Blotus the Hutt
- Nominated by: Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 20:12, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Nomination comments: 272 words. Three less than the number of years Blotus was Chancellor.
(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)
Support
- Cool. Electing Hutts for the office is as cool as electing Jedi. Imperators II(Talk) 20:45, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Blotus the good Hutt.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 21:56, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
- 274. CC7567 (talk) 01:59, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
- I like the article.--kangaroopowahTalk 02:19, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Tranner! We're Hutt buddies! :P Kilson(Let's have a chat) 03:39, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Blue 42... Hutt! Menkooroo 04:33, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Snowball, coming your way. 1358 (Talk) 05:25, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
Object
Exiled Jedi
Could you say the era when Voren Na'al claimed that Blotus was one of the most illustrious chancellors ever?- Other than that, it looks good.--Exiled Jedi (Greetings) 20:27, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Added. Thanks for the review. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 20:39, June 15, 2011 (UTC)
Attack of the Clone
Quick preliminary: I was under the impression that we don't include "the Hutt" as part of the article/official name; we only treat it as a title of sorts. Could you clarify this and possibly move the article to reflect this?CC7567 (talk) 00:35, June 16, 2011 (UTC)- The article was originally at "Blotus," actually. However, in every source, this particular individual is referred to as "Blotus the Hutt," which is why I moved the article to its current title. As the canonical name for this character, it adheres to the naming policy. Let me know if you have any more questions, CC. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 01:53, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. I just wasn't aware that he was never referred to as "Blotus." Sorry bout the confusion. CC7567 (talk) 01:59, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
- I probably should have left a comment here when I started the nom; I anticipated someone would bring this up when I moved the article. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 02:02, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. I just wasn't aware that he was never referred to as "Blotus." Sorry bout the confusion. CC7567 (talk) 01:59, June 16, 2011 (UTC)
- The article was originally at "Blotus," actually. However, in every source, this particular individual is referred to as "Blotus the Hutt," which is why I moved the article to its current title. As the canonical name for this character, it adheres to the naming policy. Let me know if you have any more questions, CC. Grand Moff Tranner (Comlink) 01:53, June 16, 2011 (UTC)