User talk:Kreivi Wolter

{| id="w" width="100%" style="background: transparent; "
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #FEFFCF; border: 2px solid #000000; padding: .5em 1em; -moz-border-radius: 1em"|

Welcome, Kreivi Wolter!
Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~.
 * Internal pages:
 * Senate Hall
 * Wookieepedia FAQ
 * Glossary of terms used on Wookieepedia
 * Manual of Style
 * Reliable sources
 * Guide to image use
 * Wookification
 * Things to do
 * Jundland Wastes Sandbox
 * External Wikipedia pages:
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Wookieepedia policies:
 * What Wookieepedia is not
 * User page, user image, and user signature policies

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! &mdash;SFH 16:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * }

Slick
If you're going to put the NPOV template on Slick, please at least point out why. All the article's content is solid fact from the episode, and if you see something that isn't, placing the template on the article without stating the issues on the talk page isn't helpful to anyone. Alternatively, since the article is a current FAN, it would have been better to state your objections in Slick's entry.  CC7567  (talk) 03:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I thought it was obvious. The article is filled with words "traitor", "traitorous" etc. and even if they are quite true, it doesn't fit on Wookiepeida, and especially in featured article.--Kreivi Wolter 19:52, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Skirmish at Coruscant
What event are you making an article about? Where did this info come from? From the looks of it, the infobox is copied off an another page, and describes events on Naboo. Unless this article is sourced and gets a proper infobox and body, it will be deleted. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie the truth  ) 09:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I know, please be patient, I'm making it right now. It was left for unfinished because I had great hurry, but know I will continue it. Please dont remove it.--Kreivi Wolter 09:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Unidentified Naboo merchant
Since you've expressed that you no longer feel your GAN objections to Unidentified Naboo merchant to be compliant with GAN rules, please strike them. If you don't strike them within a week, they will be stricken by the AgriCorps for being out-of-line. Thank you.  CC7567  (talk) 03:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Uuh, what? Sorry, I dont unterstand, no perfect english u see? So could u explain little slower, please?--Kreivi Wolter 15:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * To "strike" means to cross out your objection. In order to do it, you must place before it and after. Doing so will produce this: text of your objection . Hopefully, I made it clear.  QuiGonJinn (Talk) 16:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, yeah, okay, thx.--Kreivi Wolter 16:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * And another small heads-up. First, you only need to strike your initial objection, not all your comments below, and second, should be placed after * .  QuiGonJinn (Talk) 16:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Dagger
I've reverted your edit to the Battle of unidentified planet (Yoda's chaingun), because &dagger; is added only to the individual casualties. Tanks, droids and the like are only noted in the "casualties" section.  QuiGonJinn (Talk) 16:37, 5 July 2009 (UTC) > QuiGonJinn (Talk) 16:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Okie-Dokie. But in the Mission to Mustafar, the dagger is right after the CIS, and it is organization, not individual.--Kreivi Wolter 16:43, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I just noticed that it's even after the droid casualties.--Kreivi Wolter 16:45, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, this article is of low quality and such dagger usage proves it. If you take a look at our Good or Featured articles, you'll see what I mean. <span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-family: Verdana; font-size: 12px"
 * Okay. I wont use it any more after droids.--Kreivi Wolter 08:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Whorm Loathsom
Even though you're not a member of WP:TCW, please note that others may have already reserved TCW-related articles. WP:TCW is a collaborative effort to get all TCW-related articles to higher status, except that people reserve articles to work on through the project. You're welcome to join, but I'm planning on writing Whorm Loathsom, so I would like to ask you to try to find another article to work on. Thank you.  CC7567  (talk) 16:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, if you sa so, sir.Kreivi Wolter 17:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Loathsom
Yes, I plan to within the next two weeks. There's plenty of other projects for you to try out; they're all in the lists linked on the project page.  CC7567  (talk) 19:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: About ur projects...
Yes, I am planning on doing those. Like CC pointed out to you above, there's a whole season worth of topics to choose from. Focus on some of those rather than other user's projects. Darth Trayus  ( Trayus Academy ) 22:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

GANs
Please stop making comments like "I suppose it's good enough" or to the like when you vote for something, as you've done for Gus and now Chopper. It sounds as if you're hesitant, and it's quite simply this: if you're "not sure" if an article is good enough, then don't vote.  CC7567  (talk) 22:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Roger roger.--Kreivi Wolter 22:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Remaining objections
Before I give your Tactical droid GAN another review, you still haven't addressed my remaining objections and I believe it has been many weeks. If you have corrected those objections, though forgot to address them, please double check.  JangFett  Talk 23:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Wag Too
Unless the Databank actually has a noteworthy quote, it shouldn't be in the article.  CC7567  (talk) 18:43, September 1, 2009 (UTC)

QOTD
I noticed that you opposed one of my Ahsoka quotes on the basis that it was incorrect, but in fact the episode guide confirms it to be correct. If you would please review the guide and consider striking or changing your vote, that would be appreciated. Thanks. &mdash;Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 18:07, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Unidentified IG-86 sentinel droid 2
There is no such droid. There were two droids in the posse, both of which have articles: HELIOS-3D (my current project) and Unidentified IG-86 sentinel droid 1. Please don't create one for this non-existent droid or the page will just have to get speedied as fanon. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 15:05, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. The Episode Guide strikes again. Of course the Episode guide says there were 3 IG-86s but the episode itself only ever shows 2. Lovely. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 15:08, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, how can you tell the difference between Unidentified 1 and 2? HELIOS-3D stays in the airspeeder. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 15:14, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

Re: But why?
It doesn't matter. It's not confirmed either way.  CC7567  (talk) 16:33, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

Unidentified IG-86 sentinel droid 1
Might I recommend using this image in place of File:AlamaIG86.jpg for showing them hunting together. For one, it's higher def and clearer than the one of them running. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 17:44, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

WP:USER
We had to remove your gallery because it violates the user page policy, rule 10. -LtNOWIS 19:45, November 25, 2009 (UTC)

Karina
Kreivi, her name was added to the list after I put her on the individual project list. In the future, if you have an issue with something so petty, just fix it yourself. Darth Trayus  ( Trayus Academy ) 01:14, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Two articles
Then what exactly do you want me to do about it? You've obviously noticed it yourself and are capable of placing a Delete request tag without the need for my "consent." Learn to be WP:BOLD.  CC7567  (talk) 17:05, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Then now you do.  CC7567  (talk) 19:42, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

Covetus
I noticed you were having trouble with Covetus, so I did some editting to the plot area. Tell me if you liked my grammar changes. User:Bonbondoodle

buy racer revenge it is short, but cool

suggestion
Brocoli99buy racer revenge it is short, but cool

Brocoli99
that was a little backwards

Battle of Dorin
Just FYI, has already reserved Battle of Dorin. Xd 18:33, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, right. Thanks. Kreivi Wolter 18:36, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Hey there
Hello I'm Station7. I've read that your novel and comic dissappeared. Is this because you maybe have a messy room or another reason. If I was you I was cleaning my room. Or did it dissappeared somewhere else? I'm just wanna help.--Station7 12:17, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

Hyvää päivää
Tai lähinnä yötä. Xd "valitti" minulle, kun olen roikkunut koko päivän Wookieen puolella korjaamassa FA tarjokastani, joten sinun vuorosi saada kuittia aiheesta. Ei ole Jedipedian puolella aikoihin näkynyt ;) Would you take a look at that Celchu Trial when you get the time? I saw you have commented on some other FA noms...--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 22:04, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Quote of the Day
I would like you to reconsider why you are making objections on QOTD. If you object because you think a quote is bad, like poor dialogue or writing, etc, such as for a Mace Windu/Nick Rostu one where your objection was "''Then I will beat you into unconsciousness and ask someone else." Bah! Just.........stupid......stupid.......!" - that is a valid reason. You object because you think that line is horrid, and I tend to agree. But when your reasons are one such as "Because they changed his infobox image. The new one is just so ugly." regarding a Gryph quote and "Ugly? Actually, he looks just cool for me.''" for a quote about Admiral Trench, that is ridiculous. You should object because you think the dialogue is bad, not because the quote calls him ugly and you think he looks cool. I can't stand Jar Jar Binks, but I'm not going to object to a QOTD by him or about him just because I don't like the character. Or I happen to like the character of Han Solo, but I'm not going to object to a quote calling him a "half-witted, scruffy-looking nerf herder" just because it isn't flattering to a character I like. Just something to think about. Thanks. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 23:52, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * At least I'm not voting against something just because I dont like its series, like some others do. Well, maybe you are right about my objections. I'll try to find more valid reasons next time : ) Kreivi Wolter 08:08, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pacithhip in The Phantom Menace game?
Hey, Kreivi! I didn't know that there were talking Pacithhip in The Phantom Menace game. Do you happen to remember if any of them are named? And in what kind of context they are encountered? Thanks for any help! ~ SavageBob 15:28, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, there is this Sleeping Man, know as Anakin Skywalker's friend in Wookieepedia, and all the others are just random podaracer mechanics with random quotes like "You should hurry up if you wanna see the race; it'll be starting soon" etc. If you want, I can gather quotes about the friend, but alas, they aren't related to the species. Kreivi Wolter 15:54, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Operation: Knightfall
I added a picture to the prelude per your objection. NaruHina Talk  00:19, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Moving pages
Just because Mar Tuuk calls him "Commander" which is his rank, doesn't mean that is his official designation. An official designation would be like 224 was that droid's official designation. Or OOM-9 is an official designation. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 14:29, May 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * It isn't designation but a rank name. Just as the template displays it. Kreivi Wolter 14:32, May 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you want to take it to the article's talk page, and see if other users agree with you, feel free to do so. The naming policy here though, is that if there isn't a specified name (in the case of a living being) or a specific designation (ie 224 or OOM-9) then they are an "Unidentified" article. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 14:40, May 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Very well. I put it to there. Let the people decide : ) Kreivi Wolter 14:43, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Weequay cell guard
Where exactly is this Weequay referred to by that nickname? --Imperialles 20:38, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * In the episode guide: "Kenobi and Anakin's electric torture ceases, and Count Dooku's cell door unlocks. The count strangles the Weequay cell guard with his shackles." Kreivi Wolter 05:33, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

BD-3000
Why did you take off the "Unidentified" in this article's title? It was never given a designation. NaruHina Talk  02:27, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * The said title isn't usually used in droid characters. Good examples are the OOM command battle droids and T-series tactical droids. There's a reason for this: the conjecture droid names are usually very long, and adding the title would make them needlessly even longer: "Unidentified BD-3000 luxury droid (Senate hostage crisis)". That's a lot of words just in the name of the droid. And the said droid's name was also unupdated: since the event is now officially named, it's now "Senate hostage crisis", not "senate hostage crisis". Kreivi Wolter 09:29, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

OOM commanders
May I ask why you undid all of my work in renaming the undesignated OOM command battle droids to have the "Unidentified" prefix? Master Jonathan clearly pointed out for me that the article naming policy enforced that all unnamed characters needed to have that prefix, and it took me a long time to get this task done. So, it seemed relevant for me to ask, why might you have reverted it all? -- Mateo22 Seperatist leadership.jpg Contact 20:51, June 8, 2010 (UTC)