Wookieepedia:Inquisitorius/Log/2017 December 16

21:57:02<@Toprawa> Ok, we'll begin with articles from last meeting 21:57:06<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Roark_Garnet 21:57:11<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Roark_Garnet 21:57:15<@Toprawa> This has been extended twice now 21:58:02<@ecks> why was it extended the last time? 21:58:03<@Toprawa> The date references were the issue 21:58:09<@Toprawa> More detailed referenced should be used for the WEG dates as those sources did not use BBY/ABY dates. 21:58:09<@Toprawa>     Detailed references for all BBY/ABY dates added 21:58:09<@Toprawa>         More work needs to be done on the date referencing. Please see log for details. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 15:16, November 19, 2017 (UTC) 21:58:09<@Toprawa>             Added suggested additions to date references. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 14:17, December 13, 2017 (UTC) 21:58:20<@ecks> it appears it's fixed, then 21:58:21<@Toprawa> Examining his edits... 21:59:33<@Toprawa> You know, I think that's a pretty lazy effort at fixing it 21:59:42<@Toprawa>  All he does is link to this template http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Template:YearMathGRS 21:59:54<@Toprawa> Which doesn't really say anything at all about the specific GrS date in this article 22:00:09<@exiledjedi> Yeah. 22:00:29<@Toprawa> He's basically expecting the reader to read this convoluted template explanation and then make their own calculations on how this GrS date applies 10 ABY 22:00:34<@Toprawa> That's what he should explain 22:01:26<@exiledjedi> Yeah, allowing that would set a bad precedent. 22:02:00<@Toprawa> Well, I'm willing to give him one more crack at it, on the concession that we may not have explained this perfectly in the last meeting 22:02:08<@exiledjedi> Same 22:02:09<@Toprawa> But I don't know how else we can make it clearer after this 22:02:20<@Toprawa> You need to explain precisely how 10 ABY equals this GrS date 22:02:28<@Toprawa> It doesn't have to be a long or convoluted explanation 22:02:34<@Toprawa> Keep it as a simple as you can 22:02:46<@Toprawa> Template:YearMathGRS is the basis for how we calculate this 22:02:54<@Toprawa> It should be referenced, but it's not the solution for this explanation 22:03:10<@Toprawa> Ok, I vote to extend 22:03:15<@exiledjedi> Extend 22:03:26<@ecks> extend 22:03:32<@Toprawa> Roark Garnet extended 22:03:41<@Toprawa> I'm not even linking, but Darth Nihilus is next 22:03:45<@Toprawa> Naru is requesting an extension 22:03:49<@Toprawa> Fine with me 22:04:03<@ecks> yep 22:04:03<@ecks> extend 22:04:06<@exiledjedi> Sure, extend 22:04:09<@Toprawa> Darth Nihilus extended 22:04:17<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Mount_Corvast 22:04:24<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Mount_Corvast 22:04:25<@Toprawa> No changes 22:04:36<@exiledjedi> Kill 22:04:39<@Toprawa> Kill 22:05:03<@Toprawa> ecks? 22:05:32<@ecks> kill 22:05:33<@ecks> sorry 22:05:36<@Toprawa> Mount Corvast killed 22:05:49<@Toprawa> One second... 22:05:51<@Toprawa> Checking something 22:06:15<@Toprawa> Stating this for the record: 22:06:27<@Toprawa> Since we legally need 4 Inqs to kill these articles, as we talked about last meeting 22:06:43<@Toprawa> Imperators' absentee vote is counting in all of these votes, unstated, as noted on the meeting page 22:06:49<@Toprawa> Moving on 22:06:57<@Toprawa>  http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Coruscant_Security_Force 22:07:01<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Coruscant_Security_Force 22:07:07<@Toprawa> He got some of it 22:07:11<@Toprawa>  Didn't get all of it 22:07:16<@Toprawa>      I realize that not all objections have been met, however I'm still planning on addressing them. I would also note that it looks like there is possibly more material upcoming from the comic series that will need to be updated next month anyways. An extension on this review would be appreciated. Coruscantfan (Talk) 19:31, December 16, 2017 (UTC) 22:07:32<@Toprawa> Fine 22:07:35<@exiledjedi> Extend 22:07:39<@ecks> extend 22:07:42<@Toprawa> Coruscant Security Force extended 22:07:50<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Independence 22:07:54<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Independence_(second_review) 22:08:38<@ecks> Bts is still partly unsourced, I guess 22:08:41<@Toprawa> He didn't do all of it 22:08:45<@exiledjedi>  He didn't update for what I was asked for either. 22:08:52<@Toprawa> If you asked him, I'm sure he would say he's relying on self-sourcing in the BTS 22:09:06<@exiledjedi> It identifies it as the wrong kind of cruiser. 22:09:10<@Toprawa> He didn't subsection the BTS 22:09:38<@ecks> can you elaborate, EJ? 22:09:37<@Toprawa> I realize we didn't make this an original point of probation, but can't we get any BTS images for this? 22:09:50<@Toprawa> No production shots of this ship being made or something? 22:10:30<@exiledjedi> It calls it an MC80a. 22:10:40<@exiledjedi> Which is a different type of ship. 22:10:52<@Toprawa> Forgive me, but did we include this in the original probation reasons? 22:10:55<@Toprawa> I don't see it listed 22:11:02<@exiledjedi> This was the update. 22:11:06<@Toprawa> Ok 22:11:07<@exiledjedi>  For CSWE 22:11:33<@ecks> that wasn't really made clear 22:11:42<@Toprawa> I'm willing to give him another crack at it 22:11:45<@ecks> I am willing to grant an extension since some work was done 22:11:45<@Toprawa> At least he's working on it 22:11:55<@exiledjedi>  Extend 22:12:02<@ecks> extend 22:12:05<@Toprawa> Note to GT, I'd recommend talking to either myself or EJ to make sure you're getting everything we're looking for 22:12:14<@Toprawa> Independence extended 22:12:23<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Imperial_Hyperspace_Security_Net 22:12:31<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Imperial_Hyperspace_Security_Net_(second_review) 22:12:34<@Toprawa> Nothing 22:12:39<@Toprawa> Kill 22:12:46<@exiledjedi> Kill 22:12:47<@ecks> Kill 22:12:52<@Toprawa> Imperial Hyperspace Security Net killed 22:12:56<@Toprawa> Moving on to new articles 22:13:00<@Toprawa> This is a note from Hanzo on the meeting page: 22:13:04<@Toprawa> The following RFANs were failed due to unresolved objections, and no review was ever formally done for these still-recognized FAs. I looked at each individually and saw that the listed objections still weren't addressed: 22:13:17<@ecks> my man 22:13:20<@Toprawa> He has several listed for Joram Kithe, which were from me apparently 22:13:24<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Joram_Kithe 22:13:26<@Toprawa> I won't post them all here 22:13:29<@Toprawa> Please see meeting page 22:14:16<@Toprawa> Infobox-exclusive info 22:14:45<@Toprawa> Probe if there's nothing else to add 22:14:51<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:15:11<@Toprawa> Hanzo should just be an Inq if he does this much work 22:15:24<@ecks> Probe 22:15:28<@Toprawa> Joram Kithe probed 22:15:31<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Ravager_(Centurion-class) 22:15:36<@Toprawa>     Infobox exclusive info. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:04, November 22, 2017 (UTC) 22:15:38<@ecks> if he reviews some, I'm all for it :P 22:16:04<@Toprawa> The BTS kind of sucks 22:16:11<@exiledjedi> The 3951 BBY date cannot be sourced to the game. 22:16:16<@Toprawa> I'd say it needs to be "modernized" 22:16:22<@exiledjedi> Agreed. 22:16:23<@Toprawa> See the Layout Guide for details 22:16:28<@Toprawa> This is just trivial: Like the Leviathan, the appearance of the Ravager is similar to the Imperial-class Star Destroyers of the Star Wars films.[5][6][7][8] 22:16:42<@Toprawa> Probe 22:16:45<@ecks> seems unnecessary 22:16:46<@ecks> probe 22:16:47<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:16:51<@Toprawa> Ravager (Centurion-class) probed 22:16:59<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Tohno 22:17:03<@Toprawa>     Infobox-exclusive dates, also inadequate sourcing of the BBY dates. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:04, November 22, 2017 (UTC) 22:17:19<@Toprawa> Some of those paragraphs could use breaks in Oasis 22:17:48<@Toprawa> Yeah, the 22 BBY date is sourced to AOTC 22:17:50<@exiledjedi> 22 BBY cannot be sourced directly to AOTC. 22:17:54<@Toprawa> heh 22:17:57<@Toprawa> Probe 22:18:07<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:18:13<@ecks> pronr 22:18:15<@ecks> er 22:18:15<@Toprawa> Tohno probed 22:18:20<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Red_Nebula 22:18:33<@Toprawa>     Intro disproportionately shorter than rest of article, description missing infobox astrographical data. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:04, November 22, 2017 (UTC) 22:18:33<@Toprawa>     3 ABY citations made using a 1981 comic, 19 years before BBY/ABY was formally established. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 17:32, November 23, 2017 (UTC) 22:18:44<@Toprawa> All of these Marvel images could be improved via The Club 22:19:02<@Toprawa> This is article-quality rules 22:19:03<@Toprawa> I mean 22:19:06<@Toprawa> image-quality rules 22:19:39<@Toprawa> That Leland Chee message board ref needs to be found 22:19:46<@Toprawa> Someone had an archive of most of them somewhere 22:19:53<@Toprawa> Would take a fair amount of digging 22:20:10<@Toprawa> Anything else? 22:20:20<@Toprawa> Probe 22:20:23<@ecks> probe 22:20:24<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:20:29<@Toprawa> Red Nebula probed 22:20:37<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Monument_Plaza/Legends 22:20:43<@Toprawa>     ISWU, a source, is tagged with (First appearance) in sources list, and appearances list doesn't feature same tag. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:11, November 22, 2017 (UTC) 22:20:43<@Toprawa>     Addendum: "It is possible that Monument Plaza was used by the Vong to grow their organic war materiél" from History section sounds like speculation, unless the cited material literally says it. 22:20:43<@Toprawa>     Kaldani Spires Residential Apartments mentioned solely in the infobox. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:34, December 4, 2017 (UTC) 22:21:36<@Toprawa> I don't support the ISWU thing as a formal objection 22:21:44* @ecks objects to image caption punctuation 22:21:47<@Toprawa> We're not perfectly consistent with that stuff 22:21:52<@Toprawa> And it's been our precedent to use it in Sources list 22:22:07<@Toprawa> Plus, the LG allows a concession for this in rare instances 22:22:16<@Toprawa> "Additionally, items in the Sources list typically should never use the (First appearance) tag, which is primarily used in the Appearances list." 22:22:29<@Toprawa> This is an atypical case where we actually do use it 22:22:38<@Toprawa>  If we want to change that, I think it should go through a larger community discussion 22:22:42<@ecks> yeah, I was wondering about that 22:23:07<@Toprawa> I mean to say, that it's been our precedent to list ISWU in Sources 22:23:19<@Toprawa> But everything else 22:24:12<@Toprawa> There's a scene in TCW where they're in monument plaza 22:24:14<@exiledjedi> It could use some subsectioning. 22:24:15<@Toprawa> That's the main infobox image 22:24:21<@Toprawa> But there's more stuff that goes on that more images could be used 22:24:41<@Toprawa> There's an opportunity to show Satine and Obi-Wan together in Monument Plaza 22:25:04<@Toprawa> Probe 22:25:21<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:25:42<@Toprawa> Dates, if we didn't mention that 22:25:59<@Toprawa> Date references, I mean 22:26:17<@Toprawa> ecks? 22:26:19<@ecks> probe 22:26:45<@Toprawa> Monument Plaza/Legends probed 22:26:56<@Toprawa> starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Raich 22:27:00<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Raich 22:27:28<@ecks> these quote templates rustle my jimmies 22:27:29<@Toprawa> All instances of "Forest Moon of Endor" should be capitalized per source material 22:27:39<@Toprawa> Inadequate linking in infobox 22:27:45<@Toprawa> Infobox-exclusive info 22:27:53<@ecks> what's this referencing-appearances thing? 22:28:09<@Toprawa> Yeah... 22:28:12<@Toprawa> It's basically pure speculation 22:28:16<@ecks> this is an LG mess 22:28:16<@Toprawa> Read the second paragraph of the BTS 22:28:18<@exiledjedi> Yeah, that makes no sense. 22:28:22<@Toprawa> That's baloney 22:28:28<@Toprawa> That should all be removed 22:28:35<@Toprawa> There's no even indirectly stated connection 22:28:45<@Toprawa> I question how there's not a single date attached to this article 22:28:49<@Toprawa> We know the Ewoks series stuff takes place in 3 ABY 22:29:26<@Toprawa> Probe 22:29:33<@ecks> probe 22:29:40<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:29:51<@Toprawa> There was this from Hanzo too Raich -- Speculation in 1st paragraph of bio alone, also BTS speculation. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 04:11, November 22, 2017 (UTC) 22:29:55<@Toprawa> Raich probed 22:30:00<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Qrrrl_Toq 22:30:04<@Toprawa> Qrrrl Toq -- speculation in the article body ("Why Toq made the switch between weapons is unknown" in P&A), 3996 BBY death date infobox exclusive and cited to a comic published before the BBY system was established 22:30:32<@Toprawa> A little more subsectioning would be nice 22:30:35<@Toprawa> Particularly at the beginning 22:30:41<@Toprawa> I see redirects and redlinks 22:30:43<@Toprawa> General cleanup 22:30:58<@Toprawa> None of these TOTJ images are from The Club 22:31:16<@Toprawa> For reference, The Club basically means get high-quality digital versions of these comic images, per image-quality rules 22:31:40<@ecks> is our policy not that intact speech bubbles must have their text intact as well? 22:31:53<@Toprawa> I forget in that case 22:32:18<@Toprawa> Fix DB template formatting 22:32:34<@ecks> this linking is just horrible 22:32:48<@Toprawa> "Speech bubbles should ideally be cropped out of an image. If it is not possible to crop them out, the text in the bubbles should be left in if the bubble is intact. If the bubble is cut off, the text should be removed. " 22:32:50<@ecks> what's with the DB template? 22:33:04<@Toprawa> DB template names need to be listed by last name first 22:33:09<@Toprawa> That's how the DB formatted their entries 22:33:17<@Toprawa> But no one ever followed this for some reason 22:33:20<@Toprawa> Maybe we're all just dyslexic 22:33:43<@Toprawa> I'm satisfied this is enough to kill it 22:33:44<@Toprawa>  Probe 22:33:50<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:33:58<@ecks> I must be missing something there. I see one DB template, with the correct title displayed 22:34:07<@Toprawa> Oh, it is 22:34:08<@Toprawa>  My mistake 22:34:16<@ecks> for some dumb reason, this particular entry is Last name, first name 22:34:17<@ecks> Probe 22:34:23<@Toprawa> Funny 22:34:27<@Toprawa> Qrrrl Toq probed 22:34:35<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Noval_Garaint 22:34:40<@Toprawa> Noval Garaint -- speculation in body (P&T mentioning "for reasons unknown"), infobox-exclusive info 22:35:14<@Toprawa> This is completely unnecessary to add and explain Alternatively, throughout a player's campaign, all minor characters have a chance (chosen randomly by the game engine) to become Force-sensitive and thus trained by either Luke Skywalker or Darth Vader. If Noval Garaint is selected to be Force-sensitive, then his character could be trained in the ways of the Force by Vader. Garaint's Force-sensitivity, however, is 22:35:15<@Toprawa> non-canonical as it is decided purely by chance, and should not be confused with canon.[2] 22:35:15<@exiledjedi> Redirects 22:35:26<@Toprawa> That could be mentioned in every single Rebellion character article, which we definitely haven't been doing 22:35:47<@Toprawa> I would, however, strongly suggest looking at the game's strategy guide, which gives tips on how each character can best be used in the game; i.e., sabotage missions 22:35:51<@Toprawa> That should definitely be included 22:36:07<@Toprawa> This, too, is basically nonsense general summary: "In the game, the player could use Garaint for a wide variety of missions ranging from abduction of enemy characters, to the assassination of Rebels, to the sabotage of enemy facilities." 22:36:11<@Toprawa> That applies to everyone 22:36:19<@Toprawa> There should be specific character strengths for Noval Garaint 22:36:40<@Toprawa> We can be more specific with our ABY dates 22:36:48<@Toprawa> Rebellion begins the day after the Battle of Yavin 22:37:06<@ecks> Probe 22:37:08<@Toprawa> I know those Galaxy Guides gave general dates too 22:37:12<@Toprawa> Probe 22:37:17<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:37:23<@Toprawa> Noval Garaint probed 22:37:36<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Finhead_Stonebone 22:37:46<@Toprawa> Finhead Stonebone -- "unknown insectoid species," BBY date sourced to same comic series as Qrrrl Toq above which predate 1st usage of that dating system 22:37:58<@Toprawa> Images should be digital 22:38:00<@Toprawa> I see redirects 22:38:24<@Toprawa> Could probably use better subsectioning 22:38:38<@ecks> no quote for the first bio section? 22:38:39<@Toprawa> Infobox-exclusive info 22:39:00<@Toprawa> Probe 22:39:03<@ecks> Probe 22:39:24<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:39:38<@Toprawa> Finhead Stonebone probed 22:39:48<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Bouncer 22:39:53<@Toprawa> Bouncer -- infobox exclusive info, verify the ABY date citations. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:41, November 22, 2017 (UTC) 22:40:12<@ecks> Can we give Hanzo Emergency Powers to probe everything he wants to? 22:40:27<@Toprawa> What Hanzo is saying is that 4 ABY can't be sourced to those Dark Forces sources 22:40:42<@ecks> reference 8 is a bit... 22:40:43<@exiledjedi> What is reference 8 doing? 22:41:10<@Toprawa> Yeah, let's give possible timeline references from some fan site 22:41:16<@Toprawa> That's the Wookieepedia Way 22:41:50<@Toprawa> Probe 22:42:04<@ecks> probe 22:42:17<@exiledjedi> I'd question how reference 11 is being used as well. 22:42:23<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:42:49<@Toprawa> Bouncer probed 22:42:54<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Vors_Voorhorian 22:43:02<@Toprawa> The images are pretty good for scanning 22:43:03<@Toprawa> I'll give them that 22:43:11<@Toprawa> But I do believe there are digital versions available 22:43:18<@Toprawa> These Star Wars Kids comics were recollected in an Omnibus 22:43:32<@Toprawa> Vors Voorhorian -- infobox exclusive info, speculation ("it is possible that Voorhorian was freed" in bio cited to a dead forum link). Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:29, November 29, 2017 (UTC) 22:43:46<@ecks> ref 4 needs dat cite web 22:44:18<@Toprawa> Ref 1 needs the template 22:44:21<@exiledjedi> he X-wing would go on to be a mainstay in the Alliance fleet, and would even serve the New Republic consistently. 22:44:33<@exiledjedi> I'm sure we can reference that to a single source instead of three. 22:44:54<@Toprawa> Agreed 22:44:57<@Toprawa> Linking in infobox 22:45:03<@Toprawa> Infobox-exclusive info 22:45:07<@Toprawa> Hanzo said that 22:45:09<@Toprawa> Probe 22:45:24<@ecks> probe 22:45:23<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:45:32<@Toprawa> Vors Voorhorian probed 22:45:46<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Crado 22:45:51<@Toprawa> Crado -- infobox exclusive info, death year also only in infobox but not in biography. Equipment section also needed. 22:46:28<@Toprawa> These are really nice scans, but I'm pretty sure they're not digital, since Redemption uploaded them 22:46:39<@exiledjedi> Redlink, redirects 22:46:49<@Toprawa> Paragraph breaks needed 22:47:01<@ecks> I'm not willing to kill this just because the images are only 99% of what they could be :P 22:47:37<@Toprawa> Well, if there's a drastic difference between the sharpness of these and digital, that's an issue 22:47:47<@Toprawa> I don't know how different they are without comparing them side by side 22:47:57<@Toprawa> At the very least, someone should look at that 22:48:11<@ecks> sorry guys, have to step out for a few mins, Tope has my vote 22:48:22<@Toprawa> I'm just saying they're very nice for physical scans 22:48:27<@Toprawa> Redemption was always the best at that 22:48:44<@Toprawa> This is practically digital quality https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/6/6e/X_cathar4.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20081206170243 22:49:06<@Toprawa> Cade's infobox code makes it look like it's digital 22:49:13<@Toprawa> But you can kind of see the difference in the other ones 22:49:15<@Toprawa> Anyways, moving on 22:49:16<@Toprawa>  Probe 22:49:18<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:49:23<@Toprawa> Crado probed 22:49:29<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Chrag%27mak%27al 22:49:34<@Toprawa> Chrag'mak'al -- infobox exclusive info, check the source material to see if "whether or not he was apprehended remains unknown" is actually mentioned. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 02:41, November 29, 2017 (UTC) 22:49:47<@Toprawa> "remains" doesn't work anyway 22:49:53<@Toprawa> We write in past tense on Wookieepedia 22:50:26<@Toprawa> "Talents and abilities" isn't a LG section 22:50:35<@Toprawa> And some of its contents should be in an Equipment section 22:50:48<@Toprawa> BTS has italics formatting issues 22:50:53<@exiledjedi> I'm betting it would be possible to give some kind of timeline placement in the body. 22:50:58<@Toprawa> Most likely 22:51:17<@Toprawa> Probe 22:51:22<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:51:25<@Toprawa> Chrag'mak'al probed 22:51:28<@exiledjedi> Just to let you know, I'm going to need to head off in about 5 minutes. 22:51:34<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Leektar/Legends 22:51:39<@Toprawa> Ok 22:51:44<@Toprawa>      Equipment section needed 22:51:44<@Toprawa>     Infobox exclusive info 22:51:44<@Toprawa>     General context needed ("Leektar grew up in Red Bush Grove, a small community south of the more prominent Ewok settlement, Bright Tree Village" begins the biography for example) 22:51:44<@Toprawa>     Date for Battle of Endor not mentioned. Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 15:47, November 30, 2017 (UTC) 22:51:47<@ecks> ok, I'm back 22:52:01<@Toprawa> Redirects, general cleanup 22:52:04<@Toprawa> We'll try to move through this quickly 22:52:08<@Toprawa> There's only a few left 22:52:09<@Toprawa> Probe 22:52:13<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:52:37<@ecks> probe 22:52:40<@Toprawa> Leektar/Legends probed 22:52:43<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Croke 22:52:49<@Toprawa> Croke — this edit added information to the body of the article that should be reflected in the infobox, as well. It should also be checked whether the new information should be added elsewhere in the article, and whether the linking shouldn't be updated. 22:52:56<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Croke?curid=2429&diff=7291347&oldid=7291346 22:53:27<@Toprawa> Pretty sure all of that ABY/BBY referencing needs to be fixed 22:53:42<@Toprawa> Though I could be wrong 22:53:46<@Toprawa> It should be checked, though 22:53:59<@Toprawa> Probe 22:54:02<@ecks> probe 22:54:02<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:54:03<@Toprawa> Croke probed 22:54:14<@Toprawa> Hanzo says: 22:54:17<@Toprawa> These two edits by anonymous users should be checked for accuracy: 22:54:21<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Battle_of_Kamino/Legends 22:54:26<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Battle_of_Kamino%2FLegends&diff=7293225&oldid=7221096 22:54:41<@Toprawa> Probe 22:54:52<@ecks> p 22:54:54<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:54:55<@Toprawa> Battle of Kamino/Legends probed 22:54:58<@Toprawa> Same deal: 22:54:58<@Toprawa> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Gara_Petothel 22:55:38<@ecks> p 22:55:50<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:56:13-!- Ralltiir (~Toprawa@wookieepedia/bureaucrat/Toprawa) has joined #wookieepedia-inquisitorius (acc: Toprawa) 22:56:14* ChanServ sets modes [#wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o Ralltiir] 22:56:16<@Ralltiir> Sorry 22:56:24<@Ralltiir> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Gara_Petothel 22:56:29<@Ralltiir> http://starwars.wikia.com/index.php?title=Gara_Petothel&diff=7294013&oldid=7287159 22:56:39<@Ralltiir> Probe 22:56:41<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:56:46<@ecks> probe 22:56:45<@Ralltiir> Gara Petothel probed 22:56:51<@Ralltiir> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Sun_Guard 22:56:54<@Ralltiir> Sun Guard — this should be checked, and, if true, formatted. Imperators II(Talk) 21:21, December 14, 2017 (UTC) 22:56:59<@Ralltiir> This: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Sun_Guard?curid=83880&diff=7300738&oldid=7252954 22:57:02<@Ralltiir> Probe 22:57:15<@exiledjedi> Redlink, as well. 22:57:16<@exiledjedi> Probe 22:57:31<@ecks> p 22:57:32<@Ralltiir> Sun Guard probed 22:57:40<@Ralltiir> We will not be looking at the Maintenance Bin this meeting 22:57:52<@Ralltiir> And I didn't have time to formulate my discussion item 22:57:57<@Ralltiir> Meeting duties... 22:57:57<@exiledjedi> That thing is overflowing. 22:58:06<@Ralltiir> Do you want to look at it? 22:58:10<@Ralltiir> I was just skipping it since you have to go 22:58:14<@exiledjedi>  Not now. 22:58:17<@Ralltiir> Ok 22:58:19<@ecks> please don't be me on paperwork 22:58:20<@Ralltiir> Meeting duties... 22:58:39<@Ralltiir> Paperwork - SE 22:58:47<@Ralltiir>  Scheduling 87 - ecks 22:58:48<@ecks> awww yis 22:58:50<@exiledjedi> RIP SE 22:58:54<@Ralltiir>  Meeting 86 is concluded 22:58:56<@exiledjedi> See you later. 22:58:57<@Ralltiir> Thanks for coming 22:59:00<@ecks> excellent