Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Great Northern Crusade

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:44, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:10, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  18:18, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Interesting. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 15:41, June 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Provided that Menkooroo's objections are taken care of.&mdash;  07:46, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Kill the redlinks! You can for sure kill all of them in the main article, but I am not sure about the template, as a bunch of them are inderect mention only and currently subject to trach compact. If they get deleted, only keep the Pius Dea crusades in that template that are actualy mentioned.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Source info box completely.
 * 5) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:57, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) *Overwhelmed by the number of crusades you nommed.... :) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:49, May 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) Exiled Jedi
 * 8) * Is it refered to as the Seventh Pius Dea crusade in the book?
 * 9) **Yep. "Great Northern Crusade (7th)"
 * 10) * You need to mention the infobox's previous and next fields in the body of the article, but since they are in the trash compactor I guess you should wait. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:50, May 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Sorry, EJ. Had a long night, ending up an hour out of the way when I stopped for a DQ shake and took the wrong highway :P But the 6th and 8th are dead, so that objection should be done.  Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:38, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) ***No worries.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:18, June 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) War!
 * 14) * Similar objections as above --- as the article on the war itself, it should chronologically go through the battles using details gleaned from the arrows. Infobox should list the battles, too (ditto in the above nom). Menkooroo 01:38, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) **Objection amended to not speculate on battles but to use the arrows for chronology and list the planets as being in the invasion corridor! Menkooroo 00:22, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) **Can we get Pius Dea Era linked somewhere here too?
 * 17) **Not an objection here, but let me know when you add chronological arrow stuff to the crusades that have already been brought to status. Menkooroo 03:48, June 24, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified six-eyed aquatic creature (Naboo)

 * Nominated by: -LelalMekha 20:28, June 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I fear I've caught Cade's nomination-sickness.
 * S'cuse me? Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:30, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Referring humorously to your recent "moar noms!" ;-)

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Its got a chicken leg. Weird... 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:04, June 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) ' Biggestleo ' (Meeting Room) 02:23, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Biigg L
 * Alphabetize your categories.
 * Done. --LelalMekha 19:15, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Good work. ' Biggestleo ' (Meeting Room) 18:01, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * You need to mention the Mid Rim, Chomell sector and Otoh Gunga in the main part of the article, not just the introduction.
 * 3) **Fixed. --LelalMekha 14:17, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * I only count five eyes and are you sure this is a fish? In the Phantom Menace novel the Opee sea killer is mentioned to be a crustacean and this thing looks like it could be. Perhaps you should just say aquatic creature unless the source says otherwise.
 * 5) **Only five eyes are visible, indeed. But most animals are bilaterally symmetric, so it seems reasonable to think this creature has three eyes per "half"' of its face. Now, you're right, I can't say whether it's a fish or a crustacean, so I've changed the wording to reflect that. Thanks for pointing this out. --LelalMekha 14:17, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Yeah, for some reason when I looked at the picture I thought that the three bottom eyes were aligned where the middile one would be in the middle of the creature's head.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:41, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) * Please mention the leg/fin thing on the creature.
 * 8) **Done. --LelalMekha 14:17, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) *If its only pictured in an illustration how do you know its carnivorous?
 * 10) **Once again, it's what I'd call "biology common sense". The shape of an animal's teeth are related to its diet, and there is absolutely no point in having pointed, sharp teeth if you don't eat flesh. --LelalMekha 14:17, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) ***I'm not sure if you can state that its carnivorous, you have real-life creatures like fruit-bats that have sharp teeth and only eat fruit. Plus, in Star Wars, I don't know how much real world sciences apply. Its pretty clear that normal physics doesn't apply in Star Wars, so biology probably doesn't either.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:41, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) ****Thus I have removed it. --LelalMekha 18:45, June 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) * You should mention the upper teeth as well.
 * 14) **Fixed. --LelalMekha 14:17, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) * If its pictured and not mentioned in the text please add a tag to the appearances list. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  13:12, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) **Done. --LelalMekha 14:17, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Decimator (painting)

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 20:17, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Fourth of a series

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:00, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash;  07:54, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  13:30, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Nice tank.  Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:32, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) *Actually, could you make it clear what a Hotflix is?
 * 6) **Pffft, this isn't really an objection so I could just archive this without fixing it but I did anyway. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 19:57, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Forge Guardian

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:51, June 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Poor jurgoran. You didn't stand a chance against my awesome new blue lightsaber.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Savage  1138  05:39, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:00, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Could you get an image that shows it from the front?
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) *When I was defeated by the beast I transported back to the closest medcenter not the one in the Jedi Temple.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:35, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:31, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) Trayus
 * 7) *Because the date 3,641 BBY is never provided in-game and that specific dating system does not come from the game itself, you'll need an independent reference. Check out the note here and in other game-era articles. Best practice would be to use a citation such as that when sourcing anything to the 3,643 BBY/3,641 BBY date. If you can do what you can to ensure your other articles reflect this as well, it would be much appreciated. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 20:16, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Emperor's Eyes (painting)

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 16:26, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: FIVE! FIVE! FIVE!

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) That TIE looks pretty awesome. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:52, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Agreed. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:57, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; 07:58, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) I agree with EJ, but the expletive is "Vader's eyes", gorrammit! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:16, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *If there is any mention of TIE Sentinel in game then I believe you should mention it in the body of the article and create an article for it. Otherwise, good work.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:01, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **This is the only mention of such a TIE variant in the game and the painting's description says nothing of it. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 20:05, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * SWG never had any TIE model known as the Sentinel and as far as I can tell, one doesn't exist so I omitted the paintings subtitle from the article title. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 16:26, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think you should probably call it a "TIE Sentinel" and create an article for it. Probably just a piece of concept art that wasn't turned into a ship.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  20:20, June 18, 2012 (UTC)

Metrisse

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:14, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Composed the Études of Time and Space

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:58, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

KSE Firespray (painting)

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 00:01, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I saved this from the crap heap.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) I would ask for context for the Firespray, but the name pretty much describes it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:01, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) ' ℬiggestℒeo ' (ℳeeting ℛoom) 22:27, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) BIG
 * 2) * You've got the same images; File:KSEFiresprayPainting-SWG.png and File:Slave I - SWGTCG.jpg.
 * 3) **I don't think this sort of thing can be counted as an objection but its been taken care of anyway. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 11:52, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *Good work. ' Biggestleo ' (Meeting Room) 02:20, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Metalorn (Imperial Period)

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:49, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another for Warfare

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Seems a little run-onish, but maybe that's just me. Good job. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:25, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *If so, I should probaly split up Siege of Sy Myrth, as its even more run-onish :) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:28, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:40, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Rubedo
 * 2) * "It was part of the Sy Myrthian Insurrection, when Imperial forces attempted to drive the remnants of the Condeferate army out of the regions of Sy Myrth and the Kreetan Narrows after the Confederate's defeat during the Clone Wars at the hands of the Galactic Republic, which had become the Empire after the Clone Wars." This is a run-on in the grammatically incorrect sense, an appositive within an appositive. You do have to reword it.
 * 3) **Done. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:37, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Sy Myrth is a planet, not a region like the Narrows, so the context there doesn't work. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:40, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:37, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ***This way, the Narrows now have no context.
 * 7) ****Fixed.
 * 8) * You mention this was after the Battle of Diado in this article, but not in the Diado article. Furthermore, in the Metalorn battle article, you don't mention that was followed by the Siege of Sy Myrth. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:01, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Remedied in both.
 * 10) * "It was part of the Sy Myrthian Insurrection, when Imperial forces attempted to drive the remnants of the Condeferate army out of the regions of Sy Myrth and the Kreetan Narrows after the Confederate's defeat during the Clone Wars at the hands of the Galactic Republic, which had become the Empire after the Clone Wars." While we're talking about the Battle of Diado: grammatically incorrect run-on. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:01, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Fixed.

Comments
 * Just a tip, since I write articles like this frequenntly, you're too married to these phrase positions. I don't like the rewording rule, myself, but so long as it's going to be enforced with votes... Diado, Metalorn, and Sy Myrth are virtually identically constructed. You introduce the battle as between the Empire (Formerly the Republic!) and CIS holdouts, then explain the Sy Myrth Insurrection using virtually the same nested appositive, then say the 12 was involved. Try shifting around the order of those basic pieces at least. How about introducing the battle, then have the next sentence bring in the 12th and Dodonna? This allows for a lead-in, probably within that same sentence, for the Empire that triumphed against the CIS in the Clone Wars as the Republic. Holdouts were at Metalorn, hence the battle was fought. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:01, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * I've reworded Metalorn. I'll have to do that a bit to Siege as well. Thanks for the review. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:03, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Siege of Sy Myrth

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:43, June 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another Warfare

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Darth Bandon's Jedi Master

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 22:57, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Don't know why I haven't done this sooner&hellip; Let's go, WP:KOTOR!

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:36, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 14:47, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *First of all, lack of BtS.
 * 3) **Darn it, fixed.&mdash; 00:10, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *I'll look it over more later. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:00, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done.&mdash; 00:50, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) * You should start the article with "a" instead of "this", and change the context after accordingly. Using "a" is the excepted way for writting conjectrue articles. The bio start should be changed also.
 * 7) **Intro still needs it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:52, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Got it.&mdash; 00:55, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) * You mention the Jedi Civil War in the intro, could you do do in th bio? Just a small mention would do. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:46, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) **Done.&mdash; 00:50, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) * There are four instances of Jedi in the first sentence. Could you change it to less somehow? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:01, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) **I think I got it.&mdash; 01:08, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) * One last thing. The article should be moved to Darth Bandon's Jedi Master, as Master is supposed to be capitalized. Thats it, good work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:16, June 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) **Done. I don't remember the reasons behind why the name was the way it was, but it's moved now.&mdash; 01:20, June 22, 2012 (UTC)

Founder's Day

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:39, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Happy Birthday, Wookieepedia! :D

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:46, June 24, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Jumerian

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:23, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More than likely a pseudo-mistake we made that became canon. Didn't know they were a species until the CSWE had a one sentence article on them that matched ours from 2006 verbatim but for some procedural tweaks. Fun facts.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:07, June 26, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) An article for the singing lamp would be nice.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:39, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *That's what I get for nomming something the day I wrote it. Missing stuff. :\ The article already existed, actually. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:40, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Four Dimensions

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 15:46, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "LEEEEEET THE REBELS. LEEEEEET THE REBELS IN. Let me tell you one thing! (LEEEET THE REBELS) I want you to siiiing along with the "Four Dimensions"! Hey! And open up your heart! AWWWWW! Come on! (REBEEELS!) And let in Rebels. Ev-e-ry Day~! LEEEEEEET THE REBELS. LEEEEEEEEEEET THE REBELS IN. THE REEEEBELS IIIN.~

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:54, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Bureaucracy Blues

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:32, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A beton-nya mombay m'bwa! Mombay n'bwa~a~aaaa! Bureaucra-cyyy~ B-lues! Togo~ togu! Ya e'um pu-kay~. Mob un~ loo? Hkeek n&mdash;kull-a~uh Pe-rupa! Shooto~ga~wa~. Ashuna ha'mfoo, Gomjam Hun~ee~ya. Go-omjam m&mdash;m'bwa. Ike~e Uti~ni~.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:55, June 27, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments