Forum:SH:Conflicting policies

I've been meaning to bring this up for a while now (since around April Fool's Day, actually). It occurred to me while reviewing User page policy and User image policy (I want to refactor my user page), that those policies have rules that are (IMO) in conflict with "Wookieepedia is not censored":
 * User page policy Rule #4: User pages and images within must be "safe for work": no content which is unsuitable for a family audience or would be likely to disturb or offend other users. Any illegal or inappropriate content or links to such material is forbidden.
 * User image policy Rule #6: Images must be "safe for work": no nudity, excessive gore, or other content which is unsuitable for a family audience, or would be likely to disturb or offend other users.

Specifically, it's the "safe for work" clause that (in my view) contradicts the "no censorship" policy. As an example, I'm sure most of you are aware of an infamous image in Wookieepedia's library (I don't want to link to it here, but hint: it was displayed on the Main Page on April Fool's Day). That image is NSFW, therefore it cannot be displayed on User pages, per policy. Yet, as evidence shows, it can be displayed anywhere else on the wiki. Why are User pages a special case here?

I think this is something that should go to CT, but I wanted to bring it up here and try and get an idea of what the community thinks of this situation. Which policy wins out? Should the "safe for work" clause be removed from the User page/image policies, or (much less likely) should the "no censorship" policy be amended? I open the floor for discussion. - Esjs (Talk) 23:52, May 9, 2014 (UTC)