Forum:CT Archive/Action figures

Forums &gt; Consensus track &gt; 


 * Quinlanfan began this in the general discussion forum. I've brought it here for those interested in discussing the topic. &mdash;  SparqMan  Talk 17:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

This descussion is weather we should allow information about action figures on certain character's pages. Please cast your vote. All in favor say I. All who dissagree I Don't. Please only vote once. Thank you! &mdash;Unsigned comment by Quinlanfan (talk &bull; contribs).

Include information on action figures

 * 1) I Quinlanfan 17:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I don't see any reason not to have a seperate "==Merchandising==" section. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 20:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Imp 20:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Volemlock 20:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Herbsewell 21:01, 11 January 2007 (UTC) If it's Star Wars, it's here.
 * 6) I'll vote to include a BRIEF "==Merchandising==" section. It shouldn't be a "list of products" per se, but a general summary of the subject's coverage in the collectables market. I'd also support links to a new Star Wars Collectables Wiki. --Azizlight 00:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) I concur with Azizlight. Adamwankenobi 21:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Per Azizlight. As long as the new "Merchandising" section is placed within the "Behind the scenes" section.– Sentry  Talk 05:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) .  .  .  .  06:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Do not include

 * Leader 20:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) [[Image:DarthAbeonisSig2.gif|Jasca Ducato]] Sith Council Sith Campaign 20:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Only for EU characters should a note be made in the Behind the Scenes section. Otherwise, toywiki.org is the wiki for things like this. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|25px]] Talk 20:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I can't support something so non-specific. I'd gladly allow action figure information on the conditions that it is only for notable figures (meaning EU characters only, since it's hardly news when somebody produces a new Luke Skywalker figure) and only for figures that actually exist (not, "OMG somebody said their cousin whose friend works at the company that hauls Hasbro's trash says they're going to make a Quinlan Vos figure!!!111!!!11!"). Until the terms are laid out more precisely, I oppose this silliness. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 21:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 21:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Have a separate Star Wars merchandise wiki, keep merchandise info off this wiki, and provide links to pages on the merchandise wiki

 * 1) Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 21:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This, unless the item in question provides new In-Universe information not available elsewhere. —Xwing328 (Talk) 23:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Ditto to what Xwing 328 said. - JMAS 01:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Leader 01:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  StarNeptune Talk to me! 05:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) As Xwing328 said, we can have new IU info or BTS that helps determine canonical items, see Unknown tridactyl species. But whatever happens, we don't need any mention of C-3PO underwear. --  Riffsyphon  1024 12:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Per Riff. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Commander Jorrel Fraajic [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Communications Relay 05:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Include ONLY pertinent, canon, non-redundant information from toys, but do not make a list of merchandise HERE, regardless of whether a Star Wars merchandise wiki materializes

 * 1) -- Wild yoda - talk - contribs -[[Image:Yoda_cartoon.jpg|20px]] 23:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) See comment below.--Valin Kenobi 22:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Comments
I have an interesting example. Currently, the Mitth'raw'nuruodo page has three things relevant to this conversation in the Behind the scenes section.
 * Artistic renditions of Thrawn during his final campaign often picture him with a ysalamir.
 * An action figure of Thrawn was made in 1998 as part of the Expanded Universe assortment of the Power of the Force 2 line. The figure came with a blaster pistol and an ysalamir.
 * A Star Wars miniature was made of Thrawn, from the 'Universe' Set produced by Wizards of the Coast, depicting him with an ysalamir draped over his shoulder.
 * By themselves, the second two would seem to be exactly what this discussion is talking about, whether that is useful information for this wiki. Combined with the first point though, they support the fact that he is often portrayed with an ysalamir. I think this is an interesting fact and that it can sorta be a precendent. If there is information that is more functional than a list of merchandise, and as long as it is canon and not in contradiction to other higher sources and not simply duplicating information that has already been provided, then it is pertinent to our goal of chronicling the Star Wars universe. I've therefore created that as a voting option, and changed the titles of Support and Oppose to make them more clear voting options. And I apologize for the ridiculously long option title. -- Wild yoda - talk - contribs -[[Image:Yoda_cartoon.jpg|20px]] 23:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm reading some of the comments in the votes, and it seems like there are more options being voted on than there are currently displayed. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Isn't that what always happens? :P —Xwing328 (Talk) 02:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That's why I added my voting option, and maybe we should split the "support" again. And I think we should have a totally separate discussion of a Merchandise wiki. Doesn't that have to go through some other people above us as well anyway? -- Wild yoda - talk - contribs -[[Image:Yoda_cartoon.jpg|20px]] 02:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to vote until the voting options are all sorted out, but I do want to note that action figures do play a role in canon - for instance, Leland Chee says in the comments for this blog that "I'll leave the issue with the Ewoks [Lumat and Romba] open until it comes up in a future source. I'd lean towards using the image on the action figure packaging." jSarek 08:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Wildyoda: Yeah, we'll probably have to add another option. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 12:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, if this vote ends with the majority supporting the first option, we might need another vote to narrow it down. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 23:30, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well I'd go with anything, though having a merchandising section might be unnecessary.--Herbsewell 23:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I thought you were in favor of that. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 23:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I just wanted it in the wiki. Putting it somewhere in the article like the Behind the Scene section would suffice.--Herbsewell 00:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. Well, if anything, I'd go for a short "Merchandise" section in the "Behind the scenes" section. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * For one figure?--Herbsewell 00:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, it would depend on how many toys/collectables the article's subject had. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 01:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well then how about just one?--Herbsewell 03:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That wouldn't last long. Someone would eventually add every bit of information on collectables to the article. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You aren't listening. What if just one figure, for one character.  What else would they add.--Herbsewell 14:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I am listening. Someone would end up adding information on every toy made on the subject of that article. Luke Skywalker would end up having information on over twenty figures. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:20, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No you are not. What if there was only one figure?--Herbsewell 14:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Then be more specific next time. And it would depend on the vote. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, it would depend on how many toys/collectables the article's subject had. Well then how about just one?. I answered your question and I can't get more specific than that.--Herbsewell 14:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * It seemed to me you were just repeating yourself. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well I have to if you didn't get it the first time.--Herbsewell 14:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Then you should have said something like "Well then how about if there was only one action figure made on the subject". Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You're right, I'm wrong. Nobody could've guessed that one figure meant one figure on the subject of the article.  I should have spelled it out instead of summarizing it because I'm too lazy.--Herbsewell 14:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * You're being sarcastic, aren't you. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:45, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I get the impression that this "comments" section has degenerated into a pointless argument between Jack and Herbsewell. Is this necessary? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No. I was just trying to be helpful. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 21:18, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Only if the toy contributes something useful to canon, or is notable in some other way (say, EU figures). It will be useful in many cases, but the vast majority of articles don't need it. I've been a collector for years, so it's not that I'm against the toys--I just don't think it belongs here. Frankly, I don't see much need to start a SW merch wiki either, since there are plenty of excellent sites that already cover that in considerable detail (JediDefender.com, RebelScum.com, GalacticHunter.com, Yoda's News, Sir Steve's Guide, and on and on). So I see no reason to reduplicate the wheel and clutter our articles with extraneous garbage about, say, all the figures that have been made out of C-3PO.--Valin Kenobi 22:30, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I have no problem with the Mr. Potato Head Star Wars figures and other notable collectables having articles, but that's where I'd draw the line. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 02:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well you originally complained just because we were going to mention it.--Herbsewell 02:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I said notable collectables, not all collectables. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 02:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry Jack, it's all or nothing. We just can't pick and choose our articles.--Herbsewell 02:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No, it's not all or nothing. If it was all or nothing, every piece of information from the RotS novelization would be included next to the information from the film. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 03:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * That would be redundant.--Herbsewell 03:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * In any case, this vote will decide. What either of us think is irrelevant as of now. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 03:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry Jack, it's all or nothing. We just can't pick and choose our articles. Let me be the first to say ... why the hell not? I don't understand why every policy debate around here always turns into absolutist black-and-white/all-or-nothing arguments with no room for shading or nuance. Every rule has exceptions, and I certainly don't see that as a bad thing.--Valin Kenobi 07:22, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Anyway, I'm starting to move toward the option you voted for, Valin, though I'm still debating on it. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 14:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Well I'm just looking for a solid argument for your position.--Herbsewell 15:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * So when I'm the only one saying it, it's redundant, but when someone else supports my side, you're just looking for a solid argument? Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:19, 14 January 2007 (UTC)