Edit Page
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
*********Your interpretation is still drawing on an assumption. The fact that there are two differing views on the way the text is written proves that it can be read as ambiguous and open to interpretation. The actual facts are this: Firstly, there is no explicit reference to the Praetor I and Praetor II being the exact same design. That's the implication you have drawn from the way the text is written, and I will admit that I can see how you arrived at that conclusion. It is just one I do not share. Secondly, no verified image of a Praetor I has been created. For these reasons, it is inappropriate to use the Praetor II image in this article since it can be construed as misleading and "canonically" false (in terms of Legends continuity). - [[User:Cavalier One|<span style="color:black">'''Sir Cavalier of One'''</span>]][[File:FarStar.svg|20px]]<sup>([[User talk:Cavalier One|<span style="color:black">''Squadron channel''</span>]])</sup> 15:57, March 21, 2018 (UTC) |
*********Your interpretation is still drawing on an assumption. The fact that there are two differing views on the way the text is written proves that it can be read as ambiguous and open to interpretation. The actual facts are this: Firstly, there is no explicit reference to the Praetor I and Praetor II being the exact same design. That's the implication you have drawn from the way the text is written, and I will admit that I can see how you arrived at that conclusion. It is just one I do not share. Secondly, no verified image of a Praetor I has been created. For these reasons, it is inappropriate to use the Praetor II image in this article since it can be construed as misleading and "canonically" false (in terms of Legends continuity). - [[User:Cavalier One|<span style="color:black">'''Sir Cavalier of One'''</span>]][[File:FarStar.svg|20px]]<sup>([[User talk:Cavalier One|<span style="color:black">''Squadron channel''</span>]])</sup> 15:57, March 21, 2018 (UTC) |
||
**********It draws on assumption that the article is consistent in how it presents information, that's not very much of an assumption from that point. However I can see the dispute on both sides. I still suggest putting a note on the Praetor-II and the design in the Behind the Scenes section. Is that acceptable? [[User:Nolanstar|Nolanstar]] ([[User talk:Nolanstar|talk]]) 00:42, March 22, 2018 (UTC) |
**********It draws on assumption that the article is consistent in how it presents information, that's not very much of an assumption from that point. However I can see the dispute on both sides. I still suggest putting a note on the Praetor-II and the design in the Behind the Scenes section. Is that acceptable? [[User:Nolanstar|Nolanstar]] ([[User talk:Nolanstar|talk]]) 00:42, March 22, 2018 (UTC) |
||
− | **********Absolutely -- a properly referenced notation on the issue would be acceptable in the article's BTS section. - [[User:Cavalier One|<span style="color:black">'''Sir Cavalier of One'''</span>]][[File:FarStar.svg|20px]]<sup>([[User talk:Cavalier One|<span style="color:black">''Squadron channel''</span>]])</sup> 13:41, March 22, 2018 (UTC) |