Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month/February 2006


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of monthly Wookieepedian of the Month nominations. Please do not modify it.

Jack Nebulax

 * 1) Support. He seems to be around all the time...in a good way! Helps make the Wookieepedia the best it can be with countless edits, reverts and new info - Kwenn 22:57, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. I suspect FADM Nebulax spends more time on the Recent Changes page than any other non-admin, as he's always fixing something. &mdash;Darth Culator   (talk)  18:19, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Changing my vote, Jack definitely deserves it. --MarcK [talk] 02:20, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Changing My Vote. TIEPilot051999 02:29, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Support. Kuralyov 05:02, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Also changing. The fact that he's always here doing something is reason enough.
 * 7) Support. He seems almost like a human grammar-editing program at times, working diligently! VT-16 15:17, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Support. The more edits, the merrier. --AdmThrawn 02:04, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Support -- P.h 20:21, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)p.h
 * 10) Support. -- Adamwankenobi 21:31, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Support. Good job! Cato Neimoidia 21:09, 25 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Oppose. Could be more pleasant to deal with; crosses the manners line all the time. Just being here all the time doesn't make you a model Pedian. CooperTFN 08:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Oppose. I definately agree with CooperTFN. Jack could be a little more pleasant and kind to others. Master Secura
 * 14) Support -- While he could be less gruff to users at times the shear volume of his contributions more than makes up for it. Also, he is willing to assist those who request it which counts for a lot in my book.--DannyBoy7783 20:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Support -- Vermilion 01:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) Support -- Although he could be more polite, Nebulax is pretty much an edit machine. RMF 17:33, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) Support -- I see his edits everywhere. Great job. - Alpha Fire 23:39, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) Support -- Keep up the good work! - Divinity 03:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Great, the only one who agrees with me is the kid who nominated himself. http://media.ign.com/boardfaces/34.gif CooperTFN 01:10, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I agree with you, but I think his contributions far outweigh his diplomatic relations.--DannyBoy7783 01:21, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * LOL...for what it's worth, I agree with you, too Cooper. WhiteBoy 23:39, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Jaymach
Comment: Uh, how exactly did he provide other Wookieepedians with sourcebooks? Are we talking PDF scans or something? --Imp 22:03, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)comment
 * 1) Support. He has slaved over many a magazine to get numerous articles on this wiki. -- Riffsyphon1024 10:19, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. Besides providing lots of entries on obscure, ambiguous sources, he also manages to find time to provide sourcebooks to fellow Wookieepedians when asked. StarNeptune 23:40, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. --MarcK [talk] 08:08, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC) Changing my vote again, God I'm indecisive. --MarcK [talk] 03:37, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Support. --Master Starkeiller 10:58, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Support. Jaymach has added all the great Polyhedron and Challenge stuff, helped me with the lists of Jedi and ships, answered countless questions using his library, and provided many scans for articles.  And helped me with formatting.JustinGann 06:02, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Aye. WhiteBoy 16:40, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Kuralyov

 * 1) Support. Has done some excellent work in the past few months, particularly in the election pages, mostly unnoticed. - QuentinGeorge 07:15, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. Yeah, Kuralyov is definitely the "quiet achiever" around here. --Azizlight 08:54, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. Jasca Ducato 10:25, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Support. TIEPilot051999 19:16, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Support. --Imp 16:57, 6 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Support &mdash; Silly Dan  20:14, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Support. SFH 20:18, 14 Jan 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Support. Sparks lively debate and is concerned about the accuracy of articles. Great work. Cull Tremayne 21:03, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Support [[Image:Tbhelm.gif|30px]] Shadowtrooper talk 19:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Support -Stake black 23:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

General Secura

 * Can you nominate yourself??? Master Secura
 * Why would you want to? --Imp 19:06, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Why wouldn't i??? Master Secura
 * Well you could, but if you are productive to this wiki (and I'm not saying you're not, cuz I honestly don't know), people will be more likely to nominate and vote for you. StarNeptune 20:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose. You haven't shown that much productivity in my eyes. -- Riffsyphon1024 03:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.