Wookieepedia:Requests for adminship

This page is for requests for adminship.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating a fellow Wookieepedian (or yourself) for adminship.


 * 1) They have an account under a screenname.
 * 2) They have contributed for at least six months to the wiki.
 * 3) They have had at least some major article creations.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have demonstrated an understanding of the community's methods of operation.

Keeping in mind we won't choose admins solely on number of contributions, here is some info that may help with decisions (taken from the stats page on Nov 14, 2005):

Current top ten contributors

 * 1) JustinGann - 12,485 total article edits.
 * 2) Riffsyphon1024 - 10,858 total article edits. (Admin)
 * 3) Kuralyov - 5,895 total article edits.
 * 4) MarcK - 5,621 total article edits.
 * 5) Azizlight - 4,370 total article edits.
 * 6) StarNeptune - 3,895 total article edits.
 * 7) QuentinGeorge - 3,816 total article edits. (Admin)
 * 8) SparqMan total - 3,399 article edits. (Admin)
 * 9) Aidje - 2,993 total article edits. (Admin)
 * 10) Imperialles - 2,930 total article edits.

Please see the Wookieepedia stats page for more recent numbers.

Administrators votes must be unanimous to be accepted.

Support

 * *Raises hand* --Azizlight 14:17, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. In my mind, I honestly thought he was already an admin.  :D  WhiteBoy 00:51, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * "Project Delta Sauce" is admin-worthy by itself. Then there's the fanon hunt, which was a genius idea (I have a burning hatred for fanon, and he made it easier to kill). So, definite support. &mdash;Darth Culator   (talk)  01:21, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Whether we waive the six month rule or not, I say definately Azizlight. QuentinGeorge 09:03, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. We're too young and too in need of good, reliable admins to get hung up on a six month rule. jSarek 10:22, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

 * Oppose. Give it another two months for the six month rule.  WhiteBoy 01:43, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Neutral/comments

 * Move this vote to Support if the admins agree to waive the six-month requirement, and if non-admins can indeed vote on this. I also was under the impression he was an admin already. 8)  &mdash; Silly Dan  02:27, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Support

 * I'll do it too, if you want me. StarNeptune 14:19, 7 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. StarNeptune certainly has done alot of work around here, particularly "admin"-type (read: tedious) work.  WhiteBoy 00:52, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh, heck yes. The way I always see her name plastered all over Recent Changes from all the categorizing work and source tagging she does, I'm surprised she's not one already. &mdash;Darth Culator   (talk)  01:21, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. Whether or not we waive the six month rule, make her one as soon as possible. QuentinGeorge 09:04, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. See Darth Culator's comments above. Adamwankenobi 09:16, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
 * Support. See my comments for Aziz above, and see Darth Culator's comments for further incentive. jSarek 10:22, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

 * Oppose. Give it another month for the six month rule.  WhiteBoy 01:45, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Neutral/comments

 * Move this vote to Support if the admins agree to waive the six-month requirement, and if non-admins can indeed vote on this. She knows the wiki, and has made many useful edits. &mdash; Silly Dan  02:27, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)