Talk:Dyad in the Force

Curious about the line that says the dyad was "formed" in TLJ, when it seems to be that the dyad is not something that can be "formed" at all, it's just something they inherently are. Popular interpretation of the "two that are one" description is the idea of one soul split across two bodies, but that doesn't have to be added to this page since it's not explicitly stated. Even so, would it be acceptable to remove the line about it being "formed" in TLJ, since there is absolutely zero reason to believe that that is the case, and it doesn't really align with the basic description of the dyad besides? --Lunaeria (talk) 00:52, December 23, 2019 (UTC)