User talk:CC7567

Skirmish aboard the Tranquility
I've extracted the audio for all the quotes on this article. Would you like me to add them to the article as an extra touch for your what I'll assume is going to be a FAN? -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 02:49, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

WP:TCW members
Still-interested WP:TCW members, please sign your name here with a new line.  CC7567  (talk) 05:43, 3 July 2009 (UTC) > JangFett  Talk 15:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy )
 * 2) ShaakTi1138 07:41, 3 July 2009 (UTC) - but you know, I generally do minor edits, because of my grammar... But I'll try to do my best to improve the articles.
 * 3) Once I start working on an article :P.  Grunny  ( Talk ) 09:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) --Clone Commander Lee 11:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 5) Alexrd 11:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC) - Mostly updating and editing minor errors.
 * 6) I'm focusing on sounds right now, so I'm gonna take Chrin off as a project. But I'll still on board for copyediting, sounds, and images. I'll also take on projects here and there. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 12:03, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 7) Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 13:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) I'll never get tired of TCW :P (Imperial Intelligence)  15:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Wesker432 16:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC) Don't worry I'm still in when series 2 comes out I will be able to make more articles for the project.
 * 3) --Jedijake123 20:34, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Delta 90 02:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Re:User talk:Graestan
Thank you so much. You've made a terrible day into a wonderful day. Graestan ( Talk ) 20:39, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

TCW
I can't figure out if an article needs improvement because they already seem fine. How come the people who wrote the articles could not have made them good articles in the first place?--Darth Malice the Destroyer 23:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Wookiee Leadership
I, Graestan the Mighty, Merciless, Magnanimous, and Wise, being of certifiably unsound mind and hopelessly unfit body, hereby bestow upon you, CC7567 the Prodigal, the Wookiee Leader Award for your extremely efficient organization and running of WookieeProject The Clone Wars, in particular your leading the charge with many good and featured article nominations. Every so often a user comes along who organizes a fair slice of the user base into an extremely constructive unit with one overreaching goal in mind; you are most certainly the man of the hour in that respect. Lucasfilm threw Wookieepedia's veteran editors a real curveball when it came to The Clone Wars, and we were all surprised to see that our salvation from such a continuity and content clusterfeck would come in the form of a brand-new user. Your talents are incredible and you never cease to amaze me and any of my colleagues that I might mention you to. Carry on, tarry not, tally ho, sally forth, excelsior, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, et al. Graestan ( Talk ) 00:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Re:KRONOS-327
Hmm. Apparently I misread the sources - I could have sworn that he was made a sentry at Ziro's palace. I'll have to double check. Thanks again. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 00:59, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Out of curiosity, is there any evidence that suggests he was destroyed during the Raid on Ziro's Palace? Or is it too hard to tell? Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 16:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I figured. Don't bother re-watching it since it's practically impossible to distinguish him. That's all I needed to know. Thanks again. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 16:08, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * One last thing, and then I swear I'll shut up and stop asking you. :p Would you check the credits for the film and see if KRONOS is listed? The article for the movie claims that Corey Burton voiced him, but I can't find anything to back that up. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 13:12, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Much thanks. KRONOS should be done now. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 16:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

OOM Commander 2 (Teth)
Trying to find an image of this one for the article. Where specifically is this droid shown in the film? Is it the droid that Rex hits, then destroys several other droids with the smacked droid's own blaster while it's still holding it? -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 19:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Hate to have to tell ya this, but I've just watched the entire scene. It's not an OOM command droid. They are all just plain ol' B1 battle droids. Not a yellow marking amongst them. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 00:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It is a command battle droid. You can clearly see his yellow markings when the scene zooms to him. --Clone Commander Lee 17:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

bantha formation
why did you take all of my bantha pictures off the page?(Wwee 02:43, 9 July 2009 (UTC))

(:
Sorry i am pretty new to wookiepedia. I think you should of kept at least the diagram of the formation. Do you now a good page a new person like me should work on? (Wwee 16:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC))

Zak
Could you give me a quote of Zak. I only have then in German. --Clone Commander Lee 18:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and took care of this for ya, Lee. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 19:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Rescue on the Tranquility
Four Senate Commandos were killed. Two by Ventress and two by Argyus. --Clone Commander Lee 19:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll check this. --Clone Commander Lee 19:26, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Here's how I believe this breaks down (as explained in the Episode Guide): Ventress cuts her way into the detention center control room, subdues, not kills two commandos there. Argyus and the other two open fire, she deflects fire back killing the two other commandos. The two she subdued must be the ones that Argyus killed later while freeing Gunray. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 19:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Quote
They said "hell"? I need to rewatch the episode. I don't think TCW would say "hell" again after they removed that word from Rookies.  JangFett  Talk 17:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC) > JangFett  Talk 17:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay. Thanks for clearing that up CC :) <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"

Re: Question
Now, this is where it gets... tricky. See, even though I've read all of the Slaves of the Republic, I do not physically own any of them, nor do I own any other of hundreds SW comics I've read. I'm downloading them from various websites where high-quality scans became available just mere days after the release of the printed issue. Judgind by the fact that all comic images that initially get uploaded here are obviously taken from the very same scans, I can say that lots of people are using them as well and it seems to be okay as long as we do not announce it openly. So, if you need them just for the information, this would be both the fastest and the cheapest way do to it. Now, whether they are actually worth buing at all... I'd personally say no. Not only was the story pretty bleak and didn't actually move me at all, but the artwork in most of those issues was just.. horrible. Nothing compared to other current Star Wars titles such as KOTOR or Legacy or even old good Clone Wars. Still, if you decide to buy them is some form after all, I can't be of much help to you, since I've never ever held a comic book in my hands and the nearest comic shop to me is located a couple of thousand kilometers and several phederal borders away. Sorry. -- Mauser  Comlink 17:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Broadside
Could you look through my Broadside article before i am nominate it to good status ? --Clone Commander Lee 17:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Heavy super battle droid
I provided a source for the moving. Please move the sbd commander article to Heavy super battle droid. Than ks.--Governor Jerjerrod 21:17, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Holocron Heist
I found this summary of the episode on http://jediinsider.com/index.php?catid=246&itemid=11871, but I'm not a member of this website. I thought you might be able to update the page if this proves to be accurate. I don't know how to use this site, but this was the only way I found to contact one of you. I don't mean to disreguard any rules. ;)

"A ruthless bounty hunter infiltrates the Jedi Temple and attempts to steal their most guarded secret. It's up to Anakin Skywalker and Ahsoka Tano to stop the bounty hunter before he can use the secret to bring an end to the Jedi forever."

RE: WPJ
First, you're right. I don't can take eight articles in two weeks. I just didn't know the countdown. I have fixed your objections on the Zak page. --Clone Commander Lee 18:19, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: The Clone Wars mobile game
There's nothing much that Rex does in the mobile game. He just briefs and debriefs Denal between the missions.  QuiGonJinn (Talk) 08:36, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

SWF article
CC, I saw that you'd listed some issues about the sourcing of the Star Wars Fanon Wiki article, as well as its need for an update. I did update it, but I'm still working on addressing the other issues presented by the AC. As far as outside sources and references&hellip;there simply aren't many that exist. I've tried Google searching for results and most of the results are wiki pages. :-S Another site isn't going to tell about how various organizations and structures inside the wiki work or about its history&mdash;I could ask some of the community members to maybe make a blog or something, but aside from conducting Wookieepedia interviews with them, the limited scope of the wiki's coverage means that some measure of sourcing from the wiki itself is going to be necessary, and I'm not sure how to get around that. I imagine any other GA or FA on a website would run into similar issues when discussing the internal structure of the site itself, but if you have a suggestion, I'm open to it.

As far as POV and broadness of scope is concerned, my criteria for inclusion are things that pop up in the sitenotice, the site's newsletter, and the current events page&mdash;but their community itself doesn't keep those incredibly well-updated, so I do have to make some judgment calls. That said, I think it covers the definition of broad coverage, but I'm open to suggestion. Also, to discuss your original question about wikis being editable, I'm interested to see what you think on the matter. Would it be better if all the references were to specific revisions rather than just to specific pages so that each link is something fixed, rather than an editable page? For example, the main page link could be replaced with this link? I know others had concerns about the article as well, but since you'd left comments on the AC meeting page, I thought I'd address them with you specifically. Thanks for your time. Atarumaster88  ( Talk page ) 18:30, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Very well and thanks for the feedback. I'll start converting the references and making sure quotes are sourced as specifically as possible. I have some experience with this sort of thing on Wikipedia that I should be able to use to alter the structure. My only concern is that the AC may choose to remove the article's status without my getting a chance to work on additional requests or desired edits to the article. Cheers. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 01:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's what I figured. I'm working on adapting all the references now, but with 100+ unique ones, it's taking some time. One thing that would be good to know: Is it preferable to apply dates to each revision? For example, I have This RFA revision referenced, but would it be better to label it as a 19 June 2009 revision? If that's the case, I can go back and add the dates to all the revisions to add more specificity; I didn't the first time because the date of the edit can be seen by opening the link inside the ref, but if that's what the AC prefers, I'll do it. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 16:06, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Request
Hey, CC. Could you help me a bit? It's regarding Tope's objection to the Unidentified Naboo merchant GAN. I was told that the only person who might have the guide is. I left a message on his talk page, but it seems that he visits Wookieepedia very rarely. I know that he sometimes appears in the IRC, but I couldn't catch up with him there and I'm not able to use the IRC a lot. Knowing that you are rather frequent there, I would like to ask you a favor. If you spot Jaymach, could you ask him to check the guide for a mention? Thanks,  QuiGonJinn (Talk) 11:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC) > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 09:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Great! Thanks a lot. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"

Republic Heroes
Hi. Well, I'm trying to work on Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Republic Heroes, but one guy is constantly making his own changes. Do you know how to lock the page so that only registered users can edit it? Sorry for my English. ShaakTi1138 14:42, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much ;)! ShaakTi1138 19:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

About Loathsom...
I noticed that you haven't edit it after June. Are you going to write about it anytime soon? 'Cause I don't have any hasty projects now, and I could edit the article myself.Kreivi Wolter 18:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 21:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Sorry
I apologize for not adding my reasons in the summary but I did state them in the talk page, I personally considered my changes positive but any reversions you choose to make are acceptable.SargeLIVES 19:08, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Joining the Clone Wars Wookieeproject
Hey, CC. Could I join the project? Juts as a minor editor for now, nothing major...---Jedi Kasra (talk) 19:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'd like to create the article for the Jedi named Tauht, featured in the new comic Clone Wars #7.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 20:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Kiros
Hello again. I think I've finally finished working on the Battle of Kiros. As the person who has done a lot of TCW battle articles, maybe you could conduct a pre-nom review and point out any flaws to me? Thanks,  QuiGonJinn (Talk) 20:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)