Wookieepedia

READ MORE

Wookieepedia
Advertisement
Wookieepedia
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "Tomb of Ludo Kressh."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Kotorlogo

Tomb of Ludo Kressh is within the scope of WookieeProject Knights of the Old Republic, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in the Knights of the Old Republic metaseries.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Added that the Exile sees herself in the tomb proper, every time I've played the character on Revan's left is the Exile as a dark jedi, and it makes sense given precedents ie Luke on Dagobah, and the tomb being about what could have been. Any complaints? It isn't explicitly stated, but it seems pretty clear. It also seems to me that it's implied that the vision Exile gives her lightsaber to Revan, hence Revan having two lightsabers, but that's too much of a conjecture for me to put.

Also, when the vision of Malak asks you to join him, I thought the first time (before bastila goes over to him) was asking you to join the Mandalorian wars, and the second (after Bastila joins him), when he says now you are all alone, was the jedi civil war. that interpretation makes far more sense, at least to me. It was the jedi civil war Bastila eventually came to see Malak's view on, not the mandalorian war. It was the civil war the exile stood alone on, turning back. Hence the key decision is not just whether you'd do the MAndalorian War again, but whether you'd turn back again. What do people think? I guess it's open to interpretation, like a lot of KotOR stuff, especially since the second wasn't tidied up properly.

Jon Ralen 04:12, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

The above is complete rubbish that I wrote as a test being new to the site, which I have repeatedly tried to remove. Please ignore, or even better replace with an actual discussion. Thanks

Jon Ralen 01:38, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

The section "Behind the scene" is completely off-topic, don't you think ?

Leontrague 23:33, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

Advertisement