FANDOM


Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Naga Sadow."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit the Knowledge Bank. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

This talk page has archives.
1


Premium-DefeaturedIcon

Naga Sadow is a former featured article. Please see this article's entry on the Inquisitorius page for the reasons it was removed.

Premium-FeaturedIcon

This article was showcased on Wookieepedia's Main Page from 7 May to 14 May 2006.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
6 February 2006 Featured article candidate Success
21 April 2006 Featured article
18 March 2007 Featured article review Success
1 April 2007 Featured article
15 May 2011 Re-featured article candidate Failure
11 September 2011 Featured article
September 11, 2011 Featured article review Removed
February 28, 2012 Former featured article
May 31, 2016 Featured article candidate Failure
October 26, 2017 Failed featured article candidate
January 2, 2018 Featured article candidate Failure
September 29, 2018 Failed featured article candidate
Current status: Failed featured article candidate

Darth Edit

Just FYI, The Essential Guide to Warfare refers to Naga Sadow as "Darth Naga Sadow". It does this only once, and simply uses "Sadow" for every successive reference. Should we move the page based on this, or possibly wait and ask Fry what his intent was with the "Darth" title here when he does his Q and A on facebook on the 11th? Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 01:07, April 4, 2012 (UTC)

  • That sounds like a good idea. Also, Jason Fry has said that he will release his endnotes for TEGTW next week, so hopefully they might shed some light on his intentions. --Jinzler 09:21, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • This is becoming a tradition. The origin and use of the "Darth" title is constantly beign retconned, isn't it?--LelalMekha 09:42, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
      • Isn't it just a typo? As far as I know (didn't read the entire book) the Darth Title is mentioned only once. May be the author meant the Dark Lord, I don't know...--ScorpiO 15:51, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
      • During his Facebook chat with Fry and the fans, Urquhart said: "Yes, there was a specific intention with using the name Darth Naga Sadow. It’s meant to indicate Sadow’s ambition, and his status as “supreme viceroy” (i.e. top Dark Lord). The context needed a title that wasn’t Sith’ari. But it doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s a contemporary usage." (Source here) LelalMekha 17:03, April 24, 2012 (UTC)
      • In Star Wars: The Old Republic Encyclopedia, it called the Sith Emperor as Darth Vitiate once, rather than Lord Vitiate. 76.166.130.139 13:10, October 8, 2013 (UTC)

Questionable accuracy of the main picture Edit

While I know that the current main picture is the best portrait we have of Naga Sadow, it's still technically inaccurate. When I GANd Hakagram Graush, I was asked to move the picture of Ajunta Pall beheading him because it contradicts a single textual evidence. In Sadow's case, it's pretty clear thar Naga Sadow was red-skinned, as mentioned in multiple sources from the original Tales of the Jedi: The Golden Age of the Sith to the more recent Lost Tribe of the Sith series. For the sake of accuracy, we should find another main image. I know it's a shame, because if you overlook that sickly yellow complexion, the current pic rocks... --LelalMekha (talk) 19:26, May 18, 2013 (UTC)

Force lightning?Edit

Is that FL in those pics? If so, shouldn't it be added to Powers and Abilities?--Lucasart don't care about their fans 15:13, May 1, 2015 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.