No edit summary |
|||
Line 197: | Line 197: | ||
#[[User:KEJ|KEJ]] 09:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC) |
#[[User:KEJ|KEJ]] 09:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
#[[User:Jedi Dude|Jedi Dude]] 10:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC) |
#[[User:Jedi Dude|Jedi Dude]] 10:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
+ | #[[User:Clonesoldier91|Clonesoldier91]] |
||
'''Comments''' |
'''Comments''' |
Revision as of 14:30, 25 March 2006
Template:Shortcut The improvement drive is a collaboration to improve existing articles to Featured article status.
Template:IDRIVEtopic
Nomination and Voting
Articles to be improved can be nominated by registered users in the "nominations" section below, with an explanation of what work is needed. Please do not nominate articles involved in edit wars. Also, when nominating an article, please put {{IDRIVE}} on that article's page so as to inform any visitors of the page of its nomination.
Each Sunday, the article with the most support votes is chosen. Opposing votes are not counted. You can vote for as many articles as you like. Articles need two votes per week to stay on the list.
Note: It is considered somewhat rude not to help improving articles you've voted for.
Collaboration
Here are some best practices to use while working on an article selected for the improvement drive:
- 1. Plan your contribution. After an article has been chosen, it is a good idea to post your ideas for additions, changes and corrections for the topic on the article's talk page. You can then choose some of the listed contributions to avoid overlapping work.
- 2. Be quick. Use {{inuse}}. Once you have planned your work, make your edits quickly, but carefully. Articles chosen for the drive are the likely subjects of many rapid edits. By entering and exiting EDIT mode quickly, you can avoid another user saving a new edit before you have completed your work. If your edit will be more lengthy, place the {{inuse}} tag at the top of the article, save the edit to make the tag appear, and then begin your work.
Nominations
- The next project article is to be selected on Sunday March 26.
Please add new nominations at the bottom of the page.
Jedi Trials
Support
- Apprentice_Anakin 21:05, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- SFH 04:15, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 14:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Alpha Fire 22:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Xhysa 22:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- Chiaman280 17:25, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- RMF 23:40, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- BambookidX 07:56, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- SkywalkerPL 10:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
- Snufflestheninja 00:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- Zakor1138 08:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- Cato Neimoidia 01:32, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Jedi Dude 10:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- This page needs to be MUCH more detailed then it is. We have entire books on this subject (Jedi Trial, MedStar, etc.) and it's barely 3 sentances.
- This could be a lot better. -- SFH 04:15, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Important subject, we need a good article. - Alpha Fire 22:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed, this is a crucial and important tradition of the Jedi, it needs a lot more. -- Xhysa 22:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
- I barely know anything about. Anydangway, I need MORE. -- Chiaman280 17:27, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Alliance to Restore the Republic
Support
- UVnet 18:31, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- Clonesoldier91
- MoffRebus 23:23, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
- AdmiralNick22 18:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- Alpha Fire 02:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 10:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Lt. 1993 14:46, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Ozzel 03:51, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Admiral J. Nebulax (talk) 00:24, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- BambookidX 01:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- Just sad. This is The Alliance! --UVnet 05:22, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Definitely needs our help.
- As arguably one of the most important organizations in galactic history, this page is sorely in need to some work. Count me in. AdmiralNick22 18:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- We can do much better. Alpha Fire 02:51, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'd love to put my Rebel Alliance Sourcebook to good use. Count me in! -- Ozzel 03:51, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Tsavong Lah
Support
- SFH 06:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- The Erl Erl 01:31, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- Mirlen 14:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hman 23:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
- Cato Neimoidia 23:56, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Lt. 1993 20:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- He may have butchered half the known Galaxy, but even Tsavong Lah deserves better than this. -- SFH 06:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- Loathe as I am to enter into implied contracts of any kind, or for that matter get off my fat @$$ (or on it, come to think of it) and do some work, this article is simply pathetic.--The Erl
Galactic Empire
Support
- Srini 03:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 10:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
- Lt. 1993 23:03, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- TIEPilot051999 17:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- Darth Tader 19:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- R-41 17:25, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- RMF 01:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- King2006 05:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- DarkTrooper14 18:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Rod 17:17, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- Redemption 00:19, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- I think we can do better than this. entire star wars saga revovels around creation and distruction of Galactic Empire. so make it better. Srini 03:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- I tried to get this nominated for the Featured Article. Obviously, it didn't work. I'd really like to get it up to the point where I can nominate it for FA status and NOT have it rejected.TIEPilot051999 17:29, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- The description of the opposition to the Empire is pretty vague. The Battle of Hoth is not mentioned, the treachery of Admiral Harkov and Grand Admiral Zaarin is not mentioned (especially bad since Zaarin was a major opposition to the empire)R-4117:25, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- This is our number one most linked-to article [1]. I think we can do better. RMF 01:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Blaster
Support
- Lt. 1993 01:42, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- BambookidX 07:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- --Mr. Perfection 10:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 10:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Xhysa 19:48, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- Mike Kazz 3:55, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- RMF 01:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- LtNOWIS 11:39, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
Rogue Squadron
Support
- Ozzel 04:00, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- BambookidX 07:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- Cato Neimoidia 02:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 10:29, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- AdmiralNick22 16:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- KastMorben 19:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- TIEPilot051999 17:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- Odintheking 17:38, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Breathesgelatin 07:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- Lt. 1993 00:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- All of the X-wing comics and novels are summed up in 10 sentences. Plus, shouldn't this have a roster? -- Ozzel 04:00, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
- It is a total shame that the article is in that condition. The most famous squadron in the galaxy gets nothing more than a short and stubby article. We need to fix this ASAP. AdmiralNick22 16:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Seriously. Most of the 3 Rogue Squadron video games are summed up in one sentence. #Odintheking 18:00, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- It is a total shame that the article is in that condition. The most famous squadron in the galaxy gets nothing more than a short and stubby article. We need to fix this ASAP. AdmiralNick22 16:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- I am still getting used to the format and such here but I would love to help out. There is so much about the Rogue Squadron; it's one of the few entities that has comics, books, and games all focusing on it.Breathesgelatin 07:38, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Alec Guinness
Support
- CooperTFN 23:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- Riffsyphon1024 22:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 00:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
- Ozzel 06:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- Cato Neimoidia 20:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- Makes a huge deal out of his regretting the role, at the expense of almost all other information. Just plain too short, either way. CooperTFN 23:40, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- That section should be placed farther down with less emphasis if this does get expanded. Is that how we want to remember Alec? -- Riffsyphon1024 22:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Definitely needs a more positive tone. -- Ozzel 06:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- All the actors are this way. WHY! -- Cato Neimoidia 20:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- They are, aren't they? If this makes it through, maybe we should nominate Fisher, Hamill, et al. CooperTFN 22:04, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Watto's Shop
Support
- CooperTFN 20:18, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- Cato Neimoidia 23:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 09:04, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- "In 32 BBY, Qui-Gon Jinn visited Watto's shop looking for a hyperdrive replacement for the Queen's Royal Starship. He happened upon a Nubian 327 model. After retiring, Watto turned ownership to Wald, who renamed it Wald's Parts." CooperTFN 20:18, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Credit
Support
- UVnet 15:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- MoffRebus 00:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Ozzel 19:50, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 09:05, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- Such an important subject deserves more than this. --UVnet 15:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- I think i have some credit coloecter coins somewere that could be used as well as a small booklet that came with them DX-2052 23:15, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
Chewbacca
Support
- Cato Neimoidia 19:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- SFH 00:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Breathesgelatin 07:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 09:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Jedi Dude 10:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Clonesoldier91
Comments
- Just like Malla, it's really short. And unlike his wife, Chewie has way more info! Why are some of the major character's articles short? It's still a mystery..... -- Cato Neimoidia 19:58, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Definitely. If we put Malla on improvement, Chewie needs it even more.--Breathesgelatin 07:41, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- Chewie is like an underapreciated side-kick; he deserves a better page!--Anonymous 21:59, 14 March 2006
- Sorry, but only register users can take part in community votes. You bring up a good point though. -- SFH 00:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Come on people, chewie is one of the most importent characters in the sega, hes in more films than the trio just to prove that, lets help this walking carpet get up to standard! -- Jedi Dude 10:46, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Hologram
Support
- MoffRebus 00:15, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Ozzel 19:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 09:07, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- There is not enough information about how other of the many holo- devices (Holocamera, Hologym, holocomm, Holoprojector, Holotransciever, Holovid) work in the holograms MoffRebus 00:15, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Hapes Consortium
Support
- DarthMaul431 03:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- Breathesgelatin 07:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 09:08, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- There is way too little information on this. They played a big role in the the Vong War. I think we can come up with a lot more than what there already is.DarthMaul431 03:25, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
Black Fleet Crisis
Support
- SFH 00:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- UVnet 15:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- --MarcK [talk] 15:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- KEJ 09:10, 24 March 2006 (UTC) (although the banning option sounds tempting ;-)) KEJ 09:10, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- Adamwankenobi 11:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- Some of you might think I'm fighting a lost cause, but hey, eventually this thing is going to win, so you guys have two options: Vote for it, or ban me...Oh man, why did I say that? -- SFH 00:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- Hey, that comment is good enough of a reason to vote for it... --UVnet 15:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
- I know diddly-poodoo about the Black Fleet Crisis, but even I know this is pathetic. --MarcK [talk] 15:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Support
Comments
- This article has only one picture which is an insignificant battle. Come on, people, the Republic Navy is about 25,000 years old and we need more images and a longer history section. I am amazed at how much bigger the list is compared to the history. If you are a fan of the Galactic Republic particularly its military forces, I suggest that you vote. MyNz 3:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
New Republic Senate
Support
- MyNz 10:31, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Comments
- Come on, we have already done the New Republic article so lets concentrate on the New Republic Senate article. Currently, it has no pictures and has been lifted from an older version of the New Republic article. I have the will to do so but no the skill. Please help if you care. MyNz 10:31, 25 March 2006 (UTC)