User talk:Tommy9281

  '''Greetings,. Please feel free to leave me a message.''' Archived talk: 123

I read between the lines
I don't ever want to see a comment like this from you on another talk page, forum, or election again. I am no fool, nor is Grunny or anyone else who can read that and understands the subtleties of our language. Please, please don't troll so obviously on the wiki again, or I'll be forced to block you. Graestan ( Talk ) 04:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * That comment is out of line, Grae. Especially for someone who makes ambigious statements themselves, such as supporting FANs "In good faith that our arrangement will be carried out." There is no way Tommy's comment is a blockable offence. --Eyrezer 22:21, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * "In good faith that our arrangement will be carried out" always refers to objections I made in IRC, that the user didn't have time to fix quite yet, but I trust them to handle. I don't know or care who's been talking about me behind my back about this baloney, but it's just that&mdash;nonsense&mdash;and I'd appreciate if you'd be so kind as to extend the benefit of the doubt. Furthermore, when it comes to my warning of Tommy, which still stands, all parties involved beyond just what can be seen here right now know the depth of this issue. Graestan ( Talk ) 03:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Revanchist (faction)
Hi, Tommy. I plan to nominate the article for a GA, but I've learned from my nominations of Malak and Bandon, so could you please give me a list of objections for the article that I can take care of before I nominate it?--Jedi Kasra (talk) 14:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

The Sith'ari and Darth Bane
Hey, Tommy. Darth Bane is the Sith'ari, sccording to the Sith'ari entry in The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 16:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * No problemo, Lord Anvil. (Not a bad name for a Sith, actually)--Jedi Kasra (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Denal
Statement removed. QuiGonJinn There's always a bigger fish. 17:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)