Forum:CT Archive/Valid reasons to put something back in the trash

Another question arising from Forum:Disputed Trash compactor closing is, "When is it acceptable to nominate an article for the trash compactor when it's already survived one TC discussion?" Obviously, we don't want articles to be nominated and renominated endlessly. However, articles are sometimes kept after a TC discussion ends with "no consensus" — if someone has a new argument for deletion or merging, why shouldn't that be considered?

I'm not making a proposal yet, but I'm starting a CT thread up anyway. Hopefully, discussion will lead to a proposal soon. Note that this discussion should not be taken as invalidating any TC discussions which were started before this thread was closed. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)