Wookieepedia:AC/Log/2016 May 29

[00:15:54]  Time for the makeup AC Meeting 86 [00:16:01]  First up, old articles [00:16:07]  http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Kao_Cen_Darach [00:16:13]  http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/Kao_Cen_Darach_(third_review) [00:16:32]  Ah, this old chestnut [00:16:36] I think this is finally fixed. [00:16:37]  This thing has been extended /four/ times, which may be a recoerd [00:16:38]  *record [00:16:58]  I think it's finally time to get this one off the ledger [00:16:59]  Keep [00:17:04] Keep [00:17:12]  Keep [00:17:52]  Kao Cen Darach kept [00:18:03]  http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Galactic_Republic_Chancery_election,_3653_BBY [00:18:07]  http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/Galactic_Republic_Chancery_election,_3653_BBY [00:18:42]  Kill [00:18:46]  I really don't want to kill over redlinks, but with no first hand knowledge of the subject ... [00:18:48]  Kill [00:18:52] Kill [00:19:00] <IFYLOFD> Chancery election killed [00:19:08] <IFYLOFD> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Knighthunters [00:19:14] <IFYLOFD> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/Knighthunters [00:19:24] <IFYLOFD> Knighthunters was the Star Wars equivalent of the TV hit Knight Rider [00:19:28] <IFYLOFD> Kill [00:19:30] <CavalierOne> If you want to extend I'll take it on. [00:19:41] <CavalierOne> Referencing shouldn't be that hard. [00:20:22] <IFYLOFD> Fine with me [00:20:25] <IFYLOFD> Extend [00:20:28] Sure. [00:20:32] <CavalierOne> Extend [00:20:59] <IFYLOFD> Knighthunters extended [00:21:05] <IFYLOFD> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Stinger_(clone_trooper) [00:21:10] <IFYLOFD> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/Stinger_(clone_trooper) [00:22:17] <IFYLOFD> Kill [00:22:28] Kill [00:22:32] <CavalierOne> Kill [00:22:39] <IFYLOFD> Stinger killed [00:22:48] <IFYLOFD> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Thirsty_Bantha [00:22:52] <IFYLOFD> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:AC/Thirsty_Bantha [00:23:28] <CavalierOne> Kill [00:23:43] <IFYLOFD> Kill [00:23:57] Kill [00:24:01] <IFYLOFD> Thirsty Bantha killed [00:24:05] <IFYLOFD> Onto the maintenance page [00:24:14] <IFYLOFD> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/TC-22_blaster_rifle?t=20160514192124 Update tag, CSWE [00:24:17] <IFYLOFD> Probe [00:24:20] Probe [00:24:22] <CavalierOne> Probe [00:24:42] <IFYLOFD> TC-22 probed [00:24:44] <IFYLOFD> Discussion [00:29:16] <IFYLOFD> The GAN's in probably a shittier state than the FAN considering the articles are much shorter [00:29:51] <CavalierOne> Agreed. Review more, do better [00:30:03] <IFYLOFD> For one [00:30:25] <IFYLOFD> http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Good_article_nominations#Escape_from_Darth_Vader If one of you wants to review that, we could pass that tonight [00:30:29] <IFYLOFD> It's been on the GAN /forever/ [00:31:16] <CavalierOne> Doesn't Tope still have an outstanding objection? [00:31:17] <IFYLOFD> Also, Cav, you have a few unstruck objections [00:31:19] Well, there are open objections on that. [00:31:27] <IFYLOFD> Yeah, but that's been addressed since fucking January [00:31:28] <CavalierOne> I do? Fuck. [00:31:31] <IFYLOFD> So we can vote to strike it now [00:31:52] <IFYLOFD> Because Tope's not around to strike it any time soon [00:32:44] <CavalierOne> Sounds reasonable as long as its been addressed. [00:33:18] I'm trying to determine what the objection was. [00:34:07] <IFYLOFD> Honestly, I really don't see any referencing issues with the article as it stands [00:34:25] Tope's objection implies that this " [00:34:25] Shortly before the Battle of Yavin[1]" needs additional sourcing. [00:34:50] So, I don't think it has been entirely addressed. [00:35:13] <IFYLOFD> Does it actually, though? [00:35:59] <IFYLOFD> I mean, from the synopsis, it's pretty obviously a retelling of the opening scenes of Episode IV [00:36:03] <IFYLOFD> That's just common sense [00:36:32] Yeah, but you can't get that information from the book. [00:37:13] <IFYLOFD> What could you properly cite that to, then [00:37:17] <IFYLOFD> ANH? [00:37:56] I would think a reference saying that the book is an adaptation of the first scenes of ANH. [00:38:03] <CavalierOne> Possibly with a ref note explaining that the book retells a portion of the story of ANH. [00:38:29] <IFYLOFD> Shit, I can do that now [00:38:44] <IFYLOFD> This thing has been an eyesore on the GAN page forever and I just want to get rid of it [00:39:07] <CavalierOne> But I think its self-explanatory as it is at the same time. [00:39:17] I don't know about writing Reception sections, but something about it doesn't seem right. [00:40:01] <IFYLOFD> Then leave objections then :P [00:40:04] It seems overly focused on user reviews. [00:40:48] <IFYLOFD> I just left a new ref note in the infobox [00:41:21] <IFYLOFD> So do we want to vote to strike Tope's objection? [00:42:01] <CavalierOne> Channel vote or on the GAN page itself? [00:42:20] <IFYLOFD> We're here, might as well do a channel vote [00:42:25] I don't feel comfortable striking an AC's objections without consulting with them first. I seem to remember talking to Tope about it and him saying that there was still something else left. [00:42:52] <IFYLOFD> Well, we can wait to see if he comes back, but we don't know when that's going to be [00:42:59] <IFYLOFD> I wouldn't be advocating this if he was around [00:43:04] <CavalierOne> I've had objections struck without consultation before now. [00:44:44] <IFYLOFD> Without him around to actually explain things, all it becomes is an obstacle [00:45:03] Well, if you want to strike it you can find someone else to vote on it. I don't want to pass an article that I don't think is ready and I don't have the time to review it right now. [00:45:14] <IFYLOFD> Fine, we can wait, that's OK with me [00:45:59] <IFYLOFD> If we don't have anything left to discuss, let's do meeting duties [00:46:29] <IFYLOFD> Paperwork is me, shit [00:46:35] <IFYLOFD> Scheduling is EJ [00:46:40] <IFYLOFD> Meeting 86 is officially closed