User talk:Cade Calrayn

 Find archived discussions here: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9

CAN objection
Please check Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified Jedi Knight (Zayne Carrick) when you get a chance. You have an unstruck objection from February that is currently the only obstacle to archiving the nom as successful. Thanks. &mdash;MJ&mdash; Holocomm 21:50, April 27, 2015 (UTC)

sorry for the misunderstanding
Sorry I wasnt clear, the part I didnt understand was a section of the book about Sabines love of music. what I added to the article had nothing to do with that, what I added was a section about Sabines language skills from the book, which I understood perfectly fine. A previous editor had tried to include information on Sabines love of music, and her language abilities, but he forgot to put the reference down so it was removed. I found the book in my collection where this information was from and I found the sections containing this information... I included the language information (which I understood), but I could not adequately summarize her enthusiasm for music... sorry I did not explain myself well. ralok (talk) 02:10, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm objecting to the serious grammar errors that are in that edit and all of the other edits you have made on similar articles. Please, if you're not going to use proper grammar and spelling, then don't add info to our articles. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  02:11, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
 * Well... what grammatical errors are there? I would love to fix them. The information I added is 100% correct though as I am retrieving it directly from the book itself which is in my hands. I think it is a bit hasty to completely remove valid and accurate information from a page simply because the Grammar and spelling is incorrect (indeed the natural resposne to this should be to fix it, not to deny the accuracy and validity of the information) ralok (talk) 02:14, April 30, 2015 (UTC)

I also have a question
So ok, the EU is now not cannon, but what of the articles that fall under both Canon and Legends categories? Does the Legends information count as canon for them?--Fekyu 04:44, May 3, 2015 (UTC)

Hey can I at least have some help i'm reasonably new to Wookieepedia so...instead of saying "nonsense!" perhaps throw in a few ideas and tips. --Will.K (talk) 10:26, May 3, 2015 (UTC)


 * I know I am not Cade, but I'll try to your question, because I once had the same doubt. The only Canon sources that are applied to both Legends and Canon pages are Episodes I-VI and The Clone Wars series (not including the Bad Batch arc and the Crystal Crisis on Utapau arc). So the external information from this media are treated differently, for example if it is an information book like The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia it is considered Legends information, the Star Wars Insider content prior to Blade Squadron is also considered Legends, the old Star Wars Databank was Legends, while the new one (current online) is canon, the Star Wars Encyclopedia Online fits both Canon and Legends and there are a lot of other scources, but those you need to investigate for yourself. I hope I could help you, for any other questions that I'm able to answer contact me. Pedronog (talk) 18:10, May 3, 2015 (UTC)Pedronog

But the bad batch arc and the crystal crisis on utuapau arc are marked as canon are they not? --Will.K (talk) 06:33, May 4, 2015 (UTC)

Pedronog (talk) 17:24, May 5, 2015 (UTC)Pedronog
 * Yes, that's why I didn't include them in the scources that are both Legends and Canon...

Resurrecting my sig
Hey Cade!

I dropped by today in order to leave a brief message to Cavalier One, and found that my signature was dumping multiple copies of my user page. As I pulled the strings of page histories to unravel the mystery, it appeared that your bot had, as a matter of routine, redirected several of my component signature templates to my user page, which resulted in the confusing signature I saw. I subsequently discovered Wook has some inactivity policies in place of which I was unaware. I hope you don't mind that I've restored these files, as I've kinda gotten used to having them in place at the various wikis that mean the most to me.

Also, I initially protected most of these templates after seeing that your bot wasn't in fact an admin. The hope was that I could prevent a recurrence of the incident, but I think I've now reverted that protection on all of them. Having a word with you seemed, on reflection, something that would be done in a more civilised age.

At any rate, I hope I haven't done anything terribly offensive to Wook policies, and if, in revision notes, I referred to what happened to my templates as "vandalism", it was only out of a sense of confusion, not accusation.

Do you mind if I keep my signature, even though my activity here might be irregular? If the signature doesn't meet the inactivity policies, is there another solution I can use? Thanks! 19:02: Mon 04 May 2015
 * Your pages were caught by an automated script based on activity timing; it wasn't aware that you were staff. No problem at all. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:18, May 4, 2015 (UTC)

Quick thought.
My apologies. I believe that the game will be Star Wars focused and that's why I thought that it'd be good to be made into an article. I like to help with the Star Wars game articles and I thought that it qualified. Roger Murtaugh (talk) 18:21, May 5, 2015 (UTC)

Images of Jora Astane
Hey. Why did you mark this as empty? There are images categorized with that category. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 07:11, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Cause he didn't create it properly, as I've told him before, and he wasn't in IRC and it was late and I was tired. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:52, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, OK. I'll recreate the right way. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 16:30, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

Hey, sorry about not fully sourcing those images. I'll make sure to clean up the pages and properly source them later tonight. --98.212.76.152 17:43, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

Question
Hey, sorry if I uploaded those images wrong. The source of them is from a facebook page. I tried to re-upload one of them with all the proper info such as description, source, etc. and I was told I couldn't re upload a deleted image. Is there a reason for this? And should I do anything differently on the Jimmy McInerney page. I plan on adding a lot more info later tonight.--AH Blueface (talk) 18:02, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

OOPS! I need help
Hey Cade Calrayn, I'm new here and trying to get my bearings. I just kind of made a boo boo here, and feel really stupid. Instead of moving an article I simply created a new one and copied the information over, then redirected. That means there is no history and all that. Now that I realized what I did wrong, I can't move the page anymore because the page title already exists, and I can't delete it. The original page is Mission to steal the Triple-Zero protocol personality matrix, and I wanted to move it to Mission to steal the Triple-Zero personality matrix, so that it matches the Triple-Zero personality matrix in name. Sorry, it's hard to explain. Can you help me? -Effect 03:31, May 11, 2015 (UTC)

<<EDIT! Nevermind, Master Jonathan helped me out with it. -Effect 04:43, May 11, 2015 (UTC)

Disney Infinity
So I've noticed you deleted Disney Infinity 3.0. Why? I started a discussion about it in the Senate Hall and so far, Brandon Rhea and ProfessorTofty agreed that your deletion was arbitrary. Can you explain why Disney Infinity doesn't deserve an article in the forum in question? "Regardless of whether it includes Star Wars material, there's no need for an article." Why not? Star Wars is a big part of 3.0 with playsets. Are we really going to ignore it? SeanWheeler (talk) 00:20, May 14, 2015 (UTC)

Jumptrooper/Skytrooper
Hello. I just noticed you've redirected Sky Troopers to Imperial jumptrooper. Was there any discussion of this? I don't see anything on the talk page.

It just seems like a weird choice. May I ask why you did it? I understand that they are very similar, but if you are going to merge them, at least clean up the article a bit. Because of the merging, the article links to itself once or twice, and implies that jumptroopers and skytroopers are similar, but very separate. It would also look a lot better if there were some more pictures of sky troopers within. Thanks! DarthKnah (talk) 02:29, May 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't recall the exact situation, but the Imperial Handbook was the reasoning for the merge. The sentence in question in the jumptrooper article has been removed. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  02:37, May 17, 2015 (UTC)

File name issue
Hey Cade! Unfortunately, I forgot to give that file a proper name. :-$ Could you please fix that? Thanks in advance, my friend. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:46, May 17, 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure, whatya want the name to be? Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  15:47, May 17, 2015 (UTC)