Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Vendaran

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 10:28, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 14:26, November 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Gethralkin  Hyperwave 17:05, December 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:16, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Well-done. Any thoughts on Bob's question, though? Menkooroo 05:55, December 24, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Toprawa:
 * 2) * Do we have any establishment of whether it's "Near-Human" or "near-Human"? I see this alternating constantly across the wiki, and that article seems to capitalize more than not. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:47, December 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Unfortunately, there is no consistency across various sources. I.e.,
 * 4) ***Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game, Second Edition uses "Near-Human".
 * 5) ***Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded uses "near-human".
 * 6) ***The Essential Guide to Alien Species uses "near-human".
 * 7) ***The Star Wars Customizable Card Game uses "near-human".
 * 8) ***Ultimate Alien Anthology uses "near-Human".
 * 9) ***The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia uses "near-human".
 * 10) **I'm happy to work up a CT on this to lear Wookieepedia policy on this, in line with our policy on capitalising "Human". Do yo want to wait for that to pass first before striking? --Eyrezer 00:19, December 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 11) ***Very interesting. Thanks for looking into all of that. Please feel free to start a CT if you wish, but the nom probably doesn't need to wait for something so minor. I trust it can be updated if necessary per any decision we may reach. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:16, December 17, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Any post-New Republic history that can be gleaned from the Atlas? Since they're colonists, we can't assume anything about the pre-NR stuff, but for that period and later (or at least post-NR), there might be a factoid or two in the maps. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 14:49, November 17, 2011 (UTC)

Mission to Barab I

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:38, December 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Part Seven

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 21:21, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Fixed a minor spacing error. Good job. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg(Whatever) 16:51, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Cal Jedi
 * 2) * One of the things in the infobox is not referenced.
 * 3) **Bah, I must be getting to tired :P Adressed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:36, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Haha. Obviously, I know the feeling. :P -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 21:21, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) * "rumor of trouble" - Why is this in quotations in the body and infobox? I believe you can just remove the quotation marks. -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 01:21, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) **This is the way it is phrased in the novel. However, I agree and therefore removed the quotation marks. Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:36, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) Exiled Jedi
 * 8) *"Mundi was defeated almost to death during his mission." This seems oddly worded to me, perhaps: "Mundi was defeated and nearly killed during his mission." In my opinion, this says the same thing in a much clearer way.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  02:46, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Indeed, that was taken from the novel. Adressed and thanks.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:41, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified space battle (Saesee Tiin)

 * Nominated by:  JangFett  (Talk) 03:43, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) I hope that this not the only unidentified CW battle article.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:13, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, if only we had more nice articles about the good Clone Wars.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 04:13, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) "I'm on your tail, Red Leader." Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 01:36, December 31, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Could you find a way to introduce the Providence-class vessels into the body, so they're not infobox-exclusive? Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 18:22, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Addressed  JangFett  (Talk) 23:24, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Rubedo
 * 4) * If it was part of the Outer Rim Seiges, wouldn't that place the battle in the Outer Rim? It's still hy-uge, but it's still more specific than general "space." NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 07:53, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Per Chee, it was part of Anakin's exploits during the Outer Rim Sieges.  JangFett  (Talk) 08:56, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Then the article should reflect that it took place "somewhere in the Outer Rim" rather than "somewhere in space." NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 09:20, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Unfortunately, we do not know if it was in the Outer Rim at the time of the battle. All we know is that it was part of the Outer Rim Sieges.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:40, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 8) *****That I can go with. Tiin jaunted off to the Mid Rim to get some ice cream, I bet. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:21, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) ******Naru, if you have proof that this takes place in the Outer Rim, I'll be more than happy to see it, but there is nothing suggesting that this battle took place in the Outer Rim. It may be a part of the Sieges, but we do not know its exact location.  JangFett  (Talk) 13:34, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) *Skywalker was in both the previous and subsequent battles. I think they should be mentioned in the body as where he was coming from and where he was going. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 08:00, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Because we do not know the order of these exploits, assuming they take place in chronological order by stating so in the article is speculation, and is not needed for the article. If it comes down to removing the previous and next battle in the infobox, I will remove them, otherwise there is simply no information for a prelude or aftermath section.  JangFett  (Talk) 08:56, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 12) ***Though it's been a while since I've seen it, I don't believe this series was presented in anachronistic order. It's not speculation to work with a series in chronological order if it's never been referred to as anything different. That's especially the case here since, apparently, they all took place in the same episode. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 09:20, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) ****We cannot assume this, especially now with the unestablished timeline of the CW. Unless something will be confirmed in the future, there is simply no chronological order of these battles. We don't even know if these battles are related to one and another.  JangFett  (Talk) 17:40, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) *****There is no conflict with new sources here. TCW affects when Ani got knighted and events of 21 BBY (yes, and other things not currently relevant). It hasn't even touched the Outer Rim Sieges, 20 BBY, yet to my knowledge and he was already a Knight by that episode. The presence of continuity problems in the war does not mean that we have to assume&mdash;yes, assume&mdash;that there's something wrong with this battle continuity-wise. Disregarding that SW:CW is chronological, the main point here is that they happened in one episode. I do acknowledge the screen wipes after having watched the episode again, but I don't think that presents a problem. Those wipes are in everything and we've never looked at them twice. Unless you're telling me that we're interpereting WP:ATT to mean if I'm reading a book that has one battle at the beginning, another in the middle, and one more at the end that I cannot attribute them to that order when no-one at LucasFilm has said to do so I'm not understanding the issue here. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:21, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) ******Naru, we do not know the order of these battles. That is the end of this discussion.  JangFett  (Talk) 13:34, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Battle of Commenor system

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:24, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In which a battle is fought and Neville professes his undying love for the fair Lady Lovegood.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) HP freak.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 09:33, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 04:56, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Chun

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:54, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: No idea.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 18:31, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 01:06, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 07:08, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) "The theory hadn't been solved till 20 BBY." That doesn't quite read right. Maybe reword along the lines of "had not been solved by 20 BBY" ? Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 18:19, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Adressed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:20, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Kind of a question/objection: You call Chun a "prestigious scientist." Is that how the book describes him? Is the quote for the article the only time that Chun is mentioned? If so, I don't know how you can call him "prestigious" or a "scientist." Anyone can come up with a theory. And just because someone has a theory, I don't think we can call that person "prestigious." -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:25, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) *My dark side says that you can come to the conclusion that he is a good scientist simply by the fact that he described a formula no one was able to solve. However, my light side&mdash;which is stronger at the moment&mdash;says that this is an assumption and therefore not canon. The quote is all about Chun in the novel and therefore removed all stuff we cannot directly state without specualtion, may it be so little.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk
 * 5) Toprawa:
 * 6) *I think the article ought to make some sort of mention of the fact that I-5YQ was trying to solve the theory or whatever it is. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:08, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Chun's Theory of Reductional Infinity

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:54, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Urgh.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 18:31, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:19, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) So...what you're telling me is Occupy Wall Street came from a Star Wars novel? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 07:05, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) "theory was still to be solved." That doesn't quite look right. Maybe reword it as "had yet to be solved" ? Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 18:17, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:21, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

S'hrah

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 17:11, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I'm a article writer and not a....

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Dangit man, I'm not a doctor! Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 18:15, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Doctor who?-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:19, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Doctor-Donna, Cal. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:06, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * Category:Individuals of unidentified species. This could possibly be a SOFIXIT, but I've noticed this on so many of your noms lately. Please see if you can watch that. Otherwise, looks good. -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:16, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) *Indeed. Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 20:17, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) "Known to have no tolerance for any discipline outside medicine, [he taught many pupils, including Jos Vondar,] who would later become a surgeon on the planet Drongar. " This is run-on sentence as it's an apositive within an apositive. Needs rejiggering.  NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 06:58, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) *While I do not understand a single word written above (:P), I somehow adressed this objection I believe. Take a look.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:47, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) **It's deceptively difficult to explain for such a minor mistake. :p But grammars are grammared. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:06, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Plun Kil

 * Nominated by: 501st dogma 18:32, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:06, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Nice job working through all those objections.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 14:50, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Lee's charge
 * 2) * Gender is missing in the body.
 * 3) * Maybe a little bit context on the Clone Wars.
 * 4) * The BtS should be written in past form.
 * 5) * Concept art for Master Kil was drawn by Kilian Plunkett.  Not a full sentence.
 * 6) * Please find a synonym for Kil in one instance in the bio (e.g. Besalisk Jedi Master).
 * 7) * BtS: Fourth Season of what?
 * 8) * Hair and eye color as well as his affiliation to the Republic have to be mentioned outside the infobox.
 * 9) *Good work. 19:02, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 10) Cal Jedi
 * 11) * Lee already got my objections, so please just note my copy-edit. -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 19:26, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 12) * On more thing: Some mention in the body about his clothing and lightsabers would be good. -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 19:31, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 13) **Done--501st dogma 16:28, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 14) ***On most CAs that have passed, it is proper procedure to say something to the effect of "on at least one occasion he wore..." That way, it is not speculation in implying that he always wore that clothing. Also, I think you need to explain the clothing better, I think, rather than just saying that he wore "standard Jedi attire." You could just chop that part out probably since it is rather ambiguous anyway. Instead, you could describe his clothing some, like "On at least one occasion, he wore a tan and white shirt" or whatever it would be to fit him. See what you can do, then I'll take another look.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 23:39, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) ****Ok, I've improved his clothing description, though it is all in one sentence.--501st dogma 17:00, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) * "He was also known to use four lightsabers" - Known by whom? I think this could be better stated if written more like the clothing part. Something like "On occasion, he carried four lightsabers..."
 * 17) * "sturdy belt" - Does it say anywhere in the source that it is "sturdy?" If not, then it's speculation, and that word will have to be removed. &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:39, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) **Ok, I've removed sturdy and fixed the lightsaber sentence.--501st dogma 14:09, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Green lightsaber
 * 2) *If anyones wondering about the green lightsaber, it can only be seen here. (slide 3 on trivia)--501st dogma 21:02, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) *also, please do not try to get a picture of him with all of his lightsabers. This is because it has already been tryed but just caused his portrait to look squished, and still did not include all of the lightsabers in the image.--501st dogma 22:52, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) **I disagree -- the image in the infobox now makes him look like an amputee or something. I think you should either include the full-body image from the slide (even if it looks squished) or crop in to only his head and shoulders, like most character articles do. If you go the latter route, you could include the full concept art slide in his BTS if there's room. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 16:15, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Ok, I've created a better portrait though I do not think the full picture will fit in the BtS. Also, the same picture twice in on small article would kind of look weird, would'nt it?--501st dogma 16:25, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

N'do Maetrecis

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:58, December 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: If you want some details on the medicinal terms with witch his illness is described please say so. Last MedStar I nom.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) First CAN review of 2012!-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:15, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:39, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Egg timer

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:18, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: First CAN of 2012. It's from 1979.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work.-- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:23, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) No quotes?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:48, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) *Prose. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:46, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * In the BTS, you state that it was mentioned in the book. However, in the Appearances section, you say that it first appeared in the book. Which is it? Good work otherwise. -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 01:48, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Reason One why I don't like putting 1st on single appearance articles: the templates are one character apart. Fixed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:18, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Conquest of Drezzi

 * Nominated by: -- Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 03:14, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:The new abuse filter works! :D

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:12, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:01, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) NaruHina
 * 2) * Ressia needs specific context as the Queen of Drezzi. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 06:52, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 23:59, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Lee
 * 5) * A conquest was carried out by the Sith Empire on the planet Drezzi[1] prior to the Great Galactic War,[2] a galaxy-wide war fought between the Galactic Republic and the resurgent Sith Empire that began in the year 3,681 BBY. "A conquest was carried out" sounds meh to me. Can you change this.
 * 6) **Fixed.
 * 7) * Please tell us that the Queen and her children were spared.
 * 8) **It was already there.
 * 9) *Good work.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:51, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) **Thanks for the review.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 23:59, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) Exiled Jedi
 * 12) *It seems to me that you could place something in the other side of the combatants box. Something like "Unidentified opposing force (Drezzi)" would probably work. If this is okay, I think you should probably find some place for it in the body of the article.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:14, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) **Yeah, I was thinking about that when I nominated it. Sounds like a good idea, so added.
 * 14) *I think that you should mention the holoprojection that the Queen gave as a gift, since it was a result of the battle.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  17:16, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) **Added to the body. I didn't add it to the infobox since I don't think it was actually an outcome of the battle, per se.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 23:59, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) Imp
 * 17) * As with your GAN, you need to provide a specific reference from TOR using the TORCite template. --Imperialles 03:48, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) **As with the GAN, I added TEA instead.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 15:17, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 19) ***As with the GAN, you missed one. :P --Imperialles 20:02, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 20) Imperators II
 * 21) * Umm, why do you use the date 3,681 BBY considering it has nothing to do with the events of the novel? The article should be more precise and indicate that the conquest was carried out sometime before 3,954 BBY, the date in which Sechel told Scourge about the conquest. (Since there is no way the conquest could have happened after that date) (Same applies to your Ressa's husband GAN)  Imperators II (Talk) 18:16, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 22) **Changed.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:33, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) While it is linguistically correct, "conquest" is indeed a noun, could you state the opening sentence differently? "A conquest was carried out..." sounds wierd. I'd suggest saying "...Drezzi was conquered..." NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 06:52, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Yeah. It did sounds kinda crappy. Changed with Lee's objection.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 23:59, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Aalto

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 21:12, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Thanks to MJ for the quotes.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Looks good after a copy-edit. &mdash;MJ&mdash; Training Room Monday, January 2, 2012, 21:32 UTC
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  15:35, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified clone trooper (Haurgab)

 * Nominated by: 501st dogma 17:45, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:death by Kaski-throwing food tray

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Lee
 * 1) * This clone trooper was a trooper who served in the Grand Army of the Republic during the Clone Wars. During the course of the war, he served with the 85th Infantry Brigade.: Two times "trooper" and two times "during" in a short order. Please replace both once.
 * 2) **Done, though I had to use amid in one of the durings place--501st dogma 13:18, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) *A date is needed in the intro.
 * 4) **I mentioned that the Clone Wars started in 21 BBY--501st dogma 13:18, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Please remember that "Clone Wárs" is capitalized. You need to mention 19 BBY too, as it is his death date.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:35, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ****Ok, I've done that--501st dogma 16:32, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) *Context on Haurgab and the 85th in the intro.
 * 8) **Completed--501st dogma 21:27, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) ***Still remains.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:13, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 10) ****Context behind both is done--501st dogma 22:11, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) * Clone Wars need to be mentioned in the bio.
 * 12) **Done--501st dogma 13:18, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 13) *You give 19 BBY as death date in the infobox and circa 19 BBY in the bio. Check witch one is correct and keep it.
 * 14) **The book says he died a month and a half after 940 ABG. Is that 19 BBY or 20 BBY, because I think the date is almost in between both years. I've changed them both to just 19 BBY but I want to make sure its correct--501st dogma 16:32, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 15) ***19 BBY is correct. This needs to be added to the bio.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:13, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 16) * Context on Scorch.
 * 17) **I've cleaned that part up but what exactly do you want?--501st dogma 13:18, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 18) ***Describe what Scorch is. E.g. the Republic Clone Commando RC-1262, nicknamed Scorch.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:35, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 19) ****Ok, I've done that--501st dogma 16:32, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 20) * His height needs to be mentioned in a P&T section.
 * 21) **P&T and BtS sections done, though the latter is kind of small.--501st dogma 13:18, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 22) ***You can expand this by adding info that Order 66 was the fourth novel of the RC series and its publishing date.
 * 23) ****Ok, done--501st dogma 16:32, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 24) * Behind the scenes section is missing. If you add this and adress several objections, especially those who need context, the article could easily become a GAN. I'll keep the decision up to you, but I highly recommend it.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 20:52, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 25) **Ok, thanks for the suggestion. should I just move the nomination once I am done cleaning up the article?--501st dogma 13:18, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 26) ***The article is already over 250 words and therefore not able to be a CAN. The article therefore has to be removed from the CAN page and re-nommed at the GAN.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:35, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 27) ****Do you just want me to cut this here and paste it in the GAN?--501st dogma 16:32, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 28) ****No, no. This nomination has to be archived and a whole new has to be created. However, you better consult the GAN and CAN page or somebody from the EduCorps than me.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:41, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 29) ****If this does indeed need to be taken to the GAN, you can wait until all the current objections are taken care of if you wish. That way, you can go to the GAN with a fresh plate. If that's what you want to do, make a note here when you're done fixing the objections, and I, or some one else, will archive the article so it can be nominated on the GAN page. Cheers!&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 20:46, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 30) * Source the whole body.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:35, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 31) **I've sourced the more important points--501st dogma 21:27, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 32) ***I think Lee meant to source the whole body. Per policy, the whole body must be sourced.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 21:34, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 33) ****I've now sourced the entire body--501st dogma 22:46, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 34) *More to come.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:35, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 35) *That he is a Human male needs to be in the bio.
 * 36) **Done--501st dogma 22:11, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 37) *Also why do you source the fact that he is a human clone to the encyclopedia? Both is said in the novel.
 * 38) **fixed, sorry about that.--501st dogma 22:11, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 39) *Adress these and I'll give it a closer look when it is a GAN.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 18:13, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, I think its ready to be transfered to the GAN.--501st dogma 22:11, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) **Okay, I'll let Lee go ahead and strike his objections if he's done, then I'll archive it.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:13, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Inexorable (Imperial II-class)

 * Nominated by: Hk 47 20:15, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * This article is way over the word limit. It will have to be archived and taken to the GAN. Let me know when you're ready, and I'll archive it.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 22:08, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

Comments