Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations/Csilla

Csilla

Nominated by: Toqgers (talk) 22:34, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
Nomination comments:

(1 ECs/1 Users/2 Total)

Support

Welcome to the CAN, Toqgers! Fan26 (Talk) 00:08, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
Nice job--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:27, September 23, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan

~~Grid coordinates are considered OOU and placed in the BtS, not the article body.~~ Fan26 (Talk) 22:38, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
- To my understanding in canon they are considered in-universe information.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:40, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
  - Oh, that's exclusively legends then? My bad. Fan26 (Talk) 22:43, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
    - To be honest I just went with what I saw on existing comprehensive articles haha. That's really good to know! Toqgers (talk) 22:50, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
~~Context for Thrawn would be nice.~~ Fan26 (Talk) 22:43, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
- How is it now? Added that he's a Grand Admiral with the Empire. Toqgers (talk) 23:00, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
  - Yeah, that works. Fan26 (Talk) 00:06, September 23, 2019 (UTC)

Ruiz

~~The BTS should mention first the canon information and then the Legends information~~--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:46, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
- Made change. Toqgers (talk) 22:59, September 22, 2019 (UTC)

Anil

As far as I remember, I think there is some talk in the novel Thrawn that suggests the Chiss and their home planet were largely unknown to the galaxy. If that's the case, you should mention that in the article too.
- I've added that now. Toqgers (talk) 04:25, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
When formatting filenames, such as images, please use underscores instead of spaces. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:08, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
- Done. Toqgers (talk) 04:03, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
The "sector" field of the infobox is for specific sectors, so I'd suggest leaving it empty. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:15, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not so sure about that one, I initially considered making this objection, but the Datapad shows that there's a small space similar to Legends Chiss Space surrounding Csilla with the name Chiss Ascendancy. This is similar to the Legends Catlia system which has Chiss Space.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:56, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  - Well, I see your point, but I don't think we should make such an assumption in a canon article because of something from its Legends counterpart. For all we know, that space labeled as "Chiss Ascendancy" in the Datapad could include multiple formal sectors. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:23, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    - I'll be taking this issue to the talk page, given that the discussion is ongoing there.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:44, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    - I honestly wasn't sure about it myself and figured if I was misinterpreting it someone would speak up. I mainly interpreted it Chiss Ascendancy label as a sector and not just a reference to the political entity because the only other label in Datapad for with that text size is for Bothan Space which is definitely a sector. It's a bit confusing that Chiss Ascendancy/Legends covers both topics in one article ("Chiss Space" probably should have its own imo), but did make me feel it made at least some sense to interpret the label that way. If anyone else has an opinion, we could just go with consensus. Toqgers (talk) 02:46, September 23, 2019 (UTC)

Imp

~~The article needs to be updated. Please see our most recent Canon comprehensive article, Skynara, for an example of how to handle that.~~ Imperators II^(Talk) 07:44, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
- Can you clarify what you mean by this? Toqgers (talk) 16:28, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
- Okay nvm I see what you mean. Toqgers (talk) 17:17, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  - Updated the sources and behind the scenes sections accordingly. Toqgers (talk) 17:35, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
Another thing you should take from the Skynara article is how to reference Standard Galactic Grid. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:44, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
Please add an image category. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:44, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
You should upload a wider crop of the map for the infobox. The whole point of map images like that in infoboxes, since they don't technically depict planets themselves, is that they provide some information about the planets' location relative to nearby astronomical objects. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:44, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
- Would the map image from Where in the Galaxy Are the Worlds of Star Wars: The Force Awakens? serve better, since it demonstrates the proximity to Ilum and the Starkiller Base origin point? And digital is always nice too, since scans don't always retain original picture quality haha. Toqgers (talk) 17:09, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  - Both the TFABG map and the one in the SW.com TFA article depict Csilla and the Starkiller Base origin point, so I guess I'd be fine with whichever you choose, as long as you crop it wide enough to include both objects (but not too wide to draw the viewer's attention away from Csilla). Imperators II^(Talk) 17:52, September 23, 2019 (UTC)

Comments