User talk:Gethralkin/Archive01

Fanart
Just thought I'd let you know, putting the ARC-170 onto a starry background and adding other shrunken down versions of the fighter around it, as you did with File:TacARC170fighterSPRazorSquadron.jpg, is considered fanart, which isn't allowed at Wookieepedia. Just blacking out the background, as Darth Culator had done to File:TacARC170fighterSP.jpg is fine however. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 20:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

PocketModels
Hey, I really wouldn't consider the PocketModel packs to be appearances. They're really sources. So, if you could please put them in the "Sources" sections from now on, I'd appreciate that. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 19:02, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Could you plase not put them as appearances? I don't want to have to follow you around to every article you edit. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 19:32, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research.svg (Comlink) 13:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Resolute
Just to let you know, I reverted your edit to Resolute (Venator-class) because all those statistics, though true for the Venator-class, are not necessarily true for each individual ship. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 23:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Uploading
If you are going to continue uploading images, please use the template correctly. The licensing tag goes IN the template, not with a separate heading outside the template. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 19:49, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Oops, yeah, sorry about that. I was just clicking on the drop down for the standard Screenshot template, but didn't pay attention to where it was going to end up.Gethralkin 20:10, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Two ways to go about it. The easier is to just not touch the drop down licensing box when uploading and directly put the licensing tag in the template. Second option is continue using the drop down box to select the licensing tag, but then editing the summary to move the tag into the template once the image is uploaded. The first option is easier. But it's your choice. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 20:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I'll remember that.Gethralkin 20:25, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

+ or -
The plus and minus numbers on an edit are the number of characters/spaces added or taken away in that edit. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 16:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Problem reports
Allow me to introduce you to Mr. Redirect, who could have helped you with every single one of your recent problem reports. -- Darth Culator  (Talk) 00:41, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Hawk
Gethralkin, regardless of whether or not Hawk died in the deleted scene, please do not make any major edits without the nominator's permission if the article is currently going through a nomination process. That goes especially for adding unsourced and unnecessary information to the article that detracts from its quality.  CC7567  (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I should have been clearer: please do not edit the article at all without the nominator's permission if it's currently going through or has gone through a nomination process. It's up to the nominator to decide what is acceptable quality for the article. Furthermore, yes, you did add unsourced information. Do you see those two last paragraphs of the biography? Do you see how there's no ref number at the end of the sentences? That's unsourced information. Once an article has achieved a higher status, that is the way it should stay unless there is good reason for it.  CC7567  (talk) 22:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If I may butt in, Gethralkin, I think what CC is trying to say is please don't make huge, sweeping changes that completely alter the dynamic of a nominated article without the nominator's permission. Removing half of an article's content like that just on a whim was not the way to go about it. If you have concerns, please do leave objections to the nomination on the GAN page. That's what the nomination process is all about. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Gethralkin, please stop striking my comments on the GAN page. You have absolutely no reason to strike any comments but your own.  CC7567  (talk) 04:32, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If I wasn't clear with the above message, please stop. The comments of others are not your concern.  CC7567  (talk) 04:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Gethralkin, kindly stop ignoring these messages. My comments are not yours to strike, and there's a reason I've reverted your last few changes.  CC7567  (talk) 04:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Understood.  CC7567  (talk) 04:50, 23 July 2009 (UTC)