Wookieepedia

READ MORE

Wookieepedia
Wookieepedia
Good article
nominations

This page is for Good article nominations. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. In turn, a Good article features more detail than a Comprehensive article. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Good status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding AgriCorps review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after ten days will be subject to immediate removal.

READ THIS FIRST!

A Good article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have no redlinks.
  9. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
  10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  12. …provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic, along with an article body that is at least 165 words long, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section (not including captions, quotes, headers, etc). Articles that fail to do so should be nominated for Comprehensive status. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  13. …be at least 250 words long and must not exceed 1000 words. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
  14. …not be deliberately shortened if it approaches the 1000-word limit.
  15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. Select an article you feel is worthy of Good status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{GAnom|second}}). To automatically generate an index upon nomination, use {{GAnom|index=1}}.
  3. Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
  7. The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
  8. Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
  9. Each user (except for members of the AgriCorps) shall be limited to six active Good article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
  10. Users must successfully complete one Good article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the GAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful GA nominations before they can have three, and so on.

How to review:

  1. To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
  3. Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
  4. Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.

Result:

  1. If a nomination has been active for over two days and has no active objections, it may pass with either a total of four votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—or a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes.
  2. Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Good article." As such, an AgriCorps member will archive the nomination using JocastaBot in Wookieepedia's Discord server and place the article on the Good articles page. Only members of the AgriCorps are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 10 days.


Good article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Daysar

  • Nominated by: RocketLaunchJr (talk) 01:23, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Daysar is so fat and satisfied
  • Word count at nomination time: 671 words (169 introduction, 465 body, 37 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

BRAHA'TOK, SYNTHETIC BRAHA'TOK, BRAHA'TOK ALTERNATIVES
  • Bio quote is quite long, I think half of that is enough. And it allows for a quote to be used elsewhere too.
  • The second bio paragraph is also a bit big and could probably be bisected. I wouldn't be opposed to the bio itself being split into two sub-sections in some way or another.
  • "During the reign of the Galactic Empire, Daysar served in the Imperial Military's Naval branch, reaching the rank of lieutenant." Lieutenant? (This has also led to one of two duplicate links I'm seeing, there's a good tool you can turn on with preferences that helps with this)
  • "When ISB Major Lio Partagaz questioned the process of the kalkite extraction, to which an engineer officer stated that the process would provide "stark challenges" to the local population." This sentence feels like half a sentence, was the next one meant to be a continuation?
    • Fixed. To answer your question on how it was made, there used to be a longer sentence there but it was repetitive so I removed it. RocketLaunchJr1 (talk) 00:24, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
  • "During this time, the admiral took some treats for themself while questioning ISB lieutenant Moy on the lack of methods of repopulation such as staged plagues or natural disasters" I think "repopulation tactics" is a too generalised way to put this, I'd moreso focus on the fact he was just suggesting new ideas than questioning the lack of anything. Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 09:15, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
Stakeout
  • Is his name mentioned out loud in the episode? If not you might want to note in the BtS that his name was revealed in the credits. Stake black msg 00:43, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
Lew
  • In the infobox, you can put Imperial Navy's officer corps instead of just Imperial Navy Lewisr (talk) 23:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Admiral really shouldn't be capitalised unless it's in front of a name, so the capitalised cases should be tweaked Lewisr (talk) 23:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Dedra being put in charge of the project and it beginning is not really citable to "One Year Later" Lewisr (talk) 23:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
  • The airdate is not citable to the episode, and I would suggest moving the air date to after you mention the episode name and season details since that's typically how we do it. You can cite it to Andor Season 2 Companion, though Lewisr (talk) 23:12, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Sel Maa

  • Nominated by: Skifffy (talk) 02:24, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 498 words (59 introduction, 226 body, 213 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 01:45, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 04:10, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
  3. CometSmudge (talk) 23:59, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
  • Belatedly realised that the Episode II: Coruscant featurette from The Complete Saga in sources isn't linked, and so should be made since we do make pages for those featurettes Lewisr (talk) 16:57, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
  • To be honest, I think in this case the film poster would be a better BTS image Lewisr (talk) 05:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • Similar to other noms, this one also runs the issue of leaving the comma outside the " for the mention of Jedi Beverage Break.
  • This one as well, should keep Wallace's comments out of bigger chunks of putting them in " and work to prosify them instead. Which in this case luckily is just removing those " and sorting the "would've" contraction.spookywillowwtalk 17:13, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Both addressed Skifffy (talk) 02:02, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
  • The Mediacat should be moved to Notes and references, as in this instance, it is causing template breakage by making those sw.com ones split unnaturally, which is generally the LG-supported reason we move those down.spookywillowwtalk 15:27, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Fred strikes back
  • Last sentence of the Bts just recites the quote verbatim. Please rephrase. Master Fredcerique(talk) (he/him) 04:56, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Molo Jopeem

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Lewisr (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. spookywillowwtalk 07:09, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
  • I made a tweak in regards to the deleted page part you mentioned above. Let me know what you think Lewisr (talk) 06:22, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
    • I like it, and continue to be envious of your ability to phrase things. ThePedantry (talk) 06:36, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
      • Thanks, I appreciate it! Lewisr (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  • I think the game mechanics section should include a mention of Jopeem Lewisr (talk) 06:22, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
    • Added a small mention, let me know what you think. I also updated all the quotes around Khepi Chronicles to italics per other feedback I got on other noms. ThePedantry (talk) 06:36, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
      • That works, thanks Lewisr (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Mud yak

  • Nominated by: ThePedantry (talk) 02:28, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 286 words (24 introduction, 168 body, 94 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

26
  • Ref notes don't go in the intro Fan26 (Talk) 04:17, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Fixed. I somehow missed that when I moved from no intro to intro. ThePedantry (talk) 04:19, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • Do think the "spelled as" used here sounds a bit OOU-ish within an IU section. The standard is "also known as XYZs" or just "or XYZs,"spookywillowwtalk 20:40, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Nih's mother

(2 ACs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Lewisr (talk) 23:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. spookywillowwtalk 23:24, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
  3. StarWarsFan327 (talk) 13:35, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
  • I think in line with other articles, this should be moved to Nih's mother Lewisr (talk) 00:16, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
  • 'They were identified by the game's subtitles as simply "windfisher," but are not not otherwise identified' how do we know they are Nih's mother? I know they say Nih is their daughter, but is there something to outright specify the individual is a female? Lewisr (talk) 23:36, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Updated that line to hopefully be more clear. Nih does refer to them as her mom during the conversation but the subtitles only specify them as windfisher. ThePedantry (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
      • Can it be added as a quote? Lewisr (talk) 05:54, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
        • Took a bit to find my recording. It is updated now. ThePedantry (talk) 23:16, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  • The image caption should tie back to the character

Comments

Balagash

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 22:22, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 299 words (74 introduction, 193 body, 32 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST WP:Novels

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 20:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 23:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Objections

spookly
  • Seems fairly unusual to have information about a location (gardens) and a group from it (warriors) in description; usually that information is sectioned out per the LG.spookywillowwtalk 23:09, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
    • Originally had it like that since they weren't actually on the planet itself, but sectioned it out CometSmudge (talk) 01:18, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
      • I think it might be worth asking Imp actually whether it's relevant to even have in said case, I guess, if not worked organically into History as-needed. It definitely seems weird in Description and haven't seen it done that way elsewhere SA-wise, but at the same time fairly sure other planet/ast object articles don't always necessarily detail everything from their orbital bodies. It's different for a system and a planet because a system contains the planet within it, so the system article details the planet; unlike this, in which they are non-containing entities, albeit related. But obv if Balagash system was written, that by standard would include information about the specifics of Balagash and the moons because it contains them, if that makes sense. If it doesn't, would suggest asking Imp to explain it better.spookywillowwtalk 22:14, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
        • Imp agreed, so I cut out most of the moon info CometSmudge (talk) 20:45, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified R4 unit (Okinaa)

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 01:37, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 394 words (95 introduction, 270 body, 29 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions WP:Comics

(2 ACs/2 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support votes

  1. Stake black msg 20:48, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. spookywillowwtalk 13:36, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  3. Lewisr (talk) 00:02, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
  4. Booply (talk) 21:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Stakeout
  • The last panel in the comic has a rear view of the droid, for which I think you can expand the Equipment section, mentioning a second breast plate and another object strapped. Stake black msg 04:00, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Jedi (Tao)

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 23:25, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 449 words (63 introduction, 259 body, 127 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 15:02, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 04:08, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Unidentified human (Zerek Besh meeting)

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 07:14, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 23:20, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Lew
  • I think you can add something from Sliro as a quote in the biography Lewisr (talk) 23:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • Aesthetically, I think it'd look cleaner to add a paragraph split at "When Ruback did arrive..." as it's a bit chunky, and to also add either a photo of the summit or a context image of Sliro/another subject to the Biography, as there's space.spookywillowwtalk 17:46, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
    • Updated, and agree that it looks clearer. ThePedantry (talk) 03:46, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Darnaburny Civil War

  • Nominated by: Lewisr (talk) 05:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 282 words (73 introduction, 192 body, 17 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:MD WP:NOVELS WP:THR

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Objection handled via Discord.spookywillowwtalk 20:22, 31 October 2025 (UTC)
  2. CometSmudge (talk) 17:56, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Garbage Moon of Maher

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 21:22, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 478 words (100 introduction, 332 body, 46 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:Comics

(3 ACs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 17:53, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 04:13, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
  3. CometSmudge (talk) 00:00, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Prod

  • Nominated by: Stake black msg 21:22, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 351 words (59 introduction, 212 body, 80 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Lew
  • The intro seems to suggest that Prod was from Newenurf, while the body doesn't really indicate this Lewisr (talk) 04:20, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Newenurf could use context as an astronomical object if on is used Lewisr (talk) 04:20, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
    • Addressed. It's unclear if it's a celestial body, so I changed the preposition. Stake black msg 12:20, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
  • The listed skills in the personality/traits should be moved to a skills/abilities section Lewisr (talk) 23:24, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
spookly
  • It's a tad repetitive to have both PT sentences start with the character's name. Perhaps one of them should be swapped out for "The alien" or "They" spookywillowwtalk 00:24, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Zaloriis system/Legends

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 01:53, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 23:29, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Sump

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 21:12, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 418 words (51 introduction, 172 body, 195 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:VG

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 18:01, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 01:45, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

WAC-77

  • Nominated by: NBDani (they/them)Yeager's Repairs 11:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: WP:Droid's subproject WP:Pit. (10/12 GANs)
  • Word count at nomination time: 540 words (73 introduction, 436 body, 31 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:FFG

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

spookly
  • Its generally preferable if all image captions tie back directly to the article subject in some way. For the emblem one, that might be something similar to "WAC-77 was aboard a freighter that fled the Black Sun (emblem pictured)." or something of choice to that effect.
  • The second image caption isn't a full sentence grammatically speaking; it should either have the ending punctuation removed, or have resting changed to "rested."spookywillowwtalk 23:52, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Saltear system

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 20:50, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 318 words (65 introduction, 181 body, 72 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 19:50, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Unidentified bandit (helmet fins)

  • Nominated by: Stake black msg 03:48, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 821 words (91 introduction, 500 body, 230 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:VISIONS, WP:NOVELS

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Editor
spookly
  • Seems like your Biography's got a redirect present (shows orange, with the Preferences tool enabled).
  • The "Genbara raid" subsection has room for a context image of Genbara, Kouru, or another subject of choice.
  • The image caption present in "Firefight and death" is a full sentence, which means it should have ending punctuation in its current form.
  • The image in PT would be better moved down to Equipment where there's more room; as it's placed right now, on default view with right rail (which is what we're supposed to accommodate for), it bleeds over a section header and indents the text of the section below.
  • There's room for an image in the BTS, likely one of the concept art pieces. They'd still all remain in the gallery as well regardless, but policy allows for them to be used in the BTS as applicable as well in addition to that. That, or an image of one of the VAs.spookywillowwtalk 00:36, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
    • Thanks, I've addressed the above. Regarding the last point, the image I moved to the BtS is probably not concept art, strictly speaking, so I removed it from the gallery. Stake black msg 01:42, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

R5-T9

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

spookly
  • Similar to the other nom, contraction present in prose here as well to be removed.
    • Fixed, but now also wondering if this could be something the bot checks for when an article is nomicated? ThePedantry (talk) 00:57, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
      • Contractions are still allowed in quote templates, IU excerpts, and more limitedly when exact " are used in prose (which would cause misflags). You're welcome to ask Cade about that. My personal opinion though is that bot overreliance is bad enough as it is and that it's the nominator's responsibility to copy-edit and make sure their article meets policy standards. The sweep, as Cade has stated before, has the primary intention of mass-fixing issues on pages that don't get a lot of attention, rather than cleaning up after nominators.spookywillowwtalk 15:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • As for the color infobox field, it would generally be formatted as — White (red and blue accents) (note the addition of a link to the color page there. In addition, usually isn't a reason to capitalize colors individually "Red and Blue" like was done, for future note.
    • Fixed.
  • There's space for an image of choice between the gamemechanics tags, whether a context one or one of the exchange itself.
    • Added an image of the camp
  • The content in the gamemechanics tags seems to repeat "T9" a lot; particularly the instances in which "T9" is used more than one time per sentence. It'd be good to go through and add variation "the astromech droid" as-needed to alleviate that.
    • Mixed it up with astromech and droid.
  • Is the quote caption in Characteristics meant to be "A Pyke to Kay Vess"? ATM sort of reads as if [all Pykes] or the organization/species what have you as a whole is saying it, which is why most SAs add that starting "A" "A woman, to XYZ" or what have you, sans a couple edge cases that don't look as awkward.spookywillowwtalk 00:09, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Unidentified Tusken Raider guard

  • Nominated by: Stake black msg 21:01, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 946 words (92 introduction, 477 body, 377 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:VISIONS

(3 ACs/0 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. CometSmudge (talk) 17:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. spookywillowwtalk 00:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  3. Lewisr (talk) 07:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comet
  • The first behind the scenes section should have a header
  • The conception and design section has room for an image
  • I think the image in skills and abilities would be more relevant in Cover blown or Equipment, which both have more room to fit the image
  • There's a couple instances where the article uses he/him pronouns for the Tusken, is that accurate or should those be changed?
  • I think this and all the other guards should have their type as Bounty hunter in the infobox CometSmudge (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
    • I've made some changes. Stake black msg 23:30, 3 November 2025 (UTC)
      • I don't think skills and abilities has room for an image, especially since it's pushing away the next subheader CometSmudge (talk) 21:50, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
        • I've improved the layout of the images. Stake black msg 12:12, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
  • A New Hope should have a release year CometSmudge (talk) 02:16, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Mission to Vatleria

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Skifffy (talk) 15:06, 4 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. spookywillowwtalk 23:36, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Ghothian slime pool

  • Nominated by: Imperators II(Talk) 17:10, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 294 words (72 introduction, 176 body, 46 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional):

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 00:15, 5 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 04:26, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Shad-Rah's lightsaber

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 20:49, 2 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 634 words (63 introduction, 453 body, 118 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 22:12, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Unidentified Imperial officer (Oppressor)

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 23:38, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 342 words (86 introduction, 215 body, 41 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. Assuming Dani's objection below solved.spookywillowwtalk 00:29, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Dani
  • Looking through the images for other officer uniforms, might be worth saying they had the imperial emblem on their shoulder. NBDani (they/them)Yeager's Repairs 23:43, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Kuseph Jovi

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 21:26, 7 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: CA from a while back managed to survive being sectioned for its term. Ahhh well.
  • Word count at nomination time: 258 words (63 introduction, 171 body, 24 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:GE, WP:NOVELS

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 22:10, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
  2. Lewisr (talk) 23:35, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Crane's mother

  • Nominated by: CometSmudge (talk) 02:01, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments:
  • Word count at nomination time: 404 words (86 introduction, 260 body, 58 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:Visions

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

  1. spookywillowwtalk 02:36, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Objections

Comments

Pip-Squeak

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Tianris Mez

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Dyn Pilga

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Comments

Numesira sector

  • Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast Hello there 21:52, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Originally a CAN of mine years back, this article got his by two appendix updates, the first connecting it with a GA of mine, Charros IV, and the second connecting it to another Alexander Freed-made location. So all in all some enjoyable updates have been made.
  • Word count at nomination time: 557 words (102 introduction, 424 body, 31 behind the scenes)
  • WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:NOVELS, WP:SWBF

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Support votes

Objections

Editor
  • The Clone Wars battle on Olkrastrus IV is its own redlink. Its not clear *when* that battle ended, I personally took it as something that was won during the war itself. In any case, the battle formally ends with the surrender, but then the fighting on Olkrastrus IV carries on from there as its aftermath Editoronthewiki (talk) 22:48, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments