Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

 The featured articles of the wiki are articles that represent the best Wookieepedia has to offer. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like.


 * /History
 * /2005 History
 * /2006 History
 * /Queue

So just what makes a featured article? Well, we've prepared a list just in case someone should ask that, and it is as follows.

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
 * 5) &hellip;not be the object of any ongoing edit wars.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box.
 * 8) &hellip;have no more than 3 redlinks.
 * 9) &hellip;have significant information from all sources and appearances, especially a biography for character articles.
 * 10) &hellip;not have been previously featured on the Main Page. Otherwise, it can only be restored to featured status.
 * 11) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 12) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 13) &hellip;provide at least one quote on the article; a leading quote at the beginning is required. Only one quote would be allowed at the beginning of each section at max, although quotes may be placed in the middle of the article.
 * 14) &hellip;include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles.
 * 15) &hellip;include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available.
 * 16) &hellip;pass review by the Inquisitorius review panel.

For more information on what makes a featured article, see Wikipedia:What is a featured article.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of featured status, putting it at the bottom of the list below; see criteria above. Note that a previously featured article cannot be featured on the Main Page again; however, it can be restored to featured status.
 * 2) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources).
 * 3) Supporters adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied.
 * 4) The article is placed on the featured article list and added to the front page queue.
 * 5) Also, if, at least a week after the article's nomination, that article has 5 supports and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), it will be added the queue, and will be officially known as a "featured article".

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterwards, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved. Please cite which rule your objection falls under! Failure to do so will result in your objection being considered invalid.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors.
 * 5) Once all objectors' complaints have been solved (or the article has 5 supports and no objections after at least a week), the article will be added to the queue and be officially known as a "featured article".

Also remember to add nominated at the top of the article you are nominating.

Every Sunday the next article in the queue will be highlighted on the Main Page as featured, marked with the featured template and removed from the list of nominations. The beginning of the article then appears on the Main Page via the featured article template. Nominees that are inactive for a month will be eliminated from the nominations list.

Carth Onasi
Support Oppose
 * 1)  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 04:37, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) In spite of the shoddy infobox pic. .  .  .  .  11:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Looks good. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  14:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 16:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Shaelas (Ahto City)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 00:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) SkywalkerPL 12:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) I find Carth to be the light side smart ass of the group. - Raan 13:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Dorks on the front page!!! KEJ 08:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Choppy prose: "Carth was born on Telos IV. He had a wife, Morgana, and son named Dustil. He served in the planetary militia and later in the Republic Navy. His first posting was in an orbital watchstation over Serocco." -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I did a general copyedit. Does this address your objection? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:53, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I still think a few sections could use improvement. I'll go over it tomorrow. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs a longer introduction. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see this article reference specific conversations or events in KOTOR I and II. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * As I've said elsewhere, I find this new "rule" to be somewhat absurd. It's not required that novels reference chapters or pages, is it? When did this suddenly become an issue? I haven't seen any discussion for making this a policy, and only a couple weeks ago Ebon Hawk made it to FA without this kind of referencing even coming up. It looks ridiculous - look at the bottom of Atton Rand, all that referencing for just a couple of sources. I'm not trying to be difficult, I just strongly object to this. - Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 06:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not a rule, and it certainly isn't policy. I'm just suggesting you do this to make the article as good as possible. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 12:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, if leaving it out keeps the article from getting approved, that sounds like policy to me. And after skimming the last Inq meeting log, that appeared to be the case. - Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 18:10, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Look, I'll 'fully source' the thing, just let me try and get my brother-who-has-a-near-perfect-memory-concerning-KOTOR-stuff in the mood. That may take a few hours, so don't get your hopes up. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  21:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I've sourced it, but I cannot find the source of these three so-called facts:
 * While a name for Carth's deceased wife is not in the game files, David Gaider, BioWare's writer for the character, gave her name as "Morgana."
 * Carth originally had alternate lines for his devastation in finding out who Revan is if the player is female and has romanced Carth up to that point.
 * If the player has both romanced Carth and turned to the dark side, then the player will have the option of killing Carth herself or have Bastila finish it. In a cut-scene that didn't make it to the final game, Revan had a third option to kill Bastila and die aboard the Star Forge with Carth. It was not placed in the final version because the developers did not have enough time for finishing the game.

Any help would be appreciated. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC) Comments
 * I talked to Redemption in IRC, and he said the last two are found in dlg files (dialog files). The first one was mentioned on the BioWare forums according to him. He's a pretty good resource on all KotOR related questions, and he said he's willing to help with any future issues. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 22:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Will get to it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs sourcing for fact tags in BtS. - Lord Hydronium 01:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Addressed, many thanks to Redemption. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Hydronium. .  .  .  .  22:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Addressed per above. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Remove the bullets in the BtS - looks unprofessional. Just use sentences and clean paragraphs. Additionally, there's a redlink - but I think it might be a mispelling. QuentinGeorge 06:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Written as prose and the redlink has been cleared up. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  17:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed the infobox pic to show the background. Better?  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 18:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think he meant as in it's not a head shot/portrait. But the alternative is either game screenshot or Carth with a lazy eye. Take your pick. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 20:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * At any rate, a shorter pic will be needed for the FA template. .  .  .  .  21:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that image works best for the infobox personally, but I've also added an in-game headshot, and there's always this one for the FA template.  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 21:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll grab one later today. Like I did for Bastila's infobox image. Thankfully what I have in mind is the very first module...-- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 21:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Human
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 7:50, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Doesn't cite sources. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 15:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * As per Imp. .  .  .  .  21:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ditto (Rule 11) 15:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This is basically a citation problem, but I am disturbed by the "racial and ethnic characteristics" section. It needs to go unless it can be written in a properly cited in-universe style.  - breathesgelatin Talk 05:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * And some MOS ignorising. .  .  .  .  23:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Question: Should Bts include a note about how we decided to change the capitalization of Human for consistency, etc? 15:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps so. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I made a note of it. Chack Jadson 01:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Burl Ives
Support
 * 1) Yay! Burl Ives! .  .  .  .  23:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * If only to encourage a consistent policy with regard to barely-SW-relevant RL people, I vote yes. Yes! Excelsior to Burl! &mdash; Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 00:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Changed my mind too.  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 17:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I vote yay! If only to please the ewok-spirits. &mdash; Jinko 01:42, 28 March 2007 (UTC) Changed my mind, sorry. - Jinko 13:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Despite probably being the FA with the least canonical significance (aside from Suttle, who was and is a joke), this is worthy of the title. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) * Neutral until definition of FA is clarified. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Tentative support, providing FA rules don't drastically change. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I was going to say something about the "Ives of March", but that would be totally lame. :-P Cull Tremayne 21:48, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Shaelas (Ahto City)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 22:11, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Lord Hydronium 00:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Adamwankenobi 21:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Darth Culator (Talk)(Kills) 14:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Ozzel 02:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Curse you Burl Ives! Curse you and all you stand for! Enochf 08:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) supergeeky1 [[Image:BobaFett.jpg|20px]] The Cantina 04:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Burl Ives so deserves it. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 18:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

' Objection 1 and 4 through 9 are not valid under the FA nomination rules. Objections that do not fall under rules 1 through 15 will be disregarded. ' -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 14:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * To spite 4dot Because it contains too much information that's not relevant to a Star Wars encyclopedia. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 23:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) *Pfft. The article deals with Burl Ives. Ives participated in Star Wars. The article is legit. Why can't the expansion be so? .  .  .  .  23:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I have no problem with non-SW content. The problem is that aside from one line, it doesn't address the Star Wars content at all. His voice work for SW needs to be a bigger focus. Havac 00:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) *His...few lines in a telemovie which has absolutely no documentation whatsoever? .  .  .  .  00:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) **Yes. Havac 00:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Second objection...too many redlinks...while they don't appear red, they link to non-existant Wikipedia articles. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Includes a lot of information irrelevant to Star Wars, which is the subject of Wookieepedia. Our articles on real-world stuff only mention Star Wars-relevant facts while delegating everything else to Wikipedia. - Sikon 04:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) *Fixed. .  .  .  .  01:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) *Agreed. Darth Maddolis 04:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) **So, basically, the article should read "Burl Ives narrated Caravan of Courage". That's BS in the highest. .  .  .  .  01:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ***. -LtNOWIS 02:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ****Exactly. .  .  .  .  23:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Curse you Burl Ives! Curse you and all you stand for! Enochf 11:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with Sikon. I'm not saying the article should only have SW stuff in it, but since Ives has such little to do with SW, the article is limited in it's SW referrences, and since this is a SW wiki, an article with such a small percentage of SW in it should not be an article Featured on a SW wiki. If you read above, in the 16 requirements, it doesn't actually mention that the article requires anything Star Wars about it- of course, that means that the article passes the requirements, but it also means that any random Featured Article from wikipedia could be imported in the sense that it'd pass requirements (although I realise that we do not copy articles 100% from wikipedia). It is fine for a good article, but to be featured on a Star Wars encyclopedia is a bit much. Darth Maddolis 07:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No way. This article is unwookieepedic as argued by Sikon and others. KEJ 08:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * As per Sikon, Maddolis, KEJ. --Eyrezer 09:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Per everybody else. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Spelling and grammar errors throughout. British spelling. Does not follow MOS. Rules 1 and 4. Has a wookify tag on it. Atarumaster88  ( Audience Chamber ) 21:48, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) I know, Fourdot'll just cross me out, but I feel I have to protest. If I'm irrelevant in saying that this is all completely irrelevant to SW, then clearly we need to change the rules. For Heaven's sake, people, this is supposed to be a Star Wars encyclopedia! Evir Daal 08:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Look, bub, I didn't strike any of these objections, and obviously you missed the point at which Burl Ives narrated Caravan of Courage. .  .  .  .  08:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **Oh. Then I'm real sorry I accused you. I just made an assumption, since you seemed to be the article's greatest proponent, and didn't bother checking the history, though I realise now I should have. Please accept my heartfelt apologies. I won't change my opinion, though. My protest might be deemed irrelevant, but I don't think this warrants FA status. That should be reserved for Star Wars articles. No, I didn't miss the Ewoks reference, but I might well have, dwarfed as it is by all the rest... which IMO is completely irrelevant to SW. Evir Daal 08:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Apology accepted, but tell me this: Why do we even have a Burl Ives article, then? .  .  .  .  08:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) ****If it's policy, we'd better abide by it, as OOU articles are apparently accepted. Personally I'd rather see only things mentioned IU having articles, actors etc could fit into the BTS sections of IU articles, but I'll accept the majority view. But I don't think something with this little importance to SW should be featured. Evir Daal 08:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) *****But you can't object to an FA on the basis of it's subject. You can only object on qualitative grounds. .  .  .  .  09:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) ******Well, then someone will cross me out sooner or later for being irrelevant. Till then, I'm exercising civil disobedience. ;) Evir Daal 09:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Does not follow WP:LG, which states "official and canonical information only." The Burl Ives article is full of non-official information, though I admit that it doesn't fall under the canon ruling. Also, I find it funny that the Inq is able to veto the votes of the majority based on a minority group which contains the articles primary supporters. &mdash;Jaymach Ral'Tir (talk) 08:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *Burl Ives doesn't have any continuity retainers, I'm afraid. And let's pitch out all the unlicenced magazine articles while we're at it. .  .  .  .  10:27, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) ** No, I'd have to remove a whole paragraph from one of my pet articles. And it's the paragraph with pirates in it. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 01:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) *All the information is official. It's just not released by LFL. It's all verifiable (per the citations), however, which is the point of that requirement. - Lord Hydronium 03:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Has a wookify tag on it... indeed. §6. KEJ 09:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) *This has been fixed. - Lord Hydronium 03:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Jedipilot94 19:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * 1) *No rule, no objection. See above. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Xwing328's comments below convince me to object based on the only interpretation of rule 9 possible for a real-world article, and the several CT threads this has inspired lead me to object under a broad interpretation of rule 5 (though those threads are leading towards a consensus which would allow articles like this to be featured, and this objection in particular to be struck.) It needs more expansion on the Star Wars role he played rather than everything else he did in his life. &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 23:55, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) *I understand this sentiment, but what else can really be said? .  .  .  .  01:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) ** Is there any BTS information about the making of the movie he narrated? Why did he only narrate the one?  What did he do as narrator? &mdash;Silly Dan (talk) 01:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) **Not a well documented film, so I don't know, and he narrated as a narrator. .  .  .  .  04:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) ***Anyway, objection adressed. .  .  .  .  04:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Burl Ives is, like, teh mohtst imhportant pserson in Schtar Whores. He must be ohn teh main paeg! .  .  .  .  23:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Just wondering, but did you misspell 'Star Whores' intentionally, or is there not some hidden meaning behind it? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  12:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh? No, I was just in a mood. .  .  .  .  21:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, I could tell by the rest of the sentance&mdash;which was funny&mdash;I just mean that a 'whore' is a harlot/prostitute. I was wondering if you meant it to be taken that way. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * This objection struck because it doesn't fall under any rules


 * Puh-lease, this is Wookieepedia, not IMDb. KEJ 08:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * BTW, who struck those votes? KEJ 08:27, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Havac struck his own objection. Darth Maddolis 08:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Alright. Fair enough. KEJ 09:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The real world biography stuff for Burl Ives is lucky enough to be let on the article (due to a vote, http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Real-world_biographies based on simply allowing the content to be on wookieepeia), but making the article an FA is just plain silly. Darth Maddolis 09:02, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This could really use some expansion on his narrator role. What did he narrate? How much of the episode was narrated, the entire thing, or just one line? Any quotes to give an example of his narration? etc... If anybody has this episode, please expand it. 20:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Sio Bibble
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) .  .  .  .  07:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Shaelas (Ahto City)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 22:08, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 08:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced infobox picture. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 12:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. -- Ozzel 00:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Small, but my main issue is the present tense and speculation at the end. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 03:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced P&T. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. .  .  .  .  21:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * A small one, but unsourced last paragraph of Biography. And as mentioned, it's very short, though apparently that's not objection-worthy. - Lord Hydronium 00:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. .  .  .  .  21:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced images. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Sourced. .  .  .  .  23:43, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Four sentences for the intro? I know we don't have an objection for articles being "too short", but this just looks small, even with 3 pictures placed in the main text. Cull Tremayne 21:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Struck my objection but I agree with Cull about the length. Green Tentacle (Talk) 08:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Korriban
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 08:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) SkywalkerPL 12:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * The History section is fine, but you need more about the planet itself. More about the inhabitants, the society structure there, and the key locations. .  .  .  .  21:59, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fauna should be expanded. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 22:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see A) More on the state of Korriban during its heday under the Sith b) A section on its terrain. Apart from the pictures, there's nothing here that describes the world itself and the landscape. The comics and games are enough to go by, surely. QuentinGeorge 08:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Great Jedi Purge
Support
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 11:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) No arguement here. .  .  .  .  23:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 07:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Lord Hydronium 03:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * Doesn't cite sources. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 15:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed.-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 15:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro is incredibly short and not good enough for the FA box (Rule 7). Cull Tremayne 00:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Again, fixed. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 10:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Unsourced images. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I can't find the source for the Jedi in disguise picture. Anyone mind helping? -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 18:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's definatly a cropped image. There are these odd bluish boxes around the outside...Magazine cover?Amthyst fire 15:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The art style and color of the bluish boxes suggest to me it's one of the later WotC RPG books, possibly the Power of the Jedi Sourcebook or the Hero's Guide. jSarek 23:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's from POTJ - I have the book in front of me. That being said, I have a few objections. Mainly, the "MIA" section. It's a load of poodoo, and should be removed. 1) It's basically a big list saying, "We don't know anything about these people". Duh. Logically we just need a list of survivors and victims - anyone else is of "unknown" status. Secondly, K'Kruhk, Jeisel and A'Sharad are survivors, not MIA. Full stop. They are explictly stated as surviving the Purge in the NEC, a book which, in universe, is written 32 ABY, decades after the Purge. If it says they survived, they survived. End of discussion. QuentinGeorge 03:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Man, you need to calm down. First off, I put K'Kruhk, Jeisel and A'Sharad in the survival section. Second, we don't know anything about those people. That is why the MIA section is there. People have debated about the MIA, survivors, and victims sections on the talk page, and they've been made to the best of the article's ability. If you truly think it needs to be fixed up more, then request for it to be done on the article's talk page. That's what the talk page is there for. By the way, thanks for the source on the image. Last, Green Tentacle, you can strike your objection because we now have the source for the Jedi in disguise picture. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 4:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Second, we don't know anything about those people. - then why bother putting them there? An article is supposed to be about known, canon information. I'm sorry, but a section that basically says, "We don't know" is pointless for an article of this type. If you don't know about an individual, then don't add them to the page. There's no need for a "status unknown" list. A reader can infer that any Jedi not listed on the victim or survivor list is of an unknown fate. I won't strike this objection until that superfluous list is removed. QuentinGeorge 06:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but you can't just delete an entire section in an article. There's a point to that section, and it was made for a reason. People need that list to inform them who's survival is unknown. People can infer for a couple of Jedi, but not the entire group of unknown Jedi. There are just too many. I really don't care if you don't strike that objection. If the Survival Unknown section is really that bad, then either: 1) Ask for the section to be deleted on the talk page, 2) Do it yourself, or 3)Ask the Inquisitorious or the Administrators to do something about it. That section needs to be there. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 16:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Since I've been given implicit permission to do so, I have removed said redundant section. Now I'd like to see that bulleted BTS turned into neat and clean paragraphs. QuentinGeorge 08:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * I'd like to see some more images, and please, better ones.  Stake black   msg 19:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Added one under Siege of Naboo. It's of pretty good quality, but other than that, the article has enough. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 20:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Atton Rand
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2)  Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 19:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 08:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) .  .  .  .  23:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see this article reference specific conversations or events in KOTOR II. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 18:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, that shouldn't be hard. I'll get to it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:55, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * See Jedi Exile for a good example of KOTOR referencing. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:29, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Finished. I hope I didn't go overboard. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro fairly short. Cull Tremayne 00:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Intro expanded. Does this suffice?
 * Yes, sorry about being slow on the uptake. Cull Tremayne 12:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that another image, preferably one from the game, would look better in the infobox.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 12:24, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I am unable to capture (high-quality or otherwise) a screenshot. So I can't really do anything about that. I am not partial to the other head-shoulder shot in the article... but if I have no other choice I'll do it. Best thing to do is to just wait and see if JMAS or Redemption see this. - Solus  (Bird of Prey)  19:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The current one is promotional, crisp and nice. I see no reason to change it. It's fine. Though if you absolutely MUST change the infobox, change it to that headshot thats in the article by doing a quick switch-a-roo. Though put a vote on the talk page first just to see what everyone else thinks. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 00:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The sourcing style isn't consistent. .  .  .  .  23:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * What does that mean? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * ...with other sourced articles. I thought we decided not to specify moments in the game. Therefore, every KOTOR II source should just be attributed to KOTOR II. .  .  .  .  04:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * So that was decided against, then? - Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 06:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * May I be told which one's been formally decided upon? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  20:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've done as was requested, so uh, could 4dot and Imp see if they can cross out their oppose votes? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  13:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I did a general overhaul of the article not long ago, and the only thing (that I know of) that needs to be cleared up is the canonicity of some of the Kotor II sidequests, which will be brought up in the next Inq meeting, so I can't do anything about that until then. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  18:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It was decided that we should be as vague as possible when writing about optional content. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. I didn't know that that entailed un-detailed game referencing stuff. I'll go resource it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Uh, is it possible to say this is an early entry for the Wookiee-Cast thingy and that I forsaw it the whole time ? For 4dot especially and for anyone else that has eyes maybe: see note under the 'Cannok' nom. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Selkath
Support
 * 1) -- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 21:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 23:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Skippy Farlstendoiro 07:37, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) .  .  .  .  21:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 02:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Jinko 21:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Flipperheads! KEJ 11:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) --Eyrezer 06:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose Comments
 * "History and culture" section is too generic. Split it up. .  .  .  .  23:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. I know that it says an IP did it, but it was me, the Culture and History sections are seperate.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 13:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think some more information on kolto needs to be integrated into the article. I don't know enough about it to do it myself. --Eyrezer 02:38, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Why? There is really no information about it at all. Besides, it really doesn't have a huge impact on the article.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Kolto is a central aspect of Selkath life and history. Yet the biggest explanation of it is currently in the intro. That is not enough to get my support. --Eyrezer 11:26, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The "The Worlds of Knights of the Old Republic" link doesn't seem to work. --Eyrezer 06:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know. I'm not that good with external links.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 13:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed the link. --Eyrezer 01:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Quote under Selkath in the Galaxy is unsourced. Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 15:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Too many images. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 09:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No there's not. There's only ten. It doesn't make the text look choppy either. I am afraid that, while that is a legitamate objection, you are incorrect in saying so. Perhaps, after reconsideration, you will strike your objection voluntarily.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 04:35, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Perhaps, after reconsideration, you'll remove some images. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 23:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The number of images is acceptable. I think that your personal opinion is not valid. Since it does not take away from the value of the article, such as making the text uneven, and the images are not cluttered, the number of images is not an issue.-- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Mention of the Jedi Qual seems to be out of chronology - he should be mentioned before the KOTOR video game councillors, as he lived and died decades before hand. And yes, too many images. QuentinGeorge 07:29, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Selkath 23:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I have done alot of work, let us hope that this goes well.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 21:50, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Eh! Good work.-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 23:11, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Rather than simply a notable Selkath section, it's good to expand it out and give some detail on famous Selkath, see Drovian or Tunroth for examples. --Eyrezer 03:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Eyrezer. Let's expand the list some. Atarumaster88 [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 22:02, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That's not a legitamate objection. Besides, there isn't really that much information on any of them to include that isn't already in the article.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Notice it's in the Comments section... Cull Tremayne 23:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Duh. But they shouldn't do things like this, and not support the article on a whim, just because something would look better a certain way. A lot of things would look better in a certain way, but there is so little information on individual Selkath, that what they ask is near to impossible.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:52, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * For one, you should notice I didn't actually oppose the article. I think you've done a good job with it, but I do think it could be improved in a couple of ways. Simply having a list of notable Selkath is pointless. Just put them in the infobox and be done with it. Alternatively, an article like Rakririan shows what can be done with little information. --Eyrezer 06:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There, I added and sourced a new section as specified by you.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 14:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Did a little cleanup - Jinko 21:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Lightsaber
Support Objections Comments
 * 1) Siteoftupac 19:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs citations. .  .  .  .  00:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Present tense- Follow MOS. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Redlinks. Better sectioning needed. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 18:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Manaan
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) -- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 04:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Well, gee. .  .  .  .  04:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) KEJ 08:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Jinko 20:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5)  Gonk  ( Gonk! ) 20:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Although this is my least favorite world of all KotOR. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 20:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7)  Stake black   msg 21:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Green Tentacle (Talk) 09:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Kylekatarn 21:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Lord Hydronium 23:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * POV (Rule 4). Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 06:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Where?-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 15:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that's been sorted now. Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Swoop.jpg is unsourced and any chance of a link to the source for Image:ManaanWalls1319.jpg? Green Tentacle (Talk) 20:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 20:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * One ref tag seems to be empty, and the article needs a spelling check. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 04:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There is no empty ref tag that I can see, and I am not sure if "needs a spell check" is a valid objection.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 16:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Manaan 23:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC) I raked the article for grammar and spelling errors. Feel free to check my changes. --School of Thrawn 101 16:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Let us hope this goes even better...-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 04:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I did a semi-extensive generic clean-up of the article fixing things such as spelling and rewording anything I thought needing. Good enough, Ataru? - Jinko 20:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Excellent job everyone. Atarumaster88 [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 20:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The paragraph about Manaan being taken by and later entering the New Republic says it's from the NEC, but I've looked and can't find any mention of Manaan in that era. Is there a page number? - Lord Hydronium 04:57, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I wondered about that too. I checked the NEC, and it is in there. Sort of. While the NEC does not mention Manaan directly, it covers Ackbar's conquest of Imperial worlds in the inner rim. However, I am still looking for mention of Manaan joining the New Republic. Perhaps that was implied too, but it is unlikely. Despite being conquered, I doubt that the Selkath would abandon their neutrality all together, and join the Republic.-- Doquis (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * In that case, we should clarify the statement to remove any speculation. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 15:09, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. How about now?-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 17:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm still not sure if it should be included as taken by Ackbar if NEC doesn't explicitly say so. Better to say that it was possible or something. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 23:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I removed the speculation. --Eyrezer 06:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

CompForce
Support
 * 1) Danik Kreldin 00:55, 5 April 2007 (UTC) - McEwok and I breathed a lot of life into this article, really expanded it and so forth... think it looks good.

Oppose Comments
 * 1) No reference tags (Rule 11). Other than that a once-over doesn't find anything lacking. Cull Tremayne 01:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Per Cull. .  .  .  .  09:10, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Three redlinks should probably be filled in. Cull Tremayne 01:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

The Keeper
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) Officially the stupidest thing I've ever worked on. At least Mt. Sorrow was an attempted murderer. .  .  .  .  05:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) You're welcome. -- Ozzel 05:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Thumbs up to sarcastico-fanboyism. KEJ 08:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) I don't know how he does it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  11:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 21:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Lord Hydronium 03:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I don't know if this is a vaild objetion, but the personality and traits section uses perhaps, which kind of sounds like speculation. I'll strike this if it isn't a valid objection. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 4:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The perhaps is in reference to a strongly alluded to possibility. .  .  .  .  22:35, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Jon (farmer)
Support Oppose
 * 1) Stick this in your pipe and smoke it, detractors! .  .  .  .  07:25, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Cull Tremayne 10:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Wow...just. Wow. -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 22:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) You may want to add, under 'Alternate resolutions': (goes back for reward) (Jon:"Here is the reward I promised you" Revan: "What?? That's it? Give me more!" Jon:"Wha... what? I did not think the Jedi were so greedy. You seem almost Mandalorian. I thank you for what you have done for me, but I have nothing else to give. The Council will hear of your deeds... and your greed." Bastila: "That was beneath you. I hope in the future you will strive to be better than this.") Hmm, actually it seems you still only get 1000 credits (+ dark side points), but you may want to mention that Revan attempted to get more money out of Jon. Darth Maddolis 23:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) --Eyrezer 12:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) He's mad! Mad, I say! - Lord Hydronium 03:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) haha ok why not.  07:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Themelle444 10:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Mad as an 'atter. KEJ 13:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) -- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 22:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 12) Green Tentacle (Talk) 08:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe one or two more images §15 (even though, of course, the possibilities of getting varied pics of him are kinda limited). KEJ 08:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a valid objection. Although several images are hopefully on the way. .  .  .  .  10:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Well..."include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available." Rule 15. But they are on the way. Cull Tremayne 10:36, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I sit corrected. Gotta read these rules more often. Constantly searching for the "No Burl Ives" rule... .  .  .  .  10:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * At any rate, pictures added. .  .  .  .  23:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Not Sourced.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's single source, it doesn't need citations. .  .  .  .  11:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Rule 11. It doesn't say "if an article is from only one source, then it doesn't need reference tags."-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 11:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm learning all kinds of crazy things! Sourced. .  .  .  .  11:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Despite being addressed by the author, I object to the objection. FAs should adhere to the Sourcing, which calls for no sourcing on single-source articles. If Rule 11 can't be implicitly read as "completely sourced per our official guidelines," then it needs to be explicitly changed. jSarek 23:32, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * First paragraph of the biography needs expansion (isn't even technically a paragraph w/3 sentences; must have at least five). Rule 1.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 13:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Contrary to what English teachers may tell you for formalized essay writing, a paragraph can have as little as one sentence. The rule does not specify a given length for a paragraph. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 22:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * At any rate, fixed. .  .  .  .  22:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No disambiguation notice.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 13:58, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. .  .  .  .  22:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Jon the Farmer 03:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Although not an FA requirement, I think the article would be improved with some quotes in the various sections. --Eyrezer 12:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Stagorr
Support Oppose
 * 1) To 52! Cull Tremayne 11:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Yay! Things! .  .  .  .  11:59, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Themelle444 12:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 13:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Fantastic! -- Ozzel 18:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 22:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 00:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Why not? Chack Jadson 01:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Lord Hydronium 03:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 11) Oww! KEJ 13:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Stagorr 02:27, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * A little over-referenced for my liking (ref end or paragraph only, if it's all from one source) but otherwise fine. Green Tentacle (Talk) 13:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * A lot of these old bad Ewoks things are getting really good, aren't they ;) Rodtheanimegod4ever 16:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Chik Apla
Support Oppose
 * 1) Jack Nicholson would approve. Cull Tremayne 11:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Four Dot Stamp of Approval. .  .  .  .  01:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Good work. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 02:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Themelle444 16:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Lord Hydronium 03:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) --Eyrezer 03:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) KEJ 13:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Chik Apla 03:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to see some more quotes. --Eyrezer 12:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Quotes added for what it's worth. Cull Tremayne 00:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Barpotomous Drebble
Support
 * 1) It's not a canon fact that he liked to eat, but it can probably be assumed. Cull Tremayne 11:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) He's just big boned. .  .  .  .  05:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) --Eyrezer 12:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 15:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Lord Hydronium 03:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Yeah! KEJ 13:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 23:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Barpotomous Drebble 2:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Tavion Axmis
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 10:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Themelle444 18:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's an easy fix, but POVity POV POV POV. .  .  .  .  21:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Where?-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 22:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * "Overconfident", "Deadly", "Swift", "Devious"... .  .  .  .  22:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I was able to address the ones you listed above, except for overconfidence. From both sides, it was clearly obvious that she was overconfident. I made it sound more neutral, and it was the best I could do. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 3:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Mmkay, I've made some changes, but the prose is in need of a lot of work. A lot of sharp, short sentences that don't flow well. .  .  .  .  03:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Looks better now. I'll work on the sentences.-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 4:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The sentences are longer and I made sure they flowed better. Is it better now?-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 4:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Enough for me to strike my opposition. .  .  .  .  00:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Remove the bullets in the BtS, thanks. QuentinGeorge 08:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Halagad Ventor
Support Oppose Comments '''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Halagad Ventor 06:57, 10 April 2007 (UTC) (UTC)
 * 1) To 52! And more Abel suck-uppery! And political manuvering to curry favour with Azizlight! Nah, just kidding. *looks around nervously* .  .  .  .  00:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Cull Tremayne 00:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 01:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 02:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Lord Hydronium 03:14, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) KEJ 13:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) -- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It mentions Rahn's vision of Ventor before his death, but not that Rahn was among the Jedi specifically betrayed by Ventor to Vader. This needs to be added, as it is the context for the later vision. Otherwise its an irrelevant element of Rahn's life, not of Halagad's. QuentinGeorge 09:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. .  .  .  .  09:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Another complaint - Ventor was not the sole survivor of the crash when he was a padawan. Check the articles of the others, at least one other survived. I'm not telling you who - you gotta work for this, Fourdot. QuentinGeorge 03:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That it? .  .  .  .  03:32, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Almost. I'm sceptical of the mention of the Exactor. When and where was this mentioned in relation to Halagad Ventor? AFAIK, the only mention of this star destroyer was in Luceno's Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader. If this sentence is an inference from multiple sources, it should be qualified as such, rather than baldly stated as fact. QuentinGeorge 06:45, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * So, a footnote explaining the mention? .  .  .  .  09:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes please. It needs to be explained so that its doesn't seem dubious on a canon-y level. Does the article specify "Vader's flagship" or "Vader's personal star destroyer"? If its just a generic "star destroyer", it doesn't conclusively prove the Exactor. Vader could be hitching a ride on some other star destroyer. QuentinGeorge 10:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I made the note. And Domain of Evil specifies that it's his flagship, which, thanks to Dark Lord we know is the Exactor at that time. .  .  .  .  10:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No big deal, but I'm still a little uncomfortable with the Exactor speculation. We don't know exactly when on the timeline Halagad's capture occurred, nor do we know how long the Exactor was Vader's flagship (AFAIK). Should we change the sentence to Imperial Intelligence officers extensively tortured Ventor onboard Vader's flagship (possibly the Star Destroyer Exactor)[5]? --Azizlight 13:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I got the inference from Domain of Evil that Ventor's flight was really a kneejerk to Palpatine, and would have happened in the immediately following weeks. But if it's too much of a stretch, I can just ax the Exactor references. Or what you suggested, Aziz. .  .  .  .  22:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd be happy for it to be phrased as "...Vader's flagship, most likely the Exactor, ..." QuentinGeorge 08:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ick. That means a whole re-wording of that area. I'll get onto it tommorow. .  .  .  .  09:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Only because Abel is awesome. Okay, that's not the only reason. Cull Tremayne 00:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Hiromi
Support Oppose
 * 1) YAAAAAYYY! - Lord Hydronium 05:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Good work, Hydronium! .  .  .  .  06:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Gulp! Cull Tremayne 06:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Awesome. --Eyrezer 09:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) TALK! TALK! TALK! TALK! KEJ 14:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Nice. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 18:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:32, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Jaina Solo ( Talk ) [[Image:Jainasolosig.gif |25px]] 23:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Hiromi 02:28, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Record Time
Support Oppose
 * 1) Well, I did write it. And I mean that in the most literal sense. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 07:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  08:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Well played. &mdash; http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 12:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Objections to lack of pictures will be stricken. There aren't any. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 07:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * One redlink, can you clear that up? Cull Tremayne 07:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Redlink eliminated. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 22:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Tumble bunny trainer
Support
 * 1) Cow tow, Cull! BEHOLD HIS MIGHTY HOOP! .  .  .  .  08:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) I said it could not be done. I was wrong. But hey, we got a great article out of it, so all is well. -- Ozzel 23:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 23:29, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Eight. Seconds? Cull Tremayne 23:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 23:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Adamwankenobi 23:58, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose "Oh, well allow me to retort!"
 * The article cites Insider #27 as a source, yet doesn't specify the article or column in which the tumble bunny trainer is mentioned. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 13:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Almost half the article isn't even about the subject, but about Wicket or the other Ewoks. - Lord Hydronium 13:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It's all relevant to the guy's show. .  .  .  .  21:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ahem:
 * "With a sense of trepidation and dread, but at the same time, a lingering sense of hope, Wicket W. Warrick attended the tumble bunny show."
 * This is about Wicket's emotional state, entirely irrelevant to the subject of the trainer.
 * "Shodu Warrick heard of the tumble bunny show, and thought it would be a good idea for her son, Wicket W. Warrick, to guide a cabal of woklings to the show, and supervise them. Warrick had his doubts about the show, not believing it was his type of entertainment. Nevertheless, he gathered the woklings, and took them to see the tumble bunny program."
 * Again, about Wicket. If this is needed to establish context, it can be pared down into a sentence or so to keep the focus on the trainer.
 * "Some time later, Warrick was forced to hold his own tumble bunny show. It bore all the trappings of the tumble bunny trainer's show, right down to the large tumble bunny outfit. He was even able to perform the trainer's trick with the hoop without any incident."
 * Still Wicket. I know you tie it in to the trainer at the end, but this part should be pared down as well, then. The article isn't about Wicket or the show, it's about the trainer, and all this stuff is only very tangentially related to him. I mean, it's not a bad article, it's just not an article about the subject. - Lord Hydronium 02:21, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

- Mace Windu

These nested quotes are going to go crazy. :P Anyway, here we go: My knuckles hurt from the straw clutching. In the words of Friar Tuck from the animated furry film of Robin Hood: "Have a heart, Sheriff". . .  .  .  03:36, 9 April 2007 (UTC) Comments
 * 1) Wicket's emotional state is relevant to his critical outburst later at the trainer's antics. Directly relevant, in fact. His prior assumptions led to his later public denouncement of the trainer's program, which is directly relevant to the story of the trainer.
 * 2) It's all the lead up and proper context for the devastating scene that Wicket caused at the stage.
 * 3) Direct competition and plagarism of the trainer's own program. Strong relevance. .  .  .  .  02:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Wicket's emotions are only relevant insofar as they impact the subject. What he thinks before he even visits has only an indirect connection. Wicket's outburst has an impact, but that can be explained at the appropriate time.
 * 2) Again, even lead-up needs to ultimately have its focus on the subject. There's more context than relevant data here. If I'm writing about the Bothans, I might say that Mon Mothma mentioned them to the Rebel fleet. That's relevant. If I went on to say that she had just learned of her son's death and was getting over her grief, that's straying from the topic.  That Wicket had an outburst is related to the trainer; why Wicket had an outburst only relates to Wicket.
 * 3) For one thing, the idea that they were in competition is speculative. And even so, how well Wicket does, as an example, is not relevant. Again, Wicket's actions are only important insofar as they relate to the trainer; you can make an argument that the fact that Wicket did an identical show is connected with the trainer, but going further is straying from the topic. I might support this if it were an article on a tumblebunny show, but the show is not the trainer. - Lord Hydronium 03:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) For both examples of lead-in context apply directly. If you're talking about Luke Skywalker duelling on Bespin, you would say that Vader set the trap with a view to converting Luke for himself. Now, that context does not directly relate to Luke...you could just say that he fell into Vader's trap. But, the context of Vader's view and intent on the subject is important, unless you want to go bare bones. Warrick's mentality towards the show, the subject of tumble bunnies, and the forced upon nature of his attendance are all essential in the understanding of how the trainer lost a significant chunk of his audience.
 * 2) Again, the context is essential in understanding what could have possibly potentially been the second turd in the waterpipe of the trainer's career. Even more so the fact that it was not Warrick's passion, but rather forced upon him, wheras it was clearly the trainer's passion, due to his boundless enthusaism.
 * I'm gonna make you work for this, dagnabbit. Seriously, though, I don't think that we should be highlighting as one of what's supposed to be our best articles something that's only peripherally focused on its own subject. I'm just not seeing an article here on the tumble bunny trainer; it's an article on the story of the episode, Wicket, the tumble bunny show, with a few extra sentences on the trainer himself tossed in there. It digresses too much to be a good article on the TBT. I'm glad you managed to drag so many words out of an eight-second appearance, but I don't think that makes this one of our best. - Lord Hydronium 04:38, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Focus has been shifted back onto the character. - Lord Hydronium 07:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Per Lord Hydronium. And as for "having a heart", remember, the Inquisitorius of which LH and I are members of is "teh evil" when it comes to FAs. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:47, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Look, anything not directly to do with the trainer himself in this article is all semi-once removed context that provides the reason as to why he possibly was run out of business. .  .  .  .  04:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * And Ataru, don't cite quotes of which I was the initial utterer. .  .  .  .  05:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you do me a favor and get rid of those redlinks? Fix it and I'll vote, even though I'm not a fan of Ewoks.-- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 3:28, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fixed. .  .  .  .  23:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Grappa (Rodian)
Support Oppose
 * 1) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:17, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  21:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Cull Tremayne 23:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Audience Chamber ) 04:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Grappa had maybe one or two paragraphs of page time. The vast majority of this article is hypothetical extrapolations and discussions about other events.Kuralyov 16:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Could you provide any examples? -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 23:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Personally, I think that the only part that strays directly from Grappa is the description of the Jade Sabers intent. But then, that's needed to provide context to Grappa's actions, so it's kosher. .  .  .  .  23:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

'''Approved by Inquisitorius - Inq:Grappa (Rodian) 02:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Any objections to the lack of images will be stricken. There aren't any. -- http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 21:20, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I want "tapir" to be un-redlinked. :-P Cull Tremayne 23:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Taken care of. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 03:33, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Kir Kanos
Support
 * 1) He's angry, and he's after you. Cull Tremayne 23:07, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) -- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 23:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) .  .  .  .  02:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Mesa liken da images. KEJ 08:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) --Eyrezer 08:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments
 * De bullet that BtS and we're good to go. QuentinGeorge 08:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Ahto City
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) -- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 06:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) KEJ 08:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Nice work, Shaelas. I know how much work that must have been. - Sarendipity  Talk [[Image:Atrissig.jpg|20px]] 04:05, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) .  .  .  .  04:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Some of the intro is in present tense. --Eyrezer 07:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Corrected.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 15:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Let's see if this goes as well as the others.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 06:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The Notable residents or visitors section is cool! --Eyrezer 07:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It is, but it would be even cooler if it listed all notable (named) residents and visitors like Tansarii Point Station does. KEJ 08:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Zayne Carrick
Support
 * 1) Nominated. - Sikon 13:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Darthchristian   ( Hey! ) 16:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) A compelling read. .  .  .  .  23:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) --Eyrezer 02:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * Fix up those couple of unreferenced paragraghs. -- Darthchristian  ( Hey! ) 14:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Sourced unsourced paragraphs I could find, except for the intro, which doesn't need to be sourced. - Sikon 14:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I guess this is exempt from Fourdot's FA contest, because so many people worked on it since the beginning of the comic series. - Sikon 14:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it probably is...sorry for misleading you there, Sikon. There's still a lot of KOTOR articles than need FAmanship, though, so if you still want to go for gold, the opportunity is there. .  .  .  .  00:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Melvin Fett
Support
 * 1) Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  22:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Why not? KEJ 07:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Hah, even though this is not canon, it's awesome :P  Stake black   msg 19:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) This article claims that Chee declared the story non-canon in a forum post, but doesn't provide a link to it. - Sikon 10:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * It may be a little short, but there's little more actual information I can add. -- Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 19:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Cannok
Support Oppose
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  00:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Infobox image of poor quality. Rule 15.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I am unable to get any better, and, frankly, it seems of pretty good quality to me. What's wrong with it?- Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * A test if you will. For the Wookiee-Cast thingy (See also the early entry Atton Rand). Note for the 4dot especially and for anyone else that has eyes maybe: See note under the Laigrek nom. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Needs a few more quotes though. Put some in and I'll vote.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Quotes. All right. Got it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been deemed an appropriate submission for the Wookiee-Cast Featured Article Competition. .  .  .  .  00:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Laigrek
Support Oppose Comments
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  02:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Infobox image of poor quality. Rule 15.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll see what I can do about that.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Redemption fixed it up nicely. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Cut content within prose. .  .  .  .  00:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * By that I assume you mean culling. Will can do. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I mean the cut content should not be noted within the main body of the article. .  .  .  .  00:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay. I'll revert my culling and take out the cut content. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Another experiment. May have fanwankery, but that's why the Inqs have a shot at it. For the Wookiee-Cast thingy. NOTE: See big note under the GH-7 nom. Right now! I demand it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You must put in more images before I can vote.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll ask Redemption.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * More quotes are available I think.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but you'll have to give me some time to get to the part in the game and take notes. Bear with me. PS I have to play it on another computer that mine can't talk to, because my computer can't play TSL, so I can't toss a screencap from that computer to mine, and I am unable to upload images on the other. Just to clear up any confusion.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been deemed an appropriate submission for the Wookiee-Cast Featured Article Competition. .  .  .  .  00:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

GH-7
Support Oppose
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  00:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * My lab rat-droid-thing. For the Wookiee-Cast thingy. BIG NOTE: See big important note under the Ravager nom. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * A few more images are needed before my vote can be cast.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:12, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I added a pic, any more would be overkill.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * More quotes are available I think.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I can get a quote from the droid, if you'll just give me a sec. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Added quote. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been deemed an appropriate submission for the Wookiee-Cast Featured Article Competition. .  .  .  .  00:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Ravager
Support Oppose
 * 1) - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) .  .  .  .  00:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Mesa supporten dissen. KEJ 08:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) -- Shaelas (Ahto High Court)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Infobox image of poor quality. Rule 15.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:19, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I know, I searched around to try and find better, but I am unable to take screencaps. I'll ask Redemption about it. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Redemption replaced it with a beautiful picture, many thanks to him.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  00:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * My most promising little baby. For the Wookiee-Cast thingy. BIG IMPORTANT NOTE: I do not have permission to have a mike so I cannot win anyway. Just entering for fun. Mostly to prove I can do it. Do I pass the test? ;) Seriously, I will try and see if I can get a mike before Sunday, though. Not definite. - Solus (Bird of Prey)  22:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * A few more images please.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't be able to fit anymore. And sometimes it's better for an article to have less. Ever heard the saying "do more with less"? -- Redemption [[Image:Redemptionusersymbol.png|20px]] Talk 23:16, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * True.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:19, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * More quotes are available I think.-- Shaelas (HoloConference)[[Image:Czerka Logo.JPG|30px]] 23:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, there are more quotes; I wrote them down. There is a quote beneath each subheading except the 'Behind the scenes' because I couldn't find one that pertained to the BtS of the Ravager. Adding quotes in the middle of subsections looks messy.- Solus (Bird of Prey)  23:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This has been deemed an appropriate submission for the Wookiee-Cast Featured Article Competition. .  .  .  .  00:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There's nothing technically wrong with it, but I cannot in good conscience vote for it until this ceases to exist. -- Darth Culator  (Talk)(Kills) 02:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * That thing existed? &hellip; with the included stuff, does it not render the other article, and thus, the category, moot? And thus, can an admin blast it into oblivion? - Solus (Bird of Prey)  02:42, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This article's no longer associated with the category, which has been put up for speedying along with the other article. You may start your voting.KEJ 08:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Malcor Brashin
Support Oppose
 * 1) Havac 05:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) --Eyrezer 06:25, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Cull Tremayne 06:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Great article about a great element from a great game. KEJ 08:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) The awesome character acting of David Warner compells you! .  .  .  .  09:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Crapy game! Great character! Themelle444 21:22, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments

Plif
Support Oppose
 * 1) .  .  .  .  07:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Imp http://images.wikia.com/starwars/images/e/e5/ATATatarismall.png 08:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Gee... are you little fellows any fun? = Må jeg ikke nok få dig med i seng? = Huh?!? KEJ 08:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * Added some vital information in the BTS section regarding an official foreign language rendition of the "advances of a pack of Zeltrons". ;-) KEJ 08:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)