User talk:Silly Dan

Archives

 * 1) User talk:Silly Dan/Archive1
 * 2) User talk:Silly Dan/Archive2

External links/sources
Hey, Dan. I noticed your edit on Nimbanel changing an "External link" to a "source". I thought that "external links" were assumed to always be sources, just that they were separated out per the Appearances/Sources/External link trichotomy. This not so? — SavageBob 11:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, we decided by a narrow margin when constructing the layout guide back in November to treat articles on official websites (databank entries, WOTC web enhancements, etc.) under "sources," and reserve "External links" for Wikipedia articles, fansites, weblogs, etc., which may give useful information but are not necessarily canonical. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 12:00, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Congrats
Congrats on becoming an admin! Sorry to be late getting around to promoting ya. Been sick a little lately. WhiteBoy 19:19, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Same from me! Congratulations! — SavageBob 19:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Power! Ultimate power! Unlimited rice pudding! &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 20:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Congratulations, Silly. ;-) jSarek 19:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

sorry, seriously, really
I'm sorry for all of the trouble I have caused on Wookieepedia as all of the Crumbs. I hope we can no longer be enemies. Thank You! -- Kowakian1

seriously, I promise, I will help Wookieepedia instead of vandalizing it. I'm starting over as a good and helpful wookieepedian.--Kowakian1

I'm not going to do anything bad. You don't have to worry about me turning bad again cuz I will not.--Kowakian 1


 * OK then. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Curse you, Dan!
Curse, you, Dan, for deleting Raven-15. I really wanted to show Coop his tag in action, to wit, Actually, it's no problem. Just a sorta FYI-- The Erl of the  talk  What I do 03:03, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, this admin power has gone to my head. 8) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Having a problem...
I don't know what's wrong, but for some reason, whenever I edit something, it appears at the bottom of my watchlist instead of the top. Also, I noticed that the "Search" feature is down. I was online this morning, and the site appeared to be down as well. I was wondering, 1) am I the only person that this is happening to, and 2) how can this be fixed? Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 23:20, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * (1) No. There was a power outage at the main Wikia server facility (hence why Wookieepedia was down much of today) which reset certain server clocks, resulting in messed up timestamps on numerous wikis. (2) The server clocks were corrected, so this should be fixed now. RMF 16:55, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Strong?! continued
I just kinda figured that he was a strong fighter because after seeing Threepio's eye getting ripped out I could see that his teeth are strong enough to rip out droid eyes. Just imagine if Crumb faced a non-droid opponent, blood would be everywere, man! But, I already knew for sure he was fast because I read the essential guide to alien species. So I just tried to seem shocked so someone could tell me if I was right on him being strong. I will post it back on to the Salacious biography. Long comment, huh? --Kowakian 1
 * (Late reply) I see.  I think you will get better results from asking the question directly on the article's talk page, without pretending to hold opinions other than the ones you actually have. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 20:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Ok then, do you agree that Crumb is strong? --Kowakian 1
 * No opinion, but I haven't got around to reading Tales from Jabba's Palace yet. Perhaps I'll develop one then. In the meantime, it seems like speculation to me, so I wouldn't put it on the Salacious Crumb page.  &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:57, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Someone is harassing me.
Someone sent my IP an "You are an Idiot Flash".
 * I wouldn't know anything about that. In fact, I'm not even sure what that is.  I can say that if you sign up with an account, your IP will no longer be visible. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 23:31, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

WOW!!
Dude, I saw what that idiot did to your user page, and I can't believe how someone could be so disrespectful! What gives him the right to ruin wookieepedia like that! He is worse than me when I was a vandalizing idiot like him! WOW!! Anyway, what made him vandalize YOUR page? --Kowakian 1(ex vandal)
 * "He is worse than me when I was a vandalizing idiot like him!" Well, no offense, but you did actually do a lot more than he did. Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 21:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

But still, I only called you Nebulass and screwed the Crumb, Cabbashite, Ghoel, and Garindan pages. He called you guys homophobes (whatever that means) and insulted you about being on Wookieepedia a lot and taking care of it so it does not get vandalized. He is one crazed dude. --Kowakian 1 (ex vandal)
 * Yet you also vandalized user pages. You did more bad stuff than he did. Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 21:52, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Eh, I won't get into which vandal was worse at the time, as far as persistent personal attacks went. Mind you, as far as the actual articles went, Kowakian actually seemed to trying to improve articles by adding information he thought was accurate (though he was going about it the wrong way), while the "u cant shut me down" kid was adding obvious nonsense about gay robots.... Also, we called the vandal a homophobe (meaning a person who is bigoted against gay people), based on his belief that calling me "gay" and claiming I was from San Francisco was a powerful insult, rather than just an inaccurate statement. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:54, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

I saw all of that gay crap he wrote about you, too. But what made him get pissed off at you guys. --Kowakian 1(ex vandal)
 * We kept reverting his edits which claimed C-3PO was gay. (He's not: he's a robot.) By the way, please don't use "gay" to mean "stupid" or "rude."  &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry about that. --Kowakian 1 (ex vandal)
 * Also, Kowakian 1, you know, instead of writing "--Kowakian 1 (ex vandal)", you can just write " ~ ". In addition, you really don't need "(ex vandal)". Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

u guys get offended by the slightest thing, dont take it to personally or he wins

nominate
How do I nominate the wookieepedian of the month? Because I want to vote for you, Nebulax, or StarNeptune. --Kowakian 1
 * Can previous WotMs be re-nominated? Because all three of us were already WotMs. Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:44, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Kowakian, you can vote or nominate someone at Wookieepedian of the Month. The rules are that anyone who's won in the past six months can't be renominated.  Note that Jack Nebulax, StarNeptune, and I won in February, January, and December respectively.  This means that Jack can't win again until August, StarNeptune can't win again until July, and I can't win until June.  Since we start voting to see who wins in June tomorrow, this technically means you could nominate me starting tomorrow, but there are many many contributors who need an award before I win it again.  Look at some articles you like, see who contributed a lot to them, and nominate them instead.  That's my advice. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 16:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Administrator nomination.
Hey, Silly Dan, is there any way that you or someone else could end my admin nomination? Because I know I'm not going to become an admin this time. Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 15:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll archive it and mark it as "declined", if you want to put a note there saying you've withdrawn your acceptance of the nomination for now. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 15:47, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Should I just put it in the Comments section? Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * That makes sense to me. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll go do it now. Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:50, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. Now, hopefully I'll be able to fulfill my two promises and get re-nominated sometime in the future. ;) Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 15:52, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
 * OK then. Cheers! &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 16:12, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

J'Quille mess up
Sorry about the mess on the J'Quille page. I just tried to add that he used a vibroblade and then the page got all screwed up. Please forgive me. --Kowakian 1

Also, I added some info on the Dannik Jerriko page, R2-Q5 page, and J'Quille. On Dannik Jerriko I added that he protected Tash, Zak, and Hoole. On R2 I added his equipment, and on J'Quille I added that he was a strong fighter and that he was given a vibroblade from Valarian. I have been helping Wookieepedia a lot, don't you agree? --Kowakian 1
 * You're doing better that you were, that's for sure. 8) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 23:14, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

I just read your message on my talk page. --Kowakian 1

WOTM
Hey, any chance you could award and archive May's WOTM? It's kind of overdue... and besides, I have somebody to nominate :) RMF 22:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Wookieepedian of the Month voting
Alright man, I'm new to Wookiepedia, well like 3 months, so I don't know about all the technical stuff like that.
 * No problem. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 23:38, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Some Appreciation
Thank you for helping clear up some of this vandal bullshit and reinforcing the rules of the wiki. -- Riffsyphon1024 23:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks! (I'm never going to finish that article on the Battle of Nar Shaddaa (Galactic Civil War), am I?) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 23:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Not if its spelled wrong. Fixed it for ya. :P -- Riffsyphon1024 00:02, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Image deletion
Not at all. :) Adamwankenobi Talk to me! My home. 13:09, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Nebulax keeps harassing me...
Can you please tell him to lay off?
 * I wasn't harassing you. "Anon" is a term for members that aren't registered. Anonymous = anon. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think calling him "anon" is all that he's referring to. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not even going to ask, because I know what else I did. I was just really annoyed with the whole situation. But now Rob and I are kind of starting to be friends... I guess. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 21:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Imperial I and II
I think it's safe to unlock the articles now that it has been resolved. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see the compromise written out on the talk page first. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Basically, it's the way it was before ("Numerous light turbolasers and ion cannons"), but now there's a discussion about the number of medium turbolasers. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 21:06, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Since we really don't know the exact number of medium turbolasers.-Rob
 * Okay, now that we have ended this by saying "Numerous light and medium turbolasers and ion cannons", can the articles be unlocked so they can be fixed? Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * OK then. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 00:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Better lock the topics again. JimRaynor isn't accepting the compromise and isn't supporting his arguements/edits with canon facts.-Rob
 * You seem to be keeping it on the talk page now, aren't you? &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 18:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Yep. And Jim still hasn't brought up a revelant, canon point to the discussion. Fan analysis isn't canon, so it shouldn't be represented as such. Can you make an official ruling?-Rob
 * I'm not really qualified to determine if that article is accurate: I would only make some sort of adminstrative ruling if there were a revert war on the article or gratuitous insults on the talk page. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * We only accept canon here, right? Then how can a fan's analysis of the model, not what we see in the movies count? That is the basis for the arguement.-Rob
 * Problem is, any weapons fit put in there will, sooner or later, come down to some mix of what a fan saw from analyzing the movies and what a licensed author wrote &mdash; and the licensed author was probably a fan analyzing what was seen in the movies. This is why my only word would be "lots of weapons." &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * My main arguement is that we can't tell the difference between the medium annd light turbolasers on an ISD due to the size. Jim is claiming that he can, without providing how. Jim also didn't agree with the compromise, and he frankly through a tantrum, claiming I was clinging to the now non-canon WEG stats. Added to the fact that if the analysis isn't published in a sourcebook nor another type of book, it shouldn't be used. Jim is claiming that his view is right with his own analysis, which isn't canon.-Rob
 * If analysing the models was canon, then no Rebel Ship except for the CR90 Corvette would be armed.

How do you link pictures?
I am trying to link a picture to the Redemption article, how do you do it?
 * Answered on your talk page. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 14:34, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

I need help
Dan, on the B'omarr monk discussion page, DannnyBoy7783 asked who got their brain put into a brain walker and I told him that Bubo, Tessek, Bib Fortuna, J'Quille, and Tash Arranda had their brains removed, but Tash had her brain returned to her body. DannyBoy7783 does not believe me about Tash. She had her brain returned because she had her brain removed in the first place because of one of Jabba's plots (The plot dealed with switching brains of criminal's brains around, for more info go to the B'omarr monk article). I know its true because I read the Brain Spiders and now he says he is gonna ban me for harassing him which I did not. Please help me prove that it is true. Thank you. --Kowakian 1
 * I checked Star Wars Timeline Gold, and her brain was indeed removed and put back. It sounds like an incredibly silly book. Anyway, I'll talk to DannyBoy7783. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 15:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for helping, Dan --Kowakian 1 5/14/06 12:37 PM

Kowakian
I don't think you have the whole picture here Silly Dan...that user posted the info and I asked for him to elaborate and he got snippy and told me to go buy the source. I never said it was fanon. When I ask someone to explain something and they get sassy with me I'm less inclined to believe them. There are other comments on my user page as well as on the Tash Aranda and b'omarr monk pages if you care to look at everything. I really don't even care about any of this. I was just curious and wanted more info. Also, it's hard to "easily doucle-check" his information when I wasn't aware of "Star Wars Timeline Gold." Perhaps you should get all the facts before you start passing judgement on people? --DannyBoy7783 05:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * When I checked those talk pages, I noted that he was being over the top as well, which is why I posted a note in his talk page, and pointed out that both of you seemed to me to be overreacting over on your talk page. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:21, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The whole thing is rediulous and doesn't even deserve this much attention in my opinion...thanks I guess? --DannyBoy7783 23:10, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

He never asked me to elaborate. But, I have apologized to him on his talk page because I'm sorry about flipping out. Kowakian 1 02:15, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Mike Kazz

 * Ya i understand, but i didnt threaten him he was the one who asked for my hometown just so u know... Mike Kazz who cares about the date

On Mike Wong and SOD...
He didn't invent the term, he has his own version which differs from the norm. Basically, his version is making any chance Star Wars would lose in a fight null in void on his site.

And, this really needs to be seen, especially by an admin:

http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=80949 Wherein Mike Wong attempts to argue that a Jedi can defeat The Flash.

http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=79681 Wherein Mike Wong claims Sidious and Dooku can defeat the Juggernaught. This was specifically stated to NOT be Jobbernaught.

http://stardestroyer.net/tlc/Power/index.html Wherein Mike Wong admits that it was impossible to vaporize the asteroids, but claims the same level of energy anyway. He cites "work heating" as the reason one should use the same energy level, but provides no calculations to that effect.

http://stardestroyer.net/Empire/Misc/Canon.html Mike Wong's canon policy. Nothing inherently wrong with this, but please note it doesn't include the Technical Manual as Star Trek canon.

http://stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tech/Torpedoes/Torpedo1.html Mike Wong violates his own canon policy by using Technical Manual figures to arrive at torpedo yield.

http://stardestroyer.net/Empire/Tech/Beam/Beam1.html Mike Wong ignores the Technical Manual when it conflicts with his theories, but pulls it out again to make Phasers look weaker against armor. -Rob.


 * I admit I'm not familliar with anything Mike Wong says or does on his site. However, I reverted your previous edit because it did not seem to reflect a neutral point of view.  This isn't the place to push a pro- or anti-SD.net agenda (or an agenda that's pro- or anti-WEG, WOTC, Curtis Saxton, Karen Traviss, or what have you.) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:33, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay. But I just want to let you know Wong is not a person Wookiepedia should affiliate with. The man has been caught in constant lies.
 * We're not affiliated with him. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 11:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Pre-Republic and canon

 * Thanks for responding to my comment on the Pre-Republic talk page. I left some comments and a suggestion if you're interested. Jaywin 01:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

"He's a Wookiee, not a Korean."
That made me laugh. Anyway, how did you know about the Revised Romanizing? Did you have knowledge of Korean beforehand, or did you see the links I made in the Jundland Wastes? --68.102.193.78 14:32, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Absolutely no knowledge of Korean &mdash; it was based on your comments in the sandbox. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 18:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Lone Scout A
Doesn't an EU object connected with an onscreen reference equal as the same thing? They do that with the names of the various craft. VT-16 18:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * It seems more likely to refer to military scouts who could have been piloting any manner of scout vessels, including the Lone Scout A's. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 18:19, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, good point. Conceeded. :) VT-16 08:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Mind you, looking more closely at the edit history, Ultimate Adversaries does establish that the scouts were flying that type of ship - but that's not directly established in the movie. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 12:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I regretted giving the Lone Scout-A that reference since some sources also say TIE scouts were present. Don't know which source to go with, unless we reference both models. VT-16 17:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Lone Scout-A's aren't TIE scouts? Now I'm confused, but that's not surprising. I suppose it must have been a mixed fleet, if there are contradictory sources. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

A dispute someone's having with Sikon
Not until he reads it :) DarthVaderwillriseagain 15:33, 21 May 2006 (UTC)DarthVaderwillriseagain
 * Well, he read it and deleted it, so I guess it's settled for now. Don't do that again. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 17:23, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

The template for more images
The templete has a picture of Boba Fett on it, I don't really understand what he has to do with adding images to a page? Unfortunatly I don't have a better idea to replace it but it seems unusual to me...
 * The picture is there because Han couldn't see Boba at the time. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 11:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Vandals
ok, this dude keeps on vandalizing my user page
 * I have warned him. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
 * thanks. how do you track down who does it?Steves 00:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Click on the history tab: you can see who has edited a page, and when. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

From Captain Needa

 * I got your message Silly Dan, thanks for the advice. As a new wokipeedian I am about to make progress. I apologize for any trouble I may cause. I am just a swede with a computer and a few questions. Skål or Cheers as you would say.
 * No problem. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 00:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: Traviss

 * Not that I actually care about the threat of a ban, but Azizlight did rather piss me off by deleting an NPOV edit simply because he didn't like it. Restore it and we won't have a problem. Otherwise I have plenty of IPs I can use to vandalize various entries. It comes down to which is less trouble. Tracking down any future vandalism by me, or simply restoring the old edit (although I will also understand and accept a reason besides "stirring the pot" [see, I can be reasonable!]) Hopefully we won't have any future trouble.
 * (1) Clearly this is a "controversial issue", or we wouldn't be reverting it. If you want something to be added about the "three million" issue, try putting some proposed neutral wording on the talk page before getting into a revert war. (2) The site you tried to add to external links has no place in the article: it is a site set up entirely to insult Traviss, and has a deceptive title. (3) Insulting another user and threatening vandalism is the fastest way to lose all credibility on this wiki. If need be, we will do a range block on your IP and the IPs of any nearby computers, and/or lock the article, preventing anyone from editing it. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Very well, what would you propose as neutral wording? I figured it was neutral enough as it was, or are phrases like "many fans consider this to be incredibly low" not allowed? Also, the external link thing was not my doing, it was someone elses. Finally, as I said in the first place, a ban won't really make any difference to me. All I'd like is a portion of the article dedicated to the controversy surrounding her and her treatment of SW fans. I'm quite willing to work with you on this.
 * Try getting rid of "incredibly," and it might be acceptable. Some other people might want to balance it with a statement defending the number, too (though I personally think it's low, so I can't come up with one just now beyond saying "It's canon, so what can you do?") Sorry I got confused about who added the external link, though. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:00, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Alright, will do. And it's understandable you'd assume I did the link, considering I did threaten vandalism. I'll re-edit it in without the 'incredibly' and you decide whether or not its fine.
 * I'd suggest putting it on the talk page first, actually. Thanks! &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:04, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Whoops, sorry. "Currently there is a controversy surrounding her and her vigorous defense of her estimate of size of the Republic's Grand Army, an estimate that many fans consider to be too low. '

The Karen Traviss Database is a valid external link, she linked it to SW.Com herself and encouraged people to read it. Hardly violates NPOV if she wants it seen.
 * Shorn of whatever context she presented the link in, however, it could look as though we're endorsing whatever the site says. I don't even think it would be good to add it with the notation that it's an anti-Traviss site. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

I'm still waiting on whether the proposed edit is fine with you.
 * It's not just my opinion that's important (I don't have a very strong opinion anyway): the idea of putting it on the talk page is to allow other editors to see it, and let them make suggestions. You may have to wait a bit, since most of our editors are North Americans and we're all going to bed within an hour or so. 8) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:35, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, alright then. Will do, sorry.

Tense
Got your message. Why do they use the past tense on the site? Is it the "a long time ago" thing? Thanks. Later.

-Sadriel Fett
 * Pretty much, yeah. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Ah, I finally found it. Well, it was a good guess about the reason why.  Thanks, dude.  Sadriel Fett 03:58, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Capitilization and the KOTOR Equipment List
Uhm not sure if this is how you do it but am trying (kind of new to the whole Wiki thing).

I was trying not to capitilize all the first letters in the word but for some reason it wouldn't link to another article. Like I was writing the article for KotOR2 equipment list on Zabrak heavy blaster and was making a comment on the Zabrak blaster pistol which I wrote. So i was linking it and wrote it as Zabrak blaster pistol but it wouldn't link and when i put Zabrak Blaster Pistol it linked, sorry for that. Also yeah I am the user who was doing the equipment articles.

-Darth Batrus 04:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)