Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Sarala

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:04, January 19, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A useless lady from Carrick Station

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:56, January 20, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; 04:13, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:15, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Winterz (talk) 16:39, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Supreme Emperor
 * 2) * One quick question, can anything be said about the rewards she gives? Thanks, Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:05, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Just noting my agreement --- I think it should be included in a gamemechanics tag. Menkooroo (talk) 13:44, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Added the specific quests and the rewards, but as it's just experience that she gives you, it's not something that should be mentioned in the biography IMO. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:20, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Air Alderaan StarSpeeder 1000

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 19:12, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Star Tours avalanche. Huge thanks to Lelal, who came up with the earlier versions of the template used for these StarSpeeder 1000 articles. Note: All these StarSpeeder 1000 articles are pretty much the same, with few minor changes. If you express support for one of them, kindly consider supporting the other ones as well if no objections are made.

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 00:14, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:28, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Winterz (talk) 14:37, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:07, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Could you give us some kind of timeframe?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:06, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *I knew there was something missing. Thanks for the heads up. I added a timeframe, but I'm afraid that's as specific as it gets.  Stake black   msg 02:08, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Do we know that it did not fly during the Empire's time? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:33, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***No, but the current wording doesn't exclude this possibility, I think.  Stake black   msg 22:44, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****The Empire existed after the Republic's time, so I think it doesn't work. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:15, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****How would you have put it? It seems "Rise of the Empire era" is OOU, so that'd be ruled out.  Stake black   msg 23:18, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) ******How about prior to 0 BBY? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 02:52, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) *******Done. I've also applied the relevant changes to the other StarSpeeder articles.  Stake black   msg 09:17, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) CC-8
 * 10) * Sorry to be picky, but the Bts part about the confirmation of it being a Star Tours model reads more to me like a reference description rather than a part of an article. Do you think you could word it any differently? The same obviously goes for all of the other articles.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 10:27, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) **No worries. Is that better? If so, I'll apply it to the other articles.  Stake black   msg 12:20, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) ***Yep, I'll support the other ones once you do that.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 00:14, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) ****Oh, you've done it now. Probably would've been best to notify me :)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 07:55, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) Star Tours
 * 15) *The "Sources" section should specify the specific toy in the toy line using HasbroCite. See the "Sources" sections of articles like Lachichuk or Exar Kun's lightsaber for some examples of how to do it. The reference note should use it as well, instead of using Cite_web to link to jeditemplearchives.com. Also, note that HasbroCite uses Rebelscum.com. Follow the link to "Star Tours Photo Archive" on this page. Menkooroo (talk) 05:59, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 16) **Addendum: I can't actually find this toy on Rebelscum.com --- where did you find the info about it being one of the diecast toys? The link you've included in the article to the Starspeeder 1000 Vehicle playset at jeditemplearchives.com is to a different vehicle altogether. Menkooroo (talk) 06:17, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 17) * Also, is reserved for items in the "Appearances" section;  should be used instead.
 * 18) *Currently, "The Air Alderaan StarSpeeder 1000 was a modified StarSpeeder 1000 spacecraft used by interstellar travel agency Star Tours to operate flights bound for the Core World" is all sourced to the Empire at War strategy guide. That can't be right --- if you're intending to use the guide as a source for Alderaan being in the Core Worlds, then a reference to the toy line should be stuck in that sentence after the words "bound for the," so that only "Core World" is sourced to the strategy guide.
 * 19) *I think you'll need an additional source for Star Tours II being before 0 BBY. "The Incredible Journey" should do it; it mentions that Star Tours II takes place between Episodes III and IV.
 * 20) *Can you describe the shape of the ship, and maybe mention the placement of the passenger doors? Where does the astromech droid go (answer: astromech socket).
 * 21) *I think the BTS needs some more context --- explain what the OOU Star Tours is, and what it has to do with the Walt Disney Company.
 * 22) *I'd also like to see both Hasbro and the Star Tours toy line get namedropped in the BTS sentence that mentions the toy being released. Menkooroo (talk) 06:10, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 23) **I've addressed some of the objections you raised, but I'm a little puzzled myself about some of the others. I'll see if Lelal can help. What do you mean by passenger doors, by the way?  Stake black   msg 13:12, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 24) ***As regards the dating of Star Tours II, I suggest you to check ref 3 of the StarSpeeder 1000. What else do you need help with? --LelalMekha (talk) 13:23, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 25) ****I need assistance with #1, really. About the whole diecast thing.  Stake black   msg 14:37, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 26) *****There's here and here, which both confirm that the various Starspeeder 1000 variants were released as 1/64th diecast toys. Menkooroo (talk) 14:42, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 27) ***Those vertical rectangles at the back of the ship are the doors through which the passengers enter. At least they were when I rode Star Tours last year. See the first paragraph of "Characteristics" here. Menkooroo (talk) 14:15, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 28) ****Done.  Stake black   msg 14:37, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 29) *Since the article has an intro now, remember that any and all info from the intro needs to be repeated in the article body. The article's at 237 words now, so with that in mind, and if you make those BTS additions I requested above, I think you'll have a great GA candidate right here. Menkooroo (talk) 14:44, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 30) **Fantastic. About the Hasbro thing: they're not Hasbro toys. At least there's no official source saying that. BtS: Done. 282 words. How can I nominate this for a GA now, though?  Stake black   msg 16:00, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 31) ***You'll have to archive this as a failed nomination and only then, nominate it for the GAN page. And this Stake, is why this page should have a limit of noms per person, now you'll probably have to take all the Star Tours ships to the GAN page. I really think you should reconsider your vote on the CT, considering this situation :) Winterz (talk) 17:38, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 32) ****What I mean is, is there any special procedure or do I just call if off suddenly?  Stake black   msg 17:53, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Bespin Direct StarSpeeder 1000

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 19:12, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:43, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 07:55, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:10, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) *In the body, you should always write out numbers (there are exceptions of course, like dates for instance).
 * 3) *Link its source within the Bts.
 * 4) *Do the Aurebesh letters have any meaning, within this context?
 * 5) *It is not possible for a subject to make its "First appearance" in a Source, you should modify that.
 * 6) *Refer to my later edit on the article to correct what is wrong in the nominations below. Keep up the good work. ;) Winterz (talk) 17:02, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Hi Winterz. Thanks for taking the time to review it. I'm currently editing Air Alderaan StarSpeeder 1000 and clearing any objections one may pose, and then paste that general template to the other StarSpeeder articles with their modifications. Please see if you object to how it looks now. Regarding the Aurebesh: there is no explanation given.  Stake black   msg 17:07, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) ***Fine by me, Stake. However, note that some objections and most specifically, my edit to the article, were not mentioned previously by Menk and regardless if you're taking this to GAN or not, I think should take a look at them ;) Winterz (talk) 17:41, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Dantooine Express StarSpeeder 1000

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 19:12, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:03, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 07:55, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:11, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) "...and two laser cannons; crewed with a pilot, a green..." You're not using the semicolon right here. I fixed the two previous ones, but you can fix the ones that are left.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:48, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Roger, roger.  Stake black   msg 21:53, January 23, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Naboo Spacelines StarSpeeder 1000

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 19:12, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:08, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 07:55, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:11, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Tatooine Transit StarSpeeder 1000

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 19:12, January 21, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:09, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 07:55, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:12, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Attack on Mindor

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 03:53, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: That's it for now, I think.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) As long as you kill the redlinks...  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:00, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Winterz (talk) 17:20, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:18, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * I believe Fideltin Rusk's family became notable enough for an article.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Why is there no mention of the Cold War in the body? Also, remember to contextualize it.
 * 5) **Done.
 * 6) * You must add the Cold War template. Winterz (talk) 13:55, January 22, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 18:25, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) *** So many redlinks on the template..I believe you need to kill them. (eheh and through this sort of objections, Cade ends up writing the entire conflict by himself) Winterz (talk) 23:38, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) ****Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:35, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 10) Since you've slotted this into the Cold War template, should the previous and next fields of the infobox be filled out? Menkooroo (talk) 01:53, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) *Not in my opinion, as they're completely unrelated. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:57, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) **That's par for the course, though --- it's why they don't need to be included in the article body. See here: "All infobox material must be detailed in the article proper, with the following exceptions: ... The "prev," "conc," and "next" fields of event infoboxes, which are not necessarily relevant to the article." If they're part of the same conflict, that's what prev, conc, and next are for, regardless of relevance. Menkooroo (talk) 02:06, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) ***Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 02:12, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Coruscant Security Force Divisional Headquarters (ISB technology center)

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 02:41, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project CSF

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 14:43, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:29, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) &mdash; 03:47, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:19, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Should this article have a conjecture tag?  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:00, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *The book call is "a Coruscant Security Force Divisional Headquarters" under ISB control. Coruscantfan (Talk) 01:12, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Coruscant Security Force Headquarters

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:00, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project CSF

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:04, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; 04:04, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:21, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I think the article could mention some dates, indicating how long we know this place exists for. That it's around for over 3,000 years seems pretty noteworthy, but currently no indication of a timeframe is given at all save for a brief mention of the Clone Wars. Menkooroo (talk) 11:22, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Done.Coruscantfan (Talk) 15:35, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Vil (Coruscant Security Force)

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 04:59, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project CSF

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:09, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Did a copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:24, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) *Context on the CSF ("planetary law enforcement agency" or something similar should be enough).
 * 3) *Besides that, good work. Winterz (talk) 17:14, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * Please note that the NOTOC should be on the top of the article (between the infobox and the Eras template) ;) Winterz (talk) 17:14, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified Coruscant Security officer (akk handler)

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 05:00, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project CSF

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 13:32, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:16, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Did a copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:20, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:27, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Jossie

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 18:03, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project CSF

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:40, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Did a quick copy-edit.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:17, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) * During Order 66 condemning all Jedi as traitors to the Galactic Republic&hellip; Could you make this phrase a little more clearer?&mdash; 22:35, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 01:14, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Twi'lek Jedi (Valius Ying)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 23:38, January 23, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WP:KOTOR for the win.

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 21:46, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:32, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Copy-edited to eliminate some redundant wording.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:15, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 22:20, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:35, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * I'm sorry, but I really have to oppose the low quality image :p. You should probably contact some of the "Image junkie" users, though I'm sure you already did this. Winterz (talk) 15:10, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) ** took care of this. Much appreciated, Cade.&mdash; 21:43, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Add skin color to the body!  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:18, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) *Done.&mdash; 23:52, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Exiled Jedi
 * 7) * I don't know if you need to mention that he didn't have any hair, but if you include it in the infobox, you'll need it in the body as well. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:19, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **Removed from infobox. Not really needed.&mdash; 23:33, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * Not an image expert, so.&mdash; 23:38, January 23, 2013 (UTC)

Incident Commander

 * Nominated by: Coruscantfan (Talk) 06:52, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project CSF

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Did a copy-edit. Mainly, I tackled the passage noted below.  Rather than having it be a part of the previous sentence, I divided it off into its own sentence for better flow.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:35, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:19, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) 501st
 * 2) *".. all negotiations and as well as final say on tactical options..." This doesn;t sound right.
 * 3) **Done.
 * 4) * Compltetly source the BtS, as you sourced the rest. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:39, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Done. Coruscantfan (Talk) 02:51, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Exiled Jedi
 * 7) *Please use the InsiderCite template for the appearances section and for the references.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:16, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

CRILOC Horse

 * Nominated by:  Stake black   msg 15:06, January 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another "pictured only" Star Wars Visions thing.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Winterz (talk) 23:42, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) The last section's supposed to be called Notes and references, not the other way around... :)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 02:07, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) * I always get that mixed up...  Stake black   msg 13:29, January 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Did a copy-edit and smoothed some rough wording.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 05:25, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) * I believe you could fill in the Habitat section of the infobox, wouldn't you agree? ;) Winterz (talk) 14:46, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Agreed!  Stake black   msg 17:41, January 25, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Exiled Jedi
 * 5) *Could you mention the encounter that occured when the Human in the picture encountered combat-scout droids on the horse? Don't forgot to create an article for the Human.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:09, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *You should also mention the following characteristics: clawed limbs, tail, ears, tongue, and fangs.
 * 7) *From its feet you can probably say what skin color the creature had.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:13, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) **See how you like it now.  Stake black   msg 11:43, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * "Horse" is capitalized on the source.  Stake black   msg 15:07, January 24, 2013 (UTC)

Thomquizzar Naval Base

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:44, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's bizzare!

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Hanzo Hasashi (talk) 21:03, January 27, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:26, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) The system should be part of the Outer Rim, not the other way around :p Winterz (talk) 17:34, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Oodora

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:10, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: You dare challenge Project Hero for the CAN page? YOU WILL LOSE

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) What about that time you and Winterz had that contest?  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 21:52, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) A battle to the death shall insue...  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:57, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:34, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Fideltin Rusk's mother

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:10, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 22:01, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:48, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Fideltin Rusk's father

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:10, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 22:04, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:11, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) You switch between refering to Rusk as Fideltin and Rusk. Fix that.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:12, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * No, I name the character, introduce him by the name his mother gave him, and then refer to him as Rusk for the rest of the time. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:25, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) **At least twice you have him as Fideltin, when once should be enough. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:45, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) ***Ah, fixed. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 00:49, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Cassa Hun

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:10, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 01:10, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) CC-8
 * 2) *Missing P&T.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 22:06, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 00:45, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***The section's good but does the game say he's devoted? Sounds POVish to me.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 01:11, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Removed. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 01:25, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Is there a reason why one of the quotes is repeated? (last sentence of quote in bio and P&T's one) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 00:52, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Because he has like three lines. Fixed. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 00:57, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Lorik

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 21:10, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 22:07, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) He's ugly!  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:15, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  23:29, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash; 23:34, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Cathar Jedi (Telekinesis)

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 23:42, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "Draw me closer&hellip;"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *You forgot a Sources section.
 * 3) *You need to source the timeframe in the body to your second reference.
 * 4) *The years probably should probably be sourced to the chronology.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:49, January 28, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **All taken care of.&mdash; 02:35, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Ithorian Revanchist Jedi

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 03:25, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Revanchists are awesome. But we all know that&hellip;

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) *At some point, you established the Ithorian as male within your writing. If the Jedi was never referred to as such, you'll have modify that. (If the latter is the case, try to insert the species right in the second sentence and linking it, something you forgot to :p)
 * 3) *Context on the Mandalorian Wars.
 * 4) *Did he appear only in the picture? If so then the tag should be switched to and the Bts receive the adequate changes. Winterz (talk) 17:54, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Iktotchi Sith Lord

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 07:47, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "I'm gonna find you&hellip;"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Bith Jedi Scholar

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 08:24, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "I'm afraid he was caught up in the vines&hellip;"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified Gand Jedi

 * Nominated by: &mdash; 08:39, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Some say two blades are better than one.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) FOR GANDALORE! Err, I mean...  It passes muster.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 11:07, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) What Trak Could Track
 * 2) * Did the JATM specify that this Gand was male? Or was the Gand merely shown in an image, with no gender specified?  If the latter, the gender should be left blank, as we haven't yet seen an official Gand female and therefore can't really determine true sexual dimorphism.  Unless otherwise specified, that Gand could be female, for all we know.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 08:54, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **I forgot to take the gender out of the infobox, as I do not mention the gender at all in the general info. Fixed.&mdash; 09:06, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Journal of Xenomedicine

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:44, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Honeymoon Palace

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:44, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Cazzush

 * Nominated by: Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 16:44, January 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Hero. Ah, what the conversation files can show you.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Winterz
 * 2) *Article for Cazzush's gang.
 * 3) *Reload the infobox.
 * 4) *You mention that he was set to appear in that scene, yet you don't really specify that he was ultimately cut from the game. Regardless of the tag on the top, you should be that specific in the Bts. :p Winterz (talk) 17:28, January 29, 2013 (UTC)

Comments