Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Reridan Reksiss

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:20, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: This person needs to be used in something.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1) I was wondering if "actor" was enough indication that the character is male... I eventually decided that the answer was: "Yes." Menkooroo 02:17, March 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  OLIOSTER   (talk) 09:33, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Shimazu
 * 2) * I'm guessing that you don't like ref tags on single-source articles. SinisterSamurai 22:08, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **As stated above: per Sourcing Rule #5, ref tags on single-source articles are not required. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:16, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you sort out the publication date(s) in the BTS a bit more? We're told that this was published in-universe, but it was also published out-of-universe. In other words, the current wording makes it sound like it was published in 2002 in-universe. ~ SavageBob 20:58, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Gaeriala Boosin

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:20, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A musician to go with these song noms.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Boo! Sin! Menkooroo 02:14, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ishida
 * 2) * No ref tags? SinisterSamurai 22:07, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **And once again: ref tags are not necessary on single-source articles per WP:S rule 5. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 22:19, March 10, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same as the previous nom. ~ SavageBob 20:59, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Gelesi's wife

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:43, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My FAN's pulchritudinous sweetheart.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Menkooroo 04:38, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Clean.&mdash;  22:59, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Yimmy's vife
 * 2) * Context is needed on Gelesi. The article introduces him like the reader should know who he is, but not everybody has read the FAN. :P
 * 3) *Maybe create an article for the Captain of the Guard? The one currently linked to is a position in the Republic's Senate Guard. Probably not what you were looking for. Menkooroo 15:00, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) **Done both. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:35, March 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * The article seems to assume the player takes a particular path through the game; can the templates be added that indicate that? ~ SavageBob 21:03, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Gelesi's daughter

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:43, March 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Contrary to popular belief, my FAN and previous CAN were not polyphiloprogenitive.

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ask Menkooroo: always a good solution.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:17, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Menkooroo 04:39, March 17, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Clean.&mdash;  22:59, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Do you need a P&T here? There's nothing about her personality in it, and the near-human thing would fit in the main section easily.  Holocron  Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 02:20, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *I couldn't think of a way to integrate it into the body without disrupting the flow. "at least Near-Human" cannot just be handled with a ref tag explaination and it needs the clause about Gelesi to make sense. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:32, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Well, that makes enough sense for me to strike the objection, anyone with experience want to comment?  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 12:34, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Don't call me daughter, not fair to me
 * 5) * I'm with Holocron on this one. If the leading quote of this article is the only reference to Gelesi's daughter, then we can't assume anything. That reference isn't enough to assume that the daughter isn't adopted, and even if it was, the info currently in p & t isn't enough to justify a p & t --- I really think that it's gotta go (ditto the near-human reference in the infobox). Menkooroo 15:03, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) **That makes sense. Removed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:25, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 7) ***Excellent! Now create an article for this particular Captain of the Guard (or else expand the existing one?) and we'll call it a deal. Menkooroo 11:55, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * 8) ****I already expanded the existing one, and I added context on Gelesi in both articles. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:53, March 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same as my objections to the wife article: this seems to assume a particular path through the game. ~ SavageBob 21:06, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * The beast rider was going to kidnap and 'marry' her? Sneaky developers.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 12:34, March 13, 2011 (UTC)

Testosterone

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:39, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I'm sorry. Beethoven's Fifth came on the radio when I revisited this page and it ended when I pressed "Edit." This was divinely ordained.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) This stuff makes me rage!  OLIOSTER   (talk) 03:20, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Why not?  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:26, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  1358  (Talk)  08:58, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Whenever we have articles on things that have the same in-universe name as they do out-of-universe, I don't think it's OR or a stretch to assert that that thing should be understood to mean what we think it means. In other words, SW novels and sources are written in English for an English-speaking audience (until translated), so if a character mentions a, say, pillow, then it's safe to assume they mean a pillow. In this case, mentioning that testosterone is a hormone strongly associated with males would not be OR in my opinion. At the very least, I think you need to mention what testosterone is in the BTS, with a reference to a (non-Wikipedia) definition of the stuff. ~ SavageBob 15:23, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I updated it for all those sources except for A Hero Seeks Not Vengeance, SBob. Since I can't find a copy of it, could you tell me what the context of the mention is? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:17, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * All it says is If the heroes go off on a testosterone high and glory in the prospect of combat, then Meera will echo whatever action they take, in reference to the Heroes of Cularin and Meera Lisso.--Jinzler 21:20, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Would you say that fits into "aggressive"? In my Rifts campaigns that usually means we destroy another planet. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:27, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * The appearance list isn't complete until all of Kyle Katarn's appearances are added!  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:26, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * Kyle is testosterone in human form. And in answer to your question Naru, I do believe that this can be interpreted as meaning that testosterone was associated with agressiveness. --Jinzler 12:33, March 14, 2011 (UTC)

Rokon

 * Nominated by: NAYAYEN &mdash;it appears to be a frammistat 23:51, March 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Let's Rokon Roll.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:55, March 14, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 13:41, March 18, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * The article seems to assume a particular course in a roleplaying adventure. Could the templates be added to indicate this, and the BTS updated to include alternate paths? ~ SavageBob 21:08, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, the interactions with Rokon cannot be altered by the players. Some small bits of context around it could be reworded to have to use the assumed course, but the ultimate result of those bits is the same no matter what so no template is needed. I've noted that the encounter cannot be affected. NAYAYEN &mdash;it appears to be a frammistat 08:46, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

CT-52/89-9204

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 21:30, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A clone trooper. Yup, they're now on the CAN too.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Maybe you could list all that stuff in the infobox?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:37, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) *Personally, I think the infobox looks pretty cluttered and unsightly this way, and that's with only everything up to the 327th listed. If the rest is listed, the infobox totally breaks. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 13:56, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Per QGJ; also, if those were added, they would have to be added to the article itself as well since no info should be infobox-only&hellip; 1358  (Talk)  19:07, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * According to the Guide to the Grand Army, Bacta Company is part of the Hawkbat Battalion, which is part of the 101st Regiment, which is part of the 7th Legion of the 327th Star Corps of the 2nd Sector Army of the Systems Army Alpha. I could list all this info in the article, but I think that would be way too detailed and not directly relevant to the clone trooper in question. If you think it is fine, I'll add it. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 21:30, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's definitely all relevant information. Just because we don't know much else about the character doesn't mean we shouldn't add this. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 19:09, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Added it. The wording's kinda "meh," but that's the best way to list all that stuff that I could come up with. QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:22, March 21, 2011 (UTC)

CT-43/76-9155

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 19:05, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: One more

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:38, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Codru-Ji Jedi

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 02:50, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:38, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 07:23, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Oy
 * 2) * Can you mention in the bts that his appearance in LECG is limited to a picture?
 * 3) *On that note, should there be a in the Sources section? Menkooroo 08:48, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) **Did the first, but as he is mentioned in an image caption, I have changed the tag to 1stm instead. --Eyrezer 10:03, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

CT-53/21-8778

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 08:27, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:38, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

CT-12/12-0068

 * Nominated by: QuiGonJinn  Senate seal.svg(Talk) 09:17, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) One fine day, all clones will be either CAs, GAs or FAs.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 10:38, March 22, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Corellian Seaside

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 13:34, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Corellia is probably the best planet in SWG.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

No Division

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 14:06, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Its a "poster" this time!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) *Are there a few words of context that can be said about Combat Upgrade? Or a pipelink to its section heading within the Galaxies article might be good, too. Menkooroo 07:30, March 23, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Cruva Lenda

 * Nominated by: Jinzler 23:30, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A Twi'lek

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Ranso Li

 * Nominated by: Jinzler 23:30, March 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another Twi'lek

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments