Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

An Examination and Exploration of a Most Dangerous and Resilient Organism

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 11:09, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:NSW.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) A riviting monograph, this. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:14, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 12:31, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 01:34, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ~  Savage  B Aliens_Logo.png B ~ 02:35, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Rubedo
 * 2) * Was the title italicized in the book? The titles of acadrmic papers are supposed to have quotes around them instead. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:59, April 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **No, no it was not. The original author put the italics there, and I left them. And then removed them.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 01:07, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***ENGL&101 FTW. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:14, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) Jujiggum
 * 6) * Are you certain the essay's genre was biology? Or is that your own assumption based on the fact that it included information about orbalisks? Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 01:17, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) **I suppose it's an assumption. Given that the entire essay is about orbalisks, which are parasites, wouldn't parasitology be appropriate?  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:49, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Yeah, I guess specifying parasitology would be a better fit. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 15:19, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Done.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 22:23, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) Morrt
 * 11) * If the source provides more information, you should expand the removing procedure and the general information of the obralisk. Darth Morrt 11:48, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) **It doesn't do this though. You don't actually get to read the report, instead you read about Zannah and her triumph at finding the removing procedure, which is mostly a set up for the next plot point.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 12:24, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) ***Ok.
 * 14) Bob
 * 15) * Can you reword the first sentence so it's clear that the orbalisk is the parasite and that the paper isn't about a parasite that preys on the orbalisk? ~ SavageBob ~ Talk ~ 13:03, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 16) **Done.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 22:23, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) Imperators II
 * 18) *Shouldn't the title be simply italicized (like this one) instead of being in quotation marks?
 * 19) **It was, originally. See NaruHina's comment above for an explanation.
 * 20) *So the info Zannah obtains is really never brought up later in the novel? (I'm just asking because I can't check the source at the moment, sorry)  Imperators II (Talk) 22:26, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 21) **She threatens Darovit with death if he doesn't use it (whatever it is) to heal Bane, but eventually the orbalisks are electrocuted to death anyway, so you never see the method described in the article. The paper's mostly a plot point to let Zannah meet Darovit and give her a reason to keep him around for a while.  Holocron  Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 07:00, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Planore

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 08:33, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Not a painting? Well I'll be damned.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Helping out WP:KOTOR now?  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 08:53, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *I am a member!  OLIOSTER  (talk) 09:36, April 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Darth Morrt 11:58, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Looks good! Please be sure to add extra carriage returns between sections of your articles, though. ~ SavageBob ~ Talk ~ 12:59, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5)  1358  <sup style="color:#336600;">(Talk)  12:32, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * No mention in the strategy guide or Kahranna's CSWE entry, and oh wow did the CUSWE get this wrong but I figured I'd link it anyway.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 09:04, April 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't ever link to the CUSWE, but yeah, they screwed that up pretty badly. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 08:53, April 4, 2011 (UTC)

Clone Wars Painting (clone trooper)

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 09:59, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: *insert slightly humorous comment about paintings here*

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Kilson 01:34, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 03:22, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) I guess the gender of the spacer isn't specified, but "it was rewarded to a spacer after they killed [..]" just can't be correct.  Imperators II (Talk) 22:09, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *When gender is unspecified, "they" can actually be singular or plural.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:42, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Wow, didn't know that.  Imperators II (Talk) 22:47, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) I believe this painting is also given out if you complete Farnsworth's quest. You need to check this and if so, put the info into the article. Kilson 22:41, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) *Ah yes, forgot about that one. Added.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:33, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) **K good. By the way, I put up Farnsworth to go along with your now. Kilson 01:34, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) I'd link clone and trooper&mdash;separately of course, since you link them together in the body&mdash;in the BTS section, and I'm not sure "Clone" should be capitalized in that instance. Aside from that, a very nice article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:55, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) *Done.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 03:09, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) **Excellent; I'd just fix the redirects now (since you moved the other painting); Clone Wars painting (Grievous) to Clone Wars Painting (Grievous) and clone to clone (sorry, should have specified there).&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 03:17, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) ***Done.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 03:20, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ****Yet another nice article on the GFFA's artwork.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 03:21, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) Toprawa:
 * 13) * Is there any specific reason why "Painting" and "Clone trooper" are capitalized in the article title? Might we just move it to "Clone Wars painting (clone trooper)"? Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:02, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) **As noted in the Bts, its called "Clone Wars Painting" in the game, so its canon capitalization. As for the Clone trooper, I thought this was proper for terms in parenthesis.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 22:40, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bob
 * Does Galaxies indicate that it's Phase I armor? If not, you'll need to cite a source for that distinction (any will do). ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 02:50, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * No it doesn't, and I did not add this. Could you suggest a source?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 12:30, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Clone Wars Painting (Grievous)

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 09:59, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: *ditto*

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice little article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 03:17, April 6, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) The same objection as in the clone trooper painting article.  Imperators II (Talk) 22:11, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Axinal
 * If the painting is named "Clone Wars Painting"&mdash;note the capital P&mdash;in the game, should the article name not also capitalize the P? The same applies to the clone trooper painting above, actually. This could just be a judgment call, and I'm open to different opinions on that.
 * I suppose that makes sense, will move.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 03:09, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Aside from that, nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 03:01, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Is Grievous identified in Galaxies? If not, you'll need to cite something to support that it's him. (It is, but the game may not say so.) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 02:53, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * It does not specifically say it is Grievous. What source would you suggest?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 12:32, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified umbrella-like creature

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 19:34, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another weird Ewoks creature. 208 words.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Weird Endor.  Imperators II (Talk) 22:40, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Wierd Fiction. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:59, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 23:24, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Heh-heh, heh-heh. You said loins. ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 03:10, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Risin' up to the challenge of our rival!
 * 2) * In all seriousness, are umbrellas canon? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:31, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **A fair question; I couldn't name a source that uses them (and if anyone can, it would be greatly appreciated). But the fact that Latara and Kneesaa used it suggests that, while the object itself may or may not have been canon, the utilities of an umbrella were in demand. If we cannot find a source that names umbrellas, what do you suggest?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:41, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***They're canon; Wedge and Qwi Xux use one in Darksaber, and Obi-Wan sees a vendor using one in The Desperate Mission. Lando mentions one in The Mindharp of Sharu, too. ~ Savage  B Aliens_Logo.png B ~ 22:02, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****If you want to use an existing article, I just found parasol. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:04, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Great, thank you both. I'll just use Bob's sources and go ahead and create an article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:36, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) Imperators II
 * 8) * I hope I don't sound too much like an astrography-geek (which I am), but shouldn't the article link to Endor's sun Ibleam if it already links to "sun"?  Imperators II (Talk) 22:08, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) **I actually considered doing that when I was writing the article. Sounds fine with me. Thanks!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:36, April 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) It doesn't matter which method you use, both are acceptable, but please be consistent: in the infobox, you link each color separately, but in the article prose, you only link the first one to color.  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 01:39, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) *I originally linked only one color; it looks like NaruHina changed that on me. I'll change it back. Thanks for the review!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:47, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) **Sorry about that. I didn't know simply linking to Color was acceptable now. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:59, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) ***No problem, Naru. I just learned recently when Toprawa informed me. I appreciate your review.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 04:01, April 6, 2011 (UTC)


 * Bob
 * You'll need to cite a source for Wicket and Kneesaa's full names, as they never go by them in the cartoon; I believe The Essential Guide to Characters would be the best bet. Or you could do what I normally do and just never use the full name (calling them Kneesaa and Wicket W. Warrick instead).
 * Didn't realize that was necessary. I'll just use the latter option.
 * Sorry for the redlink, but this pond probably deserves an article.
 * I agree, and the article is created.
 * This is borderline, I think, but I'd be more comfortable with a source after the BTS info of airing dates and credits. I think "A Star Wars CELibration" should work. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 00:27, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Certainly.
 * Since the creature is protecting them from the sun, perhaps you should link to parasol somewhere.
 * I've linked already to the umbrella article, which describes that they were used for protection from sunlight. Parasol, as described in the article, is more of a piece of furniture.
 * I won't oppose because of it, but I think it's safe to assume a parasol in Star Wars is the same as a parasol in the real-world, so you could always pipelink the second use of the term "umbrella" to that article. Up to you, though. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 02:42, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, one more thing: Is the umbrella-creature wearing yellow knickers? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 00:28, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it appears it is. Do you think that's worthy of mention?
 * I would; just say that the specific one that Wicket scared was wearing a pink garment about its loins or something. I'm not sure how to phrase it, since it's not necessarily underwear. Just be careful to avoid suggesting that this is somehow typical; for all we know Kneesaa dressed it and this is her pet or something. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 02:42, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Added a brief phrase about it; see what you think.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:51, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the copy-edit and the review! I've altered the last sentence of the biology and appearance, so you may want to look at it again and make sure you're okay with it.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:40, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks fine! ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 02:42, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified butterfly-like creature

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:36, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The image quality kind of stinks, but it's a good article, I think.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Is that...Ben Skywalker? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:23, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 03:11, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) You may want to mention that they were not the only species of butterfly on Endor. Pink butterfly.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:43, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Added. That may mean I now have to source the article, but we'll see.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:56, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) The revision I made fixed a double "and" in that sentence. Fix it your own way if you don't like mine.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:26, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *I'm sorry, the way you had it written didn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Is there a rule I'm missing about having two "and"s in the same sentence? The sentence is not grammatically incorrect from what I can see.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:30, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Having two ands in a sentence makes it a run-on sentence, which is grammatically incorrect. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:35, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Not if they're referring to two different things. Saying "the creature was strong and powerful and fast" is incorrect because they're all separating adjectives. On the other hand, saying "the creature was strong and powerful, and could move quickly" is fine. I personally think the sentence was fine the way it was, but I rewrote it anyway.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:46, April 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Actually, "the creature was strong, powerful, and could move quickly" would be correct. Exceptions to this rule include only situations where there is an extremely long list of closely related traits and it would be impractical to split it up or if two duos are being referenced ("Bill and Ted ran away from Tom and Huck"). These should still be avoided like the plague whenever possible, with the absolute maximum number of "and"s being three, for three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Regardless, your fix is fine. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:47, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bob
 * I'm not sure it's OK to link Unidentified frog-like creature as "frog" since we have frogs in Star Wars that may be different. I'd change it to "frog-like creature" or something.
 * I've changed the original link from "frog" to "frog-like creature", but left the rest as just frog. Think that's okay?
 * I'd use a synonym if possible (like frog-like creature, or the creature, or the prey, etc.). It would be OK if we didn't know that frogs exist in Star Wars; I don't want folks to assume we mean that these are the same species. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 02:39, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, take a look now.
 * Again, can you source the BTS to "A Star War CELibration"? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 00:33, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I was hoping to avoid sourcing the article altogether, but if you think it's necessary, I can. I'll let you respond again before I go ahead with it. Thanks!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:46, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry. I do think it would be best practice to cite something for the air dates. Unlike with modern stuff, we don't have episode guides online to provide this information easily to readers, so it's probably best to cite the Insider article to be safe. Sorry if this makes a bunch of extra work for you... ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 02:39, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nah, no problem. I've brought other articles like this to GA without sourcing the BTS, but it doesn't really matter. Added.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 02:48, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

THX Ultrasound Speaker

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:39, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I win at random articles forever. Not as much as Trak, but in my own way.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hologram Fun World FTW! ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 02:54, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Dammit, Jeff, you're such a buzzkill
 * 2) *I hate to be that guy. I know that it's obvious. But can you reword the last sentence of the bts so that it doesn't explicitly say "It is a reference" ? There are definitely ways to say it without flat-out making that assumption; I'm not really sure what the best way is, but any sort of creative attempt on your part'll probably do the trick. Sorry to be a lame-o. Mentioning some other examples of the reference throughout canon and saying that this one is one of many might help. You could reference this page for some backup. Menkooroo 12:12, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **I understand, and I thought someone would probably bring this up. How's this? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:10, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'm not sure if I can link to speaker here. The article on them is about speakers in X-wings, so should I just change that to be more general? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:39, April 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Look at the article again! :D Menkooroo 12:12, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, golly gee, I must have been blind when I first read that over. :P NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:10, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified Vrassh Jedi

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 12:28, April 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: An unidentified member of the New Jedi Order

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) NJO Jedi! Menkooroo 06:26, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 02:58, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Since Luke identifies him as "one of my students," can you bring Luke into the picture before the end of the paragraph? Menkooroo 03:27, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. I don't think that this is sufficient to list to LS in the Master field in the infobox. Do you agree? It seems more a general reference to me. --Eyrezer 05:52, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I agree. Also, I removed the link to "Grand Master," as Luke wasn't technically the "Grand Master" until 36 ABY. Good work, baby! Menkooroo 06:26, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Bith Jedi (13 ABY)

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 07:12, April 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another unidentified member of the New Jedi Order

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 03:01, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

BlasTech Gikosphere

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:04, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Pfff. And you thought I was done with Limmie.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Always support soccer articles.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:16, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * I'm still looking for someone who has read 501st: Imperial Commando and remembers the part where they talk about Limmie. Don't worry. This can be completely confidential. Please. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:04, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Happy to help, Naru. What do you want to know?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:14, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I need to know what it says on the Match Master's role in play. The book may use the word "referee", but it is the same thing. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:17, April 10, 2011 (UTC)