User talk:Imperialles

Removal of my Wookiepedia page
Imperialles, just wanted to drop you a line and ask why you've deleted my page? I'm a webmaster of over a decade, with an article published in The Insider (Issue 90) and another in the next issue, and reports on the official site as well as being interviewed on The Forcecast. Just wondered why my page had been removed, doesn't make any sense. --JanLomona 12:22, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Your article was deleted per the site policy Notability of fan projects, specifically the bit that says "If a person is recognized purely for creating and/or maintaining a Star Wars website or other fan project, he or she is not considered notable enough to warrant an article." Your article had zero mention of any official involvement, hence its deletion. --Imperialles 12:31, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Why did you want to delete my article?
That bold text does not seem like nonsense to me. I intended it as a very clear notice that the page was intended as good faith and a metaphor to the Star Wars universe. I wanted to make sure that no administrator would block me for creating the page because they thought it was a personal attack. You may improve it, but please don't delete it or assume bad faith.99.27.224.120 22:42, May 27, 2010 (UTC)
 * Your article had zero relevance to the subject matter of Wookieepedia, hence its deletion. --Imperialles 22:44, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

Kala'uun
You put Vette's holonet entry as a source for Kala'uun, yet I see no mention of Kala'uun anywhere in her entry. What am I missing? -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 15:29, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * The background Aurebesh. :) --Imperialles 15:32, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ahhh, I see. Man, I'm losing it. I'm usually good at picking out minute details like that. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 15:40, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

I must have done that wrong...sorry
Did I do the whole moving the Delephr system page wrong? I just read up on it and thought I was moving the article the correct way, by creating the newly named page and stating why. I am sorry if I did that wrong, please let me know, thanks!  TK-299  (Click Here)  12:09, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * No, you did nothing wrong. I simply deleted the redirect from the article's old name. --Imperialles 12:10, June 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sweet, glad I did that correctly. Thanks again!  TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 12:13, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Reversions
I went ahead and reverted your edits to the tabs over the FA, FAN, etc. pages. A number of users were complaining about not being able to read the tabs, so I decided to leave it off until the CAN/Grey Cadre proposal passes CT. Don't mean to step on your toes, but I don't want new things to be added which cause problems that I end up hearing about, at least not without the community putting it to vote first. Graestan ( Talk ) 05:26, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * You could have undone instead of reverting. Now I have to go back and re-do a lot of things. --Imperialles 05:27, June 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I only rolled back stuff form the last couple of days. Everything else I saved the previous edit if it was by you. Graestan ( Talk ) 21:52, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re:
I don't see to have. If you let me know here that'd be great. Cheers -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 10:51, June 4, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 11:04, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Query
Would this article be acceptable to nom for the CAs?-- 21:45, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's only 193 words at present, so if it can't be expanded further, sure. --Imperialles 21:47, June 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and no, it can't be expanded further.-- 21:48, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Mussubir star?
Was there any mention in the book of the star for that system? I know it was typed up as Mussibir in the article, but again I don't have the book and have no idea. Thanks for checkin! :D  TK-299  (Click Here)  10:21, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * The book doesn't mention the Mussubir system at all, and it certainly doesn't mention a star called Mussubir (or Mussibir, for that matter). All that is mentioned is the planet itself. --Imperialles 10:34, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, well that puts a kink in my editing :( I'll hold off on that one till I can find some more info.  TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 10:52, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Here's the only instance of the word "Mussubir" in the novel:

Hope that helps. --Imperialles 10:59, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * It does a bit, I now have an understanding of what was mentioned in the book. I just don't want to add any unverified info to these small stubs I'm working on, which sucks cause I've already connected the system and planet to eachother, Should I delete the info about the planet belonging to the system?  TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 11:23, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nah, it's a fairly safe assumption to make. I think the Atlas authors mentioned on a forum somewhere something along the lines that the Appendix and Online Companion named a lot of systems for their most well-known planet, making the connection between Mussubir Three and the Mussubir system pretty safe to draw. --Imperialles 11:29, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, sounds good. Thanks for the help, and just think......allllll this extra typing for a little stub article, lol, sorry.  TK-299  (Click Here) Imperial_Emblem.svg 11:32, June 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't worry about it. When it comes to improving the encyclopedia, I am more than happy to help. --Imperialles 11:36, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Prince Xizor
-- Αsh Ketchum 21:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Shae Vizla
Shae Vizla is a part of the lore surrounding the game. Hence why she belongs on the Star Wars: The Old Republic page. There are other characters listed that only appear in trailers and videos so this character should be no different.Pangscar 22:11, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * We have an article for the trailer itself, she belongs there for now. The Appearances lists are for subjects that appear in that specific product, not everything loosely related to it. --Imperialles 22:20, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Might want to review some of the other characters than. For example, Hylo Visz only appears in the timeline videos.-Pangscar 22:29, June 9, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Path of Destruction
Hey Imp,

Sorry I took so long in responding. I reviewed the source and, as you have concluded, the date should correctly read something like 1,001 BBY. Let me know if you need anything else. —Tommy 9281 18:43, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

77,000th
Woot! Thanks a bunch, I have just been adding in all the new systems from the updated Atlas Online companion. Wow, that's a lot of articles! Thanks again!  TK-299  (Click Here)  13:12, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Restriction

 * It's not so much a restriction as a warning that attempting to game the system and nominating that article for deletion without a legitimate reason to do so falls under WP:POINT. The same thing applies to any article that was kept via TC&mdash;you don't renominate it for deletion without either a lot of time passing, or new and compelling arguments for deletion. I was just actually placing the policy reminder/warning there so people aren't tempted to re-nominate it after 3 discussions. Atarumaster88  Jedi_Order.svg ( Talk page ) 17:50, June 15, 2010 (UTC)