Wookieepedia:Improvement drive

The improvement drive is a collaboration to improve existing articles to Featured article status.


 * /History – For past winners.
 * /Failed – For failed nominations.

Nomination and Voting
Articles to be improved can be nominated by registered users in the "nominations" section below, with an explanation of what work is needed. Please do not nominate articles involved in edit wars. Also, when nominating an article, please put IDRIVE on that article's page so as to inform any visitors of the page of its nomination.

When you vote, please add your vote to the vote total at the Current Ranking section, and make the necessary changes.

Each Sunday, the article with the most support votes is chosen. Opposing votes are not counted. You can vote for as many articles as you like. Articles need two votes per week to stay on the list.

Note: It is considered somewhat rude not to help improving articles you've voted for.

Collaboration
Here are some best practices to use while working on an article selected for the improvement drive:
 * 1. Plan your contribution. After an article has been chosen, it is a good idea to post your ideas for additions, changes and corrections for the topic on the article's talk page. You can then choose some of the listed contributions to avoid overlapping work.
 * 2. Be quick. Use . Once you have planned your work, make your edits quickly, but carefully. Articles chosen for the drive are the likely subjects of many rapid edits. By entering and exiting EDIT mode quickly, you can avoid another user saving a new edit before you have completed your work. If your edit will be more lengthy, place the  tag at the top of the article, save the edit to make the tag appear, and then begin your work.

Nominations

 * The next project article is to be selected on Sunday May 7.

Please add new nominations at the bottom of the page.

Current Rankings

 * 1) Galactic Republic (8)
 * 2) John Williams (4)/Timeline of galactic history (4)
 * 3) Dark Jedi (3)/Carrie Fisher (3)/Confederacy of Independent Systems (3)
 * 4) Empress Teta (2)/C-3PO (2)

Dark Jedi

 * Nominated April 18, 2006; needs 4 votes by May 2, 2006

Support
 * 1) UVnet 13:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) AdmiralKadann 11:16, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) This sucks KEJ 07:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Wow mama! This is one crappy article! --UVnet 13:27, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

John Williams

 * Nominated April 19, 2006; needs 6 votes by May 10, 2006

Support
 * 1) MaulYoda 17:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Breathesgelatin 20:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Man, what a horrible article! KEJ 07:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) SkywalkerPL 17:02, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * As the composer for the music of Star Wars, I think Williams needs a bigger article with more detail. I mean come on, Star Wars is mch less without the music! --MaulYoda 17:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Galactic Republic

 * Nominated April 20, 2006; needs 8 votes by May 18, 2006

Support
 * 1) King2006 16:24, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Sikon [ Talk ] 16:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) MoffRebus 18:10, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 4)  The Erl of the  talk  What I do 16:18, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) It could use more images, I guess KEJ 07:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Darthyoda 14:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) UVnet 12:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Srini 07:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Adamwankenobi Talk to me!  My home. 12:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * The most important galactic government needs better than this. King2006 16:25, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It needs to be de-doomed. Badly. - Sikon [ Talk ] 16:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's lacking... Again :P MoffRebus 18:10, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Timeline of galactic history

 * Nominated April 21, 2006; needs 6 votes by May 12, 2006

Support Comments
 * 1) Sikon [ Talk ] 18:14, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) MoffRebus 19:30, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) SkywalkerPL 17:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) UVnet 12:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Improve! And mayby add some images to make it better-looking?

Empress Teta

 * Nominated April 21, 2006; needs 4 votes by May 5, 2006

Support
 * 1) MyNz 20:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) It sure could use an overhaul. KEJ 07:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments Absolutely pathetic. This article has not a single picture and its history section s far too short. MyNz 20:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Confederacy of Independent Systems

 * Nominated April 24, 2006; needs 4 votes by May 8, 2006

Support
 * 1) Kuralyov 16:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) SFH 14:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) LandoSystem1138 02:21, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * This is a mess, made even worse considering how important it is. Kuralyov 16:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree. This is in dire straits. -- SFH 14:13, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Carrie Fisher

 * Nominated April 25, 2006; needs 4 votes by May 9, 2006

Support
 * 1) CooperTFN 07:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Poor Carrie KEJ 07:12, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Breathesgelatin 09:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Thought I'd give another actor page a whirl; this one's almost as bad as Sir Alec's was/is. CooperTFN 07:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I support the idea of improving the actor pages. If they don't start winning ID, maybe interested parties should start a WookieProject. - Breathesgelatin 09:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

C-3PO

 * Nominated May 1, 2006; needs 4 votes by May 15, 2006.

Support
 * 1) Breathesgelatin 05:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Jasca Ducato 08:45, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * Renominating; this article makes baby ewoks cry. - Breathesgelatin 05:43, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Bounty hunter

 * Nominated May 1, 2006; needs 2 votes by May 8, 2006.

Support
 * 1) Breathesgelatin 12:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Comments
 * This is... really, really pathetic. And it'll be the last one I nominate for this week... Promise. - Breathesgelatin 12:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)