User talk:Imperialles

ESB section on Lando

 * Whaddya think? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 18:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, and here's this: ;-) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 18:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hooray, thanks! Oh, and the ESB section is great! =) --Imp 20:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

My admin nomination.
Imp, would you be willing to support an "admin trial period" for me? Please respond on my talk page. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 19:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not too sure about a trial period, either the community trusts you or they don't. But I did strike my oppose vote. --Imp 20:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
 * As much as I appreciate that, why? Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Zayne Carrick article
Just out of curiousity, how come my link to Alek was reverted? -  Yoshi  626  01:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Because Alek is already linked to in the article. Excessive links shouldn't be put in quotes, per WP:MOS. --Imp 06:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, alright. Sorry. -  Yoshi  626 [[Image:Yoshiegg.jpg|20px]] 12:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Uploading
May I ask, could you help me with understanding how to upload images? I've read the 'help' article on it, but it's all Greek to me. Thank you. -Solus 14:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Did you read the guide to image use? =) --Imp 14:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Which BTW, should have the user image section clarified. There are three custom images allowed for a user page, but there isn't much of a hard and fast rule on the number of images on a user page, provided they are in an article as well. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'll keep that in mind -Solus 17:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Consensus vs. Policy
Hey Imp, could you explain to me your view on consensus vs. policy, in relation to what I wrote on the admin page? Hopefully I can understand better. Thanks. —Xwing328 (Talk) 19:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I feel that page-by-page consensus should not override policy, because that would lead to chaos and wikiality. I do agree that not all things require policies, however. --Imp 19:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Right, I probably made a bad example. I was just trying to say that policy in some places just isn't necessary. —Xwing328 (Talk) 19:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * In that case I completely agree with you&mdash;excessive policies is definitely not a good thing, but necessary policies should be enforced over page-by-page consensus in order to keep Wookieepedia operational and reliable. --Imp 20:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikia Featured Wiki
Hey Imperialles,

First I wanted to say that I love your site. You guys have done a great job and are leading the way with new great stuff for Wikia! I did want to mention though that Wookieepedia isn't really eligible to be the featured wikia since it has already been featured this year. I think it would be most fair to let another wiki, possibly ours, which has only been a part of Wikia for a few weeks, benefit from the additional exposure. Don't you?

Update: I should reclarify my position as it probably came off more selfish and self-serving than intended. I think any Wikia wiki other than those featured recently should have the opportunity. We should also come to an agreement as to what exactly is 'recent'. Is that one year, two, or only 6 months?

Let me know what you think.

Regards,

--JamieHari 17:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * My apologies, it actually does say "The following nominees each have been active in the past 30 days, have at least 10 articles, and have not been featured in the last year.", so I suppose it is within the established rules.
 * I withdraw my concern. :-)
 * --JamieHari 17:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, the only reason we decided to nominate ourselves again was due to the one year rule that was brought to our attention by GHe. Thank you for your kind words, and I hope you'll be featured in February. =) --Imp 19:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Me too, cheers!
 * --JamieHari 15:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Forum:Non-canon material
Hey, Imp...I'm just going through previous voters on Forum:Non-canon material to see if they were aware that there was a 3rd option in the vote, to keep the ambig material and remove the non-canon material? Though I want to sway your vote, I'm just checking to make sure that you knew the option was there. And may I remind you that There Is No Cabal. :) &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 03:45, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Changed my vote, thank you for bringing this to my attention. --Imp 00:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Image deletion
I think that the image of the clone trooper on the Commander Valiant page should not be deleted because that may be him. Is it okay that it is from another website?
 * The possibility of it being Valiant is not good enough&mdash;it's just speculation. =) Additionally, the image has a Rebelscum watermark, which means they probably have copyrighted the image (not the action figure). --Imp 22:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Xanatos.jpg image opinion
You've got a good eye when it comes to images. Can you take a look at Image:Xanatos.jpg. I don't want to revert the image back, just because of pride that it was my upload. To my eye, the previous version looks a little clearer and crisper, especially looking at Xanatos' face. I'd like your opinion on it before reverting it back. - JMAS 18:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * After close inspection, the newer version (Fey'lya's) is of slightly (very slightly) worse quality&mdash;the .jpg artifacts are a little bigger. This is probably caused by Fey'lya cropping the image, then resaving it with a higher compression value (the higher compression value, the more artifacts). A compromise would be to simply crop the old version, saving the cropped image with as low compression value as possible. Hope that helps. --Imp 19:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I honestly don't see the need for the image to be cropped, so I'll go ahead and revert it. - JMAS 19:55, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Isard sourcing. Quotes & Images.
Hey Imp, I think I sourced all the images and quotes. Could you strike your objection or take another look? Cull Tremayne 20:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll get to it in a few minutes (I'm going through all the candidates right now). --Imp 20:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. Cull Tremayne 20:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Nute Gunray FA
Apart from the Shadow Hunter stuff, I think I've adressed all objections. I don't know who has Shadow Hunter though. . .  .  .  22:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I do! I do! Yes, I'd be delighted to add the information! :D --Imp 22:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, thanks very much! .  .  .  .  22:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Good articles versus Great Articles
Not sure if this is too late but you do remember my concept of changing "Good Articles" to "Great Articles", because for some reason, the best articles not being featured had to be better than just good. I mean, good articles would still be below the level of a Great Article, and one of the Great Articles would then be a Featured Article simultaneously for that week. I couldn't find the appropriate forum or talk page to reenact this idea, but you were the primary force behind the restructuring of the system. -- Riffsyphon1024 00:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * In case you missed this. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't miss it, I simply haven't responded yet! :P I agree with your "Great Article" idea&mdash;it would make the change to an eventual new system to be much smoother. --Imp 06:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

WookieeProject News

 * I've worked some on Lando's SotE section and also on Depa Billaba. Would you take a look? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help. I think we can knock off Depa our list to do! Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, we most definitely can. Thank you! --Imp 16:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Fanart Removal
Ok, fair enough - I guess we'll have to wait til Revan appears properly in the comics. You might also like to know that it's been posted on the Darth Revan's holocron page as well (which is why it thought it was ok to use). Apologies. (Ulicus 19:43, 14 December 2006 (UTC))
 * Heh, no problem at all. =) --Imp 19:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Bria Tharen
I made the NEGTC image a bit wider so that it's not so tall at 250px and swapped it for the other image. Have a look and see what you think. Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Happy Christmas!
Hi ! i want to ask you why do you want to delete the article about the Wookiee villager ?i know that are no sources but it have appearances and is no fanon and is from Galactic Battlegrounds game?I'm looking forward for you answer !Darth Nospher 13:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Darth Nospher