FANDOM


             
Comprehensive
article nominations
       
Premium-ComprehensiveArticle

This page is for the nomination of "comprehensive articles." For a list of "comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia comprehensive articles.


What is a "comprehensive article?"

A "comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …if the nominated article reaches 200 words or greater, the nominator must either provide an intro or draft an intro and provide a link to the revision in the nomination, showing that the intro does not elevate the article over 250 words. Exceptions can be made for articles wherein the majority of the text is in the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of one week.


Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Cait

  • Nominated by: Ben sc01t (talk) 17:05, January 16, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Learnt a lot from my first nomination. Time to put it into action. Ben sc01t (talk) 17:05, January 16, 2019 (UTC)

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 06:51, January 25, 2019 (UTC)
  2. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 18:12, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 10:47, February 7, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 12:48, February 7, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Anil
  • (Not an objection) Keep in mind that short stories are often reprinted in various media, and the Appearances section should cover them all. Also, about the use of the quotation mark in the Behind the scenes, commas and periods always go inside the quotation marks.
  • The FAC stared back at Brand with lifeless eyes; a dried smear of blood across her ashen lips was the only evidence of her trauma. I may be wrong, but when I first read it, I interpreted her as Brand, not the FAC Cait.
    • I don't see how it cannot be Cait. Her lips are ashen (gray) and there is blood on her lips. Cait is dead so it has to be a description of her. Ben sc01t (talk) 16:03, January 17, 2019 (UTC)
  • Since the battle of Allst Prime is a conjectural title, it shouldn't be capitalized in the infobox. Something like "During the battle on Allst Prime" should suffice.
  • I don't see any mention of two X-wings in the short story.
  • You can give some context for the battle, like whom the rebels were fighting. Also, I'd like to see some time frame for the battle. According to its article, it took place before the battle on Vir Aphshire, which also occured concurrently with the Battle of Yavin according to Battlefront: Twilight Company. I would probably suggest creating a reference note to manually explain that the battle of Allst Prime took place before the Battle of Yavin. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 14:41, January 17, 2019 (UTC)
    • Done. Ben sc01t (talk) 16:03, January 17, 2019 (UTC)
      • A little bit more context for the battle, please. The Sixty-First dropping into Allst Prime to take out the Imperial outpost is a relevant detail, in my opinion. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:52, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
      • There is an issue with your reference note. Star Wars Insider 161 doesn't state that "the Battle of Allst Prime takes place before the Battle on Vir Aphshire," it doesn't mention Vir Aphshire at all. You need to source it to the novel and say why Allst Prime must have occured before Vir Aphshire. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:52, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
        • Sorry, I assumed the article you mentioned was in the issue, not the Wookieepedia page. The only evidence I can find of the events on Allst Prime being before Vir Aphshire is that Hazram Namir referred to her as a bounty hunter following the battle in the novel. I must have used that as evidence when I created the 'Battle of Allst Prime' article almost a year ago. Ben sc01t (talk) 07:59, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
          • I have implemented that reference for now. Ben sc01t (talk) 08:00, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
            • Can you please explain what you mean in the reference note? Who do you mean by "It was not known that Brand was a bounty hunter," is it the readers, other rebels, or someone else that didn't know she was a bounty hunter? TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:40, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
              • It was meant to be the other rebels. The idea was that because Brand lied to get into Twilight Company and smuggled in her kit, she would have been hiding her identity. However, I have no strong evidence at all that fit together and places the Battle of Allst Prime before the Battle on Vir Aphshire because it may have already been known that she was a bounty hunter and that could have been why Micha Evon looked into her. Therefore, I have placed the chronology as before the Attack on Haidoral Prime in 3 ABY as the little time between that and the Coyerti campaign campaign, where Brand explains her story, is covered. You may be frustrated with me by now but this short story has a very ambiguous time-frame. It is very hard to pinpoint exactly when the events of Allst Prime occurred. Ben sc01t (talk) 21:46, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
  • According to the reference note in the Battle of Allst Prime article, the novel can be sourced to place Cait's date prior to 0 BBY. Also, from what I understand that note, Brand is not a rebel trooper at the time of the battle of Allst Prime, but the article currently suggests otherwise. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:48, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
    • That reference note has a lot of assumption. I may have written it when I was a newer member of Wookieepedia, but there is nothing in the novel that says Brand is a "well trusted member" during the battle on Vir Aphshire. I have fixed that separately. Ben sc01t (talk) 22:03, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
      • That reference note does have some assumption indeed. What I'm saying is if Brand is already a rebel at Vir Aphshire, then Allst Prime must take place before that since she joins the rebels during that battle. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:14, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
        • Namir only refers to her as a bounty hunter. So I am unsure of what the rebels knew about her. Ben sc01t (talk) 22:20, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
          • Who knows what about her is irrelevant, she is a member of the company at that point, isn't she? So, the battle during which she joined the team must take place before that. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:35, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
          • About the latter part of my objection, changing "rebel trooper" to "rebel" doesn't solve the problem. Isn't she a bounty hunter disguised as a rebel during that battle? TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:37, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
            • Just a friendly reminder that this one is still here. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:49, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
            • She said she "lied" to join Twilight Company and smuggled her kit aboard, we don't know anything more than that. Maybe being a bounty hunter might have blown her cover slightly if the rebels knew that. Does this imply enough for the battle of Allst Prime being pre-Galactic Civil War? Ben sc01t (talk) 22:46, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
              • If it is, then I have a draft reference note for it. <ref name="Date Note">In the novel ''[[Battlefront: Twilight Company]]'', [[Brand]] is referred to as a [[bounty hunter]] during the [[battle on Vir Aphshire]], which happens concurrent to the [[Battle of Yavin]] in the novel. Because Brand lied to join the [[Sixty-First Mobile Infantry]], the [[battle of Allst Prime]], where Cait dies, must have occurred before, where [[Micha Evon]] confronted her about her true identity.</ref>. Should I implement that idea? Ben sc01t (talk) 09:02, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
                • I have just read that chapter, Chapter 32, of the novel, and I think it's safe to assume Brand had joined the Company at that point. Go for the reference note, I'll make some minor changes to it. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 09:30, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
Saltier than Cait
  • Inbrief's first publication in Star Wars Insider 161 should be directly stated in the BTS. Also I'm not certain that the illustrator needs to be mentioned there if the character wasn't actually drawn, but others might disagree.
    • I feel like he needs to be mentioned. Mentioned only article do that. Ben sc01t (talk) 07:59, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
      • If I may chime in, I think just saying that the short story was first published in Star Wars Insider 161, which I've just added to the Behind the scenes, should be enough. As far as the illustrator, I personally agree with Code-8, but I'm good either way. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:40, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
        • I have removed his mention. Ben sc01t (talk) 21:46, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
  • The year of the Battle of Yavin should be included, I think Galactic Atlas is the best source to use for that.
    • I'm not sure how to do that. BBY is clearly before it and ABY is after it. So I am going to make a guess and make it 0 BBY. Let me know if you want that changed. Ben sc01t (talk) 07:59, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
      • If I may chime in, again, the history box that describes the Battle of Yavin in Galactic Atlas has 0 BBY as a date near it, but I feel it is redundant to put a year since the calender uses the Battle of Yavin itself as its epoch. Anyway, I've just read the chapter "Planet Vir Aphshire" of the novel, and appearantly the company also heard the news of Alderaan's destruction during the battle. So, I believe saying something like "sometime before the destruction of Alderaan in 0 BBY" would be better as a timeframe. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk)
        • If I may correct that, Namir was on his bunk when the news of The Disaster came out, with no mention of Vir Aphshire. The novel then states that Namir was fighting in the honey fields of Vir Aphshire days later when the news of the Battle of Yavin occurred. No evidence of Alderaan's destruction being during the battle. Ben sc01t (talk) 21:46, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
          • OK, then you should go with Yavin. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:53, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
            • How do you two want the chronology to be then? Because I am struggling to prove to myself that Cait dying before Vir Aphshire has enough evidence. Should I keep it as before the Attack on Haidoral Prime? Ben sc01t (talk) 07:47, January 19, 2019 (UTC)
              • The reference note should be fixed now. Unless there's something I've missed? Ben sc01t (talk) 06:37, January 26, 2019 (UTC)
                • I still need to know if I have missed something in the reference note. Ben sc01t (talk) 20:47, January 28, 2019 (UTC)
                  • First, you need to fix those capitalizations for conjecture battle names as discussed before. Also, according to your reference note, the battle could also have occured in 3 ABY. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:03, January 28, 2019 (UTC)
                    • Sorted. Ben sc01t (talk) 21:22, January 28, 2019 (UTC)
                      • Is there anything else needing to be changed? Ben sc01t (talk) 18:46, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
  • I think the Early rebellion against the Galactic Empire should be mentioned in the first sentence, could move the link to the Empire there too.
  • Mention that Allst Prime is a planet.
  • Just curious if the chronological placement of the battle is exclusive to Insider, if not that should be linked to the story in the first reference. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 23:32, January 17, 2019 (UTC)
    • The chronology being exclusive to Insider was a mistake on my behalf. I'm discussing what we can say about it with 'User:AnilSerifoglu' (seen above). Ben sc01t (talk) 16:13, January 18, 2019 (UTC)
  • Sorry I haven't added anything to this for weeks, just got this: the infobox needs to include what little information we know about the timeline in the death field, so that field should read "Prior to 0 BBY, Allst Prime". Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:39, February 5, 2019 (UTC)


QGJ
  • I have some gripes with ref 2, mainly:
    • Remember that it has to be fully linked (e.g. Hadoral Prime needs a link, as well as a few other words) and contextualized (Brand is missing context)
    • Please avoid using second person pronouns in references. It is considered unencyclopedic. We therefore know that the battle in which Cait's death occurs happens before
    • This part is confusing: because the story covers the majority of the 13 days inbetween. This is because you just mentioned "Brand's back-story" in the previous sentence. I was trying to wrap my head around how her back story can cover the 13 days between Haidoral Prime and Coerti, and still somehow take place before Haidoral. Finally, I realized that "the story" refers to the actual storyline of the novel. You should state that, to avoid confusion.
    • The attack on Haidoral Prime occurs 22 years after the Clone Wars How do we know that? According to which source? QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 12:42, January 22, 2019 (UTC)
      • Re-written the date note accordingly to your queries. Ben sc01t (talk) 16:28, January 22, 2019 (UTC)
        • The Clone Wars ending in 19 BBY also requires a source. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 10:19, January 24, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Jessop

  • Nominated by: Fan26 (Talk) 15:23, January 25, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:05, January 25, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Zed42 (talk) 23:41, January 26, 2019 (UTC)
  3. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 12:46, January 30, 2019 (UTC)
  4. --Lewisr (talk) 13:17, February 13, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Zed
  • "Jessop was a male individual who was friends with a Republic soldier was bitten by a rakghoul on the planet Taris..." Is this meant to be two separate sentences? Zed42 (talk) 07:55, January 26, 2019 (UTC)
    • Fixed. Fan26 (Talk) 23:36, January 26, 2019 (UTC)
Imp
  • Please format the article accordingly to your two above nominations. Imperators II(Talk) 08:50, February 11, 2019 (UTC)
    • Think I got everything that needed to be reformatted...let me know if there's still some things that need to be done. Fan26 (Talk) 15:57, February 12, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Weken

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:12, January 25, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Fan26 (Talk) 05:52, January 26, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Zed42 (talk) 07:55, January 26, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 14:19, January 30, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Braccio system

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 23:10, January 25, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Fan26 (Talk) 05:53, January 26, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Zed42 (talk) 07:55, January 26, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 14:36, January 30, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Betal

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 19:28, January 27, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: ohhh dem Poraskors

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. good WOrk imperatOrs i liKe thIs typE of articlEs. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:26, January 27, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Fan26 (Talk) 21:08, January 27, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Zed42 (talk) 09:53, January 28, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 07:38, January 31, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

TK-7193

  • Nominated by: TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:35, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Probably a good time to promote this before they close down the game.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. Fan26 (Talk) 02:58, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 09:03, February 5, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • All stormtroopers are human according to Star Wars Character Encyclopedia: Updated and Expanded. Fan26 (Talk) 00:42, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
    • Just like Star Wars Character Encyclopedia: Updated and Expanded, Ultimate Star Wars fills the species box for its stormtrooper entry as "Human," but the latter book also states that "Stormtroopers include human men and women, but very rarely, if ever, nonhuman individuals." Given that we already have an alien stormtrooper, Kreel, in the new canon, I'd rather not speculate. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:53, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
      • I'd just like to point out that there is no info that Kreel is an alien. It was assumed that he was because his skin color looked red, but it's actually dark or tan.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 02:23, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
      • I was under the impression we'd been assuming for all Canon stormtroopers that they were human. I'm not entirely convinced on this, but for now I'll strike it. Fan26 (Talk) 02:58, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
        • On second thought, you are probably right. Changed it. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 09:22, February 1, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Clysm system

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 11:29, February 1, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Jason Fry really did go after everything. Fan26 (Talk) 02:23, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Zed42 (talk) 07:24, February 4, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote The system almost shared its name with a World of Warcraft expansion. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 09:07, February 5, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Unidentified comm tech

  • Nominated by: Ben sc01t (talk) 09:24, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I have time on my hands, needed a new project. This character is probably the obscurest I could nominate. Ben sc01t (talk) 09:24, February 2, 2019 (UTC)

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. Good job. Fan26 (Talk) 22:59, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
  2. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 08:55, February 4, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Nice work! --Lewisr (talk) 12:42, February 5, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 16:22, February 10, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • The line "magic with a transmitter" seems a little bit...'casual', for lack of a better word. Would you mind changing it? Fan26 (Talk) 16:12, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
  • "The female individual" Should be 'this'. Fan26 (Talk) 16:24, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
Anil
  • The word "nights" can be pipelinked to Standard day.
  • "The planet, however, was bombarded..." Do we know if this is an orbital bombardment?
  • Please pay attention to how "Battlefront: Twilight Company audiobook" is formatted.
  • There are more than one mention of the comm tech in the novel such as this one. "Namir closed his eyes again and made an obscene gesture in Chalis's direction. He'd learned it from Twilight's dead comm tech long ago, and he wasn't sure how commonplace it was. From Chalis's laughter, however, she seemed to get the point." They should be reflected in the article as well.
    • Ah I didn't notice that. That's the third mention she has in the book then. Added. Ben sc01t (talk) 08:16, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
      • Actually, she is mentioned five times, in Chapters 2, 4, 12, 23, and 28. Please check the others for possible new info. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 08:54, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
        • It's just Namir recounting her. I've added that detail. Ben sc01t (talk) 18:21, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
  • Please note the capitalization of the "massacre at Asyrphus" in the reference note.
    • That's what it is referred to in the book so I assumed that would be it's real name. Changed it now. Ben sc01t (talk) 08:16, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
  • As discussed in your Cait nomination, please avoid using second person pronouns in references. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 18:06, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
  • (Not an objection) Please remember that eveything in the reference note must be sourced. Also, since the note is not written in in-universe, you don't need to write it in past tense. And eveything must be linked just like the article body. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 09:34, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
  • You need to expand your dating note. An event that occurs two months before another one doesn't necessarily have to be in the same year. But since the novel also says that it takes place "Nineteen Years After the Clone Wars," it can be assumed that way. Also, as far as I can find, the novel has no mention of the Battle of the Tower being two months before Yavin. However, it says that for the battle on Vir Aphshire, which occurs concurrently with the Battle of Yavin. The reference note should contain every detail for how you extrapolate that information. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 09:34, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
    • In the two months since Namir joined Twilight Company…. That is mentioned near the beginning of the chapter and insinuates that it has been two months since the Battle of the Tower. I have expanded the note now. Ben sc01t (talk) 18:21, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
      • We're almost there. But just like the year zero in real life, 0 BBY might not span over an entire year, meaning 0 BBY and 0 ABY could share the same year, the year zero. So, 2 months before Yavin could be 1 BBY instead of 0, but we can extrapolate that it is 0 BBY from the time frame given at the beginning of the Battle of the Tower chapter, "Nineteen Years After the Clone Wars." TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 19:45, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
        • Changed it accordingly. It should look fine now, unless you see any more work to do on it. Ben sc01t (talk) 19:59, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
          • The bit about Vir Aphshire should have stayed in the note to prove that the Battle of the Tower takes place before Yavin, thus 0 BBY. But I've readded that for you. Now, I'd also like to see a date interval for comm tech's death, something like "between 0 BBY and 2 ABY," for example. I'd suggest that you look into all five mentions of her, and go with the earliest. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 20:24, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
            • Done. Ben sc01t (talk) 20:34, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
              • "...which takes place 19 years after the Clone Wars in the novel, dated as 3 ABY in Star Wars: Galactic Atlas." Something is wrong here. And how exactly the novel places Haidoral Prime to three years after Yavin? Also, you should write the numbers in letters. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:00, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
                • My bad, that was meant to be 22. Sorted. Ben sc01t (talk) 22:36, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
Lewisr
  • Your reference note doesn't really establish how the Battle of the Tower took place in 0 BBY --Lewisr (talk) 18:17, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
Imp
  • "he recounted her a number of times" — "recount" is probably not the best choice of word here. (Same goes for the ref note.) And in any case, this implies there are quotes to be had for the article. Imperators II(Talk) 10:44, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
    • Changed. There are no quotes to do with her. Ben sc01t (talk) 17:28, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
  • Please tell more about the tech's droid. Imperators II(Talk) 10:44, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
    • She and her idiot droid had died in the bombardment on Asyrphus. That it the only mention of it. Ben sc01t (talk) 17:28, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
  • I feel like characterizing people as "drunk" can only be done regarding specific occasions, not as a general personality trait. Please reword. Imperators II(Talk) 10:44, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
  • Date of death needed in infobox. Imperators II(Talk) 10:44, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
    • Made it an interval, if that is ok? Ben sc01t (talk) 17:28, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
  • I'd like to see "technician" and, if possible, "comm" worked into the article. Imperators II(Talk) 10:44, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
  • "Namir also adopted a trait she had where she closed her eyes and made an obscene gesture towards something." — please rewrite this from the technician's perspective. And please specify "something." Imperators II(Talk) 10:44, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
    • It is hard to say what she was gesturing towards when she did it. But Namir did it towards Chalis, so it must have been an individual. Ben sc01t (talk) 17:28, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
  • "two months before the battle on Vir Aphshire" — what exactly is this needed for in the ref note? Imperators II(Talk) 10:44, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
    • I thought it would be good to justify that the battle on Vir Aphshire took place in the year before the Battle of Yavin, 0 BBY, by saying it happened two months prior. Give the word and I will change it. Ben sc01t (talk) 17:28, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
  • "Although the rest of the Sixty-First managed to escape, the comm tech was never replaced" — these two don't seem to be contrasting facts, so I don't think linking them with "although" is justified. Imperators II(Talk) 10:44, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
  • "Namir swore to forget her name" — this seems odd, given the level of bonding between the two implied in the rest of the article. Is any reason for this given by the novel? Imperators II(Talk) 10:44, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
    • and the comm tech who'd died on Asyrphus—the woman whose name Namir had pledged to forget. No explanation is given for this. Ben sc01t (talk) 17:28, February 15, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

  • It says “Asyrphus, however, was bombarded…” in the second sentence of the second paragraph. Is this meant to pipelink to orbital bombardment?--Afilmfanforlife (talk) 23:28, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
    • This was addressed above under Anil's objections --Lewisr (talk) 23:36, February 3, 2019 (UTC)


Blow 'em All Away

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:02, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Zed42 (talk) 07:25, February 4, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

If You're a Biped, I Can Make U Limp

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 18:02, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:02, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Zed42 (talk) 07:25, February 4, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Who Cares (If Freedom's Gone)?

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 18:03, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:02, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Zed42 (talk) 07:25, February 4, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

IG-88, Where R U?

  • Nominated by: QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 18:04, February 2, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:02, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Zed42 (talk) 07:25, February 4, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:40, February 9, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Sing us a song, you're the assassin droid
  • The song's status as a single needs acknowledgement in the body. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 11:15, February 7, 2019 (UTC)
    • Was trying to vary the wording between those noms. Must have dropped that bit in the process. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 12:07, February 9, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Encrust II

  • Nominated by: Zed42 (talk) 11:19, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another nomination, another ambiguous location name.

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

Support

  1. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 16:08, February 15, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Ben sc01t (talk) 06:47, February 16, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments