Wookieepedia:Inq/Palpatine

Wookieepedia &gt; Inquisitorius &gt; 

Palpatine

 * Status: Featured Article (other options are "featured article", "former featured article", and "article")

Things to do

 * Needs sourcing
 * Remove conclusions.
 * Conclusions pwnt. Rodtheanimegod4ever 22:13, 7 March 2007
 * Florid prose and analysis needs removal.
 * Some BTS bits need condensing.
 * Too many rhetorical questions
 * "It's an encyclopedia article, not a scholarly essay."-Havac

Removal of FA status

 * FA status removed per IRC meeting.

Keep

Remove

Comments
Forget my last few comments. It has tons of sources already. What it's our longest and most comprehensive article. What more do you want? Rodtheanimegod4ever 01:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * What the hell? What the f*** are you doing? This is outrageous! KEJ 14:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm up waaay too late, so I'll just point you to the meeting log for the reasons. Bottom of the first page/top of the second. - Lord Hydronium 14:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Reason should be given here out of user-friendliness, I think. KEJ 14:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I know, but we just got this thing going, like, today. Hopefully somebody will be along while I'm sleeping and add comments to the ones that don't have any; if not, I'll add them in later. - Lord Hydronium 14:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey, that link to the meeting log just directs you to an image file, not to any reasons for the Palpatine article to lose its FA status. Someone might want to correct that before the mobs start gathering with torches and pitchforks....  Jwebb13 HoloNet[[Image:oldsith.jpg|40px]] 03:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The image file is a PDF. .  .  .  .  03:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It has no sourcing. Under our new rules, all canon facts need to be referenced with the source they came from. - Lord Hydronium 06:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * In that case, wouldn't { { SIP } } be more appropriate? Rodtheanimegod4ever 23:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Nope. Because it's on probation, and the sourcing is not in progress. .  .  .  .  23:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * There, I called on people to start sourcing and killed that horrid "Conclusions" section personally. Can we get rid of that template now? That thing has got to scare some children.... Rodtheanimegod4ever 05:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC) P.S. Hey, look, a Four Dot Elipsis! Rodtheanimegod4ever 05:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Template will be removed when article is sourced. And yes, they do pop up from time to time. .  .  .  .  05:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * So, why haven't you begun sourcing it, 4Dot? -- SFH 05:27, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Because I did not write it. .  .  .  .  05:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)