Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

 The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.


 * /History
 * /2005 History
 * /2006 History
 * /Queue

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
 * 5) &hellip;not be the object of any ongoing edit wars.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box.
 * 8) &hellip;have no more than 3 redlinks.
 * 9) &hellip;have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
 * 10) &hellip;not have been previously featured on the Main Page. Otherwise, it can only be restored to featured status.
 * 11) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 12) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 13) &hellip;provide at least one quote on the article; a leading quote at the beginning is required. Only one quote would be allowed at the beginning of each section at max, although quotes may be placed in the middle of the article.
 * 14) &hellip;include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles.
 * 15) &hellip;include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available.
 * 16) &hellip;pass review by the Inquisitorius review panel.
 * 17) &hellip;counting the introduction and Behind the Scenes material, be at least 1000 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc).

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above. Note that a previously featured article cannot be featured on the Main Page again; however, it can be restored to featured status.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under! Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Atton Rand
Support
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 19:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 08:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) .  .  .  .  23:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Alright, but that "game completion scenario" is ugly. Chack Jadson 00:39, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Atarumaster88  21:14, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  Stake black   msg 19:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Greyman ( Paratus ) 03:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Qjuad 00:45, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Gaeamil 06:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) --Eyrezer 06:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 17:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 17:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * I'd like to see this article reference specific conversations or events in KOTOR II. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 18:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, that shouldn't be hard. I'll get to it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * See Jedi Exile for a good example of KOTOR referencing. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Finished. I hope I didn't go overboard. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro fairly short. Cull Tremayne 00:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro expanded. Does this suffice?
 * Yes, sorry about being slow on the uptake. Cull Tremayne 12:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

'''Objection overridden by Inquisitorius - Inq/Atton Rand --Eyrezer 03:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that another image, preferably one from the game, would look better in the infobox.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 12:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I am unable to capture (high-quality or otherwise) a screenshot. So I can't really do anything about that. I am not partial to the other head-shoulder shot in the article... but if I have no other choice I'll do it. Best thing to do is to just wait and see if JMAS or Redemption see this. - Solus  (Bird of Prey)  19:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The current one is promotional, crisp and nice. I see no reason to change it. It's fine. Though if you absolutely MUST change the infobox, change it to that headshot thats in the article by doing a quick switch-a-roo. Though put a vote on the talk page first just to see what everyone else thinks. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 00:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The sourcing style isn't consistent. .  .  .  .  23:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What does that mean? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * ...with other sourced articles. I thought we decided not to specify moments in the game. Therefore, every KOTOR II source should just be attributed to KOTOR II. .  .  .  .  04:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * So that was decided against, then? - Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 06:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * May I be told which one's been formally decided upon? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've done as was requested, so uh, could 4dot and Imp see if they can cross out their oppose votes? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  13:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Factual error in intro: "However, she eventually freed him from his past, and he went on to train other Jedi in the years ahead." To the best of my knowledge, this is an assumption. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 18:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is speculation expounding upon what Kreia said about him, and has been removed. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Can I get some clarificatoins in the text?
 * The intro contains info that needs to be put into the biography, such as his Echani training.
 * In the 3rd paragraph of the bio, it is unclear whether Atton actually killed the Jedi woman. It jumps straight to his later comments.
 * Secondly, I think the appearance of Kreia on Peragus needs some more context.
 * Also, if some information can be added to "when that mess was cleared up" to detail how they got out.
 * The article jumps straight into the Exile wanting to find out why she was banished without having previously mentioning she had been banished or that she'd lost the Force.
 * I also think some of the he was thinking highly of her etc needs to be changed. The developing attraction to the Exile should be more explicit.
 * The encounter with Michal needs to be in the main text also.
 * What other key worlds did the group then travel to?
 * In the final line of the biography, "Atton and the other" is awkward.
 * Can the BTS be changed to paragraphs?
 * I believe I have addressed these, sorry about the delay. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Nicely done. --Eyrezer 06:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I did a general overhaul of the article not long ago, and the only thing (that I know of) that needs to be cleared up is the canonicity of some of the Kotor II sidequests, which will be brought up in the next Inq meeting, so I can't do anything about that until then. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It was decided that we should be as vague as possible when writing about optional content. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. I didn't know that that entailed un-detailed game referencing stuff. I'll go resource it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Uh, is it possible to say this is an early entry for the Wookiee-Cast thingy and that I forsaw it the whole time ? For 4dot especially and for anyone else that has eyes maybe: see note under the 'Cannok' nom. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What else needs to be done here, as nothing has happened to this nom for several days. Imp's objection, in leiu of the new rule-thing, is moot, and would someone either back up, comment on, or strike Shaelas's objection? At the moment, nothing's really happening here.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Tavion Axmis
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 10:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Themelle444 18:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Kylekatarn 09:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It's an easy fix, but POVity POV POV POV. .  .  .  .  21:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Where?-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 22:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * "Overconfident", "Deadly", "Swift", "Devious"... .  .  .  .  22:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I was able to address the ones you listed above, except for overconfidence. From both sides, it was clearly obvious that she was overconfident. I made it sound more neutral, and it was the best I could do. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 3:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Mmkay, I've made some changes, but the prose is in need of a lot of work. A lot of sharp, short sentences that don't flow well. .  .  .  .  03:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks better now. I'll work on the sentences.-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 4:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The sentences are longer and I made sure they flowed better. Is it better now?-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 4:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Enough for me to strike my opposition. .  .  .  .  00:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Remove the bullets in the BtS, thanks. QuentinGeorge 08:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed.-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 15:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Present tense needs corrected. Atarumaster88  21:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs a general copyedit. Atarumaster88  21:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Jango Fett
Support Peter5158 21:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC) he has my vote cause he's cool
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 17:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jango Fett107 16:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Yeah, I can see it Enochf 23:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) (In Tem's accent) Looks good to me. Adamwankenobi 03:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) yeah man! General Mandofett  Wrist Holoprojector[[Image:Mandskull.jpg|20px]] 11:53, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Good to see a major character nom.  Atarumaster88  21:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Good article! DARTH SIDIOUS2 18:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8)  Stake black   msg 16:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) DWolf2k2 16:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) (nods) Thefourdotelipsis 23:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Humbone 13:43, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) It's got my vote. Ccneyo 02:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 14:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Jediknight19bby 21:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced quote. Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 12:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Quotes in prose, and a few unsourced statements in the BtS, but otherwise, fine. .  .  .  .  22:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Jango Fett107 14:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Severely lacking in detail to the point where, unless you've read the sources, it's almost impossible to understand what actually happened. Havac 19:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I want more sources for the "Weapons" section. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 06:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 14:14, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Breaks Rule 9; I recall that Jango appears in some Tales stories and those aren't mentioned in the article. Atarumaster88  01:51, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Which ones? -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 18:36, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I know for sure there's a story in volume 6 and a non-canon in vol. 5. Atarumaster88  20:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fett Club is the non-canon. Atarumaster88 16:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. Jango Fett107 18:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * There's nothing on the Star Wars Adventures Books, and if there is, it's not cited Rules 3 & 9. Cull Tremayne 03:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. --Jango Fett107 18:04, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Striked my objection, but I still agree with Havac. The level of detail is so low, that if I had never seen or read the books, my perception of the character would be severely lacking. Cull Tremayne 06:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Confederacy of Independent Systems
Support Oppose
 * 1) Unit 8311 15:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Fav article.TroybTalk contribs[[Image:Troyb2.jpg|20px]] 18:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Good article DARTH SIDIOUS2 Discussion board 15:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Like user: troyb said, this is my fav articleOOM-10 09:10, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Intro needs expanding (Rule 7). Needs to be completely sourced (Rule 11). Needs more appearances and sources (Rule 3). Needs serious expansion throughout (Examples: the entire Clone Wars section is five paragraphs, four of which are about the Battle of Geonosis and three of which are just two sentences; the whole government section is two short paragraphs; just about every other section is equally patchy) (Rules 1&9). Unsourced images (Rule 12). - Lord Hydronium 10:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Lord Hydro. History is too short. Chack Jadson 19:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I've been expanding the history section. Would appreciate it if others would help. Unit 8311 15:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

K'Kruhk
Support
 * 1) QuentinGeorge 11:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Kuralyov 13:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3)  StarNeptune Talk to me! 16:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 21:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) JMAS 22:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Greyman ( Paratus ) 01:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Adamwankenobi 23:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Yeah.-Darthtyler
 * 9) Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 14:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) great article AdmirableAckbar 14:37, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) --Eyrezer 06:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) --Eyrezer 06:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Expand intro, section the Clone Wars...section, and I cock my eyebrow, sah, at the sectioning of the BtS. Thefourdotelipsis 11:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro and sectioning done. Can't see what's wrong the BtS. It looks crap as a bullet or one massive chunky paragraph. QuentinGeorge 11:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ditch the portrayal subsection. And expand...something. Note that he's the only EU -based character to be in Clone Wars. Previously established. You know what I mean. Thefourdotelipsis 12:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Aayla was in the Clone Wars as well. But done, anyway. QuentinGeorge 12:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Too cursory in its coverage. It could use a lot of fleshing out. Also, we know that there will be a flood of information on K'Kruhk between now and its actually being featured, so it might be best to hold off anyway. Havac 18:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Tell me where it needs to be expanded, and I'll expand it. The fact he is going to make more appearances isn't an objection as we featured Darth Bane shortly before the release of Path of Destruction. QuentinGeorge 21:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Havac, look at the queue. Even approving this today would mean, at earliest, it doesn't appear on the front page until April 2008. Plenty of time for his Legacy and Dark Times appearances to be fully integrated in before he shows up on the front page. QuentinGeorge 21:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I'm not objecting on those grounds. Just suggesting that holding off a bit could improve it. But anway, all the Republic stuff, bar Seleucamai, reads like a very breezy overview -- he went here and fought there and this person died, but there's no feel of what happened. Take, for example, the Vos/Viento thing. It says he was assigned to protect Viento, Vos assassinated Viento, he got hurt. It's lacking in substance. Mention the fact that Vos sneaked past him at night. Mention that he caught Quin just too late. Mention that they went over the balcony in the fight and K'Kruhk bounced off an airspeeder and was lucky to survive. As is, it covers everything, but not to the comprehensive level expected of a featured article. Also, looking again, it could use a powers and talents section -- his healing skill could be mentioned there. And I'm also objecting on grounds of image quality now -- putting the Clone Wars crap as his main pic over one of Jan's far more realistic and detailed drawings is a clear mistake. If you want a headshot, find a Jan headshot or crop a Jan full-body shot down. Havac 21:44, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I disagree that his animated depiction is "crap", but will replace with a comic headshot if that is what people want. I was mainly trying to put a bit of variety in, since I'd used all comic depictions in the biography. QuentinGeorge 21:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * As I side note, some of the detail requirements for these bios seem faintly ridiculous in that we have to chronicle every single step someone takes but, if those are the rules, then those are the rules and I will comply. QuentinGeorge 21:54, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The image from the cartoon doesn't do the article much good. It should be replaced with a shot from one of the comics (perhaps the Dark Times one?). &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 21:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Jack, I've already said I'm going to replace the image and your antics on the Muun page don't exactly inspire confidence in your ability to spot a good one. QuentinGeorge 22:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Additionally, I'd rather you didn't do a "cleanup" of the article when I'm trying to expand the damn thing. 22:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Why are you lashing out at me? I give my opinion on the main image and then try to clean up the article, and then you scold me as if I did something wrong. What's your problem? &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 22:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

'''Objection overridden by Inquisitorius - Inq/K'Kruhk 05:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC) '''Objection overridden by Inquisitorius - Inq/K'Kruhk 05:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Karohalva I oppose this article on the grounds that using a Clone Wars Cartoon picture in the info-box is a crime against Star Wars. It sounds silly, yes, but it is true.
 * Please read what I have written above. I am going to replace it, as soon as I find a suitable headshot. QuentinGeorge 22:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops. Sorry then. What say you just crop a full-body shot? That should be Wookieepedian-legal. Karohalva
 * I have to agree with Jack about the CW image for the infobox. I don't think it's crap, but I don't think it's the kind of image we want for an infobox unless there is no other option, such as with the Voolvif Monn and Foul Moudama articles. I went ahead and cropped the Siege of Saleucami image to just his headshot and put that up in the infobox. Does that meet everyone's approval? - JMAS 22:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh, I said it's "crap" because a) I don't like the CW animation style and b) it's far less detailed and realistic than the comics pictures. It certainly deserves to be in the article, but it's not nearly a good enough depiction to be his main shot when better alternatives exist. It would be like using this as the infobox shot for Jerec. Or basically, what JMAS just edit-conflicted with me to say. Havac 22:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I think this new image is much better. And Quentin, don't lash out at me again. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 22:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, please. Don't be so melodramatic. 22:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, I don't really mind what image is used, and I'm happy to go with that one. I'm at work now, so I'll do a "Talents and Powers" section when I get home. If anyone else has more they'd like added, please tell me. In terms of images, I think its probably ok how it is now. Less is more. QuentinGeorge 22:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Melodramatic? I'm not the one who lashed out at another user just because they suggested a new main image and tried to clean up an article. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 22:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * This page is not designed for user arguments. Cool it please. Atarumaster88  00:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Back on topic, I have (once again) cleaned up the article. &mdash;Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) [[Image:Imperial Emblem.png|20px]] 00:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I've significantly changed the article, added more, added a abilities section, etc. Any more objections? 07:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Can people please strike objections that have been satisfied? Please? - QuentinGeorge 03:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * K'Kruhk remembered this and used the concept to help the Jedi evade pursuing Yinchorri starfighters. Can this be expanded? How did K'Kruhk do this?
 * found himself fighting for his life on Yibikkoror. Were they ambushed or what?
 * After their escape. How did they escape?
 * It was in this mission that his Master was killed, battling for her life on Yinchorr. More detail please. --Eyrezer 05:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Addressed. QuentinGeorge 05:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Can we get some more info on the mission to Teyr. Why were the losses so high? K'Kruhk's fault? outnumbered? Or is it only mentioned in passing?
 * Only mentioned in one comic frame, yet I've expanded it to the best of my ability. QuentinGeorge 10:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice extrapolation. --Eyrezer 23:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The last point I have, can the paragraph introducing the purge survival be made to flow more from the previous paragraph? --Eyrezer 03:27, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * How's that? QuentinGeorge 10:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Resolved --Eyrezer 06:21, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Aware that it may be short. Would be willing to listen to expansion suggestions. QuentinGeorge 11:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

501st Legion
Support Oppose
 * 1) Chack Jadson 13:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Yay  Stake black   msg 20:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Featured Article material, this is. --Bounty Offering 01:18, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Definetely deserves this Ccneyo 02:35, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) --Eyrezer 06:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 14:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Green Tentacle (Talk) 19:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * More thorough referencing needed and an unsourced image. Green Tentacle (Talk) 21:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Image sourced. -LtNOWIS 20:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Still needs some sourcing. Just a few bits like "The 501st would later be transferred to Vader's Death Squadron." Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I've made a couple of notes at Inq/501st Legion . Green Tentacle (Talk) 08:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Chack Jadson 02:11, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, those are fixed but there's a couple more I've added to the Inq page. Then it'll all be sourced. Green Tentacle (Talk) 16:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright ;) Chack Jadson 16:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The BTS should explain the origin of the fan group more. --Eyrezer 04:24, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * How is it now? And for more info, people can just see the article on the real organization. Chack Jadson 18:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * IIRC, 501st didn't kill Plo Koon, Stass Allie, or Ki-Adi-Mundi. That was CC Jag, some biker trooper, and the Galactic Marines, etc. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 14:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I know, but that part was just talking about the horror and effectiveness of Order 66. Still, if you really think it doesn't belong, I'll remove it. Chack Jadson 18:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If it was reworded so it didn't read like the 501st was responsible for their killings, I'd be happy. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 19:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. Chack Jadson 19:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * BTS: " . . .costumed as." Costumed as what? Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Stormtroopers. Chack Jadson 18:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah. It was missing that before. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 19:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Is it possible to get a pic for the Galactic Civil War section? --Eyrezer 23:40, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Anything specific you think would be good? Chack Jadson 23:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The ones put in now will be fine. --Eyrezer 06:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Finally read the whole thing. One last objection&mdash;"due to their training, it was very likely they could have killed everyone in the Temple without Vader's help" seems a little POVish. Green Tentacle (Talk) 16:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I think we need a quote for the "Post-Galactic Civil War" section. Chack, can you do that?  Stake black   msg 15:07, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I added the best one I could find, but it's not that great. Chack Jadson 13:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * That's better. Thanks!  Stake black   msg 22:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * We'll also need info on Trooper (comic)  Stake black   msg 19:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The dark deed you requested is done. Chack Jadson 23:57, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks, hard-working mate! It would also be great for the article having A Two-Edged Sword and Entrenched stories added. I don't have those, that's the reason I'm not doing it myself :P  Stake black   msg 00:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The 501st is not in A Two-Edged Sword, and I'll do what I can about Entrenched. Chack Jadson 00:27, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The 501st really does not play significant roles in either of those stories (my mistake, it is in A Two-Edged Sword). What information there is is already in the article. Chack Jadson 18:58, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, what about Databank sourceable info? Or perhaps on other sourcebooks. Sorry if I'm bothering, I'm just giving tips on how to improve the article xD  Stake black   msg 23:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. I'll try to look around soon. Chack Jadson 23:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't find any more info. Chack Jadson 19:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Gotal
Support
 * 1) Granted, the text hasn't been expanded very much since being declared good, but it's now fully sourced and illustrated. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) jSarek 05:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * #Sorry, but as much as it sucks to lose something good for something mediocre, we really should have an in-universe lead quote. :-( jSarek 03:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Unsourced image. Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * As it depicts a character only seen in Star Wars Legacy 1: Broken, Part 1, I presume that's the source. Thanks for checking! &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice article but those two [source?] tags in the history section have to go before it can be an FA. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:36, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * See comments. One is probably from Jedi: Count Dooku, the others are probably from Solo Command, Agents of Chaos II: Jedi Eclipse and/or The Unifying Force. Some of you must have those books! &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 23:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, sorted, I think. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 18:29, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Rather than a list of notable Gotal, can that be changed int paragraph form and placed within the Gotals in the Galaxy section.
 * Also the intro has lots of info that should be in the biology section, such as hair color etc. The intro could also do with some expansion. --Eyrezer 02:16, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * There are still two citations needed in the history section, but I suspect they're easy to fix. The bit about Confederate conquest and the resulting poverty is probably from Jedi: Count Dooku, and the novels in Tolokai and Ta'laam Ranth's appearances sections should have the "joined the New Republic and Galactic Alliance" information somewhere. Some of the motivation for this nomination is to get the Inquisition to track down that info for me.  8) &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Tolokai appears in the opening parts of Solo Command, I'm almost positive. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 14:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but does it mention that his people are now part of the NR? That's the point I'm trying to cite. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 00:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Come on, there has to be some quotes. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 14:43, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, all the quotes I've been able to find in my sources are somewhat dry descriptions in reference books and RPG supplements, or somewhat OOU narration in novels and short stories. I added a quote from narration anyway: after all, we do use a bit of limited omniscent narration on the Dooku article in order to quote his final thoughts, so it's not without precedent.  &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 00:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but actual article content is different from quotes. jSarek 03:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Replaced it with a less interesting but wholly IU quote. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 03:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry we have to take a less-than-ideal IU quote. You're right that the reference book descriptions are rather dry.  I have a few alternative suggestions, which I'll put on Talk:Gotal. jSarek 05:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Callista Ming
Support Oppose
 * 1) Nominated. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 15:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Greyman ( Paratus ) 11:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

'''Objection overridden by Inquisitorius - Inq/Callista Ming 15:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC) Comments
 * A lot of potential, but not enough. Luke was not her master, and it's not the best Wookieepedia has to offer. Jediknight19bby 22:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Good catch- the Master thing is removed. Could you be more specific on what you want expanded? She's only in three books and 1 short story, after all. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 14:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Like I said, it's not Wookieepedia's best. In truth, it's a great article, but probably Jango Fett will win. Jediknight19bby 15:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Win? This isn't a competition, you know. Any article can become featured if it's good enough. Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * WTF? I suggest you read the top of the page and try and get a better understanding of the FA process. If you have an objection to the quality of the article, let me know and I'll fix it. Otherwise, admins and Inqs please strike this. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 15:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This objection has been struck. We do not vote on our favourite article each week and they do not compete against each other. Any article which meets the criteria can become an FA and will be added to the queue to await its week on the front page. Any objections to an article achieving FA status need to be based on the criteria at the top of the page. Green Tentacle (Talk) 15:45, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Expand Murder in Slushtime. --Eyrezer 13:43, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 14:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * More expansion as per Inq page --Eyrezer 01:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Nom Anor
Support Oppose
 * 1) User:Siteoftupac 9:41, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) User:Ultimate Mandalore 8:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Rules 9 and 11. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 19:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Ephant Mon
Support
 * 1) AdmirableAckbar 19:57, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Chack Jadson 12:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Jediknight19bby 20:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * 1) Does not meet rules 3, 9, 11, 12 and 17 . Greyman ( Paratus ) 21:26, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *it now meets rules 3, 9, 11, 17. we're still trying to find source for main image. AdmirableAckbar 17:54, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) I question whether the ice planet event happens in his "youth" considering the presence of Imperial snowtroopers. QuentinGeorge 03:20, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) **probobly a gaff by EGTC AdmirableAckbar 23:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Something needs to be done since, as written, it makes no sense. QuentinGeorge 23:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ****fixed. i took the safest option and removed all mention of the empire. AdmirableAckbar 00:01, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) *****actually it was decades after Cerea business, which was around 32BBY, so it should be right about the imperials, but not the young bit (he may have been young, i'm not an expert in Chevin lifespans). I'm going to change it back, but without the young bit. AdmirableAckbar 21:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Jediknight19bby 17:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) *Jediknight19bby, you must provide a reason for your opposition. AdmirableAckbar 23:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) **Struck his objection. QuentinGeorge 23:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) ***hear hear. now all you have to do is block him AdmirableAckbar 23:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) *There's a point in the BTS that should be sourced. --Eyrezer 02:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 13) **which one? AdmirableAckbar 10:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 14) ***I put the source tag next to it. Shouldn't be too hard to find the source for it I hope. --Eyrezer 10:45, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 15) ****it is now referenced. t'was from the databank AdmirableAckbar 14:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 16) *It was removed the other day when you put it up on the ID, for the reason that it is an FA nom and certain people are working on to make it FA. Greyman ( Paratus ) 17:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 17) **could someone please srtike Jediknight19bby's vote again. To jediknight19bby: how does it need to be expanded. Some sections could even be described as too detailed, and every appearance of his is covered. The article still needs tweaking, but certainly not the improvement drive. AdmirableAckbar 15:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, we'll try and expand. Hey, Ack, here's a temporary page with the only excerpts I could find concerning EM from the novels: User:Enochf/Ephant Enochf 12:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * the main pic has been replace temporarily 'till it's sourced. the article now meets rule 12
 * Nice job on this article so far, AdmirableAckbar. I struck rules 12 & 17 from my objection since they've been cleared up!  Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Komari Vosa
Support
 * 1) Article looks fairly complete to my brown eyes.OOM-10 09:14, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Citations. Longer intro. Sections need to be expanded. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 2:37,  11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This article has already been nominated for an FA and failed. There has been little to no work done on it since then. See the Inq page for outstanding objections. --Eyrezer 08:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * You should consider nominating this to be a good article. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 2:42,  11 June 2007 (UTC)

Dace Diath
Support
 * 1) Nominated. Greyman ( Paratus ) 11:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 16:17,  12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Cull Tremayne 05:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 01:46, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 11:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Green Tentacle (Talk) 16:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * Inquisitor Eyrezer stated that this should be looked at for FA. So, here it is. Greyman ( Paratus ) 11:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Bouncer
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) --Eyrezer 13:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 16:15,  12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Nice. Chack Jadson 22:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Cull Tremayne 05:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) QuentinGeorge 05:29, 15 June 2007 (UTC) - Big thumbs up from me.
 * 6) Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 19:41, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Greyman ( Paratus ) 01:53, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Green Tentacle (Talk) 17:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't believe its ever explicitly stated that Zannah killed Darovit. QuentinGeorge 05:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * That's an interesting point. DFS say she "engaged her sibling [sic] in a final deadly confrontation". Final and deadly for whom? I seem to recall Abel discussing this on tfn. I'll see if I can dig it up, but will change it on this article anyway.--Eyrezer 03:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I remember this point mainly because I was the one to ask if Zannah killed Darovit, and Abel Pena told me not to assume that.... QuentinGeorge 03:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Typical ambiguity!! :) --Eyrezer 03:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Jerg's article says he discovered Ruusan in 11 BBY. The Bouncer article says 5 BBY. Which is it? QuentinGeorge 05:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Jerg says to Morgan that it was about 10 years earlier. With Morgan being killed in 1 BBY, it must be at least 11 BBY. Good spotting. Now corrected. --Eyrezer 03:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Minor point. Is Bouncer fatalism a result of the devastation of their world by Kaan, or were they always like that? QuentinGeorge 05:30, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm. I don't think it is clear. Like the differences noted in the behind the scenes, it could be a result of development over the next thousand years. However, Laa did appear to be resigned to her fate in her conversations with Rain, although whether her actions can be used as a basis for a generalization for the species as a whole is debatable. On balance, I'd probably attribute it to their biology rather than that particular cataclysm. That was what Grawley attributed it too at the least. --Eyrezer 03:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Independence
Support
 * 1) Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:30, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Good article. Chack Jadson 01:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Great article. --Eyrezer 02:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jaina Solo   ( Talk ) 10:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * Purely on appearance, is there a better pic for the infobox? I think a side on pic would be better, but one may not be available. --Eyrezer 02:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * As far as I know that's the only promo picture confirmed to be the Independence. Green Tentacle (Talk) 08:49, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Wes Janson
Support
 * 1) Lieutenant Kettch says "Yub, yub, support this article." Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 17:26, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments