FANDOM


Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Snow King."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit the Knowledge Bank. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Premium-FeaturedIcon

Snow King is a Featured article, which means it has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wookieepedia community. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, please feel free to contribute.

Premium-FeaturedIcon

This article was showcased on Wookieepedia's Main Page from 1 October to 7 October 2007.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
18 March 2007 Featured article nomination Success
26 March 2007 Featured article
8 June 2011 Re-featured article candidate Success
5 July 2011 Featured article
Current status: Featured article

ImagesEdit

Here are some images you can use in the article: -- Ozzel 06:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

  • And a few more:

Much as I love the current one, I think either one of these first two could also make a great main image. -- Ozzel 20:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Unused images removed. -- Ozzel 04:19, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Sexual affair?Edit

throughout this article, it speaks of his sexual affair with the duchess of Sleet. Is there any outside source for this at all? the Ewoks series being the kid show that it is, I seriously doubt there was meant to be anything sexual implied about their relationship.Darth Ceratis 05:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

  • It's heavily implied that they are lovers. .... 08:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Then perhaps "romantic affair" would be better. Being romantically involved does theoretically not have to imply sex (though of course in real life, it typically does... fortunately). KEJ 08:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
      • Additionally, Star Wars Insider 27 refers to her as "an evil mistress." -- Ozzel 04:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
        • But is that "mistress" as in lover or "mistress" as in the feminine form of "master?" I just can't that something in the Ewoks series would be intended to have sexual undertones.Darth Ceratis 17:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
          • This wouldn't even be a debate if the Zeltrons were involved. :P Adamwankenobi 18:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
            • She's all over him. If it's not sexual, then the Snow King would have melted from trying to stay celibate. .... 02:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
              • Well, I don't know. I haven't actually seen the episode. it just seems very un-Ewoksy for there to be any sexuality intended. also, is he even supposed to be married? If not, would this even technically be an "affair," and would she technically be his "mistress?"Darth Ceratis 18:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
                • No marriage. But as a God, he should be celibate. .... 00:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
                  • That would depend on the type of god.Darth Ceratis 01:13, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
                    • Eh. It was mistressy type situation. .... 02:27, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Build A Star Wars Movie Collection