User talk:Herbsewell

Herbsewell, welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
 * Internal pages:
 * Community Portal
 * Manual of Style
 * Online sources
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~. Four tildes produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Community Portal talk page or ask me on my Talk page. May the Force be with you! -- SFH 20:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Two things

 * Number 1: Please stop posting fanon. The statistics which I have now had to delete from the TIE Hunter twice are NOT official and therefore do not belong here. Number 2: http://insd.swcombine.com/ is not a valid source. And changing a few words when you copy-and-paste from them is still plagiarism. &mdash;Darth Culator   (talk)  18:23, 5 April 2006 (PDT)

Reply: Stormtrooper
If you want to nominate stormtrooper for featured status, go ahead. It definitely is better than some of the other articles out there. 00:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes to both. 00:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Blanking
I noticed in some of your edits that you seemed to be removing large amounts of text, specifically here and here. I assume this isn't intentional and was just wondering, what browser do you use and do you have the Google Toolbar installed? If you are doing it intentionally, please don't, as it's quite detrimental and could be considered to be vandalism. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 00:50, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't mean the quotes. If you scroll down in those links, you'll notice at the bottom that several paragraphs have been removed. I was just wondering if you had the Google Toolbar installed because I remember reading about there being a bug in it that caused things like that to happen. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 00:55, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * If you're using the Google Toolbar, it's a glitch where it doesn't load a page completely and ends up cutting off the text if it's really long. From what I've heard, downloading the latest version should fix it. If you're not using the Google Toolbar, then I have no idea. Try seeing what some of the people said here and see if any of it applies to you. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 01:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Nagai-Tof War FA
Hey, how's it going? Just wondering if your objection to the Nagai-Tof War still stands after breathesgelatin's response? Besides that, you doing any major edits recently? Cull Tremayne 18:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * What is the objection? That it's too short? That it doesn't have a lot of sources? I don't believe that either of these are true about the article, so what is the problem with it? And just for the record, it is nothing like the Grappa page because it's longer, better written, and is a significant part of the Star Wars history. 23:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * If you don't mind me asking, what point are you trying to make? And no, Grappa doesn't meet the FA requirements like Nagai-Tof War does. It doesn't meet requirements 1, 7, and 9. The Nagai-Tof War does meet those requirements. For 1) Grappa is not well-written or detailed, Nagai-Tof War is 7) Grappa does not have a "have a succint proper lead", Nagai Tof War does and 9) Grappa does not have a "detailed biography". Cull Tremayne 01:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not trying to get you to vote for the article, I'm just trying to get you to remove your objection, which at least to me, seems unwarranted. Cull Tremayne 01:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * So are you saying that Nagai-Tof War is poorly written? Then tell me what to fix, and once again, what point are you trying to make by objecting to this article? There are plenty of other, much shorter articles up for Featured article, if you're making a point why not do it to all of those articles? Cull Tremayne 04:53, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I respect your opinion. I'm just trying to verify the reason for your opinion. You still haven't told me. What point are you trying to make? Ok, so Grappa is well-written and meets the FA requirements in your opinion, then what keeps it from being a FA (the best of the best) in your opinion? Cull Tremayne 21:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Geez, that was fast. Look, why is it not worthy? Because it's in a comic? Because it's short? What? Just because it's in a comic isn't really an objection is it? Seriously now, what point are you trying to make, can you just answer that? Please? Cull Tremayne 21:25, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I understand where you're coming from, but I think that getting more obscure articles featured helps them become not so obscure. Some of the more well known people and organizations are going to have a harder time being featured because it's much harder to create a detailed and expansive article with such a large array of sources and appearances. Cull Tremayne 21:45, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Remember, best of the best has to do with the most well written articles, not with the most favorite in the fan community. No one's debating that the Galactic Civil War and the Clone Wars are much better conflicts than Nagai-Tof War. Only that Nagai-Tof War is among the best written and expansive articles within its scope of material. Cull Tremayne 21:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I didn't think I was arguing with you. At least I wasn't trying to. Cull Tremayne 23:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Darth Maul
Because it becomes part of their name when the fall to the dark side. It's not just a title, its a name. Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 20:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Listen mate, just a friendly word of advice. It's not going to change, the articles are going to remain "Darth xxx" despite the MOS, so just leave it. Sorry if i sound rude, thats not my intention, but its better just to wrap this up before it starts. Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 20:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * That would be related to the phrase "tough luck". It's not going to happen, trust me. Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 20:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * If you don't mind me asking, who did you ask? I'm curious as to the reason they gave. Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 20:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, that does make sense. Darth Vader was Skywalker's Sith name. Thanks for telling me that. BTW, sorry if i came across as rude; having troubles atm. Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 21:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

And end to these debates.
Okay, I don't know about you, but I'm getting really sick of these debates. I'm under a lot of stress lately, and frankly, you haven't made matters any better. I'm asking you to stop posting on those topics, and in response, I'll also stop posting. The decision is up to you now. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 14:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Both of you, stop bothering each other right now. I don't care who gets the last word, or who started it: just back off from one another for the day, all right? &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 15:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Apologies.
Listen, I'm really sorry about everything that's happened recently. I was an asshole, and I apologize for calling you one. I also apologize for being so rude in all of those discussions we've had. I've been trying to reform, but I failed. I hope that you can forgive me, and that we can start over. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 01:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Possible Revenge
Hey Herbsewell...Jack Nebulax has came into the IRC chat room to report that he's disturbed by your recent edits...he believes that you're editing everything he does as an act of "revenge" for previous arguments/misunderstandings. While it's not technically against the rules to do so, if you are simply doing it as a form of revenge then kindly stop and try to rise above the temptation as an act of civility. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 01:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I wasn't too keen on leaving this message myself (indeed, I argued about it for quite some time with Jack in the IRC chat room), purely because I didn't personally see any break of the rules at all...but oh well, thanks for reading and listening anyhow. :) &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 12:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Hey.
Herbsewell, listen, I really don't care anymore. If you want to continue to try to annoy me, fine. But it's not working. I in no way want this to disrupt my normal routine of editting articles. So, do what you want to. But I don't care anymore. You can hate me, but I don't hate you. Have a good time here, Herbsewell. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 18:06, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm usually inclined to give people the benefit of the doubt...
...but your constant questions on how the bombs work on TIE fighters appear to me to be an attempt to get Jack angry. Please stop: he's answered the questions as well as anyone can. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 15:50, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Response
Well, I don't know what that means, but please do not talk to me. Stop. Iam reporting you to an admin for calling Jack a prick. done.

Stay oof my talk page. Leave me alone BobafettH23

Warning

 * I've warned warned Nebulax for it before, now I'm warning you. Stop engaging in personal attacks. No good can come of it. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(TINC) 19:46, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Your user image
Based on the following discussion, I'm afraid I have to delete your user image. Please re-upload it if you can get permission from the creator. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 22:35, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Image:Picure of Herbsewell doll.jpg: This image is taken from DeviantArt. The copyright notice on that page specifically says "©2005-2006 ~Evolvana", and based on a discussion I have had with the creator of this artwork, she did not upload it to Wookieepedia, and she was not informed it was here (and therefore did not give permission for that). DeviantArt does go after people for what they call "ripping" their artwork, and this would count in their eyes. --OuroborosCobra 14:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * OuroborosCobra, did you even look through her posts before you accused him of ripping? The second page has a request from "Herbsewell" asking for permission to use the Thrawn plushie! The only Herb can be accused of is not "showing" her the page after he uploaded it. Cull Tremayne 02:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Here is his post 6 posts down. Cull Tremayne 02:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * First off, you are far more likely to reach me if you leave a message on my user page. Second off, at the time I put this up, the creator of that art work seemed to not know why she was on Wookieepedia. The uploader should have provided some proof or release showing that they had the right to use the image, and they did not. I am not going to go through someones message archive to find that, it should have been provided here on Wookieepedia on the image page. It was not. In addition, that post shows that Evolvana requested to be shown this page before putting the image up, and there is no reply showing that the uploader did that. Therefore, they may not have met the requirements set for permission to use the image. --OuroborosCobra 02:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * So I just show her the page?--Herbsewell 02:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Palpatine Picture
It has been decided that the "proper" size for a picture in an infobox is 275 px. please dont change it, its obvious that you are just trying to get under his skin. HappyTimeHarry 00:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Where was this decided, Harry? =) --Imp 00:39, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * What? I thought the standard was 250px for all pictures--Herbsewell 00:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Disregard that herbs my mind blanked for a second. im such a silly.  HappyTimeHarry 00:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Wait is the same for all images or just infobox ones?--Herbsewell 00:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * It's 250px for infobox images and 180px for images next to infoboxes. --Imp 00:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * So if an image in an article is 300px, it's not allowed to be?--Herbsewell 00:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * If you are doing it right. HappyTimeHarry 00:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * So no non-infobox image is allowed to be more than 180px?--Herbsewell 00:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

FNF
Hello, this is BobafettH23. I host the Friday Night Fight Page, and I would like to invite you to come and join us. To get to this page, go to my userpage and click on the Friday Night Fight link, read the rules and pick a chacter, and on friday just have fun. Happy Holidays!

Custom Userboxes
If you would like any user boxes made just see my talk page. Thanks. Happy Holidays!  Scwhinky Communicate 21:45, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Vote Now
We will be voting on the action figure matter in the Senate, or click the link below: [] Quinlanfan 17:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Warning
Herbsewell, please refrain from attacking other users. I know you may have a grudge against User:Jack Nebulax, but that gives you no right to post demeaning comments about him or any other user: "Jack's not an Admin. --Yoshi626 04:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC) And hopefully never will be... ". —Xwing328 (Talk) 21:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)