Talk:Form V/Legends


 * Where does Form V calling on the power of emotion come from? --Geekmasterflash 08:39, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * Maybe the novelization of Episode III - TopAce 14:35, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * As far as I recall, there's nothing in the novel to support that. It only mentions Anakin generating too much kinetic power for Dooku's Makashi to meet him head on. Although Anakin gets emotional in both duels that he uses the style, that's just because of his whole emotional instability to begin with. --Fade 15:28, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Plo and Form V
Although Wikipedia and Wookieepedia both stated that Plo is a Form V master, but exactly what is the source for such claim? I have looked for a while and still cant find one. --Darth Kevinmhk 04:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I assume it's because Plo is one of the stereotypical 'strong, slow' characters in Jedi Power Battles, which could be equated with Vader-style Form V. Dunno if there's a specific source though - Kwenn 14:45, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Is this game canon at all? It was inaccurate in regards of sabre colours. I don't own Playstation, but judging from the cover and the name, this must be a game made for eight-year olds. Like Rebel Assault, which is also non-canon. - TopAce 14:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Shien Vs. Djem So
Greetings.

I was wondering if there's a source directly branched from the movies (i.e. novelization, VD) that claims Shien to be as much a part of Form V as Djem So is? From what I've learned so far, the ROTS novelization negates Shien as Form V, but rather, only Djem So. It says that Shien is an entirely different form, altogether (which we know as Form IX). As a result, I've been under the impression that Shien is solely Form IX, and that it is a variation derived from Djem So, which may or may not be as effective against blaster fire as the Shien of Form V.

I realize that it was Knights of The Old Republic that first publicized the different lightsaber combat forms, and consequently, many hold this source to be the most accurate, and understandably so. However, due to the fact that the novelization mirrors the movie and bears the official license for its representation, its classification of the combat forms supercedes that of the video game, or at least this is how I see it. Therefore, if (hypothetically) the novel says that Djem So is the only name and style for the characteristics of Form V, then Shien is completely nullified. Where was Form IX first named Shien? Does the novel classify Form IX as Shien? If not, I think it's likely that confusion was the catalyst for this mess.

Next, I would like to know what source classifies Shien to be better suited for blaster defense and Djem So for swordsmanship. I thought this was made up to explain the co-existence of Shien and Djem So when I first heard it. - Imperious825 Form IX shien is different from form V shien.Shien is part of form V as well as Djem so, but shien deals with blasters and djem so with lightsabers.
 * I don't remember the novel referring to them by anything other than their names. As far as I recall, Form categories aren't mentioned. So the novel simply mentions Shien and Djem So as two forms, but doesn't specify a link (or otherwise) between the two. --Fade 15:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Ah, so it's settled! :) If the novel explicitly says that, 1, Djem So is Form V, and 2, Shien is a completely different form, then Shien is simply not another name for this form.  As a result of this revelation, I petition for "Shien" to be removed from the Form V title page.  All in favor?  Thank you for the info. - Imperious825
 * Neither Shien nor Djem So was refer as Form V in Novels. Shien was refer as Form V in KOTOR2. The EP3 Novel state that Anakin master both Shien and Djem So, and since most sources indicate that Anakin only master Form V (Insider62, Cestus Deception), so the general believe is Shien and Djem So are both Form V. Darth Kevinmhk 04:34, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Plo mastered both Shien / Djem So?
Alright, as you can see in the above discussion, even Plo mastering Form V is still debatable, so how come we know Plo master BOTH Shien and Djem So? Any canonical source? Darth Kevinmhk 10:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Plo and Agen - Once and for all

 * Alright, I am quite sure no source can support Agen's mastery, the article itself said as much, so i vote that we move Agen into the BTS section of Form V. And, as discussed above, Plo's mastery is debateable. Either someone give a definite source for it, otherwise I vote we move him into BTS as well. Please kindly comment. Thanks. Darth Kevinmhk 12:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Aayla
Jan Duursema has stated that Aayla uses Ataru. And since Jan created Aayla, and knows more about her then anyone, what she says about Aayla is absoulte fact/canon. Aayla uses Ataru, nothing else (unless you consider form "Zero" as an actual form). see: here

Besides, the Episode III visual dictonary only shows a single picture of Aayla holding lightsaber, and describes it as a "Djem So attack stance". That is very weak evidence compared to the facts as told by Jan. Also, just becuase Aayla was said to be in a "Djem So Stance" that can't be taken as evidence that she uses that Form. especially when you consider what Jan said.
 * It is not weak evidence, nor is what an artist says truly fact. Just because someone associated with Star Wars says something, doesn't make it canon&mdash;if so, imagine the trouble we'd have ever time Rick McCallum opened his mouth! So actually, the Visual Dictionary is more canon than Jan's thoughts, although I think it's best to compromise and say Aayla could use both Forms&mdash;just as Obi-Wan can use both Ataru and Soresu - Kwenn 17:34, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The visual dictonary dosen't state that Aayla uses Djem So, it simply shows a picture of her in a stance, with the caption "Djem So Attack Stance". I don't see the caption of a single image as evidence, since it doesn't specifically state that Aayla uses that form, it just says she was in a Djem So stance, not that she actually used that form. Jan Duursema helped to create Aayla, and said as a fact. not opinion, that Aayla uses Ataru. Jan was stating a fact, as the co-creater of Aayla, not just an opinion.
 * Comments made on message boards, regardless of who said them, are not necessarily authorized by LucasFilm. The Visual Dictionary is. And if it shows Aayla in a Djem So stance, that means she knows how to use Djem So, and is therefore a Djem So practitioner - Kwenn 17:50, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't know much about Star Wars comics, but unless I am mistaken, all the comics say that Aayla uses Ataru, and none of them say a damn thing about Aayla using Djem So. So that, and Jan's statments should override a single caption from a book. Besides, just becuase Aayla is shown in a Djem So stance, doesn't mean that she actually knows Djem So. Just becuase I can immitate a few martial arts moves, doesn't mean I actually know martial arts. Just becuase Aayla is shown immitating a stance, doesn't mean she knows that form
 * The comics never mention her style. The VD is the only official source for her Form - Kwenn 18:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * NO in-universe canonical material has ever said Aayla use Ataru, EP3 Visual Dict is the only source so far which gives us ideas of Aayla's style. And, please kindly sign your post. Darth Kevinmhk 03:13, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Last Night, someone made a post an Jan Duursema's message board, telling her about this debate, and Jan has this to say:

''Aayla is a practicioner of form IV--Ataru, a form which requires agility, speed and acrobatics. While she was not yet a master of this discipline, she had the potential to become one someday. I think if anyone wants to argue against this, they can look at the comics in which she fights. Aayla is not about overpowering strength, which form V would require. Her skill lies in her grace and in her connection to the Force.''

To see the orginal post, see here

I don't see how anyone could possibly doubt the words of the person who created Aayla in the first place. As the creater of Aayla, Jan would be the person who would know which form Aayla used.


 * Again, please kindly sign your post, would you? Thanks. Back to the topic, if you check Ataru's article and Aayla's article, they have already mentioned Aayla as a Form IV practitioner. Still my point stands: no in-universe canonical material (comic/novel/movie/etc), or canonical reference material(databank/NEC/NEG/VD/etc) has ever stated Aayla as a Form IV practitioner, and EP3 Visual Dict is the only canonical source which for the 1st time state something about her style. And lastly.. you better ask the Holocron Keeper - it is the data kept in the Lucas Liencsing Holocron that counts, and I have no doubt EP3 Visual Dict is in their list. Thank you. Darth Kevinmhk 15:59, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Another eg: GL said he dont care EU, his movies have nth to do with EU, he wont let EU to affect his movie-making, and he even said (not exact wordings) "I have my universe, and they (refering EU) have theirs" But the EU is still canonical, or say C-canon. Yet another eg: in an interview months ago (read from a blog on starwars.com), when being asked what happened to Leia & Han after Endor, GL replied "Leia becomes a Senator, Han & Leia probably marry and have kids, they live happily together, and no more adventures." So should Wookieepedia shut down all Post-Endor article due to these words from the Father of Star Wars? Darth Kevinmhk 16:09, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Your point about the character's creator being the definitive source would be correct...for anything other than Star Wars. Bear in mind all authors and artists are working in George Lucas's universe; they defer to LucasFilm and Lucas Licensing when it comes to issues of canon&mdash;they cannot just introduce elements arbiteraly without confirmation from the continuity guys. For instance, R.A. Salvatore didn't just decide one day to kill off Chewbacca: the decision was made by the higher-ups, then passed down to the author - Kwenn 16:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Exactly, NJO authors wanna kill Jacen, but GL interfered because he wanna get rid of "another Anakin". So our poor Ani was killed :( I would very much like to hear Holocrons clarify Aayla's issue too. Holocrons department is setup to prevent different authors claiming and building different issues in different works, which exists in the early days of EU. Darth Kevinmhk 16:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Whoever you are, please stop erasing Aayla's name. Her name was already in the article of Ataru too. Her own article mentioned both styles in her knowledge. This article say that Aayla as a "practitioner", not a Master. So unless you can prove that Aayla knows 0.00% about Form V, otherwise she is a Form V practitioner. Darth Kevinmhk 14:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

If it's ok
I put in a picture of Plo Koon's hilt from 32 BBY, as an example for the typical lightsaber design of the Form V pracitioners. btw i'm new =D and sorry Darth Kevinmhk it was me erasing Aayla. it will not happen again.
 * Welcome to Wookieepedia! Good editing. About Aayla: It's ok, we can always revert that. However about Plo: (1) Is this new picture canonical? Can you source it? (2) Plo Koon, actually, has no canonical source to prove that he is a Form V master... I wanna get rid of his name for ages, but still cant get much agreement... So I don't think this pic suits the article, what about posting a pic of Ani's hilt? Ani has much source proving his mastery of Form V. Darth Kevinmhk 15:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Alright, post Ani's hilt then. and thanks for the compliment =)
 * You are welcome! Darth Kevinmhk 04:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Anakin's lightsaber appearance is largely irrelevant to this or any other such article. - Plagueis1


 * Agreed. - Plagueis4


 * Who removed Plo Koon and Agen Kolar? and why?