Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Jacen Solo (second nomination)

Jacen Solo
Objections
 * 1) EAGLES610 01:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) SFH 02:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) MyNz 9:52, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Wstonefi 20:41, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Breathesgelatin 14:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Pretty nice... Would just like to know where Image:Jacen2.jpg, Image:Jacensolo.jpg, Image:Star wars jacen solo1.JPG and Image:Jacen3.jpg came from. And a nicer oraganized BTS could be nice. --UVnet 06:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * How is it that you came to be appointed Featured Article moderator? Community discussion? Administrator vote? Bureaucratic fiat? Can I see the text of the discussion that appointed you featured article moderator? -- SFH 15:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? Featured Article moderator? Am I not allowed to join discussion for EVERY featured article? If there is some sort of limit, may I please be informed? --UVnet 07:49, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * This isn't an objection on my part, but UVnet, all those pictures have sources listed on their respective image pages. I recognize at least the two from the Young Jedi Knights series as definitely being genuine. If you're concerned about the others, a google image search might help. Search for Japanese Cover of whatever book. - Breathesgelatin 22:18, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
 * They got their sources only because I asked for them. They weren't there before. --UVnet 07:49, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I reorganized the BTS. What do you think? I wasn't totally sure what you meant by reorganize but I did my best. I don't necessarily know that there's anymore information to be included in the BTS... - Breathesgelatin 14:44, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * To tell you the truth... this is one hell of an article. --UVnet 21:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * I spent some time on the intro, and I think that it's a great article with some nice information on a good character. EAGLES610 01:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Pretty indepth on some places, but I admittedly have a problem with the Legacy section, on how it is pretty much a culling of the publisher's summary. Still, with Betrayal out soon, someone will fix it. -- SFH 02:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I really didn't know what could be done about the Legacy section, considering the thing isn't out yet. EAGLES610 02:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Never mind, that has been fixed. -- SFH 20:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)