Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Unidentified Sith Knight


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Unidentified Sith Knight

 * Nominated by: Jinzler 13:50, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Basically, I want to check out this new process

(3 GCs/5 Users/8 Total)
Support
 * 1) Thefourdotelipsis 13:51, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Imperialles 14:38, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Boring sigs above this vote. :P -- 1358  (Talk) 16:18, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ~ SavageBob 17:26, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5)  Xicer9 Atgar.svg( Combadge) 22:02, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:30, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) -- TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 11:11, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8)  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 17:59, June 6, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Can we get a date of publication for his one and only appearance in BTS? Perhaps some context for how and why he is mentioned in the OS? ~ SavageBob 16:25, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Added --Jinzler 16:34, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * Hey Jinzler can I get your opinion on this? Frankly, I think bolding a conjectural title is useless and looks bad. Highlighting the work "person" doesn't really help a reader in any way. Maybe conjectural titles simply shouldn't be bolded at all. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 10:30, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with you fully. I only put in bold here because of the precedents set by other articles, but it does seem to be a bit unneccessary and doesn't really achieve much. --Jinzler 17:55, June 6, 2010 (UTC)