Wiki-shrinkable.png

This is the talk page for the article "Unstable Terrain Artillery Transport."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit the Knowledge Bank. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Premium-DefeaturedIcon.svg

Unstable Terrain Artillery Transport is a former Featured article. Please see this article's entry on the Inquisitorius page for the reasons it was removed.

Premium-FeaturedIcon.svg

This article was showcased on Wookieepedia's Main Page on 12 August 2008.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
5 October 2007 Featured article nomination Success
14 October 2007 Featured article
November 19, 2012 Re-Featured article candidate Failure
January 9, 2015 Featured article
July 15, 2018 Featured article review Removed
August 6, 2018 Former Featured article
Current status: Former Featured article

Designations[edit source]

Could someone be kind enough to lecture me on proper military designations? I´m a bit sceptical about naming ALL vehicles either 'Artillery' or 'Mechanized Infantry'. Is there really no other groups? VT-16 13:09, 16 Aug 2005 (UTC)

Unstable?[edit source]

Are these really called unstable? --Jango

  • Yes. MarcK 23:55, 5 Oct 2005 (UTC)
    • Note that it's the terrain that's unstable, not the transport; it's designed to function on treacherous ground like weak bridges, thin ice, and the like. jSarek 01:40, 6 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Artillery[edit source]

The article mentions that shells and other artillery were kept outside the vehicle. Does this mean that the Cannons also served as mass drivers for the artillery and shells? I was wondering because I'm not sure if a laser cannon can double as a mass driver or not Jacenskylo 17:57, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

  • Considering this is Star Wars and the need for various sources not contradicting each other, I'm sure certain types of cannons can, and certain types can't.71.42.89.194 03:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Quote[edit source]

Somebody please change the quote. It doesn't make any sense and doesn't add anything to the article. If a better quote isn't found within a week (and nobody objects to it) I'm going to remove it, unless I forget to or otherwise.71.42.89.194 03:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Use by Clone pilots...?[edit source]

  • Were these used by Clone pilots?--ARC commander4 19:27, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Nooo....Instead, they were operated by mechanical Gungans. (<- Sarcasm) Of course they were used by Clone pilots, what else would drive them? 70.23.106.63 01:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Armaments[edit source]

currently there is an "anti-infantry laser turret (1)" followed by two other armaments.... the last one being "anti-infantry laser turret (4)". so, are there actually 5 anti-infantry laser turrets? was there a typo where that first one was supposed to be anti-artillery? what's the story? i'm not going to make an edit addressing this because i don't know the answer, but it looks messed up.--204.246.205.46 02:24, December 8, 2009 (UTC)


Canonicity within new continuity[edit source]

Since this vehicle appeared in ROTS, shouldn't there be a tab for a Canon version of this article as well?

Smstachwick (talk) 07:17, March 11, 2016 (UTC)

  • Unless it was identified in canon material as the Unstable Terrain Artillery Transport, it would have to be an "Unidentified Vehicle", which isn't enough incentive to create a page. BrulesMy Chit Chat Page 07:23, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
    • Thanks. I'm kind of new to this, so I appreciate the info.

Smstachwick (talk) 00:38, March 12, 2016 (UTC)

  • Glad I could help. BrulesMy Chit Chat Page 05:07, March 12, 2016 (UTC)
      • Pablo just confirmed about an hour ago that it is indeed canon on Twitter. Pablo also confirmed it here --ChristopherLeeGallant (talk) 17:51, January 24, 2017 (UTC)
        • So should we make a canon version of the article? It has been confirmed canon by Pablo Hildago as shown above several months ago.--Vitus Infinitus (talk) 23:57, April 12, 2017 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.