Wookieepedia:AC/Log/2012 August 25

[08/25/12 23:01:42] <@ecks>	Welcome to meeting 49! [08/25/12 23:01:45] <@Cal_Jedi_>	:D [08/25/12 23:01:48] <@ecks>	It will be so fun!!1! [08/25/12 23:01:48] <@Cal_Jedi_>	Countdown until Cal loses connection again. :P [08/25/12 23:01:52] <@Cal_Jedi_>	hhahaahhahhahaha [08/25/12 23:02:02] <@Jangston>	YEE [08/25/12 23:02:02] <@ecks>	Apparently there is nothing from last time. [08/25/12 23:02:08] <@Cal_Jedi_>	:D [08/25/12 23:02:10] <@ecks>	So we'll just start with new stuff [08/25/12 23:02:12] <@ecks>	!!1! [08/25/12 23:02:12] <@Cal_Jedi_>	See ya, everyone [08/25/12 23:02:14] <@Cal_Jedi_>	:P [08/25/12 23:02:19] <@ecks>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Gank [08/25/12 23:02:25] <@ecks>	Gank—"mysterious," "very little known," and other OOU perspective stuff that needs to get axed. [08/25/12 23:02:25] <@ecks>	   I don't own the sources but isn't it possible those are actually officially stated by the sources, in which case there is no violation of WP:MOS? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:38, August 22, 2012 (UTC) [08/25/12 23:02:25] <@ecks>	       Considering the article was written in 2007, when this type of thing was especially rampant, I would say it's a likely violation. Either way, someone should go through the source to confirm. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:43, August 22, 2012 (UTC) [08/25/12 23:02:29] -!-	Cal_Jedi (~chatzilla@wookieepedia/administrator/Cal-Jedi) has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) [08/25/12 23:02:33] <@Jangston>	Bye Cal [08/25/12 23:02:35] *	Cal_Jedi_ is now known as Cal_Jedi [08/25/12 23:02:39] <@Jangston>	Hi Cal [08/25/12 23:02:41] <@Cal_Jedi>	YAY [08/25/12 23:02:44] <@Cal_Jedi>	:D [08/25/12 23:02:57] <@Jangston>	heh Hanzo [08/25/12 23:03:03] <@ecks>	PROBE [08/25/12 23:03:05] <@Toprawa>	I think the issues with this article run a lot deeper than a few "unknowns" here and there. [08/25/12 23:03:17] <@Toprawa>	I think the entire article's wording is subpar. [08/25/12 23:03:28] <@ecks>	yeah [08/25/12 23:03:42] <@Cal_Jedi>	Yeah. There are details that may have passed by others, but bug me, so I'm not liking it. :P [08/25/12 23:03:58] <@Jangston>	"Some Ganks spoke Galactic Basic Standard.[5]" totally worth a new paragraph :P [08/25/12 23:03:59] <@Toprawa>	I am totally serious when I say, like, total rewrite. [08/25/12 23:03:59] <@Toprawa>	This article is a nice example of 2007-era detail standards [08/25/12 23:04:11] <@Toprawa>	Look at all of our modern alien species articles, and they're pretty much masterpieces [08/25/12 23:04:15] <@Toprawa>	This doesn't even come close [08/25/12 23:04:33] <@Cal_Jedi>	Jang: XD [08/25/12 23:04:42] <@ecks>	My vote is probe [08/25/12 23:04:44] <@Jangston>	The article. It's too damn. Choppy. [08/25/12 23:04:44] <@Cal_Jedi>	There are multiple ones like that, Jang, too. [08/25/12 23:04:46] <@Xd1358>	so is mine! [08/25/12 23:04:48] <@Toprawa>	Probe [08/25/12 23:04:50] <@Jangston>	Probe [08/25/12 23:04:53] <@Cal_Jedi>	Yes, indeed. Probe [08/25/12 23:04:55] <@CavalierOne>	Probe [08/25/12 23:05:05] <@ecks>	Gank probed. [08/25/12 23:05:21] <@ecks>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Unidentified_Keshiri_bartender [08/25/12 23:05:27] <@ecks>	Unidentified Keshiri bartender—bad formatting from recent additions, needs to use, and requires sourcing throughout. [08/25/12 23:05:51] <@Cal_Jedi>	It should only need the one source, though, correct? [08/25/12 23:05:55] <@Jangston>	The sourcing I could see because of the ref & notes section [08/25/12 23:05:56] <@ecks>	If there's a reference for something, there needs to be a reference for everything. [08/25/12 23:06:04] <@Jangston>	otherwise wouldn't it be just self sourcing due to 1 source? [08/25/12 23:06:05] <@Toprawa>	per ecks [08/25/12 23:06:06] <@Cal_Jedi>	So, it, in theory, shouldn't be hard to source, correct? [08/25/12 23:06:15] <@CavalierOne>	In theory [08/25/12 23:06:21] <@Cal_Jedi>	right, I just meant that it wouldn't be too hard to do, it would seem. [08/25/12 23:06:30] <@Toprawa>	It should be very easy, but the original author is no longer active [08/25/12 23:06:36] <@Toprawa>	Unless someone volunteers to adopt it, it will die [08/25/12 23:06:47] <@Jangston>	JJM man :P [08/25/12 23:06:51] <@CavalierOne>	Floyd! [08/25/12 23:06:54] <@ecks>	Unless someone wants to check it out, probe. [08/25/12 23:06:55] <@CavalierOne>	Adopt it! [08/25/12 23:07:06] <@CavalierOne>	Lost Tribe! [08/25/12 23:07:16] <@Cal_Jedi>	Yeah, it is Lost Tribe. All in favor of Floyd doing it. :P [08/25/12 23:07:21] *	@ecks slaps IFYLOFD around a bit with a large trout [08/25/12 23:07:29] <@Jangston>	Give it to Floyd [08/25/12 23:07:38] <@Cal_Jedi>	If he doesn't answer, then probe [08/25/12 23:07:40] <@IFYLOFD>	Blargle [08/25/12 23:07:44] <@IFYLOFD>	Probe that shit [08/25/12 23:07:45] <@Jangston>	He should then kick Cade for good measure [08/25/12 23:07:59] <@ecks>	This sounds like a good plan. [08/25/12 23:08:04] <@Cal_Jedi>	XD [08/25/12 23:08:10] <@ecks>	Anyway, probe [08/25/12 23:08:12] <@Toprawa>	Probe [08/25/12 23:08:15] <@Jangston>	yeah probe [08/25/12 23:08:19] <@Cal_Jedi>	yes [08/25/12 23:08:25] <@CavalierOne>	Probe then [08/25/12 23:08:36] <@ecks>	Bartender probed. [08/25/12 23:08:44] <@ecks>	Alright, that's the agenda... HOWEVER [08/25/12 23:08:49] <@Cal_Jedi>	D: [08/25/12 23:08:56] <@Cal_Jedi>	However's always stick you. [08/25/12 23:09:03] <@ecks>	I thought we needed some sort of consensus to strike agenda items [08/25/12 23:09:10] <@ecks>	http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Wookieepedia%3AAC%2FMeeting_49&diff=4142388&oldid=4142284 [08/25/12 23:09:19] <@ecks>	And CC has struck this, for example, by himself [08/25/12 23:09:26] <@ecks>	I'm not sure if there was some consensus to strike it [08/25/12 23:09:29] <@Cal_Jedi>	IIRC, isn't it like 2 AC's have to agree to do it or something, an it can be done via IRC? [08/25/12 23:09:36] <@Toprawa>	We do, but it gets ignored [08/25/12 23:09:40] <@Jangston>	He struck the objection then ran for Pennsylvania [08/25/12 23:09:44] <@ecks>	"The AC has decided that a minimum consensus of at least four AC members present on IRC is needed to remove from an AC meeting page an article nominated for review for a future meeting in the instances that others have satisfactorily handled the objections to that article prior to the meeting. Consensus can also be reached on the meeting page itself; see the instructions page for details. This is done in an effort to [08/25/12 23:09:45] <@ecks>	eliminate any unnecessary time spent looking at articles during meetings. " [08/25/12 23:09:46] <@Toprawa>	There wasn't [08/25/12 23:09:46] <@Toprawa>	People think they can just remove their own additions [08/25/12 23:09:54] <@ecks>	§1 of the AgriCorps law. [08/25/12 23:10:13] <@Jangston>	I just leave it alone :P [08/25/12 23:10:38] <@Jangston>	if someone takes care one of my agenda items [08/25/12 23:10:53] <@ecks>	Hmm [08/25/12 23:10:59] <@Cal_Jedi>	So, um, yeah. [08/25/12 23:11:13] <@ecks>	Looks like CC just struck them all. [08/25/12 23:11:30] <@Toprawa>	This voting method becomes burdensome when articles are listed on the agenda with minor little fixes [08/25/12 23:11:30] <@Toprawa>	But I think the point should be don't burden the agenda with minor little fixes [08/25/12 23:11:30] <@Toprawa>	Talk pages work just as efficiently [08/25/12 23:11:41] <@Toprawa>	We can certainly go through them if you feel like it, ecks [08/25/12 23:11:46] <@Toprawa>	Otherwise, I don't care, personally :P [08/25/12 23:11:54] <@ecks>	They're not that many, so let's do it for the sake of bureaucracy. [08/25/12 23:11:54] <@Jangston>	Maybe CC is making it easier for us :P [08/25/12 23:12:10] <@ecks>	Swilla Corey—"unfortunately," as well as lack of adherence to WP:DASH. CC7567 (talk) 07:16, August 22, 2012 (UTC) [08/25/12 23:12:10] <@ecks>	   Fixed that "unfortunately" part, not the other one though. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:08, August 22, 2012 (UTC) [08/25/12 23:12:15] <@ecks>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Swilla_Corey [08/25/12 23:12:33] <@ecks>	http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Swilla_Corey&diff=4138749&oldid=4013827 [08/25/12 23:12:37] <@ecks>	There's still some dash issues here. [08/25/12 23:13:08] <@Jangston>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Swilla_Corey?diff=4138749&oldid=4013827 [08/25/12 23:13:11] <@Jangston>	i dont even [08/25/12 23:13:46] <@ecks>	I only spot one dash issue [08/25/12 23:14:12] <@Jangston>	Though she was never financially secure, Corey was satisfied with just reveling in her freedom–a stark contrast from her upbringing in slavery. [08/25/12 23:14:26] <@ecks>	I fixed that one. [08/25/12 23:14:30] <@ecks>	So it should be all good now. [08/25/12 23:15:07] <@ecks>	Spare? [08/25/12 23:15:20] -!-	Cal_Jedi (~chatzilla@wookieepedia/administrator/Cal-Jedi) has quit (Ping timeout: 245 seconds) [08/25/12 23:15:43] <@Toprawa>	Spare [08/25/12 23:15:44] -!-	Cal_Jedi (~chatzilla@wookieepedia/administrator/Cal-Jedi) has joined #wookieepedia-agricorps [08/25/12 23:15:46] *	ChanServ sets modes [#wookieepedia-agricorps +o Cal_Jedi] [08/25/12 23:15:50] <@CavalierOne>	Spare [08/25/12 23:15:54] <@Jangston>	Sparee [08/25/12 23:16:07] <@Cal_Jedi>	Spare (what?) [08/25/12 23:16:10] <@ecks>	Swilla spared [08/25/12 23:16:16] <@ecks>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Vindican [08/25/12 23:16:20] <@Jangston>	:D [08/25/12 23:16:21] <@ecks>	Vindican—TOR update tag. [08/25/12 23:16:22] <@ecks>	   I am waiting for Trayus's update. I wish I had TOR. JangFett (Talk) 19:26, August 24, 2012 (UTC) [08/25/12 23:16:22] <@ecks>	   Lol totally forgot about this. I'll take care of it tonight for you. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 19:33, August 24, 2012 (UTC) [08/25/12 23:16:22] <@ecks>	       Mkay, taken care of. Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 16:40, August 25, 2012 (UTC) [08/25/12 23:16:24] <@ecks>	Spare. [08/25/12 23:16:35] <@Jangston>	Trayus took care of it. Many months later :P [08/25/12 23:16:40] <@Cal_Jedi>	:P [08/25/12 23:16:42] <@Cal_Jedi>	Spare [08/25/12 23:16:44] <@Jangston>	I wish I had TOR to help out :P [08/25/12 23:16:46] <@Jangston>	Spare [08/25/12 23:17:04] <@Toprawa>	Spare [08/25/12 23:17:10] <@CavalierOne>	Spare [08/25/12 23:17:22] <@ecks>	Vindican spared. [08/25/12 23:17:25] <@ecks>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wyrpuuk_Cha [08/25/12 23:17:31] <@ecks>	Wyrpuuk Cha—requires sourcing throughout due to more than one source/appearance. CC7567 (talk) 07:19, August 22, 2012 (UTC) [08/25/12 23:17:31] <@ecks>	   Very easy fix. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 19:08, August 22, 2012 (UTC) [08/25/12 23:17:33] <@Toprawa>	Spare [08/25/12 23:17:39] <@Cal_Jedi>	Spare [08/25/12 23:17:40] <@ecks>	Spare [08/25/12 23:17:41] <@Jangston>	Spare [08/25/12 23:17:43] <@CavalierOne>	Spare [08/25/12 23:17:51] <@ecks>	Cha spared. [08/25/12 23:18:05] <@ecks>	Then some maintenance page fun [08/25/12 23:18:16] <@CavalierOne>	I have one issue to raise also. [08/25/12 23:18:16] <@ecks>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Ragnos_Lakes [08/25/12 23:18:18] <@ecks>	Update tag [08/25/12 23:18:28] <@Toprawa>	The book has been out a month as of yesterday [08/25/12 23:18:32] <@Jangston>	More JJM [08/25/12 23:18:42] <@ecks>	Perfect. Let's probe [08/25/12 23:18:45] <@Toprawa>	Probe [08/25/12 23:18:48] <@CavalierOne>	Probe [08/25/12 23:18:51] <@Jangston>	Probe [08/25/12 23:19:13] <@Cal_Jedi>	Probe [08/25/12 23:19:18] <@ecks>	Ragnor Lakes probed. [08/25/12 23:19:24] <@ecks>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Takara_Mountains [08/25/12 23:19:26] <@ecks>	Update tag [08/25/12 23:19:32] <@Toprawa>	Same book [08/25/12 23:19:34] <@Toprawa>	probe [08/25/12 23:19:37] <@ecks>	Probe [08/25/12 23:19:41] <@Jangston>	Jugs D: [08/25/12 23:19:42] <@Jangston>	Probe [08/25/12 23:19:43] <@Cal_Jedi>	Probe [08/25/12 23:19:47] <@CavalierOne>	Probe [08/25/12 23:19:58] <@ecks>	Takara Mountains probed [08/25/12 23:20:26] <@ecks>	That seems to be all, then. [08/25/12 23:20:30] <@ecks>	Cav, you had something? [08/25/12 23:20:33] <@Jangston>	TIme to party [08/25/12 23:20:34] <@Jangston>	Oh [08/25/12 23:20:35] <@CavalierOne>	Indeed. [08/25/12 23:20:44] <@CavalierOne>	A little spoilerly for Mercy Kill, however. [08/25/12 23:21:03] <@Toprawa>	I'll forget whatever you reveal here long before I ever read that :P [08/25/12 23:21:09] <@Cal_Jedi>	I don't mind spoilers from that book, if that's what you're waiting for. :P [08/25/12 23:21:21] <@Jangston>	I read 2 pages of it :P [08/25/12 23:21:23] <@CavalierOne>	I'll try and be non-spoilerly as much as possible :P [08/25/12 23:21:30] <@CavalierOne>	Basically: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Zilaash_Kuh [08/25/12 23:21:36] <@Toprawa>	guh [08/25/12 23:21:44] <@CavalierOne>	The character is revealed to be the alias of another character from MK. [08/25/12 23:21:58] <@CavalierOne>	The info needs to be merged, yadda, yadda, yadda. [08/25/12 23:22:00] <@CavalierOne>	BUT [08/25/12 23:22:41] <@CavalierOne>	Since the article as-is is no longer current, then we either need to propbe pending a merge and review, or strip it now and let it be renommed. [08/25/12 23:22:57] <@CavalierOne>	Since any merge will require us to take the links out of the random, etc pages. [08/25/12 23:23:10] -Dave2/Wallops-	Today a great pioneer, explorer and man passed away: Neil Alden Armstrong, the first man on the moon, died at the age of 82. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/08/25/us-usa-neilarmstrong-idUSBRE87O0B020120825 [08/25/12 23:23:19] <@CavalierOne>	Thoughty [08/25/12 23:23:23] <@CavalierOne>	Thoughts* [08/25/12 23:23:32] <@Toprawa>	I think it's fair to point out that there is, historically speaking, dissenting opinion among the community as to whether to allow alias articles like this or not. [08/25/12 23:23:33] <@ecks>	In other news, freenode just told me Neil Armstrong has died. [08/25/12 23:23:39] <@ecks>	(go on, don't mind me) [08/25/12 23:23:43] <@Toprawa>	Personally, I'm totally in favor of merging this into Jesmin [08/25/12 23:23:54] <@Toprawa>	And there's nothing from stopping anyone from being WP:BOLD and doing so [08/25/12 23:23:58] <@CavalierOne>	Oh, I agree, [08/25/12 23:24:06] <@Toprawa>	but this might go beyond our jurisdiction to some degree [08/25/12 23:24:12] <@CavalierOne>	But merging it will not make Jesmin a good article [08/25/12 23:24:26] <@CavalierOne>	So it should be stripped, or at least probed. [08/25/12 23:24:28] <@ecks>	Didn't we have a case like this with the Inq? [08/25/12 23:24:37] <@ecks>	With Shan and the unidentified Jedi Knight? [08/25/12 23:24:55] <@ecks>	We just killed off the unidentified JK right away since it was going to be merged with Shan [08/25/12 23:24:56] <@Toprawa>	Cav, my concern is that I don't know if we legitimately have the authority to force a merge. What are you suggesting, exactly? [08/25/12 23:25:10] <@CavalierOne>	Well, it needs to be merged, no question. [08/25/12 23:25:18] <@CavalierOne>	Kuh is Jesmin. [08/25/12 23:25:45] <@CavalierOne>	But the GA status can't transfer over to Jesmin once the merge is complete. [08/25/12 23:25:47] <@ecks>	Meh, IMO we should just kill off the status. [08/25/12 23:25:54] <@Toprawa>	True [08/25/12 23:25:57] <@Cal_Jedi>	indeed. [08/25/12 23:25:58] <@ecks>	It's going to be a completely different article after the merge. [08/25/12 23:26:02] <@CavalierOne>	Indeed. [08/25/12 23:26:04] <@Jangston>	yeah simpler :P [08/25/12 23:26:10] <@CavalierOne>	So we either need to probe or kill now. [08/25/12 23:26:15] <@ecks>	!insta-kill [08/25/12 23:26:17] <@Jangston>	Kill for me [08/25/12 23:26:23] <@Toprawa>	Wait a minute [08/25/12 23:26:49] <@Toprawa>	What I'm saying is, though, that if someone chooses to update this article to specify that this character is Jesmin, I don't think we can force the article to be merged into the actual Jesmin article [08/25/12 23:26:57] <@Jangston>	if we probe, someone needs to check the merged info right? Since it has the status. Are you moving the GA article to JesmiN? [08/25/12 23:27:07] <@Toprawa>	If someone wanted the article to remain a separate GA as an alias article, I think they have that right in the absence of policy [08/25/12 23:27:43] <@Jangston>	I was thinking about moving Jesmin information to the GA article [08/25/12 23:27:56] <@ecks>	Which one is the "real name"? [08/25/12 23:28:01] <@Toprawa>	Example: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Arica [08/25/12 23:28:03] <@CavalierOne>	Really, Kuh should be moved to Jesmin. [08/25/12 23:28:12] <@Toprawa>	If someone wanted to GA Arica, we couldn't deny them that. [08/25/12 23:28:19] <@Cal_Jedi>	Yeah. We could, in fact, "rename" this as Jesmin, and let it keep its status provided that all proper information is transferred. [08/25/12 23:28:35] <@CavalierOne>	But, Jesmin is MAJOR character in MK. [08/25/12 23:28:44] <@CavalierOne>	The update would have to be pretty thorough. [08/25/12 23:28:46] <@Toprawa>	I agree Kuh should be merged to Jesmin, and someone has the right to do that [08/25/12 23:28:48] <@Cal_Jedi>	So, we would be keeping the Kuh article, and scrapping the Jesmin article, but keeping the name Jesmin and the status. [08/25/12 23:28:51] <@ecks>	All alias articles need to go away. :/ [08/25/12 23:28:55] <@Toprawa>	But if someone protests that merge, it would end up in CT [08/25/12 23:29:07] <@Cal_Jedi>	Cav: Big character meaning like Featured lenght? [08/25/12 23:29:10] <@Toprawa>	I'm saying that the AC cannot formally require this article to be merged, only updated [08/25/12 23:29:10] <@Cal_Jedi>	*length [08/25/12 23:29:15] <@CavalierOne>	Cal - yep [08/25/12 23:29:16] <@Jangston>	Xd: Including slutty Ahsoka alias :P [08/25/12 23:29:25] <@Cal_Jedi>	XD [08/25/12 23:29:35] <@CavalierOne>	Huh, someone already merged the info into Jesmin [08/25/12 23:29:46] <@CavalierOne>	Maxattac :s [08/25/12 23:29:57] <@CavalierOne>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Jesmin_Tainer [08/25/12 23:30:05] <@ecks>	We can't just move over the status without reviewing it somehow, though. [08/25/12 23:30:06] <@Cal_Jedi>	So, apparently, the GA status is going either way. Whether it be through a crappy merge, or through a over-abundance of words. [08/25/12 23:30:19] <@CavalierOne>	I would see it that way. [08/25/12 23:30:29] <@Jangston>	Well I wouldn't give the GA status to the merged article :P [08/25/12 23:30:58] <@Toprawa>	I feel like I'm talking to a wall here. [08/25/12 23:31:09] <@Jangston>	sorry :P [08/25/12 23:31:11] <@Toprawa>	We cannot probe on the grounds of a required merge. [08/25/12 23:31:22] <@Toprawa>	We can probe on the grounds of needing an update with merged information. [08/25/12 23:31:42] <@Toprawa>	Merge means turning those two articles into one, single article [08/25/12 23:32:06] <@Toprawa>	We don't have the authority to require someone to do that to maintain GA status [08/25/12 23:32:20] <@Toprawa>	What we can do is require them to update the Kuh article [08/25/12 23:32:40] <@Toprawa>	if they wanted to merge it into a single article, it can still be probed, but on the grounds of going through a Redux type thing [08/25/12 23:32:41] <@CavalierOne>	Okay then - seeing as how you believe that the Kuh article could remain as an alias article - it needs updating for MK in any case sue to certain story factors. [08/25/12 23:32:43] <@Cal_Jedi>	You're saying keep both articles until said time that someone complains about it? [08/25/12 23:32:58] <@Cal_Jedi>	Basically? [08/25/12 23:33:12] <@Jangston>	yeah it has to be checked. I should've said that when I said "give the GA status to the merged article" :P [08/25/12 23:33:18] <@Toprawa>	Cav> Yes [08/25/12 23:33:37] <@Toprawa>	I'm not saying they should remain separate, but that no policy exists to require them to merge [08/25/12 23:33:41] <@ecks>	Basically, alias articles make things complicated. :( [08/25/12 23:33:44] <@Toprawa>	And thus we cannot enforce one [08/25/12 23:34:10] <@CavalierOne>	In that case, Kuh needs to be updated - independent of the merge issue - since the continuing identity of Kuh is a plot point in MK. [08/25/12 23:34:23] <@CavalierOne>	So I say probe on that issue in any case. [08/25/12 23:34:45] <@Toprawa>	I agree. [08/25/12 23:34:53] <@Cal_Jedi>	All right. Sounds good. [08/25/12 23:35:09] <@Toprawa>	This might all change when Jugs comes back and decides what he's going to do with it [08/25/12 23:35:20] <@CavalierOne>	And then we let Jugs sort it out when he comes back. [08/25/12 23:35:28] <@Toprawa>	Yeah [08/25/12 23:35:50] <@Toprawa>	We might ultimately end up coming up with an impromptu policy for this type of situation if he decides to merge [08/25/12 23:36:05] <@Toprawa>	i.e., in what form does the GA status transfer over [08/25/12 23:36:23] <@Toprawa>	We could go on about that, but I think we'd all rather not :P [08/25/12 23:36:25] <@CavalierOne>	Well, if updated correctly, I see no issue. [08/25/12 23:36:33] <@CavalierOne>	It would be the same as a regular update. [08/25/12 23:36:34] <@ecks>	Sooooo [08/25/12 23:36:37] <@ecks>	Probe? [08/25/12 23:36:45] <@Toprawa>	Probe for update from MK [08/25/12 23:36:49] <@CavalierOne>	Probe [08/25/12 23:36:53] <@Jangston>	probe [08/25/12 23:37:22] <@Cal_Jedi>	probe [08/25/12 23:37:29] <@ecks>	Probed. [08/25/12 23:37:38] <@ecks>	Anyone got something else? [08/25/12 23:37:44] <@Jangston>	Where is Tommy? :P [08/25/12 23:37:46] <@CavalierOne>	Nothing I can think of. [08/25/12 23:37:53] <@Jangston>	I haven't seen him a long time [08/25/12 23:37:57] <@ecks>	Any discussion items? [08/25/12 23:37:58] <@Jangston>	in a* [08/25/12 23:38:10] <@CavalierOne>	Unless we want to discuss new member potentials. We're getting a little light. [08/25/12 23:38:14] -!-	IFYLOFD (~chatzilla@wookieepedia/administrator/IFYLOFD) has quit (Ping timeout: 276 seconds) [08/25/12 23:38:28] <@Toprawa>	Anyone in mind? [08/25/12 23:38:33] <@Jangston>	Not at the moment. :P [08/25/12 23:38:37] <@CavalierOne>	None specifically. [08/25/12 23:38:52] <@CavalierOne>	I thought we might start thinking of candidates for discussion next meeting. [08/25/12 23:39:01] <@Jangston>	Yeah I'll be on the look out next time [08/25/12 23:39:07] <@Toprawa>	ok [08/25/12 23:39:11] <@ecks>	Sounds good. [08/25/12 23:39:29] <@Jangston>	I'm seeing more of the same users on the GAN nominating than reviewing [08/25/12 23:39:36] <@Cal_Jedi>	Indeed. [08/25/12 23:39:41] <@Cal_Jedi>	We need someone that can review, not nominate. [08/25/12 23:39:46] <@CavalierOne>	Yep. [08/25/12 23:39:48] <@ecks>	Let's make Xd1359. [08/25/12 23:39:50] <@Cal_Jedi>	We have tons of nominators, the GAN needs reviewers. [08/25/12 23:39:52] <@ecks>	Anyway, are we done? [08/25/12 23:39:56] <@CavalierOne>	And Cavalier Two [08/25/12 23:39:59] <@Jangston>	:D [08/25/12 23:40:00] <@Toprawa>	I need to go [08/25/12 23:40:03] <@Toprawa>	Nice meeting, everyone [08/25/12 23:40:04] <@Jangston>	Later Tope [08/25/12 23:40:05] <@Toprawa>	Peace [08/25/12 23:40:07] <@CavalierOne>	You planet needs you! [08/25/12 23:40:14] <@Cal_Jedi>	later. [08/25/12 23:40:16] <@Jangston>	White Castles will be in order :P [08/25/12 23:40:17] <@Toprawa>	It does. :P [08/25/12 23:40:18] <@Jangston>	next time [08/25/12 23:40:21] <@Toprawa>	goobah! [08/25/12 23:40:24] -!-	Toprawa (~chatzilla@wookieepedia/administrator/Toprawa) has quit (Quit: Is it the shoes?!)