Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for In-Universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good Article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Unidentified planet (Kolatill system)

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 10:05, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Umm ... yeah.

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) --Eyrezer 14:12, September 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Talk ) 21:42, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) *Well done. But based on the bts note, shouldn't the appearances section list it as an indirect mention? Menkooroo 18:57, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) **I wouldn't think so since the adventure mentions the planet directly. If the planet had been named in any source, but not here, then I would agree, but that's not the case. - Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 21:59, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Garqian reptile

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 12:01, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A reptile from the Cassandran Worlds

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Vert-mite

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 01:54, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A mite from the Cassandran Worlds

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Drexl-class starfighter

 * Nominated by:Omicron 17:18, September 20, 2010 (UTC):
 * Nomination comments:Interesting article about a previously unknown starship

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support
 * Omicron 17:18, September 20, 2010 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Soresu: A few basics
 * 2) * Remember to capitalize in the infobox.
 * 3) * Some spacing problems in the infobox.
 * 4) *Check for linking.
 * 5) **This remains to a large degree. For example, in the infobox, the manufacturer should be SoroSuub Corporation, starfighter should be linked, credits has been unnecessarily linked twice, kg could be linked, and days could be linked to Galactic Standard Calendar. Please go through the entire article to fix these sorts of things up.
 * 6) *Quite a lot of infobox stuff that has no mention in the body.
 * 7) **Not fixed. The description should contain info on the crew, consumables, etc. You might even be able to push the word count over 250.
 * 8) *There are a number of other problems I'll put up once these are addressed. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 02:01, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) **Ok, I've tried to address your objections, let me know what else needs to be done.<-Omicron 14:31, September 21, 2010 (UTC)

Unidentified Garqian fowl

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 09:12, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: I'll build a Cassander sector aviary next!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Unidentified starship (Kolatill system)

 * Nominated by: Cavalier One FarStar Logo.jpg( Squadron channel ) 10:18, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Ho-hum ...

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) I'm going to assume that it is unknown who attacked the ship and if there was any survivors. :P  1358  (Talk) 12:09, September 23, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Biituian bird

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 12:14, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: In what I think is a first for the Wookieepedia, this article includes the bird call of this creature in the wild. Flock to review this article, fellow Birdwatchers.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Plasma miner

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 23:17, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: These things can burrow underground!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Borvo the Hutt's starfighter

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 23:17, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Cannon fodder

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)
Support
 * 1) NAYA   YEN   18:59, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) * Just one: "...and starfighters had a small cross-section" Eh? Even if you put "the" in there, it still sounds odd. Reword? NAYA   YEN   23:27, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) **I put "profile" instead. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Disabled Trade Federation base

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 23:17, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It's a trap!

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Caf bean

 * Nominated by: Eyrezer 13:37, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Reviewing this will keep you awake all night

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Andrevea River

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A really long river

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Ferentina

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Kindly ignore the fact it was once named "Unidentified Naboo town"

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments

Porso Hill

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Place of a Hutt's comeuppance

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Is the "gamemechanics template" too much? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:30, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Widow's Valley

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: So named for the unstable spires.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * I could find a quote if necessary. Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Um...where's the page? =/ --''' Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 21:44, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know; it won't show up when running a search for it. The only way to go to it is through a page which links to it (BFN appearances or Battle of the south ridge). Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 21:50, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * The apostrophe was different. --Eyrezer 23:10, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Minelayer (Trade Federation)

 * Nominated by: Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ~One second of screentime.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Who wants to place bets on whether I have to move the page? Corellian PremierAll along the watchtower 14:25, September 22, 2010 (UTC)