Archives: 1 | 2

Clean talk page, Mk. IIEdit

Hello Edit

Yes Im Just asking for the commander Gree page Please add his apperence in Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Jedi Alliance.Sith my ride's Return 01:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Hey, I've completely written IG-88A's BTS. Let me know if it still needs tweaking. Chack Jadson (Talk) 13:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Millennial's BtS Edit

Hey, I reworked/expanded Millennial's BtS like you suggested. I left a note on his FAN but that's now been archived, so chances are you won't notice it. If you have any other concerns about or suggestions for the BtS, please let me know. :) -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 20:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Argyus Edit

Hey, Hydro. Toprawa has told me that you told him there's a lot of information on Argyus that's currently not in the article. Where is it from, and would you happen to have access to it? Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 21:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

  • It's in the new The Clone Wars Campaign Guide. I don't have it, though. - Lord Hydronium 03:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


Hey!Chack told me that you might have Star Wars: The Clone Wars: The Visual Guide. If so, could you check if Denal is there and what rank does he have. Thanks, QuiGonJinnBe mindful of the Living Force...Quigonheadshot 15:53, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Inqmoot 23 Edit

The twenty-third Inq meeting has been scheduled for Saturday, February 21st at 7pm Eastern time. Your presence or input on the meeting page would be appreciated. Graestan(Talk) 16:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Cassus Fett Edit

Sorry if I did something wrong. I just though that since he is a FA we should list everything we know about him. Mauser 04:49, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

  • everything?

WEG species lifespans Edit

In case you want to add them to your WOTC-inspired list, here's what Alien Encounters says:

  • Carosites have a 120-year life expectancy.
  • Coynites can live to be 250, but the high rate of violent deaths in their culture lowers life expectancy to 53.
  • Drall life expectancy is 120 years, "similar to that of Humans"
  • Ergesh life expectancy is 200 -- and they reach maturity in 20 local days!
  • Falleen have an average lifespan of 250 years, with some reaching 400.
  • Frozians live to be 80 under standard gravitational conditions, or 100 in light gravity.
  • Gacerites live to be 150, which is good because their courtship rituals last at least 10 years.
  • The oldest living Galidyn is 4000.
  • Kadri'Ra have a natural lifespan of 1000-1500 years, although since they've been enslaved by the Empire, that's been cut to 70-500 years. Which is strange, because in the timeframe most WEG books are set the Empire's been around for less than 40.
  • Kalduu live to be 500 on average.
  • Kamarian average lifespan is 123, 127 for Kamarian Badlanders.
  • Bornecks: 120 years.
  • Xa Fel: 120 years, dropping to less than 50 due to the pollution on their homeworld.
  • Rakaan: 160 years.
  • Shards: thousands of years.
  • Tasari: 120 years.
  • Tikiarri have a natural lifespan of 30 years, though hunting accidents, combat, and death in childbirth reduces that to about 20 years.
  • Vaathkree: 300 to 250 years.
  • Xan: roughly 80 years.

Hope this is useful. —Silly Dan (talk) 02:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

CotOR Edit

Hey Hydro. I was wondering if you would be able to answer a question for me. I have been asking around and it seems no one is quite sure how to treat the continuity errors that are found in Chronicles of the Old Republic, and it was suggested that I should ask you. Should the errors just be relegated to the Bts? For instance, Revan is named as a Jedi Master in CotOR, but the CG states that he was a Jedi Knight. Does the CG override any information found in CotOR? I would really appreciate any help that you could give me with this. Thanks. Cylka-talk- 02:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Categorization Edit

No problem. Thanks for pointing that out. --ToRsO bOy 22:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Vector Prime BtS info Edit

Hi Lord Hydronium,

I noticed a while back that you were working on Vector Prime on a subpage. You hand a bunch of info on R.A. Salvatore's decision to kill of Chewbacca which I think would be really useful for the Yo'Gand's Core BtS section, which I'm currently working on. I can't find your subpage anymore though, so I was wondering if you still had it avaiable. If you want, just dump everything you did on my workbench, below the Viqi Shesh section, and I'll sort through it.

Thanks so much!

- Harrar 20:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

-- Belated thanks for the stuff some really interesting links you found, especially the three page one. I'll add stuff to the BtS when I next have time. -- Harrar 10:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


Ah, thanks for the notice. I actually do have the book, and am checking it now for said information. Chack Jadson (Talk) 16:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Imperial KnightsEdit

Hey Hydro. No worries about the belatedness. :^Þ I'm not sure why I came up with a new username for Wookieepedia, when I stayed consistent with my (lack of a) username from TOS forums to the JC Forums back in 2006. But yeah, I finally got around to trimming down the IK article, but I think I need to get my hands on the Legacy Era Campaign Guide before I attempt to bring it to featured status again. I was wondering if I could get your advice... do you think that the history sections are still too long? They're a LOT shorter than the overkill I previously had, and I took your advice and looked at similar FA's like the Dark Side Elite --- that article goes into some detail about the missions and stuff that they went on, so I figured it was OK to do the same for the IK's, but I still have a sneaking suspicion that there's a bit too much in there...

There's still more work to do, like adding Mohrgan Fel to the notable members, putting in a bit about Fight Another Day, adding Sigel Dare to the action figure list, but hey, I look forward to it. :^) Menkooroo 02:03, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Jedi biased articles Edit

Look i did give examples about the Jensaarai, but ok I well drop out of hand any way--Bull36 02:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

I think my block was unjustified Edit

I think that blocking me ( was not justified.

For the record, I was not "trying to get the last word in", I honestly didn't believe that Bull36 would heed your warning, and I feared that he would try to push his anti-Jedi bias into articles, so I was trying to call attention to the fact that his opinions were clearly biased and not neutral, and that he was being biased even as he himself was accusing Wookieepedia of being biased. I'm sorry if you interpeted it as me trying to start trouble, but I was just trying (perhaps not very clearly) to express my legitimate concerns that this person might not drop the issue, and that he might try to add his biased opinions to articles. Maybe I should have worded it differently, or maybe I should have just shut up, but I was worried that he'd ignore your warning and start adding his "jedi are bad people" opinions to articles, so I was just trying to call it to attention.

I just wanted to explain myself, since you never even gave me a warning, never gave me a chance to explain myself, and simply blocked me for trying to express my concerns. I'm not asking to be unblocked, and if you want to block this IP too, fine, I won't be around for a while anyway. I'll accept my punishment. 06:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

no sense in blocken him man--Bull36 04:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Aitch Edit

Please look at the article Aitch it is more up to date then the H449-B7.And someone thinks Aitch needs to be deleted it took me a while to find the info to put it together please check it out..--Bull36 05:19, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

New Policy Edit

Hey Lord Hydronium, I was just wanting to check with the administration to see if the new canon policy is for real or just an april fool's joke, because if it's a joke (which I'm guessing it is), then I'm laughing along with you, and if not, then I'm pretty upset. :( — Jonjedigrandmaster Jedi symbol (Jedi beacon) 00:33, 1 April 2009 (UO

O is it a joke?--Bull36 01:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

  • Hey Lord Hydronium, I would like to know asap about the whole new policy thing, because if it isn't just a prank, then i'm going to be leaving the site here, and i can guarantee that other users will too. But anyway, if you could just get back to me on this I would appreciate it. Thanks. — Jonjedigrandmaster Jedi symbol (Jedi beacon) 12:18, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Fanon Edit

The TPM script calls Rushing Panaka's sergeant. Besides, his EU name is non-canon now I'd presume? Hanzo Hasashi 01:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

  • Hmmm so this isn't the biggest April Fool's joke then? :PHanzo Hasashi 01:38, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Gree Edit

Sorry about removing the inuse and update templates on Gree; I didn't realize that you weren't finished. My apologies for any work that may have been lost. —CC7567 20px-Rex.png talk 18:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorry! Edit

I don't know how to apologize for my actions on the EU talk page. I was really frustrated that day (don't ask why, it's kinda personal) and I guess I brought that over to the site. Also, the way Bull was acting towards GL got me really mad. I know this doesn't justify my actions, and I promise to you that I will never act this way again towards another user. Kilson 02:13, 08 April 09 (UTC)

Eclipse-class and Starships of the GalaxyEdit

Given that the Saga Editon of SOTG says the Eclipse-class and Executor-class were only called Super Star Destroyers, but were designated star dreadnaughts, why was the article name changed back? Super Star Destroyer is not a class designation, unlike star dreadnaught. 00:53, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

  • Because the canonical name, per page 139 of that very same work, is Eclipse-class Super Star Destroyer. "Star dreadnaught" (note the lowercase), is the type of vessel it is, but not the class name. - Lord Hydronium 00:59, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
    • Ah, but on page 97, under the "Star Destroyer designation" paragraph, it is only used as a "generic descriptor", not an "official designation" for the above classes. This is also touched upon in the "Super Star Destroyer" explanation section on page 136, where the word is based on the term Star Destroyer. This is also a recurring theme in other WOTC works, where the popularity of "Star Destroyer" during the Clone Wars, makes it a catch phrase, even for larger vessels. The article Starship Battles Preview 1 also notes that "Although the official designation was changed by the time the Executor was operational, the phrase "Super Star Destroyer" stuck, and it was even applied to later vessels such as the Sovereign-class and Eclipse-class." It is further called slang in both Inside the Worlds of the Star Wars Trilogy and Star Wars: Complete Locations (in the latter on page 171). Finally, the official site, on the SSD article, makes the destinction "Its difficult-to-comprehend size and destructive power led many to borrow superlatives popularized during the Clone Wars, and simply call it a Super-class Star Destroyer, though this was by no means an official label." So it is not a designator term, just a generic one. 01:19, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
      • Let me cover each of your references in turn:
        • SOTG, page 97 is about the "Star Destroyer" designation, not the "Super Star Destroyer" one. "Eclipse-class Star Destroyer" is the unofficial name, not "Eclipse-class Super Star Destroyer".
        • SOTG, page 163 just gives the origin of the word "Star Destroyer". It also says that "star dreadnaught" is simply a type of ship. In that same paragraph, it says that ships called "Star Destroyer" are star cruisers, but we don't put an article at Imperial-class Star Cruiser, because the class name itself is "Star Destroyer".
        • Starship Battles Preview 1 doesn't say anything about "Super Star Destroyer" not being official for them, it just says it was applied to the Eclipse and Sovereign classes. Which we see in the class names.
        • And the part of the SSD Databank entry you quoted is about the Executor. It says "Super-class Star Destroyer" isn't official, which has nothing to do with the Eclipse.
      • In all of these, the name Eclipse-class Super Star Destroyer is the only one we have. "Eclipse-class Star Dreadnaught" is a fanon name. That's why it was moved. - Lord Hydronium 01:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
        • I would think they go with the modern interpretation of both Star Destroyer and Super Star Destroyer being used for large ships as generic descriptors only and not actual designations. The designations as described in ITW:OT and SW:CL are Star Cruiser, Star Battlecruiser and Star Dreadnought, not Super Star Destroyer, which is only used as slang and referred to as such in the text on page 171 of SW:CL (I don't have the ITW book). There is nothing in the other sources to contradict this, and the texts make clear the separation between class names and SSD, the latter of which is a nickname for military personnel to use. That a military slang term pops up again isn't surprising, and there's also the Super-class Star Destroyer term it comes from, which is used to describe the Sovereign and the Eclipse in at least one source (the Gravity well projector article on the official site's database). If the name follows from class and designation, then Super Star Destroyer doesn't cut it as the latter, and it's even said as much in the official articles. The Executor wasn't designated it, yet the term just stuck around and was used in slang for other large types as well. 02:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Insta-kill pistol Edit

its a cheat in the KOTOR game its not canon.--Bull36 01:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: The new Triage system Edit

Looks good, Hydro. Thanks for the effort on it. Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 03:21, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Triage system idea Edit

Hey Hydro - just going through the noms on the Triage page and was wondering if a link to the actual nom itself somewhere on the table would be useful? - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 07:34, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

AJ 4 article for Storm Commandos Edit

Source:  Star Wars Adventure Journal 4Attribution:  Paul Sudlow
Galaxywide News Nets


Elite Commando Unit Formed at Emperor's Command

Imperial City, Coruscant

In the months following Rebel uprisings on Gerrard V and Ralltiir, and more significantly, in the aftermath of the Battle of Yavin, it had become increasingly clear to military analysts that the traditional organization of the Imperial Army is ill-suited to responding to the hit-and-fade tactics favored by Rebel guerilla units.

Four months ago the Emperor, in a classified executive order, commanded that a new unit of elite troopers be formed to respond in kind. The existence of the new unit has now been declassified, and IDD has been granted the privilege of providing the first coverage of the Imperial Storm Commandos, as the new unit is to be known.

The Storm Commandos will be made up of line units, as well as tech, saboteur, and assault specialists. Typical Storm Commando mission are expected to be covert operations, to include the extraction of captured Imperials and Rebel criminals, infiltration of Rebel bases, and siege-breaking. The unit will be armed with blaster carbines and blaster pistols. A new design of battle armor is rumored to be under development, but no details are currently available.

The first class of Storm Commandos is currently undergoing advanced training on Carida. Colonel Crix Madine, who was placed in command of the unit by Grand Moff Tanniel (both Raithal Academy graduates), is expected to lead his men into the field sometime in the next few weeks.

Imperial Defense Daily

This work is copyrighted. The individual who uploaded this work asserts that this qualifies as fair use of the material under United States copyright law.

Hope this is what you're looking for. - Cavalier OneFarStar(Squadron channel) 16:41, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Lone battle droid Edit

Just wanted to say thanks for fixing the objections on lone battle droid and for uploading the images. :-) -- AdmirableAckbar (Talk) 18:39, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Talkin' 'bout the CSWE. Edit

Source:  The Complete Star Wars EncyclopediaAttribution:  Could be anyone.

Emperor's Citadel, The

A great black tower surrounded by high walls, it served as the reborn clone Emperor's fortified palace on the planet Byss. Contained within the Citadel were the Emperor's throne room, a vast cloning complex, dark side alchemical laboratories, libraries of dark side tomes, and other facilities that were all part of the Emperor's sinister plans. Within, the Emperor performed the grisly experiments on all forms of life, including sentient beings, in order to expand his knowledge of the dark side; it was in the Citadel that the Emperor crafted his Imperial Sovereign Protectors and the Chrysalide rancors. In the bowels of the fortress were a number of chambers where the Emperor trained his Dark Side Adepts and a select few Inquisitors and he delved deep into the secrets of Jedi and Sith holocrons (yes, that's seriously how it's worded - 4dot). The Citadel was destroyed when Byss was blasted apart by the Galaxy Gun.

Emperor's skyhook

This orbiting structure, tethered to the ground, hung above the capitol on Imperial Center. It had a wide terrace overlooking a large central park that contained full-sized evergreen and deciduous trees, some of which topped 30 meters.

This work is copyrighted. The individual who uploaded this work asserts that this qualifies as fair use of the material under United States copyright law.

Did something Edit

Just wondering about whatever is happening on the Outcast(novel) talk page.--Darth Niffoc 21:00, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Never mind....I guess..that was weird..--Darth Niffoc 01:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Inq Meeting XXV Edit

An Inquisitorius meeting has been scheduled for 23:00 UTC on the 24th of May. Your presence is requested. Apologies for the late notice. Thefourdotelipsis 00:06, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


The new INQCON system is now in effect. For details on this new tool, please review the linked page. It is requested that you check any current featured article nominations that you have fully read and are currently objecting to, and change the respective INQCON number on the nomination if you are intending to ultimately support the article once your objections have been resolved. Also, please remember to change the Triage page when altering INQCON numbers. Any queries about the process can be made on the afore-linked INQCON page. Thanks, Thefourdotelipsis 00:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


A new Triage meeting has been scheduled for next Sunday, June 14, at 23:00 UTC. We hope you will be able to attend, as there are a fair amount of nominations that need sorting. Chack Jadson (Talk) 13:59, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Mirta GevEdit

Hey, I know it's not my nom, but just letting you know that your objections to Mirta Gev seem to have been addressed. Just trying to get some articles cleared off the page. :P Chack Jadson (Talk) 12:06, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Yeah, I know. I've got a number of tweaks that yet need to be made to the article—some of which are not-fully-satisfied objections there—and I've been talking them over with Floyd in IRC. - Lord Hydronium 04:52, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Inq meetingEdit

Hello. An Inq meeting is scheduled for Saturday, June 20, at 2300 UTC. Please try to attend, because we will be talking about the current state of the FAN page, what with all the summer noms. Apologies for the late notice. Chack Jadson (Talk) 00:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Prima guideEdit

Hey, Hydro, I have it on good authority that you might have the KoTOR Prima Guide. Seeing as you've FA'd Harbinger, I'd presume you have the second one; perhaps you have the first, or at least know someone who does? If it's not too much trouble, could you please (presuming you have it) tell me how/if the Endar Spire is featured in it, (either by e-mail, IRC or just a general message) or, if you don't have it, anyone who may? Cheers, Hydro. --Darth tom Imperial Emblem (Imperial Intelligence) 17:49, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

  • I don't have it, sorry. The only one I can think of who may have it is Jaymach, who has one of everything, but I don't know how available he is for getting that info for you. - Lord Hydronium 01:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Alright, thanks all the same. --Darth tom Imperial Emblem (Imperial Intelligence) 20:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Legacy's Nexu Edit

Greetings, Lord Hydronium.

On January 16th, 2007, you added Star Wars: Legacy 0 to the list of sources of Nexu, but now I cannot find any reference to the Nexu in my copy of Legacy 0. I understand it's been two years, but I was wondering if you could pinpoint the mention you were talking about. Thank you very much for your time, --Skippy Farlstendoiro 15:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

  • It's on the "Coruscant" page, in the section about the Rings of Coruscant. - Lord Hydronium 21:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Coruscant and the Core Worlds orphans Edit

I've been working through the list of orphaned pages and I find that a lot of them are from Coruscant and the Core Worlds such as Farfalla skyscraper. Seeing as you are working on the article (or at least, you have the {{Wip}} template on it) I thought you might want to check the list out to help. NayayenOld Republic military symbol(talk) 17:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


A new Triage meeting has been scheduled for Sunday, July 19, at 0:00 UTC. Please try to attend. Thank you. Chack Jadson (Talk) 15:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Inq meetingEdit

Greetings. An Inq meeting has been scheduled for Saturday, August 1 at 23:00 UTC. Please see here for details. Hope to see you there. Chack Jadson (Talk) 12:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Inq meeting 28Edit

Hello. Inq meeting 28 has been scheduled. It will be held Sunday, September 6th at 0:00 UTC. Cheers. Chack Jadson (Talk) 15:26, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

New Sith WarsEdit

  • Hey Hydro, I'm currently trying to get the New Sith Wars article up to scratch. I haven't yet get the Essential Atlas, so do you might adding what might be of interest in there? QuentinGeorge 22:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

CC-1004 Edit

Hey, Hydro. I noticed that you have ref notes in CC-1004's intro. Is this necessary? JangFett (Talk) 22:28, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

Sun Guard Edit

Hello, I have written a part of the Sun Guards Organization and Philosophy part. If you would like it, I'd be glad to give it to you. --Aeaolen Kicka™ 14:15, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

Spar Edit

Hey there, Lord Hydronium. I don't know if you're aware, but some parts of Spar's early history were retconed. The whole "memories from Jango's life" stuff was changed because whoever came up with that didn't do the research (cloning doesn't work that way) and now it's been established that he was faking all that along with backaches so that he could spend time with Cuy'val Dar medic Mij Gilamar whom he became friends with. And when he escaped from Kamino, Gilamar cashed in a favor Jango owed him and had Spar stashed in Slave I's cargo hold. It's all in Republic Commando: Order 66. Sorry for any inconvenience, I really wish I'd have spotted it before you did all that work. Everything else looks right on, though.--Bella'Mia 10:21, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

  • I've seen the part you're talking about, but it doesn't say Spar wasn't receiving Jango's memories, simply that he was pretending to hear voices. The other material remains canon, though; Galaxy at War, which is more recent than Order 66, also repeats it. - Lord Hydronium 22:17, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
    • It doesn't explicitly say that, but it seems that was what the author was trying to convey since a clone wouldn't have memories of the original host, it would be a completely separate organism that just so happens to look the same because of shared DNA. It can probably stay, but worded so that it was left to the individual reader to make up their own mind whether they believe that Spar was telling the truth or making the whole thing up. And there's still the part about Jango smuggling him off Kamino in Slave I's cargo hold that needs to be changed. I do like the way you've reconciled his exploits as Mandalore with the newer material. Nicely done.--Bella'Mia 23:41, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

Storm Commandos In X Wing: Rogue Squadron Edit

I don't recall them appearing in this book and what page are they on?--Loneshark1138 (chit chat with sharky) 15:44, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

(chit chat with sharky) 18:13, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

Grapple droid (Antamont) Edit

Hi. I've noticed that you uploaded this image. So, are you able to upload any more from that comic? Because, the article Grapple droid (Antamont) could use an infobox image.--Kreivi Wolter 20:21, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Iskalloni Edit

Those obscure cyborgs appear in KOTOR 48? Cool. Could you update the article's History section with this new info? Thanks, —Silly Dan (talk) 00:16, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Darth Plagueis Edit


I've talked to the user Mauser about an information he erased from the page Darth Plagueis and he said that I should ask you about it. In the book The Art and Making of Star Wars: The Force Unleashed there is a page where many potential faces for Darth Plagueis are shown. One of them is the face of a famous actor: Michael Gambon - you can see his image and name in this figure. I think it's a very interesting information about the character and one that can be really important later. And I would like to know if I can write this information again. --Arth sidious 21:40, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

  • I think it's fine to be added. Go ahead. - Lord Hydronium 00:06, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

Unidentified Senate Commando (Power Control Room) Edit

Sorry to bother you, but many changes were made to this article in a short amount of time by an unregistered user. I have attempted to undo these but have somewhere lost the image to this article. Could you please assist in cleaning this up. --ChancellorValorum 01:11, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

Not sure if you'll have room for this or not. Edit

BobaTheKidSinisterSamurai 05:37, January 13, 2010 (UTC)

The Fetts Edit

Hey Hydro, I was digging through my copies of Star Wars Insider, and one of them says that both Cassus Fett is an ancestor of Jango. Since you brought Cassus to featured status, I thought it best to tell you. Tomorrow I'll give you the number of the Star Wars Insider that said this, and what it says.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 19:38, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

  • Hydro, it was Star Wars Insider 97 that establishes that Cassus is a ancestor of Jango and Boba. I'll give you the exact quote tomorrow.--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 00:23, January 20, 2010 (UTC)
    • Here it is: "Knights of Suffering" also introduces Cassus Fett, a character who originated in video games but was referenced only in passing until now. In addition to this appearance by Jango and Boba's ancestor, a great deal will be revealed about the nature of the Mandalorians under Cassus Fett's command." Jedi Kasra (comlink) 00:21, January 21, 2010 (UTC)
      • Thanks for the info. I'll be sure to add it. - Lord Hydronium 00:43, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Spar Edit

Please take note that there are outstanding objections to the Spar FAN that have gone unaddressed for over two weeks now. If they go another week without any sort of activity (or even clarification from you that you intend to fix them), the nomination will be removed under the Inq inactivity policy. CC7567 (talk) 04:20, February 25, 2010 (UTC)

Question for you because you is an admin Edit

Hey Hydro,

I stumbled across a workbench for Garm Bel Iblis that's a subpage for an inactive user and hasn't been updated for over a year --- I know it's not cool to transfer the content of another user's workbench to the actual article, but since AdmirableAckbar hasn't been around for quite some time, do you think it would be OK if I did so?

I'd ask his permission on the JC forums, but he hasn't been around. for a while there, either.

I would just hate to see such a bevy of information go to waste when Garm's current article is so slim. I'd do a copy-edit, too.

Let me know! Thanks. Menkooroo 16:01, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

  • I think it would be fine. On a legal level, it's all free under GFDL from the moment he writes it; on a moral level, just note it's his work in the edit summary to give him credit. You might want to check it over to see that it is in a state capable of being transferred, and doesn't have major incomplete paragraphs or anything. - Lord Hydronium 03:11, March 25, 2010 (UTC)
    • Cool, thanks. Yeah, I'm def. gonna give it a read-through and probably tweak. Info from TFU, the Jedi Academy trilogy and The New Rebellion that's currently in the real article will have to be stuck in the middle, too. And for sure I'll give him credit. Thanks for the advice. Menkooroo 03:41, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Also, here's a heads-up on a new Fett image I uploaded, drawn from this article. (which might be useful to mine for bts). Menkooroo 07:53, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Need help moving articleEdit

Could you move Grievous's Recusant-class light destroyer to Grievous' destroyer? It's called that on the Official Site, the site doesn't list the Recusant as appearing in the CW series and the user that moved it, put no source down for the class name. Thanks! Justicius 08:05, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Main Page Edit

Slight problem with the main page. Under the "Did you know" section, the word "Scooter" redirects to Scooter, rather than Scooter (space dog). Just trying to help good sir =]. Dr. Kermit(Complain.) 00:29, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

  • Now that we have a Scooter article, I've changed that. Thanks for the heads up. - Lord Hydronium 00:30, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Oya! Edit

Haha, nice user page. Assuming you're being satirical and some obsessive Fando isn't screwing with you're stuff, that's hilarious! :D --Bella'Mia 03:40, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:So that's how it is Edit

Heh, I knew you'd like that. I had to do another one, since the Aggressor doesn't count and I wanted to keep the competition going. :p Grand Moff Tranner Imperial Department of Military Research (Comlink) 20:31, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Reversion Edit

I ask you why you reverted my edit to the Annihilator. It is my understanding that all Executor-class Star Dreadnoughts are initially created based of of the original Executor. If that is the case, than why can't it be stated that way in an article?--RC 1138Republic EmblemDelta Squad! Move out! 01:12, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

  • In Star Wars: Empire at War: Forces of Corruption, the Annihilator and Executor share the same model, which means dimensions, and armaments. Yes, I do know that Empire at War is notorious for being off scale but that means that the Annihilator has the same stats as the Executor or a standard Executor-class Star dreadnought.--RC 1138Republic EmblemDelta Squad! Move out! 02:08, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
    • Because we can never assume what modifications any given ship may or may not have, we don't include stats for an individual ship unless they're specifically given for it. The fact that they share the same model just means they look the same; it doesn't mean they have the same guns, reactor, engines, troop complement, etc. In the Executor-class's case, there are also sources that specifically state each one is a little different. - Lord Hydronium 02:15, April 4, 2010 (UTC)
      • Yes but they are only a little bit different. They all are the same size and have the same engines (or so it appears with the Annihilator) so that means that I can include physical dimensions of the ship. I do see your point though. Thank you for explaining.--RC 1138Republic EmblemDelta Squad! Move out! 02:27, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Reaper (Executor-class) Edit

"So—are you still worried about being sent to the Agricultural Corps?"
Reaper (Executor-class) has been approved by the AgriCorps and awarded Good status. Feel free to add the {{User GA}} template to your userpage to acknowledge your hard work. The AgriCorps thanks you for your efforts, and looks forward to future nominations from you! — CC7567 (talk) 06:22, April 6, 2010 (UTC)


Hey, you told me to remind you to type up that paragraph from "The Greel Wood Haven". It's the last source I need to check before I can nom Sriluur. --Imperialles 23:07, April 26, 2010 (UTC)

Help please! Edit

Could you tell me how to put "user boxes" on my home page?

Thanks ````Master Liz````

Help please! Edit

Could you tell me how to put "user boxes" on my home page?

Thanks ````Master Liz````

Sorry! Edit

Sorry for the repeat!

--Master Liz 18:36, June 23, 2010 (UTC)Master Liz

I lied! Edit

I found a comment on VP's continuity made by Sue while searching for stuff on Dark Tide: Siege. Not really any new info, but... in case you want to source things twice? ^^ Scroll down a few posts for it. Menkooroo 08:14, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Your comment in the nom for Kihotay Edit

So you're saying that I can say in my nom for Shon Kon Ray that his name is a tuckerization of Sean Connery?--Jedi Kasra (comlink) 01:26, July 16, 2010 (UTC)

  • Well, now that Menkooroo's pointed it out in the nom, it's probably best not to say anything as definite as "It is a reference to Sean Connery". But I think mentioning that it's a phonetic rendition of his name falls within the bounds of the "What isn't original research" clause. - Lord Hydronium 01:45, July 16, 2010 (UTC)

Gree Edit

If you happen to be too busy to fix the Inq's concerns with CC-1004 (or if you didn't get the info on him from the Star Wars: The Clone Wars Character Encyclopedia and still need it), I'd be happy to do either for you. Let me know. Thanks. CC7567 (talk) 04:44, July 18, 2010 (UTC)


Darth Bane has recently come up against Kratos on the Deadlisetst warrior wiki. He is being killed in the polls, but discussions count too. I have made my case. A wookieepedian such as yourself would contribute greatly to the argue ment. Please help Darth Bane kill Kratos.User:Revanthereformer1138

Signing Edit

Please sign 'all' your votes

Thanks! --Master Liz 21:08, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Darth Bane Edit

I love Darth Bane hes like my master I follow his teachings.>>

Galle Edit

Just wanted to give you a head's up that I changed the infobox image for Galle to one with him facing forward. - JMAS Jolly Trooper Hey, it's me! 17:57, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

Forum Link Edit

Hey Hydro,

I was wondering if you could help me out. I haven't quite figured out how to link directly to a post in the JC forums --- I have a link in a current FAN of mine; is there any chance that you could teach me to fish rather than giving me one? Thanks. Menkooroo 16:12, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Favor Edit

Ola Hydro. I'm wondering if you can proofread something for me. It's a CT that I want to propose, but I want to ensure that it's as clear and comprehensive as it can possibly be. I've written up a first draft and still have some minor tweaking to do, but the basic framework is there. If you have time, can you give this a read and provide feedback? Thank you! Menkooroo 02:37, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Email Edit

Hey Hydro. You don't seem to have an email set in your preferences, but I've sent you an email to the one you used on the admin list, and just want to confirm that you received it :). Cheers, Grunny (talk) 09:56, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

  • I got it. Thanks for the notice. - Lord Hydronium 11:11, December 23, 2010 (UTC)

WP:NSW check-in Edit

A look to the future…
Hello Lord Hydronium, happy new year! This is a friendly check-in from your new project head of WookieeProject New Sith Wars. Our activity has been lagging a bit of late, with only one new Featured article and one new Good article in the last three months, and no Comprehensive articles at all since their creation back in June. If you're still interested in participating in the project, I'd like to encourage you to pick an article or two to write and mark it down on our current projects listing when you have the chance. Also, if you have any questions/suggestions regarding WP:NSW, don't hesitate to ask/let me know. Let's see if we can't get this project up and running! Cheers! Your project head, Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 07:00, January 4, 2011 (UTC)

The Nebula Edit

I seen that back in January, you helped with Rose Nebula. I was going to write an article for The Nebula from Star Wars: The Old Republic: Deceived.But if its the same place I'll just edit Rose Nebula. If you could let me know if its the same place or not I'd appreciate it. Cal Jedi (Personal Comm Channel) 00:36, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

  • The Nebula in Deceived is a hotel, so probably a different place. - Lord Hydronium 00:40, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Solo Children Image in Workbench 2 Edit

Oops, I was working on fixing articles related to the image of the First Battle of Dubrillion (Yuuzhan Vong War) when I edited your thumbnail on your workbench 2 page. My apologies for not paying attention, I don't usually make a mistake like that. I had to split the image to give the Dubrillion Battle article a better format with the images placed relevant to the info and to remove information that was out of date (type of ships being used). As a result, the Wookieepedia distorted the image on related pages for some reason. GethralkinHyperwave 17:56, October 24, 2011 (UTC)

Midi-chlorians Edit

Hey Lord Hydronium, I know that you guys here at wookieepedia try to avoid making lists, but I would like to make a list of all the midi-chlorian counts mentioned in Star Wars canon, based on a brand new count revealed in Darth Plaugeis. Would that list be deleted? Also if so, how would I be able to get that new count into the wookieepedia? Thanks? 20:49, December 19, 2011 (UTC)

  • If you have a canonical count, you can just add a sentence about it into the article with the appropriate source. There's not really enough in canon to make a list, even if lists weren't frowned upon in general, but the first paragraph of "Biology" has the existing counts. Any other canon ones could fit in there. - Lord Hydronium 02:14, December 21, 2011 (UTC)
  • Thanks, I took your advise but one of the admins, Grand Moff Tranner deleted it. Im going to go ahead and re-edit it. Can I trust you to help me make sure it remains, please? Thankyou. Happy Holidays? 03:44, December 21, 2011 (UTC)

Sony Cite update request. Edit


I'm trying to update the links so they lead directly to the archived source, because the current links lead to this. However, despite my best efforts, it's not working. Since you created the template, can you fix the template so the links can actually lead to the content and not a game list? Weedle McHairybug (talk) 12:30, August 3, 2012 (UTC)

Removal of administrative powersEdit

As you have made no edits since June 14 and made no use of sysop rights since February 12, I have removed your administrative powers under the six-month activity requirement. This was a bit of an odd case, since you have maintained a presence in the IRC but have simply been absent from the wiki itself. Therefore, this was only done with the support of a majority of the remaining administrators, counting myself. I'm sorry to have to do this, and you'd certainly be welcome to run for adminship again if you ever return to your former level of activity. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 02:08, December 18, 2012 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+