User talk:Shadowtrooper/JediArchive

Catalogue of Celestial Bodies
That will be a heck of a project, trying to get everything all arranged. Does this mean every thing will have an article. I'll have to have Chad (aka CBarbry aka WhiteBoy) about how much memory we have. -- Riffsyphon1024 15:06, 26 Mar 2005 (EST)
 * Most of the minor ones will link to a list article, I still gotta change the links, but it'll do for now. Shadowtrooper 18:31, 26 Mar 2005 (EST)
 * I have just created an assload of individual sector articles, that all link from the Sectors list. They are still stubs though, with one or two exceptions. -- Riffsyphon1024 19:38, 26 Mar 2005 (EST)
 * Nice! This is really starting to become the Star Wars resource.  Everybody's got an area they know way too much about, when that gets combined...it'll be frickin' awesome! Shadowtrooper 19:45, 26 Mar 2005 (EST)
 * Be careful though. Anything you copy from TheForce.net is not appreciated by the creator of the CUSWE. I asked permission from him to copy those lists of planets, and I'm waiting for a result now. Be on the safe side. Where do you get the rest of your sources? -- Riffsyphon1024 21:19, 29 Mar 2005 (EST)
 * I didn't know the CUSWE existed, so I certainly haven't used anything from that site. Most of my info comes from Essential Guides, sourcebooks (and their respective web enhancements), the Navicomp, and the occasional novel.  I try to cite all my sources for big projects like the catalogue; if I don't cite it, it came from my head (how it got there in the first place is still a mystery). Shadowtrooper 21:27, 29 Mar 2005 (EST)

Just a reminder
Since many of us waiting for Episode III and working on here would like to avoid spoilers at all costs, please note that on those articles relating to Episode III, and include it in the edit summary before I waltz in thinking something's okay and its not. Cheers. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:23, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 * Being taken care of as we speak. Shadowtrooper 22:30, 6 Apr 2005 (EDT)

And another thing
I would hope that we become more creative in the awards process. I need to post that no actual medals can be used for copyright problems. Please cite your Corellian Cross and Endor Medal, as they seem to be real medals, but renamed. Just keeping things in check. -- Riffsyphon1024 15:13, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 * Sorry, I'm still not used to having copyrights breathing down my neck. I'll say where I got them from. I ony used 'em 'cause I like 'em, I'm not planning on using anymore copyrighted awards.Shadowtrooper 18:29, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 * Oh, you meant don't use 'em at all. Alright, they're gone.  I'll make sure future submissions are original. Shadowtrooper 19:57, 7 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 * Your actions are appreciated. I hope I have not impeded you too much. -- Riffsyphon1024 00:24, 8 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Cardia or Carida?
I believe that Cardia is incorrect, by misspelling, and should be merged with Carida. Is there proof of a planet such named, even though its nearly identical to the Carida article. -- Riffsyphon1024 00:42, 9 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 * Aww, crap. This is really a bad week for me. :(  Carida is the right one, go ahead and merge 'em. (So not my week!) Shadowtrooper 13:01, 9 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Template:DF-JK and Template:NJO
If you've been on my work-in-progress page you've probably seen the NJO template. I also did something like it for the Dark Forces/Jedi Knight videogame series (basically ripoffs of Template:Films). I was thinking that all of the longer game and book series could use one. It would save on space, help to interconnect articles, and provide some uniformity. These first two are more or less to see what general reation to them would be. Any feedback would be appreciated. Shadowtrooper 20:11, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
 * They both look good. I can't find anything wrong with them. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:22, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks fer the feedback :-) Shadowtrooper 20:54, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Moving info from Stars to Systems
Seeing how these star articles are turning out, wouldn't it seem more appropriate to put this information (the orbits of the bodies) in system articles? Those systems will always be stubs unless we do so, and then they can link back to info on the star itself. -- Riffsyphon1024 14:19, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, but leave a copy of the orbits on the star page. The idea (eventually) is to have all stars and planets include a list of known orbiting bodies (natural satilites). Shadowtrooper 14:23, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
 * So you want two copies of the orbiting bodies floating around? Refer to my edit on Coruscant Prime and you see that by providing a direct link to its system, one can still find out. -- Riffsyphon1024 14:29, 4 May 2005 (UTC)