FANDOM


Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Force vision/Legends."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit the Knowledge Bank. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

EffectsEdit

Is it known how visions affect the Jedi/Sith in question?

Are they relatively mild, or do they follow the 'Pythia' model (i.e. fits, frothing at the mouth, or loss of motor function)?

  • I think it depends on the person. Luke's visions have always seemed rather calm, not really taking him out, while Jacen's visions alway seemed to be like a kick in the face. -- SFH 20:05, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Thank you for the information.

Quote Edit

Is the quote correct? If you look at Template:Future product, it uses: "Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future", but this article uses: "Difficult to see...always in motion, the Future is". Which is the correct quote?

  • The second quote is correct. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 20:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Does that mean that Template:Future product should be changed to reflect the correct quote? 70.17.139.170 20:18, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
      • Well, it should, but I don't know if the person who put in the wrong quote had a good reason or not. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) Imperial Emblem 20:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
        • I changed the quote and left a note about it on the Template's talk page. 70.17.139.170 20:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
          • Um...watch The Empire Strikes Back again. It is absolutely 100%, beyond a shodow of a doubt: "Difficult to see. Always in motion is the future." -- Ozzel
            • It just occurred to me that you were probably thinking of his line in Attack of the Clones: "Impossible to see, the future is." -- Ozzel 23:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
              • Which quote would be more appropriate? I like "Impossible to see, the future is" much better than " Always in motion is the future". 70.17.139.170 23:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
                • Well, for one, the picture is from Empire, so if we change the quote we should change the pic too. But I prefer this one. "Always in motion" specifically implies that things could change, which I think is one of the purposes of the template. -- Ozzel 23:43, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Jacen solo had a vision in tempest so if someone could add it to apperences that would be cool as i dont no how. 69.26.85.17 02:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Visions of DeathEdit

I am wondering the source for saying that the person who had the vision, particularly if they were Sith, never saw their own death in the visions. Weren't the visions that Raana Tey had every night of her death at the hands of (she thought) Zayne Carrick? The other three also had such visions. Should that statement be changed then, if that is the case? Chervil JaingHead 05:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

  • I think it should be changed. As we now know, all members of the First WatchCircle except Lucien Draay foresaw their own deaths. Marschall 16:53, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+