Calling all Star Wars collectors! Fandom and Displate have teamed up to offer an awesome LIMITED EDITION metal print of STAR WARS Visions Lord Vader™. Head over to Displate and get it NOW, while it’s exclusively available to the Fandom community for 24 hours!



This is the talk page for the article "Star Wars: Episode VIII The Last Jedi."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Kasdan and Kinsberg[]

The article says that Kasdan and Kinberg are going to write 8 and 9, but wasn't it reported that they are actually working on the spinoffs?-- 04:05, February 28, 2013 (UTC)

7.1 New message[]

Has it been confirmed that Warwick Davis will be returning as the same character in episode VIII? He's played multiple characters across the saga, so it seems like a big assumption that Wollivan is going to be back based on the knowledge that the actor is returning. 17:04, December 29, 2015 (UTC) anonymous

Returning cast[]

I hit Enter too soon on my edit summary about removing Harrison Ford and Max von Sydow from the cast list (and Han Solo and Lor San Tekka from the appearances list). Couple of tweets from Pablo Hidalgo today regarding a bogus news site's bogus claim about winning a role on Episode VIII—he took them to task for lots of false assertions, including:

"The site then lists the returning cast, including Harrison Ford. Let that sink in for a while." (source)


"Find a quote that doesn't have to read into any vague gestures regarding who's standing around her at the time." (source)

TL;DR - reading Kathleen Kennedy's comments to mean every single person who was on the stage, including dead characters, will return is reading her comments way too literally. So I've removed Ford and von Sydow from the article. - Brandon Rhea(talk) 03:03, January 27, 2016 (UTC)


If i'm correct. Rey,Kylo,Finn,and Poe,Hux and Snoke are the new characters of Star Wars. These new characters will appear in the SW:TLJ. Now the title of this movie is The Last Jedi, The word jedi is both singular and plural,Luke is the last jedi during TFA

TLJ take place seconds or minutes after TFA

Now my theory is Luke takes the lightsaber from Rey,Rey ask Luke about the Jedi and what happened to the other jedi and how did he ended up in Ahch-To, Luke will answer all of the questions Rey asked.

Now that is my first theory

Second theory: Luke trains Rey just like in ESB Luke is Master Yoda and Rey is Luke.The Resistance is now going to Evacuate all of their troops,equipment,and fleet out of the planet D'Qar, The Resistance Fleet will provide cover for the Evac ships.After that few Evac Ships are left on the planet, The Finalizer comes out of hyperspace, The Finalizer open fires to the Resistance Fleet,The Resistance Fleet reacts and quickly returned fire to the Finalizer. The Finalizer deploys a squad of Tie Fighters, While the Resistance deploys their X-Wing.The Finalizer deploys the Landing Crafts to the surface with a Tie Escort. Some of the X-Wing intercepts the Ships, They manage to destroy few of the Landing Craft an Tie Escort, The Resistance Fleet Warns the Evac ships to get out of the planet and go to the rendezvous point to assembly the fleet.

That may happen but i'm sure that this is wrong but remember, This is just a theory

Lets continue, This is the final theory: Kylo deploys himself to the battle to assist the Tie Fighters, Poe and rest of the Resistance Fleet will assembly its Ships to make a final stand. Back to Rey, Rey completed the test but Luke tells her that she is still not on the final test and she will need more training, Rey will have a Force Vision,The Vision is about his friends on the space battle (Battle on D'Qar) Rey reacts to the vision and she told Luke about this, Rey want an answer, Luke answered, Rey wants to know about this Vision that she seen

BTW The Rebel Fleet Assist the Resistance, This is my theory

Sorry if this is wrong, You could edit this all

  • Do this on Reddit or someplace else. --asddddd6 (talk) 08:04, January 24, 2017 (UTC)
  • This is not the place for theories --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:20, January 24, 2017 (UTC)
  • Theories don't belong here, dude. This is a place to discuss the article itself. SenatorConfer (talk) 22:57, July 18, 2017 (UTC)


Ummm wots this? I saw this in the trailer... https://hlj.com/product/TKT96012/Sci?utm_source=GMCYEN_CA&utm_medium=GMC&utm_campaign=Sci&gclid=CjwKCAjwgvfOBRB7EiwAeP7ehsWRpVx5mj9k458MgVDo0hX7N94Gsb9M07vMNiAA8BKPV-lLycJIWxoCFcQQAvD_BwE (first order at at not at m6) Unsigned comment by Hoboland (talk • contribs).

  • There is the AT-M6 and the First Order variant of an AT-AT at the Battle of Crait --Lewisr (talk) 00:23, October 12, 2017 (UTC)


Is it necessary to have multiple categorizations in the lead? Wouldn't "second film in the sequel trilogy" suffice? Adamwankenobi (talk) 00:15, November 18, 2017 (UTC)

"Unidentified Porg"[]

Should this "appearance" be removed? If we add all creatures to the appearances section, we would need to add all Porgs as individual appearances (as well as other creatures)! W'kesto Snip (talk) 20:50, December 17, 2017 (UTC)

  • Its not about adding all the creature, just the ones notable enough, this Porg is the one that was kept and continued to be on the Falcon seen on Crait + at the end in the top of R2-- 20:53, December 17, 2017 (UTC)

Add information about fan backlash[]

These informations seem to be very necessary.Kintobor (talk) 21:17, March 28, 2018 (UTC)Kintobor

  • I agree. It is an imporant matter that's been covered in tons of media, and even Mark Hammil and Rian Johnson--HERRERO BOSS (talk) 00:17, April 24, 2019 (UTC)

I read about the rumors about The Last Jedi remake[]

This might be a relevant info if these rumors are true.Kintobor (talk) 21:32, September 27, 2018 (UTC)Kintobor

Reemar Kayvonix[]

Could you tell me who this Reemar Kayvonix is?--BreakFree32 (talk) 03:20, October 18, 2018 (UTC)

  • It would seem Reemar is an unlabeled stormtrooper who appears at some point in the movie. So far I have not found out anything else.Kevspy (talk) 14:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Phasma dead?[]

Abrams said she was dead, but until it's confirmed in-universe, I don't see why we should claim it here. Boba Fett anyone? Maul? Palpatine? Adamwankenobi (talk) 02:54, December 14, 2019 (UTC)

Considering her actress wasn’t on set for Rise of Skywalker or credited, it’s fairly safe to assume the director provided more than enough confirmation for her demise. Plus this wikia already has her listed as deceased on her page. --Johnatha (talk) 03:03, December 14, 2019 (UTC)

  • I agree that we should wait for an in-universe source that confirms her dead, since that essentially was the whole reason we never added a death in the first place. Is there anywhere where Rian actually said that she was dead? I don't recall seeing it anywhere. If it isn't said anywhere then JJ is essentially going off the assumption she was, which doesn't mean she was --Lewisr (talk) 15:10, December 14, 2019 (UTC)
    • He said he had read the script and what had surprised him was Rian's decision to kill off Phasma. He's not assuming anything. He knew this going in to see Episode VIII and that's what surprised him. Unless it gets retconned, for now Phasma's dead. JRT2010 (talk) 15:57, December 14, 2019 (UTC)
    • And we have an in-universe source confirming her death. As Orcward silence mentioned on Phasma's talk page, the Databank clearly states "[Phasma] fell in battle against the former FN-2187, whom she’d helped train as a stormtrooper." In battle refers to one who has died/fell in battle. It's as clear as gunned down, which is what was stated in FN-2199's databank and used to confirm his death on his page. JRT2010 (talk) 16:12, December 14, 2019 (UTC)
      • The fell in battle bit was previously reverted because fell could have several meanings, which I them assume was why it wasn't put back --Lewisr (talk) 16:24, December 14, 2019 (UTC)
        • That was before JJ Abrams confirmed that Rian Johnson had decided to kill off Phasma. The filmmakers only suggested it's possible Phasma could return if Episode IX wanted to go in that direction, which it evidently did not. Given Abrams words, "fell in battle" should be good enough, since "gunned down" (which could also mean "inured badly" instead of killed) was sufficient to mark Nines as deceased. JRT2010 (talk) 16:36, December 14, 2019 (UTC)
          • Fair enough then, we'll see what the future holds. Then should the source on Phasma's death not be sourced to something other than the film, since the film doesn't say it? I changed Nines one to a source that outright says he dies --Lewisr (talk) 16:42, December 14, 2019 (UTC)
            • Either one works in my opinion. The databank is only stating what happened in the movie. For example, Tarkin's death is sourced to Episode IV (and Galactic Atlas, for the exact year) rather than something like the databank, which outright states that he died. JRT2010 (talk) 16:51, December 14, 2019 (UTC)
              • The Tarkin one is more obvious, he's on screen on the Death Star seconds before it blows up (though maybe it would better to change that one if we want to be consistent), whereas Phasma is only shown falling into fire --Lewisr (talk) 17:00, December 14, 2019 (UTC)
          • I see no reason why the plot summary should spell out that she died, when we don't actually see her death. For example, Maul was cut in half and fell down a bottomless pit, but he didn't die. Phasma merely fell into space, which is pretty tame in comparison, especially considering that the same movie shows a character surviving the vacuum of space. Adamwankenobi (talk)
            • Already had this conversation... JJ Abrams confirmed that Rian Johnson killed Phasma off. The databank said she "fell in battle", which some people argued wasn't clear enough but that was before the Abrams interview. Given that this argument is still going because some people just don't want her to be dead, I see no reason why we should continue to ignore both a canon source like the databank and the words of the Episode VII/IX director, who outright confirmed that his colleague, the director of Episode VIII, had Phasma killed off. We'll see what the future holds, as Lewisr said, but for now Phasma is dead. JRT2010 (talk) 21:04, December 14, 2019 (UTC)