(→Keep) |
m (Bot: Re-categorizing TCs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <div id="old-forum-warning" class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
||
| + | This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the [[Forum:Senate Hall|Senate Hall]] rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was '''Keep'''. [[User:Toprawa and Ralltiir|Toprawa and Ralltiir]] 20:25, December 10, 2010 (UTC) |
||
==[[Dym family]] {{vfdlinks|Dym family}}== |
==[[Dym family]] {{vfdlinks|Dym family}}== |
||
| Line 22: | Line 24: | ||
#Additionally, the blog entry should give us a BTS section. Perhaps drawing attention to it with a TC could actually result in turning it into a CA or GA? :-P -- [[w:c:starwars:User:Darth_Culator|<span style="color:#0000FF">Darth Culator</span>]] <sup>([[w:c:starwars:User_talk:Darth_Culator|Talk]])</sup> 05:10, December 5, 2010 (UTC) |
#Additionally, the blog entry should give us a BTS section. Perhaps drawing attention to it with a TC could actually result in turning it into a CA or GA? :-P -- [[w:c:starwars:User:Darth_Culator|<span style="color:#0000FF">Darth Culator</span>]] <sup>([[w:c:starwars:User_talk:Darth_Culator|Talk]])</sup> 05:10, December 5, 2010 (UTC) |
||
#This one gets special treatment because of the literal canonical mention, but two-person family articles should still be put through the TC process. [[User:Toprawa and Ralltiir|Toprawa and Ralltiir]] 19:14, December 6, 2010 (UTC) |
#This one gets special treatment because of the literal canonical mention, but two-person family articles should still be put through the TC process. [[User:Toprawa and Ralltiir|Toprawa and Ralltiir]] 19:14, December 6, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | #Per everyone. [[User:Master Fredcerique|<span style="color:green">'''MasterFred'''</span>]][[File:Commerce Guild.svg|20px]]<sup style="color:green">([[User talk:Master Fredcerique|Whatever]])</sup> 19:42, December 6, 2010 (UTC) |
||
==Discussion== |
==Discussion== |
||
| Line 27: | Line 30: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> |
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> |
||
| − | [[Category:Trash compactor |
+ | [[Category:Trash compactor archive 2010|Dym family]] |
Revision as of 23:16, 7 January 2011
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or, if the page was deleted, in the Senate Hall rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Keep. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:25, December 10, 2010 (UTC)
Dym family (talk - history - links - logs)
This is just a father and a daughter and the source does not give their family any distinctive quality at all. In fact, it just says her father was a smuggler and that she eventually became a smuggler, not that their family business was smuggling.
Delete
- NaruHina Talk
02:52, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
Graestan(Talk) 02:55, November 30, 2010 (UTC)I kill your family. OLIOSTER (talk) 02:57, November 30, 2010 (UTC)Unnecessary. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 03:14, November 30, 2010 (UTC)Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 07:53, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
Keep
- Directly mentioned in the canon. -LtNOWIS 08:14, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Per LtNOWIS. Master Jonathan
(Jedi Council Chambers) 18:37, December 1, 2010 (UTC) - Per Xicer9 and LtNOWIS. jSarek 13:11, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- If it's directly mentioned as such in canon, this is a no-brainer. Jonjedigrandmaster (Talk) 14:33, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Per Xicer down below. 1358 (Talk) 14:47, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Look out below. - JMAS
Hey, it's me! 14:53, December 2, 2010 (UTC) - It has a canon mention. OLIOSTER (talk) 19:19, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Good catch, Xicer! Darth Trayus(Trayus Academy) 00:11, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Xicer saves the day. Bella'Mia 00:18, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Additionally, the blog entry should give us a BTS section. Perhaps drawing attention to it with a TC could actually result in turning it into a CA or GA? :-P -- Darth Culator (Talk) 05:10, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- This one gets special treatment because of the literal canonical mention, but two-person family articles should still be put through the TC process. Toprawa and Ralltiir 19:14, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Per everyone. MasterFred
(Whatever) 19:42, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
- FYI, S&V 26 actually mentions the "Dym family" directly. Stats on the Dusty Duck from S&V 26: "Manufacurer: Dym family (custom special); Affiliation: Dym family, Rango Tel" The bit about them being smugglers should be removed, though Hedec Ga's blog article on the DB entry mentions it being the "family business." Xicer9(Combadge) 03:25, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
