FANDOM


[09:04]	<Cylka>	Welcome to meeting 37.
[09:04]	<Cylka>	First up: probed articles from last time.
[09:05]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Undercity_sewers
[09:05]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Undercity_sewers
[09:06]	<Darth_Burger>	The issue is that whoever is working on it wants a second probation extension
[09:06]	<Cylka>	I'm divided on this one as some work has been done. The biggest problem is that no one has access to the game right now and can't check alternate choices.
[09:07]	<Cylka>	Absentees 3 probe, 3 kill
[09:07]	<Cylka>	So it's up to us.
[09:07]	<IFYLOFD>	Kill.
[09:07]	<Darth_Burger>	We don't even know /when/ someone might have access to the material to fix it satisfactorily
[09:07]	<Darth_Burger>	The article is so short, it could easily go through the review process again
[09:07]	<Darth_Burger>	I vote kill as well
[09:07]	<Cylka>	I won't until November or December.
[09:07]	<grunny>	Kill
[09:08]	<Cylka>	Ok, kill it is.
[09:08]	<grunny>	they can always re-FA it
[09:08]	<Cylka>	Exactly.
[09:08]	<Cylka>	Next:
[09:08]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Ric_Oli%C3%A9
[09:08]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Ric_Oli%C3%A9
[09:09]	<Cylka>	Absentees say kill.
[09:09]	<Darth_Burger>	No work has been done.
[09:09]	<Darth_Burger>	Kill.
[09:09]	<IFYLOFD>	This is a vote to kill the FA status of Ric Olie's article on Wookieepedia.
[09:10]	<grunny>	kill
[09:10]	<grunny>	haha
[09:10]	<Cylka>	Kill.
[09:10]	<Cylka>	Ok, we'll kill Ric. :P
[09:11]	<Cylka>	Next:
[09:11]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Platt_Okeefe
[09:11]	<Darth_Burger>	I have a question for Platt I'm not even sure anyone here can answer.
[09:11]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Wookieepedia:Inq/Platt_Okeefe
[09:11]	<Darth_Burger>	From what I've read on the meeting page, the issue seems to be whether all of the Atlas info has been added.
[09:11]	<Darth_Burger>	Which has not been addressed on the review page.
[09:11]	<Darth_Burger>	Apparently "some" Atlas stuff has been added.
[09:12]	<Cylka>	And everyone on the meeting page has some kind of issue with the article.
[09:12]	<Cylka>	LG, heading name
[09:12]	<Darth_Burger>	Basically because whoever handled the maintenance of the article neglected this Atlas point
[09:12]	<Cylka>	But, also everyone says keep or weak keep.
[09:13]	<Cylka>	Maybe extend probe?
[09:13]	<Darth_Burger>	I agree - extend probe so the Atlas issue is addressed
[09:13]	<Cylka>	Since some work has been done, but not all.
[09:13]	<IFYLOFD>	Extend, I guess.
[09:13]	<grunny>	extend probe then
[09:14]	<Cylka>	Extend probe it is.
[09:14]	<Cylka>	That is all for probed articles. Now on to new articles up for review.
[09:15]	<Cylka>	Unless anyone wants to add something to Platt Okeefe?
[09:15]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Halagad_Ventor
[09:15]	<Cylka>	Underlinking, and could possibly use a small intro expansion. -- 1358 (Talk) 07:28, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
[09:16]	<grunny>	underlinking really isn't a probe-worthy issue
[09:16]	<IFYLOFD>	Yeah, this seems kinda weak.
[09:16]	<grunny>	Fiolli's right, that's basically {{sofixit}}
[09:16]	<Darth_Burger>	I agree with Fioll's comment: "# Halagad Ventor: Weak probe. At this stage, I think the "underlinking issue" probably qualifies as {{Sofixit}}. "
[09:16]	<Darth_Burger>	Fiolli*
[09:16]	<Cylka>	Yes, the others said probe.
[09:16]	<IFYLOFD>	The intro could definitely be expanded though.
[09:16]	<IFYLOFD>	Probe.
[09:17]	<Cylka>	So that is 5 for probe.
[09:17]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Indeed. Probe.
[09:17]	<Darth_Burger>	Probe
[09:17]	<Cylka>	Probe.
[09:17]	<grunny>	probe for intro expansion only
[09:17]	<Cylka>	OK, Ventor probed for intro.
[09:17]	<grunny>	linking is {{sofixit}}
[09:17]	<Cylka>	Next: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/XJ-6_airspeeder
[09:18]	<Cylka>	Needs general cleanup with sentence/paragraph structure and seems to be missing some sources, as well. (Pre-Inq FA, too.) — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 15:19, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
[09:18]	<grunny>	probe
[09:19]	<Darth_Burger>	probe
[09:19]	<IFYLOFD>	Probe.
[09:19]	<Cylka>	Probe.
[09:19]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Probe.
[09:19]	<Cylka>	Alright, XJ-6 is probed.
[09:19]	<grunny>	Cav appears :P
[09:19]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Myhr_Rho
[09:19]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Nap time is over :P
[09:20]	<grunny>	haha
[09:20]	<Cylka>	Update tag.
[09:20]	<Darth_Burger>	probe
[09:20]	<grunny>	Probify
[09:20]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Probe.
[09:20]	<Cylka>	Nice to see you Cav.
[09:20]	<Cylka>	Probe.
[09:20]	<IFYLOFD>	Probulate.
[09:20]	<Cylka>	Rho is probed.
[09:21]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Kopecz
[09:21]	<Cylka>	Tommy seems to have addressed this.
[09:21]	<Cylka>	There was a fact tag.
[09:21]	<grunny>	no probe
[09:21]	<IFYLOFD>	Keep.
[09:21]	<Darth_Burger>	No probe
[09:21]	<Cylka>	Spare
[09:21]	<Darth_Crumpet>	No probing.
[09:22]	<Cylka>	Kopecz is spared.
[09:22]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Bevel_Lemelisk
[09:22]	<Cylka>	—update needed from Starships and Vehicles 9.
[09:22]	<IFYLOFD>	Probe!
[09:23]	<Darth_Burger>	the update tag should be on there
[09:23]	<Darth_Burger>	but probe
[09:23]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Probe.
[09:23]	<Cylka>	OK, the tag needs to be added.
[09:23]	<Cylka>	Probe.
[09:23]	<grunny>	probe
[09:23]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Damn Starships and Vehicles ... :P
[09:23]	<Cylka>	Bevel is probed.
[09:23]	<Cylka>	Next: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Zuckuss
[09:24]	<Cylka>	—update needed from Starships and Vehicles 8.
[09:24]	<Cylka>	* The update is not the only issue with this one. It needs a good copyedit, expanded introduction, slight reworking of some of the prose that lends to OR; it also fails the LG as it stands now and desperately needs the Bts rewritten and sectioned for cohesion. — Fiolli {Alpheridies University ComNet} 01:36, September 3, 2010 (UTC
[09:24]	<grunny>	Probe.
[09:24]	<Darth_Burger>	STRONG PROBE
[09:24]	<IFYLOFD>	Probe.
[09:24]	<Cylka>	Probe.
[09:25]	<Darth_Burger>	!!!!!!!!!!!
[09:25]	<Nuku-Nuku>	Darth_Burger: Error: "!!!!!!!!!!" is not a valid command.
[09:25]	<grunny>	haha
[09:25]	<Darth_Burger>	haha
[09:25]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Probe.
[09:25]	<Cylka>	Zuckuss is probed.
[09:25]	-->|	Fiolli (~Fiolli@wikia/Jedimasterfiolli) has joined #wookieepedia-inquisitorius
[09:25]	=-=	Mode #wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o Fiolli by ChanServ
[09:25]	=-=	Mode #wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o Fiolli by Nuku-Nuku
[09:25]	<grunny>	hey Fiolli
[09:25]	<Cylka>	Hey Fiolli.
[09:26]	<Fiolli>	Hey, guys. Sorry I'm late, but I made it.
[09:26]	<grunny>	:)
[09:26]	<Fiolli>	Where are we at?
[09:26]	<Darth_Burger>	hey Fiolli
[09:26]	<Cylka>	Good. We're about halfway through the new articles.
[09:26]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Kouhun
[09:26]	<Fiolli>	Ah, yes. "Kill with insecticide"
[09:26]	<Cylka>	update needed from Starships and Vehicles 31.
[09:27]	<grunny>	Probe.
[09:27]	<IFYLOFD>	Probe.
[09:27]	<Cylka>	probe
[09:27]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Probe.
[09:27]	<Cylka>	Tope?
[09:27]	<Darth_Burger>	PROBE THAT POS! :P
[09:27]	<Cylka>	The insects are probed. :D
[09:28]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Slave_Leia_costume
[09:28]	<Cylka>	Recently added material has been tagged {{Fact}} and needs to be verified and either sourced/cleaned up or removed if incorrect. (I can hear the probe jokes already.) —Master Jonathan (Jedi Council Chambers) 01:06, September 3, 2010 (UTC)
[09:28]	<Darth_Burger>	AUTOMATIC PROBE
[09:29]	<IFYLOFD>	Probe.
[09:29]	<Fiolli>	Probation
[09:29]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Probe joke.
[09:29]	<IFYLOFD>	*insert probe joke*
[09:29]	<grunny>	probe
[09:29]	* Fiolli	refuses to oblige probe jokes on this one.
[09:29]	<Cylka>	Actually that is from Robot Chicken.
[09:30]	* Fiolli	is unfamiliar with Robot Chicken
[09:30]	<Cylka>	I remember seeing it. I can fix that if that is the only issue.
[09:30]	* Fiolli	prefers real chicken; baked with apples and spinach.
[09:31]	<Cylka>	I would spare it and fix it.
[09:31]	<Cylka>	Others say probe, so probe?
[09:32]	<Cylka>	OK, Slave Leia is probed.
[09:32]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Vuffi_Raa
[09:32]	<Cylka>	Underlinking and some POV issues. Cylka-talk- 09:47, September 10, 2010 (UTC) 
[09:33]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Probe.
[09:33]	<Cylka>	The undelinking could probably be {{sofixit}}, but I did notice some POV issues.
[09:33]	<IFYLOFD>	Probe.
[09:33]	<Cylka>	Probe.
[09:33]	<Darth_Burger>	probe
[09:34]	<Fiolli>	Yes, underlinking is definitely a {{Sofixit}} thing, in my opinion.
[09:34]	<Fiolli>	POV issues, warrants a probe.
[09:34]	<grunny>	probe for POV
[09:34]	<Cylka>	Alright Vuffi probed for POV.
[09:34]	<Cylka>	http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Diergu-Rea_Duhnes%27rd
[09:34]	<Cylka>	—Fact tags in infobox and body. Grunny (talk) 14:41, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
[09:35]	<grunny>	Probe.
[09:35]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Probe.
[09:35]	<Cylka>	probe
[09:35]	<IFYLOFD>	Probe.
[09:35]	<Fiolli>	...probation...
[09:36]	<Darth_Burger>	PROBE WITH SCISSORS
[09:36]	<Cylka>	Right. Duhnes'rd is probed.
[09:36]	<grunny>	just as long as you're not running while you do it
[09:36]	<Fiolli>	XD
[09:37]	<Cylka>	Running with scissors has a great game out: Postal 2
[09:37]	<Cylka>	You go postal and kill eeveryone. :P
[09:37]	<Cylka>	Next: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Carth_Onasi
[09:37]	<Cylka>	update tag.
[09:37]	<grunny>	Probe.
[09:37]	<Cylka>	probe.
[09:37]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Probe.
[09:38]	<Darth_Burger>	PROBE WITH SCISSORS WHILE BICYCLE RIDING
[09:38]	<IFYLOFD>	Probe.
[09:38]	<grunny>	:O
[09:38]	<grunny>	:P
[09:38]	<Cylka>	Onasi is probed.
[09:39]	<Fiolli>	Oh yeah. Probe.
[09:39]	<Cylka>	Now for the last one, from the maintenance page: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Noval_Garaint
[09:39]	<Cylka>	update tag.
[09:39]	<Cylka>	Probe.
[09:39]	<grunny>	the user who added the update tag, didn't add it to the sources
[09:40]	<IFYLOFD>	Probe.
[09:40]	<Darth_Burger>	PROBE WITH GUILLOTINE
[09:40]	<grunny>	Probe.
[09:40]	<Fiolli>	Probe, I suppose.
[09:40]	<Darth_Crumpet>	SavageBob put it on the talk page.
[09:40]	<Fiolli>	Not sure what the source is, though.
[09:40]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Probe.
[09:40]	<Fiolli>	Oh, I see now.
[09:41]	<grunny>	ah
[09:41]	<Cylka>	Garaint is a probe then.
[09:41]	<Darth_Burger>	I have another one.
[09:41]	-->|	Xicer9 (~hasankhan@urwireless-dhcp-128-151-21-202.wireless.rochester.edu) has joined #wookieepedia-inquisitorius
[09:41]	=-=	Mode #wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o Xicer9 by ChanServ
[09:41]	<grunny>	Hey Xicer
[09:41]	<Darth_Burger>	This requires some explanation too.
[09:41]	<Cylka>	Hey Xicer.
[09:41]	<grunny>	almost missed it :P
[09:41]	<Xicer9>	Meeting still going on?
[09:42]	<Cylka>	Go ahead Tope.
[09:42]	<grunny>	yep, just at the end of new articles
[09:42]	<Xicer9>	Cool
[09:42]	<Darth_Burger>	Drovian was reviewed last meeting for LG issues. http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Drovian
[09:42]	<Darth_Burger>	I convinced everyone not to probe, since I thought it was an easy enough fix that I could just do it.
[09:42]	<Darth_Burger>	I did fix some of it, but as I was going through I realized it was beyond my knowledge.
[09:43]	<Darth_Burger>	Meaning the original nominator should go in and finish the fix-up.
[09:43]	<Darth_Burger>	I left a discussion topic on the Drovian talk page, which has not received a response.
[09:43]	<Fiolli>	Ok. Probe, then.
[09:43]	-->|	GrandMoffTranner (~Tranner@wikia/GrandMoffTranner) has joined #wookieepedia-inquisitorius
[09:43]	=-=	Mode #wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o GrandMoffTranner by ChanServ
[09:43]	<Darth_Burger>	I recommend probe so the article can be fixed completely
[09:43]	=-=	Mode #wookieepedia-inquisitorius +o GrandMoffTranner by Nuku-Nuku
[09:43]	<Cylka>	Hey Tranner.
[09:43]	<Xicer9>	Tranner
[09:43]	<Fiolli>	Hello, Xicer; Tranner.
[09:43]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Probe.
[09:43]	<grunny>	hey Tranner
[09:43]	<Xicer9>	Probify
[09:43]	<Darth_Burger>	I vote probe.
[09:43]	<Cylka>	Eyrezer is still around so he can fix it.
[09:43]	<grunny>	Probe.
[09:44]	<GrandMoffTranner>	Hey everyone. Sorry I'm late.
[09:44]	<Cylka>	Probe.
[09:44]	<Fiolli>	Probe-a-licious.
[09:44]	<Cylka>	Tranner: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Drovian
[09:44]	<GrandMoffTranner>	Ah, thank you.
[09:45]	<GrandMoffTranner>	Probe.
[09:45]	<Cylka>	Darth_Burger> I convinced everyone not to probe, since I thought it was an easy enough fix that I could just do it.
[09:45]	<Cylka>	[19:43] <Darth_Burger> I did fix some of it, but as I was going through I realized it was beyond my knowledge.
[09:45]	<Cylka>	[19:43] <Darth_Burger> Meaning the original nominator should go in and finish the fix-up.
[09:45]	<Cylka>	[19:43] <Darth_Burger> I left a discussion topic on the Drovian talk page, which has not received a response.
[09:45]	<Cylka>	Alrighty, Drovian is a probe.
[09:45]	<Cylka>	Does anyone else have any other articles they want reviewed?
[09:45]	<grunny>	nope
[09:46]	<Cylka>	Otherwise we move onto the discussion topic.
[09:47]	<Cylka>	Reducing the amount of time for a nom to be considered inactive from one month to three weeks. We have a barrage of noms on the page and inactivity shouldn't be tolerated. Similar to the current inactivity policy of two weeks on the GAN. Grunny (talk) 06:08, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
[09:48]	<grunny>	Jiggles, CC and Chack would all be for lowering it to two weeks.
[09:48]	<Fiolli>	Absolutely not.
[09:48]	<Fiolli>	Three weeks, not two.
[09:48]	* Fiolli	had to get that in.
[09:48]	<Xicer9>	Two seems a bit too restrictive
[09:48]	<IFYLOFD>	I vote for three.
[09:49]	<Cylka>	Eh, I could go for either one, but I think that three would probably be better.
[09:49]	<Darth_Burger>	Three isn't bad at all.
[09:49]	<Darth_Burger>	I support three.
[09:49]	<GrandMoffTranner>	As do I.
[09:49]	<grunny>	eh, if you can't stay on top of your nom's objections, you shouldn't have nominated it
[09:49]	<Xicer9>	Three for now, and if it's still a problem we could talking about lowering it more later
[09:49]	<grunny>	but I support three for now
[09:49]	<Cylka>	The other absentees support three.
[09:49]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Support for three.
[09:50]	<Cylka>	Alright, so we vote to reduce the time for objections from four to three weeks.
[09:50]	<Fiolli>	Now, I want us to make sure we have (while not a codified procedure) a plan to warn users after 14-17 days that idleness has come up.
[09:50]	<Fiolli>	I think that is only proper.
[09:50]	<Darth_Burger>	I disagree with that, for one reason:
[09:50]	<grunny>	I'm not really sure about that
[09:50]	<grunny>	people should be aware of their nom's situation
[09:51]	<Darth_Burger>	What we do on the GAN page is just a post a big honking bold big as hell warning: All nominations will be considered idle and are subject to removal by AgriCorps vote if objections are not addressed after a period of 2 weeks.
[09:51]	<Darth_Burger>	You can't miss it.
[09:51]	<IFYLOFD>	If they can't stay on top of their noms, to hell with them.
[09:51]	<Cylka>	Yeah, I don't think that it's our responsibility to warn users.
[09:51]	<Darth_Burger>	If people can't read the rules, that's not our problem
[09:51]	<grunny>	per Floyd :P
[09:51]	<Darth_Burger>	We shouldn't be chasing after them off the page
[09:51]	<Fiolli>	I'm absolutely not suggesting that we list it on their talk page. I'm only saying that someone would say something on the nom page.
[09:51]	<Darth_Burger>	Ok, I read you wrong then
[09:51]	<Darth_Burger>	But even so, I don't think it's our responsibility.
[09:52]	<GrandMoffTranner>	I believe a general warning would be sufficient. Individual warnings are unnecessary, imo.
[09:52]	<Darth_Burger>	They can and should be reading the rules. And we can make it huge and bold for them so they can't miss it
[09:52]	<Cylka>	Oh, sure. We'll add a notice like on the AC page.
[09:52]	<grunny>	I say we just put the same warning that is on the GAN on the FAN
[09:52]	<Fiolli>	It may not be, and I don't think it is. But, saying simply "this nomination has been sitting idle for two weeks now, please get working or it will be removed" is not difficult.
[09:52]	<Darth_Burger>	If you, personally, and I say that for everyone in general, want to leave a notice, by all means.
[09:52]	<Darth_Burger>	But I don't think it should be required as practice
[09:52]	<Cylka>	Per Tope.
[09:53]	<Cylka>	Users need to be responsible for the noms.
[09:53]	<GrandMoffTranner>	Per Tope.
[09:53]	<Cylka>	their*
[09:53]	<Darth_Burger>	I don't want some wikilawyer coming to me after I remove a nom and complain that it should be put back up because I didn't leave a removal notice
[09:53]	<Xicer9>	I guess I have to agree
[09:53]	<Fiolli>	We should be making it easier for users to become involved, not aiming to "kick them off the page" or damn them to hell. Seriously, that's a huge attitude problem.
[09:53]	<grunny>	plus, we may not notice that a nom has been inactive until it gets to three weeks, and we're not going to wait until we warn them first
[09:53]	<IFYLOFD>	If some fucker can't be responsible for his affairs, to hell with him!
[09:53]	<grunny>	haha
[09:54]	<Fiolli>	Shut up, Floyd.
[09:54]	<Cylka>	I don't want to kick users off the page, but if someone wants to nominate an article, they need to keep up with it.
[09:54]	<Fiolli>	I'm not saying we have a codified policy. I'm saying that informally, when someone notices there is a nom that has been 14-17 days, tell them!
[09:54]	<IFYLOFD>	Well if you want to do it yourself Fiolli, do it.
[09:55]	<Cylka>	I think that is fine as long as there isn't a policy.
[09:55]	<Fiolli>	I have done it, but I can't keep track of every nom.
[09:55]	<Cylka>	Otherwise we will have wikilawering.
[09:55]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Seriously, though, I thought that's why we switched to subpages - so nominators could keep better track of their noms.
[09:55]	<grunny>	^
[09:55]	<Cylka>	Ok, and I can't spell. :P
[09:56]	<Cylka>	Crumpet?
[09:56]	<Fiolli>	Again... let me make this clear: no codified "policy" that "requires" us to do this. I'm saying we have an "informal procedure" whereby someone does it as a "courtesy."
[09:56]	<Cylka>	Ok, if someone notices an inactive nom, they can inform the nominator.
[09:57]	<Cylka>	But not required to.
[09:57]	<Cylka>	Nor, will the removal be delayed because of a nominator not being informed.
[09:57]	<Fiolli>	It's simply an act of good faith, people.
[09:57]	<Cylka>	We can try to be nice. :P
[09:58]	<Xicer9>	It should be encouraged, yes
[09:58]	<Xicer9>	But no policy
[09:58]	<IFYLOFD>	Well if its totally informal and has nothing to do with making a policy, why bring it up here?
[09:58]	<IFYLOFD>	Just do it.
[09:58]	<grunny>	if an Inq chooses to, they can, but there's no reason to put anything down
[09:58]	<Fiolli>	I bring it up because it (sadly) needs to be brought up.
[09:58]	<Xicer9>	And I'd go for having that GAN notice on the FAN page
[09:59]	<Cylka>	Ok, so we can informally tell other Inqs, but not have it written anywhere but on the meeting log.
[09:59]	<grunny>	(y)
[09:59]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Aye.
[10:00]	<Darth_Burger>	per Xicer
[10:00]	<Xicer9>	Sure
[10:00]	<Cylka>	SO we are all agreed?
[10:01]	<Fiolli>	Fair enough.
[10:01]	<Cylka>	Alright, just an offical switch from four to three weeks on objections.
[10:01]	<Cylka>	Anyone have anything else they want to bring up?
[10:01]	<Fiolli>	Yes, I do.
[10:02]	<Cylka>	Go ahead.
[10:02]	<Fiolli>	Since I'm not making friends tonight, I'll bring up something that also came up earlier.
[10:02]	<IFYLOFD>	Aw Fiolli, you're still my friend :P
[10:02]	* grunny	throws Fiolli a cookie
[10:03]	* Cylka	blows Fiolli a kiss.
[10:03]	<Darth_Burger>	we all need beer
[10:03]	<Darth_Burger>	beer fixes everything
[10:03]	<Fiolli>	I would like for articles under review (not nominations) that underlinking issues fall solely under {{Sofixit}}. AWB can help in really bad cases. This should not be an issue for too many noms, as most newer ones have been thoroughly searched.
[10:03]	<IFYLOFD>	Then it's settled. Tranner buys the beer.
[10:03]	* Fiolli	doesn't drink, so that's one less beer.
[10:03]	<GrandMoffTranner>	Meh. Fair enough.
[10:03]	<grunny>	yeah, we kinda settled that while probing earlier, fiolli
[10:03]	<Fiolli>	Ok.
[10:04]	* Darth_Crumpet	will have a whisky and cigars.
[10:04]	<Fiolli>	I've spoken my peace on that one, then.
[10:04]	<grunny>	but we can make a note on the meeting minutes for those who won't read the log :P
[10:04]	<Fiolli>	Yes, please.
[10:04]	<Cylka>	That we can do.
[10:04]	<Xicer9>	Hydro says there's nothing new to add to Kouhun
[10:04]	<IFYLOFD>	Dammit Cav, you will have a beer, and you will like it!
[10:04]	<Cylka>	Anything else?
[10:04]	* Fiolli	thanks grunny for the cookie and Cylka for the kiss.
[10:04]	<Xicer9>	Did you guys vote to probe that one?
[10:05]	<grunny>	which one?
[10:05]	<IFYLOFD>	Kouhun.
[10:05]	<Darth_Crumpet>	Well, I probably would enjoy the beer, but I'd prefer the whisky.
[10:05]	<Xicer9>	Kouhun
[10:05]	<Cylka>	Yes, we did.
[10:05]	<grunny>	yes
[10:05]	<Fiolli>	Is that for certain?
[10:05]	<Fiolli>	We can vote to keep at the next meeting, then.
[10:05]	<Fiolli>	;)
[10:06]	<Xicer9>	The only thing I recall that could be added is that they release that flesh-liquefying agent through their saliva
[10:06]	<Xicer9>	I'm not sure there's anything else that needs to be updated
[10:07]	<Cylka>	Well, maybe we should keep the probe then so it can be checked out if no one is really sure.
[10:07]	<Darth_Burger>	works for me
[10:07]	<Xicer9>	Alright
[10:07]	<grunny>	sure
[10:07]	<Fiolli>	Probably the wise idea, just to be safe.
[10:07]	<Cylka>	K, we keep the probe.
[10:07]	<Fiolli>	It's not like it was up for kill.
[10:07]	<Fiolli>	Although... talk about last minute if it was.
[10:08]	<Cylka>	haha
[10:08]	<Xicer9>	heh
[10:08]	<Cylka>	Anything else?
[10:08]	<Cylka>	going once...
[10:08]	* Fiolli	passes a bottle of scotch to Darth_Crumpet and a beer to Darth_Burger
[10:08]	<Fiolli>	Anyone else? ;)
[10:08]	<Cylka>	going twice...
[10:08]	<Cylka>	aaaaaand we are done. :p
[10:09]	* Darth_Crumpet	thanks Fiolli for the scotch :)
[10:09]	<Fiolli>	No problem, Cav.
[10:09]	<Cylka>	Thanks to everyone for coming. :)
[10:09]	<Fiolli>	:)
[10:09]	* Darth_Crumpet	lights up a nice montechristo cigar.
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+