Mon Calamari officer[edit source]

Hi Jkirk, I don't know if you have access, but if you do please upload an image of the Mon Calamari officer entry from SW Datapad to this page. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:16, July 6, 2019 (UTC)

  • No worries, that link its useful enough to get a screenshot. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:25, July 6, 2019 (UTC)

Card trader[edit source]

Reminder that you need to use the template {{Topps}} to source the Card Trader cards. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:47, July 17, 2019 (UTC)

Thrawn Treason[edit source]

I recommend you to not add anything from that Amazon preview to Wookieepedia yet. Yes, I know its available but given that its almost the entire book and has several spoilers, I would recommend you to not add anything until release date.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 23:08, July 19, 2019 (UTC)

Warning[edit source]

While all good-faith contributions to Wookieepedia are appreciated, we ask that you please refer to Wookieepedia:Images and familiarize yourself with the sourcing and licensing requirements before uploading any more images. The only uploading method supported by Wookieepedia, Special:Upload, will prompt you to enter this information. Continued violation of the image policy or falsification of any information in an upload description are considered vandalism and will likely result in a block. Thank you. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:35, July 20, 2019 (UTC)

[edit source]

I see that you sourced the Sith trooper logo you have uploaded to Star Wars: Who's Who in the Galaxy: Character Storybook. If you do have the book, could you please tell me what the book says about Sith troopers? TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders.svg Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:04, July 20, 2019 (UTC)

  • I see. So is there a preview of the book that features Sidious and Vader? I can't seem to find it. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders.svg Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:18, July 20, 2019 (UTC)

Ruusan reformations[edit source]

Hi Jkirk. After talking about Palpatine's near absolute power over the Republic it says "No chancellor since before the Ruusan Reformations has wielded such power over the Republic." I'll write the article up soon once I've finished the appearances section. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:39, July 22, 2019 (UTC)

RE:Rakatan[edit source]

Hey, I'm out of the house right now so I can't access my copy at the moment but it's mentioned in Solo: A Star Wars Story The Official Guide on the sections where the book goes into detail about the artifacts in Dryden Vos' ship.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:22, July 24, 2019 (UTC)

Delete[edit source]

Hi Jkirk, when tagging something to delete please do not replace the entire text with the delete template unless is pure fanon, redirects or vandalism. That way admins and other users can see the information in the page.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:19, July 25, 2019 (UTC)

Second Imperial War[edit source]

Hi Jkirk, I had a question recently you removed a side from the Second Imperial Civil War battle infobox, I was wondering if you had any reason to do that. I honestly don't remember too much of the Legacy comics, its been a while since I read them and I have this argument given by another user saying that it should stay as a three sided battle instead of two sides. Any input on that would be welcome. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:43, July 28, 2019 (UTC)

  • I do remember the three parties forming an Alliance with the goal of deafeating the Krayt and the One Sith, maybe if you could post the exact same message into this user talk page, so a bigger discussion can happen. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:52, July 28, 2019 (UTC)
    • Thanks!--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 10:06, July 28, 2019 (UTC)
      • The Second Imperial Civil War article was reverted by the same user to 3 sides. If you could read his response on the user's talk page and answer him with more evidence or reasoning of why it should be 2 sides, please do so. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 19:11, July 28, 2019 (UTC)

The Wanderer[edit source]

Where exactly did you get that name from in that article? Or did you get it from reddit, which you know you shouldn't? --Lewisr (talk) 11:19, July 28, 2019 (UTC)

  • My bad then, apologies --Lewisr (talk) 11:25, July 28, 2019 (UTC)

Myths and Fables[edit source]

Do you know how Myths & Fables is structured? Is it like how The Legends of Luke Skywalker is? Or is it just the stories? If its like TLOLS then we can keep all the appearances on the Myths & Fables page --Lewisr (talk) 00:18, August 6, 2019 (UTC)

  • Okay cool, thanks for letting me know! --Lewisr (talk) 00:24, August 6, 2019 (UTC)

Hinged lightsaber[edit source]

Hey, I noticed that your revisions have changed all instances of hinged double-bladed lightsaber to hinged lightsaber. Was this an instance of your infobox edit overlapping the edit where I made the change or a deliberate change? Thanks. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:45, August 26, 2019 (UTC)

Spam filter[edit source]

Hi Jkirk, thanks for letting me know, I'll take a look on it and hopefully it will be solved quickly.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:56, October 23, 2019 (UTC)

Liberty-class[edit source]

Hey Jkirk, just wondering where in Star Wars Battlefront II does it mention the MC80 Liberty Type Heavy Star Cruiser? Thanks--Vitus InfinitusTalk 13:22, October 24, 2019 (UTC)

Operations against the Empire[edit source]

excuse me, but on the wanted pages section, they asked for someone to create that page. Did I do something wrong?--Doctor Starwars (talk) 22:05, October 28, 2019 (UTC)

here it is. Should be the second one where it says operations against the empire. --Doctor Starwars (talk) 22:12, October 28, 2019 (UTC)

Ohhhh. I worked my butt off for nothing. I'm so sorry. Thank you. Doctor StarwarsTalk

Prauf[edit source]

Hi Jkirk. Which source provides Prauf's surname? It's currently sourced to the databank entry but I'm not seeing it there. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:28, October 29, 2019 (UTC)

  • Huh, odd. For now I think we should probably move it back to just Prauf since we now have no verifiable source for the name. If they reverted it there's also probably a reason, perhaps that name isn't being used anymore or something. Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:47, October 29, 2019 (UTC)

Chapter 1 Mando[edit source]

Hey Jkirk, just wondering if there was a reason to remove *that* appearance from Chapter 1: The Mandalorian. Thanks!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 14:16, November 12, 2019 (UTC)

  • Ah, just realized it already existed. Sorry about that!--Vitus InfinitusTalk 14:17, November 12, 2019 (UTC)

Liberty-class cruiser[edit source]

Hey, can you pinpoint where Liberty-class cruiser is used in Battlefront 2 please? --Lewisr (talk) 20:41, November 24, 2019 (UTC)

  • Not sure if that was you but its been answered now, so thanks if it was! --Lewisr (talk) 20:43, November 24, 2019 (UTC)
    • Got it, thanks! --Lewisr (talk) 20:46, November 24, 2019 (UTC)

Creating pages[edit source]

Why do you create pages on an anon account then immediately log into this account and start editing it? --Lewisr (talk) 18:50, November 25, 2019 (UTC)

RE: Rakata Prime[edit source]

Hey Jkirk, Imperators and I have been discussing this on IRC, and to be honest, there is no canon evidence for Rakata Prime and Lehon being the same. Even Matt Martin said that we shouldn't assume as such. Also, I'm creating a new canon Lehon article as we speak, and will clarify these in the articles' BTS sections. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders.svg Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 12:38, November 26, 2019 (UTC)

Blocked[edit source]

Dialog-error.svg You have been blocked from editing for 1 month for adding leaks/spoilers for unreleased material. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:11, December 16, 2019 (UTC)

Edits[edit source]

Pay more attention to your edits, especially with broken links and refs.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:52, January 16, 2020 (UTC)

  • So are you using a mobile? Because I would recommend you to just wait when you can edit from a computer. You keep removing links, templates, interlang links, and eras template from articles. There's no rush to create/expand articles.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:19, January 16, 2020 (UTC)
    • This is the 2nd time I've seen you remove the interlangs for no apparent reason, I'm guessing because you're adding an older edit to the page, please stop. --Lewisr (talk) 17:12, January 16, 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Please familiarize yourself with our Canon policy before making any further edits to status articles. Imperators II(Talk) 12:39, January 17, 2020 (UTC)

Moving pages[edit source]

For the next time, you should always move first and then fix the redirect links. Adding redlinks fist isn't the way to go. Also when you're fixing a redirect link on a archive pages, just fix the redirect and keep the original phrase in the pipelink. If the page had [[Escape of the Colossus|Escape of the ''Colossus'']] then the fixed link should be [[Attack on Castilon‎|Escape of the ''Colossus'']]--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:19, January 21, 2020 (UTC)

    • Okay. I thought it was the opposite but thanks for the Clarification--Jkirk8907 (talk) 07:20, January 21, 2020 (UTC)

Other userpages[edit source]

As a courtesy, ask before editing someone else's userpage, even if you need to fix a redirect (which can be done by a bot instead). Shayanomer (talk) 12:13, February 25, 2020 (UTC)

Right information[edit source]

Why do you keep changing the info I put when it is right?

Warning[edit source]

You have been long enough here to know that copy-pasting information isn't allowed to do. Do not do this again, otherwise you will be blocked from editing. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:03, May 10, 2020 (UTC)

Canon tag[edit source]

Is there any particular reason why you added the {{Canon}} tag to Tarsus Valorum? Rise of the Separatists is fully based in Canon, it's only FFG sourcebooks from around 2016 that have issues with Legends material. Zed42 (talk) 04:34, May 22, 2020 (UTC)

LGBT[edit source]

"LGBT" is not a Star Wars term, and the necessity of a category for LGBT individuals has been debated before. Furthermore, it is quite remarkable that a user with over 10 years of experience and more than 40,000 edits creates a category where "characters" is capitalized incorrectly and the parent category doesn't even exist. Please pay more attention to your edits. 1358 (Talk) 15:32, June 27, 2020 (UTC)

Edit summaries[edit source]

Thanks for contributing to Wookieepedia! When editing, please remember to provide an edit summary more often. This helps your fellow Wookieepedians, particularly those patrolling the Recent changes, understand why you are making certain changes. Thanks! Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:15, August 5, 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for contributing to Wookieepedia! When editing, please remember to provide an edit summary more often. This helps your fellow Wookieepedians, particularly those patrolling the Recent changes, understand why you are making certain changes. Thanks! - - -CIS roundel.svg OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 16:54, September 8, 2020 (UTC)

Social media screenshots[edit source]

Thanks for contributing to Wookieepedia! Please note that at least one of your recent additions added a link to a social media post without including a screenshot of the post. Our Sourcing policy mandates the inclusion of a screenshot with all social media post citations. Instructions for doing this can be found on the respective citation template pages. Thanks! Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 07:40, August 6, 2020 (UTC)

  • I also want to let you know that social media posts and external links that aren't from licensed SW products (e.g. IGN) should go under External links. Secondly, we don't add novel excerpts as a link on articles after the novel is released unless they contain unique information, otherwise you would see them on status articles. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 08:59, August 6, 2020 (UTC)

Backup links[edit source]

Per Wookieepedia:Sourcing, you are required to provide a backup link for any link you use in an article. Your edit on the Sith Wars/Canon lacks a backup link. Please go back and add one. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:55, August 26, 2020 (UTC)

Old Republic[edit source]

It's not speculation, Sith Empire can't have war with canon Galactic Republic, because it's a separate government and Sith Empire wouldn't exist at that time --Goodmind (talk) 02:54, August 26, 2020 (UTC)

Destruction of an abandoned weapons depot date[edit source]

It is not upto me to clean up your edits, its a pretty simple thing to look at Skirmish on Takodana, and then write a similar date note to say how the weapons depot mission is also in 5 ABY --Lewisr (talk) 03:24, August 31, 2020 (UTC)

Categories across continuities[edit source]

Please note that since the only member of the Brotherhood of Darkness is Darth Bane, the two articles linked should not be placed in a category for members of the Brotherhood. - - -CIS roundel.svg OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 17:01, September 8, 2020 (UTC)

Continuity tabs[edit source]

With so many Sith Wars in Legends, we simply cannot say that the canon Sith Wars is the equivalent to any of them. I have thus reverted your edits here and here. Please be more careful next time, and make more use of edit summaries. - - -CIS roundel.svg OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 17:07, September 8, 2020 (UTC)

New Sith Wars[edit source]

Hi, could you provide me with the page where the term New Sith Wars is used in the book Nexus of Power. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 06:35, September 10, 2020 (UTC)

  • Your edits will be reverted, unless you can provide us with page since several users can't find the information.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:10, September 10, 2020 (UTC)
    • Your edits were removed after several users couldn't find the information. If you have the page number where the term is used please let me know, otherwise please refrain of adding speculation. Thanks--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 18:09, September 10, 2020 (UTC)

Blocked[edit source]

Dialog-error.svg You have been blocked from editing for 1 month for violating Wookieepedia's Sockpuppetry policy. To contest this block, please contact the blocking administrator with the reason you believe the block is unjustified. The violation occurred here, as you attempted to create the impression that you were two different individuals agreeing with the same point. Your dual identity as anonymous user has been confirmed. Although this happened some time ago, this was only recently brought to our attention, and the length of time that has passed doesn't change the seriousness of the situation. If nothing else, this block should impress upon you the realization that any deception you may have believed you were getting away with is now over. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 21:16, September 10, 2020 (UTC)

  • Your block has been extended an additional six months from this date for continual block evasion. If you persist, your account will continue to have its block extended until eventually the decision is reached to cut you off for good. Don't push it. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 20:51, October 5, 2020 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.