Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Metrisse

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:14, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Composed the Études of Time and Space

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:58, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:57, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * Is there a reason for linking 19 BBY but nothing else in ref [1]? Every linkable thing in that ref is linked somewhere else in the article, including 19 BBY. I know that there are no established rules for linking in ref notes, but it seems a bit odd to pick and choose links rather than going for all or nothing. Menkooroo (talk) 17:47, July 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * Not sure why I did that, removed link.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  19:25, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Battle of Metalorn (Imperial Period)

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:49, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another for Warfare

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Seems a little run-onish, but maybe that's just me. Good job. Cade   Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 23:25, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *If so, I should probaly split up Siege of Sy Myrth, as its even more run-onish :) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:28, June 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 19:40, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:48, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Rubedo
 * 2) * "It was part of the Sy Myrthian Insurrection, when Imperial forces attempted to drive the remnants of the Condeferate army out of the regions of Sy Myrth and the Kreetan Narrows after the Confederate's defeat during the Clone Wars at the hands of the Galactic Republic, which had become the Empire after the Clone Wars." This is a run-on in the grammatically incorrect sense, an appositive within an appositive. You do have to reword it.
 * 3) **Done. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:37, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) * Sy Myrth is a planet, not a region like the Narrows, so the context there doesn't work. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:40, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:37, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ***This way, the Narrows now have no context.
 * 7) ****Fixed.
 * 8) * You mention this was after the Battle of Diado in this article, but not in the Diado article. Furthermore, in the Metalorn battle article, you don't mention that was followed by the Siege of Sy Myrth. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:01, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 9) **Remedied in both.
 * 10) * "It was part of the Sy Myrthian Insurrection, when Imperial forces attempted to drive the remnants of the Condeferate army out of the regions of Sy Myrth and the Kreetan Narrows after the Confederate's defeat during the Clone Wars at the hands of the Galactic Republic, which had become the Empire after the Clone Wars." While we're talking about the Battle of Diado: grammatically incorrect run-on. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:01, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 11) **Fixed.

Comments
 * Just a tip, since I write articles like this frequenntly, you're too married to these phrase positions. I don't like the rewording rule, myself, but so long as it's going to be enforced with votes... Diado, Metalorn, and Sy Myrth are virtually identically constructed. You introduce the battle as between the Empire (Formerly the Republic!) and CIS holdouts, then explain the Sy Myrth Insurrection using virtually the same nested appositive, then say the 12 was involved. Try shifting around the order of those basic pieces at least. How about introducing the battle, then have the next sentence bring in the 12th and Dodonna? This allows for a lead-in, probably within that same sentence, for the Empire that triumphed against the CIS in the Clone Wars as the Republic. Holdouts were at Metalorn, hence the battle was fought. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:01, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * I've reworded Metalorn. I'll have to do that a bit to Siege as well. Thanks for the review. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:03, June 25, 2012 (UTC)

Founder's Day

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:39, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Happy Birthday, Wookieepedia! :D

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:46, June 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:55, June 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ' ℬiggestℒeo ' (ℳeeting ℛoom) 19:43, July 2, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * WP:ENT! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:04, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Jumerian

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 00:23, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More than likely a pseudo-mistake we made that became canon. Didn't know they were a species until the CSWE had a one sentence article on them that matched ours from 2006 verbatim but for some procedural tweaks. Fun facts.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:07, June 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) What would a lamp sing about?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:58, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) An article for the singing lamp would be nice.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:39, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *That's what I get for nomming something the day I wrote it. Missing stuff. :\ The article already existed, actually. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:40, June 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Great to see another guest nomination from you, Naru! A couple of points: the quote makes clear that the lamp was a wedding gift. Can you add this to the article? Is there any context that can be added from the Essential Atlas' placement of their homeworld or NR membership? Cheers, --Eyrezer (talk) 22:04, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *Added the wedding part ("I left that out?!"). By context from their system's placement, do you mean stating who controlled their native system? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 12:07, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **I saw that on a status article, so I just went with "yes." NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:10, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) I'd ditch the line about Humans being dominant in the Core, since it seems a bit superfluous. Otherwise, looks great. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 14:53, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) *I was basing that off the map that had the Sharu civilization on it. The inset shows a small Human area of influence that included the area around Alderaan, curved downward, which would include Jumeria. Even if it was a distinction of about fifty years, I'd say that's relevant since it was not yet the Republic. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:10, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Guest for WP:AS! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:07, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Four Dimensions

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 15:46, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "LEEEEEET THE REBELS. LEEEEEET THE REBELS IN. Let me tell you one thing! (LEEEET THE REBELS) I want you to siiiing along with the "Four Dimensions"! Hey! And open up your heart! AWWWWW! Come on! (REBEEELS!) And let in Rebels. Ev-e-ry Day~! LEEEEEEET THE REBELS. LEEEEEEEEEEET THE REBELS IN. THE REEEEBELS IIIN.~

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:54, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  01:11, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) You should probably mention the information that it was released by the time of the Rebellion era in the body of the article. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  12:43, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Taken care of. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:54, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * WP:ENT! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:04, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Bureaucracy Blues

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:32, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A beton-nya mombay m'bwa! Mombay n'bwa~a~aaaa! Bureaucra-cyyy~ B-lues! Togo~ togu! Ya e'um pu-kay~. Mob un~ loo? Hkeek n&mdash;kull-a~uh Pe-rupa! Shooto~ga~wa~. Ashuna ha'mfoo, Gomjam Hun~ee~ya. Go-omjam m&mdash;m'bwa. Ike~e Uti~ni~.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 16:55, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  01:12, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Same objection as the one with "Four Dimensions" above. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  12:44, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Fixed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:54, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * WP:ENT! NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:03, June 30, 2012 (UTC)

Battle of the Gizer system

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:22, June 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In which a duck is dissected.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Looks good. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:41, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  12:40, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

BTL-S3B Y-wing starfighter

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:45, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Found this in Warfare, decided to nom

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Did a few minor fixes. Good work. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 14:33, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  12:38, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Annexation of the northern Hutt territories

 * Nominated by: 501st  dogma ( talk ) 14:52, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Trasemene got too long for CAN, so Annexation beat him to being nommed

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:17, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  12:36, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * I see the map and why you thought to capitalize "northern," but that is not a proper noun. It was merely the start of the sentence. There is no political area called the "Northern Hutt territories." The Imperials claimed Hutt territories that were in the north. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 07:05, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, moving the page to Annexation of the northern Hutt territories. There, done. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:23, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Judging from the map arrow pointing to it, I would be inclined to say that the annexation was considered part of the Insurrection, so the "post" in the infobox would be unnecesary. However, if the prose says the annexation was "after" the insurrection then that line shoukd be removed from the infobox entirely. It was either part of the conflict or it was not. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 06:15, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Trasemene ended the Insurrection, but the annexation was a direct result of the Insurrection. Would'nt it be okay to leave the "Post-Insurrection" part because it was an important factor? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:57, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, because it was not part of the insurrection itself. It was a big chunk of the aftermath, as in after the conflict had already concluded. That infobox field shoulld not have "pre" or "post" anything. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:51, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Got rid of Post, added Reconquest of the Rim as that was the general conflict. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 18:59, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * That works. Now the Reconquest of the Rim needs to be explicitly mentioned since that name is canonical. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 20:33, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Better? 501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:38, July 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * It was going to be a quick fix, so I did it myself. I ended up changing the article's structuring more thanI wanted too in the process though, how things are introduced. The issue was that both the Insurrection and the annexation were part of the Reconquest. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 11:17, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for changing it. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:21, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Lightsaber Techniques Painting

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 01:20, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another rescue....

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) I changed "seven" to "eight" in the body as there's actualy eight forms on the poster. Otherwise, looks fine.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 12:19, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Hah, guess I should pay more attention. Perhaps I should note in the BTS that the cards description says there are seven? Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 12:33, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **That would be good. 501st  dogma ( talk ) 13:10, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Love it.&mdash;  21:28, July 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) I think it would be a good idea to mention each of the lightsaber forms by name. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  12:26, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *If you can suggest a good source for all their names, I will do so. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 14:42, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) **The Essential Guide to Warfare, pages 19, 21. There's a picture on 20. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:27, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Done. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 19:39, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) You should probably mention what the Aurebesh text on the top and side says, but I can't seem to translate it into anything that makes complete sense.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  01:24, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Serrian salt

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  04:26, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Dex's Diner!

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) But is it kosher? XD&hellip;&mdash;  06:00, July 4, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 11:02, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Exar Kun fresco

 * Nominated by: Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 15:16, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Returning to an old one.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 15:34, July 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 16:47, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *Seems to me that an article should be created for the Jedi.
 * 3) *Isn't Yavin 4 a moon not a planet?
 * 4) *It might be a good idea to mention when Kun lived.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  01:27, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Would just like to note that I did not use italics because, while the name is not conjectural (its the name used in the game), it does not appear to be the painting's proper title. Gal-icon.jpg  OLIOSTER  (talk) 15:16, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Racsan break

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 21:12, July 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I like it when I actualy find my old projects.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  01:29, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments