Wookieepedia:Good article nominations



This page is for the nomination of Good articles. For a list of Good articles, see Category:Wookieepedia good articles.

What is a Good article?
A Good article is an article that adheres to quality standards, but cannot reach FA status due to its limited content.

A Good article has the following attributes.

1. It is well written. In this respect:


 * (a) it has compelling prose, and is readily comprehensible to non-specialist readers;
 * (b) it follows a logical structure, introducing the topic and then grouping together its coverage of related aspects; where appropriate, it contains a succinct lead section summarizing the topic, and the remaining text is organized into a system of hierarchical sections (particularly for longer articles);
 * (c) it follows the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies;
 * (d) necessary technical terms or jargon are briefly explained in the article itself, or an active link is provided.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect:


 * (a) it provides references to any and all sources used for its material;
 * (b) sources should be selected in accordance with the guidelines for reliable sources;
 * (c) it contains no elements of original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage, addressing all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FA, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed);.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. In this respect:


 * (a) viewpoints are represented fairly and without bias;
 * (b) all significant points of view are fairly presented, but not asserted, particularly where there are or have been conflicting views on the topic.

5. It is stable, i.e., it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic. In this respect:


 * (a) the images are properly sourced and have succinct and descriptive captions;
 * (b) a lack of images does not in itself prevent an article from achieving Good Article status.

Nomination of Good articles
To nominate an article for Good article status, list it here. If it has more than five votes after a week, the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the template. The talk page will also be tagged with the GA template. For complete instructions see here.

Jedi Order (+2)
Support
 * 1) Jediknight19bby 20:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) AdmirableAckbar 21:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC) (temporarily (see below))
 * 3) Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 11:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) School of Thrawn 101 08:34, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  &pi; = 3  [[Image:Oldsith.png|40px]] (Talk to me, babe.) 01:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Coments
 * 1) It has no references (requirement 2a). --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 20:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) For now.  See my comments below.  Greyman ( Paratus ) 19:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) The main body of the article still needs to be sourced per guidelines. The list of appearances needs to be completed, as well as the sources. It also has many people missing from the notable members bit in the infobox, ie anybody before the Clone Wars&mdash;it is as if TOTJ and KOTOR never happened.  Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:20, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Per Greyman. The Revan and Malak business (KOTOR) is not referenced at all. And the line "Treachery is the way of the Sith" that appears somewhere in the Jedi vs. Sith, Darth Bane time frame needs to be deleted. It isn't all that professional. If I get the chance, I'll read it over completely. Overall though, the referencing is most definitely substandard.  Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 00:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What do they mean by 'references'?Jediknight19bby 22:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay. I learned to do references, and I did a couple. I might be working on it later. Any other help is appreciated. Jediknight19bby 17:29, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that there is a nice oppurtunity here to make this a good article by expanding the Timeline of major events in Jedi history. Specifically, expanding each event that is listed there into its own sub-section, which would essentially explain the Jedi's role in those respective conflicts and events.  Also, I believe that the different branchs of the Order should be examined in the article as well, ex. The Agricultural Corps.   Greyman ( Paratus ) 19:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay. I did it, except for the sub-section part. If you have time on your hands to complain, then you do to work on the page. Jediknight19bby 21:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Greyman wasn't complaining. he's trying to help you make the article better. AdmirableAckbar 21:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks AdmirableAckbar, you're right&mdash;I wasn't complaining. Jediknight19bby, firstly you had some questions about how to reference, and I pointed you (on your talk page) in the right direction, so that way you could take a look over it and see why Wookieepedia wants us to source articles.  From the looks of it, you managed to look at the Sourcing article and put it to good use, nice job!  Secondly, above I gave you some points about the article from which you can expand upon, it's completely up to you if you want to pay attention to them or not.  However, since you're the one who nominated this article, be prepared to do some work&mdash;that's what nominating GA's and FA's is all about.  Anytime you nominate or post anything on this wiki, be prepared for constructive critisim.  Anyways, I look forward to see the direction that you take this article.  Cheers,  Greyman ( Paratus ) 22:04, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that. Jediknight19bby 23:27, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to point out that you shouldn't nominate articles that are a work in progress. Both GA and FA are places for articles that are virtually finished products. This article should be longer than the New Jedi Order article when it is done, and at the moment it is not even close. --Eyrezer 03:51, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I find the GA/FA nom process to be an entirely useful method for pushing a slightly good article into good or great territory. --School of Thrawn 101 10:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * yeah, when I nominated Ephant Mon for FA it was an OK article, but after countless suggestions and tips, it's looking really good at the moment. AdmirableAckbar 10:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * All pics are sourced. There's sufficient reference material. The timeline subsections, AgriCorps and Medical Corps section is completed. Anything else you guys want me to do, because I've run out of things to check. Use your imagination, and it can be a good article soon.
 * The Timeline subsections still need some expansion, try to explain what happened during those periods. The Old Sith Wars are described as a series of problems, it was a war, it was actually multiple wars, name a few notable battles, Jedi, Sith. And I'd like to read a bit more about the Clone wars and the fact that many Jedi died during the war and that most Jedi were hunted down and killed by the Empire and Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker. I'd help you if I had time, but unfortunately I don't. I'll see what I can do about it later today or tomorrow. If you need help improving this article, just ask. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 09:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Even though I've struck my obj, I agree with Eyrezer and what he said above&mdash;that this article should be longer than the New Jedi Order article when it is done. Greyman ( Paratus ) 00:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't see why it would be. There are infinitely more resources for information on the New Jedi Order than for the Old Order.  Personally, I'm about ready to support this nomination.  I'll be checking over it within the next couple of days before I cast my vote, but I think it's a well-written article that fulfills all of the GA requirements.  Obviously, as more information for the Old Order becomes published, especially information in the KOTOR era, this article will get longer --School of Thrawn 101 05:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This is supposed to have 5 votes for a week per nominations instructions above. That's to give people time to vote against or for it. -Fnlayson 18:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * i've temporarily struck my vote. The reason for this is the sourcing (or lack thereof). The referencing is far too sparse and limited. An article of this size should have far more than 14 notes. As soon as it is properly sourced, I will unstrike my vote. I'll see what I can do, but don't count on me for too much help. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 18:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Not part of the objection, but close behind it, I think that the "Origins and brief history of the Order" should be changed to the "History of the Order" and then merged with the "Timeline of major events in Jedi history". Either way, it needs to be properly sourced. Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:36, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not entirely sure this should have been put back here since the rule is to have five or more votes after having been nominated for at least a week, which this has. However, since it now has an objection again, I'm going to remove its GA status until this is fixed. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It only received that 5th vote earlier today. That's why I brought it back.  I understand the rule as to have 5 or more votes for a week. -Fnlayson 18:48, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Nope. It's the same as FA, it has to have been nominated for at least a week and got five or more votes. There's nothing wrong with the vote closing as soon as it gets the fifth vote if a week has past since the first. Although, I would request that people don't close the votes unless they follow the instructions properly and archive the vote. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That's fine but the wording above says nothing about after nomination. I asked about that on the talk page a while back and that's how it was explained.  Edit the note above to what it should be then.. -Fnlayson 20:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Either way, the new complaints are valid, for the most part. It won't take too much effort to notate more of the body text, and the listing of members shouldn't be incredibly difficult, either, considering the convenient category for them.  The formatting, on the other hand, that Greyman mentioned...that's another beastie altogether. --School of Thrawn 101 09:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I've sourced as much as I could, including the Kotor sections. Some sections I have very little knowledge of so I left them alone. I also expanded the appearances, removed the "treachery is the way of the Sith" line and fixe a couple of spelling errors. Oh, and I added some kotor & TOTJ Jedi into the notable members section of the infobox, removing Shaak-Ti and Qui-Gon Jinn as I felt they weren't notable enough. The article still needs some attention, but I think I've improved it a fair bit, particularly the referencing. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 23:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for the help. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 17:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Fondor (+0 )
Support
 * 1)  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 14:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) user:DarthJawa

Oppose Comments
 * 1) It needs references (requirement 2a). --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 08:46, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Jedimca. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 05:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It looks good, but it needs references (requirement 2a). --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 19:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I got it partly referenced. Still needs quite a bit of filling-in-the-blanks, though. jSarek 11:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Wade Vox (0)
Support
 * 1) Nominated, Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]] 02:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Needs to be properly sourced.--Goodwood 02:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Komari Vosa(-1)
Support
 * 1) OOM-10 18:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) No sources. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 19:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Hobbes, but this article needs some dedicated user attention before it's ready for anything. For some tips on what needs done, check out the following page for suggestions from the Inq's → Inq/Komari Vosa. Cheers, Greyman ( Paratus ) 14:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Rozatta (+ 2)
Support
 * 1) OOM-10 18:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 18:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) No sources.  Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 19:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) source in intro[[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 18:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

It now has one source. That's all it needs. Your vote is now invalid.  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 18:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * never strike my vote again. you do not have the power to strike two perfectly valid votes. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 18:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I removed reference from intro and sourced it. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 19:02, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Only the user who made the vote can strike it, JK19BBY. You would do well to remember that. PS: Acky, hope you don't mind if I unstruck it...--Goodwood 00:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * not at all Goodwood. I've re-struck it, seeing as though it's been taken care of. Also, i removed the reference in the main body as it is unnecessary for a single source nom. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 14:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Gardulla the Elder (+1)
Support
 * 1) OOM-10 18:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 18:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) NO SOURCES!  Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 14:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) per Hobbes15 [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 18:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

It now has one source.  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 18:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * one ain't enough [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 18:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Jediknight19bby, what I mean is it isn't completely sourced. When it is, feel free to let me know and I'll look it over, than strike my objection if it's been remedied. Hobbes15 ( Tiger Headquarters ) 22:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Starfighter combat (+11)
Support
 * 1) Nominated.-Goodwood 00:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 01:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Nice. Joker1138 ( Mandalore ) [[Image:MandalorianSymbol.jpg|25px]] 02:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Greyman ( Paratus ) 01:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) --Eyrezer 09:56, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) good job Goodwood [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 10:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Chack Jadson 11:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Nice, long and with references...just the way I like it. Unit 8311 12:26, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Please put links to references on the list. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 22:06, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) —Xwing328 (Talk) 00:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Ozzel 05:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) It's good, but see comments. It could be featured. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 08:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Darth Whatever 00:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC) (has been given several days to provide a reason, and has not done so)
 * 2) *could you be more specific? [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 08:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Yes, please list a reason.--Goodwood 18:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Formatting (capitalization), needs fully referenced, needs mention of Loran Spitball, for starters. Also needs to be adjusted to reflect the move it had from "dogfight". Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 18:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * With Greyman's help, this article is as comprehensive as I am capable of making it. Hopefully the community can help it to eventually get to FA status where it belongs.--Goodwood 00:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Is there anything to add between the Galactic Civil War and the Yuuzhan Vong War? —Xwing328 (Talk) 00:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Also, I note a lack of information concerning the KotOR period... if it were fleshed out nicely, I would definitely consider an FA nom. Excellent work indeed. Jorrel [[Image:Wiki-shrinkable.png|20px]] Fraajic 08:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know it could be an FA nom. The problem is that I don't have access to the sources that could flesh the article out in the era you specify - there also needs to be info put in about Legacy-era dogfights but again I don't have the necessary info. This is a good set of first steps, though, what we have now.--Goodwood 18:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The Loran Spitball is using starfighters as extra torpedo/missile launchers against capital ships. It does not apply to starfighter combat, i.e. dogfighting. -Fnlayson 19:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I still say it's a tactic used by starfighters, but I'll strike. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 19:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It does use starfighters, sure. The main/thesis statement of the article is "Starfighter combat refers to engagements fought between starfighters.".  I take that as starfighters against starfighters, but some leeway can apply.  A mention of the Loran Spitball somewhere is fine as long as it is not required for completeness. -Fnlayson 19:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I added a sentence on that in the Special tactics section. It fit in there without much trouble. -Fnlayson 18:38, 21 July 2007 (UTC)


 * There's a lot of stuff covering starfighter combat in the Rebel Alliance Sourcebook, such as the Five Stages of Starfighter Combat, and several manoeuvres (such as the Reverse Throttle Hop) that isn't in the article. just wondering if its worth putting in? - Cavalier One 08:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What a silly question! Of course it's worth it, my friend! --School of Thrawn 101 10:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * There's a lot of info there, as I recall. I just didn't want to put it in and mess up the article.  I've not worked on pages going through the Good Article process, and don't want to tread on any toes. - Cavalier One 15:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Tessek (+3)
Support
 * 1) [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 11:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) A bit short, but still worth it. Unit 8311 19:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 22:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * is fully sourced and lengthened. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 11:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Cin Drallig (-1)
Support
 * 1) Darth Whatever 15:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) From a quick look, it does not meet Rule 2(a). Greyman ( Paratus ) 15:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) to be honest I've only skimmed through the article, but per Greyman, it has no references. This should answer any questions on referencing for you. Intro needs expansion an it needs a personality and traits section [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 21:37, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Per Greyman and Ack. Source it fully, expand, and I'll support. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 22:47, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Tolga (+3)
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 22:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Greyman ( Paratus ) 01:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * 1) Redlinks, P&Ts section needed. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 22:54, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *There is no requirement for P&T or no redlinks in the GA criteria. --Eyrezer 01:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Per Eyrezer. Greyman ( Paratus ) 01:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Gossam (+3)
Support Oppose
 * 1) [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 23:34, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Could you source the lifespan thing in the beggining? [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 17:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) *we're not meant to reference intros, so I'll stick it into the article somewhere. The source is Ultimate Alien Anthology. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 17:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I've sifted through it and altered the grammar and the flow slightly. IMO, it reads a bit better, now.  Good work on this, Ackbar. --School of Thrawn 101 05:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * There does not seem to be a relevant quote for this article. The only Gossam with a speaking role in the saga is Shu Mai, and none of her quotes are related to the Gossam. If anyone comes across a good lea quote, then please add it. Thanks, [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 23:57, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Bimm (+5)
Support
 * 1)  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 21:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 17:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 00:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Green Tentacle (Talk) 10:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Reference in intro. [[Image:The Death of Ki-Adi-Mundi.jpg|40px]]  Jediknight19bby  ( Jedi High Council Chambers! ) 21:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 21:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Geonosian (-1)
Support


 * 1) Darth Whatever 21:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * 1) It needs more references (requirement 2a). --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 21:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) same. Should be fully sourced with info from NEGAS, UAA and any other sources. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 21:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

what did i say about sourcebooks,AdmirableAckbar? Darth Whatever
 * it doesn't matter, you don't get a pardon on one of te requirements because you don't have any sourcebooks. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 21:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Any article that is placed here for GA review is required to meet all the above criteria before it is nominated. Users not having access to sourcebooks is not an excuse, you can always download them, borrow them, etc.  Articles that are nominated here that do not meet the requirements will not be supported, and will ultimately be stricken.  Greyman ( Paratus ) 21:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Cerean (0)
Support
 * 1) &pi; = 3  [[Image:Oldsith.png|40px]] (Talk to me, babe.) 19:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Needs more referencing, especially from NEGAS. I'll be happy to help you with that if you like. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 19:28, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Yeah, help would be nice. Ref'ing is my weak point. &pi; = 3 [[Image:Oldsith.png|40px]] (Talk to me, babe.) 19:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Ok, I'll get on it later tonight. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 19:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) *Critic. Darth Whatever
 * 5) **Oh piss off. Just because I give constructive criticism to nominations that require it, does not mean I am a critic. I offered to do it for her. So unless you've got anything useful to say, please leave. [[Image:AckbarSig.jpg|20px]]  TheOne&OnlyAdmirableAckbar  ( It's A Trap! ) 19:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ***This is not the place for this. Take it to your respective Talk pages and remember WP:NPA. Greyman ( Paratus ) 19:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Expansion would be nice. There is a lot of Appearances and Sources for Cerean, but a very small amount of information is actually covered in the article. Acky knows his way around these types of articles ;) Greyman ( Paratus ) 19:44, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * One of the pictures needs to be sourced. I'll probably have some time tomorrow afternoon, so I'll be able to help reference and perhaps even expand it then. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 19:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Anson Trask (+2)
Support
 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 16:27, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Greyman ( Paratus ) 17:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Fay (+1)
Support
 * 1) Greyman ( Paratus ) 01:11, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * I love taking random short articles and fleshing them out :) Greyman ( Paratus ) 01:11, 22 July 2007 (UTC)