User talk:Bold Clone

Talkpages
Do not remove posts from talk pages. Kuralyov 17:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

It's just a waste of space, with members swearing and arguing and spamming. BC 20:38, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Grand Master
Hello Bold Clone,

This page has been vigorously debated upon, and carefully worked and decided on, by admins no less. It is the way that I am going to restore it to because those involved have come to a consensus. Please discuss your changes here before just making them. —Tommy9281 ( Peace is a lie ) 17:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Fine. What does the Convocation section have to do with being a Jedi Grand Master? BC 19:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, BC. Also, feel free to discuss any changes on the talk page Grand Master, so that way you and others in the community can speak together about any changes. Cheers:) Greyman ( Talk ) 19:27, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, an administrator will block you from editing Wookieepedia. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 16:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Let me get this straight: You want me to stop taking all the frivolous and unneeded stuff off of the Millenium Falcon article, so I don't get in trouble. The problem is, the stuff I'm deleting is worthless. Who cares about a river and some hills on a planet? The deleted stuff not redlinked are stuff distantly connected to the page--sorta. A great deal of this stuff is minor and will never be seen again. Are you trying to down the performance of this wiki? BC 17:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's about it. It doesn't matter what you think is frivolous or worthless. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 17:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * We are an encyclopedia, so people search for those things that some others may consider useless. We have always, and will always, add everything that appears in book, is mentioned in a book, or otherwise onto that book's article here on Wookieepedia. That's it on this and if you continue, then I will block you for vandalism. Please take both mine and JMAS's warnings seriously. Greyman ( Talk ) 17:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

I do take them seriously. There's a thousand redlinks of minor stuff on that page, and you say 'so what'? And more than 'what you think is frivolous or worthless', that is common sense here, with me. Are all your book pages like this? BC 16:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Convocation section
Hey, Bold Clone,

Certainly. Feel free to make whatever edits you choose to the article in question, so long as all of your info is factual and sourceable. I agree, that section can be lanced, especially with the solid reasoning you've provided. Let me know if I can be of any further assistance, and I will do my best. —Tommy9281 ( Peace is a lie ) 01:48, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Lightsaber
Could you please explain me why you're removing content from the lightsaber article?  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk  17:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * A lot of the infomation is repetitive and contians unnecessary detail. I'm just trying to clean up the page so it can be brought up to standard. BC 17:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Ok, I was just wondering, because you removed 4 KB, but as long as you're just improving the article, I won't stop you.  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk  17:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Master of the Order

 * Hey Bold Clone. Just thought I'd let you know that I'm reverting your removal of the line "during the last decades of the Old Republic" in the article because we do know that for sure. The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia entry is "Master of the Order": "The highest-ranking member of the Jedi Council during the last decades of the Old Republic. During the Battles of Naboo and Geonosis, Mace Windu held the position. When Master Windu joined the other Jedi in military positions during the Clone Wars, the title was given to Yoda, who remained on Coruscant to serve as Chancellor Palpatine's chief military adviser. See also Grand Master." so we do know it was during the last decades of the Old Republic. Just thought I'd explain why I reverted :-). Hope you had a good New Years.  Grunny  (Talk) 05:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Don't undo my edits. All this info comes straight from the CSWE - including that it was used during the last decades of the Old Republic. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 19:08, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * So the CSWE claims that it was only used during the last decades of the Old Republic? If not, then we can say that it was a title, and that Mace Windu had it during the last decades of the Old Republic. Bold Clone 19:10, 3 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes - the entry is right in front of you. Grunny was kind enough to provide it for you, yet you removed it. So I'll re-add it. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 19:12, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm reverted your recent edit to the article, because as you can see by the above entry, it was only in use during the last decades of the Old Republic. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 20:41, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * So, the title MotO was only in use during the last years of the Republic? Never anywhen else? Bold Clone 15:23, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Appearances lists
If you can point me to where the MoS or Layout Guide says that we should include series titles in appearances lists, that'd be great. I'm not going to bother looking to show you where it'll say not to do so, because on practically every article on the site - and every article recognized as an FA or GA - they are not included. You won't see


 * Star Wars Original trilogy
 * A New Hope

in appearances lists, except on possibly a few articles that no-one's noticed it on yet. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 17:34, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * What about some pages that might just say Star Wars Legacy: Vector instead of the individual comics? --Bold Clone 22:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Block

 * You've been given a week-long block for your recent edits to Form IV: Ataru. Removing large amounts of sourced content from a featured article and replacing it with an unsourced list constitutes vandalism. You're not a new user&mdash;and even if you were, it should be fairly intuitive that removing large amounts of sourced content from a featured article without first discussing it is bad. Second of all, don't lower the quality of the wiki by removing fully referenced material. Third of all, had you asked on the talk page about why there's a paragraph format instead of a list, you would have found that Inquisitorius consensus back during the article's FAN process was to not have it formatted as a list in order to be more informative and encyclopediac. There's a line between being bold and recklessly changing articles to fit your idea of how they should look without regards for policy or consistency, and you crossed it. Please do not do so again upon your return. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 19:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Warning
Kol Skywalker has never been called Master of the Order. Therefore, it is fanon. Do not add him to the list on Master of the Order again. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 19:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

It was not fanon. I know he was the leader of the JHC. The MotO is the leader. Therefore, Kol was a MotO. Unless your definition of fanon is 'anything that isn't explicitly mentioned, even if it is implied' then I have every right to put him on the list. Bold Clone 19:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Kol is specifically called "one" of the leaders of the Jedi High Council in Legacy 0 1/2, which you used as a reference. Kol being Master of the Order isn't even implied. It's fanon, and therefore you have no right to add his name to the list. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 22:26, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Master of the Order
Hey BC, I'm just letting you know that I've moved the info you deleted from Master of the Order to a new page: Master of the Order (Baran Do). As such, I have placed a template on both pages, linking to the other. Also, the link to the Old Republic redirects to the Galactic Republic, and so the correct way to link this is with Galactic Republic or Old Republic, not with Old Republic. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi beacon ) 17:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I was going to do that later (don't have enough time now). Thanks! Bold Clone 17:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * No problem! Jonjedigrandmaster  [[Image:Jedi symbol.svg|20px]] ( Jedi beacon ) 17:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Destroying the Sith
Hey BC,

If you remove that section, what would you replace it with? I have no problems with you removing that stuff, but make sure you provide substantial reasoning, as someone who is unfamiliar with our history regarding the page may see the change and become alarmed. —Tommy  ( Nine two eight one ) 13:42, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Really, there's nothing to replace it with. All we have is 'Yoda fought several Sith to a standstill. Like fought more Sith than Yoda and defeated half of them.' Now that Kenth is a GM, the section isn't really applicable. On top of that, all that section is is someone said 'Let's add more to the page. Luke fought the Sith, so did Yoda, therefore it is notable to say they fought the Sith. Besides, most of Luke's fights against the Sith were while he wasn't a GM. Bold Clone 14:14, 20 April 2009 (UTC)