Wookieepedia

READ MORE

Wookieepedia
Wookieepedia
In a galaxy far, far away....
211,254
pages
in: Semi-protected pages, Move protected pages, Wookieepedia Featured article nomination pages

Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations

View source
Featured
article
nominations

This page is for Featured article nominations. A Featured article is an article that is of complete quality and represents the best a Wookieepedia article can be. It is for fully fleshed out subjects that go beyond the limited content of Good and Comprehensive articles. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Featured status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding Inquisitorius review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after two weeks will be subject to immediate removal.

READ THIS FIRST!

A Featured article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic.
  13. …be at least 1000 words long. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  14. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.
  15. …be nominated by a user who has promoted at least one article to Good article status. Exceptions can be made for a Good article nomination that, due to objections post-nomination, has gone over the Good article word limit, so long as the number of words added during the Good article nomination process is 250 or fewer.

How to nominate:

  1. Select an article you feel is worthy of Featured status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{FAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Featured article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{FAnom|second}}). To automatically generate an index upon nomination, use {{FAnom|index=1}}.
  3. Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
  7. The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
  8. Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
  9. Each user (except for members of the Inquisitorius) shall be limited to four active Featured article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
  10. Users must successfully complete one Featured article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the FAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful FA nominations before they can have three, and three successful FA nominations before they can have four.

How to review:

  1. To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
  3. Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
  4. Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.

Result:

  1. If a nomination has been active for over two days and has no active objections, it may pass with a total of either five Inquisitorius votes, four Inquisitorius and two user votes, or three Inquisitorius and four user votes.
  2. Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Featured article." As such, an Inquisitorius member will archive the nomination using JocastaBot in Wookieepedia's Discord server and place the article on the Featured articles page. Only members of the Inquisitorius are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.
All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by Inquisitorius vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.


Featured article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Dathomirian/Legends

  • Nominated by: AmazinglyCool (talk) 17:46, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: After 5 months, I finally found the time to finish the source list :P
  • Word count at nomination time: 4071 words (377 introduction, 2017 body, 1677 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:ALIENS, WP:NOVELS, WP:TCW

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support

Object

ThrawnChiss
Lew
  • Is there really no relevant quotes for the body sections that don't have any? A side note, the top quote in the history section should be moved from its current position to a different place Lewisr (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
  • The paragraphs in the "The Nightbrothers Two" section (especially the last two) are rather chunky and I think you can probably split them, and subsection that part Lewisr (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Addressed. Hopefully the paragraph stuff works nowAmazinglyCool (talk) 19:47, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
  • If pictured in The New Essential Chronology then its IU depiction in The New Essential Chronology (in-universe) should be noted Lewisr (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Should already be there in the "Genocide" section AmazinglyCool (talk) 19:47, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments


Snowball

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 2027 words (313 introduction, 1383 body, 331 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:MANDOVERSE

(2 Inqs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. —spookywillowwtalk 00:48, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 01:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
  3. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 06:24, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
CC-8
  • I think the intro could acknowledge that Snowball jumping on Neel started the chain of events that lead to the crew jumping to hyperspace
  • IMO details like Snowball being fed porridge (even though its the name of a subsection), stretching its legs, and screeching at Jod are too minor to include in an introduction
  • Vocals section could have an image, either of Collins or the monkey
  • Sources and notes and references are long enough to warrant a scroll box. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 07:51, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Addressed all CometSmudge (talk) 20:42, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
      • For the first one, I think what I really should have said was that Snowball triggered the crew's adventures away from At Attin Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
  • P&T can surely be extended with moments like Snowball screeching at Jod, reacting to the hologram, and not retrieving the key. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 12:56, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Old Wounds

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 19:51, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Skifffy
  • (Sources) Missing the Shadows of the Dark Side comic pack released at SDCC in 2010 and an indirect mention in The Ultimate Action Figure Collection. Skifffy (talk) 23:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Snapcrackleandpop
  • The Miscellanea field under Appearances needs filling out. Galaxy, Universe, Color, Species, Language, Planet, Desert, Lightsaber duel, etc. to name a few. Other fields like Weapons & Technology and Vehicles & Vessels also need fleshing out. SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 04:52, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
    • Thanks for those, added as much as I can. Feel free to add anything else that you notice is missing, as it's too impractical for me to try and get everything by myself. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 15:17, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
      • Piggybacking here, Owen is depicted using a GRS-1 snare rifle and I've added that to the Appearances section. It is incorrectly shown here as functioning like a blaster rifle instead of, well, like a snare rifle, but since the story isn't continuity I'm unsure if that's something that should be addressed within this article or on the Legends GRS-1 article. - GolanLegs (talk) 17:35, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Context for the Epic Collections and Omnibuses, if possible. Also, can the Insider issues' release dates be specified?
    • I feel like any extra context for the collections would be redundant, as the titles themselves are self explanatory.
    • I did have the Insider dates in earlier but tried to only include exact dates when they were absolutely necessary, as they tend to disrupt the flow of writing.
  • The clone trooper that appears in the Geonosis flashback was not a member of the Empire. On that note, would that mean that the Galactic Republic appears, if not the Grand Army of the Republic and the Republic Military?
    • Added
  • Do single members of a family appearing count as an appearance for that family? SorcererSupreme21 (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
    • I feel like it shouldn't count for single members, that may merit a wider discussion. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 07:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Comments

  • Would it be worth mentioning in the article that the Epic Collection and Omnibus present the story without qualifying it as non-canon, or at least its chronological placement in relation to the other stories in those collections? In both volumes, it is placed between Darth Vader and the Cry of Shadows miniseries and "The Duty." I know one of the early Epic Collection volumes had a statement on the canonicity of Star Wars Tales stories (non-comedic stories are assumed canonical, comedic stories are sectioned off in the back of the volume), but I don't believe one was every provided for Visionaries? Are we to now take "Old Wounds" as canonical to Legends? - GolanLegs (talk) 09:42, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
    • Posed the question to Chee on Discord, his response was "As far as the Holocron is concerned and how Legends reprints are labeled, the established statuses pre-2014 are all gone. Everything was lumped together and became Legends." So LucasFilm considers things Legends or not rather than trying to merge them into a cohesive timeline. Given the inclusion of the obviously non-canon stories I don't believe we can say the status of Old Wounds changes. But including the placements in the Legends collections is a good idea, added. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 01:27, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
      • Glad my suggestion was of help, godspeed! - GolanLegs (talk) 04:47, 5 April 2025 (UTC)



Chigg

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 00:13, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Been maintaining this since "Bad Eggs" and everything since; another of the ones stripped a year and a half ago. But really needn't and shouldn't stay stripped given it's done, basically.
  • Word count at nomination time: 2503 words (311 introduction, 2124 body, 68 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THR

(2 Inqs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Best to get it through before season 3 lol, I love Chigg Mor9347 (Talk) 00:47, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
  2. CometSmudge (talk) 21:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
  3. Lewisr (talk) 05:58, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comet
  • In the last paragraph of the Biography, Hap needs linking and context since he's previously only mentioned in the name of his eatery
  • Fruit shakes seem like they're notable, does a page need to be created and linked?
  • His homeworld is infobox exclusive CometSmudge (talk) 17:31, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Wat Tambor and the Quest for the Sacred Eye of the Albino Cyclops

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Great work! Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 11:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Objections

ThrawnChiss
Tommy
  • Lovely work so far! Got some preliminaries from a brief read over before I begin copy-editing.
  • A few duplicate links.
    • Cleared
      • There was one left, cleared in my copy-edit.
  • Not technically policy yet, but you may as well remove the links in the publishers summary.
    • Done
  • I'd recommend giving the full dates of release for both this product and RotS in the intro to show how close to the film's release this was.
    • Done
  • "to encounter the Eye of the Albino Cyclops" - so, is this eye the one Tambor is seeking as a replacement for the one he lost with Skywalker? If so, this should more explicitly be mentioned.
    • It's not clearly stated that Tambor is looking for a replacement for his own eye, that just kinda happens
  • "before opening a box containing his quarry" - is the quarry referring to the eye or Skywalker? I assume the eye, but earlier wording suggests Tambor already has the eye at this point ("Tambor, who receives a replacement for his right eye").
    • Reworded so that it's clear that he's looking for the Eye of the Albino Cyclops,
  • Some of the image captions have incorrect punctuation. "Michael Murnane, the artist behind "[the story]." is not a full sentence so does not need a full stop, whereas "Wat Tambor finds the Eye of the Albino Cyclops" does require one.
    • Fixed
  • Is the mention of Dark Journey necessary? I think it's one thing to mention that this story was placed last in the collection, but referencing the prior story, as well as what it was published in, does seem to be excessive context for what is only a reprint.
    • I think it's relevant given that the Legends collections are presented in a rough chronological order
      • OK, that is relevant.
  • "following the publication of Visionaries" - again, I think it would be nice to specify how long after the publication of Visionaries here.
    • Done
  • You use "also" back-to-back in two sentences in Legacy, could you rephrase please.
    • Done
  • "In canon" - I'd recommend using "in the current Star Wars canon" per lots of precedent.
    • Done
  • If this media is the first appearance of Skako, would it not also be the first appearance of the Skako system?
    • That tracks, done
  • Given what you describe in the body, would it be appropriate to use {{Ret}} next to Skako?
    • Done
  • If Anakin's lightsaber is vision only, surely this would also apply to weapon, melee weapons and lightsaber
  • With the inconsistency with Tambor's eye colour, would it be appropriate to mention his eye colour in the films for comparison?
    • Makes sense, done
      • Remember that we always have refs in ascending order.
  • Some duplicate refs in The quest begins and Continuity.
    • Fixed
  • Is Mustafar stated to be a plant in the comic? Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 10:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC
    • Don't know about plants but it's definitely established to be a planet :P
      • D'oh!
  • Something else came to mind; do you think it would be appropriate to have an article for the fight with Anakin where Tambor lost an eye? Unsure how much description the comic gives to see if it's a notable subject. Let me know what you think. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 12:33, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
    • All that's said is that it was "taken" by Anakin so not enough context for a whole article. Thanks for the detailed review! Commander Code-8 Hello There! 07:24, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
  • I'm curious at your choice of lead quote. Does this quote summarise the themes of the story or have specific importance to the narrative?
    • It's hard to define what's important to the narrative cause it's so weird, but it felt appropriate as the lead quote given that it was used in the preview summary and spoken twice in the comic with slight variation
      • Makes sense to me
  • Related to the above, you say that the Swirblies say "A heart in the eye is where compassion might lie," while the Lord Being says "A heart in the eye is where compassion may lie". Is this really different wording between the two quotes? If not, the lead quote should be updated to reflect the quote is used by multiple characters in the comic.
    • The wording is indeed different in both quotes
  • "the Swirblies state cryptically" - is it said to be cryptic in the source? If not, this is likely going against a neutral POV.
    • Removed
  • It may be useful to include some brief context for the Threshold of the Hidden Realms and the Eye of the Albino Cyclops in the intro.
    • Added a touch for the threshold but I feel like the Eye is self-explanatory
  • I think we could also use some more context in the plot summary ie Clouds of Cormelish, mind lattice, Four See Seers of the Cyclops (and their relationship with the Lord Being of the Swirblie, ie, is this one of the four), Albino Cyclops, etc. I appreciate these probably aren't given much context in the story, but even a brief bit of info is better than nothing. CSWE may be useful here.
    • So for the Clouds of Cormelish and mind lattice there's no context I can add without speculation, have added what I can for the others
  • "Clongor insists" - insists upon what?
    • Added
  • Crimlin clan is listed as an appearance; is this relevant to include in the plot summary or continuity (it is seemly mentioned in CSWE). Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 12:10, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Added to the summary, it's only mentioned in Wat Tambor's entry in CSWE so I don't think it's notable enough to be mentioned in the continuity section Commander Code-8 Hello There! 21:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
  • This is pretty irrelevant, even for this site, but wanted to mention: Hardcell-class interstellar transport says the transport's hull is titanium. If this is true, then this should be listed in the appearances. However, the issue is the Hardell article does not have a source for this. I'd advise having a brief look on some of the sources listed to see if you can find it, but it's not the end of the world if not, as I'd say it's outside the scope of this article if it isn't readily available info.
    • Found a source
      • Ah nice, well done. Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 11:24, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Linked to the above, I don't know to what degree we can see the Hardcell, but I assume we can at least list Hull/Legends in appearances. I also wonder if we can see any of the transport's weaponry? Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 13:30, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Added, can't see any weapons
  • Can the fact that "Dark Journey" was originally published in Star Wars Tales 17 in 2003 be sourced to the Legends Epic Collection? Tommy-Macaroni (he/they) 15:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Yes, early on in the collections list each story that they contain and the month and year they were published. Commander Code-8 Hello There! 21:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • I think "Dark Journey" should have its full date in line with comic stories getting full dates for SAs.
    • Full release dates are only required by the in universe layout guide, and my personal preference is to not use a full release date if it's not essential
      • Hmm, okay. Less fussed on comic stories. Good loophole found though; I sharply disagree with some aspect of that clause being missing from the OOU LG; as you point out, it not being there means others could abuse it being missing to skip things like specific filming dates or discussing the dates for two pieces of media when directly relevant to the subject, such as back to back TV episodes. Will tow a more refined version to CT; I don't believe that part of it being missing was done intentionally so those could be avoided.—spookywillowwtalk 03:47, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
  • "a concept artist who developed the design of Wat Tambor for the 2002 prequel trilogy film, Star Wars: Episode II Attack of the Clones."—I don't think the Tambor DB supports the 2002 date or the prequel trilogy nature for the film, at least off ctrl+f.—spookywillowwtalk 02:03, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments


Unidentified Nihil (Temerancé)

  • Nominated by: Chipchip88 (talk) 16:45, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: First FAN! And on this unnamed Nihil I thought would appear in the finale. Here we go!
  • Word count at nomination time: 1283 words (268 introduction, 961 body, 54 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:COMICS, WP:THR

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. —spookywillowwtalk 17:16, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 02:42, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Objections

spookly
  • Hm, sure there isn't anything for a skills section? I see 'em wielding a blaster in one of the images at a glance.—spookywillowwtalk 03:04, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Added skills and abilities section Chipchip88 (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Lew
  • Humanoid can be included Lewisr (talk) 04:10, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
  • I think you might actually be citing the wrong issue number in your references, you've put it down as issue 2 instead of 3 Lewisr (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
  • The freakshow comment, or at least something related to it, should be noted in the PT section Lewisr (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Do think it'd be worth very briefly giving an outcome of the incident on Abtin Lewisr (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Not sure if what I added will suffice. Chipchip88 (talk) 22:37, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments

David Tennant

(1 Inqs/2 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 Inq vote required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. 41 51 User 41 51 (talk) 20:36, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  2. —spookywillowwtalk 19:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
  3. Jedi Sarith LeKit (talk) 18:15, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Objections

ThrawnChiss
Sarith

Comments


Faris Karan

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 00:13, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Towing up to FAN; updated because script finally came out. Towing upward as said on the GAR (just barely saved from idling out).
  • Word count at nomination time: 1215 words (179 introduction, 811 body, 225 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:COMICSWP:THR

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Tiplee

  • Nominated by: Wok142 (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2025 (UTC) & Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 05:42, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Happy to work alongside Brandon, the original nominator, to restore this FA! Wok142 (talk) 16:03, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Word count at nomination time: 1455 words (202 introduction, 1086 body, 167 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Collaboration WP:TCW WP:Women WP:Comics

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. —spookywillowwtalk 19:10, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
  • I think you can cut the rings of Phelbos in the infobox and just leave it in the biography Lewisr (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Context for the Clone Wars in the intro should be added, and a date could be as well Lewisr (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • The "Ringo Vinda" section in the biography probably should be subsectioned since it's 5 paragraphs Lewisr (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Addressed the three above, will look into getting a quote for the new subsection. Wok142 (talk) 17:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
      • Quote has been added. Wok142 (talk) 06:09, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Context for Mandalore is needed Lewisr (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • In-universe mention in Star Wars: Alien Archive should be noted Lewisr (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Added this. - Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 05:56, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
      • There's some precedent to use the info from the as a quote, which I think can be added in the legacy section Lewisr (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
  • For the BTS: AOTC should have context, and Star Wars Jedi Pocket Expert should have its author and release year added Lewisr (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Currently in Category:Articles with unpopulated family parameters which should be cleared Lewisr (talk) 23:09, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Looks like spooky handled this cat issue. Wok142 (talk) 17:04, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
  • The clothing (as well as the color of it) can be described a little further Lewisr (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Expanded this. Let us know if that is comprehensive enough. Wok142 (talk) 19:00, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Reference 17 should include the specific slide number, and reference 11 should link to to the specific part of the guide Lewisr (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
  • I think a very brief note of the outcome of the Vizsla Keep battle would be worth adding Lewisr (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Would appreciate if the caption for the image in the personality/traits section was slightly tweaked to make it a little more relevant to the section Lewisr (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Mikkia doesn't appear to be referred to as a planet in Join the Battle Lewisr (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Cleaned up the above. Wok142 (talk) 19:00, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
  • There's quite a few dup links to be removed Lewisr (talk) 04:51, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Wok and I both took a pass, and they should all be de-duped now. - Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 07:52, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Since I struck the related objection above by mistake, it might have been missed, but there's some precedent to use the info from Alien Archive as a quote, which I think can be added in the legacy section Lewisr (talk) 05:38, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
    • I initially left it out since it doesn't really add anything, but I've included it per the objection. - Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 22:33, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
  • This video talking about the future of TCW, should be noted as the first reveal of Tiplee in the BTS since there's a clip of the episode that features her. Though since it predates the canon reset date, we shouldn't list it in sources Lewisr (talk) 23:08, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Senatorial arrests

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 03:19, 17 May 2025 (UTC) & --Vitus InfinitusTalk 06:05, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Pleasure to co-nom with Vitus to tow this one back up; such an intriguing topic honestly and I'm glad they expounded on it.—spookywillowwtalk & Very happy that with Spooky’s help this article is now as comprehensive as can be. This subject was always interesting to me, and glad that it has been explored with such depth.- --Vitus InfinitusTalk 06:05, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Word count at nomination time: 1733 words (125 introduction, 1405 body, 203 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMBWP:NOVELSWP:DEMOCRACYWP:COLLAB

(1 Inqs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. This was a fun one to review. Nice work both of you! Wok142 (talk) 16:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Wok
  • The infobox lists the Great Jedi Purge as concurrent, but in the body, the purge is mentioned in the prelude as having already happened. That feels like a discrepancy that can be smoothed out.
    • I sort of disagree. The Purge is an event that takes place over well, years technically, but the initial was certainly at least a window of time. And the arrests also all did not happen on one day. The HNN quote directly calls out that arresting senators is a strike against the "Jedi rebellion" as if its still a thing thats happening and not past tense; hence it being cited to Rebel Files. At the same, it's just as accurate that Palpatine makes the reference he does in his speech (referring to some of the initial Purge, but not necessarily all of it). Putting it in prev though would imply the Purge had ended, though, and it hadn't; and similarly, giving undue context to the particulars of the Purge's stages and sub-events through its end to explain that feels out of scope.—spookywillowwtalk 20:26, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
      • This makes sense to me. Good as is then. Wok142 (talk) 06:45, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Should the Delegation of 2,000 be listed in the infobox under "Affiliations involved'?
  • In the Prelude, would Outer Rim Sieges make sense to link where you mention the "final stages" of the war?
  • In The arrests, I have a suggestion about re-working the sentence about who was arrested - "Those arrested were prominent signatories of the petition, including several senators from prominent Core Worlds and many alien senators from the Outer Rim Territories." I feel as though it is smoother this way and is clearer about conveying that every arrest was a petition signer, as opposed to mentioning that fact alongside the Core and Outer Rim details, which only apply to some of the senators.
  • For the "small closet or decommissioned toilet stall" bit, I think it would be good to describe it in the way that, it was just that Mon felt it was something along those lines, as opposed to presenting it as it was definitely one of those two options.
  • In Aftermath, Marroi's "getaway" is a redlink - Lud Marroi's home
  • Same section, it's important to state that it was the Delegation's first meeting after the fall of the Republic and after the beginning of the Imperial Era specifically, not the first meeting overall. Also think it'd be good to mention that the "leadership" refers to a group of 13 senators total (Mon says she entered the living room to see 12 others waiting for her).
  • More on the above, mentioning the leadership included those from the Anti-militarist faction and the Institutionalists could be a good detail as well
  • Also in this section, I would advocate for noting that their "next steps" included the Imperial Rebirth Act
  • In Continued Imperial activity, I feel the context of Mon going to join the Alliance would be good to include
    • Added briefly on each; but I do think there's such a thing as Aftermath bloat when it starts to stray into things not immediate or direct results of the event itself. The ratio here is already pretty lopsided and would generally oppose adding more unless its offset by cutting something else.—spookywillowwtalk 20:26, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
      • A fair point, it could definitely spiral pretty quickly with excessive detail that can just be handled on other pages. With that in mind, the only things I'd really advocate for keeping in terms of the above listed suggested additions would be the Rebirth Act and Mon leading the Alliance. Feel free to trim some of the other things out if you'd prefer it that way. Wok142 (talk) 06:45, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
        • Think I'm fine with it as it is;; did slip in most of what was asked for above, moreso noted about bloat to say it probably shouldn't have more than, if that makes sense.—spookywillowwtalk 02:46, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
  • In Legacy, not sure if there is a precise date or maybe a range for Leia reading Bail's writings, but at the very least, New Republic Era can be dated in some way. Wok142 (talk) 06:48, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Its not dateable, but I disagree with dating the entire NR era as a range. There's enough precedent for when something is only set in an era to not do so when it's such a wide range and not immediately relevant to the topic.—spookywillowwtalk 20:26, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
      • All good then, I'll keep this precedent in mind moving forward. Wok142 (talk) 06:45, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
  • 19 BBY date can be incorporated into the intro
  • In Crackdown, second to last sentence, "prominent" is used twice in the same sentence. One instance could be replaced with something like "notable"
  • Same section, do Drake and Cadaman need to be mentioned twice? I would advocate for either removing the second mention or, if you would rather keep it in, moving the context of their represented planet etc to be in the first mention of them and leave just their last names in the second mention that is part of the list. Wok142 (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Crab (individual)

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:35, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Probably for the best this guy didn't make it into the rebellion proper
  • Word count at nomination time: 1500 words (280 introduction, 1166 body, 54 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

R-DUO

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 01:46, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1216 words (211 introduction, 693 body, 312 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions

(1 Inqs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 2 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. beep boop bop Mor9347 (Talk) 17:24, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
  2. —spookywillowwtalk 00:05, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Plug

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:10, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: I can sympathize with Plug's hunger, although I'm fairly certain giving a prisoner food you know is moldy is a war crime
  • Word count at nomination time: 2012 words (362 introduction, 1575 body, 75 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Editor
  • Could you include how Andor's experience with the brigade shaped his thoughts on the rebellion in that final biography sentence, as seen on Crab (individual) Editoronthewiki (talk) 05:06, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Umbaran airbase

  • Nominated by: Wok142 (talk) 23:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Three years ago, this page was just 45 words long when I did a little expansion on it. Truly one of the greatest Clone Wars arcs. Wok142 (talk) 23:33, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Word count at nomination time: 2910 words (333 introduction, 2236 body, 341 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:TCW

(0 Inqs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 3 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. StarWarsFan327 (talk) 13:35, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Objections

StarWarsFan
  • In the intro, I'm thinking the wording should be clarified to make it clear Anakin's battalion was one battalion within the 501st.
    • Amended in the intro and also clarified in the body. Wok142 (talk) 18:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
  • In the history section, Ordnance links to a Legends page.
  • The citations in the last paragraph of 'Dissension in the ranks,' should be corrected as the second half of the paragraph with Fives and Jesse's execution is from "Carnage of Krell." StarWarsFan327 (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
    • Removed link and adjusted citations. Wok142 (talk) 18:17, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments

AL1-L3

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:15, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Another very unexpected Andor cameo but pleased to get more of her rebel backstory as it fits well with what we already knew about her
  • Word count at nomination time: 1035 words (187 introduction, 614 body, 234 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Women

(2 Inqs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. —spookywillowwtalk 20:40, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 02:54, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Bloy

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 08:29, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Of course the only Imperial in season 2 described as "relatively good natured" never had a chance
  • Word count at nomination time: 1473 words (260 introduction, 1116 body, 97 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Ambition

(3 Inqs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Bloy's specific role in all this keeps reminding me of the Boston Massacre more than anything Fan26 (Talk) 02:19, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
  2. —spookywillowwtalk 02:05, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
  3. Lewisr (talk) 03:27, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Editor
  • Article needs to reflect the regiment of which Bloy was a part per the Databank, which further calls his whole regiment under-experienced Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:20, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Hmm, had that linked originally but looks like it got lost somewhere along the way. Re-added now. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:38, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Have you checked the Andor Security Officer Instagram page for behind the scenes details about the Ghorman Massacre filming that you could apply to Bloy? See Imperial security trooper's behind the scenes section for relevant posts Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:20, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
    • I looked through the article and posts before nominating and think most of it is only relevant to Lim's specific experience, which likely differs to a credited actor like Bloy, but going over it again it's probably reasonable to include the same filming dates for Bloy so I've added those. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:38, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Gharial

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Duel at the Lars homestead

  • Nominated by: Commander Code-8 Hello There! 08:49, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Maul's a goddamn idiot, could have easily just waited at the Jedi Temple for a while
  • Word count at nomination time: 1369 words (179 introduction, 958 body, 232 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Comics

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Aneth

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:04, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Didn't expect this one to reach FA length
  • Word count at nomination time: 1055 words (124 introduction, 811 body, 120 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Women

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Cabuck

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Yerbana

  • Nominated by: Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 03:12, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Taken over the word count thanks to the new Acolyte VG.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1037 words (165 introduction, 694 body, 178 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:THRWP:TCWWP:AST

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Perry (Platypus)

  • Nominated by: Panther436 (talk) 16:54, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: If I had a nickel for every time I nominated the Perry the Platypus article to be a featured article, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice, right? Happy Phineas and Ferb premiere day!
  • Word count at nomination time: 3208 words (249 introduction, 2584 body, 375 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Fillik

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 23:35, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Happy that Fillik got a full page and the Kwenn backstory is a nice touch
  • Word count at nomination time: 1241 words (188 introduction, 921 body, 132 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject The High Republic

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Naasa

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Wok
  • BTS will need subsectioning, as it is 4 paragraphs total. Can just be split 2 and 2 methinks. Wok142 (talk) 05:11, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Went with 3-1 since splitting the section right between who provided voice on set and physical portyal/voice seemed too arbitrary. Ayrehead02 (talk) 06:49, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
      • Ah yes that works quite well, good choice. Wok142 (talk) 23:50, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Rhinnal/Legends

  • Nominated by: Cade Calrayn 04:20, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: *audible creaking noises* be kind to me, I'm old
  • Word count at nomination time: 2166 words (272 introduction, 1808 body, 86 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:TOR, WP:AST

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Mor
  • I believe some images could be spread throughout the article.
  • Early history should be sectioned a bit more, it has 6 paragraphs when sections should only have 2-3 or sometimes 4 paragraphs. Mor9347 (Talk) 04:29, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
  • The end of the first paragraph in Early history is unsourced Mor9347 (Talk) 04:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
    • Done. Will work on images. Cade Calrayn 04:10, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Fred strikes back
  • Uh oh, he's back. :P First off, per Mor with more images, but also current ones should be enlarged, and the first image has a white border that should be removed. Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 04:47, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Dani
  • The top quote seems like it's fit perfectly in Locations. Is there another quote for Locations/Top? NBDani (they/them)Yeager's Repairs 11:19, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Imp
  • How do we know that the correct Coruscant and the Core Worlds image is the one in Rhinnal's entry and not the one in Ralltiir's?
    • Ralltiir has been depicted in other sources and it looks significantly different from the Core Worlds image; Ralltiir isn't an ice world. I'll check the Far Orbit Project for additional images though. Cade Calrayn 02:33, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
  • The Canon article's BTS has more relevant info that should be added onto this article as well.
  • Please note the authors of the 1stm and the 1st.
  • The release dates for the Adventure Journal issues and for Coruscant and the Core Worlds are self-sourcing, and 2008 is also noted as the copyright date for The Force Unleashed Campaign Guide. Imperators II(Talk) 14:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments


Kaz's talisman

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 17:30, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 1028 words (199 introduction, 677 body, 152 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:ENT, WP:Resistance

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Charlotte Louise

  • Nominated by: —spookywillowwtalk 01:30, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Slipped over due to a series of posts on socials identifying her characters (which we reached out to her via socials for). This was funnily the article that prompted the Stay-On-Target doctrine to get prioritized so atp just completing it out of spite like "hey, had to nuke almost all of the first draft but it's survived and well!" which is a neat callback to 2018 times imo.
  • Word count at nomination time: 1072 words (153 introduction, 919 body, 0 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:CREATORSWP:WOMEN

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Snee

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:05, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Would love to know who chose the names for all these characters
  • Word count at nomination time: 1816 words (275 introduction, 1467 body, 74 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Skirmish over Lothal

  • Nominated by: Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 14:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Back with another early rebels encounter!
  • Word count at nomination time: 1329 words (186 introduction, 1022 body, 121 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Rebels

(0 Inqs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 Inq vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 4 user or 2 Inq votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Lew
  • The first section in Aftermath is honestly rather big and I think it should be subsectioned Lewisr (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
  • The use of disabled should be changed Lewisr (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
  • The Spark teaser should be noted as the first reveal of the event Lewisr (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
  • I'd like to see these checked thoroughly, especially some of the early era videos, for any sort of reference Lewisr (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
    • The above are handled, except for the fourth bullet. I'll continue reviewing those sources. - Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 17:10, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
      • Quick update: still going through these, but I've gone through the early era videos. Other than the Spark and Ignite teasers, there's no footage of the skirmish. There is footage from Property of Ezra Bridger, but I'm drawing the line at whether it was the skirmish or the aftermath of the skirmish. - Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 01:10, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Editor
  • I still believe there is more information to squeeze out of Ezra and the Pilot, I can point out specifics on Discord or right here if you prefer Editoronthewiki (talk) 18:51, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
    • I went through it and thought I caught anything of relevance, but if you want to DM me on Discord feel free! Probably easier to work through it there. - Brandon Rhea(talk)(he/him/his) 20:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.
More Fandoms