Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.


 * /History
 * /2005 History
 * /Queue

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must...


 * 1) ...be well written and detailed
 * 2) ...be unbiased, non-point of view
 * 3) ...be sourced with all available sources and appearances
 * 4) ...follow the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide
 * 5) ...not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 * 6) ...not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
 * 7) ...have a succint proper lead that can be used for the front page featured box
 * 8) ...have a reasonable amount of red links; use common sense
 * 9) ...have a complete, detailed biography if it's a character article
 * 10) ...not have been previously featured

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections, it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Lightsaber
Objections
 * 1) --Roron Corobb 11:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Brisky 07:44 4 June 2006
 * 3) SkywalkerPL 11:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Darth Kevinmhk 04:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Cutch 19:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) LandoSystem1138 05:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Nighthawk leader 07:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Anakin Thomas 16:45, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Superior 22:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Red Head Rider 7:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 11)  Son of Nils Talk[[Image:Sabre_hilt.jpg|50px]] 15:27, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Nom Callide 22:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) --Ugluk 02:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] 15:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Impassioned Jedi 05:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) Rezendi 10:52 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) Brain40 20:36, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 18) SecondSight 18:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) Sakura Avalon 14:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) .  .  .  .  07:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * no way, this article needs so much word, its being changed all the time, facts aren't certain on it and its just...not FA material which is a shame since it is so vital..Jedi Dude
 * There is something funny going on with the image distribution throughout this article. - Breathesgelatin 14:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Definitely needs some reworking of the whole image thing, but also I'd like to see a better intro, and something nicer in the Appearances, section. "Almost all works of the Star Wars saga"? Then I'd really like to know where no lightsaber's appeared. --UVnet 08:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * FIXED - This phrase has been deleted and a list of appearances has been added.  Son of Nils Talk 19:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Not only is it poor quality but everyone knows what a lightsaber is. --Dumac 00:15, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * That has no relevance to whether or not it deserves to be featured. Most everyone knows who Yoda and Padme are, and they are both featured articles. - Breathesgelatin 03:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * "Plus many more colors." Come on. I think this is a good article that should be featured someday, but it still needs considerable cleanup. CaptainPellaeon1138 19:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
 * FIXED - This sentence has been deleted, and the color section has been refined to exclude any ambiguity.  Son of Nils Talk 19:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think this would be a very good choice, since it's always changing and such  Orange_lightsaber  Villip 21:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * When this article becomes stable, and of higher quality, I will support. As it is a highly documented topic, it still needs a lot of work. Adamwankenobi 23:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I think a section based on the Jedi Academy hilts is needed. Cutch 18:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Very important topic. If it hasn't been one already, it should be one imediatly
 * Great, good article, and very, very important. SkywalkerPL 11:25, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Contrary to what some of us who can't spell say... I think this is a great article. Cutch 19:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Corrections and mods to style and content have been made. Images are more uniform and less "clustered" now. -  Son of Nils Talk[[Image:Sabre_hilt.jpg|50px]] 15:33, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It's a lot more cleaner now than when it was nominated, and if people are complaining about it changing all the time, just revert them back. LandoSystem1138 21:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with with SkywalkerPL. It's a very important topic. Sakura Avalon 14:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Just because its an importent topic doesn't mean it should be FA, in fact as its so importent it should be of better quality surely? Jedi Dude 10:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Qui-Gon Jinn

 * 1) A major character, whose article hasn't been featured yet. It's well-written, perfectly fits into the Wookieepedia guidelines, has useful BtS section, factually accurate, contains everything that should be known about him, and has neutral point of view. - TopAce 11:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Nom Callide 22:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Ugluk 01:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) LandoSystem1138 17:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] 15:22, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Taktwo 22:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Jwebb13 [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 02:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) SecondSight 07:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Red Head Rider 20:54, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Thefourdotelipsis 01:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) --Eyrezer 08:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) --Sompeetalay 20:27, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * I think a quote from the movies (ie, from TPM) would be probably better as lead in. The "Blockade of Naboo" section is also a little image heavy. Apart from that, the article seems fine. QuentinGeorge 11:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * In fact, I suggest it could have many more quotes period. I'm sure there must be a relevant quote for most of the page sections there. --Eyrezer 23:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
 * An importent chracter, a good amount of images, but a lack of quotes brings the article down Jedi Dude 17:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Per above, but I think the bullet text in the Behind the Scenes section is rather unprofessional. Otherwise, the article is good to go. &mdash;Mir  len  01:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Jedi Dude 15:42, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I changed the bullet points --Eyrezer 23:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * I just recently put some new quotes in it. Still looking for one about Jenna Zan Arbor and Forbidden love though, and I may change the quote for Xanatos, Taktwo 22:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The link to Qui-Gon quotes at the bottom takes care of the quote problem, anyway. Jwebb13 [[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 02:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Did you notice that there are no qoutes from JA? Taktwo 03:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

The Haunted Village

 * 1) This is our best TV episode article so far. It seems comprehensive and as best as an article on a TV episode can be. Adamwankenobi 20:51, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) I like ewoks Ugluk 02:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Cutch 03:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) EAGLES610 17:24, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * The synopsis is huge! Crikey! That is not the objection, but rather, that being the case I think it needs a number of pictures added to that section. --Eyrezer 01:42, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, I plan to add more images to it soon. Adamwankenobi 01:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * once thats done i think it'l be worth nominating for. Jedi Dude 17:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with Jedi Dude Roron Corobb 19:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I counted 4 redlinks and many new things that we could try to expand on  Orange_lightsaber  Villip 21:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
 * It has about six redlinks.Red Head Rider 17:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Most random visitors won't even know what it is. Totema1 05:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That is irrelevant. - Breathesgelatin 19:02, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Too many redlinks. And more images needed. I cleaned up the prose a bit, it had waay to many mistakes. But I think it's fine now. .  .  .  .  07:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Jabba the Hutt
style="color:orange;">Roron Corobb ]]  12:57, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) I beleive it's a very popular article. I loved reading it and adding stuff of my own. Though it does have a few red links, but I will more than willingly clear them up. Plus it's a huge artical and tons of people add on to it almost every day. --Jabbathehuttgartogg
 * 2) ok i am replacing my vote again on the grounds that i assume it wont be changed too much anymore Ugluk 23:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Very near to a featured article though images do need to be cleared up. MyNz 00:20, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) I fixed a ton of the stylistic, grammar, spelling, etc. issues. I think it's worthy of a nomination now. Plus, there's stuff from the Han Solo Trilogy in there now. Cutch 04:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) The "Beauty and the Beast" section still reads a little roughly, but the article's great; it's very informative and entirely worthy of nomination. Hell, it even made me like Jabba more.  Jwebb13 15:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) [[User:Roron Corobb|<span
 * 1) Red Head Rider 16:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) You have my support.--CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 19:33, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 19:36, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Conditional - find a way around the fact that Fortuna was the majordomo at the time of TPM. .  .  .  .  08:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * I still think it needs alot of work before its FA material, maybe with less redlinks, plus theres still alot better FA worthy articles. Jedi Dude 16:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Needs to be rearranged, fixed up a littlebit, expanded and checked over and over for proper grammar. -- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 05:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree i'll go through and fix up the grammar and spelling, i have a pretty good eye for that (please disregard lower case "I"s throughout response ;)) Ugluk 03:14, 20 August 2006 (UTC) ***Update*** I went through and fixed all the spelling or grammar errors i could find. Ugluk 04:06, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Needs more info on the Jabba the Hutt: The Art of the Deal comics 21:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * What more info.? I put everything from the book onto the page into my own words.It's covered. --Jabbathehuttgartogg 21:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC) [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|30px]]
 * Info is good, images are good, grammar, syntax, etc. need serious work from someone who knows what it is supposed to say. I would do it, but I think something would get lost in translation. Almost worthy of a cleanup tag. Atarumaster88 02:32, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I take it back. While I have fixed the grammar issues, there is almost NOTHING in there from the Han Solo trilogy. Cutch 04:48, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Looks good overall, but it needs a longer intro. You also might consider cutting some of the fair use images. Adamwankenobi 23:48, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * i am also revoking my vote, i went through and fixed all the grammar and spelling twice but some doofus (Jabbathehuttgortag or cutch) either goes back and reverts it or adds more with terrible grammar/spelling. before this is FA material somebody needs to learn the english language. Ugluk 22:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Ummmmmm ..... It's Jabbathehuttgartogg. Thank you very much. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 22:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * On second thought .... Yo, that was harsh man. If I'm such a "Dufis" Howcome I know so much about jabba ..... Hmmmmm? It's Jabbathehuttgartogg pally and I'm ussally a nice guy. Cutch is nice too, we just get so caught up in the work, we forget grammer. I can belive a lot of users dissagree with you, if you knew who i was and what i (Tried) to do for Jack Nebulax ; created a very usfull template ; Protected jabba (Sort of) from Vandels ; Used my time and energy to make a wonderfull userpage ; Made freinds ; accually found someone who would work on Jabba and so on. That remark was unfair at best dude, and that's in it's technical term... -- Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 23:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh come on leave it the pair of you, this is not the place go to each others users page, don't be so rude Uklug some people aren't as good typers or have diffuculties with grammer and to be honest you havn't been here long enough to start throwing comments like that around, and Jabba you shoudln't bother responding and presume to speak for other users at the same time, end of this discussion take it further on your user pages as you have already made this look unprofiessional with your argument Jedi Dude 23:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll be a peace-maker. I'm not going to argue. This is rediculous. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 23:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * There is a ton of great information here, but the sentence structure and just writing in general is bad... very bad, to the point where the article becomes confusing at times. It needs major, major, major copy-editing before it becomes an FA. - Breathesgelatin 19:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Per Breathesgelatin Cull Tremayne 19:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Per Breathesgelatin. --Imp 23:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Actually, there's now only 3 redlinks, and one is in BtS. -LtNOWIS 23:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * If your going to support it Ugluk, then you should strike out your pervious objection, this can be done by typing stike and then slash/strike at the beginning of your comment, objection, etc. I already did it for you. Roron Corobb 23:20, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Information wise. It's fine. Though I suggest someone check it for grammar. And also, please, get rid of some of the images. More images is not good. I know some people's monitors aren't large enough so that it actually looks the way you see it and the images will look clustered. I could name a couple that are unneccesary...-- Redemption Talk [[Image:Oldrepublic.jpg|15px]] 15:47, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know who striked out what I said, im still not convinced this can reach FA status yet Jedi Dude 23:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't take it I did, because I didn't strike your name. Though it was likely because there are almost no red links anymore. Though I don't know how much more WE can add. All I know who's even contributing to the article are VERY FEW people (mabey 2 or 3 users}. everyone else is either correcting it or deleting stuff. For 2 or 3 people working on it daily and accually contributing, for how far it's come since I started on it, it's worthy of the title and I stand to that my freinds. --Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 23:59, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm thinking about voting, but I am not entirely sure...--CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 11:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm for it now; JtHG has made it loads more detailed. Cutch 18:03, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Galactic Civil War

 * 1) Darth Red Head 23:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Ugluk 23:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Support -  Relentless Recusant [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] 23:29, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Rezendi 10:51 15 September 2006
 * 5) .  .  .  .  10:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * Needs more like sources, like the template says, and coverage of pre-Death Star Battles. LandoSystem1138 21:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Needs alot more sources, I'm talking about every single appearance and source here. Also needs quotes for the different sections. --Imp 08:53, 17 October 2006 (PDT)

Comments
 * It now has sources.Darth Red Head 20:01, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Aayla Secura

 * 1) Darth Hideous 03:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) User:Zinnos
 * 3)  .  .  .  .  10:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * Redlinks, and a personality and/or abilities/traits section would be nice. LandoSystem1138 21:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with all of that Jedi Dude 13:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * As per LandoSystem .  .  .  .  11:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I counted only 3 redlinks; and, yes, a section of personality traits and her abilities would be nice - but not necessary for a good article. ~ Darth Hideous 16:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Three redlinks are more than enough to make the article looks worse, and a section on traits makes the page look that much better Jedi Dude 13:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I really like this article. It is put together nicely. User:Zinnos
 * No more redlinks. Check it out, man, check it out. :D Am I allowed to make a personality/trait or powers/abilities thing? ~ Darth Hideous 01:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, yes, you are.  - breathesgelatin Talk 03:48, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

IG-88A
style="color:orange;">Roron Corobb ]]   11:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC) Objections Comments
 * 1) [[User:Roron Corobb|<span
 * 1) SkywalkerPL 09:57, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Red Head 19:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 11:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 00:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Fan Favorite, I guess. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 00:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Superb. Though I still wince at that bit about the DSII. Oh well.  .  .  .  .  11:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * More details from Tales of the Bounty Hunters need to be added in my opinion. It just needs more details in general, what did IG-88 do with Drebble? What was his role in Young Jedi Knights: Diversity Alliance? Did he meet the Solos? If so, how? Also, Greck is still mentioned as being killed on Indobok. I don't remember that. Also, where did IG-88 appear in The Bounty Hunters: Kenix Kil? Cull Tremayne 06:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * How dare you...-- IG-Prime (Sentience Core)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 09:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It was redondent information at the beginning of the artical (it says what company created it twice). Fix that and you have my vote. Darth Red Head 15:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Fixed that. Roron Corobb 23:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Once I add something to it(primarilly more information, and perhaps restructuring and editing the written elements...) I will cast my vote, for right now, I support my nomination of Nute Gunray, who is doing very nicely right now...It would be wise for all of you to vote for him I think.--CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 11:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It still needs more... I'll vote for it soon.
 * I'll vote right now and edit it a little later.--CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 11:01, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright that is all I think, I couldn't do anything else, so I think it is ready.--CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 22:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I made a few changes and have given it my vote. However, I think some of the info in the intro is not actually in the article, ie the arm pulling etc. That would be better placed elsewhere. --Eyrezer 00:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Looks great. It's such a reconizible droid. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 00:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I assumed you misplaced your vote in Objections, so I put it in Support. Hope that's alright, and thank you.-- IG-Prime (Sentience Core)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 00:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * oops....sorry. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg ( Rancor pit ) [[Image:Grappa's Tattoo.jpg|20px]] 00:10, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I don't know any of that stuff, though if there is anything from Therefore I am, I'll put it in. Also Mister Objection, why do you have to do that? It was stuffed with information already, and are you sure all that has to do with IG-88A (emphasis on A) not just IG-88 in general? If you are I'll have to remove your objection, as this is the IG-88A article, not IG-88.-- IG-Prime (Sentience Core)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 10:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Why do I have to do that? Because the article is not up to featured article standards. It is not "stuffed with information". There are only five sections in the main body, and two of them only have one paragraph. Yes, I am positive that "all that" has to do with IG-88A, and the stuff I'm not positive about (which appears in the article), I already brought up in the objections (appearance in the Kenix Kil comic, Greck's death). Is this how you deal with criticism? By threatening to remove it? How about fixing the article first? If you have Therefore I am, why don't you add details from that story? Three things off the top of my head (1) The fight at Holowan Laboratories. Who did he kill? How did he do it? (2) Subjugating Mechis III. How did the Droid Rebellion take place? Who was killed? (3) Vader's inspection. What was he doing at the time? How did they turn Gurdun and Vader away? The level of detail there is good for the IG-88's role on the Death Star, but details on the beginning of the story are severely lacking. Also, as was said last time this article was up for a vote. It needs expansion on IG-88's role in the Marvel comics, that stub is not enough if the article is to be featured. Cull Tremayne 14:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I apologize for my comments. I was just really grumpy this morning. As for critisism, I am not used to it. You sound just like I do, sometimes. I have no excuse for my tone. You have my full apologies, you are right, it does need more detail. I was not in the right to bark at you. For that I am sorry, and I will add more detail to the aricle, but beyond Therefore I am, I know almost nothing about his life. I will need more help if this is to achieve FA status. I apologize once again.-- IG-Prime (Sentience Core)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 16:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No worries, I know how early mornings can be. Please understand that I wasn't trying to insult the character. I just thought that the article needed more work. Cull Tremayne 17:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I understand, I will improve the article as soon as I can.-- IG-Prime (Sentience Core)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 18:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Nute Gunray
Objections
 * 1) --CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 20:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3)  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 18:17, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Adamwankenobi 18:17, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Jedi Dude 20:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Jabbathehuttgartogg  [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 20:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Adamwankenobi 08:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) LandoSystem1138 22:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Rune Haako 01:48, 24 September 2006 (UTC))
 * 10) -- beeurd  talk 17:24, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg|25px]]
 * 12)  .  .  .  .  23:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Someone lengthen the intro, and I'll put it in the queue.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 07:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Expanded. Hope that's satisfactory. - Lord Hydronium 08:29, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I just put a NPOV tag on the page. It should be obvious that the article is full of POV. Furthermore, several images are poorly placed, quotes are filled with ridiculously excessive links, and the text looks clunky towards the end of the article. --Imp 17:43, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Remove the ROTS emphasis. The lead quote stinks - it says nothing about the character of Gunray, and the photo should be from TPM, his most prominent and most significant appearance. .  .  .  .  06:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * I think it is a great article, no read links, excellent organization of the text and he is a major character.--CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 20:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I won't say yes until this has some quotes, at least one a section, there must be lots to use! Jedi Dude 18:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with Jedi dude. Quotes rock. Other thing. I hate the main picture right now. I know we should use a recent pic., but like they say with Han, Luke, and leia, He hasn't changed at all. When I think of Gunray, it's what he looks like in Episode 1. All that's changed from there to Epsode 3 was his HAT. agree? -- Jabbathehuttgartogg [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 18:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I have added more quotes to his article. Also, no offense "Jabba"(If you don't mind me calling you that for short) I like his picture and there is no need in my opinion to remove it.--CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 22:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Everyone calls me that and I'm changing my signiture to fit that new nickname Jedi Dude started. The image conversation is on his talk page. looks like it's staying. -- Jabbathehuttgartogg  [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 22:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm what did I do mate? Jedi Dude 22:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Nothing bad, just your the first person to call me "Jabba". OH, the article, I'm nutral.Can't decide. -- Jabba  [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] [[Image:Desilijic Clan (Jabba’s Tattoo) .jpg|20px]] 22:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * With the quotes this is worthy Jedi Dude 20:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I do not know about Imperialles, but the quotes are very good(especially since I put the majority of them in there[not that I am biased]), and I am a little offended. The Images are well put toghether, the links in the quote are important and vital, and after reading the article three times over I have not been able to see any bias or mixed point of view. I wish Imperialles to elaborate on his accusations, he does not need to apologize, but simply if he feels that way, provide more proof other then his word(Yes I know he is an admin.) and let us all resolve this once and for all.--CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 11:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I just wish it was the TPM image. .  .  .  .  11:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Nagai-Tof War
Objections Comments
 * 1) Thanos6 11:59, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Adamwankenobi 18:17, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer 04:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Cull Tremayne 15:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 5)  - breathesgelatin Talk 21:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Roron Corobb 20:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) .  .  .  .  12:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 8)  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I think it should possibly be moved to Nagai-Tof War, unless it's referred to in a canon source with a slash. In which case I'll shut up. - Breathesgelatin 14:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Changed the name. Cull Tremayne 15:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Longer intro needed.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 23:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Expanded intro. Cull Tremayne 03:58, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * A featured article would be that which is considered best of the best. When an article is short but only due to it's limited content it should be nominated as a Good article. Herbsewell 00:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That's not the case here, it appears in 11 comics, a 2 page section in the NEC, and an extended summary in Star Wars Gamer 1. That's quite a lot of content. Is your objection that the article is too short? And in what sections? Cull Tremayne 04:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I think you have the difference between a FA and a GA mixed up anyway. GAs can be articles that are incomplete but just have good, well-written content. There are many FAs that are on smaller topics. While it's true that articles about important topics (major movie characters) need to be quite lengthy to be FAs, that's not the case with a topic like this. My question would be: what specifically should be added to this article? What material or information?  - breathesgelatin Talk 15:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * So every single entry that covers this much of a subject should be made a featured article?--Herbsewell 22:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No, that's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying that a topic that is relatively small, yet has all aspects of the topic covered. If you read the Good Article requirements, it calls for BROAD coverage and accuracy, not full coverage. In contrast, a featured article has FULL coverage. I'm arguing that this article has FULL coverage, whereas many others do not. Besides, as has already been pointed out, this has been covered in a large number of sources.  - breathesgelatin Talk 02:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * A pretty good, long article for a relatively short comic story. Thanos6 11:59, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Kit Fisto

 * 1) Master Secura.
 * 2) TopAce 16:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) What more information can we give him? .  .  .  .  12:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * I actually don't have a problem with this, except it definitely needs a longer intro. Some of the information in the first section of the biography should actually be moved up to the intro section and then reiterated where applicable in the main text. Other than that, I don't really have anything because I don't know this era very well.  - breathesgelatin Talk

Comments


 * It is a well-written article, it has only one redlink, and he is a pretty popular character. Master Secura
 * I can't belive im saying this but hes not ready yet, despite him being the best chracter ever..Jedi Dude 15:40, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm compeld to agree. It needs more information.Darth Red Head 19:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Thats the thing, past a talents/personality section there isn't much more, perhaps he's worth only a gd article slot..Jedi Dude 12:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Alliance to Restore the Republic
Support
 * 1) Red Head Rider 16:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks 18:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * Imp 13:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Herbsewell 21:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Adamwankenobi 22:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Jedi Dude 18:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * For one of the most important governments in SW history...I feel that more is needed. But there is a good foundation here. .  .  .  .  12:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Needs more sources, possibly even some shortening of certain sections (known bases and such). --Imp 13:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Waaaay to short--Herbsewell 23:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Your objections should probably be stated under "Objections" so that everyone can more easily figure out what needs to be fixed. - Breathesgelatin 19:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope thats for the comnents bit simply list your name in the objections...kinda like a tally Jedi Dude 18:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No, actually you are incorrect. Look at the model higher up on the page, in earlier nominations. You must state what your objection is so that those who are working on the article know which edits to make. If you state the objections in comments they could potentially get lost. Remember, just one objection invalidates a nomination and prevents the article from being featured, so if you do not describe what your objection is at all, the article cannot ever be fixed so as to be featured. The comments section is best used as a way to describe positive comments or concerns that a user has about the article that are perhaps not problematic enough for the user to formally object. Further, since the system is not numeric (eg, only one objection can invalidate even 20 votes), the idea of a "tally" system is not relevant. Just trying to clarify as I have seen this as a problem on the FA page for a while now. Remember that FA, Good Articles, Improvement Drive, and Quote of the Day all have different procedures.  - breathesgelatin Talk 19:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Jaina Solo
Support
 * 1) Jaina Solo ( Goddess Stuff ) [[Image:Jaina_sig.jpg|25px]] 13:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) --CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 15:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --MJPundefined 13:33, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) --User: Zinnos
 * 5)  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 00:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Adamwankenobi 23:33, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Nice .  .  .  .  10:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Impressive article for one of the principle females of Star Wars. Deserves a FA.  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) --ToRsO bOy 23:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Cutch 02:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * Rewrite the introduction. She's grown up now, therefore her introduction should be about her achievements rather than her parents and training. --Imp 15:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Need to work out the image issue, there are way too many near the end of the article where there is less text. Either more text needs to be added or some of the images need to be removed. Cull Tremayne 06:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I like it, but there are not too many images at the top and they seem more jumbled up at the bottom. If you could add more images in and then, even out the frequency of image use throughout the article I will vote for it.--CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 14:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Very good, I like it. CountDooku13(Hyper-Communications Cartel)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 15:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I think this article is very attractive and worthy t be a featured article. Zinnos

Star Wars
Support Objections
 * 1) Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 23:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Red Head Rider 17:16, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Needs much expansion and a MASSIVE clean-up. Adamwankenobi 23:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Per Adamwankenobi.  - breathesgelatin Talk 04:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Jedi Dude 12:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It's OK, but needs expansion and tidying. .  .  .  .  11:23, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments

New Jedi Order
Support
 * --Eyrezer 08:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 19:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Roron Corobb 20:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3)  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 20:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Adamwankenobi 23:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Fantastic! .  .  .  .  11:42, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) SkywalkerPL 11:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * Longer intro needed.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 23:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I wrote a longer intro. How is it now? --Eyrezer 03:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I've changed my mind. I think it needs a much bigger section on the Yuuzhan Vong War. Any volunteers? --Eyrezer 21:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not a big fan of the main image- I think we could find a better one with more color. What about the Champions of the Force cover? That's a little picky, so I'm not putting it under objections. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I had a look at that cover but I don't know if it will be big enough. The silhoutte is quite small. I guess you could put this pic of the group of Jedi in the new EC, but I don't much like it. --Eyrezer 04:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Siri Tachi
Support Objections Comments
 * 1) 1 Space Pirate 16:55, 4 October (UTC)
 *  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 23:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Jedi Dude 12:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Needs Personality/Traits section .  .  .  .  11:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I like siri just as much as anybody but this is not ready to be featured.  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 23:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Why, though? You need to give specific reasons so people can work to improve it.  - breathesgelatin Talk 04:31, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmmm i think a few more quotes and perhaps a personality/talents section would make it look that much better. Jedi Dude 12:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Stormtrooper
Support
 * 1) Herbsewell 00:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 01:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Touché Herbswell.  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 01:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * Probably could use some New Republic-era coverage in the history section. And the article doesn't mention Carida, or have much about their training. -LtNOWIS 00:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No way, as said above it doesn't mention anything specific abut training, usage anything. The amount of material that has stormies in is huge and yet this article is small in comparison to clone troopers, who appeared in less things. Jedi Dude 10:07, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * As per Jedi Dude .  .  .  .  11:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Personally, I do not think of the entry as feature article quality. But after comparing it to articles such as Rokur Gepta, Beilert Valance, and the Second Imperium, I began to reconcider.--Herbsewell 00:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm with Herbsewell on this. It is missing some things, notably Carida, but compared to some other nominees, this is a bit better. 01:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I will vote as soon as its not a good article nom anymore.  Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks Whine Here 01:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The difference between an article like this and the three mentioned above is that while they are in a limited number of sources, all of which are covered in their article, stormtroopers appear in so many more sources with so much more information about them. Therefore it has the potential to be much bigger than those. Consequently while it may seem to be equal to them, it could still be expanded more. --Eyrezer 07:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Very true--Herbsewell 21:56, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Bastila Shan
Support Objections
 * 1) One of the major characters in the EU who has not had her article featured yet. This article is well-written, unbiased and, complies with the guidelines. Factually accurate for one who wants to know a lot about her. Darth Shadow3000 23:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2)  .  .  .  .  07:10, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Needs a longer intro. Adamwankenobi 23:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Has POV issues, such as "beautiful", but other than that, it's fine. - Sikon 06:59, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments

Sith
Support
 * 1) -- IG-Prime (Sentience Core)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 10:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) In terms of summarising the organisation, good job. .  .  .  .  07:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * For me it needs much more images, mayby a little shorter history, but besides that it's ok. SkywalkerPL 11:41, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I strongly object. First of all, it's less of an article than it is a list of various Sith-related things. It needs less emphasis on ranks and more on the different Sith incarnations and their different philosophies. The "timeline" section should be replaced with a short summary of the history of the Sith. --Imp 15:52, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Sorry but it needs more info, more images and perhaps a more depth introduction Jedi Dude 11:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Since most of the information is contained within seperate links, there is little more to include, as for the history, as wookieepedians we must include all available information, so it should stay as it is. However, I added more images, and improved the introduction. So, I hope that is sufficient.-- IG-Prime (Sentience Core)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 12:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Would it kill you to put in a picture of Darth Vader? In suit? Maybe the publicity shot of Palpatine and suited Vader would be better than the current one .  .  .  .  09:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Needs a pic of the Legacy Era Sith. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:34, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Death Star
Support
 * 1) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  07:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) -- IG-Prime (Sentience Core)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 22:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections

Comments
 * When I first saw it, the only things that jumped out at me were a short summary (which I fixed) and a minor typo. Lots of good quotes and images. No infobox should be needed because it is not about a particular Death Star, but the project as a whole. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I say withhold until post-Death Star novel. Cutch 01:58, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm sort of in agreement. This article will be undergoing MAJOR changes and be unstable for a while next year when that article comes out. Since we don't have a way to un-feature articles, that is a problem.  - breathesgelatin Talk 02:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well I didn't know about the novel when I featured it. Sorry. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think that we should have to hold off something from FA status just because of an upcoming book. I think, however, that once the book is released, we should block editing of the page, and have someone set up additional information relating to the Perry book, and get it all in there in one fell swoop. .  .  .  .  04:13, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
 * Well, I'd strongly oppose that. Locking a page for no good reason is contrary to the very principle of this wiki. The idea is that people would enter the new information until it became stable.  - breathesgelatin Talk 11:11, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
 * That makes no sense at all. Why would we lock a page except for vandalism or an edit war? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Fine, don't lock it, but I don't think that upcoming material should have an impact on FA. .  .  .  .  07:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I disagree, particularly since we have no way to un-FA articles at this point; an article that has a whole book coming out about it is likely to not be FA quality when the book comes out and it's going through many, many edits. It's something where I will actually object to it, but I'm not going to vote for it, either.  - breathesgelatin Talk 14:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think we should wait for stuff to come out before featuring things. I mean, that didn't stop us when we featured Boba Fett, Tenel Ka, and Lumiya. -LtNOWIS 19:31, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't use to think so either; I've just become increasingly frustrated with the inability to de-FA articles (eg articles like Leia Organa Solo which were FA'ed very early on and then the status of wookieepedia's best articles surpassed it, leaving it behind to the point where it is now on IDrive. It's definitely a respectful disagreement on my part and I won't actually oppose this nomination for the reason of upcoming material. If that makes sense.  - breathesgelatin Talk 23:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Rune Haako
Support
 * 1) .  .  .  .  06:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) -- IG-Prime (Sentience Core)[[Image:Cislogo.png|20px]] 22:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections

Comments
 * No one said that a FA had to be long, did they? .  .  .  .  06:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * As long as this is on IDrive, it can't win here. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I withdrew it from IDrive, due to the fact that I decided to do the work myself. .  .  .  .  00:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * My beloved EQ3 won, why not this? Cutch 01:57, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Luke Skywalker
Support
 * 1) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Red Head Rider 17:35, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
 * 3) Herbsewell 20:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * Part of me hates to do this, but...
 * I don't think the subdivisions make a lot of sense. Why is the Yuuzhan Vong War categorized under "Establishing a New Jedi Order" but the Second Correlian Insurrection its own heading entirely? The subdivisions need to be worked on considerably and made more logical.
 * Certain areas don't make sense if you don't know the sources. For example, in the discussion of Kadann, the text jumps from Kadann to the false Kadann without giving an explanation for that.
 * I think the main picture should be a head shot, not full-length.
 * I haven't read the article extremely carefully, but my sense is that it probably needs a very careful grammar and spell check. Just skimming through I found several issues (primarily with diction), and more worryingly, an OOU statement.

Overall, I think the issues that I have can be cleared up very quickly; this is much stronger than it has been before and it's almost there.  - breathesgelatin Talk 01:10, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Comments
 * Better sectioning needed .  .  .  .  07:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I nominated this before, but it was put on IDrive instead. After a week of IDrive along a considerable expansion by me, the page is much larger than it was and is now worthy of being a FA. Not as long as Palpatine, but it is over 120 kb long. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 14:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I just did some adjustments to the subdivisions- see if they make more sense now. I'm not sure what you mean on the sources, although I wrote the Kadann section and I don't have either of the sources, so I had to use our articles/the databank. Yeah. That could probably use some work from someone who has the sources. As for the pic- all the other major characters use full body shots- see Palpatine, Anakin Skywalker, Leia Organa Solo, Darth Vader, Han Solo, and many, many more. I'll work on the spelling- where is the OOU? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:15, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Good job on the subdivisions generally, though 1.3 still seems that it needs another subheading--it looks bizarre with only one. You could probably smack something above the first text section just for consistency's sake. What I mean on the Kadann section part is that it skips back and forth between discussing the real Kadann and false Kadann without even explaining that there is a false Kadann... which could be confusing. I know about the full body shots but recently there's been a move to shift to headshots. Let's see if anyone else agrees with me; that one is really a minor thing that may just come down to my personal preference. I wouldn't hold the whole nomination up over that if everything else gets fixed. I vaped the OOU that I saw; it was in the Talents section. Just had me worried that there might be more. I'll try to get a copyedit of my own done soon.  - breathesgelatin Talk 02:43, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Glad to see my lobbying get a mention ;). I too would like a head shot, and one from ROTJ, since it was when he was in his "prime". Head shots are simply more encylopedic, whereas the body shot should go down in the personality section .  .  .  .  04:11, 18 October 2006 (UTC)