This is the talk page for the article "Darth Krayt's Sith trooper."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit the Knowledge Bank. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.


Can one of you smart cookies add a pic or two. I think the close up of their mask when the one kills himself is best. But maybe under that have a close up of one of the ones in the pods (page 13 of Legacy 50 contains both pics.) Thanks. This might have to wait until your all back from celebration V. lucky you. IthinkIwannaLeiaWaddaUthink? 07:46, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Title, MergeEdit

I belive the title should be "Sith Trooper (Darth Krayt's)." Perhaps the title should be "Sith trooper (One Sith)." In the actual text Krayt calls them, "My Sith troopers." Given that there is a slight division in the "One Sith," at the time (who knows how much Wyrlokk has true control over, it seemed like the title should reflect that they are only loyal to him. That was my reasoning for naming it thus, but I would love to hear everyone's opinion. As it stands now, I don't think "Darth Krayt's Sith troopers." fits with the naming conventions concerning the use of plural (s). Can someone confirm this?

Also, I don't know if this will come up, but this article should in no way be merged with the article Sith trooper. That article is referring to foot soldiers that were often not force sensitive and were part of organizations that are not directly related to the One Sith. The only thing that they share is a non-specific name and the fact that they wear armor and masked helmets. In fact, I actually think the original Sith trooper article is actually talking about two different groups, but since they are both from video games made by the same company perhaps they do show some aesthetic similarities. I don't know enough about it but I know these have nothing to do with them. They are strong force users who have had cybernetic implants and brainwashing done on them from birth. Hopefully this won't be an issue but I thought I would be preemptive. IthinkIwannaLeiaWaddaUthink? 08:42, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

  • I totally agree with IthinkIwannaLeia on all counts. I like "Sith trooper (One Sith)" for the style. And it is true that these troopers are different from others. They are not normal foot soldiers. They are Force-sensitive, "suitably loyal...unstoppable" Krayt fanatics. And we all know that Krayt's Sith are completely different than any other order's. All in all, these two articles are NOT RELATED.WIERDGREENMAN 21:58, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
I disagree with a merge and agree with the two previous posts. Merging it with the Sith Trooper article is a suggetion that makes no sense; they are completely unaffiliated - The Storm Troopers and the Clone Troopers don't share an article - and they are closer related. I also agree that it should be moved to Sith Trooper (One Sith) as in canon they have been identified as Sith Troopers and not Darth Krayt's Sith Troopers. Alexsau1991 (talk page) StupidSithEmblem-Traced-TORkit 18:56, February 3, 2011 (UTC)
    • I too disagree with the merger idea for the same reasons. Not to mention the fact that the "Sith Trooper" article needs to be disambiguated itself. This is due to the addition of more non-Force weilding soldiers under the Sith since the "Knights of the Old Republic" in titles such as "The Old Republic" MMO game, books and comics, as well as the "Knight Errant" series. Adding Darth Krayt's troopers to the mix will only fix a non-existant problem and make a existing problem worse. Also I don't think these guys are in the same league as the other soldiers of the One Sith and therefore deserve their own article. Maphisto86 02:20, February 28, 2011 (UTC)
      • So, you want to merge this into a article with the tag "This article should either be split into multiple articles accessible from a disambiguation page or as a set of articles pertaining to a certain subject." located at the top of the page? Maybe I'm missing something here... Holocron Greatholocron (Complain) 11:06, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+