FANDOM

Andrewh7

aka Andrew H

  • I live in Edison, NJ
  • I was born on March 10
  • My occupation is College student, Food Runner
  • I am Male

Welcome, Andrewh7! Edit

Hello, Andrewh7, and welcome to Wookieepedia! We hope you like the place and choose to join us in building the best Star Wars encyclopedia there is. Here are some things you should know:

Wookiees-Transparent

New to wikis? Don't worry, we were all new once. Our help pages will get you started, and the Jundland Wastes sandbox can be used for test edits. Don't be afraid to make mistakes—be bold!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, you can consult our FAQ, ask a question in the Senate Hall forum, visit our official IRC channel, or leave me a message on my talk page.
May the Force be with you! —RattsT (talk) 09:37, January 9, 2020 (UTC)

Sith Master editEdit

You added characters who exist solely in Legends to a Canon page. Certain Old Republic Sith have been made canon thanks to the ROSVD, but until a source confirms a character they are not canon. RattsT (talk) 09:02, January 9, 2020 (UTC)

  • I've added the Welcome Message on this page, hopefully it can clear up some confusion on how Wookieepedia works. And ROSVD is The Rise of Skywalker Visual Dictionary, a reference book that's canonized a few Legends Sith. Hope this helps :) RattsT (talk)

Canon/LegendsEdit

No, there's no need to merge articles. If they have appeared in both continuities then there should be two pages. Merging them would just create a mess since both continuities don't match with each other.

As for SWTOR, by community concesus it was decided that we would use the Republic side for everything from Shadow of Revan till right now on Onslaught. Any alternative would be written in the BTS--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:24, January 9, 2020 (UTC)

AnathelEdit

Anathel leads the Sphere of Sith Doctrine which includes all those other Spheres. The other three spheres "disappeared" and the Sith Doctrine one was created. So we should only list that one, since he didn't led the other three.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:59, January 12, 2020 (UTC)

WarningEdit

Thank you for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added unverified information to a mainspace article. Additions to Wookieepedia's articles must be verifiable by a reliable source per our sourcing policy, and unverified information may be reverted or deleted. Continuing to add unverified information may lead to you being blocked from editing by an administrator. Thank you. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 03:53, January 13, 2020 (UTC)

  • The warning is for Force lightning/Legends, no source was added for every single entry that you added. Besides adding Darth Nox twice in the paragraph of Force Storm. As for the Barsen'thor, I didn't reverted, but its clear why it was done. The Barsen'thor does not cover anything about the Eternal Alliance, since there's no confirmation of who that is. Our article The Commander (Alliance) is where we cover everything about it, but without speculating who is the Outlander.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:04, January 13, 2020 (UTC)
    • Any class can be the Outlander, for that same reason we're created a generic page where everything can be added. There's no 8 Outlanders, there's just one.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:50, January 13, 2020 (UTC)
      • That's why we listed Darth Nox as a Force storm user, not the Commander.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:06, January 13, 2020 (UTC)
      • Let me just ride in to point one thing: some SWTOR player characters have been referenced before the game's release. The Jedi Knight was indirectly mentioned in the Revan novel. As for the Barsen'thor, the reason we know it's a he is because his tomb was identified as belonging to the male and hero Barsen'thor in a source (the whole article is sourced). There have been other Barsen'thors but only previous to the one represented in the game. See: Barsen'thor Winterz (talk) 04:07, January 15, 2020 (UTC)
        • What Winterz said here, we know he's a he because of the source that its mentioned in the article. And no, there's no need to create another Barsen'thor--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:08, January 15, 2020 (UTC)

RE:IdeaEdit

Ideas are run by the community, not by me. If you want to hear other's opinions, please use the Senate Hall to create a post with your ideas. As for the Sith Emperor, no there's no need to create a page since it was Vitiate, not another individual.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:15, January 15, 2020 (UTC)

RE:Affiliations Edit

See: User talk:Potsk --Potsk (talk) 16:21, February 5, 2020 (UTC)

  • To Andrew, regarding this situation: I have explained many times that all Sith have frequented the Academy. We usually use the Sith Academy as an affilition when there's nothing else. In the infobox we are to be as brief and simple as possible. Do not add Sith Academy in affiliations unless there's nothing else. Can you imagine if we started adding schools that all characters have frequented in the affilition box? It's just insane and irrational. StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Winterz (talk) 21:05, February 5, 2020 (UTC)
    • The infobox is meant to be brief and objective. You're trying to compile all the information there and that's not what it is for. If you're going to list every institution Darth Nox and the Emperor's Wrath have relations with, then that's a massive list. Be reasonsable. StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Winterz (talk) 21:45, February 5, 2020 (UTC)

SWTOR Updates and skillsEdit

An update isn't an expansion. Unless they're marketed as an expansion there's no need to create something. Just like Jedi Under Siege isn't an expansion.

As for the skills of slicing or piloting, I guess if at any point of the vanilla game the character is shown to be skilled--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:43, February 11, 2020 (UTC)

RE:AffiliationsEdit

I don't think there's any rule that limits that. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:12, February 11, 2020 (UTC)

  • Hello. Since you have violated the Three-revert rule of Wookieepedia, this is your formal administrative warning: revert again and administrative action will be taken against you. It should be obvious to you by now that the community does not want the Sith Academy listed as affiliation on the articles for Sith who trained there, as evidence by several editors removing this information. Please do not go against the community's will again. You may find it far more prudent to discuss the matter on the Senate Hall. Imperators II(Talk) 19:47, February 12, 2020 (UTC)

RE:AffiliationsEdit

Firstly, it's not about rules. Secondly, that kind of tone would get you nowhere, maybe the wrong side of Wookieepedia. Thirdly, not negotiating something of such controversy before reverting edits would get you banned. On the main issue at hand, putting the academy under affiliations just because Nox was affiliated with it is unnecessary. What could be achieved by stating that this Sith is affiliated with the Sith academy just because Nox trained there, as with almost every other Sith at the time? What could be achieved, following this logic, would be to listing every single affiliation because all affiliations are affiliations and go into the affiliations field. It is of no substancial purpose, and is detrimental to the presentation of knowledge on Star Wars topics, the purpose of Wookieepedia. One could argue that putting everything up exactly fulfills this, but imagine an infobox extending for pages upon pages on computer screens. ---It's unnecessary. Feel free to create your own personal workspace for all your personal projects, including having gigantic infoboxes. I'm sure some people will appreciate it, but doing so on a public space, with, naturally, as a space, limited space, is simply innappropiate. Agree or not, I'd suggest you drop it before you lose the privilege/right to contribute to Wookieepedia. This is insignificant, both the matter and the concerned information being ommitted or included, and should be concluded before disproportional damage, to you, is made. - - -CIS roundel OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 21:04, February 12, 2020 (UTC)

  • I suggest you leave all these affiliation fields from trivial additions now, for your sake, and the community's. - - -CIS roundel OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 21:08, February 12, 2020 (UTC)

User infobox Edit

Please do not unilaterally edit the template for user infoboxes that affect virtually every user on the site. Discuss changes on the template's talk page or on the Senate Hall first. Thank you. Imperators II(Talk) 18:51, February 23, 2020 (UTC)

Re:Sith AffiliationsEdit

I've never known the Sith Order (Sith Empire) page to be something that's needed to be linked to in the infobox, or anywhere else for that matter. I took a look at the pages that link to it; not even more than a hundred pages around the wiki actually link to this thing, most of those links apparently recently added by you. Furthermore, I've been able to find only one article out of all those that link to it which is actually a status article (articles reviewed so they may be labeled as the best articles on the site), and that one doesn't even link to it in the infobox. I'm skeptical that this even needs to be a page, since there's nothing particularly different about the TOR Sith Empire's Sith, and'll probably TC this page sometime down the road. I'm going to remove this unnecessary link from all infoboxes; please do not do not revert me or continue to link to "Sith Order (Sith Empire)" in infoboxes. Thank you. Fan26 (Talk) 13:44, March 18, 2020 (UTC)

  • Furthermore, as you've been told quite a few times now, please do not add "Sith Academy" to the infobox. Several users have already provided solid reasoning for this in earlier messages on your talk page, you can check those to refresh your memory as to why this doesn't need to be there. Fan26 (Talk) 14:01, March 18, 2020 (UTC)
    • "Sith Academy" does not belong in infoboxes. Fan26 (Talk) 17:32, March 18, 2020 (UTC)
      • You can continue to revert me and add it back to the page, sure, but then you will violate Wookieepedia's three revert rule, and an admin will most likely tell you to stop. Fan26 (Talk) 17:45, March 18, 2020 (UTC)
        • OK, Andrewh7, enough is enough. Given the many, many times you've been told by other users not to do what you're doing, consider this your official warning: if the administrators learn that against the community's will you are adding either the Sith Academy or the Sith Order of the Sith Empire to inappropriate characters' infoboxes and categories, you will be facing a block. Thank you. Imperators II(Talk) 18:51, March 18, 2020 (UTC)

Dark Lord of the Sith Edit

  • Only the Dark Councilors and the Emperor are Dark Lords in Tenebrae's Sith Empire.
  • Prior to the Rule of Two, there is typically only one Dark Lord of the Sith, so it is unnecessary to specify "Dark Lords of the Sith of Darth Revan's Sith Empire". There were only two, in succession, Revan and Malak.
  • The Dark Lord is the monarch of the Sith, not just anyone bearing the Darth title.

--Potsk (talk) 03:17, March 20, 2020 (UTC)

Editing Edit

Hello. Please make sure you pay attention to our Layout Guide and other of the site's policies linked in the Welcome template at the top of this page before attempting any further edits to status articles. Thank you. Imperators II(Talk) 20:17, March 23, 2020 (UTC)

  • Consider this your official warning: do it again and you will be facing a block. Thank you. Imperators II(Talk) 08:43, March 25, 2020 (UTC)
    • Please see this section of our Layout Guide. "Status article" refers to any of our Featured articles, Good articles, or Wookieepedia:Comprehensive articles, which are all marked with an icon in the upper right corner of the page. These articles have undergone a careful review process and conform to our site's policies. Note that simply splitting up an article's first paragraph into two parts and titling the second part "Biography" does not make for a well-structured article. Thank you. Imperators II(Talk) 08:50, March 26, 2020 (UTC)

Fan-fictionEdit

Per the user page policy, fan-fiction on userpages is limited to 250 words. Currently your subpage here far exceeds that. Your primary focus here should be enhancing mainspace articles. If you would rather focus on fan-fiction, please visit the Star Wars Fanon Wiki. Thank you. MasterCommerce GuildFredcerique 04:42, April 15, 2020 (UTC)

BTS sourcingEdit

The behind the scenes section, as all part of any articles, must be sourced. Please, add a reference to what you added on Melicoste.--NanoLuukeCloning facility 10:37, April 16, 2020 (UTC)

Fan fiction warning Edit

Dialog-error

Your fan fiction is over 250 words long.

Your userpage currently breaches the officially adopted limit of 250 words for fanon works. Please trim down your fanon to an appropriate length over the next two weeks, or it will be removed by an administrator.

You may find that the Star Wars Fanon Wiki is more suited to your fanoneering needs.

Please be aware that if you refuse to comply, you may be blocked from editing in the future for a fanon word limit breach.

Imperators II(Talk) 07:45, April 18, 2020 (UTC)
  • The restriction applies to the body of your fan fiction subpage. The word count of a fan fiction work may be obtained either by counting the words manually or by using one of the word count tools available online or elsewhere. Please note also that galleries such as the one on your userpage are not allowed on Wookieepedia, per our User page policy. Imperators II(Talk) 09:14, April 18, 2020 (UTC)

CategoriesEdit

The only one that I see its repeated would be the Dathomiri one. The one for the Sith Empire is correct, not all military personnel is part of the Imperial Army--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 04:16, April 20, 2020 (UTC)

Category formattingEdit

When adding or modifying a page's categories, like you did here, make sure that you adhere to the correct formatting, like this. Thanks. Zed42 (talk) 07:17, April 27, 2020 (UTC)

Squadrons pilotsEdit

Hi there. I know you messaged Cav about this and not me, but really this is a topic that should have been asked on the pilots' talk pages instead. Regardless, I thought I'd clear this up. We're not really worried about the pilots right now, as we have little information on them. Once we get closer to release we'll deal with how to handle those pages. Also, the names from the trailer already exist as redirects to Star Wars: Squadrons. Hope this helps. RattsT (talk) 06:16, July 17, 2020 (UTC)

  • Also, in regards to this edit, please do not add Legends links to articles on canon subjects. Thanks. RattsT (talk) 08:31, July 17, 2020 (UTC)
    • Unless otherwise stated, all officially-licensed Star Wars content produced after April 2014 is a part of canon. This includes Squadrons, which features canon-only subjects such as Hera Syndulla and the U-wing/TIE Reaper. RattsT (talk) 20:38, July 17, 2020 (UTC)
      • Hey Andrew -- sorry, but you've probably come to the least-helpful admin for this type of thing. The new canon holds little interest for me, so I'm not as informed on the specifics of your question as I should be I'm afraid. RattsT appears to have the right of it though; at this stage, the information is limited enough to not worry about it until closer to the release. - Sir Cavalier of OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 20:49, July 17, 2020 (UTC)

Vanguard infoEdit

Hi Andrew, could you let me know where you got the info here so that I can add a source? Thanks. RattsT (talk) 04:35, July 24, 2020 (UTC)

  • Could you send me a link? RattsT (talk) 05:16, July 24, 2020 (UTC)
    • Oh, it was just their Databank entry. Thanks, taken care of it. For future reference, information cited from the StarWars.com Databank can be sourced using this template: {{Databank}}. RattsT (talk) 05:32, July 24, 2020 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+