Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

CorusMall

 * Nominated by: Alexrd 13:04, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ready for some shopping at the mall? Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 22:06, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) The Premier
 * 2) A few prelims:
 * 3) The second listing of the video game under the Sources section is not necessary and can be removed.
 * 4) Please add the date of the game to the BTS.
 * 5) Since the article is not sectioned, you can add  to hide the table of contents.
 * 6) Please spell out in the BTS that the mission completely contradicts the movie, since we see the Queen leave directly from the landing pad and goes to the Senate, instead of being captured. And you might need the "twoconflicting" tag.
 * 7) That's it for the moment. Hope to see more from you, Alexrd. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 13:38, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Suggested changes made. Alexrd 14:08, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Okay, you need to replace the infobox with the new version.
 * 2) *All you need to do is load a new structure infobox from the standard preload box, which is below the edit screen, and then just copy/paste (carefully) the info to the new one. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:18, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) The use of "this" in the second sentence implies an OOU viewpoint we try to avoid. Could you replace it with "the" or another word.
 * 4) Weren't the mercenaries identified as being part of the Sun Guard? If so, please add context.
 * 5) Context on chokie (that is, food and not a collectible). Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 16:13, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *I'm just suggesting that you specify its a food item. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:18, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Also, context for High Galactic Alphabet in the BTS.
 * 8) *I placed this objection so the reader could understand why it is important the High Galactic Alphabet is used and not Aurebesh. If you feel the difference is not important, then the sentence can just be removed.
 * 9) Looks like I spoke too soon. Once these objections are taken care of, the article will be over 200 words and will need sectioned per the layout guide: intro, description, and history. If it goes over 250 words, it can be taken to the GAN page instead.
 * 10) Thus ends round 2. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 16:13, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) * Points 2 and 3 done, and fixed some links. However, I'm not sure what context is needed for chokie (the article doesn't imply that it's a collectible) and High Galactic Alphabet. And I'm not familiar with a new version of the infobox. Could you help me out? Alexrd 10:31, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) **See above for my tips. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:18, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) *All done. I think I haven't missed anything. Thanks for the help. Alexrd 18:02, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) Very good job, and its still under 250! One more thing though, per the LG, thinks must be linked in both the intro and the body. After you sectioned off the article, Coruscant and Roona are no longer linked in the body. Please find a place for those links in the body. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 19:41, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. Alexrd 21:57, April 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) The deputy premier
 * 2) *What's important to remember about intros is that they aren't a prologue to the rest of the article --- they're an abstract of the article, and everything established in the intro needs to be established in the article as well. Currently, the "History" section reads as if it's building on what's been said in the intro. It mentions "the Roonans," which is confusing without the context that CorusMall is run by Roonan Traders, and it doesn't state that Corusmall is a trade center. Those facts are in the intro, but they need to be established in the article body as well.
 * 3) *An important thing to remember about image captions: Only use punctuation at the end if it's a complete sentence. Normally, this would fall under what we call the clause, but I'll leave it to you so that you always remember in the future. :)
 * 4) *Does this actually contradict the movie? For all we know, a million different things could have happened in between the scenes that we see. This kinda seems more like an Expanded Universe tale of something happening offscreen during the movie rather than a contradiction, similar to books like Tales from Jabba's Palace. Does that make sense? Menkooroo 01:07, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ** Intro and History sections fixed. Regarding the caption, isn't that a complete sentence? And regarding the events, they do contradict the movie since we see in TPM, Amidala entering the air taxi safely with Panaka, Anakin, Jar Jar and the rest. In the game, the air taxi is destroyed. Alexrd 19:35, May 18, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Please expand the introduction.
 * 3) *If the Roonan traders have uniques quotes then they are unique enough to each have their own article. The owner should definitely have his own article.
 * 4) *Any quotes from the traders?
 * 5) *You need to source the article since you have more than one source.
 * 6) *After finishing all of the objections here the article will likely need to go to the GAN page.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:04, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **I don't see how I can expand the introduction without repeating information from the rest of the article.
 * 8) ***The introduction is supposed to summarize the body of the article, so repeating things is okay.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:14, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Maybe, but is it necessary for the nomination of this article?
 * 10) ***Since they work at the mall I believe that they are an important part of the CorusMall article.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:14, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Not about CorusMall itself. But I'll see if I can get one.
 * 12) **The only source is the video game (which I've been told it wasn't necessary to repeat from the Appearances section). The Strategy Guide also describes the same events, so I felt it could be present in the Sources section too. Alexrd 20:59, May 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) ***If you have two sources/appearances then you need to source the article. It does not matter if you only have one of each, they count when checking to see if you need to source the article.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:14, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) *Could you mention what is in the glass cases?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:14, May 23, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Not an objection, but is it worth it creating articles for any of the Roonan traders? Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 16:13, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) * I don't think so, for now. In my opinion they are not relevant enough to the events of the game. Alexrd 10:31, April 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Just a thought; it's true that they're not relevant to the game but if they have quotes and are unique individuals, it's extra "flavor," as I like to say. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:18, April 11, 2012 (UTC)

7-Gee Lounge

 * Nominated by: Alexrd 10:31, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Trés cool. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 18:58, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 19:44, May 20, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Return of the Jedi
 * 2) * Just at a glance, it needs to be properly sourced. Also, you should place the CAnom template on the article. &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 14:16, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Thanks, somehow I forgot. Done. Alexrd 22:33, April 17, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Please remember to also source the info box.
 * 3) **PLease note that next time you need to source the era too.
 * 4) * In Description, mention is a cantina on Tatooine before getting to the bartender.
 * 5) *" The 7-Gee Lounge was also a favourite drinking spot of Teemto Pagalies." Should'nt really be in the Description section. Move it to history.
 * 6) *Good Work. 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 22:51, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ** Thanks and done. Alexrd 23:58, April 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) All along the watchtower
 * 9) * The article needs a tad more context: Who are Watto and Teemto, for example, junk dealer and podracer.
 * 10) * Also, links are missing in the main body: Tatooine and Grand Arena.
 * 11) *This isn't an objection, but for the Appearance section, just note that I used a pipelink to remove the parentheses from the video game.
 * 12) *Keep up the great work. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 17:41, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) **Done. Hope it's all fine, now. Alexrd 19:24, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) ***The links still need added. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 13:33, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) ****Forgot about those. Done. Alexrd 15:35, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) Exiled Jedi
 * 17) *Please expand the introduction.
 * 18) *Please create article for the two musicians.
 * 19) *This article is over 250 words so it needs to go to the GAN page after you finish the objections here.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:58, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Third Pius Dea Crusade

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:44, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  02:48, May 28, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Please create articles for the two redlinks.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * You need to mention everything in the infobox inside of the main article. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:42, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:25, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Fourth Pius Dea Crusade

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:44, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  02:46, May 28, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Context on the Pabol Hutta.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Create an article for Delacta.
 * 5) **Actually, it's Delacrix. Woops.
 * 6) * You need to mention everything inside the infobox in the body of the article as well. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:45, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:33, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Great Northern Crusade

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:44, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:10, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:18, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Kill the redlinks! You can for sure kill all of them in the main article, but I am not sure about the template, as a bunch of them are inderect mention only and currently subject to trach compact. If they get deleted, only keep the Pius Dea crusades in that template that are actualy mentioned.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Source info box completely.
 * 5) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:57, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *Overwhelmed by the number of crusades you nommed.... :) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:49, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Exiled Jedi
 * 8) * Is it refered to as the Seventh Pius Dea crusade in the book?
 * 9) **Yep. "Great Northern Crusade (7th)"
 * 10) * You need to mention the infobox's previous and next fields in the body of the article, but since they are in the trash compactor I guess you should wait. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:50, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Sorry, EJ. Had a long night, ending up an hour out of the way when I stopped for a DQ shake and took the wrong highway :P But the 6th and 8th are dead, so that objection should be done.  Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:38, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) ***No worries.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:18, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

5th Sector Army

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:21, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Gotta love Warfare, with all the Sector Armies. Now, if I can just figure out which Sector Armies go with which Systems Armies...

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  14:27, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * You need to add a Behind the scenes section.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Context on Odik, also it in the infobox you say they were headquartered at Odik II. Which is correct?
 * 5) **Apparently, Odik's a star. Guess they meant Odik II or the Odik system. I changed it to Odik II, since that's the only planet we know in the system.
 * 6) ***Does the source say Odik? If it does then you probably shouldn't mention Odik II.
 * 7) ****Changed it to Odik system, to be safe. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:50, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * You need to mention the Galactic Republic and the Galactic Empire in the body of the article.
 * 9) * Perhaps you should create an article on "Reserve Sector Army". -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:20, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) **Already did, but Tranner suggested merging the Reserve, North Campaign, and Southern Campaign Sector Armies into the Sector Army page. I kind of have to agree, but that's something I'll figure out when I rework the Sector Army page. For now, I'll leave it linkless.  Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 14:43, May 25, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * If there are Shield of Lies references then please, put the novel in the appearances section. Also if so is true, then that implies the Guide wasn't its first appearance. Correct it :) Winterz 15:49, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **I understand your confusion, Winterz&mdash;look at the placement of the tag. Shield of Lies apparently states that Moff Gann fell out of power in 18 ABY, so I referenced the info about Gann to the book. I'm pretty sure the idea of Sector Armies didn't exist when that book was written, so it wasn't mentioned there. The reference was just context on Gann. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 14:43, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Nipper

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:27, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A quick one mention species

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Foyvè oil

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:41, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Too many accented characters

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Songfish

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:30, May 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Nights

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Dusk in Kachirho

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:12, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I never did get this one.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) I didn't even know this one existed.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  02:05, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash;  06:57, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Hutt Greed

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 13:53, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The other eight will likely follow.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  14:25, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Mystic Corellia

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 16:25, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Last of a series.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:38, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Études of Time and Space

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:09, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:ENT and Nights

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 12:30, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Cast Wing in Flight

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 15:52, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number 2 of the ship concept art painting series

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Flesh Raider Bladewielder

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:19, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I find him rather epic. Awesome pose, no quotes, and he actually puts up a fight... but not too much of a fight. STUPID FLESH RAIDER CHIEFTAIN.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments