This is the talk page for the article "Battle for the Katana fleet."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit the Knowledge Bank. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

I can't remember enough of the details to add it to the article, but didn't Karrde's smuggling fleet make an appearance in this battle, with Mara Jade getting hit by an ion cannon? 03:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)


Image for this battle is wrong - it depicts rebel "cluster trap" in action, not a scene from the Katana Fleet encounter. NLoriel 10:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


Tactical New Republic victory? I mean, ok the Republic won the battle mentioned in the book. But the Empire succeded in getting away with around 170 to 180 Dreadnought Cruisers... Even with the loss of the Star Destroyer Peremptory an nearly all Ties from Judicator, the Empire was fully succesful with the goal of this battle, getting the Katana Fleet to around 90%. If this is not an imperial victory I don't know... Perhaps you could say that the New Republic has won the skirmish for the Dreadnought Katana, but the Battle for the Katana Fleet was not a "Tactical New Republic Victory" but an overwhelming imperial success...Unsigned comment by (talk • contribs). Actually retreating from a battlefield does not automatically mean loosing a battle.Unsigned comment by (talk • contribs).

  • That's why it's a "tactical" victory rather than a straight victory. The Empire overall gained more than the New Republic, but the battle itself went to the NR. The Empire's recovery of 175 Dreadnaughts occurred BEFORE the battle itself, so it doesn't really play into the outcome of the battle. 22:06, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


Why were there only 60 Imperial TIEs involved in the battle? I don't have the book available, so I can't check the numbers. There SHOULD have been roughly 144 TIEs available to the Imperials, barring any prior casualties, but surely there's an explanation for why there were so many less than 144 involved. Did the Peremptory never get the chance to deploy or something? 22:08, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

star galleonsEdit

according to for the Katana Fleet-DFRSB-138.jpg this image, there were both lancers and star galleons involved ASDF1239Chiss Ascendancy-DISCUSSION- 04:28, March 21, 2010 (UTC)


According to the Thrawn campaign map, can we indicate that the battle took place either in the Halm or the Tashtor sector?--DKS MaXoO (talk) 14:37, January 30, 2014 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+