Wookieepedia:Good article nominations

This page is for Good article nominations. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. In turn, a Good article features more detail than a Comprehensive article. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Good status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding AgriCorps review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after ten days will be subject to immediate removal.

• Good article nominations history
• Good article checklist

READ THIS FIRST!

---

A Good article must…

1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
2. …be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
6. …be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
8. …have no redlinks.
9. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
12. …provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic, along with an article body that is at least 165 words long, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section (not including captions, quotes, headers, etc). Articles that fail to do so should be nominated for Comprehensive status. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
13. …be at least 250 words long and must not exceed 1000 words. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
14. …not be deliberately shortened if it approaches the 1000-word limit.
15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

---

How to nominate:

1. Select an article you feel is worthy of Good status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{GAnom|second}}).
3. Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
5. Purge the article to update the template.
6. Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
7. The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
8. Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
9. Each user (except for members of the AgriCorps) shall be limited to six active Good article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
10. Users must successfully complete one Good article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the GAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful GA nominations before they can have three, and so on.

---

How to review:

1. To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
2. The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
3. Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
4. Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.

---

Result:

1. If a nomination has been active for over two days and has no active objections, it may pass with either a total of four votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—three of which must be AgriCorps votes—or a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes.
2. Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Good article." As such, an AgriCorps member will archive the nomination using JocastaBot in Wookieepedia's Discord server and place the article on the Good articles page. Only members of the AgriCorps are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.

---

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 10 days.

This page is for Good article nominations. A Good article is an article that adheres to certain quality standards but cannot reach Featured status due to its limited content. In turn, a Good article features more detail than a Comprehensive article. On this page, users can nominate articles that they believe are ready to be reviewed to achieve Good status.

The article-nomination process is not a way to showcase your favorite articles, but rather articles that are of high quality. Articles placed on this page will be extensively reviewed by experienced editors, including the presiding AgriCorps review panel. The nomination process will require the article nominator to respond to objections and improve the article until the requisite number of users supports the nomination.

In undertaking a nomination on this page, the nominator is taking responsibility for their nominated article. This means they need to thoroughly read the following instructions, implement them into their nominated article, and respond to given objections. Nominators are encouraged to ask more experienced editors for guidance and assistance, but self-sufficiency is a requirement of the article-nomination process. It is not inherently the job of reviewers to rewrite elements of an article, but rather to guide nominators to be able to fix issues themselves.

Your nomination is your responsibility. Nominations that severely neglect the following rules or otherwise fall idle after ten days will be subject to immediate removal.

• Good article nominations history
• Good article checklist

READ THIS FIRST!

---

A Good article must…

1. …be well-written and comprehensively detailed.
2. …be unbiased, with a neutral point of view.
3. …have comprehensive Appearances and Sources lists.
4. …be fully referenced, including all quotes and images. See Wookieepedia:Sourcing for more information.
5. …follow the Manual of Style, Layout Guide, and all other policies on Wookieepedia.
6. …be stable during and following the review process. This means the article does not change significantly from day to day with new content and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism or other administrative edits, such as page protection.
7. …not be tagged with any sort of improvement tags (i.e. more sources, expand, etc).
8. …have no redlinks.
9. …provide at least one quote on the article if available. A leading quote at the beginning of the article is preferred but not required if no quotes are available. Although quotes may be placed in the body of the article, a maximum of one quote is allowed at the beginning of each section or subsection.
10. …include a "Behind the scenes" section for in-universe articles.
11. …include a reasonable number of images of the highest quality to illustrate the article, as source availability permits.
12. …provide an introduction that gives a good summary of the topic, along with an article body that is at least 165 words long, not counting the "Behind the scenes" section (not including captions, quotes, headers, etc). Articles that fail to do so should be nominated for Comprehensive status. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
13. …be at least 250 words long and must not exceed 1000 words. This word total counts the introduction, the article body, and "Behind the scenes" material, but not captions, quotes, headers, etc. For clarification, please refer to this flowchart.
14. …not be deliberately shortened if it approaches the 1000-word limit.
15. …be properly titled in accordance with Wookieepedia's treatment of Canon and Legends articles; i.e., no nomination may have "/Canon" in the title.

---

How to nominate:

1. Select an article you feel is worthy of Good status. Nominated articles must meet all fifteen requirements stated above.
2. Add {{GAnom}} at the top of the article you are nominating, and save the page. Please note that if the article you are nominating has been nominated for Good article status previously, you will need to specify the number of the nomination as a parameter (e.g. {{GAnom|second}}).
3. Open the redlink in a new tab to create the nomination page, modifying the preloaded instructions as necessary.
4. Copy the code provided to the bottom of this page.
5. Purge the article to update the template.
6. Other users will object to the nomination with issues and suggested improvements (errors, style, organization, images, notability, sources, etc).
7. The nominator should then adjust the article until the objections are satisfied. The objector is responsible for striking their objection when it has been addressed, not the nominator. Additionally, reviewers will often copy-edit the article themselves as desired to fix any issues.
8. Following their review, other users will vote to support the nomination. Users may not vote on their own nomination.
9. Each user (except for members of the AgriCorps) shall be limited to four active Good article nominations at any given time. Any additional nominations will be subject to immediate removal.
10. Users must successfully complete one Good article nomination before they can have two nominations active on the GAN page at one time. Likewise, users must complete two successful GA nominations before they can have three, and three successful GA nominations before they can have four.

---

How to review:

1. To review an article, users should read the article completely, keeping a sharp eye out for mistakes.
2. The article should be reviewed with the criteria listed above, and any issues should be placed under the Object section of the article's nomination page. Objections should be clearly explained, and detail how the article can be improved.
3. Objections should then be addressed by the nominator. Once the objector is satisfied, they should strike their objection. The nominator should not strike reviewers' objections for them.
4. Once a reviewer is satisfied with the article, they can vote to support it. Please note that in order to support a nomination, you must have 50 mainspace edits.
5. If a nomination has been active for over one week and has no active objections, it may pass with a total of five votes, with at least three votes coming from AgriCorps or Inquisitorius members—two of which must be AgriCorps votes. Alternatively, if a nomination is between two and seven days old and has no active objections, it can pass with a total of five AgriCorps/Inquisitorius votes—three of which must be AgriCorps votes.
6. Once the nomination is successful, the article will be considered a "Good article." As such, an AgriCorps member will archive the nomination, tag the article with the {{Top|ga}} template, tag its talk page with the {{GA}} template, and place the article on the Good articles page. Only members of the AgriCorps are allowed to perform these archiving tasks.

---

All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to immediate removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 10 days.

Note: Reduxed articles require only three support votes to maintain their Good status, all of which must come from AgriCorps members. Reduxed articles will be subject to immediate removal if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks, pending the support of at least three AgriCorps members.

Good article nominations

View recent changes for this page and its subpages

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Karlini silk

• Nominated by: Minnabird ^(talk) 11:04, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Novels

(2 ACs/2 Users/4 Total)

(Votes required: 1 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 03:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
2. More Naboo fashion pls MasterFred(talk) 10:58, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
3. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:53, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
4. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 04:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Object

Pasta silk

• You've linked retcon in the bts, but {{Ret}} is not being used. That being said, based on what I'm seeing in the article, I don't think we should be treating this as a retcon, so I'm going to recommend that that link be removed. Let me know if you disagree. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Oh, no if that's not typically linked for this kind of thing, totally happy to remove it; looks like, taking another look at the article, Wook uses a pretty narrow definition of retcon. So yes: removed! Minnabird ^(talk) 19:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
• Please check your sourcing in "Fit for a queen." JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 17:08, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Ahh, whoops, fixed that. Minnabird ^(talk) 00:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
• Why have you chosen not to mention the other usages of the flame robes, at least briefly? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 15:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
  • The silk is only explicitly linked with the originals; probably the Raiders of the Lost Gundark ones can be presumed to be the same ones, and I can certainly add those, but otherwise, there's not really any reason to assume the senatorial era ones or the ones used by other queens' entourages are made from the exact same material. Minnabird ^(talk) 17:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
    • In that case, up to you on Lost Gundark, but I'd say that others that are unconfirmed should be removed from the appearances section. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
      • Kept Lost Gundark, and detailed it in the article, lost the rest.Minnabird ^(talk) 14:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

CC-8

• We should avoid using the word this in article bodies
  • Adjusted that sentence in the intro. Minnabird ^(talk) 03:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
    • There's still one in the woven together section Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 06:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
      • Ah, didn't realize absolutely all instances of "this" were forbidden, still having trouble figuring out what the problem is so I can avoid tripping into it again when rephrasing. I think in this case a less passive phrasing helps? Lmk if that's closer to what you were thinking. Minnabird ^(talk) 17:35, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
        • To me I think the writing is smoother without it, its like the word refers back to the article when we should just be referring to the sources we're drawing from. It isn't forbidden but it's a strong preference that's held up for a while. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 03:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
• Needs context for Naboo in the intro Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 10:03, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Done! Minnabird ^(talk) 03:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Fred strikes back

• The 1stID in the Appearances should be simultaneous with the audiobook, no?
  • Yes! Fixed. Minnabird ^(talk) 00:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
• Check my copy-edit here to make sure all the changes are ok! MasterFred(talk) 22:45, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Looks good, thank you. Minnabird ^(talk) 00:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• I would like to see additional clarification in the infobox title akin to this.
  • That work? Minnabird ^(talk) 20:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
• Please check Ultimate Star Wars, New Edition for a mention. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
  • I did when I compiled my sources, and did not find it. I want to say that the USW reference was to being in disguise as a handmaiden and I didn't see it recur in USWNE? This is definitely from the flame-colored robe source list. Minnabird ^(talk) 20:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

OOM

• I think the infobox title description can be shortened to "(Depicted as fabric used in gowns)"
  • Done.
• Content in article bodies should be written in an in-universe point of view, so I'd change the image caption under "Fit for a queen" to something like "Queen Amidala and her handmaidens' black gown and orange under-robe were made of Karlini silk."
  • Fixed.
• All the text in references should be linked to, so several links need to be added to the "Raiders" ref note. OOM 224 19:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
  • I'm assuming that's all the links that needed to be added?
• Missing an image category OOM 224 19:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Created and added. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
• Are the Appearances/Sources lists complete now, or are there still some sources left to check? OOM 224 07:52, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• I have listed appearances of Black traveling gown and Flame-colored robes in the spirit of "it's easier to cut back than to expand," as it seems there isn't a consensus on whether to list things made out of a material in the material's appearances. —Unsigned comment by Minnabird (talk • contribs).
• I'm a bit skeptical that the Sources section is complete. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Ack, omitted two sources when combining flame-colored robes and black traveling gowns and have now also edited to reflect how they treated Karlini silk rather than flame-colored robes, because apparently I didn't actually edit that. Otherwise, I can share my spreadsheet with you if it'll help. Minnabird ^(talk) 20:36, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
• I will continue the review over the weekend. Also, I'd like to see if Minna's happy with the recent edits. OOM 224 19:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

1. Unaddressed objections from me from 13 days ago. Would be great to see you come back and renom this when you've got the time though. OOM 224 21:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
2. An objection is over 10 days old again. UberSoldat93 (talk) 13:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
3. Imperators II^(Talk) 19:28, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was withdrawn. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Good article nomination pages archive/2021|]]

Attack on the Paataatus

• Nominated by: YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 17:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Yeet leggo
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. 01miki10 ^{Open comlink} 19:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
2. Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:49, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
3. MasterFred(talk) 07:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Object

01miki10

• Article needs to be properly sectioned.
• Infobox-exclusive information.
  • I think I got that all. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 18:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Nikardun conquests is still not mentioned in the body. 01miki10 ^{Open comlink} 18:29, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
      • Ah, good catch. I added that. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 18:44, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
• Missing BTS.
• Duplicate links.
  • Removed -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 18:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
• Quote attributions shouldn't have links. 01miki10 ^{Open comlink} 17:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Removed -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 18:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Ecks Dee

• The article needs to be properly sectioned in accordance with the "Battle, mission, and duel articles" section of the Layout Guide. 1358 ^(Talk) 18:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 18:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
• You can definitely sneak in at least two relevant images in the body. 1358 ^(Talk) 09:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 19:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
• No relevant quotes for Prelude and The attack? 1358 ^(Talk) 20:03, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Added. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 00:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Luca

• I might be wrong, but I think the intro is too long compared to the body. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 19:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Hmm, well, I just removed an unnecessary paragraph from the intro. How is it now? -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 19:07, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
    • Great! LucaRoR ^(Talk) 19:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• The date template states that Chaos Rising takes place "around" 19 BBY, contradicting what is stated in this article.
  • Took care of this in this article. Unfortunately, that’s going to cause a major chain of updates of 19 BBY to c. 19 BBY in a lot of Chaos Rising articles. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 03:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
• Many subjects need context in the body upon their first mentions, such as Paataatus, Nikardun Destiny, Nikardun, and Dioya.
  • Addressed those. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 03:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
• Here's my copy-edit in which I had to add links, fix various issues, and reword some rather informal language, which I'm still seeing in the article. I would advise you to go through it and ensure the content is written with an encyclopedic tone in mind. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Thank you, that copy edit is very helpful. I'll work on the other objections. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 00:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
    • This is still unaddressed. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:07, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
• Lesser Evil provides some new details on Yiv's attack, thus an update is in order.
  • Addressed. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 19:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
• Not a fan of the two single-paragraph subsections in Aftermath. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:50, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Handled via Discord. UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• Are you done with the info tweaks that we discussed on Discord? UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
  • As of this edit, yes. :D -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
    • The word "foolish" does not comply with a neutral point of view. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
• The infobox is currently missing all the other Chiss who participated in the battle, and they should also be mentioned in the body.
• Context for Thalias.
  • Better? -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 21:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
• A brief description of what kind of "liberating" they were doing at Nettehi would be nice. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Added. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 21:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
• Article is now above 1000 words. Can you specify what "redundant wording" you're referring to here? It might still be useful context, and constantly going through the article again and again just to bring it below the limit is a practice the rules actively discourage. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Dionne

• I don't get involved in these things all that often, but I have to ask, where the info in the last sentence of the attack section comes from: "Among all the commanding officers of the Chiss warships, only Thrawn was aware of that critical information."? If I remember correctly Wutroow dug the info about the optimal attack vector from her family, and nowhere they stated that Thrawn knew anything about it.--Dionne Jinn (talk) 06:14, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• The attack is the second half of Chapter Two of Chaos Rising and the aftermath is Chapter Three, for those interested in checking. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Skirmish in the Kinoss system

• Nominated by: YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 20:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I believe this is clean and good enough :)
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Good work, sorry for the slow review Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 14:51, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
3. MasterFred(talk) 07:39, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
4. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:00, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
5. OOM 224 17:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Fan

• Continuing from our discussion on Discord:
  • The infobox still notes the skirimish as taking place in both the Lioaoin and Kinoss systems. Given our discussion, I'd argue the actual skirmish proper only takes place in Kinoss.
    • Addressed. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
  • "Prior to the mission and skirmish, " in the "Prelude" section.
    • Addressed. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 22:05, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
  • A large part of the article body is taken up by a section detailing the mission to Lioaoin, of which a small subsection titled "The skirmish" is a part of. I think most of the info regarding Thrawn baiting the Lioaoins can be condensed a bit and moved to the prelude section. Fan26 (Talk) 23:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
    • I adjusted the sectioning and added a quote for the Skirmish. I’ll have to think about it if you think “the mission” part still needs to be condensed. — YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 22:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
      • "Qilori knew that the Lioaoin Regime was indeed supporting piracy, but was bound by Navigators' Guild confidentiality not to divulge such information to Thrawn. Furthermore, Qilori could sense some of his colleagues aboard Lioaoin pirate vessels through the Force. Qilori warned Thrawn that searching for pirates would be dangerous, and if the Regime should suspect he was hunting pirates, they would be in danger." This can be cut down to contextualising Quilori's warning by just saying he was worried about his colleagues aboard the Lioaoin ships. Apart from that, it all looks like neccesarry information Fan26 (Talk) 04:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
        • Addressed. -- YakovChaimTzvi (talk) 17:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Manoof

• Can we note in the intro that the skirmish occurred after the undercover work from Thrawn? Currently the setup for the battle doesn't have that context that it IS the prelude to the skirmish, which indicates it is part of the skirmish until we reach the second paragraph. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
• The mission—can you make it clear the pirates pursued Thrawn using the pathfinders at the end of this section. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
• You probably have room for another image in the Aftermath section. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Added one. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
• Did the book specify Kinoss the planet and the system and are these captured correctly in the article—the only mention of the planet is the agreed upon meeting place, so did the skirmish happen above the planet or elsewhere in the system? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • In the chapter itself, it just says the Kinoss system. Another chapter says “At Kinoss a few years ago,” and another says and “last year off Kinoss.” — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 17:08, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

CC-8

• Context for Bardram Scoft
  • Done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
• Should come up with a subheading for the first half of the prelude
  • Done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
• "In that way, Thrawn could prove or disprove his theory without violating the Ascendancy's preemptive-strike laws", this sentence mostly repeats what's said in the one preceeding it, be good if you could combine them. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 09:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
• The body should specifiy that corsairs are a type of ship, given that the word has a potentially confusing alternate meaning.
  • Better? — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• I don't think Kinoss should be linked separately in the phrase "Kinoss system"
  • Done — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• "the point at which she would have to forego her Irizi family." The significance of this isn't really clear, why does getting a promotion change her family situation, and the way its worded sounds like the Irizi is just some type of family rather than her actual family.
  • It is her actual family — it’s a major part of Chiss culture to strip family ties of flag officers. Additional context is provided in the article flag officer and others, but no more context was given during the skirmish’s actual aftermath. YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
    • That context should still be given here, a reader should open another article because they want to learn more, not be forced to do so just to comprehend something in this article.
      • Alright, done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 05:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Apologies for the delay, last thing to sort out with "belong to her Irizi family." the phrasing presents Irizi as an adjective, so it could be read as a type of family, when a family name is actually a noun, can address this by writing it as "her family, the Irizi," or just "the Irizi family." But I don't have access to the novel so I may be misunderstanding how it's referred to there. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 10:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
          • "The Irizi family" works. I made the change. Thanks! — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 18:33, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
• "threat to others in the Chaos" Apparently this is an alternate term for the Unknown Regions but it would be clearer to just say Unknown Regions instead.
  • I changed it. Just noting that “the Chaos” is the endonym and what’s used in the source. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• There's a contraction in the aftermath section, which shouldn't be used in encyclopedic writing
  • Done YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• The Bts is overly detailed, we don't need to specify which chapters the events appear in.
  • Is that an actual problem? I can reduce it, but I don’t see an issue at present. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
    • It's worth removing it to maintain the consistency of our other status articles based on novels Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 04:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Okay, done. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 05:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Can still remove the sentence about the chapter.
          • Done -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
            • I meant that the chapter doesn't need to be mentioned at all Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
              • You can remove it if you insist. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 05:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• The date note is a little confusing since the skirmish also takes place in the same book, it would be helpful to specify that its just the main events that take place in 19 BBY. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 00:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
  • done, thanks. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
    • 19 BBY needs to be properly linked there. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 04:14, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Oh whoops, taken care of. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 05:48, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
• A sentence summarizing the aftermath would be appropriate for the introduction
  • Done. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
• Missing the conjecture templates
  • Done. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
• "observed Lioaoin ships resembling the pirates ravaging the Ascendancy." Can you specify what Ascendancy assets were being ravaged? Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 10:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Freighters on the edge of the Ascendancy. Added. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
• The Chiss Expansionary Defense Fleet is intro exclusive and should be included in the infobox Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
  • No longer intro exclusive but I've never seen an article say e.g. "CIS navy" in the infobox instead of just "Confederacy of Independent Systems" — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 05:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
    • The way to do it would be to list both the Ascendency and fleet. I do it with the Trade Federation Droid Army in my battle articles but there isn't a consistent precedent so I won't insist. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 14:17, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
• The intro doesn't specify that Thrawn is Mith'raw'nuru and should specify that he and Irizi'ar'alani are Chiss
  • Stated Mitth'raw'nuru is Thrawn. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
  • I believe that (with revisions) it is clear enough that Thrawn and Ar'alani are Chiss and officers of the CEDF by stating their affiliations. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
• There's some underlinking in the intro, it's at least missing Gender, hyperspace, merchant, starship, freighter. A couple of these are missing in the body too
  • Fixed. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
• The quote in the mission subsection needs to specify who is speaking in the second line. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 14:17, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Addressed. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Two sentences is definitely too much for a quote attribution and not every detail about the quote has to be explained.
      • Addressed. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 18:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
• Based on their ranks Ar'lani should be listed first in the infobox even though Thrawn has a more prominent role. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 13:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Addressed. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 18:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Editor liked this chapter

• Context for Stivic needed Editoronthewiki (talk) 23:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
    • I have the nitpick to end all nitpicks. Should read "colony world of" not just "colony world" Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Done. YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 21:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• Qilori should go under Strength.
  • Added him on the Chiss side and the other Pathfinders on the Lioaoin side. -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 18:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
• Unless I missed something, is there any indication that Thrawn and Qilori conversing in a different language in some of the quotes?
• Context for Kinoss. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Added "the planet" -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 18:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Addressed via Discord. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Fred strikes back

• I don't really see Ziara's description of what the ranks above her mean being relevant to the skirmish (first paragraph of "Aftermath"). We can just leave it at detailing their promotions. MasterFred(talk) 09:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Ah, good point. Removed. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

OOM

• He thus broadcast his "discovery" of pirates — the meaning here, despite the use of those quotation marks, may be lost to readers, so I suggest rewording this for clarity. OOM 224 19:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Better? — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 04:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
• It's best to establish the timeframe of the event (a few years before 19 BBY) earlier in the prose so readers know approximately when the skirmish itself happened OOM 224 19:28, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Addressed. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 04:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• I noticed categories for Category:Battles of the High Republic Era and Category:Battles of the Imperial Era. Is it worth creating Category:Battles of the Republic Era and perhaps bunching them all under Category:Battles by era? Also wonder if it's worth having Battles by affiliation, so one could filter by battles involving a particular faction such as the Chiss Ascendancy or the Regime? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • I’m definitely in favor of the “battles of the Republic Era” category. As for battles by faction, I support that too, but we already have Category: Conflicts by faction and currently list battles of particular conflicts under those. So I would see some people arguing that Category:Battles involving the Chiss Ascendancy is redundant to Category:Conflicts involving the Chiss Ascendancy. — YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 16:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
• Reviewing note: I don't believe species should ever be linked to a demonym, so I've modified the word. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:15, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Aftab Ackbar's MC95 Star Cruiser

• Nominated by: Liverpool92 14:24, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: First GAN in a while
• WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Just double check your linking :) Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Have to reiterate Manoof's comment; ensure that everything that can be linked is linked. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
3. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 20:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
4. Supreme Emperor ^Holocomm 16:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
5. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• Why is this not at Aftab Ackbar's MC95 Star Cruiser? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Moved.--Liverpool92 00:44, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• The spirit of this Layout Guide rule applies here: "Organizations in any character infobox that are inherently implied by a stated role (examples: Stormtrooper Corps does not need to be linked within a character article body if the article states that the character is a stormtrooper; Imperial Officer Corps does not need to be linked in the article body if the article states that the subject is an Imperial officer)." See other starship status articles (e.g. Adjudicator) to understand how things like product line and model are handled in the body.
• Bunch of missing or incorrectly placed punctuation and grammatical errors throughout the article. Please revise.
  • Still seeing a few more of both. For example, "The star cruiser used by the late veteran Admiral Gial Ackbar's son, Aftab was the flagship of a fleet of starships located on the planet Mon Cala.," "Along with the rest of the fleet, they entered hyperspace and went on to joined the Resistance and its navy,...." UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed.--Liverpool92 11:26, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Please see my copy-edit. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
• Missing Mediacat. UberSoldat93 (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed. Went over on Discord.--Liverpool92 03:02, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Description is currently very weirdly worded. I would mention Aftab utilizing the ship in History instead.
  • Fixed.--Liverpool92 11:26, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Aftab was one thing, but the whole sentence still needs restructuring: "A heavy[2] star cruiser[3] was an MC95 Star Cruiser model that was equipped with a hyperdrive and an engine." UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Reworded.--Liverpool92 02:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• Notes are needed to connect the sources you are currently using to this specific ship (see status articles pointed out above). Also, does the Encyclopedia use the term "Heavy Star Cruiser" in full? That would eliminate the need for two separate refs. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Asking around.--Liverpool92 11:26, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Removed. Discussed on Discord.--Liverpool92 02:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Star Cruiser and docking bays can be sourced straight to the comic if they can be visually discerned (e.g. Formidable). UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Done.
• Aftab being a Mon Calamari male is now intro-exclusive info. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed.--Liverpool92 11:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• I'd say a "Commanders and crew" section would be in order here, in which you can also mention Aftab's dad since it isn't really suited for History. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:47, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done.--Liverpool92 14:17, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

SE

• Can we see if it has multiple engines, or just one?
  • The infobox is the only shot of the ship so it is hard to tell
• How did Nossor Ri buy time?
  • Added in history section
• If we see the inside of the bridge, is there anything that can be said about the interior in the description? Supreme Emperor ^Holocomm 16:24, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
  • No it only shows his chair.--Liverpool92 04:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Ayrehead

• After my copy-edit there's room for another image in the history section. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:34, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 13:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Hemi

• Nominated by: Liverpool92 15:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: First Mon Calamari character GAN
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:COMICS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. VergenceScatter (talk) 16:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
2. I've rearranged and reworded parts of the body in my copy edit, let me know if there's anything you disagree with. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
3. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 14:31, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
4. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 03:53, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
5. MasterFred(talk) 23:14, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Object

Vitus

• To begin with, I think we can split the History paragraph --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 15:26, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed through discord.--Liverpool92 03:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Braha

• Article currently falls under this category Category:Marvel usages with archived URLs not in Archive. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 21:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
  • For the record, this maintenance category is Cade's fault; the article does provide backup links as mandated by the sourcing policy. Nothing that can be fixed in the article, really. 1358 ^(Talk) 19:13, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Ok I'll just ignore it for now then.--Liverpool92 03:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
      • Fair enough. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 07:46, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Macaroni

• Context for the Executor.
• Species and gender should be mentioned in the bio or P+T, not both.
• Skin and eye color should only be mentioned in the P+T.
• File:Hemi and Dodonna.png can use some cropping, and the stuff to the left of Dodanna doesn't seem necessary. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 21:23, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
  • All fixed.--Liverpool92 03:41, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
• Intro can mention a date.
• Please split up the first bio paragraph.
• Please specify what Solo was signaled to do. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Handled.--Liverpool92 02:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
• Intro should be expanded a bit, probably with more details on the assault.
  • Fixed.
• Should "assault" in "Assault on the Mako-Ta Space Docks" be capitalized or not? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:25, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
  • The assault isn't conjecture so it could be fine.--Liverpool92 00:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
    • There can be un-capitalized non-conjectural titles. I'd like you to investigate if this is the case. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 17:35, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
      • Doesn't seem like it is the case.--Liverpool92 03:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
• Bio could use some subsectioning. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:42, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Subsectioned.--Liverpool92 20:43, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
• The second and third paragraphs don't mention Hemi at all, I think a smidge of condensing is needed. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Is that good there isn't a lot to condense.--Liverpool92 13:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Fan

• Alliance Fleet links to the legends page for Rebel Alliance Navy.
• "The Mon Calamari told General Dodonna that the Alliance Fleet had escaped, but their shields were failing." Specify that it was the Republic's shields which were failing here, as this sentence could be misinterpreted as the shields of all rebel ships that escaped Mako-Ta failing at once.
• Starship should be linked to in the body.
• "When the starships were able to get back and running" Back from what?
• "Hemi was at Dodanna's side when he ordered the fleet to scatter" specify that Dodonna was the one who ordered the fleet to scatter. Fan26 (Talk) 03:35, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Handled. For the first objection the link wasn't needed to begin with and the fourth one I reworded the whole sentence.--Liverpool92 03:57, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Ayrehead02

• I think you can expand the start of the bio to include a couple of sentences of description of what is happening during the Assault on the Mako-Ta Space Docks and the Republic's part in it. For example, it sounds awkward to say "the Star Destroyers were converging on them as they had used the MC80A as bait" and "override codes to get the Shu-Torun technologies that rendered them useless" as you're referring back to information that should ideally have been established up front. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Added.--Liverpool92 21:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Reading through the comic again I think there's still some major stuff missing, you state that the problem caused by the Shu-Torun technology is the hangar bay doors, but the more important issue is that they can't jump to hyperspace. They actually resolve both those issues though and the Republic does escape, but then comes back to the docks to try and help rescue those on the stations still. I'd also include that the cruisers were at the docks being refitted with the Shu-Torun technology, and mention that the Shu-Torun people betray the Alliance because they're working for the Empire. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:34, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
      • Added. I think the area might need an image now but I want your thoughts.--Liverpool92 03:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
        • There's definitely room for an image in the second subsection. Before you mention the Imperial attack you still need to establish that the Republic was one of the cruisers at the dock being refitted. I'd also establish the Shu-Torun technologies being added during the refit and that they're actually sabotage before you mention the Imperials showing up. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
          • Added.--Liverpool92 04:01, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
• You should establish in the first sentence of the second subsection that they're using the Republic as bait, rather than the second. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
• In the first subsection you say that the rebel cruisers are brought sucessfully online, but then in the second subsection they still need Han Solo to provide them with the codes to override the Shu-Torun technologies? Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
• "The Republic was taking heavy damage when Hemi reported that although all the remaining cruisers were online, their engines were too damaged for them to go anywhere" this makes it sound like all the cruisers have damaged engines rather than just the Republic. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:50, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed.--Liverpool92 21:24, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Vergence

• Just one thing: both of the quotes suggest that Hemi said the entire thing, but the way the quotes are written (and the comic image on the page) suggest that others spoke part of them. Can you please make it clear that multiple people are speaking in the quotes? VergenceScatter (talk) 22:22, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Fixed.--Liverpool92 12:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
• Not an objection, but you can put WP:Comics at the top of the nomination. VergenceScatter (talk) 22:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Done.--Liverpool92 12:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

CC-8

• Gray should be used rather than grey, keeping with the Manual of Style requirement for American English
  • Fixed.--Liverpool92 01:58, 19 January 2022 (UTC
    • Not seeing any change here Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 10:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Check the PT, Equipment and infobox.--Liverpool92 12:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
        • In the interest of speeding up this nomination process a bit: Please re-read the objection. Gray with an A is the American English variant while this article uses grey with an E. 1358 ^(Talk) 09:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
          • My bad misread it.--Liverpool92 02:33, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
• Also from the MoS, Rebel should be capitalized when talking about the organization Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 04:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
  • I have been informed that lowercase is used in canon. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 08:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• Precedent is to put the character's place and date of death in the same note. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Fixed.--Liverpool92 01:57, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
    • It still does not include the place. UberSoldat93 (talk) 13:01, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
      • There?--Liverpool92 02:44, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
• Star Wars: Battles that Changed the Galaxy places Mako-Ta in 20 AFE, or 1 ABY, so you can update the date in the article with this source. UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:11, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
  • There. Does that include the death parameter too?--Liverpool92 02:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
    • The book does not use any BBY/ABY dates, as I implied above, so you still need a note explaining how you get to 1 ABY in the first place. UberSoldat93 (talk) 03:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
      • Got it.--Liverpool92 04:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
        • It can be shortened. You don't need to explain how the calendar works, just say "the book places the event X years after the formation of the Empire." Then mention the stuff from Atlas and Hemi's death. UberSoldat93 (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
          • Fixed.--Liverpool92 06:01, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
            • Please note that I've fixed the ref in the body and the date note for you. The original intention of this objection was in fact to eliminate the approximation since the new source provides a direct date for the event. UberSoldat93 (talk) 06:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Ecks Dee

• You really need to cut down on the context a bit. Right now, the first Bio subsection barely mentions Hemi at all. 1358 ^(Talk) 23:18, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Yeah but the context was added because of other objections so if I cut it down then I would be undoing those fixed objections.--Liverpool92 20:29, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
    • I did some reorganizing and rewording to bring it down from three to two paragraphs. I checked with Ayre and he is fine with the changes. Please make sure you are, as well. 1358 ^(Talk) 22:07, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
      • Yes, its good.--Liverpool92 13:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
• "The general then sat back in his chair and expressed his pride for everyone he had fought with." This sentence, probably slightly reworded, would be a better fit in the P&T. 1358 ^(Talk) 18:39, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
  • I'm kinda confused because that sentence is about Dodonna and not Hemi.--Liverpool92 20:40, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Hence why I recommended it be reworded. "[...] General Dodonna expressed his pride for Hemi and everyone else he had fought with." Some context is needed at the start there, maybe something like "during the battle of Whatever, just prior to the ship's destruction". 1358 ^(Talk) 20:51, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Objection(s) overridden by AgriCorps 23:14, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:14, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Nano-spray paint

• Nominated by: LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:CO

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Great job! ~ D MCCG (chat) 21:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
2. Nice! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:46, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
3. Remeber to be careful with using full stops in image captions, otherwise good work! Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
4. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 20:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
5. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• Body can use an image.
• I've added a pre-release SW.com post to the article, meaning that the BTS is in need of an update. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Both done, I've added an infobox per Erebus request (thanks Erebus). LucaRoR ^(Talk) 05:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Needs publication date as well. UberSoldat93 (talk) 13:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
      • Added. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
• Would like to see some context on what the SW.com post is in relation to the comic. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Better? LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Link it with the Alpha comic because that's the issue the post discusses specifically. Also, you should talk about the comic first before mentioning what pre-release material for that comic they were featured in, per ample precedent. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Fixed. I'm not sure why I should mention the comic before the starwars.com post since the post came out before the comic, but done. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 20:37, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Because it's material for that comic, not a separate piece of work. As mentioned before, precedent is to mention the work the subject appears in before specifying any pre-release material for that work that featured the subject before release. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Horville

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: This episode has lots of fun stuff, this'll be the Wook's fourth status article from it. Also, GAN #20!
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:EWOKS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 04:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:19, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
4. MasterFred(talk) 06:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
5. OOM 224 22:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• If Horville's species doesn't have a page of its own, then filling out the species infobox field isn't necessary. UberSoldat93 (talk) 06:42, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Or better yet, just change it to "Alien," like this. UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

CC-8

• I don't think boringness is an actual word, or at the very least it doesn't sound appropriately encyclopedic Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 00:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 22:00, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Jez Planchet

• Nominated by: ToRsO bOy (talk) 18:43, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
4. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:20, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
5. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• Context for Yavin 4.
  • Added. ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
• At three paragraphs in the body, I don't think that subsectioning is necessary. The way you've broken up the paragraphs already denotes what information is about before or after his death. I'm objecting to this mainly because that's what I was recommended to do on Zett Jukassa, which had a similar situation. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 20:07, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Works for me. Done. ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:30, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Manoof

• The intro says he went on a covert mission without any communication with the alliance. Can this be rephrased as it makes it like his going on the mission wasn't communicated, rather than the mission was deep-cover without ongoing communications. Looks great otherwise! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks! Phrase has been reworded. ToRsO bOy (talk) 10:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
    • Awesome much better! Great work!Manoof (he/him/his) (talk)

UberSoldat

• Quote attributions would benefit from clarification on who Bonard is talking to. Also, it's preferable to specify the character's real name there before establishing the alias.
  • Added for both quotes. ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• Intro states he joined the Alliance during the war, while body says he only served in that time. Does the source say he actually joined?
  • Good catch. I changed the intro. ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• In the body, Reader's Companion currently sources everything before the date.
  • Fixed. ToRsO bOy (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• "Thus, he had no one to call to for help following his capture by Imperial forces." This is the first time you mention the capture in the body. Also, I think it's already redundant to state he can't call for help when you've already established that in the preceding paragraph.
  • Removed. ToRsO bOy (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Now there's no mention of his capture at all. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Added capture back. ToRsO bOy (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
• "Planchet eventually broke and divulged everything he knew about the Alliance in a plea to end the torture, which the Imperials fulfilled by executing him with a blaster shot." "Fulfilled" in the ironic sense?
  • Yeah. Is that alright? Or should I change the whole sentence. ToRsO bOy (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
    • It must maintain a neutral point of view. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Edited. ToRsO bOy (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
• "Jez Planchet was a skilled individual who managed to achieve the rank of lieutenant within the Rebel Alliance." Achieving a certain rank is not a noteworthy detail if we don't know what the character did to get it in the first place. Here's another lieutenant as an example.
  • Changed it. ToRsO bOy (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
• "He was trusted enough by his superiors to go on a deep undercover mission to Malastare for a long period without reporting back." Is this actually supported by the source? UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:30, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Yes. His handlers did not suspect anything was wrong when Jez sent no updates for a year. ToRsO bOy (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
• Since lieutenant is a military rank in this context, don't you think that would make Planchet part of the Alliance Military? UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:31, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Added that info in. Thanks! ToRsO bOy (talk) 11:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
    • You don't need to specify he was an officer in the article proper when the rank is already stated. To quote the Layout Guide, "Organizations in any character infobox that are inherently implied by a stated role." Also, it is now missing from the infobox. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:49, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Officer linked removed, and Alliance Military added to infobox. ToRsO bOy (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Ayrehead

• I'm not seeing how the current date note covers the 0 BBY date for his capture. The body also doesn't actually say that he died in 0 ABY anywhere since the date comes up after his death. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed notes for date. ToRsO bOy (talk) 14:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
• I think you can expand the sentence at the end of the bio to say that he claimed Planchet had given him a message and told him to report for duty. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:14, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Added. ToRsO bOy (talk) 14:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

Unaddressed objections from me over two weeks old. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:10, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

OOM 224 19:10, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

13,000,000,000 BBY

• Nominated by: Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: After 90,000 BBY I was curious what the oldest year article was and saw it was a former GA, thought I'd update and nom it cause I'm a sucker for former status articles lol Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
• WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Imperators II^(Talk) 09:59, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
2. Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:17, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
3. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 15:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
4. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 16:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
5. Excellent work in bringing this up to modern standards. UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Object

Imp

• Per the precedent we've relatively recently established with status articles, it is somewhat misleading to the reader to have an infobox image that doesn't actually depict the subject itself. This is the reason why on status articles for space sectors, you will only find infobox images that depict explicitly labeled sector boundaries, not just images of any planets or whatnot that happen to be a part of that sector. Similarly, here the infobox image depicts the galaxy as it was tens of thousands of years after the events that occurred in this year, therefore it's not really representative of this year by itself. So I'd like you to remove this image from the infobox and for future reference stick to just images of the actual events from a given year for the respective articles' infoboxes. Imperators II^(Talk) 11:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks Imp, missed that update! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:29, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
• Okay, that's quite a lot of stuff there that's only tangentially related to this IU date. The specific description of the galaxy's structure has got to go - it's true home is in The galaxy/Legends article. Similarly, much of the "So much life" section should be cut - it contains (apparently) contradictory info on how much sentient species were there, anyway. The only thing from there that I see as worth keeping is the fact that only a quarter of the stars was explored by the time of the Empire.
  • Done Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 22:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• "Life would still be emerging on planets in the galaxy by 5,000,000,000 BBY.[13]" — the way this is phrased doesn't really do justice to how formation of life works both in Star Wars and in real life. In the case of the latter, AFAIK there's no reason why life on other planets couldn't still be emerging today. In the case of the former, life was still emerging during the era of SWTOR, which at these timescales is basically equivalent to the most recent point in timeline. Imperators II^(Talk) 13:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Done Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 22:17, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• Alright, now that we've removed the stuff that isn't really relevant to the creation of the galaxy, it's time to add back in some information that is relevant. Firstly, I feel like you should note that, per the Atlas, by the time of the Empire nearly a billion of the galaxy's star systems had come to be inhabited by members of more than five million sentient species.
  • Oh, and you could probably throw in the appr. 3.2 billion habitable systems figure from the Atlas as well, since, you know, whether it's intelligent life or just life in general, those figures still very much differ from our current knowledge about our own galaxy. :) Imperators II^(Talk) 11:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Added, as well as Boabab's speculation of the much larger number of species. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:34, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
• Secondly—and I cannot stress enough the importance of this—the "impact" of the events of 13,000,000,000 BBY is basically the entire in-universe history of the Star Wars franchise. Accordingly, I'd like you to note in a SUPER concise fashion that a) multiple civilizations and political entities, including the Celestials, the Infinite Empire, the Galactic Republic, the Galactic Empire, the New Republic, the Yuuzhan Vong empire, the Galactic Alliance, and Darth Krayt's Galactic Empire, successively arose to rule the galaxy, and b) the history of those cultures was marked by a number of galactic-scale conflicts (remember the "Wars" part of "Star Wars"!). Imperators II^(Talk) 10:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
  • I TRIED to be succinct but a bit worried it might've been a bit much :S I wanted to cover a bit about the main setting of the saga - being the clone wars and galactic civil war. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Yes, I think the part about the Clone Wars and the GCW is too much context, plus it skews on the side of an OOU focus on the Clone Wars and GCW somehow being "the most important" part of the galaxy's history, when there are other events, such as the Yuuzhan Vong invasion, that are easily as important. Best to just leave it at that one general sentence about there being many conflicts throughout those civilizations' history. Imperators II^(Talk) 12:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Ok I cut it down and used similar wording to that mentioning the civilisations, careful to use terms found in TEA so I wouldn't need additional referencing, is that ok? :) Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 07:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Again, you're trying to list specific examples but you're just introducing bits of bias that way. You're mentioning some galaxy-spanning conflicts but at the same time you're not mentioning equally important-ones: the Jedi Civil War, the Sith Wars against the resurgent Sith Empire—and the subjugation of galactic superpowers by the Eternal Empire—the 1000-year-long New Sith Wars, and the Sith-Imperial War which led to an Empire once again dominating the galaxy. There are other such examples I'm not even listing here, so why not just stick to what I recommend to you above and leave it at the sentence that just says there were many galaxy-spanning conflicts? Imperators II^(Talk) 09:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
          • Removed both lists and made it generic per your logic Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

• There's a lot of info in the impacts section that may be irrelevant to the year itself. However as a former GA (albeit by 2012 standards I was hesitant to just go deleting it. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Jak'zin

• Nominated by: LucaRoR ^(Talk) 09:59, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Body count is 952.
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:CO

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. I think it's at 984, for a Jedi that body count keeps increasing! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
3. Fan26 (Talk) 04:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
4. UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:31, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
5. 1358 ^(Talk) 17:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Manoof

• Intro notes that Jak'zin was distrustful and aware of his lightsaber colour prior to Dooku revealing his allegiance but the body indicates this happened simultaneously? Intro also mentioned that they defeated the criminals but the body sounds like they were surrounded when the reveal occurred. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Better?
    • Much! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• Can you briefly note the aftermath of Jak'zin's mission, similar to a Legacy subsection Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Is this good or would you like more details?
    • That's perfect, I don't think we need too much detail but that brief note is great. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• Not strictly an objection, but is there a close-up of his lightsaber we could add in the Equipment section? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Added, I've alredy asked someone if they could upload a better version of it, since my monitor isn't great for taking screenshots. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Awesome Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Editor

• The quote where dooku calls Jak'zin's death a pity can be added to the section where he is betrayed Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:11, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done, thanks! LucaRoR ^(Talk) 15:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

CC

• The first sentence in the second intro paragraph runs on and should be split up Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 06:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Split up, thanks! LucaRoR ^(Talk) 07:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
• Minor thing: The intro says that the Kaldana were making inroads on Sullust, which isn't really stated in the body Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 06:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Added. (I've also taken the liberty to fix the striking in your previous objection, I hope you don't mind). LucaRoR ^(Talk) 07:25, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• No context for Serenno.
  • Oops, done. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
• Would like to see more of a description of his robes under Equipment. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:26, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • I've specified the color, the robes are pretty standard, and I personally don't think we need to go into the details. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:13, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Ecks Dee

• The intro says he was shot through the chest, and the body says through his back. Which one is correct?
• The first time you mention Sidious by name is at the very end of the bio; it's pipelinked earlier but this mention really comes out of nowhere. You should either mention Sidious by name upon his first mention or add some more context at the end.
  • Both done, thanks! LucaRoR ^(Talk) 15:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
• Does the source really use double hyphens for the Equipment quote? 1358 ^(Talk) 14:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Yup. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 15:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

• Big issue for me is that apart from the Powers and abilities and Equipment sections, the whole article was written by Braha'tok enthusiast. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
  • I see, what would you like me to do? LucaRoR ^(Talk) 04:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
    • For the record I'm not bothered with Luca taking the torch on this. I've not touched it in over two years and probably wouldn't have in the future. Besides, the writeup was my work but it's not like it hasn't had some changes since. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 09:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
      • Sounds good. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 15:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
• Reviewing note: Remember that full sentence image captions need full stops. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:26, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Brador

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Slightly longer one this time
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:EWOKS, WP:COMICS

(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. "My cab—squash melons!" DwartiiDelver (talk) 00:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Weird, I remember reading and reviewing this but I didn't support or object? Looks good! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:14, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:45, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
4. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
5. Reviewed and then saw ecks' objection, so have an extra vote. :P MasterFred(talk) 22:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
6. 1358 ^(Talk) 09:50, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Dwartii

• I think his belt and cross strap could be noted.
• Eyebrow and skin color can be documented as well. DwartiiDelver (talk) 03:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Both added. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 14:52, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
• Are the stones of obedience a single device, or should "devices" be used instead? DwartiiDelver (talk) 00:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Hmm, good question. It's actually a bunch of necklaces, and each Ewok gets an individual necklace that controls them. What do you think? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
    • If each Ewok gets an individual necklace, I think "devices" would be more appropriate. DwartiiDelver (talk) 00:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
      • On that note, I've just linked Necklace/Legends. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:28, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
        • Can the entire necklaces be referred to as "stones of obedience," or should that sentence instead say something along the lines of "...put under the influence of necklaces containing/comprised of/etc. stones of obedience"? DwartiiDelver (talk) 00:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
          • Sure, added. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Ecks

• The last part of the first Bio paragraph is somewhat PBP and unnecessarily repetitive. You basically say twice that (a) he needs the bordok to transport melons and (b) the bordok is not cooperating. See if you can cut down on the repetition a bit. 1358 ^(Talk) 22:27, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • How's that? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:48, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 09:50, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Good article nomination pages archive/2022|]]

Unidentified aiwha pod

• Nominated by: Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Continuing with the Tale of the Aiwha Pod unique articles
• WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
2. VergenceScatter (talk) 07:19, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
3. Nice! LucaRoR ^(Talk) 09:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
4. UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:02, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
5. Objections handled via DMs OOM 224 18:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• First off, the intro feels a bit too large for this article size, could use some trimming. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Gave it a crew cut Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:14, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
• Is it really necessary to mention the glory thing in both description and history?
  • I think so, it's placement in the description speaks to their behaviour and placement in history speaks to their approach in attacking Protas. Open to suggestions if you want it changed though. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
• Mentioning Legends in the bts is unnecessary. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Removed Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
• Really no more quotes? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 16:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Added another quote, I dont feel like theres enough room for more (at least from working on mobile). Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
    • That one could work for the Description section, and you can add the one located at Destruction of Protas#The battle. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:26, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Done Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 23:25, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:31, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

[[Category:Archived nominations by User:Manoof|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was withdrawn. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Good article nomination pages archive/2021|]]

Viv Tanner

• Nominated by: Dentface (talk) 07:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I tried so hard to keep this within CAN limits. Alas, 'twas not to be.
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:PRIDE, WP:CREA

(1 ACs/2 Users/3 Total)

(Votes required: 2 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 10:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
2. Nice work. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 17:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
3. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 22:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Object

Fred strikes back

• This is going to sting a bit, but we really don't need to detail each individual illustration. 90% of the biography section doesn't need to be there. We wouldn't do this for any other kind of artist, such as a comic illustrator or musician. This information could instead go in section on the book's article detailing the contents of the book. With all that information relocated, the article will no longer be eligible for the GAN and would have to go to CAN. MasterFred(talk) 12:11, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Emita/Legends

• Nominated by: VergenceScatter (talk) 02:29, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Preparing for a featured topic nomination, once those get launched
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:FFGAMES

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 20:38, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Fan26 (Talk) 06:05, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
3. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:44, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
5. OOM 224 09:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• Points of interest should be detailed under a "Locations" section as per the Layout Guide. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Was mistaken. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Ayrehead

• I think the intro is a little short. I'd add a sentence about the parks. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  • How's that?
• If the Dehsea page is accurate then that information should be added to this page. Ayrehead02 (talk) 00:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Good catch! Added. VergenceScatter (talk) 23:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 09:32, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Destruction of Protas

• Nominated by: Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: First battle nom
• WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
2. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 08:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 17:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
5. Samonic (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• Links should not be present in bolded title in intro.
  • Handled with below Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Conjecture template is present, but you've bolded the whole title in the intro.
  • Didn't realise that meant we couldn't bold the whole lot, I've kept "destruction" bolded but removed from the rest, keeping the link. Is that how to handle this? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Yeah, my objection was a bit contradictory here, my bad.
• If these quotes come from the IU short story, they should be mentioned in the attributions. See Kowakian crumb cake's quotes as an example.
  • I updated but per my query on discord and standard in referencing, put the title in double quotations without italicising, which doesn't match the crumb cake. Let me know if I've misunderstood. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Yeah, that was what I had in mind.
• Per ample precedent, it should be mentioned somewhere that this battle was featured in the IU short story.
  • Was intro exclusive, how's that? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Release year should actually be mentioned, not just in parenthesis.
  • Done Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Bts should not be italicizing the story name.
  • Done
• Unsourced bts.
  • Done
• (Review note) Please note these edits. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks, and apologies again this is clearly below my normal standard :( Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
    • All good.
• Is there a relevant image we can use in the body? Of Kamino, perhaps?
  • Kamino image added, let me know if the caption isn't ok. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
• I don't think the bit about the translation is necessary for the intro. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Removed Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
• Last thing: I'm seeing an inconsistency between "Protas's" and "Protas'". Both are correct, but it should be the same throughout the article. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:08, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Got it Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:46, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• Infobox should make it clear: Creatures of Kamino or the whole galaxy?
  • Clarified, should this be split into two bullet points, one for the rule and the other for the respect? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
    • No need. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
• Context for Kaminoan, akin to Unidentified aiwha pod. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:00, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
  • How's that? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
• Had to edit some florid language out, but I can still see some more, especially in "The battle." Feel free to contest this if you think it should stay. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:03, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
  • I think that's better? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• Reviewing note: Using "this" and similar words is discourage in in-universe sections as it reads as if the article is being read to somebody, so it is substituted with words such as "that" and "those" to distance the reader from the topic. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Radiation Cannon

• Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:47, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I meant to nom this after I expanded it but needed to make those specific B1 pages first
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:FFGAMES

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 20:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
2. YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
3. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 04:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
4. OOM 224 21:25, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
5. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• Missing Mediacat.
  • Added Editoronthewiki (talk) 02:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
• Context for Battlefront, and both the game and game guide need their full release dates added.
  • The game needs a full date as well.
    • Added Editoronthewiki (talk) 02:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
• The bts goes from discussing Legion, to Legends, and back to Legion. I think it would make more sense to group the bits on Legion. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 15:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
• I don't see a need to have a close-up of the image in the infobox, only for a larger version to be in the body. See WP:LG#Main image. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 16:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Image in body changed, as noted on discord Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

OOM

• Any progress on that image?
  • Nothing on art-station, and my attempt at reuploading looked worse. i've put in an image request Editoronthewiki (talk) 01:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Striking for now, but this has to be resolved before the nom can pass OOM 224 18:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
• Compound words should be hyphenated with en dashes (see WP:DASH) OOM 224 18:54, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Good? Editoronthewiki (talk) 01:08, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
  • "non-mounted" is fine with just a hyphen since "mounted" is only one word OOM 224 18:46, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Fixed? Editoronthewiki (talk) 23:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Manoof

• First off, apologies as I thought I reviewed this previously! I don't think we need to link the word "article" to that article since it's listed in the reference and source Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Removed Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
• Full article date should be noted. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Added Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
• I think there's some other categories that could be applied Category:Personal heavy weaponry for example doesn't seem to be captured by the existing categories. Do we also need to have a category for separatist weapons? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Added the personal heavy weapon category, I don't think we need a CIS weapons category given that the E-5 blaster rifle/Legends and E-5 blaster rifle have been articles for years but don't have them Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
• Is it fair to say it had no adverse effects for all droids, not specifically battle droids? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:15, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Good? Editoronthewiki (talk) 04:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Very! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 04:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• A quick search on the FFG site reveals another article that mentions the subject, one that predates the post currently documented.
  • Article updated Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Is the product description on the box itself? If so, you can just cite the product itself instead of the product page. But either way, I'm going to ask for its removal from Sources. Reason: We've historically never listed such product pages under Sources e.g. X-Wing novel listings under X-wing starfighter page's Sources. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:38, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Description isn't on box, but i have moved that link Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
• Not a fan of the body image as it has a very tangential relation to the subject. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:25, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  • I personally disagree, since there would otherwise be no other image to put there Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
    • There doesn't have to be an image all the time, and we should adding such images for the sake of it as they provide little to no benefit to readers. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Removed Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
• Would like to see the "size" field filled out a la X-45 and IQA-11 Blaster Rifle. UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Size field added Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
• The outcome of this TC needs to be reflected in the article. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:18, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Already looks to be done Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
    • The article still says these are a specific model of the droid, when it was determined that it is not the case. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:32, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Ah, cleared up some wording Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
        • As mentioned before, it's not supposed to be taken as an official title, please avoid using the term as such. UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
          • Better? Figured its important enough to brief include in BTS but that can be removed if you like Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
            • Yeah, it's pretty much OOU terminology after all. UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
• New body image suggestion: B1 battle droids? UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Added Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
• Would like to see the Legends subject's original name be documented in the BTS (What is it called in the original Battlefront? Does it differ from the name in the sequel?). UberSoldat93 (talk) 20:14, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Name is same in sequel, article updated with original name Editoronthewiki (talk) 16:15, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• OOM has uploaded a better version of the infobox image, so that is taken care of. again, thank you OOM Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:55, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 07:26, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Prakas

• Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 21:10, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: That's right, I'm back to Catalyst noms!
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. yeet, Catalyst was good and I'm here for it -- YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 20:11, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
2. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 16:25, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
4. OOM 224 09:08, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
5. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 09:29, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Fan

• "he had Prakas contacted, enabling him to tell Prakas about the Separatist forces on the ground to begin his attack run. " This is confusingly worded.
  • Better? Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
• "After handing over Morseerian scientists Nan Pakota and Urshe Torr and taking the Ersos aboard, Krennic, while strapping in, ordered his communications technician to contact Prakas as soon as the Good Tidings took off, ordering the technician to ensure Prakas gave them enough time to escape before the attack run." Please break this up into smaller sentences. Fan26 (Talk) 14:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Better? Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Macaroni

• I get that the second paragraph sets up Prakas's arrival, but it barely mentions him. How would you feel about cutting it down a bit?
  • Better? Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
• The bit about being an officer doesn't seem like P+T material. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 06:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Better? Editoronthewiki (talk) 00:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
• Is the bit about the CIS scientists really relavent? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 21:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
  • It establishes who the prisoner exchange was for, which plays into the overall operation so yes Editoronthewiki (talk) 18:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
• Is it really necessary to mention that Zerpen Industries approved of the mission twice? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:45, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Good? Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• I'm going to call for the removal of this information: "He spoke Galactic Basic Standard." Pretty much none of our character articles specify that they spoke Basic, and this needs discussion before sitewide implementation. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:08, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Removed Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:47, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

OOM

• Why is "new" pipelinked to Phara's faction? "New" here is just being used an adjective for Vallt's government, so the way I see it, the only subject that's being referred to is the latter article, so that's the only thing that needs to be linked.
• "Aware that pro-Republic legions still existed" — who was aware?
• Has Obitt's species and the Separatist scientists' species are neither relevant to Prakas nor needed for context, so they can be removed.
• "Upon moving toward the communications console" — I don't think this is relevant either. OOM 224 12:58, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
  • All done Editoronthewiki (talk) 20:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 09:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Mupple pie

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 14:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: The one and only pie from Droids
• WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 06:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
2. VergenceScatter (talk) 01:18, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
3. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:20, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
4. 1358 ^(Talk) 16:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
5. MasterFred(talk) 11:41, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
6. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Luca

• Could you add a bit more context to Baobab's? Perhaps merchant.
• I'd switch the quote in description with the quote in the intro. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 07:52, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Both done. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Ecks

• The last History sentence is a bit confusing. I'm presuming the security guards pursued and arrested the Yomms, but it's not entirely clear from this sentence: "However, they were quickly run down and apprehended by Baobab." 1358 ^(Talk) 09:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  • It was actually Mungo who pursued the guards, hopefully it's clearer now. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 15:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Hmm, you'd think security guards would be the ones doing the apprehending. :P 1358 ^(Talk) 16:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• After reading through the article, the guards appear to have plot significance that would warrant them their own articles. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:44, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Created one for the guy with notable dialogue, the other one just has a simple affirmation. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:41, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Ceasar

• Nominated by: IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 22:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Fixed what got it removed from status a few years ago. Let's see what else is wrong with this bad boy
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:COMICS

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Nom more of the Marvel SW stuff you've written up! :P JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Check out my copy-edit to make sure I didn't break anything. Nice work! MasterFred(talk) 00:50, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
3. DFaceG (talk) 19:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
4. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 22:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
5. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:51, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
6. UberSoldat93 (talk) 03:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• Intro & paragraph #2 in bio could use a split.
• I'd say you can create a category for watchbeasts.
• As high quality as Cull's scans are, they should honestly be digitized.
• Missing a P+T section, where info on skin color would be better suited.
• Comic requires full release date. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Should all be addressed. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 02:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
• It would be better for the subsections to be two or three paragraphs each instead of one and four.
• Definitely room for at least one more image.
• Is Bazarre supposed to be italicized? Its page makes it seem that way.
• Context on Bazarre in the bio. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
  • Should be taken care of. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 04:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
• As great as the bts quote is, I don't think it's necessary. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Removed. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 02:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• Another image for "Skirmish on Patch-4"? UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:14, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
• Our page on the comic credits two writers, while this article only names one. UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:16, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Should both be fixed. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 05:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
• Since "expansions" is more specific than the "rule" of the Empire, I'm going to count that as intro-exclusive information. UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Changed the wording in the body to match the intro. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Fan

• That luke quote is clearly a reference to " I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him." from Shakespeare's play. Would you think that's relevant BtS info? Fan26 (Talk) 06:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Sure, why not. Tossed in a mention. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 00:31, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Luca

• Any reason why the reference is formatted differently from the appearance? LucaRoR ^(Talk) 08:34, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Just me being stupid. Fixed IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 05:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
• In the BTS, you reference the Shakespeare's quote to the comic, which I don't think is accurate. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 09:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Added a new reference. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Manoof

• Probably need to mention that it picked Lando up prior to saying that it dropped him. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Right now it says "was able to catch the Rebel on his front pincers" - is that not enough? That reads like he picked him up to me. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 03:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
    • It could just be that it grabbed him without lifting him up. One could say that football players chase and catch each other, without them lifting each other up. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Since this objection is now ten days old I've gone ahead and reworded the sentence to prevent the nomination from being removed. Hope that's alright. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
• A few things mentioned in the intro aren't in the article body: Male; that he was put there to guard Ferret's stuff and allowed to run wild in Ferret's absence. It also reads as if Ferret WANTED Ceasar to kill lando and luke, whilst the article indicates this was purely because of Ceasar's aggressive nature. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Mentioned. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 03:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Perfection! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
• Did the rebels have Ferret's blessing to be there, this is unclear and provides context on why Ferret isn't there but they have his shuttle. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • They were there as part of a deal with Ferret, with his approval. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 03:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Nice! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 08:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
• Can we add the Males category? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Added. IFYLOFD ^(Talk) 03:48, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 03:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Blue-milk pancakes

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Good article nomination pages archive/2022|]]

Unidentified aiwha

• Nominated by: Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:24, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 20:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
3. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
4. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:45, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
5. Samonic (talk) 17:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Braha

• Context needed for Ryan Kaufman. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 00:30, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Addressed on Discord. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 20:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Macaroni

• Biography can use some subsectioning. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Not as long a read of Of beasts and men ;) sectioned up Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 02:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Ayrehead

• You use the same quote for the intro and bio. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Oops, I've moved the opening quote and replaced it with another. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 03:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
• Does the source actually state that aiwha have teeth? My impression was that they only have baleen. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:42, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  • I was sure it said teeth but double checked and behold, it only uses the word "jaw/s" in relation to the aiwha. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 03:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• Appears to be a typo in the "Personality and traits" quote. UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Sorted, thanks! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 21:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

[[Category:Archived nominations by User:Manoof|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Good article nomination pages archive/2021|]]

Wona Goban

• Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Might as well continue my Gold Squadron streak
• WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
2. UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
3. OOM 224 22:09, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
4. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 06:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
5. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 16:37, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• Any reason for no mention of species/gender in intro?
  • Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
• "Scramble for Scarif" missing ref in first paragraph, with dup refs in second.
  • Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
• Unfinished sentence in Equipment section.
  • Finished. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
• As with Shaef Corssin, we can mention that this name is certainly a tuckerization of the actor's name. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Added. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 16:38, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

[[Category:Archived nominations by User:Ayrehead02|]]

Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Rodian splice

Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Control (corvette)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Angela Morley

• Nominated by: Dentface (talk) 21:54, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:PRIDE, WP:RWM, WP:CREA

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 00:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Objections handled via Discord :) Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 03:06, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
3. Loved her score for Watership Down Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 01:00, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
4. OOM 224 17:54, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
5. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 14:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

NanoLuuke

• In intro. "(born on March 10, 1924 in Leeds, West Yorkshire, England)" should be replaced by (birth date – death date). --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 13:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• In Biography, events have to be presented in chronological order, so "Angela Morley was an English composer and conductor." should not be the first sentence. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 13:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• "Over the years, Morley became a frequent collaborator of Williams, working as an orchestrator on many of his subsequent film scores." should be removed, per policy. I have no objection as to putting this information in the introduction, as allowed by the same policy. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 13:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Thanks! Dentface (talk) 23:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

CC-8

• A screenshot of the moment the force theme plays would make a good image for the bio, unless you can find something more approrpiate Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 13:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Good idea! Added. Dentface (talk) 01:04, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
• The body should specify the category Morley was nominated for as well as the film it was for.
  • Appeasing our overlord Jocasta. Dentface (talk) 18:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
• "collaborate throughout the production of A New Hope in 1977." This should specify that the film was released in 77, unless a source specifies that the collaborations took place in that year. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 11:26, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Title: Added.
    • The wikipedia page for that category can be linked too. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Added. Dentface (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
  • The source explicitly states that Morley began working with Williams in 77 well after the film's orchestration was underway. Dentface (talk) 01:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
    • If that's the case then why is the additional reference to the film itself there? Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:47, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Good point. I did it out of habit. Removed. Dentface (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
• Some of the information should be presented in a more chronological order, like I don't think ESB should be mentioned in relation to Spencer's role in it, and Morely's contribution to the ANH score should be mentioned in the paragraph about her participation in that film. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 09:23, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Better? Dentface (talk) 05:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
• There's duplicate references in the third body paragraph.
• The part about her ESB contributions going unrevealed are not mentioned in the source that's given, I think it'd be fine to remove that sentence Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 08:12, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Duplicate refs: Done.
  • ESB: Done. Dentface (talk) 22:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

OOM

• The image in the body could be enlarged a bit more. Also, spaces in file names should be replaced by underscores.
• The two short paragraphs are too short to warrant paragraphs of their own, so they should be combined with the others.
• "As such, all of Morley's specific contributions to the film's score remain unknown, with one exception" — I don't think this is necessary. The next sentence could just be rewritten slightly to say that she revealed one of her orchestrations being the trench run's "The Force Theme" OOM 224 17:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Image: Done.
  • Merged one paragraph. Which other paragraph in your opinion is too short?
  • Adjusted sentence as requested. Dentface (talk) 21:57, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
    • I think the first and second paragraphs of the Biography can be combined. OOM 224 22:02, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Done. Dentface (talk) 03:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
• Lastly, just a few minor things: context should be provided for ANH at its initial mention in the Biography (in this case, the date), "toward" is preferred over "towards" in formal writing, and the image caption is missing some links OOM 224 22:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Film date, and "toward" have been added. What links need to be added to the image caption? Per here, "links should only be added in quote attributions and image captions if the subject is not linked in the article body already." I don't see anything in the caption that isn't already linked in the body. Am I missing something? Dentface (talk) 03:19, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
    • The Death Star, but I've added the link now OOM 224 17:51, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Macaroni

• {{Cite web}} can be implemented for her website in the external links section. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:00, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Just checked, her website is now live again, so I just put it back to "Official site" without an archive link. Dentface (talk) 06:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
• The other articles that mention her work in SW can be added to external links. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:38, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Done. Dentface (talk) 00:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Star Wars Episode VII: Shadows of the Sith

• Nominated by: Dentface (talk) 22:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:VG, WP:LE

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 00:25, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
2. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 09:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
4. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 15:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
5. MasterFred(talk) 07:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Object

NanoLuuke

• It's not a strong objection, but I'm a bit conflicted by the use of "wind down" here: "as development on The Force Unleashed began to wind down". Personally, (and keep in mind I'm French), I was only aware of the meaning "relax", "slow down", but I also discovered it could mean exactly what you intended: "to draw gradually toward an end" (per Merriam-Webster). At any rate, I find it confusing, too colloquial and not explicit enough. Maybe changing it for "as The Force Unleashed reached the end of its development cycle", or something similar? --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 00:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
• In the Bibliography, the entry could be updated with {{C|Logo only}} (as supported by policy). I have a copy of Rogue Leaders: The Story of LucasArts and it looks like there's nothing else. --NanoLuuke^{Cloning facility} 00:40, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Dentface (talk) 23:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

CC-8

• For that ellipsis in the main quote, you should use … rather than three full stops.
• I think a line in the body about the logo being revealed in Rogue Leaders would be appropriate.
• Blackman's full name shouldn't be used in the last development paragraph
• Might be worth specifying that Darth Caedus was a Sith, just so that there's a spot where the Sith get mentioned outside of the appearances section
• A sentence in the continuity section about the Ep VII title would also be relevant, as in how it connects to the main saga films and when it was used by TFA Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 11:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Quote fix: Done.
  • Rogue Leaders: Done.
  • Blackman Name: Done.
  • Caedus Sith: Done.
  • TFA mention: Done. Dentface (talk) 11:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• If Rogue Leaders uses the full logo with the text, wouldn't that count as a full mention of the subject? UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:25, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
  • In my opinion, Logo only is still the most accurate. Nowhere in the next is the title actually mentioned. It's just a logo on a page spread with no mention of anything or any extended context. Having the parenthetical be "mentioned only" might be misleading to the reader, making them think the original source has more information. Dentface (talk) 07:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
    • We don't use Mo for Sources anyway. We have other examples where the text in images count as mentions of the subject, like Ronto Wrap in the Star Wars Encyclopedia. UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:30, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
      • Done. Dentface (talk) 09:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
• I'd like to see context for Blackman, currently the article does not make it clear what his role was. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
  • No formal title for Blackman's role on the project was revealed, and this is just speculation, which is why it isn't explicit in the article, I'd wager that the project was so early on that there weren't any official titles. Nonetheless, I mentioned that Blackman was Creative Director of LucasArts. Dentface (talk) 07:50, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Fred strikes back

• "Never see the light of day" seems a bit too editorial. Could we reword to sound more encyclopedic? MasterFred(talk) 10:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Good call! Done. Dentface (talk) 23:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 07:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Full Monty Catering

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:CREA

(3 ACs/3 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:33, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
2. Dentface (talk) 07:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
3. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 22:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
4. UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
5. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 10:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
6. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Object

Manoof

• I think it needs to be explicitly stated that "may the craft be with you" is a play on the common SW term Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
• Since the website and facebook page are broken/inactive, can we say the company no longer trades or something to that extent, not necessarily specific (last fb post is 2015 but it seems the website went down in Aug 2018 based on the webarchive snapshots) Until I looked at the external links that was not evident, which seems quite relevant. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 11:35, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Both good points, added. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 15:58, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Ayrehead

• If Nick Chapman is listed in the film credits then I don't see why he shouldn't have an article. Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Stubbed. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:39, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 10:09, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Battle of Falleen

• Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I did not know I could have more than two GANs up, so here we are
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:TCW

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Nice work. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
2. YakovChaimTzvi (he/him/his) (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
3. VergenceScatter (talk) 14:49, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
4. UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
5. OOM 224 21:53, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Object

OOM

• My edits
  • Saw them, they look good :P. Did make a minor change to a date note Editoronthewiki (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
• Do we know whether the battle was at Falleen or on Falleen? The article seems to be using these two different prepositions interchangeably, and the meaning can be different depending on the one being used since using "at" rather than "on" indicates that the battle took place high above ground. OOM 224 23:00, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
  • The helmet collection issue calls it a "victory on Falleen", so the article reflects both at and on Editoronthewiki (talk) 21:16, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
    • I would replace "at" with "on" then, to clear things up. OOM 224 21:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Done Editoronthewiki (talk) 21:49, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:53, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Invasion of Saleucami

• Nominated by: Editoronthewiki (talk) 13:07, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Next up in my duology of Clone Wars battles that grew too big for CAN
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:CIS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
2. NBDani (talk) 12:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
3. Samonic (Ah, yes. The negotiator.) 16:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
4. 1358 ^(Talk) 16:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
5. OOM 224 18:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Object

Luca

• The prelude is quite long considering that the actual invasion is only two sentences long. Could it be shortened?
  • Its all relevant information so it is okay Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
    • I think it is a bit too much detail, but I'll strike it. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:23, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
• Is there no available quote for the Invasion section? LucaRoR ^(Talk) 09:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Nope Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Ecks

• I agree with Luca that the Prelude is excessive. Most of the first paragraph belongs in the Prelude of Battle of Saleucami, not this article.
  • Cut down, I think the rest remains revelant because this is still a battle for salecuami, so how much it was involved and its peoples thoughts on the war matter Editoronthewiki (talk)|
• You don't actually say in The invasion that the CIS successfully invaded the planet. You can launch an invasion without succeeding.
  • Removed speculation Editoronthewiki (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
• What's the significance of Has Obitt missing the invasion? 1358 ^(Talk) 09:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  • First mention of the invasion was that fact. same for Sneak attack on Roche Editoronthewiki (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
    • How does the source present this? Was Obitt supposed to be on Saleucami or was he on his way there, or why is this relevant? 1358 ^(Talk) 21:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
      • "Even after the abduction and rescue op with Orson Krennic had made him unwelcome in Separatist space, [Has Obitt] had managed to stay busy. Arrested on Celanon for blockade running, he had been bailed out by the Republic. He had had two freighters shot out from under him, but with Krennic’s help had been able to purchase replacements at cost. He lost one crew, gained another; narrowly missed the invasion of Saleucami only to end up smack in the middle of the sneak attack on Roche. The end of the war had found him in Sy Myrthian space doing scut work for a local Hutt." Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
        • I see. I think it'd be better to mention him being unwelcome in Separatist space rather than being allied with the Republic. "Has Obitt, a Dressellian smuggler whose previous <adventures, whatever> had made him unwelcome in Separatist space, narrowly missed..." or something along those lines. 1358 ^(Talk) 21:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
          • Done :) Editoronthewiki (talk) 19:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
• "the invasion of Saleucami was a massive invasion of the Outer Rim planet Saleucami undertaken by the Confederacy of Independent Systems during the Clone Wars against the Galactic Republic." Yes, an invasion is an invasion. This is redundant wording.
  • Reworded Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
• I'm presuming no relevant quotes for the Invasion and Aftermath sections are available? 1358 ^(Talk) 21:25, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  • None for invasion, added one for aftermath Editoronthewiki (talk) 17:33, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• Let's see some context for the Foundry. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:53, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
  • That good? Editoronthewiki (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Dani

• Could the invasion section be reworded to drop the sourcing of Outer Rim world? It's technically defined as an Outer Rim world in the prelude and doesn't seem relevant to the invasion section. NBDani (talk) 21:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Ah, fixed, sorry that was left over from its CAN days Editoronthewiki (talk) 14:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
• Does the information involving the Galactic Empire's interest in Saleucami belong in Aftermath? Feels more relevant to the war's aftermath than the invasion. NBDani (talk) 21:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
  • I would argue its relevant, since its the invasion that kicked off this era of violence Editoronthewiki (talk) 14:56, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Fair enough. NBDani (talk) 17:47, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• Some detail has been removed from the prologue Editoronthewiki (talk) 18:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Immalia

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 09:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:Warfare

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Fan26 (Talk) 06:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
2. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:35, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
3. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:37, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
4. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
5. MasterFred(talk) 12:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• Duplicate reference in first paragraph of "Galactic Civil War." UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:11, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Huh, thanks. Imperators II^(Talk) 17:05, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Macaroni

• Does the Author's Cut need a {{1stdesc}}? And I'm a bit confused on the bts: if the Atlas only mentioned the star system, how is it a source on this article? JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Sure, added. And we always list Atlas and the like as Sources on articles on subjects that they depict on maps (e.g., Pashvi/Legends). Imperators II^(Talk) 11:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 12:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Mittoblade/Legends

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 19:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:Warfare

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Fan26 (Talk) 06:40, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
2. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 07:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:13, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:17, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
5. OOM 224 09:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 09:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Ua system

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 13:06, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:NOVELS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Fan26 (Talk) 14:56, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
2. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 10:46, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:03, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
4. OOM 224 18:01, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
5. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• As with Uaua, I don't think it's necessary to source the name to a separate source after the first instance. UberSoldat93 (talk) 13:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Imperators II^(Talk) 13:41, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 18:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Battlecruiser 19

• Nominated by: Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 03:08, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: The other battlecruiser
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:TCW, WP:CIS

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 11:34, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
2. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 19:23, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
3. Take care with underlinking and punctuation. UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
4. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 21:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
5. 1358 ^(Talk) 12:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Object

Fancruiser 26

• "Sometime after their retreat, the Republic returned to the system for a second attack on the blockade. Following their return, the Republic fleet sent a starfighter squadron commanded by Skywalker's Padawan, Ahsoka Tano, to attack the blockade" "Attack the blockade is used at the end of two consecutive sentences here. Fan26 (Talk) 19:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Reworded. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 20:39, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Sorry it took a month and you reminding me to get back to this Erebus, I depend on the bot to ping me far too much :/ Fan26 (Talk) 03:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Braha'tok 19

• "As Battlecruiser 19, alongside the three other frigates, arrived in the system and assumed their designated attack positions, thereby reinforcing the blockade, the Republic forces were caught off guard as the three Venators suffered extensive damage, which therefore forced them to withdraw." This sentence has too many parts to it. I would like to suggest splitting it.
  • Sure.
• "Responding to the query, one of the droid commanders ordered the frigates to commence fire on the Resolute, but during their barrage of turbolaser fire, the Republic squadron was able to destroy all six Munificents, including Battlecruiser 19." I have similar feelings with this sentence as well. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 13:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Your feelings regarding this one are in fact noted, but it's fine. I'm not splitting things where it's unnecessary, mainly because that's not my writing style and it looks fine as it is. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 21:54, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
    • I disagree. But I don't feel my opinion is strong enough to object further on this. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 17:41, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Ecks Dee

• I think you need to establish in the body that the Munificents arrived from hyperspace to reinforce the blockade. Right now it sounds like they were just chilling nearby.
• The Y-wings' participation in the second assault is intro-exclusive.
• Given there are two distinct attacks on the blockade, you need to clarify in the Commanders and crew section which attack you are referring to.
• A link to Unidentified OOM command battle droid 2 (Ryloth blockade) can be included somewhere in the article, at least in the Destruction of the blockade quote attribution. 1358 ^(Talk) 21:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
  • All done. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 04:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 12:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Antipose XII

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 10:03, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:NOVELS

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
2. 1358 ^(Talk) 09:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
3. OOM 224 21:26, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
4. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:47, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
5. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 05:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• Not a proper objection, but it would be nice to have a different image in the body since the same non-cropped image is used in the BTS. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 16:24, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
• Reviewing note: using both italics and quotation marks is redundant when citing words, phrases, or anything else for that matter. In this aspect, our {{Quote}} templates are technically incorrect. 1358 ^(Talk) 09:43, 20 January 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 05:25, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Pekt's clan

• Nominated by: Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 13:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Pekt is one sick bastard
• WookieeProject (optional): Wookieepedia:WookieeProject Video Games

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Well done. Corellian Premier^MTFBWY 15:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
2. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:56, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
4. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 13:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
5. OOM 224 17:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni wants more CC-8 GANs

• "ultimately being killed on the Avatar Orbital Platform in orbit around the planet, which he had designed" — This kinda implies that he designed the planet, instead of the platform. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:37, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Addressed Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 11:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• Since Pekt is a character in the game, wouldn't that count as an appearance of the clan as well? UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
  • I'm not of the opinion that appearances of individuals constitute appearances of their families, don't if there's a precedent on this though Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 11:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Then that means that a member of a group appearing doesn't count as an appearance of said group, which is actually against how they've been handled since the beginning. UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
      • The only way I can think of wording it to make the Bts consistent is something like "Pekt appeared in Galactic Battlegrounds and his clan was described in the game's databank," is that suitable? In addition does this mean that every other source that Pekt is mentioned in needs to be included, or does this only concern appearances? Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 07:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
        • First question: Sure. Second: No, only ones that mention the clan itself should be listed. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
          • Done Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 02:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Luca

• I'm not 100% sure, but I think [Category:Slaver organizations] would fit. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 08:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Yep, that works Commander Code-8 ^{Hello There!} 13:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

Hali Ke

• Nominated by: TK-462 (talk) 18:40, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Wew, its been a minute.
• WookieeProject (optional):

(0 ACs/0 Users/0 Total)

(Votes required: 3 AC vote(s) required to reach minimum. Additional 2 user or 1 AC votes required to pass.)

Object

Ecks Dee

• You could certainly fit one or even two relevant images in the body.
• Ke needs to be introduced as a Kaminoan right at the start of the body. Right now it's not clear that Ke is a Kaminoan and referring to them as such confuses the reader.
• Jango Fett needs some context upon initial mention in the body. Right now the context is in the second paragraph. 1358 ^(Talk) 21:22, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Vote to remove nomination (AC only)

1. Objections unaddressed for 10+ days. 1358 ^(Talk) 09:26, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
2. OOM 224 09:28, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Good article nomination pages archive/2022|]]

Zornak's companion

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Back to Marvel's Ewoks
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:EWOKS, WP:COMICS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 07:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
2. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
3. Fan26 (Talk) 15:52, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
4. 1358 ^(Talk) 23:33, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
5. OOM 224 16:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• Lots of "he"s and "him"s in the last Biography paragraph that don't make it clear who the article is talking about. UberSoldat93 (talk) 13:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  • That should do the trick. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Still some confusion: "After Zornak gave his companion's blaster to Warrick and ordered him to stun and capture him," "The runaway Ewok was able to break Warrick free of the stone, however, allowing Teebo to devise a plan that resulted in him using a stone of obedience against Zornak.," "Once the alien was under his control, he had him issue an order to the rest of the crew to free all of the Ewoks and leave the moon of Endor." UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:15, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Should be done now. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Luca

• It isn't clear what the stones of obedience are.
  • Contextualized the same way I did for Brador.
• I'd like to see a touch of context for the transport chamber.
  • That's pretty much self-contextualizing to be frank--it's a chamber that transports you somewhere, simple as that.
    • The fact that it is a "teleportation device" sounds important to me, and the reader might not think that there was a chamber that allowed you to teleport to another place. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
      • A reader might not think that there was a Force that connected all living things, but we don't provide extra context on that, do we? This is quite a straightforward device: a transport chamber is a chamber that transports people. I've given a mention to teleportation in the body, but anything further than that doesn't seem necessary to me.
• In the P&T quote, it isn't clear to whom he is referring.
  • Added.
    • I don't see any changes. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Oops. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 22:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
• "Zornak's companion was excited at the prospect of having lots of precious gems." it sounds a bit out of nowhere: Could you provide a bit of context for this sentence? LucaRoR ^(Talk) 08:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  • I don't see how that's out of nowhere. The article discusses the whole precious gem situation in the bio, and then the P+T mentions that he got excited about it. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 17:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Fair point, it just sounded odd. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 16:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

[[Category:Archived nominations by User:JediMasterMacaroni|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Good article nomination pages archive/2022|]]

Wroshyr Tree Cake

• Nominated by: JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 07:00, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I'll usually be trying to keep my GANs at six with my new AC powers, but I'll make an exception for this one :P
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:GE

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 01:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
2. Dentface (talk) 21:52, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
3. VergenceScatter (talk) 07:28, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
4. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
5. MasterFred(talk) 07:50, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Ayrehead

• I think you can mention the moss somewhere in the body given that it's visible in the picture. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Done, thanks. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 21:57, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• Should clarify that Tuggs is talking about this recipe in the lead quote, some may be confused as to what he's referring to. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:38, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Done, thanks. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:05, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 07:50, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

[[Category:Archived nominations by User:JediMasterMacaroni|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Quell system

• Nominated by: Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 19:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Let's try this as a GAN now
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:TCW, WP:NOVELS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Imperators II^(Talk) 09:47, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
2. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
3. Zed42 (talk) 06:40, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
4. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 07:25, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
5. Dentface (talk) 07:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• I think we should avoid saying "the X system was a star system." None of Imp's many system status articles do it.
  • I'm aware of this.
    • Never said you weren't, just pointing it out.
• Is the system named in its first appearance? Asking because there's no 1stID and there isn't any quote from the episode with its name. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 05:42, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
  • In the opening newsreel. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 14:18, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
    • I think that warrants a mention in the bts, then. The reader might also be confused as to where the name is coming from. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 00:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
      • I disagree but sure. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 00:27, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Zed

• "...the Quell system was heavily contested by both of the warring factions' forces, including the Confederacy's Providence-class Dreadnought Lucid Voice, which had also taken part in the contentions that took place within the star system." I'm not sure if I'm misunderstanding something here, but isn't the "which had also taken part in the contentions..." bit sort of redundant to the first part of the quoted text, which already establishes that the Lucid Voice was present?
  • Is that what you're talking about.
• I think the BTS detail on Quell regarding the battle originally being in space and later being moved closer to the planet is relevant information to include here. Zed42 (talk) 03:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Added. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 03:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Imp

• Please try and condense the intro; two intro paragraphs looks too long for a 3.5-paragraph body. The description of the battle is probably where you can cut back on the details the most.
  • How's that?
• "During the war,[1] in 21 BBY,[4] the upper atmosphere of Quell served as the site of a battle between the Republic task force of Venator-class Star Destroyers led by Jedi General Aayla Secura, who was engaged by the T-series military strategic analysis and tactics droid TF-1726 and his squadron of Separatist Munificent-class star frigates.[1]" — you should use either "between X and Y" or "X was engaged by Y", mixing both phrasing approaches doesn't really work here grammatically.
  • Fixed with some help from Battles that Changed the Galaxy.
• "Although the Battle of Quell was an unqualified victory for the Confederacy, the campaign revealed that the Republic had struggled to maintain control in the Outer Rim, a region where acts of separatism had flourished." — I'm assuming this is coming from a later historian perspective - any timeline info for when this evaluation of the Battle of Quell occurred? Also, is the emphasis supposed to be on "Republic had struggled" as in "Republic did try to do something about it" (in which case connecting the two clauses with the contrasting "although" makes sense), or on "Republic had struggled" as in "Republic really had problems with this" (in which case the two clauses aren't really contrasting)? Imperators II^(Talk) 09:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Not sure what you mean by a historian's perspective, the source only mentions that the Battle of Quell was an unqualified Separatist victory that underscored how the Republic's ultimate victory in the Clone Wars wasn't going to be easy or certain. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 00:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 10:01, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Port in a Storm

• Nominated by: Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:GE and WP:NOVELS

(4 ACs/2 Users/6 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
2. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 17:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
3. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
5. For some reason couldn't stop thinking about the song Riders of the Storm while reading this. VergenceScatter (talk) 16:59, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
6. OOM 224 17:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Object

Braha'in a'tok

• The history section requires some level of sub-sectioning. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 22:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
• Pijal, Hosnian Prime, and Han Solo needs context Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 11:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done, if Hosnian Prime works? Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 18:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Unsure what the seat means but I assume that's some political terminology. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 20:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
      • Oop! So, "the seat" is where the government operates from, usually the same as its capital. However, the book doesn't actually identify Hosnian Prime with the word "capital" (and despite my searching, didn't seem to call it a planet either?) So perhaps for clarity, I could rework that and use another ref for context. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 04:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
      • See if the revision works. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 08:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
        • Perfect. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 10:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
• Riosa also needs context. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 11:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Done. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 18:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Pasta in a Storm

• Appearances/Sources needs to specify the first appearance/source that mentioned the drink prior to it being retconned into AOTC. See Puck Naeco/Legends#Appearances as an example. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 07:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Oh thank you! I'm still getting my head around what's considered a retconned appearance, so my formatting is behind. Let me know if I've got it right. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 08:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
    • Gave it a tweak, but looks good!
• Can we really be sure that How to Not Get Eaten by Ewoks depicts the drink during the events of AOTC? Perhaps that would be better sourced to the film itself. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Adjusted that, have a look! Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 11:15, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
• Does the source actually say that proving your Pamarthen-ism by drinking it is a ritual, or maybe is it just a random thing that the tavern-keeper decided to do? No rush on that since I know you've been busy. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 16:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
  • It actually never occured to me that it might be something just in the moment from this tavern-keeper and not a ritual. Thanks for pointing that out! I reviewed the chapter and I just assumed. Have I caught and removed all of that, or did I miss anything? Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 21:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
    • Looks good! JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 18:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• What do you think about moving the info about the saying to History? I say this because that's where Bassa hound documents it.
  • Sure--thought on which subsection? Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
    • When is the saying said? UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Looks from Star Wars: The Last Jedi – DJ – Most Wanted 1 like it'd be "by 34 ABY" (just prior to Episode VIII). The content about that saying doesn't really fit with the current subheadings, so not sure where it'd slot in. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 13:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
        • Should be fine under "Recipe for relief." UberSoldat93 (talk) 13:16, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
          • Made the move--and double-checked that I definitely saved this time. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 14:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
            • Oh, can you also specify who's saying it like Bassa does? I realize this will bring the article above 1000 words. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
              • I'd rather not add any more detail about that one line of narration than is already there, since it's all unrelated to the actual drink. It's just a thought DJ has when he gets arrested: "All I want to do is spend a week at Zord's Spa and Bathhouse. But... any port in a storm." The bassa hound example is explicitly referencing bassa hounds, whereas the saying is... well, a saying. The drink is likely named for that saying, but using the saying doesn't mean referencing the drink. Actually toyed with whether it ought to be there at all, but I think the duck test supports noting that there's a saying close to the drink name, but not stating that the drink is named for it? (Thanks for keeping an eye on the word count, too! I keep eyeing it like "almost... there.....") Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 09:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
                • Discussed on Discord. UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
• The Takodana mission takes place in 5 ABY. UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Thank you, changed that! Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
    • No changes were made. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Argh, save failure, thanks for heads-up. Re-changed and this time it saved! Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 13:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Luca

• "A woman of Pamarthe" occupies more than my entire screen, could you further subsection it?
  • Just my two cents, subsectioning is done based on the number of paragraphs, not the total length on the screen. The section looks fine to me. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:45, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
    • I think it's too long to be a single section, but if Immi disagrees, I'll strike it. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 11:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
• I'd like to see a bit of context for the Outlander Club. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 08:59, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  • It's self-contextualizing (Club), see Kral Grek for an example. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• Noting that I'm keeping a close watch with wordcounter since it hovers right around 1k words, sometimes over and sometimes under. If the review process takes it over and it stays stable over 1k, I'll withdraw accordingly. Immi Thrax (she/her) (talk) 18:56, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 17:23, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Wookieepedia:Good article nominations/Unidentified clone trooper officer (Kamino)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.[[Category:Wookieepedia Good article nomination pages archive/2022|]]

Unidentified Nightbrother village

• Nominated by: AmazinglyCool (talk) 21:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. ALMOST voted as an EC lol Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 06:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
2. Nicely done.— Samonic 10:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
3. Nice job with the objections. 1358 ^(Talk) 19:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
4. Make sure to apply what you've learnt here to future nominations. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:20, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
5. MasterFred(talk) (he/him) 21:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Object

Ecks

• The intro starts off really repetitive. You don't need to say a village is a village. Furthermore, you could expand the intro with a sentence or two with content from the History section.
  • Removed repetition in the intro and added an extra sentence.
• As the body of the article is independent from the introduction, you can't start the Description section with "It was built [...]".
  • Fixed.
• Are there no applicable quotes?
  • Added a couple quotes.
• The infobox says the village was destroyed after 19 BBY, but the article itself doesn't mention any destruction. 1358 ^(Talk) 20:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  • This village is not the one mentioned as being destroyed in the infobox, and is instead the prior village. AmazinglyCool (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
• "The clan and their domesticated bane back spiders lived and trained." I'm not sure what this sentence is supposed to say. Is there a missing word or something?
  • Reworked the sentence
• "In the waning years of the Galactic Republic, Order 66 survivor Jedi Master Taron Malicos crash landed on the planet, becoming entangled with the affairs of the clan." What's the significance of this? Did the Jedi visit the village during his stay on the planet? Clarification is needed.
  • Added more for clarification
• The village being located on Dathomir needs to be mentioned in the description, and you probably should mention Dathomir's location in the Outer Rim there as well.
  • Added.
    • Just checking, can its location in the Outer Rim be sourced to Fallen Order? 1358 ^(Talk) 15:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Wasn't sure so I sourced it to a different source. AmazinglyCool (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
• All references are treated as independent entities and need to be fully linked as applicable. 1358 ^(Talk) 09:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Fixed. AmazinglyCool (talk) 14:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
    • This is not fixed in ref 6. 1358 ^(Talk) 15:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Fixed. AmazinglyCool (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
• Check your image caption punctuation.
  • Fixed.
    • Good catch there, but I was actually referring to the full stop at the end. Only full sentences get a period at the end. 1358 ^(Talk) 22:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
      • Removed the period. AmazinglyCool (talk) 23:58, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• The infobox claims the village was built in 19 BBY, but the body does not actually say that; it only mentions that the prior village was destroyed in 19 BBY. 1358 ^(Talk) 21:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Fixed. AmazinglyCool (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
• The first sentence of the intro is a bit much. You could probably add a full stop after mentioning Dathomir and then slightly expand the resulting new sentence with something descriptive (maybe mention it was built into the cliffs or something).
  • The current sentence structure implies Malicos was built into the cliffs. If you can't make it work with the description part, you can just expand the intro with some additional detail from the History section. If I may suggest, you could have a complete intro sentence - maybe the second one - dedicated to describing the village (i.e. it was built into the cliffs and domesticated spiders hung out here, just like in the prior version you removed). 1358 ^(Talk) 18:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
    • I split up the sentence into two separate sentences. AmazinglyCool (talk) 19:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
• The Description section in general has very short, choppy sentences. Please see if you can do some merging and rewording for better flow.
• The second paragraph of the History section has some confusing parts where it's not very clear who is being referred to. Did the Nightbrothers plot to kill Merrin or the ex-Jedi? Was it Viscus or the ex-Jedi who was killed? Please go through the entire paragraph and check for instances like this where clarification is needed.
• Given you have four paragraphs in the History section - two related to Malicos and two to Kestis - you can subsection the History section and add more quotes and possibly images as appropriate. 1358 ^(Talk) 09:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Adressed objections. AmazinglyCool (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Please see if you can find a more relevant image for the second section, which does not talk about Malicos at all. 1358 ^(Talk) 18:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
      • I used an image of Kestis instead. AmazinglyCool (talk) 19:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
• "Inside the village, homes lined with Dathomirian Glyphs were carved into the side of the rock walls, wooden cages hung from the ceiling, and torches lit up the village." Did wooden cages hang from the ceiling of village homes, or from the ceiling of the village? If it's the former, that needs to be clarified. If it's the latter, then that also needs to be rewritten for clarity - because then the latter half of the sentence isn't really related to the first half at all. 1358 ^(Talk) 18:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
  • I reworded the sentence. AmazinglyCool (talk) 19:39, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
• A sentence on Kestis' adventures on Dathomir would be an approriate addition to the currently-short introduction.
  • You now have two consecutive sentences that start with "While trying". 1358 ^(Talk) 20:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Reworded sentence. AmazinglyCool (talk) 15:48, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
• No quotes for the Description section?
• Do we know what Kestis is doing on Dathomir to begin with? Is the Tomb of Kujet his goal? If so, that piece of context should probably be moved to a slightly earlier point.
• "He used the Force ability of Psychometry to learn the story of Malicos and the Nightbrothers." When does he do this? Before or after leaving the village? Right now it comes out of the blue. 1358 ^(Talk) 16:12, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Addressed objections. There are no quotes detailing the description of the village. AmazinglyCool (talk) 22:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
• The Jedi crash occurring during the "waning era of the Galactic Republic" is currently intro-exclusive. Furthermore, can we really be sure that it occurred during the Republic's reign and not after the Proclamation of a New Order? 1358 ^(Talk) 17:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Since the game just states that he was crash-landed while running from Order 66, dont know if it was during or after and thus I have edited the article to reflect this. AmazinglyCool (talk) 02:01, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
• Last objection, hopefully. You have two consecutive sentences in the second paragraph of "Visit by Cal Kestis" that start out identically, with "He then". Can you reword one of them for some variation? 1358 ^(Talk) 19:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Reworded. AmazinglyCool (talk) 21:15, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Manoof

• Spiders are infobox and intro exclusive Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
• Missing the fact it had a drawbridge and a narrow stone door that could be closed to prevent intruders Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
• Should note that Cal Entered the village by climbing into the dungeon via the underside of the bridge Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
• There's a couple of force echoes and I think you can get more detail around Malicos' origin as revealed by those echoes. eg in the dungeon, some nightbrothers contemplated killing the captive Malicos for the number of brothers he killed but ultimately decided to take him to Viscus. Also that Merrin warned of caution when they went to investigate the crash, sensing danger.
• Also should note that, as Kestis explored the village searching for a route back to the surface, he used this force power in X areas of the village. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
• Should note that the nightbrothers engaged Kestis in battle and were defeated, "Kestis eventually found himself at the village, passing through and continuing his journey." gives the impression he just walked through unchallenged Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
• Review note: I was going to object regarding the 1st ref but figured tweaking it myself would probably be less confusing. Just make sure you're ok with it. Watched some of the trailers and man got some chills, this was such a great game! Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Adressed objections. I love this game as well and I can't wait for the sequel! AmazinglyCool (talk) 21:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
    • You can mention that Cal gained insight to Malicos' capture using force Psychometry whilst in the village, maybe after defeating the brothers. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
      • Added more details. AmazinglyCool (talk) 21:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
• Remember to avoid the first names of characters, you've a Taron in History's second paragraph Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
• Mix up the references to the characters a bit, for example you use "Malicos" a few times in the second paragraph of the history section. Should also mention that Malicos fell to the dark side, so you can then say "the former jedi" or something similar Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
• The last three sentences in that second paragraph also have a similar sentence structure (Malicos did a thing), can you mix it up a bit? Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
• The last paragraph of the History section is beefy, feel free to split it Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
• If you move the first image to the left, you can probably get a second image to the right with the last paragraph in History. You've a few options like Cal, a spider, Malicos, nightbrothers, have a think what you want :) Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 12:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Adressed objections. AmazinglyCool (talk) 21:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• Please check if the village is featured in these videos and add to Sources/update BTS as necessary. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:25, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  • I have checked, the village is pictured in none of the videos.
• Date of creation is infobox exclusive. Not only that, another note is used for the same date and event. Please use the same note for both instances.
  • Article body still doesn't say the village was built in the same year.
    • Have now added that information.
• "While trying to reach the Zeffo Tomb of Kujet, Jedi Padawan Cal Kestis found himself knocked into the depths of Dathomir. On a journey to make his way back to the tomb, he passed through the village and learned the story of Malicos and the Nightbrothers." Both of these sentences start with the same point, please reword.
• The Force Echoes are optional content, meaning that {{Gamemechanics}} is warranted here. UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Addressed. AmazinglyCool (talk) 23:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
• JFO doesn't provide any dates, so Order 66 taking place in the same year needs a note. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Added a date note AmazinglyCool (talk) 13:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
    • Please see my edit. UberSoldat93 (talk) 03:45, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
      • The edit looks good. AmazinglyCool (talk) 22:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
• There is no mention of Viscus' clan or Dathomirian Zabraks in the body, and thus no context for the Nightbrothers. UberSoldat93 (talk) 09:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Added context. AmazinglyCool (talk) 23:01, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Fred strikes back

• "Brought to Brother Viscus..." Who brought Malicos to Viscus? Seems a bit odd that they'd have captured them seeing as he easily kills so many of them. I don't really remember if the game clarifies at all, but if it does, we should, as well.
• In "Visit by Cal Kestis," you use the phrase "into the depths of Dathomir" twice in the same sentence. Please vary the wording. MasterFred(talk) (he/him) 21:43, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
  • Adressed. AmazinglyCool (talk) 14:46, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

• Reviewing note: Take care with missing links. UberSoldat93 (talk) 16:08, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Will make sure to link everything that can be in future nominations. AmazinglyCool (talk) 22:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

[[Category:Archived nominations by User:AmazinglyCool|]]

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Askar Trace

• Nominated by: VergenceScatter (talk) 16:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Many thanks to Imp for all the help he gave me with this
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Imperators II^(Talk) 15:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
2. UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
3. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
4. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
5. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• 1stm and Po under Sources contradict each other. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:48, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Forgot {{1stp}} was a thing. VergenceScatter (talk) 20:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Does Atlas actually mention this hyperlane or is it only pictured? The BTS currently implies the former. UberSoldat93 (talk) 20:31, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Changed the wording. VergenceScatter (talk) 20:33, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
• Duplicate reference in third paragraph of "Early history and Clone Wars." UberSoldat93 (talk) 12:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed. VergenceScatter (talk) 14:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Looks like Corporate Alliance needs a separate ref. UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Imp added it. VergenceScatter (talk) 16:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Imp

• Context for Dressel, please.
• The Noolian Crisis is intro-exclusive. Imperators II^(Talk) 14:49, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Both done. VergenceScatter (talk) 15:11, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Junkfort system

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 17:34, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:COMICS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Cool lore Fan26 (Talk) 17:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
2. 1358 ^(Talk) 11:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
4. DFaceG (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
5. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Ecks Dee

• Everything in the Star Wars galaxy takes place "historically", so using that word in the infobox doesn't really work. Maybe something like (prior to 32 BBY) would do the trick. 1358 ^(Talk) 11:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Fair point. Imperators II^(Talk) 11:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 19:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Dark Omen

• Nominated by: --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:REBELS, WP:AMB

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. UberSoldat93 (talk) 03:40, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
2. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 13:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
3. A Good Omen.— Samonic 10:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
4. Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
5. MasterFred(talk) (he/him) 16:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• The air date needs another source. UberSoldat93 (talk) 18:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Would a TV listings website work? Like the one currently used in "Zero Hour" for the release date? --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Sure. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:55, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Added --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 21:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
• The episode being the season finale needs another source too. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:03, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Done --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
    • That can just be sourced to that TV listing ref, so the extra ref can be eliminated. Also, please split said citation into two. UberSoldat93 (talk) 19:19, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Split the TV listing ref? Wouldn't I need to add two refs to source that sentence then? --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 23:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
        • Yes, since it aired as a two-parter. We should never cite multiple sources in the same reference outside of notes. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
          • Done. As for the Discord objection, I found this site for having a source that states the season, episode number, and air date. Would this work? --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 01:18, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
            • That's a fansite, so no. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
              • I can't find a source, going to go look through SW.com again --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 17:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
                • Got anything? UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:18, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
                  • Sorry for the late response, no I couldn't find anything on SW.com. Looked through the series news & blog, episode guide, Rebels Recon. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 22:42, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
                    • How about this? UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:26, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
  • That one doesn't have the episode number, it just says season finale --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:40, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
    • Then you can use both refs; one for episode number and the other for season finale. UberSoldat93 (talk) 08:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
• Context for Atollon and Lothal, please.
  • Added --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 01:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Be careful with what information certain refs are covering next time. UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
• Please cite Ultimate Star Wars, New Edition instead of the original book if it supports the same information.
  • Done --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 01:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
• Lots of details need to be cut down e.g. the second paragraph of the first History section does not mention Dark Omen at all, not even indirectly, and neither does the third until the very end. Please ensure that the Dark Omen is the focus in History in all sections. Anything that is not directly relevant to the subject needs to go.
  • Trimmed, please let me know if there's anything further that needs to be cut. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 01:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Much better now. UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
• See my copy-edit. Proper compound nouns shouldn't be uncapitalized in any capacity. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Braha'tok enthusiast made that change in a copy edit but I did not catch that. Thank you for finding and reverting that --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 01:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
• I would like to see the negative space of the infobox image trimmed so that the ship is in the center. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Trimmed and centered --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 01:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Just noticed, the image appears to be upscaled. How did you take the shot? UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
      • I just cropped it --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
        • Then I think it's being upscaled due to your monitor resolution. I'll ask JMAS to take another one. UberSoldat93 (talk) 03:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
• I would also advise you to investigate these sources for potential mentions of the subject. There might be mentions of "Star Destroyers" and what not. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Working to verify only Build Your Own X-wing, rest have been searched. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 05:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
    • Three things: 1.) "Po" isn't applicable to videos 2.) I'd like to see the Youtube links used instead of SW.com since they have publication dates. 3.) The trailer is a 1stp, which also warrants documentation in the BTS. UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
      • Done --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
        • Done with source investigation as well? UberSoldat93 (talk) 03:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
          • Just need X-wing, still looking. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:51, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
          • Confirming that Dark Omen is not covered at all in Build Your Own X-wing 7. That's all the sources --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 03:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
• Can you modify the Description image caption so that it's more relevant to that section? e.g. "The ship featured a hangar" or something.
  • Fixed --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
• Few things missing as per status article precedent: Communications tower and hangar. UberSoldat93 (talk) 05:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Communications tower is on the ISD-II, this is ISD-I. Hangar was already there, but I just changed it from saying Equipped to Hangar --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
    • I didn't notice the hangar, but I've modified it to match what we have on other starship articles. UberSoldat93 (talk) 03:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
• Seeing as Electrum does not include hyperdrive rating, I think the same should be done here.
  • Shouldn't Electrum have hyperdrive rating if its confirmed that is has a hyperdrive? --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Since Tommy wrote that one you'll have to discuss with him on why it was omitted. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
      • Since there's precedent, I've removed it but I feel like that detail should be revisited. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 20:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
• I don't see the need of mentioning this when it isn't brought up later on and has no direct relation to this subject. "The Star Destroyers were accompanied by two Arquitens-class command cruisers." UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Since the Dark Omen was the lead Star Destroyer until Thrawn's arrival in the Chimaera I believe it's worthwhile to mention the Imperial capital ships that were there before Thrawn arrived. If you still feel like it should go then I'll go ahead, but I really feel like it's appropriate --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Yeah, my stance remains unchanged. We don't really do this with starships unless a direct relation is established by sources. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
      • Very well, removed! --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 20:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Dark'tok

• "The frigates were prevented from doing so with the arrival of two Interdictor-class heavy cruisers until Thrawn's flagship, the Chimaera, arrived." If I'm not wrong, the interdictors were hindering the fleet's escape after the Chimaera rocked up as well.
  • Fixed! --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
• Context required for the rebel factions as well as the squadrons from those cells. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 13:36, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Added --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Macaroni

• Context needed for Yavin 4. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 05:56, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Just saw this, added. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 03:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
• I kind of feel like we can cut down on the second paragraph in the second section. I get that it's all a bunch of context as to why the SDs launched the orbital bombardment, but until that bit it's unclear why any of it is needed, so perhaps some trimming would help. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:27, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Since all ISDs participated in those actions, including the Dark Omen, I'm not sure what part to trim down tbh in terms of the orbital bombardment, do you mean when Konstantine's Interdictor was destroyed? --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 21:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
  • I've trimmed parts of the History section per your and Shayanomer's objections. Please let me know if there's any further cutting that needs to be done. --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 01:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Fred strikes back

• The quote attribution in "Description" reads like an image caption. It should ideally start with who said it, like, "Grand Admiral Thrawn ordering the Dark Omen into hyperspace," or something similar.
  • Okay fixed! Let me know if it needs further rephrasing --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:16, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
• "After Thrawn pinpointed the location of the Rebel Alliance's Chopper Base on the Lothal sector planet Atollon, he had Admiral Kassius Konstantine dispatch a squadron of five Imperial I-class Star Destroyers from Lothal, also a planet in the Lothal sector, to Atollon, including Ferno's Dark Omen, which was the lead destroyer." This is a run-on sentence. MasterFred(talk) (he/him) 05:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Fixed --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:16, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
    • Check how you've structured the second sentence. It currently doesn't make sense. MasterFred(talk) (he/him) 18:09, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
      • Reworded --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 18:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Erebus

• The deflector shield generator domes on ISD Is are identified as ISD-72x shield generator domes by BMF 20. The engines are also seen to be the standard engine units on ISD Is in a hologram in the second part of Zero Hour.
  • Ah nice catch, added both! --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 21:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
• The octuple turbolaser batteries cannot be sourced directly to the episode, since it does not identify them as such.
  • Removed, since there isn't direct confirmation --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 21:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
• We never include hyperdrive classes unless they're explicitly identified in a source regarding that ship or if a source says that all were equipped with the same class. All we can say is that they are equipped with a hyperdrive if they enter or exit hyperspace per substantial precedent. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 19:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Removed, though I feel like that should be revisited --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 21:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
    • It's mostly because there are individual starships that are confirmed to have different hyperdrive classes than their starship class, such as the Invisible Hand, which the hyperdrive isn't a confirmed modification. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 21:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Ayrehead

• I think overlapping images with the infobox should generally be avoided where possible and since there's room for an image in commanders and crew you should be able to shuffle them images down to avoid it. I'll leave which image goes where up to you. Ayrehead02 (talk) 09:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Fixed --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 19:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 16:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

• Are you done with the Inuse? I cannot continue my review and copy-edit the article while it's still up. UberSoldat93 (talk) 03:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Removing now --Vitus Infinitus^Talk 05:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Dagelin Minor

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 22:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:27, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
2. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 09:15, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
4. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 02:31, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
5. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 13:51, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 13:53, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Gibbela

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 22:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Former GA by Eyrezer
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST, WP:COMICS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:20, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
2. Fan26 (Talk) 03:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
3. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 01:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
4. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 10:39, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
5. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:13, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• If "Hiding in Plain Sight" is being used to cite IU info, then I believe it should get its own page, like we do for other such articles. UberSoldat93 (talk) 15:10, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Sure. Imperators II^(Talk) 10:31, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 11:13, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Bogan Collection

• Nominated by: LucaRoR ^(Talk) 10:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: First Dooku: Jedi Lost GA, won't be the last :P
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:NOVELS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
2. UberSoldat93 (talk) 20:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
3. OOM 224 08:47, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
4. VergenceScatter (talk) 09:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
5. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 09:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Macaroni

• The bts doesn't make it clear how you've made the connection between this article and the Legends counterpart. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 03:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
  • I've added "a similar location." LucaRoR ^(Talk) 05:47, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
    • The two being similar doesn't mean they're the same thing. Now it just reads like the two being linked via tabs is just speculation. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 06:12, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
      • Removed the tabs. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 06:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Ayrehead

• Is there an article for Vitus and Jareni's mission? If not one should probably be made. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Added.
• Likewise, divers lightsabers seem like they deserve their own article. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
  • The source just says that there were "several lightsabers" in the collection.
    • Wait so where is "divers lightsabers" even coming from, I'm not seeing it in the blog article? Ayrehead02 (talk) 19:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
• You should include that Bogan is another name for the dark side of the Force given the contents of the collection. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
• If Sidious took control of the collection the Sith Order should also be listed in affiliations and mentioned in the body. Ayrehead02 (talk) 20:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Both added. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 05:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
• Taking a look through whatlinkshere, it seems like Parang and Spinner-web should be mentioned somewhere. Ayrehead02 (talk) 22:32, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Nice catch, added. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 06:33, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

UberSoldat

• In relation to Sidious getting the collection, I think it's worth mentioning that the temple was converted into the Imperial Palace. UberSoldat93 (talk) 10:57, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Sure, done. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 11:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• I've contacted Charles Soule about this, but since I have received no reply, I guess we'll never know. :P LucaRoR ^(Talk) 10:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Gonna be honest, a secret vault containing cabinets including Momin's mask is a pretty strong match with the vault from the Vader comics. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 13:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
    • It would still be an assumption to consider it the same place, since like we've seen, Sidious had no problem with moving ancient artifacts around. :P LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
      • I'm not sure how Sidious moving stuff means much since we see the Vault when Jocasta goes back to it and Vader (and subsequently Sidious) first learn of its existence. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 14:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
        • This tweet from Emily Shkoukani, story group member and author of the Inside Intel articles, might be useful here Lewisr (talk) 14:30, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
          • Thanks for the Tweet, Lew, yeah, it would indeed be speculation to claim they are the same place. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 14:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
            • The room was protected by a Jedi droid who attacked Vader. Jocasta also knew the passcode to it. So I don't see how it's in any way related to Sidious beforehand. It looks to me like a Jedi vault which Nu wanted to revisit. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 15:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
              • Ok, but if a clear connection isn't established between the two, then we can not assume something like that. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 15:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 09:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Merl Cobben

• Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 12:57, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Friendship ended with A New Hope pilots, Rise of Skywalker pilots are my best friend now
• WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
2. Fan26 (Talk) 23:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
3. OOM 224 15:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
4. 1358 ^(Talk) 21:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
5. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 04:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Luca

• Only a minor thing, the word "this" should be avoided in the IU parts of the article. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
  • "This" should only be avoided where it's being used to refer to the subject of the article or if it's not appropriate for past tense. I believe the instances here are all fine. Ayrehead02 (talk) 18:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
    • I believe that "this" always sounds "informal," but since it isn't a written rule, I can't be sure to be right or wrong. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:32, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 04:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Hurrie Chind

• Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 13:59, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: I'm honestly fairly certain that every minor pilot extra survives Exegol.
• WookieeProject (optional):

(4 ACs/1 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 11:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
2. UberSoldat93 (talk) 14:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
3. OOM 224 19:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
4. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 19:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
5. MasterFred(talk) 02:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

Luca

• Only a minor thing, but per Forum:CT:Use of the Film Template: "Template:Film is to be used in the Appearances section" and "Template:Film is to be used when sourcing the saga films in the Notes and references section." From what I understand, {{Film}} is mandatory. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 09:29, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Fixed. Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:29, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 02:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Paonu

• Nominated by: Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 16:07, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Been meaning to GAN more Twilight Company members for a year now.
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:SWBF, WP:NOVELS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Nice work! Fan26 (Talk) 06:00, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
2. 1358 ^(Talk) 21:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
4. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 18:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
5. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:44, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• Chalis's position as governor is currently intro-exclusive. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Fixed. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 17:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• Reviewing note: Please take care with punctuation in image captions and ensure that individual words in proper compound nouns aren't linked. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:19, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Proper compound nouns? Is it alright if I ask you to dumb that down for me? Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 17:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
    • e.g. Names of things like Twilight Company. UberSoldat93 (talk) 17:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 23:44, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Lanzora Garan

• Nominated by: Ayrehead02 (talk) 11:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: Got to balance out with some FO folks
• WookieeProject (optional):

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. JediMasterMacaroni^(Talk) 23:32, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
2. Fan26 (Talk) 14:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
3. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:11, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
4. LucaRoR ^(Talk) 11:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
5. 1358 ^(Talk) 14:58, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Object

UberSoldat

• Not sure why the quote isn't at the top to begin with, I haven't quite seen an article avoid doing so. UberSoldat93 (talk) 07:52, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
  • I generally only put quotes either from the character or directly about the character at the top. I'm certain I've done similar before, but can't remember any examples off the top of my head. Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
    • In fact, the layout guide says that opening quotes "can be said by the article's subject, or said by someone else about the article's subject." Ayrehead02 (talk) 10:44, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Fair enough. UberSoldat93 (talk) 11:11, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 14:58, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

Ulda Frav

• Nominated by: Imperators II^(Talk) 14:12, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments:
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:AST

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Love me some TOTJ lore Fan26 (Talk) 05:10, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
2. Really nice! LucaRoR ^(Talk) 15:20, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
3. 1358 ^(Talk) 13:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
4. OOM 224 21:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
5. Ayrehead02 (talk) 21:53, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Comments

• Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Good article nomination that was successful. Please do not modify it.

OM-5

• Nominated by: Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 02:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
• Nomination comments: About time
• WookieeProject (optional): WP:TCW, WP:CIS

(3 ACs/2 Users/5 Total)

(Votes required: No additional votes required to pass, please consider reviewing another article.)

Support

1. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
2. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 17:44, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
3. 1358 ^(Talk) 16:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
4. OOM 224 18:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
5. MasterFred(talk) 21:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Object

The one Editor who you all knew would review this

• Ah, should have been more clear in discord dms when I told you about the vocabulator reference being to "the new character encyclopedia", I was reffering to Star Wars: Character Encyclopedia, Updated and Expanded Edition not Join the Battle. Unless Join the Battle says so as well Editoronthewiki (talk) 01:13, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Ah, fixed. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 01:39, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
• Turns out Galactic Atlas does date Supply Lines to 22 BBY, so you can mention that instead of it dating the film and bombad jedi Editoronthewiki (talk) 02:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Changed. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 03:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Manoof

• Last half of the last sentence of the biography needs a tweak - something like "forcing the droid army to advance through a ravine as the Twi'leks and their families escaped the battle." or "forcing the droid army to advance through a ravine, allowing the Twi'leks and their families to escape the battle." Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 13:53, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Looks fine to me. If there's a problem, though, you are able to fix it yourself and inform me of a copy-edit. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 15:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
    • Thought I sorted this already, sorry it took a bit. Slight tweak made. Manoof (he/him/his) (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

BE-5

• "In their investigation, the two battle droids realized that the gunship had been loaded with explosives as a clone trooper remotely detonated the vessel, destroying both droids and causing a mountainous pillar to collapse and block the pass, forcing the droid army to advance through a ravine as the Twi'leks and their families escaped the battle." This sentence is a run on. Like with the battlecruiser objections, I would like it to be split. Braha'tok enthusiast ^{Hello there} 14:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Done. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 22:06, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Ecks Dee

• The episode gallery in the episode guide mentions "battle droids moving closer to investigate the gunship", which sounds like at least an indirect mention of OM-5. 1358 ^(Talk) 13:41, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
  • Seems kind of vague to OM-5, since it could just be referring to all the droids and not the two that went to investigate. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 16:31, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
    • In the episode, the commander spots the gunship and orders OM-5 and OM-7 to investigate. The episode guide image caption is referring to those two, hence making it an indirect mention of OM-5. 1358 ^(Talk) 19:17, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
      • Very well. Added. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 17:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
• The body image could certainly be one of more relevance to OM-5. The episode has plenty of good shots that can be used.
  • Asking JMAS.
    • How's that? Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 16:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
      • Slightly shortened the caption.
• The OOM command battle droid is notable enough for an article. He has many lines of dialogue. 1358 ^(Talk) 23:25, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
  • Created. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 16:41, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
• I think you need to clarify in the intro that the gunship was rigged to blow, otherwise saying the vessel was detonated doesn't make much sense.
• I'm not entirely sure what's going on with the garrison. First you say it was overwhelmed (kinda implying it was destroyed), then you say it was forced to recuperate. Having rewatched the episode, you need to clarify this a bit: (a) Di's forces fight, but are forced to retreat into the mountains (b) they reposition their remaining gunship in a mountain pass to redirect Separatist forces.
• "During their advancement, the clone troopers of the garrison, depleted of much of its resources, loaded their remaining [...]" This currently reads as if the clone troopers were depleted of [its] resources, which is obviously not the case. 1358 ^(Talk) 17:57, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
  • These should all be done. Erebus Chronus ^(Talk) 20:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Comments

Approved as a Good article by AgriCorps 21:13, 4 March 2022 (UTC)