User talk:Eyrezer

<< Archive >>

Re:Tyria
Yes, I am planning on it. I didn't realize I'd been neglecting it that long, but really I've been away from my sources for several weeks because of some RL obligations that have come up. I'll try to knock some out this afternoon when I get home and update it with what I've been working on offline. Thanks for taking the time to look into it before you wiped out the nom though, I really appreciate that, especially since I've really only been popping in on the CT and de-orphaning articles lately when I get a short chance to log in. Wildyoda 15:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Heroes of Cularin
I wasn't sure whether an article was appropriate or not, which was why I never created one, but they are referred to as "Heroes of Cularin" quite a lot, although sometimes other names like "Heroes of the Cularin system" are used instead. However, in some adventures, they are just called "heroes of Cularin", with the H not captialised, suggesting that they are just a group of heroes from Cularin, rather than a distinct group.

You're right in that it doesn't seem to be the intent of the authors that they are one continuous group. However, as what adventures are partcipated in by individual players can vary, we can't canonicaly define that one group of people did one thing, while another did something else, so we must decided whether to treat them as one continuous group or that there are separate heroes for each adventure/trilogy. For example Rast'Tul encountered the player characters at two different times, so assuming they are a continuous group, we would state in his article he encountered them once and then later met them again, whereas if we assumed that they were different people, we would treat them as such in the article.

Finally, if we decided not to have an article for them, we need to decide what we are going to call the player characters when they are referred to in articles, we could call them just "heroes", but this sounds a bit POV. Alternately, we could just call them "spacers", like is done with SWG articles --Jinzler 22:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I would like to restart this debate, if thats okay, as I am considering working on the Raik Muun article, but I don't want to GAN it until this issue is resolved. I believe that there are two alternate ways we can deal with this:


 * Proposal 1- we create a "Heroes of Cularin" article, treat the player chracters as a continuous group and then just state in the article that the group is refered to by various other names and that what are adventures are participated in by individual players can vary.
 * Proposal 2- we don't create and article for them, just refer to them in other articles as agents and then only refer to them as the heroes of Cularin if a specific source calls them that.

I am personally in favour in Proposal 1. Proposal 2 wouldn't necessarily work articles with a lot of Living Force content, as they would just say stuff like "a group of agents did this for Master Qel-Bertuk an then later on a group of agents did something else for him". Proposal 1 would instead allow greater degree of linking between appearances of the heroes in separate adventures, ie "The Heroes of Cularin did this for Qel-Bertuk and then later on they helped him out again.

I hope I have explained all this clearly and I was wondering if you could give me any feedback and let me know your thoughts on this --Jinzler 21:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delayed reply. I didn't realise you had posted more the second time :S I think an article on the Heroes of Cularin is perfectly justified, however I think it is best to make it refer to a large group of individuals. The second thing I would do, in regards to repeat encounters with certain individuals, is to say that some of the heroes had met him before but not necessarily all. That way you there is continuity and the opportunity for events to work in together better, but at the same time, there is also room for new individuals to interact. --Eyrezer 11:25, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a good idea --Jinzler 11:32, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * That was quick! I just created a short article on them now, going from memory (which I know I should not do :p) --Eyrezer 11:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Darksaber
Thanks for the help. I haven't gotten around to looking through the novel yet, but I'm hoping there's some stuff I can add to P&T. Maybe some more info for that, plus a slightly expanded intro, can give me 1000 words.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Removal of quote on Clone trooper page
Why did you remove the quote about clones growing up loyal to the Republic or not at all? Even if "The Star Wars: Rough Draft" did indeed somehow mention anything to the contrary about clones' loyalty, it would hardly be a canon source. - Milo Fett [Comlink] 02:41, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, looks like it's been fixed now anyway. Incidentally, I think it was from Republic #50. - Milo Fett [Comlink] 13:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Jutka
It's in the CSWE (god I love that book and its attention to detail :P). I added a little note to the BTS. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 09:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Categories in Category:Trash compactor
You recently added Category:Trash compactor archive and Category:Pages in the trash compactor to Category:Trash compactor. This has had the side effect of adding these pages to the dynamic list on the Trash compactor page itself. Any idea on how to fix this, and if not, should we move them back to their previous categories? jSarek 08:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, I think I got it. I was trying to organise the Category:Wookieepedia today, which is why I was moving them. --Eyrezer 11:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Lomite/Lommite
To answer your question regarding this in IRC - Short answer: the 3rd edition appears to retcon "lomite" to be lommite. Long answer: The first edition of A Guide to the Star Wars Universe does not have a separate entry for lomite, but it is mentioned as one of the materials used in the manufacture of dura-armor. The second edition has an entry for "lommite", but preserves the "lomite" spelling in its entry for dura-armor, something which is echoed in the original Star Wars Encyclopedia. "Lomite" is replaced by "lommite" in the entry for dura-armor in the 3rd edition of A Guide to the Star Wars Universe.--Muuuuuurgh 04:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I made a simple redirect before I asked the question. The internet has been temperamental which is why I left IRC. I'll leave the REDIRECT, but if you feel like adding a Bts, it might be appropriate. --Eyrezer 05:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:Executor
No explicit link between those ships, no. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Can you give me more info on an image
Can you tell me where an image can originally be found, or who made the image from the Star Wars Delta Squad information http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Delta_squad on the website? The image is listed as Delta_Squad1.jpg. It's also listed as 14r.jpg on the wikipedia.org website under the same topic. My son (5)absolutely loves this pic! 24.167.35.101 14:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

The new Triage system
After the Inquisitorius' most recent meeting, it was decided to enact a triage system for dealing with the large number of nominations on the FAN page. The Triage page has been set up in the Inquisitorius forum to make it easier for Inqs to see what nominations are best focused on for clearing out the nomination page. This is a tool for helping Inqs combine their efforts on articles, and shouldn't be taken as mandatory; as usual, any Inq is free to review any article they want. - Lord Hydronium 03:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Objection reminder
Just a reminder that you have an objection about the timeline of Denal that you mentioned looking into. I don't know how that's resolving, but I think it's the last objection left for that article. - Lord Hydronium 03:35, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: Denal
Unfortunately, I'm not registered in the IRC. In any way, I don't have much time right now to discuss it there. Could you ask it for me? I would appreciate it. QuiGonJinn There's always a bigger fish. 11:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Following your advice, I've consulted other users in the IRC and they agreed to your proposal. The mobile game is now placed after the episode. I'll add some other minor stuff soon. QuiGonJinn There's always a bigger fish. 15:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Andykatib - Possible Hyperspace article
Hello Eyrezer,

My name is Andrew, whom you may know as User:Andykatib. Earlier, I remember you making first contact with me when we first met up in 2006, when I was still under the username MyNz. Oh, by the way do you still live and study in Dunedin? Since you are a more experienced contributor at Wookieepedia, I just need your advice.

I have been working on a script on articles which would be published on Hyperspace. You know those Hyperspace-exclusive in-universe articles like Nathan O'Keefe's Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Praji or even Daniel Wallace's Essential Guides. Now, this is no ordinary cheap fanon trash but it is high quality material.

My three in-universe articles are written from a historical perspective and deals with the Pius Dea sect. The first article deals with their beliefs which I borrowed ideas from Christianity and Islam given my church background. The second article deals with the rise of Contispex and the start of Pius Dea rule including his jihads against the Hutts and the Jedi Order. It also deals with his daughter Bethazile I (her name is an anagram of Queen Elizabeth Tudor) who further strengthened Pius Dea rule by passing several bills in the Republic Senate. Her bills are modelled the “Elizabethan Settlement” which consolidated Anglican dominance in England during the 16th century.

The third article deals with the end of Pius Dea rule. An “Anti-Pius Dea League” is formed and consists of various factions opposed to the Pius Dea-controlled Republic. It will also deal with the resurgence of the Jedi Order under a Qel-Droma and the infamous War of Restoration which culminates in the end of Pius Dea rule. The last Supreme Chancellor Veltorius parallels the latter Emperor Palpatine. Two of his henchmen: the Duros Admiral Hurnz Cortes and Kuat Drive Yards CEO Miraz are derived from the realworld Spanish Conquistador Hernán Cortés and the antagonistic King Miraz from C.S. Lewis' Chronicles of Narnia.

My articles are not yet ready. At present, I have written the script on a 1B5 exercise book and I will have to type it up on OpenOffice later this week. I plan to approach Lucasfilm Ltd. in the future with this concept. Because, for one's work to become canon, one must get legal and written permission from Lucasfilm. ie.a license.

By the way, is it possible if I can meet up with you sometime this week. I may not be available on Friday and Saturday because I am participating in Anzac day. However, Sunday after 1 pm or even a weekday is good.

What would be a good possible venue for us to meet. My mum works at Nations Christian Church during the week days and she says that we can meet at the church office. It is located on 334 King Edward Street in South Dunedin near United Videos. Other possible venues could be the Otago Museum's Discovery Centre or the Dunedin Public Library's young adult section on the second floor.

My interests besides Star Wars include history mainly modern military, political, Southeast Asian, Cold War and church history. If you are interested please reply to me on my user talk page or email me at Akatibandrew@gmail.com. Andykatib 07:19, 20th April 2009 (UTC)

Oh hi, Eyrezer. I am online right now. I have been working on Cold War and Treaty of Coruscant. Andykatib 08:55, 20th April 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I am online right now editing. Andykatib 09:30, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

I am sorry to trouble youif you are busy but can you please reply to my posts either on your talk page or mine. Andykatib 09:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Response
I completely forgot about the pirate leader. I was planning on working on him, but changed my mind. I've now removed the tag. BTW, regarding your proposal of using the tag in Denal's article. AFAIK, it should only be used when the information from a new TCW media conflicts with the previously established canon. I don't see such conflicts with Denal. The only possible conflicts are between two pieces of TCW, and they are not really conflicts. The rank discrepancy was resolved after the change of the layout, and as far as it goes for the Separatist presence on Rodia and Orto Plutonia, no one ever said that they couldn't just return to the Republic worlds. QuiGonJinn There's always a bigger fish. 12:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, the in-game images are... no good, because of the poor graphics and over-the-head view. And the ones from cutscenes are essentially the same and represent Denal standing with his rifle and/or communicator, with only the background behind him changing. I've uploaded an image for the Unidentified Jedi, though. QuiGonJinn There's always a bigger fish. 14:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, I would like to inform you that I've finished working on Denal. QuiGonJinn There's always a bigger fish. 14:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool - I almost missed this message, but I'll look over the article again later today. --Eyrezer 23:18, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The shot of the Jedi is from the game, yes. However, I don't think the shots of Denal and his squad are that good, especially with this circle of dots which represent your health. Just see the screens provided in the THQ profile. Still, if you think they are fine, I'll upload a couple. QuiGonJinn There's always a bigger fish. 12:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Rebel Force: Sneevel

 * The Sneevels are in chapter nineteen, top of page 157.--Darth Revanon 19:41, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Your very welcome. I was glad that i could help you guys out!--Darth Revanon 11:09, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

WN
I don't suppose some of your Newsroom stuff could be incorporated into the blog? Graestan ( Talk ) 00:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I was wondering about that, but they don't seem to be frequent enough for a regular feature or anything. A one off blog might work, though. Let me know if you have an idea. --Eyrezer 00:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Genna Delpin
You cut some stuff on Genna_Delpin that I think might be partially worth retaining in some way; I'd be interested in your views - see Talk:Genna_Delpin? Thanks! --McEwok 10:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * My main aim was to cut out the "we don't know this sentence" and you bit seemed attached to that. Better to just make the positive statement that the other guy had that position by the next book, and leave the connection implicit for the reader to make if they so choose, just as you made it. --Eyrezer 06:43, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks perfect with the latest addition. I'd have probably added "... although it is not known if Delpin was his colleague", but that's just me, and probably works better as it is. --McEwok 12:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool. --Eyrezer 12:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Mordageen (Re: ''Star Wars: Bounty Hunter)
Hello, Eyrezer. It looks fine to me; I do not see any glaring omissions. I have written up a rough draft of the Wesell part on a subpage. I'm not sure if you have seen it, so I thought I'd mention it. Do you have the Prima Guide for SW:BH? If so, I could use your assistance there. I'll take a look at Moorgadeen later, too, after double checking some things in the game. As I said, however, I don't see any omissions as of now. &mdash; Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 00:30, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks Fiolli. It looks like our article on Fust was copied from CUSWE which makes it sound as if Wesell was the one that originally put him in prison. I've since corrected it. --Eyrezer 08:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem. I have the game, but have not played it in some time. I will take a look when I get the chance. I'll let you know if I come up with something. In fact, I am on holiday this weekend with Monday off, so I'll see if I can look then. &mdash; Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 01:35, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Tahiri's grandfather GA nom
Hi Eyrezer. Thanks for reviewing my GA nomination. I've addressed your objection (quite a while ago, actually), so could you be so kind as to strike it? :) Cheers, Tinwe 14:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Tinwe. That was one objection I'd forgotten about. --Eyrezer 23:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

"Fair Prey"
Hey, Eyrezer. The version of "Fair Prey" I have is missing the last few pages. I know you needed the short story to write up the Tynnan article; do you have access to it? I'm wondering if Florn Lamproids come back to play in the last few pages after the big game hunter kills the one Noone freed from the cage. Thanks for any help! ~ SavageBob 13:33, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry; just a "ping" here. I thought my message might get lost in the shuffle since you got three others soon after it. :) ~ SavageBob 23:29, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You thought correctly! I think I got someone to scan those last pages for me. I'll see if I can find them, but I am 95% certain they don't reappear after that one almost kills the Krish. I take it from this you are going to write up the Lamproids? Cool! After reading Fair Prey, they definitely seemed like a worthy candidate. --Eyrezer 00:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool; let me know if you can find th elast three pages anywhere. And, yup, I'm kinda on a cantina alien kick at the moment, fleshing out some of our articles on the lesser-used cantina species. I've got all the notes taken for Lamproid, so hopefully I'll get something up soon. "Fair Prey" and "One Last Night" both add a lot of information on the species! ~ SavageBob 07:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Great, I look forward to it. --Eyrezer 07:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Viqi
Hi Eyrezer,

I try to steer clear of "I dealt with your objection" posts due to the heavy Inquisitor workload, but I added a new image of Coruscant to Shesh's article&mdash;have a look and see if you like it. I was wondering if that was your only objection?

Thanks

-- —Harrar  ( Villip ) 23:26, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reminder, it was perfectly appropriate. I haven't actually read through Viqi which made it easy to forget about. Sorry for the delay. --Eyrezer 04:15, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Galaxies
Sorry, I don't have access to Galaxies any more. I'm not sure if it's still installed, and my subscription's certainly over by this point. I get most of my info from Allakhazam these days. Not sure who else you could try, other than Culator. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:18, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * If I might butt in... Craven is quite the Galaxies expert, and he has screen shots of his run through the game, if I understand correctly. Give him a shot. ~ SavageBob 14:20, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks! You found some surprising information on Lamproids. :) --Eyrezer 02:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Tiss'shar
Thanks for the heads up. I added it to the source list, though it doesn't appear the write-up has any specifically species-relevant information. Let me know if you think I'm missing something. jSarek 07:31, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I tend to keep the Tiss'shar in the galaxy section limited to information about the species itself, rather than specific individuals. As for the list of notable members, that list is already filled with planetary politicians, a pirate kingpin, and a bodyguard for high-ranking Corporate Sector viceprex; it seems to me this guy isn't on the same tier as them. jSarek 09:37, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: CT
Ok, thanks for the heads up. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:19, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

TC
Hey Eyrezer. Thought I would show you this TC, per our discussion. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Jaxa and Jaxa Lian
If it's meant to be a reference, it's a pretty lousy one. Bettle was the one with Rebel ties; Jaxa was the one who always got exasperated with Bettle's willingness to take risks for the Rebellion. Hardly sounds like one of Loftus's "most reliable operatives." jSarek 10:54, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Inq Meeting XXV
An Inquisitorius meeting has been scheduled for 23:00 UTC on the 24th of May. Your presence is requested. Apologies for the late notice. Thefourdotelipsis 23:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Reff'ing Kallidahin
Thank you for the cookiee, Eyrezer, thou you'll probably want to remove it after this.

Now we can reduce the initially abstract situation to one specific point: '' When it comes to identical information in numerous sources, each piece of information should only be reffed to one source if possible. This was my original objection, which FourDot agrees with. So for the example of the birth of the twins, it should indeed only be reffed to ROTS.'' Well, I cannot do this, as I really think otherwise: IMHO, from an inclusionist POV if you will, reff'ing one source when I know the information is provided in multiple sources would decrease the quality of the article, and to a lesser extent, of the 'pedia, not to speak of a possible infraction of what I see as the spirit of rule 6. I can edit my FAN's if I agree or can be convinced of the need of the edition, but I firmly believe against Eyrezer and Fourdot in this case. The point of sourcing, again IMHO, is exactly that; else, I could easily remove all the ref tags and leave only the bibliography at the end of the article.

Now, this is a wiki. The article is not protected or anything. Any of you can edit the article and remove anything you feel inadequate; and of course I wouldn't start an "edit war", even less against an admin. My point is, I would not remove that "repetitive" references.

However, I feel we have reached a deadlock. I don't think I can persuade both Eyrezer and Fourdot that they should both change opinion; after all, both opinions are valid; thus the objection will remain until the article is edited &mdash; something I would not do. It might became the last outstanding objection, and then the article would remain inactive. Nominations that are inactive with outstanding objections for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list by the Inquisitorius. Coincidentially, there's an Inquisitor reading this; I think we could save some 2,600,000 seconds or so by simply eliminating the nomination just now and considering the article a failed FAN. I'll try something different, and better I hope, next time.

Just to end, I feel compelled to apologize, yet once more, for my too-passionate-for-my-own-good position and discourse. I can see, other people's FAN's objections do not have such an active discussion.

Thank you very much, --Skippy Farlstendoiro 12:16, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I can't really accept the reffing the way it is at the moment, and it is too complicated to just whip through and remove some and change it around without plowing through all the sources themselves. Consequently, the removal might be the best option. --Eyrezer 23:49, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've just made a last attempt to unify sources and reword paragraphs, trying to avoid two footnotes with the same number in the same paragraph if possible. This has accomplished little for the article, and of course nothing for footnote #40. Have a look if you wish, revert the changes if you wish, and use your Inqpowers if you wish; I've done all that I could do. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

INQCON
The new INQCON system is now in effect. For details on this new tool, please review the linked page. It is requested that you check any current featured article nominations that you have fully read and are currently objecting to, and change the respective INQCON number on the nomination if you are intending to ultimately support the article once your objections have been resolved. Also, please remember to change the Triage page when altering INQCON numbers. Any queries about the process can be made on the afore-linked INQCON page. Thanks, Thefourdotelipsis 00:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Wookieepedia Newsnet
Hi. I just wanted to let you know (if you're not already aware) that you missed the latest WOTC RPG sourcebook, Jedi Academy Training Manual (released on May 19), in the last "Canon updates" blog entry. I love the blog; keep it up! Thanks and may the Force be with you! Master JonathanJedi Council Chambers 02:26, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

CCG infobox
It looks pretty good; I can't think of anything to add other than maybe an image of the packaging, which you already have a slot for if not the actual picture. And no, I'm pretty sure Decipher's artists were never credited (unfortunately). jSarek 04:16, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Bendix Fust
You left IRC before I could inform you about this, forcing me to do this :P

Blog
Hey, I was wondering what specific day you were planning your next update. I have two more interviews coming down in short order, but between your update and a new segment I have coming from either Chack or Cylka, I should be able to spread them out. Let me know, if you don't mind, so I can plan things out. Thanks. Graestan ( Talk ) 12:45, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I normally post it Sunday night NZ time, so that should be tomorrow your time, I guess. --Eyrezer 16:49, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

CSWE errors

 * Gactimus as a moon despite Fry's comments.
 * Ecliptic as a starship despite Jackson Miller's comments. --Eyrezer 03:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Green-skinned aliens
I wonder if the green aliens you have listed here might be Zelosians? Just a thought. ~ SavageBob 05:24, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, could be. Do they have green skin or just green eyes? --Eyrezer 05:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, never mind. Just checked Alien Encounters, and they're supposed to look like mainline Humans. Boring. ;) ~ SavageBob 05:35, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Interestingly enough, Alien Encounters has "Paradise" as the Home Planet of the Ugors, at least according to their list on page 183. Not really canon enough though... --Eyrezer 08:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Siniteen
Hi Eyrezer,

I was expanding the page on Corwin Kaezeb and wanted to have a second reference and include the fact that Siniteen are hyperintelligent. Looking at the Siniteen article however, I can't discern the source which stated that they are, and for some reason can't seem to access the decipher.com card database for "Brainiac" which probably has the information. I was wondering, seeing as you're a species expert, if you knew where the info came from, or if you can access the card and tell me if it mentions the hyperintelligence.

Thanks!

-- —Harrar  ( Villip ) 14:32, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Here is the CCG card which specifies Brainiac's ability to calculate hyperspace coordinates in his head. It's likely that is the only source that the hyperintelligent comment is based on. --Eyrezer 22:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Here is the back of his action figure card, which also mentions the ability to calculate jumps. It also says Pons Limbic (Brainiac) has a "super-intelligent appearance" but doesn't flat out say he's "super-intelligent" (a fine distinction, I suppose). It's possible that Star Wars Chronicles says something about him, but it usually doesn't add too much in-universe information about a species that Decipher, West End Games, or another source had not previously created. (Forgive me for butting in!) ~ SavageBob 22:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks so much guys! -- —Harrar  ( Cut the comm chatter ) 23:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Dev Sibwarra
Sorry to trouble you if you are busy. Can you please upload a headshots version of File:DevSibwarra1319.JPG in the Dev Sibwarra article? Apparently, articles on characters have to have headshots in the infobox. I might work on the Dev Sibwarra article besides my work on material on the Death in the Slave Pits of Lorrd. I have also worked on the Wilek Nereus and Pter Thanas articles. Would they qualify as good articles? Andykatib 09:41 7th June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll try and upload one later this week. --Eyrezer 21:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Triage
A new Triage meeting has been scheduled for next Sunday, June 14, at 23:00 UTC. We hope you will be able to attend, as there are a fair amount of nominations that need sorting.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 13:55, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Rename image
I just uploaded the image "Mari-Elan Kora.png", but I misspelt the name and it should be "Mari-Elan Nora.png", so I was wondering if you could more it to that, as you're an admin. I know we have a template for this, but I can't find it. Cheers --Jinzler 08:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)