Template talk:Rendili spaceship classes

"Rendili Battleship"

 * I'm removing this reference, as fanon.
 * ... the largest battleships and special weapons platforms were built at other, more sophisticated space construction centers in other systems, notably the Kuat Drive Yards and the Rendili and Loronar space construction facilities The Illustrated Star Wars Universe''
 * Loronar, KDY and Rendili together build "battleships and special weapons platforms" bigger than ISDs. No guarantee that Rendili build battleships, rather than large "weapons platforms", which we know they did: see under "space stations", and compare the Loronar torpedo sphere. --McEwok 13:47, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The quote says they built battleships and special weapons platforms at these three sites, among others. The quote does not say that each site built one type or the other, that is fanon. I'm reverting your vandalism and encourage you to keep it up, so I can have you banned. VT-16 16:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't call it vandalism, I'd call it a disagreement over content. In this case, however, I think VT-16 is correct. I'd advise you to leave it basically as is. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 16:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, ok, the definitions of what constitutes "vandalism" may vary, but the fact remains that we have an actual canonical source for battleships and special weapons platforms being built by all three companies (and probably more given the qoute listing them as "notable"), rather than having it say one or the other. Just because it's not mentioned in more than one source, doesn't discount the source when there's nothing that speaks against it, in canon. VT-16 16:35, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The case isn't as airtight as you seem to think: we only have a source indicating that three or more companies were responsible for battleships bigger than ISDs and special weapons platforms. We also know that KDY built SSDs, Rendili built various armed space stations, and Loronar made torpedo spheres. Your interpretation and McEwok's could both be valid, absent any other evidence. The possibility of Rendili and Loronar battleships (and KDY weapons platforms, for that matter) should be kept as more than just a redirect in keeping with our generally inclusionist policies, but a disclaimer should probably be added to those articles indicating that the exact class names are unknown and their existence is possible/probable/arguable unless other sources can be found. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 16:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)