FANDOM


Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Star Wars: Episode IX The Rise of Skywalker."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit the Knowledge Bank. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

We don't know anything about Star Wars: Episode IX The Rise of Skywalker except for what's on the page. We're excited too, but we don't know any more than you!

As this talk page is designed for discussion relating specifically to Wookieepedia's Episode IX page, and not the film itself, it isn't the place for discussing opinions, rumors, or speculation about Episode IX.

To speculate or talk about rumors and opinions, head on over to Wookieepedia Discussions. Thanks and have fun!

No Carrie Edit

According to this Carrie won't be in Episode 9 --Lewisr (talk) 22:48, April 14, 2017 (UTC)

Actually she will be in the movie and probably Leia will die in the movie just like Chewbacca --Scarlet2435

Scarlet2435, keep in mind that was from April 2017, before TLJ even came out in theaters. It is old, as the cast list confirms she will be in the movie. Magitroopa (talk) 18:11, August 31, 2018 (UTC)

Latest edits Edit

The widespread media coverage makes me think the Trevorrow thing is important to this article, but it is too early for a critical reception section, so I put it in with development. Adamwankenobi (talk) 19:15, June 17, 2017 (UTC)

Trevorrow in inforbox Edit

Unlike Lord and Miller, Trevorrow hasn't actually directed any of the film, so in light of the recent announcement, I don't think he should be credited under "director." Adamwankenobi (talk) 22:30, September 5, 2017 (UTC)

  • I would suggest hearing others opinion first before removing it, for me it should stay there for people looking who was the director first. Like historical information (I think that's overreacting, but I don't remember the correct word), especially since he was confirmed as one--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:19, September 6, 2017 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure it needs to stay in the infobox, but as long as its mentioned in the main body somewhere that seems fine. --Lewisr (talk) 02:22, September 6, 2017 (UTC)
      • I think this came up with the departure of Michael Kenneth Williams of how to address this kind of situations for example keeping pages, etc. Something I know is that people tend to see more infoboxes than main body for me it doesn't looks bad keeping it there, but if you guys think it should be removed from there go ahead then.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:29, September 6, 2017 (UTC)
        • Well we can keep the page or just redirect it to the Episode IX page --Lewisr (talk) 02:32, September 6, 2017 (UTC)
          • Also I should note that Trevorrow has only been officially let go as director; As far as we know his writing contributions are still being used. Adamwankenobi (talk) 20:30, September 6, 2017 (UTC)
            • Until we know otherwise we should keep him still there as you say --Lewisr (talk) 20:32, September 6, 2017 (UTC)
              • As per this JJ and Chris Terrio are writing so looks like Colin is out full stop --Lewisr (talk) 14:37, September 12, 2017 (UTC)
                • Lord and Miller's work will still be featured to some extent in Solo, which is why they are still credited on the infobox. Trevorrow's work has been entirely discarded, therefore he should have no mention in the infobox. His involvement should be discussed in the article.
                  • Provide the source indicating that all his work was discarded.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:54, March 23, 2018 (UTC)

edit/revert Edit

i just tried to revert a questionable edit, & i think Lewisr was reverting at the same time; i only see Lewisr in the history, so i hope my simultaneous edit didn't throw a spanner in the works!

P.S. to 84.60.138.32: Someone died in Ep IV but the actor came back for Ep V and VI. Someone died in Ep II but the character was cloned in Ep III.

--71.121.143.180 20:43, December 15, 2017 (UTC)

Hamill on the Cast List Edit

In light of the ending of Last Jedi, should Mark Hamill be removed from the cast list of this film until we have concrete confirmation? I understand Hamill tweeted that he'd be in the film, but that may have just been to avoid viewers guessing his fate prior to seeing the movie? Maybe it would be better to remove him from the cast list for the time being until we have official confirmation? --UmbraWitchAlraune (talk) 05:33, December 20, 2017 (UTC)

  • I think we should remove it because that tweet is not confirmation that he's in Episode IX. Hamill is a self-admitted troll when it comes to Star Wars information. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 05:49, December 20, 2017 (UTC)
i agree that the tweet is not confirmation of Mark/Luke being in Ep IX, and the cast list should not include him until someone official says something that unquestionably confirms Mark being in it... but if we delete him from the list, i bet swarms of eager, well-meaning editors are going to keep using that tweet as a reason to put him back.
As for what happened in The Last Jedi... like i told 84.60.138.32, someone died in Ep IV but the actor came back for Ep V and VI. Someone died in Ep II but the character was cloned in Ep III. i forgot to mention the possibility of flashbacks and/or Force visions/illusions, and i didn't even know about Dobbu Scay when i posted on this page before. i wouldn't assume a little thing like a character's death (there is no death; there is the Force) would keep any actor from being in subsequent films.
--71.121.143.218 06:15, December 25, 2017 (UTC)


Mark Hamill is going to be in Episode IX probably as Ghost Luke that appears before Rey and I don't think his name should be taken off the cast list. And I hope the the movie ends on a dark cliffhanger and the series ends forever when the First Order becomes they official rulers of the Galaxy and only Poe survives out of all the main characters. Since nobody likes Star Wars movies anymore, that seems very fair. From Scarlet2435 11:09, August 31st, 2018

Again, Scarlet2435, this is a discussion from December 2017, before the official cast list was announced. Magitroopa (talk) 18:12, August 31, 2018 (UTC)

I know that, I also just wanted to tell how I think Star Wars: Episode IX should end as a true Star Wars fan so Disney does not have to ruin it anymore.Unsigned comment by Scarlet2435 (talk • contribs).

  • Please note the talkheader at the top of the page: Talk pages are for discussion on how to improve the article, not for chatting about the subject. — DigiFluid(Whine here) 18:16, August 31, 2018 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I'm new here on the wiki and I got to get used to how things are on here and I was only chatting up a storm on here was because I couldn't find the comments for any pages and when I saw the tab Talk, I thought it was like a chat room. Again I'm sorry.Unsigned comment by Scarlet2435 (talk • contribs).

Matt Smith says he's not in it Edit

What do we make of this? Since it's never been officially confirmed that he's in the film, should we remove him from the article? Adamwankenobi (talk) 22:13, March 8, 2019 (UTC)

No Spoiling Until the title is Revealed and before the Premiere(Images and Characters OK) Edit

All fandoms of the Star Wars Community do not bring major spoiler of the plot of the movie for obtaining revelation of the story, you can also not revealing clear details of the rumored Mcguffin in all social media. We can afford for the news, images of vehicles, characters, planets and also the official poster for add the page for the Episode IX.Unsigned comment by Giancarlo Vasquez (talk • contribs).

Should we add the 111M trailer views?, also note that these are organic views according to Deadline

Box officeEdit

Tone is similar to a promotional feature. The projections of the highest box office score along with a lack of mention of any counter-projections of a potential box office bomb and other language lacks neutrality in the article. Unsigned comment by Buddydog262 (talk • contribs).

  • Okay but if you can provide these kind of sources then go ahead and add them in --Lewisr (talk) 22:52, August 1, 2019 (UTC)

add Resurgent-class Star DestroyerEdit

i saw a part of a Resurgent-class Star Destroyer in the final trailer can i please add this ship in vehicle appearance? i the source and everything (Mrjosh1994 (talk) 22:50, October 23, 2019 (UTC))

  • What time does it show up at? - Cwedin(talk) 22:56, October 23, 2019 (UTC)
  • That's what I'm looking for--Vitus InfinitusTalk 00:04, October 24, 2019 (UTC)
    • Try Fathead and amazon(Mrjosh1994 (talk) 00:09, October 24, 2019 (UTC))
      • do they look anything like [1] and this [2](Mrjosh1994 (talk) 02:09, October 24, 2019 (UTC))
        • No, I found a cropped image of the poster but I want to look for the full poster and its source. Either way, the vessel in that scene of the trailer does not look like a Resurgent, and if it was it's still too difficult to say for certain. There's no rush on this, if we get further confirmation for anything we'll add it.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:39, October 24, 2019 (UTC)
          • i think know were i can find the source for the resurgent class star destroyer in star wars 9 in the empire magazine show kylo ren and a bunch of stormtrooper being blown away by some force in a hanger maybe that hanger is a resurgent class star destroyer hanger(Mrjosh1994 (talk) 22:38, October 24, 2019 (UTC))
            • But we don't know for sure that it's the hangar of a Resurgent class. Fan26 (Talk) 22:42, October 24, 2019 (UTC)

-i have seen the latest tv spots is the resurgent class star destroyer heen in one of those spots?(Mrjosh1994 (talk) 03:39, November 24, 2019 (UTC))

  • the star wars ix read d 3d poster is out and it's has Resurgent-class Star Destroyers that mean they going to be in star wars 9 is it all right if i add it and the AAL-1971/9.1 Troop Transport tha i saw in the Official International Trailer please?(Mrjosh1994 (talk) 20:18, November 29, 2019 (UTC))
    • If you source it to an actual source, then yes. Either way, there's no rush to add appearances, if nothing official confirms it until the release date then it'll be just added afterwards. Zed42 (talk) 20:22, November 29, 2019 (UTC)
      • i added the resurgent class star destroyer and the AAL-1971/9.1 Troop Transport to the appearance app and i know the note references are i just dont know how to add them right can you help please?(Mrjosh1994 (talk) 01:57, November 30, 2019 (UTC))

add Upsilon-class command shuttle Edit

since we saw the Upsilon-class command shuttle in the international poster can we add to the appearance app?(Mrjosh1994 (talk) 01:13, November 24, 2019 (UTC))

  • As long as you add the source yes --Lewisr (talk) 01:16, November 24, 2019 (UTC)
    • ok where did the international poster come from? (Mrjosh1994 (talk) 01:36, November 24, 2019 (UTC))
      • I'm not completely sure, best to check some articles online which you can source or look at the source on the image uploaded on here --Lewisr (talk) 01:49, November 24, 2019 (UTC)
  • have and any notes and referances i can use? (Mrjosh1994 (talk) 02:14, November 24, 2019 (UTC))
    • Try this image --Lewisr (talk) 02:18, November 24, 2019 (UTC)
      • so try IMPAwards.com (Mrjosh1994 (talk) 02:20, November 24, 2019 (UTC))
      • I guess but it doesn't really say where the image is from, so using a news article may be a safer option --Lewisr (talk) 02:23, November 24, 2019 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+