In a galaxy far, far away....
In a galaxy far, far away....
161,435 Pages
Add new page
in:
Semi-protected articles, Move protected articles, Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

View source
                     
Premium-ComprehensiveArticle.svg

This page is for Comprehensive article nominations. A Comprehensive article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Good or Featured status due to its limited content. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Comprehensive status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding EduCorps review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after one week will be subject to immediate removal.

READ THIS FIRST!

A Comprehensive article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic if it reaches 165 words, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section (not including captions, quotes, headers, etc). Conversely, an article must not have an introduction if it is less than 165 words, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  13. …not exceed 250 words in length if it provides an introduction. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. However, any article that does not provide an introduction per Rule #12 is eligible to be nominated for Comprehensive status regardless of word count. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  14. …not be deliberately shortened if it approaches the 250-word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. Select an article you feel is worthy of Comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Comprehensive article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{CAnom|second}}).
  3. Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
  7. The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
  8. Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
  10. Users must successfully complete one Comprehensive article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the CAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful CA nominations before they can have three, and three successful CA nominations before they can have four.

How to review:

  1. To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
  3. Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
  4. Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.
  5. If a nomination has been active for over one week and has no active objections, it may pass with a total of either three EduCorps votes or two EduCorps and three user votes. Alternatively, if a nomination is between two and seven days old and has no active objections, it can pass with a total of four EduCorps votes.
  6. Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Comprehensive article." As such, an EduCorps member will archive the nomination, tag the article with the {{Eras|comp}} template, tag its talk page with the {{CA}} template, and place the article on the Comprehensive articles page. Only members of the EduCorps are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.
All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by EduCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 1 week.

Note: Reduxed articles require only three support votes to maintain their Comprehensive status, all of which must come from EduCorps members. Reduxed articles will be subject to immediate removal if objections are not addressed after a period of 10 days, pending the support of at least three EduCorps members.


Contents

Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Bellator-class dreadnought

  • Nominated by: Vitus InfinitusTalk 23:23, September 23, 2020 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Baellator

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png QuiGonJinn Senate seal.svg(Talk) 13:52, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
  2. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 10:20, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
  3. Ben sc01t (Hello there) 10:22, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
  4. LordMominutiae (talk) 17:26, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
  5. --Lewisr (talk) 23:11, October 20, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Braha'tok enthusiast
  • "that was in service to the Galactic Empire during its reign by the introduction of the Executor-class Star Dreadnought and the Assertor-class Command Dreadnought." Do you mean "by the time of the introduction"? And if so, it is a different explanation "introduced by the time of the Imperial Era" (in history) in the fact the first says during and the other says by the time of in regards to the "Imperial Era". Ben sc01t (Hello there) 16:14, September 27, 2020 (UTC)
    • I'm trying to say that it existed after the Assertor and Executor were introduced--Vitus InfinitusTalk 17:07, October 4, 2020 (UTC)
      • Ok, but article says the Bellator was in service "by the introduction of the Executor-class Star Dreadnought and the Assertor-class Command Dreadnought"—implying it was around before the latter two vessels—and you've just said you're saying it existed "after the Assertor and Executor were introduced", which has confused me. Also you still have those two mildy different points: "was in service to the Galactic Empire during its reign" and "introduced by the time of the Imperial Era" because the second implies it was in service prior to the Empire's "reign". Ben sc01t (Hello there) 17:49, October 4, 2020 (UTC)
QGJ
  • Article does not comply with Rule 12 of the CAN. Main body currently stands at 156 words, so subsectioning needs to be removed.
  • Bts needs to mention the author of Lead by Example
    • Per precedent, FFG sourcebooks do not need to include authors as far as I'm aware of. One instance and explanation can be found here.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 17:12, October 4, 2020 (UTC)
      • The precedent cited there concerned a book with a long laundry list of authors, which would have created a visual mess by listing them all in an article. Lead by Example is attributed to a single author, on the other hand, so I don't see why listing him would be detrimental to the quality of this specific article. QuiGonJinn Senate seal.svg(Talk) 06:38, October 5, 2020 (UTC)
        • The book attributes multiple authors, the Wook's entry of the book does not.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:35, October 5, 2020 (UTC)
          • OK. In that case, I agree that its unneccessary to list them. QuiGonJinn Senate seal.svg(Talk) 07:00, October 8, 2020 (UTC)
  • This sentence is grammatically incorrect. The Bellator-class dreadnought originally in the Star Wars Legends comic book Dark Empire 2: Devastator of Worlds[3] that was released on February 18, 1982[4] and drawn by Cam Kennedy.
  • Image caption is formatted incorrectly. QuiGonJinn Senate seal.svg(Talk) 07:10, October 2, 2020 (UTC)
    • Added underscore--Vitus InfinitusTalk 17:12, October 4, 2020 (UTC)
      • That wasn't the issue here. The caption is not a complete sentence, so there should be no punctuation. It either needs to be turned into a sentence to preserve the full stop, or kept as is with the punctuation removed. QuiGonJinn Senate seal.svg(Talk) 06:38, October 5, 2020 (UTC)
  • The first sentence seems a bit run-on. It should probably better be split in two.
  • Bts needs to provide a better explanation that the ship in the Dark Empire comic was originally unnamed and was only identified as a Bellator in The Essential Guide to Warfare. QuiGonJinn Senate seal.svg(Talk) 07:00, October 8, 2020 (UTC)
Shayanomer
  • Body should be split into two evenly-sized paragraphs for better clarity. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 19:01, October 7, 2020 (UTC)
Ayrehead
  • You can go into much more detail about the similarities between the Bellator and the Surveyor, the book says that the Bellator has a similar structure to the command bunker style structure atop the Surveyor. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:53, October 12, 2020 (UTC)
    • I was told to remove that information from this article's good article nomination, which brought the word count below GA standards. I thought it was also appropriate to have that information.--Vitus InfinitusTalk 21:25, October 12, 2020 (UTC)
  • The book doesn't say that the entire family of dreadnaughts is characterised by the features you describe, just the Assertor, so I think the description of the Assertor can be removed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:53, October 12, 2020 (UTC)
  • The book also doesn't seem to state anything about the Bellator and the Mandator being comparable in size. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:53, October 12, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Fleet Support Base

  • Nominated by: TK-462 (talk) 16:18, September 27, 2020 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/3 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. VergenceScatter (talk) 19:30, September 27, 2020 (UTC)
  2. —Tomotron Revanchist Sith.svg (Star Forge) 06:35, October 1, 2020 (UTC)
  3. LordMominutiae (talk) 03:47, October 21, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Fan
OOM
  • The first sentence is too long.
  • Since the First Battle of Geonosis marks the outbreak of the Clone Wars, "during and after the First Battle of Geonosis at the outbreak of the Clone Wars" should be reworded. - - -CIS roundel.svg OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 16:38, September 30, 2020 (UTC)
    • Fixed the above objections, thank you. TK-462 (talk) 19:14, September 30, 2020 (UTC)
  • You're welcome. Question: does the source say "the Fleet Support Base" or simply "Fleet Support Base?" - - -CIS roundel.svg OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 20:11, September 30, 2020 (UTC)
    • Hard Contact simply refers to it as "Fleet Support Base". TK-462 (talk) 21:36, September 30, 2020 (UTC)
  • "The base was considered ill-equipped to support the […]" Does the novel say who thought the base was ill-equipped?
    • It does. I don't feel that it adds anything notable to the article, but I can certainly add it if that helps the article seem more cohesive. TK-462 (talk) 13:47, October 2, 2020 (UTC)
  • Can you provide the segment of the novel that distinguishes FS Base from FS? I could only see evidence that the two are one and the same, especially since the FS article says "Fleet Support was called upon to receive twenty thousand injured clone troopers and an additional seventy-two thousand combat-fit troops, some of which were contained by Fleet Support Base," whereas this article says all of the clones were contained by FS Base. - - -CIS roundel.svg OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 16:38, October 1, 2020 (UTC)
    • Good point. This was definitely confusing to me, and I'm open to a second opinion. FS itself is mentioned a total of three times in the book (none of which are in the body, but instead in the location descriptions), while FS Base is in the article body: "Fleet Support Base hadn’t been built to accommodate tens of thousands of troops, and it showed." FS is provided as the location at the beginning of this chapter, as well as when troopers are in the barracks. However, FS Air Station is later mentioned as part of FS, which does lead me to believe they're two separate elements (Air and Base), while Fleet Support is the umbrella term for the complex. TK-462 (talk) 13:47, October 2, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

TK
  • After looking through Hard Contact for another potential nomination, it appears that there are three distinct Fleet Support elements. Fleet Support, Fleet Support Base, and Fleet Support Air Station. Unless anyone has objections to them being separate articles, I'll retract the nomination until I can update this page sufficiently with the Fleet Support data. TK-462 (talk) 19:14, September 30, 2020 (UTC)
    • I've worked out the Fleet Support situation and added it all to the page, so we're good to go here. Thanks for your patience. TK-462 (talk) 07:39, October 1, 2020 (UTC)


Singing stone

  • Nominated by: OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 08:24, October 12, 2020 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another CAN attempt. This one shouldn't exceed the word limit.

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. LordMominutiae (talk) 15:18, October 12, 2020 (UTC)

Object

LordMominutiae
  • Do you think the image used on the Yoda's quarters page would be better suited for this page? Simply because it provides a larger view of the quarters (it's not as if the current picture shows the singing stones and that other image does not, either).
    • I was going for the TCW aesthetic and the candles in the foreground, which I found more fitting for the article. However, I could change it to the Episode III image if you want to.
      • Gotcha. It's probably not a big deal at all. LordMominutiae (talk) 15:18, October 12, 2020 (UTC)
  • As I was informed in my CA nom for the Raxian Humanitarian Award, the TCW Chronological Order shouldn't be used to date the events of the Utapau arc, Dark Disciple, or Son of Dathomir, as those are no longer present in the current version of the order. Feel free to take a look at the Raxian award page to see how I changed the date reference to account for this. LordMominutiae (talk) 14:44, October 12, 2020 (UTC)
Shayanomer
  • I don't believe "Coruscant Jedi Temple" is one of the proper names for the temple. Should be "Jedi Temple on Coruscant." Coruscant will need context here of course.
  • "...after Vos was sent to assassinate the Sith Lord Darth Tyranus along with the Sith's former acolyte, Asajj Ventress." This sounds like Vos was going to assassinate Ventress too. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 19:44, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
  • "The Jedi Obi-Wan Kenobi found the music emanating from the fountain deeply soothing, and noted that it resembled sounds between that of a chime and a stringed instrument." Did this occur before 19 BBY? Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 19:45, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
    • All reworded. The novel only says Obi-Wan usually found it soothing. - - -OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 16:25, October 17, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Band Light

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 05:50, October 20, 2020 (UTC)
  2. LordMominutiae (talk) 03:46, October 21, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Fan
Shayanomer

Comments

RC-1309's squad

  • Nominated by: TK-462 (talk) 13:22, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ECs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. LordMominutiae (talk) 04:28, October 15, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Shayanomer
  • Appearances missing.
  • The SW.com forum post must use SWBoards. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 13:29, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
    • Fixed, thank you. TK-462 (talk) 14:40, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
      • You have to use the actual name of the thread along with the author and date/time of the post, and don't leave empty fields in citations. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 14:46, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
        • Oh, I gotcha. Fixed. TK-462 (talk) 14:56, October 13, 2020 (UTC)
LordMominutiae
  • The last sentence of the first paragraph currently has 3 instances of Niner's name/clone number. 2 should be fine, but 3 just seems a little redundant—not sure if he needs to be re-listed as one of the clones in the squad if he was just established to be the squad leader. LordMominutiae (talk) 04:24, October 15, 2020 (UTC)
    • Good point, fixed. TK-462 (talk) 04:26, October 15, 2020 (UTC)
QGJ
  • RC-8028's article elaborates on his accident, saying that he was decapitated as a result of mishandling explosives. This information should be presented here as well.
  • Every member of the squad has a CSWE entry, it seems. There's bound to be at least an indirect mention of this squad there, as well.
  • I feel that it's worth noting that Niner went on to join Omega Squad at the end. QuiGonJinn Senate seal.svg(Talk) 08:55, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
    • Fixed the above, thank you! TK-462 (talk) 20:01, October 20, 2020 (UTC)
  • He'd lost a brother before-Two-Eight-on exercise. The three survivors had welcomed the replacement, although they had always felt he was slightly different-a little distant-as if he had never quite believed he'd been accepted. This passage from Hard Contact implies that Two-Eight was replaced by another commando after his death. The book does not elaborate who among the other troopers was the replacement. You still need to reflect in the article somehow the fact that the four listed members beside Niner did not serve together at the same time. One of the other three—DD, Sev or O-Four—was a replacement for the deceased Two-Eight. QuiGonJinn Senate seal.svg(Talk) 09:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Zugga Challenge

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. Good work - - -OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 20:49, October 21, 2020 (UTC)
  2. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 19:17, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Object

OOM
  • The date notes can be combined into one.
    • Done.
  • "[…] the course was considered to be old." Considered by whom? - - -OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 13:50, October 15, 2020 (UTC)
    • Not sure who exactly, that's just what the book says. Here's the direct quote (under "Mon Gazza," in a box listing the Runners' heists): "Required outrunning a New Republic patrol through the old Zugga Challenge podrace course" LordMominutiae (talk) 14:15, October 15, 2020 (UTC)
      • Then the podrace course being old is fact, and the word "considered" shouldn't be used.
        • Removed "considered to be." I imagine I'll need to do some further re-wording, though, as it doesn't really like right, now. Would it be all right to just add "old" in before "Zugga Challenge" when referring to the heist, or do I need to explicitly mention that the course was old at that point in time? LordMominutiae (talk) 15:11, October 15, 2020 (UTC)
          • Just adding "old" in before "Zugga Challenge" would be fine.
            • Done.
  • "4 ABY and 35 ABY" could be changed to "4 and 35 ABY" for concision.
    • Done.
  • The date ref only needs to mention one event for 4 ABY; either the fall of the Empire or Jabba. Also, "Spice Runners of Kijimi" is a proper compound noun, which means no links for either spice or Kijimi.
    • Changed to just Jabba as that's arguably more relevant. Removed the other links as well.
  • The ref does not explain how the events of TROS taking place in 35 ABY means the heist on Mon Gazza took place before that year. - - -OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 14:26, October 15, 2020 (UTC)
    • Yeah, I'm trying to figure out how exactly to indicate that. There are parts of the book written in present tense (for instance, on Zorii Bliss's page in the book it says "She now leads the Spice Runners"), almost as if the "present" is TROS, but it's hard to say. There's no clear indication given that Zorii was a Spice Runner during the heist on Mon Gazza, either, so that can't really be used to help narrow things down. Not sure if I just need to change it to "sometime after 4 ABY," or what. LordMominutiae (talk) 15:11, October 15, 2020 (UTC)
      • Given that the heist involved the New Republic, you could just say that it took place during the New Republic Era, which was 5–34 ABY - - -OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 09:57, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
        • Ah yeah, that'd be easier to do. You wouldn't happen to know if the Galactic Atlas (or even another source) definitively states that the New Republic (or at least the NR era) ends in 34 ABY, would you? I'll try to look into it myself, but I'm just not sure if there are any sources that clearly state the entire New Republic collapsed when the Hosnian system was destroyed. LordMominutiae (talk) 14:56, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
          • Sorry to interject but since the Republic existed in 4 ABY, why should that year not be included? --Lewisr (talk) 00:06, October 18, 2020 (UTC)
            • Oh, right. Forgot it existed prior to the "official founding." LordMominutiae (talk) 00:25, October 18, 2020 (UTC)
          • Sort of an update—I've tried asking around elsewhere and taking a peek at some sources myself, and I've unfortunately been unable to find a source that definitively states that the NR was no more after TFA, or at least that the "New Republic era" came to an end then. I know the TLJ opening crawl says the NR was "decimated," which is echoed in other sources as well, but at this point it may be necessary to simply remove the second date and change it to just sometime during/after 4 ABY. LordMominutiae (talk) 19:18, October 21, 2020 (UTC)
        • Alright then. From what I gather, the present in the visual guide is the time of TROS, thereby placing everything detailed in past tense, including the heist on Mon Gazza, before the events of the film. A tweak to the date note to reflect this would do. - - -OOM 224 ༼༽{talk}༼༽ 19:59, October 21, 2020 (UTC)
          • The Star Wars Book says that the New Republic was destroyed by the First Order --Lewisr (talk) 20:18, October 21, 2020 (UTC)
            • Well hey, that works! Updated the reference—thanks so much, Lewisr! LordMominutiae (talk) 20:26, October 21, 2020 (UTC)
            • No worries! --Lewisr (talk) 20:28, October 21, 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Selsor

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 19:51, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
  2. ECvote.png Fan26 (Talk) 23:07, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
  3. CIS roundel.svg Erebus Chronus (talk) 02:10, October 22, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Altier

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 19:51, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
  2. ECvote.png Fan26 (Talk) 23:09, October 16, 2020 (UTC)
  3. CIS roundel.svg Erebus Chronus (talk) 02:11, October 22, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Ando Prime Centrum

  • Nominated by: LordMominutiae (talk) 01:14, October 17, 2020 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another (podracing) course

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 11:10, October 19, 2020 (UTC)
  2. CIS roundel.svg Erebus Chronus (talk) 02:20, October 22, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Thand sector/Legends

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 11:15, October 19, 2020 (UTC)
  2. CIS roundel.svg Erebus Chronus (talk) 02:11, October 22, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Commander of Organic Training

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 07:04, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Object

Shayanomer

Comments

Pzandias

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 07:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Object

Shayanomer
  • Pzandias being in the Mid Rim needs an explanation, per ample precedent on astrographical articles.
  • The Clone Wars need context. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 19:26, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments

Gerhalt III

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Retrieved from "https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Comprehensive_article_nominations?oldid=9480360"
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.