(Difference between revisions) | User:Fan26
(Ambient dialogue NPCs in Fort Garnik)
(Ambient dialogue NPCs in Fort Garnik)
Line 156: Line 156:
**They all have dialogue. --[[User:Nostalgia of Iran|Nostalgia of Iran]] ([[User talk:Nostalgia of Iran|talk]]) 16:03, January 28, 2020 (UTC)
**They all have dialogue. --[[User:Nostalgia of Iran|Nostalgia of Iran]] ([[User talk:Nostalgia of Iran|talk]]) 16:03, January 28, 2020 (UTC)
***I actually waited around and heard them speak. Forgot to transcribe the dialogue, though. Plus, there are the "Competetive Soldier" and "Confident Soldier" in Oradam Village around (X:-300, Y:-571, Z:13). --[[User:Nostalgia of Iran|Nostalgia of Iran]] ([[User talk:Nostalgia of Iran|talk]]) 16:42, January 28, 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:42, January 28, 2020

Skirmish in the Tromper Crags (Voidhound

Shouldn't the link have a ")"? --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 16:07, August 30, 2019 (UTC)


Hey, Fan. Just a heads up that we're going to try and do the Mofference tonight, in 2 hours from this message, rather than tomorrow due to attendance issues. Since you had stricken your attendance, I wanted to send you this message to see if you could still make it. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:06, August 30, 2019 (UTC)

RE: Task Force Admonitor

Thanks, I apologize for my bad grammar in my recent edit of Task Force Admonitor. Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 14:50, September 5, 2019 (UTC)

Juan Gimenez BD

Hi Fan26. It's on his Wikipedia page ;) ---- X9 The Android (talk) 18:02, September 11, 2019 (UTC)

Re: A7-X2

I myself have not done the Ossus missions yet, so I cannot say. --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 13:54, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

  • They probably don't understand what the template means. --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 14:04, September 16, 2019 (UTC)


Hi, Fan. I'd recommend not engaging Onicle further. He's been trying to perpetuate this thing of his for quite a while now, and you've noticed for yourself his abrasive attitude when he doesn't get what he wants. You've properly warned him for edit-warring, and the administration is aware of the issue and is prepared to step in should it continue. Thanks for your help. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:49, September 17, 2019 (UTC)

EC stuff

Hey, Fan. Since you weren't able to attend the latest EC meeting, I'd like to remind you that it's your turn to do the paperwork in case you forgot. Also, if you think your objection here is properly addressed, please strike it. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 12:59, September 22, 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! Doctor Starwars (talk) 21:43, September 22, 2019 (UTC)

I'm so sorry. Thank you!--Doctor Starwars (talk) 14:20, September 26, 2019 (UTC)


But even when he betrayed them, he was still part of the Exchange or not? I have seen on many other pages that their former allegiances are mentioned aswell even when they left and joined elsewhere. I could place (defected) behind it otherwise?

And I checked it again, you're right regarding the eye and skin colour that was more assumptions and I forgot that they can have more shades of skin and eye colour! Thank you for pointing me to this detail.

Best wishes and thank you for giving me hints, I appreciate it! Unsigned comment by Naberria (talk • contribs).


Good day!

I just saw that you have undid the change done at Darth Perash. It would be really nice to add the detail in BtS then instead of simply removing although I personally believe that the French, German and English descriptions in-game were afterall all written by Electronic Arts so it serves as a good source material. Especially in articles where the gender is unclear in the British version, the German and French variants give quite the good insight into these points.

Best wishes! --Naberria (talk) 16:08, October 5, 2019 (UTC)

Re: Fewer edits

Hey Fan. Sure, no problem. I just keep seeing bits that need to be added and corrected. OtterSurf (talk) 13:51, October 10, 2019 (UTC)

Regarding the Forgotten Terrace


No, as far as I believe, these are two different temples (they look different in-game aswell). But the temple is not described, we only see a large temple building that is draped with Revanite Banners and the player needs to defeat Revan as main boss in a circular arena in front of the temple. The inside of that temple is not accessable.

Best wishes! --Naberria (talk) 14:55, October 10, 2019 (UTC)


I made some screenshots but I am not quite understanding how to upload pictures in the files. I read that one needs a certain upload eligibility? I have uploaded it to another platform for now perhaps you can help to place it into the article!

Best wishes! Unsigned comment by Naberria (talk • contribs).

Oh then sorry for the spoilers! Now I am actually unsure myself since it's a long time ago I played that one myself! Though I think you may be right! I checked and asked around now and there is an SWTOR-Operation that is called "Temple of Sacrifice" which is probably an alternate version to conclude the storyline. However, in the regular storyline (the one I did), they travel to that temple (which looks different from the one in the Operation) but I just checked story-version again and Satele is referring to it as the "Emperor's final sanctuary" so it might be the same afterall and there's probably two versions to conclude the storyline then I suppose! My bad, I should have checked that earlier!

--Naberria (talk) 15:30, October 10, 2019 (UTC)

RE: Death Trooper Reversion

Yes, I do. Death Troopers didn't really patrol, maybe expect one on Lothal, but we don't know. There aren't anymore examples of them patrolling. They are meant as bodyguards for high ranking Imperial officials, but also elite commandos. Let me know what you think. Supreme Commander Raxus (talk) 16:44, October 10, 2019 (UTC)

Ok! Thanks!--Doctor Starwars (talk) 16:56, October 10, 2019 (UTC)

Smuggler Coruscant missions NPC

A S94-T Dealer Droid appears in one of the Smuggler missions on Coruscant in the Dealer's Den (cannot recall which). --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 17:34, October 11, 2019 (UTC)

Mantellian Army

Didn't had time to dig further on this until today.

So, as you noticed, I edited the page during the week, mostly trying to tie-up indirect mentions in the Codex and the Encyclopedia, however, I was overzealous, and you were completely right to undo that edit. When I first discovered that page, I was doubting it should exist at all, believing that Mantellian Troopers (and the over half dozen Mantellian-type NPCs) were just Republic soldiers with AO-specifics uniform. Digging the game files (thanks to TOR Community), the gears they wear further increased this initial belief, because all of them used assets textures named with "republic" in them. However, still digging the game file, I managed to find out that, while the majority of all humanoid NPCs are named Mantellian something, there is a few with name like Republic something. This, with the Codex entry "Split by Rebellion" shattered my initial belief that the NPCs were AO-specifics republic soldiers, even more when, digging further, other worlds I picked to compare don't seem to present AO-specifics named republics NPCs.

I came to believe that the wook page was right, and to make sense of it all, I must admit I was a bit overzealous, and again you were right to undid that edit. But, that's not the end of this little story, because, let's not forget, this game can be a fracking mess. So, after you undid my edit, I tried to find further proofs or disproofs of what is the Mantellian Army. Let's cut the chase. If you have the SWTOR Encyclopedia nearby, please open it page 37. The character on the left of the page is describe as a Private (in the Republic Military Hierarchy), wearing the uniform that every Mantellian-type NPCs show in the game (exception to doctor and specialist, if I recall). The description read as follow: "A new Republic Army recruit, wearing standard kit for service on the planet Ord Mantell". There it is.

I was wrong, but the page, which you created, is also wrong. While Codex entry "Split by Rebellion" speak of a "government-backed military", one could argue that the government in question could be the Republic, and not the Central Authority, making this page dubious, unless there is specific mention of the Mantellian Army somewhere that I'm not aware of. Anyway, it should at least be marked as conjectural naming, and the infobox shouldn't have those info : "Strength: Mantellian Troopers" and "Headquarters: Fort Garnik". And the Mantellian Trooper page should be edited to show that it's part of the Republic Army. That I could do, but I first want to know what you think we should do about the Mantellian Army page. --NanoLuukeCloning facility 14:53, October 13, 2019 (UTC)

  • Ok about the Codex entry. I might had a Behind the scenes bit to explain the confusion, or create a talk page. You want to remove only the headquarters, but not the Mantellian Troopers in the infobox? I mean, the Encyclopedia make it quite clear that the uniform is worn by republic personnel operating on Ord Mantell, meaning that every NPCs On Ord Mantell with said uniform should be identified as part of the Republic Army and not the Mantellian Army, right? Since you don't have the book (btw, if you ever want to know of something from the Encyclopedia, fell free to ask), I should specify that the page I'm talking about is part of "The Republic" chapter, and the double-page 36-37 is titled "Republic Military Hierarchy", so there is no confusion. --NanoLuukeCloning facility 15:21, October 13, 2019 (UTC)
    • Look like we don't agree on this. The encyclopedia make it clear, on the same page "Infantry uniform colors vary based on branch of service and location of deployment". It's explicit that the Republic infantry on Ord Mantell in field dress (that how the uniform is called in the encyclopedia) wear that uniform. Wesner, near Drelliad, wear the blue uniform and has this line "The Republic doesn't train idiots. I got a good head and I plan to keep it." Same goes for Farn, who say: "Beg your pardon, sir, but I enlisted in the Republic Army--not some gang of mercenaries killing for credits." And concerning the NPCs names, I just checked, there only four with republic in the name, from what I can tell (checking within the files with the help of jedipedia : 3 in the world: Republic Officer (officer uniform), Republic Technician (tech uniform), and Republic Soldier (with armor), and 1 specific to a mission, Republic corporal, with armor. To my knowledge, there is not one NPCs with "republic" in its name and wearing the blue uniform, while every Mantellian (Trooper, Soldier, Sergeant, Scout, Infiltrator, Commander) use it, with the exception of non-infantry NPCS (doctor, officer, with that last one wearing the same uniform as "Republic General", the NPCs you can place in a galactic fortress). One mission (Clearing the Landing Zone) specific NPCs called Mantellian Specialist wear the same armor as Republic Soldier/Republic Corporal. To the extend of my research and the explicit reference in the Encyclopedia, I have no doubt that Mantellian NPCs name ever refered to "soldier originating from Ord Mantell", but rather "republic infantry specifically geared for deployment on Ord Mantell." --NanoLuukeCloning facility 16:57, October 13, 2019 (UTC) Sorry, I didn't mean to. Did I do it right this time?--Doctor Starwars (talk) 22:19, October 13, 2019 (UTC)

Canon comics proposal change

Hey, Fan26! Just a quick heads up that I've made a small change to Forum:CT:Naming policy: Canon comic books. The change specifies that parenthetical descriptors will refer to the issue's publication year rather than the series', and the corresponding links were also changed. If you could review the changes to make sure you're still in support, I'd appreciate it. Thanks! - Cwedin(talk) 21:26, October 19, 2019 (UTC)

  • A second vote has been added to the CT, and it will determine how to disambiguate competing titles. Please take a look when you have a chance! - Cwedin(talk) 02:45, October 21, 2019 (UTC)

Re: 3629 BBY

It was mentioned in the expansion that Scourge and Kira were comatose for a year following Valkorion's final death; not sure how exactly to source that though. Not sure that it counts as a source since it is an in-universe reference. Probably would open that up to debate to see what everyone thinks and then can either keep or remove the page based on that. 13:09, October 28, 2019 (UTC)

  • Included the source per your suggestion - thanks! I hope this is alright. 16:58, October 28, 2019 (UTC)

3630/3629 BBY

I know it's been discussed in the topic above a day ago but I think this needs to be brought up again and properly addressed. First of all, it's very counter productive if you just go on and add fact templates to everything instead of questioning my reasoning directly. Regarding the dates--there are no exact dating in SWTOR so well rely on estimates (circas/arounds). It's been widely established that the story starts at around 3643 BBY/3642 BBY and that the vanilla game events take 2 years. From this [[File:Boyd Timeline.png]] we can make the math and say that 47 months (4 years) have passed since the end of the vanilla game events so right now we're starting 4.0 KOTFE at 3637/3636 BBY. At the game's start you're frozen for 5 years and so Chapter I begin in 3632/3631 BBY. Following the events of 5.0 KOTET companion conversations claim 6 years have passed since the carbon freezing which makes KOTFE+KOTET storylines a year long (we're starting at 3631/3630 BBY). Some time has passed since the events of 5.10 on Ossus but we can still claim we're somewhere between 3631-3629 BBY, and that's why I make it "around 3630 BBY". So this is my reasoning and I have quests and statements to back it up. Let me know if you think it's best to start a SH dicussion. Winterz (talk) 14:46, October 29, 2019 (UTC)

  • I saw the anon user's reasoning and as I explained above, I can't really counter it since it's all about estimates. I would prefer we if we used "around 3630 BBY" as it serves as middle-ground. Regarding Kira Carsen's statement, it's no different from companion conversations at the end of KOTET (and respective updates) as they all say the same "1 year has passed since the battle of Zakuul". But we don't have an exact dating on the Battle of Zakuul either, only an estimate. I know, it's messy but we can't say for "3629 BBY" with certainty. But I guess "circa 3629 BBY" wouldn't be any more wrong than "3631 BBY". Winterz (talk) 14:55, October 29, 2019 (UTC)
    • It's no trouble, mate. I think I'll work on a reference template for the dating. Winterz (talk) 14:58, October 29, 2019 (UTC)
      • You're right, none reference the battle of Zakuul. They just state 6 years have passed since the carbon freezing. The anon was onto something but the estimate is still 3630/3629 BBY as it's 13 years since the game start (3643/3642 BBY). We should make a proper reference for this.Winterz (talk) 15:09, October 29, 2019 (UTC)

CT: Outlander affiliation

Hey Fan. I went ahead and put a proposal up for vote regarding the Outlander's diverging storylines. I understand you had some worries regarding the need for one but please let me know if the proposal is suitable: Forum:CT:The Old Republic: Commander's storyline affiliation. Winterz (talk) 21:40, November 1, 2019 (UTC)

  • You're missing my point, Fan. It is not impossible to write everything in the Bts section, I just believe it is wrong that we shouldn't look for a way to write content pages. The Behind the scenes should be for gameplay alternatives, and that means alternatives to a story. If we're not writing any story then it's not gameplay alternatives only but the whole game's storyline; everything's going on the Behind the scenes. In the CT I have specified that the saboteur option is considered gameplay alternatives as we're assuming a character who supports the Republic and lightside choices. Whatever the saboteur outcome is, it's gameplay alternatives and should be mentioned in the Bts section. I know we disagree over some items but one thing we have strongly in common and that is to improve SWTOR articles in the Wookieepedia so we defintely look for a compromise here. Winterz (talk) 13:56, November 2, 2019 (UTC)
    • I have added an update to the CT reflecting your recommendations regarding a mention of the affected expansions and an improvement to the loyalist/saboteur options. Please, check if these suit you. Thanks. Winterz (talk) 15:15, November 2, 2019 (UTC)

EC Cup 61

Congratulations, you have qualified to participate in the 61st EC Cup! Please bring your A-game if you're coming, or leave notes if you cannot attend. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 11:57, November 6, 2019 (UTC)


My apologies, Fan, I'm rusty with the use of older sourcing templates. However, you should note that there is something in WP we call sofixit and that would apply to you. If you see there's an error or something simple in need of fixing, you can easily do it yourself (such as the TORcite class fix). Winterz (talk) 20:18, November 7, 2019 (UTC)

  • That's okay, I'm already fixing my mistakes. Also, good luck with those k'lor'slugs. Winterz (talk) 20:25, November 7, 2019 (UTC)

Address your problem

I addressed your point in the Aurodium standard CAN page.--Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:08, November 25, 2019 (UTC)

EC Meeting 62

It's time for the 62nd annual spilling of the tea. Be sure to arrive at 4pm EST on Sunday, December 29 with your tea in hand, or leave some juicy drama in the notes if you cannot attend. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 07:05, December 10, 2019 (UTC)

EC 63

Hey! See you at the EC Meeting 63 at 4 PM ET on January 25. Imperators II(Talk) 21:25, January 4, 2020 (UTC)


A reminder that you still need to attend to your objection on my nomination which I responded to. Ben sc01t (talk) 21:19, January 20, 2020 (UTC)

Ambient dialogue NPCs in Fort Garnik

There are the "Hopeful Citizen" and "Skeptical Citizen" NPCs around (X:212, Y:-36, Z:61) and the "Concerned Refugee", "Weary Refugee", and "Guarded Refugee" around (X:258, Y:-46, Z:57). --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 20:17, January 27, 2020 (UTC)

  • There are also the 2 "Republic Soldiers" around (X:208, Y:151, Z:61). --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 20:34, January 27, 2020 (UTC)
      • I actually waited around and heard them speak. Forgot to transcribe the dialogue, though. Plus, there are the "Competetive Soldier" and "Confident Soldier" in Oradam Village around (X:-300, Y:-571, Z:13). --Nostalgia of Iran (talk) 16:42, January 28, 2020 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.