Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Duel in the Senate


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Duel in the Senate (+5)
Support
 * 1) T8-13
 * 2) --Kosure 21:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Support, I've read this article many times and I thinks its well written. And although it lacks references, the film and the comic stand as a reference; and people who hadn't seen any of the films probably wouldn't know what the "Duel in the Senate" was  Anon vote struck by Atarumaster88 on 16:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) user:DarthJawa
 * 5) Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Looks better without the gallery.--Goodwood 19:11, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Where are the sources? Jediknight19bby 18:41, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) *As stated in the comments section it lacks referencing, but because the page is protected (someone kept adding fanon) we can't edit it. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 18:48, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) **I've fully sourced the article. Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Comments
 * I sourced two of the images, but I think some of the images have to go. There's just to many of them. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 07:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * We can lose "YodaDuel.jpg" - the one where they "lock blades" - ...that'll square it away a bit. --School of Thrawn 101 08:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Agreed, I also think that the ones from the comic at the end of the article don't ad much, perhaps one of them could go too? --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 10:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that the flying yoda image can replace the one that talks of him fleeing with Organa. The flying yoda pic is really the only one that's necessary as it's demonstrating a difference  between the comic and the movie. --School of Thrawn 101 13:38, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree, the diference between the comic and the movie should be in there. The other one has to go. --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 13:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I with you guys, too many pics. Humbone 16:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I removed those two pics from the article, and it already looks a lot better. Are there any other things that need to be improved before this article is ready for GA status? --Jedimca0 (Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 11:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It certainly looks better, now. I'll give it a full run through later.  Well done, Jedimca. --School of Thrawn 101 11:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It lacks references. -Fnlayson 04:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Protection level lowered to block only unregistered users. Atarumaster88  [[Image:Jedi_Order.jpg|20px]] ( Talk page ) 18:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I've taken care of the objections that have been listed here: I fully sourced and referenced the article, did some cleanup, and the picture issue has been resolved. Greyman ( Paratus ) 18:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)