FANDOM


       
Good article
nominations
             
Premium-GoodIcon

This page is for the nomination of Good articles. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. This page is not a way to showcase the articles of your favorite characters, spaceships, or the like. For a list of Good articles, see Wookieepedia:Good articles.

READ THIS FIRST!

An article must…

  1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
  2. …be unbiased, non-point of view.
  3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
  4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
  5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
  6. …following the review process, be stable, i.e., does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism.
  7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
  8. …have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic if the length of the article supports it. This may not be appropriate on articles with limited content.
  9. …have no redlinks.
  10. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article would be preferred, though not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section.
  11. …ideally include a "Personality and traits" section on all character articles if information is available.
  12. …ideally include a "Powers and abilities" section for Force-sensitive characters and a "Skills and abilities" section for non–Force-sensitive characters, where said powers and/or abilities are stipulated.
  13. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
  14. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
  15. …counting the introduction and "Behind the scenes" material, be at least 250 words long (not including captions, quotes, or headers, etc). Alternatively, a Good article cannot exceed 1000 words. Articles that do so should be nominated for Featured status.
  16. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

How to nominate:

  1. First, select an article you feel is worthy of Good article status. Your nominated article must meet all sixteen requirements listed above to become a Good article.
  2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating and save the page. NOTE: If the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify a new subpage name as a parameter in the template (e.g. {{GAnom|Lorum ipsum (second nomination)}}).
  3. Open the redlink (in a new tab or window, if possible) and fill out the form according to the instructions provided.
  4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
  5. Purge the article to update the template.
  6. Per AgriCorps consensus, non-AgriCorps members are restricted to four nominations on the GAN page at any one time. Once one nomination is removed from the page as either successful or unsuccessful, another may be added.
  7. Users may not vote on their own articles.

How to vote:

  1. Before doing anything, be sure to read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
  2. Afterward, compare the article to the criteria listed above, and then either support or object the article's nomination.
    • If you object, please supply concrete reasons for doing so, and how it can be improved.
  3. Any objections may be looked upon by the nominator, supporters, and anyone willing to improve the article, and action will be taken to please the objectors. Do not strike other users' objections; it is up to the objector to review the changes and strike if they are satisfied.
  4. Once a nomination has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. Alternatively, if a nomination receives a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—with no outstanding objections before one week has passed, the nomination will be considered successful.
  5. The article is placed on the Good article list.


All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 10 days.

Note: All Reduxed articles require only three support votes to maintain their Good status, all of which must come from AgriCorps members. Reduxed articles will be subject to removal if objections are not addressed after a period of two weeks, pending the support of at least three AgriCorps members.


Good article nominations

To nominate an article for Good article status, place the {{GAnom}} template on the top of the article and then follow the instructions above. Nominated articles must meet all sixteen requirements stated above. If an article has a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be an AgriCorps vote—after at least a week since it was nominated (beginning the day of its nomination) and no objections (or the objections have been stricken or overridden), the article will be considered a "Good article" and tagged with the {{Eras|good}} template. The talk page will also be tagged with the {{GA}} template. For complete instructions on archiving nominations, please see here.

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Besh (Korun)

  • Nominated by: OtterSurf
  • Nomination comments:

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Fan
Tommy
  • Following on from your last nomination, I think it would be prudent to confirm you have access to both of the sources in this article.
  • Furthermore, is there really no information from TCSWE to add to the article? Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 19:26, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
    • That I'm not sure on, but since Besh isn't really a massive character I wouldn't think so. OtterSurf (talk) 19:56, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
      • That's not good enough. GAN rule 1 states "[An article must] be well-written and comprehensively detailed." You have not checked all sources for this article, and therefore it cannot be confirmed if it is comprehensive. Please purchase or find other means of checking TCSWE for more information, or this nomination will likely be failed too. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 20:29, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
        • I've just read Besh's entry: it states that Besh was stung by fever wasps thus resulting in his malady, and that Kar Vastor butchered him. I don't know about the first one, but he was never butchered by Vastor; the man did all he could to save him. Guess I'll mention that in the BTS. OtterSurf (talk) 20:47, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
          • Add the information that doesn't contradict the other source to the body, and discuss the erroneous info in the BTS. Also make sure to use Template:CSWECite. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 20:57, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
            • There you go. OtterSurf (talk) 21:08, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
              • The bit in the body is fine, but the bit about wasps in the BTS in now redundant, so you can just remove it. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 21:18, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
  • I shouldn't have to remind you of basic grammar like putting periods at the end of sentences, which I've noticed two instances of with just a glance of the article. Tommy Imperial Emblem Macaroni 21:18, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
    • When you're deleting stuff, adding stuff and shuftying it about, sometimes periods get lost. I'll be careful, though. OtterSurf (talk) 08:19, May 8, 2019 (UTC)
Zed
  • Does the book use the date 22 BBY? If not, it'll have to be manually referenced. Zed42 (talk) 19:32, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
    • I'll double-check. OtterSurf (talk) 19:56, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
    • The Clone Wars timeline in the Arrow novels dates the Haruun Kal campaign as taking place six months after Geonosis, so I'll use that. OtterSurf (talk) 20:01, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
    • Done. OtterSurf (talk) 20:26, May 7, 2019 (UTC)
Spooky
  • Human is infobox only.
  • "Besh was a scarred individual, both mentally and physically; however, this did not prevent him from being an expressive and eloquent individual." - The word individual seems redundant, could you tweak the sentence?
  • In the BTS, could we get a release year for The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia? spookywillowwtalk 21:34, May 7, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Cambylictus tree

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:46, May 26, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Time for some TPM nominations in honor of the anniversary

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Zed
  • Both the intro and the Description sections begin with "Cambylictus trees were a type of tree". Maybe change one up a little, if possible.
  • Should their habitat also be mentioned in the description? Zed42 (talk) 19:13, May 26, 2019 (UTC)

Comments

Turret Room

  • Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 16:50, May 26, 2019 (UTC)
  • Nomination comments: Yet more TPM goodness

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

Support

Object

Comments