Wookieepedia:Good article nominations

Featured articles

Featured article nominations

Inquisitorius

Good articles

Good article nominations

AgriCorps

Comprehensive articles

Comprehensive article nominations

EduCorps

Tutorials

This page is for Good article nominations. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. In turn, a Good article features more detail than a Comprehensive article. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Good status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding AgriCorps review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after ten days will be subject to immediate removal.

• Good article nominations history
• Good article checklist

READ THIS FIRST!

---

A Good article must…

1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
2. …be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
6. …be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
8. …have no redlinks.
9. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
12. …provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic, along with an article body that is at least 165 words long, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section (not including captions, quotes, headers, etc). Articles that fail to do so should be nominated for Comprehensive status. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
13. …be at least 250 words long and must not exceed 1000 words. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
14. …not be deliberately shortened if it approaches the 1000-word limit.
15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

---

How to nominate:

1. Select an article you feel is worthy of Good status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{GAnom|second}}).
3. Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
5. Purge the article to update the template.
6. Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
7. The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
8. Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
9. Each user (except for members of the AgriCorps) shall be limited to four active Good article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
10. Users must successfully complete one Good article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the GAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful GA nominations before they can have three, and three successful GA nominations before they can have four.

---

How to review:

1. To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
2. The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
3. Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
4. Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.
5. If a nomination has been active for over one week and has no active objections, it may pass with a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes. Alternatively, if a nomination is between two and seven days old and has no active objections, it can pass with a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes.
6. Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Good article." As such, an AgriCorps member will archive the nomination, tag the article with the {{Top|ga}} template, tag its talk page with the {{GA}} template, and place the article on the Good articles page. Only members of the AgriCorps are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.

---

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 10 days.

Note: Reduxed articles require only three support votes to maintain their Good status, all of which must come from AgriCorps members. Reduxed articles will be subject to immediate removal if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks, pending the support of at least three AgriCorps members.

Good article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

Karlini silk

• Nominated by: Minnabird ^(talk) 11:04, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Novels

(2 ACs/2 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 03:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
2. More Naboo fashion pls MasterFred(talk) 10:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
3. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
4. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 04:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Pasta silk

• You've linked retcon in the bts, but {{Ret}} is not being used. That being said, based on what I'm seeing in the article, I don't think we should be treating this as a retcon, so I'm going to recommend that that link be removed. Let me know if you disagree. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Oh, no if that's not typically linked for this kind of thing, totally happy to remove it; looks like, taking another look at the article, Wook uses a pretty narrow definition of retcon. So yes: removed! Minnabird ^(talk) 19:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
• Please check your sourcing in "Fit for a queen." JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 17:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Ahh, whoops, fixed that. Minnabird ^(talk) 00:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
• Why have you chosen not to mention the other usages of the flame robes, at least briefly? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 15:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
  • The silk is only explicitly linked with the originals; probably the Raiders of the Lost Gundark ones can be presumed to be the same ones, and I can certainly add those, but otherwise, there's not really any reason to assume the senatorial era ones or the ones used by other queens' entourages are made from the exact same material. Minnabird ^(talk) 17:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
    • In that case, up to you on Lost Gundark, but I'd say that others that are unconfirmed should be removed from the appearances section. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
      • Kept Lost Gundark, and detailed it in the article, lost the rest.Minnabird ^(talk) 14:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

CC-8

• We should avoid using the word this in article bodies
  • Adjusted that sentence in the intro. Minnabird ^(talk) 03:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
    • There's still one in the woven together section Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 06:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
      • Ah, didn't realize absolutely all instances of "this" were forbidden, still having trouble figuring out what the problem is so I can avoid tripping into it again when rephrasing. I think in this case a less passive phrasing helps? Lmk if that's closer to what you were thinking. Minnabird ^(talk) 17:35, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
        • To me I think the writing is smoother without it, its like the word refers back to the article when we should just be referring to the sources we're drawing from. It isn't forbidden but it's a strong preference that's held up for a while. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 03:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
• Needs context for Naboo in the intro Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 10:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Done! Minnabird ^(talk) 03:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Fred strikes back

• The 1stID in the Appearances should be simultaneous with the audiobook, no?
  • Yes! Fixed. Minnabird ^(talk) 00:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
• Check my copy-edit here to make sure all the changes are ok! MasterFred(talk) 22:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Looks good, thank you. Minnabird ^(talk) 00:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Shayanomer

• I would like to see additional clarification in the infobox title akin to this.
  • That work? Minnabird ^(talk) 20:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
• Please check Ultimate Star Wars, New Edition for a mention. Shayanomer (talk) 19:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
  • I did when I compiled my sources, and did not find it. I want to say that the USW reference was to being in disguise as a handmaiden and I didn't see it recur in USWNE? This is definitely from the flame-colored robe source list. Minnabird ^(talk) 20:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

OOM

• I think the infobox title description can be shortened to "(Depicted as fabric used in gowns)"
  • Done.
• Content in article bodies should be written in an in-universe point of view, so I'd change the image caption under "Fit for a queen" to something like "Queen Amidala and her handmaidens' black gown and orange under-robe were made of Karlini silk."
  • Fixed.
• All the text in references should be linked to, so several links need to be added to the "Raiders" ref note. OOM 224 19:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
  • I'm assuming that's all the links that needed to be added?
• Missing an image category OOM 224 19:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Created and added. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
• Are the Appearances/Sources lists complete now, or are there still some sources left to check? OOM 224 07:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• I have listed appearances of Black traveling gown and Flame-colored robes in the spirit of "it's easier to cut back than to expand," as it seems there isn't a consensus on whether to list things made out of a material in the material's appearances. —Unsigned comment by Minnabird (talk • contribs).
• I'm a bit skeptical that the Sources section is complete. Shayanomer (talk) 19:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Ack, omitted two sources when combining flame-colored robes and black traveling gowns and have now also edited to reflect how they treated Karlini silk rather than flame-colored robes, because apparently I didn't actually edit that. Otherwise, I can share my spreadsheet with you if it'll help. Minnabird ^(talk) 20:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
• I will continue the review over the weekend. Also, I'd like to see if Minna's happy with the recent edits. OOM 224 19:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

1. Unaddressed objections from me from 13 days ago. Would be great to see you come back and renom this when you've got the time though. OOM 224 21:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Shayanomer (talk) 12:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Attack on the Paataatus

• Nominated by: YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 17:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Yeet leggo
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. 01miki10 ^{Open comlink} 19:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
2. Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:49, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Object

01miki10

• Article needs to be properly sectioned.
• Infobox-exclusive information.
  • I think I got that all. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 18:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Nikardun conquests is still not mentioned in the body. 01miki10 ^{Open comlink} 18:29, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
      • Ah, good catch. I added that. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 18:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
• Missing BTS.
• Duplicate links.
  • Removed -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 18:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
• Quote attributions shouldn't have links. 01miki10 ^{Open comlink} 17:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Removed -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 18:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Ecks Dee

• The article needs to be properly sectioned in accordance with the "Battle, mission, and duel articles" section of the Layout Guide. 1358 ^(Talk) 18:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 18:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
• You can definitely sneak in at least two relevant images in the body. 1358 ^(Talk) 09:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
• No relevant quotes for Prelude and The attack? 1358 ^(Talk) 20:03, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Added. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 00:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Luca

• I might be wrong, but I think the intro is too long compared to the body. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 19:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Hmm, well, I just removed an unnecessary paragraph from the intro. How is it now? -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 19:07, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Great! LucaRoR ^(Talk) 19:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Shayanomer

• The date template states that Chaos Rising takes place "around" 19 BBY, contradicting what is stated in this article.
  • Took care of this in this article. Unfortunately, that’s going to cause a major chain of updates of 19 BBY to c. 19 BBY in a lot of Chaos Rising articles. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 03:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
• Many subjects need context in the body upon their first mentions, such as Paataatus, Nikardun Destiny, Nikardun, and Dioya.
  • Addressed those. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 03:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
• Here's my copy-edit in which I had to add links, fix various issues, and reword some rather informal language, which I'm still seeing in the article. I would advise you to go through it and ensure the content is written with an encyclopedic tone in mind. Shayanomer (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Thank you, that copy edit is very helpful. I'll work on the other objections. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 00:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
    • This is still unaddressed. Shayanomer (talk) 09:07, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
• Lesser Evil provides some new details on Yiv's attack, thus an update is in order.
  • Addressed. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
• Not a fan of the two single-paragraph subsections in Aftermath. Shayanomer (talk) 07:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Handled via Discord. Shayanomer (talk) 18:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• The attack is the second half of Chapter Two of Chaos Rising and the aftermath is Chapter Three, for those interested in checking. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Interdictor-class

• Nominated by: --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 02:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: This is the true Interdictor-class Star Destroyer, not this imposter.
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AMB

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Looks good to me! — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 02:23, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
2. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 07:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Object

Shayanomer

• The image in the body is extremely blurry. Please acquire a higher quality shot.
  • This will be a bit difficult, I'll let you know if/when I'm able to get an HD image. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Managed to get an HD screenshot from a friend. Unfortunately it's still pretty dark since the bridge Karius is at doesn't produce much light, and it's more in the corner of the Windfall. I've brightened it up the best that I could. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 22:29, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
      • What about the infobox? In-game screenshots will always be preferred over Youtube captures. Shayanomer (talk) 06:29, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
        • Okay, I'll let you know! --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 13:40, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
        • Done. I tried editing the image to increase the brightness but that only makes it worse. I think the game is darker on Oculus Quest 2 compared to the original Oculus Quest --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 14:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
          • Looks a lot better. Shayanomer (talk) 14:13, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
• BTS needs to document SW.com article appearance prior to game's release. Shayanomer (talk) 08:06, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Added. Let me know if the wording is appropriate. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Needs publication date, and the fact that it comes from SW.com. Shayanomer (talk) 19:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
      • Fixed --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
• Full publication dates required for comic and magazine issues in BTS, if available. Writer and illustrator needed for the comic. Shayanomer (talk) 08:18, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Added. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Please put the full comic release date in one place, right now the sentence reads really weird. Shayanomer (talk) 19:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
      • Done --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
• On the Front Lines does not have BBY/ABY dates, so the date note needs more elaboration.
  • Expanded --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Take note of my copy-edit here. Shayanomer (talk) 19:27, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
      • That looks great, thank you. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
• Please implement {{FFCite}} for Ref 10. Shayanomer (talk) 11:08, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:16, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
• I'd like you to investigate everything here as well as any promotional material that may not be listed to spot potential appearances. Shayanomer (talk) 15:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Done --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 22:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
• I would move the Karius image down to History, enlarge it, and left-align it.
  • Done --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 14:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
• Currently, the first date note does not connect Secret Cargo and On the Front Lines together. Shayanomer (talk) 10:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
  • How is it now? --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 14:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
• How's the update coming along? The article content hasn't been touched since the start of the month. Shayanomer (talk) 10:30, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
  • That should be it. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
    • There's a broken ref. Shayanomer (talk) 19:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Just saw this, fixed it yesterday I believe --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 02:56, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Braha'tok-class

• In Heir to the Jedi, during the passage where Luke is intercepted by an Interdictor cruiser, it mentions how Interdictor cruisers had stopped being produced and that the Empire was now putting gravity projectors in Star Destroyers. This seems like a reference to the Interdictor-class being produced in favour over the cruisers. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 10:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Added --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 22:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
• The second history paragraph has a few issues:
  • Three sentences start with "after", it'd be better for only one of them to do that.
  • You refer to "Admiral Karius" twice in two consecutive sentences, I'd like to see at least the second instance altered.
  • Similar with the above point, you also got two sentences ending with "the Interdictor." Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 08:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed all --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 13:15, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

OOM

• Is there a reason why some of the components aren't given numbers in the "Card Trader" ref?
  • Done --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 13:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
• Similarly, if those components require confirmation from another source, so should the gravity well projectors. OOM 224 17:03, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
  • They do not require other confirmation, but we can see in the game that there are four gravity well projectors. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 13:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Two bulbs at the top of a Star Destroyer isn't apparent to viwers to be in fact deflector shield generators; this type of info comes from reference material, so they require confirmation. The same goes for the gravity well projectors, since 1) the game doesn't actually say that they're gravity well generators and 2) that finding is based on our knowledge of other Star Wars designs. OOM 224 17:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
      • Hey OOM, I'm struggling with how I can explain that the domes are in fact deflector shield generators. The domes we see in Vader Immortal are identical to the Card Trader ISD blueprints, so I'm not sure on what else I can add. As for the gravity well projectors, I added in a ref note but I'm not sure how else to word it. I thought it was sufficient for a duck test, just how if a ship has what appears to be a propelling device at the rear we can deduce that its an engine. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 20:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
        • The deflector shield generators part is fine then. I was more so pointing out that a ref note is needed for gravity well projectors in the same vein as needing the existing ref note confirming the engine models, deflector domes etc. on a Star Destroyer. For the gravity well projectors ref here, it's got the explanation down and is good to go for the most part, so I'll strike for now. OOM 224 20:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
          • Nice, thank you! --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 21:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Macaroni-class

• 18 references is not enough for a scroll box to be necessary per WP:LG#Notes and references.
  • Ah fixed, don't think I added that bit --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 23:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
• I think you can fit an image in the "Characteristics" section. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 23:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
• Why do you say the garrison was above Mustafar? Wasn't it on the planet?
  • Fixed --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
• It would be better to use an official SW source for the HttJ release date, such as SW.com or Insider. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:38, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Still looking into this. Will continue tomorrow --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Fred strikes back

• In the third sentence of the intro, "As an Interdictor vessel..." indicates that what follows applies to all Interdictor vessels. Does "four gravity well projectors and was 1,600 meters in length" indeed apply to all types of Interdictor vessels?
  • Fixed, thank you --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
• You capitalize "Interdictor vessel" in the intro but switch back and forth in the body. MasterFred(talk) 22:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• Not going to make this an official objection. But there is no reason for the smaller image with the transparent background. It is the identical image to File:InterdictorClassSD-EGTW.jpg, therefore, the canon source should be added to that image file, and that higher quality image should be placed in the inbox. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 12:28, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Do you know if the image from EGTW has a black background? If not, I can remove that and then CSD the newer version. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 04:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
• Are you done with the major edit that had you place Inuse? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Skirmish in the Kinoss system

• Nominated by: YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 20:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I believe this is clean and good enough :)
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support

1. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Object

Fan

• Continuing from our discussion on Discord:
  • The infobox still notes the skirimish as taking place in both the Lioaoin and Kinoss systems. Given our discussion, I'd argue the actual skirmish proper only takes place in Kinoss.
    • Addressed. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
  • "Prior to the mission and skirmish, " in the "Prelude" section.
    • Addressed. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
  • A large part of the article body is taken up by a section detailing the mission to Lioaoin, of which a small subsection titled "The skirmish" is a part of. I think most of the info regarding Thrawn baiting the Lioaoins can be condensed a bit and moved to the prelude section. Fan26 (Talk) 23:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
    • I adjusted the sectioning and added a quote for the Skirmish. I’ll have to think about it if you think “the mission” part still needs to be condensed. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 22:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
      • "Qilori knew that the Lioaoin Regime was indeed supporting piracy, but was bound by Navigators' Guild confidentiality not to divulge such information to Thrawn. Furthermore, Qilori could sense some of his colleagues aboard Lioaoin pirate vessels through the Force. Qilori warned Thrawn that searching for pirates would be dangerous, and if the Regime should suspect he was hunting pirates, they would be in danger." This can be cut down to contextualising Quilori's warning by just saying he was worried about his colleagues aboard the Lioaoin ships. Apart from that, it all looks like neccesarry information Fan26 (Talk) 04:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
        • Addressed. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 17:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Manoof

• Can we note in the intro that the skirmish occurred after the undercover work from Thrawn? Currently the setup for the battle doesn't have that context that it IS the prelude to the skirmish, which indicates it is part of the skirmish until we reach the second paragraph. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
• The mission—can you make it clear the pirates pursued Thrawn using the pathfinders at the end of this section. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
• You probably have room for another image in the Aftermath section. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Added one. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
• Did the book specify Kinoss the planet and the system and are these captured correctly in the article—the only mention of the planet is the agreed upon meeting place, so did the skirmish happen above the planet or elsewhere in the system? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • In the chapter itself, it just says the Kinoss system. Another chapter says “At Kinoss a few years ago,” and another says and “last year off Kinoss.” — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

CC-8

• Context for Bardram Scoft
  • Done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
• Should come up with a subheading for the first half of the prelude
  • Done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
• "In that way, Thrawn could prove or disprove his theory without violating the Ascendancy's preemptive-strike laws", this sentence mostly repeats what's said in the one preceeding it, be good if you could combine them. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 09:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
• The body should specifiy that corsairs are a type of ship, given that the word has a potentially confusing alternate meaning.
  • Better? — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• I don't think Kinoss should be linked separately in the phrase "Kinoss system"
  • Done — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• "the point at which she would have to forego her Irizi family." The significance of this isn't really clear, why does getting a promotion change her family situation, and the way its worded sounds like the Irizi is just some type of family rather than her actual family.
  • It is her actual family — it’s a major part of Chiss culture to strip family ties of flag officers. Additional context is provided in the article flag officer and others, but no more context was given during the skirmish’s actual aftermath. YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
    • That context should still be given here, a reader should open another article because they want to learn more, not be forced to do so just to comprehend something in this article.
      • Alright, done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 05:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Apologies for the delay, last thing to sort out with "belong to her Irizi family." the phrasing presents Irizi as an adjective, so it could be read as a type of family, when a family name is actually a noun, can address this by writing it as "her family, the Irizi," or just "the Irizi family." But I don't have access to the novel so I may be misunderstanding how it's referred to there. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 10:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
          • "The Irizi family" works. I made the change. Thanks! — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 18:33, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
• "threat to others in the Chaos" Apparently this is an alternate term for the Unknown Regions but it would be clearer to just say Unknown Regions instead.
  • I changed it. Just noting that “the Chaos” is the endonym and what’s used in the source. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• There's a contraction in the aftermath section, which shouldn't be used in encyclopedic writing
  • Done YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• The Bts is overly detailed, we don't need to specify which chapters the events appear in.
  • Is that an actual problem? I can reduce it, but I don’t see an issue at present. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
    • It's worth removing it to maintain the consistency of our other status articles based on novels Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 04:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Okay, done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 05:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Can still remove the sentence about the chapter.
          • Done -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
            • I meant that the chapter doesn't need to be mentioned at all Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
              • You can remove it if you insist. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 05:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• The date note is a little confusing since the skirmish also takes place in the same book, it would be helpful to specify that its just the main events that take place in 19 BBY. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 00:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
  • done, thanks. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
    • 19 BBY needs to be properly linked there. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 04:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Oh whoops, taken care of. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 05:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
• A sentence summarizing the aftermath would be appropriate for the introduction
  • Done. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
• Missing the conjecture templates
  • Done. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
• "observed Lioaoin ships resembling the pirates ravaging the Ascendancy." Can you specify what Ascendancy assets were being ravaged? Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 10:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Freighters on the edge of the Ascendancy. Added. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
• The Chiss Expansionary Defense Fleet is intro exclusive and should be included in the infobox Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
  • No longer intro exclusive but I've never seen an article say e.g. "CIS navy" in the infobox instead of just "Confederacy of Independent Systems" — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 05:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Editor liked this chapter

• Context for Stivic needed Editoronthewiki (talk) 23:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
    • I have the nitpick to end all nitpicks. Should read "colony world of" not just "colony world" Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Done. YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• I noticed categories for Category:Battles of the High Republic Era and Category:Battles of the Imperial Era. Is it worth creating Category:Battles of the Republic Era and perhaps bunching them all under Category:Battles by era? Also wonder if it's worth having Battles by affiliation, so one could filter by battles involving a particular faction such as the Chiss Ascendancy or the Regime? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • I’m definitely in favor of the “battles of the Republic Era” category. As for battles by faction, I support that too, but we already have Category: Conflicts by faction and currently list battles of particular conflicts under those. So I would see some people arguing that Category:Battles involving the Chiss Ascendancy is redundant to Category:Conflicts involving the Chiss Ascendancy. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Maxis

• Nominated by: Dentface (talk) 11:34, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Why do I go down rabbit holes like this?
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:VG

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Nice work. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:23, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
2. It could be worth noting the "Sims series" rather than specifically sims 4 in the intro but up to you :) Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:40, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
3. NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 22:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• No more quotes? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:54, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Did some serious digging. Added. Dentface (talk) 22:03, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

NanoLuuke

• Instead of "The studio is best known for life simulation video games such as The Sims 4" in the intro, I would remove the mention of The Sims 4 and add instead (with appropriate links to Wikipedia) The Sims and SimCity series. While we don't have specific "OOU company" rules, I would refer to "Real-world person articles" rules following line: "The introduction section of real-world person articles may briefly summarize the highlights of a person's non-Star Wars career." There is no doubt that those series are the company highlights. Of course, reference(s) (might reused the first cited article?) will have to be added to the intro to support this claim, following the reasoning from rule 1 of WP:Sourcing: "If, of course, the information does not appear elsewhere in the article, then it is acceptable to source it in the introduction." Furthermore, this remove the need for the first phrase in the article body ("Maxis is an American video game development studio that releases life simulation games such as The Sims 4."), as it does not fit well with the section, and the second phrase should be merged with the paragraph bellow after this cut. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 05:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
• Journey to Batuu release year could be added to the intro. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 05:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
• The heading "Star Wars games developed by Maxis" should either be shortened, since "developed by Maxis" is redundant to the subject of the article, or be replaced by "Gameography". While the use of this word haven't yet reached status articles and will be discussed in a future CT (aimed at real-world persons), I would refers to the argumentation on my workbench (Note regarding "gameography") as to why we should use that word. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 05:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
• Finally, please modify the table and rename Date to Year so that the columns follow the order set by precedent OOU status articles (Year, Title, Notes). --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 05:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nearly forgot about two more issues... First, the "Bibliography" (or "Sources" when the current CT will be passed) is too thin. There are SW.com articles, EA.com articles, official youtube video and SW Insider articles are missing from the list, as revealed by The Sims 4 and The Sims 4 Star Wars: Journey to Batuu articles. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 05:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
• List of Maxis games on Wikipedia should be added to the External links. Optionally, the same could be done with The Sims on Wikipedia and SimCity on Wikipedia. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 05:19, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Thank you so much for all the feedback! This has been absolutely eye-opening.
  • All objections have been addressed, save for one thing.
  • I disagree regarding the "Bibliography" (soon to be "Sources") section. I only included articles that explicitly mention Maxis by name. The articles/links you mentioned talk about Journey to Batuu or The Sims 4 but never explicitly talk about Maxis. For that reason, I did not include them nor do I think it is relevant to do so. Dentface (talk) 20:15, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Update: Actually, I added the 2 trailers linked on the Journey to Batuu page since the Maxis logo appears at the end of each video. But as for the other sources, my above claims still stand. Dentface (talk) 20:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Fred strikes back

• The Gameography table should show that the content updates went from 2014-2019, as they were not all in 2014.
  • Obligatory response to sate JocastaBot. Dentface (talk) 03:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
• See my copy-edit here and let me know if you disagree with any changes! MasterFred(talk) 09:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Updated! Let me know if that's too much information. Should I dial it back to "Star Wars-themed content updates" and just do "2014-2019" in the year column? Dentface (talk) 06:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
    • The table looks great! That being said, it added a lot of information that I also believe should be prose-ified in the History section in addition to the table. :P MasterFred(talk) 10:43, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Done. Dentface (talk) 00:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
• I think we can work that first intro sentence into the "Founding and acquisition" section so we can remove the intro ref. MasterFred(talk) 21:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Dentface (talk) 00:46, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Hmm, that can't all be sourced to the "About" page on their website. I think we could make things flow better by not mentioning "further entries in the SimCity series" and instead saying after the acquisition they started making The Sims games, which then ties it into the Star Wars-related section that follows. MasterFred(talk) 01:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Better? Dentface (talk) 02:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• I tried to base how much non-Star Wars content is in the article off of the decision made in this CT forum. The CT says to state birth/death information but no other non-Star Wars info. I tried to carry that over to a company as best as possible. I included only the founding of the company and its acquisition by EA and no other information. Dentface (talk) 11:34, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
  • I would comment, as the person behind that CT, that this (appart from the objections) follow the spirit of the policy. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 05:05, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Aftab Ackbar's MC95 Star Cruiser

• Nominated by: Liverpool92 14:24, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: First GAN in a while
• WookieeProject (optional):

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support

1. Just double check your linking :) Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Have to reiterate Manoof's comment; ensure that everything that can be linked is linked. Shayanomer (talk) 15:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• Why is this not at Aftab Ackbar's MC95 Star Cruiser? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Moved.--Liverpool92 00:44, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Shayanomer

• The spirit of this Layout Guide rule applies here: "Organizations in any character infobox that are inherently implied by a stated role (examples: Stormtrooper Corps does not need to be linked within a character article body if the article states that the character is a stormtrooper; Imperial Officer Corps does not need to be linked in the article body if the article states that the subject is an Imperial officer)." See other starship status articles (e.g. Adjudicator) to understand how things like product line and model are handled in the body.
• Bunch of missing or incorrectly placed punctuation and grammatical errors throughout the article. Please revise.
  • Still seeing a few more of both. For example, "The star cruiser used by the late veteran Admiral Gial Ackbar's son, Aftab was the flagship of a fleet of starships located on the planet Mon Cala.," "Along with the rest of the fleet, they entered hyperspace and went on to joined the Resistance and its navy,...." Shayanomer (talk) 08:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed.--Liverpool92 11:26, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Please see my copy-edit. Shayanomer (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
• Missing Mediacat. Shayanomer (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed. Went over on Discord.--Liverpool92 03:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Description is currently very weirdly worded. I would mention Aftab utilizing the ship in History instead.
  • Fixed.--Liverpool92 11:26, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Aftab was one thing, but the whole sentence still needs restructuring: "A heavy[2] star cruiser[3] was an MC95 Star Cruiser model that was equipped with a hyperdrive and an engine." Shayanomer (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Reworded.--Liverpool92 02:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• Notes are needed to connect the sources you are currently using to this specific ship (see status articles pointed out above). Also, does the Encyclopedia use the term "Heavy Star Cruiser" in full? That would eliminate the need for two separate refs. Shayanomer (talk) 08:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Asking around.--Liverpool92 11:26, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Removed. Discussed on Discord.--Liverpool92 02:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Star Cruiser and docking bays can be sourced straight to the comic if they can be visually discerned (e.g. Formidable). Shayanomer (talk) 11:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Done.
• Aftab being a Mon Calamari male is now intro-exclusive info. Shayanomer (talk) 11:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed.--Liverpool92 11:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• I'd say a "Commanders and crew" section would be in order here, in which you can also mention Aftab's dad since it isn't really suited for History. Shayanomer (talk) 11:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done.--Liverpool92 14:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Hemi

• Nominated by: Liverpool92 15:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: First Mon Calamari character GAN
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Object

Vitus

• To begin with, I think we can split the History paragraph --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 15:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed through discord.--Liverpool92 03:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Braha

• Article currently falls under this category Category:Marvel usages with archived URLs not in Archive. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 21:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
  • For the record, this maintenance category is Cade's fault; the article does provide backup links as mandated by the sourcing policy. Nothing that can be fixed in the article, really. 1358 ^(Talk) 19:13, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Ok I'll just ignore it for now then.--Liverpool92 03:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
      • Fair enough. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 07:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Macaroni

• Context for the Executor.
• Species and gender should be mentioned in the bio or P+T, not both.
• Skin and eye color should only be mentioned in the P+T.
• File:Hemi and Dodonna.png can use some cropping, and the stuff to the left of Dodanna doesn't seem necessary. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 21:23, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • All fixed.--Liverpool92 03:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
• Intro can mention a date.
• Please split up the first bio paragraph.
• Please specify what Solo was signaled to do. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Handled.--Liverpool92 02:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
• Intro should be expanded a bit, probably with more details on the assault.
  • Fixed.
• Should "assault" in "Assault on the Mako-Ta Space Docks" be capitalized or not? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:25, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
  • The assault isn't conjecture so it could be fine.--Liverpool92 00:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
    • There can be un-capitalized non-conjectural titles. I'd like you to investigate if this is the case. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 17:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
      • Doesn't seem like it is the case.--Liverpool92 03:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
• Bio could use some subsectioning. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Subsectioned.--Liverpool92 20:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Fan

• Alliance Fleet links to the legends page for Rebel Alliance Navy.
• "The Mon Calamari told General Dodonna that the Alliance Fleet had escaped, but their shields were failing." Specify that it was the Republic's shields which were failing here, as this sentence could be misinterpreted as the shields of all rebel ships that escaped Mako-Ta failing at once.
• Starship should be linked to in the body.
• "When the starships were able to get back and running" Back from what?
• "Hemi was at Dodanna's side when he ordered the fleet to scatter" specify that Dodonna was the one who ordered the fleet to scatter. Fan26 (Talk) 03:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Handled. For the first objection the link wasn't needed to begin with and the fourth one I reworded the whole sentence.--Liverpool92 03:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Ayrehead02

• I think you can expand the start of the bio to include a couple of sentences of description of what is happening during the Assault on the Mako-Ta Space Docks and the Republic's part in it. For example, it sounds awkward to say "the Star Destroyers were converging on them as they had used the MC80A as bait" and "override codes to get the Shu-Torun technologies that rendered them useless" as you're referring back to information that should ideally have been established up front. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Added.--Liverpool92 21:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Reading through the comic again I think there's still some major stuff missing, you state that the problem caused by the Shu-Torun technology is the hangar bay doors, but the more important issue is that they can't jump to hyperspace. They actually resolve both those issues though and the Republic does escape, but then comes back to the docks to try and help rescue those on the stations still. I'd also include that the cruisers were at the docks being refitted with the Shu-Torun technology, and mention that the Shu-Torun people betray the Alliance because they're working for the Empire. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:34, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
      • Added. I think the area might need an image now but I want your thoughts.--Liverpool92 03:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Nano-spray paint

• Nominated by: LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:CO

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Great job! ~ D MCCG (chat) 21:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
2. Nice! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Object

Shayanomer

• Body can use an image.
• I've added a pre-release SW.com post to the article, meaning that the BTS is in need of an update. Shayanomer (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Both done, I've added an infobox per Erebus request (thanks Erebus). LucaRoR ^(Talk) 05:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Needs publication date as well. Shayanomer (talk) 13:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
      • Added. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
• Would like to see some context on what the SW.com post is in relation to the comic. Shayanomer (talk) 10:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Better? LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Link it with the Alpha comic because that's the issue the post discusses specifically. Also, you should talk about the comic first before mentioning what pre-release material for that comic they were featured in, per ample precedent. Shayanomer (talk) 19:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Fixed. I'm not sure why I should mention the comic before the starwars.com post since the post came out before the comic, but done. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 20:37, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Because it's material for that comic, not a separate piece of work. As mentioned before, precedent is to mention the work the subject appears in before specifying any pre-release material for that work that featured the subject before release. Shayanomer (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Horville

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: This episode has lots of fun stuff, this'll be the Wook's fourth status article from it. Also, GAN #20!
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:EWOKS

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 04:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Shayanomer

• If Horville's species doesn't have a page of its own, then filling out the species infobox field isn't necessary. Shayanomer (talk) 06:42, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Or better yet, just change it to "Alien," like this. Shayanomer (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

CC-8

• I don't think boringness is an actual word, or at the very least it doesn't sound appropriately encyclopedic Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 00:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Jez Planchet

• Nominated by: ToRsO bOy (talk) 18:43, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• Context for Yavin 4.
  • Added. ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
• At three paragraphs in the body, I don't think that subsectioning is necessary. The way you've broken up the paragraphs already denotes what information is about before or after his death. I'm objecting to this mainly because that's what I was recommended to do on Zett Jukassa, which had a similar situation. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 20:07, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Works for me. Done. ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Manoof

• The intro says he went on a covert mission without any communication with the alliance. Can this be rephrased as it makes it like his going on the mission wasn't communicated, rather than the mission was deep-cover without ongoing communications. Looks great otherwise! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks! Phrase has been reworded. ToRsO bOy (talk) 10:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
    • Awesome much better! Great work!Manoof (he/him/his) (talk)

Shayanomer

• Quote attributions would benefit from clarification on who Bonard is talking to. Also, it's preferable to specify the character's real name there before establishing the alias.
  • Added for both quotes. ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• Intro states he joined the Alliance during the war, while body says he only served in that time. Does the source say he actually joined?
  • Good catch. I changed the intro. ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• In the body, Reader's Companion currently sources everything before the date.
  • Fixed. ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• "Thus, he had no one to call to for help following his capture by Imperial forces." This is the first time you mention the capture in the body. Also, I think it's already redundant to state he can't call for help when you've already established that in the preceding paragraph.
• "Planchet eventually broke and divulged everything he knew about the Alliance in a plea to end the torture, which the Imperials fulfilled by executing him with a blaster shot." "Fulfilled" in the ironic sense?
• "Jez Planchet was a skilled individual who managed to achieve the rank of lieutenant within the Rebel Alliance." Achieving a certain rank is not a noteworthy detail if we don't know what the character did to get it in the first place. Here's another lieutenant as an example.
• "He was trusted enough by his superiors to go on a deep undercover mission to Malastare for a long period without reporting back." Is this actually supported by the source? Shayanomer (talk) 10:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
• Since lieutenant is a military rank in this context, don't you think that would make Planchet part of the Alliance Military? Shayanomer (talk) 10:31, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

13,000,000,000 BBY

• Nominated by: Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: After 90,000 BBY I was curious what the oldest year article was and saw it was a former GA, thought I'd update and nom it cause I'm a sucker for former status articles lol Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Object

Imp

• Per the precedent we've relatively recently established with status articles, it is somewhat misleading to the reader to have an infobox image that doesn't actually depict the subject itself. This is the reason why on status articles for space sectors, you will only find infobox images that depict explicitly labeled sector boundaries, not just images of any planets or whatnot that happen to be a part of that sector. Similarly, here the infobox image depicts the galaxy as it was tens of thousands of years after the events that occurred in this year, therefore it's not really representative of this year by itself. So I'd like you to remove this image from the infobox and for future reference stick to just images of the actual events from a given year for the respective articles' infoboxes. Imperators II^(Talk) 11:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks Imp, missed that update! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
• Okay, that's quite a lot of stuff there that's only tangentially related to this IU date. The specific description of the galaxy's structure has got to go - it's true home is in The galaxy/Legends article. Similarly, much of the "So much life" section should be cut - it contains (apparently) contradictory info on how much sentient species were there, anyway. The only thing from there that I see as worth keeping is the fact that only a quarter of the stars was explored by the time of the Empire.
  • Done Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 22:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• "Life would still be emerging on planets in the galaxy by 5,000,000,000 BBY.[13]" — the way this is phrased doesn't really do justice to how formation of life works both in Star Wars and in real life. In the case of the latter, AFAIK there's no reason why life on other planets couldn't still be emerging today. In the case of the former, life was still emerging during the era of SWTOR, which at these timescales is basically equivalent to the most recent point in timeline. Imperators II^(Talk) 13:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Done Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 22:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• Alright, now that we've removed the stuff that isn't really relevant to the creation of the galaxy, it's time to add back in some information that is relevant. Firstly, I feel like you should note that, per the Atlas, by the time of the Empire nearly a billion of the galaxy's star systems had come to be inhabited by members of more than five million sentient species.
  • Oh, and you could probably throw in the appr. 3.2 billion habitable systems figure from the Atlas as well, since, you know, whether it's intelligent life or just life in general, those figures still very much differ from our current knowledge about our own galaxy. :) Imperators II^(Talk) 11:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Added, as well as Boabab's speculation of the much larger number of species. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
• Secondly—and I cannot stress enough the importance of this—the "impact" of the events of 13,000,000,000 BBY is basically the entire in-universe history of the Star Wars franchise. Accordingly, I'd like you to note in a SUPER concise fashion that a) multiple civilizations and political entities, including the Celestials, the Infinite Empire, the Galactic Republic, the Galactic Empire, the New Republic, the Yuuzhan Vong empire, the Galactic Alliance, and Darth Krayt's Galactic Empire, successively arose to rule the galaxy, and b) the history of those cultures was marked by a number of galactic-scale conflicts (remember the "Wars" part of "Star Wars"!). Imperators II^(Talk) 10:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
  • I TRIED to be succinct but a bit worried it might've been a bit much :S I wanted to cover a bit about the main setting of the saga - being the clone wars and galactic civil war. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Yes, I think the part about the Clone Wars and the GCW is too much context, plus it skews on the side of an OOU focus on the Clone Wars and GCW somehow being "the most important" part of the galaxy's history, when there are other events, such as the Yuuzhan Vong invasion, that are easily as important. Best to just leave it at that one general sentence about there being many conflicts throughout those civilizations' history. Imperators II^(Talk) 12:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Ok I cut it down and used similar wording to that mentioning the civilisations, careful to use terms found in TEA so I wouldn't need additional referencing, is that ok? :) Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 07:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Again, you're trying to list specific examples but you're just introducing bits of bias that way. You're mentioning some galaxy-spanning conflicts but at the same time you're not mentioning equally important-ones: the Jedi Civil War, the Sith Wars against the resurgent Sith Empire—and the subjugation of galactic superpowers by the Eternal Empire—the 1000-year-long New Sith Wars, and the Sith-Imperial War which led to an Empire once again dominating the galaxy. There are other such examples I'm not even listing here, so why not just stick to what I recommend to you above and leave it at the sentence that just says there were many galaxy-spanning conflicts? Imperators II^(Talk) 09:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
          • Removed both lists and made it generic per your logic Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• There's a lot of info in the impacts section that may be irrelevant to the year itself. However as a former GA (albeit by 2012 standards I was hesitant to just go deleting it. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Jak'zin

• Nominated by: LucaRoR ^(Talk) 09:59, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Body count is 952.
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:CO

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support

1. I think it's at 984, for a Jedi that body count keeps increasing! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Manoof

• Intro notes that Jak'zin was distrustful and aware of his lightsaber colour prior to Dooku revealing his allegiance but the body indicates this happened simultaneously? Intro also mentioned that they defeated the criminals but the body sounds like they were surrounded when the reveal occurred. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Better?
    • Much! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• Can you briefly note the aftermath of Jak'zin's mission, similar to a Legacy subsection Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Is this good or would you like more details?
    • That's perfect, I don't think we need too much detail but that brief note is great. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• Not strictly an objection, but is there a close-up of his lightsaber we could add in the Equipment section? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Added, I've alredy asked someone if they could upload a better version of it, since my monitor isn't great for taking screenshots. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Awesome Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Editor

• The quote where dooku calls Jak'zin's death a pity can be added to the section where he is betrayed Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:11, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done, thanks! LucaRoR ^(Talk) 15:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• Big issue for me is that apart from the Powers and abilities and Equipment sections, the whole article was written by Braha'tok enthusiast. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
  • I see, what would you like me to do? LucaRoR ^(Talk) 04:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
    • For the record I'm not bothered with Luca taking the torch on this. I've not touched it in over two years and probably wouldn't have in the future. Besides, the writeup was my work but it's not like it's had some changes since. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 09:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
      • Sounds good. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 15:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Brador

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Slightly longer one this time
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:EWOKS, WP:COMICS

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. "My cab—squash melons!" DwartiiDelver (talk) 00:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Weird, I remember reading and reviewing this but I didn't support or object? Looks good! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Dwartii

• I think his belt and cross strap could be noted.
• Eyebrow and skin color can be documented as well. DwartiiDelver (talk) 03:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Both added. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 14:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
• Are the stones of obedience a single device, or should "devices" be used instead? DwartiiDelver (talk) 00:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Hmm, good question. It's actually a bunch of necklaces, and each Ewok gets an individual necklace that controls them. What do you think? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
    • If each Ewok gets an individual necklace, I think "devices" would be more appropriate. DwartiiDelver (talk) 00:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
      • On that note, I've just linked Necklace/Legends. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:28, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
        • Can the entire necklaces be referred to as "stones of obedience," or should that sentence instead say something along the lines of "...put under the influence of necklaces containing/comprised of/etc. stones of obedience"? DwartiiDelver (talk) 00:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
          • Sure, added. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Unidentified aiwha pod

• Nominated by: Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Continuing with the Tale of the Aiwha Pod unique articles
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Object

Macaroni

• First off, the intro feels a bit too large for this article size, could use some trimming. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Gave it a crew cut Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
• Is it really necessary to mention the glory thing in both description and history?
  • I think so, it's placement in the description speaks to their behaviour and placement in history speaks to their approach in attacking Protas. Open to suggestions if you want it changed though. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
• Mentioning Legends in the bts is unnecessary. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Removed Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Crev Bombaasa

• Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: This is one of my favourite Legends pulls in the new canon films.
• WookieeProject (optional):

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Support

1. That's a nice pull by Pablo for sure. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• The Legends page specifies that he appeared in Crisis, which should be added and then sourced via {{DarkStryder}}. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 15:30, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Ayrehead02 (talk) 15:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

CC-8

• The film and the official guide need to have full release date since they're being discussed in tandem. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 05:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Accompanying has always been sufficient to say they came out on the same day. Happy to discuss if you disagree, but this will effect almost all of my Disney Era status articles :P Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:02, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Sorry for the delay. Accompanying doesn't exactly confirm that the dates were the same, and per the LG: This means that films… reference books… should only provide a publication year, …The exception to this rule is when two sources are being discussed in tandem. In such a case, the month and/or full date may be provided as necessary, particularly if both sources were released in the same year. I'll put a message out on Discord if that wording as is has been accepted in reviews so far. I've still got to update all my GB articles for concurrent dates so I understand that it's a hassle. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 10:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
      • No worries, I believe I actually wrote that bit of policy but generally the terms saying that a book was "accompanying" or "released in conjunction with a film" has been accepted. For reference here's a small sample of some of the other status articles that use accompanying: 1MSE-KUP24, B8G-H0R, G2-1B7, KMD-RA-71, Diles Anevi, Boshti Anilee. Again, I'm still happy to discuss if you disagree with this interpretation though. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Viv Tanner

• Nominated by: Dentface (talk) 07:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I tried so hard to keep this within CAN limits. Alas, 'twas not to be.
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:PRIDE

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 10:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Nice work. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 17:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
3. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 22:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Emita/Legends

• Nominated by: VergenceScatter (talk) 02:29, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Preparing for a featured topic nomination, once those get launched
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:FFGAMES

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 20:38, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Shayanomer

• Points of interest should be detailed under a "Locations" section as per the Layout Guide. Shayanomer (talk) 09:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Was mistaken. Shayanomer (talk) 15:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Destruction of Protas

• Nominated by: Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: First battle nom
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Object

Macaroni

• Links should not be present in bolded title in intro.
  • Handled with below Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Conjecture template is present, but you've bolded the whole title in the intro.
  • Didn't realise that meant we couldn't bold the whole lot, I've kept "destruction" bolded but removed from the rest, keeping the link. Is that how to handle this? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Yeah, my objection was a bit contradictory here, my bad.
• If these quotes come from the IU short story, they should be mentioned in the attributions. See Kowakian crumb cake's quotes as an example.
  • I updated but per my query on discord and standard in referencing, put the title in double quotations without italicising, which doesn't match the crumb cake. Let me know if I've misunderstood. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Yeah, that was what I had in mind.
• Per ample precedent, it should be mentioned somewhere that this battle was featured in the IU short story.
  • Was intro exclusive, how's that? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Release year should actually be mentioned, not just in parenthesis.
  • Done Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Bts should not be italicizing the story name.
  • Done
• Unsourced bts.
  • Done
• (Review note) Please note these edits. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks, and apologies again this is clearly below my normal standard :( Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
    • All good.
• Is there a relevant image we can use in the body? Of Kamino, perhaps?
  • Kamino image added, let me know if the caption isn't ok. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
• I don't think the bit about the translation is necessary for the intro. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Removed Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
• Last thing: I'm seeing an inconsistency between "Protas's" and "Protas'". Both are correct, but it should be the same throughout the article. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Got it Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Radiation Cannon

• Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I meant to nom this after I expanded it but needed to make those specific B1 pages first
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:FFGAMES

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 20:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
2. YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• Missing Mediacat.
  • Added Editoronthewiki (talk) 02:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
• Context for Battlefront, and both the game and game guide need their full release dates added.
  • The game needs a full date as well.
    • Added Editoronthewiki (talk) 02:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
• The bts goes from discussing Legion, to Legends, and back to Legion. I think it would make more sense to group the bits on Legion. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 15:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

OOM

• Any progress on that image?
  • Nothing on art-station, and my attempt at reuploading looked worse. i've put in an image request Editoronthewiki (talk) 01:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Striking for now, but this has to be resolved before the nom can pass OOM 224 18:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
• Compound words should be hyphenated with en dashes (see WP:DASH) OOM 224 18:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Good? Editoronthewiki (talk) 01:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
  • "non-mounted" is fine with just a hyphen since "mounted" is only one word OOM 224 18:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed? Editoronthewiki (talk) 23:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• OOM has uploaded a better version of the infobox image, so that is taken care of. again, thank you OOM Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Prakas

• Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 21:10, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: That's right, I'm back to Catalyst noms!
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support

1. yeet, Catalyst was good and I'm here for it -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Object

Fan

• "he had Prakas contacted, enabling him to tell Prakas about the Separatist forces on the ground to begin his attack run. " This is confusingly worded.
  • Better? Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
• "After handing over Morseerian scientists Nan Pakota and Urshe Torr and taking the Ersos aboard, Krennic, while strapping in, ordered his communications technician to contact Prakas as soon as the Good Tidings took off, ordering the technician to ensure Prakas gave them enough time to escape before the attack run." Please break this up into smaller sentences. Fan26 (Talk) 14:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Better? Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Macaroni

• I get that the second paragraph sets up Prakas's arrival, but it barely mentions him. How would you feel about cutting it down a bit?
  • Better? Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
• The bit about being an officer doesn't seem like P+T material. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 06:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Better? Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
• Is the bit about the CIS scientists really relavent? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 21:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
  • It establishes who the prisoner exchange was for, which plays into the overall operation so yes Editoronthewiki (talk) 18:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
• Is it really necessary to mention that Zerpen Industries approved of the mission twice? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Good? Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Mupple pie

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 14:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: The one and only pie from Droids
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support

1. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 06:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Luca

• Could you add a bit more context to Baobab's? Perhaps merchant.
• I'd switch the quote in description with the quote in the intro. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 07:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Both done. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Ceasar

• Nominated by: IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 22:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Fixed what got it removed from status a few years ago. Let's see what else is wrong with this bad boy
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:COMICS

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Support

1. Nom more of the Marvel SW stuff you've written up! :P JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• Intro & paragraph #2 in bio could use a split.
• I'd say you can create a category for watchbeasts.
• As high quality as Cull's scans are, they should honestly be digitized.
• Missing a P+T section, where info on skin color would be better suited.
• Comic requires full release date. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Should all be addressed. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 02:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
• It would be better for the subsections to be two or three paragraphs each instead of one and four.
• Definitely room for at least one more image.
• Is Bazarre supposed to be italicized? Its page makes it seem that way.
• Context on Bazarre in the bio. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Should be taken care of. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 04:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
• As great as the bts quote is, I don't think it's necessary. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Removed. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 02:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Shayanomer

• Another image for "Skirmish on Patch-4"? Shayanomer (talk) 18:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
• Our page on the comic credits two writers, while this article only names one. Shayanomer (talk) 18:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Blue-milk pancakes

• Nominated by: D MCCG (chat) 01:52, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: CAN turned into GAN
• WookieeProject (optional):

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• References should be removed from the intro and should only be present in the body.
  • Done ~ D MCCG (chat) 23:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
• Is there no relevant image for the body? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 14:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
  • The image up right now is the only time it is actually shown. ~ D MCCG (chat) 23:40, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
    • You can add an image of Derlin eating the pancakes.
      • Added an image in the History section. ~ D MCCG (chat) 13:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
  • I also want to add a audio file for the quote but don't know how. ~ D MCCG (chat) 23:45, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure either, never have been able to do audio files. You can try asking Ayrehead02.
      • Ok, I'll ask him. Thanks ~ D MCCG (chat) 13:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
• You can split up the opening quote so that there's a quote for the History section. And is there a quote you can use in the Description section? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:25, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
  • I just added a new quote to the History section. I didn't find any quote that fit the Description section. ~ D MCCG (chat) 13:43, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
• I'd like to see the history section mention that Derlin preferred the pancakes to the Empire's food, per that opening quote. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 06:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. ~ D MCCG (chat) 13:24, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Shayanomer

• Please cite Star Wars: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know, Updated and Expanded if it contains the same info as the old version.
• Article should establish that R0-GR used to make blue-milk pancakes before his encounter with Hondo. Currently the subject's first mention in History comes in the second paragraph. Shayanomer (talk) 09:38, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• I saw you were looking for help adding audio files and added them. Let me know if there's any issues with them or they need changing. NBDani (talk) 19:19, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Thank you! ~ D MCCG (chat) 20:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Unidentified aiwha

• Nominated by: Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support

1. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 20:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Braha

• Context needed for Ryan Kaufman. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 00:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Addressed on Discord. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 20:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Wona Goban

• Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Might as well continue my Gold Squadron streak
• WookieeProject (optional):

(1 ACs/0 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• Any reason for no mention of species/gender in intro?
  • Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
• "Scramble for Scarif" missing ref in first paragraph, with dup refs in second.
  • Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
• Unfinished sentence in Equipment section.
  • Finished. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
• As with Shaef Corssin, we can mention that this name is certainly a tuckerization of the actor's name. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Rodian splice

• Nominated by: Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 20:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: "Han Solo, a desperate smuggler with something to prove..."
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:GE

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Bootyful. Tuggs' kiss! -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 23:13, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 00:06, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Control (corvette)

• Nominated by: Dat1899 (talk) 11:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Thank you to User:Green Tentacle, User:Shayanomer, User:Supreme Emperor, User:OOM 224, User:Erebus Chronus, User:VergenceScatter, User:Hanzo Hasashi, User:JediMasterMacaroni, User:LucaRoR, User:YakovChaimTzvi, User:Jaymach and others for their help.
• WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Video Games

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

#YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 02:54, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

1. For real this time — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 18:11, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Good work for your first GAN. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 19:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Erebus

• Characteristics goes before History.
  • Fixed.--Dat1899 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
• Intro could definitely be expanded to give a quick summary about what it did, just saying that it was a Corellian corvette use by the Empire during the war in a training simulation doesn't seem like enough.
  • Added a little more information.--Dat1899 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
• Italicization for the Delta-class DX-9 stormtrooper transport
  • Mended.--Dat1899 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
• Per Grievous's frigate or Battlecruiser 17, individual ships do not share the same specifications or manufacturer as the class they are a part of. As such, unless it is specifically confirmed by a source, please remove both the Corellian Engineering Corporation and hyperdrive rating from the page. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 03:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Repaired. Also added some information from the game itself.--Dat1899 (talk) 15:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Yakov

• I don't think "corvette" should be a "role" in the infobox since it's already the "class" -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed.--Dat1899 (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
• (Review note): when you need to italicize something that is linked, if you want to display the exact article title, do not pipelink it like [[Executor|''Executor'']]; instead do ''[[Executor]]''. Only pipelink and put the italicization inside the pipelink if you need to for some reason, such as [[Executor/Legends|''Executor'']] or [[Imperial-class Star Destroyer|''Imperial''-class Star Destroyer]]. If this isn't clear, please ask on #user-help on Discord. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the suggestion,.--Dat1899 (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Note: I struck this for Jocasta purposes, but the advice stands. It's been moved to #Comments -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 18:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• (Review note): when you need to italicize something that is linked, if you want to display the exact article title, do not pipelink it like [[Executor|''Executor'']]; instead do ''[[Executor]]''. Only pipelink and put the italicization inside the pipelink if you need to for some reason, such as [[Executor/Legends|''Executor'']] or [[Imperial-class Star Destroyer|''Imperial''-class Star Destroyer]]. If this isn't clear, please ask on #user-help on Discord. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Angela Morley

• Nominated by: Dentface (talk) 21:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:PRIDE, WP:RWM

(0 ACs/2 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 00:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Objections handled via Discord :) Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 03:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

NanoLuuke

• In intro. "(born on March 10, 1924 in Leeds, West Yorkshire, England)" should be replaced by (birth date – death date). --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 13:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• In Biography, events have to be presented in chronological order, so "Angela Morley was an English composer and conductor." should not be the first sentence. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 13:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• "Over the years, Morley became a frequent collaborator of Williams, working as an orchestrator on many of his subsequent film scores." should be removed, per policy. I have no objection as to putting this information in the introduction, as allowed by the same policy. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 13:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Thanks! Dentface (talk) 23:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

CC-8

• A screenshot of the moment the force theme plays would make a good image for the bio, unless you can find something more approrpiate Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 13:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Good idea! Added. Dentface (talk) 01:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
• The body should specify the category Morley was nominated for as well as the film it was for.
  • Appeasing our overlord Jocasta. Dentface (talk) 18:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
• "collaborate throughout the production of A New Hope in 1977." This should specify that the film was released in 77, unless a source specifies that the collaborations took place in that year. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 11:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Title: Added.
    • The wikipedia page for that category can be linked too. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Added. Dentface (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
  • The source explicitly states that Morley began working with Williams in 77 well after the film's orchestration was underway. Dentface (talk) 01:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
    • If that's the case then why is the additional reference to the film itself there? Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Good point. I did it out of habit. Removed. Dentface (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Star Wars Episode VII: Shadows of the Sith

• Nominated by: Dentface (talk) 22:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:VG, WP:LE

(0 ACs/1 Users/1 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support

1. NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 00:25, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

NanoLuuke

• It's not a strong objection, but I'm a bit conflicted by the use of "wind down" here: "as development on The Force Unleashed began to wind down". Personally, (and keep in mind I'm French), I was only aware of the meaning "relax", "slow down", but I also discovered it could mean exactly what you intended: "to draw gradually toward an end" (per Merriam-Webster). At any rate, I find it confusing, too colloquial and not explicit enough. Maybe changing it for "as The Force Unleashed reached the end of its development cycle", or something similar? --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 00:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• In the Bibliography, the entry could be updated with {{C|Logo only}} (as supported by policy). I have a copy of Rogue Leaders: The Story of LucasArts and it looks like there's nothing else. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 00:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Dentface (talk) 23:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Full Monty Catering

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Ochotl

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 20:55, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:Warfare

(3 ACs/1 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:28, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Shayanomer (talk) 09:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
3. OOM 224 22:41, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
4. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 16:36, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Barenth

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 07:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:35, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Shayanomer (talk) 11:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Battle of Falleen

• Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I did not know I could have more than two GANs up, so here we are
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:TCW

(1 ACs/1 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support

1. Nice work. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
2. YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Invasion of Saleucami

• Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 13:07, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Next up in my duology of Clone Wars battles that grew too big for CAN
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Immalia

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 09:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:Warfare

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Mittoblade/Legends

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 19:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:Warfare

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Ua system

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 13:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:NOVELS

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Zevel Hortine

• Nominated by: Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 21:47, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Probably not the only Corellian smuggler to consider ejecting Threepio into space.
• WookieeProject (optional):

(2 ACs/0 Users/2 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Support

1. I like it. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 21:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Nice work. Shayanomer (talk) 09:15, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Yay for Droids!

• Since Hortine was mentioned without a connection to the unidentified smuggler, and he was later established to be that smuggler, I think we can place {{Ret}} next to the indirect mentions that predate the connection to Droids. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Green Tentacle ^(Talk) 20:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Battlecruiser 19

• Nominated by: Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 03:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: The other battlecruiser
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:TCW

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Antipose XII

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 10:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:NOVELS

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Pekt's clan

• Nominated by: Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 13:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Pekt is one sick bastard
• WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Video Games

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Hali Ke

• Nominated by: TK-462 (talk) 18:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Wew, its been a minute.
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Zornak's companion

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Back to Marvel's Ewoks
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:EWOKS

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Wroshyr Tree Cake

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 07:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I'll usually be trying to keep my GANs at six with my new AC powers, but I'll make an exception for this one :P
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:GE

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Quell system

• Nominated by: Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 19:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Let's try this as a GAN now
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:TCW, WP:NOVELS

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Object

Macaroni

• I think we should avoid saying "the X system was a star system." None of Imp's many system status articles do it.
  • I'm aware of this.
• Is the system named in its first appearance? Asking because there's no 1stID and there isn't any quote from the episode with its name. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 05:42, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
  • In the opening newsreel. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 14:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Port in a Storm

• Nominated by: Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:GE and WP:NOVELS

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Object

Braha'in a'tok

• The history section requires some level of sub-sectioning. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 22:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
• Pijal, Hosnian Prime, and Han Solo needs context Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 11:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done, if Hosnian Prime works? Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 18:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Unsure what the seat means but I assume that's some political terminology. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 20:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Oop! So, "the seat" is where the government operates from, usually the same as its capital. However, the book doesn't actually identify Hosnian Prime with the word "capital" (and despite my searching, didn't seem to call it a planet either?) So perhaps for clarity, I could rework that and use another ref for context. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 04:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
      • See if the revision works. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 08:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Perfect. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 10:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
• Riosa also needs context. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 11:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 18:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Pasta in a Storm

• Appearances/Sources needs to specify the first appearance/source that mentioned the drink prior to it being retconned into AOTC. See Puck Naeco/Legends#Appearances as an example. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 07:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Oh thank you! I'm still getting my head around what's considered a retconned appearance, so my formatting is behind. Let me know if I've got it right. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 08:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Gave it a tweak, but looks good!
• Can we really be sure that How to Not Get Eaten by Ewoks depicts the drink during the events of AOTC? Perhaps that would be better sourced to the film itself. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Adjusted that, have a look! Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 11:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• Noting that I'm keeping a close watch with wordcounter since it hovers right around 1k words, sometimes over and sometimes under. If the review process takes it over and it stays stable over 1k, I'll withdraw accordingly. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 18:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Unidentified clone trooper officer (Kamino)

• Nominated by: Eddiebox28 (talk) 17:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Nomination number two for me. Let's see how it goes.
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Object

Erebus

• The intro can be reduced a fair amount, since it provides more information than it should.
  • Done. Eddiebox28 (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
• Currently, the two paragraphs in the History section are quite large. Could you please split them up, as well as provide a second image?
  • Done, for the first part. I'd like to upload an image taken from the Clone Wars Rewatch article but it's a screenshot they have taken from the episode. Would the source be the article or the episode? Eddiebox28 (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
• Context for Coruscant in History, please.
  • Done, I think? I'm assuming what I've done is what you meant, in which case does Kamino require it as well? Eddiebox28 (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
• There is currently a single duplicate link in the body. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 17:22, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Eddiebox28 (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
• The episode being part of the sixth season should be sourced to the episode guide instead, per a substantial amount of modern precedents.Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 17:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Eddiebox28 (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Shayanomer

• Article title should be at "Unidentified clone trooper officer" since there are no other canon pages competing for the namespace.
  • Actually, does the episode even call this character an "officer"? Shayanomer (talk) 18:22, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
    • I've just double checked and no, not explicitly. However, in this case, it's clear he is a higher rank than ordinary clones: he has command over troops and is ordered to position them by superiors ("your men"); his armor and gear resemble those worn by other clone officers throughout the show. This is a slight assumption on our part but it's one backed up by a lot of evidence presented to us in the episode. I think referring to him as a standard trooper might be disingenous. Eddiebox28 (talk) 19:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
      • But he is a clone trooper, so that isn't inaccurate. We shouldn't extrapolate meaning based on appearance in this case. Shayanomer (talk) 09:38, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
        • True. What should I move it to? "Unidentified clone trooper (Kamino security)" is apparently either invalid or taken (I'm assuming by a redirect since no such page exists). Eddiebox28 (talk) 20:53, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
          • It's a redirect. Shayanomer (talk) 11:51, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
• A link to a disambiguation page is also in order. Shayanomer (talk) 18:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Unidentified Nightbrother village

• Nominated by: AmazinglyCool (talk) 21:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Antipose IX

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 08:44, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Discovered a bit of relevant info that tipped this just over the 165-limit.
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:NOVELS

(2 ACs/1 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 1 user or 1 AC vote required to pass.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 21:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Shayanomer (talk) 11:20, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
3. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:28, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Askar Trace

• Nominated by: VergenceScatter (talk) 16:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Many thanks to Imp for all the help he gave me with this
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)

Object

Shayanomer

• 1stm and Po under Sources contradict each other. Shayanomer (talk) 17:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Forgot {{1stp}} was a thing. VergenceScatter (talk) 20:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Does Atlas actually mention this hyperlane or is it only pictured? The BTS currently implies the former. Shayanomer (talk) 20:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Changed the wording. VergenceScatter (talk) 20:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Junkfort system

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 17:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:COMICS

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 2 AC votes required to pass.)