Jack Nebulax (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-|process=FAC +|process=FAN)) |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Talkheader}} |
||
− | Yes. TIE Shuttles are interesting. I would have liked to see more of them in the films. |
||
+ | {{FA}} |
||
+ | {{FeaturedOn|January|6|2010}} |
||
+ | {{Ahh}} |
||
+ | {{Ahm |
||
+ | |date=December 12, 2008 |
||
+ | |oldid=2289055 |
||
+ | |process=GAN |
||
+ | |result=Success |
||
+ | }} |
||
+ | {{Ahm |
||
+ | |date=December 22, 2008 |
||
+ | |link=Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/TIE/sh shuttle |
||
+ | |process=GA |
||
+ | |oldid=2304155 |
||
+ | }} |
||
+ | {{Ahm |
||
+ | |date=January 17, 2009 |
||
+ | |oldid=2343398 |
||
+ | |process=FAN |
||
+ | |result=Success |
||
+ | }} |
||
+ | {{Ahm |
||
+ | |date=January 26, 2009 |
||
+ | |link=Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/TIE/sh shuttle |
||
+ | |process=FA |
||
+ | |oldid=2355595 |
||
+ | }} |
||
+ | {{Ahm |
||
+ | |date=July 26, 2011 |
||
+ | |oldid=3548792 |
||
+ | |process=FAR |
||
+ | |result=Kept |
||
+ | }} |
||
+ | {{Ahm |
||
+ | |date=October 23, 2011 |
||
+ | |link=Wookieepedia:Inq/TIE/sh shuttle |
||
+ | |process=FA |
||
+ | |oldid=3744975 |
||
+ | }} |
||
+ | {{Ahm |
||
+ | |date=September 15, 2014 |
||
+ | |oldid=5235164 |
||
+ | |process=FAR |
||
+ | |result=Kept |
||
+ | }} |
||
+ | {{Ahm |
||
+ | |date=October 26, 2014 |
||
+ | |link=Wookieepedia:Inq/TIE/sh VIP shuttle (second review) |
||
+ | |process=FA |
||
+ | |oldid=5339875 |
||
+ | }} |
||
+ | {{Ahf|status=FA}} |
||
== Main image... == |
== Main image... == |
||
− | The main image looks a bit too much like a modified picture of a [[TIE bomber]] to me...[[User:Unit 8311|Unit 8311]] 19:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC) |
+ | The main image looks a bit too much like a modified picture of a [[TIE/sa bomber/Legends|TIE bomber]] to me...[[User:Unit 8311|Unit 8311]] 19:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC) |
− | *I'm positive it's not fan-modified. However, the TIE shuttle was a modified TIE Bomber anyway. [[User:Jack Nebulax|Grand Admiral J. Nebulax]] <sup>([[User talk:Jack Nebulax|Imperial Holovision]])</sup> [[ |
+ | *I'm positive it's not fan-modified. However, the TIE shuttle was a modified TIE Bomber anyway. [[User:Jack Nebulax|Grand Admiral J. Nebulax]] <sup>([[User talk:Jack Nebulax|Imperial Holovision]])</sup> [[File:Imperial_Emblem.svg|20px]] 20:21, 17 January 2007 (UTC) |
**Check your sources. It's from the Databank - '''\\[[User:Kwenn|Captain Kwenn]]//''' <sup>— ''[[User talk:Kwenn|Ahoy!]]''</sup> 20:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC) |
**Check your sources. It's from the Databank - '''\\[[User:Kwenn|Captain Kwenn]]//''' <sup>— ''[[User talk:Kwenn|Ahoy!]]''</sup> 20:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | ==Canon?== |
||
+ | Should this have a canon page? |
||
+ | [[User:The Crazy Ace|The Crazy Ace]] ([[User talk:The Crazy Ace|talk]]) 21:02, March 16, 2016 (UTC) |
||
+ | *No, because the name "TIE/sh VIP shuttle" still has to appear in a canon source. --[[User:LelalMekha|LelalMekha]] ([[User talk:LelalMekha|talk]]) 21:15, March 16, 2016 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | *Well, according to Leland Chee every ship model retains its original name in canon too if not specified otherwise.[[User:Veltramore|Veltramore]] ([[User talk:Veltramore|talk]]) 10:17, July 10, 2017 (UTC)Veltramore |
Revision as of 13:54, 2 May 2020
Template:FeaturedOn
Main image...
The main image looks a bit too much like a modified picture of a TIE bomber to me...Unit 8311 19:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm positive it's not fan-modified. However, the TIE shuttle was a modified TIE Bomber anyway. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision) 20:21, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Check your sources. It's from the Databank - \\Captain Kwenn// — Ahoy! 20:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Canon?
Should this have a canon page? The Crazy Ace (talk) 21:02, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
- No, because the name "TIE/sh VIP shuttle" still has to appear in a canon source. --LelalMekha (talk) 21:15, March 16, 2016 (UTC)
- Well, according to Leland Chee every ship model retains its original name in canon too if not specified otherwise.Veltramore (talk) 10:17, July 10, 2017 (UTC)Veltramore