User talk:Toprawa and Ralltiir

Archived talk: 1 2 3 4 5

Gorgon
Yeah, I guess I'll deal with the objections.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 12:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

SWE
Got something for ya. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 13:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Oops
Ah, sorry. I've never used the random page before, and I just forgot about the history page. I'll get it next time.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 21:19, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Scarl system
I have responded to your inquiry on the Scarl System and the Executor on my page. Briefly, the page originally said it was constructed at Fondor (unsure of the source...it was already on the page for a while). I tried to combine the two seemingly contradictory statements. See my talk page for further details. I will go and look at my wording to insure no "personal research"/fanfic hanky panky. IthinkIwannaLeia 21:51, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Light and Shadow
Hey, T&R. After finding several articles linking to the previously non-existant Jedi Nova, I instinctively created her article. However, after reading the source material, I fear the story she originates from -- as well as all the other articles based on the story -- are pure fanon (the site can be found here; I'm sure the "Fanboy Association" in the title pretty much confirms its fanon...icity? I doubt that's a word.). I'm not sure if we allow fanon articles on Wookieepedia, so do you mind taking a look into the situation during your free time? Thanks in advance, and happy editing. // ~mikah~  02:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bringing this to my attention. It seems that the article is not fanon, but instead comes from a licensed story that was canceled and never released. I've added the appropriate tag signifying this at the top of the Nova article. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:Your GAN activity
Sorry, I didn't know. I'm new to the whole GAN thing. Do I need to add a short summary or something of my changes into comments as a record? Thx for the tip. Soresumakashi 02:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * You don't need to specify what changes you make to an article on the GAN page. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Bring Back... Star Wars

 * On 17th September, you deleted the page Bring Back... Star Wars, which I created, citing that it was "nonsense". This was a real episode that aired in the UK, as you can check for yourself here. I was just wondering if you could explain to me why you felt it was appropriate to delete the page --Jinzler 08:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, cheers for explaining that to me. I'm guessing that it is alright for me to put something on it in List of references to Star Wars in television instead. Although, if it had aired in the US, i'm sure that it would have got enough viewers to be worthy of it's own article --Jinzler 21:18, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Executor
Hey there T&R. I saw your recently uploaded Executor image Image:ExecutorShuttle.jpg and thought I'd let you know there is already a larger/more complete version of that image in use on the site, Image:Theexecutorsheiswhite.JPG, in case you wanted to use that instead. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I know. I'm not a big fan of that picture, though. Too dark. There is a much cleaner version in the SOTG 2007 book I'm trying to get to replace it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * In that case, I'll try to scan it. :) VT-16 19:20, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, cool :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, this didn't turn out quite the way I thought it would. You be the judge. =/ VT-16 19:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Here's my take on the SotG Executor image. Not quite as big VT-16's but slightly darker contrast. Executor SotG -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 22:44, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Delete and block
WHY THE FUCK DID YOU DELETE MY PAGE ? 92.10.124.244 20:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Pepper's Pax
It's mentioned under Nogo Sistek's entry, and the info is in the second paragraph under Darlyn Boda on pages 9/10. Nesis Vod 16:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Gorgon
You sure love that SWE don't you? :P Anyway, (and you're probably tired of this by now), do you think you could be a little more specific as to what you would like to see there, or if possible, provide the entry? Thanks a ton.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 23:38, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I have to get the new encyclopedia for Christmas so I don't have to keep asking you. The link is a big help though.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 21:42, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Maul Stanley
Hello. I'm new at this so it's quite possible I made a mistake, but could you please explain to me why you deleted my Maul Stanley article just 5 minutes after I created it? I made the effort to substantiate the piece with no less than 10 reference links, so I can't imagine what about the entry you considered "nonsense." I would appreciate a clarification, thank you.

Cybercomic 16:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Not knowing what your objection is to my contribution, I have just re-posted the article. Before doing so, I gave it a subsequent review to ensure that proper guidelines have been followed. If you have further issues with this entry, I would appreciate you making them known through proper channels, rather than pulling the article outright. Thank you.

Cybercomic 18:08, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Though I appreciate you taking the time to indicate that you consider this entry "not notable" (while deleting the entire article for a second time), this is not solely for you to decide. In cases like this, the subject is to be brought up for review by other contributors and not arbitrarily pulled because one individual objects to its inclusion. As for the character being "not notable," he is easily as notable as other "notable fans" included in Wookieepedia, such as Thomas J. Spanos and The Elvis Trooper. His contributions to Star Wars fandom are tangible and of merit, otherwise they would not have been reported on by such sources as TheForce.net and the blog at StarWars.com. Maul Stanley's activities have also been reported on by such notable non-Star Wars sites as Blabbermouth.net, MetalSludge.tv, KissOnline.com and KissAsylum.com, all of which were linked in the body of the article. Clearly, these established sites consider this subject notable so I'm rather surprised that you feel the need to discount them.

I am trying to give you due consideration here, which is more than you have thus far shown me by deleting my entry twice. If you personally do not feel that the entry has merit (despite all the evidence provided), you are entitled to put the topic up for discussion. However, you are overstepping accepted boundaries and being unfair to both me and the subject by repeatedly acting as judge, jury and executioner with regard to this matter.

Cybercomic 19:44, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

RE:Ordering appearances
It seems that you are ordering appearance lists by OOU publication date, rather than IU chronological order, as they should properly be arranged. Please refrain from doing this. Only source lists are to be arranged by publication date. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I beg your pardon, but I didn't do any such edit. At least I'm not aware of that. Which article do you have on mind? -- Darth Paulus [[Image:JaingHead.svg|20px]] ( May the Force serve you well! ) 18:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry about my unintentional copying your original message here... I meant no harm. Also, I am wondering which articles I DID screw up, regarding appearance sections. I REALLY have no idea. Could you, please, be more specific? Aren't you just mistaken? Trust me, the last thing I wanna do is vandalism... -- Darth Paulus [[Image:JaingHead.svg|20px]] ( May the Force serve you well! ) 23:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

AgriCorps Meeting One
The AgriCorps will be meeting for the first time on Saturday, 4 October at 22:00 UTC. Please do your best to be there, and if you cannot, please leave your thoughts and input on the meeting page. Graestan ( Talk ) 01:25, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Wookiee Warpath Levels
Hi Toprawa and Ralltiir, could you say me why you deleted my articles about the Wookiee Warpath Levels? Kind regards,  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk to me  15:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright. I can understand that they don't need an own article, I just added them because there were redlinks to this articles on Yoda: Dark Rendezvous. Kind regards,  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk to me  17:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I've just removed them from the article. Kind regards,  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk to me  17:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Hoth
Dash Rendar flying as Rogue 12 during the Battle of Hoth is not false info.
 * I have a website saved where it says he flew as Rogue 12, thats why I edited it. I'm just trying to help, I follow the Rogues pretty close. My intention is to help, not to post wrong information.

Gorgon
I belive Ataru and I have addressed your Gorgon objections.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 01:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Get ready for Round 2. :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Gray Jedi robe
Hey there T&R. Since I'm pretty new here I wanted to make sure I understood about merging pages. Basically my understanding of it is that I add in a new paragraph into Traditional robes, cite my sources, add new refs if needed, delete everything from the Gray Jedi robe page and add a redirect to Jedi apparel. Did I miss anything? Cylka 18:01, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Will do. Thanks.  ~   Cylka   ~  18:40, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

I actually am having a problem with refs, I'm not sure I understand what's going on with them and the help pages aren't really helping me. When I footnote using an existing ref, it changes the number of that ref and all other refs - maybe this is normal? I also wanted to add a new ref and I was wondering if I'm suppossed to give it a ref name or if there's some kind of standard list for refs or something like that.  ~   Cylka   ~  19:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Ozzel objections
I was going to tell you the other day on IRC that I took care of your objections to the Ozzel FA nom, but since you managed to elude me, I figured I'd let you know here. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 11:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

AgriCorps Meeting Two
Please save the date for our second meeting of the AgriCorps. If you know now that you can't make it, please give your input on the meeting page. Graestan ( Talk ) 23:08, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

What's up with my IRC?
I'm not suggesting you had something to do with this, but I have been banned - without any warning or stated reason - from the Wookieepedia IRC. I'm notifying you to see if something can't be done to find out what happened and if it can be reversed. Please see if you or another admin can address this as soon as possible. I will be notifying other admins of this development as well. Erik Pflueger  22:13, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Griff and the Executor

 * I'll chime in here really quickly: "Amise" is from Geonosis and the Outer Rim Worlds, and all three of Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game, Second Edition, Revised and Expanded, Rebellion Era Sourcebook, and GatORW mention the Executor (though Revised and Expanded does so only in an attribution of a quote regarding capital ship shields). jSarek 00:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, good stuff. Thanks, JS :) Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:28, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Battle of the TIE Fighter facility nomination
The Battle of the Construction Facility article GA nomination hasn't been going anywhere, you voted against it but just to let you know I addressed your problems. DjMack 01:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Talk: Executor

 * You deleted my section in the Executor's talk page... Why? Stormie Fan 21:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

New Wampa info

 * Hi, there is some new info on wampas here. As you seem to have contributed most to the wampa article and probably know most about it, I think it is best if you add the info from this source, rather than me or anyone else. I hope that is ok --Jinzler 20:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Alphabetized categories
Aw, sorry. Thx for the heads-up!

GA Opinion
Having never nominated anything before, and because I know you are heavily involved with both FA and GAs, I'd like to ask your opinion on whether you think an article is quality enough for me to nominate it for GA status. The article is Saboteur. Thanks in advance. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 19:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I decided to just take the plunge and went ahead and nominated it. Your review would be most appreciated though. :) -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 20:16, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. I don't think it's got what it needs to ever make the standard. It's too broad a subject for all the implied instances and too limited with just the two stated sources. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 00:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

TFU Executor pic
I'm sorry, T&R, but I don't have the ability to take screencaps from my Xbox, nor the funds to purchase what would be necessary to try. I think you'll be best off asking some other Wookieepedians with the game. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 01:07, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It's cool. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:13, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Executor images
Sure thing, what would you like? =) VT-16 00:58, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Here ya go! VT-16 11:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Back to the old photobucket:   VT-16 17:00, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Got a question for ya TR regarding your work on the Executor article (I assume you'll be replacing the existing article once you're work is complete). Are you planning to incorporate any or all of the current images in the article? Take this image, for example. It's an excellent image of the command salon and I'd hate to see it not included in any re-write. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 18:33, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * As of now, the images I definitely plan to include into the new article can be seen in the "Image repository" section of my Executor project page. I'm not really sure right now where I would include the command salon picture, and I'm trying to avoid including images that aren't specific to the Executor itself. For example, a picture of the bridge is kind of redundant since every Imperial and Executor-class Star Destroyer has an identical bridge layout. Likewise, the picture of the command salon can just as easily be applied to any Executor-class ship. So, I think it'd be more appropriate to include that image in the Executor-class Star Dreadnought article. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 19:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Glad it was useful! :) VT-16 23:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Having trouble with a user
Hello. I'm reporting to you as an admin that I'm having a trouble with a user RC-5015, who is constantly inserting fanon into articles. Examples include:


 * Three-five
 * RC-Θ288
 * RC-1138
 * Delta Squad

So, I'm asking you to warn him one last time and ban him permanently if he doesn't listen. The content he inserted is fanon crap in almost all cases, except for his own userpage. Mauser 08:38, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Got it. Graestan ( Talk ) 12:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Here we go again: One, Two. This time he at least didn't make any spelling and formating mistakes, but I'm still unsure if this information is correct. Mauser 04:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Archive?
Hey: You left a message on my page that I can't delete user's comments on my talkpage. Okay, sorry about that. Can you tell me how to "archive" them? Thanks! Kgrimes2 03:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Kgrimes2 03:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: The issues
Sorry, Top; had a few things on my plate this weekend. I'll do it tonight and get them to you by tomorrow morning (my time, obviously :)) - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 08:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Firstly, thanks for the award. It was a nice surprise :)
 * Secondly, here we go with the FF numbers you want:


 * Pages PIE1-PIE6 (Firmus Piett)&mdash;1-2 come from #70, 3-6 come from #89
 * VAD7-VAD12 (Vader)&mdash;all come from from #19
 * HOT1-HOT6 (Battle of Hoth)&mdash;all come from #4
 * SKY10 (Luke)&mdash;#21
 * END29 (Battle of Endor)&mdash;#79
 * Hope it helps. Let me know if you need anything else. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 12:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Single source referencing
I thought it's a policy that it's not allowed to source single source noms, but you live and learn. I hope you don't mind it.  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk  20:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Carrion Fly
Would you like to handle this one? // ~mikah~  00:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:03, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Merci beaucoup. // ~mikah~  01:11, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Trandoshan mercenary page
why did you delete the page:Trandoshan mercenary?Darth exelton 03:49, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The Wookieepedia community has come to a decision on not creating articles of that nature, such as Corellian pilots, Rodian bounty hunters, etc. Any information that might go into that article can be added to the Trandoshan page. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * thanks.Darth exelton 02:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I think I fixed the articles that used to link to that page, so they link to Trandoshan and mercenary pages separately. If there are other articles you remember deleting around the same time, could you please check that you've eliminated any other redlinks that might have been created?  Thanks, &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 23:15, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Bendu
I was wondering if you could change the name of the Bendu page to Insignia of Unity, here's why. Ii own all of the sources, with the exception of one, that are stated on the page and not one of them state the symbol as "Bendu". They say that the symbol was inspired by the Bendu/Jedi but never call it as such. Second the Millennium Falcon novel describes the insignia in the book and calls the symbol the "Insignia of Unity". This title also fits better with the information provided in its other sources. So I'm currently making edits to the page but I don't want to add the Falcon info till the name has actually been changed. What do you think? Apotheoses Jedi 00:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC-6)
 * I have no opinion on the matter. Feel free to move the page to a new title using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

TFU Emperor on your Executor.
When the Emperor confronts Vader about Galen Marek, you mention that the Emperor is there via hologram. Is that the case in the Novel or Comic? In every version of the video game, (PS3, XBox360, Wii, PS2, PSP, at least) he appears to be physically present. He doesn't appear as the standard blue hologram, and there's no indication that he's "possessing" PROXY. Just a heads up that you may need to pull a source count. SinisterSamurai 20:04, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * That information comes explicitly from the novel and is accordingly sourced to it. In the case of TFU, I believe the novel outranks any of the video game variations on the hierarchy of canon, as it's the "original" story. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:39, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Executor sketches
Here ya go:

Hope these will do for ya. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 19:27, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Saw you had this image in your repository for the Executor update and I went ahead and cropped out the awkward looking blank area on the right and adjusted the contrast some in case you're interested. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 20:50, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I like that the ships aren't so squeezed, but I'd rather not cut off part of the Executor. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:32, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, the Executor is cut off in the currently uploaded version. It cuts off to blank black space, hence why I thought cropping would make it look better. But it's your call. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 04:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. Wow. I'm slow today. It just dawned on me that it isn't cut off, it's just the angle the image is illustrated. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 04:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

GA noms
Just like to bring to your attention the nominations for Treis Sinde, Knights of the Old Republic, and Yeeru Chivkyrie; it's been some time since any comments (negative or positive) have been made on any of them, and with the exception of Knights, all objections have been crossed out. // ~mikah~  02:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:Klev SWE entry
Thanks. Unfortunately for me, the entry didn't contain any new info. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 14:48, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Gha Nachkt
Would you mind semi-protecting Gha Nachkt so at least new and unregistered users cannot edit it. I don't want to risk the 3RR. See the talk page for what the issue is regarding. Thanks. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 20:58, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * So that I won't break the 3RR, would you mind reverting the last edits on the page until it is settled on the talk page? None of the "opposing" party seem willing to discuss it on the talk page. I would be interested to know your opinion however, as an admin, is my reasoning on the talk page valid? -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 21:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * We've come to an agreement on the talk page to keep the BTS comment and re-add The Clone Wars film as an appearance with the attached. If you wouldn't mind unlocking the page so we can do that. If not, and you feel it's necessary to keep the lock on until the expiring date, no worries. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 15:03, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Alliance Fleet
Hello! just curious why you removed Rusty Eagle, etc. from the Alliance Fleet page. Did I put them in the wrong categories?JustinGann 19:52, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The difference between the ships you've added and the ones I've removed is that those still up there are specific starship classes, not individual ships. Perhaps a section for individual ships would be something to add to the article, but they should be treated separately in another section. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:11, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

hi again
Curious why you removed this item from Garven Dreis page, as it is true: "Furthermore, in the comic adaptation one of Dreis's wingmen in the trench run is in a Y-wing, whereas in the movie both wingmen are in X-wings."
 * I removed it because it's trivial information that departs from anything directly related to Dreis. That sort of information would fit best in the wingmen articles. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok. But I'm not sure which of the two wingmen it is. How about I put it in the Red Squadron article?JustinGann 16:49, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's cool. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Talk pages
Hey, I just wanted to let you know I do try to refrain from "general discussion" in page's discussion. Sorry if I crossed a line somewhere. Was it the thing about Jaxxon? I didn't intend that as a general comment. I actually thought that was information to consider working into the article, although perhaps it is more of a BTS thing. It strikes me that most readers may not realized Jaxxon is taxonomically correct (and not just in a state of denial) when he claims "I ain't no Rodent!" I really thought that meritted mentioning in either the Jaxxon or Lepi article. I wasn't just trying to make conversation. I admit I probably needed to elucidate my intent a bit more--sometimes I think I just expect people to read my mind;) JustinGann 03:12, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:Cape
That page you asked about creating cannot be created because of constantly recreated pages.(Flakie 08:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC))

Chevin
I noticed Chevin's an FGA now, although the only issue mentioned on its discussion page was the sourcing, and I think that's fixed. I suspect the AC had other issues with it, though. If you could make a note on Talk: Chevin stating what they are, I'd like to fix them...someday...and renominate. Thanks, &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:11, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks! &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 23:15, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Ahsoka's Delta-7B
Pic 1, Pic 2

Are pic1 and pic2 both Ashoka's starfighter? The ships themselves, as well as the droids, look super similar. I'd bet anything that they're the same thing, but I dont know if I could use the pic on other pages without having it confirmed. Dr.Kermit ( The Doctor is in ) 03:25, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I have no way of confirming whether or not the two are the same. I wouldn't assume they're both the same without some sort of official confirmation. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:56, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, thats what I figured. Thank you for your time. Sorry if it was any trouble. Dr.Kermit ( The Doctor is in ) 04:08, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. Glad to help. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:18, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I can't make out the name of her R2 droid in pic 1. What does that say?JustinGann 20:30, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

A quick favor
Hi, sorry for the bother, but you were the only admin who I saw was currently active. Could you delete Nankling or merge it with Nank fly? I didn't realize they were the same until I created the former. Thanks. --ToRsO bOy 06:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Viper probots in the Fact Files
Hey, Toprawa&mdash;I did some checking for some dates on the commissioning on the droids and all I got was "following the Battle of Yavin". However, there were similar droids in the same Probot series manufactured by Arakyd before this time. Information is from issue 6; did you want a scan of it? - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 08:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * There is a VERY similar looking droid in the Republic comics c. 27 BBYJustinGann 07:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Page move
Could you move Star Wars: The Essential Atlas back to The Essential Atlas? All the other Essential Guides start with The Essential Guide ... or The New Essential Guide ... and don't have the "Star Wars" at the beginning, so it seems logical to have The Essential Atlas article follow suit. I'd do it myself, but as the move happened back in January, it was too long ago to allow for a revert now. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 02:21, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Redirects
I really don't think it is wrong to have a page named R2 redirecting to R2-series astromech droid. Just check the number of articles linking to it. Tomorrow it will be at the top of Wanted Pages list because of those redlinks. Most of the redirects you just purged are crappy indeed, but if you want to delete this one, let's at least update the links to it. Mauser 17:26, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * It's not my fault other people have foolishly created redlinks to one specific R2 unit or model. "R2" could easily apply to dozens of different R2 units and models in canon. If anything, R2 should be a disambig page. Feel free to create it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Your input/opinion
I'd like your opinion on something. A user keeps adding a presumed "Battle of Hoth (Clone Wars)" and Hoth as possible appearances in the Departure webcomic based solely on the letters HOT appearing in aurebesh on the first page of the comic, where the letter following the T is not visible at all. Based on our policies, is that basis enough to speculate and put them in the Appearances for the article? -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 01:58, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not seeing the Aurebesh letters in the comic. Where are they at exactly? I would have to say that "HOT" does not equal "HOTH," as much as someone might like it to. It could be any other location that belongs with those three letters. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:37, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Question
Why'd ya erase my message on Borvo's Freighter talk page? I was trying to answer the question there.
 * Your question has been answered before you even posted this message. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)