Should this be further cat'd into conflicts where possible? "Battles of the Yuuzhan Vong invasion" or "Battles of the Thrawn campaign". --SparqMan 05:23, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- Well that would change the entire sorting structure by date of the battle in a partucular place, wouldn't it? ([[Category:Battles|Coruscant 4]])-- Riffsyphon1024 05:47, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- Plus the battles are already sorted by era in the list of battles. -- Riffsyphon1024 05:47, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
I was proposing removing the current structure. Articles can have multiple categories. --SparqMan 05:54, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
- Well damn, I was just thinking this structure was good and all, and after tweaking it enough, I don't see a need for change. I see the category as an alphabetical listing, and it should continue to look like this with proper maintenance. The list is there to provide the entire timeline, so that a person can associate a war with it there. -- Riffsyphon1024 05:58, 12 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Problem[]
I've discovered a problem. When we get more than 10 battles on a single world, the category starts sorting those past 9, (ie "10", "11", "12") as after "1" rather than "9". Check out what has occured with the Coruscant battle listing. QuentinGeorge 23:52, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Hmm...couldn't this be solved by, instead of marjing the tenth battle as "Battles|Coruscant 10", marking it as "Battles|Coruscant 91"? That way, the tenth battle would be listed after the ninth one. Kuralyov 23:57, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- That might work. I'll try it. QuentinGeorge 00:03, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Or, how about taking 1-9 and categorizing them as "Battles|Coruscant 01", etc.? — Silly Dan 00:17, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- This seems like the thing to do to me. WhiteBoy 06:22, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- But only for those over 10. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:43, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah...just to keep it sorted correctly. WhiteBoy 06:56, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- But only for those over 10. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:43, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- This seems like the thing to do to me. WhiteBoy 06:22, 9 Dec 2005 (UTC)
- How about a Category:Battles of Coruscant? -- SFH 00:00, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- I'd rather not. I'm trying to halt this "category-creep" we seem to be encountering, which I think is leading us to over-categorise everything. QuentinGeorge 00:03, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Categorize by war?[]
Should we subcategorize these by war? For example "Battles of the Galactic Civil War," and so forth. I personally think it would be a good thing, since this category is so full. -LtNOWIS 02:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. VT-16 23:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- We could also further categorize by combatants ("Battles of the Rebel Alliance", "Battles of the Mon Calamari", etc., etc.,) if we went for a split. —Silly Dan (talk) 23:37, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well lets get started then? I mean, it would make it a lot neater. So should we? Darth Abeonis Sith Council (Sith Campaign) 21:05, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- I appreciate this action very much so. I should have realized the warrant for a subcategory or 20 when the category started filling up. -- Riffsyphon1024 20:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)