FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Premium-ComprehensiveArticle

This page is for the nomination of "Comprehensive articles." For a list of "Comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive articles.


What is a "Comprehensive article?"

A "Comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "Comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "Comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "Comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …provide an introduction if it reaches 165 words, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section. Conversely, an article may not have an introduction if it is less than 165 words, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of Comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive Comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of one week.

Note: All Reduxed articles require only three support votes to maintain their Comprehensive status, all of which must come from EduCorps members. Reduxed articles will be subject to removal if objections are not addressed after a period of ten days, pending the support of at least three EduCorps members.

Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Pioku system

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:26, September 11, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:23, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  3. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:48, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  4. spookywillowwtalk 12:12, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
  5. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 06:27, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead
  • I think you can mention that the conflict must have taken place prior to 0 BBY since that's when Tagge dies. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:13, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
    • Added both no-earlier-than and no-later-than dates. Imperators II(Talk) 19:02, September 13, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Droid laser turret

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:56, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Chronologically, the first kills in the series goes to this thing.

(3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 14:39, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 16:05, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Zed42 (talk) 08:52, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  4. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:43, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  5. --Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:43, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  6. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 07:32, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Object

AV
  • I know the Journeys games are difficult to access these days (the Radiant VII's destruction isn't featured, though I'm unsure if it's mentioned in the profiles section), but have you checked the PT Graphic Novel for an appearance of the droid laser turret? I know the Radiant VII appears in that. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 23:35, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
    • I think you can actually see most of the Journeys stuff on Youtube. The graphic novel skips the ship's destruction. Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:42, September 12, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Do we need to add this droid to Trade Federation Droid Army?--Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:50, September 12, 2019 (UTC)

  • Since it's a stationary part of a starship I didn't treat it as such. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:09, September 12, 2019 (UTC)


Gungan whistle

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:37, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I wasted a lot of time looking for this in the Gungan parade before spotting it in the battle

(3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. --Lewisr (talk) 16:41, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:15, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 22:46, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
  4. Zed42 (talk) 08:52, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  5. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:45, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  6. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 07:33, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • I feel like I'm nitpicking here, but is it clear in the movie that the whistle is to signal the retreat? Fan26 (Talk) 16:57, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
    • I mean he sees the shield generator explode, blows the whistle and as soon as he blows it everyone turns and begins to retreat. I'd say it's pretty unambiguous that's what's happening. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:08, September 12, 2019 (UTC)
      • Fair enough. Fan26 (Talk) 22:46, September 12, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Shirb system

  • Nominated by: OtterSurf (talk) 08:33, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(2 ECs/0 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:11, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 12:53, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Zed
  • The grid coordinates should be mentioned in the BTS since that's currently infobox-exclusive.
  • This article formerly stated that the system was located on the Celanon Spur, as do the New Holgha and Celanon Spur articles. Is there a reason why it was removed?
    • I checked TEA, and it only lists Ciutric as being on the Spur. OtterSurf (talk) 09:00, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • Is there a date for the invasion?
    • Added. OtterSurf (talk) 09:00, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
    • Done better. OtterSurf (talk) 09:14, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
      • The evidence in the reference note could still technically mean that the invasion happened in 26 ABY, if the start of the Yuuzhan Vong invasion occurred near the end of the year. Zed42 (talk) 09:28, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
        • The way I read it from the Chronology, the invasion began more or less at the start of 25 ABY. OtterSurf (talk) 11:00, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • The BTS should also include the publication dates of the sources mentioned. Zed42 (talk) 08:50, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • You can use the {{ID}} template rather than {{C}} in the Sources section. Zed42 (talk) 09:28, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
Imp
  • The Essential Atlas places the Shirb system in grid square N-5 and designates that entire square as part of the New Territories. This must be reflected in the infobox and the body. Imperators II(Talk) 12:41, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
    • Done. OtterSurf (talk) 13:46, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
      • Right now, you're referencing "that contained the world of New Holgha" to the Online Companion. That doesn't work. Imperators II(Talk) 16:21, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • Please upload an image for the infobox and create an image category for it. The Yuuzhan Vong War maps of the Atlas depict the system, and I'd go with one of the maps depicting the latter phases of the conflict given they show the system's environs more clearly. Imperators II(Talk) 12:41, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • Also, those maps clearly place the system on the Celanon Spur. Imperators II(Talk) 12:41, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • There's ample precedent on our site, when describing a star system, to mention any known arrivals/departures in/from that system. For example, if Boba Fett: A Practical Man mentions Boba Fett was on New Holgha, you should mention that Fett traveled to New Holgha. Imperators II(Talk) 12:41, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • The Atlas listing the Shirb system as "New Holgha" in the Appendix is not "incorrect". It is named like that for convenience, and that's not meant to replace the system's canonical name. See here. Therefore, that bit should be removed from the BTS. Imperators II(Talk) 12:41, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • The mention of the Online Companion in the BTS adds no new information and should be removed. Imperators II(Talk) 12:41, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • Context for Boba Fett. Imperators II(Talk) 16:21, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
    • Done. OtterSurf (talk) 17:00, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
      • I'd prefer something clearer to the casual reader who might not be well-versed in Mando'a, i.e., leader of the Mandalorian Protectors or something to that effect. Imperators II(Talk) 17:05, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
        • Clarified. OtterSurf (talk) 17:41, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
          • You can pipelink to Manda'lor there. Imperators II(Talk) 17:47, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
          • You've added a redirecting link there. I suggest you go to your Preferences and enable highlighting all redirects. That will allow you to see when you're adding redirects in the future. Imperators II(Talk) 17:47, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • Please see item No. 5 here regarding the first sentence of the article. Imperators II(Talk) 16:21, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • The Atlas Yuuzhan Vong War maps contain information that should be reflected: 1) in the Affiliation field of the article's infobox, and 2) as an affiliation category for the article. Imperators II(Talk) 16:21, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
    • Added. OtterSurf (talk) 17:07, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
      • Regarding categorization, the same goes for Yuuzhan Vong. Imperators II(Talk) 17:11, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
        • There's no such category. OtterSurf (talk) 17:35, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
          • That means you should create it. Imperators II(Talk) 17:38, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
            • Created! OtterSurf (talk) 17:45, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
              • Good, now go back to that category you've created and 1) add an appropriate category to that category, and 2) add more (at least one more) pages to that category. Imperators II(Talk) 17:49, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
                • Done and done. Think I've found a new addiction. OtterSurf (talk) 17:57, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • The table of contents should only be utilized when there are sections in the in-universe sections of the article. Since this article only has out-of-universe (BTS and further) sections, you should hide the TOC by specifying {{Eras|type=legends|notoc=1}}. Imperators II(Talk) 16:21, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • The semi-colon is unnecessary in this article, please make do without it. Imperators II(Talk) 16:21, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • I can't find the mention of the Shirb system in the New Essential Chronology. Could you provide the page number please? Imperators II(Talk) 16:53, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
    • I added it as a source because of the 25 ABY information. If it's not apropos I'll remove it. OtterSurf (talk) 16:58, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
      • That's not how the Sources section on our site works, OtterSurf. You only list media under Appearances/Sources if they actually feature/mention the article's subject. Imperators II(Talk) 17:05, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • The lead sentence is too long, please split it up. I feel like any mention of the objects contained within the system should follow the description of where the system is located, anyway. Imperators II(Talk) 17:51, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • Please mention what systems the Shirb system was immediately linked to via the hyperlane. Imperators II(Talk) 18:19, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
    • Done. OtterSurf (talk) 18:50, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
      • Please change the mentions of the planets to mentions of star systems, as I requested on my original objection. The Atlas doesn't provide information on those worlds, just their systems. Imperators II(Talk) 18:59, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
Fan
  • "It was invaded by the Yuuzhan Vong during their invasion of the galaxy in 25 ABY." You use a form of invade twice in one sentence. I think the battle pipelink can be switched to "attacked" or something similar. Fan26 (Talk) 17:22, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
Anil
  • Does the novella confirm that the Shirb system, or the planet New Holgha, was aligned with the New Republic? If so, it should be reflected in the article as well. The system's NR allegiance is only mentioned in the article's infobox and categories anyway. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:18, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
    • It does state that the New Republic didn't act on Mandalorian intel to defend or evacuate the planet, so the New Republic was at least supposedly responsible for protecting New Holgha. There's no assertion that it was independent, either. OtterSurf (talk) 08:54, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
    • I've reflected this as best I can in the article. OtterSurf (talk) 09:22, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
      • I'm afraid that doesn't satisfy my objection. The New Republic failing to protect a planet doesn't mean the world was a member of the Republic. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:22, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
        • I'll remove it then. There's no other info. OtterSurf (talk) 17:23, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
AV
  • I'd mention in the body that the Shirb system was also known as the New Holgha system, per The Essential Atlas and Online Companion. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 21:34, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • The CSWE entry for New Holgha specifies that it's a planet, so the article should be updated to reflect that. In case you don't have that source, it's volume II, page 374, and the entry is called "New Holgha". - AV-6R7Crew Pit 22:08, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
    • I have it, but thanks anyway. Done. OtterSurf (talk) 08:59, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
      • I'm going to repeat what I told you above, OtterSurf. You only list a medium under Sources if it actually mentions the subject. Imperators II(Talk) 09:10, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
        • I could do without people giving me the wrong information. OtterSurf (talk) 09:39, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
          • First off, you just said yourself that you have the book, so you have absolutely no right to accuse other users of providing you with "wrong" information that you could just have checked yourself. Secondly, I believe you're misreading AV's objection, as it has to do with updating the article body's wording. Imperators II(Talk) 09:48, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
            • I see an objection and I act on it. I thought that was how this was supposed to work. In any case, I've already specified that New Holgha was a planet. OtterSurf (talk) 09:56, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
QGJ

Comments

Sivad

  • Nominated by: Zed42 (talk) 09:31, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 14:03, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 17:25, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  3. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 20:51, September 13, 2019 (UTC)
  4. spookywillowwtalk 16:51, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
  5. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 07:49, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Sindee's refueling station

  • Nominated by OtterSurf (talk) 12:16, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(4 ECs/0 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 10:05, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 11:35, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
  3. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 08:26, September 16, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 14:11, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Imp
  • "bound for Ord Gertoth" — is this phrase from the SW.com article what you're basing the "somewhere between R-Duba and Ord Gertoth" on? Because that's not enough. Ord Gertoth could just as easily have been, say, in the same direction from the station as R-Duba. For all we know, Gertoth could have even been on the other side of the galaxy from the station. Imperators II(Talk) 12:40, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
  • Isn't there some way to narrow down the "during the early years of the Galactic Empire" to at least a range of dates? Surely the Droids series is dated, and maybe there's some indication as to where the appearance of the station was with the respect to the series? Imperators II(Talk) 12:40, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
Anil
  • (Reviewing note) "One-man" literally means "just one individual," so that's not an error.
    • I'll correct that. OtterSurf (talk) 07:05, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
    • Nevermind. Thanks! OtterSurf (talk) 08:17, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
  • I personally believe that an article should be named as "unidentified" as last resort, so I think the article would do better at Sindee's refueling station. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:49, September 14, 2019 (UTC)
    • I was thinking that as well. Move? OtterSurf (talk) 07:05, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
    • Done. OtterSurf (talk) 08:16, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
Fan
  • I think the second sentence can be broken up into two; one about the droids getting abandoned and one about R2 learning dejarik. Fan26 (Talk) 23:12, September 15, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Sullustan farmer

  • Nominated by: spookywillowwtalk 22:50, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:19, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • I think you can just say 'Months after...' at the beginning of the second sentence. Fan26 (Talk) 23:05, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
    • Actually, since the date ref firmly places the events of the novel in 34 ABY, I think the mention of the Hosnian Cataclysm can be removed since it doesn't seem necessary in the context. Fan26 (Talk) 23:08, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
      • Think this'll work.spookywillowwtalk 23:49, September 15, 2019 (UTC)
        • In my experience, it's only been necessary to say "By such-and-such year' if the event cannot be concretely determined to take place in that year and might take place prior to it. Unless I'm wrong, I think it could be changed, as the book is proven to take place in 34 ABY. Fan26 (Talk) 13:03, September 16, 2019 (UTC)
          • Altered; took out that 34 ABY entirely to work in two objections in one sentence tweak, since it's also mentioned later on.spookywillowwtalk 18:41, September 16, 2019 (UTC)
QGJ
  • She was born in 21 ABY. Such a short sentence feels choppy and doesn't flow well. See if you can integrate it better with the rest of the text. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 12:56, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Tourani system

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 19:25, September 16, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

V'shar system

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Marzoon system

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Build A Star Wars Movie Collection