Talk:Imperial Assault Carrier Expansion Pack

Canon or Legends?
Hi.

What should we put this expansion pack under? Canon timeline or Legends timeline? On the one hand, we've got Agent Kallus, a character from Star Wars: Rebels, and a canon character. But on the other, we've got Wampa (chaser) and Chaser, who while technically characters in the films and thus are technically canon, qualify more as Legends characters than true Canon characters especially when they weren't named in the films themselves. And that's not even getting into Youngster, who was definitely a Legends-exclusive character due to being in The Force Unleashed novelization. This is probably the most confusing Expansion Pack yet regarding where exactly it belongs since it incorporates both timelines. At least with the Ghost expansion pack and possibly the Inquisitor's TIE expansion pack, it's a very safe bet that they will be Canon material and won't include any Legends material that wasn't already in the films or Rebels beforehand (or at least, the Ghost won't. The Inquisitor's TIE is a bit iffy, as the v1 WAS hinted at in the Legends book Star Wars: Imperial Handbook: A Commander's Guide.), and we definitely know the Mist Hunter and Punishing One expansions will most likely be Legends material. And the TIE/fo Fighter and T-70 X-wing expansions are obviously both in the Canon timeline only due to their debuting in Star Wars: Episode VII The Force Awakens. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 14:14, November 28, 2015 (UTC)