Talk:Second Galactic Civil War

Insurection seems like a loaded term in my opinion. Would Second Corellian Crisis be a more neutral term? -- SFH 22:36, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I second that. Crisis would be better Stinkywookie 18:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah. I'm actually glad they're almost making the Galactic Alliance bad guys, or at least controversial. I hated their name. I hope in the end, after this, after the Legacy stuff, they stick with the name (and form of Government) "Republic". -Aiddat 21:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Naming
Shouldn't this be listed as a conjectural name, since, to the best of my knowledge, the authors have never referred to the war as the Second Corellian Crisis? 64.12.116.9 16:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

I personally like the GA government. That asside everything from Op. Roundabout to the end of the Correllian Blockade should be named the Corellian Crisis. However the Battle of Hapes and the majority of events in Tempest should be considered a seperate catagory of the Hapes Civil War. Further more the Battle of Gilatter VII and everything after that should be put in the catagory of a galactic civil war. In Inferno "The galaxy has esploded into all-civil war..." this means that Gilatter VII and the events of Sacfrice will be the catalyst for the eventual civil war. Apotheoses Jedi 01:28, 2 April 2007

Layout
It seemed to me, when I read through, that the section "Operation Roundabout" seemed rushed and kind of sloppy. Could we put it into a seperate article like everything else so it could be given a more detailed look there? As it is, I was either confused or overloaded with information. --OompaLoompa of DOOM 02:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Date
How do we know it ends around 42 ABY? Chack Jadson 21:55, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If you've read the series, you'd know why. TheNewDarthMalevlent ( The Sith shall rise to power!) |undefined 15:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)