FANDOM


Riffsyphon1024Edit

SupportEdit

  1. A fresh new face on the GAN page, who's been working hard on promoting musical scalefish to status and who is always very polite and good-natured while responding to objections. He's also been doing good work outside of the GAN page, particularly on updating various pages in response to official Episode VII announcements. This up-and-comer will be a good addition to our WOTM history. Also he made the site. Menkooroo (talk) 09:55, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
    • I'm voting for his work in the early years which was of significant relevance and he should've earned one WOTM back then. Winterz (talk) 11:59, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
    • 501st dogma(talk) 12:13, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
    • Sure, why not. Gal-icon OLIOSTER (talk) 18:42, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Whether he feels it necessary or not, this award is long overdue for Riff, and I prefer new winners over repeat winners.
    Master JonathanJedi symbol.svgCouncil Chambers
    19:08 UTC ThuMay 22, 2014

OpposeEdit

CommentsEdit

Xd1358Edit

SupportEdit

  1. After Cav's recent second WOTM, I believe that we should continue this trend of giving these awards to Wookieepedians who have clearly earned it. Xd highly deserves this award because of his sincere passion and love for the Wook. If you ever want to look at a diplomatic, kind, and well mannered man, it's Xd. I've known Xd for nearly five years now and I consider him to be a great pal and fellow Wookieepedian. JangFett (Talk) 18:59, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
  2. After more thought, I can't abide someone who doesn't defend the Wook when it's under attack like Riff did on Twitter lately. Plus, I <3 ecks. Gal-icon OLIOSTER (talk) 19:09, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Yeah ecks has been working a lot recently and his whole IRC tutorials kind of make it worth my change of votes. I still don't like this guy though.. Winterz (talk) 19:13, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
  4. I vote for ecks due to his noble sacrifice of sleep for the EduCorps meetings...--Exiled Jedi Oldrepublic crest (Greetings) 19:26, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Close, Oli, but more accurate would be "someone who sympathizes with and appeases the attackers in a transparent and desperate attempt to stay relevant." I'd rather vote for someone who actually is relevant beyond a figurehead title. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 20:01, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
  6. I have "encountered" the ecks more than Riff, so I'm going to vote for him this month. Also, per EJ. 501st dogma(talk) 20:21, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
  7. Ecks is bad IFYLOFD (Enter the Floydome) 00:08, May 3, 2014 (UTC)
  8. I really like this trend of double-WOTM awards. In other news: Ecks is awesome. Seriously. He's a guy who tends to stay in the background where there isn't much attention, but I know from personal experience that he is one of the great moving forces behind this wiki. He's a great contributor, a wonderful admin, a brilliant techy guy, and a good friend. Go ecks.—Cal JediInfinite Empire (Personal Comm Channel) 02:27, May 3, 2014 (UTC)
  9. Definitely. ecks is around literally every single day. I haven't once seen him even argue with users on here, and as EJ said, every time we have an EC meeting, he logs it all for us. Per all above, Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:07, May 3, 2014 (UTC)
  10. Some of the above support comments remind me of our April Fools WOTM page. QuiGonJinn Senate seal(Talk) 14:58, May 3, 2014 (UTC)
  11. Nahdar Vebb (talk) 15:09, May 3, 2014 (UTC)
  12. Yep. Corellian PremierJedi symbolThe Force will be with you always 18:53, May 8, 2014 (UTC)
  13. Lord Dreist (talk) 18:37, May 22, 2014 (UTC)
  14. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 19:02, May 22, 2014 (UTC)
  15. He is cool. MasterFredCommerce Guild(Whatever) 19:14, May 22, 2014 (UTC)
  16. Don't secks me, bro Cade StupidRepublicEmblem-Traced-TORkit Calrayn 19:15, May 22, 2014 (UTC)
  17. JorrelWiki-shrinkableFraajic 19:39, May 22, 2014 (UTC)

OpposeEdit

CommentsEdit

  • Nom accepted via IRC about a month ago JangFett (Talk) 18:59, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
    • wut is this i dun even 1358 (Talk) 19:01, May 2, 2014 (UTC)
  • For the record, this WOTM is unnecessary. I did not accept a nomination nor was made aware of it until recently. I do not require the additional recognition, though the thought is appreciated. In regards to comments, I hope you understand that I was keeping with the best interests of the wiki by defusing the situation. That is all I will say about it here. -- Riffsyphon1024 02:41, May 5, 2014 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+