User talk:Toprawa and Ralltiir

'''Do not leave messages concerning FAN or GAN objections. I will not respond to them. Use the nominations pages.'''

Archived talk: 1 2 3 4 5

Re: Congrats
Thanks very much, Tope. :)  CC7567  (talk) 20:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Asteroid victim officer
It doesn't look like the scene - for one, there are too many people present, whereas there are only three (I think) in the film. Most of them look like regular crewmembers (as they lack rank plates). But my guy could very well be the guy who Vader cuts off almost entirely. Still pretty interesting, though. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 10:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Do you remember
Since you were the one who closed the TC on Category:Non-force sensitive Lightsaber Users, I was hoping you could help. Here is your review history for that day: [|April 28]. Can you tell me if all of the edits from Anja Gallandro to Thall Joben were related to that Category (since edits to categories aren't directly shown, I just wanna be sure). Some of the articles don't even mention lightsabers, so I didn't want to mistakenly add someone unrelated to my new list (User:IthinkIwannaLeia/Non-Force sensitive Lightsaber Users. Thanks for your help T&R.  IthinkIwannaLeia  WaddaUthink?  17:20, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The link you gave me doesn't work, but regardless, you can check my editing history just as easily as I can. All you need to do is check whether I removed that category or not. I don't know if everything that was in that category was accurate. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: TC
My apologies. - Esjs (Talk) 19:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Even though this is too late, is the new voting option OK with you?- Esjs (Talk) 19:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I don't mind if someone creates a new voting option if they think that is the best option, but I do believe it's best to speak with the thread author first. No worries. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:42, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: New Otoh Gunga
Hi. I just added the only source we have here -which is the same as the only appearance, by the way. I know this isn't very much/enough, but this is the only one we have, I fear.

LelalMekha 22:03, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Redlinks
No need to explain, I fully understand it (the redlink tag). Was sort of confused on the official guidelines of GAN and in the future if a article is nominated I shouldn't tag it? Thanks for filling me in on all of this. I am not new to the wiki formatting, Im a sysop on Wikipedia - just a little new to Wookieepedia :P Im trying to understand a lot more of Wookieepedia's official policies so I can make the best edits as possible. Thanks again for the help :)  JangFett  Talk 20:09, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Inq Meeting XXV
An Inquisitorius meeting has been scheduled for 23:00 UTC on the 24th of May. Your presence is requested. Apologies for the late notice. Thefourdotelipsis 00:11, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

INQCON
The new INQCON system is now in effect. For details on this new tool, please review the linked page. It is requested that you check any current featured article nominations that you have fully read and are currently objecting to, and change the respective INQCON number on the nomination if you are intending to ultimately support the article once your objections have been resolved. Also, please remember to change the Triage page when altering INQCON numbers. Any queries about the process can be made on the afore-linked INQCON page. Thanks, Thefourdotelipsis 00:49, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey dude
Hey Toprawa, it's Marauder 09, I dont know if your still pissed off at me for that voting mix up on the Scoundrel's Luck, but it's been taking me quite a while to rack up the courage to want to say this to you about that voting on deletion article, I guess you might have taught me one thing about voting on deletions, and that's to look at the date it was last responded to, but just to say I have been editing around here sometimes as an anonymous user, only adding appearances, adding small bits I'm of info to articles, and spelling corrections. I dont know if you can unblock users after being sentenced to a permanent ban but even though I'm guessing this request will just be a waste of time, and I know after someone gets banned, they'll probably wanna oppose it and hope there ban will be ended, and well, thats what I'm doing right now, so this is probably another, o great, another beggar, to you, but I'm willing to make a little deal with you and everyone else, if you decide to accept my apology and well end my ban, then I'll edit similarly to how I've been lately, just maybe a little more often, but doing everything I can to stay out of trouble, if you decide not to then I'll just keep doing what I've been doing lately, just staying out of trouble, adding appearances, sources, spelling corrections, etc.

I've been contributing a lot to the swgames wiki, mostly after my ban, and they do have just some administrators and myself with a few other rare contributors, so I'm guessing that they probably would need myself more than most other wikis, but all wiki's need users of course, but if their spammers or vandals or whatever, than they'd best be contributors no more, which from your point is probably as I was to the wiki, but I've probably said enough, so farewell for now, and please reply on my talk page (not my account one) on what you'll do with my account or whatever.

Cheers; 24.131.169.104 02:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, for my own sake I'll reread the rules of this wiki before I start editing again, and I'll do everything I can to stay away from places that might get in some hot water. And should I leave my user page alone, or could I delete that template and start my user page again?

Marauder 09 14:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Locked Page
My user page is locked, could you unlock it? Marauder 09 18:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:43, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Stele Chronicles

 * TSC has tech specs for the A-wing which lists two Dymek HM-6 Concussion Missile Launchers but that's the only mention. Personally I'd take that to be two HM-6 launchers for concussion missiles rather than two launchers for HM-6 concussion missiles if you see what I mean. That's the way CUSWE has taken it too. Unless there's actually a source that says those were anything other than normal missiles it might be an idea to move the article and make it about the launcher instead. Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Correct. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:01, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi
I see you used a rollback on an edit of mine that was intended to be in good faith on Showdown on Coruscant.

Is there any particular reason you removed my edit? Although I understand I didn't source it (I'm not sure how that works on wookieepedia on particular), I thought it was a valid parallel and hence put it in the article. 90.203.82.9 12:09, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

kessel

 * I'll keep the page as the Third Battle of Kessel, but I'm gonna split the page into two, one being the rescue of Wedge Antilles, one being Third Battle of Kessel, since the two battles detailed in the article are different events. DjMack 18:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Mara and Insider 91

 * Hey Tope, I saw you added the Insider magazine to Mara's source list. Whenever you get a chance, would it be possible to get the information from that, if there is any unique info? Thanks. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 01:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent! Much thanks. :-D Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 01:53, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

massassi temple

 * I don't know actually, that was a long time ago that I named that article, so we're better off removing the title. DjMack 01:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Anj Dahl
According to spoilers posted here they are correct http://boards.theforce.net/literature/b10003/29757493/p8/?200

Also how do I edit this box to show this information about Anj Dahl

 PointGiven  ( I call it aggressive negotiations ) 02:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Okay, got it. For future reference, how do I edit that Rogue Leader box?  PointGiven  ( I call it aggressive negotiations ) 02:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Just found out the comic has officially been released, so I'll do the edits. Thanks for directing me the right way for the Template box.  PointGiven  ( I call it aggressive negotiations ) 04:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Images
Hey Tope. Here is the link to the scale. The image from A Day in the Life is a bit tricky so I am going to work on it a bit more. I want to line the seam up as best as possible. I should have it up tomorrow. Let me know if there is anything else. Cylka  -talk- 05:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry it took so long for me to upload the image from A Day in the Life. I did the best that I could with lining up the two halves and cloning out the seam. Cylka  -talk- 00:32, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

User page
Tope, if you get this, could you protect my user page from anons? It seems that it's constantly getting vandalized. Thanks.  CC7567  (talk) 16:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Nevermind; Atarumaster got it. :)  CC7567  (talk) 16:37, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Starships
Hey, you said in the most recent CT that the parentheses titles of starships should be specified by kind. Since I'm not the biggest expert of starships I wanted to make sure that I won't move the articles incorrectly. Should Guarlara (ship) be moved to Guarlara (Venator-class Star Destroyer) and Sibwarra (ship) to Sibwarra (Shree-class battle cruiser) or should they be at another title? Thanks for your help in this case.  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk  21:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks, let me know if I make any mistakes during the moving.  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk  08:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you, for your nomination offer, and your words of praise, and your assistance and guidance over the past few years. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 19:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll get it in the morning. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:32, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Twilight
No problem; I felt I needed to actually do something useful around here. :P  CC7567  (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:Green Wing
Thanks - sorry for bugging you about that yesterday. Anyway, should I list all three editions of the book as sources, or just the third? Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 10:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Avenger
There are two Avengers, an Imperial II-class and a Pellaeon-class.--Gonzalo84 23:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Triage
A new Triage meeting has been scheduled for next Sunday, June 14, at 23:00 UTC. We hope you will be able to attend, as there are a fair amount of nominations that need sorting.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 14:00, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

HO Length
Then take out ALL discussion on the Home One's length, because that's what the whole freakin sections of both have turned into. Don't just remove ONE comment. Ambaryerno 23:02, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

MGLT Talk Edit
In response to your edit, according to this statement: ''Editors may make straightforward mathematical calculations or logical deductions based on fully attributed data that neither change the significance of the data nor require additional assumptions beyond what is in the source. It should be possible for any reader without specialist knowledge to understand the deductions.'' the estimate I posted of the speed of 100MGLT within the X-wing games is a perfectly valid statement for that discussion as a response to the previous user's. It is basic, simple math carried out entirely based on measurements taken using the mechanics of the X-wing game itself. It is not variable, is repeatable, and thus verifiable so does not fall under Original Research. It is also relevant to the discussion itself.Ambaryerno 05:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You're mistaken if you think I'm going to debate with you about what is and what is not Original Research, but that's not the point to begin with. Unless your talk page discussion relates to an actual edit you or someone else is about to make to a given article, your discussion is off-topic. And that's the point. We're here to foster a community of contributing editors. If you want to talk about Star Wars and all its amazingly intricate technicalities, you're welcome to come into the IRC channel or join any one of the hundreds of Star Wars message boards that exist on the World Wide Web. Unfortunately, Wookieepedia is not a message board for your theories and speculation. I would suggest you learn this and stop grating with me about it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 05:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Well right now it's like you're singling me out, because there are multiple comments in that exact same talk page that didn't correspond to a recent edit of the article or even an impending change. My comment was not theory or speculation, but hard numbers in response to the comment by 88.115.122.123 which ALSO had nothing to do with any recent or pending edit to the formal article. If you're going to enforce to such a degree then fine, but enforce it equally. Otherwise it's just arbitrary.Ambaryerno 13:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You should worry about yourself, not what other people are posting, and leaving the administrative decisions of this site to the administrators. If I'm removing your comments and not removing others, you can be assured that there's a reason for doing so, and that should be good enough for you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Well when I see comments like the "My god that ship is ugly!" on the E-wing talk page get left alone for SIX MONTHS while I get edited five minutes later while attempting to make a constructive contribution (including references and repeatable calcs) in response to a previous comment, that's NOT good enough for me. It comes off as a double-standard so I AM going to protest it.Ambaryerno 22:04, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You've unwittingly hit the proverbial nail on the head. There is a difference between posts that are six months old and are subsequently archived, and new off-topic nonsense that you contribute. You don't hold any special right to add new off-topic posts just because someone else posted something before your time. And you're more than welcome to protest this, and you're also more than welcome to be blocked from editing if you carry this on any further. You've been warned. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:08, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * JAVOHL!Ambaryerno 22:21, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Inq meeting
Hello. An Inq meeting is scheduled for Saturday, June 20, at 2300 UTC. Please try to attend, because we will be talking about the current state of the FAN page, what with all the summer noms. Apologies for the late notice.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 00:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Executor!
Yeeeeehhaaaaa! Congrats Tope; a work of true scholarship. -- —Harrar  ( Cut the comm chatter ) 23:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC) > JangFett  Talk 20:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow. Glad I'm not an Inq. I am legitimately frightened by the length of that article.  IFYLOFD  ( You will pay the price for your lack of vision! ) 23:17, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. :) I'm still waiting for Wookieepedia to send me my paycheck. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:25, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Excellent work Toprawa :) Wasn't too sure about the image placing&mdash;I knew that it wasn't a rule but a guideline to follow. Good thing you mentioned about the little "picky" note in my objection, otherwise others might find little problems (such as the images) with the article. :P <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * No worries. Nitpicky objections are good, but only if they're of real substance, where maybe I really messed up on something, for example, if you understand my meaning. Thanks for looking at it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Warning/Graestan Comment
I apologize for the comment I made to Graestan, I understand it was rude. It will not happen again. Thank you, -- Skypopper (HoloNet Transmission) 16:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Sign
sorry about the Emperor Shorty 22:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC) thing. I'm new, and I never did that before.

SOTE Comics
Xicer9 ( Combadge) 05:15, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I decided to upload the pictures on a third-party site since they wouldn't be of any use here. Anyway:
 * 1) Kenner Special, I think this one is basically a reprint of a few pages from the actual SOTE comic.
 * 2) Micro Machines Mini-Comic This one doesn't actually show the exterior the Executor but Vader is still on the ship.
 * 3) AMT/ERTL Mini-Comic Battle of the Bajic Shipyards
 * Yeah, it looks like the part where Vader is dueling his Asp droids, which is in chapter 7 of the SOTE novel. But then there's that dialogue with the Emperor and Xizor where Palpatine is telling Vader to work with Xizor, which happens before the droids scene in the novel. Both comics are basically concurrent so order doesn't matter. Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 05:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Here's the image. Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 06:02, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Whoops, sorry about that. I uploaded a new version with both panels. Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 02:06, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Right, that's what I uploaded but for some reason Wookieepedia is just extending my original image. But if you go to Battle of the Bajic Shipyards page, the image looks fine. I'm guessing its a cache issue or something that should fix itself soon. Xicer9 [[Image:atgar.svg|20px]]( Combadge) 02:11, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

2.1 Page created
in galactic battle fronts it appeared as a planet in the system and admiralackbar deleted the other source p.s. i don'remember the name of the planet --Agent chant 22:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That's not what I asked you, but I suppose it's a moot point now. Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Photo Comics
I accept I don't own any of them myself, but Dark Horse website clearly calls of them Photo Comics, not PhotoComics. Are you sure your move was correct?  Mauser  Comlink 10:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I own them myself. The book calls itself a "PhotoComic." Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Whatever then. The reason I moved in the first them was to unificate the titles. Some were Photo Comics and some were PhotoComics. I don't actually care which one it will be as long as it's used for all of them.  Mauser  Comlink 16:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, no worries. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:15, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Talk:ARC trooper armor
I was wondering how come you deleted the talk page I created for ARC trooper armor.--Darth Malice the Destroyer 21:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It was probably off topic. Toprawa and Ralltiir 21:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Skypopper - Block
Good Morning Toprawa and Ralltiir, This is Skypopper and I am having to resort to contacting you logged out because you disabled my email access in the block I would like to talk to you about today. If you do not recall, this is about the block you gave me on 00:19, June 18, 2009. The reason stated for the block is Vandalism and/or general disruption (WP:VP): Admitted association with sockpuppet/vandals in IRC. The block expires in one year, and the Block ID# is #69165. I would like to know what I said/ how I "admitted association with sockpuppet/vandals" in IRC. Yes, I was logged in to IRC that day and you even blocked me for violating the 3 revert rule for 1 day. No, I do not have a sockpuppet account and I do not associate with vandals on this wiki. I totally think that you either got the wrong man, or there was some mistake, and if not, I want to appeal the block. Please contact me at my Wookiepedia talk page, and I will respond to you here. Thank You,  Skypopper (Talk)
 * I'd have been more inclined to believe you if you hadn't demonstrated yourself by taunting me in IRC. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

RE: Merazane Gold
Yep, it does spell Merazane Gold on the comic. But given the numerous typos of that issue, I wouldn't be surprised if it was indeed meant to be Merenzane Gold. Redirect? --ToRsO bOy 04:38, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. Thanks for the heads up.--ToRsO bOy 04:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

nonsense
why did you delete Catagory:Invertebreate i made it with sources from The Essential Guide To Alien Species Like Space Slug P.120 and Whaladon P.171 --Agent chant 17:14, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Did you even read the talk page message I first left on your page? Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:22, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I read it right after i wrote it. The Swamp Slug is a Gastropod it says on page 171 in The Essential Guide To Alien Species --Agent chant 17:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for teaching me to sign my name. Taxtro Grave 03:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Request
Hey Tope, could you place the objections that are from my Battle of Orto Plutonia FAN to a separate Wookiee page? Here is what I mean: 1  JangFett  Talk 20:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Merchant
Hey, Tope. I would like to talk to you about your GAN objection for the Unidentified Naboo merchant. Frankly, I do not own the Game Guide, and it appears that no one else here has it. However, after some googling, I've found this guide, which appears to be the shortened version of the guide proper. The guy's mentioned there, so I guess it is safe to assume that he is mentioned in the book itself. If you're okay with that, I'll add the guide to the "sources". If you are not, then I'll keep trying to check the guide somehow, but there is a big chance that I won't be able to. In the latter case, you may remove my nom once the reserved period for unaddressed objections passes.  QuiGonJinn (Talk) 16:14, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Revert
Hey, Toprawa. Sorry about my earlier revert of Fleebog without a message here. I was in a hurry and probably should have waited so I could explain properly. Basically, we at WookieeProject Aliens have been doing a lot of GA-size aliens lately. The problem with these is that they end up not having enough information to fill out the whole standard alien layout template. To compensate, we often merge "History" and "___ in the galaxy" into one section. I suppose it would be possible to get away with just calling it "History," but I prefer to indicate that we have, in fact, merged two sections. Hope this explains my earlier reversion! ~ SavageBob 12:49, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I see that you're right based on a straight reading of the LG. I still think we should retain some leeway to rename sections when warranted, though, especially with these shorter alien articles, but I grant that discussion may be warranted. I've posted a request for some input form the Aliens members at Forum:Layout of short articles. We may decide to scrap the renamed sections, or we may go ahead with a CT. Thanks for pointing all this out! ~ SavageBob 00:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Triage
A new Triage meeting has been scheduled for Sunday, July 19, at 0:00 UTC. Please try to attend. Thank you.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 15:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Triage
A new Triage meeting has been scheduled for Sunday, July 19, at 0:00 UTC. Please try to attend. Thank you.  Chack Jadson  (Talk) 15:52, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

General Veers
Is there any reason why you deleted the thing I put about General Veers? And is there any better way I can put? Ghostkaiba297 16:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

):
stop being meean to small black children ): (72.94.184.84 16:01, 10 July 2009 (UTC)) when i was a little girl i liked to jump rope with daddy
 * Excuse me? Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * --72.94.184.84 16:10, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[Link title]$Italic text$you heard me you racist!!!!!!!! '''