Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Unidentified Cloud City technician

 * Nominated by: Rokkur Shen (talk) 08:13, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) I went through with another copy-edit and smoothed out some wording. Meets my standards, good job!  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:33, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Do the cereal commercial alien next. Menkooroo (talk) 17:06, February 25, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) What Trak can Track
 * 2) *I did a copy-edit and cleaned up some wording and fixed some linking.
 * 3) *I also added the CAnom template for you.
 * 4) * My objection: It needs a Behind the scenes section.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:23, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Added. Rokkur Shen (talk) 10:05, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) What Menk can... Menk
 * 7) * With CAs that are this short and only have the one non-BTS section, be sure to hide the table of contents by adding the code at the top of the article.
 * 8) **Fixed. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) * Be careful of using out-of-universe wording in the in-universe section: "this man was seen accessing a scomp link computer terminal within the corridors of Cloud City." Seen by whom?
 * 10) **Fixed. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) * I always advise against using "formerly" in the affiliation field of an infobox, as the infobox is supposed to represent a character's entire life, not just a snapshot of when we see them in canon. In which case it would be better to list Galactic Empire first rather than last, for chronology.
 * 12) **Fixed. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) * I think the article could proceed more chronologically --- rather than beginning when he's already defected to the Rebels, it should begin when he's serving the Empire and then go into his defection afterward.
 * 14) **Reworded. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) * Just calling the Rebel Alliance the "Alliance" is a bit confusing; a more full name like "Rebel Alliance" or "Alliance to Restore the Republic" should be used for clarity's sake.
 * 16) **Fixed. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 17) * The Occupation of Bespin should be dated to 3 ABY. The New Essential Chronology is our go-to source for that if you wanna use it.
 * 18) **Fixed. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 19) **If I may add in my two cents, it's not necessary to source the date for stuff cited to the films. Take for instance the fact that I have written a ton of articles for film characters, and wouldn't get objections. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:57, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 20) ***I was of this opinion also, Hanzo. I had added it however, prior to seeing your comment. Rokkur Shen (talk) 06:54, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 21) ****The thing is, there's nothing in the film, at all, that indicates three years have passed since the Battle of Yavin. The films have been cited in the past, but it's a mistake that needs to be corrected. Menkooroo (talk) 11:26, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 22) *****I actually meant that I questioned the inclusion of the date to begin with. But nevertheless I have now sourced it. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:32, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 23) ******If a character's actions can be dated, they absolutely should be. Have you addressed the other above objections? If so, you need to indicate as much here on the review page. Menkooroo (talk) 11:45, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 24) *******I have. Sorry, I thought it was clear that I had. I was unaware that I had to sign under each one of your points. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 25) ********No worries; leaving one note at the end is OK; just make sure to indicate in that note that you've addressed all the objections. Menkooroo (talk) 12:15, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) * For characters that look Human, we have an unwritten policy that the duck test should be used. I think that this guy passes it. Menkooroo (talk) 11:56, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 27) **Adjusted. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:39, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 28) ***It needs to be sourced. It can't be infobox-exclusive, either. Also, the category needs to be changed.
 * 29) ****The only reason I added Human was on your suggestion of the duck test. How would you suggest I source it? I'm quite happy to leave his species blank, as I originally had it, to be honest. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:18, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 30) *****You could source either the film or the CCG card. The duck test is passed for both. Menkooroo (talk) 11:21, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 31) ******I'm still not comfortable with this but have sourced as Empire as seems to be the consensus on this matter. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 32) *******Make sure to add Category:Humans, and be sure to always capitalize Human in the prose per the Manual of style. Menkooroo (talk) 12:15, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 33) ********Added & capitalized. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:53, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 34) * This next objection is an annoying necessity when any film character, now matter how small, is nominated for status: The adaptation check. The various comic adaptations of Empire (Photocomic, storybook, Manga, Marvel comic) should be checked to see if this guy makes an appearance. I have most of 'em and can do it for you; just let me know exactly when and where in the film he appears.
 * 35) **I'd already checked the Classic Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back comic. He isn't pictured I sincerely doubt that this extra would have been detailed anywhere as he has no interaction with any other character. His entire scene involves him facing a wall after all. I'd appreciate you checking your sources however. As for the time and place of his appearance within Empire, it's pretty clear from the description and picture. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:18, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 36) ***Couldn't find him in anything. Menkooroo (talk) 18:09, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 37) * LEGO Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy should also be checked, which you can do on youtube. Menkooroo (talk) 08:19, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 38) **As per above comment. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:18, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 39) ***You should still check it, just in case. The difference between severely doubting and being 100% sure is an important one. Menkooroo (talk) 11:21, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 40) ****As you wish. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:24, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 41) *****Ok, I just watched a play-through of the LEGO Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy Bespin levels and as I thought, he does not appear. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:37, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 42) * Sorry for the delay. Just a few more: Can you explicitly name the Galactic Empire in the article, rather than pipelinking them to "Imperial?" This probably sounds nitpicky, but there are other Empires throughout the history of SW, and we should try to write our articles to cater to people unfamiliar with SW. I've objected to this on a few other noms recently, if it's any consolation. ;)
 * 43) **Done. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:56, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 44) * Aaaand, can you mention the Galactic Civil War, or at least make it clear that the Rebel Alliance is in conflict with the Empire?
 * 45) **Done. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:56, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 46) * Look out for double linking --- there are a few things linked once in the in-universe part of the article and again in the BTS.
 * 47) **Done. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:56, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 48) * There's one more applicable category: His sex!
 * 49) **Done. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:56, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 50) ***Be sure to place the categories in alphabetical order.
 * 51) ****Done.
 * 52) * Can you relate Cloud City and Bespin to each other? They're both currently mentioned, but their relationship isn't clear. Even something as simple as "The planet Bespin's Cloud City" would do it, I think. Menkooroo (talk) 05:28, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 53) **Done. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:56, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 54) * The article's now 200 words, which, per Rule #14, means that it will require an introduction. Alternatively, you could trim some fat in the BTS, like "the theatrical release of." Menkooroo (talk) 13:05, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 55) **Done. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:06, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 56) What Hands can... Hands?
 * 57) * Context needed for Cloud City and Bespin (mentioning that Cloud City was on the planet Bespin is fine), mention Palpatine's name, context on who Leia and Lando are. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:17, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * 58) **Really? Surely we don't have to detail their backstories? The article's about him not them, links are provided so that if more detail is needed people can click on the links and read more on them. Also re-worded your edit as it sounded clunky. I've left your addition of "male" in there but also feel that adding it was redundant as it was already stated that he was both human and a man. Rokkur Shen (talk) 01:04, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 59) ***The goal of Wookieepedia is so that everything written in every article can be hypothetically told to people who know literally nothing about Star Wars. Anyhow, I made an edit for Cloud City and Bespin for you, just also give Palaptine's name and this objection should be taken care of. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:36, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 60) ****He was rarely, if ever, referred to as "Palpatine" during this era. He was more commonly known as simply, The Emperor. Rokkur Shen (talk) 01:42, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 61) *****In one way or the other, please actually give a link to Palpatine, if not a direct name drop, then pipelink the name. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 05:06, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 62) ******Done. Rokkur Shen (talk) 05:24, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 63) '''What Dogma can.... dog something
 * 64) *Context on Alderaan!
 * 65) **Done. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:49, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 66) *Since you sourced the rest of BtS, please source the remainder (the last sentence).
 * 67) **Done. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:49, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 68) *Good work otherwise. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:00, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * Note how I rearranged the intro text for you. In the future, be sure to follow that example for any noms. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:30, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

26-424

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 18:20, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:20, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 16:40, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 06:44, February 22, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Notes and refs goes after Sources.
 * 3) **Done.  Stake black   msg 21:45, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * "although 26-424 had presence confirmed for the feedings." I'm not really sure what this is trying to say.
 * 5) **All the source says about him is: "26-424 of Galloway Island, as usual, refuses to participate but will be available for feedings."
 * 6) * You could probally add what he looked like via the picture's likeness.
 * 7) **I'll give it a shot, although this is almost speculation.
 * 8) **How's that now?
 * 9) * Is there a way to get rid of that blue line on the side of the image? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:37, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) **Will do.  Stake black   msg 21:45, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) **Done.  Stake black   msg 23:35, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * You use "featured" way too many times. Please replace, at least in one occasion, with a synonym. Winterz (talk) 16:33, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done.  Stake black   msg 16:51, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

Destiny Days

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 16:39, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:26, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Weird that he can be planning to write sequels after dying. Oh well, it's non-canon. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:40, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Destiny awaits.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 14:55, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Context on Lusaanda. It's a planet.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * How can Skreen write about true events that happened after his death? Is this just wacky stuff from the book, or a mistake? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:49, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Wacky. This is what the entry says: "For the next year, he will be writing three sequels to "Destiny Days", the fictional account of true events that occurred on Skreen's home planet after he died."  Stake black   msg 21:55, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Return of the Jedi
 * 7) * The infobox needs to be reloaded. Looked pretty good, otherwise. &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:08, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **Thanks! I don't follow, though. How do you mean? All the infobox fields are already there.  Stake black   msg 20:11, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) ***Some of the coding in the template is missing or misplaced. The original coding that is used in the template must be used. Reloading it means removing the infobox that you have, and putting in the same one again, just with the full, original coding. Then, you can fill in the same fields you had in there before. If that doesn't make sense, let me know.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 02:30, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) ****I have followed the instructions at the template page and... it's fine, all the fields were there already and in their right places.  Stake black   msg 02:40, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) *****Huh. You're right. I must have gotten this mixed up with some other article I was reviewing. Sorry about that. :P &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 14:55, February 26, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) *I'm confused, the book was based on events that happened after the author died?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 06:50, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Yes. Please see 501st's second objection.  Stake black   msg 11:00, February 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I reckon you should make note of that in the Bts to save anyone else from the confusion.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 05:58, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Good point, Done.  Stake black   msg 14:28, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Shian

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:26, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Isn't mentioned in the Explorer's Guide.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Shian Mountain!  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 22:06, February 17, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:13, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 18:33, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) " Trained as a Jedi Knight", you should make that more clean, as the definition of Jedi Knight in the game is somewhat different from everywhere else (in which Jedi Knight is the title above Padawan and not a class for those who seek the warrior path). Winterz (talk) 16:45, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *I just removed it, as it doesn't really work otherwise. It's not just the game that diffentiates between Knight and Consular, it's indicated in most sources at that time that the two are different Jedi roles. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Interstellar Parcel Service

 * Nominated by: Fe Nite (talk) 17:40, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Everybody has to start somewhere.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Burned at the stake
 * 2) *Nice to see you here, Fe Nite. First off, "scenes" in "Behind the scenes" is not capitalized. Same goes for "Notes and references".
 * 3) **Ah man! I think I have done the same thing on all the pages I have created. I fixed it on IPS and I will look into it on the other pages. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Please provide context on what "Mos Eisley" and "Tatooine" are. For Tatooine, include the galactic region (and maybe the sector if you feel like it) that it's located in and remember to source it.
 * 5) **Not 100% sure what you meant but I think I got it. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Almost. For the Essential Atlas ref, place it straightaway after the word Outer Rim. The way it is now makes it seem like the Essential Atlas is also a source for all the information in that paragraph. I would suggest the following scheme: .   Stake black   msg 17:33, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Done.
 * 8) * There's no need to use the same ref twice in a row. It's automatically implied that the ref sources everything that precedes it.
 * 9) ** Someone else fixed it for me but I think I just messed it up again. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) * Appearances needs a 1st.
 * 11) **Done. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) * "Over-sized" package redistribution center? Sounds like POV.
 * 13) **No. Best Birthday Ever specifically calls it the over-sized package redistribution center. You could even make the argument that it needs its own page. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) *For now that'll do.  Stake black   msg 17:50, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) *Bonus round
 * 16) ** Please use Company infobox, add the revelant fields and source them.
 * 17) ***Done.
 * 18) ****I think you forgot to source the fields filled.  Stake black   msg 22:10, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 19) *****Yep. Fe Nite (talk) 22:27, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 20) *****Done.
 * 21) ** Add more context to Best Birthday Ever. What is it? A comic book? A graphic novel? Also, like 501st said, the release date should be there too.  Stake black   msg 17:33, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 22) ***Done. Fe Nite (talk) 22:06, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 23) Nice to see you writing
 * 24) *I think you could mention Bib in the article, and how he goes to pick up the parcel.
 * 25) **Done. Fe Nite (talk) 21:26, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) * A date released would be nice in the BTS, and you could put a note about how it's ambiguously canon.
 * 27) **Read my comment in the comments. Fe Nite (talk) 17:08, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 28) ***I have no idea either, so we'll see what others have to say....  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:10, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 29) ****Done. Fe Nite (talk) 22:06, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 30) * If this article is about the company, I don't think you can have a category for Mos Eisley locations, as that is the category for buildings and such, not companies.
 * 31) **You know, when I rewrote the article I did not even look at the categories. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 32) *Don't freak out because there's so many objections. Everybody has this many on their first nom or two. Good job. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:06, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 33) **Shoot. This nom has more objections than a FA! No I am just kidding. I kinda expected this. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * I thought Best Birthday Ever was non-canon. The nature of the comic sounds non-canon, and also the FA Bidlo Kwerve states that comic to be non-canon, and strangely the comic's article itself is categorized as both ambiguously canon and Infinities. Of course I know the information could be in error, but perhaps something to look into. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 18:39, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * This one is tricky. If you read Tales from Jabba's Palace there is no specific mention of how the rancor got to the palace. It simply says that it was transported there. This would make the Best Birthday Ever/IPS seem ambiguously canon. However, at the end of Best Birthday Ever Bib, Bidlo, and Tessek all take a plunge into the rancor pit. This of course would make Best Birthday Ever noncanon. However, if you really want to make some speculation that they didn't die when they fell down this story would be back to ambig canon. Therefore, I am going to let someone smarter than me make the call. If it is noncanon I'll fix IPS. If it is ambig someone will have to fix Bidlo Kwerve. Fe Nite (talk) 17:08, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * You should talk to others about this. An FA saying something doesn't automatically mean it's the case, but the nature of this comic would make me think it's non-canon. I think I'll ask Leland Chee this. If he doesn't respond, hopefully this site can come to a consensus. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:45, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * While we wait, I don't think we should kick the nom off the page for unanswered objections, as we are waiting for a response. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:06, February 21, 2013 (UTC)

Marsune and Gallo

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 05:56, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Haven't done many CANs recently.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Not sure if the quote marks in the Bts should be there or not, but the GB databank only writes this with the quotation marks, so I've wound up putting them there.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 05:56, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified Ord Mantell day spa

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:11, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: PROJECT HERO HAS RETURNED

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Imperial outpost (prison camp)

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:25, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Berrun warden

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:38, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Berrun detention center

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:38, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Master Satele's holocron

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:01, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero. ~213 words, but the BTS is more than half of that.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * A couple of things I see at first glance (which I'd just fix myself, but hey, it's your CAN):
 * Holocron is linked twice
 * Blarg. The move from Satele Shan's holocron to Master Satele's holocron screwed up the structure of everything.
 * "the Jedi Master known as the Hero of Tython after the Jedi's defeat of the Empire's Sith Emperor" comes across as redundant. Twice, ironically enough.
 * Eh, fixed.
 * Grammatical goof in the first line of BTS: "Master Satele's holocron first appeared as in the video game..."
 * Fixed.
 * BTS: "However, as the Jedi Knight is a Republic character and therefore is assumed to only choose the moral light side options" &mdash; preachy value judgement, not neutral POV.
 * Removed the "moral." Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:41, February 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Otherwise I don't think there's really anything wrong with it. &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 17:30, February 26, 2013 (UTC)

Comments