Wookieepedia

READ MORE

Wookieepedia
Don't have an account?
Register
Register
Wookieepedia
In a galaxy far, far away....
190,477
pages
in: Semi-protected pages, Move protected pages, Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages, Comprehensive article nominations

Changes: Wookieepedia:Comprehensive article nominations

Back to page
View source
No edit summary
No edit summary
(12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 75: Line 75:
 
[[Category:Comprehensive article nominations| ]]
  
[[Category:Comprehensive article nominations| ]]
   
−
{{/Pioku system}}
 +
{{/Toledian main city}}
   
−
{{/Droid laser turret}}
 +
{{/Toledian}}
   
−
{{/Gungan whistle}}
 +
{{/Unidentified Gungan farmer}}
   
−
{{/Shirb system}}
 +
{{/Jmin system}}
   
−
{{/Sivad}}
 +
{{/Jac Lodain's father}}
   
−
{{/Unidentified Sullustan farmer}}
 +
{{/Jac Lodain's aunt}}
   
−
{{/Tourani system}}
 +
{{/Csilla}}
   
−
{{/V'shar system}}
 +
{{/Ternin system}}
   
−
{{/Marzoon system}}
 +
{{/Hewl}}
−  
−
{{/Toledian main city}}
  
−  
−
{{/Toledian}}
  
−  
−
{{/Unidentified Gungan farmer}}
  
   
−
{{/Skynara}}
 +
{{/Iskin system}}

Revision as of 20:11, 23 September 2019

Template:Shortcut

Premium-ComprehensiveArticle

This page is for Comprehensive article nominations. A Comprehensive article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Good or Featured status due to its limited content. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Comprehensive status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding EduCorps review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after one week will be subject to immediate removal.

READ THIS FIRST!

A Comprehensive article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic if the article reaches 165 words, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section (not including captions, quotes, headers, etc). Conversely, an article must not have an introduction if it is less than 165 words (with the exception of articles on out-of-universe products), not counting the "Behind the scenes" section. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  13. …not exceed 250 words in length if it provides an introduction. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. However, any article that does not provide an introduction per Rule #12 is eligible to be nominated for Comprehensive status regardless of word count. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  14. …not be deliberately shortened if it approaches the 165- or 250-word limits.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. Select an article you feel is worthy of Comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Comprehensive article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{CAnom|second}}).
  3. Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
  7. The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
  8. Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
  9. Each user shall be limited to eight active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
  10. Users must successfully complete one Comprehensive article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the CAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful CA nominations before they can have three, and so on.

How to review:

  1. To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
  3. Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
  4. Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.

Result:

  1. If a nomination has been active for over two days and has no active objections, it may pass with a total of either three EduCorps votes or two EduCorps and three user votes.
  2. Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Comprehensive article." As such, an EduCorps member will archive the nomination using JocastaBot in Wookieepedia's Discord server and place the article on the Comprehensive articles page. Only members of the EduCorps are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.
All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by EduCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 1 week.


Premium-ComprehensiveArticle

This page is for the nomination of "Comprehensive articles." For a list of "Comprehensive articles," see Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive articles.

What is a "Comprehensive article?"

A "Comprehensive article" is an article that contains all information regarding the topic. Often, "Comprehensive articles" cannot reach Featured or Good Article status due to their limited content. This process is intended to recognize articles that contain all relevant information, yet are still under the 250 word limit required for a Good Article. The purpose of this is twofold—firstly, to help users distinguish what is a stub, and what is merely a short article with no further relevant material to be added, and, more importantly, to highlight for the reader when they are reading something that has been judged definitely "Comprehensive"—that is, a guarantee to the reader that whatever they are reading contains the sum total of all available content on that topic.

Nominations and promotions of the Comprehensive article process are overseen by a collective of users known as the "EduCorps," which is made up of the Inquisitorius, the AgriCorps, and various other experienced users who are considered qualified to adequately judge the nominated material.

Lucasfilm Ltd. and its many licensees continue to expand the Star Wars universe. Since new information might become available, it may be necessary to revoke a "Comprehensive article's" status. A forum will be used to nominate articles that have fallen out-of-date. Members of the EduCorps will then post a warning template on that page, and a grace period of at least one week will be instituted in which the article can be improved. If there is a significant amount of new information, it is likely that once updated, the article will become eligible for Good article status, and thereby ineligible for Comprehensive article status.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia. This is, of course, within reason. If a topic only has a very limited degree of content that cannot be divided up into the relevant article sections, it is not required that it follow the Layout Guide precisely. This is to be judged on a case-by-case basis.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one relevant quote on the article if available.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …counting the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, must not exceed 250 words in length (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Any articles exceeding the limit should be taken to the Good article nominations page for consideration.
  13. …provide an introduction if it reaches 165 words, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section. Conversely, an article may not have an introduction if it is less than 165 words, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section.
  14. …if an article approaches the 250-word length for Good article nominations, it should not be deliberately shortened in order to avoid meeting that word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, find an article you find is worthy of Comprehensive status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{CAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for CA one or more times previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{CAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Others will object to the nomination if they disagree that the article is good enough; they will then supply reasons for doing so, and ways to improve the article in accordance with the established rules.
  7. Nominators and supporters will adjust the article until the objectors (with reasonable objections) are satisfied. Objectors may also make alterations—if there is any reason for contention on a given point, it should be settled in a civil manner in the nomination field itself.
  8. Users may not vote on their own articles.
  9. Each user shall be limited to four active Comprehensive article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations beyond four will be subject to immediate removal.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. As stated above, any objections will be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. There are several ways in which an article can receive the required number of votes. Within a 48-hour period of nomination, only EduCorps votes will count towards the total, although anyone may choose to vote in that window. If four members of the EduCorps support a nomination in that window [0 to 48 hours post-nomination], and there are no outstanding objections, the article can be considered a "Comprehensive article" and be tagged with the {{Eras|comp}} template 48 hours after the initial nomination. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{CA}} template. When the 48 hours are up, any user's votes will contribute towards the total. If two EduCorps members have voted for an article after a week, three regular votes will be required. After a week, an article may also pass with just three EduCorps votes.
  5. Once a nomination is successful, it will be placed on the Comprehensive article list. Note: Only members of the EduCorps, which includes the members of the AgriCorps and Inquisitorius, are allowed to archive Comprehensive article nominations.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to instantaneous removal by EduCorps members if objections are not addressed, or at least not answered, after a period of one week.

Note: All Reduxed articles require only three support votes to maintain their Comprehensive status, all of which must come from EduCorps members. Reduxed articles will be subject to removal if objections are not addressed after a period of ten days, pending the support of at least three EduCorps members.

Comprehensive article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages archive/2019|]]

Toledian main city

  • Nominated by: DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:49, September 17, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(4 ECs/2 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 14:37, September 17, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 09:25, September 18, 2019 (UTC)
  3. Zed42 (talk) 09:27, September 18, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:42, September 18, 2019 (UTC)
  5. —spookywillowwtalk 09:59, September 19, 2019 (UTC)
  6. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:01, September 25, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Zed
  • Since it's referred to as the "main city", can't it be inferred that it was a capital and thus be placed in Category:Capital cities? Zed42 (talk) 08:07, September 17, 2019 (UTC)
    • I would prefer not to speculate. Like how LA or San Diego can be considered main cities, but they're not California's capital. If more people feel that it should be considered the capital, I can add it--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 08:14, September 17, 2019 (UTC)
      • Yeah, good point, that may be too speculative to say outright. I'll just strike the objection for now. Zed42 (talk) 08:18, September 17, 2019 (UTC)
Imp
  • The dating ref still needs some tweaking. Firstly, the D23 image doesn't explicitly use the BBY/ABY system anywhere on that image, therefore it can't be sourced straight to that. Secondly, "Since the destruction of the Toledian main city took place between the Hosnian Cataclysm" — what is the source for the destruction actually taking place after the Hosnian Cataclysm? Imperators II(Talk) 19:56, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • Done--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 05:46, September 25, 2019 (UTC)
      • Please see this. Imperators II(Talk)
        • I disagree with that, but I guess it needs to be removed so this can pass. That issue can be discussed later. Anyways removed--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 07:10, September 25, 2019 (UTC)
          • Right now, the article still gives the hard date of 34 ABY for the destruction, which is not supported by the ref note. I believe Spookywilloww has dealed rather successfully with the same issue on his nom below, why don't you take a look? Imperators II(Talk) 08:05, September 25, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 09:01, September 25, 2019 (UTC)


[[Category:Archived nominations by User:DarthRuiz30|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages archive/2019|]]

Toledian

  • Nominated by: DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:49, September 17, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(4 ECs/2 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Zed42 (talk) 08:20, September 17, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:48, September 18, 2019 (UTC)
  3. —spookywillowwtalk 18:49, September 18, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 18:52, September 18, 2019 (UTC)
  5. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 06:07, September 19, 2019 (UTC)
  6. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 09:01, September 25, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Spooky
Imp

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 09:01, September 25, 2019 (UTC)


[[Category:Archived nominations by User:DarthRuiz30|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages archive/2019|]]

Unidentified Gungan farmer

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 00:59, September 17, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(4 ECs/2 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. Zed42 (talk) 08:21, September 17, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 18:53, September 18, 2019 (UTC)
  3. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 19:14, September 18, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 06:36, September 19, 2019 (UTC)
  5. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:42, September 19, 2019 (UTC)
  6. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 19:57, September 24, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Imp
  • Please see my objection on the Toledian main city CAN. Imperators II(Talk) 19:57, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • Took a pass at it, not entirely sure if it'll work or not; let me know.—spookywillowwtalk 20:44, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
      • Can you connect the Hosnian Cataclysm to TFA in the note? Imperators II(Talk) 15:40, September 24, 2019 (UTC)
        • Following an objection brought up on Jac Lodain's GA, had to take out the Matt Martin material to comply with the social media rules, so I've replaced it here with what I hope will work for this case.—spookywillowwtalk 18:00, September 24, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 09:01, September 25, 2019 (UTC)


[[Category:Archived nominations by User:Spookywilloww|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages‎ archive/2019|]]

Jmin system

(3 ECs/2 Users/5 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 17:52, September 18, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 23:25, September 18, 2019 (UTC)
  3. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 07:14, September 19, 2019 (UTC)
  4. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 09:11, September 19, 2019 (UTC)
  5. Zed42 (talk) 09:33, September 19, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

[[Category:Archived nominations by User:Imperators II|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages archive/2019|]]

Jac Lodain's father

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 02:19, September 21, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 12:26, September 21, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 03:40, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
  3. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:09, September 30, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 13:27, October 2, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • I'm not really sure if the last sentence in the body is all that necessary, since it doesn't mention the father. Fan26 (Talk) 03:26, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
    • Hm, maybe that'll work? It was about the father, it just wasn't worded super clearly. That particular part comes from the bit in his quote —spookywillowwtalk 03:39, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
      • Yeah, that's good. Fan26 (Talk) 03:40, September 22, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 13:27, October 2, 2019 (UTC)


[[Category:Archived nominations by User:Spookywilloww|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages archive/2019|]]

Jac Lodain's aunt

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 02:16, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Just wrapping these up because why not.

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Nice job doing all these. Fan26 (Talk) 03:49, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 00:26, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  3. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:11, September 30, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Imperators II(Talk) 06:48, October 3, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • Could you reword the last sentence? Here I do feel it's relevant to the article, as it pertains to his perception of his aunt, but right now it feels, IMO, a little out of place, and could be reworded to more clearly connect to the aunt. Fan26 (Talk) 03:38, September 22, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 06:48, October 3, 2019 (UTC)


[[Category:Archived nominations by User:Spookywilloww|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages archive/2019|]]

Csilla

  • Nominated by: Toqgers (talk) 22:34, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:

(3 ECs/3 Users/6 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote Welcome to the CAN, Toqgers! Fan26 (Talk) 00:08, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  2. Nice job--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 00:27, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Nice work for your first nomination! TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:28, September 25, 2019 (UTC)
  4. ECvote Good work, indeed. Imperators II(Talk) 06:50, September 25, 2019 (UTC)
  5. —spookywillowwtalk 10:07, September 25, 2019 (UTC)
  6. Good work. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 18:43, September 27, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Fan
  • Grid coordinates are considered OOU and placed in the BtS, not the article body. Fan26 (Talk) 22:38, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
    • To my understanding in canon they are considered in-universe information.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:40, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
      • Oh, that's exclusively legends then? My bad. Fan26 (Talk) 22:43, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
        • To be honest I just went with what I saw on existing comprehensive articles haha. That's really good to know! Toqgers (talk) 22:50, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
  • Context for Thrawn would be nice. Fan26 (Talk) 22:43, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
    • How is it now? Added that he's a Grand Admiral with the Empire. Toqgers (talk) 23:00, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
      • Yeah, that works. Fan26 (Talk) 00:06, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
Ruiz
  • The BTS should mention first the canon information and then the Legends information--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 22:46, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
    • Made change. Toqgers (talk) 22:59, September 22, 2019 (UTC)
Anil
  • As far as I remember, I think there is some talk in the novel Thrawn that suggests the Chiss and their home planet were largely unknown to the galaxy. If that's the case, you should mention that in the article too.
    • I've added that now. Toqgers (talk) 04:25, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  • When formatting filenames, such as images, please use underscores instead of spaces. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:08, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  • The "sector" field of the infobox is for specific sectors, so I'd suggest leaving it empty. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 01:15, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • I'm not so sure about that one, I initially considered making this objection, but the Datapad shows that there's a small space similar to Legends Chiss Space surrounding Csilla with the name Chiss Ascendancy. This is similar to the Legends Catlia system which has Chiss Space.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 01:56, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
      • Well, I see your point, but I don't think we should make such an assumption in a canon article because of something from its Legends counterpart. For all we know, that space labeled as "Chiss Ascendancy" in the Datapad could include multiple formal sectors. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:23, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
        • I'll be taking this issue to the talk page, given that the discussion is ongoing there.--DarthRuiz30 (talk) 02:44, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
        • I honestly wasn't sure about it myself and figured if I was misinterpreting it someone would speak up. I mainly interpreted it Chiss Ascendancy label as a sector and not just a reference to the political entity because the only other label in Datapad for with that text size is for Bothan Space which is definitely a sector. It's a bit confusing that Chiss Ascendancy/Legends covers both topics in one article ("Chiss Space" probably should have its own imo), but did make me feel it made at least some sense to interpret the label that way. If anyone else has an opinion, we could just go with consensus. Toqgers (talk) 02:46, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • I've gone ahead and removed it from the sector field, because the discussion on the talk page shows there's too much uncertainty. The planet's link to the Chiss Ascendancy is covered by affiliation anyways, even if it does turn out to definitively be an acceptable name for the sector also. Toqgers (talk) 04:46, September 24, 2019 (UTC)
  • (Reviewing note) When pipelinking, please always place all characters inside the link brackets per the Manual of Style. TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 02:28, September 25, 2019 (UTC)
Imp
  • The article needs to be updated. Please see our most recent Canon comprehensive article, Skynara, for an example of how to handle that. Imperators II(Talk) 07:44, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • Can you clarify what you mean by this? Toqgers (talk) 16:28, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • Okay nvm I see what you mean. Toqgers (talk) 17:17, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
      • Updated the sources and behind the scenes sections accordingly. Toqgers (talk) 17:35, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  • Another thing you should take from the Skynara article is how to reference Standard Galactic Grid. Imperators II(Talk) 07:44, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • Done. Toqgers (talk) 20:03, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
      • You didn't change anything about how it's referenced. Imperators II(Talk) 20:11, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
        • Okay, I misunderstood. I thought you meant the way I phrased it was off. Well coordinates sounds better than square and I've fixed it now! Toqgers (talk) 22:13, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  • Please add an image category. Imperators II(Talk) 07:44, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • Can you clarify what I need to do for this? I know the original map image wasn't in the category "Maps of the Unknown Regions," which the one I've replaced it with is. Is there anything else that needs done with the image? Toqgers (talk) 15:50, September 25, 2019 (UTC)
      • That meant that you should always add {{Imagecat}} to an article if applicable. Anil already did this for you in his copy-edit. And I forgot to strike the objection, so apologies for the confusion. Imperators II(Talk) 16:10, September 25, 2019 (UTC)
  • You should upload a wider crop of the map for the infobox. The whole point of map images like that in infoboxes, since they don't technically depict planets themselves, is that they provide some information about the planets' location relative to nearby astronomical objects. Imperators II(Talk) 07:44, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • Would the map image from Where in the Galaxy Are the Worlds of Star Wars: The Force Awakens? serve better, since it demonstrates the proximity to Ilum and the Starkiller Base origin point? And digital is always nice too, since scans don't always retain original picture quality haha. Toqgers (talk) 17:09, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
      • Both the TFABG map and the one in the SW.com TFA article depict Csilla and the Starkiller Base origin point, so I guess I'd be fine with whichever you choose, as long as you crop it wide enough to include both objects (but not too wide to draw the viewer's attention away from Csilla). Imperators II(Talk) 17:52, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
        • I've replaced the image with one from SW.com that better illustrates where Csilla is in relation to the other nearby places Toqgers (talk) 22:59, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  • "This means the events of Star Wars: Episode VIII The Last Jedi, including the First Order attack on the Resistance fleet, also take place in 34 ABY." — why? Imperators II(Talk) 06:28, September 24, 2019 (UTC)
    • Oh, because the evacuation of D'Qar is directly after TFA. Would it be better to use Han's death/Battle of Starkiller Base as a point of reference, since Galactic Atlas explicitly date's that and the general point is really that's it's during or after the sequel trilogy? I picked the TLJ event since it's a bit later in the timeline, but they're all pretty close together. Toqgers (talk) 15:50, September 24, 2019 (UTC)
    • Okay I've added a sentence noting that The Last Jedi takes place shortly after The Force Awakens. Toqgers (talk) 21:53, September 24, 2019 (UTC)
AV
  • Does the Thrawn novel provide any timeline clues regarding when the Empire discovered Thrawn? If so, I like to see that information integrated into the section that discusses the obscurity of Csilla. - AV-6R7Crew Pit 16:37, September 27, 2019 (UTC)
    • We know it was between 13 BBY and 11 BBY based on the Del Rey timeline placing it between Solo (13 BBY prologue) and A New Dawn (11 BBY). Give me a minute, I'll add that to the sentence. Toqgers (talk) 17:28, September 27, 2019 (UTC)
    • Okay, done. Let me know what you think! Toqgers (talk) 17:39, September 27, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

  • Should you mention that the artist learned of the planet and recorded it in their journal?--Editoronthewiki (talk) 23:17, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
    • Just added some info on that. Interesting counterpoint to the Empire and Lysatra myths knowing next to knowing about Csilla. What do you think? Toqgers (talk) 04:31, September 24, 2019 (UTC)

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 03:16, September 30, 2019 (UTC)


[[Category:Archived nominations by User:Toqgers|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages archive/2019|]]

Ternin system

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:31, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 01:08, September 24, 2019 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:19, September 28, 2019 (UTC)
  4. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:13, September 30, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 21:25, September 30, 2019 (UTC)


[[Category:Archived nominations by User:Imperators II|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages archive/2019|]]

Hewl

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:31, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 01:19, September 24, 2019 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:18, September 28, 2019 (UTC)
  4. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:16, September 30, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 21:25, September 30, 2019 (UTC)


[[Category:Archived nominations by User:Imperators II|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a comprehensive article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Comprehensive article nomination pages archive/2019|]]

Iskin system

(3 ECs/1 Users/4 Total)

Support

  1. ECvote TanDivoInsignia-SenateMurders Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 22:31, September 23, 2019 (UTC)
  2. ECvote Fan26 (Talk) 01:27, September 24, 2019 (UTC)
  3. ECvote Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:38, September 28, 2019 (UTC)
  4. --DarthRuiz30 (talk) 21:17, September 30, 2019 (UTC)

Object

Comments

Approved as a Comprehensive article by EduCorps 21:25, September 30, 2019 (UTC)


[[Category:Archived nominations by User:Imperators II|]]

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms