Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Vendaran

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 10:28, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 14:26, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:05, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:16, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Well-done. Any thoughts on Bob's question, though? Menkooroo 05:55, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Toprawa:
 * 2) * Do we have any establishment of whether it's "Near-Human" or "near-Human"? I see this alternating constantly across the wiki, and that article seems to capitalize more than not. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:47, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Unfortunately, there is no consistency across various sources. I.e.,
 * 4) ***Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game, Second Edition uses "Near-Human".
 * 5) ***Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded uses "near-human".
 * 6) ***The Essential Guide to Alien Species uses "near-human".
 * 7) ***The Star Wars Customizable Card Game uses "near-human".
 * 8) ***Ultimate Alien Anthology uses "near-Human".
 * 9) ***The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia uses "near-human".
 * 10) **I'm happy to work up a CT on this to lear Wookieepedia policy on this, in line with our policy on capitalising "Human". Do yo want to wait for that to pass first before striking? --Eyrezer 00:19, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Very interesting. Thanks for looking into all of that. Please feel free to start a CT if you wish, but the nom probably doesn't need to wait for something so minor. I trust it can be updated if necessary per any decision we may reach. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:16, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) Exiled Jedi
 * 13) *I would have to agree with Bob on checking the Atlas for any post-New Republic history. I just thought I would make this an objection before someone archived the nomination.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:19, January 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Any post-New Republic history that can be gleaned from the Atlas? Since they're colonists, we can't assume anything about the pre-NR stuff, but for that period and later (or at least post-NR), there might be a factoid or two in the maps. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 14:49, November 17, 2011 (UTC)

Peckva

 * Nominated by: - 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 01:27, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Ungulates

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:50, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Tinwe (comlink) 09:57, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Return of the Jedi
 * 2) * Two preliminary objections. One: There needs to be a BTS section.
 * 3) **Completed--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:22, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Two: There needs to be a "Sources" section instead of an "Appearances" section. Material such as The Essential Atlas belong in a Sources section rather than an Appearances section.
 * 5) **Esjs fixed this--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:22, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:42, January 14, 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Lee's charge
 * 2) * Source the second sentence.
 * 3) **Completed--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:22, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Please take a look at Sourcing and apply it on the article.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:24, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ****I've sourced the date of publishing and looked over the sourced aspects of the article. What exactly did you want changed?--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:38, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *****You don't have to source each sentence as long as there is no new source. You can remove the source tag between your two sentences.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:39, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ******Ok, thanks for telling me. It has been removed--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:45, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:18, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) * AFAIK we should not include links to other pages in the body of our articles.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:47, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) **Ok, I put the link in external references. I also removed the category for hunting creatures because it is hunted, and according to the atlas does not hunt.--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:08, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) ***The category applies, because it is for "hunted creatures".  Imperators II (Talk) 13:10, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) ****Whoops. I glanced over it and saw rancor and some wolf, so I assumed it was for the hunters. Thanks for correcting me.--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:12, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) * Who wrote the book? Please add this to the BtS.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:26, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) **Added--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:42, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Daranas

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:04, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Finishing MedStar II

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) --- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:39, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  &mdash;NAYAYEN is back!  16:05, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 23:46, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Tinwe (comlink) 14:07, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * The only problem I can see is that you do not mention that Daranas is female in the body, while it is one of the categories on the page. --- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:16, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Good catch. Adressed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:21, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Is there a link for the battle Offee was anticipating? I can't remember the plot of the Medstar novels :P  &mdash;NAYAYEN  is back!  13:32, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) *There is no link for that special attack, so I linked it to the overall Battle of Drongar.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:08, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Tinwe
 * 7) * Currently, "seer" links to a Yuuzhan Vong rank. Should a more general seer article be created?
 * 8) **Linked and created.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:05, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) * The Clone Wars, or at least the year of the Battle of Drongar, should be mentioned.
 * 10) **Added the year.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:05, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) * Seems like Daranas is based on Cassandra from Greek mythology. Mentioning the similarities in Bts would be a nice addition. Tinwe (comlink) 10:15, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) **Yes, indeed. But AFAIK we are not allowed to include such info as long as it is not stated in a canon source that he has something to with real-life things. Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:05, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) ***Per this CT, you can mention the similarity as long as no direct connection is stated. Tinwe (comlink) 14:20, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) ****Ah, thanks. Added the info, feel free to tweak it if you like.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:10, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) *****Sorry to barge in and make life more difficult for you, but I think you should find a source for that statement.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 16:14, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) ******This is a big problem indeed. I could source it to wikipedia or some sort of book (non-SW), but that would make it difficult to check for others. Therefore I thought it would be better to leave it out. However, if such an statement is required, I'm glad for any help with the sourcing problem.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:16, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 17) *******IIRC, I've seen other users do a Cite web in this type of instance, and source it to a reliable website. I'd suggest perhaps doing a Google search of this person and seeing what you can find.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 16:23, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) ********Thanks for the idea. Did it that way.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:31, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) I noticed you linked Alderaan for Alderaanian. There is a link for Alderaanian if you want to change it. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:12, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Thanks, I changed it.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 15:18, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Andar Suquand

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:35, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Next one

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) --- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:38, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) "I hate sand. Its coarse and it gets everywhere." Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:09, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) I should re-read the Medstar books, I recall them being quite good.  &mdash;NAYAYEN is back!  16:05, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 23:48, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Tinwe (comlink) 10:19, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Is there any way you could work in the comparison between Suquand's saying and the actions of Klo Merit? The comparison is directly made in the book, so it should be fair game.  &mdash;NAYAYEN  is back!  13:50, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Yup, added.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:10, January 16, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

T'un

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 15:34, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Are Jon and I the only two persons who bothered writing articles from the Jedi Apprentice series?

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) --- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 16:34, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) "If the data is not in our Archives, it was probably stolen."--Jocasta Nu. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 20:17, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Irid, but that's just one. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:54, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Nice job remembering Category:Individuals of unidentified species on these articles. :) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 00:40, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Tinwe (comlink) 14:25, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) The Premier
 * 2) * "During that year, several of the data maintained by T'un was stolen, although Jedi Master Qui-Gon Jinn was able to recover them." Several followed by "was" is grammatically incorrect. It needs replaced by "were."
 * 3) **Ah, thanks.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:22, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Also, the following sentence starts with "Jedi Master." Which Master, Jinn or T'un?
 * 5) **Clarified.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:22, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *Great work. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 16:19, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) **Thank you.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:22, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) The Uncertain Path mentions T'un to be "a wizened being of great learning." This should be mentioned, but I'll leave it up to you whether you want to make a separate P&T for it or mention it in the body of the article.  Tinwe (comlink) 10:34, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *Added. Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:06, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) **I tweaked it a little so that it doesn't stick out as much, see if that's okay. Otherwise, looks good. :) Tinwe (comlink) 14:25, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Freedon Nadd's short lightsaber

 * Nominated by:  &mdash;NAYAYEN is back!  23:11, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I'm a little rusty after being gone for a couple of months so don't hit me.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ohai! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:30, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) This lightsaber article is now the ultimate power in the universe. I suggest we use it. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 22:07, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) --- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 21:18, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 23:55, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) The Premier
 * 2) * A few prelims: hyphen between bronze and bladed.
 * 3) **I can has grammar (done).
 * 4) * Could you remove the links from the bolded section? They look too garish, and I think we try to avoid them in articles.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * Infobox-exclusive information that needs to go into the article proper, such as "shoto" and the hilt shape.
 * 7) **Whoops, forgot to note that I'd done this.  &mdash;NAYAYEN is back!  13:52, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) * Is there any more context you can add to the Exile's companions and how/why they stole the lightsaber?
 * 9) **We don't know which companions actually went, and there isn't anything special to how or why they picked it up.
 * 10) *This was a good read. And welcome back! Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 23:21, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Thank you, it's nice to be back =3  &mdash;NAYAYEN is back!  23:56, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) 501st
 * 13) * Needs a Conjecture template, otherwise well written
 * 14) **The title isn't actually conjectural, it's specifically called that in the game.  &mdash;NAYAYEN is back!  22:01, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) *--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 21:08, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) Cal Jedi
 * 17) * If it is not conjectural, then you should bold the full text. &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:03, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) **I had to rearrange some wording but, done.  &mdash;NAYAYEN is back!  17:16, January 17, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * I've added the Gamemechanics template and relevant Bts note after a pointer by Graestan on IRC.  &mdash;NA YAYEN  21:46, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * You still need . And would all the history be under the tag, or just the part about the companions. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 02:33, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Gah, that's what I get for attempting to multitask. It was just the last sentence of the history that needed it. Fixed now.  &mdash;NA YAYEN  03:25, January 21, 2012 (UTC)

Rouggle

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 13:10, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Continuing down The Jedi Path.

(1 ECs/4 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) More!  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:46, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) With a name like Rouggle... Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 16:55, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ...100% juice. 18:41, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) --- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 21:22, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) Not fair? Just deal with it.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 00:45, January 18, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Battle of Zel system

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:38, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In which Xamsters slam some xanthic xylophones.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) --- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 21:20, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:40, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Link Manadlorian Neo-crusaders in Infobox
 * 3) **You probably see objections like this on your nominations, but that's because you're new and we want you to be familiar with things. We call things you can do yourself in less time than it took to write out that sentence, like single links, "sofixits". Good catch all the same. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:28, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **OK, thanks for the heads up--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 21:20, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) *" between the Galactic Republic and Mandalorian Neo-Crusaders that had invaded their space". Change "that" to "who" so the Mandalorian Neo-Crusaders do not sound like a thing and instead of a group of people. Also, maybe change "their space" to Republic space so it is easier to tell who is invading whom.
 * 6) **Changed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:28, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) *Good work--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 21:22, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) Jujiggum
 * 9) * "The battle took place during a Mandalorian campaign to capture the Core World of Duro called Mandalorian Triumph." Grammar here&mdash;it currently suggests that the world of Duro was called "Mandalorian Triumph."
 * 10) **Fixed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:00, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) * I feel like this: "&hellip;from which they moved on to victories in the Commenor system and the Quellor system. They then triumphed in the Exodeen system and staged their successful conquest of Duro from there." is a bit more information than is really warranted by the article's subject. If both of the battles at Commenor and Quellor immediately followed the one at Zel, then that part is alright (although the infobox suggests that only Commenor followed immediately), but I don't think that the mention of Exodeen is necessary; just a general reference that they succeed in conquering Duro would be fine.
 * 12) **I agree. Removed mention of the success of Duros because keeping it here would pretty much be the same as putting that into the Battle of Eres III. I don't think would be relevant to the battle in question until you get towards the end of the charge. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:00, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) * Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 18:45, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) Imperators II
 * 15) *Please source the fact that Zeltros is located in the Zel system.  Imperators II (Talk) 22:54, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Mera

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:50, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Finishing off the Twitter characters.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Such love cut tragically short. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 22:29, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 18:47, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  &mdash;NA YAYEN  20:41, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * The Premier
 * Please add Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 17:00, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Added. Please sofixit next time. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:32, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * I will. I'm just trying to help shape you into a better article writer. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 22:29, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * If someone considers something to be worthy of an objection, there's nothing wrong with leaving it on the reviewing page.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:40, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Didn't say there was anything wrong with it. Of course he's at liberty to object as he likes. I just mean that if you're going to type out the entire addition to the article here and a touch extra, then you might as well write it in the article. The author will facepalm either way. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:17, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Would this want the Ambig template as TK329 does?  &mdash;NAYAYEN is back!  13:25, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * No. The tie-in was official, therefore canonical, and TK is mismarked. He was actually in the book too, apparently. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:17, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Considering her husband and son were both Human, would it be too much of a stretch to assume that she was one as well? I know, technically she could be of one of the numerous near-Human species, so adding the species to infobox would probably be counted as speculation, but a Bts note might be appropriate. Tinwe (comlink) 09:50, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * There are inter-species couples in Star Wars, and one marriage that I know of. Adoption or Gareth being TK's child from outside this marriage are also possible. While it would make less sense for a Stormtrooper to marry a non-Human, I don't think there's enough circumstancial evidence here to call for a BTS note. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:17, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Huwhaka revolt

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 14:31, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Adventure. Heh! Excitement. Heh! A Jedi craves not these things.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:45, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Among the combatants were the reformed Black Knights, a dark side faction: dark side of what?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 14:36, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Changed to "a faction of dark side Force-users." Hope that's clearer. Tinwe (comlink) 15:02, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Jujiggum
 * 4) * First sentence is a bit redundant.
 * 5) **Trimmed.
 * 6) * "&hellip;who had been destroyed by the Jedi&hellip;" Seeing as this is immediately followed by a reference to their many returns, perhaps "defeated" would be better than "destroyed" here.
 * 7) **I suppose you're right. Changed.
 * 8) * Just to verify: there is no conclusion presented for the conflict? No mention as to the Jedi winning/being successful (even if it doesn't say whether the Black Knights were eradicated)?
 * 9) * And also just to verify: there's nothing on the origin of the name "Huwhaka," is there? Nothing to connect it to the Black Knights or that grants it as a place name, or anything like that?
 * 10) **No and no, to both questions. Be assured, if such info could have been gleaned from The Jedi Path, I would have done it. :) Actually the opening quote of the article is all the book has to say about the revolt. I guess you could take Yoda's mention of "adventure" as a sign that the Jedi were successful, but that might be reading too much into it. Tinwe (comlink) 20:31, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Cool, I just feel obligated to check. :) I'm not going to make an objection out of it, but it might be worth a BTS note to say that the source doesn't actually mention the outcome of the revolt. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:45, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) * Jonjedigrandmaster ( Talk ) 18:56, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Tailring bacon

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:34, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Back to Dex's for a bit of bacon.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
 * Yay, bacon!--- 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 21:04, January 20, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Tarisian surveillance droid

 * Nominated by: &mdash;MJ&mdash; (War Room) Saturday, January 21, 2012, 04:39 UTC
 * Nomination comments: Laugh and support.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Before anyone asks: there's nothing from JJM's notes. &mdash;MJ&mdash; (War Room) Saturday, January 21, 2012, 04:39 UTC

Anonymous rescue worker

 * Nominated by: &mdash;MJ&mdash; (War Room) Saturday, January 21, 2012, 04:39 UTC
 * Nomination comments: Yes, I believe the title is OK; "anonymous" is a valid in-universe descriptor as an IU encyclopedia writing an article from the news story would have to say the same thing, since they didn't give their name to the news.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Before anyone asks: there's nothing from JJM's notes. &mdash;MJ&mdash; (War Room</b>) Saturday, January 21, 2012, 04:39 UTC