Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Trioculus


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Trioculus
Support
 * 1) If I do say so myself. - Lord Hydronium 22:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Yes! We must have more stupid stuff on the main page! .  .  .  .  06:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Adamwankenobi 06:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Well, I'd rather accept this than any other Ewok cartoon thing. - Skippy Farlstendoiro 06:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Ozzel 05:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  - breathesgelatin Talk 20:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments '''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Trioculus 07:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how much this violates MoS or other rules, so I won't officially object to it, but I prefer the relationships section be reserved for romances, not for general relationships, in keeping with standard practice. I think the info could be better integrated into the actual article. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If it was given a name like "Personal relationships", would that be better (it might just be me, but that phrasing suggests more things like friendships than the admittedly ambiguous "Relationships")? Truthfully, I see no reason why a section like that can only be used for romances, and in this case I felt that stuff like MD-5 wouldn't flow in the Bio section. - Lord Hydronium 04:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I have to agree, the information on Hissa works better in a separate section, and this article works great with this section separated from the main bio. Cull Tremayne 05:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * "Personal relationships" sounds better to me.