No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
**Late to the party, I realize, but you '''are''' talking about taking one of those to FA, right? Civil War, with a relatively small amount of fine-tuning, would breeze through the GA process -- a tried and true method for testing FA waters, IMO. Reunification, on the other hand, needs a more concentrated effort to meet this project's standards. --[[User:School of Thrawn 101|<b><span style="color:blue">SoT</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:School of Thrawn 101| <b><span style="color:green">Holonet of the Hand</span></b>]]</sup> 08:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
**Late to the party, I realize, but you '''are''' talking about taking one of those to FA, right? Civil War, with a relatively small amount of fine-tuning, would breeze through the GA process -- a tried and true method for testing FA waters, IMO. Reunification, on the other hand, needs a more concentrated effort to meet this project's standards. --[[User:School of Thrawn 101|<b><span style="color:blue">SoT</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:School of Thrawn 101| <b><span style="color:green">Holonet of the Hand</span></b>]]</sup> 08:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
***I have done some work on Imperial Civil War already, most of it on the infobox (in fact all of it...), but I dislike sending articles to GA when they can be polished to FA status. Reunification has been untouched by me however.--[[User:Mith'raw'nuruodo|<span style="color:darkblue;">'''Mitth'raw'nuruodo'''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Mith'raw'nuruodo|Imperial HoloNet]])</sup>[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 11:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
***I have done some work on Imperial Civil War already, most of it on the infobox (in fact all of it...), but I dislike sending articles to GA when they can be polished to FA status. Reunification has been untouched by me however.--[[User:Mith'raw'nuruodo|<span style="color:darkblue;">'''Mitth'raw'nuruodo'''</span>]]<sup>([[User talk:Mith'raw'nuruodo|Imperial HoloNet]])</sup>[[Image:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 11:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
| + | ****I can understand not wanting to "cheat" an article by sending it through GA when it could probably pass an FA nom; however, I've always been a huge advocate for promoting the GA process and, in all reality, it doesn't really speak against an article to run it through a GA nomination. If an article is good enough for FA, it should have no problem making GA -- which doesn't in any way disqualify something from making FA, so it's not like it's a hindrance. Again, I totally understand your position but I want to stress how useful a tool the GA feedback process can be to smooth out the more rigorous experience of an FA nom.--[[User:School of Thrawn 101|<b><span style="color:blue">SoT</span></b>]]<sup>[[User talk:School of Thrawn 101| <b><span style="color:green">Holonet of the Hand</span></b>]]</sup> 14:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 14:45, 30 June 2008
Wookieepedia > WookieeProject Ambition > New Main Focus (PrAmb)
- Well, Daala's nomination is going relatively well. But we shouldn't allow any slow down in project momentum. I suggest we go ahead and brainstorm ideas for our next main focus. Hopefully we can come to a decision by the end of Daala's nomination. Now, as I mentioned in my last memo, I was considering Galactic Empire, Imperial Navy, and Mitth'raw'nuruodo. But after some consideration and a discussion with Chack Jadson, I have decided that the first two would be too large in scope for our project, so we'll hold those for when Project Ambition gains some more members. Also, I believe Green tentacle is doing some substantial work on Thrawn, so we'll leave that alone and see how it goes. So, I have come up with two ideas that would be of suitable size and scope for our little project. These are Executor and Imperial Ruling Council. Both of these are being reviewed by two respected users, and I think it might be best to help them in their endeavour. If any of you have other ideas or comments please feel free to share them.--Mitth'raw'nuruodo(Imperial HoloNet)
22:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Executor is being worked on separately. So that too is out of the question.--Mitth'raw'nuruodo(Imperial HoloNet) 14:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Executor is being worked on separately. So that too is out of the question.--Mitth'raw'nuruodo(Imperial HoloNet)
- Alright, I now have two suggestions which I am behind. Either Imperial Civil War or Imperial Reunification. If there are no objections by the end of Daala's nomination, then one of these will be our new main focus.--Mitth'raw'nuruodo(Imperial HoloNet) 23:41, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Late to the party, I realize, but you are talking about taking one of those to FA, right? Civil War, with a relatively small amount of fine-tuning, would breeze through the GA process -- a tried and true method for testing FA waters, IMO. Reunification, on the other hand, needs a more concentrated effort to meet this project's standards. --SoT Holonet of the Hand 08:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- I have done some work on Imperial Civil War already, most of it on the infobox (in fact all of it...), but I dislike sending articles to GA when they can be polished to FA status. Reunification has been untouched by me however.--Mitth'raw'nuruodo(Imperial HoloNet)
11:32, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- I can understand not wanting to "cheat" an article by sending it through GA when it could probably pass an FA nom; however, I've always been a huge advocate for promoting the GA process and, in all reality, it doesn't really speak against an article to run it through a GA nomination. If an article is good enough for FA, it should have no problem making GA -- which doesn't in any way disqualify something from making FA, so it's not like it's a hindrance. Again, I totally understand your position but I want to stress how useful a tool the GA feedback process can be to smooth out the more rigorous experience of an FA nom.--SoT Holonet of the Hand 14:45, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- I have done some work on Imperial Civil War already, most of it on the infobox (in fact all of it...), but I dislike sending articles to GA when they can be polished to FA status. Reunification has been untouched by me however.--Mitth'raw'nuruodo(Imperial HoloNet)
- Late to the party, I realize, but you are talking about taking one of those to FA, right? Civil War, with a relatively small amount of fine-tuning, would breeze through the GA process -- a tried and true method for testing FA waters, IMO. Reunification, on the other hand, needs a more concentrated effort to meet this project's standards. --SoT Holonet of the Hand 08:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
