Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations



This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles". For a list of "comprehensive articles", see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


 * Comprehensive article nominations history
 * Comprehensive article nominations archiving checklist

What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant canon information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold&mdash;firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"&mdash;that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must&hellip;


 * 1) &hellip;be well-written and detailed.
 * 2) &hellip;be unbiased, non-point of view.
 * 3) &hellip;be sourced with all available sources and appearances.
 * 4) &hellip;follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
 * 5) &hellip;following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
 * 6) &hellip;not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
 * 7) &hellip;have no redlinks.
 * 8) &hellip;have all relevant canon information presented.
 * 9) &hellip;be completely referenced for all available material and sources. See Sourcing for more information. While this is not required for an article possessing a singular source, it is encouraged, as it provides both uniformity and a good infrastructure should the topic be referenced in any future materials.
 * 10) &hellip;have all quotes and images sourced.
 * 11) &hellip;provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
 * 12) &hellip;include a "Behind the scenes" section for In-Universe articles.
 * 13) &hellip;counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.

How to nominate:


 * 1) First, nominate an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status, putting it at the bottom of the list below. Nominated articles must meet all thirteen requirements stated above.
 * 2) Add CAnom at the top of the article you are nominating.
 * 3) Be sure to place sign in the "Nominated by" line when the nomination is posted for voting.
 * 4) Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
 * 5) Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations&mdash;if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
 * 6) Users may not vote on their own articles.
 * 7) There is no limit to the amount of nominations a given user can submit at any given time.

How to vote:


 * 1) Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
 * 2) Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
 * 3) *If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
 * 4) As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
 * 5) There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If two members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window, and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the template 48 hours after the initial nomination.  The talk page will also be tagged with the CA template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If one EduCorps member has voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After the 48 hour period, an article can still also pass with just two EduCorps votes.
 * 6) Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Instructions on how to archive nominations, successful or otherwise, can be found here. Anyone can archive a nomination&mdash;just make sure it has the correct number of votes, has been nominated for at least a week (or 48 hours if there are two EC votes), and that there are absolutely no outstanding objections. If you are not sure how to do this, just ask, and someone will likely be more than willing to help you. Also, if you think you can slip one past us, think again&mdash;someone is always watching you.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of 2 weeks.

Guardian (Venator-class)

 * Nominated by:  Agent Cards <> 03:08, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: My first run through this process, lets see if an article I started is good enough to be deemed comprehensive.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Is the Jedi General mentioned the player? If so, we have an article of them (Unidentified Padawan (Clone Wars)). Also, since the player is apparently a Padawan, shouldn't they be a Jedi Commander, or are you promoted to Jedi Knight and Jedi General through the course of the game?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 11:20, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * The Jedi General is the player and the mission is only available once you become a Jedi Knight, hence why I put the rank of General.  Agent Cards <> 12:47, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you go and add "Description" and "Commanders and crew" sections (per WP:LG), you prolly have good GAN in your hands, any reason why not go for it? I know I was scared by it at time, now feel silly by it. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 11:51, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I basically just felt the article was too short to be in with the GANs. :D  Agent Cards <> 12:47, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and add 'em, as there's now infobox-only information AFAICS. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 14:28, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with Tm_T. Do a little more work on it while reading all its current objections then take it to GA nom. It's already over the word limit at 305 words anyway.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 16:49, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Are the majority of those infobox stats assumptions? Because if SW:CCS doesn't say that the Guardian had that amount of, for example, compliment, you can't have it. 1358  (Talk) 13:10, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * The stats are listed as standard for a Venator-class Star Destroyer, since there is no mention as to any modifications shouldn't the ship be treated as "stock"? If not please inform me as to why. :)  Agent Cards <> 12:53, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * There is no reason why we 'should assume that this ship has the "normal" amount of, for example, compliment, to be honest. That is complete speculation. I suggest you remove everything that is not confirmed. 1358  (Talk) 13:41, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I removed the complements. Should I also remove the length and width and all the Venator-class info?  Agent Cards <> 03:13, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * See my objections below. 1358  (Talk) 17:42, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * Is the Guardian explicitly mentioned in Star Wars: Complete Cross-Sections, the databank entry you have listed, and Star Wars Annual 2011? I appreciate that you are using sources as references for some of the information contained in the article, but unless they actually mention the Guardian itself, they cannot be included in the article's source list. --Jinzler 14:45, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * The Databank and Cross-Sections sources are for Venator-class Star Destroyers which is what this ship is, as there is no mention of any special modifications to the ship it shouldn't it be treated as if it was stock straight out of Kuat Drive Yards? If I'm wrong please inform me as to why :).  Agent Cards <> 12:47, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * RE-read your statement and I think I may have misread it the first time around... I thought we couldn't reference/cite things that aren't listed in the article's sources section.  Agent Cards <> 13:10, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * The Star Wars Annual 2011 is just to source the 21 BBY date seeing as the game follows the TV series it has the same time frame.  Agent Cards <> 12:47, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * The "Sources" section of an article is only meant to list sources in which the article's subject matter itself has been mentioned, so in this case, only any sources that explictly mention the Guardian. It is perfectly acceptable to reference other sources to provide an article with background information, such as referencing Star Wars Annual 2011 for the 21 BBY date, but these sources should not be included in the article's source list. --Jinzler 13:21, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * I was under the impression that if it was referenced it needed to be listed in the sources. Anyway thank you for that information, I have fixed it in the article.  Agent Cards <> 14:22, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Xd1358
 * For the infobox, I suggest you remove /everything/ that hasn't been confirmed. Please see GAs like Resilient and Redeemer for examples.
 * The ship name needs to be italicized in the infobox.
 * Fixed  Agent Cards <> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Two unsourced facts in the infobox.
 * Fixed  Agent Cards <> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ref 3 also needs to be italicized.
 * Fixed.  Agent Cards <> 06:42, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * "Crew members" in the infobox: Only one clone naval officer?
 * Updated.  Agent Cards <> 06:42, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Why is hyperdrive capitalized in the quote?
 * It is capitalized in the quote because it is capitalized in the speech text in-game. I made it lowercase in the article now.  Agent Cards <> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * "&hellip;engaged the Separatist Supreme Commander of the Droid Armies, General Grievous, in battle." Article for the battle?
 * Mention that it was damaged during the battle; currently the intro just says "Though severely damaged...".
 * Fixed.  Agent Cards <> 07:06, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * "&hellip;the Guardian managed to repel its attackers and its crew were able to repair enough of the damages to escape to hyperspace.[2]" Huh? Why did they espace if they were able to repel the enemy?
 * Anything I would say would just be speculation on why but that is what happened in game.  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * "The Guardian was a Venator-class that served&hellip;" Venator-class what?
 * Fixed  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * "Marked with the red colors of the Republic&hellip;" Red colors of the Republic? Hmm? Cut out "of the Republic" would be my suggestion.
 * Cut.  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Punctuation error at the beginning of the history; makes it choppy.
 * Fixed.  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 07:06, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps add a sentence about KDY manufacturing it?
 * KDY removed so this is moot  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 07:06, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps some small context on Serros, like his species?
 * Add race and gender.  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * References go after commas.
 * Fixed.  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Again, link for the battle?
 * Wait, what? The Guardian engaged General Grievous? o_O
 * Fixed.  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Article for the Jedi general?
 * Fixed.  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * "The Jedi's plan was a success, and the constructed defenses held firm against the Droid Army's assault&hellip;" The droid army itself was not involved, afaik, the navy was.
 * "&hellip;allowing Republic technicians the time they needed to repair the Guardian's hyperdrive." Didn't they escape, per the intro?
 * Bts section header is improperly capitalized.
 * "The Republic Venator-class Cruiser, Guardian, first appeared&hellip;" Punctuation error; also, I thought the ship was a Star Destroyer, not a cruiser. Address the ships properly.
 * Star Destroyers are a type of cruiser... I did this to not repetitively write Star Destroyer, Star Destroyer, Star Destroyer, Star Destroyer.  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Quotation marks go after periods.
 * Fixed.  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 04:00, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * If no one minds me saying, you can do either; before quotation, or after, is a difference between US english and Canadian/British english. I've never really been clear on this sort of thing (e.g lightsaber color vs lightsabre colour), but AFAIK there's no rule about it, so...-- Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 16:52, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Our MOS disagree. (: –Tm_T (Talk) 17:02, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, so maybe there is a rule...darn it. :P-- Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 17:06, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Per Tm_T above, this article could use a commanders and crew section.
 * No more applicable categories?
 * Added another category.  Agent Cards <<Talk!>> 06:42, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 1358 (Talk) 17:42, November 10, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * The word count for this is currently over 300. The limit for CA's is 250. Once everyone's done over here, this should be taken to the GAN.-- Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 21:01, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

Tau serpent

 * Nominated by: NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 12:16, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:What is it with LucasArts and leaving trilogies unfinished? They haven't actually finished a story in years, if ever since they truck along with stupid ideas, spin-offs, and sequels. TFU should at least be finished so they don't rush out a crappy retcon in another crappy book to explain the ending of TFUII. Also, while I rant on that. KOTOR.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1)  OLIOSTER  (talk) 22:23, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 14:23, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * Is the infobox really needed?  OLIOSTER  (talk) 16:24, November 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Maybe adding Snake or Reptile to the infobox class would help, if it is not too speculative. Darth Morrt 19:31, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * I figured that those would be speculative since it could just as easily be some mammal, bug, or even a crustacean since it's an alien animal. There was just nothing to put into the infobox fields, but I knew people would object to the absence of one. Perhaps thet GC could weigh in on this. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 23:34, November 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * Isn't serpent a synonym for snake? Darth Morrt 00:08, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * I just think that if there is no information to fill it with, there shouldn't be an infobox. Once information you can put in it becomes available, then add it.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 11:33, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Agreed, no infobox needed. MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg<sup style="color:green">(Whatever) 13:50, November 8, 2010 (UTC)
 * Removed. NaruHina  Talk Anakinsolo.png 22:21, November 8, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Brangus Glee

 * Nominated by: Menkooroo 04:34, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: So here's what you missed last week on Glee.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * 1) Isn't he based on an unused concept alien from ROTJ? If so, you probably should talk about that and add some sources for wherever that maquette has appeared. I'll check Chronicles for you when I get a chance. ~ SavageBob 05:53, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *I think he's just a realistic-looking dude from the CCG. Wookieepedia editors in the past thought he was from the cantina scene, but I think he's a CCG-original E.T. kinda thing. If you think that info's from Chronicles, yeah, It'd be great if you could check it out. Menkooroo 06:13, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) ** Here ya go: He was one of many alien designs for Jabba's Palace that never made it past the maquette stage. He never received a name and was known simply as "Alien 23" among the crew. Chronicles includes this caption under the image of his maquette: "'The thinker' among aliens?" (Chronicles pp. 242-243). If he's in Chronicles, he may be in Behind the Magic, too, so I'll check that later. ~ SavageBob 06:18, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Holy crap. You are awesome. Thank you. ^^ Is the image of his maquette the same one from the ccg card? Menkooroo 06:23, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) **** Yeah, the maquette photo (front view) was simply Photoshopped into a cantina booth, it looks like. Chronicles has a side-view image as well, though. In other news, he's in Behind the Magic (or his maquette is), on a table with a ton of other Jabba's Palace maquettes. No info on him, but it's a visual reference, I guess. ~ SavageBob 06:24, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) **** You can find his maquette image here. (It's funny you decided to CA this guy, since I finished expanding Tocoyan, another abandoned Jabba's Palace alien, last week, so had all the sources at hand!) ~ SavageBob 06:34, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) *****OK! I've given the bts a complete overhaul. Thank you so, so much for the info and the image. Seriously, that's really cool of you. Surprisingly, the article is still easily CA length, so take a look and tell me what you think! Menkooroo 07:03, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) ******Happy to oblige! :) ~ SavageBob 16:05, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, next thing: Can we claim that Dor Nameth is the former quarterback of the New York Jets homeworld of his species, or just of Glee?
 * 1) *Whoops, misread that sentence on the card. Remedied.

Comments
 * 1) Perhaps some note of his CCG abilities in the BTS? He seems fairly weak offense-wise, but he gets a boost when he's in a cantina. His "ability" indicates that he's pretty astute at defense. He has the skill needed to pilot a vehicle or fire a weapon. Characters can move to or from his location for free, provided he's at a docking bay. He avoids most low cases of attrition (death not directly related to battle). It's a lot of abilities for one little guy, but some summary might be in order. ~ SavageBob 16:05, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Honestly, adding card game stats to the bts seems kinda fluffish to me. As a comparison, I've never noted RPG stats in the bts sections of characters who are profiled in the Legacy Era Campaign Guide or any other WEG or WOTC sourcebook. If the bts were pretty slim, it admittedly couldn't hurt, but with all the info that's in the bts already (thanks to you! :^D), I don't really see it as necessary. Menkooroo 16:26, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **I always do this, since Chee's gone on record that game stats are considered pseudo-canon in that an author can very well use them to base the a character's abilities on when they use that character in fiction. My personal practice is to indicate what things are different from average, so in his case, his card's good defensive abilities, and perhaps the fact that he's more powerful in a cantina (which fits in with his lore). The fact that he can drive and fire a weapon are perhaps negligible (who can't in Star Wars?), and the docking bay thing is kind of neither here nor there. What do you think about simply noting the cantina thing, good defensive value, and calling it a night? ~ SavageBob 19:31, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***I still don't like the idea of it. When adding stats for one character is mandated, then it sets a precedent for noting stats in bts sections of every character who has ever had RPG or card game stats. Should Havac beef up Wedge's bts with a few paragraphs detailing the stats given to Wedge in every sourcebook he's ever been in? I really don't mean to be stubborn or contrarian here (you know I think you're awesome!), but noting card game stats in a bts section just doesn't seem all that necessary to me. If a one-sentence bts section could use some beefing, it couldn't hurt, but otherwise, it kinda seems like trivia. An author can use the stats, sure, but they can just as easily discard them if they want. Menkooroo 04:17, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) ****I'd argue that, yes, Wedge's article should probably note any exceptional game stats he's got in his various incarnations. As I said, I always try to do this, whether the stats come from an RPG, a CCG, or a video game. In my opinion, our articles are sources for SW authors. I know of at least a few who have stated they use Wookieepedia as a resource when working on their novels or comics. In addition, I feel that game stats add color. It's kind of fun to know that Character X is a badass with the Klatooinan nunchuks even though his bio doesn't reference it, say; it allows us to mention something that otherwise isn't part of the larger article. And finally, it's part of being comprehensive in my opinion. We need to cover these characters and species and vehicles from all sorts of angles, not just their in-universe ones. But, then, I'm unaware of any policy on this, so I won't oppose based on it, I guess. ~ SavageBob 04:52, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) *****Don't give up yet! Objections don't have to be strictly based on what is and what isn't policy. Like everything else we've discussed in the past week, I'm interested in the community's thoughts on this. To the Senate Hall? Menkooroo 05:40, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) ******I'm cool with that. I started the last one, though. ;P ~ SavageBob 18:48, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

Gunnery captain

 * Nominated by: Darth Morrt 19:42, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: An other underused rank.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Not an objection, but feel free to keep the novel quote in the Bts. :)  1358  (Talk) 20:24, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 13:28, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3)  Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 17:03, November 20, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) No Bts.  1358  (Talk) 19:51, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *I knew something is really missing :D Darth Morrt 21:00, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) * Film quotes take precedence over novel quotes.
 * 4) **IMO, the additional words in the dialogs of a novelization are kinda 'minor cut-scenes'. I have cut with 'hellips' the words that are different from the film dialog ("one" vs "pod"), so the quote doesn't contradicts the film. The "Instructions?" makes it clear that Bolvan, the gunnery captain is superior. I think the reduced novel quote is better for this article.
 * 5) ***I'll talk to you later regarding this. 1358  (Talk) 10:24, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) ****The fact that film material rule over other canon is still there. Stuff from films should always take precedence over other stuff. How about adding the film quote as lead quote and the novel quote in the Bts? 1358  (Talk) 19:45, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) *****Fixed. Darth Morrt 20:17, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) * "Its duty was to oversee the chief gunnery officers&hellip;" Who is "its"? The assignment's?
 * 9) **The gunnery captain's. I tried not to say 'gunnery captain' in every sentence. Reworded.
 * 10) ***Now it sounds like the Empire was tasked to oversee the chief gunnery officers. 1358  (Talk) 10:24, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) ****Fixed. Darth Morrt 20:17, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 12) * The image needs a caption.
 * 13) * The CSWE needs to be italicized.
 * 14) * Also, in the note, the entry needs to be italicized.
 * 15) * Cite_web for the external link, please.
 * 16) * No categories. 1358  (Talk) 20:25, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * 17) **All addressed. Darth Morrt 02:05, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 18) Are you sure Gunnery Captain wasn't an assigment as much as it was a rank? -- Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 17:08, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * 19) *The only direct source of this post states the following: "Bolvan, Captain - Gunnery captain of the Devastator, he was the commanding officer when Darth Vader ordered the destruction of a biological weapons lab on Falleen, resulting in the death of many." It says gunnery captain of Devastator, not gunnery captain aboard Devastator. That's why I think it is not his rank, but I am not good in topic of rank/assignment/commission. It could be a rank as well, but it us just an assumption, isn't it? Darth Morrt 23:38, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
 * 20) **If that's all we have to go on, asignment is good enough.-- Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 17:03, November 20, 2010 (UTC)


 * You'll need to decide if that first section is an intro or not. It has unsourced information that isn't restated elsewhere in the article (such as the fact that more than one chief gunnery officer could serve under the captain). I think the article would probably work better without an intro, though, as restating that info would require the creation of a cumbersome additional section. Comprehensive articles are unique in that they don't need to have intros, even if there's an additional section like "Personality and traits" or "Notable gunnery captains." The first section, as it's currently written, could work just fine as part of the article's "body." All of the information in the first paragraph is currently unsourced, so if you just source it, everything will be OK.
 * The first section is part of the body. Sourced.
 * The linking was pretty messy. I fixed it, but remember to link things on their first mention (Bolvan). Star Destroyer was linked once in the intro and twice in the body. I took care of it, but definitely take a note. Menkooroo 05:26, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Darth Morrt 12:23, November 20, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Kuep

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 22:37, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Time for yet another obscure character nominee.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  OLIOSTER  (talk) 19:24, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Menkooroo 14:25, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3)  1358  (Talk) 20:09, November 15, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) "The card's statistics portray the character as average." Average what? Please explain.  1358  (Talk) 19:58, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) *Changed to explain how he had average abilities. Hanzo Hasashi 21:03, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **Could you elaborate a bit more on these abilities? What abilities, specifically? 1358  (Talk) 19:36, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) ***Alright, will mention them being combat abilities. Hanzo Hasashi 01:02, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll make the lack of humanness a formal objection. Again, see here, particularly Havac's comment. For what it's worth, I would have objected to Evax had I seen the nomination at the time. Menkooroo 04:54, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, will change accordingly, as I will do for Nar Millich. Hanzo Hasashi 16:03, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * Have removed him being Bespinian, because just because he was a Bespin Wing Guard, doesn't necessarily make that his homeworld. Lando's homeworld was Socorro. Nor is he necessarily human, as opposed to one of several humanoid species. Hanzo Hasashi 22:37, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Wasn't there a CT about Human lookalikes to be considered Humans until proven otherwise, per the supposed authorias intent? If the author would have liked him being other than Human, he surely mentiones it on the card. Darth Morrt 02:15, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * I dunno, I looked at the Evax article a while back after it became a good article, and upon reading the nomination, him just appearing human was not good enough proof that he was human as opposed to a Clawdite changeling IIRC.Hanzo Hasashi 03:20, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's an unofficial but widely-accepted policy: If it looks like a duck... Menkooroo 04:02, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * To be safe, at least for now, I am going to leave things open to the possibility that Kuep could be something else. I looked at the Evax page, a good article, a few seconds ago, and still they do not mention him being human, just leave his species blank. Hanzo Hasashi 21:24, November 10, 2010 (UTC)

Nar Millich

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 22:50, November 9, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1)  OLIOSTER  (talk) 19:18, November 10, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Not an objection, but you might want to update Security Chief. :)  1358  (Talk) 20:14, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Just remember to add NOTOC to CAN's that display a table of contents (see my edit). Menkooroo 11:10, November 17, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Obscure!
 * 2) * Based on the image, I believe you could add his skin color (and possibly the eye color as well?) to the infobox.
 * 3) **I got the skin and hair color, but not sure if eye color is possible to tell, some dark color blurred by shading. Hanzo Hasashi 19:22, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) * It pretty much sounds that the Imperial Navy is on the Death Star. Could you reword a bit, and say that he was stationed there or something like that?
 * 5) **Done. Hanzo Hasashi 19:22, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) * Perhaps some kind of time indicator would be cool?
 * 7) **What do you mean? As in when was he stationed on the Death Star? There is no way to determine. Hanzo Hasashi 19:22, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) * Context on Vader?
 * 9) **Wrote he was a Sith Lord. Hanzo Hasashi 19:22, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) * In what way is he more powerful than the other characters?
 * 11) **Elaborated. Hanzo Hasashi 19:22, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 12) * 1358 (Talk) 14:28, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * Have used this SH forum to decide to source his card image for his being human, upon several other users' requests. Hanzo Hasashi 16:14, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know this card game very well, but isn't it possible that this guy is intended to be Shann Childsen? He seems to be similar, considering this game's not-too-good graphic. IIRC, this card game recreated scenes from the films. Are there other examples in this game for creating new characters out of the blue? Darth Morrt 20:57, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * As a matter of fact, I always thought he was similar to Shann Childsen myself. And it even looks like he's in Detention Block AA 23. There are plenty of characters created out of the blue in the Premier branch of the JKTC, going to the page you can find many characters created for the card game who have been neglected by every other source in existence. Hanzo Hasashi 22:47, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

Apple slug

 * Nominated by: ~ SavageBob 23:41, November 11, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: What's worse than finding an apple slug in your apple? Finding half of one. (More canonized concept art to boot!) ~ SavageBob 23:41, November 11, 2010 (UTC)

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Delectable. :P MasterFred Commerce Guild.svg<sup style="color:green">(Whatever) 03:42, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2)  1358  (Talk) 16:54, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Interesting and well-done. Menkooroo 14:29, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Mmm...food
 * 2) * I think we should use 'creature' instead of 'animal'.
 * 3) * Some context on Coruscant, please?
 * 4) * Quotation marks (") go after periods and commas.
 * 5) * Lacks a first mention/appearance template.
 * 6) * 1358 (Talk) 19:47, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) **Will get to the rest of these soon, but should the 1stm template go on its first in-canon mention ("Dining at Dex's") or its first mention period, which would be the Lucasfilm Archives book? ~ SavageBob 21:43, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * 8) ***According to Toprawa via IRC, 1stm goes at the very first mention, the Archives stuff. However, it could also use or something like that.  1358  (Talk) 21:56, November 12, 2010 (UTC)
 * 9) ****OK, all have been addressed. Thank you for tasting the apple slug. ~ SavageBob 03:36, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 10) *****I'm not sure, but if you have 1stm, you'll gonna need 1st as well. Also, perhaps add after the Archive item?  1358  (Talk) 10:20, November 13, 2010 (UTC)
 * 11) ******None of those is an appearance, though. They're all sources. ~ SavageBob 16:52, November 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Mazara

 * Nominated by: <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 04:04, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A minor character. She was only in the book for a few pages anyway.'''

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object
 * Hey there! Is there any more info from the book you can give about the character? Her mentions an article she wrote that got her fired from her job, and the fact that she staged small rallies.
 * Fixed. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 21:40, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good show. Can you fix up the second sentence, though? Right now it looks like Blackwater Systems was breaking Falleen's laws against the wishes of Mazara's superiors.
 * Fixed. Serves me right for trying to fix an article at 7 am. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 06:51, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you give any more info on when Obi and Ani hooked up with her? Where was it, what was she doing?
 * Fixed. Funny how you forget these things until someone else points them out. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 21:40, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Looking at her CUSWE entry, it seems like there's enough info for a personality and traits section.
 * Done. I have a message on the page you linked to for the CSWE. Thanks. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 21:40, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you know if she has an entry in The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia? If you have no idea, you can ask here. Menkooroo 14:41, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good work! Just make a note here when you get a response on the CSWE entry. Menkooroo 09:57, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * One more, actually. Does she have any other lines that would make an appropriate quote for the personality and traits section? Menkooroo 10:01, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * Done. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 21:55, November 15, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

Kin-Ya Dosun

 * Nominated by: Jinzler 11:57, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: A Gungan Jedi Knight

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)
Support
 * 1) Force help us all. Menkooroo 15:20, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) And Force hates us all.  Clone Commander Lee  Talk 15:45, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Wow. Even scarier that one of them turned into a Dark Jedi. ~ SavageBob 03:30, November 19, 2010 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified Twi'lek part supplier

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 15:35, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Nomming this as a complement to my Bith scientist GA. Tm_T told me to! :P

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)
Support
 * 1)  1358  (Talk) 19:27, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) <font color="#208090"> Holocron  Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 05:51, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Poor guy. Menkooroo 14:17, November 15, 2010 (UTC)
 * 4)  SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 07:33, November 21, 2010 (UTC)

Object Comments
 * 1) Soresu
 * 2) * Don't forget the game completion/LS completion templates and accompanying BTS explanation. SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 20:40, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) **Wrapped the quest part in the gamemechanics template. The Bts already mentions that he only appears during a side quest.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 21:27, November 20, 2010 (UTC)

Neff

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 20:49, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:Obscure female Bespin Wing Guard.

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Have used this forum as a way to source her card image as her being human. Hanzo Hasashi 20:51, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

ST-103

 * Nominated by: Hanzo Hasashi 21:11, November 14, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)
Support

Object

Comments
 * Very clearly the trooper is a male, if he was female he would have a different chest plate. I have used the logic of the duck test with apparently human characters to state that apparently male characters are male whether or not any source states it (his card image I am using as the source for his being male). Hanzo Hasashi 21:11, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

Wanuri

 * Nominated by: <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 07:36, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Really, really, really minor character, not enough for a personality and traits section. I checked our CSWE page and he wasn't mentioned there.

(1 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support
 * 1) Menkooroo 11:12, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2)  OLIOSTER  (talk) 02:09, November 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * 3)  SoresuMakashi ( Everything I tell you is a lie  the truth  ) 22:33, November 19, 2010 (UTC)

Object
 * Looks good. However, the homeworld is exclusive to the infobox --- in the body, can you mention what planet Blackwater Systems is on?
 * Done. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 08:06, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, "Blackwater Systems" might be appropriate for the "Affiliation" field of the infobox. Menkooroo 14:00, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's a loose fit, but I suppose it's true. Added. <font color="#208090"> Holocron Greatholocron.jpg <font color="#208090">(Complain) 08:06, November 17, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

A festive gathering

 * Nominated by:  OLIOSTER  (talk) 08:20, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: Talk about a disconnect between its name and what it depicts....silly SWG.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)
Support Object
 * 1)  Trak Nar  Ramble on 09:28, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Hooray for misleading titles! Bonslywizard Trade Federation Symbol.jpg( Send a transmission ) 01:08, November 21, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
 * Should I mention the rest of the group's weapons? I believe I've identified the Wookiee and Twi'lek's weapons as a E-11 blaster rifle and a DL-44 heavy blaster pistol respectively, but I don't recognize the Rodian's weapon.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 08:28, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * To be on the safe side, I'd mention them. I don't recognize the Rodian's weapon, either. It kinda looks like an elongated, stylized UZI.   Trak Nar  Ramble on 09:21, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Xd said this might fall into original research, but said that the lightsaber was too obvious not to mention, so I think I'll just leave it like it is for now.  OLIOSTER  (talk) 09:23, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good point. That is quite the fine line to walk.  The article, overall, seems fine to me.  Nothing that I could see particularly wrong with it, nothing that needed a tweaking, so I'm gonna go ahead and vote for it.  Trak Nar  Ramble on 09:28, November 20, 2010 (UTC)