Per Jorrel; who needs to be occupied, otherwise he( Jorrel) starts to break things :-P
Inactive user
This user has been inactive for 12 months or more and has lost their user page privileges. If you are the user in question, simply undo the last edit to this page when you return to normal article editing activity.
I am voting first time the Wookipedian of the month. I want to vote someone and I think I vote you. DARTH SIDIOUS2 18:56 24, March 2007 (UTC)
The past month or two have definitely seen 4dot shine in ways I think most of us never expected, and this extra recognition is definitely warranted. jSarek 09:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
He has failed me for the last time with the first wookie cast, pray that I like episode II and III and I might vote for you. —Unsigned comment byGyasz Kudeb (talk • contribs).
How does that work, I failed you for the last time with the first one, so that must mean I have no chance of not failing you with the second and third ones, since the first one was the last straw in a long history if mistreatment. .... 21:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
And this is grounds to vote against him why? Chack Jadson 22:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
I was trying to sound like Darth Vader,"You have failed me for the last time"Gyasz Kudeb 15:18, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
He's not a bot. Seriously. He's just a user with nothing better to do ;-) JorrelFraajic 15:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
While I don't think we have (or should have) a hard-and-fast rule against admins being awarded WOTM, I think non-admin users should be clearly favored over admins for WOTM, and we currently have two solid non-admin contributors in the running. jSarek 09:40, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Comments[]
As far as I can tell, Kuralyov has never been WOTM which strikes me as a huge oversight.--Eyrezer 13:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
You're very right. Grr...the decision gets tougher yet. —Xwing328(Talk) 03:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)