- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.
Contents
Electromagnetic duster[]
- Nominated by: Cumulonimbus Cloud 12:35, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: Date is from Codex entry
(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)
(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)
Support[]
- Nice work. JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 01:59, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
- UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:45, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Who cares about Jedi vs Sith, we all really want to know how the galaxy is kept clean. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 07:38, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
- Exciting. OOM 224 ༼༽talk༼༽ 07:48, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
Object[]
Fan[]
The Codex entry wouldn't be able to give a date in the BBY/ABY dating system since all codex entries are set within the timeframe of the game. Please add a date ref extrapolating how 3666 BBY is the date.Fan26 (Talk) 03:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)- Yeah, that's true. I've added a date ref. Cumulonimbus Cloud 08:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- It could use a little more explanation re: how we get to the BBY/ABY calendar from a BTC/ATC date. Fan26 (Talk) 14:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- How does it look? Cumulonimbus Cloud 16:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Like JM Macaroni said, it could use a little linking. Fan26 (Talk) 21:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- See my response on Macaroni duster below Cumulonimbus Cloud 22:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Like JM Macaroni said, it could use a little linking. Fan26 (Talk) 21:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- How does it look? Cumulonimbus Cloud 16:14, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- It could use a little more explanation re: how we get to the BBY/ABY calendar from a BTC/ATC date. Fan26 (Talk) 14:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's true. I've added a date ref. Cumulonimbus Cloud 08:59, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Macaroni duster[]
Ref two should be fully linked.JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 07:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)- Added a link to 3666 BBY but everything else that should be linked is linked IMO, what do you think? Cumulonimbus Cloud 08:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Aight guys so I really big brained it and got 7 links on ref 2. I really can't think of anything else to link at this point. Cumulonimbus Cloud 22:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Added a link to 3666 BBY but everything else that should be linked is linked IMO, what do you think? Cumulonimbus Cloud 08:20, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
Many apologies for the delay, two more things: what establishes that the Treaty of Coruscant took place in 3653 BBY?Inconsistency between Vibro-mop and vibromop.JediMasterMacaroni(Talk) 23:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC)- Thanks for getting back to this! Both addressed. I've restored the link to 3653 BBY in the ref b/c it doesn't look like a dup, fyi. Cumulonimbus Cloud 01:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Comments[]
Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 00:29, 27 June 2021 (UTC)