Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

 The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.


 * /History
 * /2005 History
 * /2006 History
 * /Queue

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well written and detailed
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style and the Layout Guide
 * 5) &hellip;not be the object of any ongoing edit wars
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc)
 * 7) &hellip;have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box
 * 8) &hellip;have no more than 3 redlinks
 * 9) &hellip;have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles
 * 10) &hellip;not have been previously featured
 * 11) &hellip;be completely referenced with tags for all available material and sources.
 * 12) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced
 * 13) &hellip;provide at least one quote on the article; a leading quote at the beginning is required. Only one quote would be allowed at the beginning of each section at max, although quotes may be placed in the middle of the article.
 * 14) &hellip;include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles.
 * 15) &hellip;include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available.
 * 16) &hellip;pass review by the Inquisitorius review panel.

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under! Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

HK-47
Support Object
 * 1) Darth Ceratis 23:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 21:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) RC 2413 15:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Question-in the quote source under 'Personality and Traits', is 'squishy' supposed to be italicised?Grand Moff Rhell 17:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  .  .  .  .  23:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) SkywalkerPL 11:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) --CommanderGree117 17:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Starwarsrulez 18:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Statement: I support this. KEJ 18:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Jedi master Rimsek   [[Image:Chiss Insignia.jpg|20px]] My rantings 19:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) DAWUSS 18:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Nejee16 23:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Tyg13 00:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) Nice   Stake black   msg 00:14, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It has two red links. Fix those and I'll vote.-- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 12:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Main image is unsourced. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I got rid of the red links. I am currently working on finding the main image's source info.Darth Ceratis 20:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd really like that image sourced and all of the images to use the Information template. Besides that, this seems pretty good. 05:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
 * All images are sourced now, according to the Information template.Darth Ceratis 21:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro seems a little short. 14:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro made longer. 15:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * In line with the new rules, this article needs to cite its sources. QuentinGeorge 06:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The new rules don't apply here, per Ataru's comments at the bottom section.-- IG-Prime (IG-2000)[[Image:Arakyd Industries.jpg|17px]] 12:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Uhhh, well QuentinGeorge disagrees, and it is his right to object to it. You could perhaps ask the Inquisitorius to strike it. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Too long of an intro (Rule 7) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed (sort of). The intro's still long, but I tinkered with the opening paragraph, and it should be concise, yet informative enough to get the necessary points across.  Or maybe I'm so totally wrong that there isn't even a word for it.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 03:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It's still too long. Condense it to about half of that size! Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The opening paragraph or the entire opening section? Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 06:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This is a little strange: It was too short, so we lengthen it, then new rules come in and it's too long...can we just use the intro as it was originally?Darth Ceratis 02:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The intro is the first section of prose immediately before the main body, and it should be about 6-9 decent sized sentences, IMO. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. never mind what I said earlier, the original intro has nothing with Trials of Obi Wan.Darth Ceratis 23:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Bad introduction (rule 7). --Imp 20:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've tried to cut back on the information, but it is extremely hard. Anyone have any suggestions? 02:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Don't cut back just organize it so it is more coherent.-- Dooku (Solar Sailer)[[Image:Huppla Pasa Tisc.jpg|17px]] 05:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I trimmed it a bit more; see if it's acceptable now. jSarek 05:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Could use both image and prose cleanup (Rule 1), particularly in the "From Master to Master" section.  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not really sure what's wrong with any of it at this point. It looks fine to me, I can't see any way to improve it more.Darth Ceratis 18:44, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Question-in the quote source under 'Personality and Traits', is 'squishy' supposed to be italicised?
 * Yes. It's italicized in the subtitles when he says it in the game.Darth Ceratis 21:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. There's three new redlinks concerning bits associated with Trials of Obi Wan. I'm really not too knowlegable about that part of this, so I'm not sure if there even need to be links there or if articles should be created. If someone could take a look at them and fix them, I'd be grateful.Darth Ceratis 01:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I removed the links. I see no standing objections, can this go on the queue?Darth Ceratis 02:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There are some new rules which are in place, one of which is approval by the Inquisitorius. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Form V: Shien / Djem So
Support
 * 1)  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 02:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Vatrir 16:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Objections Comments
 * Needs sourced, (Rule 11) fix all the present tense, (Rule 4). Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I think I've taken care of all usages of the present tense, but let me know if I missed any. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 23:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I still see several mentions of "is" and "are." Most of those happen when something is written OOU- which is also a violation of Rule 4. Example: "It is known that Anakin Skywalker mastered. . . " It would be better to re-write this as "Anakin Skywalker mastered . . . ", IMO. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 00:26, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Right, I'll go over it again later when I get a minute. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No sourcing, small introduction, first two images are terrible screenshots. .  .  .  .  08:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Unencyclopedic tone (Rule 1).  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I just recently overhauled this article, so if anyone sees any problems that I missed, I'd appreciate your input. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 02:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * KotOR II quotes would be nice. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

The Haunted Village
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 02:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Same problem I had with it last time: The plot "summary" is a play-by-play. .  .  .  .  08:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Except that you never made that objection last time! "I think it's fine now". :p --Eyrezer 09:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I lied. .  .  .  .  09:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * There's a redlink in the intro, and 2 others in the Appearances section. Darthchristian 08:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been up for FA before, but it failed because it didn't have enough pictures. I have since added more pics to it and made a couple of changes. The discussion on the old FA nom can be seen here (for convienience), or the original page here . As to the objection about redlinks that is bound to come, there is 3 redlinks in the article: 2 are there twice so it looks like 5, but isn't. --Eyrezer 02:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * All those things under "Appearances" that aren't linked, should be. And then, they shouldn't be red. -- Ozzel 02:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Voren Na'al
Support
 * 1) jSarek 04:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 04:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Ozzel 05:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) .  .  .  .  06:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Lord Hydronium 07:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  - breathesgelatin Talk 21:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 14:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Objections
 * Needs a main image better proportioned for the FA box on the main page. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 22:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Now has a square bust shot for infobox, with old full image moved to bottom of article. jSarek 06:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Same as for Ms. Captison...I don't think the butchered infobox image is of good quality when it's not the full image. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 16:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Somebody make up my mind. Square image, or the complete original image? Or some cut-off point in between?  jSarek 19:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Voren Na'al 21:12, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think I've got everyone's favorite history major up to snuff, or at least up to snuff enough that objections will be manageable. jSarek 04:10, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Gaeriel Captison
Support
 * 1) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Shaelas (Ahto City)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 16:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) .  .  .  .  22:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 22:31, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Cull Tremayne 02:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) --Eyrezer 03:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Lord Hydronium 05:11, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Support with the current infobox image.  14:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) I don't think the butchered infobox image is of good quality when it's not the full image. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *"Must include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available." It has two other images that are as good as they're getting. That's a reasonable number. Plus the infobox image quality is highly subjective and your impartiality in this matter is suspect. Therefore even if anyone takes this objection seriously, which we don't, it's still irrelevant. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 00:18, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **I actually agree with Jaymach on this. For precedent on keeping the full image, see Isolder. --Eyrezer 12:31, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Err, what? So because Isolder has a freakishly proportioned infobox image, Gaeriel Captison should too? -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 15:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) ****I don't see the point in sacrificing a perfectly good image for the sake of a week it will appear on the front page of the site. The full image looks much better than the cut up one, and if the only reason is so that it appears "good" on the Main Page...well...that's not an improvement to the article. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 18:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Not all infoboxes are the same length. Look at Millennium Falcon. for instance. The short pic there looks "freakishly" short compared with the infobox. --Eyrezer 01:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * '''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Gaeriel Captison 04:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Fully sourced! There simply aren't many pictures of this lady though, but I did what I could. Beg, borrow, but not steal! Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Very nice. Cull Tremayne 02:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Arbra
Support Oppose
 * 1) Lord Hydronium 06:50, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  06:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer 07:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC) Great work
 * 4) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 11:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Cull Tremayne 11:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC) -- He's too quick. He makes us look bad. Great work. :-P
 * 7) Nicely done in such little time! Themelle444 14:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Not good work. Excellent work. 14:16, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Arbra 00:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Carth Onasi
Support
 * 1)  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 04:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) In spite of the shoddy infobox pic. .  .  .  .  11:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Looks good. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  14:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Shaelas (Ahto City)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 00:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Choppy prose: "Carth was born on Telos IV. He had a wife, Morgana, and son named Dustil. He served in the planetary militia and later in the Republic Navy. His first posting was in an orbital watchstation over Serocco." -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I did a general copyedit. Does this address your objection? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Changed the infobox pic to show the background. Better?  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 18:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think he meant as in it's not a head shot/portrait. But the alternative is either game screenshot or Carth with a lazy eye. Take your pick. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 20:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * At any rate, a shorter pic will be needed for the FA template. .  .  .  .  21:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that image works best for the infobox personally, but I've also added an in-game headshot, and there's always this one for the FA template.  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 21:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll grab one later today. Like I did for Bastila's infobox image. Thankfully what I have in mind is the very first module...-- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 21:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Kaox Krul
Support' Oppose Comments
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 11:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 12:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) .  .  .  .  06:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh, I wanna see more inline citations. .  .  .  .  21:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced P&T. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Even with only one source? Oh fine. :-P Cull Tremayne 21:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sourced P&T and used inline citations for contestable points and after each section. Even though it was all with the same source. Cull Tremayne 22:48, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This apparently failed previously because someone believed it was "too short" and because it was NPOV in the P&T section. I've tried to expand the article a little, especially the intro, and I removed most of the absolute phrases from the P&T, so hopefully that should satisfy those objections.

Dark Side Elite
Support Oppose
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 11:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 12:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Themelle444 14:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Lord Hydronium 20:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Havac 20:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) .  .  .  .  21:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) DARTH SIDIOUS2 15:06, 26 March 2007 (2007)
 * 8) TMOFFT 15:08, 26 March 2007 (2007)
 * 9) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Dark Side Elite 20:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Human
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian 7:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Doesn't cite sources. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 15:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * As per Imp. .  .  .  .  21:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Guardian of Forever
Support Oppose
 * 1) Cull Tremayne 04:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) A well-written article on something I knew nothing about; I'm oddly impressed to find something like this. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 08:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) This is the kind of FA I like to see! .  .  .  .  09:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Not all paragraphs have citations. Fix that, and I'll be happy to support. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I sourced the end of the first paragraph. If you're referring to the second and last paragraphs in the Bio, the entire text is cited at the end of the paragraph, since it all comes from one source in both cases. Or do you want redundant sourcing throughout both those paragraphs? Cull Tremayne 17:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Never mind, just did it anyway. Cull Tremayne 17:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * A big old beast on the front page...yeah, that's what we need. :-P Cull Tremayne 04:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but you know every pathetic little Trekkie who comes here to check up on their betters is going to think someone ripped off the name from that big hunk of rock they used for a time machine in the original series. We'll never hear the end of it.  On the other hand, I don't suppose the opinions of people who believe that a right turn qualifies as "evasive maneuvers" mean very much. ;)  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 08:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * On a more serious note, I have noticed a few things which could stand a second look (the occasional missed comma, and it would scan better if a synonym or two for "city" were introduced), but nothing a quick once-over wouldn't catch. By the time the vote's over, I can see this one measuring up. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 08:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean about the word "city", I tried to replace several instances of it. Commas are a little harder to spot. Cull Tremayne 17:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Burl Ives
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) Yay! Burl Ives! .  .  .  .  23:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) If only to encourage a consistent policy with regard to barely-SW-relevant RL people, I vote yes. Yes! Excelsior to Burl! &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 00:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) To spite 4dot Because it contains too much information that's not relevant to a Star Wars encyclopedia. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 23:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Pfft. The article deals with Burl Ives. Ives participated in Star Wars. The article is legit. Why can't the expansion be so? .  .  .  .  23:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I have no problem with non-SW content. The problem is that aside from one line, it doesn't address the Star Wars content at all. His voice work for SW needs to be a bigger focus. Havac 00:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) *His...few lines in a telemovie which has absolutely no documentation whatsoever? .  .  .  .  00:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) **Yes. Havac 00:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Second objection...too many redlinks...while they don't appear red, they link to non-existant Wikipedia articles. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Burl Ives is, like, teh mohtst imhportant pserson in Schtar Whores. He must be ohn teh main paeg! .  .  .  .  23:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)