Forum:SH:Comic cover's canonicity

Something that seems to be a matter of some debate lately is the canonicity of comic covers (the main ones, not the variants). This was mainly brought upon by The Last Padawan #1, the cover of which is contrary to actual events. As such, it cannot be considered as Canon. Personally, I don't believe any of the main covers should be considered canon representation of characters or events that can be put into pages, as we shouldn't just pick and choose between comics of which covers should be Canon and which should not be. We can still list anything that appears on the main cover in the appearances section with next to them, but I don't think the cover's events should be counted as canon. What does everyone else have to say concerning this? Cevan (talk) 04:44, April 4, 2015 (UTC)