Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Lankashiir

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 16:13, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:35, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:00, December 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Authors for the Atlas?
 * 2) * Main terrain needs to be mentioned in main article.
 * 3) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done. Winterz (talk) 21:58, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) 502
 * 6) * "Outside the Star Wars universe, the name of the planet may be a reference to Lancashire, a county in England." It's always tempting to guess like that, but this kind of speculation falls under our No original research policy and is a big no-no if there's nothing to back it up. Menkooroo (talk) 12:28, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Good, it looks prettier without it. Still, considering that it wasn't me who added it, I thought the info could be relevant in some ways. Winterz (talk) 13:47, October 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * One more question: Anything from the Atlas on parts of space under which it later fell? Any Imperial warlord territories, New Republic, Krayt's Empire...? Menkooroo (talk) 09:59, November 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Info added, sir. Winterz (talk) 21:48, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) ***Great. However, "until its fragmenation one year later" can't be sourced to the Atlas. I don't think it can even be sourced to the last issue of Legacy War, which only tells us that the Alliance conquers Coruscant and that the Sith go into hiding. No indication of what happens to Krayt's Empire. Probably best just to leave that sentence out. Menkooroo (talk) 01:55, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) ****Actually, yes the Empire collapses and the Triumvirate takes over. It is the remnants of the One Sith that go into hiding, Krayt's Empire was no more after his death. I'm sure I can get you a reference. Winterz (talk) 20:43, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) *****There's not a lot we can say about the Triumvirate based on the single panel in which they appear in Legacy War 6 --- we can speculate on what Hogrum Chalk means when he says that the galaxy has been unified, but it would be just that: speculation. Sure, the Sith go into hiding, but we can't make any assertions about what actually happens to Krayt's Empire; we can only guess. Menkooroo (talk) 03:21, November 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) ******If it is speculation then someone should really take care of the false information that is referenced in Darth Krayt's Galactic Empire. Winterz (talk) 14:10, November 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) *******Done, but this objection still needs to be addressed... Menkooroo (talk) 00:47, November 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) ********Done. Winterz (talk) 18:53, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) * Sorry for the delay; one more: "Galactic Basic Standard" is currently exclusive to the infobox and should be in the article proper. Menkooroo (talk) 10:18, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) **That was sort of an assumption since I considered it because a Human (Imperial) family resided there and were obviously standard Imperial language speakers. Anyway, it's gone now. Winterz (talk) 16:27, December 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) *Looks like I have one more --- why was the "Sources" section removed? Menkooroo (talk) 02:42, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 19) **I've recently reviewed the Atlas, due to one my GANs objections, and couldn't find any Lankashiir, so removed it from the article. In fact, I was never too sure about Atlas being a source. Winterz (talk) 23:50, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 20) ***If it's not in the Atlas, how do you know its grid coordinates? Or even that it's in the Colonies? Menkooroo (talk) 03:36, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Berrun system

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:09, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I really need to remember to post my nominations on the pages.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  15:43, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) How bout some info for the Atlas in the BtS? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:34, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done.
 * 3) Exiled Jedi
 * 4) * Based on the maps in the Atlas and the location of the system could you provide some information on who controlled the aea of space near the system at different times?
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * Some of the information from the Berrun article should be summarized here I think. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:27, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:12, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Ghibli fruit

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:54, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Nights!

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:24, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:20, December 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) *Does the source actually say that only humans could eat this fruit?  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:03, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **No, but they are the only species that the source confirms to be able to eat the fruit. The way the article is currently worded does not say that only Humans could eat the fruit, but since we have no other examples that is the only species that can be mentioned.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:41, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Vel Terno

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:03, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:24, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:33, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:05, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash; 05:08, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * The article is in the Humans category but the article does not mention him as a Human, which is correct? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:23, December 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Whoops. Category deleted. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:54, December 12, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Tyrral

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  06:01, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Just an SWG vendor...

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:32, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:37, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:17, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Emperor's Voice (Human female)

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:38, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A long name for a short article.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:44, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  04:36, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; 05:04, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * It seems to me that since the article is about the woman, that the first sentence should establish her as a Human female living at whatever time, and then move on to the part about her being the Emperor's Voice.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * The second sentence seems to conflict with the BTS, since the BTS says she could have died naturally, while the sentence states that she died when the Emperor changed voices.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * You need to link the Sith Empire somewhere in the body. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:17, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:33, December 18, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Emperor's Voice (Sith Pureblood)

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:38, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Ditto.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  04:39, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; 05:06, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Same objections as the previous nomination.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * I would change the article to say that the guy was elderly as the Emperor's Voice. He wasn't always elderly, so the article should introduce him as a Sith male before mentioning his age at a certain point in his life. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:19, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:33, December 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Supreme Emperor
 * 7) *One small thing, you said the man was utilized Sith Emperor as his voice, should be utilized by the or something like that. Other than that, awesome.
 * 8) **Just to let you know, if you find a few simple grammar mistakes in a nominated article you can go ahead and fix them.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  04:39, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Alaris Prime colonization resolution

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 08:39, December 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Article based on a small GB databank mention. BB5

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:43, December 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:58, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) --LelalMekha (talk) 15:26, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  04:42, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501s
 * 2) * In the infobox, the event is said to happen between 56 and 59 BBY. However, in the body, it is siad that it happened over a twenty year time period before 36-39 BBY, which would indicate that it took twenty years to come to an agreement. Which is correct?
 * 3) **That line on the infobox is for the date proposed, not for the time it took to complete it. So it was proposed between 59 and 56 BBY, but wasn't passed until 20 years later.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:39, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * In the infobox, I think the Support and opposition part is for the sides. the TF is goog there, but you might want to switch out the Wookiee leader for the Wookiees themselves.
 * 5) **Most articles I've seen have the support and opposition as particular people. I just have the Trade Federation there because the source doesn't identify exactly who represented them in this event.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:39, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ***In edit mode, it says that is for side 1 and side 2, which would indicate that the TF and the Wookiees should be there. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:30, December 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Here's a couple of status article examples where the individual representatives are used in the infobox, and in the second one an organization is used when exactly who was opposing it wasn't named, so I'm sure its fine the way it is.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:38, December 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) *****I guess... 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:43, December 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) * 501st dogma ( talk ) 13:03, December 18, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) 502
 * 2) *The dates proposed are exclusive to the infobox and should be in the article proper. Since we have an article on explorer, it's probably worth mentioning in the article proper that the Wookiees were explorers, like the infobox does. Menkooroo (talk) 04:46, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **They're in the article now... proper :P  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:14, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified rainy planet (Sith Empire)

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 11:42, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:AST

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:17, December 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 01:42, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:22, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  04:22, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) You should mention the atmosphere type in the body.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:26, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Added.  Imperators II (Talk) 08:47, December 22, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Technically, shouldn't this be just at Unidentified rainy planet, since it would have been created before the Clone Wars rainy planet?  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 09:46, December 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not about which came first, but rather which is the primary topic, i.e. the topic which most people entering the title in the search box are looking for. That's the page that should be hosted at the undisambiguated title. In this case, both planets appear to be equally obscure, so there is no primary topic (a reader entering "Unidentified rainy planet" into the search box could be looking for either one). In such cases, the undisambiguated title should host a disambiguation page, which is what I've converted Unidentified rainy planet into. &mdash;MJ&mdash; Comlink 18:42, December 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, MJ.  Imperators II (Talk) 19:10, December 22, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified draped senator

 * Nominated by: LelalMekha (talk) 14:03, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A very modest contribution to the ongoing politics barn-burner.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:39, December 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) "Honey, I'm going to work now at the Senate!" "Don't forget your ridiculously oversized curtain!" "Oh yeah, I forgot, wouldn't want to look stupid at the Senate now, would I?"  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 10:18, December 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:26, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  15:37, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) * I'm pretty sure that whenever you refer to this guy as a senator, it can be capitilized since its referring to him
 * 3) **Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:07, December 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * More of a query than an objection, but can you say he was an Alderaanian representative in-universe going by the cut episode 1 content. Even you can't, Alderaan needs to be linked in the Bts anyway.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 09:44, December 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **I did not suppose we could assume that, since the draped man has only been referenced as "a Human senator", while his colleague Liana Merian and Agrippa Aldrete were specifically referred to as members of the Alderaanian delagation. I always thought the draped senator was in fact the original Bail Antilles&mdash;since Adrian Dunbar originally played Bail Organa&mdash;but this is impossible to prove. (I did, however, answer your objection about linking Alderaan in the BtS.) --LelalMekha (talk) 10:07, December 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Fair enough then.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42
 * 7) Exiled Jedi
 * 8) * I think that you might need to remove "average build" since it is kind of vague and subjective. (Unless of course, this information is explicitly stated in one of the sources.)
 * 9) **Agreed. --LelalMekha (talk) 09:46, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * "That year, Supreme Chancellor Finis Valorum was removed from office following the invasion of the remote planet Naboo by the Trade Federation." I can't see what this sentence has to do with the senator, since it is not confirmed that he was even present at the time. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  04:18, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **He may not have been present at the time, but he was still in politics and was contemporary of this important event. --LelalMekha (talk) 09:46, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified planet (Sith Empire)

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 13:04, December 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:AST

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:20, December 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:24, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  04:12, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash; 05:02, December 23, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments