User talk:JangFett/archive8

 '''This talk page is an archive of previous talk posts and is no longer active. If you wish to leave me a message, please use my current talk page.''' 

SWPM Friend of Wookiee nom
Hi, JangFett. I was wondering if you would be able to support the nomination for the Star Wars PocketModel TCG official website to become friends with Wookieepedia&mdash;like the former Decipher SWCCG committee site&mdash;since there are many articles that link to the SWPM site for source images&mdash;except that these images aren't restricted like the the ones currently on SWCCGCC. Thanks! &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 13:30, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Headache
I actually could've sworn that I saw a 21 BBY date elsewhere in the book, but I can't find it at the moment. In any case, I think the best we can assume is that it's an error on the author's part&mdash;I have no inclination to go along with it. At this point, I'm about ready to shout down anyone who makes the mess even messier. :P  CC7567  (talk) 20:56, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Gank AC page
Hey, Jang, can you point me to the AC page about the current probe of Gank? I"d like to work on the article, but the template on the page currently goes to a redlink, so I'm not sure what needs to be done. Thanks! ~ Savage  01:33, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Kep-She
Good evening sir or whatever time of the day is when you read this message. I found the Essential Guide to Warfare in your collection and wondered if you could help me out a little bit with the info about Kep-She? Thanks for any sort of reply.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:34, April 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 15:33, April 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem, I actually never considered to leave the article at its current state and will detail the background of the battle a little bit more.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:30, April 9, 2012 (UTC)


 * I worked a little bit more on the article. If you still have some ideas how to improve the article please let me know.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 20:13, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

But...
It was not triva, it was an animation error. I just thought it was important to point out. If there is no diffrence could you explian, please?--Darthahsokaboyfrenidfett 21:19, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Rattatak dating
Jang, on the article Mission to Rattatak, I changed the infobox for the battle to fit between the Mission to The Wheel and the First Battle of Kamino. It's been reverted on the Kamino article, so I ask you: when does this event take place? Leland Chee said it was mere weeks after Geonosis, but this was later changed to two months (in the Dooku article, it's placed right before Kamino). Also, is it true that the NEC says the battle took place in 24 BBY? If so, that would be a rather odd retcon, as it would place the event OUTSIDE of the Clone Wars.

Also, I'm working on brining the Battle of Nelvaan article up to a higher status - since you seem to be knowledgeable when it comes to the old CW show, could you possibly help out? Thanks, Chip Brown 15:53, April 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Also, in the article Battle of Ilum, there used to be a mention of the battle's appearance in Clone Wars Chapter 1 which has since been deleted. I think there was a mention on the old Cartoon Network CW site that the snowy world with the dome in Chap. 1 was indeed Ilum, but this link is dead. Now, would it be appropriate to re-add the Chap. 1 mention, or does verifiability take place over truth? Chip Brown 10:58, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Consensus
I'm sure the Agricorps as a group have the right to tinker with the archiving instructions, but I'm skeptical that one member can unilaterally declare them a "mess" and re-order them as he pleases. They were modeled after the FA instructions, which no Inquisitor has had a problem following, and which aren't ordered arbitrarily. You add the article to the queue at the beginning, and since you already have it open in edit mode, you add the FA star and hit save. You don't have to open the article in edit mode at all for the remainder of the process. The community ratified modeling the GA queue after the FA queue, and I wouldn't be skeptical if the AC as a group discussed changing at a meeting, but consensus isn't generally unilaterally ignored. Menkooroo 00:46, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * The instructions page was indeed part of the discussion, and the vote: Vote # 1 read: "Approve... the proposed updates to Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/instructions." I'm not following precedent here; I'm following community consensus. In this case, consensus does dictate that what was established in the FAN carries to the GAN. It's what was approved. Deciding that it's "in need of fixing" is highly subjective. Menkooroo 01:02, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Have you not read the CT? Vote #1 explicitly approved this edit. It included a link to this page and said "These are the proposed changes." It seems like you're not familiar with the CT; take a few moments to read it over so that you can understand what was voted on by the community. Let me know when you've read it. I'm not accusing you of violating any policy, and I apologize if that was what I came across as. It just seemed at first glance like an active attempt to subvert consensus, but now I understand that it was ignorance of the CT. Menkooroo 01:12, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't mean "ignorant" as an insult. You expressed doubt that this edit had been approved by the CT when Vote #1 clearly did approve it. It wasn't a stretch to assume based on that that you weren't familiar with the CT. If you are, in fact, familiar with it --- why should an individual user's subjective declaration of a "mess" trump community consensus? Menkooroo 01:23, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * Still waiting on an answer to this question. Since the community voted for this edit, why should an individual user's subjective declaration of a "mess" trump community consensus? Menkooroo 16:12, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

About a GANom (unidentified young new recruit)
Hello, JangFett. I wanted to ask you, if you have time, if you could review the GANom of the "unidentified young new recruit" article. It's already been reviewed in detail by SavageBob and Clone ommander Lee, but I still wish to know the opinion of other editor&mdash;especially ACs, of course... I've been on the Wook for five years, but it's my first try at a GA. It went through a lot of hard work, and I hope it will end up being accepted. :) Who knows, if this one works, perhaps I'll try with others? Cheers.--LelalMekha 15:47, May 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I wouldn't want to sound impatient. Did I? Well, most probably. :$ I guess this what it does on your first GANom. ;-)--LelalMekha 16:04, May 4, 2012 (UTC)

TCW timeline (not really) in The Ultimate Visual Guide
Have you gotten Star Wars: The Ultimate Visual Guide: Updated and Expanded yet? In the introduction, Windham says that the order in which TCW episodes presented comes with input from Leland Chee and is actually chronological, but I'm having trouble just following the order that Windham is trying to suggest, what with all the placement of pictures and grouping by topics ("Monsters," "Witches and Demons," etc.) instead of anything that seems like what we've seen before.  CC7567  (talk) 03:33, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll have an SH thread up soon and then you can see what I'm talking about.  CC7567  (talk) 05:01, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * How different is the placement of the episodes?  JangFett  (Talk) 05:03, May 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * You'll see in about seven minutes. :P  CC7567  (talk) 05:04, May 5, 2012 (UTC)

Verhandle
I'm having trouble uploading an image to the article, Verhandle, which I recently created. It claimed that if I contacted an administrator, you might be able to help me. The site claimed an error due to "combined user upload," or something like that. Do you know what the problem is?--Cheesetater 03:59, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Retcon?
With the release of The Clone Wars episode Citadel Escape wouldn't that make the appearance of his lightsaber retcon in Coruscant Nights I: Jedi Twilight? DarthRevan1173 01:06, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Where is my screenshot??
My screenshot, which was deleted a short time ago, was properly sourced, fit into the article, and had a proper name, so I would like to get some explanation on its deletion. --XXLVenom998 16:32, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Lego Star Wars stop motion videos
Hi! I have a new account on Youtube and I was wondering if you'd like to take a look at it if you have the time! My channel name is LJ1138. Please comment if you like what you see!

Blank sections
what exactly are you talking about? i have not edited that page in a while.--CC-1990 21:37, May 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * I was busy making the new Updated visual guide page. I probably just thought i would add it when i was done.--CC-1990 22:00, May 7, 2012 (UTC)

Hardcase
When did that user insert "trivia"? I don't see it in any of the pages you referenced.

CT-4/619
Could you look over your objections for CT-4/619? They've been adressed for over 3 weeks. Thanks, 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:19, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, sorry to bother you. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:02, May 20, 2012 (UTC)

Season 5 Teaser
Is the fact that the Season 5 Teaser was an excerpt of the full Star Wars Weekends trailer not worth noting? Bane7670 00:42, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * The fact that the full trailer was/is to be shown at Star Wars Weekends was released by an official source. It is in the description of the Season 5 teaser video on Star Wars.com. Bane7670 00:54, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Is it still not worth having on the page? Bane7670 15:25, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, the full trailer was recently released here. Though I'm not certain if that site is affiliated with Lucasfilm LTD. Bane7670 01:14, June 12, 2012 (UTC)

Timeline of Books edit
I would like to make a major revision to the Timeline of Books page. It would make the colors more consistent with the Timeline of media page. I would make red unpublished, blue adult novels (because blue is the color for the main stories as opposed to the short stories), and green would be kids novels. I think the consistency would make it easier for readers in the long run and give a more professional look to the site. Could I have your input on this? Thanks. &mdash; Eшσҡ  $їтӈ Lōяƌ  04:58, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

R3
Oh I didn't know it was your article. I just saw that article had a rather easy update, and I wasn't sure if its original nominator was still active or not. Hanzo Hasashi 13:39, June 4, 2012 (UTC)

Will you join my wiki called freestarwars wiki it has one page and needs more please spread this around on other peoples talk pages.Also I need photos on the wiki. if you want to you can become an admin. sincerly- --Han Solo64 01:55, June 10, 2012 (UTC)

Offer of Assistance
Well, I know as well as anyone what it's like to have an overfilled schedule. How about this: I could complete it myself, and you could fix anything you don't like later? I know your answer's probably going to be "No" on this, but I thought I should offer to make myself useful around here. I am, of course, willing to follow through on my offer, and do a good job, but if you wish to do it by yourself... All you have to do is say the word. User: Dr. Anonymous1 19:06, June 21, 2012 (UTC)

wiki
I don't want to start another edit war, again. I've been in plenty on a lot of wikis. --MrSmartyMax 22:10, June 26, 2012 (UTC)


 * I did add those statements by Jabba myself. I got then from a website, this was how it was actually spelled. --MrSmartyMax 22:15, June 26, 2012 (UTC)


 * Son, if you just got it from some random website, then odds are it isn't legit.  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 22:21, June 26, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Pongy
Not a problem, and nope, no conflict. Can't wait to see him finished. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 00:19, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Just a mention and some stuff about his Master. Not much more than a sentence or two. I can take care of it for you if you want. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 00:22, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

hi
I didn't post nonsense this all truly happened and I wanted to make a timeline for the users of the site. I worked on this and did research it won't bother anyone so what's your problem?
 * As a matter of fact, the question is not if JangFett has a problem with it or not. I first added a deletion template too. While your addition must have been done in good faith, the subject of your out-of-universe article is simply non-notable. --LelalMekha (talk) 15:20, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

CSD -- No trouble, my friend
It is no trouble, Jang. Perhaps the only thing I could say is that your edit was a bit... harsher than mine. ;-) --LelalMekha (talk) 15:25, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

AC Meeting 48
Hey Jang. Quick reminder that AC Meeting 48 is tomorrow at 4 PM EDT. Cheers.&mdash; Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 20:50, July 6, 2012 (UTC)

WP:VG one year anniversary
&mdash; Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 02:10, July 9, 2012 (UTC)

CT amendment
This is to inform you that a small amendment has been made to Forum:CT:Subcategorization and MW 1.19. The reasons for the amendment are laid out there. Please review it and make sure that you are still in support. Thanks. &mdash;MJ&mdash; War Room Friday, July 13, 2012, 14:22 UTC

Re:Romance
No problem. I'm at Dairy Queen at the moment, I'll check it when I get home in five minutes. Cade  Calrayn   17:42, July 14, 2012 (UTC)

tcw
Hey, I am trying to add a fact about Anacondans' resemblance look Planarian like! They do! If you don't know what Planarian is, look it up. Second, one of those jerks keep deleting it! Now look what they've done, they made that page blocked! Now I can't put a fact there!

TCW Characters
Well if you look at the majority of the pages, they are about characters which generally have lines, and the others are about characters that actually did something to stand out from the crowd. There are way more pages out there about characters that do absolutely nothing, but they still have their own articles. I am careful to look after details and quotes that make them stand out, even though that might mean creating articles about a lot of characters.TheMasterMind (talk) 13:28, July 16, 2012 (UTC)

88th Flight
Please identify and post the specific issues regarding Original Research on the 88th Flight article's Talk Page. Thank you. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 03:30, July 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Your basis for calling it OR is that you believe that the SWPM game has no bearing on the identifying of the material in the TCW show. However, that is entirely not the case as the SWPM game was a major platform for introducing characters, equipment, and vehicle/ship units that would be featured in series episodes not yet aired. This has been established by advertisements and promotional material issued by the WizKids company and Lucas. The identity of the droids fighters marked with the same markings as those in the game were confirmed by the game company prior to the airing of the show. Their visual collective (rather than individual) identity is confirmed by WizKids and Lucas (particularly George Lucas, who was reported by Topps/WizKids company representatives to have signed off on design sheets personally). In addition, visual acknowledgement of identification is proper as per other precedents. &mdash; Gethralkin  Hyperwave 08:08, July 26, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Workbenches
Sorry about that. I just thought it would be easier fixing it myself than telling Zoidburg what to do. 501st dogma ( talk ) 16:10, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

D'Pow
Ok, cool, didn't know. Thanks for the heads up, friend!&mdash; 18:54, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

Dyer Radio quote
Hello JangFett, I have a problem with the Dyer article having his radio drama quote in the bio. That quote is a direct contradiction with what was said in the movie (him shouting "Freeze" just before getting hit by that charge) and there's no way he could have canonically said both things at that moment. If you put that line in the article at all, you can choose to just put it in the behind the scenes section (see DV-692 as an example). Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 00:32, July 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * But the second after Dyer shouted "Freeze" in the film, he was hit and fell. Yes I know scenes in adaptations are canon, but not the parts that contradict with the films. For example, are we to say that Cassio Tagge was canonically choked by Vader for mocking the Force in ANH, or Kabe antagonized Luke in the cantina, and was attacked by Obi-Wan? I don't think so. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:00, July 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * And I think any direct contradictions are to be treated as non-canon, and, if mentioned at all, mentioned in the BTS. I remember having that issue with the Kendal Ozzel article in the past. The quote in the bio when Vader was choking him was from the Radio Drama, which directly contradicted with the movie. Anyhow, when Tranner rewrote the whole article sometime afterward, he also replaced that quote with the movie quote. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:07, July 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes the article isn't complete, but when I see that quote in the bio, it appears to me you will be treating it as fully canon when it's overridden. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:14, July 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, maybe you can have an inconsistencies subsection, and list the quote there instead of the bio, like Nahdonnis Praji? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 01:17, July 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Probably a subsection title that incorporates both inconsistency and different takes of Dyer. The Renz/Dyer merge, split, and possibly this radio drama bit.  JangFett  (Talk) 01:30, July 25, 2012 (UTC)

Shmi Skywalker
Why was my topic removed from the Shmi Skywalker Lars talk page? Did I give information that was incorrect or did I just offend someone with it? I do not mean to sound like I am talking out of my a** with this theory but there are people who believe it. If I can find a source that states the full theory then I will give it. Matt Seay (talk) 01:04, July 27, 2012 (UTC)

More 21 BBY dates
Hey Jang. When you get the chance, please head on over to the Senate Hall&mdash;more battles/episodes have been dated to 21 BBY as the new timeline is getting implemented across the site. Please make sure to update the dating in your articles as needed. Thanks.  CC7567  (talk) 06:53, July 27, 2012 (UTC)

Dyer Inuse
Hi.

Just out of curiousity, when will you finish up the necessary edits for the Dyer article? Weedle McHairybug (talk) 01:21, July 31, 2012 (UTC)

I've replied
I've completed all of stuff you suggested for the Massacre of Otoh Sancture GA nom so if you could check that out it would be great.--Commander Code-8 (talk) 08:07, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

User
Thank you--99.56.53.249 16:32, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

Unlucky(I105)
Hi. First off, thanks for resuming the cleanup.

That being said, I wanted to ask about something that was on the personality and traits section (emphasis on "was"): What was the "Unlucky(I105)" thing that was there before you removed it? Was it a card, and was it intended to be a source? I want to know, because if it was a card and intended to be a source, we might need to note the source somewhere. Weedle McHairybug (talk) 00:30, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Re:Articles
I just redirected them to the CWA article. Someone would have probably recreated all of them if I had deleted them anyway. Thanks for the heads up, Jang. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 16:31, August 5, 2012 (UTC)

Fives Training image
Hello there, since the message I left on CT-27-5555's talk page has gone unnoticed, I thought I should inform you of this. This image that was posted on the page does not actually have Fives in it at all, much less arguing with Echo. As I recall, Fives had the training number of 5, while 4 went to Cutup. Am I mistaken? Bane7670 (talk) 19:16, August 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * That is what I thought. Fives isn't in this image at all. Bane7670 (talk) 22:08, August 14, 2012 (UTC)

Talk Pages
Thanks for the tip I'll make sure I do in future. Sorry you had to go back through and correct all those I created today. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:57, August 13, 2012 (UTC)

Your image of Luke
Where did you get this picture of Luke from? Im not a homophobe but Luke looks like that gay character of Sasha Baron Cohen's (Bruno) from the movie of the same name. Lolz.Supershadow3 (talk) 00:15, August 14, 2012 (UTC)

Ahsoka Picture
I am guessing the picture was removed because the resolution was wrong or something like that, can I change that? Matt Seay (talk) 02:41, August 14, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Concurrent Ryloth
You're very, very behind, Jang. I'm disappointed. :P It's how Star Wars: The Ultimate Visual Guide: Updated and Expanded orders it, and you'd know that if you read Forum:SH:TCW Timeline 2012. Step it up, mister.  CC7567  (talk) 18:26, August 14, 2012 (UTC)

Meeting 49
Hilarious Entertaining AC Meeting 49&trade; is scheduled for August 25 at 8 PM UK time like usual. Please make an effort to show up. Cheers, 1358  (Talk)  22:50, August 17, 2012 (UTC)

Zam Wesell
I don't understand why my edits were undone. They did not lower the standard of the article and in fact added new information that was properly sourced. Jartka&#39;irn (talk) 02:34, August 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Appreciate that. Unfortunately, until it is given an official name it is difficult to refer to it in an in-universe sense despite its wide-spread use. Would it be permissible to change it to ''"that displayed targeting information in an obscure language" Jartka&#39;irn (talk) 04:11, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

why the hell
why the hell did you remove the stuff on the expanded universe page? Marino312 (talk) 14:35, August 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * and who decided that? If you haven't noticed that page went for over one year without mentioning Lego Clone Wars III!
 * since barely anyone has the game here and most likely do not care That is blasphemous & horrible! it is certainly better than the old republic.

Category:Titan Magazine [sic] comics
If yourself and Cal_Jedi insist on deleting, renaming or recreating pages I or other users created I'd appreciate it if you actually take the time to correctly spell the titles. ‘’Category:Titan Magazine comics’’ should in fact be ‘’Category:Titan Magazines comics’’ as that is the name under which the company is registered. Also back flipping on pages you've nominated for deletion then contributing to them later is highly irregular. Jartka&#39;irn (talk) 03:51, August 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * Thankyou for your kind words. Have a pleasant day. Jartka&#39;irn (talk) 03:58, August 26, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Revert
It's fine&mdash;just please be careful in the future.  CC7567  (talk) 20:07, August 30, 2012 (UTC)

Project Novels
By any chance would you be interested in joining the project. Just get back to me when you can if you interested in joining. DarthRevan1173 (Long live Lord Revan) 22:58, September 2, 2012 (UTC)