Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

 The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.


 * /History
 * /2005 History
 * /2006 History
 * /Queue

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written and detailed
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide
 * 5) &hellip;not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
 * 7) &hellip;have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box
 * 8) &hellip;have no more than 3 redlinks
 * 9) &hellip;have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles
 * 10) &hellip;not have been previously featured
 * 11) &hellip;be completely referenced with tags for all available material and sources.
 * 12) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced
 * 13) &hellip;provide at least one quote on the article; a leading quote at the beginning is required. Only one quote would be allowed at the beginning of each section at max, although quotes may be placed in the middle of the article.
 * 14) &hellip;include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles.
 * 15) &hellip;include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available.
 * 16) &hellip;pass review by the Inquisitorius review panel.

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under! Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

HK-47
Support Object Comments
 * 1) Darth Ceratis 23:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) RC 2413 15:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Question-in the quote source under 'Personality and Traits', is 'squishy' supposed to be italicised?Grand Moff Rhell 17:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  .  .  .  .  23:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) SkywalkerPL 11:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) --CommanderGree117 17:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Starwarsrulez 18:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Statement: I support this. KEJ 18:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Jedi master Rimsek   [[Image:Chiss Insignia.jpg|20px]] My rantings 19:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) DAWUSS 18:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Nejee16 23:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Tyg13 00:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Nice   Stake black   msg 00:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It has two red links. Fix those and I'll vote.-- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 12:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Main image is unsourced. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I got rid of the red links. I am currently working on finding the main image's source info.Darth Ceratis 20:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd really like that image sourced and all of the images to use the Information template. Besides that, this seems pretty good. 05:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * All images are sourced now, according to the Information template.Darth Ceratis 21:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro seems a little short. 14:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro made longer. 15:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The new rules don't apply here, per Ataru's comments at the bottom section.-- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 12:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Uhhh, well QuentinGeorge disagrees, and it is his right to object to it. You could perhaps ask the Inquisitorius to strike it. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Too long of an intro (Rule 7) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed (sort of). The intro's still long, but I tinkered with the opening paragraph, and it should be concise, yet informative enough to get the necessary points across.  Or maybe I'm so totally wrong that there isn't even a word for it.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 03:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It's still too long. Condense it to about half of that size! Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The opening paragraph or the entire opening section? Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 06:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This is a little strange: It was too short, so we lengthen it, then new rules come in and it's too long...can we just use the intro as it was originally?Darth Ceratis 02:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The intro is the first section of prose immediately before the main body, and it should be about 6-9 decent sized sentences, IMO. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. never mind what I said earlier, the original intro has nothing with Trials of Obi Wan.Darth Ceratis 23:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Bad introduction (rule 7). --Imp 20:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've tried to cut back on the information, but it is extremely hard. Anyone have any suggestions? 02:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't cut back just organize it so it is more coherent.-- Dooku (Solar Sailer)[[Image:Huppla Pasa Tisc.jpg|17px]] 05:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I trimmed it a bit more; see if it's acceptable now. jSarek 05:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Could use both image and prose cleanup (Rule 1), particularly in the "From Master to Master" section.  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not really sure what's wrong with any of it at this point. It looks fine to me, I can't see any way to improve it more.Darth Ceratis 18:44, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see this article reference specific conversations or events in KOTOR I and II. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Question-in the quote source under 'Personality and Traits', is 'squishy' supposed to be italicised?
 * Yes. It's italicized in the subtitles when he says it in the game.Darth Ceratis 21:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. There's three new redlinks concerning bits associated with Trials of Obi Wan. I'm really not too knowlegable about that part of this, so I'm not sure if there even need to be links there or if articles should be created. If someone could take a look at them and fix them, I'd be grateful.Darth Ceratis 01:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I removed the links. I see no standing objections, can this go on the queue?Darth Ceratis 02:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There are some new rules which are in place, one of which is approval by the Inquisitorius. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

The Haunted Village
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) --Eyrezer 02:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 08:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Same problem I had with it last time: The plot "summary" is a play-by-play. .  .  .  .  08:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Except that you never made that objection last time! "I think it's fine now". :p --Eyrezer 09:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I lied. .  .  .  .  09:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There's a redlink in the intro, and 2 others in the Appearances section. Darthchristian 08:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been up for FA before, but it failed because it didn't have enough pictures. I have since added more pics to it and made a couple of changes. The discussion on the old FA nom can be seen here (for convienience), or the original page here . As to the objection about redlinks that is bound to come, there is 3 redlinks in the article: 2 are there twice so it looks like 5, but isn't. --Eyrezer 02:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * All those things under "Appearances" that aren't linked, should be. And then, they shouldn't be red. -- Ozzel 02:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ditto. Also, the plot is written in present tense. 15:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Plot summaries are conventionally written in present tense. In-universe historical articles are the ones which are supposed to be in past tense. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 00:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Carth Onasi
Support Oppose
 * 1)  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 04:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) In spite of the shoddy infobox pic. .  .  .  .  11:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Looks good. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  14:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Shaelas (Ahto City)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 00:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) SkywalkerPL 12:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) I find Carth to be the light side smart ass of the group. - Raan 13:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Dorks on the front page!!! KEJ 08:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Choppy prose: "Carth was born on Telos IV. He had a wife, Morgana, and son named Dustil. He served in the planetary militia and later in the Republic Navy. His first posting was in an orbital watchstation over Serocco." -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I did a general copyedit. Does this address your objection? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I still think a few sections could use improvement. I'll go over it tomorrow. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs a longer introduction. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see this article reference specific conversations or events in KOTOR I and II. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * As I've said elsewhere, I find this new "rule" to be somewhat absurd. It's not required that novels reference chapters or pages, is it? When did this suddenly become an issue? I haven't seen any discussion for making this a policy, and only a couple weeks ago Ebon Hawk made it to FA without this kind of referencing even coming up. It looks ridiculous - look at the bottom of Atton Rand, all that referencing for just a couple of sources. I'm not trying to be difficult, I just strongly object to this. - Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 06:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not a rule, and it certainly isn't policy. I'm just suggesting you do this to make the article as good as possible. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 12:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, if leaving it out keeps the article from getting approved, that sounds like policy to me. And after skimming the last Inq meeting log, that appeared to be the case. - Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 18:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Look, I'll 'fully source' the thing, just let me try and get my brother-who-has-a-near-perfect-memory-concerning-KOTOR-stuff in the mood. That may take a few hours, so don't get your hopes up. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  21:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I've sourced it, but I cannot find the source of these three so-called facts:
 * While a name for Carth's deceased wife is not in the game files, David Gaider, BioWare's writer for the character, gave her name as "Morgana."
 * Carth originally had alternate lines for his devastation in finding out who Revan is if the player is female and has romanced Carth up to that point.
 * If the player has both romanced Carth and turned to the dark side, then the player will have the option of killing Carth herself or have Bastila finish it. In a cut-scene that didn't make it to the final game, Revan had a third option to kill Bastila and die aboard the Star Forge with Carth. It was not placed in the final version because the developers did not have enough time for finishing the game.

Any help would be appreciated. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs sourcing for fact tags in BtS. - Lord Hydronium 01:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Changed the infobox pic to show the background. Better?  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 18:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think he meant as in it's not a head shot/portrait. But the alternative is either game screenshot or Carth with a lazy eye. Take your pick. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 20:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * At any rate, a shorter pic will be needed for the FA template. .  .  .  .  21:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that image works best for the infobox personally, but I've also added an in-game headshot, and there's always this one for the FA template.  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 21:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll grab one later today. Like I did for Bastila's infobox image. Thankfully what I have in mind is the very first module...-- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 21:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Human
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian 7:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Doesn't cite sources. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 15:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * As per Imp. .  .  .  .  21:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ditto (Rule 11) 15:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Question: Should Bts include a note about how we decided to change the capitalization of Human for consistency, etc? 15:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps so. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Burl Ives
Support
 * 1) Yay! Burl Ives! .  .  .  .  23:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If only to encourage a consistent policy with regard to barely-SW-relevant RL people, I vote yes. Yes! Excelsior to Burl! &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 00:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Changed my mind too.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 17:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I vote yay! If only to please the ewok-spirits. &mdash; Jinko 01:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Changed my mind, sorry. - Jinko 13:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Despite probably being the FA with the least canonical significance (aside from Suttle, who was and is a joke), this is worthy of the title.  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Neutral until definition of FA is clarified. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I was going to say something about the "Ives of March", but that would be totally lame. :-P Cull Tremayne 21:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) -- Shaelas (Ahto City)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 22:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Lord Hydronium 00:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Adamwankenobi 21:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 14:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Ozzel 02:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Curse you Burl Ives! Curse you and all you stand for! Enochf 08:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

' Objection 1 and 4 through 9 are not valid under the FA nomination rules. Objections that do not fall under rules 1 through 15 will be disregarded. ' -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 14:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC) Comments
 * 1) To spite 4dot Because it contains too much information that's not relevant to a Star Wars encyclopedia. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 23:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Pfft. The article deals with Burl Ives. Ives participated in Star Wars. The article is legit. Why can't the expansion be so? .  .  .  .  23:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I have no problem with non-SW content. The problem is that aside from one line, it doesn't address the Star Wars content at all. His voice work for SW needs to be a bigger focus. Havac 00:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) *His...few lines in a telemovie which has absolutely no documentation whatsoever? .  .  .  .  00:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) **Yes. Havac 00:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Second objection...too many redlinks...while they don't appear red, they link to non-existant Wikipedia articles. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) *Fixed. .  .  .  .  01:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Includes a lot of information irrelevant to Star Wars, which is the subject of Wookieepedia. Our articles on real-world stuff only mention Star Wars-relevant facts while delegating everything else to Wikipedia. - Sikon 04:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) *Agreed. Darth Maddolis 04:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) **So, basically, the article should read "Burl Ives narrated Caravan of Courage". That's BS in the highest. .  .  .  .  01:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) ***. -LtNOWIS 02:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) ****Exactly. .  .  .  .  23:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Curse you Burl Ives! Curse you and all you stand for! Enochf 11:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) I agree with Sikon. I'm not saying the article should only have SW stuff in it, but since Ives has such little to do with SW, the article is limited in it's SW referrences, and since this is a SW wiki, an article with such a small percentage of SW in it should not be an article Featured on a SW wiki. If you read above, in the 16 requirements, it doesn't actually mention that the article requires anything Star Wars about it- of course, that means that the article passes the requirements, but it also means that any random Featured Article from wikipedia could be imported in the sense that it'd pass requirements (although I realise that we do not copy articles 100% from wikipedia). It is fine for a good article, but to be featured on a Star Wars encyclopedia is a bit much. Darth Maddolis 07:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) No way. This article is unwookieepedic as argued by Sikon and others. KEJ 08:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) As per Sikon, Maddolis, KEJ. --Eyrezer 09:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) Per everybody else. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 18) I know, Fourdot'll just cross me out, but I feel I have to protest. If I'm irrelevant in saying that this is all completely irrelevant to SW, then clearly we need to change the rules. For Heaven's sake, people, this is supposed to be a Star Wars encyclopedia! Evir Daal 08:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 19) *Look, bub, I didn't strike any of these objections, and obviously you missed the point at which Burl Ives narrated Caravan of Courage. .  .  .  .  08:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 20) **Oh. Then I'm real sorry I accused you. I just made an assumption, since you seemed to be the article's greatest proponent, and didn't bother checking the history, though I realise now I should have. Please accept my heartfelt apologies. I won't change my opinion, though. My protest might be deemed irrelevant, but I don't think this warrants FA status. That should be reserved for Star Wars articles. No, I didn't miss the Ewoks reference, but I might well have, dwarfed as it is by all the rest... which IMO is completely irrelevant to SW. Evir Daal 08:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 21) ***Apology accepted, but tell me this: Why do we even have a Burl Ives article, then? .  .  .  .  08:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 22) ****If it's policy, we'd better abide by it, as OOU articles are apparently accepted. Personally I'd rather see only things mentioned IU having articles, actors etc could fit into the BTS sections of IU articles, but I'll accept the majority view. But I don't think something with this little importance to SW should be featured. Evir Daal 08:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 23) *****But you can't object to an FA on the basis of it's subject. You can only object on qualitative grounds. .  .  .  .  09:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 24) ******Well, then someone will cross me out sooner or later for being irrelevant. Till then, I'm exercising civil disobedience. ;) Evir Daal 09:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 25) Spelling and grammar errors throughout. British spelling. Does not follow MOS. Rules 1 and 4. Has a wookify tag on it. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 26) Does not follow WP:LG, which states "official and canonical information only." The Burl Ives article is full of non-official information, though I admit that it doesn't fall under the canon ruling. Also, I find it funny that the Inq is able to veto the votes of the majority based on a minority group which contains the articles primary supporters. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 08:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 27) *Burl Ives doesn't have any continuity retainers, I'm afraid. And let's pitch out all the unlicenced magazine articles while we're at it. .  .  .  .  10:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 28) Has a wookify tag on it... indeed. §6. KEJ 09:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Burl Ives is, like, teh mohtst imhportant pserson in Schtar Whores. He must be ohn teh main paeg! .  .  .  .  23:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Just wondering, but did you misspell 'Star Whores' intentionally, or is there not some hidden meaning behind it? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  12:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh? No, I was just in a mood. .  .  .  .  21:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I could tell by the rest of the sentance&mdash;which was funny&mdash;I just mean that a 'whore' is a harlot/prostitute. I was wondering if you meant it to be taken that way. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This objection struck because it doesn't fall under any rules


 * Puh-lease, this is Wookieepedia, not IMDb. KEJ 08:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * BTW, who struck those votes? KEJ 08:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Havac struck his own objection. Darth Maddolis 08:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright. Fair enough. KEJ 09:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The real world biography stuff for Burl Ives is lucky enough to be let on the article (due to a vote, http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Real-world_biographies based on simply allowing the content to be on wookieepeia), but making the article an FA is just plain silly. Darth Maddolis 09:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Sio Bibble
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) .  .  .  .  07:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Shaelas (Ahto City)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 22:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 08:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced infobox picture. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 12:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. -- Ozzel 00:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Small, but my main issue is the present tense and speculation at the end. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced P&T. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. .  .  .  .  21:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * A small one, but unsourced last paragraph of Biography. And as mentioned, it's very short, though apparently that's not objection-worthy. - Lord Hydronium 00:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. .  .  .  .  21:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced images. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sourced. .  .  .  .  23:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Four sentences for the intro? I know we don't have an objection for articles being "too short", but this just looks small, even with 3 pictures placed in the main text. Cull Tremayne 21:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Struck my objection but I agree with Cull about the length. Green Tentacle (Talk) 08:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Korriban
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian 08:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) SkywalkerPL 12:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * The History section is fine, but you need more about the planet itself. More about the inhabitants, the society structure there, and the key locations. .  .  .  .  21:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fauna should be expanded. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 22:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Great Jedi Purge
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian 11:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) No arguement here. .  .  .  .  23:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 07:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Doesn't cite sources. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 15:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed.--Darthchristian 15:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro is incredibly short and not good enough for the FA box (Rule 7). Cull Tremayne 00:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Again, fixed. --Darthchristian 10:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced images. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't find the source for the Jedi in disguise picture. Anyone mind helping? --Darthchristian 18:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Atton Rand
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 19:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 08:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see this article reference specific conversations or events in KOTOR II. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 18:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, that shouldn't be hard. I'll get to it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * See Jedi Exile for a good example of KOTOR referencing. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Finished. I hope I didn't go overboard. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro fairly short. Cull Tremayne 00:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro expanded. Does this suffice?
 * Yes, sorry about being slow on the uptake. Cull Tremayne 12:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that another image, preferably one from the game, would look better in the infobox.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 12:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I am unable to capture (high-quality or otherwise) a screenshot. So I can't really do anything about that. I am not partial to the other head-shoulder shot in the article... but if I have no other choice I'll do it. Best thing to do is to just wait and see if JMAS or Redemption see this. - Solus  (Bird of Prey)  19:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The sourcing style isn't consistent. .  .  .  .  23:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What does that mean? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * ...with other sourced articles. I thought we decided not to specify moments in the game. Therefore, every KOTOR II source should just be attributed to KOTOR II. .  .  .  .  04:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * So that was decided against, then? - Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 06:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * May I be told which one's been formally decided upon? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I did a general overhaul of the article not long ago, and the only thing (that I know of) that needs to be cleared up is the canonicity of some of the Kotor II sidequests, which will be brought up in the next Inq meeting, so I can't do anything about that until then. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It was decided that we should be as vague as possible when writing about optional content. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. I didn't know that that entailed un-detailed game referencing stuff. I'll go resource it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Atris
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Of course I have to vote for this one. - Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 19:07, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) .  .  .  .  23:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Yays Enochf 11:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 04:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Lord Hydronium 00:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) KEJ 08:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see this article reference specific conversations or events in KOTOR II. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Will can do. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  21:05, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * One unsourced quote, one unsourced image. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Rectified. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  12:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Some POV. "Even through her hypocrisy", "becoming corrupted by her own arrogance". - Lord Hydronium 03:15, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe that is now corrected. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  21:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It was stagnating on it's review page, so I thought, 'Why not?' I get more input this way. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Selkath
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) -- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 21:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Darthchristian 23:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) .  .  .  .  21:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Jinko 21:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Flipperheads! KEJ 11:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * "History and culture" section is too generic. Split it up. .  .  .  .  23:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. I know that it says an IP did it, but it was me, the Culture and History sections are seperate.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 13:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think some more information on kolto needs to be integrated into the article. I don't know enough about it to do it myself. --Eyrezer 02:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Why? There is really no information about it at all. Besides, it really doesn't have a huge impact on the article.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The "The Worlds of Knights of the Old Republic" link doesn't seem to work. --Eyrezer 06:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know. I'm not that good with external links.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 13:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed the link. --Eyrezer 01:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Quote under Selkath in the Galaxy is unsourced. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 15:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I have done alot of work, let us hope that this goes well.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 21:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh! Good work.--Darthchristian 23:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Rather than simply a notable Selkath section, it's good to expand it out and give some detail on famous Selkath, see Drovian or Tunroth for examples. --Eyrezer 03:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Eyrezer. Let's expand the list some. Atarumaster88 [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 22:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That's not a legitamate objection. Besides, there isn't really that much information on any of them to include that isn't already in the article.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Notice it's in the Comments section... Cull Tremayne 23:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Duh. But they shouldn't do things like this, and not support the article on a whim, just because something would look better a certain way. A lot of things would look better in a certain way, but there is so little information on individual Selkath, that what they ask is near to impossible.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * For one, you should notice I didn't actually oppose the article. I think you've done a good job with it, but I do think it could be improved in a couple of ways. Simply having a list of notable Selkath is pointless. Just put them in the infobox and be done with it. Alternatively, an article like Rakririan shows what can be done with little information. --Eyrezer 06:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There, I added and sourced a new section as specified by you.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 14:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Did a little cleanup - Jinko 21:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Lightsaber
Support Objections Comments
 * 1) Siteoftupac 19:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs citations. .  .  .  .  00:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Present tense- Follow MOS. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Manaan
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) -- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 04:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Well, gee. .  .  .  .  04:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 08:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jinko 20:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 20:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Although this is my least favorite world of all KotOR. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 20:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  Stake black   msg 21:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * POV (Rule 4). Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Where?-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 15:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that's been sorted now. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Swoop.jpg is unsourced and any chance of a link to the source for Image:ManaanWalls1319.jpg? Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 20:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Let us hope this goes even better...-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 04:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I did a semi-extensive generic clean-up of the article fixing things such as spelling and rewording anything I thought needing. Good enough, Ataru? - Jinko 20:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Excellent job everyone. Atarumaster88 [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 20:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The paragraph about Manaan being taken by and later entering the New Republic says it's from the NEC, but I've looked and can't find any mention of Manaan in that era. Is there a page number? - Lord Hydronium 04:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I wondered about that too. I checked the NEC, and it is in there. Sort of. While the NEC does not mention Manaan directly, it covers Ackbar's conquest of Imperial worlds in the inner rim. However, I am still looking for mention of Manaan joining the New Republic. Perhaps that was implied too, but it is unlikely. Despite being conquered, I doubt that the Selkath would abandon their neutrality all together, and join the Republic.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * In that case, we should clarify the statement to remove any speculation. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. How about now?-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 17:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Oxygen
Support
 * 1) It may not have anything to do with Star Wars, but why should that stop us? &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 13:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) It abides by all the regulations, and I learned something. Darth Maddolis 13:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * No proper intro (rule 7), insufficient info from all appearances and sources (rule 9), what little info is there isn't all cited properly (rule 11), no images--since oxygen is canonically part of breathable air this should be easy (rule 15), and some might argue that copying from Wikipedia violates rule 1. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 14:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * How can it violate rule one? What's wikipedia got to do with whether or not the article is well written? KEJ 14:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Because it wasn't written at all, it was copied. But that's a minor point. It still clearly breaks four rules. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 14:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * But it doesn't break rule 1, so unless you remove references to rule one, your objection would be invalid I guess, wouldn't it. Of course, I didn't make the rules, and it's not my job to enforce them. KEJ 14:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * STRONG OPPOSE. Per Culator.
 * Since you insist... -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 16:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) No proper intro (rule 7) -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 16:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Insufficient info from all appearances and sources (rule 9) -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 16:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) What little info is there isn't all cited properly (rule 11) -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 16:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) No images--since oxygen is canonically part of breathable air this should be easy (rule 15) -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 16:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Culator and Ataru.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 17:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh my. It is really short for an FA. Really short. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 19:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * April Fools Day is over guys. Chack Jadson 19:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Culator, and POINT. And childishness. .  .  .  .  23:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Culator and Jorrel. I have no objection to this being an FA if you can get it there, but it's got to meet the criteria.  jSarek 03:30, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Length, lacking specific appearances (I'm not talking about every appearances with a planet with breathable atmosphere, just where oxygen is specifically mentioned), lack of available images, lack of available canonical information, copied from Wikipedia (unless this has been changed already). 19:23, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Seeing as we can have other articles with nothing to do with Star Wars, I see no reason not to have this. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 13:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Copying other websites is bad. How can we get onto TFN for copying our stuff when we copy Wikipedia? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * How hilarious. Ooh ooh, my sides are hurting! Please stop! Seriously though, can you prove that oxygen has the same properties in the Star Wars galaxy as in our atmosphere? No, you cannot. Is this anything like Burl Ives? No, it is not. One is a canon representation of an element that just so happens to have the same name in Star Wars, one is a real-life person of which we should try to contain relevant facts and a biography. Stop being so damn petty. Cull Tremayne 19:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is why we have WP:POINT. - Lord Hydronium 19:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Copying from Wikipedia was the original foundation of the site. And it's quite legal, thanks to GFDL. And it's inaccurate to say that this has nothing to do with Star Wars. It's completely canon, and it's got more appearances than Darca Nyl, our current FA.

CompForce
Support
 * 1) Danik Kreldin 00:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC) - McEwok and I breathed a lot of life into this article, really expanded it and so forth... think it looks good.

Oppose Comments
 * 1) No reference tags (Rule 11). Other than that a once-over doesn't find anything lacking. Cull Tremayne 01:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Cull. .  .  .  .  09:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Three redlinks should probably be filled in. Cull Tremayne 01:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

The Keeper
Support Oppose
 * 1) Officially the stupidest thing I've ever worked on. At least Mt. Sorrow was an attempted murderer. .  .  .  .  05:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) You're welcome. -- Ozzel 05:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Thumbs up to sarcastico-fanboyism. KEJ 08:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I don't know how he does it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  11:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Jon (farmer)
Support
 * 1) Stick this in your pipe and smoke it, detractors! .  .  .  .  07:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Cull Tremayne 10:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * 1) Maybe one or two more images §15 (even though, of course, the possibilities of getting varied pics of him are kinda limited). KEJ 08:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Not a valid objection. Although several images are hopefully on the way. .  .  .  .  10:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well..."include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available." Rule 15. But they are on the way. Cull Tremayne 10:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I sit corrected. Gotta read these rules more often. Constantly searching for the "No Burl Ives" rule... .  .  .  .  10:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Not Sourced.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC) **It's single source, it doesn't need citations. .  .  .  .  11:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Rule 11. It doesn't say "if an article is from only one source, then it doesn't need reference tags."-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm learning all kinds of crazy things! Sourced. .  .  .  .  11:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * First paragraph of the biography needs expansion (isn't even technically a paragraph w/3 sentences; must have at least five). Rule 1.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 13:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Stagorr
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) To 52! Cull Tremayne 11:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Yay! Things! .  .  .  .  11:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Themelle444 12:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 13:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * A little over-referenced for my liking (ref end or paragraph only, if it's all from one source) but otherwise fine. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)