Wookieepedia

READ MORE

Wookieepedia
Register
Advertisement
Wookieepedia
This article covers the Canon version of this subject.  Click here for Wookieepedia's article on the Legends version of this subject. 
TPMCGYoda

Master Qui-Gon, more to say, have you?

It is requested that this article, or a section of this article, be expanded.

See the request on the listing or on this article's talkpage. Once the improvements have been completed, you may remove this notice and the page's listing. No reason has been supplied; please provide a reason on the template or talkpage

"Understand this, Commander, and understand it clearly. The Ascendancy does not attack other systems unless we have clear evidence that they attacked us first. We don't attack militarily, diplomatically, subversively, clandestinely, or psychologically. Those who do not attack us will not be attacked by us. Is that clear?"
General Ba'kif warning Junior Commander Thrawn[1]

The preemptive-strike laws, or alternatively the non-aggression protocols or non-intervention policy, were a set of laws of the Chiss Ascendancy that rendered preemptive strikes in warfare illegal and punishable by exile. This policy, influenced by the Ascendancy's isolationism and libertarian approach to the galaxy at large, was taken very seriously as a Chiss military rule of engagement. These protocols required the Chiss military to do everything necessary to avoid preemptive combat against potential adversaries.

While the protocols did not allow first strikes, they did allow for punitive and retaliatory strikes against confirmed aggressors, in response for encroachment on Chiss territory or trade routes. After the attack on Csilla by unknown assailants, the Chiss Syndicure and Defense Hierarchy Council decided to attack the Paataatus because, even if the Paataatus were not behind the attack, they had "been poking at the edge of the Ascendancy again," which deserved a retaliatory strike.[1]

Part of the mission of the Chiss Expansionary Defense Fleet was to conduct reconnaissance and evaluate threats beyond the Ascendancy's borders. Between the Fleet's mission and the non-aggression protocols, there was a strong preference for stealth missions when the Fleet ventured to inhabited systems unknown to the Chiss. An incursion into someone else's territory, even just to gather data, was viewed as dangerously close to preemptive combat.[1]

History[]

Parck: "Your people exiled you here. Do they disagree with you as to the magnitude of these threats?"
Thrawn: "We do not disagree on threat. We disagree on process. They do not accept belief in… ezeboli hlusalu."
Eli Vanto: "They don't believe in preemptive strikes."
―Captain Voss Parck asking Mitth'raw'nuruodo why he was exiled, with Eli Vanto helping translate[3]

Due to his unauthorized, though militarily successful, conduct in the Vagaari pirate operations, Chiss Senior Captain Mitth'raw'nuruodo had the protocols concerning preemptive strikes specifically detailed to him afterwards. The Senior Captain, whose core name was Thrawn, explained that he was aware of the protocols.[1]

The forces of General Yiv the Benevolent's Nikardun Destiny sought to exploit the laws against preemptive strikes by conquering or otherwise subjugating several civilizations on the borders of Chiss territory. Yiv planned to encircle the Chiss, who would not be allowed to strike until it was too late. However, Yiv's plot was uncovered by Senior Captain Thrawn of the Chiss Expansionary Defense Fleet's Picket Force Six, who proved the threat posed by the Nikardun and defeated them above Primea. In the process, Thrawn captured Yiv for the Ascendancy.[1]

During the raid on Rapacc, Thrawn was attacked by Nikardun blockade forces, and then captured a Nikardun blockade frigate and brought it back to the Ascendancy for structural and technological investigation. Supreme General Ba'kif told Thrawn that certain members of the Syndicure would see Thrawn's actions as violating the preemptive strike laws, and that it would be easier if Thrawn had just destroyed the captured vessel. Indeed, Syndic Thurfian asserted that the ship's capture was illegal. Ba'kif mused that some Aristocra may even demand that Thrawn return the warship to the Nikardun. Thrawn could not do so as the entire crew of the vessel committed mass suicide minutes before Chiss boarding parties boarded, leading Ba'kif to pronounce the frigate's capture as a "gray area" until the Syndicure wrote the specifics into law.[1]

Following Yiv's capture and interrogation, he revealed the locations of the scattered remnants of his forces. The Ascendancy's ruling Chiss Syndicure, by then fully convinced of the danger posed by the Nikardun Destiny, allowed the Ascendancy military to bend the non-aggression policy to hunt the remnants down.[2] During the Imperial Era, Imperial Navy forces discovered an exiled Chiss man named Mitth'raw'nuruodo on an uncharted world. Thrawn explained that he had been exiled for conducting preemptive strikes against a known threat to the Chiss Ascendancy, thereby violating the policy.[3]

Years later, Thrawn revealed to select trusted individuals of the Galactic Empire that he was not exiled. Instead, it was a ruse allowing him to get close enough to the nascent Empire to learn about it and whether it could serve as a suitable ally for the Chiss Ascendancy against the Grysk Hegemony. Thrawn had never expected to be made an Imperial Navy officer, let alone to be taken directly to the Emperor.[3] However, the Emperor sought the Chiss's knowledge of his native Unknown Regions for his own purposes.[4]

Behind the scenes[]

The preemptive-strike laws were first mentioned in the relaunched canon in the 2017 novel Thrawn by Timothy Zahn.[3] Details of the laws were first provided in the 2020 novel Thrawn Ascendancy: Chaos Rising.[1] Though they were mentioned in numerous canonical sources, they were first definitively identified as "preemptive-strike laws" in the 2021 novel Thrawn Ascendancy: Greater Good.[2] Even so, the policy against aggression has not been referred to with the same direct terminology on more than one occasion.

In the Star Wars Legends continuity, the Chiss policy against first strikes was first mentioned as a law in the novel Vision of the Future, also written by Timothy Zahn and published in 1998 by Bantam Spectra.[5] It was identified as the "defensive-only doctrine" by Zahn's 2006 novel Outbound Flight.[6]

Appearances[]

Sources[]

Notes and references[]

In other languages
Advertisement