User talk:Dangerdan97

Dangerdan97, welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * Internal pages:
 * Community Portal
 * Manual of Style
 * Online sources
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~. Four tildes produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Community Portal talk page or ask me on my Talk page. May the Force be with you! -- Riffsyphon1024 04:58, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Reversion of your edits
I've re-reverted the changes you've made to several date articles. Removing information without an explanation generally is a bad idea. If you're going to do so, you need to explain your reasons in the accompanying talk page. Or, if you're making sweeping reforms for the Wook, please start a Consensus Thread. Thank you for your cooperation. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Warning
You have broken Wookieepedia's three-revert rule. If you revert either of the articles in question once more, you will be blocked form editing. Graestan ( Talk ) 02:09, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * All I did was warn you not to further flout policy. Your paranoia is unfounded; no one is more "important" than anyone else on the wiki, and you could just have easily taken your arguments to the talk page. Your activities on the wiki determine your relationships with the community&mdash;perhaps taking a more measured approach would benefit you. Graestan ( Talk ) 21:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Manaan
Thank you for providing the source – especially the direct link. Keep in mind that if you add information to articles, especially featured articles, they need to be sourced or they risk becoming reverted on sight. Manaan is a FA and as such, there are many people who monitor it to ensure factual accuracy. Thanks for providing the information.  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Year templates
Just so you know, I reverted the changes to the year templates because of their usage in canon. The Old Sith Wars is a canonical period; one, in fact, that as of right now ends with the Battle of Malachor V. This is confirmed in canon and can be found in a couple of sources. Until LFL changes this date, we have to assume that the era still ends at 3,951 BBY even though there are events after it which might appear to fit into the era. Thanks.  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 16:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Sithy emblems
Here you go. Just did a printscreen TOR website and cropped it. :) The other image looks so much like the Jedi Order emblem during The Clone Wars that I think I mislabeled it as "Republic." SinisterSamurai 22:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

The Clone Wars retcon
I saw your comment in the Senate Hall about the Clone Wars being completely retconned and I completely agree. That time period had to have been the most exhaustively documented in the entire Star Wars saga. And instead of trying to make the new content fit, they just decided to overwrite all the existing canon for it. Someone should start a petition or something. - Milo Fett [Comlink] 14:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree 100%. Older pre-prequel (pre May 1999) sources place the clone wars further in the past justifying the adjective Old Republic. Is 18 to 20 years long enough to call something like a government "old"? -- Frank V Bonura  - The Bane of Revisionism 01:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Post April 1999 SW Material
"You're always welcome to create your own wiki that stops recording SW material at 1999 if you like. Dangerdan97 00:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)"

Do I know you sir? You seem to know me rather well sir. I can't help but ask, why can't this Wiki respect the views of those who recognize the prequels and those who do not? Can we not be open-minded and inclusive of both camps? Thank you in advance for your time. -- Frank V Bonura  - The Bane of Revisionism 02:13, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Cooldown block

 * You've got a one-day cooldown block for edit-warring and NPA violation in edit summaries. While we're appreciative of your edits here, there's no need to express that kind of attitude; it's not helpful to the community. At any rate, the official release date is the one that should be used. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 22:56, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Creating articles
When creating articles of any kind here on Wookieepedia, please make sure to include a proper "Appearances" and/or "Sources" section. Articles will be deleted after one week's time otherwise. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:37, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I understand your reasoning. I'm not sure why the trend was started of not providing sources for year articles like all others, but it shouldn't be. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:45, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Year articles
I noticed you've been creating and improving articles on years. I've been doing the same myself lately and thought you might find 0 BBY to have a helpful year template for new articles. I added it to 4,100 BBY as an example. — Milo Fett [Comlink] 17:36, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Great, keep up the good work! — Milo Fett [Comlink] 17:41, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

Re:
Images should ideally be at a much larger resolution. If you click on all three images currently on the TIE shuttle article, you'll see that they are all at large resolutions so that we can actually see them rather than just thumbnail pictures. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:45, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't believe there is a minimum pixel count. Just use common sense. The page you're uploading from is large enough that you should be able to get a decent-sized image. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:50, January 7, 2010 (UTC)

Warning
Please watch your tone when commenting on public forums on this wiki. Posting messages like this is nothing but hostile and inflammatory, and it's contrary to the principles of both our Civility and No personal attacks policies. If you have nothing constructive to contribute to a forum of this nature, I would suggest not posting anything at all. Considering you've already been warned and blocked for this type of behavior previously, you're lucky I'm not giving you another, lengthier block. However, if I see anything of this nature from you again, you will be blocked from editing. Thank you for your cooperation. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:52, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * In that instance, you can politely remind the appropriate parties that off-topic posts are subject to deletion and then notify an administrator. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:06, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

A Bridge Too Far
Your link on Talk:Jabba! was BRILLIANT. jSarek 07:21, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Halagad Ventor
Why do you keep removing Halagad Ventor from the Jedi Purge survivor list?

Date
Dan, would you mind pointing out to me where in the Atlas you found the date for 25,102 BBY? Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir 06:44, November 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good deal. Thanks again. Toprawa and Ralltiir 07:41, November 21, 2010 (UTC)

Galaxy Guide 2
Hey Dangerdan,

Do you by chance have Galaxy Guide 2: Yavin and Bespin (Second Edition)? If so, can you tell me what it says in regard to Exar Kun's defeat on Yavin 4 please? Thanks, —Tommy 9281 13:02, November 23, 2010 (UTC)