Wookieepedia:Userbox proposal

This page is for the nomination of new userboxes. For past nominations, see Userbox proposal/History.

Before you create
Before you propose a userbox, read the following:


 * 1) No nonsense or joke templates. What you think may be funny may not be to everyone else, so it's best to just keep it on your userpage.
 * 2) If you are creating a Star Wars themed userbox, try and keep it OOU (i.e. "This user is a fan of Jedi" is good, but "This user is a member of the New Jedi Order" is not).
 * 3) Any offensive/racist/provocative userbox proposals will be deleted on sight, and the user warned. If the user persists, he/she will be banned.
 * 4) Due to being inflammatory, any religious and political userboxes that are nominated here will be automatically rejected, so don't bother.
 * 5) When nominating a template, keep in mind that the template will be for community use, not just your exclusive use. As a rule of thumb, if you think at least 10 people will use your idea, nominate it. If not, it's best left as code on your userpage.

To use this page:


 * 1) Use the current date as a header, and add the code of the proposed userbox underneath (use the following syntax:  ).
 * 2) Multiple userbox proposals should be presented separately so that the community can vote on each userbox based on its individual merit. Up to three userboxes may be presented for approval under one vote, if and only if, they are closely related in theme or are proposed as alternatives.
 * 3) Add sections underneath for "Support", "Object", and "Comments". Your fellow Wookieepedians will use these sections to support, oppose, or comment on your design.
 * 4) Once a majority has been reached, and two weeks have passed, the userbox will be created as a template for use in the community. If the nomination fails, the template must not be created regardless. If it is, then it will be deleted on sight, and the offender warned.

Support

 * From numerous requests. Darth Maddolis 01:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This is getting really stupid  03:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I think this moved past "stupid" into the realm of surrealism.--Valin Kenobi 04:36, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) This user doesn't like this idea. Atarumaster88  04:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * It'll probably get shot down anyway, but I may as well try. Darth Maddolis 01:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Nope - JMAS 11:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Green Tentacle (Talk) 11:51, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) maybe fourdot's userbox is needed after all  11:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 12:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) ok wtf guys. srsly. lolZ!!1--Valin Kenobi 17:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) This user thinks some humans (i.e. vandals) need serious mental help. Atarumaster88  04:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Snide Remarks

 * Although for the record, I like the Yevetha. ;)--Valin Kenobi 17:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Can these two userboxes be deleted now? It goes against rule 2 and noone's going to vote for these anyway 23:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Nope. - JMAS 11:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Make it stop! Green Tentacle (Talk) 11:51, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 11:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 12:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, seriously. ENOUGH.--Valin Kenobi 17:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Atarumaster88  04:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Since the Zann Consortium one failed due to "notability", this one falls under that same pretense. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) This one's already been tried and failed recently  00:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) "This user doesn't." .  .  .  .  09:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) JMAS 11:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 12:03, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) This user does not support many "This user supports" userboxes. Atarumaster88  04:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Not that I use userboxes anymore. .  .  .  .  08:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, proving a point! KEJ 13:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Three words: "Best. Userbox. Ever." supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 16:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Witty *and* controversial. You've really outdone yoursel...., nah, good work. Darth Maddolis 09:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 09:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Per rule 1.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 16:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) * and possibly 3 for some people 07:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **How can if offend anyone? If they think that their userboxes are "dumbass", then they wouldn't have come up with them in the first place. .  .  .  .  09:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No, seriously. This isn't gonna work. Evir Daal 09:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) This user is sick of people making a big deal over userboxes. Atarumaster88  04:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Snide remarks

 * I wish I could think of a snide remark... but I just can't. KEJ 13:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Makes about as much sense as the others... QuentinGeorge 11:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Absolutely. .  .  .  .  23:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Ozzel 06:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Double Support

 * 1) How can anyone *not* support this?! supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 16:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm a spoilsport

 * 1) Damn you and your black heart Burl Ives Enochf 13:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Nevah! KEJ 13:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Per Rule 1. Now, if it said "This user is a Burlist," that might be different.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 16:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 22:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) "Nooo! I... refuse!" Evir Daal 08:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This user supports very few "This user supports" userboxes. Atarumaster88  04:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Alternative

 * 1) Frankly I'd support this one, although I really don't know why.Valin Kenobi 05:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) If the other doesn't go through, this is even more suitable. .  .  .  .  09:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
Does this fall under the joke category (Rule 1)? Jorrel Fraajic 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No way. Anyway, maybe there'll be support for "This user is afeared that Burl Ives will eat his babies." infobox, since that seems to be the mentality. .  .  .  .  23:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Or even...

Support

 * 1) School of Thrawn 101 11:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Fine for custom. Not here though.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 16:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 22:33, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Custom.Valin Kenobi 05:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This user sees no redeeming qualities in this idea. Atarumaster88  04:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 05:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) We just voted down something almost identical to this.--Valin Kenobi 08:02, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) If we had to have one for music, I'd rather the one that Solus created before  09:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) The other was better. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Paint on tilde key...wearing off...  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 16:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) This user does not like this request. Atarumaster88  04:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 01:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) The Phantom (Talk)
 * 2) Could be useful. KEJ 13:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) DarkJedi Robert 14:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Why not? Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 16:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Made these userboxes for other Star Wars-related Wikis. I put them together because I tought it would save space and the wikis are all about the same size, but they can be separated if they have to be 01:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * And why do these other wikis exist in the first place? --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * My question exactly. I thought there was already a Star Wars Games Wiki around someplace? The population of people who both play SW games AND wiki about it is small enough--I don't see much point in further subdividing and balkanizing an already niche market. What's next, Super Nintendo Return of the Jedi Wiki?--Valin Kenobi 06:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) As a nominator. supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 06:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) As someone who thinks this is a decent idea. We have one for wikipedia and whatnot.  And this is actually kinda relevant.  And it rocks. (if the fanon one can get 18 votes, so can this) - Jinko 07:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) BambookidX 07:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Maybe change SWGames to Star Wars Games Wiki or SW Games WIki though  07:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 07:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) It says "wiki" on the graphic. That's good enough for me.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 13:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  Stake black   msg 20:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Just like the SWMW one. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 14:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Vadahata2 23:28, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) I was going to suggest this myself, but I couldn't find the logo and the main page logo just kept redirecting me back to the main page.--Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)11:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) *I had the same problem when I dealt with the SWFW logo. Just for future reference, it can be found at Image:wiki.png. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 13:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Could be useful. KEJ 13:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * I would like to be able to keep track of users who also contribute to SWGames. supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 06:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * In regards to Nighthawk, SWGames is the unofficial name of Star Wars Games Wiki, like Wookieepedia is actually The Star Wars Wiki. Everyone calls it SWGames. supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 07:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh ok sorry :). I've just never heard of this wiki before and I didn't know it was a wiki until I clicked on the link 07:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1)  StarNeptune Talk to me! 09:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Great idea.  10:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 10:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Wildyoda 18:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Lord Hydronium 06:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) .  .  .  .  08:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8)  Stake black   msg 20:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 14:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) lol @ Riffsyphon1024 below 00:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Nothing wrong in shameless self-promotion. I wouldn't use it myself, since I never make any useful contributions, but, yeah, why not? KEJ 13:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Ozzel 06:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) That'll show the haters! Darth Maddolis 01:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * We have one for FAs, why not one for GAs as well?  StarNeptune Talk to me! 09:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I still don't know why this hasn't been changed to Great Articles, because that's what they really are. --  Riffsyphon  1024 05:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 07:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 10:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Hell yes!!!!!User:X-fighter023

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose for lack of relevant image. If we get a canon logo for them, maybe. I think this is better as a custom userbox unless and until that occurs, though. Wildyoda 17:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *The lack of an image was one reason why I didn't propose this straight after I read Exile because I thought a logo may have come along, but it hasn't so far. If anyone has any other suggestions for the image, they are welcome to change it. 07:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 00:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Needs a good picture. Chack Jadson 00:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Atarumaster88  04:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Made this for the alliance organised by the Corellians in the Legacy Era (in the novel Exile). I couldn't find an appropriate image for the userbox so I just put in the Legacy Era logo - 07:21, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Some alternatives to the original userbox:

If anyone wants to change the original to one of these, feel free to. 07:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  19:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 06:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) If you must. .  .  .  .  21:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 14:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) More shameless self-promotion. KEJ 08:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * IMO, you can't use 'user featured' with a good conscience when you restore an article that was going to be/has been de-featured. At least not with the current text. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  19:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) I proposed itTwilekmaster 17:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Many other races have them, its only fair...and the Twilek dancers are just fine by me :) Darth Sarge 22:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I suppose. But I don't really like the picture - 23:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4)  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 06:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) The Phantom(Talk)
 * 6) I already put it on mine!!!!Keep it comingUser:X-fighter023
 * 7) Enochf 13:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) I like it. Fett 1138 01:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Object

 * 1) Why not just have a "This user is a Wookieepedian" userbox? (My point being that everyone would use it, therefore eliminating the need to differentiate yourself, you see.)  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 19:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) This user supports a month-long moratorium on "This user supports" userboxes. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 07:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) "This user supports breathing." .  .  .  .  22:46, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) "This user is against breathing as it is so cumbersome" - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Didn't we already vote against this a while back?  StarNeptune Talk to me! 06:33, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) JMAS 06:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) I realize it's a completely subjective distinction between this one and Wookiees, Ewoks, Gungans, Tuskens, etc., but I think Twi'leks fall on the wrong side of the notability line. The others played a role in the plot of one or more of the movies. Twi'leks were never more than background.--Valin Kenobi 17:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 14:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 00:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
I don't know what you are talking about. you may have put that comment on the wrong section. what you said did not make since in this section. Twilekmaster 22:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wait a second. Something very similar to this has been proposed already, and rejected. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think you mean the "Twi'leks are hot" userbox I created and then removed from consideration (for obvious reasons). As a box showing support for the species in general, it has as much merit as the ones for Gungans, Wookiees, etc.  Hell, more people probably like Twi'leks than they do Gungans, anyway.  The image is kinda weak, though.   Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 06:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


 * On a separate note, should the one vote above for User:Twilekmaster be scratched? He is a noted sockpuppet. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 14:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) This is not for showing off, but rather for identifying users who can provide technical assistance if necessary. Sikon 08:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  08:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Happy days. Darth Maddolis 08:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Great idea --Jedimca0 (, Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 08:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 08:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 08:46, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 14:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) JMAS 14:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 15:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 20:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Tech help needed everywhere and we need to ID those that can help. --  Riffsyphon  1024 06:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) My page is about to get a bit longer... 00:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Sikon 08:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jedimca0 (, Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 08:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 14:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Hmmm... something about the phrasing strikes me as off. Not sure what it is. Maybe it should be "interpersonal conflicts." &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 15:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 22:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) On a diplomatic mission .... KEJ 08:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Object

 * 1) Eh. Not enough flame gifs. Not enough pizzazz. .  .  .  .  08:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) See comment.Valin Kenobi 09:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
OK, how does this sound: [removed] ...Because otherwise people will use this box who have never actually resolved a dispute. (Unless that was the intent?) And plus it doesn't sound as much like "tell me your personal problems." I don't need to know about other Wookieepedians' family troubles or lumbago. &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 15:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Replaced it with your version. - Sikon 15:39, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure I see the point. So now we're designating users as resident shrinks and hall monitors?--Valin Kenobi 17:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Adamwankenobi 19:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ahh, what the hell. &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 23:15, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) While not my favorite I support them for those that might like them. Darth Sarge 23:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 06:58, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) im with darth sarge General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 10:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Valin Kenobi 20:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) MTFBWUA. Starkiller1996 Adidas F50+[[Image: 79jawas.jpg|20px]] 18 March 2007, 16:36 (UTC)
 * 4) Jedimca0 (, Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 15:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) When I finally give in and undertake serial cannibalism, these userboxes will make it easy for me to choose people who obviously won't be missed. Frankly, if you enjoyed the Holiday Special, then you have it coming.  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 22:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Yikes! *runs and hides* :P Adamwankenobi 02:00, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 01:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) We have to account for the crazy people, too. .  .  .  .  03:19, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *I'm not crazy, I'm "differently sane." Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 10:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) May as well be availia..avalia...avai... May as well be there. Darth Maddolis 06:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * While worthless I am sure some people will use them, even if only for comic relief so I will cast my vote...Darth Sarge 22:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Not my favs, but okay... KEJ 08:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Fett 1138 01:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Object

 * 1) Someone's gotta be number one. They're not really films, and if your favourite "film" is not one of the six, that's a little messed up. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)23:37, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Ugh. No. A line must be drawn somewhere, and I draw it by the 6 major films. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) *Thank you, Atartumaster88. Someone here is sane. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)23:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 07:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Per Atarumaster88. - Patricknoddy The Jedi Council [[Image:Obiwanprofile.jpg|20px]] 18:54, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Ranat 23 01:17, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 06:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Per Atarumaster88. C-3POwen 18:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) There would be no users of these userboxes. Hopefully. Havac 17:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Per everyone else. Jedibob5 01:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 02:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

 * Per Gonk (below). Adamwankenobi 19:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Would anyone actually be using these? I'll support them if there are people who'll use it, but they seem a bit pointless if they aren't. 06:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Well... I know I will. :P I think about the same amount of people will use these as will the Episode I userbox. Adamwankenobi 06:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * None of them are films. They're tele-movies. Well...the HS at least. Since the other two recived theatrical releases outside the US. .  .  .  .  21:50, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Wait a minute, they released that schlock in theaters? And I thought that the American movie industry was out of ideas.... Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 10:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * At first I agreed only because I thought people would use these, but then I thought they're not really part of the Star Wars movies. If these are made then other userboxes such as ones about the cartoon episodes and the future live-action and 3-D shows, so it could get a bit out of hand. - 07:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Lucas personally said that if he could, he would smash all copies of the holiday special with a sledgehammer. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)22:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * A worthy mission for any Wookieepedian, though I'd recommend a flame thrower and some holy water. Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 03:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Not if anything to say about it I have! :P Adamwankenobi 07:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think you'd find defending the freakin' Holiday Special to be a pretty lonely crusade. At least I really, really hope so....  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 08:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Luke: "I'm not afraid." Adamwankenobi 08:51, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * "You will be. You will be."  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|30px]] 03:08, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Flamethrowers are nice. They use up a lot of precious natural gas, though.  I reccommend staking them in a nice, neat pile and nuking them.  It's a little more satisfactory. --Ryluk Shouja(Bounty Hunters Guild)19:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I, uh... I'm not quite sure what to do with this vote. Simple majority says yes, but that's not, IIRC, the correct majority needed. A little help? Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 14:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No consensus. It doesn't look like a majority would even use them. They just appear to support them for anybody who might. 00:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)