FANDOM

Kreivi Wolter

  • I live in Finland
  • I was born on May 21
  • I am Male

Welcome, Kreivi Wolter! Edit

Hello and welcome to Wookieepedia. I hope you like the place and choose to join our work. Here are a few good links for newcomers: right|180px

Remember that you should always sign your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wookieepedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the Senate Hall, visit our official IRC channel, or ask me on my talk page. May the Force be with you! —SFH 16:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Slick Edit

If you're going to put the {{NPOV}} template on Slick, please at least point out why. All the article's content is solid fact from the episode, and if you see something that isn't, placing the template on the article without stating the issues on the talk page isn't helpful to anyone. Alternatively, since the article is a current FAN, it would have been better to state your objections in Slick's entry. CC7567 (talk) 03:19, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

  • I thought it was obvious. The article is filled with words "traitor", "traitorous" etc. and even if they are quite true, it doesn't fit on Wookiepeida, and especially in featured article.--Kreivi Wolter 19:52, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Skirmish at CoruscantEdit

What event are you making an article about? Where did this info come from? From the looks of it, the infobox is copied off an another page, and describes events on Naboo. Unless this article is sourced and gets a proper infobox and body, it will be deleted. SoresuMakashi(Everything I tell you is the truth) 09:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

  • I know, please be patient, I'm making it right now. It was left for unfinished because I had great hurry, but know I will continue it. Please dont remove it.--Kreivi Wolter 09:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Unidentified Naboo merchant Edit

Since you've expressed that you no longer feel your GAN objections to Unidentified Naboo merchant to be compliant with GAN rules, please strike them. If you don't strike them within a week, they will be stricken by the AgriCorps for being out-of-line. Thank you. CC7567 (talk) 03:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Uuh, what? Sorry, I dont unterstand, no perfect english u see? So could u explain little slower, please?--Kreivi Wolter 15:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
To "strike" means to cross out your objection. In order to do it, you must place <s> before it and </s> after. Doing so will produce this: text of your objection. Hopefully, I made it clear. QuiGonJinn 20px(Talk) 16:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Ah, yeah, okay, thx.--Kreivi Wolter 16:30, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
And another small heads-up. First, you only need to strike your initial objection, not all your comments below, and second, <s> should be placed after *. QuiGonJinn 20px(Talk) 16:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Dagger Edit

I've reverted your edit to the Battle of unidentified planet (Yoda's chaingun), because † is added only to the individual casualties. Tanks, droids and the like are only noted in the "casualties" section. QuiGonJinn 20px(Talk) 16:37, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Okie-Dokie. But in the Mission to Mustafar, the dagger is right after the CIS, and it is organization, not individual.--Kreivi Wolter 16:43, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
    • I just noticed that it's even after the droid casualties.--Kreivi Wolter 16:45, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
      • Well, this article is of low quality and such dagger usage proves it. If you take a look at our Good or Featured articles, you'll see what I mean. QuiGonJinn 20px(Talk) 16:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
        • Okay. I wont use it any more after droids.--Kreivi Wolter 08:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Whorm Loathsom Edit

Even though you're not a member of WP:TCW, please note that others may have already reserved TCW-related articles. WP:TCW is a collaborative effort to get all TCW-related articles to higher status, except that people reserve articles to work on through the project. You're welcome to join, but I'm planning on writing Whorm Loathsom, so I would like to ask you to try to find another article to work on. Thank you. CC7567 (talk) 16:18, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Well, if you sa so, sir.Kreivi Wolter 17:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: Loathsom Edit

Yes, I plan to within the next two weeks. There's plenty of other projects for you to try out; they're all in the lists linked on the project page. CC7567 (talk) 19:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Re: About ur projects...Edit

Yes, I am planning on doing those. Like CC pointed out to you above, there's a whole season worth of topics to choose from. Focus on some of those rather than other user's projects. Darth Trayus 30px (Trayus Academy) 22:02, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

GANs Edit

Please stop making comments like "I suppose it's good enough" or to the like when you vote for something, as you've done for Gus and now Chopper. It sounds as if you're hesitant, and it's quite simply this: if you're "not sure" if an article is good enough, then don't vote. CC7567 (talk) 22:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Tactical droid Edit

right|75px
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
TJ-55 has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Grunny (Talk) 10:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Remaining objections Edit

Before I give your Tactical droid GAN another review, you still haven't addressed my remaining objections and I believe it has been many weeks. If you have corrected those objections, though forgot to address them, please double check. JangFett Talk 23:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Wag Too Edit

Unless the Databank actually has a noteworthy quote, it shouldn't be in the article. CC7567 (talk) 18:43, September 1, 2009 (UTC)

Tactical droid (unidentified planet) Edit

right|75px
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Unidentified T-series tactical droid (unidentified planet) has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — CC7567 (talk) 02:53, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

QOTD Edit

I noticed that you opposed one of my Ahsoka quotes on the basis that it was incorrect, but in fact the episode guide confirms it to be correct. If you would please review the guide and consider striking or changing your vote, that would be appreciated. Thanks. —Master Jonathan(Jedi Council Chambers) 18:07, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Unidentified IG-86 sentinel droid 2 Edit

There is no such droid. There were two droids in the posse, both of which have articles: HELIOS-3D (my current project) and Unidentified IG-86 sentinel droid 1. Please don't create one for this non-existent droid or the page will just have to get speedied as fanon. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 15:05, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

  • Nevermind. The Episode Guide strikes again. Of course the Episode guide says there were 3 IG-86s but the episode itself only ever shows 2. Lovely. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 15:08, September 24, 2009 (UTC)
    • OK, how can you tell the difference between Unidentified 1 and 2? HELIOS-3D stays in the airspeeder. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 15:14, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

Re: But why? Edit

It doesn't matter. It's not confirmed either way. CC7567 (talk) 16:33, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

Unidentified IG-86 sentinel droid 1 Edit

right|thumb|100px Might I recommend using this image in place of File:AlamaIG86.jpg for showing them hunting together. For one, it's higher def and clearer than the one of them running. - JMAS Hey, it's me! 17:44, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

WP:TCW Edit

Hello everyone, this is CC7567 from WookieeProject The Clone Wars. It is currently six months after the project was started, and the number of individual projects is steadily growing. While I am happy that so many of you are writing for the WookieeProject, the majority of articles there have been sitting there for months. Several users even have ten projects or more at the moment, and I am frankly just disappointed at the level of inactivity that is befalling our articles. I understand that many of you have other obligations, and while I respect that, the responsibility falls to you to judge whether or not you're still capable of writing all of these articles, whether in time or in energy. For this reason, I once again urge you to reconsider your current projects. The criteria should be that you have the unrelenting intent to finish all of your projects within the next month. I myself have had to reconsider my own projects on account of real-life time constraints. I do not want to have to set a limit to the number of projects per user, but if it comes down to that, I will, because I do not want to see the project deteriorate and hope that you do not want to either. Thank you. CC7567 (talk) 19:23, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

WP:USER Edit

We had to remove your gallery because it violates the user page policy, rule 10. -LtNOWIS 19:45, November 25, 2009 (UTC)

KarinaEdit

Kreivi, her name was added to the list after I put her on the individual project list. In the future, if you have an issue with something so petty, just fix it yourself. Darth Trayus 30px (Trayus Academy) 01:14, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Two articles Edit

Then what exactly do you want me to do about it? You've obviously noticed it yourself and are capable of placing a {{Delete}} request tag without the need for my "consent." Learn to be WP:BOLD. CC7567 (talk) 17:05, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

  • Then now you do. CC7567 (talk) 19:42, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

Covetus Edit

I noticed you were having trouble with Covetus, so I did some editting to the plot area. Tell me if you liked my grammar changes. User:Bonbondoodle

buy racer revenge it is short, but cool

suggestion Edit

Brocoli99buy racer revenge it is short, but cool

Brocoli99 Edit

that was a little backwards

Battle of Dorin Edit

Just FYI, CC7567 has already reserved Battle of Dorin. Xd 18:33, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Neimoidian controller (Saak'ak) Edit

right|75px
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Neimoidian controller (Saak'ak) has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Cavalier One20px(Squadron channel) 10:05, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Hey thereEdit

Hello I'm Station7. I've read that your novel and comic dissappeared. Is this because you maybe have a messy room or another reason. If I was you I was cleaning my room. Or did it dissappeared somewhere else? I'm just wanna help.--Station7 12:17, February 24, 2010 (UTC)

Hyvää päivää Edit

Tai lähinnä yötä. Xd "valitti" minulle, kun olen roikkunut koko päivän Wookieen puolella korjaamassa FA tarjokastani, joten sinun vuorosi saada kuittia aiheesta. Ei ole Jedipedian puolella aikoihin näkynyt ;) Would you take a look at that Celchu Trial when you get the time? I saw you have commented on some other FA noms...--Dionne Jinn (Something to say?) 22:04, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Quote of the Day Edit

I would like you to reconsider why you are making objections on QOTD. If you object because you think a quote is bad, like poor dialogue or writing, etc, such as for a Mace Windu/Nick Rostu one where your objection was "Then I will beat you into unconsciousness and ask someone else." Bah! Just.........stupid......stupid.......!" - that is a valid reason. You object because you think that line is horrid, and I tend to agree. But when your reasons are one such as "Because they changed his infobox image. The new one is just so ugly." regarding a Gryph quote and "Ugly? Actually, he looks just cool for me." for a quote about Admiral Trench, that is ridiculous. You should object because you think the dialogue is bad, not because the quote calls him ugly and you think he looks cool. I can't stand Jar Jar Binks, but I'm not going to object to a QOTD by him or about him just because I don't like the character. Or I happen to like the character of Han Solo, but I'm not going to object to a quote calling him a "half-witted, scruffy-looking nerf herder" just because it isn't flattering to a character I like. Just something to think about. Thanks. - JMAS 20px Hey, it's me! 23:52, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

  • At least I'm not voting against something just because I dont like its series, like some others do. Well, maybe you are right about my objections. I'll try to find more valid reasons next time : ) Kreivi Wolter 08:08, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pacithhip in The Phantom Menace game? Edit

Hey, Kreivi! I didn't know that there were talking Pacithhip in The Phantom Menace game. Do you happen to remember if any of them are named? And in what kind of context they are encountered? Thanks for any help! ~ SavageBob 15:28, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

  • Well, there is this Sleeping Man, know as Anakin Skywalker's friend in Wookieepedia, and all the others are just random podaracer mechanics with random quotes like "You should hurry up if you wanna see the race; it'll be starting soon" etc. If you want, I can gather quotes about the friend, but alas, they aren't related to the species. Kreivi Wolter 15:54, April 5, 2010 (UTC)

Operation: Knightfall Edit

I added a picture to the prelude per your objection. NaruHina Talk 14px 00:19, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

Moving pages Edit

Just because Mar Tuuk calls him "Commander" which is his rank, doesn't mean that is his official designation. An official designation would be like 224 was that droid's official designation. Or OOM-9 is an official designation. - JMAS 20px Hey, it's me! 14:29, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

  • It isn't designation but a rank name. Just as the template displays it. Kreivi Wolter 14:32, May 10, 2010 (UTC)
    • If you want to take it to the article's talk page, and see if other users agree with you, feel free to do so. The naming policy here though, is that if there isn't a specified name (in the case of a living being) or a specific designation (ie 224 or OOM-9) then they are an "Unidentified" article. - JMAS 20px Hey, it's me! 14:40, May 10, 2010 (UTC)
      • Very well. I put it to there. Let the people decide : ) Kreivi Wolter 14:43, May 10, 2010 (UTC)

Weequay cell guardEdit

Where exactly is this Weequay referred to by that nickname? --Imperialles 20:38, May 27, 2010 (UTC)

  • In the episode guide: "Kenobi and Anakin's electric torture ceases, and Count Dooku's cell door unlocks. The count strangles the Weequay cell guard with his shackles." Kreivi Wolter 05:33, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

BD-3000 Edit

Why did you take off the "Unidentified" in this article's title? It was never given a designation. NaruHina Talk 14px 02:27, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

  • The said title isn't usually used in droid characters. Good examples are the OOM command battle droids and T-series tactical droids. There's a reason for this: the conjecture droid names are usually very long, and adding the title would make them needlessly even longer: "Unidentified BD-3000 luxury droid (Senate hostage crisis)". That's a lot of words just in the name of the droid. And the said droid's name was also unupdated: since the event is now officially named, it's now "Senate hostage crisis", not "senate hostage crisis". Kreivi Wolter 09:29, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

OOM commanders Edit

May I ask why you undid all of my work in renaming the undesignated OOM command battle droids to have the "Unidentified" prefix? Master Jonathan clearly pointed out for me that the article naming policy enforced that all unnamed characters needed to have that prefix, and it took me a long time to get this task done. So, it seemed relevant for me to ask, why might you have reverted it all? --Mateo22 20pxContact 20:51, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

  • Not only does WP:NP specify the usage of "unidentified", titles such as OOM command battle droid (Rugosa) are IMO ambiguous; does that refer to a new model of OOM command battle droids found on Rugosa, or does it refer to an unnamed individual regular OOM commander that was on Rugosa? Obviously the article itself clears that up, but the title should be able to convey that information alone since the title is the first thing the reader will see, often when hovering over a link to the article from another article. Especially when dealing with droids and other non-living objects such as starships, an article whose title is simply the name of a model without any qualifiers such as "unidentified" is almost always an article on the model; "unidentified" is needed to make clear that the article is on an individual droid rather than a whole model. With regard to the defense above of "other droid articles are like that", unless you can point to a community discussion somewhere where it was decided to name droid articles in this way that is contrary to established policy, then there is no precedent; just because a large number of policy violations survive for a long time without being discovered does not automatically make new policy. —Master Jonathan 20px (Jedi Council Chambers) 21:27, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
    • Phhh, whatever, I really dont care anymore about that. Do what you want about them. I wont revert it. Kreivi Wolter 21:52, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Leaving Edit

Well, I wish you luck wherever you choose to spend your time. It was a pleasure having you as one of WP:TCW's most active and helpful members. CC7567 (talk) 17:04, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

  • Really? :¨) Thank you. It has been an honor to contribute this wiki. Who knows what I'll be doing in the future. Keep the Wookieepedia living. Kreivi Wolter 19:09, June 14, 2010 (UTC)

Hey i see you edited the second battle of jabiim page, on the page it says all nimbus commandos were lost but after the battle once alto stratus was killed colonal Mazzi took leadership of the nimbus commandos ..... I believe when the sources talk about when when aubrie wyne killed stratus' last nimbus guard they were talking about his guards at the present time and place and not the nimbus commandos as a whole.

I figured I would run this by some one else before i go and edit the page

Bulldogue 23:15, February 13, 2011 (UTC) Bulldogue

TC Edit

Just letting you know that I have closed and archived your Trash compactor forum. Thought I would give you an opportunity to merge any relevant information into the Bib Fortuna article before an administrator deletes it. Thanks. Toprawa and Ralltiir 14:32, February 17, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified ... lieutenant Edit

GoodIcon2
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Unidentified OOM command battle droid lieutenant has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — 1358 (Talk) 10:49, February 27, 2011 (UTC)

Raid on Yirt-4138-Grek-12 Edit

GoodIcon2
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Raid on Yirt-4138-Grek-12 has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 20:06, March 7, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Tactical droid Edit

The only source that I can find that mentions the specific tactical droid is The Official Episode Guide: Season 1, which has no new info. On a side note, you might consider moving the article to Unidentified T-series tactical droid (Quell) or something of the like, as that would be the full, "unidentified" title. I do realize that not all of the tactical droid articles (and not even the B2-HA series super battle droid articles) are formatted that way, but that's probably because no one has gotten around to sprucing them up yet. CC7567 (talk) 05:58, April 1, 2011 (UTC)

Sources Edit

Hello, Kreivi. Please remember that items in Sources list are to be arranged by real-world publication date. When adding a missing item to a well-populated Sources list, this often requires you to make the effort of seeing where the item should be placed within the list. Making an edit like this, especially when the article is an FA, as this article is, is really just lazy and unacceptable, for it lowers the quality of the FA itself. Please take some time in the future to make sure you place the item accordingly in the list. Thank you. Toprawa and Ralltiir 17:41, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

  • Oh, im sorry. I had no idea they are to be placed in that order. Kreivi Wolter 17:47, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Kime Enanrum Edit

GoodIcon2
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Kime Enanrum has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — 1358 (Talk) 21:16, April 9, 2011 (UTC)

Ewoks date Edit

Hey, Kreivi. If you notice any more Ewoks articles that assert a date without a source, rather than putting the fact tag, would you mind putting this instead? <ref name="date">The ''Ewoks'' series takes place in [[3 ABY]]; see {{Cite_web|url=http://forums.starwars.com/message.jspa?messageID=14621041|title=StarWars Forums: Books, Comics, & Television VIPS|accessdate=2011-03-09|author="Leland Y Chee"|last=|first=|authorlink=Leland Chee|coauthors=|date=2006-04-20, 11:42 am|year=|month=|format=|work=[[StarWars.com]] Forums|publisher=|pages=|language=|archiveurl=|archivedate=|quote=}}</ref> That should establish the date without necessitating bringing the articles to GAR or FAR (unless there are other issues, of course). Thanks, man! ~SavageBOB sig 16:15, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

  • Yeah, it looks ugly, but that's because of the citeweb template, I think. I suppose you could drop the expository parts of it and just use the Citeweb part? ~SavageBOB sig 19:21, April 14, 2011 (UTC)
    • I do have access to that article; it's at home at the moment, but if you have a question about it, I'd be happy to check it for you. ~SavageBOB sig 19:34, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified T-series tactical droid (Quell) Edit

GoodIcon2
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Unidentified T-series tactical droid (Quell) has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — 1358 (Talk) 20:36, April 14, 2011 (UTC)

Unidentified B1 battle droid captain (Dooku's frigate) Edit

GoodIcon2
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Unidentified B1 battle droid captain (Dooku's frigate) has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Kilson(Let's have a chat) 20:49, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

Cyborg slicers of Yirt-4138-Grek-12 Edit

GoodIcon2
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Cyborg slicers of Yirt-4138-Grek-12 has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 21:00, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

Neg Edit

GoodIcon2
"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Neg has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — 1358 (Talk) 21:22, June 1, 2011 (UTC)

Warb Null Edit

Hello Kreivi,

What specifically are you referring to?—Tommy 9281 Thursday, June 9, 2011, 21:42 UTC

  • Ah yes. Well, Null's article uses only the storyline presented in the comic version of Tales of the Jedi, yet First Battle of Onderon (Naddist Uprising) (a FA itself) combines the story of the comic and the audio version of TotJ. Null's article does not tell anything about Null's hand being cut off and him begging for mercy, which happened only in the audio version. Kreivi Wolter 21:49, June 9, 2011 (UTC)

Kazz image Edit

Hey, Kreivi. I wanted to let you know that I found this image of Admiral Kazz so that you could add it to his article if you wanted to. This is an animation cell, so it would require a bit of Photoshop work to remove the shadow to the right of his face, to crop the image, and to change the background to pure white, but it's a cleaner image than the ones you can get from YouTube and so on. I've spoken to the owner of the site, and she's been very supportive and has no problem with us using her images. Anyway, just a thought. Good luck with the article! ~SavageBOB sig 14:20, July 28, 2011 (UTC)

Watto's flunkyEdit

Hey Kreivi. Just a heads-up that there are some objections on the Featured Article nomination of Watto's flunky that are nearly three weeks old. After three weeks, the nomination can be removed. Hopefully you can address them soon. Mastering the art of avoiding play-by-play can be tricky --- if you need any help with it, feel free to ask me. It was definitely something that plagued me in my first few articles, and I'll be happy to help you out if you need it. Menkooroo 00:23, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

  • Thanks for remainding, but unfortunately, I currently do not own the time to make anything about that. I've already asked the nomination to be removed. I will try again in the future when I have more time, if the nomination hasn't been taken FA by then. Cheers! Kreivi Wolter 10:37, August 3, 2011 (UTC)

Duel on DircaEdit

The page from Duel on Dirca, which a link is from Kaa refers to the planet, but it should refer to Kaa (Dark Jedi). Could you do that, since you're planning to edit the page? --Station7 19:14, October 15, 2011 (UTC)

WP:VG group project Edit

Hey, Kreivi. Recently, a discussion was brought up in one of the forums for WP:VG. The topic, seen here, is a discussion of a group project. Corellian Premier originally came up with the idea, and he thought perhaps the Battlefront series would be a good one to work on. Anyway, if you have any thoughts and/or are interested in helping out, feel free to join in on the discussion, and we'll see what we can do with this. Cheers!—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 15:40, March 28, 2012 (UTC)

WP:VG and Star Wars: 1313 Edit

Hey, Kreivi. I'd like to direct your attention to this. If you could check it out when you get a chance, I would appreciate it. Thanks.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 18:15, June 1, 2012 (UTC)

Leaving? Edit

Sorry to see you go! :( ~SavageBOB sig 01:22, July 7, 2012 (UTC)

WP:VG one year anniversary Edit

1313 preview
WookieeProject Video Games has completed its first year!
A year ago today, WookieeProject Video Games was founded. Although it started out rather small, it quickly grew to be currently one of the most productive WookieeProjects. In that year, WookieeProject Video Games has seen seven Featured articles, thirty-four Good articles, and sixty-five Comprehensive articles passed, a very impressive amount especially for such a short time.


WP:VG was founded by Cal Jedi on July 8, 2011 with a mission "to improve...video game articles and bring them up to date" and also to "bring all related articles to Featured article status, Good article status, and Comprehensive article status." WP:VG has answered the call to the best of its ability. Five days after its formation, Exiledjedi joined the Project. More and more users began joining, until now, the project has eleven members. On July 26, 2011, the Project gained its first Comprehensive article, Unidentified Bakuran astromech droid, taken to status by Cal Jedi. Shortly thereafter, WP:VG's first Good article, J'Meeb Gumb, was taken to status by Exiledjedi on August 17, 2011. WP:VG's first Featured article, Battle of Kessel (0 ABY), was brought to status on October 19, 2011 by a guest nominator, Kilson.


WP:VG has associated with many other WookieeProjects—such as WookieeProject The Old Republic, WookieeProject Knights of the Old Republic, WookieeProject Galaxies, and others—helping each other bring articles to status. Overall, Wookieepedia's video game articles have drastically improved. While many have been taken to status, many more have been worked on and improved through the efforts of WP:VG's members.


There are many Star Wars video games. From the very first Star Wars game, Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back, to the recently released Kinect Star Wars, WP:VG has been there to work on an area on Wookieepedia that needs much attention. With the many games that have been produced under the Star Wars title, a large amount of people have come to love Star Wars games. We have had some tremendous Star Wars games in the past, and as we look to the future, we can see many more promising Star Wars titles on the horizon. Star Wars: 1313 is just around the corner, and it will require much work. And that is not the end. There will be more Star Wars games in the future. WP:VG needs to be there to address their needs on Wookieepedia.


However, a WookieeProject is nothing without its members. An impressive amount of work has been done by Corellian Premier. He has done a lot of work taking care of the little details in video game articles—many of which would otherwise have been forgotten—and he has also done a fine job of doing a lot of "inside work" of WP:VG. Olioster has also been doing a tremendous job of late. He has recently nominated an impressive amount of articles from Star Wars Galaxies. Even though the game has been offline for quite some time now, he keeps carrying on in his work. Congratulations, though, go to all of WP:VG's members. Without the members, WP:VG would be nothing. Together, the members of WP:VG have done a wondeful work on Wookieepedia. WookieeProject Video Games has done a great job over the past year. May it continue to do even better in the years to come. May the Force be with the gamers!

Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 01:20, July 8, 2012 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+