Wookieepedia:Good article nominations



This page is for the nomination of good articles. This is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of good articles, see Category:Wookieepedia good articles.


 * Good article nominations history
 * Good article checklist

What is a Good article?
A Good article is an article that adheres to quality standards, but cannot reach FA status due to its limited content.

A Good article must&hellip;
 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, it is stable, i.e., it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This is essential in articles over 1000 words but may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
 * 8) &hellip;not be tagged due to an excessive number of redlinks.
 * 9) &hellip;have significant information, especially a biography for character articles. For articles under 1000 words in length, comprehensive detail is required with all information covered from all sources and appearances. For articles over 1000 words, broad coverage addressing all major aspects of the topic is sufficient.
 * 10) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information.
 * 11) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 12) &hellip;provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
 * 13) &hellip;ideally include a "personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
 * 14) &hellip;ideally include a "powers and abilities" section on relevant character articles, especially for Force-sensitive characters where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
 * 15) &hellip;include a reasonable number of images of good quality if said images are available.
 * 16) &hellip;counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc).

Nomination of Good articles
To nominate an article for Good article status, list it here. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, at least two of which are from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members, after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the template. The talk page will also be tagged with the GA template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations please see here. Also remember to add GAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.

Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 03:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination Comments: I think it may finally be ready... NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 03:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

(0 AC/2 users/2 total)
Support
 * 1) I strongly feel that this is a good nomination. KotOR's article page was in something of shambles several months ago with a badly written, inconsistently tensed synopsis, revealing of plot details at the beginning, etc. The fact of the matter is though, a large amount of improvement has been done since then and it is a much better article than it was then. While I don't think it's worthy of featured article status, I definitely see it as worthy of being a "good article." Niirfa-sa 23:58, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) After all my grammatical nit-picking, I think it's of GA standard. Soresumakashi 06:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose **A specialist —either a normal Republic soldier, scout, or scoundrel. Suggest changing specialist and all other cases of it to player instead. There should be no space between specialist and the mdash. 22:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC) **The padawan then follows this map to a krayt dragon's cave and assisted a local hunter, Komad Fortuna, in killing it. Assisted should be assists. **The party baits, finds the beast, and kills it, retrieved the blade from its hide. Suggest rephrasing **The party was leaving the base with droid in hand when they were confronted by Selkath authorities with reports of shots fired within the embassy. Was should be is and were should be are. *Revelation aboard the Leviathan **''The potential students of the academy prove their worth by performing various tasks and gaining prestige. Some of the challenges are martial in nature while others were mental, but all require a certain commitment to the Sith ideals''. Prove should be proved, are should be were and require should be required. **Revan discovers the Rakatans were divided into several tribes. Were should be are. **Revan was able to break Bastila's resolve and persuaded her to turn back to the light. Was should be is and persuaded should be persuades. Yay! I'm done! Have fun fixing the article! Soresumakashi 10:41, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) An excess of redlinks and the synopsis needs to be written in present tense.  Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 14:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) *There is no limit towards how many redlinks can be in a GA. DC 15:50, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) **Additionally, in-universe articles are to be written in past tense, per the Manual of Style. // ~mikah~  01:44, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) **Redlinks I was wrong about then, but a synopsis is always written in present tense. Look at the film articles. Drewton  [[Image:Era-old.png|20px]] ( Drewton's Holocron ) 13:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) ***Again, directly from the Manual of Style itself, "All in-universe articles should be in past tense, per 'A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away...'" Only out-of-universe articles (ie, George Lucas, John Williams) should be written in present tense. Despite whatever tense the film articles are written in, if its not past tense, its wrong. // ~mikah~  14:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) ****This is not an in-universe article. Stylistically, plot summaries for anything almost anywhere are in the present tense&mdash;the MoS doesn't contradict this in any way, because this is an OOU article. "In contrast, articles about books, movies, games, or other real-life Star Wars material should obviously be written from an out-of-universe perspective, but should still be noted as such." Our OOU FAs also use this system, and so should this article. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 14:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) *****I see what you mean now, I misread what I was reading. So that would be a prominent problem with the article. I'll go ahead and try to fix as much as I can for now. And sorry about the confusion, Drewton. // ~mikah~  14:27, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) ******Fixed NaruHina  Talk[[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 03:59, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no mention I can see that the soundtrack was composed by Jeremy Soule --Jinzler 09:33, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Addressed NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 06:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) This does sound kind of strict, but these are meant to be a showcase of our very best articles, so here goes:
 * Trapped on Taris
 * on the Hammerhead-class capital ship, the Endar Spire. Hammerhead should be in italics.
 * When the player wakes, Carth informs him of the situation and that they needed to find and rescue Bastila, whose escape pod had crash-landed somewhere on the planet. Needed should be need and had should be has.
 * and the slums of Lower City. Of Lower City should be of the Lower City.
 * impose a security lock down. Lock down is and should be one word.
 * that has been stolen from them by the Vulkars. Has should be had.
 * Ironically, when they found her. Found should be find.
 * Zaalbar has been captured. Has should be had.
 * The group venture into the sewers, the trio track down and rescue Zaalbar from the slavers. Suggest rephrasing.
 * They Raid the Vulkar Base. Raid should not be capitalized.
 * Afterwards, they return to Gadon and the Beks, they stay the night before going to the swoop race the next morning. Suggest rephrasing
 * At the swoop race, the neophyte racer manages to win the race. Could we just say that the player won the race? There are too many uses of race, and neophyte is a bad word.
 * Before he could accept his prize however, Brejik broke the deal at the last moment, claiming the player has cheated by using the prototype accelerator. Could should be can and broke should be breaks.
 * Bastila breaks free and a fight ensued. Ensued should be ensues.
 * Brejik and his Vulkar thugs could not defeat them and die in the lightfight. Lightfight is defined as a fight where both sides use blasters. Bastila was using a double vibro and we don't know what Revan used. And the sentence needs a full stop. Basic grammar here.
 * Canderous recommends the leader of the party to Davik for hire as a ploy. Last I heard, a ploy was a gambit.
 * It can also mean "trick." NaruHina  Talk
 * Other than that, fixed. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 23:31, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Second Star Map: Tatooine
 * As he and the others left the cave. Left should be leave.
 * Fixed NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 22:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Third Star Map: Kashyyyk
 * As a reward for their aid, Freyyr gives his only surviving son Bacca's Ceremonial Blade and allows him to come out of exile and was no longer branded a madclaw. Suggest rephrasing.
 * Shortly thereafter, the Wookiees of the village united under their new chieftain, Freyyr, and rebelled against Czerka with the aid of the party. United should be Unite and rebelled should be rebel.
 * Fixed NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 22:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Fourth Star Map: Manaan
 * The two were the only Human scientists still alive and were trapped in the facility. Both were's should be ares
 * the padawan persuades them to tell him what they knew. Knew should be know.
 * which was responsible for the Selkath's insanity. Was should be is.
 * Fixed NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 23:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * For every question he answers incorrectly, Bastila was tortured. Was should be is.
 * Meanwhile the padawan's pick is able to infiltrate the Leviathan. Suggest rewording padawan's pick.
 * Seeing nothing else that they could do. Could should be can.
 * Fixed NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 22:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Fifth Star Map: Korriban
 * Are you sure that should be in past tense? NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 22:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my mistake. Both are acceptable. Soresumakashi 06:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Crash-landing on an unknown world
 * Though he was required to enter alone, Juhani and Jolee, after receiving a vision that warned them that Revan was in danger, joined him at the last minute against the Elders' protests. Warned should be warn, both was and was should be is and is. Joined should be join.
 * They had the vision before which showed them that Revan is in danger.
 * Revan and the others joined the Republic's assault on the Star Forge. Joined should be join.
 * Fixed NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 22:51, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The Star Forge
 * Fixed NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 22:09, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

From the Pasta Bowl of Fiolli: &mdash;  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 22:35, 26 September 2008 (UTC) &mdash; Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 17:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * First off, the article isn't sourced fully. In fact, it isn't even 75% sourced. The first citation I found was the last paragraph of section five. Every section outside of the intro needs to be sourced.
 * I would like to emphasize that this nomination will not be approved by the AgriCorps until everything is source, including the infobox.  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 17:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know about the rest, but for reference sections like plot summary wouldn't need ref tags, as they are self-sourcing. - Lord Hydronium 16:51, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, the infobox is now sourced. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 01:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * "While KotOR does not have as much evident cut content as its sequel, Star Wars Knights of the Old Republic II: The Sith Lords, it is still present." &mdash; OR. Reword or find a citation for this.
 * I personally don't feel that qualifys as OR in that it is a lead in to the cut content and we need a separate article for kotor2 cut content. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 03:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I strongly beg to differ. If you are inferring or have deduced that this game has less cut content and this is not supported anywhere else, then it is OR. Please find a citation or reword the sentence.  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 05:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Is this citation good? NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 13:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, it is not. If you can find documentation that compares the cut content, then I will allow it. Otherwise, there is no quantifiable way of determining which would have included more.  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 17:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Removed NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 03:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * "It features the planet Sleheyron&hellip;" What is it? The game? Sleheyron is not in the game. Reword.
 * Reworded. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 03:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * "The existence of a cut planet can be also deduced&hellip;" &mdash; OR.
 * Again, it leads into it but reworded. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 03:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Same as before: Find a citation or reword. Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 05:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I did reword it. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 13:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I added a lot of fact tags to the page where there was definite missing of citation. Please look into these.
 * Section six has too many short paragraphs please restructure this section.
 * There is no source list. There are many KotOR supplements that are OOU which can be used to further beef up this article.
 * There are two very important ones: here and here.
 * Plus, Chronicles probably has some information as to further development and tying in storylines.
 * Added NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 03:29, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, so there is a basic source list. Now, the citations from these documents are very important.  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 05:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The plot which is described in section two is very much a play-by-play of the game. While this isn't necessary bad, it is too detailed and only one means of game completion.
 * There is no mention that planets can be completed in any order.
 * From atop the synopsis: "(Note: This is based on the canonical male light side version of the game and assumes that the planets are visited in the order Dantooine, Tatooine, Kashyyyk, Manaan and Korriban. Gender, Force alignment, order of planets visited and other variables can differ depending on the input of the player.)" NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 05:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, I missed that. My apologies. However, you should use the gameLS and endgame tags as needed throughout the article. The further detailing of this can be left where you have it, but I wouldn't use "Note:" or put it in parenthesis.  Master Aban Fiolli  {Alpheridies University ComNet} 05:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no mention that Calo Nord can appear in multiple places, as can Darth Bandon.
 * Addressed in the Alternate Stories NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 05:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The middle of this section lacks pictures and the ones clustered above are too close together.
 * Addressed NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 13:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
 * In that case, could you define the "middle" of the article. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 03:00, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * There is no section about primary characters. Characters are listed, but not explained with relation to their role in the game. Please see Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi for a good example of how this is done.
 * There is now a budding main character section, albeit still under construction. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 08:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Finished. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 23:42, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Honestly, this is just from a cursory look. I really didn't read too much of the article. Once these things have been addressed, I'll be happy to look at it again.
 * Two other things before I take another look at the nomination:
 * There is a lot of information missing from the article about conception, creation and production, supplemental media, and the critical reaction seems to be bare bones. Please take a look again at Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi to see the structure. I really want to see "Conception," "Production," and "(Supplemental) Media" sections. Also, I would like to see the different story arcs to have the seealso template used to link to the various incidents, from Attack on the Endar Spire and Rescue of Bastila Shan to Skirmish aboard the Leviathan and the final battles.
 * I felt it superfluous but I'll try. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 13:16, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Youtube is not a source. Youtube might show a possible outcome, but should not be used as a source. Instead, please cite the game and the scene it comes from. Then, if you feel it is necessary, show an alternate link to Youtube to highlight a possible outcome.
 * Fixed. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 13:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * I'm pretty sure the excess redlink template should be at the top of the article, as per wookieepedia's page layout policies. Soresumakashi 06:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Moved NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|20px]] 21:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Battle of the TIE Fighter Construction Facility

 * Nominated by: DjMack
 * Nomination comments: This would be my first real good article I wrote entirely by myself, just point out to me anything that needs fixing, I want to be criticized and become a better writer. SPOILERS FOR FORCE UNLEASHED, BEWARE.

(2 AC/2 users/4 total)
Support
 * 1) Good work. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 11:02, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * :)  Aqua  Unasi  19:11, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) DC 21:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2)  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk to me  15:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Oppose Good work.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 21:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) From the post-it of DC
 * 2) * Indecisive victory? For who?
 * 3) *You need an aftermath section for the battle.
 * 4) *This article was fantastic, DjMack, it was very well written. DC 18:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Aqua Unasi
 * 6) *Great article. Very well written indeed. A few things:
 * 7) ** You need an tag.
 * 8) ** A few things are unsourced: The first paragraph of Prelude, The two paragraphs in the Aftermath section, and a few things in the infobox.
 * 9) **Also, I went in and changed these for you, but a thing to remember for future articles is to put a tag on the article when nominating it. Also, don't forget to link to your references, and that they go immediately after punctuation, with no space between.
 * 10) *I hope to see more articles from you in the future! :)  Aqua  Unasi  19:27, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) *One more thing - it looks like some things have been added into the infobox and aren't sourced. The thing about the hijacked AT-ST, the AT-ST in the casualties, and the outcome need referencing.
 * 12) ** Also, you have the first paragraph of prelude referenced by "Hasbro". Can this be more specific? Is there a website article, interview, or what?  Aqua  Unasi  20:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 13) Xadún's Dun Moch:
 * 14) *Quotes?
 * 15) *A few linking issues. Remember, once in the intro and the first appearence in the main body.
 * 16) *Intro - "raised in the dark" makes it sound like Vader kept him in a small cupboard without light. Say he was was trained in the Dark Side and the Emperor knew nothing of him. that would be sufficient.
 * 17) *Does the novel not give any specifics for the battle of duel? particular strikes, sequences of fighting etc would make the duel section far better.
 * 18) *"He would spend his time in various bars, before Starkiller found him and asked for his help to gather the enemies of the Empire." Did Starkiller just want information or help to actually get the Rebels all in one place? what was this plan?
 * 19) **Starkiller wanted to gather the enemies of the empire together. DjMack 02:23, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 20) ***Does Starkiller execute a plan in the game? if so, a link to this battle please, even if it doesn't exist yet. Darth Xadún ( Consult the Holocron ) 08:25, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 21) *Not bad. Nice to see somone working on Battle GA's. Darth Xadún ( Consult the Holocron ) 13:27, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 22) Pranay Sobusk
 * 23) * In the introduction, you only tell about the prelude. You should write about the whole battle.
 * 24) * I'd like to see a quote in the article. Kind regards,  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk to me  16:19, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 25) Toprawa:
 * 26) *Your BTS is really bare bones. You should detail the differences between the events in each version of TFU. Certainly there is much that happens in the game that doesn't happen in the novel. Explain what each version introduces, how anything contradicts with other versions, etc. Toprawa and Ralltiir 04:33, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 27) From the sad vibe of IFYLOFD after a tough Dolphins loss:
 * 28) * "But, he quickly learned what happened to the rest of the Jedi Order, and vanished into the Outer Rim Territories." Specify what did happen to the rest of the Jedi Order.
 * 29) *I would suggest you call Starkiller Galen Marek throughout the article, as you state his actual name earlier in the article.
 * 30) * "Kota said in a rather cryptic manner that he could see the young man's future, and in it all he could see was himself, and that he would not always be Vader's servant." A bit of an awkward sentence, you use "and" twice. I suggest that you reword it.

Comments
 * Oh, next time you nominate something that recently came out, just make sure to say that there are spoilers. DC 18:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I added everything. DjMack 01:47, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Remove nomination (AgriCorps vote only)
 * 1) Doesn't seem to be going anywhere.  Graestan ( Talk ) 12:08, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Eh, this nom is active once again, so this removal vote is invalid now. DC 00:01, 17 October 2008 (UTC

Yeeru Chivkyrie

 * Nominated by:  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk to me  17:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: This is my first GAN, so it's probably not the best article on this site, but I will do a lot to bring this article up to GA standards.

(1 AC/1 users/1 total)
Support
 * 1)  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 21:01, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 16:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Hi Sobusk. Nice to see you're trying for a GA. A few things:
 * 2) *In the intro it would be good to mention what Republic Redux is.
 * 3) **Addressed
 * 4) * "In 0 ABY he wanted Rebel Alliance to join Governor Barshnis..." This doesn't quite make sense. I think there might be a couple of words missing. You also should mention in the intro who or what Disra is. At the moment it is unclear.
 * 5) **Addressed
 * 6) * You also need to mention what the "negotiation" is. --Eyrezer 00:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) **Addressed. Thank you for the review.  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk to me  09:32, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) From the squadron briefing of Cavalier One:
 * 2) * In the intro, mention should be made of Darth Vader's deployment to Shelkonwa to lead the search.
 * 3) **Addressed
 * 4) * Mention should be made of Chivkyrie's social standing within the Adarian caste system at the start of the biography.
 * 5) **Addressed
 * 6) * What question did Leia pose that caused Disra to leave the meeting?
 * 7) **Addressed
 * 8) * They fled and, against their will, he stayed on his home planet with Organa. - against who's will? did Chivkyrie want to leave the planet as well?
 * 9) **Addressed
 * 10) * Then, he brought her to a tapcaf run by the Mungra Vicria, where he had got her a job before. - do you mean that Leia was working at the tapcaf prior to the meeting with Disra, and that Chivkyrie arranged it? If so, this needs to be mentioned earlier in the article.
 * 11) **Addressed
 * 12) * Context is needed on how Organa attempted to save a child in the night.
 * 13) **Addressed
 * 14) * Context is needed on the catacombs - where are they, etc.
 * 15) **Addressed. Thank you for the review and especially for cleaning up. The things you said are still some weaknesses I have, but I'm working on it.  Pranay Sobusk  ~  Talk to me  20:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 16) *Nice to see a new user on the GA page - however, I would check your word usage and grammar. There were several missing words, or words used in place of others that had similar meaning but were not quite correct. Although I understood the majority of the article, other readers may have difficulty. I have cleaned up the article, and encourage you to take a look at the changes to better understand what I mean. This is not meant as discouragement&mdash;far from it&mdash;and I hope you do not take it as such. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 12:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Get that done, and you have my vote.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 02:12, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) From the Somewhat Well-lit Bedroom of IFYLOFD
 * 2) * Provide context on who Darth Vader is.
 * 3) **Addressed.
 * 4) * Who are Aurek, Besh and Cresh? Provide context.
 * 5) **Addressed.
 * 6) * Unsourced. Add references to your infobox and everything else.
 * 7) * Do we have quotes for Biography and Personality and traits?
 * 8) **I only found a good one for Personality and traits.
 * 9) * Check the article for spelling mistakes, please.
 * 10) **Addressed. Thank you for the review.

Comments

Darth Stryfe

 * Nominated by: DC 03:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Meh, I was bored. And before anyone complains, there's nothing to add for a Powers and Abilities Section, so it isn't getting added.

(3 AC/2 users/5 total)
Support
 * 1) IT WAS ALL MY IDEA! :P IFYLOFD Talk 03:45, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 2)  Graestan ( Talk ) 05:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) -  Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 12:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 4)  —Tommy9281 [[Image:Red lightsaber.png|20px]] ( Peace is a lie ) 14:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Looks like its going through. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie ) 09:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) From Graestan the Cruel:
 * 2) * Another quote, please.
 * 3) * The caption to the image of Stryfe and Meeshal should be expanded beyond "Captain Meeshal."
 * 4) * A little context for why there were Yuuzhan Vong on Ossus, please.
 * 5) * Graestan ( Talk ) 12:05, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) **All of the above are fixed. Thanks for the review. DC 14:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) From the squadron briefing of Cavalier One:
 * 8) * In the intro - a little mention of his involvement in the destruction of the Ossus Jedi Temple is needed. Also, clarification on why Cade Skywalker was present in the Sith Temple on Coruscant is needed.
 * 9) * Succession box needs sourcing. - Cavalier One ( Squadron channel ) 10:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) **All of the above are fixed. Thanks for the review. DC 20:56, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) Soresu
 * 12) * Fixed some grammatical, tense and spelling errors.
 * 13) **And?
 * 14) * Make mention of his Sith Tatoos.
 * 15) **Done.
 * 16) * Needs sucession box for Hand.
 * 17) **See above.
 * 18) ***No you haven't. It needs a separate sucession box for Hand. You only have one for Fist at the moment. I would do it myself, but I'm hopeless at sourcing (one of the main reasons I review GA's but don't write them.)
 * 19) ****Err...wow...I kind of associated this objection with Cavalier's. My bad, and fixed. DC 00:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 20) * I think there was something else, but I've forgotten it.
 * 21) **Okay...
 * 22) **Thanks for the review. DC 20:56, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 23) BtS needs to be sourced that Duursema created him. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 12:09, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 24) *Uhh....isn't that self-sourced by using the general Legacy title? I wouldn't know where to find the exact place where it says that Jan drew him. DC 00:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 25) Toprawa:
 * 26) *The opening quote provides no context as to how that applies to Stryfe in any way. Some context would help in the attribution line. Toprawa and Ralltiir 18:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Galney (Ducha of Terephon)

 * Nominated by:  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 23:41, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: It was a dark and stormy night. The Dolphins had just lost, and William Shatner's rendition of Rocket Man was stuck in my head. So I thought "I'll GA a conniving Hapan lady. That should cheer me up." The rest is history.

(3 AC/2 users/5 total)
Support
 * 1) Who beat the Dolphins? The Ravens?  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  19:45, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Anakin Skywalker, Juhani, Goran Beviin HAHAHAHAHA! NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anlink titleakinsolo.png|14px]] 21:12, 28 October 2008 (UTC) PPS:The Phillys WON!
 * 3) DC 02:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie ) 09:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) This was such a great story. I loved every minute of it. —Tommy9281 [[Image:Red lightsaber.png|20px]] ( Peace is a lie ) 22:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) From NaruHina's Homework Stuffed Death Note:
 * 2) * This is minor, I fixed the grammer and flow errors I noticed, but in the "Incident at the Villa Solis" section, I think the "know" is supposed to be italicized in the quote, not "I" NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 13:27, 28 October 2008 (UTC) PS:You jinxed me! Shater's Rocket Man came on the radio as I was reviewing this >:P
 * 3) **No, the quote is correct.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 19:29, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Oh, OK, it sounds weird though. But then again the whole series is. NaruHina  Talk [[Image:Anakinsolo.png|14px]] 21:12, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) DC
 * 6) * Why did Galney want to kill Jaina and Zekk?
 * 7) **Addressed.
 * 8) * "Ducha Galney was a very plotting and calculating woman." Does Tempest actually state that?
 * 9) **Addressed.
 * 10) * Mention Lady Galney and her actions in the bio and intro.
 * 11) **Addressed. Thanks for the review.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 02:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) **Not bad. DC 02:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 13) The Anvil:
 * 14) * Some mention of the Consortium's relation to the Galactic Alliance needs to be made in the infobox.
 * 15) **Addressed.
 * 16) * Galney unknowiwingly gave inside information to a consort in league with the Heritage Council. A consort? Was it not her consort?
 * 17) **Addressed.
 * 18) * Also is there no article for the consort? I think there should be, as he did get a notable enough mention to warrant a stub at least, IMO.
 * 19) **I don't think there is an article for said consort.
 * 20) ***Okay, care to create one?
 * 21) * That same sentence. Which Galney? There are ways of differentiating them without constantly using their name.
 * 22) **Addressed.
 * 23) * For quote formatting, a two-individual, single-line each exchange should be formatted as:  , with line breaks.
 * 24) **Addressed.
 * 25) * No quote for the Battle of Hapes section?
 * 26) **Addressed.
 * 27) * Things that have their own articles need to be linked once in the intro, and once in the body at first mention of the subject.
 * 28) **Addressed.
 * 29) * What type of Star Destroyer was the Anakin Solo?
 * 30) **Addressed.
 * 31) * The whole P&T could use some reworking. Talk about her participation in a coup and against whom in one fell-swoop. The section can also be expanded, as the Ducha displayed many more personality traits than being just conniving and loving. —Tommy9281 [[Image:Red lightsaber.png|20px]] ( Peace is a lie ) 10:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 32) **Addressed. Thanks for the review.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 20:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * I must say, that the opening quote is absolutely astral. —Tommy9281 [[Image:Red lightsaber.png|20px]] ( Peace is a lie ) 22:15, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Galney (Lady)

 * Nominated by:  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 03:04, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Now we have TWO Galney noms! BWAHAHAHAHA!

(1 AC/1 users/2 total)
Support
 * 1) DC 02:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) You sure like to use commas a lot. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie ) 10:04, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) DC
 * 2) * Mention in the info that Galney gave the info to her consort unknowingly.
 * 3) **Addressed.
 * 4) * Mention Ducha Galney in the intro as well, and give context to her.
 * 5) **Addressed.
 * 6) * Young Chume'da is POVish. Use other words to describe Allana.
 * 7) **Addressed.
 * 8) * Why did Galney burst out in anger to the GA providing a defense fleet?
 * 9) **Addressed.
 * 10) * I believe you could add a few more things to the P&T.
 * 11) **Addressed. Thanks for the review.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 02:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 12) **Good article. DC 02:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 13) Hammertime:
 * 14) *However, it was revealed that Galney had nothing to do with the assassination attempt, but had unknowingly given inside information to a consort who was a trator to the throne. We've already discussed this "a consort". Who was he/she the consort of? I let you slide on the article creaton for this individual on the Ducha nom, but I'm cracking the whip now.
 * 15) **Addressed.
 * 16) *Also, that sentence could be slightly reworded to read a little better.
 * 17) **Addressed.
 * 18) *Eliminate underlinking. Make sure things are linked once in the intro, and once upon first mention in the body.
 * 19) **Addressed.
 * 20) *Per Soresu up there. You sure do enjoy the use of commas. See if you can't substitute a few semicolons, or reword or split several sentences so that they aren't so long. If you need clarification/assistance, summon me to IRC.
 * 21) **Addressed.
 * 22) *...Led by Galney's older sister, the Ducha of Terephon. What's Terephon? Only a single word of context is necessary.
 * 23) **Addressed.
 * 24) *You and I have also discussed quote formatting for two-person, single-line apiece exchanges. Please rectify.
 * 25) **Addressed.
 * 26) *I know his significance is probably minor at best, but who is Sergeant Darb? You inroduce him as though we already know who dude is. Was he a Hapan Sergeant? A crewman on the Anakin Solo? Please add a note of context there.
 * 27) **Addressed.
 * 28) *Soon after, the Battle of Hapes broke out. Soon after what? The prom? Christmas? Some context please ;)
 * 29) **Heh. Addressed. Thanks for the review.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 18:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 30) *Good job, though Ducha Galney was more fun. —Tommy9281 [[Image:Red lightsaber.png|20px]] ( Peace is a lie ) 14:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Super Star Destroyer

 * Nominated by: VT-16 10:49, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Here we go agaaain. I tried to rewrite most of it to simply reflect the various types and their histories, not list all the Executors and what they did. Hopefully it will pass "good" this time. :) VT-16 10:49, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

(0 AC/0 users/0 total)
Support

Oppose
 * 1) Toprawa
 * 2) *Many things are not sourced.
 * 3) *The article should include an infobox.
 * 4) *In this instance, intro sourcing is really unnecessary, and should be worked into the article proper.
 * 5) *These lists are really unnecessary. Rather, the article would benefit from a section that enumerates and briefly describes each SSD.
 * 6) *Source list should be in order by OOU publication date; additionally, the Source list seem woefully brief. I'm sure there are many more items, very likely with more information that could be included. Toprawa and Ralltiir 16:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) *It seems like you're getting the right idea of what I'm referring to. In response to your comment below about each Executor-class ship going only in the Executor-class article, that, respectfully, is where you're mistaken. The significance of this article is its incredibly broad scope of information. It encompasses everything that is considered a Super Star Destroyer, down to the very last ship. For this article to be comprehensive, it should discuss each individual ship. Not in lurid detail, of course, but each one should be given its own brief topic. As an example of how this article could be best sectioned, look at the Rakehell Squadron article to see how each pilot of the squadron is given their own subsection. That could be applied here to each individual ship class, and then subsection by each individual ship of that class. Indeed, this article is going to be very long, by simple virtue of its very broad scope. Also, for the Appearances and Source lists, again, as a result of this article's broad coverage, these lists should identify every single appearance and source in which a Super Star Destroyer appears. That means every Executor source, every Iron Fist source, etc. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) IFYLOFD
 * 9) *Toprawa got most of my objections, but I do have one little thing. Give context on Palpatine. Who is he?  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 19:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 10) Your joking, right? The article breaks Rules 3, 4, 10, and it has no info box image. It certainly doesn't cover all the sources, it doesn't use all available references, and half the article is a list, breaking the MoS. The BtS needs to expanded, sourced, and removed of all unsourced speculation. I also believe that the info you deleted did more harm than good to the article, which could almost be counted as vandalism, since it was sourced, relevant information. Replace the info you deleted, though keep the info you added as well. Expand it greatly, and fix the numerous POV issues as well. DC 01:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 11) Jinzler
 * 12) *The appearances are not in chronological order --Jinzler 22:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 13) * SSDs do not appear in The Core of Corruption like the article says, one is mentioned --Jinzler 22:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 14) * The Core of Corruption and Jaws of the Sarlacc in the appearances list should have the WizardsCite template, as they are from Wizards.com --Jinzler 22:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 15) * An SSD appears in Allegiance, this is missing from the list of appearances --Jinzler 22:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 16) *There are many other appearances missing --Jinzler 22:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 17) **Please familiarize yourself with the clause, which your middle three objections fall under. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:10, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 18) ***Sorry, I have now and I have addressed those issues --Jinzler 21:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments
 * Would the brief class descriptions go in the "characteristics" section? There's already 19 source present. There are not many left that I can remember. Most early sources just repeated info about the Executor much of which is now outdated. But other than that there's nothing else to add. VT-16 20:40, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Added more info on each class in a separate section. Got more sourcing. Removed BtS as it was just opinion. Executor ships by individual names goes in the Executor-class article, not here, that's why they were removed. Hope this is getting better. This is for a good status, not a great one. I don't even know what's required for that, so I aimed low. Don't know what more info I can cram into this that isn't already there. =/ Will do a sourced collage for the info box picture when I have time. VT-16 10:03, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It would be best if you could post these changes underneath my individual objections, so we can discuss each objection respectively. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree on including every source, but every last SSD mentioned? I hope it's not going to be as broad in the Star Destroyer article as well. That's potentially thousands of ships. Not to mention the cruiser one. I just disagree that this should deal with every individual ship, and not just the broader classifications under the term. I think I'll add the Executor variants under the Executor tag, but other than that, I don't see why this article has to have every single ship. There's no single ships in the frigate, destroyer or cruiser articles. Of course, that could be expanded, but for something like "cruiser", it would be a mini-encyclopedia all by itself. So far, I've only included ships that have a physical particularity about themselves. VT-16 18:33, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * VT-16, I understand you might be a little less familiar with the GAN process, but Toprawa is correct in that this article will be quite large, even under the "broad coverage" descriptor. And yes, the Star Destroyer and cruiser articles should, in all reality, be mammoth articles ranging in the hundreds of kilobytes in order to be considered "broad". There is so much information. You can talk briefly about each ship (read:A paragraph or two at minimum) in the history section, but citing the frigate, destroyer and cruiser articles, which are not GA and are in sore need of serious expansion, will not get you anywhere. That's just the way it is, and it won't be changing any time soon, even if it means this article is not GA'd. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 19:29, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * No need to take that tone, I was genuinely asking, because I've never seen anything quite as large as what is being proposed, anywhere on this site. (Except for the Palpatine or Anakin/Vader articles, heh.) Either way, did more organizing and found as many sources as possible. Some aren't really locked down with a date, and I need help on those. The Databank and FF ones. I'll leave the mini-bios for later, too tired now. VT-16 21:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, wasn't trying to come off as snippy. But yes, we do have delusions of grandeur when it comes to article size. ;-) And I humbly beg to differ. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.svg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 00:40, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Point taken. =X Well, that's certainly something to strive for. I only doubt it will happen for this article, even with having a small mention of every ship, there's limits to how much actual info we've actually got. VT-16 07:49, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * @Jinzler: Well, the problem is, I haven't read all the books that might have it, so I don't know all of them. That's why I need help. I've only gotten the ones that are listed on the Executor pages, for the most part, and that's what I know. =/ VT-16 07:51, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * VT, if I were trying to make this article a GA, here's some things I'd probably do:
 * Get rid of the collage, and stick with a good picture of an Executor-class SSD. I understand why you'd want a collage in the infobox, but isn't a collage technically fanart?
 * Remove the sections on the individual classes. The way it looks now, there really doesn't seem to be any info in those sections that are all that relevant to the article as a whole, and any info that might be relevant could easily be merged with the other sections. Besides, by just glancing through them, you have some classes listed that have never (to my knowledge) been called SSDs.
 * I'd probably also cut back on the number of images in the article. I could understand why you'd want to keep them, but unless/until you get more info, they just seem to be one on top of the other.
 * To be honest, I don't think this is the type of article that can be made into a GA, but feel free to prove me wrong. And if you need any assistance, I'd be glad to help. Grand Moff Tranner [[Image:Imperial Department of Military Research.svg|20px]] (Comlink) 11:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help, but I think T&R meant for it to be structured like that. As for the profile image, it's not fanart if only offical images are used/cropped together (and sourced in the image info), and that's exactly the reason why I chose a collage of different designs, not picking one class only. The classes and singular designs get mentioned for being of the types lumped together as SSDs. I think I will do a similar rewrite and reworking on the SD article down the road, removing the "ships similar to" list. VT-16 11:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Saboteur

 * Nominated by:  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 20:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My first try at this, so go easy on me. Any help for improvements getting it up to snuff to overcome any potential objections is welcomed. -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 20:11, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

(0 AC/0 users/0 total)
Support

Oppose
 * 1) Err...the infobox isn't fully sourced. Also, I have a feeling the coverage of the topic is rather broad, care to expand a bit more? And I have a feeling there are a lot more appearances and sources for the article as well.... DC 22:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) This one's a little fishy. If you're going to only use information from things where the word 'saboteur' is used directly then you should be okay, but if you're going to incorporate information from RotJ and other sources where the term isn't actually used you're missing an awful lot of sources/appearances to such a point that a broad article would be many, many times longer than the current version. -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 23:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I was wondering about that. The article would be way too short I think if it only included information from sources that the word "saboteur" is actually used. Since to my knowledge, there's only the two sources listed that use the specific word. And as for the other sources where it's implied but not explicitly stated, I just filled in the ones I could think of. OK, I think I'll just withdraw the nom until/if I decide to just shorten it to specific two sources. Should I just delete this nomination or strike through my nomination above? -  JMAS  Hey, it's me! 00:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Removal vote (AgriCorps only)

 * 1) JMAS has expressed his desire to remove this nom. Toprawa and Ralltiir 02:42, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Per above. —Tommy9281 [[Image:Red lightsaber.png|20px]] ( Peace is a lie ) 11:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Sigh....if he says so. DC 21:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 4)  Chack Jadson  (Talk)  21:59, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Chreeto the Defiant

 * Nominated by: Behold, I am Toprawa, greatest hunter of all realms. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Fastest written nom ever. &#91;source?&#93;

(0 AC/1 users/1 total)
Support
 * 1)  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 20:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) IFYLOFD:
 * 2) ** Do we have a quote for P&T?
 * 3) ***No.
 * 4) ** Why did the Rodians regard Chreeto as a hero?
 * 5) ***It doesn't say. A reason is loosely alluded to in that he has Rodian medals on his sash, which is covered in the P/T, but no explanation.
 * 6) ** "Flamboyant and boastful, Chreeto, regarded as a hero in his native province on Rodia, led a crew of six other hunters who worked as Imperial retainers in the wake of the Battle of Hoth in 3 ABY to capture fugitive Rebels." Run-on sentence, but a bit awkward in my opinion. I suggest you cut it up and/or reword it.
 * 7) ***That's not a run-on sentence by official standards. I'll try to tweak it. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * 8) **Good work.  IFYLOFD  ( And now, young Skywalker, you will die. ) 20:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments