Wookieepedia:Requests for user rights

This page is for requests for user rights.

Voting will last two weeks, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, the nominee will be granted the requested user rights.

Requests for adminship
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFA archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They are of adult age (18 years or older).
 * 4) They have demonstrated they are willing to take on additional responsibilities to make the community better.
 * 5) They have had at least some major article creations.
 * 6) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 7) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 8) Registered users' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted.
 * 9) Administrators' votes must have a 2/3rds supermajority for adminship to be accepted. (Separated from user votes)
 * 10) Bureaucrats' votes must be unanimous for adminship to be accepted.
 * 11) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFA.

Questions
Here are some general adminship questions. They are 100% optional, so feel free to answer all, some, or none of them. :)

Greyman (9 users + 0 admins + 0 bureaucrats / 0 users + 0 admins + 0 bureaucrats)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends 26 July 2007.

Support

 * 1) Greyman is an extremely helpful user.  He is always ready to help others with his already expansive and ever-growing knowledge, and never fails to maintain a positive and fair attitude. -  05:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) If it weren't for Greyman, I would never have become as involved as I am in the more community-centered aspects of the site, especially the GA process.  He is, by far, one of the single most professional editors on this site.  I'm not sure it's an entirely fair way of describing him, but the best word that comes to mind regarding his editing style is:  grace.  He flows through conversation and research with a grace that most of us, myself included, would do well to emulate.  I've never seen a single edit/message/post even bordering on a personal attack and, in my experience, he's yet to edit anything in a manner which detracts from the article/conversation.  I can't sing his praises enough, actually. --School of Thrawn 101 09:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) A friendly, helpful user who never loses his cool and has an impressive amount of FA/GAs under his belt. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 10:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Per all of the above. Chack Jadson 10:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) After all the harwork he puts into this wiki, he deserves to be an administrator! Well done Excelior 8:11, 12 Jully 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) He’s been here since January and has made over 5,000 edits, is a helpful and friendly user, just what’s needed for an Admin. Good Luck Greyman. Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]] 13:56, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) I'd wait until the 16th, per policy, but I'm not likely to be around that day. We need more pleasant, positive admins.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 14:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Greyman is awesome. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 16:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) I'm not going to be around on the 16th, so I'm voting now. In any event, Greyman is an incredibly dedicated user. He has over 5,000 edits, and he hasn't even contributed for 6 months, he writes out FA's and GA's very fast, and, like School of Thrawn says, he hasn't once made a remark even close to a personal attack, as far as I can see. In my opinion, Greyman is an exemplary Wookieepedian who definitely has worked hard enough to gain admin power. Congratulations, Greyman, and keep up the great work. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 17:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Greyman has helped me a lot when it comes to getting to know the wiki, its mechanics and methods, as well as helping me to get the most out of the articles I create and improve. His escalation to adminship would be a good thing for the entire Wookieepedia community.--Goodwood 20:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Greyman accepted my nomination on the IRC. - 05:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I hate to be a stickler for policy, but, per Rule 2, he's not eligible for nomination until the 16th of this month. Yes, I know, that's only four days away, which is why this is a comment instead of an actual "oppose" vote. jSarek 10:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Bah, according to his contributions page...you're a day off! --School of Thrawn 101 11:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll be voting as soon as he's hit six months. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 13:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Sometimes looking at the essence over minding the technicalities is in order. There are many things about Greyman that more than make up for three days that he was not here. -  14:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What's wrong with just waiting for a few days? He sounds like an excellent candidate, and as jSarek said, it's only a few days,  else the nomination would have been removed.  So, on Monday I'll be supporting him.  WhiteBoy 19:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Same here. 6-month mark. --  Riffsyphon  1024 19:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Questions & Answers
1. Why do you want to become an administrator?
 * It was first brought up to me on IRC, but I didn’t give it much thought at first, thinking it was not a serious conversation. However, I started thinking more and more about it, and before long I had decided that it was, indeed, something I was interested in.  I love editing here; I enjoy helping out new users, and answering any questions that are put forth to me. I also feel that being an administrator will provide me more opportunities with which to help out around the site in a more “administrative” role&mdash;whether it is helping out where needed,  looking for a resolution to disputes, or maintaining the site, I feel that my being an Administrator would only add to the site, and in the end, that’s ultimately about I came here to do&mdash;help improve Wookieepedia!

2. In your opinion, what is the role of an administrator?
 * When I first came to Wookieepedia, I paid close attention to how several established users contributed to the site. What I didn’t realize, but soon discovered, was that these users were actually Administrators, and it was their job to not only contribute to the site, but also to help safeguard it against any misinformation and the likes. However, I also believe that an administrator’s job is to help improve the site any way possible, not just the routes that they agree with, or which fit their own agenda’s, but any way which helps the general overall wellbeing of the encyclopedia. Also, being a go-to person for any problem, or compliment, is another important role of an Administrator.

3. In your view, do administrators hold a technical or political position?
 * I personally believe that being an Administrator is a position which regulates both the technical and political sides of the site. When a problem arises with article formatting, wiki code, or the general appearance of the site, it is ultimately the job of the Administrators to remedy the problems. The political side of the coin, I feel, revolves around presenting the site, lending a helpful hand where needed, and abiding by policy as required.

4. How do you feel admins should use their power/stand in comparison with other users?
 * To a) Protect the site, b) Contribute in an effective and demonstrative manner, and c) be an example to both new and established users&mdash;whether it be through general edits, or upholding policy, no matter how obscure.

5. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * No, I have not been in any edit conflicts during my time as a contributor, and anything that could/would be seen as a potential “conflict”, I would approach through simple probing questions to find out what was/is trying to be done. If needed, this could be used as an example of how I try to remedy potential conflicts.

6. Of your articles or contributions to Wookieepedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I’m particularly pleased with the amount of articles from the Tales of the Jedi comic series that I have been able to take to either FA and/or GA. That series of comics is my favorite in the Star Wars universe, and the fact that I can use that to help promote otherwise unknown articles is a great enjoyment for me. Also, I’ve rather enjoyed being able to work in conjuction with other users, such as Ataru, on some major characters such as Wes Janson and Mara Jade Skywalker.

7. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with?
 * If granted Adminship I could see myself taking an active role in patrolling the Recent Changes and the Harassment in Progress chores. I would also enjoy helping out with the Unused Images project, and would anticipate a healthy enjoyment in searching out red links and Wanted Pages.

8. How important is it for you to be involved in things such as CT, IDrive, FA, and other community-centered items that involve discussion and voting?
 * To be involved in the events of the community is very important to me, and as of right now, I actively participate in such community-centered items as FA’s, GA’s, being an Inq, and watching the CT for areas in which I can be helpful.

9. Do you think admins performing actions (I.e. deletions, blocks, etc.) for reasons not covered on policy should be sanctioned/punished? If so, how?
 * I believe that these type of issues should approached and considered on a case by case basis. Doing the right thing, does not always mean doing the popular thing.

10. What is your policy, if any, of welcoming new users? Should you welcome a new user, do you look at his/her contributions beforehand? What about anonymous IPs?
 * Unless the new user is actively and openly vandalising articles, or harassing/stalking users, then I believe in rolling out the red welcome mat and making those new users who are here to help the site, feel welcome. I’ve never had a problem with helping them out, and pointing them in the right direction&mdash;and I feel like I’ve done a good job at doing that.

11. How would you react if someone undeleted an article you'd mistakenly speedied? Under what circumstances would you consider it appropriate to undelete an article mistakenly speedied by another administrator, if any, and how would you approach this task?
 * The most simple answer is: Take it to the Talk Pages! :D If an admin undeleted an article that I either mistakenly or purposely deleted, then I have no problem with asking them why. I believe it’s important to not view things as a personal attack, or an act of undermining my authority. For the vast majority of possible cases, talking the situation over like adults, and fellow admins, is often more than enough to resolve the issue.

12. How would you react if your user page was vandalized? Under what circumstances would you block the offender? Is there anything else that you would do in this situation?
 * If my user page was vandalized, I would simply warn a first time offender (if they had not already been warned). If that said user continued to vandalise my user page (or any user page, for that matter) after they had been warned, then I would follow our Blocking policy. Once again, it’s not something that I’m going to take personally.  I’m here to contribute in quality, not get upset over immature users/anons.

13. Under what circumstances would you consider blocking an established user?
 * When policy has been clearly ignored, and all attempts of warning have also been ignored. Rules are there for a reason, if you don’t like them, be prepared for the consequences from the site Administrators.

14. If you could change any one thing about Wookieepedia, what would it be?
 * Hmmm, I’d probably lay down some stricter rules for the GA process.

15. Would you look at a glass to be half-empty or half-full?
 * Half-empty? Half-full!? How about you just drink your blue milk and be happy! :P

16. Do you feel the current blocking policy is too restrictive, not restrictive enough, or OK as it is?
 * I believe that parts of it are dead on, while others, such as the 3RR policy, need updating with more clarification. I believe that the current 3RR CT is a good thing, and view it as a step forward in helping evolve the site.

17. Have you ever considered becoming a regular visitor to the Wookieepedia IRC chat?
 * I already am :) . You can find me there under my nick of Greyman.

18. How do you feel about people who already have some influence on other Star Wars communities (TheForce.Net, StarWars.com) trying to change policies here?
 * If they are not users who contribute, then their opinions are rather meaningless to me. Our policies are laid down by our Bureaucrats and Administrators&mdash;and that’s enough for me.

19. How many clones do you think fought in the Clone Wars? (Note: You are wrong no matter what answer you give.)
 * Uh, uh, uh...eleven? :P

20. Who is the most awesome Jedi of all time? (Note: The only correct answer is Kyle Katarn.)
 * Oooh, tough one...I mean Kyle Katarn is one tough SOB, but Kyle Katarn is an even tougher SOB. Ugh...this could take a while.

21. Are you or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?
 * I don’t like the color Red...well, sometimes, heh.

22. What's more important to you: consensus or policy?
 * It depends on the situation at hand&mdash;but, when it’s required, I’m a stickler for policy. However, on some issues, we need to have a strong community voice.

23. Have you had any previous leadership experience (in your community, on the web, etc.)?
 * I have numerous leadership experiences from my time in the Army. I’ve led small groups of soldiers, to large groups, and I’ve enjoyed every minute of it. My time in the service has given me the confidence to do what needs to be done, when it is required, and through what means are necessary&mdash;Being a leader isn`t always about being liked, it`s about doing what`s right.

Those users who I`ve had the pleasure of editing alongside, and/or speaking with on IRC, know what I’m about and how I like to do things&mdash;which usually means helping out those who need it, while doing my best to contribute quality articles to the site. Those users who I haven’t had the pleasure of working with just yet, I look forward to it, and I hope that the above questions helped answer some of your questions about who I am, and what I plan to help with. Cheers, Greyman ( Paratus ) 06:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Jaymach (2 users + 2 admins + 0 bureaucrats / 0 users + 0 admins + 0 bureaucrats)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends 27 July 2007.

Support

 * 1)  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 20:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk) 20:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) SFH 00:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Only because he gets me Fact File info :P Greyman ( Paratus ) 00:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments
Accepted re-nomination via IRC, following much goading.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 19:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd really like to hear what Jaymach will be doing differently once he is reinstated. When I met him at CIV, he didn't have anything particularly positive to say about WP. Have his feelings changed? I understand that he has been a major contibutor, and not a bad admin, but the whole quitting business gives me doubts. Honestly, I'd like to see this addressed before I vote one way or another. - 20:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * If this reinstatement to Adminship includes, if the rest of the community will indulge me the metaphor, "POWAH in the IRC channel", then this user wouldn't feel very confident in voting for the affirmative.--Goodwood 20:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * For the record, I think this whole thing is unnecessary and a bit silly. He wasn't de-adminned through the full procedure, he shouldn't need to be re-adminned through the full procedure. Bureaucracy is bad, mmmkay? But since some people feel the need to drown us in red tape, I'll cast the first admin vote for him. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 20:54, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Questions & Answers

 * 1) Why do you want to become an administrator?
 * 2) *Honestly? mostly because I was on before...but if the question is why do I want to become an admin again then I guess it's because I had a change of heart...mostly due to meeting the other admins at CIV. I want to take up the responsibilities again for the same reason as before...to help maintain the site, stop vandalism, and not have to bug other admins to do routine stuff when they have better things to do...oh and I wants my POWAH. :P
 * 3) In your opinion, what is the role of an administrator?
 * 4) *To act as the public face for the site...yes, they perform activities like blocking and deleting, but their real job is to be a public face for the site. Other editors are part of the site, but if you want to go to someone that can actually represent the site then you go to an admin.
 * 5) In your view, do administrators hold a technical or political position?
 * 6) *Political...like I said, they perform technical duties but so does any editor...admins simply have more tools to help with technical things.
 * 7) How do you feel admins should use their power/stand in comparison with other users?
 * 8) *More responsibly...regular users have to stick to the rules, obviously, but admins are meant to set a good example to all others.
 * 9) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * 10) *Of course I have...plenty of times. I admit that I'm stubborn, and indeed I argue my point to the very end...but if others can prove me incorrect then I'll happily go with their viewpoint. If, however, it's over article appearance (eg. image placement) then I expect both sides to post screenshots that detail their problems with the page so that an amicable solution can be found for both...if only one side is willing to do so, then the other side should shut up or provide proof.
 * 11) Of your articles or contributions to Wookieepedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * 12) *Uh...I don't know really...I like all my ambig articles, but I'm not proud of any specific one...the Kadann and Merili articles are mostly mine...I like those ones, but I wouldn't say they were the peak of Wookieepedia achievement...so I can't really answer the "why"...I just like doing the articles that nobody else can be bothered doing.
 * 13) What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with?
 * 14) *Same as before...as many or as little of them as are required.
 * 15) How important is it for you to be involved in things such as CT, IDrive, FA, and other community-centered items that involve discussion and voting?
 * 16) *CT's, very much seeing as they decide what actions the admins are to perform...IDrive and FA now to much...like I said, I prefer to work on articles that nobody else can be bothered with and both of those ventures are to do with articles others feel the need to edit.
 * 17) Do you think admins performing actions (I.e. deletions, blocks, etc.) for reasons not covered on policy should be sanctioned/punished? If so, how?
 * 18) *It depends on the situation, really...yes to an extent...but I feel that if the reason keeps on coming up again then it should be either added to the policies or brought up in a CT.
 * 19) What is your policy, if any, of welcoming new users? Should you welcome a new user, do you look at his/her contributions beforehand? What about anonymous IPs?
 * 20) *I don't welcome users...I haven't done for quite some time...there's just no need anymore. We have plenty of users that do that already.
 * 21) How would you react if someone undeleted an article you'd mistakenly speedied? Under what circumstances would you consider it appropriate to undelete an article mistakenly speedied by another administrator, if any, and how would you approach this task?
 * 22) *Undelete an article? If it was an article that I had deleted by accident, then I'd be fine with it being undeleted...if, however, it was fanon then I'd request it be deleted again.
 * 23) How would you react if your user page was vandalized? Under what circumstances would you block the offender? Is there anything else that you would do in this situation?
 * 24) *I don't honestly care...it has been plenty of times before...but when I was an admin previously, I locked it...so that won't be a problem if this vote goes through.
 * 25) Under what circumstances would you consider blocking an established user?
 * 26) *If they broke the rules...I don't care if you're an established user or a brand new anon...you follow the rules or you get blocked...it's simple.
 * 27) If you could change any one thing about Wookieepedia, what would it be?
 * 28) *Honestly? I'd get make a rule that articles have to be relevant to Star Wars. I'm fine with having OOU articles up to a point...but when we have articles like Burl Ives which feature next to no information about Star Wars, it saddens me...those kinds of pages should be on the Wikipedia.
 * 29) Would you look at a glass to be half-empty or half-full?
 * 30) *Depends what's in it...if it's alcohol or Irn-Bru then it's already empty...if it's anything else then I've topped it up with whisky.
 * 31) Do you feel the current blocking policy is too restrictive, not restrictive enough, or OK as it is?
 * 32) *Mostly OK as it is...but it needs some improvements like those currently being hammered out in CT's.
 * 33) Have you ever considered becoming a regular visitor to the Wookieepedia IRC chat?
 * 34) How do you feel about people who already have some influence on other Star Wars communities (TheForce.Net, StarWars.com) trying to change policies here?
 * 35) *If they try to change them on this site, then I don't care...if they try to change them offsite, then they should go to hell. Site rules can be decided here and here alone.
 * 36) How many clones do you think fought in the Clone Wars? (Note: You are wrong no matter what answer you give.)
 * 37) *I don't care unless it's covered in an ambig source.
 * 38) Who is the most awesome Jedi of all time? (Note: The only correct answer is Kyle Katarn.)
 * 39) *God...that damn well better be a redirect.
 * 40) Are you or have you ever been a member of the Communist Party?
 * No, but I hear they have lovely parties.
 * 1) What's more important to you: consensus or policy?
 * 2) *What a stupid question...policy...consensus decides policy, so policy is consensus.
 * 3) Have you had any previous leadership experience (in your community, on the web, etc.)?
 * 4) *Yes...I was an admin here...look up my previous works. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 23:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Requests for bureaucratship
Rules:
 * Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.


 * 1) They are an administrator.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * 3) They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 6) Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month&mdash;from the day the nomination is put forth&mdash;are counted).
 * 7) Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 8) Bureaucrats' votes must be unanimous for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 9) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged since it may affect how others decide and vote on the RFB.

Requests for rollback
Rules:
 * You may nominate another Wookieepedian (please ensure they accept the nomination first)
 * You cannot nominate yourself.

To view past requests, see the RFR archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian for rollback rights.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have demonstrated a need for the ability through extensive anti-vandalism work.

Questions

 * 1) Why should you be granted rollback rights?