User talk:Cade Calrayn

 Find archived discussions here: I | II | III

Barsen'thor
What powers did you delete from the guy? I just wanna know, you probably did the right thing and I don't want to doubt you but I just need to know. Mattto123 06:25, May 29, 2012 (UTC)

Alliegence
Why did you return the Allegiance page to the red links category? I checked the whole thing and there is not one red link on the whole page. Please explain. Fire-lord (If no one talks thing out, how will we ever have world peace?) ; 00:25, May 30, 2012 (UTC)

How long would you have me wait, because i thought that the motto was be bold, i'm not going to make a major change on a controversal page like palpatine without asking for people's thoughts, but Allegiance is a minor page and the move i made was the obvious one to make. I apologize if i'm being rude but the move speaks for itself. Fire-lord (If no one talks thing out, how will we ever have world peace?) ; 00:51, May 30, 2012 (UTC)

Ouch, sorry about that, i truly did see that. a thousand apologies. Fire-lord (If no one talks thing out, how will we ever have world peace?) ; 00:57, May 30, 2012 (UTC)

Re:TORCite
It looks great Cade. No need to put it to a vote; it's a clear improvement but not a major change in style, so it can just be implemented. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 22:36, May 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * That's fine. I would recommend TORcite. Templates are case-sensitive, so decapitalizing the C will make a whole new template. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 22:46, May 30, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Timeline
The CC7567 page is nice, but it's not what I was thinking of. Also, how are other people supposed to find that? The content of that Timeline of media page doesn't seem terribly user friendly in the Clone Wars. That page would be solid if it wasn't for the new Clone Wars stuff. The other page you sent me isn't really a timeline. I'd still like there to be a timeline. The problem that I see on that page is that most of the unverified claims and conflicts are in the Clone Wars. If we removed that, it would be easier for other people to use the page. I do appreciate your feedback on it. That's why I wanted to wait a week before just doing it. I've already done my personal projects. Quite frankly, that page has bothered me for over a year now. --EwokSithLord 01:31, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * Then, uhh... you might want to look at that page. It contains the original research tag.  I'm almost positive it was added because of the Clone Wars things.  A lot of them used to have dates given, but they were replaced with "Exact placement currently unknown."  Also, by that alone, the new Clone Wars media should be removed.  There is an existing official Clone Wars timeline that was printed in the front covers of many of the novels.  That conflicts with the new media.  By creating a new page, you could use this official timeline until a new official timeline is established to include the new Clone Wars media.  That's basically what I want to do.--EwokSithLord 01:43, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm doing my best to stay objective here. Based on my interpretation, the presence of TCW on there is only based on speculation.  As of right now, the only thing we can put on there that isn't speculation is the original timeline.  I'm not debating that it's canon.  I learned three years ago that that is a lost cause.  Oh, and I don't want to add dates to that material.  I gave up trying to figure that out (in one of my personal projects). --EwokSithLord 02:13, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * If by "exactly what you're trying to do," you mean what I posted in the sandbox, that is a copy and paste from the timeline. It's no better/worse than what's already there. --EwokSithLord 02:21, May 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * I just want to say something outside of all this so you don't take any of it the wrong way. I'm not arguing with you.  I just sort of...debating to reach a better conclusion. ...if that makes sense.
 * --EwokSithLord 02:25, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

All you have to do is explain how TCW isn't original research/speculation. That's basically the ground I'm standing on right now. If you can explain to me how TCW is not original research/speculation, you win this debate. I'm not unreasonable. I will drop this whole thing and delete the documents containing the code patches I've created for the timelines. --EwokSithLord 02:48, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

Ah, so you're the one who keeps changing my edits to Obi-Wan's Lightsaber training section. Charmed. In any event, I'd refer you to my explanation at the bottom of the Talk page, where you'll see (hopefully) that it's not a matter of POV, but rather established fact.

Darth Creditor 04:03, May 31, 2012 (UTC)

WotM
Hey Cade, congrats on WotM! Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 01:24, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Congrats on the award, Cade, keep up the great work!&mdash; 06:59, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Pyrrhic
I did not know you reacrired souces for every word; but I will stop editing that page. Although I do think that battle was hard won thoudh no canon souces say the word Pyrrhic. Would it not be considered pyrrhic due to the Repuplic's heavy loses? 108.147.8.3