Talk:Second Imperial Civil War

Shouldn't we make an article called Fel's capture of Bastion or Retake of Bastion??? Themelle444 18:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Not really a battle, though. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.png|20px]] 20:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, we can have non-battle events. I dunno, I guess it was a pretty momentous shift in the war. -LtNOWIS 01:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * True, but it just seems like the article would be a sentence, a picture, an appearance, and maybe a category and stub template. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Implogo.png|20px]] 11:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Name

 * I suggest we rename this the Second Imperial Civil War until we can get a name confirmation. Fits it more, it was a civil war.
 * Read the "Behind the scenes" section. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 14:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh.
 * Besides, "Second Imperial Civil War" would be even more conjecture. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 20:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Daluuj and additional name discussion
I was skiming over this article, and noticed that the skirmish on Daluuj is considered a part of the Fel insurgency. Shouldn't it be removed? Afterall, it only involved Jedi, who have no interest in working with Fel. Both the Jedi and GA's actions against the Sith would be entirely seperate of the Fel Insurgency. While I understand the rationale for the name (and it fits perfect with Fel's actions), the other factions fighting the Sith would not say they are part of the Emperor's fight. Thoughts? AdmiralNick22 22:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)