Wookieepedia:Re-featured article nominations

Featured articles which have been previously featured on the main page can be showcased again, providing they still meet the standards outlined on the featured article nominations page. Before they can be added to the featured article queue, these articles must undergo a quick review to ensure there are no major problems.
 * RFA queue checklist

How to nominate:


 * 1) Simple: don't.
 * 2) Articles will be added to this page by the Inquisitorius in the order in which they were originally featured on the main page.
 * 3) No more than thirty articles will be listed on this page at any given time.
 * 4) Articles which have lost their FA status are not eligible and must go through the normal FAN process.
 * 5) No articles which have appeared on the main page in the last two years will be put up for a vote.

How to vote:


 * 1) Featured articles should be generally assumed to still meet the quality requirements. You should not need to thoroughly read the whole article, but should read through any major changes or additions since it was originally featured, along with checking for any major issues, such as missing or inaccurate information, failure to comply with the Manual of Style or Layout Guide, etc.
 * 2) If you spot any issues that need fixing, you can either do so yourself or leave an objection, clearly stating what the problem is.
 * 3) If issues are raised about an article then it cannot be put back on the queue until they are resolved. The original authors of an article are encouraged to fix any issues raised, but other users should feel free to contribute. If issues go unresolved, then the article will be given a more thorough review by the Inquisitorius at the next regular meeting.
 * 4) Once you are satisfied that an article is suitable to be shown on the main page, then support it.

Once an article has four supporting votes, of which two must be from Inquisitors, it can be placed on the queue. Such articles will be added to the queue by the Inquisitorius when spaces are available. The number would be determined by how many new FAs were added to the queue that month. If we create 20 new FAs, then we'll only need to take 10 existing ones to maintain the length of the queue. In this way, the old FAs are used to regulate the length of the queue and to keep featuring a different one each day.

=Re-featured nominations=

Naga Sadow

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: May 7, 2006
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Tm
 * 2) *There's occasional speculation, like "Precisely what he said at that point is unknown, though it apparently won over many of those present."
 * 3) *And I couldn't find any mention about how he treated his massassi and all that relationship.
 * 4) *I'm willing to give this some work but I'm going to need review help. –Tm_T (Talk) 06:33, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Brenn Tantor

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: February 4, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Rune Haako

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: February 11, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Kreivi
 * 2) *Dates should be moved from image texts and subheads to the bio. Kreivi Wolter 17:27, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) *All dates also needs better sourcing. For example, The Phantom Menace is not a proper source, since the date isn't clearly mentioned in the movie. Kreivi Wolter 17:27, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *Links from image texts could be deleted. They are rather unnecessary. Kreivi Wolter 17:27, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) *The intro needs major expanding, and it could be formated more, how to say... chronologically? Kreivi Wolter 17:27, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *P&t could also use some work. For example; "By the end of the Clone Wars, Rune appeared to be somewhat more courageous compared to most Neimoidians, as he tried to order Vader to stop his massacre of the Separatist leaders, rather than blubber mercy pleas like most of the other council members." Am I the only one who thinks this doesn't sound so rational? Kreivi Wolter 17:27, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Bria Tharen

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: March 11, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Jeff
 * 2) *Something crazy is going on with p&t. It's quoteless, sourceless, and contains speculation. Menkooroo 05:59, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **That's how we wrote 'em back in the day. :P Don't know how I missed that when I sourced the rest, but I'll sort it over the weekend. Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:00, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Good stuff. Is there a quote that could be used for "The Yavin Vassilika?" Also, some info for the bts:
 * 5) ****Crispin heavily discusses her creation of Bria here.
 * 6) ****Apparently Crispin got a lot of hate e-mail from fans who vehemently disliked Bria's character. She was an active poster on the Jedi Council Forums, but the "Bria haters" as she calls them caused her to stop posting for a while. Read her comment on it here. See some of that saga first-hand throughout this thread. Menkooroo 03:13, June 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Darca Nyl

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: April 1, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Jeff
 * 2) *Linking is pretty bad. And I'm pretty sure he wasn't in all five issues of The Ahakista Gambit. I'll go through and fix these within the next couple weeks if I have time. Menkooroo 15:08, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Hoth (individual)

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: April 29, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:36, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Moffship
 * 2) *Species and gender should be mentioned in the intro and the bio.
 * 3) *If Dree Vandap and Tal were trained by Hoth, they should be listed in some capacity in the "Apprentices" field of the infobox. (Would do this myself, but I don't know enough about these individuals.)
 * 4) *His status as a Jedi Master is not mentioned until the middle of the bio; his status as a Jedi Lord is not even in the bio.
 * 5) *Context is needed on Darth Bane in the bio.
 * 6) *The P&T could probably be expanded.
 * 7) *No P&A section.
 * 8) **In regards to this one, there's no info for one. I don't think he ever even uses the Force in a work. - Lord Hydronium 06:01, June 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 9) *A lot of the "Name" section of the BTS seems unnecessary; there's also speculation in the first two sentences. The last sentence is all that is really relevant to the character, and it should be incorporated into a new section detailing his origins (a "Hoth was created for the video game Dark Forces: Jedi Knight before appearing in..." kind of paragraph). Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 18:24, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Form IV: Ataru

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: May 27, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 06:11, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Joram Kithe

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: June 3, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * At a glance, the Bts needs some expansion. He's also mention in the CSWE, which should be added to the Sources list. Kilson ( Let's have a chat ) 05:22, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Jaina Solo

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: July 2, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 10:39, June 15, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Gaeriel Captison

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: August 20, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object Comments
 * 1) What Trak Could Track
 * 2) *I went through with a copy-edit and the main thing that has stood out to me is that Coruscant Museum could do with at least a stub. And is there possibly anything else that could be added to T&a to expand it? If not, then ignore that bit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:07, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Will check into this week. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 04:48, June 27, 2011 (UTC)

Guardian of Forever

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: 27 August, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Jujiggum
 * 2) *Lots of very speculative wording in the intro: "seemingly created," "For some unknown reason," "apparently killing," "seemingly invincible"
 * 3) *"&hellip;whose technology and culture had been lost to time." Surely we can say something like, "whose technology and culture had been lost by ."
 * 4) *"When the Rebels first entered the massive structure&hellip;" What were the Rebels doing there? There's no preamble to this whatsoever.
 * 5) *In the intro it's mentioned that the ancient race sealed the Guardian in the city; but in the body it isn't said who actually locked up the Guardian.
 * 6) *More to come once these are fixed. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 17:17, June 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

The Keeper

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: September 10, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: May 15, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Stagorr

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: September 17, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 7, 2011

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Assuming that Dark Wizards bit is sorted. –Tm_T (Talk) 06:36, June 16, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Tm_T
 * 2) * P&a: comparison of his powers to Palpatine's looks to me all OR, am I totally lost with this? –Tm_T (Talk) 18:52, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Agreed. I've tried to remove the speculation. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 20:10, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Savaged&hellip;
 * 5) *The bit about Dark Wizards in the P&A needs to be sourced (it's not mentioned in the cartoon or comic book). Does anyone know where these magician types are named Dark Wizards? ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 20:12, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Chik Apla

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: September 24, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 8, 2011

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Kilson ( Let's have a chat ) 05:27, June 14, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Snow King

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: October 1, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 8, 2011

(2 Inqs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 05:18, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Kilson ( Let's have a chat ) 05:37, June 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:37, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Green Tentacle:
 * 2) * His siblings aren't identified in the biography.
 * 3) * Rise to power: Context on Iceheads.
 * 4) * Fatal attraction: Who are Warrick's companions? I assume it's the three who are introduced later, in which case it just needs rearranging a little. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:24, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) **Got all three. Menkooroo 13:27, July 3, 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) Kreivi
 * 2) * "During the Imperial era..." Would it be better to change this to the actual date, which is 3 ABY? Kreivi Wolter 17:43, June 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Changed. Menkooroo 13:27, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Hiromi

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: October 1, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 19, 2011

(1 Inqs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) The glory of this article is assured! Yaaayyyy!!! Menkooroo 12:11, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) I've read over this article many a time and the only thing I object to is that it makes me think of donuts and thus become hungry for donuts.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 03:11, June 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Dagon Niriz

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: October 15, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 19, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Record Time

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: October 15, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 19, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Plif

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: October 22, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 19, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Teek

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: October 22, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 19, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Guri

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: October 29, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 19, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Imperators II
 * 2) * Five redlinks in the Sources section.  Imperators II (Talk) 14:10, June 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Down to three. All to the same article. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:51, June 29, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Jadru

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: October 29, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 19, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Carth Onasi

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: November 5, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 19, 2011

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Seems to be like in last review except splitting long paragraphs. –Tm_T (Talk) 16:28, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ozrei N'takkilomandrife

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: November 12, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 19, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Voss Parck

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: November 12, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 21, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Anti-Sith conspiracy

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: November 19, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 22, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Burl Ives

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: November 26, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: June 25, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Tholme

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: November 26, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: July 3, 2011

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Reviewed it myself a year ago, and it hasn't changed much since then.  CC7567  (talk) 23:59, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 06:26, July 5, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Recently regained its status in May 2010, just FYI.  CC7567  (talk) 23:59, July 3, 2011 (UTC)

Odan-Urr

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: December 3, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: July 4, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Ravager

 * Originally nominated by:
 * Last featured on: December 3, 2007
 * Changes since last review: diff
 * Date placed on this page: July 4, 2011

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments