Star Wars 1
Is there anything that confirms that it's 4-LOM next to Aggadeen, or are we saying it's 4-LOM because LOM-series droids haven't been named by any Canon source and thus we can't treat 4-LOM's design as anything other than belonging to a unique individual/droid? I mean, I get the thought process behind the latter option, but it seems... ridiculous, I guess. Operative lm (talk) 06:48, February 11, 2015 (UTC)
- It's like how we treat IG-88 within the new Canon. In the EU, he was four separate entities, but we assume he is one in the new Canon. - AV-6R7User talk:AV-6R7 14:06, February 11, 2015 (UTC)
- In the writer's cut the writer says he would like a protocol droid in the story preferably a LOM droid, so there's no real reason assuming it's 4-LOM instead of a generic one.--178.117.184.14 21:30, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, it's a generic? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:36, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
- To Quote the book: 'And he's flanked by a protocol droid. Maybe one of the LOM-series droids, with the big bug eyes.'--178.117.184.14 21:48, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, it's a generic? - AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:36, June 22, 2015 (UTC)
- In the writer's cut the writer says he would like a protocol droid in the story preferably a LOM droid, so there's no real reason assuming it's 4-LOM instead of a generic one.--178.117.184.14 21:30, June 22, 2015 (UTC)