Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

 This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
 * 14) &hellip;if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 1 week.

Please remember to archive your nomination beforehand if you plan on taking it to the Good Article Nominations page.

Unidentified Rebel sergeant

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 07:37, March 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "The Marines have landed and have the situation well in hand!"

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Nice work, though try to get the first edition to see if there is any more info. 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 13:05, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *There wouldn't be more info. It's just a "the quote was there." NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 17:33, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) He forgot to call them monkeys. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 17:07, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Great quote. Hanzo Hasashi 00:44, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 16:10, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6)  graestan ( talk ) 22:53, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * The article refers to the sergeant as male, but the character is categorized as unidentified gender. Hanzo Hasashi 15:02, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * Fixed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:47, March 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * I think a bit of reorganization in the main part of the article might be in order. As it stands, we have two sentences on the historian before we know why it's pertinent information to the sergeant. Perhaps reword to say something like, "The historian Arhul Hexawhatever quoted the sergeant in a manual for the Alliance called blah blah blah..." and then give the background information. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 16:57, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Crap. I noticed a mistake after I slapped on the tag, as is my custom. I don't know if he was mentioned in the first edition. If someone has it, please let me know. I'll try to find a copy on Monday. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 07:42, March 11, 2012 (UTC)
 * I can't find a copy of the first editon anywhere. Anyone know a Wookieepedian to ask about WEG books? NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 03:47, March 19, 2012 (UTC)
 * Please remember that "this" (and, by extension, its plural form: "these") is not a past-tense term. Anyway, I'm ready to drop my vote on this as soon as you can get this figured out&mdash;I'd suggest asking in the Senate Hall. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 15:51, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * I bought the book online. It'll be here in a bit. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:03, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, everybody, his quote was in there. At 8 cents per word, this is my most expensive article yet. :) NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:06, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, I was apparently tired when I read that. "This" has no tense. It's grammatical. The sentence's tense depends on other words: "There once was a panther. This beast's hair was black." NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:26, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree with you. I'm not sure when or how the hate for this and these got started 'round here. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 16:53, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * It traces back to some people having a preference for "A" at the start of unidentified articles. "'This' is past tense" was an argument invented to support "A" being the standard, and if that is true (it's not) then it follows that "this" can't be used in articles at all. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 16:57, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Is that a joke, Naru? Do you honestly believe there was a group of us who decided: "Ooh, let's change unidentified article intros from "This" to "A" even though there's no actual grammar rule!" because we just randomly decided to like "A" better? That's far and away one of the most ridiculous accusations I've heard in my time on this site (and this being the internet, I've seen my my fair share of silly accusations). I just went over "this" with Trayus here. From what I understand, it does have a tense because the term "this" fundamentally requires a reference to something that is here and now&mdash;if you point to "this" it must be something that is tangible in the present&mdash;it cannot be something of the past that is not present in the situation. Anyway, Trayus and I are both looking into it more to see what we can find out. If we can find proof of a grammar rule one way or the other, then I guarantee you this site will stick to it. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 17:20, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * It does not have to do with something that is here and now, though it can. By definition is a word that references something to be given context (A panther is a beast) or, if that context has already been given, it is a variant identifier (This beast's hair was black). Your prose can be whatever tense you want, but "this" doesn't affect it. Further, I didn't say "random" because I don't know exactly where the idea came from initially, only roughly when, and the first time I saw the tense argument was some time after that. If your reasoning given there was why the initiative started, then more people who wanted to change it should have been aware of that and should have been providing it as a reason. They were not. I didn't say the whole group decided that because they thought "A is better" because I know ther had to be multiple ones and I can recall off the top of my head the location of at least one proponent, Cal Jedi, citing that it looks better as a reason. That wasn't the only time I've heard that. Simmer down. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:12, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Getting off-topic here, so I've replied on your talk page. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 19:09, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * Bob: I don't know how long it's been for others, but Tommy clued me in at least a couple years ago. And it's not "hate" for the words; with my understanding of grammar I just honestly think that "this" (and, by extension, it's plural form "these") cannot correctly be used in the simple past tense. Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 17:23, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * FWIW, Naru, you are assuming too much again by saying that I gave a reason of that it "looks better." On that nomination, I was merely making a statement. I never said that you should change "this" simply because it "looks better."&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 13:31, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * If I took what you said a step too far, sorry, but I intepereted that as a listed reason to stop using it. I didn't say that it was "simply because" of that or that it was your only reason. I did not think that for a second. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 18:39, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified speeder (Bespin resort club)

 * Nominated by:  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:21, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: The getaway car...

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 18:42, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 01:37, March 27, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Savage  1138  16:56, April 3, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * This is a bit picky, but I think you can add an infobox here. There are some fields that can be filled in; "role," "skeleton," etc. &mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 15:29, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Added.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:18, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Is there a way you could reword the article so the first sentence doesn't just basically say "a thing was at a place?" graestan ( talk ) 22:58, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Is this better?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  16:44, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * The individuals mentioned in the rpg seed section are the player characters.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  18:21, March 12, 2012 (UTC)

Zug Tassik

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:14, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: One of Three

(2 ECs/5 Users/7 Total)
Support
 * 1)  nayayen ★talk  12:00, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Tinwe (comlink) 14:35, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 13:22, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Linked to "bounty" and fixed the spelling.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 07:28, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5)  Savage  1138  16:56, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 16:59, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  16:52, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Just needs something about the holo image not allowing skin or eye color identification, so people don't assume he's blue. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 14:22, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Adressed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 15:54, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Doesn't the aurebesh text under his picture say Zug Tassik? If this is true then he was refered to a Zug Tassik in the show first. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:43, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *Yep indeed, but would you be satisfied if I handle it like this?  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:46, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Sure that would be fine.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  12:29, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Done.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:23, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

Omar Toggs

 * Nominated by:  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 11:27, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Two of Three

(2 ECs/5 Users/7 Total)
Support
 * 1)  nayayen ★talk  12:00, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Tinwe (comlink) 14:33, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 13:23, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Linked bounty for you. Looks good.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 03:45, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5)  Savage  1138  16:56, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:00, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  16:54, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) With Toggs, I think it'd be safe to say he had green skin in the body and infobox, but mention that his eye color is ambiguous in the BTS. Other than that, he looks good. ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 14:19, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) *Adressed. Thanks for the review.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 16:17, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Doesn't the aurebesh text under his picture say Omar Toggs? If this is true then he was refered to a Omar Toggs in the show first. You should probably fix this on the bounty that is already a CA as well. -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:45, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *Please see above.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 08:46, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Adressed.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 13:23, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified Chuhkyvi Jedi

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 10:00, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Trés cool. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 22:04, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2)  nayayen ★talk  11:18, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) ~ Savage  BOB sig.png 17:03, April 5, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) * Is it proper to use "it" when referring to a sentient.
 * 3) **Bob's copy-edit removed the "it", although personly, I am not so sure they are inappropriate. --Eyrezer 23:00, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *The article mentions various other descriptive information for the species on page 56 such as a prounounced nose, a good sense of smell, being short in height, and being heavily muscled. I am not sure if you really need this information, but since you included the information on yellow eyes and tan skin, I thought it might be necessary. What do you think?-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  13:00, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) **Well, eye and skin color go in the infobox, and therefore need to be repeated in the body of the article. Height and musculature would vary among members of the species, so I don't see that I can draw many conclusions re the individual from those. In short, I think I've got the balance right as it is. --Eyrezer 23:00, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) ***After your reply the only one I still think you should add is about the excellent sense of smell. The other qualities would vary more, but I do not believe that the sense of smell would vary anymore than the eye or skin color.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  22:49, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * 7) ****Edited. --Eyrezer 01:10, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Rebel officer (Ghost Base)

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 20:59, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: "The Imperials are coming! The Imperials are coming!"

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1) Fly, you fools!&mdash; Cal Jedi Infinite Empire.svg (Personal Comm Channel) 02:49, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Tinwe (comlink) 14:02, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3)  Imperators II (Talk) 21:57, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4)  Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  22:51, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Please move the date of his service at the base to the first mention of him. Otherwise it implies he was there in other years, which he may not have been. graestan ( talk ) 23:10, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) ~140 words. WP:VG. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 20:59, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Just a question: Wouldn't calling it the Rebel Alliance campaign be more accurate than the Princess Leia campaign? -- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg  (Greetings)  12:23, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) *Well, no. It's called the Princess Leia campaign in the select screen. Corellian PremierRobotech.jpg along the watchtower 03:16, April 2, 2012 (UTC)

Chalarax

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 21:50, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Another creature nom of mine. This one sadly doesn't even have a given location for its homeworld.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1)  graestan ( talk ) 23:09, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Object

Comments
 * Not sure if I should change the bolded chalarax to... chalaraxes?  Imperators II (Talk) 21:50, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
 * Very ingenious article. Don't forget, punctuation goes inside of quotation marks anytime they are used in conjunction with one another. graestan ( talk ) 23:09, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Guts and Glory

 * Nominated by: Darth Needham 22:43, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Good old KOTOR article, why not?

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Exiled Jedi
 * 2) *First, you should move this page to the book's full title.
 * 3) *You also need to include more information about the contents of the book. I am pretty sure that it mentioned several different band members.
 * 4) *You need to mention when the book was written in the article.
 * 5) *If the game did not say that the band was killed by Calo Nord then do not speculate that it might have occured.
 * 6) *The information in the behind the scenes section should probably go inside of Gamemechanics tags.
 * 7) *Revan was not a Jedi at the time of the events on Taris.
 * 8) *Please include a Behind the scenes section mentioning what source the item appeared in.
 * 9) *I will review the article again after you fix these issues.-- Exiled Jedi  Oldrepublic crest.svg (Greetings)  23:00, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
 * hows that? (Can't move page per what I wrote in the SH) Darth Needham 23:29, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Brovto

 * Nominated by: — Cade  Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:28, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: One of several TOR vendors on Tatooine that I wrote up quickly.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) A more specific date for the events of the game is available. See the article for the game. graestan ( talk ) 23:05, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Savaged&hellip;
 * 3) *For these kinds of articles, there should be quotes, even if just the generic "Best post exchange around" kind of thing. They're still canonical sayings by these folks. Can you add quotes? ~ Savage BOB sig.png 01:14, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) *Also, don't forget to describe appearance in the main body: hair color, eye color, skin color, any distinguishing features like scars, and clothing. Languages too, especially for the aliens, since they tend not to speak Basic but can presumably understand it since the player characters all speak it. ~ Savage BOB sig.png 01:17, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments
 * Are the specific titles such as Mods Vendor or Cantina Vendor referring to classes of NPC? Are they listed as such in the game? I need more information before I review further. graestan ( talk ) 23:05, April 8, 2012 (UTC)

Nif Sarjun

 * Nominated by: — Cade  Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:28, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Roarcher

 * Nominated by: — Cade  Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:28, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Cheroth

 * Nominated by: — Cade  Calrayn  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg 22:28, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Stax Mullawny

 * Nominated by: 501st Dogma Republic_emblem.png( Comlink ) 16:09, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Project Warfare

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Menkers
 * 2) *The table of contents should be hidden.
 * 3) *Warfare takes care to identify both the pilot and the gunner as each callsign. Eg, both Zev and Stax are Rogue Eight. With that in mind, I think a succession box like the one here would be appropriate.
 * 4) *There are some more details in Warfare that I think are necessary --- the opening of the Rogue section mentions that Rogue Group was formed from Rogue Flight, Blue Squadron, and Green Squadron. As such, we can definitely say that Mullawny was serving at Echo Base as a member of one of those squadrons prior to the battle.
 * 5) *I think that more context is needed overall. Hoth isn't linked and Echo Base isn't explicitly identified as being on Hoth; there's no mention that the Rogues are fighting a delaying action while the Rebels evacuate, etc. Menkooroo 16:29, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

Comments