Consistency? Or is it for continuity's sake? As in, are you assuming what's most likely to be made canon?

You know, I think you're doing it for continuity's sake, since the Sith Empire would later be defeated once and for all, and a Republic lightsider is most likely to be made the canonical Commander. Am I right?

As for the black and white morality (that is, Republic lightsider and Imperial darksider) assumption, I'm guessing it's for convenience's sake, right?

Mr and miss editor people I was wondering is there an off topic post? I belive other wikis have em so I’m curious if we do

No

The wiki for the Corvus (the raider corvette) says that it was equipped with concussion missiles but didn’t iden versio tell zay that the Corvus never had missiles in the battlefront 2 campaign? Is there something I’m missing?

The Inferno Squad novel said that it did have concussion missiles in chapter 6

Has Wookieepedia always supported the light side? I mean, were player characters in games (such as Revan and the Exile) all assumed to be lightsiders before the game events are canonised?

@General Khor While I can't speak on how long it's been in practice, the "light side" option (or "dark side" in the case of Sith-aligned characters in SWTOR, iirc) is typically the default because the game kind of props players up as the "good guy" so we generally document things as such. That being said, we have templates that indicate when content is not necessarily defined canon chiefly due to this alignment system, and they'll be present on articles when a choice has no "canon" path unless it's defined by an external source. In both cases (unconfirmed and confirmed) the alternate routes/options are supposed to be listed in the Behind the Scenes section (though whether or not an editor puts in the effort to document this is up to them).

..ok, I get it now.