Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Imperial Ace (individual)


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

(+9)
Support
 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Thefourdotelipsis 00:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) What is it with you and pilots? --  AdmirableAckbar  [Talk] 00:14, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Pretty pictures Kilson LOVES PIE 19:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Imperialles 17:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Nice addition. Greyman ( Paratus ) 17:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 13:09, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Hah, awesome! I knew that if I started a small stub, someone would expand it. Great work :)  Stake black   msg 17:05, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * Before anybody asks, he says nothing and shows no signs of a personality. Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * How do you know that the Battle of Mygeeto was in 3 ABY? Any sources on that? Because the battle article says it happened in 0 ABY. Cheers.  Stake black   msg 17:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The presence of the TIE Defender and Piett being an admiral place it after ESB. Green Tentacle (Talk) 18:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
 * He and I talked about this, and while no date is really given, the Battle of Mygeeto page is clearly wrong. 0 ABY is really as "speculative" as 3 ABY, but certain aspects of the game (besides the TIE Defender and Piett, the presence of both A-wings and B-wings) clearly would make anything other than 3 ABY impossible. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC)