Forum:CT Archive/Disallowing Fanon - Yes or no. Period.

Since the last thread was deliberately derailed by people who wanted to game the system, we're starting over.

It goes like this: Do we want to disallow/ban/outlaw all fanon/fanfic on Wookieepedia. Yes or no.

There is no third option. There WILL BE NO third option.

Any addition of a third option will be reverted.

(And before anyone goes fear-mongering, this doesn't include silly things like userboxes. Introducing that as a strawman was a disgusting tactic, and the so-called "debater" should be banned. You know who I'm talking about. This is about fanon/fanfic. Period.)

Anyone caught vote-farming will be permanently and irreversibly banned and this is your warning.

It's that simple. Disallow fanon. Yes or no.

''' No discussion. No "neutral." YES OR NO. '''

Yes

 * 1) -  Darth Culator  (Talk) 21:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 21:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --Goodwood 21:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Havac 21:48, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  StarNeptune Talk to me! 21:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Lord Hydronium 21:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 22:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Ozzel 22:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Four Dot says yes to no fanon. Or fanfiction, if you want to get semantical. Thefourdotelipsis 23:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Sigh... sorry dudes, but I feel like I gotta vote this option. Carlitos Moff 23:55, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Just remove it. Cull Tremayne 01:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Oh grow up already...-- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 03:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Send them on over to SWFanon. I have faith that interpretation of this rule will be more than fair to parties concerned. And I hate fanon with all the hate in my cold, black heart.&mdash; Graestan [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( This party's over ) 05:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

No

 * 1)  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 22:00, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) No. Now let's drop it.  Chack Jadson  Talk 22:49, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Still like my word-count idea better than a total ban, even though my ability to care either way is waning. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I thought this finished ages ago -- Dark Lord  Xander  ( Embrace The Dark Side! )[[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|20px]] 23:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) I refuse to allow my intense personal distaste for fanon to lead us down the path of dictating what people do with their userpages. Meaning I'm not yet convinced there's a problem here that our edit count policy can't handle.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 02:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Per Gonk. --Imperialles 02:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) It's not the fanon that is the problem, it's the users. QuentinGeorge 02:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) For the love of Kyle! This issue is like a karking zombie, it just won't die. I don't particularly care about, read, or desire to see fanon on Wookieepedia, but (per Gonk), there's no smoking gun, axis of evil, clear and present danger, or any other clichéd analogy that you may care to throw out there to prove that it is detrimental to Wookieepedia. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 04:31, 16 September 2007 (UTC)