbert27 (talk) 22:02, May 9, 2018 (UTC)

About SWTOR 5.1-5.9
I got a message from a user who gave a thorough argument concerning SWTOR 5.1 through 5.9. What do you think? --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 15:04, May 11, 2018 (UTC)


 * What do you think? --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 19:08, May 11, 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for answering the message on my talk page. --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 19:32, May 11, 2018 (UTC)

Regarding Ferroda
There was no speculation there were yellow tattoos on his blue face. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqTlmuDmsc0

How many blue-skinned, yellow-tattooed, near-humans, are there anyway? Given the fact that this is a Legends article we'll be waiting for info like that forever, if that wasn't already that way. --Openminds (talk) 2:23, May 13, 2018 (UTC)

Burning Seas
Okay I've pretty much got started with what you said can I expect help with more Books?--Rgilbert27 (talk) 06:42, May 13, 2018 (UTC)

TC
TC the aqualish tech please?--12.1.205.127 19:46, May 13, 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually both the canon and legends counterparts--12.1.205.127 19:46, May 13, 2018 (UTC)

More Copero
I've returned to updating the Copero page, and I was wondering if you could give me some more details on the fauna listed. Are they specific to certain regions of the planet? Certain climates? Do they all just roam around the landscapes freely? MasterFred (Whatever) 07:57, May 16, 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, I'm a little confused on how we're reaching the date for the Mission to Copero. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 07:58, May 16, 2018 (UTC)