Wookieepedia:Good article nominations



This page is for the nomination of good articles. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of good articles, see Category:Wookieepedia good articles.


 * Good article nominations history
 * Good article checklist

What is a Good article?
A Good article is an article that adheres to quality standards, but cannot reach FA status due to its limited content.

A Good article has the following attributes.

1. It is well written. In this respect:


 * (a) it has compelling prose, and is readily comprehensible to non-specialist readers;
 * (b) it follows a logical structure, introducing the topic and then grouping together its coverage of related aspects; where appropriate, it contains a succinct lead section summarizing the topic, and the remaining text is organized into a system of hierarchical sections (particularly for longer articles);
 * (c) it follows the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies;
 * (d) necessary technical terms or jargon are briefly explained in the article itself, or an active link is provided.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect:


 * (a) it provides references to any and all sources used for its material;
 * (b) sources should be selected in accordance with the guidelines for reliable sources;
 * (c) it contains no elements of original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage, addressing all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FA, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed);.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. In this respect:


 * (a) viewpoints are represented fairly and without bias;
 * (b) all significant points of view are fairly presented, but not asserted, particularly where there are or have been conflicting views on the topic.

5. It is stable, i.e., it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic. In this respect:


 * (a) the images are properly sourced and have succinct and descriptive captions;
 * (b) a lack of images does not in itself prevent an article from achieving Good Article status.

Nomination of Good articles
To nominate an article for Good article status, list it here. Nominated articles must meet all six requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the template. The talk page will also be tagged with the GA template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations please see here. Also remember to add GAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.

Saba Sebatyne

 * Nominated by:Markrox91 10:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:I've done alot of work on this article in the last few weeks,and i now believee it is of good quality; the introduction now gives a summary of the article, the actual article is much more comprehensive and is now much more adaquaetly referenced.--Markrox91 10:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

(+0)
Support
 * 1) Now if only we can GA Tesar.  Ifindyourlackoffaithdisturbing  ( You're all clear kid! )( Now let's blow this thing and go home! ) 21:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Wynssa Fel 15:48, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Needs Personality and traits section and one for Behind the scenes.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  20:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Toprawa:
 * 3) *Everything must be sourced, including the infobox and every paragraph.
 * 4) **Some paragraphs are still missing sources, and the intro should not be sourced. Toprawa and Ralltiir 15:59, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) * Quotes must not be located in the middle of a section, only at the top of sections
 * 6) * Ref notes should come after punctuation, not before, and not two spaces after punctuation
 * 7) *Certainly some more quotes could be found to head up these sections
 * 8) *Please use the Insider template for the appropriate sources.
 * 9) **And as a personal recommendation to both the nominator and those who have voted on this article so far, please read the rules at the top of the GAN page and familiarize yourselves with our Manual of Style before nominating or voting on articles. Do not just vote on something because you like the concept of an article. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) ***I've addressed all of, or close to all, your concerns. And please don't think i nominated this article on pure whim; i worked very long and very hard on it. Congradulations on becoming an administrator, by the way =]--Markrox91 09:36, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) ****You've still got a bit of work to do to satisfy the objections above. And thank you for your comment. :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:03, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) Missing info from Enemy Lines. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:18, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) Have added Personality and traits section, as well as the Behind the scenes one.--Markrox91 02:12, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) I have written the German article about Saba and I think that she finished her jedi training before the Yuuzhan Vong war has begun. Wynssa Fel 20:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) You are right! I've just taken care of it and placed the info about her Jedi training under Master Eelysa in an Early Life section =]--Markrox91 10:22, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Yeah I'm right!^^ I have there one more thing which I had already written on the discussion: In the introductory sentence stand, that Saba was promoted to a Jedi Master after the Yuuzhan Vong War but wasn't she in Star by Star at that rank? Wynssa Fel 21:14, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Nope, because she was the only Jedi Knight to be a member of the Galactic Alliance High Council which wasn't created until Destiny's Way.--Markrox91 10:57, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Lady Tarkin

 * Nominated by: Ozzel 01:18, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: That's what I'm Tarkin about. -- Ozzel 01:15, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

(+3)
Support
 * 1) Darth Star... DC 15:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Colinmcev 05:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Good show. 15:11, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) POV-ish header: "Megonite megalomaniac." --Imperialles 01:20, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) She the proceeded her banquet hall to host the Imperial Diplomatic Conclave, for guests such as Shea Hublin, Chancellor Qua of the Zenox Star Cluster, the Most High Proctor of Thebeon 8, and Darth Vader himself. By this do you mean She then proceeded to her banquet hall to host the Imperial Diplomatic Conclave for guests such as Shea Hublin, Chancellor Qua of the Zenox Star Cluster, the Most High Proctor of Thebeon 8 and Darth Vader himself? Soresumakashi 09:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) *Indeed. Fixed. -- Ozzel 11:02, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Darth Star? Is this like a mistake or joke or something of that sort? =D DC 12:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) *I think that was the original name. :-p Nah, I typed that once and then was clumsy enough to copy it, and then I didn't catch either one. -- Ozzel 21:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) From the desk of Atarumaster88
 * 7) * The intro is a bit confusing with which Tarkin is being referenced.
 * 8) **Addressed. -- Ozzel 08:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 9) *"Her fate is unknown". This must die on sight.
 * 10) **I'll think about this one some more. -- Ozzel 08:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) *Have a Super Terrific Friendly Un-frustrating day. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 20:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) Nice job with this, and cool subject. A few suggestions... -- Colinmcev 02:56, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 13) * Could you try rewording "Lady Tarkin was the cousin of Commander Conan Motti—and it was for the connection to her powerful relatives such as he that Wilhuff Tarkin married the woman." You already mentioned the Motti family in the previous sentence, so perhaps something like "Wilhuff Tarkin married her due to her powerful family connections, such as her cousin, Commander Conan Motti" or something like that? -- Colinmcev 02:56, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) **Done. -- Ozzel 08:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 15) * I don't feel strongly about this objection, but I'm not sure this needs to be in the behind the scenes: "Also, no source has yet indicated whether or not she was aware of her husband's affair with Natasi Daala." -- Colinmcev 02:56, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 16) **I wouldn't be crushed if it was removed, but I thought it was worth noting because it's a pretty major part of her character that we don't know. If she didn't know about Daala, then she was just blindly devoted to Wilhuff, but if she did, then that puts a different spin on things. And since the Biography was written with the knowledge of Daala, someone might just assume that she knew, so I thought it was best to make it clear that we don't know either way. -- Ozzel 08:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 17) ***Fair enough. -- Colinmcev 05:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 03:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination Comments: I think it may finally be ready... NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 03:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

(+1)
Support
 * 1) I strongly feel that this is a good nomination. KotOR's article page was in something of shambles several months ago with a badly written, inconsistently tensed synopsis, revealing of plot details at the beginning, etc. The fact of the matter is though, a large amount of improvement has been done since then and it is a muhc better article than it was then. While I don't think it's worthy of featured article status, I definitely see it as worthy of being a "good article." Niirfa-sa 23:58, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) An excess of redlinks and the synopsis needs to be written in present tense.  Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 14:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) *There is no limit towards how many redlinks can be in a GA. DC 15:50, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) **Additionally, in-universe articles are to be written in past tense, per the Manual of Style. // ~mikah~  01:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) **Redlinks I was wrong about then, but a synopsis is always written in present tense. Look at the film articles. Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 13:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Again, directly from the Manual of Style itself, "All in-universe articles should be in past tense, per 'A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away...'" Only out-of-universe articles (ie, George Lucas, John Williams) should be written in present tense. Despite whatever tense the film articles are written in, if its not past tense, its wrong. // ~mikah~  14:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) ****This is not an in-universe article. Stylistically, plot summaries for anything almost anywhere are in the present tense&mdash;the MoS doesn't contradict this in any way, because this is an OOU article. "In contrast, articles about books, movies, games, or other real-life Star Wars material should obviously be written from an out-of-universe perspective, but should still be noted as such." Our OOU FAs also use this system, and so should this article. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 14:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) *****I see what you mean now, I misread what I was reading. So that would be a prominent problem with the article. I'll go ahead and try to fix as much as I can for now. And sorry about the confusion, Drewton. // ~mikah~  14:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) ******Fixed NaruHina  Talk[[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 03:59, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no mention I can see that the soundtrack was composed by Jeremy Soule --Jinzler 09:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Addressed NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 06:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Q-series droideka

 * Nominated by: -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 01:28, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination Comments: Attempt #2. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 01:28, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

(+1)
Support
 * 1) Seems good to me, somebody else might spot something, but at the moment I can't see anything, nice article. - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 18:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) From the homework strewn Aqua Unasi
 * 2) *After my quick read through, it's a very good article, and for me the only issue is with the sourcing for it. It's tricky with it being a very similar variant of the droideka. It appears the sources and appearances list contains onones that specifically state Q-series Droideka, which is good. My question is, is there still information about droidekas in general in the article?
 * 3) **For example, there's the information in the article taken from Suvivor's Quest'. I just read Survivor's Quest and is the Q-series specifically in there? I don't believe so, plus Survivor's Quest is not on the appearances list. I would go through and make sure you only talk about what is known about the Q-series, not talking about things known just about the droideka in general.
 * 4) **Also, some things about the characteristics of the Q-series. Is it anywhere stated that all of the physical aspects of it were the same as the droidekas, or something like only this one thing is different and the rest are the same as other droidekas? It may very well be, but if it's not said, characteristics based solely off the droideka may have to be removed. Example: the height 1.83 meters in the infobox might not be able to be sourced by something referring only to droidekas unless you have proof that their characteristics are the same.
 * 5) *A good article and nice work - once these things are sorted through I'll support, though I may come back after looking at it with more detail. :P  Aqua  Unasi  18:42, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I see what you're saying. This is tricky business indeed here. While I can't find a specific source that says the Q-series had everything the original had, a simple comparison of the pictures shows this. Since this model is a variant of the original droideka, I believe the same facts regarding the original model should be allowed in the article unless a specific source states otherwise (e.g. that the Q-series were not 1.83 meters). -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 22:40, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Hm, I see what you are saying too. Any other users' opinoins on this?  Aqua  Unasi  02:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, I'd like other users' opinions on this, but since no one has replied, I think that we should stick with what we solidly know about the Q-series, and not assume from other things. Also, my objection about the Survivor's Quest info still stands.  Aqua  Unasi  22:56, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The reason I'm reluctant to remove info about the droideka is because it'll make the article so much shorter, when it really doesn't need to be. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 20:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Well if the info from Survivor's Quest isn't even about the Q-series droideka, then yes, it does need to be taken out.  Aqua  Unasi  20:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It is about the Q-series droideka. The information talks about droidekas being sold to the corporate sector; and all droidekas produced after RotS were Q-series (Revenge of the Sith: Incredible Cross Sections).
 * And where, exactly, is the evidence that this particular droideka was constructed after RotS? -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Its first appearance was in RotS, which is one piece of evidence, and this was proven in RotS: ICS. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 16:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I mean the particular droids in Survivor's Quest. They could've been pre Q-series models. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 16:59, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, if you do have this evidence, it should probably be explained in a footnote so people can know that's how the information was gathered.  Aqua  Unasi  21:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Toprawa:
 * 2) *You still need to handle the objections you failed to address the first time around, found here. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:26, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) **Okay, I've just addressed your objection relating to the eras. I'll deal with Ackbar's objection later. -- Joe Butler (Obi Maul12)  (Chow) 15:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Same as last time; everything I said still applies. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 21:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Tetrum

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 18:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination Comments: More DarkStryder. I hope everyone is paying attention - there will be a quiz later.

(+1)
Support
 * 1) Nice article, - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 14:24, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Battle of the TIE Fighter Construction Facility

 * Nominated by: DjMack
 * Nomination comments: This would be my first real good article I wrote entirely by myself, just point out to me anything that needs fixing, I want to be criticized and become a better writer. SPOILERS FOR FORCE UNLEASHED, BEWARE.

(+3)
Support
 * 1) Good work. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 11:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * :)  Aqua  Unasi  19:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) DC 21:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) From the post-it of DC
 * 2) * Indecisive victory? For who?
 * 3) *You need an aftermath section for the battle.
 * 4) *This article was fantastic, DjMack, it was very well written. DC 18:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Aqua Unasi
 * 6) *Great article. Very well written indeed. A few things:
 * 7) ** You need an tag.
 * 8) ** A few things are unsourced: The first paragraph of Prelude, The two paragraphs in the Aftermath section, and a few things in the infobox.
 * 9) **Also, I went in and changed these for you, but a thing to remember for future articles is to put a tag on the article when nominating it. Also, don't forget to link to your references, and that they go immediately after punctuation, with no space between.
 * 10) *I hope to see more articles from you in the future! :)  Aqua  Unasi  19:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) Xadún's Dun Moch:
 * 12) *Quotes?
 * 13) *A few linking issues. Remember, once in the intro and the first appearence in the main body.
 * 14) *Intro - "raised in the dark" makes it sound like Vader kept him in a small cupboard without light. Say he was was trained in the Dark Side and the Emperor knew nothing of him. that would be sufficient.
 * 15) *Does the novel not give any specifics for the battle of duel? particular strikes, sequences of fighting etc would make the duel section far better.
 * 16) *"He would spend his time in various bars, before Starkiller found him and asked for his help to gather the enemies of the Empire." Did Starkiller just want information or help to actually get the Rebels all in one place? what was this plan?
 * 17) **Starkiller wanted to gather the enemies of the empire together. DjMack 02:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 18) ***Does Starkiller execute a plan in the game? if so, a link to this battle please, even if it doesn't exist yet. Darth Xadún ( Consult the Holocron ) 08:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 19) *Not bad. Nice to see somone working on Battle GA's. Darth Xadún ( Consult the Holocron ) 13:27, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * Oh, next time you nominate something that recently came out, just make sure to say that there are spoilers. DC 18:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I added everything. DjMack 01:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Recon-PK series droid

 * Nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis 01:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: WTS series resumes.

(+3)
Support
 * 1)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  22:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Great job.  Ifindyourlackoffaithdisturbing  ( Oya Manda! ) 22:54, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 08:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Probably one of my favorite WTS... don't really know why.  Aqua  Unasi  20:58, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Ultimo Vista

 * Nominated by:
 * Nomination comments: This is what happens after a night of no sleep and the reinstallation of Vista (Before anyone asks, it was broken, and then repaired over the night of little sleep)

(+5)
Support
 * 1)  Ifindyourlackoffaithdisturbing  ( Oya Manda! ) 00:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 08:33, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 3)  Aqua  Unasi  02:48, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 4)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  22:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:23, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Refs?  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  21:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) *Hahaha oh wow. Told you this is what happens when I work on a random article without sleep. :| Fixed, by the way. 00:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Per Chack. Well written, but totally unsourced.  Ifindyourlackoffaithdisturbing  ( Oya Manda! ) 23:06, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) *See above. 00:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Toprawa:
 * 6) * I know it's not mandatory, but I would request you include some kind of BTS. Usually I discourage the types of bits about "[Word x] means [whatever] in the Ukrainian language," but in this specific case, I think it would be pertinent to specify that "Ultimo Vista" would mean "Ultimate View" if that "u" was accented. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) **Oy, BTS. I too dislike the "this means this" inclusions (especially with the atrocious wording I typed up), but I'm willing to throw that in there.
 * 8) * What is this describing exactly? I'm not finding anything in the infobox illustration remotely matching this description. Can you word this a little better? "with a horizontal, flat, beam-shaped device resting on the ship's fore underbelly"
 * 9) **Well, it's that... thing (I don't know what to call it) at the front of the ship, just under the curved front thing. I tried a better description, but I'm drawing a blank. Suggestions?
 * 10) * Please link this "airspeeder" to the appropriate article. It's one of our FAs, I do believe: "narrowly avoided impact with the slow-moving craft inside of an airspeeder"
 * 11) **Sigh. I don't know how I missed that. I mean, I really don't know how I missed that. Linked (and sigh).
 * 12) * The "Role" section is unnecessary and any and all information should be merged with the "Characteristics" section, per our running precedent of ship articles. We typically reserve "Role" sections only for ship classes, not individual ships.
 * 13) **Removed, with a bit of "meh" included.
 * 14) * There are definitely some infobox fields that could be filled in based on some of the information in the article. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:22, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 15) **Like what? The only thing I could think of - and it's a stretch at that - is the "First/Last seen" field, which is more of a source thing than anything else. I'm uncomfortable with saying it was first spotted in 21 BBY, when it was known to operate several decades before then. Likewise, saying it was last spotted in 21 BBY is also suspect, since the one source said it continued on into the future. It just feels all OOU to me, like the era field. The other one I could think of is the "Passengers" field which would essentially contain "several thousand beings", which I thought was frowned upon in the vein of a status of "equipped" in the engine/hyperspace/shield forms if we don't know what type they possessed. If I'm wrong on that, correct me. I also might be just drawing a complete blank (since I actually don't remember writing most of this thing). 03:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * No idea what possessed me to write this up. 20:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Teyora Rekab

 * Nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis 08:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: If only I were writing about coolth suits.

(+4)
Support
 * 1) I can't see anything wrong, except from the Harry Potter toy glasses and fish bowl ;D. (One thing actually, did you spell makeup right? (I think it's spelt make-up in English.)) - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 10:53, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Do we get a coolth suit GAN to go with this? - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 14:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 3)  Ifindyourlackoffaithdisturbing  ( Oya Manda! ) 01:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Ozzel 19:19, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Asagov Raider

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 14:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: To go with my Miktiss FAN.

(+2)
Support
 * 1)  Ifindyourlackoffaithdisturbing  ( Oya Manda! ) 02:00, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 14:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) I do like your style, Cav.  Darth Xadún ( Consult the Holocron ) 08:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1)  Kingpin :
 * 2) * I think the start of history needs to be reworded.
 * 3) **In what way? Is it not clear as it is?
 * 4) ***I've reworded it, but please check it. - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 14:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Fair enough. It works both ways, but I'll keep it as it is :) - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 14:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) * Why did Miktiss want to keep it safe? - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 14:12, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) **Because of the fear of losing the vessel to an Imperial ship, as detailed in the following sentence. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 14:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Steel Fist

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 14:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: To go with Kolig below.

(+1)
Support
 * 1) - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 14:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1)  Kingpin :
 * 2) * You say "the vessel" a lot in the intro, could this be substituted?
 * 3) **Some instances changed.
 * 4) * You haven’t got any tags on the appearances and sources, are these needed?
 * 5) **Added.
 * 6) * Also see my second objection to Kolig, I presume you don't have information on what happened next but I'll ask anyway - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 14:00, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) **Context added. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 14:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Kolig

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 14:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Awesome twirling moustachio.

(+2)
Support
 * 1) - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 14:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Graestan ( Talk ) 20:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1)  Kingpin :
 * 2) * Could you say why the group was named Qulok's Fist?
 * 3) **No details on that I'm afraid.
 * 4) * If known, could you say how FarStar fared (i.e. Did it survive, did they kill or injure any crew, why did they withdraw instead of finishing it off, etc.) - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 13:49, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) **Some context added. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 14:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Kyli Ned'Ix

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 12:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: There's a pattern to my noms ...

(+2)
Support
 * 1) Another great article - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 13:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Graestan ( Talk ) 16:11, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1)  Kingpin :
 * 2) * Just one thing, in BtS you say he was created as a comical character, but you don’t say anything about this in personality and traits (I think), maybe you should? - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 13:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) **There's nothing in his personality that indicates he is "funny" - the comic relief is intended to come from situation comedy such as him turning up at exactly the wrong moment, or as springboard for a light-hearted original adventure. I've added a little to the BTS to reflect this. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 13:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Fxz'Et

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 12:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ... but I can't quite figure out ...

(+3)
Support
 * 1) Couldn't spot anything wrong with this one, it's almost disappointing ;D Great work with all of these - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 13:20, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Ozzel 19:22, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Graestan ( Talk ) 16:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Veild-danol

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 12:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ... what the connection between them all is ...

(+2)
Support
 * 1) Well written, interesting article - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 13:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Graestan ( Talk ) 15:34, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1)  Kingpin :
 * 2) * In "Biography" do you mean to say "to the planet Galtea" or "past the planet Galtea", which ever, please fix.
 * 3) **Should be "to". Added.
 * 4) * Also is The DarkStryder Campaign a source or appearance? - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 13:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) **It's a source, since Veild-danol is only refered to in the character bio section, and is never used in any of the in-narrative adventures. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 13:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Jarell

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 12:36, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ... if there is one at all.

(+2)
Support
 * 1) That was quick :D Great piece - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 13:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Graestan ( Talk ) 15:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1)  Kingpin :
 * 2) * Seems good, just two things. Firstly, could you reword the start of “Biology and appearance”, I don’t understand if they can have all three colours or if they can have just one (or both). I see in the image it’s purple and white but please reword.
 * 3) **Rewritten - hopefully it's clearer now.
 * 4) * Secondly shouldn’t the “Sources” section be renamed “Appearances”? Otherwise a great article. - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 12:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) **No, since the Jarell do not appear in a narrative piece of work. Information from The DarkStryder Campaign is all behind the scenes bio information, and the Vision of the Future reference is to the language only. They do not technically "appear" in those works. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 13:11, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Bhasu Ruuq

 * Nominated by: Harrar 19:37, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Just filling out those ranks&hellip;

(+3)
Support
 * 1) Very nice. Easy to follow even for people not familiar with the Vong.  Aqua  Unasi  20:44, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) -  Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 13:11, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Graestan ( Talk ) 15:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Sufar

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 10:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: GA one murderous bounty hunter ...

(+3)
Support
 * Cav, I often wonder what you'll do if you ever write up the entire Darkstryder campaign... ;) Darth Xadún ( Consult the Holocron ) 08:20, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Nice one again. Skippy Farlstendoiro 12:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Graestan ( Talk ) 15:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Kingpin:
 * 2) *Could you put a little bit from the personality into the biography to explain why he committed murder? - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 15:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Padak

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 10:56, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ... get another for twice the price.

(+3)
Support
 * 1) Nice. Very enjoyable reading these DarkStryder's BTW - Kingpin13Cantina Battle Ground 15:20, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, I can vote twice at the same time, true? Skippy Farlstendoiro 12:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Graestan ( Talk ) 15:01, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments