Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Hoover


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Hoover

 * Nominated by: --Eyrezer 07:49, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination comments: ~500 words. No appropriate lead quotes.

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)
Support
 * 1) You've picked up the first vote.--Skippy Farlstendoiro 09:48, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Maybe Jabba tolerated his blood-sucking because he kept the palace floor free of dirt and debris? ~ SavageBob 16:07, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * 3)  Grunny  ( Talk ) 15:57, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Though I'm not a fan of the vampire-like elements.  CC7567  (talk) 21:46, November 21, 2009 (UTC)
 * 5)  Jonjedigrandmaster  ( Jedi Beacon ) 15:36, November 23, 2009 (UTC)

Object
 * 1) Skippy hoovering details.
 * 2) * Bts: If you detail the probable origin of the monniker "Hoover", you should also detail it for the monniker "Dogephant".
 * 3) **The origins of Hoover were specifically referred to in the referenced source, which is why I've put it in. Dogephant has not been canonically explained, although I suppose I could do so.
 * 4) * Bts: This has been treated as in error. By whom? By later canon sources, by the current article...?
 * 5) **Clarified.
 * 6) * Let me see. The Encyclopedia says that there were two small aliens from a species that the Enc. does not specify: Mr. Attark and Mr. Hoover. Is it what you mean? Thus, maybe there was a second, unseen Hoover at Jabba's, known as Mr. Hoover? I mean, the Weequays were known as "the Weequays" for a long time; and we try not to assume that sources are mistaken.
 * 7) **Yes - I was originally writing the article to include a Hoover, but it became absurd. The characteristics and skills of each are all repeated. Seeing as the CSWE was divided into four authors, it is pretty much a given that the two were written separately and not harmonized. --Eyrezer 09:46, November 20, 2009 (UTC)
 * 8) *Sometimes BtS is richer than the article... in objections, at least. --Skippy Farlstendoiro 08:35, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

Comments