(→Keep) |
(→Keep) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
#Additionally, the blog entry should give us a BTS section. Perhaps drawing attention to it with a TC could actually result in turning it into a CA or GA? :-P -- [[w:c:starwars:User:Darth_Culator|<span style="color:#0000FF">Darth Culator</span>]] <sup>([[w:c:starwars:User_talk:Darth_Culator|Talk]])</sup> 05:10, December 5, 2010 (UTC) |
#Additionally, the blog entry should give us a BTS section. Perhaps drawing attention to it with a TC could actually result in turning it into a CA or GA? :-P -- [[w:c:starwars:User:Darth_Culator|<span style="color:#0000FF">Darth Culator</span>]] <sup>([[w:c:starwars:User_talk:Darth_Culator|Talk]])</sup> 05:10, December 5, 2010 (UTC) |
||
#This one gets special treatment because of the literal canonical mention, but two-person family articles should still be put through the TC process. [[User:Toprawa and Ralltiir|Toprawa and Ralltiir]] 19:14, December 6, 2010 (UTC) |
#This one gets special treatment because of the literal canonical mention, but two-person family articles should still be put through the TC process. [[User:Toprawa and Ralltiir|Toprawa and Ralltiir]] 19:14, December 6, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | #Per everyone. [[User:Master Fredcerique|<span style="color:green">'''MasterFred'''</span>]][[File:Commerce Guild.svg|20px]]<sup style="color:green">([[User talk:Master Fredcerique|Whatever]])</sup> 19:42, December 6, 2010 (UTC) |
||
==Discussion== |
==Discussion== |
||
Revision as of 19:42, 6 December 2010
Dym family (talk - history - links - logs)
This is just a father and a daughter and the source does not give their family any distinctive quality at all. In fact, it just says her father was a smuggler and that she eventually became a smuggler, not that their family business was smuggling.
Delete
- NaruHina Talk
02:52, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
Graestan(Talk) 02:55, November 30, 2010 (UTC)I kill your family. OLIOSTER (talk) 02:57, November 30, 2010 (UTC)Unnecessary. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 03:14, November 30, 2010 (UTC)Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 07:53, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
Keep
- Directly mentioned in the canon. -LtNOWIS 08:14, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Per LtNOWIS. Master Jonathan
(Jedi Council Chambers) 18:37, December 1, 2010 (UTC) - Per Xicer9 and LtNOWIS. jSarek 13:11, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- If it's directly mentioned as such in canon, this is a no-brainer. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 14:33, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Per Xicer down below. 1358 (Talk) 14:47, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Look out below. - JMAS
Hey, it's me! 14:53, December 2, 2010 (UTC) - It has a canon mention. OLIOSTER (talk) 19:19, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Good catch, Xicer! Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 00:11, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Xicer saves the day. Bella'Mia 00:18, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Additionally, the blog entry should give us a BTS section. Perhaps drawing attention to it with a TC could actually result in turning it into a CA or GA? :-P -- Darth Culator (Talk) 05:10, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- This one gets special treatment because of the literal canonical mention, but two-person family articles should still be put through the TC process. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:14, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Per everyone. MasterFred
(Whatever) 19:42, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
- FYI, S&V 26 actually mentions the "Dym family" directly. Stats on the Dusty Duck from S&V 26: "Manufacurer: Dym family (custom special); Affiliation: Dym family, Rango Tel" The bit about them being smugglers should be removed, though Hedec Ga's blog article on the DB entry mentions it being the "family business." Xicer9(Combadge) 03:25, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
