Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Cloud City chief engineer

 * Nominated by: Darth Morrt 13:58, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another SWM nom. Verrrry minor character.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Looks verrrry nice. ~ SavageBob 06:03, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 04:33, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) This article does not need to be called "Unidentified."  Graestan ( Talk ) 23:11, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *I was assuming that Bossk was impersonating an actual chief engineer rather than simply calling himself by that title. In other words, if Bossk is trying to pass himself off as Bob Jenkins, chief engineer, the "unidentified" seems appropriate. However, if he's simply trying to pass himself off as any ol' chief engineer, I agree, this article should be renamed. ~ SavageBob 23:57, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **This article describes the actual person, not his job/title. From the scenario: "Bossk sabotaged some vital equipment, then hacked into the city's computer and sent an urgent message to Lando under the guise of the city's Chief Engineer." Darth Morrt 01:22, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***There weren't more than two in canon so far, so what is the point of the Unidentified? Graestan ( Talk ) 17:55, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 5) ****If this had more votes and was ready to be archived except my objection, I'd be a little more likely to exercise lenience, but I really don't see the point of calling him "Unidentified" when the category on the CA page can handle it well enough. Graestan ( Talk ) 18:00, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * 6) *****I prefer to call 'Unidentified' what is unidentifed, but I've moved it to Cloud City chief engineer. Darth Morrt 00:21, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * The opening sentence of the article probably shouldn't be sourced to what is currently reference [1]. "In 1 ABY" should, yeah, but the opening sentence should be sourced to Sore Loser's Revenge.
 * Does the chief engineer actually appear in Sore Loser's Revenge? The article makes it seem like he doesn't. If it's just Bossk impersonating him, then would be correct.
 * Remember to link to Rebellion era in the infobox, not just Rebellion.
 * The article seems to have quite a bit of extraneous info. It reads more like an article about Ambush in Cloud City than it does an article about the Chief Engineer. Is there anything you can trim? Aaaand is the sentence in "Behind the scenes" about the alternate non-canon ending relevant to the Chief Engineer? Menkooroo 03:25, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * All is addressed. Darth Morrt 03:53, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Excellent! One more, though: Since reference [1] is specifically about the date, shouldn't a new reference that just references Lando Calrissian: Idiot's Array be used for the final "Calrissian survived" sentence? Menkooroo 04:09, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Darth Morrt 04:16, January 3, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Graestan, could you please elaborate on your objection? ~ SavageBob 16:22, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

Project X271

 * Nominated by: Darth Morrt 15:00, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Bolvan-related nomination.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 04:58, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Sorry; forgot about this one. ~ SavageBob 16:18, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Hanzo Hasashi 21:59, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Does the source actually say that it's stored aboard Vader's Star Destroyer? The leading quote makes it sound like they'd actually have to retrieve it from the Outer Rim. Menkooroo 15:24, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * No it doesn't say that it was stored. In the Fact Files, Bolvan suggested "that the planet should be utterly cleansed using experimental ordinance [sic] from Project X271". The sentences about deployable ordnance and storing it on the Destroyer is actually conjectural. They didn't have much time, and Bolvan wanted to use this weapon, so I think the weapon was deployable and they have it at hand. Darth Morrt 16:48, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * We can't put speculation into articles. Anything conjectural has gotta go. Menkooroo 17:37, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. Darth Morrt 17:52, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Prepare to be savaged...
 * Is there a reason to keep the "somewhere" in the first sentence? Seems it'd read fine without it, and "somewhere in the Outer Rim" is kind of like using "unidentified" in an article, IMO.
 * Cut. Darth Morrt 00:14, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you find some synonyms or alternative wording that avoids using the words "weapon," "development," and "project" so much? ~ SavageBob 15:55, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Reworded. Darth Morrt 00:14, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I might be wrong, but perhaps instead of First Galactic Empire, it could instead just be First Galactic Empire . Feel free to change back if it was better the other way. And also I removed the two links to Bombardment of Falleen in the same paragraph. Otherwise, support and good job. Hanzo Hasashi 21:59, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review and for your edits. Darth Morrt 02:52, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

X-1 (assassin)

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number one!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Hey there! Since the article has an intro, keep in mind that the body operates entirely independent of the intro --- that is, everything that's been established in the intro needs to also be established in the body. As such, it's usually a good idea to begin the body similar to the intro, with something like "X-1 was an assassin..." Right now, the body starts out by talking about Rezi Soresh, and it's kind of like "Wait, who?" The body also doesn't mention that X-1 was created by Soresh, just that he was used by him.
 * Got rid of intro on all of the articles. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Does he die? "Dispatched with a vibroblade" makes it seem like he does. Menkooroo 16:17, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * Replaced with the less ambiguous phrase, "killed". --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Excellent! A couple more: "Soresh wiped their identities from the system"... what system?
 * Not too sure what system it is referring to. The sentence in the book is "...had their former identities completely wiped from the system..." Some sort of universal Empire identification system I'm guessing. Not to sure how to say that. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 21:34, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Consider putting it in your own words, and making it seem less vague. You can do it! :) Menkooroo 05:58, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Is it true that X-7 was already Soresh's personal assassin in 7 BBY (per Nahdar's comment below)? If so, isn't it fair to say that X-1 died before 7 BBY?
 * In my research, I can't find any mention to anything prior to the Battle of Yavin concerning X-7 or any of the others. I'm not 100% completely acquainted with everything said in the books so I may be mistaken. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 21:34, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Might be worth asking on Nahdar's talk page if that info is indeed from the book. Menkooroo 05:58, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * The only other thing I would recommend would be to make some revisions to all of the other X-articles you have nommed so that they're not just the same article copied and pasted six times. It's better to write a unique article each time that gets the same important points across, but in a different way. I'm currently doing the same thing with a bunch of similar articles, see here here and here if you want to get a better idea of what I'm talking about --- same points, different sentences expressing them. Make sense? Menkooroo 20:44, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Will try and take this into account. I don't have that much time, so writing six different articles about the same points will be fairly difficult for me. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 21:34, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * It won't be as difficult as it seems --- just change the sentences around so that the wording isn't exactly the same, ya know? Menkooroo 05:58, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've splitted the article into two sections. IMO, it looks better this way, but feel free to revert it if you disagree. If the sectioning is good for you, please put the appropriate ref at the end of the first section. Darth Morrt 03:24, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 04:47, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Does the source give X-1's species? Darth Morrt 03:24, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * No mention of species anywhere. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 04:47, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same objections as X-2, below. ~ SavageBob 18:06, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments For all clones of Project Omega: Soresh didn't train them to hunt Skywalker. X-7 serves him seven years before the Death Star blows up. Nahdar Vebb 21:34, December 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Got rid of it. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)

X-2

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number two!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Same objections as above (both mine and Nahdar's). If he dies, "Death" should be listed in the infobox. Aaaand the other stuff too. Menkooroo 02:33, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Death date is added to all articles now --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Please check your link for male; it should probably be pipelinked to sexes.
 * "six other men" -- were they indeed all male? Star Wars stuff tends to avoid using words like "men" and "women," I suppose because they seem to imply human. Perhaps change the word to "beings" or "people"? ~ SavageBob 17:51, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

X-3

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number three!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Like above. Menkooroo 02:33, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same as X-2. ~ SavageBob 17:51, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

X-4

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number four!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Same as above. Menkooroo 02:34, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same as X-2. ~ SavageBob 17:52, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

X-5

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number five!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * And again. Death, intro/bio separation, clarification of what year they were trained. Menkooroo 02:34, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Year isn't specified, "prior to Battle of Yavin" is what I said. --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same as X-2. ~ SavageBob 17:52, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

X-6

 * Nominated by: Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 01:07, December 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Number six! Not doing X-7 cause I'm lazy.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * One more time. Death, intro/bio separation, clarification of what year they were trained. Menkooroo 02:35, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done --Vandar Tokare42 (Talk to the hand) 02:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same as X-2. ~ SavageBob 17:53, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

PS-29-2

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 04:59, December 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project for the holidays.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 16:20, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 04:42, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ~ SavageBob 19:06, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * What about adding Imperial Navy to his affiliations? Maybe you could mention that he got his nickname after a creature that attach itself to starships, or something like this. Darth Morrt 01:57, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Added Imperial Navy. And it is never stated that he was named Mynock after those creatures, although that is the only logical possibility. Would that count as speculation if I did add it? Hanzo Hasashi 04:22, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * IMO, you can reword it not be speculative, like: he is called Mynock, which is the name of a creature... But this is not a real objection, just an idea. Darth Morrt 05:09, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you add a reference that says all TIE pilots during the Imperial period were Human males? ~ SavageBob 16:59, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Human is sourced by the duck test, to be honest I don't know about whether that is confirmed by any source. What does the Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia have to say? And the card says that he is male. Hanzo Hasashi 18:28, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * Species unclear, no source ever stated that all the TIE fighter pilots were all human, and by the time of 7.5 ABY, there were Devaronian TIE pilots too. Hanzo Hasashi 04:39, January 6, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Unlike previous similar nominations, I have used the logic of the duck test to assume this character is a human. Hanzo Hasashi 16:07, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Duck test was not sufficient, no source ever confirmed all TIE pilots were humans during the Galactic Civil War. Hanzo Hasashi 16:22, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

AF-119

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 21:49, January 2, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) ~ SavageBob 18:53, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 00:40, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Menkooroo 22:38, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * I think I may have overlooked this on your previous stormtrooper entries, but can you source the species and gender? I think the duck test is fine in these cases, but only with a source that says that Imperial-era stormtroopers are human and male. ~ SavageBob 16:48, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * The duck test was not used to source his gender, his Scum and Villainy Quick Draw card sources it. Will source the species though. Hanzo Hasashi 18:28, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * CSWE sourcing for species, using the entry you gave for TK-420's nomination. Did I get the entry title right though? I wrote it was "Stormtrooper." Hanzo Hasashi 18:42, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * That's the one. Thanks! ~ SavageBob 18:53, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think that reference [2] is needed. References [1] and [2] are sourcing the same thing. You could stick the text of reference [2] (minus "The above") at the end of reference [1], but right now the same thing is referenced twice. Menkooroo 05:51, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Taken care of. Hanzo Hasashi 18:11, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Unlike previous stormtrooper nominations, I have used the logic of the duck test to assume this character is a human. Hanzo Hasashi 16:07, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
 * Strangely, this article, along with a couple of my other personal projects, has two CUSWE entries. Hanzo Hasashi 19:26, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

NT-757

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 01:40, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Fearless soldier.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 13:28, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 02:29, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  ~ SavageBob 16:19, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Human should be capitalized, like any other species name. Darth Morrt 00:06, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Taken care of. Hanzo Hasashi 02:17, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Any reason not to just say, "NT-757 was a Human Imperial stormtrooper..." That's the way we treat most bio articles. ~ SavageBob 15:58, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Changed. Hanzo Hasashi 18:11, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

NT-311

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 01:40, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Squad point man.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 16:54, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 02:32, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  ~ SavageBob 16:20, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Can you give us a sentence or two saying how the boarding of the Tantive IV turned out? Menkooroo 13:34, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done, tell me what you think of it. Hanzo Hasashi 16:35, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Perfect. Menkooroo 16:54, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe it's just my foreign English, but the first sentence sound to me saying that he was cloned during the Galatic Civil War. Maybe you could put "during the Galactic Civil War" at the beginning of the next sentence. Darth Morrt 01:04, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * You're right, fixed.
 * His card mentions planetary coverage and his power is boosted while on Tatooine. I'm not sure, but presumably he was sent down to Tatooine to search for the escape pod. What's your opinion? Darth Morrt 01:04, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * I might leave that as an ambiguous bts note that he was possibly later among the 501st deployed along with Desert Sands to search for the droids on Tatooine. Hanzo Hasashi 02:17, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same question as NT-757 above. ~ SavageBob 15:59, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Think I got it. Hanzo Hasashi 18:11, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

RGA-972

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 01:40, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Assault specialist.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Darth Morrt 02:40, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 04:43, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) ~ SavageBob 19:41, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * His supporting ability is not written correctly. He and another trooper together need to support a third one. Altough, since this ability cannot be 'translated' into something unique ability or trait, I think it is purely game-mechanics and shouldn't be mentioned. But if you mention it, IMO you should also state that his support is much powerful than the general support ability of the game. Darth Morrt 02:05, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * I myself thought this was only game mechanics too. Will get rid of. Hanzo Hasashi 02:17, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * This article needs a biography segment. Instead of listing everything in the intro, put a more detailed recount in a biography segment. brightfur 02:31, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Short articles, like this, doesn't necessary need Biography section. This trooper appeared only on two card. There is no more details of his life or his role in the Battle of Hoth. Darth Morrt 02:40, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * As Darth Morrt said, there is too little known about this character for a biography section. Also, if you were to look at other articles brought to comprehensive status by other users, many of those also don't have biography sections. Hanzo Hasashi 03:11, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
 * Morrt and Hanzo are correct; the CA rules allow for articles on characters that do not have "Biography" sections. Unless another EC disagrees, Brightfur, I believe that your objection is non-actionable. ~ SavageBob 01:09, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Got it. brightfur (Questions or comments) 15:36, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Same question as the two noms above. ~ SavageBob 16:00, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * I got that. Hanzo Hasashi 18:11, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Might wanna talk about how he had training in the use of heavy weapons before you talk about the Battle of Hoth stuff, for chronology's sake. Otherwise fantastic. Menkooroo 22:47, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Got it taken care of. Hanzo Hasashi 00:27, January 21, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Is there supposed to be two RGA-972 in the Completely Unofficial Star Wars Encyclopedia links at the bottom?  TK-299  (Click Here)  Imperial_Emblem.svg 12:23, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oddly enough, yes. Perhaps those were two different authors, and one only knew about his Premiere card, while another only knew about his Scum and Villainy card. There were also two AF-119s and two NT-311s. Hanzo Hasashi 16:19, January 11, 2011 (UTC)

Anti-Alien League

 * Nominated by:  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:57, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Something different for a change.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Gorton Colu has a CSWE entry and is mentioned in the KOTOR Strategy Guide --- do you know if either of those sources mention the Anti-alien league?
 * Nope, no mention in the CSWE.
 * Strategy Guide? SoresuMakashi might be able to help you out; he GA'd Colu.
 * I'll see if he can help.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome! Let me know when you find out whether or not the league is mentioned (directly or indirectly) in the strategy guide. Menkooroo 04:45, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * "The Anti-Alien League was a Humanocentrist group formed by Gorton Colu" is currently sourced to The Essential Atlas.
 * Resourced.
 * I could and should fix this one myself, but it'll be handy for you to know if you don't already: Only use punctuation in image captions if it's a complete sentence. Menkooroo 02:43, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:06, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
 * Rubefacient
 * Context of Taris's multiple cities should be added.
 * Done.
 * Mention that aliens were prohibited from UpCity under normal conditions. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.
 * There needs to be a year in the intro
 * Try now.
 * I'm sorry, I was confused by the banner. Because of that banner, I think this should be made with a History section to avoid the dissonance caused by it. I'll not force you to, but it would probably be beneficial. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I've moved the image over. Does this help?
 * Greatly. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * You say the league was mentioned in the game in the body but say it appeared in the BTS.
 * Corrected.
 * Because the article assumes 100% completion, you do not need the clause saying he could be avoided. That is, unless you include the alternate dialogue tracks (which you should).
 * Alternate dialogue tracks? There are no others that mention the League.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 15:09, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * Revan can ignore the man, can agree with his speciesism, or tell him to screw off. Which of these elicits the mention? If it is the lattermost, remove the portion saying that Colu mentioned it to Revan and say that he could mention it to Revan given the proper dialogue in the BTS. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 02:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I believe he mentions it the first time Revan talks to him (and before any dialogue choices come up).  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 04:26, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Then say that Revan can choose not to speak to him. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 01:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 13:00, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the runaround. I couldn't wrap my head around it the right way. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:39, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Speciesism FTW NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 05:17, January 18, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Also, guest nom for WP:KOTOR.  Darth Karika  will destroy your planet! 21:58, January 9, 2011 (UTC)

The Lost Twenty: Dooku's Rise

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:26, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: HM

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 11:40, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  ~ SavageBob 18:20, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Can you give some sort of timeframe (2002) somewhere in the bts? Menkooroo 02:15, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll add it to the others later. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:35, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
 * Instead of "without permission from proper parties", why don't you say "without permission from Dooku"? Darth Morrt 02:39, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Keder

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 00:28, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Darth Morrt 16:02, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 17:29, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Although the past tense in the BTS makes me cringe, especially since this game is still being played... ~ SavageBob 18:23, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Are you sure we can say anything about his skin color from that image? It looks a bit darker than "light" to me --- might be best to leave that field blank. Menkooroo 05:47, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * With that in mind, I saw that it indeed could have been darker, so hard to say for sure. Changed. Hanzo Hasashi 18:11, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Bts: Not his abilities, but his deploy cost is descreased on Coruscant. Darth Morrt 13:36, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Got it. Hanzo Hasashi 18:11, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * Should he be considered affiliated with the Republic and the Senate Guard, despite the fact he is an assassin merely using that as a cover? Hanzo Hasashi 00:41, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, definitely. By infiltrating them, he did join them. Menkooroo 05:47, January 19, 2011 (UTC)

Enrichment Dome

 * Nominated by:  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 02:13, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: No CSWE entry. Lots of nice plants in that dome.

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Darth Morrt 12:12, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 10:51, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3)  Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 18:33, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * IIRC, Obi-Wan is not an apprentice during his time in the Dome. Darth Morrt 04:50, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * He wasn't. Just checked what the proper title is, and it's Initiate, so that's fixed.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 07:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Is there a hyphen in the shortform of Agricorps? I thought there wasn't.
 * The novel uses a hyphen.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:28, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Can you give the date of the novel's publication somewhere in the bts?
 * Done.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:28, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe rejig the sentence --- it kind of implies right now that it was the second novel to be published on May 3, 1999.
 * Changed.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:02, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * I think the article should mention the Dome wall secret annex (with a little bit of detail on it) in the first paragraph rather than waiting until Obi-Wan discovers it, as the first paragraph seems to be a description-kinda-paragraph. Menkooroo 02:20, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 03:28, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Careful --- last sentence of the first paragraph is now unsourced, and Dome wall secret annex and Offworld Mining Corporation are now linked twice. You might want to give some context on the annex at the end of the first paragraph (what is it?), too. Menkooroo 04:06, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed.  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg (Complain) 05:02, January 22, 2011 (UTC)


 * From the Council Chambers:
 * "The Dome wall secret annex was a room": Conjectural titles like that shouldn't be used in articles; reword and pipelink it.
 * "Kenobi and Treemba discovered the Dome wall secret annex": Same as above; reword.
 * As written, the BTS says that The Dark Rival was the second book in the series that Watson wrote, which is false (Dave Wolverton wrote the first book). Please reword so that it's clear that this was simply the second book in the series.
 * Better?  Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 08:54, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, I removed the hyphen from AgriCorps; while the book uses it, all other sources I'm aware of, including the Power of the Jedi Sourcebook, The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia, and The Jedi Path, do not use it, so it's better to go with the majority.  Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 04:41, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Dome wall secret annex

 * Nominated by: <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 04:09, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Why are all the corporations in my articles sneaky and evil? Again, no CSWE entry.

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 14:41, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 00:47, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Darth Morrt 02:44, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * You should mention that Obi-Wan discovered the secret annex, etc. Darth Morrt 04:54, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 07:59, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * "In 44 BBY, Jedi Initiate Obi-Wan Kenobi found this annex while exploring the dome, he reported its existence to Jedi Knight Qui-Gon Jinn shortly after the discovery." Improper English; that second comma is incorrectly used. 1358  <sup style="color:#336600;">(Talk)  07:43, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Rewrote that section. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 21:37, January 23, 2011 (UTC)


 * Can you mention Bandomeer in the article's body? It would also help give needed context on the Enrichment Dome.
 * Context on the Agricorps? What do they have to do with the dome? Menkooroo 14:13, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 14:38, January 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * From the Council Chambers:
 * Conjecturally-titled articles shouldn't have the article name in bold at the start of the article like that. Just dive into the article and bold the word or words that seem most descriptive, such as "This secret annex was located in...".
 * Done.
 * The same goes for the opening of the BTS, which should be reworded also.
 * The first sentence is just plain confusing. For one, it's a run-on and needs to be broken up or cut down. Second, as written it says that the annex itself was used by the AgriCorps to grow plants, which IIRC in not the case. If only Offworld used the annex and you're trying to refer to the dome which I think is the case here, then please correct it to say so.
 * "As the AgriCorps were not allowed to associate with any corporation, the annex was illegal.": How is the AgriCorps associating with Offworld here? IIRC, the AgriCorps didn't know about the annex until Obi-Wan discovered it, so I fail to see how the mere presence of it creates an association, which is what you're implying.
 * They're not. That sentence was supposed to show that the annex was illegal, and not endorsed by the AgriCorps. I can remove it and simply mention that Offworld wasn't actually allowed to have this annex somewhere else, if you would prefer. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 14:48, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * After digging out the book to check, the book doesn't actually call it illegal that I saw; also, it appears it's Offworld that would be breaking the rules, but you are implying that the AgriCorps is the one breaking the rules. Please reword to avoid outright calling it illegal and make clear that it's Offworld violating rules, not the AgriCorps (which didn't even know about it).  Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 19:00, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Changed to show that they were breaking Agricorps rules, not Bandomeer laws. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 00:42, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * Obi-Wan, at this time, is a full member of the AgriCorps and no longer an Initiate. Please correct this.
 * As I read it he wasn't a full member at that stage, he was only touring the facility. Could you name the page that says he's a full member? <font color="#208090"> Holocron  Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 08:39, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * The first few chapters of the previous book, The Rising Force, show how Obi-Wan was rejected as an Initiate and remanded to the AgriCorps. The tours are merely his introduction to the AgriCorps.  Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 19:00, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I don't have that book, so I wasn't aware of that. Changed. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 00:42, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
 * As written, the BTS says that The Dark Rival was the second book in the series that Watson wrote, which is false (Dave Wolverton wrote the first book). Please reword so that it's clear that this was simply the second book in the series.
 * Changed. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 08:39, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 *  Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 04:18, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, I removed the hyphen from AgriCorps; while the book uses it, all other sources I'm aware of, including the Power of the Jedi Sourcebook, The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia, and The Jedi Path, do not use it, so it's better to go with the majority.  Master Jonathan New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 04:33, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Yortal's Emporium

 * Nominated by: <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 12:30, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  OLIOSTER  (talk) 04:55, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 09:43, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Darth Morrt 02:47, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Be careful not to link redirecting pages, pipelink them instead.
 * Fixed.
 * Use templates in the infobox.
 * Done.
 * Add an "1" after the |hidep in the infobox, if nothing goes into the Physical specification section.
 * Done. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 03:18, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Add an image of the shop. Darth Morrt 13:38, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I can add the one on this page, as that's the owner standing in the store. Other than that I'll need to find someone who can take screenshots. Do you know anyone who can do that?
 * I took these, choose which you prefer. One is inside and the other is the shop's sign. File:YortasEmporiumSign-KOTOR.jpg - File:YortalsEmporium-KOTOR.jpg.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 04:34, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help, second image added. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 05:02, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * The Siths mocked Ixlis in the shop, so this is part of the shop's history and should be mnetioned. And maybe the discount offered to Revan, too. Darth Morrt 05:15, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * The Sith harassing Yortal was already mentioned, but I'll add Revan's discount. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 05:17, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't know why I didn't noticed it. Darth Morrt 05:31, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Morrt is right --- "may have" doesn't fly, and the game mechanics template should be used, even if it's not part of the plot. If you need some examples, see here or here.
 * The problem is that those templates say "fully completes and chooses only 'light side'" when neither of those apply to Revan going in there unless fully complete is defined as having walked into every room in the game. Is there precedent for that template being used in awkward places? <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 14:33, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Here's the template itself --- looks like you don't have to mention anything about the dark or light side. "100% game completion" means, I think, that you do everything. So, talking to Yortal would be required for 100% completion. Menkooroo 14:47, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Much better than the other template. It's not like you could strangle poor Yortal or burn his store down. Template added. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 03:43, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you know if Yortal has a CSWE entry? If he does, it probably mentions his shop.
 * Neither his page or the giant list of CSWE entries mentions him. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 14:33, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yarr, and Y has been fully covered!
 * For completeness's sake, could you add a bit on to the end of the last sentence in "Behind the scenes" mentioning the different name for the shop that the strategy guide gives? Menkooroo 14:20, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Done. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 14:33, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * I think, you shouldn't say something like "Revan may have visited the shop." I don't make this an objection, because I don't know how to solve it. IMO, the is not the best here, because the shop is not related to the plot of the game. I sure that other users who are more experienced than me would object this and find a solution. Darth Morrt 13:38, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't see the need for a game mechanics template to be added, because the store wasn't involved in any quests or the main plot. But I'm even less experienced than you, this is my first nomination for an article not based on a book. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 03:18, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * The shop is mentioned as "Yortal Ixlis's Junk Shop" in the Knights of the Old Republic: Prima's Official Strategy Guide. Should probably add it as a source.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 04:27, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, added.

Quesh

 * Nominated by: GTQ
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Needs a "Behind the scenes" section. If you need any help with what to put in that section check any of the articles nominated above this for ideas. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 05:15, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * Read the sourcing guide and change your referencing according to the rules specified there. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 05:15, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Trayus
 * 2) *With the information provided by the TOR website, this could easily be a GA. It's missing much of that information, doesn't conform to the layout guide, and will need frequent updates that would quickly take it out of CA or even GA territory. Take care of the missing info and the layout guide, and we can go from there. Darth Trayus ( Trayus Academy ) 05:59, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * A picture of the planet needs to be added.
 * You should mention the creature shown on the pictures. Darth Morrt 06:03, January 22, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * My objections aren't the only problems, but they (especially the BTS objection) are important. Somebody more experienced should take a look before I keep going. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 05:15, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
 * How can a featured planet on a MMORPG that has yet to even be released even be remotely considered comprehensive? To me, this nomination is little more than a joke. -  JMAS  Jolly Trooper.png Hey, it's me! 02:55, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, yes. Even if this article wasn't so poorly written it's still about un-released content which can and will change at any time. Once the game actually comes out this will probably be large enough to go for FA status anyway, so any sort of status it's given now is really not worth much. Suggestions? <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 04:52, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * You get 24 hours to prove that this article can be up to standards. 1358  <sup style="color:#336600;">(Talk)  17:13, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Cataclysm

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 03:18, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: a paiting ca?! from olioster?! its more likely than you think!

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 14:22, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 02:50, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Yellow power droid

 * Nominated by: Darth Morrt 10:45, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Created and CANned

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  IFYLOFD  ( Floyd's crib ) 03:45, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 11:48, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Hanzo Hasashi 03:29, January 26, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Toprawa
 * 2) * The tag is used incorrectly.  is never used in the Sources list, because Source list items are not "appearances," and that Insider article is not its first appearance to boot. The ANH film is. Toprawa and Ralltiir 03:52, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) **Done. Darth Morrt 04:22, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) ***After actually reading the BTS now, I realize that the article itself is being treated as cut content and not necessarily canonical. In that case, the tag shouldn't even be used, since it has no "first appearance" in canon. I've removed it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:34, January 25, 2011 (UTC)

Comments

Outer Rim Oreworks Market

 * Nominated by: <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 12:27, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Just merged from Apatros General Store. The book gives the name as ORO Market, so that's the canon name. tags were used in the infobox, everything's sourced. Needs to be checked from grammatical errors I might have missed. Could somebody leave a message on my talk page telling me why you need to use  tags in the infobox?

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) No objections here, but be careful of short, choppy sentences. I several instance of this in my copy-edit; take a look at what I did and try to avoid this in the future.  Master Jonathan  New Jedi Order.svg ( Jedi Council Chambers ) 04:56, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 16:59, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Menkooroo 04:30, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Darth Morrt 02:55, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * Can you give a timeframe somewhere in the article? That is, in what year the store was in operation?
 * Try to avoid using "this" to refer to an article's subject, even in the bts, unless it's an unidentified something. Even then, there are possibly better alternatives to "this." I fixed this one for ya, but keep it in mind. Menkooroo 12:09, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Fixed. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 14:55, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * As far as I know, the usage of "this" is acceptable in some cases, like when referring to something mentioned in the text. For example, I'd consider "...and decided to use the Marg Sabl maneuver. This strategy was successful..." completely fine. 1358  <sup style="color:#336600;">(Talk)  17:19, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Comments
 * If this passes, it's the first CA for WP: NSW. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 12:45, January 25, 2011 (UTC)
 * Damn. I do the infobox refs correctly and fail on the main articles refs instead. Fixed now. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 03:08, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Just a couple comments: First, to double-check: there are no applicable quotes? None of the characters mention the store in conversation? Also, remember that if an entire paragraph can be sourced to one source, then you only need to add that ref tag at the end of the paragrah; you don't need one halfway through and then another at the end. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 16:59, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, I thought that each tag was supposed to show where the information in that sentence came from, noted for the future. No, there aren't any quotes. All the information comes from Bane thinking about it, nobody actually goes into the store. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 00:29, January 28, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified H'nemthe (Jabba's Palace)

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 14:09, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Checked a whole bunch of adaptations. No sign of this one.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice to see minor characters not even given names from the movies be made into quality articles. Hanzo Hasashi 21:37, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Morrt 02:58, January 30, 2011 (UTC)

Object
 * I think you should upload a new infobox image centering on the H'nemthe, cutting the band featuring the Aqualish. Or maybe a half-lengh portrait.
 * Yeah, you're right, the Aqualish was distracting. I've cropped the image to just feature the H'nemthe. I do like the full-length portrait, though; there's enough precedent for it and it gives you an idea of what the character was wearing.
 * The H'nemthe card in the SW CCG's Jabba's Palace set shows a H'nemthe in the same cloth, altough it is not a shot from the film, but Decipher's photoshopped image mimicking the a background similar to palace. Do you think it is the same character, or another H'nemthe also present in the palace, or just an unidentified H'nemthe in an unidentified room? Darth Morrt 06:29, January 27, 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks for that bringing that to my attention. I had no idea. Yeah, definitely the same character --- I've added it to the Sources section with a, and written a second paragraph in the bts about it. Thanks for the heads-up! Menkooroo 10:01, January 27, 2011 (UTC)

Comments