This is the talk page for the article "Ahsoka Tano."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit the Knowledge Bank. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.


"This point forward, we are entering uncharted territory."

Ahsoka Tano is within the scope of WookieeProject: The Clone Wars, an effort to develop comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in or related to the Star Wars: The Clone Wars television series.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.


Ahsoka Tano is within the scope of WookieeProject: Rebels, an effort to develop comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in or related to the Star Wars Rebels TV series.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the discussion.

Confused Edit

Ahsoka is from The Clone Wars cartoon, all of that is Canon right? why is everything about her from the Clone Wars carton listed under Legends? Chasemarc (talk) 23:24, October 8, 2014 (UTC)

  • TCW is actually both canon and Legends. If it wasn't part of both, the Legends article would have huge continuity holes everywhere. Everything produced prior to April 25, 2014, is Legends as well. 1358 (Talk) 23:28, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
    • That doesn't mean we can't have all of the info from her Legends article in her Canon article. From what I understand, Ahsoka's Canon and Legends articles should be identical. 22:27, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
      • Any Legends info will have to stay in the Legends page. Only information from her canonical appearances can be in the Canon page. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 22:33, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
      • So is only TCW content released after April 25 canon then? Because I'm pretty sure that would only include Son of Dathomir, which wouldn't make sense because that's a continuation of content released before April 25. The way I understand the new canon policy, all of TCW is canon, which would make all of Ahsoka's appearances throughout the entire series canon. Canon and legends are not mutually exclusive. Legends is presumed to be non-canon until the Story Group affirmatively says it is canon. They've affirmatively said that TCW is canon. Which would mean that Ahsoka's canon article would be virtually identical to her legends article, because the story group has said that everything that happened to her in that series is canon. 23:49, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
        • The series and the movie are canon. The Legends page, however, also includes non-canon appearances, so it would not be identical. So yes, most of her appearances from before April 25th are canon, but not all. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 23:53, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
        • All of the show's supplementary material (comics, reference books, young readers) is Legends, which is most of the names and specific details comes from in addition to supplementary events not featured in the TV series. Very few of the ships, planets, locations, people, etc. in TCW are named in NuCanon. Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 23:55, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
        • That's still about 90% of her legends article that's canon though. Her canon article should go into just as much detail about those events as her legends article does. It's just a simple matter of copy-pasting that material in. 00:05, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
          • We don't copy and paste. Each new Canon page needs to be written as a unique page, rather than a carbon copy of the Legends page. We will, at some point, get to making a much more comprehensive Canon page about Ahsoka. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 00:08, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
          • If you say so, but there's really nothing wrong with having identical articles if the info they're covering is identical is there? I think most professional encyclopedias would prefer it that way... 00:14, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
          • This makes no sense. Legends should be just the non-canon material. The rest is canon and should be only on that page, as it is not Legends. The Canon page should have the correct material, with any additional supplemental Legends material being on the Legends page. So almost all of Ahsoka's material should only be on the Canon page. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 23:34, November 14, 2014 (UTC)
            • The problem is that without that Canon information, the Legends information wouldn't make any sense. It's needed in order to have a page that people can actually understand, because that Legends information is based around the Canon info. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 23:52, November 14, 2014 (UTC)
              • I would think that in those instances it would just refer back to the Canon page as necessary. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 23:54, November 14, 2014 (UTC)

Resetting indent. That's not how we've decided to do things. Just something because something is canon doesn't mean that wasn't also part of the Expanded Universe at the time. You couldn't tell the story of the Expanded Universe without the bedrock of the films, etc. That's why for the purposes of such listings, we consider them both "canon" and "Legends." It can be a little confusing at first, but I think on the whole it makes sense once you wrap your head around it. ProfessorTofty (talk) 00:24, November 15, 2014 (UTC)

  • It makes it look like the rest is *not* canon. The main focus should be on canon. "Legends" is supposed to be that which is not canon. But since I'm sure you've already all discussed this at great length and detail somewhere on this wiki, it doesn't need discussed again, especially not here. Just throwing an opinion from a user out there....I'll shut up and go away now....Thanks... - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 01:00, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
    • This is still bugging me. I look at the canon page, and nearly everything canon is missing. People coming here looking for canon information won't know that most of the stuff on the legends page is canon. It makes no sense to not have the canon content on the canon page. Focus should be on the canon page. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 17:47, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
      • Feel free to write the canon info! It's not like it's never going to be there. Not at all. It just means it hasn't been written yet. Remember, before the Canon/Legends split, some of these major pages took years to write. It's unrealistic to assume everything is going to be just as good in the Canon pages less than a year after the Canon pages were created. So if you'd like to see more information, feel free to contribute it. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 17:51, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
        • I mean it feels like most of the legends content should just be moved over to canon, where it belongs. - RaptorWiki (Ryan) 19:03, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
          • This is ridiculous. I think you guys should recognize that the system you have in place is driving all of us users crazy. It makes no sense to have the majority of the information be in the legends article, ESPECIALLY IF IT IS CANON! The focus here should be on the canon article!! Why would you completely re write the article for canon when the information in the Legends article is perfect? "We don't copy paste" is a silly argument. This is so simple, I'm not sure how you don't see it. Either make both articles nearly identical (get rid of the non canon stuff for the canon article), or have the canon article be the page with all of the information. "Well then the legends page wouldn't make sense" is not a valid argument. As it stands, THE CANON ARTICLE HARDLY MAKES SENSE BECAUSE IT IS MISSING ALL OF THE CANON INFORMATION!!!!!!!!!!! Unsigned comment by (talk • contribs).

(resent indent) It's not a silly argument at all. Having duplicate content is bad for Search Engine Optimization (SEO). If we have two articles that are largely word-for-word the same, then both of those articles will be weighed less in search engine results. It will make the pages harder for people to find. I hope that clears things up. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 00:01, March 8, 2016 (UTC)


I have an image I'd like to add but since I'm new to the wiki I can't upload it here. Here's an link to the image GrandmasteroftheArchives (talk) 07:25, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

  • What's the source? Once I know that, I can upload it for you. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 07:33, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

The newest Rebels Recon GrandmasteroftheArchives (talk) 07:41, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

  • Correct, though I meant where you found that specific image. It's very high quality and looks like it was from some sort of press release/news story. Can you link me to where you got it from? - Brandon Rhea(talk) 07:52, March 3, 2015 (UTC)

Legacy sectionEdit

What exactly should we do with the legacy section? Everything in that section takes place before Rebels, when Ahsoka reappears, so should we just change the title and move it back before the Rebels sections? Cevan (talk) 00:03, March 4, 2015 (UTC)

  • I think I was the one who wrote most, if not all of it. I'll tackle it myself a bit later today, determine what to do with it. Hang tight. ProfessorTofty (talk) 18:21, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
    • Hey Tofty, just checking in to see if you've any ideas as to what to do with the Legacy section yet. Cevan (talk) 23:46, March 8, 2015 (UTC)
      • Yeah, sorry, I do, I just got distracted from it. I'll take care of it later this evening. I'll keep this page open in a tab on the browser so I don't forget. ProfessorTofty (talk) 23:58, March 8, 2015 (UTC)
        • No worries, I just figured I'd check back up and see how it was going. Cevan (talk) 00:14, March 9, 2015 (UTC)
          • It's done. Let me know what you think, or feel free to make any changes you feel are necessary. I didn't see any reason to purge it or move it. Everything it says is still true. I just added info about Rebels. ProfessorTofty (talk) 05:48, March 9, 2015 (UTC)
            • I removed a bit from the end of your Legacy updates, as it was highly speculative. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 05:49, March 9, 2015 (UTC)
              • Fair enough. I've added back something, though, I feel speaks to that point but doesn't contain anything that could be considered speculative. ProfessorTofty (talk) 05:54, March 9, 2015 (UTC)
                • What you just added looks fine, since the re-added information - Vader being a key figure etc - is now used in an entirely different (and non-speculative) context. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 05:57, March 9, 2015 (UTC)

"Resigned" ?Edit

This is probably being technical, but shouldn't the infobox under affiliations say "Jedi Order (expelled)" ? That would be more accurate considering that refusing an offer to join the Jedi is not the same as resigning. Count Dooku for example did resign from the Order, he left of his own free will. That is not the case with Tano. --Petiflo (talk) 02:38, March 7, 2015 (UTC)

  • The Jedi Council offered to reinstate her and the episode makes it sound that she would rise to the rank of Jedi knight but Ahsoka chose to leave instead. Here is a link: --CookieCrumb 21:19, March 7, 2015 (UTC)
    • I watched the episode and I remember it very well. She did not choose to leave, she chose not to come back which is different. The Council made it (painfully) clear she was not a Jedi anymore, and you cannot leave a group you are not a part of. In that regard, every occurrence of the article (not just the infobox) stating she "left the order" is incorrect. Whether or not she would have been made a Knight (which is only speculation) makes no difference : the reason she wasn't a Jedi anymore in the first place was because the Council kicked her out. --Petiflo (talk) 05:35, March 8, 2015 (UTC)
      • I agree with your objection and I changed it to read "Expelled (Refused offer of readmission)." ProfessorTofty (talk) 05:48, March 9, 2015 (UTC)
        • Thank you. It would be nice if the page could be edited though, there are a couple of tiny changes I would made, mostly rewordings, but I can't. --Petiflo (talk) 12:09, March 11, 2015 (UTC)

Lothal rebels affiliationEdit

Should we remove the Lothal rebels from Ahsoka's infobox under the affiliations section? Ahsoka, as "Fulcrum," seems to be in contact with numerous rebel cells, not just the Lothal rebels in particular. From the season 2 concept art it appears she'll be with Phoenix Squadron at some point as well. I believe we should remove the Lothal rebels from her affiliations, as the only reason it was there was because Rebels is focused on the Ghost crew, so we didn't see other rebel cells in contact with her. Rebel network encompasses all the cells, including the Lothal rebels, so we can just leave it at that and take the Lothal rebels out. Cevan (talk) 23:46, March 8, 2015 (UTC)

  • Since it says "Rebel network," which includes the Lothal rebels by definition, I removed the specific reference to them as redundant. ProfessorTofty (talk) 05:48, March 9, 2015 (UTC)

How did Ahsoka get the two blue sabers? 18:29, March 19, 2015 (UTC)

  • They are white, actually. It may be discussed in season two. Her armour is supposed to be reminiscent of samurai armour. One of her sabers hilts is also long and curved, looking very much like the handle of a katana. Mondoblasto (talk) 18:39, March 19, 2015 (UTC)

Are You infering that older Ahsoka draws from Samurai?-Sam West-- 16:39, January 7, 2017 (UTC)

Lightsabers Edit

I may have missed something, but I didn't find specific clarification about her lightsabers. Her shoto is mentioned and there are some pictures that show her with lightsabers, but I didn't find specification what lightsabers she posessed at what time, and why her equipment changed. Granted, that may be minor information, but since Ahsoka Tano firstly had some unique weapons (shoto, yellow-green blade, later curved hilts and white blades) and secondly changed them relatively often, adding that information might be worth considering. --Desercitus (talk) 18:22, April 9, 2015 (UTC)

"ready and worthy of being promoted to Jedi Knight." ?? Edit

In my opinion, stating "you've shown the mark of a true Jedi Knight" is not the same as saying "you're ready to become a Jedi Knight", so saying she was going to be promoted to a Knight after going back to the order is only speculation and as such, should not be in the article. --Petiflo (talk) 11:46, May 13, 2015 (UTC)

  • Don't the admins ever read this page?--Petiflo (talk) 17:29, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
    • The admins are not responsible for responding to comments on mainspace talk page; any user is capable of doing so. Per WP:BOLD, you are welcome to change the information in the article to accurately reflect the source material. CC7567 (talk) 17:32, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
      • The last time I tried to change something ont he page the system told me I couldn't because only registered users could.--Petiflo (talk) 10:31, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
      • From Ultimate Star Wars pg.63, Ahsoka Walks Away: "When the Jedi Council admits its mistake and proposes reinstatement with a promotion to Jedi Knight, Ahsoka refuses the offer." Hopefully this clarifies things. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 17:36, June 29, 2015 (UTC)
        • Well that book is wrong then, because they do not give her a promotion. That's not even a matter of point of view, it's what they say. --Petiflo (talk) 10:31, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
          • The episode implies it. The Council says that her strength and resilience during her struggle is "the true sign of a Jedi Knight" and that it was her "great trial." The book simply solidifies what the Council was getting at. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 14:24, June 30, 2015 (UTC)
            • Just because they say it was her great trial, doesn't mean it really was ; it sounds a lot more like the Council's trying to cover their ass. But if the book says it was a promotion then I suppose we have to go along with it. Maybe you guys could add that book as a source to that statement since all it has to far is the episode, which is more than ambiguous on this point.--Petiflo (talk) 14:41, June 30, 2015 (UTC)

Expansion Edit

Should we try to give a more detailed history of her life in the Clone Wars? I am aware that we cannot copy and paste the things from the Legends page but shouldn't we try to recount the events in that show with the same detail? I think we should so that new Rebels viewers who didn't watch Clone Wars could see more details of her life without having to navigate the complicated Legends V. Canon debacle. I intend to write a detailed history of her Clone Wars career on her canon page starting Monday July 20. I plan to do everything from Christophsis to her expulsion. If anyone has any objections or wants to help I am willing to cooperat.--DEMOLISHER11 (talk) 01:25, July 14, 2015 (UTC)

  • You're welcome to do so! Please be sure, however, that any additions adhere to all of the site's current policies, as well as proper English spelling and grammar. If you're looking for help with wiki coding and editing, please see Help:Contents. CC7567 (talk) 01:28, July 14, 2015 (UTC)


How do we know for sure that in the new canon, Ahsoka comes from Shili. How do we know that she doesn't come from Kiros or any other planet inhabited by Togruta? --Kyle03 (talk) 09:04, August 20, 2015 (UTC)

Adult height Edit

Since apparently I haven't reached the threshold to be able to edit this page yet; Ahsoka's adult height is listed as 1.88 meters in Star Wars: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know.--WilkZnika (talk) 09:04, October 14, 2015 (UTC)

I don't know about her adult height, since I haven't seen Rebels yet (feels like a lot, but maybe it's normal for Togruta women to grow to be so tall?), but the adolescent height of 1.70 meters seems definitely wrong, just by judging on the way she appears on screen next to people who aren't all over 2.00 meters tall. Teen Ahsoka was definitely petite, more like 1.55 or something, 1.60 tops even taking into account the stylization. Kumagoro-42 (talk) 00:52, March 14, 2016 (UTC)
    • Have you guy taken into account that they might be taking her montrals into account when listing her height, and not just the top of her head?

Rebels Magazine Appearance Edit

Apparently I haven't reached the threshold to be able to edit this page yet, but can someone please add SWRM "Ocean Rescue"—Star Wars Rebels Magazine 12 between "Battle to the End" and "Star Wars Rebels: The Siege of Lothal" in the appearances list? --AnilSerifoglu (talk) 16:41, February 15, 2016 (UTC)

  • Also the term "shoto" has become canon, if someone could replace a "shorter-blade emitted lightsaber" with "shoto-style lightsaber", that would be nice. --AnilSerifoglu (talk) 16:46, February 15, 2016 (UTC)

Still AliveEdit

After reading the Jedi Council Forums discussions of people who have watched the episode, many think they saw her walking away, so I don't think we should assume that she died. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sharptooth (LAT) (talk) 02:18, March 31, 2016 (UTC)

  • Correct. Her fate is unknown. Whether she's alive or dead will surely be revealed next season. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 02:37, March 31, 2016 (UTC)

They have a shot of her. File:Ahsoka_lives.png Your Friendly Neighborhood Sharptooth (LAT) (talk) 02:40, March 31, 2016 (UTC)

is there a time stamp for this? We sure it happened after vader left alone and not before their battle? talk2ty 06:55, May 18, 2016 (UTC)
    • It is after the battle during the little montage right at the end of the episode. Her appearance here makes her survival very likely though as many have pointed out it could be a force spirit and she is really dead, so until another source confirms one way or the other it should probably remain ambiguous. Overlordjeff (talk) 17:40, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

This is a stretch, but could it be a spirit? Weirdo Guy (talk) 02:42, March 31, 2016 (UTC)

Heard it going around that her story is pretty much over, whether she made it or not. At least, that is what Filoni said. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sharptooth (LAT) (talk) 03:07, March 31, 2016 (UTC)

  • We'll find out in season three, I'd guess! Unless the Episode Guide says something definitive (which I doubt), then when the information about the episode is added to this page it can end with the temple blowing up (or whatever it was that happened). That way, we're not speculating. That could very well be her, but we don't really know what happened. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 03:10, March 31, 2016 (UTC)
    • According to the episode guide: "An image of the back of Ahsoka Tano is seen walking back down into the temple." So yeah. Still ambiguous. - The Shadow Emperor (talk) 05:53, March 31, 2016 (UTC)
  • IIRC, Filoni said that her story is finished in the Star Wars Rebels series, meaning she will not appear again in the series. But as to her ultimate fate... it's Schrodinger's Ahsoka.  [ pepoluan talk ] 16:51, April 24, 2016 (UTC)

Is this why Ahsoka is not in the "Jedi Purge survivor" category? --unsigned 01:38, June 30, 2016 (UTC)

  • She's not in that category because she wasn't a Jedi during the purge; she left the order. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 02:14, June 30, 2016 (UTC)

Twilight of the Apprentice?Edit

Is there a reason no one has added information from Twilight of the Apprentice to her Biography yet? I'd do it myself but I wanted to make sure someone else hadn't tried and it didn't work or the page is protected or something like that. Thatgirlwiththestaff (talk) 05:06, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

  • Go ahead, I think most of us are still shattered after watching it. --Alientraveller (talk) 07:14, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
    • Somebody added the information but the quality of the writing was so bad and not in universe that I deleted it. --Kyle03 (talk) 16:17, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
      • Why not rewrite it? Or add an improvement template? Did you find the author of the information (M4Z.TeR.Z) and leave them a talk page message (that's a rhetorical question—you didn't) with suggestions for how they can improve their next edits? Their profile says they are from Finland; maybe English isn't their first language and could use some pointers, or another contributor can use M4Z.TeR.Z's edit as a basis for rewriting it into stronger prose. Outright removal of information with no help or context (you didn't even leave an edit summary) is a poor contributor experience. It doesn't give the person an opportunity to improve, and can drive potential contributors away. I know this is a wider issue on the community so I'm not just coming down on you or singling you out, but I think this is a definite area for improvement for the community. So I hope this message is helpful to you (and others) in the future, as that's my intention in posting it. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 17:55, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
        • I was I who added the information of the season finale. I was expecting someone to fine tune my text as it wasnt the most perfect one.M4Z.TeR.Z (talk) 18:07, April 1, 2016 (UTC)
          • Hi! Sorry for removing your edit. I've undone my edit of removing your edit. I wasn't really thinking. Sorry again! --Kyle03 (talk) 20:18, April 1, 2016 (UTC)

Clearly Someone Hates Grammar Edit

There are numerous pronoun infringements in this article.

"The Jedi Council finally sent Tano to her first mission on Christophsis to aid the Republic forces and finally meet his new master as well as pass on a message that masters Kenobi and Skywalker were needed on the Temple."

- should be "her"

"With her master pinned down by the horde, she noticed a piece of wall behind him with a convenient hole just right where Anakin was positioned. She used the force to pull the wall down, crushing the droids around him. Angered that she could've got him killed, she ordered her to blow up the generator."

- far too many pronouns here leaves readers wondering who is "she" and "her". Needs to be clarified with names/surnames.

"After the fight was over, Skywalker noted how reckless the youngling was and that she would've never made it as Obi Wan's apprentice, but she could've made it as Anakin's. As the two found themselves settled, Yoda wondered if having a padawan would calm Skywalker's wild ways or instead she would pass it onto her apprentice."

- Again, meaning is unclear here. Is Ahsoka going to pass on Anakin's Wild ways to her apprentice, or should it be Anakin passing it onto Ahsoka?

There's more, these just jumped out to me, and even more non-pronoun errors. It just occurs to me, at least, that if you can't be bothered to proof-read what you post, you should at least make it editable so these errors can be fixed.

DarthGramm (talk) 17:05, April 3, 2016 (UTC)

  • Thank you for pointing out these areas for improvement. Keep in mind that contributors to Wookieepedia (like all fan-based wiki projects) have varying levels of writing ability—some are really great, some have room for improvement—but all are doing the best that they can. All contributions are made in a good faith effort to improve the site and add information. So it's not that someone hates grammar, it's just that the person who wrote it has room for improvement. So thanks again for pointing these out so they can be corrected. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 17:16, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
    • Also, the page protection level currently only prevents new and unregistered users from contributing. That type of page protection will no longer affect you after your account is 4 days old, so beginning on April 7th you'll be able to edit pages like this. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 17:20, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
      • Sorry if I came off as aggressive or un-civil, was just a little frustrated trying to find information for a little fan-fiction project I was doing for a creative writing class. I understand there are many levels of speakers in the English language and I do not want anyone on any level to feel inferior or that the work they produce is sub-par. After all, that is what proof reading and editors are for, and even the best writers get their work checked by someone. DarthGramm (talk) 18:04, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  • It says this page is super-semi protected, which means that you have to have an edit count of 150 in order to edit it. I think it would be beneficial for an admin to change this protection level to only semi-protected, so that the account must simply be 4 days old like you said. It seems that there are many contributors (including myself) who are serious about editing, are registered, and are older than 4 days old, yet simply have not reached the 150 edit count yet. We would love to help make this page better, but we simply are not allowed to. -Thatgirlwiththestaff (talk) 17:48, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
  • I've fixed some (if not all) of the things you've pointed out and tried to make the page just all-out better. I still think it looks a little clonky and will come back to it at some other point. You can look over it if you want to and if you find anything else that looks like it could use a little fancying up, I'd be glad to fix it! --LoLuX12 (talk) 18:26, April 3, 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks LoLuX12! In regards to Thatgirlwiththestaff's comment, where are you seeing "super-semi protected" on the page? I'm not aware of anything like that. The protection is set as "Block new and unregistered users," which means you have to have an autoconfirmed account (autoconfirm happening after 4 days). EDIT: Never mind, I see that there's an abusefilter setting at play here that requires 150 edits. I'll ask the admins about lowering that. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 19:18, April 3, 2016 (UTC)

Can't add a new section, wiki keeps telling me "DEATH TO MICROSOFT PUNCTUATION" and gives some extension hook errors. Edit

I'm trying to add info from the new Ahsoka Tano panel from SW: Celebration but the stupid wiki won't let me add the info. I can't copy and paste it here neither because I get the same error. What's is going on??M4Z.TeR.Z (talk) 14:13, July 20, 2016 (UTC)

Edit: I added the text but wiki won't let me add the refrence but rather gives me an extension hook error. Please don't delete it but rather add the source link of this: (Ahsoka panel SW:CE 2016)

at the end, thank you! M4Z.TeR.Z (talk) 14:21, July 20, 2016 (UTC)

More editing: I tried adding the refrence < ref name="Ahsoka’s Untold Tales Panel">SWYTlogo Ahsoka’s Untold Tales Panel on the official Star Wars YouTube channel</ref> To the section in the source editor but now it says I have a foreign apostrophe.M4Z.TeR.Z (talk) 14:25, July 20, 2016 (UTC)

More Edits: Great, now somebody deleted my edits because I can't add the source.M4Z.TeR.Z (talk) 16:34, July 20, 2016 (UTC)

  • The reason I removed the edits is because whilst Dave Filoni said about these events in the panel, none of them have happened in a canon source as of yet, maybe when the Ahsoka novel comes out we will know more, like I said also it would go in the behind the scenes section --Lewisr (talk) 16:37, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
    • Alright well can you move the text I just readded to the behind the scenes section? Thanks M4Z.TeR.Z (talk) 16:56, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
      • Sorry I didn't see this until after the edit, Brandon is writing an Ahsoka page, and he will no doubt include that information in his page so I would say let's wait until he is done! Once again sorry --Lewisr (talk) 16:59, July 20, 2016 (UTC)
        • No it's fine, thanks for replying anyways.M4Z.TeR.Z (talk) 17:34, July 20, 2016 (UTC)

Ahsoka Never Died Edit

The table shows that she died on Mortis; however Filoni has stated that the Mortis arc is a force vision and not real. Therefore she is not dead in my understanding. I have a link to the video here The video can be found on Star Wars The Clone Wars Season Three: Altar Of Mortis Featurette on Youtube (I'm not allowed to link).

  • Although is like a mystical placem she did and the daughter used her force to revive Ahsoka that's how I see it, i dont know how the others see it --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:47, January 7, 2017 (UTC)
  • The episode gallery for Altar of Mortis states that the Son killed Ahsoka (image #11), but that the Daughter transferred her remaining life force through Anakin to Ahsoka (image #13). JRT2010 (talk) 06:59, January 7, 2017 (UTC)

Seasons 6 7 and 8 Edit

Should we add the events from the last 3 seasons of the Clone Wars? I heard it was considered canon even if it was never actually finished. Mmwa (talk) 13:34, February 2, 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes the stories are canon, but we dont know anything about just the little information provided by Pablo and Dave. Until we have more information the best idea is to wait.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 19:33, February 2, 2017 (UTC)
    • Lucasfilm treats them as canon internally, but since there have been no story releases (or meaningful details, like Ruiz said) then it's best to add what we know about them to the Behind the scenes section until those stories are actually told. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 19:36, February 2, 2017 (UTC)

Age and Pablo's twitterEdit

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't I see somewhere that Pablo said he doesn't want us to use his twitter as an official source on Wookieepedia? I know that his answers are usually deemed canon, but he also sometimes posts opinions and personal theories that should not be regarded as canon. We have that she was born about 4 months into 37 BBY based solely on a personal calendar that Hidalgo visualizes, not actual fact. Of course she was born in 37 BBY, but I feel like the 4 months is not a valuable source and only based on Pablo's opinion as well as Ashley Eckstein's actual birthday. Thoughts? Thatgirlwiththestaff (talk) 01:46, March 26, 2017 (UTC)

  • I don't know if he said that or not, but I do think we should take care not to mistake a Lucasfilm Story Group member's personal opinion or theory as canonical fact. Regarding your view on the '4 months' thing, I'm inclined to agree with your view as Pablo refers to his calendar as an "internal chronology." I take that to mean it's exclusive to himself and technically not a canonical source. However, I would wait to see what other users have to say on this matter before making any changes to Ahsoka's date of birth. JRT2010 (talk) 07:46, March 26, 2017 (UTC)

Copy Paste info from Legends article that is canon Edit

Are we able to copy and paste the parts of Ahsoka's legends article that describes her appearances in the clone wars tv show? Rather than just rewriting them? I'd make sure to comb them for any legends references and make sure they fit. --Vid0907 13:10, June 8, 2017 (UTC)

  • No it has to be rewritten. I'm not good at explaining why, but if you look here you'll see Brandon explain why --Lewisr (talk) 17:12, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
    • To make a long story short: Google penalizes duplicated content. If we copy/paste from the Legends page to the Canon page, we harm the search ranking of both pages. And as it stands this page is the top article on Wookieepedia so that would be a bad approach. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 18:22, June 8, 2017 (UTC)

Why do we place Ahsoka's birth in 36 BBY? Edit

  • Ahsoka's birthday on this wiki has always been set at 36 BBY. But why? Yes, Ahsoka was 14 when she became Anakin's padawan, but she wasn't 14 throughout the entire year. Ahsoka turned 15 a few days before "Rookies" occured. "Rookies" is in 22 BBY, therefore, Ahsoka's 15th birthday is also in 22 BBY. 22 + 15 (rather than minus, since we're going backwards) is 37. So logic states that we should place her birth in 37 BBY, right? SenatorConfer (talk) 04:15, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
    • What source says she turned 15 a few days before Rookies? Until a canon source says that she turned 15 in 22 BBY then we won't be changing the date --Lewisr (talk) 22:21, January 30, 2018 (UTC)
      • Pablo himself, in the internal Lucasfilm Story Group timeline places her birth in that position. And why do you say that she has to be 15 when she becomes Anakin's padawan to be born in 37 BBY? Let me put it in real-world terms. I am currently 18 years old. At this point in time, if we do the math backwards, I should have been born in 2000, correct? That would be accurate if I had already had my birthday for this year. However, I have not yet. That's why I can accurately say that I was born in 1999. The same is for Ahsoka. Just because we see her as 14 in 22 BBY, it doesn't mean that her birthday already occurred. As per the Story Group timeline, Ahsoka had her birthday later that same year. That's the point I'm trying to make. SenatorConfer (talk) 04:15, January 31, 2018 (UTC)
        • Sorry but Pablo's internal timeline is not going to be used on here, its his own personal stuff and he doesn't like his tweets being used as canon sources on here. Yes I realised my mistake after I sent my initial comment which was I altered it. No canon source as of yet says she was 15 shortly before Rookies so we can't say that on her page --Lewisr (talk) 04:19, January 31, 2018 (UTC)


Ezra concluded that if he could save Ahsoka, she could also save his master. Ahsoka warned him that if he were to do so, Ezra and the others would die. Thinking about this, he allowed the fire caused by the fuel pods to consume Kanan for good.

Should be

Ezra concluded that if he could save Ahsoka, he could also save his master. Ahsoka warned him that if he were to do so, Ezra and the others would die. Thinking about this, he allowed the fire caused by the fuel pods to consume Kanan for good.

Because he didn't think Ahsoka could save Kanan he thought he could --Dogsteeves (talk) 17:27, February 27, 2018 (UTC)

  • In the "World Between Worlds" segment on Ahsoka's page it says "Ezra concluded that if he could save Ahsoka, she could also save his master." In reality it should be "Ezra concluded that if he could save Ahsoka, he could also save his master." If anybody has permission to edit the page, they should fix this. That is unless Ezra is confused about his gender. Unsigned comment by Hidanprime (talk • contribs).
    • Its been fixed now, is there anything else either of you can spot? --Lewisr (talk) 18:15, February 27, 2018 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.