In a galaxy far, far away....
In a galaxy far, far away....
165,980 Pages
Add new page
in:
Semi-protected articles, Move protected articles, Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages

Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

View source
             
Comprehensive
article nominations
        
Premium-ComprehensiveArticle.svg

This page is for Comprehensive article nominations. A Comprehensive article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Good or Featured status due to its limited content. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Comprehensive status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding EduCorps review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after one week will be subject to immediate removal.

READ THIS FIRST!

A Comprehensive article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic if it reaches 165 words, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section (not including captions, quotes, headers, etc). Conversely, an article must not have an introduction if it is less than 165 words, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  13. …not exceed 250 words in length if it provides an introduction. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. However, any article that does not provide an introduction per Rule #12 is eligible to be nominated for Comprehensive status regardless of word count. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  14. …not be deliberately shortened if it approaches the 250-word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. Select an article you feel is worthy of Comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Comprehensive article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{CAnom|second}}).
  3. Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
  7. The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
  8. Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
  10. Users must successfully complete one Comprehensive article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the CAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful CA nominations before they can have three, and three successful CA nominations before they can have four.

How to review:

  1. To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
  3. Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
  4. Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.
  5. If a nomination has been active for over one week and has no active objections, it may pass with a total of either three EduCorps votes or two EduCorps and three user votes. Alternatively, if a nomination is between two and seven days old and has no active objections, it can pass with a total of four EduCorps votes.
  6. Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Comprehensive article." As such, an EduCorps member will archive the nomination, tag the article with the {{Top|ca}} template, tag its talk page with the {{CA}} template, and place the article on the Comprehensive articles page. Only members of the EduCorps are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.
All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by EduCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 1 week.

Note: Reduxed articles require only three support votes to maintain their Comprehensive status, all of which must come from EduCorps members. Reduxed articles will be subject to immediate removal if objections are not addressed after a period of 10 days, pending the support of at least three EduCorps members.


Contents

Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Portminia system

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Immi Thrax (talk) 09:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 04:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
  3. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 09:39, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
  4. ECvote.png OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 11:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
  5. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 05:24, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Raspar-6

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 16:19, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Former GA that ended up below the word count limit.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 1 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 00:46, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 09:40, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
  3. ECvote.png OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 11:45, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
  4. What a no-good delinquent moon. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 05:27, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Fondo

  • Nominated by: VergenceScatter (talk) 21:54, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: For WP:FFGames

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Immi Thrax (talk) 09:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. Let our status articles take flight :P Erebus Chronus (talk) 14:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
  3. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 04:38, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
  4. ECvote.png OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 11:48, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Imp
  • You should note that Fondo shared his equipment and mannerisms with the other thugs.
  • Maybe it's just me, but I think that noting that Kulda was also a Rodian is somewhat more important than saying she was female.
  • Please describe in the body where can the players encounter Kulda and her thugs. Imperators II(Talk) 20:53, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
    • First two are addressed. The third is a little complicated, because Kulda and the thugs compete with the players in a Granee Noopa event. This section is so highly influenced by the way that the game is played that I excluded it from the article itself. However, if you believe that it should be added I can add a sentence about the event. VergenceScatter (talk) 02:48, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
      • Okay, so I've taken a look at the specific section of the book myself, and yes, it's basically biographical info that is relevant to Fondo. Also, there's enough info that it won't be a single sentence, either. Fondo is automatically present at the foyer where the introductions between the three groups are made, and is then among the guests that endure the toasting process. And in the BTS you should note that, should Fondo survive both the toasting and the Dance, his still being around for the Dinner affects the number of massiffs that are deployed against the guests. Oh, and that sidebar mentioning how during the toasts the actions of characters not directly affecting the PCs should be described cinematically is also something I believe should be noted in the BTS. Imperators II(Talk) 10:46, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
        • How's that? VergenceScatter (talk) 15:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
          • Context for Nal Hutta and Sherin needed. You're still missing the part about the introductions in the foyer as well as the toasting bit. Also, not all of the drinks were poisoned. Imperators II(Talk) 15:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Separatist droid speeder

  • Nominated by: CT-1742 Clone Army patch.svg (talk) 20:46, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Second CAnom.

(2 ECs/2 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 1 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. Great. I've also made a quick manual of style edit if you want to take a look. Biggestleo (Talk) 02:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 14:28, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  3. ECvote.png Unfortunate that a better image isn't available, but good work writing up the article OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 21:04, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  4. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 05:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Leo
  • Italicize 'Star Wars: The Clone Wars' in bts.
    • Fixed. Completely forgot to do that. CT-1742 Clone Army patch.svg (talk) 01:13, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Link to wing. Biggestleo (Talk) 00:22, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Also fixed. Didn't know we had a page for wings. CT-1742 Clone Army patch.svg (talk) 01:13, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
OOM
  • The {{Youmay}} template should give an indicator as to why readers might be looking for the Flitknot or the heavy speeder, like mentioning that they, like the Separatist droid speeder, were also speeders of the CIS.
  • You should fully discuss the speeder's description first before going on to mention its use on Rugosa.
  • Per this, the article is missing info regarding the clone troopers. The article should also mention the colour of the blaster bolts.
  • The fact that Rugosa was a moon cannot be sourced to the Hasbro toy. Same goes for the Clone Wars and context for the war.
  • Please obtain a better infobox image than the one on Rebelscum.com. It is currently distorted, has a low resolution, and does not fully illustrate the subject matter. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 06:40, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
  • For linking to files on articles, underscores should be used instead of spaces (e.g. [[File:Luke_Skywalker.jpg]], not [[File:Luke Skywalker.jpg]])
Shayanomer
  • Please replace the blanket citation to The Clone Wars with a more reliable source. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 10:02, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Sikurdian privateers

(2 ECs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png Nice to see something from the old Marvel comics make a return OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 20:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. Erebus got himself a fresh new signature. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 23:12, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
  3. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 10:28, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Shayanomer
  • Please introduce Sikurdian into the body. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Completely forgot to add that. Thanks for catching that. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 20:16, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
      • Now the sentence implies the entirety of the CIS naval forces were Sikurdians. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 20:17, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
        • Still have trouble with that. Does that read better? Erebus Chronus (Talk) 20:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
OOM
  • A little context for Murkhana would help
  • Category:Corporate Alliance and Category:Privateering can be added OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 06:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Both done. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 13:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
      • "Fantail-class destroyers on the Corporate Alliance headquarters of the planet Murkhana" I'm a little confused by this line. Are you trying to say that the Fantails were on Murkhana, which was the headquarters of the Corporate Alliance, or that the Fantails were at the Alliance headquarters on the planet Murkhana? OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 16:13, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
        • The book describes them as "on" I believe. However, I'm currently away from my computer so I can't check the book to be sure until tomorrow. If it doesn't make sense, I can rewrite it to say they were above instead since it doesn't make sense to me either. Erebus Chronus (Talk) 16:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
          • I think it's best to check the source for clarification before rewriting it, but there's no need to rush OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 16:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
            • Alright, now that I was able to check Rise of the Separatists, the book does not specify whether it was on or above. "Fantail-class destroyers defend the Corporate Alliance headquarters of Murkhana with support from Sikurdian privateers." So I'm assuming I can just go ahead and say "the privateers supported Fantail-class destroyers in defending the planet Murkhana, the headquarters of the Corporate Alliance." Erebus Chronus (Talk) 21:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
  • For readers with no knowledge of the prequels, I think the article would benefit from mentioning that the Corporate Alliance joined the CIS OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 17:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Is that a good spot for the info? Erebus Chronus (Talk) 17:46, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
      • That's fine, but I moved it up because I think the sentences flow better in this instance.
  • Last thing: is it "the Sikurdian privateers" or simply "Sikurdian privateers." There's inconsistency between the body and the BTS OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 19:01, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Dalan Reid

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 08:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 17:12, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

OOM
  • Ah! Rereading that Codex entry, all of this weirdry finally makes sense. As opposed to slicers, who are experienced with computers, identity slicers manipulate phenotypes and genotypes—biological traits and genetic code. Links to Slicer/Legends should be replaced by redlinks to identity slicer, and that article should be created to fill in those redlinks. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 07:41, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Seems like identity slicer is currently a redirect to Slicer/Legends. In this case, an article should be created over the redirect. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 07:42, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
      • Good catch. I've made the changes. Looks like someone created an article for identity slicers initially before it was redirected to just Slicer/Legends. Strange, since the article was fine for the most part. Biggestleo (Talk) 08:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
        • To be fair, the user who initially made the article did not clarify the differences between identity slicers and computer slicers. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 08:20, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Daniel M. Lavery

  • Nominated by: Immi Thrax RainbowRebellion2.png (talk) 11:38, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I only listed his single Star Wars work in keeping with the current movement towards no longer listing non-Star Wars work in the Published works.

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 13:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 03:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Shayanomer
  • Reviewing note: Table rows should be sourced. Examples in Fraser Kelly and Eben Figueiredo. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 11:58, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Looks like you took care of it? Thanks for catching the bibliography item I forgot to include. Immi Thrax RainbowRebellion2.png (talk) 12:05, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
      • No problem. That's why I made a "reviewing note" instead of an objection for a minute issue. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 12:07, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
OOM
  • I'd like to see some more information from the SW.com interview included in the article. Specifically, how Lavery chose to write about Motti and his intentions in writing the short story (third and fourth questions) They're pretty relevant to the author and his contribution to Star Wars. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 12:00, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Macaroni
  • I'd like to see the intro expanded beyond one sentence. (Don't worry, you'll probably stay below 250 :P). JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 17:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments

I'm going to leave this in Comments rather than in opposition, as the article seems fine. This is addressed to the reviewers:

  • The website= parameter on the infobox was changed to a title, as it was explained to me that it was following the precedent set by David Maxwell and Lawrence Holland. Note that I had to remove the links from their infoboxes, since they were deadlinks (thanks Shay for retroacting those change to the External links, I missed that). Those were old status articles, from before 2010, I think it should be better to follow how we proceed now on most OOU pages, meaning: [http(s)://domain.com domain.com], instead of [http(s)://domain.com Title]. It's way neater that way IMO, and not every website are titled in an explicit manner. -- NanoLuukeCloning facility 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Precedent aside, I think we should default to a title when provided, and use the former example as a last resort. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 14:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Regarding archivedate, I'm really not understanding the issue here regarding using archive.org timestamp instead of ISO 8601 YYYY-MM-DD. Both will result in the same wikilinked display of the date, "Month Day, Year". Yes, the documentation tells us to do it in ISO formatting, but this documentation is a mess. It's a copy of an old Wikipedia documentation, that should have been rewritten year ago, if only to add proper Star Wars-related examples. Since then, archivedate was used on numerous citation template, always using the timestamp. Sure, Cite_web can't use archivedate on it's on like others template, but the point is that it could in the future be used for that very purpose with some modification, as it's something we might want to do, as already discussed with ecks. I would like for you to reconsider, as 1) it's not erroneus, and is working as intended, 2) it can confuse editors in regards to the general use of archivedate= parameter, 3) it would hinder work on a possible future rework of Cite_web, 4) a majority of Cite_web instances uses timestamp, and it would be counter-productive to have status articles tell us it's not a proper use. -- NanoLuukeCloning facility 14:42, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


Abran Balfour

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png Fan26 (Talk) 19:26, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote.png OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 19:49, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
  3. Biggestleo (Talk) 10:25, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
  4. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 10:39, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • "Leia Organa told fellow member of the Alliance Luke Skywalker". "fellow Alliance member" is less wordy. Fan26 (Talk) 18:14, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Pair O'Dice

  • Nominated by: Liverpool92Ackbar HS.jpg 12:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Paradise!

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png Imperators II(Talk) 15:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote.png Objection resolved through Discord OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 13:25, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  3. It took a while, but let's get Liverpool his first CAN. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 18:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  4. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Imp
  • The Legends page for Pair O'Dice notes that its first appearance was in The Jewel of Yavin. Have you checked whether this is indeed the case? If it is, it should be noted in this article's BTS per status article precedent. Imperators II(Talk) 12:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
    • Added.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS.jpg
      • Can you please tell me the page number where it appears? Imperators II(Talk) 13:03, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
        • And in any case it doesn't mean that the first mention in GG2 is somehow invalidated by this, please restore that. Imperators II(Talk) 13:04, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
          • Restored in a copy-edit. Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 13:06, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
            • I don't own the book so I have to go by the article. Shay fixed it anyway.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS.jpg 13:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
              • Wookieepedia articles, especially ones that have not undergone status article review process—like the Legends Pair O'Dice—are not a reliable source. It is your responsibility as a nominator to check the sources for information that is applicable to this article, which in this instance is The Jewel of Yavin. Imperators II(Talk) 13:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
                • Found it and can confirm that Pair O'Dice is in the book.--Liverpool92Ackbar HS.jpg 13:45, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
                  • For the record, just want to clarify that Liverpool confirmed the casino is mentioned in the book but it's only a {{Mo}}. Imperators II(Talk) 15:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
OOM

Comments

Unidentified umbrella-like creature

(0 ECs/2 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. Liverpool92Ackbar HS.jpg 00:21, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. Nice work! - Cwedin(talk) 00:36, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Cwedin
  • The quote should be updated to match the Disney+ subtitles. (And audio would be a nice touch, but it's not required.) - Cwedin(talk) 21:44, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Old-fashioned potato salad

  • Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 01:24, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Time to start finishing the lunch sides.

(1 ECs/2 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. Objections addressed via discord. VergenceScatter (talk) 02:42, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote.png OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 21:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  3. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 17:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Chrellis system

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 15:41, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. ECvote.png Fan26 (Talk) 17:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  3. ECvote.png OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 21:10, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  4. DwartiiDelver (talk) 03:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
  5. ECvote.png Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 10:46, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Bongo Marauder

(1 ECs/3 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png Fan26 (Talk) 17:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 18:06, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  3. --Liverpool92Ackbar HS.jpg 23:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
  4. Biggestleo (Talk) 10:20, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Comments

B1 grapple droid

  • Nominated by: Cwedin(talk) 00:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: CAN is a GA is a FGA is a CAN.

(1 ECs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 1 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

  1. ECvote.png OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 20:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

OOM
  • Is there a reason why the droid's degree isn't mentioned?
    • Added.
  • The fact that the droid is a trooper (per BTS and the quote) should be mentioned in the article body. Also, the link to troop should be changed to trooper, since they're two different subjects.
    • Done.
  • The last part of the BTS, the part about the 1stID, would integrate better between the first paragraph and the part about the droid's appearance in the game as dark side units. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 06:26, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Oplovis system

(2 ECs/3 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

  1. Reviewing Imp's noms is super easy, barely an inconvenience. JediMasterMacaroniAdmiral Ackbar RH.png(Talk) 19:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  2. I know right? Erebus Chronus (Talk) 20:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  3. ECvote.png OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 20:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
  4. ECvote.png I hope you're actually reviewing them. :P Shayanomer Din Djarin's clan.svg (talk) 10:47, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
  5. grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 16:59, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Wistie Fest pie

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Delmaasi pirates

  • Nominated by: Erebus Chronus (Talk) 05:17, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: These pirate groups are interesting :P

(0 ECs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 2 EC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 1 EC vote required to pass.)

Support

Object

Comments

Retrieved from "https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Comprehensive_article_nominations?oldid=10276159"
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.