Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Unidentified male Dark Jedi

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 21:27, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Give in to your anger&hellip;"

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) A Jedi serving the Empire? Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:26, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:28, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 14:18, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:42, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) There's an empty Eras template on the article, so you should probably fill it in, considering my comment below. Also if he isn't given any relevant info, that should warrant a  tag ;). Winterz (talk) 15:18, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *The book does not specify which era the Dark Jedi or the trooper belonged to, whether it was the Rise of the Empire era or the Rebellion era.&mdash; 17:43, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) ** Then you should probably remove the Eras template, at least until this receives the status. How about my second point? Winterz (talk) 18:21, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Both taken care of.&mdash; 20:41, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **** isn't required when is already used, the same as  not being required when  is used. "Picture only" is implied by "First pictured." Menkooroo (talk) 01:10, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Thanks for clearing that up, Jeff.&mdash; 03:21, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) *****Yeah, thanks for correcting me on that. Winterz (talk) 14:18, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * Same question as the one below: is the stormtrooper confirmed dead?  Stake black   msg 14:19, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see the answer below.&mdash; 00:33, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you confirm that he served Palpatine's Galactic Empire? Or is there a chance that it isn't Palpy's? Winterz (talk) 15:18, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Please see the comment above.&mdash; 17:43, February 5, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified stormtrooper (Victim of a male Dark Jedi)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 23:22, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Ouch.

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:54, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:26, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 17:31, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Menkooroo (talk) 18:07, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * Might be a sofixit, but please fix the categories. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 23:23, January 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * Can you establish how he ended the soldier's life? "Lightsaber" isn't currently mentioned. Menkooroo (talk) 05:49, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * Done.&mdash; 05:59, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * A couple more: Category:Unidentified military personnel and Category:Unidentified individuals are both used, which isn't necessary, since one is a parent category of the other. Actually, I think Category:Unidentified Imperial personnel would be a better choice than either.
 * Does the JATM say for sure that this stormtrooper serves the Galactic Empire? If so, I think the death field of the infobox could say something like "At some point during the Galactic Empire's reign" or something. I don't think it should be left blank. Menkooroo (talk) 14:12, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Both taken care of.&mdash; 06:28, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Supreme Emperor
 * Could you reword the first sentence a bit? It almost sounds like it is talking about stormtroopers in general, rather than this particular one. Thanks, Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:46, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * Done.&mdash; 06:28, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * For WP:AMB.&mdash; 05:40, January 31, 2013 (UTC)
 * Are not all stormtroopers part of the Stormtrooper Corps? Perhaps that should be added? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:26, February 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * I have absolutely no idea.&mdash; 01:04, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Does the source explicitly say the trooper died? If not, that's OR.  Stake black   msg 14:18, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * The caption for the image says this: "A Dark Jedi gives in to his anger, cutting down a subordinate."&mdash; 17:22, February 3, 2013 (UTC)

DRN-592

 * Nominated by:  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 09:49, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Since 38 went to the GAN...

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:27, February 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Fe Nite (talk) 21:19, February 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Everything in the infobox needs to be in the body. You're missing the height, and you might as well link to battle droid and B series as well.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:01, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *I've put the height in, still not sure how to handle the other ones.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 21:19, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Put the B-series and battle droid parts in, is it too awkward?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:56, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***It's a bit awkward, but it should do the trick. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:27, February 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Two first appearances? Fe Nite (talk) 21:29, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *Lol, didn't even notice that! Done.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 05:51, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) While detailing the height and gender programming, you are attributing it considering the model and not that individual droid, so you should probably add something to make that clear, like "As with all the droids of the same model" or within those lines. Winterz (talk) 14:23, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) *Done.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 04:44, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Atomic blast on Raspar-6

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 17:37, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: That's all there is to it, really.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Did a copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:35, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:17, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 16:56, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) I should get that book :P Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:20, February 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Would a conjecture tag be in order?
 * 3) **Trak handled that for me, thanks.
 * 4) ***Actually, thinking about it, the source explicitly calls it "the atomic blast on Raspar-6". Are you sure it needs the tag?  Stake black   msg 21:22, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Popping my head in: If it ain't a conjectural name, be sure to use the full name as the bolded in-prose title, rather than "a large-scale atomic blast..." Menkooroo (talk) 13:31, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Done.  Stake black   msg 13:37, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) * How about saying that the blast happened in the Outer Rim, because that's were the sector it's in is located. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:04, February 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **I said it happened in the Tragan Cluster, which is in the Outer Rim. Would you rather have me replace Tragan Cluster with Outer Rim?  Stake black   msg 14:55, February 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) ***You could establish that the cluster is in the Outer Rim to add more context, or you could leave it as is. Your choice. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:44, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) ****How is it now?  Stake black   msg 21:55, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) *****Was the moon mentioned in the Atlas companian as being in the tragen cluster? If not, you can't source to the atlas for that part, as you are doing now. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:29, February 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) ******The moon's system was.  Stake black   msg 18:13, February 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) This article warrants an infobox (Event's). And context on Dust farmers. Winterz (talk) 14:26, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) *How's that now?  Stake black   msg 16:46, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * I cannot give further context on "Stolivea" or "talking fogs" because the author never really says what those things are.  Stake black   msg 14:53, February 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * Some clarification was given in this SH thread: Forum:SH:Monsters and Incomprehensible Gibberish from George Lucas.  Stake black   msg 16:30, February 7, 2013 (UTC)

First mission to Obredaan

 * Nominated by: Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:01, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: And the Premier returns with something that isn't Battle for Naboo.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 04:14, February 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:56, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Context on Obredaan and Coruscant.
 * 3) * In the mission section, please state who "They" is, as you were previously just talking about Tiin and Kenobi.
 * 4) * You could probally say that the arms shipment belonged to the Jin'ha. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:49, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Voila. Thanks for looking it over. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 15:54, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *I don't think that the lightsaber duel part is very relevent to the article. You might want to remove it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:24, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Actually, I must disagree with you here, dogma. It is entirely relevant&mdash;it is concurrent with the mission and it details what Kenobi is doing before he leaves on the second. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 21:11, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) ***The duel itself has nothing to do with the event. You could just say that Kenobi was sent, it doesn't matter if he was sparing before. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:36, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) ****I think this is more of a preference thing. However, having the bit about Kenobi's fight isn't hurting anything, and it does provide some back-story to explain what's going on.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 04:14, February 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) *****Leave it if you want, I guess. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:56, February 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) I'm Winterz, and you'll hate me afterwards
 * 12) *"(...)necessitating a second mission." To what? You must specify this by giving at least a reason (even if it's clear) and who went on it.
 * 13) **Additional info added. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 15:34, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) *I'm not seeing the Summertime War relevance to the article. If there's something connecting the events, then please specify in the article and organize the events correctly. If not, then gone with it.
 * 15) **There is no relevance, but per precedence, everything that is in the infobox needs to be linked in the article. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 15:34, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 16) ***Actually you're wrong there. Per this section in the Layout Guide, exceptions should be made in those cases. Burn it and you may stile get a chance for CAN!
 * 17) ****Might as well leave it. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:44, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 18) * The lightsaber training isn't relevant either, unless you make due connections those assessments need to go.
 * 19) **As I explained above, it is relevant. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 15:34, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 20) *** Indeed it is, but isn't suitable on that section (Aftermath instead), considering the quote. Also through the quote, the aftermath can be even more expanded, as you're excluding Tiin from the "after activites".
 * 21) ****Broke it up a little since it's concurrent. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:44, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 22) * The mission section is really poor and can be easily expanded. Let me know if you're not seeing anyway to expand it.
 * 23) **There's nothing else to add, but I put additional content. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 15:34, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 24) *** Well CP, you ended the prelude with "They were assigned to (...)" but then start the next section on "Their X ship crashed", do you see my concerns now? You gave no intruding info about the ship, the arrival on the planet, nothing.
 * 25) ****Addressed the first point, but there isn't any other details about the mission that can be inferred. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:44, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) *I understand you haven't been in the CAN section for a while, as you stated (somewhere), so sorry, because it is not today and I'm gonna make you take this to GAN :p. However, beforehand let's just work through these objections. Winterz (talk) 14:45, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 27) *I don't hate challenges, I embrace them! Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 15:34, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 28) **You'll regret saying that! ^^
 * 29) * The infobox could be expanded. The participants section could still receive a certain ship and a certain number of "Jedi Masters". Also in the infobox, the outcome can receive an entry on who won.
 * 30) **Right, added. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:44, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 31) * The planet isn't only home to the warriors but to the species itself, this is quite worthy in terms of relevance.
 * 32) **I think it's fine as is. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:44, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 33) * In the Second mission to Obredaan article, you wrote that it was a rescue mission, yet in this article you claim it is an investigative mission, so which one of them is it?!
 * 34) **It's both&mdash;it starts out as a discovery mission. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:44, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 35) * Black Heth has a name and shouldn't be pipelinked. Also you should contextualize it, by at least saying that it is a criminal gang, considering you use the latter term to describe them without pointing it out properly. Winterz (talk) 16:15, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 36) **Sure thing. Thanks again. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:44, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) WP:VG of course. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:01, February 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *This is now over 250, but I'd like to work out the last objections first. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:44, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **I am shocked :p. Okay then, my objections are done...for now, feel free to archive it. Either way, this article was begging for a GAN. Winterz (talk) 23:10, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Chasuka

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:07, February 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero's broken 25% completion. Only 358 articles to go.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:50, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; 18:13, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 23:12, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Please add a food infobox.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:05, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:19, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Winterz
 * 5) * The quote should be in the intro, considering that it is in-universe. Winterz (talk) 14:50, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **Can't, since the message is only sent if you're playing a female character with a romance. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 15:48, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Orthodontia

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:07, February 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero. Though actually, if I count the current noms and the ones waiting in the wings to be nommed, I'm at 33.68%, or 317 left.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:51, February 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; 18:13, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 14:53, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *In the xenopathologist article you say that it is only mentioned in the encyclopedia, so you need to source that Doc was a xenopathologist to the encyclopedia.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  15:03, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 17:19, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Polomie

 * Nominated by: &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 23:10, February 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:WP:VG

(3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1) What an infernal racket! Everbody, flee!  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:45, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Ahhhh, my ears!-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  14:21, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) First time in history a battle was won just by noise? Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 17:21, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Bwa ha ha.&mdash;  18:46, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Did a copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 07:17, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Winterz (talk) 15:08, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I noticed you removed my comma addition, and well, this might be a problem because your first sentence is huge enough and warrants at least one. I mean.. you give locations, participants and even dates, all these without a single comma. Winterz (talk) 17:51, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *I removed the commas since they didn't look right there. Commas aren't designed to just break up sentences; they have to be used in the proper places. Personally, I don't think the sentence is that long. I'm not really breaking any grammar rules that I can think of. However, if you prefer, I'll break it up into two sentences.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 17:55, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Okay that will do. I'm not sure if your grammar rules differ there about the comma, but here something we learnt back on primary school is how to easily distinguish places that may warrant a comma. "Start reading (slowly) the sentence and if you involuntarily pause to inhale once before the end, then the phrase is too big and needs some sort of separation". Also, when you converge several ideas or points, that certainly needs punctuation. Example: "Roses are blue, blue is dark, dark is scary" sounds a lot better than just adding several connectors as in "Roses are blue which was dark and that is scary" like you did there. So yeah it's kind of a grammatical mistake. Anyway, I'll quit whining, just wanted to make my point. :p Winterz (talk) 18:33, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I see your point, but to make my point clear. :P Your example does not mesh with my sentence. Saying "Roses are blue, blue is dark, dark is scary" is not a proper sentence anyway, since it's a run-on sentence. Likewise, your second example sentence is incorrect since it once again doesn't properly utilize conjunctions and commas. My original sentence was not a run-on sentence since it was only one independent clause. If I had said something like "There was a battle on Polomie and it was fought by the Empire and Rebellion and it was in the years 2 or 1 BBY," then it would be incorrect, since it would be a run-on sentence. However, the sentence I originally had contained only one independent clause. Nevertheless, it's two sentences now, so it doesn't really matter. Cheers.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 19:27, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Not going to object over this, but should Rebu be mentioned by his title, the Inspector-General? Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 17:21, February 11, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *I don't see why not. Thanks for the review.&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 19:14, February 11, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified Cloud City technician

 * Nominated by: Rokkur Shen (talk) 08:13, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I went through with another copy-edit and smoothed out some wording. Meets my standards, good job!  Trak Nar  Ramble on 06:33, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) What Trak can Track
 * 2) *I did a copy-edit and cleaned up some wording and fixed some linking.
 * 3) *I also added the CAnom template for you.
 * 4) * My objection: It needs a Behind the scenes section.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:23, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Added. Rokkur Shen (talk) 10:05, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) What Menk can... Menk
 * 7) * With CAs that are this short and only have the one non-BTS section, be sure to hide the table of contents by adding the code at the top of the article.
 * 8) **Fixed. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) * Be careful of using out-of-universe wording in the in-universe section: "this man was seen accessing a scomp link computer terminal within the corridors of Cloud City." Seen by whom?
 * 10) **Fixed. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) * I always advise against using "formerly" in the affiliation field of an infobox, as the infobox is supposed to represent a character's entire life, not just a snapshot of when we see them in canon. In which case it would be better to list Galactic Empire first rather than last, for chronology.
 * 12) **Fixed. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) * I think the article could proceed more chronologically --- rather than beginning when he's already defected to the Rebels, it should begin when he's serving the Empire and then go into his defection afterward.
 * 14) **Reworded. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) * Just calling the Rebel Alliance the "Alliance" is a bit confusing; a more full name like "Rebel Alliance" or "Alliance to Restore the Republic" should be used for clarity's sake.
 * 16) **Fixed. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 17) * The Occupation of Bespin should be dated to 3 ABY. The New Essential Chronology is our go-to source for that if you wanna use it.
 * 18) **Fixed. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 19) **If I may add in my two cents, it's not necessary to source the date for stuff cited to the films. Take for instance the fact that I have written a ton of articles for film characters, and wouldn't get objections. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 03:57, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 20) ***I was of this opinion also, Hanzo. I had added it however, prior to seeing your comment. Rokkur Shen (talk) 06:54, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 21) ****The thing is, there's nothing in the film, at all, that indicates three years have passed since the Battle of Yavin. The films have been cited in the past, but it's a mistake that needs to be corrected. Menkooroo (talk) 11:26, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 22) *****I actually meant that I questioned the inclusion of the date to begin with. But nevertheless I have now sourced it. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:32, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 23) ******If a character's actions can be dated, they absolutely should be. Have you addressed the other above objections? If so, you need to indicate as much here on the review page. Menkooroo (talk) 11:45, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 24) *******I have. Sorry, I thought it was clear that I had. I was unaware that I had to sign under each one of your points. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 25) ********No worries; leaving one note at the end is OK; just make sure to indicate in that note that you've addressed all the objections. Menkooroo (talk) 12:15, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) * For characters that look Human, we have an unwritten policy that the duck test should be used. I think that this guy passes it. Menkooroo (talk) 11:56, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 27) **Adjusted. Rokkur Shen (talk) 02:39, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 28) ***It needs to be sourced. It can't be infobox-exclusive, either. Also, the category needs to be changed.
 * 29) ****The only reason I added Human was on your suggestion of the duck test. How would you suggest I source it? I'm quite happy to leave his species blank, as I originally had it, to be honest. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:18, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 30) *****You could source either the film or the CCG card. The duck test is passed for both. Menkooroo (talk) 11:21, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 31) ******I'm still not comfortable with this but have sourced as Empire as seems to be the consensus on this matter. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:01, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 32) *******Make sure to add Category:Humans, and be sure to always capitalize Human in the prose per the Manual of style. Menkooroo (talk) 12:15, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 33) ********Added & capitalized. Rokkur Shen (talk) 12:53, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 34) * This next objection is an annoying necessity when any film character, now matter how small, is nominated for status: The adaptation check. The various comic adaptations of Empire (Photocomic, storybook, Manga, Marvel comic) should be checked to see if this guy makes an appearance. I have most of 'em and can do it for you; just let me know exactly when and where in the film he appears.
 * 35) **I'd already checked the Classic Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back comic. He isn't pictured I sincerely doubt that this extra would have been detailed anywhere as he has no interaction with any other character. His entire scene involves him facing a wall after all. I'd appreciate you checking your sources however. As for the time and place of his appearance within Empire, it's pretty clear from the description and picture. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:18, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 36) ***Couldn't find him in anything. Menkooroo (talk) 18:09, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 37) * LEGO Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy should also be checked, which you can do on youtube. Menkooroo (talk) 08:19, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 38) **As per above comment. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:18, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 39) ***You should still check it, just in case. The difference between severely doubting and being 100% sure is an important one. Menkooroo (talk) 11:21, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 40) ****As you wish. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:24, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 41) *****Ok, I just watched a play-through of the LEGO Star Wars II: The Original Trilogy Bespin levels and as I thought, he does not appear. Rokkur Shen (talk) 11:37, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Founding Day

 * Nominated by: Tinwe (comlink) 12:17, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Just stretching my article writing muscles a bit.

(1 ECs/3 User/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice job.  Stake black   msg 13:09, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Remember Alderaan... --LelalMekha (talk) 18:26, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 18:38, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:31, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Considering what you say early in the article, isn't it safe to fill in the "End" section of the infobox? Winterz (talk) 15:12, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *My understanding is that the "end" field is meant for things like "the third day after the beginning of the festival" or "at the thirty-fifth day of the tenth month," and not for displaying when the holiday ceased to exist. And who knows, maybe Leia (and possibly other Alderaanians) still celebrated Founding Day even after Alderaan's destruction, just not on Alderaan. Tinwe (comlink) 18:22, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **You're right, I wasn't paying due attention. Winterz (talk) 18:38, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * WP:TCW I guess. Tinwe (comlink) 12:17, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * "The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia, Vol. I, p. x". Page X?  Stake black   msg 18:22, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep, as in the Roman numeral 10 (though it should really be xi now that I checked it again, oops)&mdash;I'm reffing the timeline that precedes the encyclopedia entries. I tweaked the ref so it's hopefully more clear now. Tinwe (comlink) 07:58, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

26-424

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 18:20, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:20, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Notes and refs goes after Sources.
 * 3) **Done.  Stake black   msg 21:45, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * "although 26-424 had presence confirmed for the feedings." I'm not really sure what this is trying to say.
 * 5) **All the source says about him is: "26-424 of Galloway Island, as usual, refuses to participate but will be available for feedings."
 * 6) * You could probally add what he looked like via the picture's likeness.
 * 7) **I'll give it a shot, although this is almost speculation.
 * 8) **How's that now?
 * 9) * Is there a way to get rid of that blue line on the side of the image? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:37, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) **Will do.  Stake black   msg 21:45, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) **Done.  Stake black   msg 23:35, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Society for the Refusal of Astrophysics

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 18:20, February 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:46, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Destiny Days

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 16:39, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:26, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) * Context on Lusaanda. It's a planet.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * How can Skreen write about true events that happened after his death? Is this just wacky stuff from the book, or a mistake? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:49, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Wacky. This is what the entry says: "For the next year, he will be writing three sequels to "Destiny Days", the fictional account of true events that occurred on Skreen's home planet after he died."  Stake black   msg 21:55, February 13, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified stormtrooper (Imperial security)

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:56, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:AMB and WP:SWG.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:32, February 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:41, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *I know it looks like the inside of the Death Star, but how do you know that it couldn't be some other Imperial starship or station that has a similar section?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:04, February 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Changed. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 16:05, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * Death Star II is based on the visual evidence. Also AFAIK the rifle cannot be clearly identified. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:56, February 13, 2013 (UTC)