Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Nagai-Tof War


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a featured article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Nagai-Tof War
Objections Comments
 * 1) Thanos6 11:59, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Adamwankenobi 18:17, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer 04:46, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Cull Tremayne 15:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * 5)  - breathesgelatin Talk 21:18, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Roron Corobb 20:25, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) .  .  .  .  12:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 8)  Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 19:18, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Wstonefi 14:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I think it should possibly be moved to Nagai-Tof War, unless it's referred to in a canon source with a slash. In which case I'll shut up. - Breathesgelatin 14:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Changed the name. Cull Tremayne 15:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Longer intro needed.  StarNeptune Talk to me! 23:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Expanded intro. Cull Tremayne 03:58, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * A featured article would be that which is considered best of the best. When an article is short but only due to it's limited content it should be nominated as a Good article. Herbsewell 00:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * That's not the case here, it appears in 11 comics, a 2 page section in the NEC, and an extended summary in Star Wars Gamer 1. That's quite a lot of content. Is your objection that the article is too short? And in what sections? Cull Tremayne 04:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I think you have the difference between a FA and a GA mixed up anyway. GAs can be articles that are incomplete but just have good, well-written content. There are many FAs that are on smaller topics. While it's true that articles about important topics (major movie characters) need to be quite lengthy to be FAs, that's not the case with a topic like this. My question would be: what specifically should be added to this article? What material or information?  - breathesgelatin Talk 15:43, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * So every single entry that covers this much of a subject should be made a featured article?--Herbsewell 22:52, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * No, that's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying that a topic that is relatively small, yet has all aspects of the topic covered. If you read the Good Article requirements, it calls for BROAD coverage and accuracy, not full coverage. In contrast, a featured article has FULL coverage. I'm arguing that this article has FULL coverage, whereas many others do not. Besides, as has already been pointed out, this has been covered in a large number of sources.  - breathesgelatin Talk 02:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Can we go ahead and declare this objection solved? Thanos6 00:07, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree! --Eyrezer 02:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't. Grappa is equally covered but is simply not FA material.--Herbsewell 17:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Can we get a better explanation? This is not like Grappa. Not as short, not a minor event or character (It's a major part of the Marvel comics and is a Major Galactic conflict), and it is much better written (in my humble opinion). This article is just as long as some other FAs, so what is the real objection here?
 * Rokur Gepta is short and a minor character but for some reason became a featured article.--Herbsewell 16:34, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * A pretty good, long article for a relatively short comic story. Thanos6 11:59, 14 September 2006 (UTC)