Wookieepedia:Good article nominations



This page is for the nomination of good articles. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of good articles, see Category:Wookieepedia good articles.

What is a Good article?
A Good article is an article that adheres to quality standards, but cannot reach FA status due to its limited content.

A Good article has the following attributes.

1. It is well written. In this respect:


 * (a) it has compelling prose, and is readily comprehensible to non-specialist readers;
 * (b) it follows a logical structure, introducing the topic and then grouping together its coverage of related aspects; where appropriate, it contains a succinct lead section summarizing the topic, and the remaining text is organized into a system of hierarchical sections (particularly for longer articles);
 * (c) it follows the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies;
 * (d) necessary technical terms or jargon are briefly explained in the article itself, or an active link is provided.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect:


 * (a) it provides references to any and all sources used for its material;
 * (b) sources should be selected in accordance with the guidelines for reliable sources;
 * (c) it contains no elements of original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage, addressing all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FA, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed);.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. In this respect:


 * (a) viewpoints are represented fairly and without bias;
 * (b) all significant points of view are fairly presented, but not asserted, particularly where there are or have been conflicting views on the topic.

5. It is stable, i.e., it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic. In this respect:


 * (a) the images are properly sourced and have succinct and descriptive captions;
 * (b) a lack of images does not in itself prevent an article from achieving Good Article status.

Nomination of Good articles
To nominate an article for Good article status, list it here. Nominated articles must meet all six requirements stated above. If an article has a net total of five votes of support (+5) after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the template. The talk page will also be tagged with the GA template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations please see here.

(+6)
Support Oppose
 * 1) --Eyrezer 09:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) It looks great. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 11:06, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 11:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --Goodwood 14:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 6)  Victor  ( talk ) 00:10, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I really like this nom, but I think it could use a bit of an explanation on the sentience, sapience, etc. thing. Also, is it canon that the majority of species breathe oxygen or OR? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 19:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The oxygen breathers bit is canon from Alien Encounters. It is said OOU to gamemasters advising them on creating their own species but I believe that still qualifies. As to the sentience expansion part, that is a good idea. I wasn't really sure how/where to expand the article and so will look into it. I'm not sure where I'll find canon commentary on it though. I don't think the RPG books I've looked in so far explore it. --Eyrezer 23:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * There's mention of sentience test in Planet of Twilight, if that helps. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 14:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Actually AE says "carbon-breathing" species. Odd. --Eyrezer 23:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I dunno how relevant this is any more, but Ooroo's entry in the POTJ sourcebook states that most species breathed oxygen. --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 15:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * So are all the objections cleared up now? Greyman ( Paratus ) 14:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I've made no addition re sentience so nope. --Eyrezer 08:18, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The "Species Navigation" template should be moved to the bottom, or be changed to a right-floater. The "Article Design" part has little to do with species in the Star Wars galaxy, and should be moved to a tutorial article or the manual of style. --Imperialles 14:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by a right floater? I actually think it works well at the top as a guide. --Eyrezer 09:20, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * See Adminnav for an example of a right floater. --Imperialles 18:49, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed. --Eyrezer 03:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Different.  Chack Jadson  Talk 18:15, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Definately different - but me likes. Could use links in the Notes and References, though.--Goodwood 14:02, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That's an interesting one that. I always leave the links out in my footnotes because that is my preference. --Eyrezer 14:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

(+5)
Support
 * 1) -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 21:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 21:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) -  Graestan  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( This party's over ) 21:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Well-executed, well-referenced; not bad for a GA-level. Though, of course, you've got your work cut out for you if Featured status is the ultimate objective.--Goodwood 22:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) I'll help some more now that I'm back. They grow up so fast! [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 17:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Better, but still ways to go. Prose issues, tense issues, copyedit issues, reference issues, some POV issues, and that's just after a cursory look. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 16:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * We're working on it. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 12:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I've been working on some of the things you pointed out and I think we'll be able to deal with the rest of your objections during the weekend. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 14:19, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Me and Jedimca0 have put a lot of work into this article in the last few weeks, and Graestan has done all the tedious tidying up after us. We recognise that this article has recently failed FA and GA nominations, however, this article is vastly different from the one that was nominated a month ago, and with three different users as the main editors. The article in under new management, so to speak, and although it's not got the comprehensiveness of an FA, we feel it's ready for GA. -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 21:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * My thanks to Acky, Graestan, Jedimca, JMAS, Darth Culator, SoT, Pi, and everyone who's helped get my old pet project this far. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 17:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

(+1)
Support
 * 1) Pelmarn Da&#39;kari 05:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) —Xwing328 (Talk) 01:14, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * I'm fairly certain this could be substantially expanded (Criteria 3). --Imperialles 18:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * In what way? Pelmarn Da&#39;kari 07:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments

(+2)
Support
 * 1) Pelmarn Da&#39;kari 05:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I don't see anything that doesn't meet the criteria. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 14:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) —Xwing328 (Talk) 01:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Could be expanded even further (Criteria 3). --Imperialles 18:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Expanded with what? There is really not much more to be said about the subject as far as I can tell.  Care to elaborate on what you feel is lacking? Pelmarn Da&#39;kari 07:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Further detail can be added to all sections. --Imperialles 14:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments

(+2)
Support
 * 1) Ataru said it might make it through GA.  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers ) 15:25, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Not a bad article aside from the lack of detail that it would need for FA. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 15:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  Chack Jadson  Talk  01:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Not a bad article. Unit 8311 16:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Master Aban Fiolli (Alpheridies University ComNet) [[Image:NewRepublic.png|20px]] 20:07, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Redundant internal links in several quotes. These should be removed per WP:MOS (Criteria 1.c). --Imperialles 19:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Just from a quick glance:
 * 3) *Infobox information needs to be sourced. His homeworld, death, hair color, eye color, and all of his affiliations. Must be fully sourced per GA rule 2(a).
 * 4) *Succession box dates, at the least, should have reference tags&mdash;it wouldn't hurt to provide reference tags for his predecessor and successor as well.
 * 5) *Large parts of the article are too crammed with pictures and take away from the visual flow of it. This is per GA rule 1(c), specifically here.
 * 6) *Remove random pointless image from the Sources section.
 * 7) *Why is the template just randomly placed in BtS? Both it and the  template should be stacked lower in the article where there is abundant space&mdash;such as the "Sources" section.
 * 8) *If there is going to be a section on Jango's vehicles it should be complete. The information right now for Slave I basically says "He got a ship: it was sabotaged; he got a new one; eventually his son took it." what missions did he do with these ships?? Why are they important enough to be in his article? Rewrite and expand with relevant information per GA rule 1(a). Greyman ( Paratus ) 14:20, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Has a general half-done look to it. I.e. the vehicles section --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 15:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Working on the excess linking Imp mentions. -Fnlayson 05:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

(-1)
Support
 * 1) Added 1 source, to the Sources section, so the article now has five sources (I'm talking to you Hobbes195) added two new sections, a Personality and Traits section and a Relationships section. All that needs doing now is having the images sourced. Anyways,Nominated.OOM-10 09:27, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 16:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) It needs to be referenced (requirement 2a). --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 10:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Jedimca. OOM-10, what I meant by sourcing was referencing (see Sourcing), which is a requirement before an article can become a GA. I'm sorry if I was unclear before. It tells you how references work if you follow the link, and if you need help, ask on IRC. And my name's Hobbes15, not 195 ^_^.  Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 04:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) *Fixed. Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 16:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) The text needs to be cleaned up in several places (Criteria 1). There's also far too many images. --Imperialles 19:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) *Per Imperialles, and can somebody brighten up a couple of the images? They're way too dark. Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 21:09, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Comments

(-1)
Support
 * 1) --Domlith 08:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Most of it's sourced, don't see why not. Unit 8311 12:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Skippy Farlstendoiro 15:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) The article needs to be sourced, per the instructions at the top of this page. - Graestan  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( This party's over ) 15:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) One of the images needs to be sourced (requirement 6a) and the article needs to be referenced (requirement 2a). --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 15:40, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) The intro could also be expanded. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 14:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Mostly sourced does not cut it. For an article to be nominated successfully as a GAN it needs to meet all the requirements at the top. Just because an article has "some" reference tags doesn't make it "good enough". Please source fully and accurately as already pointed out. And per Jedimca0, the intro needs expansion to lay out the main points of the article. Greyman ( Paratus ) 17:12, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Not fully sourced, could be expanded some and pictures look funny --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 15:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Started sourcing according to my best knowledge, but I do not have all the sources at my disposal, so I must rely on the greater knowledge of other users...--Domlith 14:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * There are still two source tags in the article, ones those are sourced I will strike my objection and support this nomination. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 13:30, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I sourced one of them, can't find the source for the second. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 14:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * If there is no source for his height, it can be deleted as speculation, but I suspect that it is in the Official Fact File. Since I don't have it, someone else would be very kind if looked it up there, or anywhere else. Domlith 14:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

(0)
Support
 * 1) I've given it 1 source, 1 reference, and added a bit of information to her Behind the Scenes section. if anything needs doing I'll gladly help now that I've learned the ropes of referencing.OOM-10 14:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Um, you have to ref the whole thing, except the intro, which you don't ref. Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 21:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) *Sorry I'll get to work on it nowOOM-10 09:39, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) **FixedOOM-10 10:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Still not fully referenced. Some paragraphs still need ref tags. Greyman ( Paratus ) 17:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

(+3)
Support
 * 1) -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 21:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 12:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Semi-funny name.  Chack Jadson  Talk 00:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Wouldn't a government infobox be better suited? Also the history section doesn't make any mention as to how the Agency arose. Did it begin out as a tax agency or what? I think the Agency shouldbe mentioned earlier. --Eyrezer 01:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Infobox changed and Agency mentioned early in History section. About the founding, Galaxy Guide 4 doesn't mention anything about its founding. -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 18:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Single source nomination. -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 21:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

(+5)
Support Oppose
 * 1) -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 19:07, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 13:10, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 21:46, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --Goodwood 20:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) --Domlith 15:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) From the Forest of Goodwood
 * 2) * Grammatical error in opening quote.
 * 3) **Fixed.
 * 4) * Prose issues in the introduction; "various shapes and positions because they had one single cell" needs to be rewritten.
 * 5) *Addressed.
 * 6) * Grammatical issue with the first paragraph of "Biology". The second sentence needs to be tweaked.
 * 7) **Addressed.
 * 8) * "because of the speed the exuded pseudopodia" needs to be rephrased.
 * 9) **Addressed.
 * 10) * In general, correct grammar needs to be applied to the uses of the proper name "Ugor" in the article, particularly in the possessive forms.
 * 11) **Addressed, I think, though I may have missed a few; I had to do it twice thanks to my beloved internet connection.
 * 12) * An overall prose readjustment wouldn't go amiss, but it's a good article, generally-speaking.--Goodwood 22:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments

(+3)
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 21:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Domlith 16:27, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --Harrar 19:04, 9 September 2007 (GMT)

Oppose

Comments

(+4)
Support
 * 1) After a good deal of work on it, I think it deserves a nomination. Master Aban Fiolli (Alpheridies University ComNet) [[Image:NewRepublic.png|20px]] 19:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Domlith 16:31, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 20:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  Chack Jadson  Talk  01:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Three things:
 * 2) * Introduction: "The effectiveness of kolto was considered miraculous" Reword this to avoid weasel wording.
 * 3) * The introduction states that kolto was more effective than bacta, yet later in the article it is stated to be less effective.
 * 4) * The article contains no mention of how kolto was utilized for highly effective medpacks in the Old Republic era.
 * --Imperialles 20:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) *Took care of one and two, I think. I'll keep searching on point three. I've seen it somewhere, but can't seem to find the source. Master Aban Fiolli (Alpheridies University ComNet) [[Image:NewRepublic.png|20px]] 20:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) **Kolto is mentioned in KOTOR I as the basis of all medpacs of that era, I believe. --Imperialles 20:43, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ***I took care of at least addressing point 3 with what I've found out so far. I'll keep searching KOtOR, but I've had to replay the game to get to Manaan. I am also trying all the conversations leading up to it as well. If anyone else would like to help, it would be appreciated. Master Aban Fiolli (Alpheridies University ComNet) [[Image:NewRepublic.png|20px]] 17:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments

(-1)
Support

-Darth_Revan- 16:05, 09 September, 2007 (CAT) (User does not meet the minimum number of main space edits required to vote; removing vote per policy.  Greyman ( Paratus ) 17:03, 22 September 2007 (UTC))
 * 1)  Chack Jadson  Talk  00:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Needs to be sourced. --Imperialles 14:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Needs sourcing, and it's just too short.  Chack Jadson  Talk  23:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) A few thing need to be improved:
 * 4) * The article needs to be referenced (Requirement 2a).
 * 5) * The intro could be expanded.
 * 6) * One of the images needs to be properly sourced (requirement 6a)
 * 7) *And, like you said in the comments section, The article needs to be expanded. After you have improved these things I'll review the article again. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 13:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) **Fixed everything but the article expansion.  Chack Jadson  Talk 01:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) ***Good work. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 14:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I like this article, but it would be nice if it could be expanded a bit. -Darth_Revan- 16:05, 09 September, 2007 (CAT)
 * It's just too short. I've worked on it, but I'm not a good enough writer to expand it sufficiently.  Chack Jadson  Talk 23:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

(+2)
Support
 * 1) As nominater.  Chack Jadson  Talk 22:21, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) It may deserve to be even featured. --Domlith 19:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Too many/too big pictures. They make the article look a wit awkward. -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 17:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Fixed.  Chack Jadson  Talk 23:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments

(+4)
Support
 * 1) Nomination. Master Aban Fiolli (Alpheridies University ComNet) [[Image:NewRepublic.png|20px]] 00:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, the first time an article I worked at reaches the GAN! I am almost ashamed. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 17:31, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Greyman ( Paratus ) 16:59, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 15:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Just a couple of things:
 * 2) *The article needs to be fully sourced per GAN requirements.
 * 3) *The intro could stand to be quite a bit longer than the current one sentence.
 * 4) *Infobox information needs to be sourced.
 * 5) *Though it's not really an objection, but more of a comment, would it be possible to get a P&T and P&A out her information?
 * 6) ** Greyman ( Paratus ) 00:44, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Oops. Forgot to upload the sourced version from the changes. I think I expanded the introductory paragraph a little bit more. Does this help? Master Aban Fiolli (Alpheridies University ComNet) [[Image:NewRepublic.png|20px]] 01:02, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) ****Okay, I thinks all fixed up. Thanks, Greyman. Master Aban Fiolli (Alpheridies University ComNet) [[Image:NewRepublic.png|20px]] 17:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments

(+5)
Support
 * 1) Nominating. --Azizlight 07:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Looks good. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 17:37, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --Domlith 12:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 15:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Greyman ( Paratus ) 19:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * Go easy on me, it's the first time I've done this. --Azizlight 07:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Article is good, but I have one request. Would it be possible to merge some of the smaller paragraphs together? Other then that it looks fine -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 17:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm assuming the name comes from the Harry Potter character. Is there a source anywhere stating that is in fact the case?  Chack Jadson  Talk 23:34, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if it's a common name in Britain or not... anyway as far as I know there has never been an official connection made. --Azizlight 06:52, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

(-2)
Support
 * 1) Almost fully sourced, it looks splendid.--Domlith 12:18, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) As someone who has this article on his to-do list, it could be expanded a lot. Also has a, and the common names section should be made into a prosified paragraph. -- [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|40px]] dmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 17:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Needs expansion.  Chack Jadson  Talk 19:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) "Almost fully sourced"? Ugh, no. Please fully source any article before nominating it. And yes, expansion is needed for this as well. Greyman ( Paratus ) 16:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments

(+6)
Support
 * 1) Alas, not enough info out there for FA, but I think I've got this up to the GA standard. jSarek 11:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  Chack Jadson  Talk  01:55, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 15:26, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --Goodwood 12:23, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Greyman ( Paratus ) 13:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 15:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

(+5)
Support
 * 1) Nominated--Goodwood 23:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I can't speak for the breadth of coverage (the KOTOR era is not my strong suit), but, after a little light cleanup, this looks pretty good as far as the rest of the criteria go. jSarek 13:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Greyman ( Paratus ) 13:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 15:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 18:14, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * I know this article needs more and better images, but I'm saving that for the FA nomination if I can help it. I haven't yet gotten that far in my recent playthrough.--Goodwood 23:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

(0)
Support
 * 1) Nominated. Sourced virtually everything and crammed as much info as possible in there. Unit 8311 16:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) I've only scanned through it, so I may have more objections at a later date. The known Magna guards needs to be sourced, and in my opinion, should be made into a prosified paragraph, though that's more of a request. Also, there's no references from the databank: if there is additional info there, then it needs to be added. Also has a blank reference and an unsourced image--  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 16:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Sourced that. Most of the info from the databank is already in there and in other sources, so that's not that necessary. De-blankified the reference and sourced the image. Unit 8311 16:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments