Wookieepedia:Requests for bureaucratship

This page is for requests for bureaucratship.

Admins may be nominated here purely by another admin or bureaucrat. Self-nominations are not allowed. Voting will last two weeks from when the nominee officially accepts the nomination, at which time, if the vote is affirmative, he or she will be granted bureaucrat status.

To view past requests, see the RFB archive.

Requirements
There are some basic things to consider when nominating an admin for bureaucratship.


 * 1) They are an admin.
 * 2) They have actively contributed for at least a year to the wiki.
 * 3) They have actively taken on additional responsibilities to make the encyclopedia better.
 * 4) They have dealings with other users on a regular basis in a fair, restrained, and constructive manner.
 * 5) They have have a deep understanding of the community's methods of operation.
 * 6) Registered users' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted (Only users who have been registered for over a month&mdash;from the day the nomination is put forth&mdash;are counted).
 * 7) Administrators' votes must have a 3/4ths supermajority for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 8) Bureaucrats' votes must be unanimous for bureaucratship to be accepted.
 * 9) Additionally, the nominee may be asked a series of questions by users. While it is not required to answer them, it is strongly encouraged.

Sikon (6 admins + 10 users/0/0)
Two week deadline from first request, voting ends November 27th.

Support

 * 1) Imp 07:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Darth Culator  (Talk)(TINC) 20:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) For.  Fnlayson 20:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Roron Corobb 21:14, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Havac 22:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Cull Tremayne 01:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) QuentinGeorge 07:36, 14 November 2006 (UTC) - A mad Wiki scientist.
 * 8) Definitely. Chack Jadson 19:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Kuralyov 20:06, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) He's definitely been a great help and is a good choice for this. 23:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Went over his record with the proverbial "fine-tooth comb" and couldn't find any reason he's not worthy of the bureaucrat title. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 13) Good enough for Imp, good enough for me. Bub 02:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Adamwankenobi 02:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 15)  Yoshi  626  02:42, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) jSarek 06:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Neutral/comments
Due to Riff and WhiteBoy's lessened activity, I think we could use at least one more bureaucrat. Sikon is a great candidate for the job, being deeply involved with the wiki (closing a number of difficult CTs and VFDs) and being very active. He has accepted the nomination. --Imp 07:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Being one of the few among us who really seems to understand the MediaWiki stuff, I'm inclined to support this even though his infamous "defaulting to policy" annoyed me. :-P And if we ever get neat new toys they might go to bureaucrats first, and I can't think of anyone better than Sikon for that job. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(TINC) 20:44, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Neat new toys? Could you explain? -- Riffsyphon1024 20:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Forum:Wiki feature requests - I figure that any new features, if authentication is required, will go to bureaucrats first. Of course, I base this on nothing except the fact that it's how I would do it. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(TINC) 20:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)