Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Duel on Dantooine

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:38, September 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Need I say anything other than... MOAR?

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:58, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:57, October 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Tinwe (comlink) 10:15, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Go ahead! I challenge you for "Moooar" CANs. Winterz (talk) 13:40, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  15:32, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) One thing: Is a duel the best title for this? Is there any evidence they actualy fought, or did they just debate? If they did not fight, I would suggest changing the title, not to Debate on Dantooine, but something else.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:12, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, it's specifically a duel. They were just debating while fighting. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 20:37, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) **That's just weird. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:58, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Quote. He's explaining this to the player.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:47, September 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) *Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:13, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) In the Infobox's outcome, wouldn't "turned to the light side" look better than "converted"? That term makes it look like he changed his religious views, plus it's a term rarely used in SW :> Winterz (talk) 19:11, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) *Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:50, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Exiled Jedi
 * 7) * You currently source the fact that the duel happened on Dantooine to the encyclopedia, but you say that it placed the duel on Nar Shaddaa. Please fix the sourcing. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  21:39, October 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:42, October 14, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Major expansion because of a fail in the Encyclopedia placing it on Nar Shaddaa, but some good info anyway. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:50, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Engagement in the Mid Rim

 * Nominated by: Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 00:19, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:07, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Tinwe (comlink) 10:24, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  15:44, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Could you completely source the infobox? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:28, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) **Woopsie. Done. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 18:45, September 29, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Aar

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 22:31, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Credit goes for Purpilia as he worked the most on it three years ago

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:37, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  00:47, October 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Tinwe (comlink) 13:46, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * First of all, I noticed you had a few redirects. In order to eliminate them, go to your preferences, to gadgets, and select "Highlight all redirects orange". This will make it way easier to find them.
 * 2) **Oh thanks a lot, done!
 * 3) * Same reff Atlas objection as before.
 * 4) **Done.
 * 5) * A little context for the Hutts?
 * 6) **Done.
 * 7) * Could you add authors to Snare and Atlas?
 * 8) **Done.
 * 9) *Looks good. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:51, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) **Thanks again, I went ahead and corrected the objections in all my other nominations. Winterz (talk) 15:04, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) Exiled Jedi
 * 12) * You need to source the sector to the companion in the body.
 * 13) * Looking at the map of galactic exploration int the atlas, I saw that the N-5 coordinate region was explored between 5,000 and 1,000 BBY not 1,000 and 25 BBY.
 * 14) * On the map on page 226, I can tell that all of N-5 is located in Roan Fel's Empire in Exile due to the position of Vinsoth.
 * 15) * From the Outer Rim sectors map (which only has the Nijune sector in N-5's top right corner) and the map on page 151 I can tell that Aar was in Separatist space during the Clone Wars.
 * 16) * From the Outer Rim sectors mao and the map on page 200 I can tell that Aar was in the area controlled by Thrawn in 9 ABY.
 * 17) * Is Aar mentioned in the Atlas outside of the appendix at the end? If not, you should probably add a tag to it, since the appendix only mentions the system. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  20:28, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) **Damn I always tend to forget looking at those territorial maps. Done. Winterz (talk) 21:24, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 19) Tinwe
 * 20) * Since an article shouldn't contain any infobox exclusive information, the grid coordinates should be mentioned in the body of the article. (This goes for your other planet noms as well.) Looks good to go otherwise. :) Tinwe (comlink) 10:06, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 21) **Done ;) Winterz (talk) 13:33, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abatrarg

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 23:03, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Three planet nominations so far

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Looks good.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:59, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * If this planet isn't mentioned in the Online Companion, then the first sentence can't entirely be sourced to the Online Companion --- it seems like everything up to the end of "from the star Atrig" should be sourced to Planets of the Galaxy. Also, be sure to place ref notes after punctuation.
 * Fixed.
 * Hmmmmm but now nothing in the body is referenced to the Online Companion --- should the reference to the Inner Rim be? It is in the infobox. Menkooroo (talk) 15:15, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. Winterz (talk) 15:56, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nitpicky, but in "Behind the scenes," "first appeared" doesn't jive with something that goes in a "Sources" section. "...Abatrarg's first mention" would be more accurate. Menkooroo (talk) 13:56, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Duh me, corrected! Winterz (talk) 15:11, October 15, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abanol

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 02:25, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Meh

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 17:04, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Abbaji

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 17:10, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:29, September 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) How bout adding it's atmosphere type to the body?
 * 2) *Argh, done.
 * 3) **Still remains. Are you sure you saved the page?
 * 4) ***Now. Winterz (talk) 19:27, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) I've done it here, but in the future add near the top of the article to get rid of the table of contents when we have this short of an article.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:38, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *Well I tried to find that code to remove the content table, but apparently it vanishes after being inserted. Winterz (talk) 19:00, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **The table of contents only pops up for some noms, so you were probally looking at those who did not have the template. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:12, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***TOC's appear when there are three or more section headings of any level. - i.e. a Behind the scenes, an Appearances section, and a Notes and references. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:42, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Gamorrean dancer

 * Nominated by: --LelalMekha (talk) 19:02, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Good. Our first silly catch of the day.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 18:41, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:19, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Tinwe (comlink) 10:13, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) I wonder if this guy went one to become one of Jabba's palace guards.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 21:54, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Could you add his skin color to the main article? Otherwise, great work.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:56, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Fixed. --LelalMekha (talk) 16:54, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) You should mention that Fode commented on his dance in the body (but by all means keep the quote). ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:33, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *Done. Do not hesitate to tell me if you think the wording is not satisfying&mdash;it's not easy to talk about one of the heads of a Troig. --LelalMekha (talk) 17:53, October 6, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Return of the Jedi
 * 2) *Needs some categories.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:11, October 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. --LelalMekha (talk) 07:28, October 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Code-8's report
 * 2) * the Gamorrean artist was graceful and skilled enough to dance on points. I'm not exactly sure what you mean by points. Could you find some way of explaining what they are? Other than that good job.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 21:29, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Well, I could use another wording, but I think "dancing on points" is the proper technical term to convey what I mean, which is "the action in dancing of extending one leg and arching the foot so that only the tips of the toes touch the floor." But English is not my first language, after all, so I may be mistaken. --LelalMekha (talk) 10:35, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *** I think you're right. I like the technical term's usage here. For what it's worth, we actually use the French in English too: "dancing en pointe." I'd keep the technical term, but perhaps add a descriptive phrase. Maybe, "skilled enough to dance en pointe, full weight resting on the tiptoes of a single foot" or some such. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 12:24, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Just followed your advice and used your suggestion word for word. --LelalMekha (talk) 12:31, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abbaji Minor

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 20:26, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Cade, I think Winterz is challenging you for the maximum number of noms on this page.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:19, October 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Sky's the limit! :p Winterz (talk) 14:49, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **If war is what you want, my young friend, then war is what you will get! !crazylaugh Now, to find some CANoms... Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:43, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Could you add the Carrion sector to the main article?
 * 2) * 501st dogma ( talk ) 20:59, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Winterz (talk) 21:30, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Authors for Atlas? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:25, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **I just can't get enooooough. Done. Winterz (talk) 22:28, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Base D8-Red

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:42, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:The opening nom for The Far Orbit Project project!

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 20:56, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Capital! I've been waiting for this project to start. Move over, Cav. Menkooroo (talk) 12:26, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Tinwe (comlink) 10:16, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Can you be more explicit about the theme here and in the previous article publication in the BtS section?
 * 3) **That better?
 * 4) * Context on the SpecNav and Ubiqtorate (the latter is optional since most people won't understand what is an Imperial Ubiqtorate) Winterz (talk) 23:55, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Contexted for SpecNav, but I did not do so for Ubiqtorate. Thanks for looking it over. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:31, October 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * One question, why the references? I thought you said it wasn't necessary when you only had one source :> Winterz (talk) 20:58, October 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not necessary, but it's encouraged.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 23:29, October 2, 2012 (UTC)

Ulicia

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:41, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:26, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you give context on Direx? Also, does the prisoner have enough info the warrant an article?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done. Winterz (talk) 21:58, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Lankashiir

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 16:13, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:35, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Authors for the Atlas?
 * 2) * Main terrain needs to be mentioned in main article.
 * 3) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:12, October 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done. Winterz (talk) 21:58, October 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abregado-fus

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:41, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * Savaged&hellip;
 * With this and the other planet noms below, you should be able to tell a bit more about the planet's place in galactic history by going through the maps in both The Essential Atlas and The Essential Guide to Warfare. You should be able to tell what regions of the galaxy it was in (the Slice, etc.), what territories it fell within during various periods, when its general vicinity was known to the galaxy at large, etc. You might be able to steal a bunch of this info from the Gados article. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 18:59, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * You know, that always made me wonder. If the planet or system's name don't appear in the map, wouldn't it be speculating claiming they fell under X's territory? :s Winterz (talk) 18:53, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Though I'm supporting, I don't think you can call its primary terrain "gas gaint". 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:41, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Yeah that kept me wondering for a while too. However I back checked major gas giant articles like Endor (planet) and Bespin, and they all say in terrain "Gas giant", I guess that serves to explain that there isn't any solid terrain, just gases. Winterz (talk) 11:56, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **I guess you can keep at that since other articles do it the same way. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:09, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Abregado-san

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Cade, Winterz is winning this contest!  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:44, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Abregado-dai

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 15:38, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Three in a row...fus-san-dai!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I need EC back up here... Too many noms to deal with alone.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:47, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Yahi'i

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:49, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Nights, move over Clone Wars, Even Piell is coming through...

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 18:55, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:22, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:19, October 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Is that 'fight' relevant enough to warrant its own article? :< Winterz (talk) 21:30, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Oops, article created.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:13, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 501
 * 1) * Shouldn't the name of the article be Yahi'i, not Yahi'i stalk? You should just mention that it has a stalk in the body, not the title. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:53, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) **I wasn't sure, moved.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:13, October 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abregado-taki

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 23:04, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Sorry EduCorps!

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:38, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Your ref in the main body of the article is formatted wrong. Use in the infobox only. You should be using  in the body. Please look over your other noms and see if they are formatted correctly.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:15, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) **Wow, I really wasn't aware of that. What is the difference? Anyways, corrected it in all my 17 noms, thanks for the heads-up! Winterz (talk) 15:44, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ***Truthfuly, I have no idea what the difference is, but that's how we properly reff an article. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:38, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Abrion Major

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 23:43, October 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work on all these noms.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:41, October 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Same reffing problems as before.
 * 2) * You should mention that it seceded to the CIS.
 * 3) * Humans as the immigrated species needs to be mentioned in the main body.
 * 4) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:20, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. I decided to remove the immigrated species and language from the Infobox as I couldn't find any source that confirmed it. Winterz (talk) 15:48, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Ahlenn

 * Nominated by: Winterz (talk) 00:51, October 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I've got nothing better to do this weekend!

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Evidently.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:42, October 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Neither did I - 400+ edits in about four hours yesterday! Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:19, October 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Same reffing problems.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:23, October 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Corrected. Winterz (talk) 15:45, October 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Battle on the Ash Plains of Lenico IV

 * Nominated by: Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 06:23, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:48, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:19, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Coruscantfan (Talk) 00:52, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Engagement in the asteroid-hives of Gelpog the Tyrant

 * Nominated by: Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 06:23, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:52, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey, now you can actually understand what the destruction of an Imperial flagship is supposed to be. Get crackin' on it! Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:19, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) *Challenge accepted. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 17:00, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Anskow

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 21:04, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Better safe than sorry was his philosophy

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:38, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 501
 * 1) * Could you add that Jedi were fugitives at that time?
 * 2) **Done.
 * 3) * Article for the cantina? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:56, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 20:22, October 10, 2012 (UTC)

Dovel

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 21:30, October 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Spaceport hostage siege commander

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Good work. 197 words...  501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:59, October 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Thanks. Yeah, I have a habit of cutting it close... :) Coruscantfan (Talk) 01:08, October 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  01:19, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Could you provide a link to the senator who was held hostage? Just link the article to "a" the word before senator. I assume the senator was Meena Tills, but I wanted to make sure. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  00:54, October 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 01:06, October 11, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Tasiele Shan

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 04:08, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Sideproject Encyclopedia. Meet Satele's mommy!

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) I won't ask for an article for the planet.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:37, October 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 12:04, October 13, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * The planet seems relevant enough to receive its own article. Winterz (talk) 15:29, October 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ** * grumble grumble grumble * Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:17, October 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *Wouldn't it be 'awesome' if you could organize the content chronologically? :p Winterz (talk) 19:08, October 14, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Darth Nostrem

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:29, October 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Darth Nostrel
 * 2) *What's a Kaggath?
 * 3) *Could we maybe have context on the Great Sith War?
 * 4) *Context for Dromund Khas.
 * 5) *You need to say he's male in the body of the article.
 * 6) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:43, October 14, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Thalmussen

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:44, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Presenting Operation Battlegrounds first CAN (would have been my third if the others hadn't wound up on the GA page)

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:18, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Let's keep this a CAN.
 * 2) * Context on Alaris Expanse?
 * 3) * Please do not link to things in Quotes
 * 4) * Could you give us a description of the ship? The picture does give a bit of the appearence.
 * 5) *Good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:10, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) **I've done the first two but I'm not exactly sure what to say in a desciption of the ship.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 09:30, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Just saying that it had two engines would do I think. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:49, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ****I've put it in.  Commander Code-8  To say hi, press 42 05:01, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Rage (Lancer-class frigate)

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:59, October 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:More Far Orbit!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Coruscant Security Special Investigation Panel

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:02, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: For WP:TOR

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 1) One thing: You need to say the headquarters are in Galactic city. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:56, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Headquarters has been added. Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:05, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **It still doesn't say that they were headquartered in Galactic City. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:28, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Telissa

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 06:49, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I would have nommed this ages ago had I had a source for the date. Which, thanks to The Essential Reader's Companion, I now do. :)

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:32, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 19:26, October 20, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 501
 * 1) * Context on Belasco?
 * 2) **Contextified. Tinwe (comlink) 05:20, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) *Looks good otherwise. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:03, October 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Winterz
 * 5) * Senate Building's location?
 * 6) * Mention the Republic in the body.
 * 7) **Blarg. I really should know better by now. :P Addressed. Tinwe (comlink) 19:22, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) *Good work. Winterz (talk) 14:46, October 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * I know we don't normally source release dates, but there's no rule against it either, is there? Tinwe (comlink) 06:49, October 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Not that I know of, I've just never seen anyone else ask for a release date to be sourced. Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:10, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * My comment (about my own nomination) wound up in your nom comments section by accident, Coruscantfan, so I took the liberty to put it back here. :) Tinwe (comlink) 05:14, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified SIS director

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:01, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:TOR

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Welcome back to the CANs. Winterz (talk) 13:30, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Context on the SIS Winterz (talk) 18:30, October 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 12:49, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 501
 * 1) *It sounds like the enycyclopedia was published by Kindersley. Is that true?
 * 2) *You need to say he is male in the body. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:35, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * [My comment here was actually for my own Telissa nomination that wound up in this section by accident, so I put it back where it belongs. Tinwe (comlink) 05:14, October 18, 2012 (UTC)]
 * That makes so much more sense! :) Coruscantfan (Talk) 12:49, October 19, 2012 (UTC)

Green/Aura

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Aurabesh

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Apparently there isn't a code for that, yet. :/ Winterz (talk) 18:56, October 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * Is there any way to remove the "< Green"? Considering that the Green article isn't related to these ones.
 * 3) **I have no idea how to remove it. I noticed it when I first created the article, but did not know how to eliminate it.
 * 4) ***I'll leave the question at Darth Culator's talkpage, will sign my support once I have a reply. ;)
 * 5) * Context on Sienar Fleet Systems.
 * 6) **Contextified.
 * 7) *** Lol, I was expecting some more specific context like "a subsidiary of the massive company X", not just two obvious words. Winterz (talk) 18:48, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ****Does that satisfy your objection? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:31, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *****Meh, I guess so. Winterz (talk) 13:09, October 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) * (objections apply to both 'Aurabesh') Winterz (talk) 14:43, October 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Both articles have been upadated according to your objections. Thanks for the review(s). 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:17, October 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Green/Besh

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:02, October 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Aurabesh

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments