Talk:LEGO

The official company name is not Lego, but LEGO. Should we change the title of the page to reflect that? -Gorblax, 5:29 August 24 2006 (EST)

• Wikipedia also has it as "Lego." - TopAce 09:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia is wrong then. Check the official LEGO site for confirmation. It is LEGO not Lego. Sulgran 10:17, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
    • I checked wiktionary and found this. Moving it to LEGO.
• WILL YOU QUIT ARGUING ABOUT THAT POINTLESS TOPIC!!WHO CARES IF ITS NOT IN CAPITOL LETTERS!jeeeeeeeeeesssshhhh!Imperialwalker 22:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Turn to the dark side!!
  • Calm down. Chack Jadson 22:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
• sorry but theyre arguing about something that nobody cares about.sorry though. Imperialwalker 22:43, 24 June 2007 (UTC) Turn to the dark side!!
  • It's okay. Chack Jadson 22:44, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

New sections added

Hi. The new sections added in the past week (crafts, locations etc.) were done by me (not a Wookieepedian...yet).I hope you like them. hopefully some pictures will be added. 05:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Wookipediaosity

Why do we really need a list of Star Wars LEGO (or Lego) sets? Couldn't that be considered advertising?Geekboy42 21:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

• Would having a list of Star Wars movies be considered advertising? —Xwing328^(Talk) 23:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Yeah, but this isn't LEGO(or Lego)pedia. It's WOOKIEpedia-star wars, not LEGO (or Lego). See the difference? Geekboy42 15:44, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Nope, because, by the same token, "it's WOOKIEEpedia-star wars, not MOVIES. See the difference?" It's Star Wars, ergo it's relevant. We also have lists of Star Wars books, games and trading cards, so why not LEGO? -

\\Captain Kwenn// ^{— Ahoy!} 16:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

• • • • That was meant to be a completely rhetorical question. Anyways, it was decided before that a list of, say action figures, was okay, but individual articles for each figure usually isn't appropriate. —Xwing328^(Talk) 04:50, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
        • It's probably alright to have a list of LEGO sets as long as you don't list the suggested retail price and where to find the set next to it... And I for one use this list occasionally. --Darth Phonebook 22:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Neutrality

• There are several references to how the fans were "disappointed" by the sets or how the sets were "well-recieved". This could be a bit opionated, considering that not all fans were "disappointed" and not all fans like those sets that were "well-recieved". Do we have to put in how popular the sets are? --Darth Phonebook 21:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I've made this article as objective as I can now, but if there are still problems with neutrality I missed, feel free to fix them -NighthawkLeader 00:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
    • I assume that since it's pretty free of opinion, that this means the neutrality banner on the page can be removed... --Darth Phonebook 01:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Deletion

I proposed this article for deletion. - Patricksheridan 6:31pm, January 11, 2007

What?? Why? --Darth Phonebook 01:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

• What have you got against LEGO? While we're at it, we may as well delete all computer games, toys, rpg's, card games and reduce Wookieepedia to 10 pages -NighthawkLeader 02:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • If you have comments about this, please post them on Wookieepedia:Votes for deletion/LEGO. —Xwing328^(Talk) 02:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Wookification

• Does any know what parts of this article needs to be fixed so that it is Wookified?

Inactive user This user has been inactive for 12 months or more and has lost their user page privileges. If you are the user in question, simply undo the last edit to this page when you return to normal article editing activity. Last article edit: April 1, 2013 (contribs)

22:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

• • Just taking a quick look at it, I'd say the lists should be made with bullets, instead of just having the items spaced apart. Not much else though. It's come along way since it started. —Xwing328^(Talk) 03:47, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Ok thanks. I'll get started on it tomorrow.

Inactive user This user has been inactive for 12 months or more and has lost their user page privileges. If you are the user in question, simply undo the last edit to this page when you return to normal article editing activity. Last article edit: April 1, 2013 (contribs)

08:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• • • • Would it be alright to remove the Wookification template now?

Inactive user This user has been inactive for 12 months or more and has lost their user page privileges. If you are the user in question, simply undo the last edit to this page when you return to normal article editing activity. Last article edit: April 1, 2013 (contribs)

05:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

• • • • • Yeah, I went through after you and fixed it up even more. I also removed the template. —Xwing328^(Talk) 06:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

2008 Sets

• Has anyone got the information about model numbers 7669-7672 from a reliable source? I can only find these on rumour sites

Inactive user This user has been inactive for 12 months or more and has lost their user page privileges. If you are the user in question, simply undo the last edit to this page when you return to normal article editing activity. Last article edit: April 1, 2013 (contribs)

08:13, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

• • There haven't been any incorrect rumors that are this widespread yet. Remember, a few months back, many of the current sets would be considered unlikely. Why not make a "Rumored" section for them?

A LEGO lover. —Unsigned comment by 207.62.190.9 (talk • contribs).

Canon

Should this article be N-canon? Darth Whatever

• No it doesn't need to be- it's already a real-world article.

Inactive user This user has been inactive for 12 months or more and has lost their user page privileges. If you are the user in question, simply undo the last edit to this page when you return to normal article editing activity. Last article edit: April 1, 2013 (contribs)

23:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

LEGO Star Wars: Clone Wars and/or Star Wars: The Clone Wars

Who says that we should have a LEGO Star Wars: Clone Wars and/or Star Wars: The Clone Wars! Olsonman 24:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)