User talk:JangFett

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #FEFFCF; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, JangFett!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Internal pages:
 * Senate Hall
 * Wookieepedia FAQ
 * Glossary of terms used on Wookieepedia
 * Manual of Style
 * Reliable sources
 * Guide to image use
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Wookieepedia policies:
 * What Wookieepedia is not
 * User page, user image, and user signature policies

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash;SFH 22:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * }

Re: Joining TCW Project
To join, you don't have to request it from me; it's not "exclusive". All you have to do is head over to the WookieeProject page and sign your name at the bottom with three tildes under the "Participants" section. We'd love to have more participants; the more, the merrier. :)  CC7567  (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sounds good  JangFett  You want to clone me? 18:24, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

One month already
Hello to all the members of WookieeProject: The Clone Wars! Considering the project has just been launched, we've had a great first month, taking three articles to FA status and five articles to GA status. I would like to remind you to please try to do whatever you can to help out; there are still many potential articles that can be taken up as projects, and many of you are already working very hard on them. In the next month, we have a goal to double (if not multiply even more) our current FAs and GAs, because once Season Two starts airing, there will be a ton of more articles that will require attention, and it's best if we get as many as we can out of the way now. Thank you for contributing! Your project head,  CC7567  (talk) 20:22, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * That sounds good. :) I can try to get the quote to you later today, actually; I just haven't had the time to work on the Battle of the Kaliida Nebula much recently. Trayus and I are just about to start it. :P  CC7567  (talk) 23:28, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, you might want to check out the current GAs just to see what kind of quality is expected for GAs. Cheers. :)  CC7567  (talk) 23:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * By the way, I've noticed that you've made a great deal of edits for the Malevolence. While it's helping the article, you might want to consider using the "Submit" button to check your work before you submit your edit of the article.  CC7567  (talk) 23:37, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No offense, but I don't think copying other articles (such as the Battle of Phu, Battle of Abregado and Battle of Ryndellia) into the Malevolence article is the way to go. The article needs to be told from the ship's perspective, not from the general battle perspective, which is what the battle articles are in. As well, please check sourcing throughout the article. Also, please remember to respect the Inuse tag on articles (as on the Battle of the Kaliida Nebula), as someone may be editing the article at the time, and when they submit their information, their edit will be lost.  CC7567  (talk) 18:06, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I personally find that copying articles implies that one doesn't feel the need to do any more work, which isn't always the best idea to portray. There's no reason that the article can't be expanded more from the perspective of the ship itself. Also, less can be told from the Republic's point of view. The focus is the Malevolence, not the battles it was in. The Battle of the Kaliida Nebula can also be expanded much more, and more can be said for the warship's characteristics.  CC7567  (talk) 19:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It's up to you what you want to do. You don't have to check in with me with what you plan to do; I was only giving suggestions. Also, a section specifically for the Republic's view of the ship is unnecessary; it can be incorporated into the history.  CC7567  (talk) 19:44, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
Per the title of this section. :P Thanks as well.  CC7567  (talk) 23:10, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've noticed that you've been reviewing some of the current GANs, and your help is appreciated. Some of your objections have been rather minor ones (such as your review for The Clone Wars: Procedure, in which you mentioned a typo), and I'm not sure if you're already aware of this, but there is an unofficial   clause that most reviewers follow. Basically, it's that if there are any minor mistakes, you correct them yourself; it's mostly to prevent people from leaving extremely minor/unnecessary objections. Thanks.  CC7567  (talk) 00:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Ive heard about that SoFixit hehe. Yeah and its no problem. Anyway, thanks CC.  JangFett  Talk 00:06, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * It's fine how it is. The future tense is correct; using "can" would not make the sentence "proper", it would just mess up the sentence's meaning.  CC7567  (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Redlinks
Hey JangFett,

Just to let you know that two redlinks isn't usually classified as an excessive amount. Those tags are usually used for when there are at least more than 5 or 6, and you'll mostly find them on articles about sources or novels. For Good Articles, there also isn't a redlink limt. I've removed the tag. -- —Harrar  ( Villip ) 11:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Oops, you've removed it already. Happy editing. -- —Harrar  ( Villip ) 11:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey Jang, I just wanted to reiterate the same thing so we're all clear on this. The GAN rules state that an article should not be tagged with an excessive number of redlinks, and as Harrar has said that's really for articles that have maybe 5, 6, 7+ redlinks in them. The Featured article rules on the FAN page, which is really Wookieepedia's guidelines for our highest quality articles, allows a maximum of 3 redlinks. So if a GAN like Fendrilon Koozar has only two, it doesn't need to be tagged with the redlink template. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

GAN
I've noticed that you've been making an edit to say that you've addressed every single objection. It's recommended that you just do all the work you can on the article and then submit the "addressed objections" on the GAN page at one time. It's currently clogging up the recent changes page. Thank you.  CC7567  (talk) 20:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, I'd like to say the same for the Malevolence article itself as well. That's also clogging up the RC page.  CC7567  (talk) 20:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not trying to accuse you of anything; I'm sorry if I came off that way. I wasn't sure if you were using the Preview button, so I wanted to mention it to you. I don't believe that I was trying to imply that you should stop working on the article.  CC7567  (talk) 20:50, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thanks
Your welcome for finding the spelling errors, but I'm not sure I added those templates. That must have been someone else. Your welcome again.&mdash;Darthtyler (Talk) 21:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Thanks on my page
Hey, no problem. I'm just helping the process along, as the page I noticed yesterday would be in top position if refs were added. Happy that they were. — Excelsior,   The Flash  - ( Talk to me, talk to me, talk to me bay-bay! ) 16:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

RE:Edit to Chi Cho
Its alright, just trying to help --Jedijake123 22:28, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * While i have you, may i ask a favor --Jedijake123 23:06, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Its not about Chi Cho --Jedijake123 23:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * U have battlefront 2, so do i. but i lost the code and i REALLY want 2 play the game. can u give it 2 me me PLEASE!?!?!?!?! --Jedijake123 23:48, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * by code i mean the code that u need 2 punch in during instillation, besides, im pretty sure that every other wookieepedian who has the game has the instillation code --Jedijake123 00:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 2 things 1. i have it 4 PC and i lost the code 2. i tried google and i did not find it so i am up for it if you find a page and put a link 2 that page, thanks--Jedijake123 00:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have 1 and it works fine --Jedijake123 00:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

WOTM
That message was for everyone. You didn't have to dignify it with a response. Graestan ( Talk ) 02:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Quote
In what way? They were both questions, however emphasized. I'm changing the last one to an exclamation point, but if you're going to say that it's wrong, please say why.  CC7567  (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, and because what Ahsoka said is still currently correct in the article, it hasn't been changed.  CC7567  (talk) 18:50, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing what you think is wrong; what you stated on my talk page for Ahsoka is exactly what it says. Also, please use the preview button to make sure what you have before you submit is what you want to say, instead of making a ton of minor edits to my user talk page.  CC7567  (talk) 18:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, I see it.  CC7567  (talk) 19:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Orto Plutonia FAN
...Yes, I believe I did. Was there something you wanted to ask me?  CC7567  (talk) 00:10, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd like to recommend that you address as many objections as you can at one time before continuing. If the one you recently addressed for the Battle of Orto Plutonia is the only one you currently have time for, I apologize, but if not, I would recommend doing one larger edit, again, instead of doing many small ones.  CC7567  (talk) 00:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey JangFett :). I'll take a look at Orto Plutonia soon, but I'll let CC complete his review first :-).  Grunny  ( Talk ) 09:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:FAN
Well it was a comment, not an objection. More of a reminder for you to not forget to put it up for your nominations. Darth Trayus  ( Trayus Academy ) 18:44, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's already been SoFixIt-ed. Now worry more about objections and less about comments. Darth Trayus  Sith_Emblem.svg ( Trayus Academy ) 04:09, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Massacre on Tatooine
Just a little thing. But in your quotes on the page, you spell Anakin's nickname as Annie, when it should be Ani. Just thought I'd point that out so you could correct it. :) -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 16:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC) Thought I'd toss this image out as a possibility for the "Aftermath" section instead of the current funeral shot. My thinking is two-fold. 1. The funeral image is already used elsewhere. 2. The image of him carrying his mother is the direct aftermath, and the look on his face really show's how the massacre affected him and his future fall to the dark side. Just a thought. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 17:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, I guess according to the AOTC script, it was spelled Annie. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 16:44, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hold off, I'm gonna check the subtitles on the DVD. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 16:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Nope, I just checked the DVD subtitles. And it is clearly Ani, not Annie. You can leave it. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 16:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Mission to Tatooine (Separatist Crisis)
I hope you don't mind, but I did some editing to this article to clear up some past-tense issues, along with some spelling and grammatical edits. If you don't like my edits, simply revert them. :)  OLIOSTER  (talk)  17:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I added a few notes of more things I saw problematic to the nomination page.  OLIOSTER  (talk) Sith_Emblem.svg 17:56, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

TCW Check-in
Please come on IRC in #WP:TCW when you can.  CC7567  (talk) 23:04, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Axe
Just wanted to let you know I did a minor edit to the Axe article. I moved the image you had in the Death Section and moved it up, split the Death section into two paragraphs and added a death image to the appropriate section. Take a look and see if you approve. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 23:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Axe GAN
Hey Jang, please make sure to use the "preview" button before saving any changes to articles. That way, we can avoid the little mix-up we had over one of my objections to your GAN. Also, making several edits at a time&mdash;rather than saving after every little edit&mdash;makes it easier for an objector to check and see if the nominator has really fixed that which was objected. When you make several small edits, this becomes hard to track, and it can be difficult to accurately compare past versions to current versions of an article. Also, such frequent edits can make it difficult for me to get a copyedit in, as I am often blocked by edit conflicts. Also, if you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask, and I'll do my best to help. Thanks :), Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jujiggum ) 23:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Which is what previews are for: so that you can read over your edits and make sure you didn't make any mistakes before you save. :P Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jujiggum ) 23:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC)