User talk:I need a name

Vongspawn
Why revert it to an incorrect title? http://www.darkhorse.com/Comics/16-142/Star-Wars-Legacy-43Vongspawn Dangerdan97 18:59, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
 * ,, , . The story arc was apparently originally named Vongspawn, then renamed to Monster with the announcement of subsequent issues. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 19:03, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

Great Page!!
Hey I saw your Dinner at the Lars homestead battle on your homepage. I started laughing when I looked at the casualties. DarthGuy 00:46, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Articles
Hey I need a name, I need some articles that need fixing, do you know any?

--Lot Krotan 15:30, January 3, 2010 (UTC)Lot Krotan
 * Category:Cleanup, Category:Articles with wrong tense, Category:Articles with proseline, Category:We're Doomed!, Category:Articles that need plot summary. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 15:37, January 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * You might have just point to WP:TODO. =)  Mauser  Comlink

Eeth Koth/Agen Kolar
Why do you and others insist that the Zabrak Jedi on the bubble wort projector planet is Agen Kolar when the Zabrak Jedi on the Council from Chapter 22 has been confirmed as Eeth Koth? The disputed Zabrak Jedi is the same Jedi.
 * Because there's no source that says that's Eeth Koth in Chapter 22, whereas the credits for Chapter 22 clearly identify the character as Agen Kolar. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 19:04, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Eeth Koth/Agen Kolar (Sorry don't know how to continue conversation)
How come no one is changing any of the articles related to Eeth Koth's appearance in Chapter 21? Wookieepedia states that that is Eeth Koth yet it states that it is Agen Kolar in Chapter 22. I doubt it is credited differently.
 * Those articles have been changed, by users incorrectly changing the previous Kolar mentions to Koth ones. The ones I've seen have been reverted now. To continue a particular discussion, click the edit key to the right of the section header. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 12:17, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

hey
lets talk
 * Might be a bit late for that. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 22:37, January 7, 2010 (UTC)

Barriss Offee
Please explain to me why you keep removing the TCWRetcon tag from the Barriss Offee article? Any newly TCW information conflicts with existing canon, regardless if it doesn't show it. We don't know what year or when that new Barriss information occurred, due to the unestablished timelime. I would recommend that you leave the tag on the page.  JangFett  (Talk) 15:04, January 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * The template is for actual, verifiable contradictions, not super secret ones which are hiding under the surface but are totally definitely maybe there. TCW =/= automatic contradiction with previously established canon. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 15:14, January 9, 2010 (UTC)

Yoda's species
Yoda's species is the Whills
 * No, it isn't.  OLIOSTER  (talk) Imperial Emblem.svg 01:06, January 10, 2010 (UTC)

Omnibus: Shadows of the Empire
I may have done this outside of protocol, so I'm sorry if that's the case, but I reverted your edit to the Omnibus: Shadows of the Empire page. According to the Dark Horse website, it comes out January 27th. If you already have it, then it's a fluke. The release date hasn't changed. Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith  -Just shy, not antisocial: You can talk to me!- 15:21, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Diamond, a far more reliable source for comic release dates and which is recommended by Randy Stradley here says the 13th. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 18:11, January 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * I stand corrected. Isn't that pretty dumb though?  You'd think that the DH website would be the be-all-and-end-all.  Then again, I did also check my comic vendor's website, and he gets it next week (20th.)  So Diamond it is.  My apologies.  Also, I'm going to start a discussion on the Senate Hall, that perhaps we should start sourcing release dates (so that this sort of thing doesn't happen anymore). Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith  -Just shy, not antisocial: You can talk to me!- 18:50, January 15, 2010 (UTC)

calling me a lier
fuck off
 * 'K. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 00:34, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

stop editing my edet's


 * I see you had a little visit from Giacco too. It's ok to delete those comments from one's talkpage right?--Tellanroaeg 00:46, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

Lego Star Wars
Didn't even think about a redirect. Thanks.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 19:47, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Darksaber (lightsaber) canon-level
What exactly are you trying to point me toward with your ambiguous edit description of "Try reading the article". Are you saying something in the Darksaber (lightsaber) article shows that GL did not design the weapon? Or are you saying that the canon article says something other than "Elements originating with Lucas"? Both of the above are statements I disagree with. The Darksaber is G-canon. &mdash;fodigg (talk) | 15:48, February 22, 2010 (UTC)

Satele Shan
Where has it been confirmed that Satele Shan is Bastila's descendant? As far as I've heard she has only been confirmed as a descendant of "pne of the KotORI party members". NaruHina Talk  06:43, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Order 66 commando edit
Why'd you revert my edits to Order 66 page? It's established in Order 66: A Republic Commando Novel that the commandos and Nulls disobeyed the order in higher numbers than elsewhere in the GAR. The impression that section gives about how much the order was obeyed is a little disingenuous. Rackham 20:59, February 28, 2010 (UTC) So if I do it again, with proper sourcing, it'll stay? Pinky swear?Rackham 21:09, February 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Replacing sourced information with unsourced, contradictory information is an automatic revert as far as I'm concerned. --  I need a name  ( Complain here ) 21:06, February 28, 2010 (UTC)