Wookieepedia

READ MORE

Wookieepedia
Advertisement
Wookieepedia
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Defender/Legends."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Premium-DefeaturedIcon

Defender/Legends is a former Featured article. Please see this article's entry on the Inquisitorius page for the reasons it was removed.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
May 3, 2009 Good article nomination Success
June 14, 2009 Good article by Kilson
June 14, 2009 Featured article nomination Success
September 21, 2009 Featured article by Kilson
April 27, 2019 Featured article review Removed
May 22, 2019 Former Featured article
Current status: Former Featured article
WP-TCW

"This point forward, we are entering uncharted territory."

Defender/Legends is within the scope of WookieeProject: The Clone Wars, an effort to develop comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in or related to the Star Wars: The Clone Wars television series, the related television series Star Wars: The Bad Batch and Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi, and related multimedia.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Why have we decided to call this the Redeemer in the title? SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is a lie) 06:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

  • Sorry; copy/pasted from the Redeemer and forgot to change. --CC7567 06:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

First appearance[]

Shouldn't the {1st} template be tacked to Storm Over Ryloth, since that's the first time it appears in Star Wars media? Or is there some rule I'm not aware of? --CC7567 05:20, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

A bit redundant[]

The "Description" section is a bit redundant considering the fact it has been identified as a Ven. It adds nothing and the only thing that went through my mind reading it was "Thank-you Captain Obvious!"SargeLIVES 01:31, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

  • And it's required per the Layout Guide. Captain Obvious is there whether you like him or not. CC7567 (talk) 04:19, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
    • I was not fully aware of that referring to basic traits of the class perhaps It might be changed to refer to the identifying features it gained through the severe battle damage?SargeLIVES 19:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Advertisement