"Atrocity" is a little POV, isn't it? I understand the Atlas may call it such, cut per my current GAN, even sourced POV is not allowed unless it is IU. Other than that, I fixed some excessive comma use and a typo. Good article! MasterFred(Whatever) 13:53, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
The "Imperial atrocities" map doesn't say whose point of view it's from, so I don't know if we can ever use it to source articles. I'd guess that 99.99% of anyone you'd ask would consider genocide an atrocity, but I've gone ahead and removed the statement. ~Savage 19:55, June 17, 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for handling that Bob. Apologies for the delay, MF. --Eyrezer 04:13, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
No, I'm sorry for the delay. I forgot all about this. Kilson reminded me on IRC. :P Anyway, I'm good. MasterFred(Whatever) 19:43, June 21, 2011 (UTC)
In the intro, it's ambiguous whether they were enslaved to construct the ubiqtorate, or as punishment for constructing the ubiqtorate.
Any reason to keep the post-genocide history in the article? It seems superfluous if the species is all gone.
I originally wrote this article without this information, for the reason that you state. However, it seemed remiss not to at least briefly mention it. If I was researching the Tangrene, I would personally find it useful to have these battles briefly mentioned, so I added it back in.
OK, I can see that. I still think it's not necessary, but I can see that it potentially has a place in the article. ~Savage 15:57, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
Can you indicate in BTS that the OS doesn't indicate the plural form of the name? It could just as easily be "Tangrenes," but we don't know that for sure. ~Savage 22:21, June 4, 2011 (UTC)