This is the talk page for the article "CompForce/Legends."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit the Knowledge Bank. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.


"We do not require glory, only status articles for our Emperor."

CompForce/Legends is within the scope of WookieeProject Ambition, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles relating to the Galactic Empire.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can find out more about our mission, or even join yourself!


CompForce is a former Good article. Please see this article's entry on the AgriCorps page for the reasons it was removed.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
21 January 2007 Good article nomination Success
19 March 2007 Good article
5 April 2007 Featured article nomination Failure
18 May 2007 Failed Featured article nominee
October 4, 2008 Good article review Removed
November 4, 2008 Former Good article
Current status: Former Good article


I don't think I missed anything, but if I did, let me know! -Danik Kreldin 05:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

88% failier rate and nearly 25% of failiers were fatal. "Two die for every one that gets though?" The math doesn't work out unless all succesful troopers get killed. Unsigned comment by (talk • contribs).

  • Unless I miscount, that means 12% make it, 25% die (slightly more than twice 12%), and 63% fail without getting killed. So the math works OK. — Silly Dan 00:41, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, it says that of the 88% "nearly one quarter" are combat fatalities; I assume that means either nearly 22%, or nearly 25%. I've changed it to "around twenty percent" - thorough rewrite, too; seemed like too much of the phrasing and structure had survived, and the stuff from DESB and the ISB chapter on military structure needed to go in. As ever, feel free to disagree with the revised version! --McEwok 00:29, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Observ Detachments Edit

152*3 + 5 = 461, yet the article says that Observ Detachments of 471 were composed of three 152-man companies, a Captain, and a four-man staff. 01:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC)


"Very little about CompForce endears it to the regular army"
Rebel report on Sector Group organization

I removed this quote until it can be sourced. --Eyrezer 23:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Ask and ye shall receive. Sourced (it's on pg. 94 for those who want to see it in context). jSarek 01:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

GA cleanup templateEdit

The only thing that I can see that needs to be done to bring this up to standards is to source the article. Once the article has been fully sourced per our sourcing policy, the {{Gacleanup}} template should be removed. Greyman(Talk) 06:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Full armor photo? Edit

Don't they wear a helmet or something? Do we have a fully armored CompForce trooper in the article? 03:17, September 12, 2013 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Some of the links below are affiliate links meaning, at no additional cost to you, Fandom will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase.

Stream the best stories.

Some of the links below are affiliate links meaning, at no additional cost to you, Fandom will earn a commission if you click through and make a purchase.

Get Disney+