Talk:Ahsoka Tano

Confused
Ahsoka is from The Clone Wars cartoon, all of that is Canon right? why is everything about her from the Clone Wars carton listed under Legends? Chasemarc (talk) 23:24, October 8, 2014 (UTC) Resetting indent. That's not how we've decided to do things. Just something because something is canon doesn't mean that wasn't also part of the Expanded Universe at the time. You couldn't tell the story of the Expanded Universe without the bedrock of the films, etc. That's why for the purposes of such listings, we consider them both "canon" and "Legends." It can be a little confusing at first, but I think on the whole it makes sense once you wrap your head around it. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:24, November 15, 2014 (UTC)
 * TCW is actually both canon and Legends. If it wasn't part of both, the Legends article would have huge continuity holes everywhere. Everything produced prior to April 25, 2014, is Legends as well. 1358  (Talk)  23:28, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
 * That doesn't mean we can't have all of the info from her Legends article in her Canon article. From what I understand, Ahsoka's Canon and Legends articles should be identical. 161.130.188.98 22:27, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * Any Legends info will have to stay in the Legends page. Only information from her canonical appearances can be in the Canon page. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 22:33, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * So is only TCW content released after April 25 canon then? Because I'm pretty sure that would only include Son of Dathomir, which wouldn't make sense because that's a continuation of content released before April 25. The way I understand the new canon policy, all of TCW is canon, which would make all of Ahsoka's appearances throughout the entire series canon.  Canon and legends are not mutually exclusive.  Legends is presumed to be non-canon until the Story Group affirmatively says it is canon.  They've affirmatively said that TCW is canon.  Which would mean that Ahsoka's canon article would be virtually identical to her legends article, because the story group has said that everything that happened to her in that series is canon.167.160.128.246 23:49, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * The series and the movie are canon. The Legends page, however, also includes non-canon appearances, so it would not be identical. So yes, most of her appearances from before April 25th are canon, but not all. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:53, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * All of the show's supplementary material (comics, reference books, young readers) is Legends, which is most of the names and specific details comes from in addition to supplementary events not featured in the TV series. Very few of the ships, planets, locations, people, etc. in TCW are named in NuCanon. Cade  StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit.svg  Calrayn  23:55, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
 * That's still about 90% of her legends article that's canon though. Her canon article should go into just as much detail about those events as her legends article does.  It's just a simple matter of copy-pasting that material in.167.160.128.246 00:05, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * We don't copy and paste. Each new Canon page needs to be written as a unique page, rather than a carbon copy of the Legends page. We will, at some point, get to making a much more comprehensive Canon page about Ahsoka. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 00:08, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * If you say so, but there's really nothing wrong with having identical articles if the info they're covering is identical is there? I think most professional encyclopedias would prefer it that way...167.160.128.246 00:14, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
 * This makes no sense. Legends should be just the non-canon material.  The rest is canon and should be only on that page, as it is not Legends.  The Canon page should have the correct material, with any additional supplemental Legends material being on the Legends page. So almost all of Ahsoka's material should only be on the Canon page. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 23:34, November 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * The problem is that without that Canon information, the Legends information wouldn't make any sense. It's needed in order to have a page that people can actually understand, because that Legends information is based around the Canon info. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 23:52, November 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * I would think that in those instances it would just refer back to the Canon page as necessary. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 23:54, November 14, 2014 (UTC)
 * It makes it look like the rest is *not* canon. The main focus should be on canon. "Legends" is supposed to be that which is not canon. But since I'm sure you've already all discussed this at great length and detail somewhere on this wiki, it doesn't need discussed again, especially not here. Just throwing an opinion from a user out there....I'll shut up and go away now....Thanks... - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 01:00, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * This is still bugging me. I look at the canon page, and nearly everything canon is missing.  People coming here looking for canon information won't know that most of the stuff on the legends page is canon.  It makes no sense to not have the canon content on the canon page.  Focus should be on the canon page. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 17:47, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
 * Feel free to write the canon info! It's not like it's never going to be there. Not at all. It just means it hasn't been written yet. Remember, before the Canon/Legends split, some of these major pages took years to write. It's unrealistic to assume everything is going to be just as good in the Canon pages less than a year after the Canon pages were created. So if you'd like to see more information, feel free to contribute it. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 17:51, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

Image
I have an image I'd like to add but since I'm new to the wiki I can't upload it here. Here's an link to the image http://a.pomf.se/rwglkg.png GrandmasteroftheArchives (talk) 07:25, March 3, 2015 (UTC) The newest Rebels Recon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xggYEpemcck GrandmasteroftheArchives (talk) 07:41, March 3, 2015 (UTC)
 * What's the source? Once I know that, I can upload it for you. - Brandon Rhea (talk) 07:33, March 3, 2015 (UTC)
 * Correct, though I meant where you found that specific image. It's very high quality and looks like it was from some sort of press release/news story. Can you link me to where you got it from? - Brandon Rhea (talk) 07:52, March 3, 2015 (UTC)
 * I made it myself by combining the two images from the video GrandmasteroftheArchives (talk) 13:35, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

Legacy section
What exactly should we do with the legacy section? Everything in that section takes place before Rebels, when Ahsoka reappears, so should we just change the title and move it back before the Rebels sections? Cevan (talk) 00:03, March 4, 2015 (UTC)