Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
 * 15) &hellip;if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place your signature in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the  template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article can also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are four EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Ribba

 * Nominated by: Demos Traxen (talk) 05:36, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Hutt, Hutt, Hutt.

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:23, December 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Supreme Emperor (talk) 14:03, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  04:33, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * Could we get articles for the employee and the bar that he dies in please? Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:53, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **I'm absolutely willing to make the employee article, I don't want to clutter the wiki; the bar is mentioned in a single sentence without a name. Should I still make that one as well?
 * 4) *** Yup, although it may seem obscure there's no need to worry about cluttering the wiki, we have plenty of room! :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:05, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****Done and done.
 * 6) * With articles this short you can add __ NOTOC __ (without the spaces around NOTOC) above the infobox and it will remove the contents sections. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:53, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Done. Thanks for the tip.
 * 8) * You link to a redirect of Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game in the behind the scenes, could you change it? Also a tip, if you go to the my preferences page and go to gadgets, you can set your account to highlight redirects in yellow. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:53, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) **Done, thanks for catching that.
 * 10) * Could you mention in the bts the date that the sourcebooks were published, and mention the New Essential Guide. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:53, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) **Done as well.--Demos Traxen (talk) 18:37, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) *** Ah, I think you might of got sources and references mixed up. I'm assuming Ribba isn't actually mentioned in the New Essential guide and you've added it as a source for their gender. On the Wiki the Sources list contains all non-story mentions of the subject of the article, these include books like the New Essential guides or the Essential Atlas. If you use information from a book but the subject of the article doesn't appear in that book then it should only be included in the references not the sources. Don't worry it's a very easy mistake to make, all you need to do is remove the sources section of the article and the mention in the bts. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:05, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) ****Fixed!--Demos Traxen (talk) 03:46, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) * Sorry just remembered can you use the WEG template for the appearance. You can see an example of its use here in the appearances section. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:44, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 15) **Done, and thanks for the link.--Demos Traxen (talk) 05:41, December 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * SE
 * 1) * Can we get an article for the firefight in the bar?
 * 2) **Honestly, that seems a bit superfluous... But I'll do it if it's needed.
 * 3) ***Done. Demos Traxen (talk) 05:03, December 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Can you expand on the "supposedly legitimate textile business" at all?
 * 5) **I wish I could, but there's no other information.
 * 6) * In the behind the scenes, can you change "Ribba made their single" to "Ribba made its single" or some variation? As is, their makes Ribba sound plural. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:54, December 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Though it does sound goofy, "their" is the proper grammatical term for a subject with an unknown gender; its would be for a non-gendered sentient like a droid, or an object.--Demos Traxen (talk) 19:12, December 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) Exiled Jedi
 * 9) * While "their" is commonly used for subjects with unknown gender, it is not the proper word to use. Please change it.
 * 10) **Done.
 * 11) * Could you combine the first two sentences with the larger paragraph below. It looks choppy the way it is.
 * 12) **Done.
 * 13) * You need to more clearly establish the time Ribba lived in the body. Mentioning the Imperial Period does not narrow it down to the same time as the eras tag.
 * 14) **Hope the rewrite works.
 * 15) ***You still need to establish that the events take place in the Rebellion era. The easiest way to do this is mention that the events occurred "sometime after the Battle of Yavin."-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  01:00, December 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 16) ****Should be all set.
 * 17) * Please reload your infobox.
 * 18) **Done? If not, please let me know how I can do this.
 * 19) ***Reloading the infobox, means putting in a new infobox using the standard preloads list and then adding the information from the old infobox to it.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  01:00, December 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 20) ****Done, I believe. Demos Traxen (talk) 08:08, December 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 21) * "Ribba owned a supposedly legitimate textile business." I would reword this to say that people thought it was legitimate if the book used supposedly. Otherwise, it is speculation and should not be in the article.
 * 22) **Fixed.
 * 23) * Was Ribba on Celanon? If so, you should mention it. Otherwise, make it clearer how the Hutt found out about the death of the embezzler.
 * 24) **He was not. The book doesn't say how he learned of it, and I don't want to speculate.
 * 25) * The BTS says that Ribba appeared, but the appearances section just has a mentioned tag.
 * 26) **Fixed.
 * 27) * There are different articles for the No Disintegrations book. Please mention and link to the part of the book Ribba appeared in. You should also change the appearances template to show the adventure.
 * 28) **Done.
 * 29) * Are the bounty hunters player characters? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)
 * 30) **They are indeed. Fixed, I think. Demos Traxen (talk) 06:02, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Capture of Obri

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:30, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Dawn of the Jedi

(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:35, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:55, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Not that a gas giant would do much good. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 17:12, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  05:42, December 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * Could you mentioned the settled worlds in the body. This applies to the nom below as well. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:55, November 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  21:32, November 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * SE
 * 1) *"During the Infinite Empire of the Rakata species invaded the" Can you reword this? As is, it doesn't make sense. Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:01, December 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) **Done. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  03:22, December 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Veamon

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:33, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More Dark Forces II mp stuff.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:32, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:55, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) * You don't need to say he's a scout twice.
 * 2) **I think it's needed in context as too his arsenal (per MotS), but the way it was worded wasn't good. I changed it up now, though if you still think it should be removed then I'll remove the second mention.
 * 3) * Given that he's the only current member, there doesn't need to be a category for his species. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:33, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **Alright. Removed the category then. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:49, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) No mention of gender at all??? Is he male, or is it unconfirmed? Either way, you need to add an appropriate category.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:43, December 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *Never seen such a use of question marks from you before. He uses the game's more male body, however, seeing that he appears to be some new alien species, I didn't want to jump to any gender conclusions, because we wouldn't know what a female version of Veamon would look like. As multiplayer profiles, they have basically zero bio minus what the MotS Personalities provides us. Also, I didn't know there was a category for unknown genders. Consider it fixed! --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 15:15, December 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * SE
 * 1) *" Veamon was a scout and a member of a blue-skinned humanoid species that had gray eyes, active during the reign of the New Republic." Can you reword this a bit so he info about the species and eyes come before the scout part?
 * 2) **How is that?
 * 3) * Can you specify that the pauldron was on his right shoulder? Supreme Emperor (talk) 16:33, December 6, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) **Okay --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 15:51, December 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) *Can anything be said about his pants? Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:18, December 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **I believe that goes under "darkly colored clothing". His jacket received special attention due to the red shape.--Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:30, December 14, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Krugon

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 02:33, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: More Dark Forces II mp stuff.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:40, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:56, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Ayrehead
 * 2) * I'm not sure you can assume he is a cyborg because of his neck guard. Although there does appear to be something on his nose as well. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:34, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Ah, neck guard. Sounds much better than cybernetics, though with how intricate it is we may never know. I removed the mention of it for the neck guard, but I dunno.  The nose attachment could be augmented, or maybe it's just style or some sort of detachable equipment. Hm, I don't know.  It should be mentioned, but I don't know about it being cyber or not in any way.  --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:51, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***To be honest I'm not really sure what to make of the nose thing myself. I'll support the article for now as I'm happy with it, but I imagine other users may come up with better ideas as to how to handle it. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:40, December 2, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) One thing: "..and he wore a neck-guard. He wore gray..." Kill a wore please.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:45, December 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *Kay. Also added eyebrow color. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 15:26, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * SE
 * 1) *I'm unsure what to make of the nose thing. To me, it could be a tattoo, a mark of some sort, or any number of other things. Any way you could reword this line? Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:44, December 13, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) **Well, how's that? As I said in the line comment, that's pretty much as descriptive one can get. It's a thing. I listed its color though. Well, maybe it can be described better, but I can't come up with anything better. Maybe, "Krugon had an H shaped silver-blue shape on the beidge of his nose"? --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 22:33, December 14, 2013 (UTC)

Uro Koo

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:50, December 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Wanted a quick project as a break from Dark times, Tyrant's Fist seems do-able

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:46, December 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Demos Traxen (talk) 04:23, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Fridge horror: Wasn't that a living forest?  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 20:24, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Supreme Emperor (talk) 05:51, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Trivak Ninegun

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:00, December 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Nothing in the comic actually says they're a Jedi sadly (also enjoy the infobox dogma....)

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:57, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Demos Traxen (talk) 05:05, December 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) A Jedi character infobox? Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 17:09, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) *Woops a relic from before the write up. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:12, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) DOGMA HATES THAT INFOBOX
 * 2) * How about a link for the insurgency? Its not mentioned anywhere in the body.
 * 3) **Hmm thought I'd mentioned it somewhere previously in the body. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:15, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * Also, the Appearances has a 1st appearance in it, while the BtS says he was only mentioned in the comic. ;) 501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:49, December 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) **Whoops, forgot the m. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:15, December 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Traxen
 * 7) * Just a couple quick notes: the first line should read "an" insurgency.
 * 8) **Whoops fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:30, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 9) * You can link children to youngling.
 * 10) **Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:30, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 11) * I'm not sure about the British spelling&mdash;do we have a policy on that? --Demos Traxen (talk) 07:28, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 12) **Yes there is a policy and it's that we use American English :P However as a Brit I sometimes miss some spellings, no thanks to my British spell checker. What did I get wrong? Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:30, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 13) *** "Recolonisation" (with an S instead of a Z) in the quote and the first sentence. I thought that might be the case, but I didn't want to presume. Demos Traxen (talk) 18:45, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 14) ****Fixed. Thanks for the heads up. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:07, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Rugar

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:23, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Dark Forces II multiplayer character extravaganza continues in the CAnoms page.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:36, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 22:00, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) * Can you mention that he has almost the exact same face as Admiral, One-Eye, and Santiago? This probably should of also been on the One-eye page to be honest. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:34, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) **Well, if we wanna get technical, only Santiago and Admiral carry the exact same head. They all use the same face as a base, but they all have differences (Minus the two I mentioned). As such, I'd think only Sant and Admiral should have it noted about similar facial models, something already described in Santiago.  Same base, but different faces. Note Rugar's cheek scar compared to the eye scars. Unless you meant that the base alone should be mentioned. --Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:40, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Fair enough I hadn't noticed all the little scars. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:36, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Santiago

 * Nominated by: Clonehunter(Report your W.M.D.) 18:37, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Rugar's ugly twin.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 23:03, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * This reminds me. I must find a picture of Jeremay Sann'tiago and write him up simply because he has that name. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:16, December 5, 2013 (UTC)

Deep Ocean

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:16, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project DOTJ

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:40, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:39, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Aurum

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:16, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project DOTJ

(3 ECs/0 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:39, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 17:10, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:40, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ice Giant Range

 * Nominated by: Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  19:16, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project DOTJ

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:39, December 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:42, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Coil-Cell Needler

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:45, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Is taking on the weapons of TOR more insane then Cade attempting the Hero? Probably not but we'll see.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:44, December 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 00:03, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

C-210 Elite Watchman Saboteur

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:09, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Most quest weapons might end up pretty similar to this one.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:46, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Xuvva Hunter's Sport Rifle

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:22, December 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now for an Agent weapon

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:47, December 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  02:01, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Is it Xuvva Hunter's Sport Rifle or Xuvva Hunter's Sports Rifle? You have it both ways in the article.
 * 3) **Whoops it's just sport. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:54, December 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) * The credit symbol comes before the number, please correct that in your current articles.
 * 5) **Fixed in all relevant noms. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:54, December 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) * More of a question: Do you think that having sport rifle in the title is enough to say that it was a sporting blaster rifle? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  00:53, December 12, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) **Yeah I'd say so, added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:54, December 12, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Longspur STAP

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:21, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: An to vary it a bit more, a vehicle.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 20:04, December 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:48, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) A Force user
 * 2) * If it is unarmed, I would just make a note of it in the body. Or not, maybe. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 20:02, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:14, December 9, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Larbec

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:11, December 9, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: An a vendor! Diversity is truly the spice of life.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:14, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ivers

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:54, December 10, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: And another Vendor. Diversity is overrated.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:17, December 13, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Master of the universe
 * 2) *A couple things:
 * 3) *Source list?
 * 4) **Whoops thought I copied that across, added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:14, December 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) *And please fix the grammatical error in the last BTS sentence. Corellian Premier Jedi symbol.svg Force will be with you always 22:55, December 14, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) **Fixed I think. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:14, December 15, 2013 (UTC)

Comments

Glomkettle Hierogryph

 * Nominated by:  IFYLOFD  ( Enter the Floydome ) 04:37, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Glomkettle! GLOOOOOOOOOMKETTLE

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Just a few missing links...-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  04:42, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 04:43, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Supreme Emperor (talk) 04:55, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:54, December 16, 2013 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Portani

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:05, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now that Cade has made all the redlinks we need to fill em in.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Kelen

 * Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:05, December 16, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: You'll all get to see his products soon.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments