Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Battle of Nar Shaddaa (second nomination)


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Battle of Nar Shaddaa

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Red XIV (talk) 06:02, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I think the Inquisitorius' objections have been met. It's time to try and regain this article's FA status.

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Preliminaries
 * 2) *Infobox need to be fully sourced.
 * 3) *Sectioning should at least vaguely comply to the Layout Guide.
 * 4) *Sourcing goes after punctuation.
 * 5) *Please use the &dagger; mark to indicate casualties in the infobox.
 * 6) *Please make sure that it fully complies with all of the current FAN rules at the top of this page.  CC7567  (talk) 06:08, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * At what point is there a rule saying that the nominator has to be the one who did all the edits? And the sources are limited because there aren't many sources that this appeared in. &mdash; Red XIV (talk) 06:37, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * At this point, the article is extremely lacking, and if you want to nominate it, then you should be the one making all of the edits. As the nominator, you are responsible for basically every single word in your article.  CC7567  (talk) 06:40, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * And we expect people to have enough common sense that it doesn't need to be a rule. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 06:41, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I would think that nominating an article where you're the only editor would be egotistical at best. &mdash; Red XIV (talk) 06:43, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (Inquisitorius only)

 * 1) Formatting is still wrong, captioning is still wrong, BTS (most of which the nominator didn't write) is minuscule, and the article basically meets none of our current standards for level of detail (five sources with nothing referenced to them? Seriously?). Nominator has exactly one edit to the page after 2006 and has done exactly one thing on the old review listing. This is like an instruction manual in how not to nominate an FA. --  Darth Culator  (Talk) 06:29, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2)  Grunny  ( Talk ) 06:32, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3)  CC7567  (talk) 06:35, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4)  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 06:38, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Heh. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:44, January 3, 2010 (UTC)