Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

BlasTech Gikosphere

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:04, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Pfff. And you thought I was done with Limmie.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Always support soccer articles.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:16, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 09:51, April 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) What's next, the Industrial Automaton Blogosphere? ;) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 18:12, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:42, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * I find the last sentence of the intro a little awkward: "A Match Master employed at the Gikosphere was a Roonan." Could we perhaps change this to "A Roonan was employed at the Gikosphere as a Match Master"? If you prefer the sentence as is, I'm willing to let it go, as it is fine grammatically. &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:26, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Changed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:08, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * My deepest apologies for forgetting about this. Nice work!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 18:42, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks for the review. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:07, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * How do we know that that Roonan is a Match Master and not a member of one of the teams? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:24, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Because that picture's caption says the Match Master interrupts play, which means in the picture the Match Master is interrupting play. The Roonan in green is blocking two others who are wearing the same color. The caption says there is only one Match Master, so it can be neither of those in purple. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:08, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Good enough for me! ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 18:12, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'm still looking for someone who has read 501st: Imperial Commando and remembers the part where they talk about Limmie. Don't worry. This can be completely confidential. Please. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:04, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Happy to help, Naru. What do you want to know?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:14, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * I need to know what it says on the Match Master's role in play. The book may use the word "referee", but it is the same thing. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:17, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * It says pretty much the things witch the real referee does. He gives offside, has to two assistants and decides if it's a goal. The referee in this game is Parja Bralor. Hope that helps. Just contact me if you need more.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:27, April 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd just like to point out that there are officially enough links to this article, it pops up before Blastech Industries in the auto complete box. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:01, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Electric harp

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:37, April 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I play the electric triangle.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:14, April 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  OLIOSTER   (talk) 17:50, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * I don't have Tales of the Bounty Hunters on me; can 3 ABY be sourced to Payback or TotBH? If it can, no problem; otherwise, I think that will need a reference.
 * 3) **Ref'd. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:28, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Other than that, I have no formal objections, though I wouldn't mind seeing Cloud City specifically named in the article. Nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:02, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **I see you originally had that in base nose flute and changed it at the request of another reviewer. I don't have a problem with the sentence the way it is.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 01:15, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) Nayayen
 * 7) *Is there any reason why "Payback: The Tale of Dengar" is in quotes and not italicised? I would sofixit but I just wanted to check there wasn't some arcane reason. Nothing else. N  AYAYEN  13:50, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) **TThe titles of short stories are quoted, not italicized. This is a rule for the English language, not just a Wook policy. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:59, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) ***Ah, I see. I'll strike and support now but you might want to do something about the in the story's article ;).  N  AYAYEN  20:43, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) ****Done. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:19, April 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Still Life - Kite Plant

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 21:32, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A painting players were never meant to have.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:51, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) This was a triumph. I'm making a note here: HUGE SUCCESS! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:30, April 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 18:18, April 17, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * As we write articles in past tense, should the first sentence say "rumored to have been created" rather than "rumored to be created"?
 * 3) **Fixed.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 22:27, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) * Just one more, regarding the phrase "non-player owned buildings": are these buildings owned by non-player characters, or simply buildings that are not owned by players? I suggest saying "non-player character owned" for the former, or "non-player-owned" for the latter. I'd just like to make this sentence a bit less ambiguous without removing your individual writing style. &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:37, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Clarified.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 22:48, April 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Cool, thank you.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:51, April 15, 2011 (UTC)

Aurora Adasca

 * Nominated by: N  AYAYEN  20:24, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I expected more of her. Meh.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 22:04, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) GTQ 01:04, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ~  Savage  BOB sig.png 06:27, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * I suggest rewording the first paragraph so that you explicitly call her a Jedi Scout in the first line (which should serve as a "definition" of the character). Currently, the article seems to be privileging her niece-hood to the Adasca clan rather than her Jedi-hood, much as if we began Luke Skywalker's article with, "Luke Skywalker was the son of Anakin Skywalker. He eventually became a Jedi Knight." Please let me know if this is not as clear as I was hoping to make it! ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 22:00, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've tried to reword it to have her as a Jedi first but I'm wary of ending up reversing what little chronology there is. Thanks for the pointer. N  AYAYEN  08:37, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * No, good show. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 06:27, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Crab-stuffed creampuffs

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:54, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: What can I say? They amuse me.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I remember these things. Ugh, crabs.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 16:01, April 26, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Felloux

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:51, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Greetings, fellows

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice.  Imperators II (Talk) 23:44, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Another good article, Naru.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:16, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) * Ummm, why Category:Musicians?  Imperators II (Talk) 22:33, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **No clue. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:40, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Axinal
 * 5) * I don't own the New Essential Chronology, so I'm just asking to be sure: can all the details you mentioned of the battle&mdash;specifically, the date&mdash;be sourced to the NEC? If yes, obviously no change is needed.
 * 6) **For future reference, if it came from the NEC, it's dated. Every section has it's own BBY year or a specific span of years. A lot of times (as in this case) the date is given in parentheses. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:40, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Cool, thanks for letting me know that.
 * 8) * I might link sky to atmosphere, but that's just me.
 * 9) **Good thought. Pretty much like Realspace. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:40, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) * I'm assuming we don't know the name of the poem?
 * 11) **Do not. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:40, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) * Per Imperators, why the musicians category? If he was a musician as well as a poet, or if the poem was also a piece of music, that should be mentioned.
 * 13) **He wasn't a musician. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:40, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 14) *Aside from that, nice work.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:53, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 15) Trayus
 * 16) *Per them, but also, is there an article for the poem itself? Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 22:58, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 17) **Made a redlink. I'll fill it later. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:40, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Cunning of Tyranus

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 14:46, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Its not a painting!

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) LIES! It paints the lightsaber red. N  AYAYEN  14:51, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:41, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Otavon XII's second moon

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:37, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Arbitrary numbering is arbitrary.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:22, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Imperators II (Talk) 21:20, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I find the first sentence a bit lengthy. Do you think you could split it into two just for ease of reading, or maybe replace a couple of commas with emdashes?&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:44, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *I subbed in Jon's version. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:00, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Otavon XII's moon

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:37, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Or is it?!

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 21:32, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 21:44, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) I can already see the Iego's moons' CANs coming...  Imperators II (Talk) 21:17, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) * I'm in no way an English grammar expert, but is the singular noun "coordinate" also correct in this case?  Imperators II (Talk) 22:16, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **I think it works this way. If someone wants to give us a third opinion, it'd be appreciated. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:03, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***As there are two different values (X and Y), I would say "coordinates." For example, you never hear someone say "Send me the coordinate."&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:19, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Changed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:12, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * A few notes to accompany my support: Please remember to make sure that all fields of the infobox are present and in order&mdash;even if they're not currently in use, later info may make those fields necessary. Also, during my copyedit I took care of a couple instances of linking and providing adequate context for subjects. These are things that I fully expect a nominator who has been writing for as long as you have to be able to catch, particularly in an article of such miniscule size. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 21:32, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Serraknife

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 22:02, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Because.

(2 ECs/4 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) Because Rusher said so.  Imperators II (Talk) 22:11, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:22, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Because that is really well done for something indirectly mentioned Shadowsaber623 TORrepublicemblem.PNG ( Comlink ) 22:30, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4)  Kilson ( Let's have a chat ) 23:54, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:29, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) <- Omicron (Leave a message at the BEEP! ) 00:44, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) You should add a note saying that the serraknife was the only weapon used for naming those squadrons that had not previously appeared in Star Wars canon.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:50, April 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Added. Thanks!&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 00:25, April 29, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Kybacca

 * Nominated by: SinisterSamurai 06:02, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: First CAN of the Barn-Burner?

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:45, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Kilson ( Let's have a chat )

Object
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) * Do we know what year this vote took place?
 * 3) **We know what year the actual Kerrithrarr vote from The New Rebellion novel took place. However, the Encyclopedia entries themselves don't mention a specific year. While AGttSWU(3rd) and SWE source the entry to "TNR", it seems like original research or speculation to add canon info about/from TNR. SinisterSamurai 16:00, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I agree.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:45, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) * The last sentence of the BTS implies that Kybacca's entries in the SWE and the CSWE are exactly the same as the entry in The New Rebellion. This isn't really an objection, just wondering if I'm interpreting that correctly.
 * 6) **Edited. SinisterSamurai 16:00, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) * I'm not sure, but I think you don't need to add the parentheses in the Sources section unless the subject appears under a different title (for example, if Kybacca's name was mentioned under Chewbacca's entry rather than her own).
 * 8) **Removed. SinisterSamurai 16:00, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) *Other than that, a nice and interesting article.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 11:53, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) **Thanks. I owe it all to Talk:Kerrithrarr. SinisterSamurai 16:00, April 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Star's Nova Wookiee

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 13:12, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: An unidentied contribution for the barn-burner

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 1) Axinal
 * 2) *I might argue that, because we have an article for the Wookiee, the other members of the team would also deserve articles and thus should be linked in this article, rather than just linking their races. It wouldn't make much sense for the Humans, because there are four of them, but for the others it should be simple.&mdash; Axinal  Convocation Chamber 20:53, April 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Fair call. Added those three that are easily linked to from this Wookiee. --Eyrezer 00:22, May 1, 2011 (UTC)