Wookieepedia:Featured article nominations/Joralla

Joralla

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 21:07, March 22, 2020 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:

Support

1. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 15:28, April 15, 2020 (UTC)
2. Shayanomer (talk) 08:53, April 21, 2020 (UTC)
3. QuiGonJinn ^(Talk) 09:45, May 3, 2020 (UTC)
4. --Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:37, September 17, 2020 (UTC)

Object

Anil

• Is the double referencing in the demonym field of the infobox really necessary?
  • Well, both of the entries are equally valid, but I've went with one of them. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:15, April 15, 2020 (UTC)
• Does the source decapitalize the term "celsius"? Just wanted to make sure as its real-life counterpart is capitalized as far as I know. Anıl Şerifoğlu (talk) 21:44, April 14, 2020 (UTC)
  • Yes, it's decapitalized. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:15, April 15, 2020 (UTC)

Toprawa

• Considered by whom? "The jungle planet was considered to be a paradise world"
  • From the source: "Joralla [...] is a tropical paradise [...]." Imperators II^(Talk) 07:22, September 23, 2020 (UTC)
• "Notable" according to whom or what? Does the source actually say the diversity was "notable"? "Joralla's flora and fauna displayed notable diversity"
• Again, considered by whom? "and were considered to be beautiful."
  • In reply to both of the objections above, from the source: "The flora and fauna of Joralla is remarkable for its beauty and diversity," and also "Joralla [...] is a tropical paradise filled with lush trees, wondrous flowers, and incredibly varied species of animals." Since the source presents all of the above as fact, would you prefer I simply remove the word "considered"? Imperators II^(Talk) 07:22, September 23, 2020 (UTC)
    • Responding to all three objections above and to answer your question, absolutely. Don't try to couch it at all. If the source says the planet is a "paradise" or "beautiful" or whatever, just say that outright. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:49, September 23, 2020 (UTC)
      • Changed all of the above. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:48, September 24, 2020 (UTC)
• The article has alternated between "offworlder" and "off-worlder" enough that I'm forced to ask which is the correct version?
  • Switched to the form actually used by the source. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:22, September 23, 2020 (UTC)
    • There is still one instance of "offworld" in the intro. This should presumably be changed as well? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:49, September 23, 2020 (UTC)
      • Changed, thanks. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:44, September 24, 2020 (UTC)
• None of the RPG events provide endings? For example, was the Tikiarri attack on the offworlders fended off successfully? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 22:21, September 22, 2020 (UTC)
  • With RPG articles, I usually try to follow the assumption that game-master players use as many of optional events and scenarios as possible in their games, and that the player-characters are as successful as possible. As a result, what's in the article is what I can say certainly happened. The source only elaborates on what happens if the Tikiarri are successful in their attack. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:26, September 23, 2020 (UTC)
    • Well, shouldn't the BTS detail any and all possible or alternative outcomes? Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:49, September 23, 2020 (UTC)
      • Added. Imperators II^(Talk) 07:59, September 24, 2020 (UTC)