Talk: Battle of Kamino/Legends

Chronology

Chronologically, wouldn't this be the First Battle of Kamino? Since the other two were fought in 21 BBY and 19 BBY. --Farragut79 15:54, September 18, 2010 (UTC)

• The TCW timeline has not yet been established. I say we just keep them at the current titles for now. TCW just screws up everything. Perhaps {{TCWRetcon}} could be added to the article. 1358 ^(Talk) 15:58, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
  • The TCWRetcon tag is meant for only pre-TCW articles that were featured in TCW itself. If canon has been contradicted, then the tag would be added. The Third Battle of Kamino is a TCW creation. Therefore, no, it's not the First or Second Battles of Kamino. Until a cohesive timeline is established by Lucasfilm, this is what is it for now. We cannot speculate or assume. JangFett ^(Talk) 02:56, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Personally, I'm inclined to move the articles to Battle of Kamino (c. 22 BBY), Battle of Kamino (21 BBY), Battle of Kamino (19 BBY), etc and leave the exact order until a later date. -- I need a name (Complain here) 16:16, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
    • I'm in favor of this. Moon Demon 00:46, September 19, 2010 (UTC)
      • I agree - I was thinking about doing this myself last night, but only succeeded in giving myself a headache. Something needs to be done to make these articles at least semi-manageable, and "Third Battle" isn't cutting it. I love TCW, but I truly hope these continuity errors won't be as devastating to the EU as I think they will be.--Demos Traxen 00:51, September 19, 2010 (UTC)

• until an official source has stated so, this article will maintain it's current title, and date. because an official source has not yet clarified the date of this battle, the article will maintain it's current time and name. also, this article needs to be updated to tell the events and aftermath of the battle, and i cannot do it currently. Ralphjedimaster 02:40, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Interesting, because I don't recall you being qualified to dictate policy here. I think INAN has the best idea. Move them all to "Battle of Kamino" with the date in parenthesis. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 02:53, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
    • JMAS, the best solution is to leave the articles as they are now. Moving them will only make things absolutely worse. Once an official source names the battles, then it would be proper to move them. JangFett ^(Talk) 02:57, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
      • I'm not saying to just arbitrarily move them. But I think it's open for discussion to get other peoples' opinion on the matter. To say moving them would make them absolutely worse is an extremist and subjective stance. Since none of the three battles are officially named as "first, second or third" anywhere, and with as convoluted as the timeline is right now, no one actually knows what the final outcome will be. Having them titled according to the date they occurred is a logical suggestion. Leaving them as First, Second and Third is speculative, especially considering the "second" battle happened after the "third" battle chronologically. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 21:22, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
      • In order to not cause even more chaos into this, we should leave the articles alone. They weren't a problem in the past. Because TCW decided to screw canon up even more, it shouldn't mean we should jump and change the articles names. Until the confirmed battle name(s) is released, they should be left alone. JangFett ^(Talk) 22:04, September 23, 2010 (UTC)
• Not to re-open a can of worms, but I'd like to point out that what people keep referring to as "Battle of Kamino (21 BBY)" took place in early 22 BBY. It even says so on the article (21.83 BBY = 22 BBY, that's how negative years work). So if you went with moving the articles, you'd have "Battle of Kamino (c. 22 BBY)" and "Battle of Kamino (22 BBY)". Does anyone else see the logical flaw here? Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith ^{-Just shy, not antisocial: You can talk to me!-} 12:43, October 7, 2010 (UTC)
  • As an update to this discussion in the Star Wars: Clone Wars Adventures (video game) this battle is referred to as simply "Battle of Kamino". Not sure if that if enough to solidify the name for it but I figured it wouldn't hurt mentioning it. Agent Cards 04:13, October 26, 2010 (UTC)

• This can not be the First Battle of Kamino because in episode ARC Troopers of SW TCW were allready some ARC troopers present like Colt and other two ARCs and they even appeared in a previous episode Clone Cadets.

ARC troopers were originally deployed during the First Battle of Kamino for a first time in a desperate attempt to save the planet from CIS. So the current battle of Kamino could only be some in order onwards from the first one. Second- ,Third- ... My guess is the this could be Second Battle of Kamino ,because the last one was in 19BBY and TCW is currently not there yet. We are around 21/20 BBY. —Unsigned comment by 10.7.10.169 (talk • contribs).

• • The current naming is the best, so it's fine the way it is. CC7567 ^(talk) 03:04, January 29, 2011 (UTC)

Arc Commander 1

His page clearly says he was shot to death during the battle. Not to mention the episode itself. 75.11.46.106 16:17, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

Constant reverts

Why not just put up the In Use template with your name on it? Moon Demon 15:42, October 11, 2010 (UTC)

High General Shaak Ti?

As much as Shaak Ti should be given the status of High General, I was under the impression that only Yoda, Mace Windu and Obi-Wan Kenobi are confirmed as High Generals and therefore only they would have that status in articles. Just curious as why Shaak Ti has been branded as one as this is a newish article, unless new information on this subject has been revealed? JimminyTi 00:12, May 22, 2011 (UTC)