Wookieepedia:AgriCorps/Log/2009 August 8

[15:59]		AC Meeting 12 is now underway. 	Thank you two for showing. ChackJadson	nods GrandMoffTranner	salutes 	First up, probed/extended articles from Meetings 10 and 11. 	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Watto [16:00] 	No changes made. 	kill 	Kill 	Killify. 	Watto killed. 	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Vuvrian 	kill, no change [16:01]		Kill 	Killitize. 	Vuvrian killed. 	The article we forgot from Meeting 10: 	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Duel_on_Yavin_4 <ChackJadson>	still seems to be missing stuff [16:02]	<ChackJadson>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/Duel_on_Yavin_4 <ChackJadson>	so, kill <Ralltiir>	didn't check CSWE or Databank <Ralltiir>	Kill <GrandMoffTranner>	Killerize. <Ralltiir>	Duel on Yavin 4 killed. <Ralltiir>	Now the articles we extended probation on from last meeting: <Ralltiir>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Bimm <ChackJadson>	hmm... [16:03]	<Ralltiir>	Looks good to me. <Ralltiir>	Dan handled my concern about the intro. <Ralltiir>	Keep <ChackJadson>	yeah, I was leaning towards keep <GrandMoffTranner>	Keepify. [16:04]	<Ralltiir>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Skreej <Ralltiir>	The canonicity bit was sourced. <ChackJadson>	ugh, I hate these small comics <Ralltiir>	That was the only thing <Ralltiir>	Keep <GrandMoffTranner>	Keepirize. <ChackJadson>	keep <Ralltiir>	Ditto here: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Being_Boba_Fett [16:05]	<Ralltiir>	Keep. <ChackJadson>	keep <GrandMoffTranner>	Keepiberifify. <Ralltiir>	All extended probed articles kept. <Ralltiir>	New articles for review: <Ralltiir>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Gavar_Khai <Ralltiir>	Jugs updated it. <Ralltiir>	No probe. <ChackJadson>	keep <GrandMoffTranner>	Keep. [16:06]	<Ralltiir>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Nazzar <Ralltiir>	Has update tag still <GrandMoffTranner>	Probe. <Ralltiir>	Probe. <ChackJadson>	probe <Ralltiir>	Nazzar probed. [16:07]	<Ralltiir>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Gherant <ChackJadson>	the next is so minor...is there anything new there, really? <Ralltiir>	This one is mine. <Ralltiir>	It's an easy fix. <ChackJadson>	yeah <Ralltiir>	And yes, it is missing information <ChackJadson>	oh, ok <Ralltiir>	I vote to probe on my own behalf. <ChackJadson>	well, probe, then <Ralltiir>	Just so I actually fix it. <GrandMoffTranner>	Well, if you say so... Probe. <ChackJadson>	I trust that you will fix it :P <Ralltiir>	Otherwise I'll continue to be lazy and never do it <Ralltiir>	Gherant probed. <Ralltiir>	That's all for new articles. <Ralltiir>	Items for discussion. [16:08]	<Ralltiir>	Early removal of noms with 5 AC support votes. Chack Jadson (Talk) 23:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC) <ChackJadson>	all 50 of them :P <Ralltiir>	Chack? <ChackJadson>	yeah, well, if a nom have 5 AC votes at anytime past one day, we vote to remove <Ralltiir>	remove and archive, you mean <ChackJadson>	is that ok with you all? <Ralltiir>	as successful <ChackJadson>	yes, archive <ChackJadson>	pass them after one day if they get 5 AC votes <GrandMoffTranner>	Sounds fine to me 	<ChackJadson>	to clear off good noms really quick [16:09]	<ChackJadson>	could be handy sometimes <ChackJadson>	Tope? <Ralltiir>	I support as well. <ChackJadson>	cool <Ralltiir>	As does Jugs, Grunny, and CC 	<ChackJadson>	we shall implement this then <Ralltiir>	and I believe Cav voiced his support once upon a time. <Ralltiir>	Measure passed. <ChackJadson>	cool [16:10]	<GrandMoffTranner>	Sweetness. <ChackJadson>	so, now what? :P <Ralltiir>	If a nom receives 5 AC support votes before the one-week time period expires, it will be eligible for <GrandMoffTranner>	There are refreshments in the foyer... <ChackJadson>	sounds good <Ralltiir>	This exceptionally brief meeting is hereby concluded.