Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Alliance to Restore the Republic


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Alliance to Restore the Republic
Support
 * 1) Red Head Rider 16:07, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks 18:20, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Objections
 * Imp 13:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Herbsewell 21:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Adamwankenobi 22:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Jedi Dude 18:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * For one of the most important governments in SW history...I feel that more is needed. But there is a good foundation here. .  .  .  .  12:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Longer intro, better arrangement of the images, text expansions, fix some of the more obvious redlinks . . . Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Needs more sources, possibly even some shortening of certain sections (known bases and such). --Imp 13:54, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Waaaay to short--Herbsewell 23:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Your objections should probably be stated under "Objections" so that everyone can more easily figure out what needs to be fixed. - Breathesgelatin 19:32, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope thats for the comnents bit simply list your name in the objections...kinda like a tally Jedi Dude 18:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No, actually you are incorrect. Look at the model higher up on the page, in earlier nominations. You must state what your objection is so that those who are working on the article know which edits to make. If you state the objections in comments they could potentially get lost. Remember, just one objection invalidates a nomination and prevents the article from being featured, so if you do not describe what your objection is at all, the article cannot ever be fixed so as to be featured. The comments section is best used as a way to describe positive comments or concerns that a user has about the article that are perhaps not problematic enough for the user to formally object. Further, since the system is not numeric (eg, only one objection can invalidate even 20 votes), the idea of a "tally" system is not relevant. Just trying to clarify as I have seen this as a problem on the FA page for a while now. Remember that FA, Good Articles, Improvement Drive, and Quote of the Day all have different procedures.  - breathesgelatin Talk 19:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)