Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Ch'hodos's red sun


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Ch'hodos's red sun

 * Nominated by:  Imperators II (Talk) 13:44, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It just happened.

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) Go WP:AST  Stake black   msg 13:49, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Fe Nite (talk) 15:43, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3)  501st  dogma ( talk ) 21:47, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Winterz (talk) 15:33, April 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Supreme Emperor (talk) 02:42, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Isn't this conjecture? Fe Nite (talk) 13:56, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) *Nope, it's identified as "Ch'hodos's red sun" in the source.  Imperators II (Talk) 13:59, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) **That still means it's conjectural, though. It's not a proper name.  Stake black   msg 14:01, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I respectfully disagree. How can we know that the star was not referred in-universe as "Ch'hodos's red sun"?  Imperators II (Talk) 14:05, April 3, 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) ****This sort of thing can happen with lightsaber articles, since they would obviously be called "Anakin Skywalker's lightsaber" etc. in-universe, but I'm not really sure if the same applies to planets.  Commander Code-8  G'day, mate 08:19, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) *****I don't know the official policy on this; but, if the source specifically calls it "Ch'hodos's red sun" then that is good enough for me. If it turns out to be conjecture then just put a conjecture template up there. Fe Nite (talk) 15:43, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) "The red star was orbited by the planet of Ch'hodos.[2] By the time of the renewed warfare between the Galactic Republic and the resurgent Sith Empire[2]..." You don't need to ref to ref 2 twice in a row here.  501st  dogma ( talk ) 20:23, April 4, 2013 (UTC)
 * 8) *Thanks, good catch. Fixed.  Imperators II (Talk) 20:29, April 4, 2013 (UTC)

Comments