Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Aris-Del Wari


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Aris-Del Wari

 * Nominated by: Thefourdotelipsis 10:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: First pure-infant FA?

(5 Inqs/1 Users/6 Total)
Support
 * 1)  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 12:42, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Lord Hydronium 14:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Brilliant.  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  15:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) That baby picture is certifiably creepy. Toprawa and Ralltiir 23:14, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I can think of creepier ones. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) A wonderful article about a too young and important individual. -- Delmar Nori 00:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Ackbar:
 * 2) * "One month later, the recovering Jonava was discovered, and she eventually discovered what had happened to her child." Two "discovered"s in close proximity, please reword.
 * 3) **I actually reworded this a little bit when I was going through it. ;) Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) * And we get another "discovered" in the next sentence. :-P
 * 5) **Is that now diffused by Top's "learned" in the earlier sentence? :P
 * 6) *That's all. Interesting and well-written article, though I do hate the term "Republic Classic Era." -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:39, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) **Sorry. ;) Thefourdotelipsis 03:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) Toprawa:
 * 9) * This sentence doesn't make sense to me. It would seem that the show would rightfully encourage more protests, so it had the desired effect. Please reword a little it: "Even after the airing of the Essence episode, active protesting failed to halt."
 * 10) **Yes...that makes utterly no sense. :S Changed.
 * 11) * If you don't feel comfortable putting a 1st Appearance tag, then please at least put a 1st mention tag. That would still be appropriate. Toprawa and Ralltiir 00:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) **Yah, in there now. Thefourdotelipsis 03:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Comments


 * There's no "1st" template there, because I don't know how the hell you can tell between what appears in HNN and what is mentioned. If someone could upscale the main image a bit, that'd be great. Thefourdotelipsis 10:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm surprised Supreme Chancellor Palpatine wasn't in this plot. Of course he could take advantage of this episode against the Jedi, but obviously without being interested on the baby and her mother's benefit. After all, the child could be easily murdered during the Order 66. -- Delmar Nori 00:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)