Wookieepedia:Wookieepedian of the Month/May 2006


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of monthly Wookieepedian of the Month nominations. Please do not modify it.

Support

 * 1) &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 07:30, 1 April 2006 (UTC) Felt like getting it in before anyone else could. :) &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 07:30, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Blast it, you beat me to it. I just need to learn to stop sleeping entirely. &mdash;Darth Culator   (talk)  16:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) This is really tough, as Erik has done great things on the Palpatine article, but AdmiralNick22 has done a lot on various other articles. And I can't forget Sikon. ;) Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 20:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) QuentinGeorge 05:07, 2 April 2006 (UTC) - But the others are also deserving...so keep nominating them! QuentinGeorge 05:07, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Cato Neimoidia 14:03, 3 April 2006 (UTC) This election should end in a tie
 * 6) CooperTFN 17:29, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Writing is hard.
 * 7) Darth Steves 13:15, 4 April 2006 Yea, i should win next time, cause i made my page better, and im still a sith lord. 
 * 8) DannyBoy7783 04:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) AdmiralNick22 17:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC) A tough choice to be sure. Both deserve this greatly.
 * 10) MaulYoda 13:33, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) RMF 03:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Neutral/comments

 * This is way overdue. Not that previous W'sOTM didn't deserve it, of course. But as I have said before, Erik's writing inspires me. &mdash;Darth Culator   (talk)  16:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * "Yea, i should win next time, cause i made my page better, and im still a sith lord". Good lord, are you serious? Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) [[Image:Implogo.jpg|20px]] 00:52, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Azizlight 16:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC). I know we don't normally nominate admins, but Sikon's work has really stood out above all others this past month. His knowledge of Wiki coding has been a huge benefit. And don't forget R2 :-)
 * 2) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 16:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Kuralyov 20:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Admin or not, he's been doing a great job! WhiteBoy 22:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Go R2!!! Master Secura
 * 6) &mdash; Demolitions Specialist RC-1187
 * 7) Erl 01:42, 3 April 2006 (UTC) Not that I don't love Sikon and R2, just can't choose. The Erl of the   talk  What I do 23:42, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) He was being voted for (if not at least well liked) before adminship wasn't he? -- Riffsyphon1024 16:35, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) AdmiralKadann 08:13, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) R2 is the bee's knees!--DarkShroud 17:53, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Sikon is definitely deserving of the award! --AnakinSolo 01:02, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Sikon has my vote! --volemlock 22 April 2006
 * 13) Ozzel 04:05, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) If he doesn't deserve this award than who does? --DarkShroud 19:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Neutral/comments

 * Made this a joint nomination. 8) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 16:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) SFH 20:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) TIEPilot051999 05:05, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:Tbhelm.gif|30px]] Shadowtrooper talk 18:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Huntersquid 19:49, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Neutral/Comments

 * Turned the Ackbar article from an appalling stub into featured material in almost lickity split, and has greatly expanded many of the battles of the Yuuzhan Vong War (an area we seem to be weak in), and also streamlined the many confusing Battles of Dac...did I just say "lickity split"? -- SFH 20:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
 * When I first saw this, I thought someone was playing an April Fool's Joke on me. I am very honored to be nominated along such other distinguished Wookieepedians. :-) AdmiralNick22 15:32, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree that he's flown under the radar, but those additions really have helped. -- Riffsyphon1024 21:26, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Oops. Forgot about the one vote thing Chad. -- Riffsyphon1024 21:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, man. I figured it was that or you forgot that you'd already voted.  :p  WhiteBoy 21:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with SFH. Nick turned stubby lil' Ackbar into a really, really, really good and long article. --Jeedai123 23:06, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the kind words, Jeedai123. AdmiralNick22 00:02, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Cull Tremayne 03:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) MyNz 5:13, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Palpy 21:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Neutral/Comments

 * Does grunt work on a regular basis. Friendly, willing to help etc. etc. Also, how sweet of a name is Volemlock? Cull Tremayne 03:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.