Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Masanya


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Masanya

 * Nominated by:  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 15:15, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Expanding game-referenced articles.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 501
 * 1) * First of all, you have quite a few redirects. Please get rid of these. If you go to your preferences, and then go into gadgets there is an option to trun all redirects orange. This will help you find them.
 * 2) **Done. Thanks for that tip. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 06:45, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) * You have to mention everything mentioned in the intro and the infobox (besides the eras) in the body of the text. Right now, there is a bit missing, including the fact that it is a CR90.
 * 4) **Fixed. Let me know if I missed anything. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 06:45, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Please note that you can link to an article three times: Once in the infobox, once in the intro, and once in the rest of the body. There are some things that you can link to in the body.
 * 6) ****Okay, I think that should fix it. Let me know. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 02:34, November 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) * I think the BtS could be expanded. You should mention where it first appeared and it's other appearance.
 * 8) **Done. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 06:45, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *Fix these, and I will continue my review. Good job. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:56, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) *Currently, we are at 300 or so words, whcih means it can't be a GAN. Do you want me to finish my review before we move it to the GAN page? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:28, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Yes, please. It would be nice to have everything tidied up so that the GAN can pass muster quickly. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 22:23, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) * The intro has two "during"s in it. Change it to one please.
 * 13) **Done. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:59, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) ***No we have two "fought"s.
 * 15) ****Got it. Thanks. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 15:12, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) * Context for Galactic Civil War in the History. Also, could you clarify that the Battle at Endor was between the Empire and the Rebels?
 * 17) **Done. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:59, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) ***It looks good, though it is quite long for a context. I have no problem with it's length, but I don't think we can source the context of the War to cards list as it is now. Reffing that context would eliminate that problem. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:35, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 19) ****How's that? &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 15:07, November 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 20) * Does Empire at War have any info for the article, or is it just mentioned?
 * 21) **Done. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 18:59, November 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 22) *Looks good otherwise. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:34, November 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 23) *You've addressed all of my objections, so I will archive it tonight when I get the chance. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:51, November 7, 2012 (UTC)