Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Interstellar Parcel Service

 * Nominated by: Fe Nite (talk) 17:40, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Everybody has to start somewhere.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:57, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Burned at the stake
 * 2) *Nice to see you here, Fe Nite. First off, "scenes" in "Behind the scenes" is not capitalized. Same goes for "Notes and references".
 * 3) **Ah man! I think I have done the same thing on all the pages I have created. I fixed it on IPS and I will look into it on the other pages. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Please provide context on what "Mos Eisley" and "Tatooine" are. For Tatooine, include the galactic region (and maybe the sector if you feel like it) that it's located in and remember to source it.
 * 5) **Not 100% sure what you meant but I think I got it. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Almost. For the Essential Atlas ref, place it straightaway after the word Outer Rim. The way it is now makes it seem like the Essential Atlas is also a source for all the information in that paragraph. I would suggest the following scheme: .   Stake black   msg 17:33, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Done.
 * 8) * There's no need to use the same ref twice in a row. It's automatically implied that the ref sources everything that precedes it.
 * 9) ** Someone else fixed it for me but I think I just messed it up again. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) * Appearances needs a 1st.
 * 11) **Done. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) * "Over-sized" package redistribution center? Sounds like POV.
 * 13) **No. Best Birthday Ever specifically calls it the over-sized package redistribution center. You could even make the argument that it needs its own page. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) *For now that'll do.  Stake black   msg 17:50, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) *Bonus round
 * 16) ** Please use Company infobox, add the revelant fields and source them.
 * 17) ***Done.
 * 18) ****I think you forgot to source the fields filled.  Stake black   msg 22:10, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 19) *****Yep. Fe Nite (talk) 22:27, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 20) *****Done.
 * 21) ** Add more context to Best Birthday Ever. What is it? A comic book? A graphic novel? Also, like 501st said, the release date should be there too.  Stake black   msg 17:33, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 22) ***Done. Fe Nite (talk) 22:06, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 23) Nice to see you writing
 * 24) * I think you could mention Bib in the article, and how he goes to pick up the parcel.
 * 25) **Done. Fe Nite (talk) 21:26, February 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) ***How bout giving us some context as to who these characters are. Only minor though, like "the Hutt crime lord" Jabba for example. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 27) ****How about that?
 * 28) *****Could you add that crumb was a monkey lizard? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:53, March 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 29) ******Ok. Sorry it is taking me so long. I've been swamped. I'll probably fix it tomorrow. Fe Nite (talk) 23:12, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 30) *******There you go. Fe Nite (talk) 20:55, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 31) * A date released would be nice in the BTS, and you could put a note about how it's ambiguously canon.
 * 32) **Read my comment in the comments. Fe Nite (talk) 17:08, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 33) ***I have no idea either, so we'll see what others have to say....  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:10, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 34) ****Done. Fe Nite (talk) 22:06, February 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 35) * If this article is about the company, I don't think you can have a category for Mos Eisley locations, as that is the category for buildings and such, not companies.
 * 36) **You know, when I rewrote the article I did not even look at the categories. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 37) *Don't freak out because there's so many objections. Everybody has this many on their first nom or two. Good job. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:06, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * 38) **Shoot. This nom has more objections than a FA! No I am just kidding. I kinda expected this. Fe Nite (talk) 16:58, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 39) Emperor Supreme
 * One minor question, do you know what year Bib and Crumb went to the IPS? Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:46, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well that is the problem this nom has stalled on. If Best Birthday Ever is non-canon it falls under the Infinities and has no real date. However if it is ambiguously canon then the date would probably be between 0 BBY and 4 ABY. Now of course I obviously think the nomination should go on (because I nominated it) but I think everyone is waiting on a confirmation. I have been planning to do some research into it but I haven't the time yet. All I know is that according to Wikipedia it is considered non-canon. But where did they get that information is the problem. Fe Nite (talk) 17:08, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair enough, i'll strike my objection, other than that, nicely done. Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:36, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, hey, hey. You want to support it? ; ) Fe Nite (talk) 19:50, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Please create an article for the over-sized package redistribution center on Dune Street.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) *Since you refer to Salacious Crumb and Jabba by their species, please do the same for Bib Fortuna.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:54, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **I kinda butchered that sentence. Please tell me if I messed it up. Fe Nite (talk) 20:03, March 11, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * I thought Best Birthday Ever was non-canon. The nature of the comic sounds non-canon, and also the FA Bidlo Kwerve states that comic to be non-canon, and strangely the comic's article itself is categorized as both ambiguously canon and Infinities. Of course I know the information could be in error, but perhaps something to look into. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 18:39, February 18, 2013 (UTC)
 * This one is tricky. If you read Tales from Jabba's Palace there is no specific mention of how the rancor got to the palace. It simply says that it was transported there. This would make the Best Birthday Ever/IPS seem ambiguously canon. However, at the end of Best Birthday Ever Bib, Bidlo, and Tessek all take a plunge into the rancor pit. This of course would make Best Birthday Ever noncanon. However, if you really want to make some speculation that they didn't die when they fell down this story would be back to ambig canon. Therefore, I am going to let someone smarter than me make the call. If it is noncanon I'll fix IPS. If it is ambig someone will have to fix Bidlo Kwerve. Fe Nite (talk) 17:08, February 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * You should talk to others about this. An FA saying something doesn't automatically mean it's the case, but the nature of this comic would make me think it's non-canon. I think I'll ask Leland Chee this. If he doesn't respond, hopefully this site can come to a consensus. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:45, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * While we wait, I don't think we should kick the nom off the page for unanswered objections, as we are waiting for a response. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:06, February 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * I think I have answered everything now. So are we going to wait to see how the whole noncanon/ambiguous thing turns out? Fe Nite (talk) 21:42, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * If we're waiting for Leland's answer, we may as well sit here forever...  Stake black   msg 21:52, February 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Or do a consensus. Fe Nite (talk) 01:58, February 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * This archived post gives Leland Chee's position on the matter (It's in the middle of the page.) That's probably as good as we're going to get.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  00:05, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * I guess Best Birthday Ever would be "outrageous" or whatever he said. Which means it is non-canon. Fe Nite (talk) 14:04, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Not having read the comic, I cannot say for certain, but that would be my best guess from what I know of it.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:37, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok. I non-canonized everything in the article. I think I have done everything now. I noticed that some of the objections have not been struck yet; but they haven't told me anything more to do. Fe Nite (talk) 18:46, March 5, 2013 (UTC)

Klee-klee nut

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:06, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Sometimes you feel like a nut...

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Now I've got this old recorder song from primary school stuck in my head...  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 21:16, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:29, March 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 14:18, March 6, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * Offee is used twice in one sentence, change one of them to avoid repetition.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 21:11, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Thanks for the catch, fixed.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:13, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***That was quick :P  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 21:16, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) One thing: "during a battle between the..." It sounds like she was fighting, and then smelled the nuts. Could you change this so it explains that she was not fighting at the time.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:37, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *Any better? The battle was taking place, but she was just in her quarters.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:29, March 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) Winterz
 * 8) * You should probably mention the larger conflict between the CIS and Republic (could be done in that start). Winterz (talk) 17:43, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Oops, added.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:49, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 19:26, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) * I know it's nice to have a BTS section and all, but in this case it seems completely redundant.
 * 12) **It isn't redundant, as it tells us when the thing was mentioned. Additionally, all CANs require a BTS. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:09, March 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) ***Struck because it's a requirement for CAN, but I still think it's stupid to include a BTS that says exactly the same thing as the Appearances directly below. &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:26, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Imperial scientist

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:07, March 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:30, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Not long afterwards (– Tm_T@Wookieepedia:&#126;$ 06:40, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:28, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I'mma back!
 * 2) * "One of the Empire's top scientists during the war " ... this part of the quote is ignored in the article, perhaps figure out what you can tell about him being one of the top scientists?
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * "The scientist was the only non-Sith to ever set foot aboard the space station, but he was killed when his Pythar-class shuttle Deference was shot down " ... makes me think something him being non-sith should have prevented him being killed?
 * 5) **Eh, I don't see how. It's not related to the fact that he was shot down in a space battle. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 00:37, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) ***It must be the "He was foo, BUT was killed" sentence structure, maybe the "but" word could be omitted entirely? – Tm_T@Wookieepedia:&#126;$ 06:55, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 13:50, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) * Other than that, all looks rather good with my old eyes. (: – Tm_T@Wookieepedia:&#126;$ 07:04, March 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) 501st
 * 10) * Context on Hoth!
 * 11) **Done.
 * 12) * If he was only mentioned, there should not be a 1st tag in the Appearances. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:45, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:02, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Republic operative

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:48, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For those of you who were wondering, when Project Hero runs out of CAN-able articles, I'm moving on to the Codex. :P Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:48, March 10, 2013 (UTC)

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work.&mdash;  20:43, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  21:21, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:57, March 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 15:01, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Any way you can split this up? Granted unlimited authority and a large sum of credits by the initiative's leader, General Var Suthra of the Republic Military, the operative progressed with the Power Guard project on the neutral moon of Nar Shaddaa in absolute secrecy until[2] the year 3,643 BBY,[1] when the project was uncovered by the Empire and the man was tortured to death by the Sith Lord Sadic.. &mdash;  16:04, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 19:38, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) ** One more thing: Source his location of death in the infobox. &mdash; 20:39, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:41, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:30, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * Grammar: The very beginning "An male"....nope. That's not how a/an works ;) Otherwise, looks solid to me.
 * 7) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 14:59, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) Ah-ah!
 * 9) *The Bts uses too many "first mentioned", please tweak it a bit in order to avoid repetition.
 * 10) *Also in the Bts, you refer to the individual as "man". Correct this, sir. Winterz (talk) 18:04, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

Soth Petikkin's species

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:28, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Continuing the scrapped Chronicles maquettes

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:20, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:45, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:31, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Winterz (talk) 17:21, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) If he appeared on a card, shouldn't that be a first appearance, not a first mentioned?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:57, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *We've always treated any sort of depiction in sources as mentions, not appearances. If he first appeared in a story, comic, film, game, etc. those would be counted as appearances. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 12:34, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * For Project Aliens. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:28, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * CSWE entry mentions Soth alone, without an image or mentioning the species. I know different users have treated this differently, but I think that still counts as a mention for his species. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:13, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

MUQ-751

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:49, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another random GB droid

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 13:23, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Random indeed. &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:32, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:41, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) *You have two appearances' sections. Fix it, please.
 * 3) *Context on the Clone Wars (participants). Winterz (talk) 17:15, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified scout trooper (Missile launcher)

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 13:22, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For WP:SWG and WP:AMB

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 14:33, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 17:07, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I don't think you can link to stormtrooper armor for scout trooper armor. There is no mention of scout trooper's in the stromtrooper armor article at all. Perhaps create an article for the armor. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:07, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *But the Scout trooper article specifically identifies them as "specially trained soldiers of the Imperial Stormtrooper Corps." Doesn't it automatically follow that scout troopers are necessarily under the umbrella of the Stormtrooper Corps? &mdash; DigiFluid(Whine here) 15:16, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **I guess you could call them stormies. Scout trooper armor is unique though, and should have an article of its own, since its not included in the stormtrooper armor article. Any thoughts? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:14, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Fe Nite
 * 5) *Shouldn't it be "A certain Human...?" Fe Nite (talk) 16:23, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Winterz
 * 7) *Alphabetize categories. Winterz (talk) 17:12, March 12, 2013 (UTC)

Comments