This is the talk page for the article "Protector (Victory I-class)."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit the Knowledge Bank. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.


  • As fantastic as that image is, it couldn't possibly be the Victory Star Destroyer "Protector" considering that's not a Victory Star Destroyer. More over, that's the same ISD at the end of EVERY battle in TIE Fighter. I will search for a better graphic of the Protector, unless someone has something.--MIS Tau 1 22:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


Having just followed the chain of edits to this page, I'm thinking that Protector (Imperial) isn't the best choice. Rather, perhaps Protector (Empire) might be better, since a) it is in the same vein as Protector (New Republic), and b) doesn't invoke the possibility that it's an Imperial-class Star Destroyer. Thoughts? Taral, Dark Lord of the Sith -Just shy, not antisocial: You can talk to me!- 21:00, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

Canon conflictEdit

The new information added to the article is incompatible with the existing information. This Protector was destroyed in the course of TIE Fighter. All the information from Forces of Corruption needs to either be applied to a new Protector article, or included in the Protector (New Republic) article. DD97Which bear is best? 19:15, October 28, 2011 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+